All documents

RSS feed for this page

Historic Landmark CommissionDec. 14, 2022

16.2 - 515 Congress - East Sign original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

PMG : Digital Marketing Agency East Elevation v6 *Channel letters *LED lit *RGB color changing capabilities 60.0” 350.0” 14.0” 14.0” 14.0” **RENDERING REGISTERED FOR ESTIMATE PROPOSAL. DESIGN NOT TO BE REPLICATED AND OR CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT APPROVAL. Client Name: PMG : Digital Marketing Agency Mayfield Armstrong Location: 515 Congress Ave Austin, TX 78701 12/15/2021 12/12/2022 Start Date: Last Revision: Job#: 2675 Drawing#: Page: 1 of 1 PMG_v5 Client Approval • • Date COPYRIGHT 2020, BY YESCO • ALL DESIGNS PRESENTED ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF YESCO , AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM YESCO Sales Rep: Robb Pittman Designer: Rick Moore MEMBER INTERNATIONAL SIGN ASSOCIATION LISTED .

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 1:50 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionDec. 14, 2022

20.b - 801 A-B W Johanna St - public comment original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 1:50 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionDec. 14, 2022

20.c - 801 A-B W Johanna St - public comment original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 1:50 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionDec. 14, 2022

21.2 - 2003 Canterbury St - Mold Report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 51 pages

Mold Assessment Summary Client Name Project Address Date of Inspection November 21, 2022 Scope Entire Structure Ilia Belov 2003 Canterbury Street ~ Austin, TX 78702 Summary of Findings and Lab Results My inspection revealed the following suspect conditions: • Visible mold-like growth • Elevated moisture content • Water damage or staining Samples were recommended according to the conditions observed and/or the reported complaints or concerns. Surface samples were collected from areas of visible mold-like growth, and laboratory analysis confirmed the presence of mold on the areas sampled as follows: • Crawlspace – Floor Truss • Primary Bedroom – Wall drywall • Kitchen – Ceiling Drywall Air samples were collected from the following areas, and laboratory analysis indicated the airborne mold spore concentration levels to be statistically elevated when compared to the outdoor air sample collected at the same time and place. Based on these results, there is a high likelihood that an indoor source of mold growth in the tested area is amplifying the indoor levels as follows: • Kitchen • Primary Bedroom • Primary Bathroom • Living Room Final Conclusion Based on the findings of the visual inspection and/or the lab results of the samples collected, mold remediation is needed. Corporate Office: (512) 535-2493 • 10403 Quail Ridge Dr., Austin, TX 78704 www.MoldInspectionTexas.com Recommendations 1. Engage Mold Inspection Sciences to write a Mold Remediation Protocol for the remediation project which is to include the following areas: • Living Room (<25 SF) • Kitchen (<25 SF) • Primary Bedroom (<25 SF) • Primary Bathroom (<25 SF) If less than (< 25 SF) 25 SF of visible mold growth was present, according to the Texas Mold Assessment and Remediation Rules (Rules), Exceptions and Exemptions, (b) Minimum area exemption, “A person is not required to be licensed under this subchapter to perform mold remediation in an area in which the mold contamination for the project affects a total surface area of less than 25 contiguous square feet.” In this case, a Licensed Mold Remediation Contractor is not required, but we strongly recommend hiring a licensed company. NOTICE: According to the Texas Mold and Remediation Rules (Rules): Regardless of the size of the area affected by mold contamination, if a licensed Mold Remediation Contractor is hired by the consumer, the Mold Remediation Contractor must follow the Rules. This includes developing a work plan which follows a protocol developed by a licensed Mold Assessment …

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 1:50 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionDec. 14, 2022

21.3 - 2003 Canterbury St - Foundation Repair original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 1:51 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionDec. 14, 2022

21.4 - 2003 Canterbury St - Structural Report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 63 pages

