Barton Springs Road Bridge Preliminary Design - Bridge Architecture Design Report 12 August 2025 Contents This PDF is an interactive document. Click on each number to navigate to the corresponding section. The menu icon on the bottom left returns you to this Table of Contents Introduction Design Concept Cut Sheets About the Bridge Site Context About Austin Project Needs & Goals Overall Bridge Concept Details Lighting Concept Lighting Equipment Surface Material Wall Finish INTRODUCTION 01 Prepared for Ramsey CountyBarton Springs RoadBarton SpringsRoad BridgeZilker ParkColorado RiverBarton CreekBartonSpringsPoolDowntownAustin 01 / Introduction Barton Springs Bridge Background Built in 1925, the Barton Springs Road Bridge provides access over Barton Creek along Barton Creek Road at the entrance to Zilker Park. The bridge was widened to its current form in 1946, which includes two traffic lanes in each direction. The bridge also features narrow sidewalks along each side, guard rails and a sidewalk underneath. While the existing bridge is structurally in fair condition, many of its features are functionally obsolete and it requires replacement to ensure safety and longevity. Given that the existing bridge present mobility challenges for vehicles, bikes and pedestrians, this project will provide needed mobility enhancements for all users. Intersection improvements to nearby Barton Springs Road and Azie Morton Drive are necessary as part of this project. In November 2020, Austin voters approved $102 million for major infrastructure projects, with the possibility of allocating a portion of that funding to address the Barton Springs Road Bridge. In December 2023, Austin City Council officially recommended replacing the bridge and advanced the project to the design phase. The City of Austin received a $32 million grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation in November 2024 to help fund construction of the new bridge. 4 AECOMPrepared for The City of Austin Longitudinal Beam - Exposed Rebar Spandrel Column - Spalling 01 / Introduction Condition Assessment • Deck (with integral longitudinal joint), floor beams, and spandrel columns exhibited the most degradation. • All structural components exhibited some degradation. • Rehabilitation for increased service life would need to remove deck, floor beams, and spandrel columns, stripping structure to arch ribs as a starting point. • These results remove Rehabilitation Option 1 as feasible alternative since that option was the “low-impact”, “preserve-structure” option. • Based on the above, we are now focused on Rehabilitation Option 2 and on potential bridge replacement options. 5 Longitudinal Beam - Exposed Rebar …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts March 4, 2026 HR-2026-014183 Congress Avenue Historic District 617 Congress Avenue 4 – 1 Proposal Rehabilitate a primary elevation on an altered compatible building. Project Specifications 1) Remove existing stucco slipcover at streetfacing façade. Retain general layout of ground floor entry. 2) Install new windows in historic locations at second floor, with the center bay becoming a french door. 3) Construct a balcony over the sidewalk, to be accessed from the proposed second floor doorway. Architecture The existing building at 617 Congress is a three bay, two-story commercial structure that has been heavily altered from its original design. Historic photos show this address as being the middle of three matching properties along this block of Congress Avenue. Its neighbor to the north has been demolished and the property to the south has been altered, but not as much as 617 Congress. The ground floor currently has two windowed bays facing the sidewalk, with the southern bay recessed with a doorway for entry. The second floor is covered by stucco, possibly a structured slipcover, which removed the three windows originally there. There are two signs that are installed directly into the stucco cover. The condition or presence of any historic material underneath the stucco is currently unknown. Research Upon its first listing in city directories in the 1910s, the property was occupied by J.A. Jackson Jewelers through the 1930s, with occasional other tenants. After a brief period of being used by a shoe shop and cleaners, Leutwyler Jewelers took over the building and remained for almost 20 years, before becoming a menswear shop. The current use as a theatre and coffee shop began around 1999. Design Standards The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards Removal of material from the front façade is proposed to be non-original only, specifically the stucco coating. If, during the process of removing this material, evidence of original materials, openings, or fenestration details are discovered, it is highly recommended that these guide and refine the proposed design of the project. There are general concerns about the proposal incorporating elements that were either never present historically or more decorative than …
ELEVAITON PROPOSED TO BE MODIFIED & DETAILED VIEW OF AREA TO BE MODIFIED PHOTOGRAPH OF THE 600 BLOCK OF CONGRESS ca. 1877-1878. Please note location of the building with its "twins" to either side. The intent isto remove the stucco added sometime in the 1950-60s, repair and paint the brick, reintroduce the windows and cornice elements and add anoccupiable balcony to the front of the building. PHOTOGRAPH OF THE 600 BLOCK OF CONGRESS ca. 1960s. Please note the removal of the windows and the addition of the stucco facade,masking the original elements of the building. For reference, the building to the right in this image still has the original facade with painted brick, and anadded awning (which remains today). The matching building to the left was removed as part of the construction of the Caroline Hotel. THIS CADD FILE IS ON GRID COORDINATES INT: 135 SITE NOTE LEGEND: Ⓐ BALCONY (OVERHANG) AND RAILING Ⓑ BALCONY COLUMNS AND 2'X2' FOOTING Ⓒ EXTERIOR LIGHTS (APPROXIMATE LOCATION ATTACHED TO BUILDING) Ⓐ 13.54' 12.00' WL WL WL Ⓑ WL 2 5 . 0 0 ' 2 3 . 6 6 ' Ⓑ ±R3.63' 0 4.0 9 4 Ⓑ ' 0 0 . 3 2 ' E " 3 1 5 3 ° 6 1 N 8.20' WL WL 8.13' Ⓒ 8.08' Ⓑ 8.02' 12.34' 13.19' ±R3.88' Ⓐ 1.03' 0.96' 2 5 . 0 0 ' 0.91' 0.85' Ⓓ ADA ROUTE WL WL WL 0 4.0 9 4 0 4.0 9 4 Ⓐ WL ± R 1 . 