To: From: Date: Subject: MEMORANDUM Planning Commissioners Jonathan Tomko, AICP, Planner Principal, Austin Planning November 9, 2026 Staff Clarification Items #2 Wesley Relocation Project (NPA-2026-0009.01) and #3 Wesley Property Donation (C14-2026-0028) The purpose of this memorandum is for Staff to provide additional information that is relevant to the applicant’s request and questions posed by the neighborhood. Effects of Senate Bill 840 on Zoning The applicant’s request is to rezone from SF-3-NP to LO-NP. Limited office base district zoning allows a maximum height of 40 feet and a floor to area ratio of .7:1. Under Senate Bill 840 (SB 840), if this were designated a commercially zoned property, a multifamily residential or mixed-use residential development could reach a height of 45 feet with an unlimited floor to area ratio. Staff cannot speculate on the maximum number of residential units that could be developed under SB 840, as there are many site development variables aside from zoning entitlements at play. As a density bonus combining district has not been requested for this property, the maximum height would be 45 feet for an SB 840-compliant development should City Council grant LO-NP zoning. Additional information about the effects of SB 840 in Austin is available on the SpeakUp Austin website. Transportation Analysis The TIA determination worksheet is attached and includes estimated daily vehicle trips. As with every case, a TIA determination worksheet is based on the applicant’s request. The TIA Determination was based on the proposed LO-NP base zoning requested with 1,360 square feet of general office use. A total of 11 vehicle trips per day are anticipated based on the proposed use. The applicable trip- generations are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rate for General Office Building (710). Assumptions are based on 1,360 sq. ft. of general office building at 7.83 trips per 1,000 sq. ft. A Neighborhood Transportation Analysis (NTA) was not required. The minimum threshold for a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis is 300+ net trips. 02 NPA-2026-0009.01 - Wesley Relocation Project; District 11 of 5 If the project changes substantially, another TIA determination worksheet would be filled out at that time, which may be during the site plan review phase. Future Land Use Map The Central East Plan supports neighborhood-serving commercial uses. Staff believes the Neighborhood Mixed Use land use is appropriate adjacent to residential uses. There is Mixed Use land use to the north of the …
November 10, 2026 Planning Commission hearing date Item #2 – NPA-2026-0009.01 – Wesley Relocation Project Item #3 – C14-2026-0028 – Wesley Relocation Donation From: Sara DAgostini Sent: Monday, November 9, 2026 9:12 PM To: Tomko, Jonathan <Jonathan.Tomko@austintexas.gov>; LandUseLiaison <LandUseLiaison@austintexas.gov>; Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov>; Garcia, Ella <Ella.Garcia@austintexas.gov>; Gannon, Chris - BC <BC-Chris.Gannon@austintexas.gov>; Woods, Alice - BC <BC- Alice.Woods@austintexas.gov> Subject: Objection to Neighborhood Plan Amendment and Rezoning at 1187 Navasota - Case Numer: C14-2026-0028 Good evening Commissioners, Apologies for the late email. We own the lot located at 1205 Cotton Street. We are objecting to the rezoning request for 1187 Navasota (Case Numer: C14-2026-0028), and the associated proposed FLUM amendment. Please see our objection letter attached. I ask that this objection be included in the record for both cases and forwarded to the Planning Commissioners. Thank you! Sincerely, Sara D'Agostini 03 C14-2026-0028 - Wesley Property Donation; District 11 of 22 Objection to Neighborhood Plan Amendment and Rezoning - 1187 Navasota Nov 9, 2026 GS Coventry LLC 1205 Cotton Street Austin, Texas 78702 Chair Alice Woods and Members of the Planning Commission City of Austin 301 West 2nd Street Austin, Texas 78701 cc: Jonathan Tomko, AICP, Case Manager, jonathan.tomko@austintexas.gov · Maureen Meredith, Senior Planner, maureen.meredith@austintexas.gov · LandUseLiaison@austintexas.gov RE: Objection to NPA-2026-0009.01 (Wesley Relocation Project) and C14-2026- 0028 (Wesley Property Donation) — 1187 Navasota Street Dear Chair Woods and Commissioners: GS Coventry LLC owns 1205 Cotton Street, a lot located two lots east (on Cotton) from 1187 Navasota. We are currently designing a single-family home to be constructed at 1205 Cotton. We object to both the neighborhood plan amendment and the rezoning of 1187 Navasota, and we ask the Commission to recommend denial of each. The proposed change to the neighborhood plan, and rezoning of 1187 Navasota Street, is not in response to changing conditions in the neighborhood, and reasonable use of same, but rather in response to a donation of an office building to the Wesley United Methodist Church. Our objection is not to Wesley United Methodist Church, to its congregation, or to its stewardship of this neighborhood. It is to the entitlement. A rezoning is not an entitlement for one building and one owner. LO zoning attaches to the land permanently, survives any sale, and is not conditioned on the applicant's current plans. The standard that governs this rezoning request As we understand it, the Supreme Court of Texas set out the criteria …
To: From: Date: Subject: MEMORANDUM Planning Commissioners Jonathan Tomko, AICP, Planner Principal, Austin Planning November 9, 2026 Staff Clarification Items #2 Wesley Relocation Project (NPA-2026-0009.01) and #3 Wesley Property Donation (C14-2026-0028) The purpose of this memorandum is for Staff to provide additional information that is relevant to the applicant’s request and questions posed by the neighborhood. Effects of Senate Bill 840 on Zoning The applicant’s request is to rezone from SF-3-NP to LO-NP. Limited office base district zoning allows a maximum height of 40 feet and a floor to area ratio of .7:1. Under Senate Bill 840 (SB 840), if this were designated a commercially zoned property, a multifamily residential or mixed-use residential development could reach a height of 45 feet with an unlimited floor to area ratio. Staff cannot speculate on the maximum number of residential units that could be developed under SB 840, as there are many site development variables aside from zoning entitlements at play. As a density bonus combining district has not been requested for this property, the maximum height would be 45 feet for an SB 840-compliant development should City Council grant LO-NP zoning. Additional information about the effects of SB 840 in Austin is available on the SpeakUp Austin website. Transportation Analysis The TIA determination worksheet is attached and includes estimated daily vehicle trips. As with every case, a TIA determination worksheet is based on the applicant’s request. The TIA Determination was based on the proposed LO-NP base zoning requested with 1,360 square feet of general office use. A total of 11 vehicle trips per day are anticipated based on the proposed use. The applicable trip- generations are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rate for General Office Building (710). Assumptions are based on 1,360 sq. ft. of general office building at 7.83 trips per 1,000 sq. ft. A Neighborhood Transportation Analysis (NTA) was not required. The minimum threshold for a Neighborhood Traffic Analysis is 300+ net trips. 03 C14-2026-0028 - Wesley Property Donation; District 11 of 5 If the project changes substantially, another TIA determination worksheet would be filled out at that time, which may be during the site plan review phase. Future Land Use Map The Central East Plan supports neighborhood-serving commercial uses. Staff believes the Neighborhood Mixed Use land use is appropriate adjacent to residential uses. There is Mixed Use land use to the north of the …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2026-0055 – McCall Lane Utility Rezoning DISTRICT: 2 ADDRESS: 3403 McCall Lane ZONING FROM: SF-2-NP TO: CS-NP SITE AREA: 0.21 acres PROPERTY OWNER: Charlotte Stoeckle AGENT: Thrower Design, LLC (Victoria Haase) CASE MANAGER: Nancy Estrada (512-974-7617, nancy.estrada@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommendation is to grant general commercial services – conditional overlay – neighborhood plan (CS-CO-NP) combining district zoning. The Conditional Overlay will prohibit the following uses: Automotive Rentals, Automotive Repair Services, Automotive Sales, Automotive Washing (of any type), Construction Sales and Services, Drop-off Recycling Collection Facility, Equipment Sales, Exterminating Services, Service Station and Vehicle Storage. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: November 10, 2026: CITY COUNCIL: ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES: None at this time. 11 C14-2026-0055 - McCall Lane Utility Rezoning; District 21 of 16 C14-2026-0055 Page 2 CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The subject property consists of approximately 0.21 acres located at 3403 McCall Lane, west of US Highway 183 and north of McKinney Falls Parkway. The property is situated west of Austin-Bergstrom International Airport and within the Southeast Combined Neighborhood Planning Area. The site is currently vacant, has frontage along McCall Lane, and is zoned family residence – neighborhood plan (SF-3-NP) combining district zoning. Immediately to the north are single-family residences and limited industrial uses (SF-2-NP; LI-PDA-NP); to the south are single-family residences, commercial services, an Austin Energy substation, and undeveloped land (SF-2-NP; CS-CO-NP); to the west are single- family residences and limited industrial uses (SF-2-NP; LI-PDA-NP); and to the east is undeveloped land and commercial services (CS-NP). The broader surrounding area includes substantial commercial zoning, particularly along US Highway 183 and McKinney Falls Parkway. Please refer to Exhibits A (Zoning Map) and B (Aerial View). The Applicant is requesting general commercial services – neighborhood plan (CS-NP) combining district zoning for the subject property to facilitate the extension of utilities from McCall Lane to the adjacent property to the east, which is currently zoned CS-NP. The adjacent property is proposed to be developed with an office/warehouse use and requires utility connections from McCall Lane to support the proposed development. The requested rezoning would allow the subject property to accommodate the necessary utility infrastructure and provide a consistent zoning classification between the two properties. No buildings are proposed on the subject property. Please refer to the Applicant’s Summary Letter for an exhibit showing the property to be served by utilities through the subject tract. Staff is recommending general …