Document Number: TSE-2022-502094-STR-RPT-001-01 Nov 23, 2022, This letter summarizes the results of my structural and foundation assessment of a single-family home located at 2003 Canterbury St, Austin, TX 78702, inspected on Nov 18, 2022. TexasStructuralEngineers.com; Registration No.: F-21242. We Operate in 10 Largest Cities of Texas, Page 1 of 63 7505 Fannin St Suite 440 Houston TX 77054, (833) 781-7661, info@TexasStructuralEngineers.com The client hired Texas Structural Engineers to perform a structural inspection of the house based on the recommendation from the home inspector. Background Process Findings I inspected the house's interior and exterior walls, ceiling, roof framing (through the attic), and foundation, including the piers, beams, and floor sheathings. I also measured the maximum floor level differences using a laser level to investigate any foundation settlements in this house. The following are the findings from the structural inspection of the property: 1. The house is aged and worn. 2. There are several cracks in the house's ceilings and interior walls in multiple places (Figures 2 to 11). 3. There is visibly sagging on the ceiling drywall in the living room of the house (Figure 12). places (Figure 13). 4. There is visible damage and cracks on the floor of the house in multiple 5. There is visible rotten wood on the interior walls sheathings in multiple locations of the house (Figures 14 to 18). TexasStructuralEngineers.com; Registration No.: F-21242. We Operate in 10 Largest Cities of Texas, Page 2 of 63 7505 Fannin St Suite 440 Houston TX 77054, (833) 781-7661, info@TexasStructuralEngineers.com 6. The wall is not stable on the west side of the house and has movement. 7. The crawl space and floor have some leveling problems in this house. 8. The floor surfaces were walked and viewed for potential movement and deflection (Figure 16). 9. There are multiple piers that are missing a footing (Figures 40 to 50). 10. There are some different types of piers with different heights and sizes used in the house's foundation (Figures 40 to 50). 11. There are the most visible rotten floor beams and floor joists (Figures 40 to 50). 12. There are visible rotten and termite wood piers in multiple locations in the crawl space (Figures 31,32, 50,51). 13. There are about five piers that seem to be skewed and not fully vertical (Figure 31,34,40). 14. Visible rotten wood on the exterior walls sheathings on the east, west, and south side of …

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 1:51 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionDec. 14, 2022

21.5 - 2003 Canterbury St - Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 11 pages

2003 Canterbury Historic Land Commission Presentation Proximity to Historic Districts Proximity to Historic Districts Structural Report Excerpts There is visible rotten wood on the framing members of the wall on the east and west side of the house. Structural Report Excerpts There is water damage on the ceiling sheathings of the kitchen Structural Report Excerpts Visible rotten wood on the exterior walls sheathings on the east, west, and south side of the house Structural Report Excerpts There are visible rotten and termite wood piers in multiple locations in the crawl space Structural Report Excerpts There are the most visible rotten floor beams and floor joists Structural Report Excerpts There are visible damaged and rotted members of the roof frame in multiple locations in the attic The laser level reading of the floor shows a maximum level difference of 7 inches on a span of 23 feet. 1705 Haskell St Historic Designation Denial

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 1:51 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionDec. 14, 2022

4.2 - 1606 Niles Rd - presentation_redacted - revised original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 22 pages

