All documents

RSS feed for this page

Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

07.0 - 507 E 10th St original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Certificate of Appropriateness July 1, 2026 HR-2026-052864 German Free School 507 East 10th Street 7 – 1 Proposal Install a metal roof on a City of Austin landmarked building. Project Specifications 1) Remove existing non-original roofing material, including damaged structural members and unsecured roof support elements. 2) Insulate the attic space and repair rafters where possible. 3) Install new roof decking and standing seam metal roof above, along with new flashing and sealed roof penetrations. Design Standards The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The existing roof of the main building is asphalt or composition shingle roof, which has been replaced as required since original construction. 3. Roofs Replacement metal roofing material can be found at the property above the porch overlooking the courtyard, which has been installed in such a way that decorative and structural material of the building’s walls have not been compromised. Due to the durability, as well as how it will match this section above the porch, a metal roof over the main structure is appropriate and meets design standard 3.1. The roof shape and pitch are not to be altered, and no additional decorative elements are proposed. However, more information is needed from the applicant regarding the exact appearance and dimensions of the metal material in order to determine it is appropriate and will not draw attention away from other architectural elements of the German Free School building. It is recommended that, if these details are not supplied at the time of the July 1 meeting, the applicant may submit them to Historic Preservation Office staff for administrative approval. 4. Exterior walls and trim Exterior trim details are not included in this scope, and it is highly recommended that as little interference is performed if not necessary to install the new roof. 7. Chimneys Existing chimneys and roof penetrations are to remain. Care must be taken when installing flashing to avoid potential for water infiltration as well as unnecessary covering of historic material. Summary The project generally meets the applicable standards. Department Comments This project has been awarded a 2026 Austin Arts, Culture, Music and Entertainment Heritage Preservation Grant. This application will time out …

Scraped at: June 27, 2026, 9:12 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

07.1 - 507 E 10th St - Photos original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

Backup

Scraped at: June 27, 2026, 9:12 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

07.2 - 507 E 10th St - Proposal original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 13 pages

507 E 10TH ST PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY German Free School Alan Lee and Geoff Wait AGC Home Remodeling management@agchomeremodeling.com www.agchomeremodeling.com 512.900.1688 December 09, 2025 COVER LETTER Dear German: AGC Home Remodeling is pleased to present our proposal for the project at 507 E 10th St. As experts in construction, we stand by our commitment to deliver projects on time and on budget. We have spent decades perfecting our craft and our advantages include: • We communicate constantly to ensure you are updated on the project progress. • We focus on high quality finish outs and go to great lengths for quality control. • We treat your home like our home. • We have completed projects of all sizes including large additions and full remodels. We are confident that our qualifications suit your needs and are excited about the opportunity to work on your project. Sincerely, Alan Lee and Geoff Wait AGC Home Remodeling GERMAN FREE SCHOOL / 507 E 10TH ST PAGE 1 AGC Home Remodeling is led by Geoff Wait and Alan Lee with decades of combined construction and project management experience. Our goal is to design with modern and tasteful standards, while creating a stress- free remodeling experience through design, quality, and communication. Geoff Wait began his construction career 18 years ago and is a homegrown Texan. In his early 20s, he was a foreman for several companies before becoming a contractor and starting his own home remodeling business. Geoff is a father of 3 boys and enjoys spending time with them when he's not working. Alan Lee brings expertise in design, technology, project management, and financial execution. He has nearly 20 years of experience in engineering and project management. He has executed several dozen fix and flip homes and is an avid real estate investor. Alan is a father of 1 young boy and enjoys hiking and computers, when he's not working. GERMAN FREE SCHOOL / 507 E 10TH ST PAGE 2 PROJECT SUMMARY The following proposal provides an outline and estimate of costs for the project located at 507 E 10th St, Austin, Texas 78701. TOTAL COST OF THE PROJECT: $116,176.92 PERMIT PROCESSING - NO AGC FEE TO FILE PERMITS (HOMEOWNER PAYS CITY FEES) • AGC will coordinate with a permit expeditor to facilitate the permitting process required for your project. • Our team will assist in providing necessary documentation, plans, and details to the …

Scraped at: June 27, 2026, 9:13 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

07.3 - 304 W 42nd St - Survey original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: June 27, 2026, 9:13 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

07.4 - 304 W 42nd St - additional notes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

Backup

Scraped at: June 27, 2026, 9:13 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

07.a - 304 W 42nd St - public comment original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: June 27, 2026, 9:14 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

08.0 - 1109 Travis Heights Blvd original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 8 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts July 1, 2026 PR-2026-053670 Travis Heights-Fairview Park Historic District 1109 Travis Heights Boulevard 8 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1920 house. Architecture This American Foursquare house with Prairie School stylistic influences was constructed around 1920. The two- story house has a low-pitched hipped roof with broad overhangs. The full-width, hipped-roof porch has a long, open span supported at the corners by large square columns. The second floor had recessed corners that been infilled and converted to interior space. Much of the house has been covered with aluminum siding. Wood windows appear throughout the building, with larger, multi-lite fixtures appearing at the front elevation and simpler 1-over-1 units more common at the sides and rear. Research Early owners of this ca. 1920 house were Elmer & Cora Young. E. E. Young was co-owner of an automotive dealership, Hart & Young, Willys-Knight and Overland Austin Agency; he later bought out his partner and continued operation under his name. He served as president of the local automobile dealers’ association. Shortly before his death in 1928, Young became secretary of the Stacy Realty Company, developer of the Travis Heights neighborhood. Later owners included Charles & Katherine Brunner, who owned the house from 1929 until 1947. Charles Brunner operated a jewelry business on East Sixth St. beginning in the late 1890s. After his death in 1933, Katherine Brunner continued to run the jewelry store for another ten years. It appears that she leased out the house following her husband’s death but moved back in around 1941. In the 1950s, the house was occupied by Robert B. and Gwendolyn Hill. Robert Hill was a foreman at the Calcasieu Lumber Company. Department Comments A demolition permit for this property was originally referred to HLC in July 2019 (HDP-2019-0379), and the case was subsequently withdrawn. Meeting minutes are available here: https://services.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=325930. A demolition application for the garage at the rear of the property was submitted in 2024 (PR-2024-055675), but this was later withdrawn upon the subsequent owner’s purchase of the property. This property also attended the January 15, 2025 Architectural Review Committee meeting to discuss a potential remodel, though no permit application was submitted for this scope of work. Documentation, including agendas and backup materials, for the three previous applications can be found in backup attached to this case. Per city code § 25-11-213 (G)(4), the …

Scraped at: June 27, 2026, 9:14 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

08.1 - 1109 Travis Heights Blvd - Photos original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 7 pages

