[A] 1205 1/2 W. 5TH, LLC DOC. NO. 2015111217 O.P.R.T.C.T. [B] TRACT 2 STEVEN D. OGDEN DOC. NO. 2020136745 O.P.R.T.C.T. [C] TRACT 5 1205 1/2 W. 5TH, LLC DOC. NO. 2020136742 O.P.R.T.C.T. [D] TRACT 4 STEVEN D. OGDEN DOC. NO. 2020136743 O.P.R.T.C.T. [E] TRACT 6 STEVEN D. OGDEN DOC. NO. 2020136748 O.P.R.T.C.T. [F] TRACT 3 STEVEN D. OGDEN DOC. NO. 2020136746 O.P.R.T.C.T. [G] TRACT 1 STEVEN D. OGDEN DOC. NO. 2020136747 O.P.R.T.C.T. W 5TH STREET (60' R.O.W.) 0 1 T O L 9 T O L 9 T O L 8 T O L 8 T O L 7 T O L 7 T O L 6 T O L 6 T O L 5 T O L CALLED 0.147 ACRE 1213 WESTT FIFTH LP DOC.NO. 2013089350 O.P.R.T.C.T. CALLED 0.4571 ACRE BR WEST 5TH LANDCO LLC DOC.NO. 2025093866 O.P.R.T.C.T. SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK NO. 2 OF THE DUVAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT NO. 1 DIVISION Z VOL. 1, PG. 119 P.R.T.C.T. [A] " A " E N I L H C T A M 5 T O L 4 T O L [B] [C] 1 STORY FRAME BUILDING 1 STORY METAL & FRAME BUILDING 2 1 T O L 1 1 T O L [E] [D] 1 STORY FRAME BUILDING (1) 1 STORY BRICK & FRAME BUILDING [F] (2) (3) 1.0067 ACRE(S) 43,851 SQUARE FEET W 4TH STREET (30' R.O.W.) T E E R T S D R A H C R O ) . . W O R . ' 0 5 ( P.O.B. MATCHLINE "B" P.O.B. (1) 1 STORY FRAME BUILDING (2) STORAGE UNIT (3) STORAGE UNIT T E E R T S H S L A W ) . . W O R . ' 0 3 ( ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY OF 1.1730 ACRES OUT OF THE SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK NO. 2 DUVAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT NO. 1, DIVISION Z AND THE SUBDIVISION OF EAST HALF OF LOT NO. 1 IN DIVISION Z OF THE OUTLOTS ADJOINING BLOCK NO. 1 City of Austin, Travis County, Texas A Limited Liability Company PO Box 90876, Austin Texas 78709 INFO@4WARDLS.COM (512) 537-2384 TBPELS FIRM #10174300
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION May 6, 2026 Briefing: National Register of Historic Places Nominations 2300 Rosewood Avenue, 2406 Rosewood Avenue, 1201-1203 Lavaca Street, 3304 East 12th Street 20 – 1 Proposal A valid nomination to the National Register of Historic Places has been submitted to the Texas Historical Commission for the following historic properties: Rosewood Avenue Park, 2300 Rosewood Avenue Rosewood Elementary School, 2406 Rosewood Avenue First Methodist Church, 1201-1203 Lavaca Street Evergreen Cemetery, 3304 East 12th Street Austin’s Historic Landmark Commission is required by the provisions of the State of Texas Certified Local Government program to comment on National Register nominations and to notify the THC and CLG program coordinators of its position. The nominations will be heard by the Texas Historical Commission’s State Board of Review on May 16, 2026. Copies of all draft nominations and meeting information are available at www.thc.gov/sbrmeeting and in backup materials. Recommendation Recommend approval of all nominations to the State Board of Review.
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20260506-20 Date: May 6, 2026 Subject: National Register Applications at May 16, 2026 Texas Historical Commission State Board of Review Recommendation 20260506-20 Recommend approval of the National Register of Historic Places nomination of the Rosewood Avenue Park at 2300 Rosewood Avenue to the State Board of Review. Recommend approval of the National Register of Historic Places nomination of the Rosewood Elementary School at 2406 Rosewood Avenue to the State Board of Review. Recommend approval of the National Register of Historic Places nomination of the First Methodist Church at 1201-1203 Lavaca Street to the State Board of Review. Recommend approval of the National Register of Historic Places nomination of the Evergreen Cemetery at 3304 East 12th Street to the State Board of Review. Motioned by_______. Seconded by __________. Vote Votes in favor: Votes against: Absent: _______________________________ Attest: Kalan Contreras Historic Preservation Officer Austin Planning Department
NPS Form 10-900 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form OMB No. 1024-0018 1. Name of Property Historic Name: Evergreen Cemetery Other name/site number: NA Name of related multiple property listing: NA 2. Location Street & number: 3304 E. 12th Street City or town: Austin Not for publication: State: Texas Vicinity: 3. State/Federal Agency Certification County: Travis As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ( nomination request for determination of eligibility) meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ( meets does not meet) the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following levels of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D Signature of certifying official / Title State Historic Preservation Officer __________________________ Date Texas Historical Commission State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________ Signature of commenting or other official Date ____________________________________________________________ State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: ___ entered in the National Register ___ determined eligible for the National Register ___ determined not eligible for the National Register. ___ removed from the National Register ___ other, explain: _____________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action SBR Draft United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places REGISTRATION FORM NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Evergreen Cemetery, Austin, Travis, Texas 5. Classification Ownership of Property X Private Public - Local Public - State Public - Federal Category of Property X building(s) district site structure object Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 buildings sites structures objects total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: NA 6. Function or Use Historic Functions: FUNERARY/cemetery Current Functions: FUNERARY/cemetery 7. Description Architectural Classification: NA Principal Exterior Materials: STONE, CONCRETE Narrative Description (see continuation sheets xx) Page 2 SBR Draft United States Department of the …
NPS Form 10-900 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form OMB No. 1024-0018 1. Name of Property Historic Name: First Methodist Church Other name/site number: First United Methodist Church (current) Name of related multiple property listing: NA 2. Location Street & number: 1201-1203 Lavaca Street State: Texas City or town: Austin Vicinity: Not for publication: County: Travis 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ( nomination request for determination of eligibility) meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ( meets does not meet) the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following levels of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D Signature of certifying official / Title State Historic Preservation Officer ___________________________ Date Texas Historical Commission State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________ Signature of commenting or other official Date ____________________________________________________________ State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: ___ entered in the National Register ___ determined eligible for the National Register ___ determined not eligible for the National Register. ___ removed from the National Register ___ other, explain: _____________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action SBR Draft United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places REGISTRATION FORM NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 First Methodist Church, Austin, Travis County, Texas 5. Classification Ownership of Property X Private Public - Local Public - State Public - Federal Category of Property X building(s) district site structure object Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 buildings sites structures objects total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: 0 6. Function or Use Historic Functions: RELIGIOUS: Church Current Functions: RELIGIOUS: Church 7. Description Architectural Classification: Neoclassical Revival; Modern Movement Principal Exterior Materials: Brick; Stone; Stained Glass Narrative Description …