3 WL 4' WL WL 494.00 LICENSE AGREEMENT BOUNDARY 7' 1.0 R ± ±R9.43' EXISTING BUILDING 1616 W. 5TH STREET (1-STORY / 3,677 SF) ROW LINE N O R T H L A R U T C U R T S & L I V C I I G N R E E N G N E I 0 5 7.5 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 5' 10 2 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED DESCRIPTION S 45°56'24" W 526.54' S 45°56'24" W 526.54' LOC ELEC TELE COMM WL WWL E WW S CO SUBJECT PROPERTY BOUNDARY ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES BUILDING SETBACK EASEMENT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ELECTRIC BOX ELECTRIC METER GAS METER GAS VALVE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD UTILITY TELECOMMUNICATIONS LINE GAS LINE LIGHT POLE POWER POLE / DOWN GUY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE WATER METER WATER LINE WASTEWATER LINE ELECTRIC MANHOLE WASTEWATER MANHOLE STORMSEWER …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts March 4, 2026 HR-2026-014204 Congress Avenue Historic District 809 Congress Avenue 5 – 1 Proposal Demolish a building behind the front wall at an existing compatible property. Project Specifications 1) Demolish existing two-story building behind streetfacing wall, which had been covered by stucco, and since uncovered. 2) Stabilize historic sections of the front wall facing Congress Avenue, including removal of nonhistoric CMU above the brick storefront. Existing storefront features, also not of historic age, are to be removed. 3) Install temporary security walls at front storefront and rear alley. Architecture Initially built as a single-story commercial storefront, the building at 809 Congress had three bays with large display windows, an ample awning, and transom windows above. At the top of the façade was brick oriented in a decorative pattern that terminated at a triangular peak. Currently, that shape is no longer present and was replaced with a concrete masonry unit wall, which extended the overall height of the front façade and housed a second story behind it. The entire storefront has been altered and original material removed, but the overall size of the opening has not changed, allowing for a matching replacement storefront if proposed. Research This property saw many tenants and uses since it first appeared in city directories, including a beauty salon, a millinery, a cafeteria, a saloon (which became a purveyor of soft drinks during Prohibition), but its longest and most notable tenant was Stelfox Jewelers, who became a tenant in the 1940s. The most dramatic of alterations appear to have occurred in the early 2000s when it became a sandwich shop. Design Standards The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed demolition calls for all non-historic material to be removed, with the remaining brick façade to remain. Though there is little of this material that is left intact, including the loss of the triangular peak above the storefront, what little remains is being retained and meets the design standards in these circumstances. 4. Exterior walls and trim Appropriate repair or treatment of remaining exterior material is recommended based on further exploration of existing conditions. It is recommended …
- 809 CONGRESS AVE HISTORIC REVIEW APPLICATION Austin, TX 6 2 0 2 Y R A U R B E F . M O C S R E N T R A P N E S L E N SURVEY NTS 2 02 / 2026809 CONGRESS AVE EXISTING FACADE TO BE PRESERVED CMU ABOVE FACADE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING PARTY WALL TO REMAIN TEMP WALL TO SECURE SITE EXISTING TWO STORY BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED EXISTING PARTY WALL TO REMAIN DEMOLITION PLAN NTS 3 02 / 2026809 CONGRESS AVE " 4 - ' 7 " 2 - ' 6 " 6 - ' 2 1 EXISTING CMU BLOCK TO BE REMOVED EXISTING FACADE TO BE PRESERVED EXISTING STOREFRONT OPENING TO BE REMOVED TEMPORARY WALL TO BE INSTALLED FOR SECURITY WEST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" 4 02 / 2026809 CONGRESS AVE HISTORIC PHOTO NTS Stelfox Fine Jewelry Jan 1, 1946 CURRENT PHOTO NTS 5 02 / 2026809 CONGRESS AVE
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts March 4, 2026 HR-2026-010143 Old West Austin Historic District 1611 Preston Avenue 6 – 1 Proposal Alter existing front elevation and construct a second-story addition. Project Specifications 1) Renovation of existing contributing property, including window and door replacement, front porch alteration, and replacement of exterior finishes. 2) Construction of a second floor addition, approximately 879 square feet. Architecture The house is a single-story asymmetrical design with a front porch at one side covered by an ample overhanging roof supported by wood posts. Its foundation is elevated on piers, and two pairs of large windows face the street. The roof is set at a moderate pitch, and the overall structure reads as horizontal, like other contributing properties in the neighborhood. Research For approximately the first two decades after its construction, the house was owned by the McCrummen family. Hugh and Mary McCrummen lived together at the address with at least one daughter until Hugh’s passing after 1952. Mary McCrummen continued to live at the address and worked as a dietitian. Design Standards The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The alterations in this proposal call for the removal of intact historic material, though it is not determined how much of the siding was replaced since original construction. Views of the building from the 2000s show different windows were present, making the current fixtures replacements. The size and location of the addition allows approximately half the existing house to retain its form. 3. Roofs The second floor addition will remove a portion of the roof form that is visible from the street, but will retain the current form above the porch. 4. Exterior walls and trim Brick veneer is proposed at the front wall and at locations around the side and back of the existing house. 5. Windows, doors, and screens Front windows are to be replaced. However, these fixtures are not original and appear to have been replaced around 2011-2013. 6. Porches The present form of the front porch was created around the same time as the window replacements described above. Proposed alterations closer resemble the previous, possibly original, assembly. 6 – 2 …