' 0 0 . 0 0 1 E " 0 0 ' 0 0 ° 0 2 N . R O C F R I M C " 2 / 1 . . E N 5 3 T O L 1/2" IRF BLUE DISK 50.00' S 70° 00' 00" E 1/2" IRF UTILITY POLE 3.2' 1/2" IRF BLUE DISK 0.4' LOT 34 ' 7 . 0 ' 0 . 2 S 70° 00' 00" E 50.00' ' 9 . 4 ' 2 . 0 2 526 24.3' ONE STORY FRAME GARAGE FLOOR= 526.21' 5 2 5 19.4' ' 5 . 0 5.7' 3.4' 6 2 5 5 2 4 3 2 5 525 2.6' EM ' 0 0 . 0 4 1 W " 0 0 ' 0 0 ° 0 2 S LOT 31 ' . 0 0 0 4 1 E " 0 0 ' 0 0 ° 0 2 N LOT 33 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BOULEVARD LOT 32, BLOCK 28 TRAVIS HEIGHTS 525 4 2 5 25' BUILDING LINE 20" OAK 7" GUM 1/2" IRF BLUE DISK 520 523 522 525 524 S 70° 00' 00" E 50.00' (ASSUMED REF. BEARING) 521 520 519 518 517 1/2" IRS 50.00' S 70° 00' 00" E CM 1/2" IRF S.E. COR. LOT 31 W WATER METER W WATER METER TRAVIS HEIGHTS BOULEVARD (80' R.O.W.) TBM SET MAG NAIL ELEV. = 520.72' NOTES: BEARINGS ARE ASSUMED. BUILDING LINES ARE BASED ON THE RECORDED PLAT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. LEGEND: BARBWIRE FENCE CHAINLINK FENCE WROUGHT IRON FENCE WOOD FENCE VINYL FENCE ELECTRIC LINE ASPHALT = CONCRETE = GRAVEL = TILE = WOOD = GM = GAS METER EM = ELECTRIC METER IPF = IRON PIPE FOUND IRS = IRON ROD SET WITH "PREMIER" CAP IRF = IRON ROD FOUND CM = CONTROLLING MONUMENT (WOOD) RAILROAD TIE = STONE = BRICK = LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BEING LOT 32, BLOCK 28, TRAVIS HEIGHTS, AN ADDITION IN TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 3, PAGE 15, OF THE MAP AND/OR PLAT RECORDS OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON THIS DATE A SURVEY WAS MADE ON THE GROUND, UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND REFLECTS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF THE DIMENSIONS AND CALLS OF PROPERTY LINES AND LOCATION AND TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS. THERE ARE NO VISIBLE AND APPARENT EASEMENTS, CONFLICTS, INTRUSIONS OR PROTRUSIONS, EXCEPT AS …

Scraped at: June 27, 2026, 9:14 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

08.2 - 1109 Travis Heights - Previous agendas and application materials original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 14 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION July 22, 2019 - 6:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Council Chambers, Austin City Hall 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, Texas COMMISSION MEMBERS: Emily Reed, Chair Beth Valenzuela, Vice Chair Ben Heimsath Emily Hibbs Kevin Koch Mathew Jacob Kelly Little Terri Myers Alex Papavasiliou Blake Tollett Witt Featherston REVISED AGENDA a) b) c) NOTES ON HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MEETINGS The first speaker signed up for each side of a contested public hearing will be allowed up to 5 minutes to speak. Any further speakers will be allowed up to 3 minutes. The Commission does not allow for the donation of time. The applicant or their agent may have a rebuttal after the conclusion of testimony of up to 3 minutes. Speakers should not repeat the testimony previously given on any case. Cases passed by the Commission on the consent agenda will not have a formal public hearing. If a citizen would like to speak on a case proposed for passage on the consent agenda, that person should make it known to the Chair of the Commission at the time of the reading of the consent agenda. Otherwise, the case will pass on consent, and there is no later recourse. In cases involving the review of demolition or relocation permit applications, the Commission may initiate a historic zoning case to further study the evidence regarding the potential of the subject property for landmark designation. If the Commission initiates a historic zoning case, the Commission will review the case again at its next regularly scheduled meeting for a recommendation regarding historic zoning. There will be no new notification sent out by the City stating the next hearing date. d) All public comments must be received by staff by 1 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Staff cannot forward public comments to commissioners after this time. 1. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first three speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address items not posted on the agenda. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. June 24, 2019 3. BRIEFINGS, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION A. Heritage Grant Program By Melissa Alvarado 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ON APPLICATIONS FOR HISTORIC ZONING, DISCUSSION AND ACTION ON APPLICATIONS FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT 1 ZONING, AND REQUESTS TO CONSIDER THE INITIATION OF A HISTORIC ZONING CASE 1. HDP-2019-0180 – Tuke-Lyon Store – Discussion 220 …

Scraped at: June 27, 2026, 9:15 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

0.0 - Public Communications - Heritage Preservation Grant Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

FY 2027 Heritage Preservation Grant Launch on July 7, 2026 AUSTIN ARTS, CULTURE, MUSIC AND ENTERTAINMENT | JULY 1, 2026 Heritage Preservation Grant Program description: Heritage Preservation Grant aims to preserve and promote preservation projects, expand access to historic spaces and heritage resources, showcase local stories rooted in history, support the creative economy, and make Austin’s history relevant and tangible – all with a strong focus on attracting and expanding audiences and engaging tourists seeking authentic experiences while promoting tourism and the convention and hotel industries. Image by Chelse Purgahn, courtesy of Black Austin Tours (FY21 awardee) Image courtesy of Center for Women & Their Work (FY24 awardee) View of post-restoration project of Tudor Cottage at Pease Park, Image courtesy of Pease Park Conservancy (FY21 awardee) Heritage Preservation Grant Capital Improvement Projects MAX Award Amount: $250,000 Example of Awarded Project: Required: • Historic designation or eligible • Owner authorization • • • Site open and accessible to the public Site marketed to tourists Site in Austin City Council District or ETJ See program guidelines for additional requirements • Grant Term: 24 months BEFORE AFTER Exterior restoration of Southgate-Lewis House, Images courtesy of W H Passon Historical Society, Inc. (FY25 & FY26 awardee) Heritage Preservation Grant Heritage Event Projects MAX Award Amount: $50,000 or $150,000 Required: • Include historic research and highlight the history of the site • Historically significant site or site • • • • with historic designation Event is open and accessible to the public Event marketed to tourists Site in Austin City Council District or ETJ See program guidelines for additional requirements Grant Term: 12 or 24 months Example of Awarded Project: Screenshots taken from Black History Bike Ride social media flyer (FY26 awardee) Screenshots taken from Black History Bike Ride social media; Images by @luisgphoto 2027 Application Assistance • Bookings Link for 1:1 meetings with staff * • Virtual Open Office Hours * • Grant Workshops (So far!) +* • Wednesday, June 24, Noon – 1:30pm: Grant Writing Workshop (virtual and recorded) • Wednesday, June 24, 6-8:30 pm: Grant Writing Workshop in Spanish (virtual and recorded) • • • Wednesday, July 15, 11am-12:30pm: Heritage Preservation Workshop Co-Hosted by/at Preservation Tuesday, June 30, 6 – 7:30pm: ACME Funding Programs Overview (virtual) Tuesday, July 7, 2 – 3:30pm: ACME Funding Programs Overview (virtual) • Austin Tuesday, July 21, 3:00pm-4:30pm: Heritage Preservation Workshop – Capital Projects at ACME Ben …

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

02.2 - C14H-2026-0039 - 400 W 37th St - Caldwell House Site Plan original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

02.a - C14H-2026-0039 - 400 W 37th St - public comments original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Backup

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

08.3 - 1109 Travis Heights Blvd - SRCC neighborhood letter original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

SOUTH RIVER CITY CITIZENS Mary Fealkoff, President Robin Sanders, Vice President Kenneth Burnett, Co-Vice President Will Andrews, Treasurer Mary Friedman, Membership June 24, 2026 Mr. Ben Heimsath Chair, Historic Landmark Commission City of Austin RE: Preservation of 1109 Travis Heights Blvd. Dear Chair Heimsath, The Historic Preservation Committee of the South River City Citizens neighborhood association opposes the granting of a demolition permit for the historic home at 1109 Travis Heights Boulevard. We believe this home merits consideration as a historic landmark. This house is a contributing circa 1920s American Foursquare within the Travis Heights- Fairview Park Historic District and remains an important example of the neighborhood's early residential development. Its balanced proportions, prominent front porch, and traditional massing embody a residential form that helped define Austin's historic streetcar suburbs. Located on a highly visible corner lot, the house contributes significantly to the character of the surrounding streetscape and serves as an architectural anchor within the district. Unlike many historic homes that have lost their integrity through extensive alterations, this property retains much of its original character and historic fabric. The interior finishes remain in remarkably good condition, preserving craftsmanship, materials, and details that would be difficult and costly to replicate today. Photos of the interior make it clear that it was a high style bungalow for the neighborhood (see attached photos). The beamed ceiling, oak paneling, fireplace, and built-in dining sideboard are fine examples of the Craftsman ideal so important to the bungalow style. The inviting front porch encourages the visitor to walk up the steps, sit down, and be entertained. The entire building retains all of its original massing and there are no unfortunate additions. The rear of the structure has retained the sleeping porch in its South River City Citizens • PO Box 40632 • Austin • Texas • 78704 original configuration. The windows, front door, and roof line are all original to the fabric of the building. These surviving features provide an authentic connection to the home's history and enhance its architectural significance within the district. Importantly, the house is not functionally obsolete or structurally compromised. Available information indicates that the building remains fundamentally sound and highly salvageable. While rehabilitation may require investment, the structure presents a strong opportunity for restoration and thoughtful modernization by a buyer who values historic architecture. The existing building offers a solid foundation for adaptive reuse, renovation, or sensitive expansion without …