Draft Recommendation: Proposed amendments to the Interlocal Agreement between the City and the University of Texas related to the Brackenridge Tract. Chair Woods and Parliamentarian Ahmed: 1. General recommendation to ensure the conveyance of Lions Municipal Golf Course allows for flexible public use beyond golf, such as opening the property as general parkland at designated times and offering programming for non-golfers. 2. Increase the maximum building height to at least 200 feet, and remove the provision capping all buildings at 65 feet as measured from Lake Austin Boulevard, which would otherwise limit that increase. 3. Require that all TIRZ-required affordable housing, and all replacement of the affordable student housing currently on the tract, be located either on-site or within the boundaries of the TIRZ. 4. Ensure the TIRZ has a net positive fiscal impact on the City over its term, and that up- front infrastructure costs are funded by UT or its developers and reimbursed only from tax increment actually collected, without the City issuing bonds. 5. Ensure non-University development on the tract aligns with Austin’s strategic plan, including requiring UT to grant a public easement within the Lady Bird Lake setback for a future extension of the Hike & Bike Trail. 6. Preserve the Brackenridge Field Laboratory by excluding its land from non-University development or securing UT’s commitment to keep it at its current location. Commissioner Breton: 1. Ensure conveyances of the land currently occupied by the Lions Municipal Golf Course and the West Austin Youth Association from the University to the City are broad enough to facilitate only the conveyance of property. Acceptable uses for the land should be determined and codified by the City only. 2. As a part of establishing a TRIZ, include non-car-oriented transportation infrastructure in the preliminary project and financing plan, including but not limited to a continuous, ADA-compliant pedestrian and bicycle accessible boardwalk along the length of Lady Bird Lake between the University of Texas Rowing Center and the Emmett Shelton Bridge. 3. To incentivize the preservation of the Brackenridge Field Laboratory (BFL) and maximize potential funding for infrastructure identified within the TIRZ preliminary project and financing plan: a. Amend the primary development standards for the areas currently occupied by the Brackenridge Apartments, Colorado Apartments and Boulevard at Town Lake to reflect the site development regulations of the City's CBD zoning district. b. Identify the BFL and associated areas of research as a …
ORGANIZATION OF BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATIONS Advancing field-based research, education, and stewardship across the globe www.OBFS.com November 9th, 2026 The Honorable Kirk Watson, Mayor, City of Austin Mr. T.C. Broadnax, City Manager, City of Austin Dr. Eric Johnson, Assistant City Manager, City of Austin Members of the Austin City Council 301 West 2nd Street, Austin, TX 78701 Re: Letter of Support for the Brackenridge Field Laboratory – Protecting a Cornerstone of the City of Austin’s Research, Teaching, and Public Engagement Dear Mayor Watson, City Manager Broadnax, and Members of the Austin City Council, I write in my capacity as President of the Organization of Biological Field Stations (OBFS), the professional association representing the 1,200+ field stations and marine laboratories across the globe. OBFS's mission is to support the field station and marine laboratory community and to advocate for the long-term protection of the places where field science and education happen. It is in this capacity that I write to express OBFS's strong support for The University of Texas at Austin's Brackenridge Field Laboratory (BFL), and to urge the City to ensure that BFL is permanently protected as the University and the City of Austin consider amendments to the 1989 Brackenridge Development Agreement. We applaud the effort to preserve the Lions Municipal Golf Course, and we urge the City not to approve amendments to the 1989 Brackenridge Development Agreement that would open BFL to development. Field stations and marine laboratories, like BFL, are critical and irreplaceable components of scientific research infrastructure. They protect land that provides the ecosystem services every community depends on, including clean air, water, and habitat, and they provide the long-term, undisturbed field conditions needed to understand how those systems respond to change. Field stations are also community assets: places where residents, schoolchildren, and volunteers engage directly with science. A field station within an expanding city is exceedingly rare, and once it is built over, it cannot be recreated elsewhere. Decades of research and a community’s access to a living laboratory are lost with it. BFL is a particularly strong example of what this stewardship offers a city. Established in 1966 on 82 acres of the Brackenridge Tract, BFL is the only active, formal research site within greater Austin that contributes to our understanding of the region’s urban ecology, with findings that matter to the State and the Nation. Its research on invasive species of importance to Austin and …
Item 4 Water & Wastewater Commission: November 10, 2026 Council: December 3, 2026 Posting Language ..Title Recommend approval of Service Extension Request No. 6517 for water service to a 10-acre tract located at 10656 N. FM 620 within the Drinking Water Protection Zone, unincorporated Travis County, and Austin Water’s service area. Funding: This item has no fiscal impact. The property owner will pay the related infrastructure costs to connect to Austin Water’s water system. Fiscal Note Funding: This item has no fiscal impact. The property owner will pay the related infrastructure costs to connect to Austin Water’s water system. Prior Council Action: June 5, 2025 – The motion approving Service Extension Request No. 6139 was approved on consent on a 7- 4 vote, but this approval expired on December 2, 2025. Council Committee, Boards and Commission Action: May 7, 2025 – SER-6139 was not recommended by Environmental Commission on a vote of 10-0, with Commissioner Sullivan absent. May 21, 2025 – SER-6139 was recommended by the Water and Wastewater Commission on a 6-1-1 vote with Commissioner Moriarty voting against and Commissioner Trilli abstaining and three vacancies. November 10, 2026 – To be reviewed by the Water and Wastewater Commission. November 18, 2026 – To be reviewed by the Environmental Commission. Additional Backup Information: The McLemore Tract Multifamily project consists of approximately 10 acres of land located at 10656 N. FM 620 (the “Property”). The Property is located entirely within unincorporated Travis County, the City of Austin’s (the “City”) Impact Fee Boundary, Austin Water’s service area for water, the Drinking Water Protection Zone (DWPZ), and the Lake Travis Watershed. A map of the property location is attached. Applicant: CWS Capital Partners, LLC (the “Applicant”) is proposing to develop approximately 303 multi-family units. The Applicant requested that the City provide water utility service to the Property and Austin Water has determined the service requirements as proposed in Service Extension Request (SER) No. 6517. If approved by Council, Austin Water will provide retail wastewater service to the Property as proposed in SER No. 6518. All costs will be paid by the Applicant. City Code § 25-9-35 requires City Council approval for this SER because the Property is not located within either: the Desired Development Zone, or the Drinking Water Protection Zone and within the City’s full-purpose corporate limits Infrastructure Improvements: To serve the Property, the Applicant will be required to construct …
Item 5 Water & Wastewater Commission: November 10, 2026 Council: December 3, 2026 Posting Language ..Title Recommend approval of Service Extension Request No. 6518 for wastewater service to a 10-acre tract located at 10656 N. FM 620 within the Drinking Water Protection Zone, unincorporated Travis County, and Austin Water’s service area. Funding: This item has no fiscal impact. The property owner will pay the related infrastructure costs to connect to Austin Water’s wastewater system. Fiscal Note Funding: This item has no fiscal impact. The property owner will pay the related infrastructure costs to connect to Austin Water’s wastewater system. Prior Council Action: June 5, 2025 – The motion approving Service Extension Request No. 6140 was approved on consent on a 7- 4 vote, but this approval expired on December 2, 2025. Council Committee, Boards and Commission Action: May 7, 2025 – SER-6140 was not recommended by Environmental Commission on a vote of 10-0, with Commissioner Sullivan absent. May 21, 2025 – SER-6140 was recommended by the Water and Wastewater Commission on a 6-1-1 vote with Commissioner Moriarty voting against and Commissioner Trilli abstaining and three vacancies. November 10, 2026 – To be reviewed by the Water and Wastewater Commission. November 18, 2026 – To be reviewed by the Environmental Commission. Additional Backup Information: The McLemore Tract Multifamily project consists of approximately 10 acres of land located at 10656 N. FM 620 (the “Property”). The Property is located entirely within unincorporated Travis County, the City of Austin’s (the “City”) Impact Fee Boundary, Austin Water’s service area for wastewater, the Drinking Water Protection Zone (DWPZ), and the Lake Travis Watershed. A map of the property location is attached. Applicant: CWS Capital Partners, LLC (the “Applicant”) is proposing to develop approximately 303 multi-family units. The Applicant requested that the City provide wastewater utility service to the Property and Austin Water has determined the service requirements as proposed in Service Extension Request (SER) No. 6518. If approved by Council, Austin Water will provide retail water service to the Property as proposed in SER No. 6517. All costs will be paid by the Applicant. City Code § 25-9-35 requires City Council approval for this SER because the Property is not located within either: the Desired Development Zone, or the Drinking Water Protection Zone and within the City’s full-purpose corporate limits Infrastructure Improvements: To serve the Property, the Applicant will be required to …