PRESTON RESIDENCE 1611 PRESTON AVE. AUSTIN, TEXAS 78703 GENERAL SHEET # G0.00 SHEET NAME COVER PAGE ARCHITECTURE SHEET # D1.11 A0.01 A0.02 A0.03 A1.01 A1.11 A1.21 A1.31 A2.01 A3.01 SHEET NAME DEMO PLAN SURVEY UTILITY PLOT PLAN SUBCHAPTER F DIAGRAMS SITE PLAN GROUND FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 02 - FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING SECTIONS OWNER CHRIS & REBEKAH MCWHORTER 1611 PRESTON AVE. AUSTIN, TX 78703 T. 281-468-3587 ARCHITECT GOOD PARTNERS STUDIO, LLC 5707 A WILLIAM HOLLAND AVE. AUSTIN, TX 78756 T. 918-640-2001 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ARCH CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PLLC 9901 BRODIE LANE, SUITE 160 PMB 297, AUSTIN, TX 78748 T. 512-328-5353 CONTRACTOR HILLTOWN BUILDING CO. MAX HAMBLY, ROW ID #5587740 2108 WESTOVER RD. AUSTIN, TX 78703 T. 512-748-5833 PROJECT NO. 2501 PERMIT SUBMITTAL 18 DEC 2025 SITE DIAGRAM - SEE SHEET A1.01 FOR COMPLETE SITE PLAN PROJECT DATA PRESTON AVE OWNER PROJECT ADDRESS: CHRIS & REBEKAH MCWHORTER 1611 PRESTON AVE. AUSTIN, TX 78703 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RENOVATION OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE JURISDICTION: ZONING: AUSTIN FULL PURPOSE SF-3-NP FIRE SUPRESSION: NOT REQUIRED; FIRE AREA UNDER 3,600 SF LOT COVERAGE LOT SIZE: MAX. BLDG. COVERAGE: MAX. IMPERVIOUS COVER: 8,408.40 SF 3,363.36 SF (40%) 3,783.78 SF (45%) PPSD. BLDG. COVERAGE: PPSD. IMPERVIOUS COVER: 2,627.00 SF (31.2%) 3,418.50 SF (40.6% VICINITY MAP H T R O N N A L P 1 SITE DIAGRAM 1" = 20'-0" G O O D P A R T N E R S A D (E) GAS METER TO BE RELOCATED; APPROXIMATE LOCATION (E) PVC CLEAN-OUT; TO BE RELOCATED AS REQUIRED CO G 6' - 9" W/D 1.5 3 (E) RIBBON DRIVEWAY TO REMAIN EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED 4 GENERAL NOTES - DEMO 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF DISCREPANCIES & IF ANY DEVIATIONS FROM ANTICIPATED CONDITIONS ARE DISCOVERED. 2. PROTECT FROM DAMAGE ALL EXISTING WORK THAT IS TO REMAIN OR BECOMES EXPOSED DURING DEMOLITION OPERATIONS. 3. SALVAGE ALL STONE PAVERS ON SITE FOR USE 4. ALL WINDOWS SHALL BE REPLACED; REF. ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR WINDOW SIZES. NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING OR CONSTRUCTION G O O D P A R T N E R S G O O D P A R T N E R S . S T U D I O PRESTON RESIDENCE PROJECT NO. 2501 1611 PRESTON AVE. AUSTIN, TEXAS 78703 ISSUE DATE : Δ REVISIONS 18 DEC 2025 PERMIT SUBMITTAL ARCHITECT: MEEGAN BEDDOE …
I G N R O B H G E N I ) E ( Y A W E V R D I 31' - 6" CRZ 15' - 9" N O B B R I ) E ( Y A W E V R D I 3000 31.5" LIVE OAK 5'-0" K C A B T E S ' 5 601'-0" W/D I G N R O B H G E N I ) E ( " 0 - ' 5 2 K C A B T E S T N O R F 602'-0" 5'-0" K C A B T E S ' 5 Y A W E V R D I LEGAL DESCRIPTION E 15FT OF LOT 2 & W 45’ OF LOT 3, BLOCK 26 PEMBERTON HEIGHTS SECTION 9 GROSS FLOOR AREA: GSF GSF W/ EXEMPTION 1,978 GROUND FLOOR: SECOND FLOOR: 879 (E) ACCESSORY BLDG: 449 COVERED PATIO*: 200 1,978 879 449 0 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 3,506 SITE AREA: 3,036 GSF 8,408.4 GSF *PORCH EXEMPTION PER SUBCHAPTER F 3.3.3.A FLOOR AREA RATIO: 0.36 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE F.A.R. IS 0.40 IMPERVIOUS COVER: BLDG. COVERAGE: BLDG. COVERAGE OTHER: COVERED PATIO: UNCOVERED WOOD DECK**: SF W/ EXEMPTION 1,978 1,978 449 449 200 200 365 182.5 FLATWORK: DRIVEWAY: TOTAL AREA: SITE AREA: 163 163 446 446 3,601 3,418.5 SF 8,408.4 SF **UNCOVERED WOOD DECK WITH DRAINAGE SPACES OVER PERVIOUS SURFACE TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVER: 40.6% MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS COVER IS 45% NEW CONSTRUCTION LEGEND: INDICATES LINE OF EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT INDICATES NEW CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING OR CONSTRUCTION G O O D P A R T N E R S G O O D P A R T N E R S . S T U D I O PRESTON RESIDENCE PROJECT NO. 2501 1611 PRESTON AVE. AUSTIN, TEXAS 78703 ISSUE DATE : Δ REVISIONS 26 JAN 2026 GENERAL NOTES - SITE PLAN 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROLS, TREE/NATURAL AREA FENCING, AND CONDUCT ‘PRE-CONSTRUCTION’ TREE FERTILIZATION (IF APPLICABLE) PRIOR TO ANY SITE PREPARATION WORK, INCLUDING CLEARING, GRUBBING, OR EXCAVATION, PER CITY OF AUSTIN ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA MANUAL. 2. FIELD VERIFY LOCATION OF BUILDING WITH ARCHITECT AND OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR INFORMATION REGARDING SITE PREPARATION AND FOUNDATION STRUCTURAL RECOMMENDATIONS. 4. UTILITIES: PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXTENT OF UTILITY WORK WITH OWNER AND GP. GC SHALL LOCATE EXISTING GAS AND WATER METERS …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Permits in National Register Historic Districts March 4, 2026 PR-2025-015633; GF-2026-017650 Old West Austin Historic District 1508 Pease Road 7 – 1 Proposal Construct a new two-story residence on site of a previously approved relocation. Research From staff report presented at October 1, 2025 HLC, when the relocation application was heard: When first constructed in the 1930s, the house was owned by William & Kay Ransom. William Ransom worked in the family’s drug store business as a salesman. After they moved, the house was occupied for over three decades by Matthew and Ethel Balagia. During this time, Matthew Balagia worked several jobs, including as a butcher and a clerk. In their ownership of the property, there was also a garage apartment at the rear of the house that was constructed and often housed students and workers. After her husband’s passing sometime after 1977, Ethel Balagia lived at the house for several more years. Design Standards The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location Proposed setback from the street is 36 feet, which is less than the previously relocated structure on site. The neighboring properties on the block have varying setbacks, ranging from 25 feet to over 50 feet, so this proposed location fits within the neighborhood context. 2. Orientation Like other properties in this section of the district, the design is oriented towards the street with the front door and driveway facing the right of way. 3. Scale, massing, and height Unlike the previously relocated structure, the proposed building is a full two stories in height and, at its highest point, is slightly above 35 feet tall. There are no stepdowns as the building gets closer to the street, with the wall closest to the street being fully two stories in height. However, while the relocated structure was the shortest or least imposing on the block, the proposed design is not wholly out of scale with surrounding contributing properties. The roof pitch may create the appearance of excessive height, but the side gabled roof allows that maximum height to be located far from the street. 4. Proportions As mentioned above, neighboring contributing properties are generally tall and two stories in …
