O-SDA Industries C O N TA C T: A B B Y TAT K O W A T A T K O W @ A F F O R D A B L E H O U S I N G T E X A S . C O M A B B Y P E N N E R A B B Y @ A F F O R D A B L E H O U S I N G T E X A S . C O M Waverly North 3710 Cedar Street Site Plan Bldg 2 addition Bldg 1 addition Bldg 1 addition New Construction Leasing Office Building 1 Floor Plan Building 1 Cedar Street Elevation Stucco Hardie Panel Split Face CMU Building 1 - 35th Street Elevation Building 1 - 38th Street Elevation Building 1 - Home Street Elevation Building 2 Floor Plan Building 2 Home Street Elevation Stucco Hardie Panel Split Face CMU Building 2 - 35th Street Elevation Building 2 - 38th Street Elevation Building 2 - Cedar Street Elevation (interior courtyard) Thank You! Questions? Learn more at: Affordablehousingtexas. com Waverly North 3710 Cedar Street
3710 CEDAR STREET February 4, 2026 HLC Meeting Submitted to HLC February 3, 2026 Nick Wallace SUMMARY • Restoring the site to provide affordable housing is to be commended as compatible with the original use of the site in the period of significance. • This historic property deserves careful attention and clarity of what items will be restored vs those that will be replaced, obscured and/or removed. • The submittal is inadequate to describe proposed changes, additions and treatments. • The plans that have been submitted do not appear to accurately show the current building(s) and structures on the property as they exist today or as they existed in the period of significance. This makes it difficult for the HLC to evaluate what change(s) are being proposed. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Postpone vote on request until accurate documentation of the current structures and specific descriptions of the proposed changes are provided. 2. Encourage applicant to produce to HLC reviewers photos and accurate elevations showing each building, structure, and signage as it currently exists from all angles—including but not limited to placement of windows/doors and proposed changes. 3. Encourage applicant to produce historic photos of the site from the period of significance, which are readily available in Austin History Center archives. While a few photos available online are included in this deck, many more historic photos of the building exist in AHC archives. 4. Review new construction proposed on southern half of site. 5. Provide recommendations for signage interpreting history of site. ISSUE 1: INACCURATE AND/OR INCOMPLETE EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATIONS IMPEDE REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHANGES ELEVATIONS OMIT EXISTING CEDAR STREET-FACING DOORS Applicant’s Elevations Is this a request of HLC to remove all street-facing doors from the Cedar Street façade? Actual Current Building Doors Facing Cedar St. ELEVATIONS OMIT 38TH STREET-FACING DOOR STREET-FACING DOORS ALONG CEDAR AND 38TH ARE CHARACTER DEFINING FEATURES Source: Austin History Center online archives. Undated – North Stone Masonry Tower ELEVATIONS OMIT APPARENTLY HISTORIC STONE PILLARS WITH MASONRY MATCHING FAÇADE OF MAIN BUILDING How are these historic resources to be treated? Note: a stone pillar matching those shown above appears on claimed “non- historic” southern end of lot at 35th and Cedar. Source: Austin History Center Online Archives, 1910 ELEVATIONS OMIT EXISTING CONCRETE RAMP WALLS ATTACHED TO BUILDING They do not appear historic but it is not clear whether they are to be removed as part of the restoration. ELEVATIONS …
. l i a n o s s e f o r P n g s e D e h t i t c a t n o c , e r u t a n g s i r o l a e s e h t f o y t i l i b a c i l p p a r o y t i d i l a v e h t y f i r e v o T . t n e m u c o d h c u s f o e s u d e z i r o h t u a n u r o , n o i t p u r r o c , n o i t a c i f i d o m GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES, AND TO INCLUDE ALL REQUIREMENTS OF OTHER AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION. 2. EXAMINATION OF THE SITE AND PORTIONS THEREOF THAT AFFECT THIS WORK SHALL BE MADE BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, WHO SHALL COMPARE EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND SATISFY HIM/HERSELF AS TO THE EXISTING CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED. CONTRACTOR SHALL AT SUCH TIME ASCERTAIN AND VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING STRUCTURES. 3. THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS DESCRIBE DESIGN INTENT, AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE ALL INCLUSIVE. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MEANS AND METHODS TO PROVIDE COMPLETE OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS AND INSTALLATIONS. NO CLAIMS FOR ADDITIONAL WORK WILL BE AWARDED FOR WORK WHICH IS DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS OR WHICH IS REASONABLY INFERABLE FROM THEM. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THOROUGH COORDINATION OF TRADES. ALL CLAIMS FOR ADDITIONAL WORK WILL NOT BE AWARDED FOR ANY AND ALL WORK RELATED TO SUCH COORDINATION. t n e u q e s b u s y n a r o f e b s n o p s e r i l t o n s i e r u t c e t i h c r A d r a w t u O . e r u t c e t i h c r A d r a w t u O y b d e h s i l b u p y l l i a n g i r o s a t n e m u c o …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Eric Schweiker <ems0228@gmail.com> Thursday, January 29, 2026 12:39 PM Historic Preservation Office Fwd: Attention Hunter Sturgill You don't often get email from ems0228@gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Hello. I am a resident of the Zilkr on the Park condominium located at 1900 Barton Springs Road. I am writing to object to the bridge replacement project proposed at 2100 Barton Springs Road, Case # 2025- 145729. To begin, it is not clear whether this project contemplates replacement of the vehicle bridge on Barton Springs, the pedestrian bridge on the hike and bike trail, or both. The existing bridges are suitable for current traffic. I do not see any upside for the area in replacing them unless they are structurally unsound. Also the area is already heavily disrupted as a result of the rebanking project on the hike and bike trail just downstream from the existing pedestrian bridge. We are looking forward to a return to normalcy when this project is completed and do not need another disruptive project following it. Best regards, Eric Schweiker CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1
702 Winflo Dr Preliminary Design January 2026 West facing view from Winflo Dr. 21' - 5" " 0 - ' 7 POOL YARD 3 /A2.1 56' - 11" " 0 - ' 0 1 PUE EASEMENT / SETBACK " 0 - ' 0 1 K C A B T E S " 1 1 - ' 2 2 6' - 1" SETBACK 1 . 2 A / 1 5' - 0" SETBACK " 8 - ' 4 4 2 / 1 . 2 A " 6 - ' 6 " 7 - ' 8 1 YARD " 0 - ' 5 2 K C A B T E S T N O R F 10' - 3" FRONT STEP DRIVE WAY STRIPS PERVIOUS PAVER LANDSCAPE PATH PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION This drawing is not to be used for regulatory approval, permitting, or construction purposes. 00/00/0000 FIELD INSPECTION REQUIRED Prior to performing any bidding, new construction, and/or repairs, general contractor shall visit the site, inspect all existing conditions, and report any discrepancies to the architect. R D O L F N W 2 0 7 I 3 0 7 8 7 X T , I N T S U A DATE ISSUED FOR 00/00/0000 REVIEW Site Plan 1 SITE PLAN 3/16" = 1'-0" A2.0 1 / WINFLO DR SITE PLAN A0.3 TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH PL 1 A3.0 PL LIGHT COLORED STUCCO FINISH ROOF 123' - 10" 6' - 1" SETBACK VINES IN PLANTERS BEHIND PARAPET 33' - 6" 20' - 4" 3' - 2" BRICK OR STUCCO FINISH GARAGE DOOR 5' - 0" " 0 1 - ' 8 2 " 4 - ' 5 2 " 3 - ' 2 1 " 7 - ' 1 1 " 6 - ' 1 SECOND FLOOR 111' - 7" FIRST FLOOR = 523.0' 100' - 0" AVERAGE GRADE = 521.5' 98' - 6" 1 FRONT ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" Front Elevation Current PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION This drawing is not to be used for regulatory approval, permitting, or construction purposes. 00/00/0000 FIELD INSPECTION REQUIRED Prior to performing any bidding, new construction, and/or repairs, general contractor shall visit the site, inspect all existing conditions, and report any discrepancies to the architect. R D O L F N W 2 0 7 I 3 0 7 8 7 X T , I N T S U A DATE ISSUED FOR 00/00/0000 REVIEW EXTERIOR …
