All documents

RSS feed for this page

Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

06.1 - 916 Congress Ave - New Facade — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Copyright © 2026 by Mark Hart Architecture, INC. All rights reserved. The arrangements depicted herein are the sole property of Mark Hart Architecture, INC. and may not be reproduced in any form without written permission. Project Name 916 CONGRESS AVE. Project Address 916 CONGRESS AVE AUSTIN TX 78701 Client Name LEE ACKERLEY Sheet A1 | NEW FACADE RENDERING Date 06/09/2026 P O N M L K J I H G F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 1'-9" 12'-0" 1'-1"1'-1" EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ 4 EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING STAIRS TO ALLEY ABOVE UP RAISED WOODEN DECK 1'-7 1/2" 1 0 - 2 - A / 0 1 I 0" 10 6 COURTYARD CL 2'-1" 1 B 1 B / " 2 1 7 - ' 1 " 0 1 - ' 1 " 0 1 - ' 1 " 1 - ' 1 " " 5 6 - - ' ' 6 9 1 " 1 - ' 1 " 0 1 - ' 1 " 0 1 - ' 1 " 2 1 / 1 1 - ' 1 " 6 - ' 1 / " 2 1 9 - ' 8 " 1 1 - ' 3 2 " 0 1 - ' 4 I10 A-3-01 " 2 1 / 0 1 - ' 7 " 1 1 2 7 EQ EXISTING BUILDING 3 EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ GENERAL NOTES - FLOOR PLAN 1. THE INSIDE FACE OF DOOR JAMBS IS TO BE LOCATED 6 INCHES FROM AN INSIDE CORNER UNLESS NOTED OR SHOWN OTHERWISE. 2. DIMENSIONS ARE LOCATED ON CONSTRUCTION PLANS. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE CENTER OF PARTITIONS AT NON-PRESCIENT PARTITIONS USE GROUP / CONSTRUCTION TYPE GROUP A2 / TYPE VB CONSTRUCTION / SPRINKLED NFPA SPRINKLER NOTE THE STATE OF TEXAS LICENSED CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS TO THE TRAVIS COUNTY ESD NO. 12 FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL AFTER THE BUILDING PERMIT IS APPROVED. THESE SHOP DRAWINGS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE TRAVIS COUNTY ESD NO. 12 PRIOR TO THE CONTRACTOR BEGINNING THE WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. CONSTRUCTION PLAN - FINISH LEGEND 8 4 1 0 - 2 - A EXISTING BRICK PAVERS EXISTING GRAVEL / 1 I 9 4 D1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN KEY NOTE LEGEND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:03 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

06.2 - 916 Congress Ave - Drawings — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

6000 527.779 CHK 6 6001 527.954 CHK 609 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SITE PLAN LEGEND STAIRS PROPERTY LINE MARK HART ARCHITECTURE 2007 S. 1st Street, Suite 101 Austin, TX 78704 +1.512/910.7057 www.markhartarch.com XXX.XX' FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION SECURITY FENCE PATH TO AVAILABLE RESTROOMS SITE PLAN KEY NOTE LEGEND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 EXISTING BOLLARDS EXISTING STAIRS PER IEBC 306.7.2 EXISTING STRUCTURAL REINFORCEMENT TO EXTERIOR WALL PERMIT# 2025-001439 BP EXISTING COURTYARD LIGHTING ELECTRIC PANEL PERMIT# 2025-043567 EP EXISTING FOOD TRUCK ELECTRIC PANEL PERMIT# 2025-043567 EP EXISTING LIGHTING PERMIT# 2025-043567 EP EXISTING GRAVEL EXISTING BRICK PAVERS EXISTING HOSE BIB ANTIQUE WOOD TRIFOLD DOOR WITH TRANSOM ELEVATED WOOD DECK STEEL SECURITY FENCE FOOD TRUCK PICNIC TABLES GISTERED ARCHITE MARKW.HART C T E R TS AT SA 20562 XETE FO 08/27/2026 CLIENT: RANGER RUNNING LLC DBA SWIFT FIT EVENTS LEE ACKERLEY 2929 E 14TH ST AUSTIN, TX 78702 512.660.7746 PROJECT NUMBER: Project Number PROJECT STATUS: IFP SET Copyright © 2026 by Mark Hart Architecture, INC. All rights reserved. The arrangements depicted herein are the sole property of Mark Hart Architecture, INC. and may not be reproduced in any form without written permission. FROM WHICH A CHISLED "X" FOUND BEARS: S38°05'24"E A DISTANCE OF 0.89' 9 13 COPPER 1/2" SERVICE LINE EX. DOMESTIC WATER FOOD TRUCK ONLY IN OPERATION AND PRESENT DURING EVENTS EX. HOSE BIB EX. ELECTRICAL SERVICE X2 METERS ASPHALT DRIVEWAY CONCRETE 3/4" COPPER SERVICE LINE EDGE OF CONCRETE LOT 5 H EXISTING 5/8" WM WV EMH TBOX 14 EXISTING SERVICE SINK EXISTING SINGLE USE RESTROOM 1 EXISTING SINGLE USE RESTROOM 2 1 5 0.7' 12 2 LONGEST DISTANCE TO FURTHEST RESTROOM 166'-5" DRINKING FOUNTAIN FEMALE RESTROOM 4 11 MALE RESTROOM 920 CONGRESS 918 CONGRESS 7 6 8 EX. HOSE BIB 916 CONGRESS FACE OF WALL LOT 4 914 CONGRESS AVENUE 3 9 0.6' 7 (PARTIALLY DEMOLISHED) 2 - STORY STONE BUILDING FACE OF WALL A1 UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT - SITE PLAN 1" = 5'-0" 1" = 5'-0" 3.13 ft 6.25 ft 12.5 ft 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 N 25 ft 18 19 20 Designer ISSUE DATE: 08/27/2026 SHEET: AS-1-01 N A L P E T S I P O N M L K J I …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:04 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

06.3 - 916 Congress Ave - 2007 Approved Plans — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 8 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS C14H-82-0001-F 916 CONGRESS AVENUE C.2 - 1 MARCH 26, 2007 PROPOSAL Remove existing second-story window and replace with a new steel-framed door in the shape and profile of the existing window; construct a new steel deck and canopy across the front of the building. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed replacement door will have a pained steel frame with a profile and configuration matching the existing window. The proposed new deck and canopy will be constructed of painted steel columns with a painted steel guardrail in an X-pattern and a perforated metal scalloped-edge canopy with a cloverleaf pattern to complement the cloverleaf pattern on the quoins of the building. The ceiling of the canopy will be pressed tin with recessed lighting. The floor of the deck will be tiled. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Commission’s Standards for Review of applications for Certificates of Appropriateness include: · Do not destroy the distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure, or site and its environment. Avoid the removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features. · Recognize all buildings, structures, and sites as products of their own time. Do not construct alterations which have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance. · Treat with sensitivity distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site. · Repair, rather than replace deteriorated architectural features wherever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Base the repair or replacement of missing architectural features on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historical, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from other buildings or structures. · Contemporary designs for alterations and additions to existing properties are appropriate when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historic, architectural, or cultural material and such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material, and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment. STAFF COMMENTS The front of this building was extensively renovated in 1982, when the non-historic storefront was replaced. Historic photographs of the Larmour Block show canopies with decks across the fronts of the buildings. The canopy and deck at 916 Congress Avenue appears to have a scalloped three-bay fascia across the front, although the …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:04 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

06.4 - 916 Congress Ave - 2013 Approved Plans — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 12 pages

Backup

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:04 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

06.5 - 916 Congress Ave - 2017 Approved Demo Mitigation — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 18 pages

A B B.3 C C.3 D E E.7 F G 1 S0.01 ] 8 1 [ 6 1 / 5 X 2 1 X 2 1 S S H EXISTING WALL BRACING AND DEADMEN BY OTHERS, REF 1/S0.01. 5"Ø STD PIPE HORIZONTAL BRACE@ 5'-0" MAX. BY OTHERS (SIZE AND SPACING PROVIDED FOR PRICING. ALTERNATE DESIGNS BY BRACING ENGINEER MAY BE ACCEPTABLE AND SHALL BE REVIEWED BY CHW) LOCATE BRACING ELEVATION WITH 18" OF EXISTING SECOND FLOOR DIAPHRAGM. A LEVEL 2 EXISTING WALL BRACING PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A B B.3 C D E E.7 F G PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BRACING AT EXISTING WALL WITHIN 18" OF EXISTING ROOF DIAPHRAGM WHERE EXISTING THIRD FLOOR OCCURS B LEVEL 3 EXISTING WALL BRACING PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" EXISTING WALL 5"Ø STD PIPE HORIZONTAL BRACE@ 5'-0" MAX. BY OTHERS (SIZE AND SPACING PROVIDED FOR PRICING. ALTERNATE DESIGNS BY BRACING ENGINEER MAY BE ACCEPTABLE AND SHALL BE REVIEWED BY CHW) LOCATE BRACING ELEVATION WITHIN 18" OF EXISTING THIRD FLOOR / ROOF DIAPHRAGM. 1 S0.01 1 S0.01 " 6 - ' 6 " 0 - ' 7 " 6 - ' 6 BRACING AND DEADMEN BY OTHERS, REF 1/S0.01. 1 1.2 1.5 1.8 2 1 1.2 1.5 1.8 2 G CONT. WT12X52 +/-14,000# CONT. HSS REF. B/S0.01 +/-16,000# CONT. HSS REF. A/S0.01 +/-16,000# VARIES FIELD VERIFY " 2 / 1 6 2 S0.01 2 S0.01 " 2 / 1 6 3/8" MIN. KNIFE PL., TYP. DEADMAN BY OTHERS 3 S0.01 CORNICE EL. = 138'-4" I Y F R E V D L E F I I Y F R E V D L E F I I Y F R E V D L E F I " 3 - ' 8 " 9 - ' 3 1 " 4 - ' 6 1 LEVEL 3 T.O.C. EL. = 130'-1" LEVEL 2 T.O.C. EL. = 116'-4" SUPPORT WALL ABOVE FOR COLUMN REPLACEMENT EXISTING FINISH FLOOR EL. = 100'-0" FUTURE FOUNDATION ELEMENTS EXISTING DEMIZING WALL AND CONCRESS AVE HISORIC FAÇADE BRACING SEQUENCE: 1. 2. 3. 4. MAX. 5. 6. DOCUMENT PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONDITION OF BOTH SIDES OF EXISTING DEMIZING WALLS AND CONCRESS AVE HISORIC FAÇADE. NOTE ANY VISIBLE CRACKS, LOOSE ROCKS, OR ANY OTHER VISIBLE DISTRESS IN THE WALL OR ADJACENT PROPERTY SLAB ON GRADE. INSTALL NEW STEEL BRACING BEAMS AS SHOWN ON A & B/S0.01 AT CONGRESS AVE HISTORIC FAÇADE. PROVIDE TEMPORARY FLOOR SUPPORT POST SHORES …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:04 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