26'-2" " 2 / 1 1 7'- NEW BURIED ELEC. LINE POOL EQUIPMENT LOCATION " 1 4'- E D LIN UIL 0' B 1 1 2 CRZ 1/4 CRZ 5' BUILD LINE " 7 3'- PROVIDE 8" LAYER OF MULCH WITHIN ENTIRE AVAILABLE ROOT ZONE " 2 / 1 1 5'- 156 36'-4 1/2" 10'-0 1/2" 567.8' LOWEST ADJACENT NATURAL GRADE 260 PROPOSED POOL AUTO FILLED & HEATED 567 56'-11" 274 568 " 1 1 5'- RESIDENCE FIN. FLR. ELEV=571.5' 5 6 9 5 7 0 272 " 2 / 8 1 4'- 5' BUILD LINE E D LIN UIL 6' B 3 570.8' HIGHEST ADJACENT NATURAL GRADE " 0 3'- " 0 2'- " 0 3'- " 0 3'- " 0 3'- " 0 2'- " 0 3'- TREE PROTECTION CONC. STRIP DRIVE 24" SQ. x 5' H. BRICK COL. E T A RIC G T C E L E R 5 ' - 0 " E T U O S R S E C C A 5 7 2 " 0 9'- 1 R5'-0" 233 " 2 / 7 1 3'- DUMPSTER 5 7 1 PORT-A-POT " 2 / 2 1 5'- 36'-0" PAINTWASHOUT SPOILS CONCRETE WASHOUT WATER TRENCH WM SEWER TRENCH GAS TRENCH E C N E L F A T E 4' H. M CITY OF AUSTIN - GROSS FLOOR AREA AREA UNIT 1 - 1ST FLOOR AREA (INCL. MASONRY) UNIT 1 - 2ND FLOOR AREA (INCL. MASONRY) GARAGE UNIT 2 - 1ST FLOOR AREA (INCL. MASONRY) UNIT 2 - 2ND FLOOR AREA (INCL. MASONRY) TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA TOTAL LOT AREA EXISTING/ REMODELED NEW/ ADDITION 0` 0` 0` 0` 0` 0` 2,585` 1,053` 563` 0` 987` 5,188` TOTAL 2,585` 1,053` 563` 0` 987` 5,188` 9,437` UNIT 1 3,638` / 9,437` x 100 = 38.5% FLOOR-TO-AREA RATIO (FAR) UNIT 2 1,550` / 9,437` x 100 = 16.4% FLOOR-TO-AREA RATIO (FAR) ALLOWABLE FAR: 9,437` x 55% = 5,190` CITY OF AUSTIN - BUILDING COVERAGE AREA 1ST FLOOR AREA GARAGE/CARPORT ACCESSORY BUILDING (DETACHED) COVERED PORCHES TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE TOTAL LOT AREA EXISTING/ REMODELED NEW/ ADDITION 0` 0` 0` 0` 0` 0` 2,585` 563` 0` 471` 3,619` 3,619`/ 9,437` x 100 = 38.3% PERCENTAGE OF LOT ALLOWABLE BUILDING COVERAGE: 9,437` x 40% = 3,774` CITY OF AUSTIN - IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE AREA TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE DRIVEWAY SIDEWALKS/WALKWAYS UNCOVERED PATIOS UNCOVERED WOOD DECKS (0` @ 50%) AC/ POOL EQUIP PADS OTHER: …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Demolition and Relocation Permits March 4, 2026 PR-2026-012921; GF-2026-016460 844 Airport Boulevard 8 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1976 restaurant. Architecture This commercial structure is rectangular in plan and a single story, though the side gabled roof adds additional height, with a short wall projecting at the peak that includes signage facing Airport Boulevard. The exterior walls are clad in wood board paneling. The front dining room features large windows across the entire front elevation. At one side is a brick chimney that projects above the highest point of the roof. Research Opened in 1977 as the third location of Dan’s Hamburgers, the restaurant featured a large amount of indoor seating and coincided with an expanded menu, which included breakfast, across all locations. As with the other locations, this Dan’s was partially staffed by family as the business grew. The current appearance is relatively unchanged and, unlike some locations after 1990, it did not change names to Fran’s Hamburgers. Department Comments This application times out on May 18, 2026. Property Evaluation Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a decent example of 1970s roadside restaurant architecture. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. Staff Recommendation Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, relocation, or deconstruction and salvage over demolition, but approve the demolition permit application upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. Location Map 8 – 2 Property Information Photos 8 – 3 Dan’s Hamburger’s Airport Boulevard location, 1977. Source: https://www.kut.org/austin/2019-05-29/whats-the- real-story-behind-dans-and-frans-hamburgers Demoliton application, 2026 Occupancy History City Directory Research, February 2026 1959 Address not listed Historical Information 8 – 4 …
Austin Lukes Historic Preservation Office City of Austin January 24, 2026 RE: Request to consider initiation of historic zoning, Hill-Thomson House (1906 Maple Ave.) Dear Mr. Lukes, I would like to express my strong support to include the Hill-Thomson House, located at 1906 Maple Avenue, on the Historic Landmark Commission’s February agenda for consideration of initiation of historic zoning. The owner, Marilynn Poole Bailey, fully supports this request. This property demonstrates significance in accordance with the criteria of historical association and community value. It is a great cultural asset to the history of the City of Austin and contributes to the Rogers- Washington-Holy Cross Historic District (RWHC), which honors Austin’s Black heritage. Historic Association: The Hill-Thompson House, completed in 1963, is the first residential commission by John S. Chase, the first Black graduate of the University of Texas School of Architecture, and first licensed Black architect in the state of Texas. The home serves as an intact example of Chase’s first commission, influenced by the Usonian constructions of Frank Lloyd Wright and the personal touches of Mrs. Irene Hill Thompson. The home is characterized by strong horizontal massing, a connection between the indoor and outdoor environment, and understated materiality. Mr. Chase maintained a relationship with the RWHC and made further contributions including the Colored Teachers State Association of Texas headquarters (1191 Navasota St); the Della Phillips House (2310 E MLK, Jr Blvd); David Chapel Missionary Baptist Church (2211 E MLK, Jr Blvd); and Olivet Baptist Church (1179 San Bernard St). Mr. Chase then went on to grow his practice through offices in Houston, Dallas, and Washington DC, eventually becoming a founding member of the National Organization of Minority Architects (NOMA). The Hill Thompson House represents an early part of his enduring architectural legacy. Community Value: The Hill Thompson House also served as a beacon of Black civic engagement led by Irene Hill Thompson. The house served as a meeting place for political organizing and community gatherings that reflected her deep commitment to public service and civic participation. Ms. Thompson hosted numerous political events at her home for President Lyndon B. Johnson, U.S. Congressmen Lloyd Doggett, East Texas Black Republican operative Ernest Sterling, J.J. “Jake” Pickle, and Texas State Senator Gonzalo Barrientos. Throughout these activities, the house functioned not only as a private residence but also as an important site of grassroots political participation, further reinforcing its historical and cultural significance. …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION HISTORIC LANDMARK INSPECTION RESULTS MARCH 4, 2026 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Certify the historic landmarks noted as passing their inspections in the following exhibit as eligible for the partial ad valorem tax