NPS Form 10-900 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form OMB No. 1024-0018 1. Name of Property Historic Name: Rosewood Elementary School Other name/site number: F. R. Rice Alternative Learning Center, Texans CAN! Academy Name of related multiple property listing: NA 2. Location Street & number: 2406 Rosewood Avenue State: Texas City or town: Austin Vicinity: Not for publication: County: Travis 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this (nomination request for determination of eligibility) meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ( meets does not meet) the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following levels of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D Signature of certifying official / Title ___________________________ ___________________________ Date State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________ Signature of commenting or other official Date ____________________________________________________________ State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: ___ entered in the National Register ___ determined eligible for the National Register ___ determined not eligible for the National Register. ___ removed from the National Register ___ other, explain: _____________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action SBR Draft United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places REGISTRATION FORM NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Rosewood Elementary School, Austin, Travis County, Texas 5. Classification Ownership of Property X Private Public - Local Public - State Public - Federal Category of Property X building(s) district site structure object Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 2 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 buildings sites structures objects total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: 0 6. Function or Use Historic Functions: Education: School Current Functions: Vacant/Not in Use 7. Description Architectural Classification: MODERN MOVEMENT: PWA Moderne; MID-CENTURY MODERN NONRESIDENTIAL Principal Exterior Materials: Brick, Glass, Concrete, Wood Narrative …
NPS Form 10-900 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form OMB No. 1024-0018 1. Name of Property Historic Name: Rosewood Park Other name/site number: Rosewood Neighborhood Park Name of related multiple property listing: NA 2. Location Street & number: 2300 Rosewood Avenue State: Texas City or town: Austin Vicinity: Not for publication: County: Travis 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following levels of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D Signature of certifying official / Title State Historic Preservation Officer ___________________________ Date Texas Historical Commission State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________ Signature of commenting or other official Date ____________________________________________________________ State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: ___ entered in the National Register ___ determined eligible for the National Register ___ determined not eligible for the National Register. ___ removed from the National Register ___ other, explain: _____________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action SBR Draft United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places REGISTRATION FORM NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Rosewood Park, Austin, Travis County, Texas 5. Classification Ownership of Property X Private Public - Local Public - State Public - Federal Category of Property X building(s) district site structure object Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 5 3 4 5 17 4 1 3 15 23 buildings sites structures objects Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: 0 6. Function or Use Historic Functions: Recreation and Culture: sports facility, outdoor recreation; Landscape: park Current Functions: Recreation and Culture: sports facility, outdoor recreation; Landscape: park 7. Description Architectural Classification: No style Principal …
RESOLUTION AFFIRMING PARTNERSHIP WITH THE AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL 4/27/26 WHEREAS: The Barton Creek bridge in Zilker park was constructed in 1926 as a two lane bridge and expanded in 1945 and 1946 to four lanes, and the bridge is located in a National Register District, Whereas: The Historic Landmark Commission learned in March, that the 100-year old Barton Springs Bridge was slated for demolition and replacement. At the same time, members learned that a Council decision to demolish the bridge was made two years ago without any consultation with HLC, nor the examination of the accurate facts concerning the condition of the bridge. And, members were informed that the recommendation for demolishing the bridge had not gone through the City-mandated review process, which included a reviews by other board and commissions, and including the Historic Landmark Commission review. Beginning the review process after a Council action had already been taken in the process has created unnecessary discord and community outrage. It did, however, provide the HLC with the opportunity—albeit after the fact--to delve into the information about the viability of the bridge and the options for remediation. Whereas, with the limited information provided, there is reason to believe that the condition of the bridge has been misrepresented to the Council and that options for retaining the bridge has not been explored or have been withheld from objective evaluation. For example, the initial HLC presentation included misleading claims regarding the cost of rehabilitation vs. the cost of replacement, how long the bridge might last if remediation is chosen over replacement, lack of clarity on the federal standards and how the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) could govern the development process. In response to tough questions from Commissioners about the validity of the engineering studies, and conclusions drawn from them, the request for HLC review of the demotion request has been put on hold. However, a follow- up briefing did little to dispel Commissioner’s concerns and many questions remain unanswered. Whereas, there is sufficient evidence that if the Council-required process for review of proposed demolition had not been by-passed, and in particular, the advice and expertise from members of the HLC had been included, the Council might not have approved the bridge demolition and a great deal of rancor could have been avoided. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: The Historic Landmark Commission requests that the Council’s decision to demolish the Barton Springs …