WOODL AW N R ESTOR AT ION P ROJEC T Austin Historic Landmark Commission / December 14, 2022 / Proprietary & Confidential © 1 PROJECT STATEMENT Woodlawn is one of the finest examples of Greek Revival architecture in Texas. Our goal is to honor the tradition of master builder Abner Cook and bring new life to the craftsmanship of the original era. Austin Historic Landmark Commission / December 14, 2022 / Proprietary & Confidential © 2 HISTORICAL TIMELINE The historic mansion is built by master builder Abner Cook Additions constructed at the north, west, and south facades Recorded Texas Historical Landmark (RTHL) City of Austin Historic Landmark and Texas Historical Commission Protective Easement City of Austin Historic Landmark 1854 1859 1903 1957 1962 1970 2002 2003 2022 Pease Family purchased the home and painted the mansion dark red with green trim Gov and Mrs Allan Shivers purchased Woodlawn in 1957 and painted the house "Pease Pink" Listed in National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) The mansion was renovated, and the footprint was reduced in size Austin Historic Landmark Commission / December 14, 2022 / Proprietary & Confidential © 3 We are preserving the legacy of Woodlawn by ensuring its stately, historic character prevails as it has since1854. RESTORE Renew original 1854 and remaining 1903 portions of the home. Perform all necessary structural stabilization and exterior maintenance. Restore and refinish original 1854 front door and surround. • • • HONOR REVITALIZE PRESERVE • Retain panoramic public views of historic house by placing outbuildings along western boundary. • Perform repairs using traditional methods of woodworking, masonry, and metal work. • • Reinstate missing historic features, such as windows, shutters and scuppers Protect heritage trees & lawns of the property. Upgrade all building systems and provide new secondary structures to support modern day living. Design additions & outbuildings to sit in deference to historic house and relate to historic proportions and details. • • Austin Historic Landmark Commission / December 14, 2022 / Proprietary & Confidential © 4 Preservation Approach Over the past year, our team has worked closely with the Texas Historical Commission to define the preservation approach and methods which ensure that the proposed work — including the additions and outbuildings — is in compliance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards. As of this submittal, THC has approved our general design direction and will continue to monitor the project throughout design …

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 1:51 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionDec. 14, 2022

8.4 - 613 Blanco St - Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 11 pages

LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 40' MARK SECTION B LOW POINT -1'-8 3/8" N 67°43'09'' W 101.22' (F.M.) N 65°30'00'' W 101.22' (PLAT) 4'-1 1/2" 5' BLDG. SETBACK 482 PROPERTY LINE LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 0' MARK SECTION A LOW POINT -2'-9 3/8" 480 PL PL LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 80' MARK SECTION C LOW POINT 0'-3 3/4" FROM FNC. POST N 80°53'37'' W 0.56' PL PL 484 " 4 / 3 1 - ' 8 K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 5 E N I L Y T R E P O R P ) . M . F ( ' 8 2 . 1 5 W ' ' ' 3 0 7 5 ° 7 2 S 486 488 7'-0" 33'-4" 3'-6" 4'-0" 22'-10" " 4 / 1 2 - ' 6 10'-7 1/2" " 0 1 - ' 0 1 2 3 " 2 / 1 7 - ' 4 P U N D EXIST. 1 -STORY WOOD FRAME SIDING HOUSE NEW SECOND AND THIRD STORY ADDITION 100'-0" F.F.E. FIRST LEVEL ELECTRIC POLE T E E R T S O C N A L B E T E R C N O C K L A W E D S I ) T A L P ( ' 9 2 . 1 5 E ) . M F. ( ' 9 2 . 1 5 E ' ' ' ' ' 0 0 4 5 ° 9 2 N ' 1 5 0 4 ° 7 2 N E N I L Y T R E P O R P K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 0 2 K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 5 1 K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 0 2 PL 488 PL 486 484 LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 80' MARK SECTION C HIGH POINT +1'-8 3/8" VARIES" (TENT PORTION B) 40'-0" (TENT PORTION B) 40'-0" (TENT PORTION A) 5' BLDG. SETBACK GATE GATE 482 PROPERTY LINE SERVICE YARD LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 40' MARK SECTION B HIGH POINT -2'-5 5/8" S 65°29'00'' E 101.46' (PLAT) S 67°42'09'' E 101.46' (F.M.) 480 PL PL LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 0' MARK SECTION A HIGH POINT -3'-5" M P 6 3 : …

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 1:51 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionDec. 14, 2022

8.b - 613 Blanco St - public comment original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Monday, December 12, 2022 3:41 PM HPD Preservation Comment on Case HR-2022-170074 - 613 Blanco St. *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To the Historic Preservation Office, attn: Amber Allen: Please register my opposition to the project planned for 613 Blanco St. (Case HR-2022- 170074). This project violates multiple deed restrictions (height, easement, etc.); requires removal of a large tree; is an inappropriate and incompatible addition that would be seen by multiple neighbors including me. Thanks for your consideration, Randall Brown CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 1:52 a.m.
Joint Sustainability CommitteeDec. 14, 2022