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

08.a - 1109 Travis Heights Blvd - Passanti presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

09.0 - 2009 Travis Heights Blvd original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 7 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts July 1, 2026 PR-2026-059982; GF-2026-073317 Travis Heights-Fairview Park Historic District 2009 Travis Heights Boulevard 9 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1939 house. Architecture The original portion of this house can be seen at the right two thirds of the street-facing façade, which still retains some Tudor Revival details such as the arched door and steep roof pitch. Original side lites and modest front porch with concrete stairs continue with this style. The exterior material is stucco or plaster, which may be original but has been painted. To the north of the main house is a 2012 addition of a covered porch, which was enclosed with walls covered in matching painted stucco, and appears from the street as conditioned space. Behind this is a pergola that is also enclosed by full height walls, though no roof covers it. Research Original owners of this house S.R. & Maxine Blake, who worked in sales and briefly lived at the property before it was acquired by Frank & Florence Schirripa, then Jason & Virginia Forbes, who owned the property for the next ten years. During their ownership, Jason Forbes went from a record keeper at the Texas State House Reporter to a correspondent and finally an editor of the publication. By 1957, the property was sold again to Floy & Pearl Forister. Department Comments Per city code § 25-11-213 (G)(4), the Historic Landmark Commission has 180 days to review demolition permits in National Register historic districts starting from the date the application was submitted. This period is set to time out on November 9, 2026. Property Evaluation The property contributes to the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is an intact, if altered, example of Tudor Revival architecture in the district. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, …

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

09.1 - 2009 Travis Heights Blvd - Photos original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 10 pages

Backup

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

09.a - 2009 Travis Heights Blvd - public comment original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

10.0 - 1212 Bickler Rd original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts July 1, 2026 PR-2026-069571; HR-2026-073406 Travis Heights-Fairview Park Historic District 1212 Bickler Road 10 – 1 Proposal Construct a second housing unit at a contributing property. Project Specifications Construct a detached housing unit behind the existing main house. The proposed unit is two stories and 1,055 square feet in size, and is oriented towards the front of the property. Design Standards The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed accessory building is located at the rear of the property, minimally visible from the street. This is typical of other secondary housing units in the neighborhood, both from the period of significance and more recent new construction. 2. Orientation New construction is oriented towards the street, which is typical of the district generally and the neighboring houses specifically. 3. Scale, massing, and height While most contributing properties in the area are a single story, there are several that have had a second floor addition since construction. Given the location of the second dwelling unit at the rear of the property, a two-story structure of limited footprint, as is being proposed, does not look out of place and meet the design standards. 4. Proportions Like the section above, the two-story housing unit does extend higher than many original houses in the district, but its proportions are reasonable and it does not appear out of place. 5. Design and style The design of the proposed residence does not pull strongly from any one style, nor does it combine styles to create an inappropriate appearance. Materials proposed can be found throughout the district, and ornament is kept to a minimum. 6. Roofs The front gable assembly proposed is simple and can be found throughout the district. In some cases, a front-facing gable on a two-story building can increase the overall height to a point where it negatively affects the visibility from the street. However, this is not the case here, as the roof pitch is kept low. 7. Exterior walls Exterior walls are proposed to be clad in lapped siding at the first floor with board and batten above. These materials can be found throughout the …

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

10.1 - 1212 Bickler Rd - Drawings original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 17 pages

0 5' 25' 50' 0 4' 12' 24' 0 1' 6' 12' 0 1' 6' 0 1' 4' 0 1' 3' 0 1' 2' 0 1' 1/8" = 1'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/2" = 1'-0" 3/4" = 1'-0" 1" = 1'-0" 1-1/2" = 1'-0" 3" = 1'-0" Graphic Scales: 1/16" = 1'-0" GENERAL NOTES LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR OWNER SHALL SUBMIT DRAWINGS FOR PLAN CHECK. THE OWNER SHALL PAY FOR ALL PLAN CHECK FEES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY FOR, PICK UP AND PAY FOR ALL PERMITS. REPAIRED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 26. WHERE EXISTING CONSTRUCTION IS CUT, DAMAGED, OR REMODELED, PATCH OR REPLACE WITH MATERIALS TO MATCH IN KIND, QUALITY, AND PERFORMANCE WITH ADJACENT MATERIALS. 2. DIMENSIONS TO DOORS, WINDOWS, AND OPENINGS ARE 27. DO NOT NOTCH, BORE OR CUT STRUCTURAL MEMBERS FOR NOMINAL WIDTHS. REFER TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR ACTUAL ROUGH OPENINGS, FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF STUD. ALL DOORS NOT LOCATED BY DIMENSION ON PLAN OR DETAIL SHALL BE 3 INCHES FROM FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF NEAREST DOOR BUCK OR CENTERED ON ROOM. 3. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES SECTION OF THIS DOCUMENT. 4. ALL WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED SKILLFULLY AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED TRADE STANDARDS. EXCEPT WHERE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS INCLUDE MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS, APPLICABLE INDUSTRY STANDARDS INCLUDING MANUFACTURER STANDARDS AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTION HAVE THE SAME FORCE AND EFFECT AS IF BOUND OR COPIED INTO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. SUCH STANDARDS ARE PART OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE. WHERE COMPLIANCE WITH A STANDARD IS REQUIRED, COMPLY WITH THE STANDARD IN EFFECT AS OF THE DATE OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 5. THE DRAWINGS SHOW ONLY REPRESENTATIVE TYPICAL DETAILS TO ASSIST THE CONTRACTOR AND DO NOT ILLUSTRATE EVERY CONDITION. 6. THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLEMENTARY AND WHAT IS REQUIRED BY ANYONE SHALL BE AS BINDING AS IF REQUIRED BY ALL. THE INTENTION OF THE DOCUMENTS IS TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND OTHER ITEMS AS NECESSARY FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION AND COMPLETION OF THE WORK. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO ASSURE EFFICIENT AND ORDERLY INSTALLATION OF EACH PART OF THE WORK, COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS THAT ARE DEPENDENT UPON EACH OTHER FOR PROPER INSTALLATION, CONNECTION, AND OPERATION. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER FOR OWNER PROVIDED MATERIALS. THE OWNER SHALL DETERMINE LEAD TIME FOR ALL PRODUCTS AND DELIVER PRODUCTS WHEN …

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

10.a - 1212 Bickler Rd - public comment original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Backup

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:21 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