06.6 - 916 Congress Ave - 2017 Approved Mitigation — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 69 pages

Backup

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:04 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

06.7 - 916 Congress Ave - 2017 Approved Plans — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

• Existing Cast Iron Columns to Remain In‐Place • No modifications to historic masonry façade • New Paint on existing wood storefront system will be provided. • New Glazing Putty will be provided only as necessary on existing wood storefront system. Renderings courtesy of Michael Hsu Office of Architecture 916 Congress – Historic Facade SIXTHRIVER ARCHITECTS | AUSTIN, TEXAS 916 Congress – Elevations SIXTHRIVER ARCHITECTS | AUSTIN, TEXAS Renderings courtesy of Michael Hsu Office of Architecture 916 Congress – Elevations SIXTHRIVER ARCHITECTS | AUSTIN, TEXAS Renderings courtesy of Michael Hsu Office of Architecture Historic Façade Faceted Glazing Area of New Faceted Glazing • Previously Approved Plans showed “flat” glazing design @ Level 3. • Current Building design shows enhanced design feature of “faceted” glazing design @ Level 3. • This minor modification enhances the visual connection between the new structure and the existing faceted glazing at the historic ground level entry. • 3rD Floor glazing design enhances visual separation between historic and new, and creates a traditional “belt‐line” floor, breaking building mass into classical proportions of base, middle, top. 916 Congress – Façade Articulation SIXTHRIVER ARCHITECTS | AUSTIN, TEXAS Renderings courtesy of Michael Hsu Office of Architecture EACH PANEL IS APPROX. 6” X 60” INSTALLATION PHOTO OF OKO‐SKIN INSTALLATION PHOTO OF OKO‐SKIN – EXAMPLE OF PRODUCT’S MASONRY‐LIKE COLOR VARIATION • Previously Approved Plans showed masonry cladding on rear of building. • Current Building design shows rain screen panel cladding on rear of building. • Architect, owner, and contractor have logistical and safety concerns of installing brick masonry above adjacent structures. • Fiber cement panels are lighter, larger, and require far less structural support, while providing a varied, natural texture similar to a masonry wall. • • System Specified is a high‐end European product produced by Reider, called “OKO‐Skin” “Fiber Cement” is not synonymous with “Hardie.” No Hardie Products are specified or desired. 916 Congress – Masonry VS. Fiber Cement SIXTHRIVER ARCHITECTS | AUSTIN, TEXAS Renderings courtesy of Michael Hsu Office of Architecture SAMPLE OF STANDING SEAM METAL WALL PANELS – PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DESIGN. INSTALLATION PHOTO OF OKO‐SKIN VARIED PANEL PROFILES AND COLORS CURRENTLY SPECIFIED EXAMPLE OF OIL‐CANNING PRESENT IN STANDING SEAM INSTALLATIONS • Previously Approved Plans showed standing seam metal panel system. Design team has concerns about oil‐canning of these panels. • Current design uses higher‐end, more commercial‐grade system better‐suited for installation in this location, no oil‐canning. • 3 profiles …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:04 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

07.0 - 2406 E Martin Luther King Jr Blvd — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 8 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Certificate of Appropriateness October 7, 2026 HR-2026-114321 Rogers Washington Holy Cross Historic District 2406 East Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard 7 – 1 Proposal Rehabilitate a contributing property and construct a rear addition. Project Specifications 1) Repair existing exterior cladding including horizontal siding and stone skirt, replace street-facing windows, construct a small utility addition at the rear of the existing carport. 2) Construct a small, one-room addition behind the main house. Architecture The property is a single story ranch house with a corner inset carport. There is a stone clad skirt around the perimeter of the front façade, with the remainder of the walls clad with horizontal wood siding. There are two sets of paired windows at the front, but it is not certain if the units are replacements. The roof is a shallow pitched side gable form. Design Standards The Rogers Washington Holy Cross Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 4. Alterations to Contributing Properties 4.1. Exterior walls Exterior wall materials at the rear addition are proposed to match the horizontal-oriented siding of the main house. Trim around windows are to be of similar dimension to existing as well. As the addition will be minimally visible from the street, there is little concern about the material matching too closely, and the rear-projecting shape of the addition gives indication that it is a later addition. Existing wall materials are to be retained, and should be repaired or refinished to bring them back into serviceable condition. Where cladding is too damaged to be repaired, it should be patched with matching material. The Historic Preservation Office must be alerted if substantial material loss is encountered for guidance on how to proceed. 4.2. Roofs A TPO roof is proposed for the addition, which will not exceed the height of the overall roof structure for the original house. While this material will not match the historic exactly, it is compatible and will allow the addition to be read as from a later date of construction. 4.4. Porches and entrances Existing front porch and entrance is to be retained in its orientation. 4.5. Windows Front windows are proposed to be replaced with fixtures of a similar size, appropriate to their respective wall in material, and openings. In keeping with the design standards, window frames must not be …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:04 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

07.1 - 2406 E Martin Luther King Jr Blvd - Photos & Drawings — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 10 pages

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1 HOLY CROSS HEIGHTS AUSTIN, TX. TRAVIS COUNTY LOT SIZE: IMP. COVER: 6843 SF 35.8% IMPERVIOUS COVER AREA CHART PROJECT SCOPE: NAME EXISTING SLAB PROPOSED SLAB EXISTING DRIVEWAY PROPOSED DECK EXISITNG SHED AC PAD IMPERVIOUS COVER TOTAL: AREA 1,184.83 SF 152.20 SF 828.55 SF 120.00 SF 156.93 SF 9.00 SF 2,451.51 SF REMODEL - ADDITION Existing one story 2 Br, 1 Ba woodframe on Pier beam. Remodel kitchen, convert bedroom to bath and add new bedroom (2 Br 2 Ba) SF-3-HD-NP 19" PECAN MULTI-TRUNK N80° 53'17" E 51.24' 5' P.U.E. (PER PLAT) SHED LOT 1 6843 SF HOLY CROSS HEIGHTS (8/27) UNCOVERED DECK NEW ADDITION 4 ' - 1 1 " 4 2 ' - 3 " 4 7 ' - 7 " ) T A L P R E P ( . E . U P . ' 5 ' 2 1 . 0 2 1 W ' " 5 3 2 3 ° 8 0 N ' 9 9 . 9 1 1 W ' " 8 0 7 1 ° 9 0 N ) T A L P R E P ( . . E . U P C R T C E L E I ' 5 17" PECAN MULTI-TRUNK EXISTING 1 STORY WOOD HOUSE. APPROX. 931 SQ. FT. BUILDING FOOTPRINT R 15' - 0" R 15' - 0" " 5 - ' 0 3 " 0 - ' 5 2 PROPOSED ADDITION OUTSIDE OF REQUIRED ELECTRICAL CLEARANCE 5' - 6" 40' - 11" 6' - 2" PLT LVL 01 8' - 0" F.F. LVL 01 0" 23" MAGNOLIA 2 5 ' - 4 " EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY REFER TO AE LETTER FOR DRIVE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINES POWER POLE R E N N U R E T E R C N O C 7' - 7" 7'-6" MIN. REQUIRED CLEARANCE FROM OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINES - NEED TO VERIFY ON FIELD 4 REAR ELEVATION ELECTRICAL CLEARANCE 1/8" = 1'-0" (22x34) 1/8" = 1'-0" (11x17) S80° 45'23" W 52.80' EXISTING CONCRETE WALK SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NORTH POWER POLE 2410 E. MLK JR BLVD 1 01 - Plan - Site - 1"=10' 1" = 10'-0" (22x34) 1/8" = 1'-0" (11x17) Felicia Foster, Principal, Assoc. AIA, CPBD 512.637.4426 barroncustomdesign.com info@barroncustomdesign.com These Plans have been Prepared by Felicia B. Foster, CPBD # 44-719 Stamp and Signature Provided in Blue on originals for Regulatory Submittals. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION STAMPED …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:05 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

08.0 - 2410 E Martin Luther King Jr Blvd — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Certificate of Appropriateness October 7, 2026 HR-2026-106327 Rogers Washington Holy Cross Historic District 2410 East Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard 8 – 1 Proposal Construct two housing units on a vacant lot. Project Specifications 1) At an existing vacant lot, construct two housing units utilizing the HOME ordinance. Each housing unit will be two-stories and will be of similar size, with one located directly behind the other. 2) Construct a driveway at the western edge of the lot to provide for off-street parking. Architecture The existing property is a vacant lot, with no record of permanent structures ever built on the site. Design Standards The Rogers Washington Holy Cross Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: General Standards 2. Lot Configuration The subject lot was created as a result of subdividing 2406 E. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. While the design standards prohibit the replatting of lots, this situation may be unique in the district. The original 2406 property was much wider than the typical lot in the neighborhood, and it is bisected by a utility easement that prevents a single structure that uses the entire street frontage from being constructed. Additionally, the two properties immediately to the rear of the 2406 lot both have single-family structures on them. Given these circumstances, the development patterns of the larger district are maintained even through the lot subdivision. 3. Site and Site Elements 3.2. Driveways Proposed driveway is concrete in material. There is no existing driveway on the property, and the proposed work requires a new curb cut on E. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. The layout of the driveway will be consistent with the standards with regard to design and width, and will terminate at two carports located within the footprint of the two housing units. No circular or semi-circular layout is proposed. 3.7. Mechanical and energy conservation equipment Proposed mechanical equipment is to be located between the two units and not visible from the street. 8. New Construction of Infill (Principal Buildings and Accessory Dwelling Units) 8.1. Orientation, Setbacks, and Height The front housing unit will be oriented toward the street, and will have a similar setback to contributing resources. The overall height of the new buildings will be close to the 27 foot maximum outlined in the design standards. However, the two …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:05 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

08.1 - 2410 E Martin Luther King Jr Blvd - Photos & Drawings — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