1. October 26 JSC Meeting Minutes for approval original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

Item 1 JOINT SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING MEETING MINUTES October 26, 2022 The Joint Sustainability Committee convened in a hybrid meeting on October 26, 2022 via videoconferencing and at City Hall, Council Chambers, 301 West 2nd Street, Austin, Texas Chair Kaiba White called the Board Meeting to order at 6:10 pm. Board Members in Attendance: Kaiba White, Richard DePalma, Diana Wheeler, Melissa Rothrock, Haris Qureshi, Alberta Phillips, David Carroll, Frances Deviney, Kelsey Hitchingham, Karen Hadden Board Members Absent: Fisayo Fadelu, Robert Schneider City Staff in Attendance: Rohan Lilauwala CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION The speakers who registered in advance for public comment have three minutes each to address items on the agenda at this time. N/A 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES June 22, 2022, meeting of the Joint Sustainability Committee • Motion to approve (Rothrock), second (Wheeler). Record of the vote: 10 approved, 0 opposed, 0 abstained. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES August 24, 2022 meeting of the Joint Sustainability Committee • Motion to approve (Rothrock), second (Wheeler). Record of the vote: 10 approved, 0 opposed, 0 abstained. 4. AUSTIN TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CLIMATE EQUITY PLAN – COLE KITTEN, AUSTIN TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT (DISCUSSION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION) • Many transportation elements in Austin Strategic Mobility Plan are aligned with the Austin Climate Equity Plan. • Common goals around mode shift (shift of 70% to target 50% of people driving alone to work) and equity (success should be centered on equity) • Strategies in both plans are circularly referenced and supportive of each other’s goals • Presentation provided insights on ATD’s implementation of strategies in the Climate Equity Plan, including work as part of Project Connect, Mobility Bond Funding, Walk Bike Roll, • Rothrock: Kyle has a Boring Company tunnel proposal, has Austin considered this? State employees work downtown but don’t have CapMetro passes and free parking • DePalma: when do we see implementation of WalkBikeRoll initiatives • Kitten: Since 2016 bond, local mobility programs have annual implementation plans, presented to public for feedback. In 2020 bond, equity was centered. WalkBikeRoll = updates to plans, and updates to implementation. 2016 bond closing out in 2024, 2020 bond spending to last until 2027. 5. AUSTIN ENERGY RESIDENTIAL RATES AND VALUE OF SOLAR TARIFF (DISCUSSION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION) • Base rate review – Mark Dombroski, CFO, Austin Energy • Everything relevant to base rate case available on AE website • Presentation covered history of …

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 4:10 a.m.
Joint Sustainability CommitteeDec. 14, 2022