November 9, 2026 Water Management Strategy Implementation REPORT Third Quarter 2026, July - September November 9, 2026 1 2 Contents Third Quarter Summary Water Conservation Updates Water Loss Reduction Updates Reclaimed Water and Onsite Reuse Updates Conservation Outreach Updates Water Supply Project Updates Water Use and GPCD Notes Regarding Data 2 Austin Water Third Quarter 2026 Report 1 November 9, 2026 Third Quarter Introduction The Water Management Strategy Implementation Report is intended to provide transparency and accountability regarding the execution of strategies from the 2024 Water Conservation Plan and the 2024 Water Forward Plan. The plans include proactive and substantial demand management strategies and innovative local supply strategies, but the hard work necessary to complete the strategies and meet the goals are illustrated in the implementation reports. 2024 Water Loss Report recommendations response is complete – 32 of the 32 recommendations have been addressed. New Online Water Conservation Hub launched - Provides customers better information regarding applications, report submittals, and water waste enforcement. Expanded water conservation outreach – 28 million conservation-related media impressions and 327,000 Home Water Use Reports emailed with a 66% open rate. Water Conservation Updates Landscape Transformation Strategy 50% irrigation limit for new homes - Rule posted to Building Criteria Manual; applies to new home building permits after Oct. 1 New water conservation hub – improved application and communication for rebates, water waste enforcement, and commercial conservation Meter Hero Program – contracted program for AP Environmental Science students to utilize water use data in class projects Community Outreach Grants – Completed 1st year of grants; estimated 380 community members reached 3 4 3 4 Austin Water Third Quarter 2026 Report 2 Water Conservation Metrics Residential Rebate Programs Approved Rebates 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Drought Survival Tools Irrigation Upgrades Rainwater Harvesting Rebates WaterWise Landscape WaterWise Rainscape Other Residential Programs Q3 2025-Q2 2026 Q3 2026 5 6 Water Conservation Metrics Commercial Rebate Programs Approved Rebates 5 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 2 1 Bucks for Business Q3 2025-Q2 2026 Q3 2026 November 9, 2026 5 6 Austin Water Third Quarter 2026 Report 3 November 9, 2026 Water Conservation Metrics Compliance Assessments Number of Compliant Commercial Facilities Number of Compliant Commercial Facilities 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 350 300 250 200 150 100 …
90th Legislative Session Preview Austin Water | Water and Wastewater Commission November 10, 2026 Agenda • Key Dates • City’s Legislative Platform • Austin Water’s Role in Session • Austin Water Initiated Legislation • Topics to Monitor • Key Associations Key Dates November 9, 2026 – Bill Pre-Filing Began Late 2026 & Early 2027 – Interim Committee Reports Published January 12, 2027 – First Day of Session March 12, 2027 – Last Day of Statewide Bill Filing May 31, 2027 – Sine Die (Last Day of Regular Session) 3 City of Austin Legislative Platform Adopted July 23, 2026 Emergency Preparedness & Natural Resources Strengthen Climate and Disaster Resilience: Support efforts to effectively mitigate, prepare for, respond to, and recover from emergencies and disasters, including flooding, wildfires, extreme temperatures, and public health disasters. Protect Natural Resources: Support policies to further conservation, reuse, and water supply strategies in Austin’s 100-year water plan. Ensure sustainability of the State’s natural resources and support efforts to improve local air quality. Public Infrastructure Support Critical Infrastructure and Services: Fund critical mobility infrastructure and preserve ability to govern residents’ investment in municipally owned-utilities. 4 Austin Water’s Role In Session Austin Government Relations (AGR) assigns bills for analysis Austin Water (AW) staff and external organizations also identify bills AW staff work to Analyze bills (and amendments) Prepare educational materials, answer questions Determine public positions, communicate with AGR Prepare written and oral testimony for committees Coordinate with other municipalities and organizations 5 Austin Water Initiated Legislation Enabling Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Texas Administrative Code prohibits most injection wells (including wells for ASR) from transecting the Edwards Aquifer AW would need to transect the Edwards for the potential ASR project in Eastern Travis County An Austin Water proposed bill mirrors a bill passed last session for ASR projects in Eastern Williamson County and Medina County 7 Priority Topics to Monitor Bill positions to be determined based on specific content Not an exhaustive list Funding for Water Infrastructure The City of Austin relies on financial assistance from the Texas Water Development Board’s (TWDB) loan programs to deliver essential water, wastewater, and reclaimed water projects TWDB’s State Water Implementation Fund for Texas (SWIFT) recapitalization is a priority, this revolving loan fund is oversubscribed Monitor implementation of funding …
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, September 8TH, 2026 The COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION convened in a REGULAR MEETING on TUESDAY, September 8TH, 2026, at CITY HALL, BOARDS AND COMMISSION ROOM in Austin, Texas. Some members of the commission participated by video conference. Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance: Lyric Wardlow, Vice Chair Jenny E. Achilles Omar Gamboa Cynthia Jaso Valeria Menard Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Taniquewa Brewster Raul Longoria Sonia Martinez Staff Members in Attendance: Nefertitti Jackmon Miguel Lopez Angel Zambrano CALL TO ORDER Vice Chair Lyric Wardlow called the meeting to order at 6:48 PM. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Marian Sanchez, speaking on behalf of PODER, provided public comment. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the CDC Regular meeting on August 11, 2026. The minutes from the Community Development Commission Regular Meeting on August 11th, 2026, were approved on Commissioner Menard’s motion, Commissioner Gamboa’s second, on a 8-0 vote. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing regarding Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) activities and outcomes. Presentation by Angel Zambrano, Program Manager III, Austin Public Health. The presentation was made by Angel Zambrano, Program Manager III, Austin Public Health. DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. Discussion on the recent meeting of the Housing Investment Review Committee (HIRC). Discussion led by Commissioner Valeria Menard. This item was tabled for the October meeting. 4. Update and discussion of the CDC Election process. Discussion led by Chair Noe Elias. This item was tabled for the October meeting. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 5. Discussion and action on the election and nomination process for APH concerning Public Sector and Private Sector Appointees. Presentation by Angel Zambrano, Program Manager III, Austin Public Health. This item was tabled for the October meeting. 6. Discussion and possible approval of a recommendation regarding the Dog’s Head Development. Discussion led by Commissioner Valeria Menard. The motion to approve the recommendation regarding the Dog’s Head Development was approved with the listed amendments on Commissioner Jenny E. Achilles’s motion, Commission Raul Longoria’s second, on 8-0 vote. • Addition of the number 20 item as “Allow and prioritize affordable housing ranging from 30%-80% Median Family Income (MFI) throughout the area.” • Replacement of the Environmental Commission with the Community Development Commission on the second WHEREAS. …
Housing & Community Needs Federal Funding Each year, we receive nearly $14 million annually in federal grant funding to support housing and public service programs. Homeowner Assistance Homeless Assistance Homebuyer Assistance Special Needs Assistance Affordable Housing Development Assistance Other Community Development Assistance We invite you to join the federal funding process by sharing your insight at the link below. You can provide feedback on: 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 Past Performance Report Action Plan Needs Assessment Survey How we did What we are doing What is next Share your needs online at: www.SpeakUpAustin.org/MyCommunityNeeds or Text MyNeeds27 at 73224 Financiamiento federal para necesidades de viviendas comunitarias Cada año recibimos cerca de 14 millones de dólares en subvenciones federales para apoyar programas de vivienda y servicios públicos. Asistencia para propietarios de viviendas Asistencia para personas sin hogar Asistencia para compradores de vivienda Asistencia para personas con necesidades especiales Asistencia para el desarrollo de viviendas asequibles Otros tipos de asistencia para el desarrollo comunitario Te invitamos a participar en el proceso de financiación federal compartiendo tu opinión en el siguiente enlace. Envia tus comentarios sobre: 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 Informe de desempeño anterior Plan de acción Encuesta de evaluación de necesidades Cómo lo hicimos Lo que estamos haciendo ¿Qué sigue? Comparte tus necesidades en línea en: www.SpeakUpAustin.org/MyCommunityNeeds_esp o envía un mensaje de texto a MyNeeds27 al 73224
◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ OCTOBER CDC Meeting 10/13 NOVEMBER CDC Meeting 11/10 DECEMBER CDC Meeting 12/8 JANUARY CDC Meeting 1/12 FEBRUARY CDC Meeting 2/9 MARCH CDC Meeting 3/9 Austing Housing Federal Reporting Calendar FY 26-27 OCT 31: Austing Housing deadline for Public Notice of upcoming CAPER Public Comment period ◦ NOV 15, 2029 (every 5th year) - Consolidated Plan due to HUD ◦ DEC 29 - CAPER due to HUD ◦ CDC Public Hearing for Needs Assessment ◦ Austin Housing to end Community Needs Assessment Feb. 15 Austin Housing presents Year Ahead Review to CDC detailing federal regulations and project timelines ◦ NOV 16: Austin Housing to begin 15 day Public Comment period for CAPER ◦ DEC 2: Austin Housing to end 15 day Public Comment period for CAPER ◦ Austin Housing to host City Council Public Hearing for Needs Assessment ◦ ◦ Austin Housing to begin Community Needs Assessment thru Feb. 15 Austin Housing presents CAPER data to CDC detailing previous FY progress toward goals ◦ Austin Housing to inform Community of how feedback from CAPER Public Comment period was incorporated into CAPER APRIL CDC Meeting 4/14 MAY CDC Meeting 5/12 JUNE CDC meeting 6/9 JULY CDC Meeting 7/14 AUGUST CDC Meeting 8/11 SEPTEMBER CDC Meeting 9/8 APR 14-30: Public Notice of Upcoming Action Plan Public Comment period Austin Housing present to CDC detailing Needs Assessment feedback and how it informed modifications in drafted AAP ◦ May 1-May 30: 30 day Public Comment period for AAP ◦ CDC Public Hearing for Annual Action Plan ◦ ◦ CDC review of draft AAP & draft is finalized; CDC recommend approval to the Austin City Council ◦ First Week - Finalized Draft Annual Action Plan added to docket for late July City Council meeting ◦ AUG 15 - Annual Action Plan due to HUD Austin Housing to inform Community of how feedback was incorporated into AAP ◦ City Council late July review/approval Note: HUD requires that we prepare a Consolidated Plan every 5 years detailing the use of 4 sources of federal funds, including CDBG, that the CDC supports and advocates for the use of on behalf of low- and moderate-income Austinites. Each year, we must prepare a reapplication for funds via the Annual Action Plan, further detailing the use of those funds in alignment with progress and community feedback. To be sure we are receptive to the needs of those we …