Steering Committee Members: Stephen L. Amos, Chair Renae Alsobrook, Mark Ashby, Jeff Callahan, Scott Campbell, Mark Carlson, Hunter Coleman, Evelyn Fujimoto, Adrienne Goldsberry, Paula Hern, Nick Mehl, William Osborn, Charlie Rice, Paul Shattuck, Shawn Shillington February 1, 2026 RE: Item 9: HR-2026-004703 – 702 Winflo Drive – West Line National Register Historic District Council District 9 Dear Chair Heimsath and Commissioners, The Old West Austin Neighborhood Association (OWANA) Zoning Committee appreciates the applicant’s attendance at our January meeting to discuss their conceptual design proposal for 702 Winflo Drive, which would replace a contributing structure within the West Line National Register Historic District. Given the limited information presented, we strongly encourage the applicant to return to the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) with a complete submittal prior to proceeding to the Historic Landmark Commission (HLC) for further review. Accordingly, we respectfully request that the HLC hearing scheduled for February 4 be postponed to allow this additional work to occur. At this time, OWANA cannot determine whether to oppose or support the proposed design, as insufficient information has been provided regarding the proposed replacement structure. While the applicant presented a rudimentary site plan and a basic street-facing elevation, no building plans, sections, or three- dimensional drawings were provided to adequately illustrate the overall massing of the building or its relationship to adjacent properties. Although we appreciate that the site plan reflects a 25-foot front setback consistent with the neighborhood’s Restrictive Covenant (RC), additional documentation is necessary to evaluate compatibility with surrounding contributing homes. We also acknowledge the applicant’s stated willingness to work toward a solution that is more compatible with the neighborhood. Protecting these homes is vital to preserving the unique character and national recognition that define Old West Austin. Following the meeting, the applicant submitted images of nearby homes for comparison. However, some of the referenced examples are non-contributing structures and therefore do not provide an appropriate basis for comparison within the historic district. Additionally, the contributing structure at 716 Brownlee Circle was cited as an example of a street-facing garage; however, this property is located on a corner lot, and the garage is situated at the rear of the house rather than along the primary street frontage. These contextual distinctions are important when evaluating compatibility within the district. We believe additional work is required to align the proposal with the Old West Austin Neighborhood Design Guidelines and to provide a meaningful …
2/2/26, 2:41 PM Inbox - Lukes, Austin - Outlook Outlook John Henry Swingler, 702 Winflo proposal From Price Mulford <pricem35@gmail.com> Date Fri 1/30/2026 5:21 PM To Lukes, Austin <Austin.Lukes@austintexas.gov> You don't often get email from pricem35@gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution To whom it may concern, I am the owner of 716 Brownlee Cir, located directly across the street from 702 Winflo. I understand that the applicant for 702 Winflo recently got married, and I’m delighted that they want to start a family in this neighborhood and become our neighbors. We strive to be welcoming and inclusive to our neighbors. The proposed design is thoughtful, and it’s clear that the architect has made significant efforts to honor the neighborhood’s character. My home has a two-car side by side garage and a low-profile roof, which is similar to what is being proposed for 702 Winflo. Additionally, 804 Winflo features a modern design with a flat roof and a comparable style. I urge staff not to delay the application further, as it is will be approved, and unnecessary delays only add to the challenges of affordability for young families like theirs. Sincerely, Price Mulford 214-862-6092 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0A6UK4Akm%2F4kyeqPqQsWBd3wABmOYfbwAA?nativ… 1/1
2/2/26, 2:43 PM Inbox - Lukes, Austin - Outlook Outlook RE: Item 9 - 702 Winflo - HR-2026-004703 From Kim Overton <kimoverton@me.com> Date Mon 2/2/2026 12:06 PM To Cc Lukes, Austin <Austin.Lukes@austintexas.gov> zoning@owana.org <zoning@owana.org> You don't often get email from kimoverton@me.com. Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Chair Heimsath and HLC Commissioners, I am a nearby neighbor and the owner of 703 Brownlee Circle, writing regarding the proposed demolition and redevelopment at 702 Winflo Drive currently scheduled for Historic Landmark Commission review. As someone who values the historic character of our neighborhood, I am concerned that the information available to date does not provide enough detail about the proposed replacement structure to fully evaluate its compatibility with the historic district guidelines. Accordingly, I respectfully request that the February 4 HLC hearing be postponed to allow time for ARC review and the preparation of a more comprehensive submittal package, including additional plans and visual materials. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Kim 703 Brownlee Circle, Owner CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0A6UK4Akm%2F4kyeqPqQsWBd3wABmlnMtgAA?native… 1/1
2/3/26, 10:45 AM Inbox - Lukes, Austin - Outlook Outlook E: Item 9 - 702 Winflo - HR-2026-004703 From M Blockley Date Thu 1/29/2026 1:02 PM To Lukes, Austin <Austin.Lukes@austintexas.gov>; You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Chair Heimsath and HLC Commissioners, I am writing in protest against the boxification of the south side of Winflo, having looked at the images of the white-slabbed towering double-decker sketch posted. Yes, there is already a similar new construction on the other side of the hill, the side with the apartment buildings. I would note that other recent remodels, like 701 Brownlee and 716 across the street from 702 Winflo have a noticeably lower profile. Also, 712 and 707 Brownlee, while tall, have non-stucco facades more in keeping with the dozen plus other mid-century and earlier properties here. I ask for a more detailed and less blonde- box description before permitting. Sincerely, Mary Blockley 702 Brownlee Circle CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0A6UK4Akm%2F4kyeqPqQsWBd3wABmCUn3wAA?nativ… 1/1
February 4, 2026 RE: Dr. O.H. and Thelma Elliott House Historic Landmark Designation Dear Chair Heimsath, Vice Chair Evans, and Members of the Historic Landmark Commission Preservation Austin exists to empower Austinites to shape a more inclusive, resilient, and meaningful community culture through preservation. We write in support of the proposed historic landmark designation of the Dr. O.H. and Thelma Elliott House for architecture and historic associations. Built in 1954, the Elliot House is a testament to the lives of two remarkable educators and civic leaders, Dr. Ora Herman Elliott and Thelma Mitchell Elliott. The Elliots were leaders in the communities of segregated East Austin and in the state and nationwide Civil Rights movement. Dr. O.H. Elliot served as business manager and Interim President of Samuel Houston College, and was instrumental in the merger of the college with Tillotson College in 1952, forming Houston-Tillotson University. Among his many accomplishments, Dr. Elliot led efforts to seek Black representation in elections within the Democratic Party in the 1940s, was a director of the City’s Rights Agency tasked with implementation of the Civil Rights Law of 1964, and played a significant role in the founding of Austin Community College in 1973 through his work with the Coordinating Board of Texas Colleges and Universities. Through his decades of political involvement, Dr. Elliot cultivated close relationships with President Lyndon B. Johnson, Governors John Connally, Preston Smith, and Dolph Briscoe, and U.S. Representative Jake Pickle. Thelma Mitchell Elliot was one of the first students to desegregate the University of Texas in the 1950s and was the first Black woman to graduate and obtain her degree from UT’s School of Social Work. She was the first Black female probation officer for the Travis County Juvenile Court, serving in this role for 10 years. In 1966, Mrs. Elliot was recruited to lead the ENABLE (Education and Neighborhood Action for Better Living Environment) program, part of President Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty, which tackled initiatives from unsanitary living conditions in rental units to neighborhood safety and infrastructure. Her efforts under ENABLE Austin were recognized as one of the most successful initiatives of its kind nationwide. Homeowner and daughter, Ms. Ora Houston, carries on her parents’ legacy of civic leadership, notably during her time as representative of District 1 on Austin City Council from 2015 to 2019. A committed preservationist, we congratulate Ms. Houston on her efforts to preserve her …