2. HPD update re: Climate Equity Plan original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 14 pages

Joint Sustainability Committee: Departments Activities Related to the Austin Climate Equity Plan Rachel Tepper, AICP Housing and Planning Department December 14, 2022 Content • Related Climate Equity Goals • Short Term Goals and Activities • Success Measures • Equity Tools and Initiatives Climate Equity Policy Goals related to HPD  TLU, Goal 1 (TLU.G1): 80% of new non-residential development is located within the city’s activity centers and corridors. – TLU.G1-S1: Plan for complete communities  TLU, Goal 2 (TLU.G2): By 2027, preserve and produce 135,000 housing units, including 60,000 affordable housing units, with 75% of new housing located within ½ mile of activity centers and corridors. – TLU.G2-S1: Offer immediate affordable housing assistance – TLU.G2-S2: Fund affordable housing – TLU.G2-S3: Enhance community engagement for affordable housing and anti-displacement programs 3 Short Term Goals and Activities  TLU.G1-S1: Plan for complete communities – Northeast Austin District Plan Resolution No. 20201112-043 – Staff conducted a solicitation for consultants in the summer of 2022 that did not have any compliant responses; staff is considering other approaches and will send an update to Council in fall of 2022. – Equitable Transit Oriented Development Planning Resolution No. 20201112-043 – Public Review of ETOD Policy Plan: November 2022 – City Council initiated Station Area Planning in North Lamar Transit Center and South Congress Transit Center December 8, 2022 – ETOD Policy Plan and initiation of related code amendments will be considered February 2023 – District Level Planning Process Resolution No. 20220609-069 – Staff anticipates sending a response to Council in early 2023. – Palm District Planning Initiative Resolution No. 20190523-029 – Public Review of Draft Plan: October 2022 – City Council 1st Reading: February 2023 4 Short Term Goals and Activities  TLU.G2-S1: Offer immediate affordable housing assistance – From August 2020 to January 2022, the housing and planning department distributed nearly $76 million in direct rental assistance 5 Short Term Goals and Activities  TLU.G2-S2: Fund affordable housing: All Subsidized Units Constructed/Pending 6 Short Term Goals and Activities  TLU.G2-S2: Fund affordable housing: Subsidized Units Constructed/Pending 7 Short Term Goals and Activities  TLU.G2-S2: Fund affordable housing: Incentivized Units Constructed/Pending 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 Downtown + Rainey East Riverside Corridor 138 0 North Burnet Gateway 190 31 TODs 233 362 University Neighborhood Overlay 195 1,092 Vertical Mixed-Use (VMU) 549 657 Planned Unit Development s (PUD) 5 317 Under Construction Completed 40 …

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 4:10 a.m.
Joint Sustainability CommitteeDec. 14, 2022

3. APH update re: Climate Equity Plan original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

UPDATE ON AUSTIN CLIMATE EQUITY PLAN EFFORTS PRESENTATION TO JOINT SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE DECEMBER 14, 2022 STEPHANIE HELFMAN & MICHELLE FRIEDMAN APH Mission and Vision Vision: Everyone will have an optimal quality of life, health and well-being free from racism, poverty and oppression Mission: To prevent disease, promote health and protect the well-being of all Accredited by the Public Health Accreditation Board Austin Climate Equity Plan (ACEP) Food and Product Consumption: Strategy 2: Promote and fund community-driven food retail programs Retail: ▪ Mobile Markets and Curbside Delivery (Farmshare Austin) ▪ Nutrition education and recipe sampling at Markets (SFC) ▪ Healthy Corner Store Program (APH + EDD) Non-Retail outlets: ▪ Healthy Food Pantries and Pop-ups (Foundation Communities) ▪ APH Neighborhood Centers Food Programs ▪ Equidad ATX ACEP Food and Product Consumption: Strategy 3: Incentivize pro-climate, pro-health food choices ▪ Double Up Food Bucks (SFC) ▪ Farmers Markets, Mobile Markets ▪ Grocery Expansion of Double Up Food Bucks (SFC) ▪ Wheatsville Food Co-op Additional Strategy: Educate on pro-heath food choices Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Diabetes Empowerment Education Program PreventT2 Diabetes Prevention Program Mayors Health and Fitness Council Worksite Partner Certification Program Additional Strategy: Building community resiliency ▪Social Determinants of Health Screening and Referral through ConnectATX ▪Public Health Emergency Preparedness ▪Cold Weather Sheltering Operations ▪Competition for Social Services Food Access and Distribution programming coming out in February 2022 Thank You! FO R A D DI T IO NAL I N FO R M ATIO N CO N TAC T: ST E PHA NIE.HELF M AN@AU STINTEXAS.GOV M I CHE L LE. FR IEDMAN@ AU STI NTEXAS.GOV

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 4:10 a.m.
Joint Sustainability CommitteeDec. 14, 2022