Federal Funding Engagement Cycle Austin Housing | November 10, 2026 Federal Funding Overview The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) allocates entitlement funding to municipalities and state governments. The City of Austin applies for approximately $14 million in annual grant entitlements across four grants for affordable housing, community development, economic development, and public services. These grants are part of a 5-year cycle. 2 3 HUD Funding Sources 3 4 5-year Cycle Consolidated Plan (5-Year) Allocates federal resources to housing and community development Action Plan (1-Year) Summarizes actions, activities and federal/non- federal resources in the Consolidated Plan Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) (1-Year) End-of-year report on progress toward consolidated plan 4 Austin Housing's Role Grant application Grant management (coordination with other departments, reporting) Community Engagement Program management 5 CDC's Role Advise Council Host Public Hearings U.S. Code states public organizations administer CSBG funds with support of a tripartite board (42 USCA 9910) Code of Federal Regulations states jurisdiction must have Citizen Participation Plan & host public hearings (24 CFR 91.105) Austin Municipal Code requires the operation of a Community Development Commission for the representation of low-income populations (2-1-128) Citizen Participation Plan outlines when public hearings shall be held during preparation of the Annual Action Plan and 5-Year Consolidated Plan 6 Needed Shifts for Engagement Check-box engagement with limited impact Misaligned calendar with too little time to use feedback Unclear roles and responsibilities between staff and commissioners 7 Needed Shifts for Engagement Check-box engagement with limited Thoughtful engagement connected to impact decision-makers Misaligned calendar with too little time Engagement calendar aligned with to use feedback decision-making processes Unclear roles and responsibilities between staff and commissioners Clear expectations and ongoing communication 8 New Calendar October (FY start) November December January February March CAPER Season CAPER 15-day Public Comment Period CAPER due to HUD Begin Community Needs Assessment Community Needs Assessment Community Needs Assessment Community Needs Assessment April May June July August Drafting of Action Plan 30-day Public Comment Period for Action Plan CDC Review of Action Plan; recommendation to Council Council review & approval of Action Plan Action Plan submission to HUD Begin Action Plan Draft September (FY end) 9 What you can expected from us Monthly updates on where we are in the process Opportunities for meaningful dialogue and input 10 How you can …
CITY OF AUSTIN CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN A. PURPOSE Participating Jurisdictions (PJs) that receive U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) entitlement grant funds must develop a Citizen Participation Plan (CPP). The CPP describes efforts that will be undertaken to encourage community members to participate in the development of the City’s federal reports: Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH), Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plan, and the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). The CPP is designed to encourage the participation of city residents in the development of the federal reports listed above, particularly those residents who are predominantly low- and moderate-income. For purposes of CDBG funding, a resident is considered to be low-income if their family income equals 50% or less of median family income (MFI), as estimated by HUD. A person is considered to be moderate-income if their family income is between 50% and 80% of MFI. Predominately low-to moderate-income neighborhoods are defined as any neighborhood where at least 51% of the residents have incomes equal to or below 80% of the MFI for any given year. The determination of whether a neighborhood meets the low-to moderate income definition is made by the City at the time a project of area-wide benefit is funded based on current data provided by HUD. The CPP also encourages local and regional institutions and other organizations (including businesses, developers, and community and faith-based organizations) to participate in the process of developing and implementing the Consolidated Plan and related reports. The City takes appropriate actions to encourage the participation of persons of minority backgrounds, persons with limited-English proficiency, and persons with disabilities. It is important to note that HUD’s use of the statutory term “citizen participation” does not in any way limit engagement and consultation with community members based on legal status or country of origin. Any person that resides in the Austin metro area is encouraged to provide input about the federal reporting process as outlined in this CPP. The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. The City of Austin does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in its programs and activities. The City of Austin considers it the right of …
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 202503XX-X Recommendation on the CDC Election Process RECOMMENDATION Whereas, the Austin Community Development Commission (CDC) consists of eight members democratically selected to represent residents from each of the eight geographic areas of Travis County, in order to represent low-income populations eligible to be served under the Community Services Block Grant (CSBG); Whereas, Board members serve for a term of four years beginning March 1 of the year of appointment; Whereas, the eight democratically selected members shall serve an initial two-year term, with an additional maximum of two consecutive four-year terms; Whereas, a transparent, accessible, and well-communicated election process is essential to ensuring meaningful participation by low-income residents and individuals with lived experience; Whereas, community members have expressed that current election notifications do not provide adequate time for outreach, planning, or participation; Whereas, community members have also noted confusion regarding the steps required to vote or to become a candidate, indicating a need for clearer instructions and educational materials; Whereas, greater engagement between current CDC members, candidates, and community organizations would increase trust, strengthen relationships, and improve civic participation; Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Austin Community Development Commission advises Austin Public Health to widely advertise the CDC election and election process at least one month in advance, using multiple reminders and multiple communication platforms to reach as many community members as possible. Be it further resolved that the Commission advises Austin Public Health to provide training and educational materials on the election process, the history and purpose of the Commission, roles and responsibilities of commissioners, and how community members can participate. Be it further resolved that the Commission advises Austin Public Health to strengthen communication and outreach regarding deadlines, eligibility requirements, and step-by-step voting instructions to prevent confusion and increase accessibility. Be it further resolved that the Commission advises Austin Public Health to provide opportunities for prospective candidates to learn about CDC roles and responsibilities prior to the election cycle. Be it further resolved that the Commission advises increasing community-facing information that highlights the CDC’s focus on low-income populations and people with lived experience, ensuring these communities know the election is intended for them. Be it further resolved that the Commission advises providing clear, accessible instructions—both in writing and through optional training—on how to cast a vote, how to submit candidate information, and how community organizations can properly conduct their elections. Be it further resolved …
City of Austin Housing Department Community Development Commission November 10, 2026 Meeting Discussion of the Housing Development Assistance Gap Financing Program & the Housing Investment Review Committee (HIRC) Agenda HDA Gap Financing Application Process: High-Level Overview Housing Investment Review Committee FY 25-26 Spring-Summer Round HDA Funding Awards Q&A Request: Nomination of 1 HIRC Member & 1-2 Alternates HDA Gap Financing Application Process: High Level Overview The Austin Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC) is a public, nonprofit corporation and instrumentality of the City of Austin, with a mission to generate and implement strategic housing solutions for the benefit of low- and moderate- income residents in Austin. The Housing Development Assistance (HDA) division administers multiple programs. Including: developer incentives, fee waivers, issuance of tax- exempt bonds, and gap financing. Gap financing in affordable housing development is typically the final piece of funding needed after other sources have been assembled. Rental and ownership gap financing programs provide funding through loans to developers in exchange for affordability restrictions on the property. 4 Overview of New HDA Funding Application Process Initial Staff Application Review: Eligibility Checklist & Application Scoring Housing Department Leadership Team Meeting & Funding Recommendations to the AHFC Board Staff Application Processing, Underwriting & Analysis Interdepartmental Review Panel Housing Investment Review Committee (HIRC) Meeting AHFC Board Consideration & Funding Award Move forward to loan closing process 5 Housing Investment Review Committee (HIRC) HIRC Background The Austin City Council adopted a Resolution in 2007 which established a Housing Bond Review Committee that was retitled the Housing Investment Review Committee (HIRC) in 2018. Per the Resolution, the HIRC is to be comprised of 3 members of the public at-large and 2 Community Development Commission (CDC) Commissioners. The present-day HIRC is tasked with the biannual review of RHDA and OHDA project applications. The HIRC does not recommend applications for financing, but rather, plays an important role in the application review process, identifying areas of concern or approval associated with respective developments. 7 HIRC Member Responsibilities HIRC members are responsible for the following on a biannual basis: 1.) Review of RHDA & OHDA applications. 2.) Attendance of HIRC pre-meeting with staff (typically virtual). 3.) Attendance of HIRC meeting with applicants and staff (typically virtual). 4.) Submission of post-HIRC meeting feedback on each project to staff. HIRC Meeting Format Staff presents a slide for each project application. Developer gives a high-level summary of the project. HIRC members and staff …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE URBAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2026, AT 5:00 P.