11.0 - 1808 E Cesar Chavez St original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 11 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Demolition and Relocation Permits July 1, 2026 PR-2026-040403 1808 East Cesar Chavez Street 11 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1930 structure. Architecture The existing structure is a two story commercial structure with two storefront entries side-by-side on the main elevation. There is a small, metal clad awning above the ground floor entryways. Above, two sets of paired, wood- frame windows are present at the second floor, with a moderately pitched hipped roof with exposed rafter tails above. The roof material is metal standing seam, and all exterior walls are clad in thin teardrop siding. While several of the windows are currently boarded over or otherwise inaccessible, images from the past decade would indicate that the existing material is largely intact, if in need of repair. Research This property has a long history of commercial tenants who served the East Austin community. For several decades after construction, it was home to a beauty parlor, a barber shop, and a shoe repair shop. By the 1950s, one or more of these tenants had vacated the building, but there was always at least one occupied storefront at the property. Newspaper records feature advertisements for Smith’s Barber Shop, Guarantee Wave Shop, and Carlson’s Shoe Repair Shop. The latter of these was owned by Reverend E. A. Carlson, formerly a Swedish Baptist minister, for 31 years until his death in 1964. Department Comments Two permits were issued for the property in 1999, though there are no digitized records of the application material. However, summary descriptions are available in city records. One permit described work to remodel the building’s interior & exterior to create a duplex. The second permit from the same year is summarized as, “Add 1st floor stair tower, porch, and 2nd floor extension.” There are no records of this property being surveyed in the 1980 East Austin historic resource survey or the 1984 citywide comprehensive resource survey. At time of writing, no photos of the property can be found prior to the 1999 permits. This application will time out on August 17, 2026. Property Evaluation The 2016 East Austin historic resource survey lists the property as eligible as a City of Austin landmark, as well as contributing to a potential local or National Register historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. 3) …

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:21 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

11.1 - 1808 E Cesar Chavez St - Photos original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

A.L.T.A./N.S.P.S. LAND TITLE SURVEY 2 1 1 2 29" Pecan Tree 20.5" American Elm Tree Buildings & Covered Area to be Demolished LOC: Demolition Erosion Controls: Silt fence or mulch sock, as needed Boundary Boys, LLC

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:21 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

12.0 - 2103 Enfield Dr original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Demolition and Relocation Permits July 1, 2026 PR-2026-062237; GF-2026-073365 2103 Enfield Road 12 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1953 house. Architecture The property is a two-story residential duplex located on Enfield Road, which was experiencing major development in the 1950s along the east-west road corridor. Unlike other duplex properties, where the house may have been subdivided, this structure appears to have been purpose built as a top-bottom duplex, with two front doors at the entry and similar floorplans that each extend the entire floorplate save for vertical circulation. Each unit has a large picture window to the right of the main entry and a paired window to the left, most likely serving a bedroom. The walls are clad in tan brick with minimal ornament, and the hipped roof is set at a moderate pitch above, with a matching shape and slope covering the entryway. All windows appear to have been replaced around 2011, but the remainder of the building’s architecture is intact. Research Mentioned above, the location of this property is on a major east-west road corridor that was undergoing significant development at time of construction. The lot was located near the north-south rail corridor that would later see the construction of MoPac Expressway. The first owner of the property was Bernice Owen, who was a widow of Joseph Owen and served in several religious and community groups, notably the St. Jude’s Ladies Auxiliary. She is listed as living in one of the two units for several years, renting out the other to various renters, including Bess Belford, another widow, and Francis Maloney, who worked as an assistant district attorney. By the 1970s, the property was listed as the final address for Charles Kouri, the brother of Bernice Owen. Department Comments This application will time out on September 14, 2026. Property Evaluation The 2011 MoPac Reconnaissance Historic Resource Survey lists the property as contributing to a potential Westfield historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate to high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of 1950s duplex residential architecture. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant …

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:21 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

12.1 - 2103 Enfield Dr - Photos original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

Backup

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:22 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

13.0 - 1004 W 43rd St original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 7 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Demolition and Relocation Permits July 1, 2026 PR-2026-062639; GF-2026-073384 1004 W. 43rd Street 13 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1938 house. Architecture One-story bungalow with partial-width gabled front porch, 1:1 wood windows, horizontal wood siding, and an asymmetrical plan. Research The house at 1004 W. 43rd Street, also addressed as 1104 W. 43rd Street during the historic period, was constructed by Jerry Schiller in 1938. Schiller was a carpenter for the University of Texas for several decades and it is likely that his handiwork also appears on his family dwelling; the house’s unusual fenestration pattern and somewhat anachronistic Craftsman influences suggest either a non-developer builder or seamless changes over time completed by a skilled craftsperson. The Schiller family moved to 1205 W. 43rd Street toward the end of the historic period. Department Comments The demolition application for 1004 W. 43rd Street first appears on the July 1, 2026 agenda of the Historic Landmark Commission. The 75-day timeline for action will elapse on September 14, 2026. Property Evaluation The 2016 Bouldin survey lists the property as contributing to a potential historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a Craftsman bungalow. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. Staff Recommendation Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, relocation, or deconstruction and salvage over demolition, but approve the demolition permit application upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. Location Map 13 – 2 Property Information Photos 13 – 3 13 – 4 Occupancy History City Directory Research, June 2026 1959 1957 Jerry E. and Dorothy Schiller, owners Carpenter at the University of Texas …

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:22 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

15.0 - Annual Internal Review and Report 2025 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Annual Internal Review This report covers the time period of 7/1/2025 to 6/30/2026 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ____________________________________ (Official Name of Board or Commission) The Board/Commission mission statement (per the City Code) is: The mission of the Historic Preservation Commission is to encourage and support historic preservation in Austin. The HLC was created to prepare and periodically revise an inventory of the structures and areas that may be eligible for designation as historic landmarks. The Commission also prepares, reviews and proposes amendments to the Historic Landmark Preservation Plan. The Commission reviews requests to establish or remove a historic designation, and makes recommendations on the requests to the Land Use Commission, as determined in accordance with Section 25-1-46 (Land Use Commission). Section 2-1-147 of the City Code. The duties of the Historic Landmark Commission are to: • Promote historic preservation activities in Austin • Review applications for historic zoning cases • Review certificates of appropriateness and tax exemption applications for city landmarks • Review sign and building permits in historic districts Annual Internal Review and Report Questions 1.Name of Board or Commission: Historic Landmark Commission 2. Has the board or commission's actions throughout the year complied with City Council directives and bylaws? This should address all elements of the board's mission statement as provided in the relevant sections of the City Code. (Yes) If No, please explain 3. How many recommendations did your board or commission approve? The commission has approved 16 recommendations. 4. Please list the recommendation numbers. The following are the recommendations approved and their case numbers: National Register Applications Barton Springs Bridge Project Approved Budget recommendation for FY26-27 National Register Applications Nomination to Rally Austin Board of Directors 20260506-019 20260506-020 20260304-009 20250903-010 20250903-012 1906 Maple Ave. - Thompson House 810 W. 10th St. - Mayer-Howse House 2207 E. 22nd St. - Elliott House 907 E. 13th St. - Goins-Versea-Nitschke House 1300-1308 Springdale Rd. - Bethany Cemetery 112 W. 10th St. - Simmons-Glaser House 2401 Givens Ave. - Calhoun House 1712 Rio Grande St. - Reed House 1701 San Gabriel St. - Stedman-Graves House 200 N. IH 35 Svrd SB. - Palm Park Shelter House 201 & 217 Red River St. - Castleman-Bull/Trask House C14H-2026-0018 C14H-1987-0016 C14H-2025-0122 C14H-2026-0013 C14H-2025-0117 C14H-2025-0105 C14H-2025-0095 C14H-2025-0086 C14H-2025-0022 C14H-2025-0077 C14H-2025-0066 5. All of these recommendations are closely aligned to the organization's core mission and why? All of these recommendations are closely aligned to the commission’s …

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:22 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 1, 2026

MEMORANDUM - Castleman-Bull Rezoning Update original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