Historic Landmark Commission Homeowner Response 304 W 42nd Street 1. The Home’s original location does not meet the intent of the area and is not compatible with Hyde Park’s NCCD Ordinance # 20101216-093 Design standards for both Remodeling and New Construction. The Home is located at the rear of the property, and 5’ of the existing structure is currently non-compliant with current City building guidelines for setbacks. The Ordinance requires 5.9 New construction garages to be detached and at the rear of the property, Carports can’t face the front of the building. This creates a hardship for the Owner, as the current location of the home will not allow for remodeling. The Owner wants to add a garage or carport, and the proposed way to alleviate the homeowner’s hardship is to construct a new Home within the NCCD’s guidelines and get the parking (carport) at the rear portion of the property. 2. Part 7 of Hyde Park NCCD shows that the intent of the property is to locate the House facing Ave C. Part 7 of The Hyde Park NCCD # 2009423-092, as well as current City Regulations, would require this property to Face Ave C. The City will consider the narrow or shorter side of the property Ave C the front regarding current setbacks 25’ front and the corner, longer side 15’ the side setback, side property. Reviewing the 3 corresponding corner properties (see attached) of 42nd street at Ave C, 4201 Ave C, 4114 Ave C and 4115 Ave C, all are front facing Ave C, all at the front setback line. The house at 304 W 42nd Street is built at the rear of the property line currently encroaching The City of Austin’s rear setback guidelines. 3. 4.2 of The Ordinance #20101216-093 requires that any new Additions be located at the rear or rear side to be less visible from the street. This part of the Ordinance gives additional hardship to the Owner as the current location of the existing home is entirely at the rear of the property and would not allow for any new additions because any new additions or alterations could only go to the front of the Lot and facing Ave C. The Owner wants a garage or carport, so there is no way of keeping part of the current homes “elevation” since this is the only location on the lot for a …
H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N · M A Y 6 , 2 0 2 6 1511 Rainbow Bend Application to Demolish a ca. 1935 Contributing Building Item #10 · PR-2026-030473 Old West Austin National Register Historic District · Council District 10 Presented by Patrick & Charlotte Beathard, property owners p r e s e r v a t i o n @ a u s t i n t e x a s . g o v · C i t y S t a f f : K a l a n C o n t r e r a s 0 2 · T H E I N T E G R I T Y T E S T What §25-2-352 Requires for Integrity § 2 5 - 2 - 3 5 2 · A G E § 2 5 - 2 - 3 5 2 · I N T E G R I T Y I N T E G R I T Y · N P S B U L L E T I N 1 5 More than 50 years old A high degree of integrity Seven aspects of integrity The property must be at least 50 years old. The property must retain “a high degree of integrity, NPS National Register Bulletin 15 defines integrity 1935 — 91 years old. Satisfied. Not at issue. as defined by the National Register of Historic Places, through seven aspects: that clearly conveys its historical significance and does not include an addition or alteration which has significantly compromised its integrity.” The highlighted phrase is the crux of our case. Location · Design · Setting · Materials · Workmanship · Feeling · Association For an architecturally-significant property, the three highlighted aspects — Design, Materials, Workmanship — are most critical. Age is satisfied. Integrity is where the case turns — and Design, Materials, and Workmanship are the aspects we will examine. 1 5 1 1 R A I N B O W B E N D · I T E M # 1 0 · P R - 2 0 2 6 - 0 3 0 4 7 3 2 / 15 0 3 · W H E R E I N T E G R I T Y F …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Hi Hunter and HPO, CleanTag Permits Friday, May 1, 2026 2:48 PM Historic Preservation Office Re: HLC Supporting Documentation for 1511 Rainbow Bend BOA-C15-92-034~001.TIF External Email - Exercise Caution We reviewed the documentation package for 1511 Rainbow Bend and have a couple of questions. 1. Is the documentation package narrative stating that the residence has not undergone significant additions? In 1992 a Board of Adjustment variance request was approved for an exterior staircase to provide access to a proposed third story addition. The description of the proposed addition matches the third story board and batten portion of the residence. The interior photos available in the real estate listing for the property show more clearly that the board and batten portions of the residence are not original. The documentation package doesn't mention the early 90s variance or the addition which appears to have increased the size of the residence by 50% or more of it's original square footage. I could not locate any building permits for the addition, but it appears that more than the just a third story was added. The board and batten areas all look to have been added at the same time. I have attached the Board of Adjustment file is attached for reference. 2. Would these additions affect the recommendation for consideration of historic zoning? Kind regards, Linda Linda Sullivan Isabel Villegas CleanTag Permits 2320 Webberville Rd Austin, TX 78702 512-826-4209 cleantagpermits.com On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 6:05 PM CleanTag Permits < Thanks Hunter! 1 wrote:
March 27, 2026 To the Austin Historic Landmark Commission: We, the undersigned neighbors and nearby residents, support the proposed demolition and reconstruction project at 1511 Rainbow Bend. We understand that the existing house is proposed to be replaced with a new residence. Based on what has been shared with us, we support the project and believe the proposed new home will be an appropriate improvement for the property and a positive addition to the neighborhood. We also understand that the new construction is intended to respect the character of Old Enfield and remain generally consistent with the existing site layout. For these reasons, we support approval of the proposed demolition and reconstruction at 1511 Rainbow Bend. Sincerely, Name: ______________________________ Address: ____________________________ Signature: __________________________ Date: _______________________________ Docusign Envelope ID: 494C89FD-C160-8636-8026-A2ED3FDD1AB55/4/2026Diego Mendez-Sabre1515 Pease Road March 27, 2026 To the Austin Historic Landmark Commission: We, the undersigned neighbors and nearby residents, support the proposed demolition and reconstruction project at 1511 Rainbow Bend. We understand that the existing house is proposed to be replaced with a new residence. Based on what has been shared with us, we support the project and believe the proposed new home will be an appropriate improvement for the property and a positive addition to the neighborhood. We also understand that the new construction is intended to respect the character of Old Enfield and remain generally consistent with the existing site layout. For these reasons, we support approval of the proposed demolition and reconstruction at 1511 Rainbow Bend. Sincerely, Name: ______________________________ Address: ____________________________ Signature: __________________________ Date: _______________________________ Elizabeth and Ryan Taylor2300 Pease Road, Austin, TX 787035/4/26
April 27, 2026 Kalan Contreras, MSHP Historic Preservation Officer Austin Planning Department RE: 507 Park Blvd- Condition and Historic Assessment Dear Ms. Contreras: I have been asked by the owners of the above property to assess its physical condition and architectural significance with regard to whether it qualifies as a historic landmark. I am a licensed architect with over 30 years of professional experience, including in the remodel and preservation of historic landmark homes. The house on the property was built in 1922 and is approximately 1966 square feet in size. There is evidence of multiple additions. Further, the house is a one-story craftsman style, and non-sympathetic additions are visible from the front which detract from the front gable and overall facade. In my assessment of this structure my findings are that the architectural significance of the structure is low and its physical condition is poor, making it unworthy of preservation. My specific findings are in the attached. I appreciate your consideration of this report, and I am available at any time to answer any questions you may have. Sincerely, Bart Whatley, Architect Delineate Studio | architecture . urban design 916 Springdale #4-104 Austin TX 78702 512-522-3511 Page 1 of 3 507 Park Blvd- Condition and Historic Assessment After studying the house, I have found the architectural significance of the home to be low and its physical condition poor. While it may be possible to correct the structural issues affecting the home, the cost of doing so would be very high and unjustifiable in consideration of its low architectural significance. The architectural significance is low. 1. The original chimney has been removed. 