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, ROOM 1405 6310 WILHELMAINA DELCO DRIVE AUSTIN TEXAS Some members of the Urban Transportation Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once, either in person or remotely, and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Natalie Leone, 512-974- 3428, natalie.leone@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Susan Somers, Chair Daniel Kavelman, Parliamentarian Deshon Brown Heather Buffo Kevin Chen Nathan Fernandes Justin Jacobson Varun Prasad Spencer Schumacher, Vice Chair AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 5 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Urban Transportation Commission Regular meeting on 10/06/2026. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. 3. Update on the East Riverside Corridor Regulating Plan Initiative. Presentation by Ana Villareal, Principal Planner, Austin Planning. Update on Traffic Enforcement Efforts. Presentation by William White, Lieutenant, Austin Police. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 4. 5. Discussion and approval of a Right-of-Way Vacation of a partial alley abutting 2300 E 2ND Street. Presentation by Joseph Fotinos, Project Manager, Austin Transportation and Public Works. Discussion and approval of a recommendation regarding the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) Parmer Lane (FM 734) Corridor Study. COMMITTEE UPDATES 6. Update from Commissioner Chen from the Downtown Commission regarding actions taken at the October 21, 2026, meeting. 7. Update from Commissioner Prasad from the Joint Sustainability Committee regarding actions taken at the October 28, 2026, meeting. 8. Update from Commissioner Schumacher from the Bicycle Advisory Council regarding actions taken at the October 20, 2026, meeting. 9. Update from Commissioner Kavelman from the Pedestrian Advisory Council regarding actions taken at the November 2, 2026, meeting. 10. Update from Chair Somers from the Community Advisory Committee of the Austin Transit Partnership Board regarding actions taken at the October 8, 2026, meeting. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and …
URBAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES URBAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, October 6, 2026 The Urban Transportation Commission convened in a regular meeting on Tuesday, October 6, 2026, at Austin City Hall, Boards and Commissions Room 1101, Austin, Texas. Chair Somers called the Commission Meeting to order at 5:08 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Nathan Fernandes (District 2) Susan Somers (District 4) Spencer Schumacher, Vice Chair - (District 9) Daniel Kavelman - (District 5) Commissioners in Attendance Virtually: Heather Buffo - (District 1) Kevin Chen - (District 6) PUBLIC COMMUNICATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the URBAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING on 8/4/2026. The minutes of the 8/4/2026 meeting were approved on a motion from Commissioner Schumacher, seconded by Commissioner Fernandes, on a 6-0 vote, with Commissioners Brown, Jacobson, and Prasad absent. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Curb Management Study Briefing. The commission received a presentation from Joseph Al-Hajeri, Division Manager, Austin Transportation and Public Works. DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. The Mayor’s Public Spaces Taskforce Outcomes Report. The commission received a presentation from Steven Rivas, Chair, Public Spaces Task Force. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 4. Discussion and approval of 2027 Urban Transportation Commission meeting dates. 1 URBAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES On a motion from Commissioner Somers, seconded by Commissioner Schumacher , the recommendation was approved on a 6-0 vote, with Commissioners Brown, Jacobson, and Prasad absent. COMMITTEE UPDATES 5. Update from Commissioner Chen from the Downtown Commission regarding actions taken at the August 19, 2026, and September 16, 2026, meetings. The Commission received an update from Commissioner Chen. 6. Update from Commissioner Prasad from the Joint Sustainability Committee regarding actions taken at the August 26, 2026, and September 23, 2026, meetings. Item postponed. 7. Update from Commissioner Schumacher from the Bicycle Advisory Council regarding actions taken at the August 18, 2026, and September 15, 2026, meetings. The commission received an update from Commissioner Schumacher. 8. Update from Commissioner Kavelman from the Pedestrian Advisory Council regarding actions taken at the August 3, 2026, and September 15, 2026, meetings. The commission received an update from Commissioner Kavelman. 9. Update from Chair Somers from the Community Advisory Committee for the Austin Transit Partnership Board regarding actions taken at the August 13, 2026, and September 10, 2026, meeting. The commission received an update from Commissioner Somers. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS New Future Agenda Items Discussed: I35 Safety in Construction • ADJOURNMENT Chair Somers adjourned …
East Riverside Corridor Planning Initiative Urban Transportation Commission Briefing Tuesday, November 10, 2026 Equitable Transit-Oriented Development (ETOD) Station Area Planning Team Ana Villarreal Principal Planner, Austin Planning Tim McCarthy Senior Planner, Austin Planning Leela Bhairy Senior Planner, Austin Planning 2 Study Area Study Area and Scope • Update East Riverside Corridor (ERC) Vision Plan and Regulating Plan Integrate equity as an actionable goal • • Promote economic opportunity • Recalibrate ERC Development Bonus Program • Align the plans with the equitable tools in the ETOD Policy Plan • Update the Future Land Use Map • Support a vibrant, connected, and inclusive corridor 4 Project Background The Corridor Today The East Riverside Corridor (ERC) is one of Austin’s most diverse and culturally rich communities, with many homes and businesses, and high demand for public transit. Population Transportation Housing Median Age: 29.4 Ethnicity: 49% Hispanic and 51% Non-Hispanic MHHI: $75,782 High demand for transit CapMetro Rapid Route 800 ALR Phase 1 Units: 18,582 Types: 81% MF % of Renters: 89% 6 Growth Projections What do we know about growth in the study area? Jobs and population are expected to nearly double in Austin by 2060, while the East Riverside Corridor area is expected to grow by 30-60%. This potentially includes 10,000-25,000 additional residents and 3,500-4,000 new jobs around the East Riverside Corridor by 2060. 7 Reimagining a Connected and Equitable Future The City of Austin is partnering with the community to update the East Riverside Corridor Vision Plan and Regulating Plan, reimagining how growth and development can center equity, connection, and opportunity. What We Aim to Achieve Equity Connectivity Housing Choice Sustainability Vibrancy 8 Equitable Transit-Oriented Development (ETOD) Equitable Transit-Oriented Development (ETOD) builds on traditional Transit-Oriented Development and takes steps to ensure that those who have the greatest need for the transit enhancements offered by Project Connect can benefit the most. ETOD Goals Enable All Residents to Benefit from Safe, Sustainable, and Accessible Transportation Help to Close Racial Health and Wealth Gaps Preserve and Increase Housing Opportunities That are Affordable and Attainable Expand Access to High-Quality Jobs and Career Opportunities Support Healthy Neighborhoods That Meet Daily Needs Expand Austin’s Diverse Cultural Heritage and Small Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC)-owned and Legacy Businesses 9 Community Engagement Project Timeline Fall 2025 Project Launch • Ambassador Program Recruitment and Training • Courtesy Postcards • Tabling Events Winter 2026 Round 1 Community Engagement • …
Austin Police Briefing: Austin Police Briefing: Traffic Enforcement Traffic Enforcement Lieutenant William White | Austin Police Department Urban Transportation Commission | November 10, 2026 1 Annual Statistics January 2019 – October 2026* • Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) Arrests • Citations • Hazardous • Non-hazardous • Electronic Handheld Device • Warnings 2 2 DWI Arrests DWI Arrests January 2019 – October 2026 3 DWI Arrests by Year 38% decline between 2019 & 2025 4,200 3,165 2,675 2,870 2,620 2,792 3,070 2,707 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 4 4 DWI Arrests by Council District (2026) D 1 (Harper-Madison) = 278 D 2 (Fuentes) D 3 (Velásquez) D 4 (Vela) D 5 (Alter) D 6 (Laine) D 7 (Siegel) D 8 (Ellis) D 9 (Qadri) D 10 (Duchen) = 321 = 443 = 304 = 180 = 103 = 283 = 83 = 506 = 145 5 5 Citations Citations January 2019 – October 2026 6 Citations by Year 69% decline between 2019 & 2025 (combined) 35k 32k 15k 13k 11k 9k 10k 10k 10k 8k 10k 7k 13k 8k 10k 7k 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Hazardous Non-hazardous 7 7 Handheld Device Citations by Year 3,567 89% decline between 2019 & 2025 1,102 227 174 111 160 391 194 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 8 8 Warnings Warnings January 2019 – October 2026 9 Warnings by Year 74% decline between 2019 & 2025 67 k 34 k 19 k 14 k 14 k 15 k 17 k 17 k 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 10 10 Impaired Driving Impaired Driving Investigations (IDI) Investigations (IDI) 11 About the Unit The Impaired Driving Investigations (IDI) Unit’s primary mission is to support and promote all Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) and Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) related activity within the Austin Police Department. • Created following reallocation of DWI Enforcement officers (June 2021) • Conduct investigations of open DWI cases • File criminal charges of DWI-related title codes • Coordinate DWI and DRE training for officers and cadets • Promote safety through public education and outreach 12 The Unit was created following the reallocation of DWI Enforcement officers to Patrol in June 2021. Those officers that maintained their DRE certifications from their time on the DWI Unit were reorganized under the DRE Program The IDI Unit conducts investigations of open DWI cases and will file …
A PARTIAL ALLEY Right-of-Way Vacation ABUTTING 2300 E 2ND STREET Austin Transportation and Public Works Land Management | November 10, 2026 Urban Transportation Commission A PARTIAL ALLEY Right-of-Way Vacation ABUTTING 2300 E 2ND STREET November 10, 2026 Item # 04 File #2025-161689 LM District: 3 2 Abutting property owner: Housing Authority of the City of Austin, a Texas Municipal Public Housing Authority 3 2300 E 2nd Street Unpaved/Undeveloped Alley Right-of-Way 4 Picture of property street view 5 OVERVIEW: Vacation tract is approximately 4,772 square feet. All property owners within 300 feet of the vacation area were sent public notices on August 19, 2026. No objections have been received as of the day of this presentation. All affected City Departments and external stakeholders have reviewed and recommend approval of this right-of-way vacation application, subject to the conditions on the Master Comment Report submitted with this presentation. How do you plan to develop the area to be vacated? The area proposed to be vacated will be incorporated into the adjacent property at 2300 E 2nd Street and developed consistent with the zoning district. Site Plan # SP- 2025-0224C.SH is approved. This is an affordable housing project. 6 I am happy to answer your questions regarding the right of way process The applicant can answer your questions regarding the abutting property and the proposed development. Thank you for your time! Joseph Fotinos – 512-978-4659 7