MEMORANDUM TO: Historic Landmark Commission FROM: Katy Zamesnik, Interim Director, Austin Convention Center DATE : July 1, 2026 SUBJECT: Update on Rezoning Resolution Item for Castleman-Bull House The purpose of this memorandum is to provide an update on the historic zoning of the Castleman-Bull House. On June 5, 2025, City Council approved Ordinance No. 20250605-022 initiating the rezoning of city properties located at 201, 201 ½, 205, and 217 Red River Street and 603 East 3rd Street, which are adjacent to the Austin Convention Center located at 500 East Cesar Chavez Street. The purpose of the resolution was to facilitate development activities related to the Convention Center redevelopment (the “Project”) and expansion project. Tracts 3 and 4 of the subject property were subsequently rezoned through Ordinance No. 20251023-072, to allow relocation and reorientation of the Castleman-Bull House at 201 Red River Street and to apply historic zoning to the historic building. At that time, the building was to be reoriented to accommodate the Downtown District Chilling Plant #4.1 (“DCP4.1”), which was originally planned for this site. An upcoming Council Item on August 27, 2026, will initiate a modification of the previous resolution. As the Project has progressed, it has been determined that the DCP4.1 will no longer be constructed on the block east of the Convention Center. Thus, this Project will not require relocation and reorientation of the Castleman-Bull House. The previous rezoning of Tracts 3 and 4 will be modified to keep the current location of the Castleman-Bull House and apply historic zoning to its footprint. The Trask House is still proposed to be relocated back to its original site on the plaza of the new convention center. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. I can be reached by email at katy.zamesnik@austintexas.gov, or by phone at 512-404-4208. cc: Riley Triggs, Lead Project Manager, Capital Delivery Services Kim McKnight, Division Manager, Historic Preservation Office, Austin Planning Kalan Contreras, Principal Planner, Historic Preservation Office, Austin Planning Ginny Chilton, Project Director, LMN/Page

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 2:23 a.m.
Environmental CommissionJuly 1, 2026

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, JULY 1, 2026, AT 6:00 P.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, ROOM 1405 6310 WILHELMINA DELCO DRIVE AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Environmental Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Nicole Corona, 737-291-3084, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Mariana Krueger, Chair Jennifer Bristol, Vice Chair Haris Qureshi, Secretary Richard Brimer Isabella Changsut Annie Fierro AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Justin Fleury Martin Luecke Allison Morrison David Sullivan The first ten speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on June 17, 2026. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing regarding Austin Watershed Protection's Reservoir Update for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026. Presentation by Brent Bellinger, Conservation Program Supervisor, Austin Watershed Protection. 3. Staff briefing regarding Austin Resource Recovery's On-Demand Brush, Bulk, and Household Hazardous Waste Program. Presentation by Ron Romero, Assistant Director, Samuel Gilbert, Litter Abatement Division Manager, and Andy Dawson, Diversion Facilities Assistant Division Manager, Austin Resource Recovery. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 4. 5. Discussion and action to recommend approval of the Austin Water Capital Improvement Projects located in the Drinking Water Protection Zone for inclusion in the five-year Capital spending plan as required by Financial Policy #8. Approve a recommendation to Council from the Dog’s Head Working Group regarding the environmental aspects and future potential City Council action, including a vote on the creation of a Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ), for the Dog’s Head area, located between the Colorado River, US Highway 183, and State Highway 130. Sponsored by Chair Krueger and Vice Chair Bristol. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS City Code requires at least two board members sponsor an item to be included on an agenda. This section of the agenda provides members an opportunity to request items for future agendas. Staff should assume that if there is no objection from other members expressed …

Scraped at: June 27, 2026, 2:18 p.m.
Environmental CommissionJuly 1, 2026

20260701-001, Draft Meeting Minutes June 17, 2026 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, JUNE 17, 2026 The Environmental Commission convened in a regular meeting on Wednesday, June 17, 2026, at the Permitting and Development Center, Room 1405, located at 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive in Austin, Texas. Chair Krueger called the Environmental Commission Meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Mariana Krueger, Chair Jennifer Bristol, Vice Chair Annie Fierro Martin Luecke David Sullivan Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Richard Brimer Isabella Changsut PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on June 3, 2026. The minutes from the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on June 3, 2026, were approved on Commissioner Sullivan’s motion, Vice Chair Bristol’s second, on a 7-0 vote. Secretary Qureshi and Commissioners Fleury and Morrison were absent. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing regarding the Spill Response Program. Presentation by Ana Gonzalez, Environmental Monitoring and Compliance Division Manager, and Biz Yarbrough, Environmental Compliance Specialist Senior, Austin Watershed Protection. The presentation was made by Biz Yarbrough, Environmental Compliance Specialist Senior, Austin Watershed Protection. DISCUSSION ITEMS 1 3. Discussion of the environmental and drainage requirements in the Development Agreement for Dog's Head, located between the Colorado River, US Highway 183, and State Highway 130. Presentation by Andy Pastor, Endeavor Real Estate Group, and Richard Suttle, Armbrust and Brown PLLC. Sponsored by Chair Krueger, Vice Chair Bristol, Secretary Qureshi, and Commissioner Brimer. Discussed. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 4. Approve the creation of a working group to organize and engage community stakeholders; advise the applicant, City of Austin, and City Council on the regulatory plan; and to make recommendations regarding the regulating plan of the Dog's Head development agreement. Sponsored by Vice Chair Bristol and Commissioner Brimer. The motion to approve the formation of the Dog’s Head Working Group to organize and engage community stakeholders; advise the applicant, City of Austin, and City Council on the regulatory plan; and to make recommendations regarding the regulating plan of the Dog's Head development agreement was approved on Vice Chair Bristol’s motion, Commissioner Luecke’s second, on a 7-0 vote. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS None. ADJOURNMENT Chair Krueger adjourned the meeting at 9:59 p.m. without objection. 2

Scraped at: June 27, 2026, 2:18 p.m.
Environmental CommissionJuly 1, 2026

20260701-002, Reservoir Update for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 19 pages

Reservoir Update FY 2026 Reservoir Update FY 2026 Brent Bellinger, Ph.D. Conservation Program Supervisor Austin Watershed Protection July 1, 2026 Overview  Austin Lakes Index  Aquatic vegetation  Harmful algal proliferations  Turbid water in Lake Austin this winter 2 Austin Lakes Index • Purpose – understand conditions and drivers impacting Lake Austin, Lady Bird Lake, and Lake Walter E Long • Policy Relation – inform management recommendations to protect and/or improve the health of our lakes • Goal – maintain scores as high as possible reflecting “healthy” ecological integrity 3 Austin Lakes Index – Scores Scores fair-to-good • Water and sediment chemistry, biological communities, habitat • Drivers: land-use, pollutant inputs, climate, flow Good Fair Marginal Abundance of vegetation • Positive for water quality, aquatic invertebrates • Non-native species or excess cover negatively impacts scores 4 Aquatic Vegetation – Lake Austin Hydrilla continued to be abundant through winter  Upper reservoir: some die-back  Lower reservoir: similar extent TPWD recently completed survey Feb 27, 2026 5 Aquatic Vegetation – History hydrilla total vegetation grass carp population 25 years of data indicate that: • Climate (drought/flood) is a driver of hydrilla growth • Grass carp system-wide control measure ) s e r c a ( n o i t a t e g e V c i t a u q A 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Year 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 G r a s s C a r p ( # ) 6 Aquatic Vegetation – Grass Carp Implementing in a measured way to avoid catastrophic crash in lake ecology FY2026 Grass carp stocking  Nov 2025 – added 1,955  May 2026 – added 2,790 May ‘26 Carp Stocking Current population as of July 1 is estimated to be: 4,467  8 fish/acre (based on February 2026 veg survey) 7 Aquatic Vegetation – Lake Austin drawdown Pros  Ease of access for shoreline maintenance  temporary reduction of exposed Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla Cons  May increase hydrilla long-term  Impacts to water storage & energy  Impacts to recreation and businesses Guidance  AW, AE, LCRA collaborating on logistics 8 Aquatic Vegetation – Management Developing a long-term guidance document  Focus on …