2. A portion of an addition visible from the front has a cantilevered space fitting under an original eave, with a projecting garden window. This addition detracts from the original integrity. 3. Addition windows are metal/composite material and not consistent in proportion or material to the original wood windows. 4. The craftsman style of the house is generic & lacks features that many other bungalows have, such as flared porch columns or decorative rafter tails. 5. The underside of roof eaves at portions of the additions are exposed OSB. As to the physical condition of the house, some portions of the interior of the house are in fair condition, but the house is mostly in poor condition. The more significant problems are as follows: 1. The front façade …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Holly Neighbors Sunday, May 3, 2026 9:07 PM Historic Preservation Office; Holly Neighborhood Association Board Case # PR 2026-040403; 1808 Cesar Chavez, 'Weather Up' property You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Commissioners, I am writing on behalf of the Holly Neighborhood Association on the case number above, regarding the property at 1808 Chavez. This home most recently held the Weather Up bar, but has sat vacant for several years. The Historic Landmark Commission is set to hear the application for demolition on this Tuesday, May 8. We would request a delay in order to more fully inform neighbors of the application and the history of the house, give them an opportunity to address the Commission. The staff notes that the application times out in July. Your consideration of the neighbor's interest in the property would be greatly appreciated. Sandra Boone, President Holly Neighborhood Association Bringing old and new together. CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1 Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Sarah Arvey Tuesday, May 5, 2026 9:32 AM Historic Preservation Office 1808 E Cesar Chavez You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution I'm utterly opposed to the demolition of 1808 Cesar Chavez, which most recently housed WeatherUp bar. This property is identified by the Landmark Commission as being built in the 1930s, and originally housed a barber shop and beauty salon for many years. The property was identified by the 2016 East Austin Historic Resource Survey as eligible as a City of Austin Landmark. Developers continue to bulldoze through East Austin, and there is very little opportunity for residents to take action. While the Preservation Austin might not deem this building important, it is critical that local residents have a say in what happens to their neighborhood. I truly dislike the fact that all I can do is write this email. I have wanted to speak when attending online meetings/hearings and there is no way for attendees to voice their opinions in this forum. This is truly unfortunate. Thank you. Sarah Arvey -- …
Steering Committee Members: Stephen L. Amos, Chair Mark Ashby, Jeff Callahan, Scott Campbell, Marc Carlson, Hunter Coleman, Evelyn Fujimoto, Adrienne Goldsberry, Nick Mehl, William Osborn, Charlie Rice, Paul Shattuck, Shawn Shillington April 30, 2026 Historic Landmark Commission 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, TX 78752 Re: DA-2026-038798 - 403 Orchard Street DA-2026-038813 -1208 West 4th Street Dear Chair Heimsath and HLC Commissioners, The Old West Austin Neighborhood Association (OWANA) Zoning Committee recently met with the applicant regarding the proposed demolition of the structures at 403 Orchard Street and 1208 West 4th Street. OWANA was first notified of this request on Tuesday, April 28, and met with the applicant thereafter on Thursday, April 30. At the time of the meeting, the applicant was able to provide only limited details regarding both the historical significance of either structure and any future plans for the site. During our discussion, we emphasized the importance of preserving contributing structures within the district, as the cumulative loss of such buildings could jeopardize the district’s historic designation. Based on our understanding, the structures appear to be in good condition. We strongly encourage allowing additional time for staff to conduct further archival research, which may reveal information supporting potential landmark designations. The 2025 Downtown Austin historic resource survey lists 403 Orchard Street as a high priority and eligible for the National Register as an individual resource. If the findings do not yield criteria to meet the metrics of nomination, OWANA recommends that the applicant make a genuine effort to relocate and financially fund expenses related to the relocation of these structures. Supporting and maintaining the integrity of our National Historic District is of great importance to OWANA. Given the limited information and limited amount of time currently available before the May 6th Landmark Commission meeting, OWANA supports a Landmark Commission initiated postponement of both demolition cases, 403 Orchard Street and 1208 West 4th Street, to allow for a more thorough understanding of the structures and site. We hope the applicant will agree that this is a prudent and necessary step in the process. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Stephen L. Amos Chair Old West Austin Neighborhood Association, Inc. OWANA
403 Orchard Street Historic Landmark Commission Item 17: DA-2026-038798 May 6, 2026 1 Demolition Application 2 Proximity: Downtown Austin Historic Resources Survey 3 Proximity: Local Historic Districts 4 Proximity: National Register Historic District Texas Historic Sites Atlas 5 Landmark Designation Criteria LDC 25-2-352: 1. years ago; and The property must be 50 years old and must represent a period of significance of at least 50 2. The property must retain a high degree of integrity, as defined by the National Register of Historic Places, that clearly conveys its historical significance and does not include an addition or alteration which has significantly compromised its integrity; and 3. Demonstrates significance in at least two of the following categories: • Architecture • Historical Associations • Archaeology • Community Value • Landscape Feature 6 Staff Report and Recommendation 7 Request We respectfully request staff recommendation for the requested total demolition of the structure located at 403 Orchard Street and release of the demolition permit upon receipt of a City of Austin Documentation Package. 8 9 i. Architecture ARCHITECURE CRITERIA: Embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; × Exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; Displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; × Represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; × Serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; × Possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or × Represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY: • 1917 Single-Family House • National Folk stylistic influence • No alterations noted • Not eligible for local historic district designation • Individually eligible for National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) designation 10 Landmark Designation Criteria ii. Historical Associations. institutions, The property has long-standing significant associations with persons, groups, businesses, or events of historic importance which contributed significantly to the history of the city, state, or nation; or represents a significant portrayal of the cultural practices or the way of life of a definable group of people in a historic time. • Occupants from 1920-1970: • 1920: Tidwell, A.D. • 1927: W.P. Payne • 1935: I.A. Payne & W.P. Payne • 1940: Mrs. M.A. Payne • 1944: …