To: From: MEMORANDUM Urban Transportation Commission Betty Nguyen, Real Estate Services Agent, Austin Transportation and Public Works Date: October 1, 2026 Subject: F# 2025-161689 LM Alley Right-of-Way Vacation of approximately 4,772 square feet abutting 2300 E 2nd Street Attached is the Application Packet and Master Comment Report pertaining to the partial alley right-of-way vacation application for an approximately 4,772 square foot portion of land, being the unpaved/undeveloped or right-of-way abutting 2300 E 2nd Street, as shown on Plat of the Industrial Addition, a subdivision of record in Volume 409, Page 553, Deed Records of Travis County, Texas. The proposed vacation tract will be added to the abutting parcels. The abutting properties are owned by Housing Authority of the City of Austin, a Texas Municipal Public Housing Authority. Per the transmittal letter dated December 23,2025, received by the City of Austin, the applicant states, “How do you plan to develop the area to be vacated? Response: To provide affordable housing.” All affected departments and private utility franchise stakeholders have reviewed the application and recommend approval, subject to the reviewers’ conditions shown on the attached Master Comment Report. Per City Code §14-11-71 – Notice to Interested Property Owners Public notice will be sent to owners within 300’ of the area to be vacated. The director of Austin Public Works may approve the application after the 10th day that the notice is issued; and an affected property owner may submit comments regarding the proposed vacation. Public Notice was sent to appropriate parties on August 19, 2026. No objections have been received by staff as of the date of this memorandum. The applicant has requested that this item be submitted for placement on the November 10, 2026, Urban Transportation Commission agenda. Staff contact: Betty Nguyen, Real Estate Services Agent Austin Transportation and Public Works, 512-974-6401, landmanagementROW@austintexas.gov Applicant: Isabelle Parcel, (908) 601-0877, iparcel@dunaway.com Abutting Landowner(s): Housing Authority of the City of Austin, a Texas Municipal Public Housing Authority The applicant and/or property owner’s representative will be present at the meeting to answer any questions regarding future development and the vacation request. Attachments: Application Packet Master Comment Report Right of Way Vacation Transmittal Letter LandManagementROW@AustinTexas.gov | Phone: 311 (or 512-974-2000 outside Austin) For submittal and fee information, see www.austintexas.gov/department/land-management Provide a by answering the : 1. Property Type: R C P S Instrument Yes No 5. I : F -of- O Yes No Yes No ________________________________________________ …
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Urban Transportation Commission Recommendation Number: 20261103-005: CAMPO Parmer Lane (FM 734) Corridor Study WHEREAS, the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) and the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) are conducting the Parmer Lane (FM 734) Corridor Study, whose short-term improvements are mainly traffic signal changes and turn lanes, and whose long- term concepts include controlled-access main lanes with grade separations at intersections and frontage roads on both sides, for which funding and a timeline "have not been identified"; and WHEREAS, northwest Austin is already served by US 183, the 183A toll road, SH 45, and MoPac, which provide high-speed routes for regional and long-distance trips, and the two new toll lanes in each direction on US 183 between MoPac and SH 45 North are now open; and WHEREAS, CAMPO's 2050 Regional Transportation Plan sets goals to "reduce severity and number of crashes for all modes" and to "support local government and transit agencies reaching TxDOT Road to Zero metrics," CAMPO's Regional Safety Action Plan sets a goal to "reduce fatal and serious injury crashes by 50% by 2035 and eliminate them entirely by 2050," and the Texas Transportation Commission directed TxDOT in Minute Order 115481 to work toward cutting deaths on Texas roadways by half in 2035 and to zero by 2050; and WHEREAS, TxDOT's Roadway Design Manual states that "as motor vehicle speeds increase, the risk of serious injury or fatality for pedestrians in the event of a crash also increases" and quotes the federal presumption that bicyclists and pedestrians "will be accommodated in the design of new and improved transportation facilities," and the City of Austin has identified Parmer Lane on its High-Injury Network; and WHEREAS, CAMPO's Congestion Management Process directs planners to "identify and support [travel demand management] projects and strategies before capacity projects when developing corridor studies," and lists complete streets, public transit enhancements, and bicycle and pedestrian improvements among its congestion strategies; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin's Imagine Austin plan designates Parmer Lane as an Activity Corridor meant to be "walkable, bikeable, and connected," and CAMPO's 2050 plan seeks to enhance "economic development potential by increasing opportunities to live, work, and play in proximity for residents and visitors"; and WHEREAS, among self-selected respondents to the study's first public survey, 78% use Parmer to visit shops, restaurants, or recreation, compared with 59% who use it to get through town; and WHEREAS, among …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MONDAY, November 9, 2026 AT 5:30 P.M. AUSTIN CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, ROOM 1001 301 WEST 2ND STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Elaine Ramirez at 512-974-2202 or email elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov. CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: ___Jeffery Bowen (Chair) ___Margaret Shahrestani (Vice-Chair) ___Haseeb Abdullah ___Corry L Archer-McClellan ___Joseph El Habr ___Melissa Hawthorne ___VACANT CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL ___Yung-ju Kim ___Bianca A Medina-Leal ___Brian Poteet ___Michael Von Ohlen ___VACANT(Alternate) ___Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) AGENDA The first 4 speakers signed up/register prior (no later than noon the day before the meeting) to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Board of Adjustment Regular meeting on October 12, 2026 On-Line Link: ITEM01 October 12, 2026, draft minutes PUBLIC HEARINGS Discussion and action on the following cases New Variance cases: 2. C15-2026-0041 Luke and Cherry Scarmardo 8402 Kimble Cove On-Line Link: ITEM02 ADV PACKET; PRESENTATION The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) (D) from setback requirements for a front setback of 25 feet (required) to 20 feet on right side and 13 ft on left side (requested) in order to attach a Carport in a “SF-3NP”, Single-Family-Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (Wooten Neighborhood Plan). 3. C15-2026-0043 Di Yang Shi 7606 Creston Lane On-Line Link: ITEM03 ADV PACKET; PRESENTATION The applicant is requesting a variance from the Land Development Code, Section 25- 2-899 (Fences as Accessory Uses) to increase the height from six (6’) feet from natural grade (maximum allowed) to ten feet (10’) (requested) in order to erect a solid fence along interior sides (NW & NE) and rear (NW & N) property lines in a “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family- Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Highland Neighborhood Plan). Note: The Land Development Code 25-2-899 Fences as Accessory Uses (A) Except as otherwise …
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Monday, October 12, 2026 The BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT convened in a Regular meeting on Monday, October 12, 2026, at 301 West 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Chair Jeffery Bowen called the Board of Adjustment Meeting to order at 5:35 PM. Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance in-Person: Jeffery Bowen-Chair, Haseeb Abdullah, Corry Archer-McClellan, Joseph El Habr, Melissa Hawthorne, Michael Von Ohlen Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Maggie Shahrestani-Vice Chair,Yung-ju Kim, Bianca A. Medina-Leal, Brian Poteet APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Board of Adjustment Regular meeting on September 14, 2026 On-Line Link: ITEM01 September 14, 2026 draft minutes The minutes from the meeting on September 14, 2026, were approved on Board Member Melissa Hawthorne, Board Member Haseeb Abdullah second, on Vote 9-0. (Chair Jeffery Bowen abstained) PUBLIC HEARINGS Discussion and action on the following cases Item 4 - C15-2026-0034 Applicant is requesting to withdraw. Item 6 – C15-2026-0036 Applicant is requesting to postpone to November 9, 2026. Previous Postponed cases: 2. C15-2026-0029 Stephen Hawkins for Agustin Gonzalez 3011 Westlake Drive On-Line Link: ITEM02 ADV PACKET; PRESENTATION The applicant has requested variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2- 1176 (Site Development Regulations for Docks, Marinas, and Other Lakefront Uses) (A) (1) to increase the dock length from 30 feet (required) to fifty feet (50’) (requested), in order to erect a boat dock in a “LA” Lake Austin zoning district. Note: Land Development Code, 25-2-1176 Site Development Regulations for Docks, Marinas, and Other Lakefront Uses A dock or similar structure must comply with the requirements of this subsection. (A) (1) A dock may extend up to 30 feet from the shoreline, except that the director may require a dock to extend a lesser or greater distance from the shoreline if deemed necessary to ensure navigation safety. The public hearing was closed by Chair Jeffery Bowen, Vice Chair Maggie Shahrestani’s motion to approve, Board member Melissa Hawthorne second on 10-0 votes; GRANTED. 3. C15-2026-0030 Xiao Huang 2805 Saratoga Drive On-Line Link: ITEM03 ADV PACKET; PRESENTATION The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) (D) from setback requirements for a front setback of 40 feet (required) to 7 feet (requested) in order to erect a four-foot high (4’) attached uncovered wood deck in front of an existing single-family residence in a “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. The public …