DRIVEWAY TYPE I - NOTES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. "ZERO" CURB AT PT OR SIDEWALK EDGE, WHICHEVER IS ENCOUNTERED FIRST. THE DRIVEWAY EDGE SHALL BE SMOOTHLY TRANSITIONED INTO THE SIDEWALK BEGINNING AT THE RADIUS PC LINE IF DIMENSION IS LESS THAN 1.5 METERS (5 FEET), REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER TO EXISTING JOINT AND POUR MONOLITHICALLY WITH THE DRIVEWAY. IF THE BASE IS OVER EXCAVATED WHERE THE CURB AND GUTTER WAS REMOVED, BACKFILL WITH CONCRETE MONOLITHICALLY WITH THE DRIVEWAY. ALL DRIVEWAYS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE STREET FRONTAGE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS DETERMINED BY EXTENDING THE SIDE PROPERTY LINES TO THE CURB DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT EXCEED 70% OF A LOTS' STREET FRONTAGE TYPE I DRIVEWAYS ARE TO BE LOCATED NO CLOSER TO THE CORNER OF INTERSECTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY THAN 60% OF PARCEL FRONTAGE OR 15 METERS (50 FEET) WHICHEVER IS LESS. DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOR BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE CURB RETURN OF A STREET INTERSECTION. SINGLE FAMILY LOTS LIMITED TO ONE DRIVEWAY EXCEPT FOR APPROVED SEMICIRCULAR DRIVES. WHEN TWO DRIVEWAYS ARE USED(ONE PER UNIT;TWO MAXIMUM) FOR DUPLEXES AND TOWN HOMES, SINGLE FAMILY STANDARDS SHALL APPLY. WHILE THE PROPERTY OWNER REMAINS RESPONSIBLE FOR GRADE BREAKS WITHIN PRIVATE PROPERTY, THE FIRE DEPARTMENT SHOULD BE CONSULTED WHERE THE DRIVEWAY IS ESSENTIAL TO EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS AND "G2" IS GREATER THAN 15%. "G1" PLUS "D" SHOULD NOT EXCEED 15%. SEE TRANSPORTATION MANUAL SECTION 5 FOR OTHER APPROVED MATERIAL, FOR CURB AND GUTTER EXPANSION JOINTS. USE 12MM (½") ASPHALT BOARD, OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIAL, FOR CURB AND GUTTER EXPANSION JOINTS. THE SIDEWALK, REGARDLESS OF ITS LOCATION WITH RESPECT TO THE CURB OR PROPERTY LINE, SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE DRIVEWAY AT THESE LOCATIONS. PLACE AN EXPANSION JOINT DOWN THE CENTER OF ALL DRIVEWAYS. WATER METER BOXES AND WASTEWATER CLEAN OUTS ARE PROHIBITED FROM BEING LOCATED IN DRIVEWAY AREAS. EXPANSION JOINT CENTERLINE EXPANSION JOINT SEE DETAIL BELOW AND NOTE 14 ON SHEET 4 OF 4 0.6 m (2'-0'') TYP. R.O.W. 1.2 m (4'-0'') MIN. 2% MAX. SLOPE SIDEWALK TIE-IN LOCATION. SEE NOTE 13 SEE DRIVEWAY CRITERIA CHART BELOW PT SEE NOTE 1 EXIST. JOINT SAW-CUT & EXP. JT. PC TRANSITION TO ZERO CURB MATCH CATCH/SPILL GUTTER SECTION OF EXIST. CURB & GUTTER PLAN SEE NOTE 2. R.O.W. A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIDEWALK TIE-IN LOCATION. SEE NOTE 13 R INLET B CURB & GUTTER 3 m (10'-0'') MIN. NOTE: …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:05 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

09.0 - 4309 Avenue D — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Certificate of Appropriateness October 7, 2026 HR-2026-104982 Hyde Park Historic District 4309 Avenue D 9 – 1 Proposal Rehabilitate a contributing property and construct a rear addition. Construct a second housing unit at the existing garage. Project Specifications 1) Interior selective demolition of the existing main house, as well as alterations to the front of the building and replacement of non-original windows. 2) Construction of a rear addition consisting of several rooms and a rear porch, to be minimally visible from the street. 3) Construction of a second-floor addition to the existing detached garage for conversion to a secondary housing unit. Architecture This property is a single-story residence in the Hyde Park neighborhood with Craftsman elements, which fits well with surrounding properties. It features a large hipped roof with a front facing gable projecting at a front corner. While other contributing properties on the street feature elevated porches facing the street, this house has no such porch, with its two front doors accessed via simple concrete stairs. City directory research indicates that the house was built as a single unit but was split into two in the early 20th century. A roof overhang in front of the two doors is supported by two simple wood posts. At the rear of the lot is a garage facing a rear alley. Design Standards The Hyde Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1. General Standards 1.1. Prevention of Demolition The proposal calls for reuse of the main house structure as well as two of the walls at the rear garage. The overall form of the historic residence will be retained, with the rear addition tying into the existing very appropriately. 1.2. Retention of Historic Style There are few remaining stylistic flourishes at this property that are more common elsewhere in the district. However, the Craftsman form and appearance will be retained. There is a concern that loss of some more utilitarian elements, such as the simple posts, concrete pad in place of a porch, and double front entry doorways previously serving the additional unit, may change the overall character of the property. This concern is relatively minor but it is recommended that options including retention of the second doorway, fixed in place, be explored to retain some of the change over time that occurred …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:06 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

09.1 - 4309 Avenue D - Photos & Drawings — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 16 pages

Submission to Historical Preservation Office 4309 Avenue D Hyde Park Austin TX 2026-093502 PR We are restoring 4309 Avenue D to a single family residence and adding an Accessory Dwelling Unit to the garage in back. For the front house, we are removing the second front door and adding a brick porch at the floor level of the home. Common in much of Hyde Park. Photos of area included: The new porch will have new 8” round traditional painted columns by HBG PermaCast – smooth non-tapered. Gable will be resided with smaller fiberglass rectangular make-up air vent typical of Hyde Park. New siding as reqd will be Hardie lap siding in coursing to match original as possible. New Asphalt shingle roof – three tab – grey. Columns and gable vents to fit Hyde Park. New Windows will be operable one over one double-hung units to match existing rough openings. The kitchen and bedroom extensions happen at the rear of the building leaving original structure intact. Hip and gable roof forms of matching pitch for addition with attic for mechanical equipment. Electrical service will be relocated underground. Existing sewer and water lines to remain with no disruption of tree root zones. New rear porch to fit neighborhood The addition will not be seen from Avenue but will be viewed from alley. The second dwelling unit (ADU) in back will abut and span over the existing garage. The original north and east walls of the garage will remain and the ADU will be set back from existing garage. The west wall (facing house) and south wall will be new and incorporate same materials as front house but with different expression – a cantilever balcony and blind arch transom are unlike the front house. Setbacks follow alley and Hyde Park standards.

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:06 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

10.0 - 2009 Travis Heights Blvd — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 8 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts October 7, 2026 PR-2026-059982; GF-2026-073317 Travis Heights-Fairview Park Historic District 2009 Travis Heights Boulevard 10 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1939 house. Architecture The original portion of this house can be seen at the right two thirds of the street-facing façade, which still retains some Tudor Revival details such as the arched door and steep roof pitch. Original side lites and modest front porch with concrete stairs continue with this style. The exterior material is stucco or plaster, which may be original but has been painted. To the north of the main house is a 2012 addition of a covered porch, which was enclosed with walls covered in matching painted stucco, and appears from the street as conditioned space. Behind this is a pergola that is also enclosed by full height walls, though no roof covers it. Research Original owners of this house S.R. & Maxine Blake, who worked in sales and briefly lived at the property before it was acquired by Frank & Florence Schirripa, then Jason & Virginia Forbes, who owned the property for the next ten years. During their ownership, Jason Forbes went from a record keeper at the Texas State House Reporter to a correspondent and finally an editor of the publication. By 1957, the property was sold again to Floy & Pearl Forister. Department Comments Per city code § 25-11-213 (G)(4), the Historic Landmark Commission has 180 days to review demolition permits in National Register historic districts starting from the date the application was submitted. This period is set to time out on November 9, 2026. An update to the demolition application has been submitted, which has changed the scope of work to not include the detached garage. As a result, this proposed demolition is now limited to the main house only. Property Evaluation The property contributes to the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is an intact, if altered, example of Tudor Revival architecture in the district. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:08 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

10.1 - 2009 Travis Heights Blvd - Photos — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 12 pages

Backup

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:08 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

11.0 - 611 West Lynn St — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts October 7, 2026 SP-2026-035365; HR-2026-070009 West Line Historic District 611 West Lynn Street 11 – 1 Proposal Construct eight detached residential units on a property. Project Specifications Construct a total of eight multi-story housing units, oriented around a center driveway and pool area. Five units at the front of the property will face this new driveway, and the three rear units will face a rear alley. This driveway will require a new curb cut. Architecture The property is currently a vacant lot. The original house on the property was demolished in 2020. Design Standards The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The front units will have their walls closest to the street with a setback that approximately matches surrounding properties. Other units are spread equally across the property and don’t extend beyond required setbacks. Due to the site elevation, which slopes down towards the rear alley, units will be less visible as they are more set back from the front of the property. 2. Orientation The front five units will face the central driveway, which is not typical to single family houses in the district. However, design revisions have been made since the August 12, 2026 Architectural Review Committee, and both units closest to West Lynn St. have been revised to include porch areas and details at the ground floor. Additionally the massing has been altered to make these units interface with the street more than in previous design iterations. The three rear units, facing the alley, are in keeping with the standards in their guidance on additional structures on the property. 3. Scale, massing, and height All housing units are designed to be at least three stories in height. This is taller than surrounding contributing properties, with the exception of the Sheeks-Robertson House across the street. The massing of each unit appears very vertical due to each being detached, which may not be as perceptible if the structures were duplexes or rowhomes. Revisions have been made to the design to break up the massing into smaller elements and to create a “stepped back” effect when viewed from the street. These revisions are …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:08 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

11.1 - 611 West Lynn St - Drawings — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 8 pages

GOSSET AND Co. 824 W 10th STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 512-842-9904 CEDAR BUILD, INC. 800 BRAZOS ST #340 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 512-402-7586 HOLT CARSON INC. 1904 FORTVIEW ROAD AUSTIN, TX 78704 512-442-0990 TBPLS FIRM #10050700 1 P:\21102.01 West Lynn 611\CADD\Construction\Sheet Files\21102.01 - Cover Sheet.dwg, 4/16/2026 11:40:35 AM 04-15 0 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20' W W W W W W W W W W W W g n i v a p f o e g d e W W W W R.L. Slaughter & Helen Slaughter to Charles J. Fruth Volume 287 Page 518 1916 conflicting elements R.L. Slaughter et Ux. to C.R. Anderson et Ux. Volume 334 Page 193 December 1921 R.L. Slaughter et Ux. to C.R. Anderson et Ux. Volume 334 Page 194 December 1921 ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED Michael W. Little Document No. 2024108611 INT #2153 I G N T S X E I Y A W E V R D I W W ' 0 2 W . I . C " 0 2 X E W W C S C " 6 3 X E W I G N T S X E I ' 0 2 Y A W E V R D I b r u c n o e l g n W a i r t : k r a m h c n e b ' 8 9 . 4 3 5 t a x o b r e b i f e l g o o G W b r u c G E H O G E G H O G E H G O G E H O G P P G W W ) ' 0 5 ( T E E R T S N N Y L T S E W W ' 1 . 3 3 5 t a e l o W p ' 3 . 1 6 5 t a e r i w G E H O G G E H O G M W G E H O G N E G H G O S I G E H G O G E H O G G k l a w G E H O G e t e r c n o c G E H O G 611 WEST LYNN STREET CUT, PLUG AND ABANDON G Y N EXIST.3/4" COPPER WATER SERVICE AT THE A …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:08 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