4. JSC Strategic Planning Session proposal original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

Joint Sustainability Committee Strategic Planning Discussion 12/14/22 Context The Austin Climate equity Plan was adopted in September 2021 Resolution 110 directed the addition of 5 new members to the JSC Over the last year, we’ve had challenges meeting quorum We’ve had a lot of back and forth about working groups / community task forces, with no resolution The Office of Sustainability is not “in charge” of implementing the climate equity plan and we have no dedicated budget for projects from the plan We’ve been inviting departments to present on their climate equity plan aligned activities for the past year, usually creating lots of Q&A The JSC occasionally passes resolutions adopted by other commissions (in support of their work) Seems like a good opportunity to pause and think strategically about what comes next Who is the JSC? The council creates the Joint Sustainability Committee of the: Community Development Commission; Design Commission; Economic Prosperity Commission; Electric Utility Commission; Environmental Commission; Parks and Recreation Board; Planning Commission; Resource Management Commission; Austin-Travis County Food Policy Board; Urban Transportation Commission; Water and Wastewater Commission; and Zero Waste Advisory Commission. (12 commissions) + + 1 Social Service Committee Nominee 5 Mayoral Nominees 18 total members, quorum = 10 The council intends that the joint committee members represent a broad diversity of community stakeholders including: large companies and employers; small businesses owners and non-profit leaders; renters; central city residents and families; and suburban residents and families. JSC By-laws The joint committee shall advise the council on matters related to conservation and sustainability; and review City policies and procedures relevant to the Austin Community Climate Plan and the Austin Climate Equity Plan, including planning, implementation, community engagement, goal setting, and progress monitoring; promote close cooperation between the council, City management, City boards, commissions, committees, and task forces, and individuals, institutions, and agencies concerned with the politics, procedures, and implementation of the Austin Community Climate Plan and the Austin Climate Equity Plan, with the goal of coordinating all similar activities within the City and the community in order to secure the greatest public benefit; and forward to the city manager all advisory material that the joint committee provides to the council, the Office of Sustainability, City departments and offices, or City boards, commissions, committees, and task forces. The joint committee may: advise the council, the city manager, the Office of Sustainability, City departments and offices, and City boards, commissions, …

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 4:10 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionDec. 14, 2022

1 - 11.02.2022 Draft Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 13 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, November 2, 2022 – 6:00 PM CITY HALL - Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. COMMISSION MEMBERS: x Terri Myers, Chair x Ben Heimsath, Vice Chair x Anissa Castillo x Witt Featherston x Kevin Koch x Carl Larosche x Harmony Grogan x Trey McWhorter x Blake Tollett x Beth Valenzuela x Caroline Wright DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Meghan King gave an update for Preservation Austin. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. October 5, 2022 – Offered for consent approval MOTION: Approve the minutes, per passage of the consent agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Larosche. Commissioner Koch seconded the motion. Vote: 11-0. BRIEFINGS 2. Palm District plan Presenter: Mark Walters 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS/DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION Historic Zoning Applications 3. C14H-2022-0139 – 2311 Woodlawn Blvd. – Discussion The Felts-Moss House Council District 10 Proposal: Owner-initiated historic zoning Applicant: John Pieratt City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Recommend historic zoning. John Pieratt spoke in favor of the project. There were no speakers in opposition. MOTION: Close the public hearing, on a motion by Commissioner Larosche. Commissioner Koch seconds the motion. Vote 11-0. MOTION: Recommend historic zoning, on a motion by Commissioner Grogan. Commissioner Castillo seconded the motion. Vote: 11-0. Historic Landmark and Local Historic District Applications 4. HR-2022-119336 – 900 Blanco St./1202 W. 9th St./901 Shelley Ave. – Consent Castle Hill Local Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Addition/remodel (Postponed October 5, 2022) Applicant: Tyler Rush City Staff: Kimberly Collins, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-1801 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the plans with the following conditions: notes are added to the plans that the carriage house is moved under structural engineer supervision via lifting and rotating the structure, not deconstruction and rebuild; and if there is significant deterioration found resulting in the need for deviance from the approved plans that the case return to the Historic Landmark Commission for approval. MOTION: Approve the project in accordance with the staff recommendation, per passage of the consent agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Larosche. Commissioner Koch seconded the …

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 4:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionDec. 14, 2022

19.b - 2717 Manor Rd - public comment original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 4:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionDec. 14, 2022

21.d - 2003 Canterbury St - set of public comments original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 12 pages