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2026-0041 BOA DATE: Monday, November 9th, 2026 ADDRESS: 8402 Kimble Cv OWNER: Luke & Cherry Scarmardo COUNCIL DISTRICT: 4 AGENT: N/A ZONING: SF-3-NP (Wooten) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 7 BLK A WOOTEN TERRACE SEC 1 VARIANCE REQUEST: Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) (D) from setback requirements for a front setback of 25 feet (required) to 20 feet on right side and 13 ft on left side (requested). SUMMARY: attach a carport ISSUES: original 1-car garage converted prior to my purchase in 1981. ZONING LAND USES Site North South East West SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Neighborhoods Council Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association North Austin Neighborhood Alliance Red Line Parkway Initiative Shoal Creek Conservancy Wooten Neighborhood Association Wooten Neighborhood Plan Contact Team ITEM02/1 October 28, 2026 Mrs.. Cherry Scarmardo 8402 Kimble Cv Austin TX, 78757 Property Description: LOT 7 BLK A WOOTEN TERRACE SEC 1 Re: C15-2026-0041 Dear Applicant, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance request from LDC Section 25-2-492 at 8402 Kimble Cv . Austin Energy does not oppose the request, provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. All signage will need to stay out of Austin Energy easements and 5’ from existing underground electric lines. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements, which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Ashley Robinson, Project Assistant Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050 ITEM02/2 ITEM02/3 ITEM02/4 ITEM02/5 ITEM02/6 ITEM02/7 ITEM02/8 ITEM02/9
r-rr�on"I C,16-lOl&;-0041 Applicants: Luke and Cherry Scarmardo Property: Lot 7, Block A, Wooten Terrace Address: 8402 Kimble Cove, Austin, TX Request: Front-yard setback variance for attached carport Introduction Luke and Cherry request a variance to allow construction of a 12' x 18' attached carport extending over the existing driveway at the front of their home. The carport is designed to restore functional covered parking while maintaining compatibility with the neighborhood and preserving the architectural character of the property. Hardship & Practical Need The original one-car garage on the right side of the house was permanently transformed prior to their purchase July 1981 into a storage area and a smaller one-third garage space through installation of a permanent interior wall. This modification eliminated the ability to park a full-size vehicle inside the structure. As a result, the property no longer has any usable covered parking. Neighborhood Compatibility The carport aligns with the existing driveway and maintains the established streetscape. Its scale and placement are consistent with similar covered parking structures found throughout the neighborhood. The design avoids visual clutter, preserves sightlines, and maintains the low-profile appearance typical of Wooten Terrace homes. The 12-foot width matches the existing garage opening, and the 18-foot depth provides adequate vehicle coverage without extending excessively toward the street. Minimum Variance Necessary This request represents the minimum variance needed to restore functional covered parking to the property. The carport is limited to a single-vehicle width, placed entirely over the existing driveway. No alternative location on the lot would meet the functional need without creating greater impact or violating other setback requirements. Conclusion The proposed 12' x 18' carport is a practical, modest improvement that restores ess�ntial functionality lost due to the permanent interior modification of the original �arag�. It ts c�mpat1ble with the neighborhood, minimizes visual impact, and represents the least mtrusIve solution to meet the property's needs. Luke and Cherry respectfully request approval of this variance. ITEM02/1-PRESENTATION this is our driveway showing the curve of street ITEM02/2-PRESENTATION left side of house showing no possibility of building a carport ITEM02/3-PRESENTATION I right side showing no space to build a carport ITEM02/4-PRESENTATION
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2026-0043 BOA DATE: Monday, November 9th, 2026 ADDRESS: 7606 Creston Ln OWNER: Di Yang Shi COUNCIL DISTRICT: 4 AGENT: N/A ZONING: SF-3-NP (Highland NP) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 7 BLK A NORTHWAY CREST SEC 3 VARIANCE REQUEST: Land Development Code, Section 25-2-899 (Fences as Accessory Uses) to increase the height from six (6’) feet from natural grade (maximum allowed) to ten feet (10’) (requested). SUMMARY: erect a solid fence along interior sides (NW & NE) and rear (NW & N) property lines ISSUES: townhome complex bordering backyard ZONING LAND USES SF-3-NP Site SF-3-NP North SF-3-NP South SF-3-NP East West MF-3-NP Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Multi-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Neighborhoods Council Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Highland Neighborhood Association Highland/Skyview Neighborhood Plan Contact Team Homeless Neighborhood Association North Austin Neighborhood Alliance ITEM03/1 Board of Adjustment General/Parking Variance Application DevelopmentATX.com | Phone: 311 (or 512-974-2000 outside Austin) For submittal and fee information, see austintexas.gov/digitaldevelopment WARNING: Filing of this appeal stops all affected construction activity. This application is a fillable PDF that can be completed electronically. To ensure your information is saved, click here to Save the form to your computer, then open your copy and continue. The Tab key may be used to navigate to each field; Shift + Tab moves to the previous field. The Enter key activates links, emails, and buttons. Use the Up & Down Arrow keys to scroll through drop-down lists and check boxes, and hit Enter to make a selection. The application must be complete and accurate prior to submittal. If more space is required, please complete Section 6 as needed. All information is required (if applicable). For Office Use Only Case # __________________ ROW # ___________________ Tax # ____________________ C15-2026-0043 0233130607 13780231 Section 1: Applicant Statement Street Address: __________________________________________________________________ Subdivision Legal Description: ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Lot(s): _________________________________ Block(s): _____________________________ Outlot: _________________________________ Division: _____________________________ Zoning District: ___________________________________________________________________ Council District: 4 SF-3-NP (Highland NP) I/We ________________________________________________ on behalf of myself/ourselves as authorized agent for ________________________________________________ affirm that on Month , Day , Year , hereby apply for a hearing before the Board of Adjustment for consideration to (select appropriate option below): Erect Attach Complete Remodel Maintain Other: ____________ Type of Structure: ______________________________________________________________ City of Austin | Board of Adjustment General/Parking Variance Application 2/9/22 | Page 4 of 8 ITEM03/2 Portion of the City of Austin Land Development Code applicant is seeking a variance from: ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ …
Fence Variance Request C15-2026-0043 7606 Creston Ln ITEM03/1-PRESENTATION Summary of Incidents and Grievances Over 7 Years ● Littering ○ Baby diapers, Trash bags, Doormats, Balls ■ We’ve caught a child having no issues tossing these over from the patio and when the parents were confronted, they could not care less ○ I’ve made calls to 311 but they’re unable to assist unless I film the act of littering occurring, but even then they explained enforcement would be difficult ● Harassment ○ Neighbors feel entitled to harass me while I’m reasonably enjoying my backyard ■ I was having a backyard fire in a smokeless fire pit and one of my neighbors aggressively yelled at us to stop our fire because she was not willing to close her windows and could not tolerate the smell of it ● Privacy and Functionality ○ ○ ○ ○ Neighbors will just stare at me and my housemates or guests while we’re in our living room and bedrooms Blocking off the windows would remove the main source of light in main living area of the house and bedrooms I believe specifically the condos behind my property have some elevated decks that go right up to the property line ■ I’ve seen photos of other units at that complex where it’s not elevated The fence is at guardrail height for neighbors while being 1.5-2 ft taller than my 6 ft fence ■ Essentially, they can lean their arms on them (I don’t believe all my neighbors are 7 feet tall). ITEM03/2-PRESENTATION View from ~10 ft from fence. A person standing at their window can easily see me even when I’m close to the fence. View from my living room. The top half of their living room TV is visible. Neighbors standing in their living rooms can easily see into my entire living room and multiple bedrooms. Trash discovered within a single week. Not as bad as regular used baby diapers and food waste. Still not great. ITEM03/3-PRESENTATION ITEM03/4-PRESENTATION
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2026-0044 BOA DATE: Monday, November 9th, 2026 ADDRESS: 2106 E 8th St OWNER: Avery Construction, LLC COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 AGENT: Billy Blackburn ZONING: SF-3-NP (Central East Austin) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 15 BLK 22 GRANDVIEW PLACE VARIANCE REQUEST: LDC, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) (D) & Section 25-2-943 (Substandard Lot) from lot size requirements decrease the minimum lot size from 5,750 square feet (required) to 5,627 square feet (requested) SUMMARY: erect a Two-Unit Residential Use ISSUES: protected-sized trees, skewed lot shape, & overhead lines ZONING LAND USES Site North South East West SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Neighborhoods Council Blackshear-Prospect Hill Central Austin Concerned Architects Del Valle Community Coalition East Austin Conservancy El Concilio Mexican-American Neighborhoods Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association Organization of Central East Austin Neighborhoods Overton Family Committee Preservation Austin ITEM04/1 October 23, 2026 Billy Blackburn 2106 E 8th St Austin TX, 78702 Property Description: LOT 15 BLK 22 GRANDVIEW PLACE Re: C15-2026-0044 Dear Billy, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from – LDC 25-2-492 and LDC 25-2-943 at address 2106 E 8th St., Austin, Texas, 78702. https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/land_development_code?nodeId=TIT25LADE_CH 25-2ZO_SUBCHAPTER_CUSDERE_ART1GEPR_S25-2-472BOADVAAU Austin Energy does not oppose the request, provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. All signage will need to stay out of Austin Energy easements and 5’ from existing underground electric lines. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Ashleigh Woolf, Project Assistant Austin Energy Infrastructure Support Services 4815 Mueller Blvd Austin, TX 78723 512-972-8400 ITEM04/2 ITEM04/3 ITEM04/4 ITEM04/5 ITEM04/6 ITEM04/7 ITEM04/8 ITEM04/9 ITEM04/10 Board of Adjustment – Advance Packet Case: C15-2026-0044 Address: 2106 E. 8th Street, Austin, TX 78702 Hearing: November 9, 2026 Owner: Avery Construction LLC (Alan Avery) Agent: Billy Blackburn, To the Members of the Board of Adjustment: This packet supplements the application and survey on file for case C15-2026-0044. The request is a variance from LDC Sections 25-2-492 …