11.2 - 611 West Lynn St - Revised Drawings — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 21 pages

08/21/2026 To: HLC Commission From: Cedar Re: 611 West Lynn St, Austin, TX 78703 Sept 2, 2026 HLC Meeting To committee members, We incorporated the following updates based on comments from 08/12/2026 ARC meeting: Unit 1 (left in elevation view): ● Massing: ○ In response to comments about stepping levels back: ■ We broke the main stucco facade into two areas: ● 1. Main horizontal stucco volume (pulled forward) ● 2. Secondary vertical stucco volume (stepped back) ○ These two moves help break down overall massing on this street facing facade. ● Materiality: ○ In response to comments about stepping levels back: ■ We changed the material of the stair bulkhead, which is stepped back, from stucco to terra cotta ○ This move helps break down overall massing as seen from the street. ● Fenestration: ○ In response to comments about studying window rhythm: ■ Raised window sill heights to 1’-6” (previously 0’-0”) ■ Introduced new window strategies in place of large single window units: ● Window groupings of 3 ● Simulated divided light pattern at 2nd floor ○ Together, these moves bring windows in line with historical glazing examples in the area, per contributing structures, and reduces overall glazing size. Unit 4 (right in elevation view): ● Massing: ○ In response to comments about stepping levels back and continuing porches: ■ Stepped back stair bulkhead ■ Added door and overhead porch language to first floor ○ These moves break down overall massing and continue the language of porches from the neighboring historic contributing structures. ● Fenestration: ○ In response to comments about studying window rhythm: ■ Raised window sill heights to 1’-6” (previously 0’-0”) ■ Introduced new window strategies in place of large single window units: ● Window groupings of 3 ● Simulated divided light pattern at 2nd floor ○ Together, these moves bring windows in line with historical glazing examples in the area, per contributing structures, and reduces overall glazing size. Thank you, Kyle Vancise, Cedar Jake Hawkins, Cedar 6 2 0 2 . 2 t p e S 611 West Lynn Historic Landmark Commission September Session . c n I d l i u B r a d e C © Confidential Context_West Line Historic District (WLHD) Contributing Structures Featuring: -3.5 story massing -Roof terrace -Large glazing -Corner glazing -Stucco facade Featuring: -Flat roofs -Stone facade Featuring: -Stone facade + walkway -Full-view glazing Featuring: -Large glazing 1301 …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:09 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

12.0 - 706 E Monroe St — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 7 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Demolition and Relocation Permits October 7, 2026 PR-2026-079349; GF-2026-090393 Travis Heights-Fairview Park Historic District 706 East Monroe Street 12 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1927 house. Architecture This property is a single-story Craftsman bungalow featuring an ample, projecting front porch that is supported by two square wood posts. These posts, along with the porch railing and brackets above, decorate the front of the house, which retains strong integrity. The front gabled roof features prominent overhangs and rafter tails still present under a later gutter addition. Windows all appear to be original and are in good condition. The walls are clad in narrow horizontal siding, and the elevated foundation is covered by a concrete or stucco skirting. Behind the house is a porch structure that has been confirmed by a previous owner to have been designed by former University of Texas architecture professor Bob Mather. The design of this structure, made from portions of the original garage, matches the roof pitch to create a sheltered space at the rear, and was likely designed while Mather lived, along with his wife Jean Mather, nearby at 1611 Alameda Drive. Research After its construction, this property was shortly owned by Walter & Larah Bergfield, the former of whom was employed as a barber. After a series of short term owners and residents, including a taxi driver and a telephone repairman, the property was bought by Edmund & Dorothy Morris around 1944. Edmund Morris worked at the Mutual Benefit Health Association as a manager, before starting his own insurance agency by 1949. Doris is listed as assisting in this operation, and the couple raised several children at the property. By 1957, the property was purchased by Clyde & Georgia Priddy, a chef at the Commodore Perry Hotel. Department Comments Per city code § 25-11-213 (G)(4), the Historic Landmark Commission has 180 days to review demolition permits in National Register historic districts starting from the date the application was submitted. This period is set to time out on February 17, 2027. Property Evaluation The property contributes to the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:09 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

12.1 - 706 E Monroe St - Photos & Letter — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 11 pages

06/09/2026 June 18, 2026 City of Austin Development Services Department Historic Preservation Office / Austin Planning Re: Residential Total Demolition Permit Application — 706 E Monroe Street, Austin, Texas To Development Services and Historic Preservation Staff: We recently acquired the property at 706 E Monroe Street and are submitting this Residential Total Demolition Permit application to begin the City’s required review process for the existing bungalow and related accessory structure. We understand that the property is located within the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Historic District context and that review by Historic Preservation staff and/or the Historic Landmark Commission may be required before any permit may be released. At this stage, we are evaluating multiple paths for the existing bungalow. Demolition is not our first or only path. In parallel with this permit application, we are actively exploring preservation alternatives, including retention of the structure as part of the overall site plan and potential relocation/donation to a house preservation nonprofit. We are submitting the application now so that the required City review can proceed while those preservation and relocation conversations continue. Based on the information currently available to us, we understand that the bungalow may be a contributing-age structure within the National Register district context, but we do not believe it independently meets the City’s criteria for local historic landmark designation. Specifically, while the structure may meet the age threshold, we are not currently aware of facts indicating that it has individual architectural significance, significant historical associations, unique community value apart from the broader district context, archaeological significance, or landscape significance sufficient to support individual landmark designation. We welcome staff’s review and will provide additional information requested by Historic Preservation staff. We are submitting an updated combined survey for 700 and 706 E Monroe, including current tree information. No tree removal is proposed as part of this demolition permit application. We are not proposing to impact the critical root zone of any protected or heritage tree or to prune more than 25% of any protected-size tree canopy as part of this application, except as may be separately reviewed and approved by the City. We understand that any required tree protection and erosion/sedimentation controls must be installed and inspected before demolition or removal work occurs. The application materials identify the existing bungalow and the existing accessory shed, approximately 125 square feet. No demolition, relocation, or removal work will occur unless and …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:09 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

13.0 - 1614 Preston Ave — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 7 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts October 7, 2026 HR-2026-101908 Old West Austin Historic District 1614 Preston Avenue 13 – 1 Proposal Construct a two-story addition at a contributing property. Project Specifications 1) Remove or cover existing stone exterior cladding and remove existing windows. 2) Construct a second floor addition above the existing house, doubling the footprint. Architecture This house is a single-story, stone clad residence with an inset porch and modest decoration at the corner of Preston Avenue and Jefferson Street. The front elevation is dominated by a large picture window at the rear of the porch and a broad low-pitch gable roof above. The house is set slightly above grade on an elevated foundation, with the stone cladding extending to the ground. At the side street, a two car garage is present behind the house and attached to the main house by a non-original conditioned space. Research For at least the first two decades after its construction, this property was owned by pastors from the University Christian Church in Austin. There is no record that this was ever designated as an official residence, and deed details show that each of the pastors owned the property outright. It is likely that the first owners, Lawrence & Letha Bash, sold the property upon the installment of Dr. William Gibble to the same position, at which point the former owners moved. Design Standards The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential additions 1. Location The second story addition extends roughly the entire floorplate of the ground floor, approximately doubling the square footage of the property. 2. Scale, massing, and height By doubling the size of the house, the addition does not propose a similar scale to the existing. However, there are numerous examples of large additions found throughout the district that have been approved. 3. Design and style This proposal removes or covers the existing first floor cladding and creates a unified appearance between original and the addition. Due to issues with the existing masonry cladding, it is not inappropriate to remove and replace with another appropriate material. 4. Roofs The proposed roof form is hipped, which will entirely eliminate the character-defining front gable. A …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:10 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

13.1 - 1614 Preston Ave - Photos & Drawings — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 22 pages

1614 PRESTON AVE AS-BUILT DRAWINGS COPYRIGHT NOTICE: The designs represented by these plans are copyrighted and are subject to copyright protection under 17 U.S.C. §101, et seq., as amended. Unauthorized use of these plans or the designs represented therein will subject the infringer to damages and/or judicial action as provided by federal law. e v A n o t s e r P 4 1 6 1 3 0 7 8 7 , X T n i t s u A i s g n w a r D t l i u B - s A s t i m r e P s s e r p x E n i t s u A e n a K e k i M STREET VIEW AERIAL VIEW PROJECT # 26042 06.12.2026 Issued for Review PROJECT DATA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROPERTY ID: ZONING DISTRICT: NEIGHBORHOOD: HISTORIC: W 60FT LOT 40 BLK 16B PEMBERTON HEIGHTS SEC 9 116588 SF-3-NP WINDSOR YES LOT AREA (TCAD): WCID #10: EDWARDS AQUIFER: FLOOD: BATH COUNT: 8,249.82 SF N/A YES NO 2 SHEET TITLE Cover Sheet SHEET NO. A - 0.0 1614 PRESTON AVENUE PROPERTY IMAGES, LEFT ELEVATION 1614 PRESTON AVENUE PROPERTY IMAGES, FRONT & RIGHT ELEVATION 1614 PRESTON AVENUE PROPERTY IMAGES, FRONT ELEVATION I s a x e T f o S L A N G R O N G I S E D I r e t n e c n g i s e d e m o h 6 6 6 8 7 . X T , S O C R A M M A S D A O R D O O W D E R 8 0 9 4 5 7 7 1 - 1 3 3 ) 2 1 5 ( I E C F F O 4 0 7 2 - 5 4 8 ) 2 1 5 ( L L E C © NOTE: TREE TAGS 243, 244, 245 PENDING URGENT REMOVAL UNDER APPROVED PERMIT 2026-090014TP (DEAD, DISEASED, IMMINENT HAZARD) FOR SEVERE ROT AND UTILITY LINE RISKS. 19'-8" 11'-3 1/2" 14'-6 7/8" 8'-8" 13'-6 7/8" 7'-1 3/4" 91'-11 3/4" " 4 / 3 0 1 - ' 7 " 4 / 3 1 1 - ' 7 2 S H 0 2 0 2 " 1 - ' 0 2 2050 SH 6068 GLASS DOORS W/H BED-2 8'-3" CLG 217 SQ. FT. 14'-2" x 15'-3" 3050 SH …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:10 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