exemption granted by Title 11, Article 2 (Partial Exemption for Historic Landmarks) of the Code of Ordinances, adopted under the authority provided in Article 8, Section 1-f (Ad Valorem Tax Relief) of the Texas Constitution and Section 11.24 (Historic Sites) of the Texas Tax Code. Exhibit B.1: CITY LANDMARK SITES THAT ARE ALSO RECORDED TEXAS HISTORIC LANDMARKS (RTHL) or STATE ARCHEOLOGICAL LANDMARKS (SAL) RECEIVING THE PARTIAL EXEMPTION FROM AD VALOREM TAXES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 Parcel Number Landmark Name Address Zoning Case Number FY26 Inspection Result RTHL/SAL 0206040514 0423060302 0206041611 0219060509 0208051017 0208090601 0205070505 0402012601 0107000501 0206050915 0303000805 0210000322 0105020308 0206031709 0220061601 0206031808 0208011103 0108031175 0210022508 0206050212 0408020104 0206031501 0206010904 0206011001 0206011006 0206011007 0113000502 0206011002 0206011005 0206010501 0206011004 0206040606 0211010506 0210041802 0208001508 0205010509 0206040906 0206031017 0422050214 0206040109 0208030201 0210040214 0210040214 0208111801 0208030110 0205020211 0104040616 0206030312 0107060101 0107060101 0400040209 0109010611 0215020302 0207080601 0242120316 0212010301 0218030712 0206040104 0211010307 0208000808 0206030701 0206030803 0219060821 0220060607 0122000825 0119080320 0210022507 0118060112 0208011801 0204041405 0108031527 0402030237 Depot Hotel Horton - Duval House Walton - Joseph Building Mansbendel - Williams House Jeremiah Hamilton Building Southgate - Lewis House Majors-Butler-Thomas House Stanley Homestead - Outbuilding Gilfillan House Johnson (Alfrida) House Walter Tips House Daniel Caswell House Paggi House St. Charles House Ney Museum St. David's Church Hirshfeld House And Cottage Smoot Family Home Goodman Building French Legation St. Edwards Main Building & Holly Cross Hall St. Mary'S Cathedral B. J. Smith House Catherine Robinson House Pierre Bremond House Eugene Bremond House Neill-Cochran House Walter Bremond House John Bremond House North - Evans Chateau Phillips - Knudsen House E. H. Carrington Store West Hill Scholz Garten Boardman - Webb House J. P. Schneider Store German Free School Millett Opera House Onion Creek Masonic Lodge Paggi Carriage Shop Land Office Building Carrington - Covert House Gethsemane Lutheran Church Madison Log Cabin Lundberg Bakery Southwestern Telephone & Telegraph Building I. V. Davis Homestead Walter Tips Building Swedish Log Cabin Esperanza School Millbrook Texas Military Institute Castle Beriah Grahman House Thompson House Edward E. Zimmerman Stone House Gerhard - Schoch House Leser House Buass Building Denny - Holliday House Burlage - Fischer House Littlefield Building Paramount Theatre Shipe House Kopperl House Radkey House Swisher - Scott House Hancock House Donnan …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: C14H- 1987-0016 HLC DATE: March 4, 2026 PC DATE: CC Date: APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission (owner-supported) HISTORIC NAME: Mayer-Howse House WATERSHED: Shoal Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 810 W. 10th Street ZONING CHANGE: GO-ETOD-DBETOD to GO-H-ETOD-DBETOD COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from general office- equitable transit-oriented development-equitable transit-oriented density bonus (GO-ETOD- DBETOD) district zoning to general office-historic landmark-equitable transit-oriented development-equitable transit-oriented density bonus (GO-H-ETOD-DBETOD) district zoning as a means of correcting the existing administrative record. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: architecture and historical associations HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: November 23, 1987 – public hearing occurs. No minutes available. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: 1988 minutes unavailable. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 1988 ordinance missing. CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras, 512-974-2727 DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The building has been a landmark since the late 1980s; it has received a City of Austin Landmark medallion and has filed Certificates of Appropriateness for all work done on the property exterior. However, the building’s original paper landmark casefile is largely missing, with original copies of the HLC, PC, and Council minutes and ordinance apparently lost before the era of digitization. Thus, the Historic Preservation Office seeks to correct this administrative oversight in obtaining a new valid ordinance for its designation. NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Neighborhoods Council, City of Austin Downtown Commission, Downtown Austin Alliance, Downtown Austin Neighborhood Assn. (DANA), Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Historic Austin Neighborhood Association, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Old Austin Neighborhood Association, Preservation Austin, Shoal Creek Conservancy BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: See original application in backup. PARCEL NO.: 0208000814 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 46 X 138 FT OLT 4 DIVISION E ESTIMATED ANNUAL TAX EXEMPTION (non-homestead, not capped): AISD $1,425.74 COA $1,769.13 TC $1,158.36 TC Health $363.75 Total $4,716.99 APPRAISED VALUE: Land: 634,800; Improvement: 299,004; Total: 933,804 PRESENT USE: Office DATE BUILT/PERIOD OF SIGNIFICANCE: ca. 1885; 1885-1937 (calculated from 1987 application date) INTEGRITY/ALTERATIONS: High PRESENT OWNERS: Mayer-Howse House LP ORIGINAL OWNER(S): Ernst and Anna Mayer OTHER HISTORICAL DESIGNATIONS: None Source: Certificate of Appropriateness for repair, 1999. Source: H-H-M, Inc., 2019 Location Map