Steering Committee Members: Stephen L. Amos, Chair Mark Ashby, Jeff Callahan, Scott Campbell, Marc Carlson, Hunter Coleman, Evelyn Fujimoto, Adrienne Goldsberry, Nick Mehl, William Osborn, Charlie Rice, Paul Shattuck, Shawn Shillington April 30, 2026 Historic Landmark Commission 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, TX 78752 Re: DA-2026-038798 - 403 Orchard Street DA-2026-038813 -1208 West 4th Street Dear Chair Heimsath and HLC Commissioners, The Old West Austin Neighborhood Association (OWANA) Zoning Committee recently met with the applicant regarding the proposed demolition of the structures at 403 Orchard Street and 1208 West 4th Street. OWANA was first notified of this request on Tuesday, April 28, and met with the applicant thereafter on Thursday, April 30. At the time of the meeting, the applicant was able to provide only limited details regarding both the historical significance of either structure and any future plans for the site. During our discussion, we emphasized the importance of preserving contributing structures within the district, as the cumulative loss of such buildings could jeopardize the district’s historic designation. Based on our understanding, the structures appear to be in good condition. We strongly encourage allowing additional time for staff to conduct further archival research, which may reveal information supporting potential landmark designations. The 2025 Downtown Austin historic resource survey lists 403 Orchard Street as a high priority and eligible for the National Register as an individual resource. If the findings do not yield criteria to meet the metrics of nomination, OWANA recommends that the applicant make a genuine effort to relocate and financially fund expenses related to the relocation of these structures. Supporting and maintaining the integrity of our National Historic District is of great importance to OWANA. Given the limited information and limited amount of time currently available before the May 6th Landmark Commission meeting, OWANA supports a Landmark Commission initiated postponement of both demolition cases, 403 Orchard Street and 1208 West 4th Street, to allow for a more thorough understanding of the structures and site. We hope the applicant will agree that this is a prudent and necessary step in the process. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Stephen L. Amos Chair Old West Austin Neighborhood Association, Inc. OWANA
1208 W. 4th Street Historic Landmark Commission Item 18: DA-2026-038813 May 6, 2026 1 Demolition Application 2 Proximity: Downtown Austin Historic Resources Survey 3 Proximity: Local Historic Districts 4 Proximity: National Register Historic District Texas Historic Sites Atlas 5 1960 Sanborn Map 6 Landmark Designation Criteria LDC 25-2-352: 1. years ago; and The property must be 50 years old and must represent a period of significance of at least 50 2. The property must retain a high degree of integrity, as defined by the National Register of Historic Places, that clearly conveys its historical significance and does not include an addition or alteration which has significantly compromised its integrity; and 3. Demonstrates significance in at least two of the following categories: • Architecture • Historical Associations • Archaeology • Community Value • Landscape Feature 7 i. Architecture ARCHITECURE CRITERIA: Embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; Exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; × Displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; × Represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; × Serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; × Possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or × Represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY: • Quonset Hut • No stylistic influences visible • Not eligible for local or NRHP designation • Side porch addition • Fenestration pattern altered • All windows and doors replaced Engineers Constructing Quonset Hut, 1944-1945 Unknown Location The Portal to Texas History 8 Landmark Designation Criteria ii. Historical Associations. institutions, The property has long-standing significant associations with persons, groups, businesses, or events of historic importance which contributed significantly to the history of the city, state, or nation; or represents a significant portrayal of the cultural practices or the way of life of a definable group of people in a historic time. Built in 1940 and relocated from Camp Mabry (National Register of Historic Places) in the 1970s. Camp Mabry Gate, 1918 The Portal to Texas History Camp Mabry Buildings, 1942 The Portal to Texas History 9 Landmark Designation Criteria × Archaeology. The property has, or is expected to yield, significant data concerning the …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, MAY 6, 2026, AT 6:00 P.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, ROOM 1405 6310 WILHELMINA DELCO DRIVE AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Environmental Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Nicole Corona, 512-974-3146, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Mariana Krueger, Chair Jennifer Bristol, Vice Chair Haris Qureshi, Secretary Richard Brimer Isabella Changsut Annie Fierro AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Justin Fleury Martin Luecke Allison Morrison David Sullivan The first ten speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on April 15, 2026. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing regarding the Barton Springs Road Bridge Project. Presented by Eric Bailey, Deputy Director, Austin Capital Delivery Services. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Name: SoLa Mixed Use, SP-2024-0397C Applicant: Hannah Riemer, P.E., LJA Engineering, Inc. Location: 2700 and 2800 South Lamar Boulevard Council District: 5 Staff: David Michael, Environmental Review Specialist, Austin Development Services, 512- 974-2263, David.Michael@austintexas.gov Applicant Request: Redevelopment Exception in the Barton Springs Zone, per City Code 25- 8-26 Staff Recommendation: Recommended DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. Discussion on the MoPac South Project. Presented by Mike Sexton, Director of Engineering, Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority (CTRMA), and Charlotte Gilpin, General Engineering Consultant, CTRMA. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 5. Approve a nomination of a member of the Environmental Commission to the Urban Forestry Committee. COMMITTEE UPDATES 6. Update from Urban Forestry Committee regarding the meeting on April 28, 2026. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS City Code requires at least two board members sponsor an item to be included on an agenda. This section of the agenda provides members an opportunity to request items for future agendas. Staff should assume that if there is no objection from other members expressed at the meeting, the members’ silence indicates approval for staff to include on the next agenda. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed …
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, APRIL 15, 2026 The Environmental Commission convened in a regular meeting on Wednesday, April 15, 2026, at the Permitting and Development Center, Room 1405, located at 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive in Austin, Texas. Chair Krueger called the Environmental Commission Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Mariana Krueger, Chair Jennifer Bristol, Vice Chair Haris Qureshi, Secretary Richard Brimer Justin Fleury Martin Luecke Allison Morrison David Sullivan Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Annie Fierro Mar Moretta-Urdiales PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Susana Almanza, Poder, Montopolis-Fairway Mixed Use Zoning Case. Bobby Levinski, Save Our Springs Alliance, Draft MoPac Environmental Assessment, MoPac South Project. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on April 1, 2026. The minutes from the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on April 1, 2026, were approved on Commissioner Sullivan’s motion, Commissioner Brimer’s second, on a 10-0 vote. Commissioner Changsut was absent. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Presentation, discussion, and recommendation to amend City Code Title 25 (Land Development) and amend Ordinance No. 20221115-048 to modify development review 1 processes, methods to demonstrate water quality compliance, street design, and utility infrastructure design for the design and construction of certain transit system projects and related transit system infrastructure. Presented by Donna Galati, Capital Program Consultant, Austin Project Connect, donna.galati@austintexas.gov, 512-974-2733. The public hearing was conducted and a motion to close the public hearing was approved on Vice Chair Bristol’s motion, Commissioner Brimer’s second, on a 10-0 vote. Commissioner Changsut was absent. The recommendation to amend City Code Title 25 (Land Development) and amend Ordinance No. 20221115-048 to modify development review processes, methods to demonstrate water quality compliance, street design, and utility infrastructure design for the design and construction of certain transit system projects and related transit system infrastructure was approved with the following proposed amendments: • Only native (no adaptive) plants, including trees, will be used. • To promote insect and other pollinator survival, rain gardens and other green spaces in the Right of Way will never be mowed, but periodic efforts to remove non-native, invasive species will be made. • To promote the survival of insects and amphibians, fallen leaves from street trees will not be blown, but may be raked around the circumference of the tree and/or left in green space. • Deny administrative waiver for heritage trees, maintaining the current code standards. If the waiver is granted, then every effort …
Parks Board – Barton Springs Rd. Bridge Update Eric Bailey, P.E. – Deputy Director Capital Delivery Services May 6, 2026 Barton Springs Road Bridge 100years old built in 1926 1946 Bridge Expansion 20,000 Vehicles per day Key Entrance to Zilker Park and for Major City Events FUNDING SOURCE: • Preliminary Design: 2012, 2018 and 2020 Bonds • Design: 2020 Bond • Construction: FHWA/City 2 Project Development Process - PRELIMINARY PHASE 2015 - 2023 - DESIGN PHASE 2024 - 2027 - CONSTRUCTION PHASE 2027 - 2029 PUBLIC MEETING April 2023 RESPOND TO COMMENTS Summer 2023 REFINE REPORT Fall 2023 COUNCIL ACTION December 2023 60% DESIGN + NEPA PUBLIC MEETINGS + BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS FINAL DESIGN AND PERMITTING BID AND AWARD + COUNCIL ACTION CONSTRUCTION WE ARE HERE Current Condition Spalling Concrete in Bridge Structure Concrete Cores Delamination of Beams Curb And Railing Do Not Meet Current ADA Standards Load Restricted As Of November 2023 – Heavy Vehicles Moving Eastbound Must Use Outer Lanes 4 Analysis Structural and Mobility Analysis: • • • • External Structure - Spalling Concrete • ADA compliance – Pedestrian Circulation Internal Structure – Deteriorating Steel Geotechnical Data –Replacement Design • Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility – no improvement to existing condition Cost/Benefit Analysis – extended life vs. cost Historic Analysis: • Coordinated with US Army Corps (USACE) and Texas Historic Commission (THC) • The bridge is a contributing feature to the Zilker Park Historic Landmark designation • The Texas Historic Commission has approved potentially fully replacing the bridge. As the process continues, the final design will be reviewed and approved by USACE and THC. 5 Project Options 6 Bridge Rehabilitation Bridge Structure Rehabilitation 1 Remove Existing Bridge Deck and Spandrel Columns 2 Remaining Portion of Existing Structure 3 New Components: Exterior Pairs of Arch Ribs, Spandrel Columns, Deck, and Abutment Extensions Less than half of the original structure will remain Remaining structure will require refacing with new material surfaces View of old arches will be mostly blocked by new structure 7 City Council Actions 1 Direction from Council in 2020 Bond Resolution (20200812-011): 2 Previous Council Action/Hearings: 11/30/23 – Council conducts a public hearing to recommend the bridge replacement alternative 12/12/23 – Council work session on the recommended option 12/14/23 – Council conducts a public hearing and directs Staff to pursue replacement option 03/07/24 – Council Directs TPW Director to apply for a federal bridge grant …
Redevelopment Exception in the Barton Springs Zone SoLa Mixed Use 2700 & 2800 South Lamar Blvd Austin, Texas 78704 SP-2024-0397C David Michael Environmental Review Development Services Department 1 AGENDA The Site The Code The Project 2 The Site 3 VICINITY MAP N PROJECT LOCATION 4 WATERSHED CLASSIFICATION MAP N PROJECT LOCATION 5 EDWARDS AQUIFER RECHARGE ZONE MAP PROJECT LOCATION N RECHARGE ZONE 6 AERIAL IMAGE 7 Property Data • Barton Creek Watershed & West Bouldin Creek Watershed • Barton Springs Zone Classification & Urban Watershed Classification • Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone • Full Purpose Jurisdiction • Council District 5 • All uplands (no CWQZ; no WQTZ) 8 The Code 9 What is the Redevelopment Exception (RE)? Section 25-8-26 of the Land Development Code (Redevelopment Exception in the Barton Springs Zone) allows for redevelopment of existing commercial properties in the Barton Springs Zone. Section 25-8-26 supersedes Article 13 (Save Our Springs Initiative), to the extent of conflict. There are many requirements associated with the redevelopment exception. However, in brief summary the redevelopment exception resets the watershed impervious cover limit equal to the amount of impervious cover currently on site. 10 What is the Redevelopment Exception (RE)? (continued) So the redevelopment exception allows the developer to remove existing impervious cover and build back up to the same amount of impervious cover. To be clear, there are other requirements including regulations that provide environmental benefit. 11 What are the requirements of the RE? LDC 25-8-26(E) lays out nine requirements: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. May not increase impervious cover. May not increase non-compliance Critical Water Quality Zone, Water Quality Transition Zone, or Critical Environmental Feature requirements. Must comply with Environmental Resource Inventory, Erosion and Sedimentation Control, and fiscal requirements. The water quality controls on the redevelopment site must provide a level of water quality treatment that is equal to or greater than that which was previously provided. Item no. 6 provides additional WQ requirements. Must obtain a Barton Springs Zone Operating Permit for ponds. 12 What are the requirements of the RE? (continued) 6. A site with more than 40 percent net site area impervious cover, must have: (a) sedimentation/filtration ponds for the entire site; or (b) SOS ponds and sedimentation/filtration ponds for the entire site. 7. A site with 40 percent or less net site area impervious cover, must have SOS ponds for the entire site. 8. Must mitigate the effects of …