Scraped at: June 27, 2026, 2:18 p.m.
Environmental CommissionJuly 1, 2026

20260701-003, On-Demand Brush, Bulk, and Household Hazardous Waste Program Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 14 pages

On-Demand Services: Brush, Bulk and Household Hazardous Waste Samuel Gilbert, Division Manager- Litter Abatement Andy Dawson, Assistant Division Manager- HHW-RRDOC Austin Resource Recovery July 1, 2026 Brush, Bulk and HHW then and now: In January 2025 Austin Resource Recovery began city wide collection of Brush, Bulk and Household Hazardous Waste material through an appointment-based service model. This allows for:  Three (3) collections per year per service  Customers scheduling at their convenience  Collections completed off service day to increase the curb access Previous Model  Customer notifications sent by mail for upcoming brush and bulk collections  Brush and Bulk collection twice annually. Collections generally six months apart  Limited diversion of revenue generating bulk recyclables  Appointments for HHW drop-off only with no curbside collections. 2 Brush and Bulk On-Demand Appointments CY25 Brush and Bulk On Demand Monthly Appointments • Brush - 14,146 calendar year appointments • Bulk - 52,442 calendar year appointments 3 CY25 Brush and Bulk On-Demand Tonnage Appointment based servicing has caused a decrease in the tonnage collected for both Brush and Bulk landfilled. The tons of recyclables diverted has increased. 4 Operational Costs, Revenue, Diversion, Mileage Category Metric Brush CY25 Operational Costs, Revenue, and Diversion CY24 $121,668 $107,844 $92,671 $134,405 $283,105 $205,656 $152,854 $183,254 $258,199 $172,080 $21,485 334 Overtime Fuel Costs Overtime Fuel Costs Disposal Costs Revenue Tons Diverted $140 198 Difference ($13,824) ($41,734) ($77,449) $30,400 ($86,119) $21,345 136 Bulk Bulk Fuel savings in Brush With on-demand, ARR has experienced changes by program: • Overtime savings in Brush and Bulk • • Reduced landfill cost in Bulk Increased fuel costs in Bulk • Increased revenue from diversion efforts • Brush collection experienced a significant decrease in miles driven, bulk collection showed an increase in total miles. Of the increase in bulk mileage, 22% is related to diversion related materials. Calendar Year Mileage Comparison Category Brush Bulk CY24 CY25 Difference 140,844 160,176 97,110 192,033 (43,734) 31,857 5 HHW On-Demand Program Performance The launch of the On-Demand program has helped to increase participation in HHW disposal services with almost 2,000 more residents requesting service in calendar year 2025 over the previous 12 months. HHW Program Participation CY2024 vs CY2025 40,000 36,000 32,000 28,000 24,000 34,050 35,921 CY 2024 CY 2025 Total Year Participation HHW Calendar Year 2025 Data HHW Drop-off HHW On-Demand Participation Total Disposal Cost Total Collected (lbs) Disposal Cost/lb Personnel Cost Waste/HH (lbs) …

Scraped at: June 27, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
Environmental CommissionJuly 1, 2026

20260701-004, Capital Improvement Projects in the Drinking Water Protection Zone Memo original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

To: From: Date: Subject: MEMORANDUM Environmental Commission, Resource Management Commission, and Water and Wastewater Commission Shay Ralls Roalson, P.E., Austin Water Director May 28, 2026 Board and Commission Review of Capital Improvement Projects in the Drinking Water Protection Zone The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a report of Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) located within the City’s Drinking Water Protection Zone (DWPZ), in accordance with Austin Water’s Financial Policy No. 8. The DWPZ designation and the associated financial policy, adopted by City Council, are included in the Appendix and outline the requirements for identifying, reviewing, and obtaining Board and Commission input on capital projects within western Austin and Travis County. The DWPZ is subject to development regulations to protect water quality and contains critical water resources that support both the environment and the community. Together, these policies establish the process through which capital projects in the DWPZ are submitted as part of the annual budget process as part of Austin Water’s comprehensive five-year capital improvement plan. The Fiscal Year 27–31 CIP includes projects located throughout the Austin metropolitan area, including the DWPZ. These projects are essential improvements to maintain and enhance Austin Water’s services and operational standards. Austin Water has a robust and comprehensive asset management and capital planning program, in which condition, capacity, and level of service are reviewed annually to validate these investments in resiliency, preparedness, and proactive infrastructure management. The CIP projects in the DWPZ are shown in the attached CIP Subproject Supplemental Information Summary and Map. Should you have any questions, please contact Randi Jenkins, Deputy Director of Technical Services of Austin Water at randi.jenkins@austintexas.gov or 512-972-0133. Page 1 of 6 Date: Subject: May 28, 2026 Board and Commission Review of Capital Improvement Projects in the Drinking Water Protection Zone Index of Attachments Attachment 1: Table outlining the CIP subprojects located within the Drinking Water Protection Zone, including their descriptions, current status, and associated five-year and total spending plans. Attachment 2: DWPZ Map displaying the geographic location of all active CIP subprojects within the Drinking Water Protection Zone. Attachment 3: Appendix provides supporting definitions. Page 2 of 6 Date: Subject: May 28, 2026 Board and Commission Review of Capital Improvement Projects in the Drinking Water Protection Zone ATTACHMENT 1: PROJECT SUMMARY Page 3 of 6 Subproject IDSubproject NameSubproject DescriptionProject StatusFY27-31 Spending PlanTotal Spending Plan2015.118Davis WTP Medium Service Pump Station ExpansionThis project is for the expansion …

Scraped at: June 27, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
Environmental CommissionJuly 1, 2026

20260701-005, Dog's Head Development Draft Recommendation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Environmental Commission Recommendation 20260701-005: Dog’s Head Development WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission was informed about the Dog’s Head project by Endeavor Real Estate Group, city staff, and more than 35 concerned citizens at the June 17, 2026, meeting; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission formed a working group to advise and make recommendations regarding the environmental aspects of the project; and WHEREAS, the working group, comprised of commissioners and citizens, met on June 22, 24, and 29; and WHEREAS, the working group was informed that the City of Austin has not conducted an Environmental Assessment Study or an Environmental Resource Inventory, or Tree Survey, or worked with the state to assess the existing pollutants on the property; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin is recommending expanding access to the Dog’s Head by at least 3 bridges across the Colorado River as part of the infrastructure package, yet has not conducted an Environmental Assessment or Impact Study; and WHEREAS, the working group disagrees with the statements made by the developer that the ENTIRE property is “bombed out” or totally degraded to the point that it 100% has to be restored; however, we do agree major restoration is necessary and should be guided by the City’s policies and practices; and WHEREAS, Travis County and the State Historical Commission, via the Hicks Report, recognized portions of this property to have existing historic structures from earlier farms and ranching efforts in the 1850s, and adjacent properties that are still in ranching production; and WHEREAS, the working group recognizes this project falls in the blackland prairie ecoregion, and that the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department states that less than 1% of this region is left in Texas; and WHEREAS, the working group acknowledges the project is habitat for hundreds of species of migratory and resident birds that bring in birders from around the world every year who contribute millions to the regional economy; and . WHEREAS, the working group understands the project encompasses the alluvial aquifers that store and filter water along the river to provide drinking water for Austin’s Colony, Manor, Travis County, downstream counties, livestock, and wildlife; and WHEREAS, on November 6, 2024, the Environmental Commission passed a Recommendation concerning the Colorado River Code Amendment, and subsequently the City Council passed Ordinance 20250327-084, amending section 27-7-32 of the Land Development Code as the “Colorado River Protections Ordinance”; and, WHEREAS, approximately 20% …