Abigail Ventress Associate Attorney Direct: (512)770-9521 Abigail@VBPenaLaw.com February 4, 2026 Via Email: preservation@austintexas.gov HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION CITY OF AUSTIN 301 W. 2nd St. Austin, Texas Re: Owner Opposition to Historic Zoning/Designation – 907 E. 13th St. Dear Commissioners: I represent the owner of 907 E. 13th St., Bubble Bee LP, and I am writing on its behalf to express its opposition to the proposed historic zoning/designation of its property. My client does not consent to historic zoning/designation of its property and intends to explore all available remedies should its property be designated historic over its wishes. The Structural Assessment Report for the property is included with this letter. My client respectfully requests that the Commission refrain from designating its property historic and allow demolition to proceed. Sincerely, Abigail Ventress ATTORNEY FOR BUBBLE BEE LP Enclosure cc: Blayre Peña 406 N. Lee Street, Ste. 103, Round Rock, Texas 78664 www.VBPenaLaw.com Telephone: (512)642-8585 Structural Assessment Report Prepared for: Eureka Holdings January 10, 2026 FEI Project No.: 1710 STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Foundation Engineering & Inspection (FEI Engineering) 12219 Tyson Cv. Unit A, Austin TX 78758 (512) 956-1030 FEInspectionLLC@gmail.com Texas Firm #: 22625 1 Structural Assessment Report Prepared for: Eureka Holdings January 10, 2026 FEI Project Number: Site Address: Dear Eureka Holdings, 1710 907 E. 13th St. Austin, TX January 10, 2026 FEI Project No.: 1710 As per your request, a professional engineer from FEI Engineering, Ashkan Ghaeezadeh, P.E., conducted a site inspection at the specified address. The primary objective of the evaluation was to assess the structural integrity of the building and determine the extent of existing damage attributable to age-related deterioration and/or other contributing factors. The assessment was conducted in accordance with nationally recognized interdisciplinary scientific methodologies and engineering practices, consistent with ASTM International standards, including ASTM E2713-25 and applicable related standards. The inspection was carried out on January 07, 2026, and consisted of a visual assessment of accessible interior and exterior components. Observed conditions were documented through field notes and photographic evidence both of which are included within this report. Please don’t hesitate to contact us should have any questions regarding the inspection and this report. Foundation Engineering and Inspection, LLC Texas Certificate of Registration F-22625 Ashkan Ghaeezadeh, M.S., P.E. Principle Engineer 2 Structural Assessment Report Prepared for: Eureka Holdings January 10, 2026 FEI Project No.: 1710 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) SITE DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................................ 4 2) DOCUMENT REVIEWED …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 5:41 PM Historic Preservation Office PR-2025-138065; GF-2025-144692 ; 907 E 13th Street Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Completed You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Preservation Board, I am writing to oppose the demolition permit for 907 E 13th Street. This house is one of the oldest remaining homes in the neighborhood and meets the City’s criteria for historic consideration, including architectural significance, association with early settlers in this area of Austin, and established community value. It is also one of the few remaining structures tied to the Swedish history of Swede Hill, much of which has already been lost to prior development. Neighborhood representatives have attempted to contact the applicant to discuss alternatives to demolition, but those requests have gone unanswered. This raises concerns about demolition-by-neglect and a lack of good-faith engagement in the preservation review process. The applicant’s consistent demolitions among their considerable 12th and 13th Street holdings and plethora of empty lots have become a blight on the East Side. It is about time that the Board and the City of Austin to do something about it as it is long overdue. They are not honest brokers and never will be until they held to account.. I respectfully urge the Commission to deny the demolition permit and to require consideration of preservation alternatives consistent with the City’s adopted criteria and long-term neighborhood interests. Bruce Sheehan 903 East 14th St Austin, TX 78702 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1 February 3, 2026 RE: PR-2025-138065; GF-2025-144692 ; 907 E 13th Street To whom it may concern, As a resident of Swede Hill, I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed demolition permit for 907 E 13th Street. The property is one of the oldest remaining residences in the neighborhood and retains clear historical significance. Based on the City’s adopted criteria, the building meets multiple standards for consideration, including architectural integrity, association with historically significant individuals, specifically early settlers in this area of Austin, and community value. As one of the few remaining structures connected to …
Barton Springs Road Bridge Capital Delivery Services | 04 Feb 2026 Project Project Background Background Project History About the Bridge Nearly 100years old built in 1926 20,000 Vehicles per day 1946 Bridge Expansion Key Entrance to Zilker Park and for Major City Events 3 Project Site Protect Park Monuments Bridge Site Challenge and Constraint Categories: Park and Historic Environmental Roadway Intersection Bridge 4 Project Purpose and Need Project Needs Project Goals / Outcomes Age of Structure 100 yrs old, Associated structural degradation Safety Barton Springs roadway not aligned Hillside instability at Umlauf Gardens Provide 75 Year Bridge Service Life Improve Safety Stabilize Umlauf Gardens Insufficient Paths Not enough bike or pedestrian paths on bridge Add Multi-modal and Connect with Park Trails Intersection Congestion At Barton Springs / Azie Morton intersection Reduce Congestion with addition of right turn 5 Project Purpose and Need Roadway Alignment Issues 6 Project Purpose and Need Goal During Construction Maintain two-way traffic during construction Maintain the Azie Morton / Barton Springs intersection during construction 20,000 Vehicles per day on Barton Springs Road (cid:127) Important commuter route (cid:127) Key access to Zilker Park (cid:127) Access to many special events (Trail of Lights, Austin City Limits, Blues on the Green, Zilker Park) 7 Project Options Project Options Rehabilitation or Replacement Options 9 Project Elements Elements Required for Rehabilitation or Replacement Bike Lanes Sidewalk / Path Shared Use Path Proposed Bridge Widened Bike Lane Accommodates Accommodate hiking Trails Wider Ped. Paths off-road biker trail users Accommodates Pedestrians for Special Events Multimodal areas to accommodate off-road hike and bike trail users Longer service life length Wider bridge Better alignment for safety Dedicated bike lanes 10 Bridge Inspection Bridge Inspection Findings Deck (with integral longitudinal joint), floor beams, and spandrel columns exhibited the most degradation. All structural components exhibited some degradation. Degraded Concrete Spandrel Column Spalling Exposed and Corroded Rebar Exposed and Corroded Rebar 11 Rehabilitation Options Spandrel Columns Arch Ribs Bridge Inspection Findings Rehabilitation for increased service life requires removal of deck, floor beams, and spandrel columns Demolish the structure to the arch ribs. Significant work is needed: major rehabilitation or bridge replacement. Do Nothing is not an option 1 Preserve Rehabilitation Option 1 is not feasible 12 Rehabilitation Options Improve Paths Arch ribs …