13.2 - 1614 Preston Ave - Contractor Letter on Masonry — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

August 20, 2026 Historic Preservation Office City of Austin, Texas preservation@austintexas.gov RE: Condition of Existing Masonry at 1614 Preston Avenue, Austin, Texas 78703 Mr. Lukes and Members of the Historic Landmark Commission, I am the general contractor for the proposed renovation and second-story addition at 1614 Preston Avenue. I have over 20 years of experience in residential construction in Austin and Central Texas, including work on homes of this era, and with the kinds of masonry challenges present at 1614 Preston. This letter details my professional assessment of the condition of the existing masonry, the origin of the present issues, and my recommendation. On the structural questions, I have relied on the concurring opinion of the project’s structural engineer, Bradley Shaw. The existing stone masonry at 1614 Preston does not extend around the building. The stone is present on the front and along a little more than half of the left side. The remaining walls are not stone- clad. In my assessment, significant portions of this masonry do not appear original to the 1939 structure. This is most apparent at the chimney and along the Jefferson Street side. This conclusion is based on the variation in the stone’s cut and color, differences in coursing and mortar, and the way the stonework terminates, particularly at and around the chimney and the earlier addition area. These observations are consistent with the property’s other evidence of prior additions, as well as the structural engineer’s findings. The existing masonry is deteriorating and cannot be reliably stabilized. I observe cracking and displacement within the stonework, failed mortar joints, and clear evidence of chronic moisture intrusion. This evidence includes staining, dampness, and heavy biofilm growth in areas that appear to remain persistently wet rather than occasionally damp. The concentration of biofilm at grade and across the lower half of the wall is consistent with water collecting and remaining at the base of the wall, from ground contact, splashback, and the lack of appropriate base flashing. At the chimney, the biofilm marks sustained water entry at a junction that is a common source of leaks. Mortar loss and stone decay are most advanced in these same areas. In my experience, the cause is most often the manner of construction. A masonry wall always takes on some water. Without sufficient weather-resistive barriers, drainage cavities, flashing, or weep systems, water is held against the back of the stone and …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:11 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

13.3 - 1614 Preston Ave - Updated Contractor Letter on Masonry — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Highland Lakes Engineering Box 1164, Kingsland, Texas 78639 830-637-9584 Tx. Reg # F-9209 To: City of Austin and HOA From: Brad Shaw Subject: 1614 Preston Street, Austin This is to certify that a structural review of the existing house rock veneer was made with the following conditions and concerns: 1) The single story house is approximately 60+ years old and is constructed as a pier and beam foundation with an exterior limestone rock veneer. There are also two additional separate concrete slabs on the property adjacent to the main house which are of unknown age that show signs of settling. There are some visible exterior evidence of moisture penetration in the wall cavities that requires further demolition, but is a good indicator that the rock veneer has been penetrated. 2) A rock fireplace and chimney has been added in the past and is leaning and pulling away from the main structure of the house. 3) There is proposed a second story addition to the entire house area. Since the second story will add a significant weight load condition to the perimeter house veneer foundation and that some movement has currently been noticed, it is recommend the original rock veneer of the house be removed and replaced with a stucco veneer on both first and second floors of the proposed project. This solution is also recommended since the location of the house is in an area of expansive soils. Date: 9/17/2026

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:11 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

13.4 - 1614 Preston Ave - ARC Update Letter — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

1614 Preston Avenue | Owner’s Update RE: Architectural Review Committee Discussion September 27, 2026 Austin Lukes and Planning Department Team Historic Preservation Office City of Austin, Texas preservation@austintexas.gov Owner’s Update Re: Architectural Review Committee Discussion of Proposed Interior Renovation and Second-Story Addition at 1614 Preston Avenue, Austin, Texas 78703 (Old West Austin NRHD) Dear Mr. Lukes, Historical Preservation Office, and Members of the Historic Landmark Commission, This letter supplements the Owner’s Letter of Information dated August 5, 2026. Following referral from the September 2, 2026 meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission, we presented our project to the Architectural Review Committee on September 10, 2026. We have summarized the discussion and the Committee’s feedback below. a. Exterior masonry and wall assembly. Following the Commission meeting, we returned to our professional team to request the sealed letter recommended by the Commission and to discuss selective demolition of the wall to further inspect its assembly. We were advised firmly that such an inspection would only confirm the deterioration and moisture issues previously described rather than yield new findings. Given that advice, and to avoid inadvertent start-of-work complications with construction loan financing underway, we have not conducted further demolition of the wall assembly. The sealed letter provided by our Engineer, dated September 17, 2026, has been submitted for the Commission’s review. b. Front porch. We discussed an area of confusion in the plan submission, and confirmed that the existing recessed porch is retained and extended slightly to the right. c. Setback, massing / placement of the addition. We discussed that relocating a significant portion of the second story to the rear-right, outside the utility zone, is not feasible per our Structural Engineer; the existing slab dates to a prior addition and cannot bear the load, and would require added supports within critical root zones. A deeper front setback is achievable, but only with added structural complexity and cost. With consideration to the project’s likely impact on the structure’s contributing status, the Committee did not recommend further measures to alter the massing, setback, or scale. d. Roof form and second-story porch. Following the Commission meeting, we were prepared to restore the original front gable, and to remove the second-story porch area. After discussion and review of renderings, and with consideration to the project’s likely impact on the structure’s contributing status, the Committee indicated a preference for the front elevation as originally proposed (no front gable, …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:11 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

14.0 - 71 Rainey St — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts October 7, 2026 SB-2026-112656 Rainey Street National Register Historic District 71 Rainey Street 14 – 1 Proposal Install a freestanding sign. Project Specifications The proposed project includes installation of a single unlit sign. The proposed sign is an 8.7 square foot circle, mounted on a metal post near the entrance to the property. Design Standards The City of Austin’s Sign Standards for Historic Districts and Landmarks are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks, in National Register districts, and in locally designated historic districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Number of Signs: The Commission allows one sign per building, unless the building has multiple tenants; in this case, the Commission may allow one sign per façade module, if the façade modules correspond to tenant spaces. The Commission may also allow one sign for each street frontage if the building is at an intersection. A single directory sign is appropriate for a large building with multiple tenants. A single sign is proposed. Sign Types: The Commission may allow window signs, awning signs, projecting signs, and flush mounted signs for most commercial buildings. Freestanding signs are allowed for office and retail uses in historic residential buildings. City codes prohibit the Commission from approving the following sign types: (1) rotating, (2) off-premise, (3) roof signs, (4) portable, or (5) signs which flash or blink at intervals. City code also prohibits handbills, posters, or placards on a structure except inside a window or on a bulletin board. The proposed sign is freestanding; however, it does not correspond to a commercial use in a historically residential building type. Sign Size: The maximum size for signs depends on the sign type: 1. Projecting (blade) signs: 6 square feet 2. Flush-mounted signs: 7% of the overall façade area, with a maximum height of 2 feet and a maximum size of 20 square feet 3. Window signs: The lesser of 20% of the window or 8 square feet 4. Awning signs: The lesser of 20% of the awning panel or 8 square feet. Large commercial buildings (over 3 stories): Cumulative signage may not exceed 40 square feet per façade and must comply with a signage plan for the building. The proposed sign is 8.7 square feet. It exceeds the size limit for blade signs but falls under the limit for flush- mounted signs. Sign …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:11 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

14.1 - 71 Rainey St - Updated Drawings — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

6 1/4" ONE(1) NON-ILLUMINATED SIGN • ONE(1) ALUMINUM SIGN CABINET MFG OUT OF ALUMINUM SQUARE TUBE AND SKINNED WITH ALUMINUM SHEETING. PAINTED BLUE AND HAVE PINK GRAPHICS. • DIGITALLY PRINTED GRAPHICS MATCHING PMS 219 SATIN • CABINET PAINTED PMS 2925 C SATIN • STEEL SUPPORT AND FOUNDATION BY CLIENT. INSTALL BY GLOW. ART 26-071 R11-P-FAFP PMS 2925 C BLUE STAIN PMS 219 C PINK SATIN ART 26-071 R11-P-FAFP ART 26-071 R11-P-FAFP ART 26-071 R10 FAFP

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:11 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

15.0 - 2107 Hartford Rd — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 8 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts October 7, 2026 PR-2026-104861; GF-2026-111379 Old West Austin Historic District 2107 Hartford Road 15 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1938 residence. Architecture This single-story bungalow features Tudor Revival design elements including a steeply pitched roof, casement windows, and nested gable overhangs on the front elevation. To one side is an enclosed corner porch that is now clad in vinyl or wood siding, matching the gable walls. The remainder of the exterior walls are clad in multi-colored brick. Above the front door is a small gable overhang that slightly shields the entryway. Due to grade changes on the site, the front of the house sits several feet above the street and is accessed via a front stair and porch entry. The property has seen some alterations to character defining features and has lost some integrity, though this may be reversible. Research Long time owners and residents of the property were Louis Harvey and Lillian Kelly, who both lived at the address as widowers. During this time, Lillian Kelly worked as assistant director of the Texas State Teacher Retirement System until her own retirement around 1952. She and her late husband had one son together who served in World War II and continued his service afterwards. Department Comments Per city code § 25-11-213 (G)(4), the Historic Landmark Commission has 180 days to review demolition permits in National Register historic districts starting from the date the application was submitted. This period is set to time out on February 8, 2027. Property Evaluation The property contributes to the Old West Austin National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a decent example of Tudor Revival architecture in the district. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:12 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

15.1 - 2107 Hartford Rd - Photos — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 10 pages

Backup

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:12 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

16.0 - 211 Academy Dr — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 7 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts October 7, 2026 HR-2026-118672 Travis Heights-Fairview Park Historic District 211 Academy Drive 16 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1933 residence. Architecture This house is a largely symmetrical U-plan former duplex with Colonial Revival details. A single-story structure, the recessed center front porch formerly featured two front doors facing each other. At some point in the past, the house was converted to a single unit and one front door was infilled and clad with matching siding. The porch remains in its original appearance otherwise, with two sets of paired windows at its rear, which complement the arched windows at other areas of the front of the building. Three simple wood posts support the roof structure above, which is largely side gabled and features two dormer attic vents. To each end of the house is a street facing gable roof projecting out which each feature several windows covered with wood screen assemblies. This house is slightly elevated, which allows it to sit more evenly on the changing grade of the property. The overall condition of the house is good, and it retains integrity. Research Since this property was purpose built to be a side-by-side duplex, there is a long history of multiple renter tenants who lived in this building. Many of these tenants lived at the property for a long time, including several families employed locally in the area. Early occupants included a tax assessor and collector, as well as an employee for the nearby School for the Deaf. During the Second World War, it was occupied by a supervisor at US Civil Aeronautics Administration. The longest owners and tenants belonged to the Turner family. Marshall & Lucille Turner owned the property from the end of World War II onward, and for a time Jason & Grace Turner occupied the other side. During this period, Marshall and Jason both were employed by the Austin Chemical Company. Department Comments Per city code § 25-11-213 (G)(4), the Historic Landmark Commission has 180 days to review demolition permits in National Register historic districts starting from the date the application was submitted. This period is set to time out on March 9, 2027. Property Evaluation The property contributes to the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:12 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