APPENDIX Q-4 CALCULATION FOR PAYMENT INTO THE BARTON SPRINGS ZONE MITIGATION FUND A. OWNER/AGENT INFORMATION: Joe Warnock Name: Seamless LMA, Ltd. Company: (512) 970-2223 Telephone: SoLa Mixed Use B. PROJECT INFORMATION: Name: Location or Address: 2700 & 2800 South Lamar Blvd, Austin, Texas 78704 Permit Number: Case Manager: Total Gross Site Area (GSA): Total Net Site Area (NSA): Total Acres Impervious Cover: Percent Impervious Cover of NSA = Total Acres Impervious Cover / Total Net Site Area Percent Impervious Cover of NSA: SP-2024-0397C, (Withdraw/Resubmit of SP-2023-0283C) Chris Sapuppo 4.489 4.255 3.008 0 70.69 ac. ac. ac. % C. MITIGATION CALCULATION: 1. OVERALL MITIGATION Overall Mitigation Required (ac.) = (Total Acres Impervious Cover / 0.20) - Acres Gross Site Area Overall Mitigation Required: If the entire site is treated with sedimentation/sand filtration or an equivalent level of water quality control, skip to section 3. Final Mitigation Required is equal to Overall Mitigation Required. 2. NON-DEGRADATION (ND) REDUCTION Total Site Area Treated with ND Controls (including Treatment Area): Total Acres Impervious Cover Treated with ND Controls: Non-Degradation Reduction (ac.) = (Acres of ND Impervious Cover / 0.20) - Acres of ND Site Area Non-Degradation Reduction: 3. FINAL MITIGATION Final Mitigation Required (ac.) = Overall Mitigation - Non-Degradation Reduction Final Mitigation Required: 10.551 10.551 ac. ac. 0 0 ac. ac. ac. 0 D. PAYMENT CALCULATION: Mitigation Land Provided by Applicant: Mitigation by Payment (ac.) = Final Mitigation Required - Mitigation Land Provided by Applicant Mitigation by Payment: Base Fee: Annual Adjustment Factor: Adjusted Fee: Total Fee: Mitigation by Payment (ac.) * Adjusted Fee = 10.551 $15,000 7% beginning October 1, 2008 $50,698.98 $ 534,927.24 0.00 ac. per acre ac. E. AUTHORIZATION: Owner/Agent: Reviewed by: APPENDIX Q-1 NET SITE AREA NOTE: NET SITE AREA IS ONLY APPLICABLE TO WATERSHEDS CLASSIFIED AS WATER SUPPLY SUBURBAN / WATER SUPPLY RURAL / BARTON SPRINGS ZONE (BSZ) TOTAL SITE AREA DRAINING TO BSZ = 4.489 ACRES SITE DEDUCTIONS CRITICAL WATER QUALITY ZONE (CWQZ) = WATER QUALITY TRANSITION ZONE (WQTZ) = WASTEWATER IRRIGATION AREAS = 0.000 ACRES 0.000 ACRES 0.000 ACRES DEDUCTION SUBTOTAL = 0.000 ACRES UPLAND AREA (GROSS SITE AREA MINUS TOTAL DEDUCTIONS) = 4.489 ACRES NET SITE AREA CALCULATION AREA OF UPLANDS WITH SLOPES 0-15% = AREA OF UPLANDS WITH SLOPES 15-25% = AREA OF UPLANDS WITH SLOPES 25-35% = AREA OF UPLANDS WITH SLOPES > 35% = 4.172 x 100% = 0.178 x 40% = 0.059 …
ITEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 6, 2026 NAME & NUMBER OF PROJECT: SoLa Mixed Use, SP-2024-0397C NAME OF APPLICANT OR ORGANIZATION: Hannah Riemer, P.E., LJA Engineering, Inc. LOCATION: 2700 and 2800 South Lamar Boulevard COUNCIL DISTRICT: District 5 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STAFF: David Michael, Environmental Review Specialist, Austin Development Services, 512-974-2263, David.Michael@austintexas.gov WATERSHED: REQUEST: Barton Creek Watershed (classified as Barton Springs Zone) and Bouldin Creek Watershed (classified as Urban) Redevelopment Exception in the Barton Springs Zone, per City Code 25-8-26 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommended STAFF CONDITION: Conditions do not apply for this type of request Austin Development Services Staff Recommendations Project Name: Ordinance Standard: Watershed Protection Ordinance (current code) SOLA MIXED USE Request: The request is for an affirmative recommendation for this project to develop using the Redevelopment Exception in the Barton Springs Zone [LDC 25-8-26] Per LDC 25-8-26(F), this project requires approval from City Council because the redevelopment includes more than 25 dwelling units. § 25-8-26 REDEVELOPMENT EXCEPTION IN THE BARTON SPRINGS ZONE. (A) This section applies to property located in the Barton Springs Zone that has existing commercial development if: (1) no unpermitted development occurred on the site after January 1, 1992, and COMPLIES (2) the property owner files a site plan application and an election for the property to be governed by this section. COMPLIES (B) For property governed by this section, this section supersedes Article 13 (Save Our Springs Initiative), to the extent of conflict. (C) In this section: (1) STANDARD POND means water quality controls that comply with Section 25-8-213 (Water Quality Control Standards) or are approved under Section 25-8-151 (Innovative Management Practices); and (2) SOS POND means water quality controls that comply with all requirements of Section 25-8-213 (Water Quality Control Standards) and the pollutant removal requirements of Section 25-8-514(A) (Pollution Prevention Required). (D) The requirements of this subchapter do not apply to the subdivision of property if at the time of redevelopment under this section subdivision and site plan applications are filed concurrently. Not applicable (E) The requirements of this subchapter do not apply to the redevelopment of property if the redevelopment meets all of the following conditions: (1) The redevelopment may not increase the existing amount of impervious cover on the site. COMPLIES (2) The redevelopment may not increase non-compliance, if any, with Article 7, Division 1 (Critical Water Quality Zone Restrictions), Section 25-8-281 (Critical Environmental Features), Section 25-8-282 (Wetland …
City of Austin Environmental Commission ____________ MoPac South Environmental Study Briefing May 6, 2026 MoPac South • Limits: Cesar Chavez Street to Slaughter Lane • Length: Approximately 8 miles • Project Status: Environmental Study, Draft Environmental Assessment published • Recent Activity: – Public Hearing: March 9 to May 3, 2026 • Current Activity: – Review all comments – Prepare Public Hearing Report • Next Steps: – Prepare final Environmental Assessment 2 Public Hearing Overview • Virtual Public Hearing Completed: March 9, 2026 through May 3, 2026 • In-person Public Hearing Completed: March 24, 2026 • Promoted via: Social media, postcards to residents, newspaper ads, media outreach, agency newsletter, variable message sign boards on the corridor • Comment Received Via: – In writing at the in-person Public Hearing – Online – Email – Mail – Voicemail • 79-day review period • 55-day comment period • All comments received will be reviewed and posted with responses as part of the NEPA process. 3 Public Hearing Materials At both the In-person and Virtual Public Hearing, participants viewed: – The Draft Environmental Assessment and accompanying Technical Reports – Information on Project history and the NEPA process – Environmental findings on topics including but not limited to water quality, air quality, cultural resources, and traffic noise. – Preliminary Project schematic and proposed Bike/Pedestrian Improvements – Official Public Hearing Presentation Video – Video fly-through – Information on how to submit comments 4 Environmental Assessment (EA) • The study type and process are determined by TxDOT’s Environmental Affairs Division under the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) assignment from the Federal Highway Administration. The preparation of an EA or EIS was discussed and confirmed with TxDOT on several occasions throughout the process, including in early 2026 as we finalized the draft EA. • TxDOT and FHWA classified the MoPac South environmental document as an Environmental Assessment based on factors including minimal ROW needs for some alternatives being studied, no relocations or displacements required, and consistency with the CAMPO RTP. • There is no difference in the resources studied for an EA or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). • There is no difference in the consultation process for endangered species for an EA or an EIS. • An Environmental Finding of no Significant Impact or a Record of Decision for an EA or EIS, respectively, both consider the measures to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts. • TxDOT will determine …
. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Environmental Commission Recommendation 20260506-003: SoLa Mixed Use Redevelopment Exception, SP-2024-0397C WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes that the applicant, LJA Engineering, is requesting a Redevelopment Exception; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the site is located in the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone within Barton Creek Watershed & West Bouldin Creek Watershed; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes that staff recommends this redevelopment exception. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Environmental Commission recommends the SoLa Mixed Use Redevelopment Exception with the following conditions: • To augment community benefit and promote alignment with the City’s Comprehensive Vision Plan and the Comprehensive Austin-Travis County Food Plan: o Increase affordable housing units to 25% of all units from 30 - 60% Median Family Income (MFI) o Utilize bird-friendly building design o Incorporate a community garden on the ground or rooftop level o Incorporate dense, native plantings throughout the property, and utilize no-mow and no leaf-blowing principles year-round o Help meet the city’s goal of connecting all residents with a park by working with the City of Austin to enhance and formalize the access point on the Barton Creek Green Belt. Date of Approval: May 6, 2026 Motioned By: Secretary Qureshi Seconded By: Commissioner Brimer Vote: For: 10-0 Chair Krueger, Vice Chair Bristol, Secretary Qureshi, Commissioners Brimer, Changsut, Fleury, Luecke, Moretta-Urdiales, Morrison, and Sullivan Against: Abstain: None None Off the dais: None . Absent: Commissioner Fierro Attest: _____________________________________________ Liz Johnston, Executive Liaison
REGULAR CALLED MEETING OF THE COMMISSION FOR WOMEN WEDNESDAY, MAY 6, 12:00 PM AUSTIN CITY HALL, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ROOM, #1101 301 WEST 2ND STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 Some members of the Commission for Women may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Chelsea Pfeifer at chelsea.pfeifer@austintexas.gov or 512-974-2498. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Alexandria Anderson, Chair Tasha Billet Becky Bullard Diana Melendez Alicia Ramirez CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Jocelyn Tau, Vice Chair Vanessa Bissereth Angela Harris Rabia Shaik Shaimaa Zayan The first ten speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Commission for Women regular meeting on April 1, 2026. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. 3. 4. Presentation regarding women’s wellness by Noor Collective. Presentation by Communities in Schools of Central Texas regarding the results of the economic mobility study and Communities in Schools of Central Texas programs. Presentation by Sharon Vigil, Chief Executive Officer, Communities in Schools of Central Texas. Discuss three priority areas and initiatives for 2026-2027. WORKING GROUP UPDATE 5. Update from Recognition Working Group regarding progress towards September goals. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Chelsea Pfeifer at the Austin City Clerk’s Office, at 512-974-2498 or chelsea.pfeifer@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Commission for Women please contact Chelsea Pfeifer at 512-974- 2498 or chelsea.pfeifer@austintexas.gov.
COMMISSION FOR WOMEN MEETING MINUTES WEDNESDAY, APRIL 1, 2026 Commission for Women Regular Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 1, 2026 The Commission for Women convened in a regular meeting on Wednesday, April 1, 2026 at Austin City Hall, 301 W 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Commissioner Anderson called the Commission for Women Meeting to order at 12:10 PM Commissioners in Attendance: Becky Bullard, Chair Alexandria Anderson Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Jocelyn Tau, Vice Chair Angela Harris Diana Melendez Alicia Ramirez Rabia Shaik Shaimaa Zayan PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Commission for Women Regular Meeting on March 4, 2026. The minutes from the Commission for Women regular meeting on March 4, 2026 were approved on Chair Bullard’s motion, Commissioner Harris’ second on a 6-0 vote. Commissioner Melendez was off the dais. Vice Chair Tau was absent. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff Briefing regarding the Levers of Economic Mobility Index. Presentation by Gary Aaron, Business Process Consultant Sr., Austin Equity and Inclusion and Shivani Datar, Business Process Specialist, Austin Equity and Inclusion. The presentation was made by Gary Aaron, Business Process Consultant Sr., Austin Equity and Inclusion and Shivani Datar, Business Process Specialist, Austin Equity and Inclusion. 1 COMMISSION FOR WOMEN MEETING MINUTES WEDNESDAY, APRIL 1, 2026 DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 3. Conduct officer elections for the Chair and Vice Chair. Commissioner Anderson was elected as Chair on Commissioner Bullard’s motion, Commissioner Tau’s second on a 7-0 vote. Commissioner Melendez was off the dais. Vice Chair Tau was reelected as Vice Chair on Chair Anderson’s motion, Commissioner Bullard’s second on a 7-0 vote. Commissioner Melendez was off the dais. WORKING GROUP UPDATES 4. 5. Update from the Collective Sex Crime Response Model Working Group regarding updates from the last meeting. Withdrawn without objection. Update from the Quality of Life Working Group regarding updates from last working group meeting. Update was given by Commissioner Melendez. Chair Anderson adjourned the meeting at 12:40 p.m. without objection. 2
CIS in Austin Services and Outcomes City of Austin Commission for Women May 6, 2026 2 The Need for CIS Services • 1 in 3 children in Central Texas lives below 200% of the poverty line. • 1 in 4 children in Central Texas is food insecure. • 1 in 5 students has experienced sexual abuse or assault nationally. • 1 in 4 children nationally has experienced physical abuse by a caregiver. • 1 / 4 Americans had an alcoholic parent • 1 / 8 Americans witnessed their mother in an abusive relationship Integrated Student Support (ISS) Model Tier 3: Individualized Support • Working one-on-one with students • Intensive mental health supports • Providing basic needs • Home visits Tier 2: Targeted Programs • College campus tours • Self-esteem groups • Leadership groups • Friendship skill development Tier 1: Schoolwide Services • Attendance challenge • Red Ribbon Week • Kindness Week • Career Fairs • Basic Needs 4 CIS in Austin: 2025-26 Students and Services 72 Schools served 40,100 Students receive school-wide supports 6,525 Students receive intensive case management $433,000 Direct assistance to students & families 94% Qualify for Free or Reduced Lunch 21% Emergent Bilingual (English Language Learners) 17% Experience Family Conflict or Crisis 16% Special Education Program 5% Experiencing Homelessness 3% Have an incarcerated parent/guardian 94% of student body receiving school- wide supports 5 CIS Layered Supports in Austin 6 Menu of Case Management Services Enrichment: Mental & Behavioral Health: • Behavior Intervention, Skill Building Activities, Conflict Resolution, Crisis Intervention • Mentoring • Professional Mental Health Services • Safety Intervention Student /Teacher Conferences • Field Trips Summer Camps and activities • • Creative Arts/ Recreation activities • Before and after school activities • School Climate activities Case Management/ Academics & Attendance: Goal Setting & Monitoring: • Individual goal setting for academic, attendance, and behavior needs • Goal-related intervention planning with student; monitoring check-ins • Case consultation, staffing, service coordination 7 • Tutoring and Homework Assistance Student / Teacher Conferences • • Attendance Interventions • Language Acquisition Support (Emergent Bilingual) Parent/ Family Engagement: • Home visits • Parent Conferences • Family referrals to community resources • Care Coordination & ASPIRE multi-generational learning programs Health & Human Services: • Basic Needs Assistance: (food, clothing, household, rental assistance, utilities) • Transportation assistance • Independent Living Skills Development • Agency Referrals 2024-25 Total Unique Services Provided: 188,173 ➢ 61,657 Behavior/mental health supports …