City of Austin 301 W. Second Street Austin, TX Recommendation for Action File #: 23-3600, Agenda Item #: 79. 12/14/2023(cid:4) Posting Language Conduct a public hearing and approve the recommended alternative in the Preliminary Engineering Report to replace the Barton Springs Road Bridge over Barton Creek. Lead Department Capital Delivery Services. Fiscal Note This item has no fiscal impact. For More Information: James Snow, Director, Capital Delivery Services, 512-974-9795; Eric Bailey, Interim Deputy Director, Capital Delivery Services, 512-974-7713; Paulinda Lanham, Capital Delivery Project Manager, Capital Delivery Services, 512-974-7974. Council Committee, Boards and Commission Action: November 10, 2022 - Update on the Barton Springs Road Bridge over Barton Creek project to the Mobility Committee. Update only, no action taken. May 11, 2023 - Briefing on the Barton Springs Road Bridge project and mobility elements of the Zilker Park Vision Plan to the Mobility Committee. Briefing only, no action taken. October 27, 2023 - Briefing on the Barton Springs Road Bridge project to the Mobility Committee. Additional Backup Information: The Barton Springs Road Bridge over Barton Creek is located near the intersection of Azie Morton Road and Barton Springs Road. The location of the bridge, at the entrance to Zilker Park, is a focal point of key community events such as Austin City Limits Musical Festival, South-By-Southwest (SXSW) Conference and Music Festival, Barton Springs, Trail of Lights, and Blues on the Green. Barton Springs Road and the associated bridge is also a key connection for vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian access linking Mopac to downtown and the South Lamar/Congress Avenue corridors, as well as providing the primary northern entrance to the Zilker and Barton Hills neighborhoods via Azie Morton Road, located immediately east of the bridge. The full bridge replacement option provides the most cost-effective and the longest useful life The Barton Springs Road Bridge over Barton Creek requires rehabilitation or replacement. It was originally built in 1925 and was expanded on one side in 1946. Structurally it is in fair condition, however, the existing bridge dimensions, sidewalks, and bike lanes do not meet with current design standards. The roadway west of Azie Morton Road is not aligned with the roadway east of Azie Morton Road. The project will reduce congestion and provide benefits to the local neighborhoods, commuters (all travel modes), and local businesses, as well as Zilker Park users and event attendees. City of Austin Page 1 of 2 Printed on …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Amanda Bejarano Wednesday, February 4, 2026 9:57 AM Historic Preservation Office Barton Springs Bridge You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution To whom it may concern; My family and I urge you to consider preserving history and nature of our beloved Barton Springs Bridge. Do not destroy the bridge. Please consider doing repairs and maintenance on this beautiful historical bridge rather than destroying it. Thank you! The Bejarano Family CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1 Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Tanya Payne Tuesday, February 3, 2026 4:59 PM Historic Preservation Office Please vote no on the destruction and replacement of the Barton Springs Bridge You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Historic Preservation Commission, Thank you for reviewing the Barton Springs Bridge destruction and replacement. This has been a project that has had me scratching my head for some time now. There is so much about this project that is confusing that I won't be able to get to them all, but here's a few for you. Barton Springs Rd was brought down to one lane each way. Speak very slowly to me as you explain why we will have a four lane bridge with a two lane road. We have gone to great lengths (the Pfluger pedestrian bridge, for example) to save other bridges that don't even serve as the entrance to a historic and important park. Why not this one? Destroying and replacing the bridge is really expensive - way more expensive than even predicted! Why on earth is the city looking to spend a huge amount of money here rather than on the priorities they bemone being left behind by prop Q? And don't forget all the environmental impact to that very sensitive area! Please vote no on the Barton Springs Bridge destruction and replacement. Thank you for your service to Austin. Sincerely, Tanya Payne CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Matthew Arth Wednesday, February 4, 2026 11:33 AM Historic Preservation Office Landmark Commission meeting 02/04/2026: Support new bridge at Barton Springs Road [You don't o(cid:332)en get email from h(cid:425)ps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIden(cid:415)fica(cid:415)on ] Learn why this is important at External Email - Exercise Cau(cid:415)on Good morning, My family and I live in the Barton Hills neighborhood and we strongly support the replacement of the bridge on Barton Springs Road leading to Zilker Park. Although it is a beau(cid:415)ful historic bridge, it is dangerously narrow for pedestrians and cyclists. It is impera(cid:415)ve that a replacement include protected bicycle lanes on both sides of the bridge and wide pedestrian sidewalks. If the bridge is not replaced, then new bridges or structures on either side to provide a safe space for pedestrians and cyclists should be priori(cid:415)zed. We would also recommend extending the right turn lane on Azie Morton Road that leads to Barton Springs Road as part of this project. We appreciate the Landmark Commission’s considera(cid:415)on of these comments. Best regards, --- Ma(cid:425)hew A. Arth Barton Hills CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use cau(cid:415)on when clicking links or opening a(cid:425)achments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" bu(cid:425)on in Outlook. For any addi(cid:415)onal ques(cid:415)ons or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@aus(cid:415)ntexas.gov". 1 Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: David Weinberg Wednesday, February 4, 2026 10:47 AM Historic Preservation Office Opposition to Barton Springs Road Bridge Replacement You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution I fully agree with and support the Zilker Neighborhood Association on this matter. Regards, David Weinberg Barton Hills From ZNA: The historic Zilker Park bridge, built in the 1920s and expanded in the 1940s, is a critical contributing feature of the National Register of Historic Places' Zilker Park Historic District. We urge the City Council to protect and preserve this bridge indefinitely and to reverse the decision to replace it with a standard highway-style bridge. Since our 2025 resolution, new data has further solidified our opposition: Escalating Costs: The estimated cost for a replacement bridge has increased from $40 million to $54.5 million. Funding Gap: While the city has secured a $32 million federal grant, the total project cost of $54.5 million leaves a significant unfunded gap of approximately $14.5 million. Viable …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Rodolfo Carrera Wednesday, February 4, 2026 1:36 PM Historic Preservation Office Please preserve the Barton Springs Bridge. You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Please preserve the Barton Springs Bridge. It is an iconic jewel and part of the soul of Austin. -- Rodolfo Carrera, 2323 Farnswood Cir Austin Texas 78704 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2026 AT 6:00 PM PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, EVENTS CENTER, ROOM 1405 6310 WILHELMINA DELCO DRIVE AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Environmental Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Kaela Champlin, (512) 974-3443, Kaela.Champlin@austintexas.gov CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Jennifer Bristol, Chair Mariana Krueger, Vice Chair Haris Qureshi, Secretary Richard Brimer Isabella Changsut Annie Fierro CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Justin Fleury Martin Luecke Mar Moretta-Urdiales Allison Morrison David Sullivan AGENDA The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Special Called meeting on January 28, 2026. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 2. 3. Presentation on “Sound Enforcement by Ordinance.” Presentation by Elaine Garrett, Assistant Director and Dedric Knox, Division Manager, Austin Development Services. Presentation on the Food Implementation Plan. Presentation by Edwin Marty, Food Policy Manager, Austin Climate Action and Resilience. 4. 5. Presentation on “Beverley Sheffield Northwest District Park duck pond overview and solutions.” Presentation by Janae Spence, Assistant Director, Austin Watershed Protection. Briefing on Austin Watershed CIP project information sharing. Presentation by Janae Spence, Assistant Director, Austin Watershed Protection. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Kaela Champlin at Austin Watershed Protection Department, at (512) 974-3443, Kaela.Champlin@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Environmental Commission, please contact Kaela Champlin, (512) 974-3443, Kaela.Champlin@austintexas.gov