16.1 - 211 Academy Dr - Photos — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 17 pages

Backup

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:12 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

17.0 - 1410 Travis Heights Blvd — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts October 7, 2026 PR-2026-112460; HR-2026-118626 Travis Heights-Fairview Park Historic District 1410 Travis Heights Boulevard 17 – 1 Proposal Construct a rear addition. Project Specifications Construct an addition at the rear of a contributing property. Addition will extend beyond the current width of the house but will be located entirely behind the existing rear wall line. A side screened deck is also proposed at the side extending beyond the width of the current house. Architecture This Craftsman bungalow retains excellent integrity and has seen minimal alterations. Most prominent of these is a screened-in porch set under an existing front gable roof, which is couched within the building’s larger roof structure. There are sets of paired windows at the front and side of the property, and the moderately-pitched roof retains its exposed rafter tails. Overall, the house is in good condition and fits with its surrounding properties on Travis Heights Boulevard. Research Upon construction in the 1920s, the property was owned by a series of residents who were employed at local businesses, including cashiers, salespeople, and security personnel. The longest of these owners were Charles & Mary Huddleston, who raised children together there until Mary’s death in 1956. Design Standards The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential additions 1. Location The proposed addition is located behind the historic structure. Though it does extend beyond the width of the original building, it is set far back from the street and will be minimally visible, which meets the citywide historic design standards. 2. Scale, massing, and height The overall height and massing of the addition will match the main house. It will be differentiated by the roof structure, which will be a side gable located only at the rear addition. As a single-story addition, the scale is also appropriate for the property and district. 3. Design and style The overall style of the Craftsman bungalow house is retained across the new addition, though more muted and without decoration. The simple form and style, including at windows, roofing, and siding, all defer to the original section of the house and do not stand out visually. 4. Roofs A side-gabled roof structure is …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:12 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

17.1 - 1410 Travis Heights Blvd - Photos & Drawings — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 15 pages

' . 9 7 7 5 . v e E l e r i w e p a c s d n a l s r e b m i t f p i 2 5 5 ' . 6 3 k c e d d o o w d o o w t e e r c n o c t r e o o f 20" LIVE OAK TREE PROTECTION PER NOTE 18.5" TOTAL HACKBERRY (10" + 13.5") 14.5" TOTAL HACKBERRY (9" + 10") CRZ al) pic 2 / 1 y t ( 4.6' ' 5 . 6 1 t e m a r F y r o S - e n O 18.4' CRZ 4 / 1 B t e e r c n o c ' g n d i l i u B t f q s 4 0 3 r o o l f h s n i i f . 8 6 3 5 5 . v e E l wood deck t r e o o f " 4 / 3 3 - ' 5 e p a c s d n a l s r e b m i t 15' - 9 3/4" ' . 7 0 ' . 5 0 A PROPOSED ADDITION d e v o m e r e b o k c e d t d o o w HEAVY EQUIPMENT ALLOWED HERE concrete walk to be removed 5 5 5 " 4 / 1 1 - ' 5 k c e d d o o w d e r e v o c t r e e m l t d e a c o e r e b o t c i r t c e e l ' . 5 8 2 cinder block wall 4 4 0 4 ' . 5 1 a/c 17.5' 10.2' ' 2 ' 2 t y r o S - e n O e m a r F 0 1 4 1 . o N 44.4' 0 4 0 4 k c o r s p e t s p e t s ACCESS PATH elec to relocate r e d r o b k c o r d e v o m e r e b o t PROPOSED STORAGE AREA proposed new elec " 4 / 3 6 - ' 3 2 d o o …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:12 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

17.2 - 1410 Travis Heights Blvd - Presentation — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 10 pages

1410 Travis Heights Our forever home Index 01 02 03 04 PRECEDENT FRONT FACADE ENTRY SIDE VIEW O I L O F T R O P e m a N y c n e g A n g i s e D # There is a precedent for enclosing a front porch with steel windows. 518 Mary Street SERVICES Once owned by Liz Lambert, this bungalow was permitted in 2014 to enclose the front porch with steelcase windows and door. l a c i r o t s i H k r a m d n a L n o i s s i m m o C s t h g i e H s i v a r T 0 1 4 1 # i s t h g e H s i v a r T 0 1 4 1 e d a c a F t n o r F Current Future SAME: - Siding - Windows - Roofline Paint NEW: - - Walkway and entry steps - - Porch windows Planters Adding to the charm To accommodate our growing family, we will enclose the screen porch with steel windows for a new entry space. The windows and screens will be painted Sherwin-Williams International Orange. The original wood siding and roof trim will be painted Farrow and Ball Green Smoke. We will maintain all original windows on the front and sides of the home, including within the screened in porch. s t h g i e H s i v a r T 0 1 4 1 # EXAMPLE.COM An inviting entry We will remove the rotten wood deck and replace it with new steps. To add interest, we will include new metal planters with native Austin plants. s t h g i e H s i v a r T 0 1 4 1 # EXAMPLE.COM A peek of a screen porch Through our treasured live oaks and extending behind the current house, a screen porch will be slightly visible from the sidewalk. International Orange will be used for the posts. The skirting of the house will be a natural stucco. This porch was designed specifically to enjoy the majestic live oaks without bugs, of course. s t h g i e H s i v a r T 0 1 4 1 # New Screened Porch w e i V e d i S …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:13 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

18.0 - 515 Leland St — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts October 7, 2026 PR-2026-113721 Travis Heights-Fairview Park Historic District 515 Leland Street 18 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1929 garage. Architecture This structure is a two-bay garage listed as a contributing resource to the district. It features two separate garage doors, which have been replaced, separated by a center post for support. The walls are clad in painted board and batten siding which is in good condition but retains its utilitarian appearance. The structure is front gabled and features vents at the front and rear. A non-original metal roof is present above. Research The property was owned for many years by Alton & Julia Walker, and at times also housed renters for a short time. Alton Walker worked for a time as a driver for the Driskill Hotel, but later in the 1940s-50s started a business repairing washing machines and other appliances. The repair shop was listed as having this address on Leland Street, and it is possible that the garage structure was used in service of this work. Department Comments Per city code § 25-11-213 (G)(4), the Historic Landmark Commission has 180 days to review demolition permits in National Register historic districts starting from the date the application was submitted. This period is set to time out on February 27, 2027. Property Evaluation The property contributes to the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of a simple detached garage without stylistic influences found throughout the district. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. Staff Recommendation …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:13 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

18.1 - 515 Leland St - Photos — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

Backup

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:14 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

19.0 - 1808 E Cesar Chavez St — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 11 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Demolition and Relocation Permits October 7, 2026 PR-2026-040403 1808 East Cesar Chavez Street 19 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1930 structure. Architecture The existing structure is a two story commercial structure with two storefront entries side-by-side on the main elevation. There is a small, metal clad awning above the ground floor entryways. Above, two sets of paired, wood- frame windows are present at the second floor, with a moderately pitched hipped roof with exposed rafter tails above. The roof material is metal standing seam, and all exterior walls are clad in thin teardrop siding. While several of the windows are currently boarded over or otherwise inaccessible, images from the past decade would indicate that the existing material is largely intact, if in need of repair. Research This property has a long history of commercial tenants who served the East Austin community. For several decades after construction, it was home to a beauty parlor, a barber shop, and a shoe repair shop. By the 1950s, one or more of these tenants had vacated the building, but there was always at least one occupied storefront at the property. Newspaper records feature advertisements for Smith’s Barber Shop, Guarantee Wave Shop, and Carlson’s Shoe Repair Shop. The latter of these was owned by Reverend E. A. Carlson, formerly a Swedish Baptist minister, for 31 years until his death in 1964. Department Comments Two permits were issued for the property in 1999, though there are no digitized records of the application material. However, summary descriptions are available in city records. One permit described work to remodel the building’s interior & exterior to create a duplex. The second permit from the same year is summarized as, “Add 1st floor stair tower, porch, and 2nd floor extension.” There are no records of this property being surveyed in the 1980 East Austin historic resource survey or the 1984 citywide comprehensive resource survey. At time of writing, no photos of the property can be found prior to the 1999 permits. This application will time out on November 17, 2026. Property Evaluation The 2016 East Austin historic resource survey lists the property as eligible as a City of Austin landmark, as well as contributing to a potential local or National Register historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain integrity. 3) Properties …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:14 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

19.1 - 1808 E Cesar Chavez St - Photos — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

A.L.T.A./N.S.P.S. LAND TITLE SURVEY 2 1 1 2 29" Pecan Tree 20.5" American Elm Tree Buildings & Covered Area to be Demolished LOC: Demolition Erosion Controls: Silt fence or mulch sock, as needed Boundary Boys, LLC

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:14 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

20.0 - 1508 Canterbury St — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 11 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Demolition and Relocation Permits October 7, 2026 PR-2026-075085; GF-2026-111431 1508 Canterbury Street 20 – 1 Proposal Partially demolish and construct an addition to a ca. 1903 house. Project Specifications Remodel and add a second story. Add a covered deck atop the second story. Replace existing windows, replace siding with stucco, and remove and replace porch. Architecture One-story National Folk cottage with full-width porch supported by turned posts, side-gabled roof, symmetrical wood-trimmed windows, and horizontal wood siding. Research The house at 1508 Canterbury was constructed around 1903. Its first owner-occupants were the family of Charles H. Alhardt, a grocer who also owned and operated the Lone Star Yeast Company. Around 1910, Alhardt sold the house and it became a rental property with relatively high turnover until it was purchased by Eulalio and Reinalda Saldana around 1918. Though Eulalio Saldana died shortly after, his widow remained in the home for the next ten years. After Mrs. Saldana sold the house, it again became a rental property, hosting a variety of working-class tenants including waiters, a concrete finisher, a painter, and students. Pete and Esther Martinez bought the home in the early 1950s, and remained there for at least a decade. Pete Martinez was a plasterer, while Esther Martinez worked at the Casa Blanca Café. Design Standards The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at potential historic landmarks. Staff have evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet the applicable standards for alterations or residential additions, as the proposed modifications are so extreme as to equate to total demolition when evaluated cumulatively: the proposed project removes almost all historic fabric from the existing 123-year-old house and adds second and third floors that entirely overwhelm the original. Department Comments This item first appears on the October 7, 2026 agenda of the Historic Landmark Commission. The Commission’s 75- day timeline for action will elapse on December 21, 2026. Property Evaluation The 2016 East Austin survey lists the property as contributing to potential local and National Register districts. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff have evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:14 p.m.
Historic Landmark Commission – Oct. 7, 2026