Scraped at: July 5, 2026, 7:23 a.m.
Library CommissionJune 29, 2026

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

REGULAR MEETING OF THE LIBRARY COMMISSION MONDAY, JUNE 29, 2026, AT 6 P.M. HAMPTON AT OAK HILL LIBRARY 5125 CONVICT HILL ROAD AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Commission may be participating via video conference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Laura Polio, 512-974-9624, laura.polio@austintexas.gov. Edward Selig, Vice Chair Dr. Suchitra Gururaj Elizabeth Hansen Andrea Herrera Moreno Lorrie Ann Mitchel CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Lynda Infante Huerta, Chair Pamela Carlile Sara Gore Melissah Hasdorff Sheila Mehta Holly Sabiston AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first five speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Library Commission regular meeting on May 18, 2026. DISCUSSION 2. Discussion regarding the agenda for the July 25, 2026, Library Commission Retreat. WORKING GROUP RECOMMENDATION 3. Report of the recommendation by the Book Safe Harbor Working Group. DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL 4. Approval of an updated recommendation to the Austin City Council reaffirming and expanding the previously adopted Freedom to Read Resolution (Resolution Number 20220901-086) and further designating the City of Austin as a Book Safe Harbor. STAFF BRIEFINGS 5. Staff briefing on June 2026 Austin Public Library Public Programming Highlights and Facilities Updates, by Hannah Terrell, Director of Libraries. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Laura Polio at Austin Public Library Department, at 512-974-9624 or laura.polio@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Library Commission, please contact Laura Polio at 512-974-9624 or laura.polio@austintexas.gov.

Scraped at: June 25, 2026, 6:13 a.m.
Library CommissionJune 29, 2026

Recommendation 20260623-004: Book Safe Harbor original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL LIBRARY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Recommendation Number: 20260623-04: Book Safe Harbor Date of Approval: June 29, 2026 Recommendation: Designate the City of Austin as a Book Safe Harbor. Description of Recommendation to Council: Requesting that the Austin City Council adopt a resolution that designates the City of Austin as a Book Safe Harbor rea(cid:431)irming and expanding the previously adopted Freedom to Read Resolution (Resolution Number 20220901-086). Rationale: Background Across the country and in the State of Texas, libraries are confronting aggressive challenges to materials in their collections. School libraries have been the primary target of these incidents.1 While public libraries are a lesser target, these challenges are occurring there, too.2 3 Since 2021, the State of Texas has passed several bills to restrict public access to books.4 5 Challenges and complaints often cite explicit content, issues around race, gender identity and sexuality, and sex education.6 We continue to believe it is a core mission of the public library to provide quality information from diverse viewpoints, especially on these kinds of topics. We also continue to believe that book bans and these undue challenges are attacks on open access and free inquiry, which are essential to our democracy. 7 On April 18, 2022, the City of Austin Library Commission sent a recommendation to City Council to support and protect the "Freedom to Read" as a result of the numerous challenges to the access of literature and library materials 8, resulting in Resolution 20220901-086.9 With sustained e(cid:431)orts at local, state, and national levels to ban access to literature and educational material, the nationwide Book Safe Harbor movement (also known as the Book Sanctuary movement) has emerged to protect access to information and literature. A book safe harbor provides unwavering support and protection for the freedom to read.10 Becoming a book safe harbor means a city is dedicated to protecting books and resources (physical or digital) that are endangered, challenged, or banned. This movement has championed the right to read all books, without censorship or limitation to access. Successful designations in the State of Texas include the Harris County Library System. 11 12 The "Freedom to Read" is a constitutional right13 that should continue to be protected and reinforced by the City's status as a Book Safe Harbor should undue challenges arise at the Austin Public Library. This designation aligns with the public, as 71% of Americans oppose book bans.14 All patrons …

Scraped at: July 2, 2026, 8:16 p.m.
Library CommissionJune 29, 2026

Backup original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL LIBRARY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Recommendation Number: 20260623-04: Book Safe Harbor Date of Approval: June 29, 2026 Recommendation: Designate the City of Austin as a Book Safe Harbor. Description of Recommendation to Council: Requesting that the Austin City Council adopt a resolution that designates the City of Austin as a Book Safe Harbor rea(cid:431)irming and expanding the previously adopted Freedom to Read Resolution (Resolution Number 20220901-086). Rationale: Background Across the country and in the State of Texas, libraries are confronting aggressive challenges to materials in their collections. School libraries have been the primary target of these incidents.1 While public libraries are a lesser target, these challenges are occurring there, too.2 3 Since 2021, the State of Texas has passed several bills to restrict public access to books.4 5 Challenges and complaints often cite explicit content, issues around race, gender identity and sexuality, and sex education.6 We continue to believe it is a core mission of the public library to provide quality information from diverse viewpoints, especially on these kinds of topics. We also continue to believe that book bans and these undue challenges are attacks on open access and free inquiry, which are essential to our democracy. 7 On April 18, 2022, the City of Austin Library Commission sent a recommendation to City Council to support and protect the "Freedom to Read" as a result of the numerous challenges to the access of literature and library materials 8, resulting in Resolution 20220901-086.9 With sustained e(cid:431)orts at local, state, and national levels to ban access to literature and educational material, the nationwide Book Safe Harbor movement (also known as the Book Sanctuary movement) has emerged to protect access to information and literature. A book safe harbor provides unwavering support and protection for the freedom to read.10 Becoming a book safe harbor means a city is dedicated to protecting books and resources (physical or digital) that are endangered, challenged, or banned. This movement has championed the right to read all books, without censorship or limitation to access. Successful designations in the State of Texas include the Harris County Library System. 11 12 The "Freedom to Read" is a constitutional right13 that should continue to be protected and reinforced by the City's status as a Book Safe Harbor should undue challenges arise at the Austin Public Library. This designation aligns with the public, as 71% of Americans oppose book bans.14 All patrons …

Scraped at: July 2, 2026, 8:16 p.m.
Library CommissionJune 29, 2026

Backup original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Library Commission Meeting Minutes May 18, 2026 THE LIBRARY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MONDAY, MAY 18, 2026 The Library Commission convened in a regular meeting on Monday, May 18, 2026, at the St. John Branch Library in Austin, Texas. CALL TO ORDER Chair Infante Huerta called the Library Commission meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Lynda Infante Huerta, Chair Sara Gore Melissah Hasdorff Sheila Mehta Edward Selig, Vice-Chair Dr. Suchitra Gururaj Elizabeth Hansen Holly Sabiston Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Pamela Carlile Andrea Herrera Moreno Commissioners Absent: Lorrie Ann Mitchel PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Library Commission regular meeting on April 27, 2026. Library Commission Meeting Minutes May 18, 2026 The minutes meeting were approved, as amended, on a motion by Commissioner Gore and a second by Commissioner Hansen. The motion passed on a 10-0 vote. Commissioner Mitchel absent. The approved amendments correct the spelling of the name “Scanlon” by changing the character “i” to “l” on line 2 and line 5 of Page 2, under Agenda Item 2 in the Discussion section. WORKING GROUP UPDATE 2. Update from Working Group regarding Austin as a Book Safe Harbor. Commissioner Mehta provided the update. STAFF BRIEFING 3. Staff briefing on Austin Public Library Reconsideration Process by Christina Nelson, Branch Services Division Manager, Austin Public Library. The briefing was presented by Christina Nelson, Branch Services Division Manager. 4. Staff briefing on Summer at Austin Public Library and Kids Block Party, by Alanna Graves, Librarian III, Austin Public Library. The briefing was presented by Alanna Graves, Librarian III. 5. Staff briefing on the April APL Public Programming Highlights and Facilities Updates, by Hannah Terrell, Director of Libraries. The briefing was presented by Hannah Terrell, Director of Libraries. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Book Safe Harbor Working Group One ATS Reorganization Recycled Reads ADJOURNMENT Chair Infante Huerta adjourned the meeting at 7:43 p.m. without objection.