Sound Enforcement by Ordinance Austin Development Services | February 4, 2026 2 Noise Regulation: Our Response Areas OMV Permits Construction Noise Mechanical Noise 3 City of Austin Code- Title 9: Prohibited Activities Chapter 9-2: Noise & Amplified Sound-Article 1: General Provisions § 9-2-3-General Restrictions Use or permit sound equipment at a business that exceeds the decibel limits § 9-2-3 (A)(1) Make noise or play a musical instrument that is audible to an adjacent business or residence between 10:30 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. § 9-2-3 (A)(2) Operate machinery (for separating, gathering, grading, loading, or unloading sand, rock, or gravel) within 600 feet of a residence, church, hospital, hotel, or motel between 7:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., except for concrete installation permitted under Section 9-2-21. § 9-2-3 (A)(3 Use or allow the use of a vehicle or device associated with cold-storage activities (refrigeration, freezing, ice production) between 7:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., if noise or vibration from the vehicle or its equipment is audible or causes vibration at a residence. § 9-2-3 (A)(4) Operate sound equipment in a vehicle if it is audible or causes vibration 30 feet from the equipment (unless authorized by Section 9-2-22 permit). § 9-2-3 (A)(5) Operate sound equipment in a watercraft if it is audible or causes vibration 100 feet from the equipment § 9-2-3 (A)(6) 4 Affirmative Defense to Violation Chapter 9-2-Noise & Amplified Sound-Article 1: General Provisions § 9-2-3-General Restrictions (Loading/Servicing Exception) Noise or vibration occurred while a vehicle or equipment was actively loaded, unloaded, or serviced in compliance with all codes. § 9-2-3 (B)(1) (Advance Consent Exception) At least 48 hours prior, written consent obtained from each affected dwelling unit within 600 feet, using a City-approved form. (Emergency Refrigeration Exception) Use lasted 48 hours or less on or near a licensed food/beverage business. Necessary to maintain cold hold or freezing due to a documented emergency (e.g., equipment or utility failure). § 9-2-3 (B)(2) Violation of Chapter 9-2 or any rule adopted under 1-2 pursuant to Chapter § 9-2 is a violation of City Code, chargeable as a Class C misdemeanor by a fine upon conviction not to exceed$500. Proof of a culpable mental state is expressly waived. § 9-2-3 (B)(3 § 9-2-3 5 Introduction of the Noise Ordinance Restrictions § 9-2-4- Restriction on Decibel Level Chapter 9-2-Noise & Amplified Sound- Article 1: General Provisions § 9-2-5 (A),(B), and (C) Restriction on Use of Sound …
The Austin Travis County Food Plan ● August 8, 2024 2026 1 Agenda 1. Background on Food Planning in Austin, Texas 2. How We Created the Austin Travis County Food Plan 3. What’s in the Plan, and what’s coming next 4. Questions and Answers 2 Background 3 Some Food for Thought Some of Our Food System Challenges Disasters and severe weather events: Winter Storms Uri and Mara Rapid community growth and planning for land use Supply chain disruptions: COVID-19 pandemic The climate impacts of the food system 5 How We Co-Created the Food Plan 6 Origins Why a Food Plan? • • In June 2021, Austin City Council directed the City Manager to initiate a planning process. In December 2022, Travis County Commissioners Court approved formal Travis County participation in the plan. • Sets clear goals and strategies to move toward a more equitable, sustainable, resilient food system. • Builds on existing plans and initiatives from the County, City, and community to tackle key food system issues. • Centers equity and the lived expertise of those most impacted by the current food system. 7 7 Co-Creation Through Stewardship: Who Wrote the Plan and Guided the Process? Project Team Summary Consultants & City/County staff Design & Implement Community Advisory Committee Guide & Approve City/County Executive Leadership Team Review & Course Correct Austin Travis County Food Policy Board Support & Advise 8 Community Engagement Data Summary 1,399 2,226 Demographics Additional participants are estimated to have been involved in tabling events and presentations Participants were involved in the Community Advisory Committee, Community Food Ambassadors, Issue Area Group workshops and other formal food plan meetings 46% identified as having been directly impacted by the food system, e.g. having current or past experience of hunger, using public benefits, or struggling to meet basic needs 19% were engaged from Travis County areas outside City of Austin boundaries 13% engaged in a language other than English 9 CO-CREATION THROUGH COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: LISTENING SESSIONS, WORLD CAFÉS 10 CO-CREATION THROUGH COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: TABLING ACTIVITIES & MEETING-IN-A-BOX 11 CO-CREATION THROUGH COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: ISSUE AREA GROUP WORKSHOPS 12 Some of the organizations represented in the planning process 13 Major Themes Two themes emerged across all community feedback: 1 2 Access to food and affordability 59% of all comments (1,647 total comments) Local food production and agriculture 52% of all comments (1,452 total comments) 14 Adoption October 29th, 2024 October 10th, 2024 …
Duck Pond Improvements Austin Watershed Protection | Feb 4, 2026 Background / History 1955 - City of Austin acquires the Park 1986 – Park added functionality of flood storage facility Partnership: Austin Watershed Protection (AWP) and Austin Parks and Recreation (APR) Duck Pond built in current location Great recreational value Water quality benefits 2022 – Vision Plan is adopted 2 Recent Water Level Issues January 2025 – Pool construction began August 2025 – Community concern re: duck pond water level Oct 23, 2025 – CM Siegel Community Meeting APR + AWP short- and long-term solutions Oct 25, 2025 – Pond full after 3.2” rain January 2026 – Community concern re: duck pond water level 3 Concerns Reduced water supply Lack of rain Potable water leak repaired with pool construction Runoff from smaller rains blocked Possible pond leakage Limitations on Makeup Water Monitoring water level Tree and Aquatic life threat Supplemental water as needed Prepared for fish relocation 4 We Are Listening Short-Term Solution (In Progress) AWP + APR Partnership Improve drainage to pond Sediment removal and berming to help more runoff enter pond Site visit held in November Survey in progress Design expected summer 2026 Construction anticipated fall of 2026 5 Long-Term Solution 1 (Unfunded) **Engineering needed for feasibility** Add flow from 72” storm drain Add bentonite liner Expand pond to southwest Minimize tree impacts Remove accumulated sediment Reduce leakage and preserve tree roots Formalize as AWP Asset for Maintenance 6 Long-Term Solution 2 (Unfunded) **Engineering needed for feasibility** Same as Solution 1 No flow added from 72” storm drain 7 Long-Term Improvements Ensure the dam and detention facility can handle more flow Significant new design and permitting work Working on funding solutions for design and construction Option Complexity 1 2 High Low Solution Strength High Low Cost $2-3M $1.25-$2M Watershed Health Benefits Time to Implement High Low 2 year minimum 1 year minimum 8 Questions? 9 Restrictions with make-up water Code restrictions on potable water CHAPTER 6-4. - WATER CONSERVATION. Quantity of water needed would be substantial (based on limited available information) 3 feet down in 4 months - 600,000 gallons to …