Backup

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 4:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionDec. 14, 2022

4.3 - 1606 Niles Rd - drawings_redacted pt1 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

TO B E R E M OV E D PR O P O S E D CO N S T R U C T I O N T R E E S TO B E R E M OV E D T R E E S TO R E M A I N (cid:14)(cid:24)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:10) (cid:14)(cid:24)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:10) (cid:14)(cid:24)(cid:28) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:22)(cid:22)(cid:22)(cid:25)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:23) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:20) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:20) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:20) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:20) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:20) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:25) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:21) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:21) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:21) (cid:10) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:21) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:22) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:22) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:22) (cid:10)(cid:22) O C (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:19) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:19) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:24)(cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:26) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:27) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:28) (cid:10) (cid:23)(cid:24)(cid:25) (cid:23)(cid:24)(cid:25)(cid:23)(cid:24) E M G (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:28) PARKING COURT P L BRICK WALL (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:24) (cid:24)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:23)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:22) O C (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:20) (cid:19) (cid:10) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:21) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:27) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:27) O C BASKETBALL COURT (cid:23)(cid:26)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:26)(cid:23) (cid:14)(cid:25)(cid:19)(cid:23)(cid:10) (cid:14)(cid:25)(cid:19) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:24)(cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:25)(cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:26)(cid:10) (cid:24)(cid:21)(cid:24) (cid:24)(cid:21)(cid:24) (cid:10) (cid:27) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:14) FOOTPATH (cid:28) (cid:10) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:14) POOL HOUSE POOL (cid:19)(cid:10) (cid:20) (cid:25) (cid:14) UTILIT Y SHED PL ANTER (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:26) (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:26) (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:27) (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:27) TREE HOUSE (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:26)(cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:26)(cid:22)(cid:26)(cid:26)(cid:26)(cid:26) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:26) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:25) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:25) POOL EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE / LOW WALL WELL HOUSE (cid:23)(cid:26)(cid:28)(cid:26)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:26)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:24)(cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:24)(cid:24)(cid:24)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:24)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:24)(cid:28)(cid:24)(cid:28) (cid:24)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:26) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:26) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:23) (cid:24)(cid:21)(cid:23) (cid:24)(cid:21)(cid:23) (cid:10) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:26)(cid:10) (cid:26)(cid:10) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:25) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:14) (cid:14) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:28) (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:28) (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:28) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:27) (cid:27) (cid:27) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:25) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:14) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:27) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:27)(cid:28)(cid:27)(cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:28) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:26)(cid:10) (cid:25) (cid:10) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:19) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:19) CURB CUT TO BE RELOCATED FO NOISNETXE WROUGHT IRON FENCE NORTHUMBERLAND RD NEW GATE NEW GATE (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:27) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:27) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:19) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:19) (cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:28)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:28) (cid:19)(cid:10) (cid:20) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:25) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:25)(cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:25) (cid:14)(cid:25)(cid:19)(cid:27)(cid:10) (cid:28)(cid:10) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:22) (cid:14)(cid:25)(cid:19)(cid:26)(cid:10) 364 3 264 464 460 TENNIS SSIISSSSSSSSS T NNNNNNNNNNNNNEEEETT NTTEEEEEETT NNNNNE TT TENNISNN SS TENNIS TENN SS TENNIS TENNISS TENNIS CCCCOOOOOOOOUUUUUUURRRRRTTRRTTTRTRTTTTT R CCCCCCOOOOOOOOUUUURRRRUUCCC CC COURTUU TT COURTUCCCOURT COCO COURT COURT COURT 474 R DN (4) R @ 6" DN DN (4) R @ 6" …

Scraped at: Dec. 14, 2022, 4:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionDec. 14, 2022

4.3 - 1606 Niles Rd - drawings_redacted pt2 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of None page

Backup

Scraped at: Dec. 15, 2022, 6:53 a.m.
Ethics Review CommissionDec. 14, 2022

Play video original link

Play video

Scraped at: Dec. 16, 2022, 9:30 p.m.