20.1 - 1508 Canterbury St - drawings — original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 35 pages

AUSTIN ENERGY Email: aebspaespa@austinenergy.com ☐This project will require a temporary loop ☐Design required* *If AE Design is required, all construction for AE facilities must be complete and shown on the plot plan in place to meet all clearance requirements. This form must have Designer name, Design WR# in “Scope of work”. Building Service Planning Application (BSPA) This form to be used for review of Residential Building Permits only. The plot plan submitted to plan review must be the same plan submitted for Austin Energy review. Any change to previously submitted plans requires AE review and re-approval. This review DOES NOT include the electric service location or routing. Person Responsible for Request: _____________________________________________________ Email: ___________________________________________________________________________ Project Address: ____________________________________________________________ –OR– Legal Description: _____________________________________ Lot: ________ Block: ________ Who is your electrical provider? AE Other: _______________________________________ Scope of work must list ALL new construction, for it to be considered as part of this review (pool/spa, retaining walls, etc.). Anything not listed below is not considered in the review. Scope of work: ____________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________ BSPA Completed by (print name) Phone _______________________________________________________________ _______________ BSPA Completed by (signature) Date AE Representative Use Only City of Austin | Austin Energy Building Service Planning Application (BSPA) v. 6 - 7/2022 (cid:53)(cid:39)(cid:32)(cid:97)(cid:108)(cid:108)(cid:101)(cid:121)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:101)(cid:116)(cid:98)(cid:97)(cid:99)(cid:107) (cid:83)(cid:54)(cid:56)(cid:176)(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:39)(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:34)(cid:32)(cid:69)(cid:32)(cid:53)(cid:56)(cid:46)(cid:53)(cid:48)(cid:39) (cid:87)(cid:87) (cid:101)(cid:108)(cid:101)(cid:99)(cid:116)(cid:114)(cid:105)(cid:99)(cid:97)(cid:108)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:107)(cid:121)(cid:45)(cid:116)(cid:111)(cid:45)(cid:103)(cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:117)(cid:110)(cid:100) (cid:99)(cid:108)(cid:101)(cid:97)(cid:114)(cid:97)(cid:110)(cid:99)(cid:101) (cid:53)(cid:39)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:105)(cid:100)(cid:101)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:101)(cid:116)(cid:98)(cid:97)(cid:99)(cid:107) (cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:97)(cid:105)(cid:114)(cid:32)(cid:97)(cid:98)(cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:51)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:53)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:102) (cid:115)(cid:101)(cid:119)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:32)(cid:108)(cid:111)(cid:99)(cid:97)(cid:116)(cid:105)(cid:111)(cid:110) (cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:104)(cid:101)(cid:97)(cid:100)(cid:32)(cid:112)(cid:111)(cid:119)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:32)(cid:108)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:101) (cid:101)(cid:108)(cid:101)(cid:99)(cid:116)(cid:114)(cid:105)(cid:99)(cid:97)(cid:108)(cid:32)(cid:99)(cid:108)(cid:101)(cid:97)(cid:114)(cid:97)(cid:110)(cid:99)(cid:101) (cid:53)(cid:39)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:105)(cid:100)(cid:101)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:101)(cid:116)(cid:98)(cid:97)(cid:99)(cid:107) (cid:53)(cid:39) (cid:53)(cid:39) (cid:97)(cid:47)(cid:99)(cid:32)(cid:112)(cid:97)(cid:100)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:49)(cid:48)(cid:46)(cid:48)(cid:56)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:102) (cid:116)(cid:114)(cid:101)(cid:101)(cid:32)(cid:73)(cid:68) (cid:115)(cid:112)(cid:101)(cid:99)(cid:105)(cid:101)(cid:115) (cid:116)(cid:114)(cid:117)(cid:110)(cid:107)(cid:32)(cid:100)(cid:105)(cid:97)(cid:109)(cid:101)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:114) (cid:116)(cid:114)(cid:101)(cid:101)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:99)(cid:104)(cid:101)(cid:100)(cid:117)(cid:108)(cid:101) (cid:72)(cid:49) (cid:72)(cid:50) (cid:84)(cid:49) (cid:84)(cid:50) (cid:84)(cid:51) (cid:69)(cid:97)(cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:110)(cid:32)(cid:66)(cid:108)(cid:97)(cid:99)(cid:107) (cid:87)(cid:97)(cid:108)(cid:110)(cid:117)(cid:116) (cid:80)(cid:111)(cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:32)(cid:79)(cid:97)(cid:107) (cid:72)(cid:97)(cid:99)(cid:107)(cid:98)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:114)(cid:121) (cid:67)(cid:104)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:97)(cid:98)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:114)(cid:121) (cid:83)(cid:105)(cid:108)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:32)(cid:77)(cid:97)(cid:112)(cid:108)(cid:101) (cid:50)(cid:56)(cid:34) (cid:50)(cid:54)(cid:32)(cid:49)(cid:47)(cid:50)(cid:34) (cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:46)(cid:53)(cid:34) (cid:51)(cid:49)(cid:34) (cid:49)(cid:49)(cid:34) (cid:99)(cid:114)(cid:105)(cid:116)(cid:105)(cid:99)(cid:97)(cid:108)(cid:32)(cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:111)(cid:116)(cid:32)(cid:122)(cid:111)(cid:110)(cid:101)(cid:115) (cid:49)(cid:47)(cid:52) (cid:55)(cid:39) (cid:54)(cid:39)(cid:45)(cid:55)(cid:32)(cid:49)(cid:47)(cid:50)(cid:34) (cid:49)(cid:48)(cid:39)(cid:45)(cid:55)(cid:32)(cid:49)(cid:47)(cid:50)(cid:34) (cid:56)(cid:39) (cid:45) (cid:49)(cid:47)(cid:50) (cid:49)(cid:52)(cid:39) (cid:49)(cid:51)(cid:39)(cid:45)(cid:51)(cid:34) (cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:39)(cid:45)(cid:51)(cid:34) (cid:49)(cid:54)(cid:39) (cid:45) (cid:102)(cid:117)(cid:108)(cid:108) (cid:50)(cid:56)(cid:39) (cid:50)(cid:54)(cid:39)(cid:45)(cid:54)(cid:34) (cid:52)(cid:50)(cid:39)(cid:45)(cid:54)(cid:34) (cid:51)(cid:50)(cid:39) (cid:45) (cid:99)(cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:101)(cid:100)(cid:32)(cid:112)(cid:97)(cid:116)(cid:105)(cid:111)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:57)(cid:52)(cid:46)(cid:54)(cid:56)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:102) (cid:99)(cid:97)(cid:110)(cid:116)(cid:105)(cid:108)(cid:101)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:101)(cid:100)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:108)(cid:97)(cid:98)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:114)(cid:101)(cid:102)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:32)(cid:116)(cid:111) (cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:114)(cid:117)(cid:99)(cid:116)(cid:117)(cid:114)(cid:97)(cid:108) (cid:69) (cid:69) (cid:72)(cid:49) (cid:97)(cid:114)(cid:101)(cid:97)(cid:32)(cid:111)(cid:102) (cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:99)(cid:105)(cid:100)(cid:101)(cid:110)(cid:116)(cid:97)(cid:108)(cid:32)(cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:111)(cid:102) (cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:104)(cid:97)(cid:110)(cid:103) (cid:32)(cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:111)(cid:102)(cid:32)(cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:104)(cid:97)(cid:110)(cid:103)(cid:44) (cid:97)(cid:98)(cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101) (cid:39) (cid:48) (cid:48) (cid:46) (cid:56) (cid:49) (cid:49) (cid:32) (cid:69) (cid:32) (cid:34) (cid:48) (cid:48) (cid:48) (cid:48) (cid:176) (cid:50) (cid:50) (cid:78) (cid:39) (cid:112)(cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:112)(cid:111)(cid:115)(cid:101)(cid:100)(cid:32)(cid:116)(cid:119)(cid:111)(cid:45)(cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:111)(cid:114)(cid:121)(cid:32)(cid:50)(cid:32)(cid:117)(cid:110)(cid:105)(cid:116)(cid:32)(cid:65)(cid:68)(cid:85) (cid:49)(cid:44)(cid:52)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:44)(cid:51)(cid:54)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:102) (cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:46)(cid:54)(cid:56)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:113)(cid:32)(cid:102)(cid:116) (cid:99)(cid:97)(cid:110)(cid:116)(cid:105)(cid:108)(cid:101)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:101)(cid:100)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:108)(cid:97)(cid:98)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:114)(cid:101)(cid:102)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:32)(cid:116)(cid:111) (cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:114)(cid:117)(cid:99)(cid:116)(cid:117)(cid:114)(cid:97)(cid:108) (cid:72)(cid:50) (cid:32)(cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:111)(cid:102)(cid:32)(cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:104)(cid:97)(cid:110)(cid:103)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:97)(cid:98)(cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101) (cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:112)(cid:115) (cid:49)(cid:54)(cid:46)(cid:48)(cid:53)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:102) (cid:112)(cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:112)(cid:111)(cid:115)(cid:101)(cid:100)(cid:32)(cid:99)(cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:101)(cid:100)(cid:32)(cid:112)(cid:111)(cid:114)(cid:99)(cid:104) (cid:49)(cid:49)(cid:54)(cid:46)(cid:54)(cid:54)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:102) (cid:50)(cid:46)(cid:49)(cid:57)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:113)(cid:32)(cid:102)(cid:116) (cid:69) (cid:84)(cid:51) (cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:99)(cid:105)(cid:100)(cid:101)(cid:110)(cid:116)(cid:97)(cid:108)(cid:32)(cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:111)(cid:102) (cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:104)(cid:97)(cid:110)(cid:103)(cid:32)(cid:116)(cid:111)(cid:116)(cid:97)(cid:108) (cid:61)(cid:32)(cid:49)(cid:48)(cid:52)(cid:46)(cid:53)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:113)(cid:102)(cid:116) (cid:97)(cid:114)(cid:101)(cid:97)(cid:32)(cid:111)(cid:102)(cid:32)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:99)(cid:105)(cid:100)(cid:101)(cid:110)(cid:116)(cid:97)(cid:108) (cid:97)(cid:114)(cid:101)(cid:97)(cid:32)(cid:111)(cid:102)(cid:32)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:99)(cid:105)(cid:100)(cid:101)(cid:110)(cid:116)(cid:97)(cid:108) (cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:111)(cid:102)(cid:32)(cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:104)(cid:97)(cid:110)(cid:103) (cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:111)(cid:102)(cid:32)(cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:104)(cid:97)(cid:110)(cid:103) (cid:115)(cid:105)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:32)(cid:112)(cid:108)(cid:97)(cid:110)(cid:32)(cid:108)(cid:101)(cid:103)(cid:101)(cid:110)(cid:100) (cid:49)(cid:48)(cid:48) (cid:116)(cid:111)(cid:112)(cid:111)(cid:103)(cid:114)(cid:97)(cid:112)(cid:104)(cid:105)(cid:99)(cid:32)(cid:108)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:101)(cid:115)(cid:32)(cid:49)(cid:39)(cid:45)(cid:48)(cid:34) (cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:118)(cid:97)(cid:108) (cid:112)(cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:112)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:116)(cid:121)(cid:32)(cid:108)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:101) (cid:98)(cid:117)(cid:105)(cid:108)(cid:100)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:103)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:101)(cid:116)(cid:98)(cid:97)(cid:99)(cid:107)(cid:32)(cid:108)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:101) (cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:110)(cid:116)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:101)(cid:116)(cid:98)(cid:97)(cid:99)(cid:107)(cid:32)(cid:112)(cid:108)(cid:97)(cid:110)(cid:101) (cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:104)(cid:101)(cid:97)(cid:100)(cid:32)(cid:117)(cid:116)(cid:105)(cid:108)(cid:105)(cid:116)(cid:121)(cid:32)(cid:108)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:101) (cid:117)(cid:110)(cid:100)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:103)(cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:117)(cid:110)(cid:100) (cid:101)(cid:108)(cid:101)(cid:99)(cid:116)(cid:114)(cid:105)(cid:99)(cid:97)(cid:108)(cid:32)(cid:108)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:101) (cid:119)(cid:97)(cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:32)(cid:119)(cid:97)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:32)(cid:108)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:101) (cid:119)(cid:97)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:32)(cid:108)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:101) (cid:103)(cid:97)(cid:115)(cid:32)(cid:108)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:101) (cid:112)(cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:112)(cid:111)(cid:115)(cid:101)(cid:100)(cid:32)(cid:102)(cid:101)(cid:110)(cid:99)(cid:101) (cid:101)(cid:120)(cid:105)(cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:103)(cid:32)(cid:102)(cid:101)(cid:110)(cid:99)(cid:101) (cid:97)(cid:115)(cid:112)(cid:104)(cid:97)(cid:108)(cid:116) (cid:99)(cid:111)(cid:110)(cid:99)(cid:114)(cid:101)(cid:116)(cid:101) (cid:50)(cid:53)(cid:37)(cid:32)(cid:99)(cid:114)(cid:105)(cid:116)(cid:105)(cid:99)(cid:97)(cid:108)(cid:32)(cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:111)(cid:116)(cid:32)(cid:122)(cid:111)(cid:110)(cid:101) (cid:53)(cid:48)(cid:37)(cid:32)(cid:99)(cid:114)(cid:105)(cid:116)(cid:105)(cid:99)(cid:97)(cid:108)(cid:32)(cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:111)(cid:116)(cid:32)(cid:122)(cid:111)(cid:110)(cid:101) (cid:112)(cid:111)(cid:119)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:32)(cid:112)(cid:111)(cid:108)(cid:101) (cid:101)(cid:108)(cid:101)(cid:99)(cid:116)(cid:114)(cid:105)(cid:99)(cid:97)(cid:108)(cid:32)(cid:109)(cid:101)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:114) (cid:119)(cid:97)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:32)(cid:109)(cid:101)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:114) (cid:103)(cid:97)(cid:115)(cid:32)(cid:109)(cid:101)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:114) (cid:69) (cid:87) (cid:71) (cid:87)(cid:87) (cid:119)(cid:97)(cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:32)(cid:119)(cid:97)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:32)(cid:116)(cid:97)(cid:112) (cid:67) (cid:99)(cid:108)(cid:101)(cid:97)(cid:110)(cid:32)(cid:111)(cid:117)(cid:116) (cid:39) (cid:48) (cid:48) (cid:46) (cid:56) (cid:49) (cid:49) (cid:32) (cid:87) (cid:39) (cid:32) (cid:34) (cid:48) (cid:48) (cid:48) (cid:48) (cid:176) (cid:50) (cid:50) (cid:83) (cid:57)(cid:56)(cid:46)(cid:54)(cid:52)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:113)(cid:32)(cid:102)(cid:116) (cid:101)(cid:120)(cid:105)(cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:103)(cid:32)(cid:99)(cid:104)(cid:97)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:32)(cid:108)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:107)(cid:32)(cid:102)(cid:101)(cid:110)(cid:99)(cid:101) (cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:111)(cid:102)(cid:32)(cid:97)(cid:98)(cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101) (cid:112)(cid:105)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:32)(cid:111)(cid:117)(cid:116)(cid:115)(cid:105)(cid:100)(cid:101)(cid:32)(cid:116)(cid:104)(cid:101)(cid:32)(cid:49)(cid:47)(cid:52)(cid:32)(cid:67)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:44) (cid:114)(cid:101)(cid:102)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:32)(cid:116)(cid:111)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:114)(cid:117)(cid:99)(cid:116)(cid:117)(cid:114)(cid:97)(cid:108) (cid:101)(cid:120)(cid:105)(cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:103)(cid:32)(cid:104)(cid:111)(cid:117)(cid:115)(cid:101) (cid:51)(cid:46)(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:113)(cid:32)(cid:102)(cid:116) (cid:49)(cid:44)(cid:51)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:46)(cid:51)(cid:54)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:113)(cid:32)(cid:102)(cid:116) (cid:84)(cid:50) (cid:71) (cid:50)(cid:110)(cid:100)(cid:32)(cid:102)(cid:108)(cid:111)(cid:111)(cid:114)(cid:32)(cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:111)(cid:102) (cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:104)(cid:97)(cid:110)(cid:103) (cid:99)(cid:111)(cid:110)(cid:99)(cid:114)(cid:101)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:112)(cid:115) (cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:46)(cid:48)(cid:53)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:102) (cid:49)(cid:53)(cid:39)(cid:32)(cid:102)(cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:110)(cid:116)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:101)(cid:116)(cid:98)(cid:97)(cid:99)(cid:107) (cid:78)(cid:54)(cid:56)(cid:176)(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:39)(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:34)(cid:32)(cid:69)(cid:32)(cid:53)(cid:56)(cid:46)(cid:53)(cid:48)(cid:39) (cid:101)(cid:120)(cid:105)(cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:103)(cid:32)(cid:112)(cid:111)(cid:114)(cid:99)(cid:104) (cid:49)(cid:53)(cid:52)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:53)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:102) (cid:84)(cid:49) (cid:97)(cid:47)(cid:99)(cid:32)(cid:117)(cid:110)(cid:105)(cid:116)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:119)(cid:97)(cid:108)(cid:108)(cid:45)(cid:104)(cid:117)(cid:110)(cid:103) (cid:115)(cid:105)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:32)(cid:61)(cid:32)(cid:54)(cid:44)(cid:57)(cid:49)(cid:53)(cid:46)(cid:53)(cid:57)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:113)(cid:45)(cid:102)(cid:116) (cid:105)(cid:109)(cid:112)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:118)(cid:105)(cid:111)(cid:117)(cid:115)(cid:32)(cid:99)(cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:32)(cid:61)(cid:32)(cid:50)(cid:44)(cid:56)(cid:51)(cid:51)(cid:46)(cid:51)(cid:57)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:113)(cid:45)(cid:102)(cid:116)(cid:32)(cid:40)(cid:52)(cid:49)(cid:46)(cid:48)(cid:37)(cid:41) (cid:98)(cid:117)(cid:105)(cid:108)(cid:100)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:103)(cid:32)(cid:99)(cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:32)(cid:61)(cid:32)(cid:50)(cid:44)(cid:52)(cid:53)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:56)(cid:51)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:113)(cid:45)(cid:102)(cid:116)(cid:32)(cid:40)(cid:51)(cid:53)(cid:46)(cid:54)(cid:37)(cid:41) (cid:101)(cid:120)(cid:105)(cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:103)(cid:32)(cid:103)(cid:114)(cid:97)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:108)(cid:32)(cid:100)(cid:114)(cid:105)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:119)(cid:97)(cid:121) (cid:49)(cid:57)(cid:53)(cid:46)(cid:49)(cid:51)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:102) (cid:87) (cid:112)(cid:111)(cid:114)(cid:99)(cid:104)(cid:32)(cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:111)(cid:102) (cid:111)(cid:118)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:104)(cid:97)(cid:110)(cid:103) (cid:67)(cid:65)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:69)(cid:82)(cid:66)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:89)(cid:32)(cid:83)(cid:84)(cid:82)(cid:69)(cid:69)(cid:84) (cid:78) (cid:50) (cid:112)(cid:114)(cid:111)(cid:112)(cid:111)(cid:115)(cid:101)(cid:100)(cid:32)(cid:115)(cid:105)(cid:116)(cid:101)(cid:32)(cid:112)(cid:108)(cid:97)(cid:110) (cid:115)(cid:99)(cid:97)(cid:108)(cid:101)(cid:58)(cid:32)(cid:49)(cid:47)(cid:56)(cid:34)(cid:32)(cid:32)(cid:32)(cid:61)(cid:32)(cid:32)(cid:32)(cid:32)(cid:49)(cid:39)(cid:45)(cid:48)(cid:34) (cid:71)(cid:83)(cid:80)(cid:117)(cid:98)(cid:108)(cid:105)(cid:115)(cid:104)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:86)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:115)(cid:105)(cid:111)(cid:110)(cid:32)(cid:50)(cid:48)(cid:57)(cid:52)(cid:46)(cid:51)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:52)(cid:46)(cid:49)(cid:49) (cid:56)(cid:50)(cid:56)(cid:32)(cid:65)(cid:105)(cid:114)(cid:112)(cid:111)(cid:114)(cid:116)(cid:32)(cid:66)(cid:108)(cid:118)(cid:100)(cid:46)(cid:32)(cid:65)(cid:117)(cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:84)(cid:88)(cid:32)(cid:55)(cid:56)(cid:55)(cid:48)(cid:50) (cid:109)(cid:111)(cid:111)(cid:110)(cid:116)(cid:111)(cid:119)(cid:101)(cid:114)(cid:97)(cid:117)(cid:115)(cid:116)(cid:105)(cid:110)(cid:46)(cid:99)(cid:111)(cid:109)(cid:32)(cid:124)(cid:53)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:46)(cid:57)(cid:53)(cid:51)(cid:46)(cid:57)(cid:50)(cid:54)(cid:49) (cid:101) (cid:99) …

Scraped at: Oct. 5, 2026, 9:14 p.m.