Austin Watershed CIP project information sharing Austin Watershed Protection | 02/04/2026 Current CIP yearly update Current CIP yearly update Current CIP yearly update Current CIP yearly update Current CIP yearly update Current CIP yearly update Interest from members for more project specific info Project Distribution Lists Project presentations from public meetings Proposal Add Environmental Commission members to distributions lists Can opt out Can be added to only particular distribution lists Share presentations from Public Meetings with Environmental Commission members 11 Questions? 12
. RECOMMENDATION TO AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL Environmental Commission Recommendation Number: 20260204-002 Sound Enforcement by Ordinance WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission was presented an update on the Sound Ordinance and Enforcement and that Austin Development Services enforces sound ordinances; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the challenges to enforcement when Austin Police, Austin Development Services, and Austin Arts, Culture, Music & Entertainment (which are three separate entities) are responsible for enforcing in various sections of the city and certain code violations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Environmental Commission supports the efforts of Austin Development Services’ sound ordinance enforcement and recommends the following: a. City owned properties prioritize using electric maintenance and cleaning equipment versus gas powered equipment for outdoor landscaping b. Better communication or consolidation of the three enforcement entities c. Work on creating a public dashboard where residents can see data regarding sound permits and complaints d. Require construction companies to keep decibel meters onsite to ensure compliance with sound ordinance e. Explore creating an equity-focused framework that examines noise violation consequences for repeat offenders. Date of Approval: February 4, 2026 Motioned By: Harris Qureshi Seconded By: Jennifer Bristol Vote: 9-0 For: Jennifer Bristol, Haris Qureshi, Richard Brimer, Justin Fleury, Mar Moretta-Urdiales, David Sullivan, Mariana Krueger, Annie Fierro, and Allison Morrison Against: None . Abstain: None Off the dais: None Absent: Isabella Changsut and Martin Luecke Attest: _____________________________________________ Jennifer Bristol, Chair
. RECOMMENDATION TO AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL Environmental Commission Recommendation Number: 20260204-003 Food Implementation Plan WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes that Austin Climate Action and Resilience has created the Food Implementation Plan in conjunction with the City of Austin Food Policy Board and Travis County Commissioners Court; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes that local food and agriculture programs impact the environment as well as public health and safety. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Environmental Commission supports the Food Implementation Plan with the following additional recommendations: a. Continue to give the Environmental Commission annual updates on the food implementation plan b. Amend planned unit development requirements to involve food security components c. Examine adding community gardens to the list of requirements for affordable housing d. Examine looking at city or county-owned property including decommissioned schools to see if community food production could be part of the land use plans. Date of Approval: February 4, 2026 Motioned By: Haris Qureshi Seconded By: Mariana Krueger Vote: 8-0 For: Jennifer Bristol, Haris Qureshi, Richard Brimer, Justin Fleury, Mar Moretta-Urdiales, David Sullivan, Mariana Krueger, and Annie Fierro Against: None Abstain: None Off the dais: Allison Morrison Absent: Isabella Changsut and Martin Luecke Attest: _____________________________________________ Jennifer Bristol, Chair
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, February 4, 2026 The Environmental Commission convened a regular meeting on Wednesday, February 4, 2026, at 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive in Austin, Texas. Chair Bristol called the Environmental Commission Meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Jennifer Bristol, Richard Brimer, Justin Fleury, Haris Qureshi, David Sullivan, Mariana Krueger, and Annie Fierro Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Mar Moretta-Urdiales, Allison Morrison Commissioners Absent: Isabella Changsut and Martin Luecke PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Speakers: Natalie Evans, Festival Beach Food Forest Aly Tharp, Festival Beach Food Forest Angelina Analis, Festival Beach Food Forest APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Special Called meeting on January 28, 2026. The minutes of the Special Called meeting on January 28, 2026, were approved on Commissioner Krueger’s motion, Commissioner Sullivan’s second, on a 7-0 vote. Commissioners Changsut and Luecke were absent. Commissioners Morrison and Fierro were off the dais. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 2. Presentation on “Sound Enforcement by Ordinance.” Presentation by Elaine Garrett, Assistant Director and Dedric Knox, Division Manager, Austin Development Services. Speakers: Elaine Garrett, Austin Development Services Dedric Knox, Austin Development Services 1 A recommendation related to Sound Enforcement by Ordinance was approved on Commissioner Qureshi’s motion, Commissioner Bristol’s second, on a 9-0 vote. Commissioners Changsut and Luecke were absent. 3. Presentation on the Food Implementation Plan. Presentation by Edwin Marty, Food Policy Manager, Austin Climate Action and Resilience. Speakers: Edwin Marty, Austin Climate Action and Resilience A recommendation regarding the Food Implementation Plan was approved on Commissioner Qureshi’s motion, Commissioner Krueger’s second, on an 8-0 vote. Commissioners Changsut and Luecke were absent. Commissioner Morrison was off the dais. The meeting was recessed at 8:50 P.M. until 8:57 P.M. without objection. The Environmental Commission Regular Meeting was reconvened at 8:59 P.M. 4. Presentation on “Beverley Sheffield Northwest District Park duck pond overview and solutions.” Presentation by Janae Spence, Assistant Director, Austin Watershed Protection. Speakers: Lee Sherman, Austin Watershed Protection Lindsey Machamer, Austin Parks and Recreation Caroline Reynolds, public comment Mary Ferro, public comment Gordon Thompson, public comment A motion to waive the rules and allow the Environmental Commission to extend the meeting until 10:15 P.M. was approved on Commissioner Krueger’s motion and Commissioner Qureshi’s second on an 8-0 vote. Commissioners Changsut and Luecke were absent. Commissioner Morrison was off the dais. 5. Briefing on Austin Watershed CIP project information sharing. Presentation by Janae Spence, …
COMMISSION FOR WOMEN WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2026, AT 12:00 P.M. AUSTIN CITY HALL, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ROOM #1101 301 W. 2ND ST AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Commission for Women may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by remotely, contact Christi Vitela at christi.vitela@austintexas.gov or 512-974-2792. telephone. To to speak register CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Becky Bullard, Chair Alexandria Anderson Vanessa Bissereth Angela Harris Diana Melendez Alicia Ramirez AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Jocelyn Tau, Vice Chair Katrina Scheihing Rabia Shaik Fernanda Veloz Salas Shaimaa Zayan The first ten speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Commission for Women regular meeting on January 7, 2026. WORKING GROUP UPDATES 2. Update from the Maternal Health Working Group and discussion of their scope of work. 3. Update from the Budget Working Group and discussion of possible recommendations. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Christi Vitela at the Austin City Clerk’s Office, at 512-974-2792 or christi.vitela@austintexas.gov, to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Commission for Women, please contact Christi Vitela at 512-974-2792 or christi.vitela@austintexas.gov.