ITEM05/1 CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM06 DATE: Monday October 12, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C15-2026-0036 ____Y____Joseph El Habr (D1) ____Y____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ____Y____Corry L Archer-McClellan (D3) ____Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ____Y____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ____Y____Haseeb Abdullah (D6) ____-____VACANT (D7) ____Y____Margaret Shahrestani-Vice Chair (D8) ____Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ____Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ____Y____Jeffery L Bowen-Chair (M) ____-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) ____-____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ____-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: Richard T Suttle Jr. OWNER: Erin Booth Derbas ADDRESS: 4107 LAKEPLACE LANE VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code: (cid:131) Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations) (B)(3) (a) to permit a tram (mechanical pedestrian access). And (cid:131) Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations) (E)(2) to permit 260 square feet development on a slope with a gradient of more than 35%, in order to maintain a tram in a “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. For the above address the Subdivision Plat was recorded on March 25, 1915. Note: Land Development Code, Section 25-2-551 Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations {A} In this section: (1) SHORELINE means the 492.8 topographic contour line along the shores of Lake Austin. (2) SHORELINE SETBACK means a line parallel to the shoreline and at a distance from the shoreline that is prescribed in this section. (3) SHORELINE SETBACK AREA means an area between the shoreline and the shoreline setback. ITEM05/2 (B) This subsection specifies shoreline setbacks in a Lake Austin (LA) district. (1) The shoreline setback is: (a) 75 feet; or (b) 25 feet, if: (i) the lot is located in a subdivision plat recorded before April 22, 1982, or is a legal tract exempt from the requirement to plat; and (ii) the distance between the shoreline and the front lot line, or the property line of a l egal tract, is 200 feet or less. (E) This subsection specifies additional development standards based on a slope gradient in a Lake Austin (LA) district. (1) On a slope with a gradient of more than 15 percent; (a) vegetation must be restored with native vegetation, as prescribed by the Enviromental Criteria Manual, if it is disturbed or removed as a result of construction; and (b) construction uphill or downhill from the slope must comply with the Enviromental Criteria Manual. (2) on a slope with a gradient of more than 35 percent, development is prohibited except for the construction of a fence, driveway, road …
C15-2026-0036 4107 Lakeplace Lane ITEM05/1-PRESENTATION ITEM05/2-PRESENTATION Existing tram was constructed in approximately 2001 by a previous owner. ITEM05/3-PRESENTATION ITEM05/4-PRESENTATION ITEM05/5-PRESENTATION ITEM05/6-PRESENTATION Variances Requested: 1. Variance from Section 25-2-551(B)(3)(a) (Lake Austin District Regulations) to permit mechanical pedestrian ("LA") zoning district. access in a Lake Austin 2. Variance from Section 25-2-551(E)(2) (Lake Austin District Regulations) to permit development on a slope with a gradient of more than 35 percent. ITEM05/7-PRESENTATION Variances Findings: Reasonable Use: The zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: The shoreline setback area restrictions and additional development standards based on slope gradient regulations are only applicable to properties zoned Lake Austin residence district ("LA") and do not apply to other zoning districts along Lake Austin. Without the variances the property owner would not be able to access all areas of the property. ITEM05/8-PRESENTATION Variances Findings: Hardship: a. The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: The topography of the property between the residence and Lake Austin is steeply sloped and varies from 35% to over 1,500% with a vertical drop in excess of 60 feet which makes it extremely difficult to access the entire property without a tram. ITEM05/9-PRESENTATION Variances Findings: Hardship: b. The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: The property sits on a sheer vertical cliff verses rolling slopes that are more common along Lake Austin. There is also an abundance of large, mature tress that are heavily concentrated along the lake side. ITEM05/10-PRESENTATION Variances Findings: Area Character: The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: These variances would not alter the character of adjacent properties nor impair their use of their own property because the tram is located within a heavily vegetated area and cannot be seen by the adjacent neighbors. LA zoning allows for roads and driveways to be located within the shoreline setback area with a gradient of more than 35%, but due to the extreme topography on the subject property, these types of improvements are not feasible. A tram is required to access all of the property. ITEM05/11-PRESENTATION
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM07 DATE: Monday October 12, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C15-2026-0037 ____Y____Joseph El Habr (D1) ____Y____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ____Y____Corry L Archer-McClellan (D3) ____Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ____Y____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ____Y____Haseeb Abdullah (D6) ____-____VACANT (D7) ____Y____Margaret Shahrestani-Vice Chair (D8) ____Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ____Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ____Y____Jeffery L Bowen-Chair (M) ____-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) ____-____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ____-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: Soren Aandahl OWNER: Shesh Aandahl ADDRESS: 714 POST OAK ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-779 (Small Lot Single-Family Residential Use) (J)(4) from gross floor area requirements to increase unit size from 2,300 square feet (maximum allowed) to 2,886 square feet (requested) in order to enclose an existing balcony to create conditioned bedroom space in a “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family-Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Bouldin Creek NP). Note: Land Development Code 25-2-779 Small Lot Single-Family Residential Use (A) This section applies to a small lot single-family residential use. (B) This section supersedes the base zoning district regulations to the extent of conflict. (C) Only one dwelling unit is permitted on a lot. (D) This subsection applies to small lot single-family residential use on a property zoned single-family residence small lot (SF-4A) district or less restrictive. (J) Gross Floor Area (1) This subsection applies to a property located within the area described in Subsection 1.2.1 of Subchapter F (Residential Design and Compatibility Standards). (2) GROSS FLOOR AREA means the total enclosed area of all floors in a building with a clear height of more than six feet, measured to the outside surface of the exterior walls, except as provided in this subsection. (3) The gross floor area may not exceed the greater of 1,650 square feet or a floor-to-area ratio of 0.55. (4) The maximum unit size is 2,300 square feet. Source: Ord. 041118-57; Ord. No. 20240516-006, Pt. 5, 5-27-24; Ord. No. 20250227-039, Pt. 2, 10-1-25. ITEM06/1 BOARD’S DECISION: September 14, 2026 Vice Chair’s motion to postpone to October 12, 2026, Board member Melissa Hawthorne second on 7-0 votes; POSTPONED TO OCTOBER 12, 2026, NOT ENOUGH BOARD MEMBERS FOR VOTING PURPOSES. October 12, 2026 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jeffery Bowen, Board member Melissa Hawthorne’s motion to postpone to November 9, 2026, Vice Chair Maggie Shahrestani second on 10-0 votes; POSTPONED TO NOVEMBER 9, 2026. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property does not allow …
Variance Presentation for Case Number C15-0037/714 Post Oak St. BOA Meeting date November 9, 2026 Good evening. My name is Ms. Shesh Aandahl. Thank you to the Board of Adjustment for giving us the opportunity to present our case. ITEM06/1-PRESENTATION First: Hardships. The subject property has several significant physical, topographical, and restrictive limitations which create hardships for modifying the house. These hardships are not general to other properties in the larger residential zoning districts in Austin. The following is a list of the physical hardships that deny reasonable use of the subject property: 1. The lot is small, measuring 5,250 square feet. 2. The lot is subject to both the City of Austin 25-year and 100-year flood plain regulations. Both of these flood plain regulations have posed physical restrictions and constraints on the current location and footprint of the house. These restrictions and regulations have strictly limited the entire location of the current house, leaving no room for additional lot coverage. 3. A significant portion of the rear lot area is restricted by a City of Austin Dedicated Drainage Easement. See site plan. The drainage easement does not allow any permanent buildings, sheds, fences, garages, patios, and walls and no trees can be planted. 4. The lot has an unusual and sizable topographical area where there is a steep drop off at the rear of the subject lot that significantly restricts the use of the lot. Together, these geographic and environmental lot restrictions and regulations create hardship barriers for standard home modifications and development. I would also note that the original footprint of the house was restricted by a large, protected tree that subsequently was removed. After a large limb fell on the subject house. An arborist confirmed that the tree was rotten in various places. ITEM06/2-PRESENTATION Second: The Impacts of Changing Balcony Space to Conditioned Bedroom Space. The requested variance is simply to change already existing balcony space to enclosed space. The idea to reallocate the balcony space to critically needed bedroom space was birthed by logical reasoning. Why leave a balcony in the existing footprint of the house to permanently remain as unconditioned and underutilized space when it could become more useful space? Further, given the lot’s hardships, there is nowhere else on the subject lot to add conditioned bedroom space. Finally, there appears to be negligible to no impact created by this altered use of existing space. …