Scraped at: July 2, 2026, 8:16 p.m.
Library CommissionJune 29, 2026

Backup original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 12 pages

Highlights & Updates Report Hannah Terrell, Director of Libraries June 2026 Public Services Highlights AUSTIN PUBLIC LIBRARY APL Public Programming Highlights Highlights Greater Austin Book Fest (GAB Fest) Austin Public Library hosted the third annual Greater Austin Book Festival on May 16 at the Central Library, featuring over 200 local authors and drawing more than 800 attendees. The free event included panels and workshops on writing, publishing, and marketing, and authors sold their books directly to readers. Poet Laureate Zell Miller III led a workshop on performing poetry, and participating authors expressed strong appreciation and excitement for future festivals. Mayor’s Teen Town Hall 2026 As part of the Mayor’s USA250 Community Read Challenge, the Mayor’s Teen Town Hall was hosted by the Austin Public Library in partnership with the Mayor’s Office on May 22, 2026, at the Gallery. The event brought together 24 students and 7 chaperones from Akins Early College High School, Ann Richards School for Young Women Leaders, Austin High School, Crockett Early College High School, International High School, Navarro Early College High School, and Northeast Early College High School for a unique civic engagement opportunity with Mayor Kirk Watson. Student representatives from each participating campus had the opportunity to ask questions and share their perspectives on issues affecting young people and the Austin community. Mayor Watson also shared his personal journey, experiences in public service, and insights into local government, creating a meaningful dialogue that encouraged civic engagement and leadership among participants. 3 AUSTIN PUBLIC LIBRARY APL Public Programming Highlights History Harvest The John Gillum Branch Library hosted a History Harvest on May 30 as part of APL’s Centennial celebration, inviting community members to share photos and memories for inclusion in the Austin History Center archives. Attendees contributed stories, scanned photos, and wrote memories, and received a free APL 100 coffee mug. Centennial Planning Updates Centennial programming includes the rollout of the Adventure Booklet, with staff encouraged to increase in‑branch promotion after community feedback indicated limited awareness of the program. Additional summer offerings featured themed adult and teen programs such as vintage cake decorating, cheese tasting, the Library’s 100th Birthday Bash, mini piñatas, and Decoden workshops. Several History Harvests were completed in collaboration with the Austin History Center, with additional events scheduled at John Gillum, Milwood, and Old Quarry. Planning also continued for APL After Dark on July 10, a Roaring Twenties–themed evening event for adults, with …

Scraped at: July 2, 2026, 8:17 p.m.
Community Police Review CommissionJune 26, 2026

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

REGULAR MEETING OF THE COMMUNITY POLICE REVIEW COMMISSION (CPRC) FRIDAY, JUNE 26, 2026, 3:00 PM AUSTIN CITY HALL, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, ROOM 1101 301 WEST 2ND STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 Public comments will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registra(cid:415)on no later than noon the day before the mee(cid:415)ng is required for remote par(cid:415)cipa(cid:415)on by telephone. To register to speak remotely, please call or email Ryan Alvarez at 512-974-9090 or Ryan.Alvarez@aus(cid:415)ntexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Carlos Alfonso Greaves, Chair Ruben DeLaPaz Terry Flood Christopher Harris Kathryn Russell Darrick Eugene Laura Cortes Franco, Vice Chair Lee Peterman Lauren Peña Marissa Johnson Celesta Williams AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Speakers who sign up prior to the mee(cid:415)ng being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approval of the minutes of the Community Police Review Commission regular-called mee(cid:415)ng of May 15, 2026. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. 3. Staff briefing/updates regarding progress of work with the Police Technology Unit on an internal drive for the CPRC to access case files. Staff briefing regarding updates related to Aus(cid:415)n Police Oversight, including an overview and key highlights; administra(cid:415)ve and opera(cid:415)onal updates; commission support and follow-up; community engagement; polity highlights; and upcoming items and priori(cid:415)es from Director Gail McCant. DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. 5. Discussion of Working Groups A, B, and C’s experiences reviewing case files and recommenda(cid:415)ons for expedi(cid:415)ng the case review process. Discussion of the Aus(cid:415)n Police Oversight Officer-Involved Shoo(cid:415)ng (OIS) Dashboard, presented by Public Informa(cid:415)on and Marke(cid:415)ng Program Manager Sara Peralta and Policy Compliance Consultant Crystal Kimbrough. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 6. 7. 8. 9. Summary, delibera(cid:415)on, and ac(cid:415)on regarding a recommenda(cid:415)on from Commissioner Review Working Group A for Case 2025-01049. Summary, delibera(cid:415)on, and ac(cid:415)on regarding a recommenda(cid:415)on from Commissioner Review Working Group B for Case 2025-1839. Summary, delibera(cid:415)on, and ac(cid:415)on regarding a recommenda(cid:415)on from Commissioner Review Working Group C for Case 2025-2338. Approve the crea(cid:415)on of a working group for the “CPRC Year in Review” to prepare a one-(cid:415)me report summarizing the Commission’s first-year accomplishments, challenges, and lessons learned, including compila(cid:415)on of commissioner input and a dra(cid:332) report for Commission review. 10. Selec(cid:415)on of new commissioners appointed by the City …

Scraped at: June 27, 2026, 10:19 p.m.
Community Police Review CommissionJune 26, 2026

Item 1 - CPRC Minutes 05152026 - Approval Pending original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Community Police Review Commission – Meeting Minutes Friday, May 15, 2026 COMMUNITY POLICE REVIEW COMMISSION (CPRC) REGULAR CALLED MEETING MINUTES FRIDAY, MAY 15, 2026 The Community Police Review Commission convened in a regular meeting on Friday, May 15, 2026, at Austin City Hall, Boards and Commissions Room 1101, 301 West 2nd Street, in Austin, Texas. Chair Carlos Alfonso Greaves called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Carlos Greaves, Chair Laura Cortes Franco, Vice Chair Darrick Eugene Marissa Johnson Christopher Harris Lauren Peña Lee Peterman (joined online at 3:15 p.m.) Kathy Russell Commissioners Absent: Ruben De La Paz Terry Flood Celesta Williams PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approval of the minutes of the Community Police Review Commission regular-called meeting of April 17, 2026. The minutes from the April 17, 2026, meeting were approved on Commissioner Marissa Johnson’s motion, seconded by Commissioner Darrick Eugene, on a 7-1 vote, with Commissioner Lee Peterman abstaining. Commissioners Ruben De La Paz, Terry Flood, and Celesta Williams were absent. STAFF BRIEFING 2. Staff briefing regarding progress of work with the Police Technology Unit on an internal drive for the CPRC to access case files. No update was provided on this item. 1 Community Police Review Commission – Meeting Minutes Friday, May 15, 2026 3. Staff briefing regarding updates related to Austin Police Oversight, including an overview and key highlights; administrative and operational updates; commission support and follow-up; community engagement; policy highlights; and upcoming items and priorities from Director Gail McCant. Presentation was made by Gail McCant, Director, Austin Police Oversight. DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. Discussion with Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis regarding Community Police Review Commission, Austin Police Oversight, and Austin Police Department working relations. Discussed. 5. Discussion of Commissioner Review Working Groups A, B, and C experiences reviewing case files Discussed. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 6. Summary, deliberation, and recommendation from the Commissioner Review Working Groups on cases 2019-0792, 2025-2113, 2026-00114, 2026-00134, 2026-0053, and 2025-2678. The Community Police Review Commission will determine whether to endorse or not endorse each working group’s recommendation. Commissioners Lauren Peña and Lee Peterman presented the recommendations of Working Group A for Cases 2019-0792, 2025-2113, and 2026-00114. The Commission voted to endorse Working Group A’s recommendation for Case 2019- 0792. The recommendation was approved on a 6–0 vote, with Vice Chair Laura Cortes Franco and Commissioner Kathy Russell abstaining. Commissioners Ruben De La Paz, Terry Flood, …

Scraped at: June 27, 2026, 10:19 p.m.