COMMISSION FOR WOMEN MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, January 7, 2026 Commission for Women Regular Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 7, 2026 The Commission for Women convened in a regular meeting on Wednesday, January 7th, 2026, at City Hall, 301 W 2nd Street, Austin, TX. Chair Bullard called the Commission for Women regular meeting to order at 12:04 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Becky Bullard, Chair Alexandria Anderson Shaimaa Zayan Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Jocelyn Tau, Vice Chair Angela Harris Rabia Shaik Fernanda Veloz Salas PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Commission for Women regular meeting on December 3, 2025. The minutes from the meeting on December 2, 2025 were approved on Commissioner Anderson’s motion, Commissioner Zayan’s second, on a 6-0 vote. Vice Chair Tau was absent. Commissioners Bissereth, Melendez, and Scheihing were absent. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. Presentation regarding the development of a report by Austin Equity and Inclusion to in community conditions across neighborhoods. understand and address disparities Presentation by Shivani Datar, Business Process Specialist, Austin Equity and Inclusion. The presentation was made by Shivani Datar, Business Process Specialist, Austin Equity and Inclusion, and Gary Aaron, Business Process Consultant Sr., Austin Equity and Inclusion. 1 COMMISSION FOR WOMEN MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, January 7, 2026 3. Presentation regarding the National Association of Commissions for Women by Nancy Bremeau, Board Member, National Association of Commissions for Women. The presentation was made by Nancy Bremeau, Board Member, National Association of Commissions for Women. 4. Presentation regarding the Chamber of Mothers by Neha Erford, Shelley Mattingly, Mallory Lehenbauer, Austin Chapter of Chamber of Mothers. The presentation was made by Neha Erford, Shelley Mattingly, Mallory Lehenbauer, Austin Chapter of Chamber of Mothers. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 5. Approve the formation of a State Legislative Response Working Group. The motion to approve the formation of a State Legislative Response Working Group was approved on Commissioner Zayan’s motion, Commissioner Anderson’s second, on a 7-0 vote. Commissioners Bissereth, Melendez, and Scheihing were absent. Chair Bullard, Vice Chair Tau, and Commissioners Anderson and Zayan were added to the working group without objection. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Maternal Health Working Group update and discussion on scope of work Budget Working Group update and discussion of possible recommendations ADJOURNMENT Chair Bullard adjourned the meeting at 1:03 p.m. without objection. 2
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2026, AT 6 P.M. AUSTIN CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, ROOM 1001 301 WEST 2ND STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Zoning and Platting Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than 2 p.m. the day of the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Ella Garcia, Staff Liaison, for questions regarding speaker registration at LandUseLiaison@austintexas.gov or by phone at 512- 978-0821. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Hank Smith, Chair (District 8) Betsy Greenberg, Vice Chair (District 10) Ryan Puzycki, Secretary (District 7) Alejandra Flores, Parliamentarian (District 5) Luis Osta Lugo (Mayor’s Representative) Scott Boone (District 1) EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) David Fouts (District 2) Lonny Stern (District 3) Andrew Cortes (District 4) Christian Tschoepe (District 6) Taylor Major (District 9) The Zoning and Platting Commission will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on this agenda. The commission may not conduct a closed meeting without the approval of the city attorney. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071 Staff Liaison: Ella Garcia, 512-978-0821 Attorney: Jenna Schwartz, 512-978-0871 Page 1 of 5 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first four speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Zoning and Platting Commission regular meeting on Tuesday, January 20, 2026. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Rezoning: Location: Owner/Applicant: Son Thai Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: C14-2025-0124 - Parmer Lane Center; District 7 1623 West Parmer Lane and 1701 ½ West Parmer Lane, Walnut Creek LR to GR-MU-CO Recommended Sherri Sirwaitis, 512-974-3057, sherri.sirwaitis@austintexas.gov Austin Planning 3. Conditional Use SPC-2025-0156C - The Learning Center at Parmer; District 7 Permit: 12705 Center Lane Dr, Walnut Creek Location: Owner/Applicant: Centerstate 99 LTD Agent: Request: Civilitude (Esteban Gonzalez, PE) The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Daycare (General) on the …
ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 20, 2026 ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 20, 2026 MEETING MINUTES The Zoning and Platting Commission convened in a regular meeting on Tuesday, January 20, 2026, at Austin City Hall, Council Chambers, Room 1001, 301 W. Second Street, in Austin, Texas. Chair Smith called the Zoning and Platting Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Hank Smith Betsy Greenberg Andrew Cortes Luis Osta Lugo Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Ryan Puzycki Scott Boone David Fouts Lonny Stern Christian Tschoepe Commissioners Absent: Alejandra Flores Taylor Major PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Zoning and Platting Commission regular meeting on Tuesday, January 6, 2026. The minutes from the meeting of Tuesday, January 6, 2026, were approved on the consent agenda on Commissioner Osta Lugo’s motion, Commissioner Cortes’ second, on a 9-0 vote. Parliamentarian Flores and Commissioner Major were absent. 1 ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, January 20, 2026 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Rezoning: Location: Owner/Applicant: Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: C14-2025-0107 - 2301 North Loop; District 7 2301 West North Loop Boulevard, Shoal Creek Watershed FTM North Loop LLC Metcalfe Wolff Stuart and Williams (Michele R. Lynch) GR to CS-1 Recommended Cynthia Hadri, 512-974-7620, cynthia.hadri@austintexas.gov Austin Planning The motion to approve Staff’s recommendation of CS-1 for C14-2025-0107 - 2301 North Loop; District 7, located at 2301 West North Loop Boulevard, was approved on the consent agenda on Commissioner Osta Lugo’s motion, Commissioner Cortes’ second, on a 9-0 vote. Parliamentarian Flores and Commissioner Major were absent. 3. Subdivision C8-2025-0085.0A - Arbor View Subdivision; District 10 Environmental Variances: Location: Owner/Applicant: Ali F Tabrizi Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: 4316 Far West Boulevard, Bull Creek Watershed Mirza Baig, PE and Terry Irion Request to vary from LDC 25-8-301 and LDC 25-8-302 to allow driveway construction on slopes over 15% and to allow building construction on slopes over 15%, respectively; Request to vary from LDC 25-8-423 to exceed watershed impervious cover limits to allow 3900 square feet of impervious cover. Staff does not recommend these variances, having determined that the findings of fact have not been met. Mike McDougal, 512-974-6380, mike.mcdougal@austintexas.gov Austin Development Services Angela Gallegos, 512-974-3437, angela.gallegos@austintexas.gov Austin Development Services The public hearing was closed on Commissioner Osta Lugo’s motion, Vice Chair Greenberg’s second, on a 9-0 vote. Parliamentarian Flores and Commissioner Major were …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2025-0124 – Parmer Lane Center DISTRICT: 7 ADDRESS: 1623 West Parmer Lane & 1701 1/2 West Parmer Lane ZONING FROM: LR SITE AREA: 4.05 acres TO: GR-MU PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: Son Thai CASE MANAGER: Sherri Sirwaitis (512-974-3057, sherri.sirwaitis@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMEDATION: Staff recommends GR-MU-CO, Community Commercial-Mixed Use-Conditional Overlay Combining District, zoning. The conditional overlay will prohibit Automotive Rentals, Automotive Sales, Automotive Washing, Drop-Off Recycling, Exterminating Services and Pawn Shop Services uses on the property. ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: February 3, 2026 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ORDINANCE NUMBER: 02 C14-2025-0124 - Parmer Lane Center; District 71 of 10 C14-2025-0124 ISSUES: N/A CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: 2 The property in question is an undeveloped 4.05 acre area. The lots to the north fronting Parmer Lane, contain a retail strip center and an automotive repair business. To the east, there is an undeveloped area and a detention pond. The lots to the west are developed with restaurant uses and a car wash. To the south, there are duplex residences and office uses. The applicant is requesting a rezoning to GR-MU to develop retail, office, restaurant uses and residential uses at this location. The staff recommends Community Commercial-Mixed Use-Conditional Overlay Combining District zoning, with a conditional overlay to prohibit the more intensive commercial uses adjacent to the SF-3 zoning/residential uses to the south. The GR base district will permit additional commercial services on this property with access to West Parmer Lane a designated activity corridor (Parmer Lane Activity Corridor). These undeveloped lots are located within an existing commercial center at the southeast intersection of two Level 4/arterial roadways, Metric Boulevard and Parmer Lane. The proposed MU combining district will allow for a mixture of uses at this location near a Capital Metro bus route (325- Metrict/Rundberg) and bus stops (12430 Metric/Parmer and 4795 – Metric/Running Bird) to the west at the intersection of Metric Boulevard and Running Bird Lane. The applicant agrees with the staff’s recommendation. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: 1. The proposed zoning should be consistent with the purpose statement of the district sought. Community Commercial district is intended for office and commercial uses serving neighborhood and community needs, including both unified shopping centers and individually developed commercial sites, and typically requiring locations accessible from major traffic ways. Mixed Use combining district is intended for combination with selected base districts, in order to permit any combination of office, retail, commercial, …
ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION SITE PLAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: SPC-2025-0156C PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: February 3, 2026 PROJECT NAME: The Learning Experience at Parmer PROPOSED USE: General Daycare ADDRESS OF APPLICATION: 12705 Center Lake Dr COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7 AREA: 2.35 acres APPLICANT: AGENT: Centerstate 99 LTD 2725 Bee Cave Rd Austin, TX 78746 Esteban Gonzalez, PE Civilitude LLC 5110 Lancaster Court Austin, TX 78723 CASE MANAGER: Christine Barton-Holmes, CNUa, LEED AP Telephone: 974-2788 christine.barton-holmes@austintexas.gov EXISTING ZONING: The site is part of a larger commercial development, and is zoned LI-PDA. The 2000 rezone did not change the base development standards of LI, but did restrict several otherwise permitted uses. Daycares are not one of the prohibited uses, but General Daycares – those with more than 12 children – are conditional in the base zoning. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The project will one of the final stages of the buildout of the 18.279-acre LI-PDA, which currently has offices, multifamily, and some general commercial. The proposed daycare will be 10,000 square feet, with a proposed enrollment of 333 children, and will be fully compliant with the Land Development Code. SUMMARY STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit to construct the daycare facility. PREVIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: NA AREA STUDY: NA WATERSHED: Walnut Creek (Suburban watershed) APPLICABLE WATERSHED ORDINANCE: Current/ Comprehensive watershed ordinance CAPITOL VIEW: NA T.I.A.: Not Required 03 SPC-2025-0156C - The Learning Center at Parmer; District 71 of 12 PROJECT INFORMATION 2.35 acre site; part of 18.279-acre site overall EXIST. ZONING: LI-PDA ALLOWED F.A.R.: 1:1 MAX. BLDG. COVERAGE: 75% MAX. IMPERVIOUS CVRG.: 80% REQUIRED PARKING: 0 VEHICLES/0 BIKES PROVIDED PKNG: 98 VEHICLES/6 BIKES PROPOSED FAR: 1:.17 PROPOSED BLDG. CVRG: 17% PROPOSED IC:76% SUMMARY COMMENTS ON SITE PLAN: Land Use: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a 10,000 square foot daycare. Daycare (General), which is a daycare with an enrollment over twelve, is a conditional use in the base LI zoning. The site plan will comply with all requirements of the Land Development Code prior to its release. Environmental: The site is in the Walnut Creek Suburban watershed. There are no known Critical Environmental Features located within the limits of construction. Transportation: Access to the site is from Center Lake Drive. SURROUNDING CONDITIONS: Zoning/ Land use North: LI-PDA (multifamily) East: LI-PDA (hotel then detention) South: LI-PDA (undeveloped – to be restaurant) West: …
POA 2 REGIONAL WET POND E V I R D E K A L R E T N E C ) . . W O . R ' 0 9 ( POA 1 . . T T . . G G PARMER LANE (F.M. 734) (200' R.O.W.) 512 D LEGEND BOUNDARY / RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT / SETBACK CURB / EDGE OF PAVEMENT RETAINING / SCREENING WALL PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE STORM DRAIN LINE STORM DRAIN MANHOLE STORM DRAIN CURB INLET STORM DRAIN GRATE INLET DRAINAGE SWALE FLOW LINE DRAINAGE AREA 00.0 % 0.00 Ac DRAINAGE AREA NAME AREA/IC % FLOW DIRECTION N 03 SPC-2025-0156C - The Learning Center at Parmer; District 78 of 12 MEDIUM & LARGE BUFFER SHRUBS CENTER LAKE DRIVE CENTER LAKE DRIVE (90' R.O.W.) (90' R.O.W.) SMALL TREE FOR STREET YARD, TYP. L.O.C L.O.C DY DY BM BM BM DY DY BM BM L . O . C L.O.C L.O.C L.O.C L . O . C S S S L.O.C L.O.C L.O.C L.O.C L.O.C L.O.C SD SD SD P S SD S SD SD SD S SD SHADE TREE FOR PARKING, TYP. L.O.C L.O.C L.O.C L.O.C L.O.C L.O.C SHADE TREE FOR STREET YARD, TYP. L.O.C L.O.C L.O.C L.O.C L.O.C L.O.C S S S L.O.C S L.O.C STREETYARD L.O.C L.O.C SHADE TREE FOR PARKING, TYP. L.O.C 10' ELEC. EASEMENT L.O.C L.O.C G A S LOT DELINEATION FOR STREET YARD SD SD G A S UE SD G A S U E U E U E S D S D S D S D S D S D S D S D L.O.C L.O.C SD L . O C . SD SD U E U E U E L . O C . STREETYARD W W G.T. L . O C . L . O C . L . O C . L . O C . L . O C . L . O C . L . O C . P L.O.C S L L.O.C . O C . L . O C . L . O C . L . O C . L . O C . L . O C . L . O C . L . O C . L . O C . L . O C . L . O C . L . O C . L . O C . L . O C . SD W W …
ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, February 3, 2026 ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, FEBURARY 3, 2026 MEETING MINUTES The Zoning and Platting Commission convened in a regular meeting on Tuesday, February 3, 2026, at Austin City Hall, Council Chambers, Room 1001, 301 W. Second Street, in Austin, Texas. Chair Smith called the Zoning and Platting Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Hank Smith Betsy Greenberg Luis Osta Lugo Andrew Cortes Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Ryan Puzycki David Fouts Lonny Stern Christian Tschoepe Commissioners Absent: Alejandra Flores Scott Boone Taylor Major PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Zoning and Platting Commission regular meeting on Tuesday, January 20, 2026. The minutes from the meeting of Tuesday, January 20, 2026, were approved on the consent agenda on Vice Chair Greenberg’s motion, Commissioner Osta Lugo’s second, on an 8-0 vote. Parliamentarian Flores and Commissioners Boon and Major were absent. 1 ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, February 3, 2026 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Rezoning: Location: Owner/Applicant: Son Thai Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: C14-2025-0124 - Parmer Lane Center; District 7 1623 West Parmer Lane and 1701 ½ West Parmer Lane, Walnut Creek LR to GR-MU-CO Recommended Sherri Sirwaitis, 512-974-3057, sherri.sirwaitis@austintexas.gov Austin Planning The motion to approve Staff’s recommendation of of GR-MU-CO zoning, with the addition of the following prohibited uses to the conditional overlay: Alternative Financial Services, Service Station, Bail Bond Services and Commercial Off-Street Parking. Basic Industry and Recycling Center are not permitted or conditional uses in the GR base district and cannot be prohibited in a CO for this case. The Drop-Off Recycling, Exterminating Services and Pawn Shop Service uses were already listed as prohibited uses in the staff's recommendation, for C14-2025-0124 - Parmer Lane Center; District 7, located at 1623 West Parmer Lane and 1701 ½ West Parmer Lane, was approved on Vice Chair Greenberg’s motion, Commissioner Osta Lugo’s second, on an 8-0 vote. Parliamentarian Flores and Commissioners Boon and Major were absent. 3. Conditional Use SPC-2025-0156C - The Learning Center at Parmer; District 7 Permit: 12705 Center Lane Dr, Walnut Creek Location: Owner/Applicant: Centerstate 99 LTD Agent: Request: Civilitude (Esteban Gonzalez, PE) The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Daycare (General) on the property. Recommended Christine Barton-Holmes, 512-974-2788, christine.barton-holmes@austintexas.gov Austin Development Services Staff Rec.: Staff: The motion to approve Staff’s recommendation of …