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Date: March 4, 2026 Subject: FY 2026-27 Budget Recommendation Motioned By: RECOMMENDATION Seconded By: WHEREAS the City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission was established in 1974 to promote historic preservation activities in Austin and advise the Austin City Council on matters related to historic preservation; and WHEREAS the purpose of the Historic Landmark Commission is to prepare and periodically revise an inventory of the structures and areas that may be eligible for designation as historic landmarks, most recently completed in 1984; prepare, review, and propose amendments to a citywide Historic Preservation Plan recently updated in 2024; and review requests to establish or remove a historic designation and make recommendations on the requests to the Land Use Commission; and WHEREAS the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan outlines historic preservation policies for the City of Austin to preserve and interpret historic resources in Austin for residents and visitors, with goals including 1) the inventory and protection of historic buildings, structures, sites, places, and districts in neighborhoods throughout the city; and 2) the retention of the character of locally designated historic districts and National Register districts by ensuring development is compatible with the historic character of the districts; and WHEREAS the City Council adopted the Equity-Based Preservation Plan, a historic preservation plan, as an element of the City’s comprehensive plan by ordinance on November 21, 2024; and WHEREAS the City Manager is directed to identify funding to implement the Plan, including but not limited to these near-term items: (1) Evaluation of historic preservation incentives and any changes needed to make them more effective, building on the exploration of TDR; (2) Ready access to professional archaeological and engineering expertise for City staff and the Historic Landmark Commission; (3) Two additional staff members for the Historic Preservation Office to assist with Plan implementation; (4) A cultural mapping program to identify significant places, businesses, and other resources, prioritizing communities historically marginalized communities and neighborhoods where longtime residents face a high risk of displacement; and 1 of 2 (5) Resources to develop a deconstruction program for demolished historic buildings to preserve and recycle materials in an environmentally-sensitive way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Historic Landmark Commission recommends that the Council allocate additional funds to Austin Planning for FY2026-27 for permanent staffing in the Historic Preservation Office to manage and coordinate implementation of the preservation plan. The two additional staff positions are essential …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2026, AT 6:00 P.M. CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 301 W. 2ND STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Historic Landmark Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live CURRENT COMMISSIONERS X BEN HEIMSATH, CHAIR (D-8) X CARL LAROSCHE (D-6) X ROXANNE EVANS, VICE CHAIR (D-2) X TREY MCWHORTER (D-10) X JEFFREY ACTON (MAYOR) X TONYA PLEASANT-WRIGHT (D-1) X JAIME ALVAREZ (D-7) X JUDAH RICE (D-4) X HARMONY GROGAN (D-5) X BAT TANIGUCHI (D-9) X KEVIN KOCH (D-3) DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER: 6:01PM PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Historic Landmark Commission regular meeting on January 7, 2026. MOTION: Approve the minutes per passage of the consent agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Rice. Commissioner Larosche seconded the motion. Vote 11-0. The motion passed. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing regarding the Downtown Density Bonus Program Update by Alan Pani, Planner Principal, Austin Planning. (Sponsored by Chair Heimsath and Vice-Chair Evans) PUBLIC HEARINGS/DISCUSSION ITEMS Historic Zoning 3. C14H-2025-0122 – 2207 E. 22nd St. Elliott House Council District 1 Proposal: Owner-initiated historic zoning Applicant: Terri Myers City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Grant the proposed zoning change from SF-3-NP to SF-3-H-NP. Ora Elliott Houston spoke in favor of historic zoning. Terri Myers spoke in favor of historic zoning. Gina Houston spoke in favor of historic zoning. Maria Priebe spoke in favor of historic zoning. MOTION: Close the public hearing on a motion by Commissioner Larosche, seconded by Commissioner Acton. Vote 11-0. The motion passed. MOTION: Recommend historic zoning per staff recommendation on the basis of community value, architecture, and historical association on a motion by Vice Chair Evans. Commissioner Pleasant-Wright seconded the motion. Vote 11-0. The motion passed. 4. PR-2025-138065 – 907 E. 13th St. Council District 1 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning Applicant: Historic Landmark Commission City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Should the Commission find that the building’s historical associations and landmark designation, recommend historic zoning for the front part of the lot, containing the original portions of the house only. Otherwise, encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, relocation, …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION HISTORIC LANDMARK INSPECTION RESULTS MARCH 4, 2026 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Certify the historic landmarks noted as passing their inspections in the following exhibit as eligible for the partial ad valorem tax exemption granted by Title 11, Article 2 (Partial Exemption for Historic Landmarks) of the Code of Ordinances, adopted under the authority provided in Article 8, Section 1-f (Ad Valorem Tax Relief) of the Texas Constitution and Section 11.24 (Historic Sites) of the Texas Tax Code. Exhibit B.1: CITY LANDMARK SITES THAT ARE ALSO RECORDED TEXAS HISTORIC LANDMARKS (RTHL) or STATE ARCHEOLOGICAL LANDMARKS (SAL) RECEIVING THE PARTIAL EXEMPTION FROM AD VALOREM TAXES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 Parcel Number Landmark Name Address Zoning Case Number FY26 Inspection Result RTHL/SAL 0206040514 0423060302 0206041611 0219060509 0208051017 0110011302 0208090601 0205070505 0402012601 0107000501 0206050915 0303000805 0210000322 0105020308 0206031709 0220061601 0206031808 0208011103 0108031175 0210022508 0206050212 0408020104 0206031501 0206010904 0206011001 0206011006 0206011007 0113000502 0206011002 0206011005 0206010501 0206011004 0206040606 0211010506 0210041802 0208001508 0205010509 0206040906 0206031017 0422050214 0206040109 0208030201 0210040214 0210040214 0208111801 0208030110 0205020211 0104040616 0206030312 0107060101 0107060101 0400040209 0109010611 0215020302 0207080601 0242120316 0212010301 0218030712 0206040104 0211010307 0208000808 0206030701 0206030803 0219060821 0220060607 0122000825 0119080320 0210022507 0118060112 0208011801 0204041405 0108031527 Depot Hotel Horton - Duval House Walton - Joseph Building Mansbendel - Williams House Jeremiah Hamilton Building Cruchon - Cabaness - Spiller House Southgate - Lewis House Majors-Butler-Thomas House Stanley Homestead - Outbuilding Gilfillan House Johnson (Alfrida) House Walter Tips House Daniel Caswell House Paggi House St. Charles House Ney Museum St. David's Church Hirshfeld House And Cottage Smoot Family Home Goodman Building French Legation St. Edwards Main Building & Holly Cross Hall St. Mary'S Cathedral B. J. Smith House Catherine Robinson House Pierre Bremond House Eugene Bremond House Neill-Cochran House Walter Bremond House John Bremond House North - Evans Chateau Phillips - Knudsen House E. H. Carrington Store West Hill Scholz Garten Boardman - Webb House J. P. Schneider Store German Free School Millett Opera House Onion Creek Masonic Lodge Paggi Carriage Shop Land Office Building Carrington - Covert House Gethsemane Lutheran Church Madison Log Cabin Lundberg Bakery Southwestern Telephone & Telegraph Building I. V. Davis Homestead Walter Tips Building Swedish Log Cabin Esperanza School Millbrook Texas Military Institute Castle Beriah Grahman House Thompson House Edward E. Zimmerman Stone House Gerhard - Schoch House Leser House Buass Building Denny - Holliday House Burlage - Fischer House Littlefield Building Paramount Theatre Shipe House Kopperl House Radkey House Swisher …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ms. Haven L Verrett Saturday, February 21, 2026 4:26 PM Historic Preservation Office; Sturgill, Hunter; Contreras, Kalan; McKnight, Kim; historiclandmarks@austintexas.gov Rudd, Mueni L. Request for Historic Landmark Consideration – 1914 E 12th Street (Ideal Barber Shop / Alcove Grill Site) Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged Some people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Members of the Historic Landmark Commission, My name is Haven Verrett, and I am a student at Huston-Tillotson University enrolled in SOCI 4308: Cultural Advocacy and Community-Led Preservation. I am writing to respectfully request consideration of the historic property located at 1914 E 12th Street in East Austin, which is currently home to Ideal Barber Shop and was historically associated with the Alcove Grill. Ideal Barber Shop, founded in 1948, is recognized as the oldest continuously operating Black-owned barbershop in Austin. For decades, it has served as more than just a place for haircuts. It has been a community gathering space where residents connected, shared information, mentored younger generations, and built social and political awareness during segregation and beyond. Historical records show that this same property also housed the Alcove Grill beginning in the late 1940s. The grill operated as a Black-owned restaurant and gathering space that contributed to the cultural and economic life of East Austin’s Black community at a time when access to many public spaces was limited. As one historic property that supported multiple Black-owned businesses, 1914 E 12th Street represents an important example of Black entrepreneurship, resilience, and community building in East Austin. Its history reflects the broader story of East Austin as a center of Black cultural and economic life. Because of ongoing development pressures and the importance of preserving historically underrepresented spaces, I respectfully ask that the Commission consider reviewing this property and placing it on a future Historic Landmark Commission agenda for discussion of potential historic designation. 1 Thank you for your time and for the work you do to preserve Austin’s history. Sincerely, Haven Verrett Huston-Tillotson University SOCI 4308 Student CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Flowers, Nilesvan L. Sunday, February 22, 2026 10:34 PM Historic Preservation Office Rudd, Mueni L. Subject: St. Joseph Grand Lodge Agenda Consideration Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Historic Landmark Commission Members and City Staff, I hope this message finds you well. My name is Nilesvan Lee Flowers II, and I am a student at Huston- Tillotson University. I am reaching out to advocate on behalf of the St. Joseph Grand Lodge, an integral part of East Austin's rich history. The St. Joseph Grand Lodge has long stood as a testament to the cultural and historical tapestry of our community, serving as a significant hub for social and civic activities among African Americans in the area. Its designation or review as a historical landmark is essential to preserve its legacy and ensure its stories continue to inspire future generations. I kindly request that the St. Joseph Grand Lodge be considered for placement on an upcoming Historic Landmark Commission agenda. Thank you for your time and consideration. Warm regards, Nilesvan Lee Flowers II Contact Information: 737-268-6449 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1
Begin forwarded message: From: "Berry, Xiara A." Subject: Request for Historic Landmark Consideration – Blackshear Elementary School, 1712 E. 11th St, Austin, TX Date: February 22, 2026 at 11:31:40 PM CST To: "historiclandmarks@austintexas.gov" <historiclandmarks@austintexas.gov>, "BC- Ben.Heimsath@austintexas.gov" <BC-Ben.Heimsath@austintexas.gov>, "BC- Kevin.Koch@austintexas.gov" <BC-Kevin.Koch@austintexas.gov>, "BC- Judah.Rice@austintexas.gov" <BC-Judah.Rice@austintexas.gov>, "BC- Jeffrey.Acton@austintexas.gov" <BC-Jeffrey.Acton@austintexas.gov>, "BC- Roxanne.Evans@austintexas.gov" <BC-Roxanne.Evans@austintexas.gov>, "BC- Carl.Larosche@austintexas.gov" <BC-Carl.Larosche@austintexas.gov>, "BC- Jaime.Alvarez@austintexas.gov" <BC-Jaime.Alvarez@austintexas.gov>, "BC- Trey.McWhorter@austintexas.gov" <BC-Trey.McWhorter@austintexas.gov>, "BC- Tonya.Pleasant@austintexas.gov" <BC-Tonya.Pleasant@austintexas.gov>, "BC- Harmony.Grogan@austintexas.gov" <BC-Harmony.Grogan@austintexas.gov>, "BC- Bat.Taniguchi@austintexas.gov" <BC-Bat.Taniguchi@austintexas.gov> Cc: "Rudd, Mueni L." Some people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Members of the Historic Landmark Commission, My name is Xiara Berry, and I am a student at Huston-Tillotson University enrolled in SOCI 4308: Cultural Advocacy and Community-Led Preservation. I am writing to advocate for the historic recognition and consideration of Blackshear Elementary School, 1712 E. 11th St, Austin, TX, located in East Austin. Through research including archival materials, community history, and architectural documentation, I have learned that this site is significant because: •It provided education for Black children during segregation when opportunities were limited •It served as an important gathering place and support system for the Black community in East Austin • It represents the strength, resilience, and shared history of Black communities in Austin This site contributes to the cultural and historical landscape of East Austin and reflects broader narratives of Black community life, resilience, and place-making in the city. Given ongoing development pressures and the importance of preserving underrepresented histories, I respectfully request that the Commission consider reviewing this property for potential historic designation and/or discussion at a future meeting. Thank you for your time and for your service to the city. Sincerely, Xiara Berry Huston-Tillotson University SOCI 4308 Student 2
MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Kalan Contreras, Planner Principal, Austin Planning Eric Bailey, Capital Delivery Services Deputy Director March 3, 2026 Subject: Barton Springs Road Bridge Historic Landmark Commission Withdraw The purpose of this memorandum is to withdraw application HR-2025-145729 from the March 4, 2026 Historic Landmark Commission (HLC) Agenda. Background and Context On December 14, 2023, after an extensive public outreach and preliminary engineering process, City Council directed Capital Delivery Services Staff to proceed with the replacement alternative for the Barton Springs Road Bridge. Since 2023, staff advanced the design and permitting of the new structure and was awarded a $32 million Federal Bridge Improvement Program grant for construction. The grant requires the project undertake the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process in addition to the regular City permitting process which requires review from several boards and commissions, including the HLC. Staff submitted a Historic Review application which was on the February 4, 2026 HLC agenda. This application was premature as the project design hasn’t progressed enough to provide the information necessary for the review by the HLC. Next Steps Staff requests a project briefing for HLC at the April 1, 2026 meeting, no action is requested, but there are several questions from the February meeting that will be addressed. Staff will return to the HLC as the NEPA process continues with input from federal agencies and public comment. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Eric Bailey, Deputy Director of Austin Capital Delivery Services, at Eric.Bailey@austintexas.gov or (512) 974-7713. cc: Kim McKnight, Division Manager Austin Planning
DRAFT Historic Narrative1 Barton Springs Bridge Zilker Park Historic District Austin, Travis County, Texas Completed 1926 (Widened 1946) Summary The Barton Springs Bridge (1926) is historically and architecturally significant for its association with the development of Austin’s early twentieth-century civic infrastructure and for its embodiment of the open-spandrel reinforced concrete arch bridge type as designed by prominent Texas engineer Terrell Bartlett. Bartlett is still considered a pioneer in bridge design. The bridge represents an important phase in Austin’s expansion of permanent, modern transportation infrastructure and is a contributing structure within the broader historic landscape of the Zilker Park. The architectural amenities of the park are a unique collection of buildings, bridges, pergolas, fencing, railings, shelters, picnic facilities, comfort stations and concession stands and others that together create an engaging and vibrant gathering place central to Austin’s history and development. Completed in June 1926, the bridge replaced an earlier wood and iron structure described at the time as antiquated and unsafe. Its construction marked the first major bridge built in Austin since the Congress Avenue Bridge and was widely covered in local media and documented in City Council minutes, reflecting its civic importance. Designed by Terrell Bartlett Engineering Co. of San Antonio, the bridge is an early and well- documented example of the open-spandrel reinforced concrete arch form that became widely used throughout Texas in the early to mid-twentieth century. The bridge retains integrity of location, setting, design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Civic Infrastructure and Park Development During the 1920s, Austin undertook significant improvements to public infrastructure in response to population growth, automobile use, and expanding recreational development in what would become Zilker Park. Barton Springs and the surrounding parklands were emerging as central civic amenities, necessitating safer and more durable crossings over Barton Springs. In September 1924, city officials formally advanced plans to replace the deteriorated Barton Springs bridge with a permanent concrete structure. By March 1925, the City awarded the design contract to Terrell Bartlett Engineers. The bridge’s construction followed careful engineering investigation of site conditions, including subsurface testing that identified stable 1 This historic narrative was compiled, in part, with information provided by Ross Smith. Mr. Smith is a member of the Zilker Neighborhood Associa8on Execu8ve Commi?ee for 2025. He was appointed to the Transporta8on Commi?ee, which involves discussions and mo8ons related to the neighborhood's infrastructure and community projects. limestone bedrock beneath layers of clay. Contemporary reports …
March 2, 2026 RE: Barton Springs Bridge Project Dear Chair Heimsath, Vice Chair Evans, and Members of the Historic Landmark Commission Preservation Austin exists to empower Austinites to shape a more inclusive, resilient, and meaningful community culture through preservation. We write today to express our concerns over the procedural handling of the Barton Springs Bridge Project, which seeks to demolish a National Register-listed bridge, despite a limited public engagement process and irregularities in the City’s review of demolitions of historic structures. As Austin’s only citywide nonprofit for historic places, we’re deeply concerned by the precedent this may set for future projects involving city-owned historic sites. In the spring of 2023, the Department of Public Works (DPW) held a month-and-a-half-long engagement period for the Barton Springs Road Bridge that proposed replacement as the preferred option and presented rehabilitation as infeasible. In response, Preservation Austin sent a letter to DPW requesting that a qualified engineer with expertise in historic bridges assess the bridge's condition before a final determination was made (see attached). During this brief window, DPW neither sought Preservation Austin’s input nor responded to our letter. In December 2023, City Council voted on consent to approve the bridge’s replacement, effectively authorizing its demolition with limited public input and no historic review by the Historic Landmark Commission (HLC). Now, Capital Delivery Services is requesting that the HLC provide input on the design of the potential replacement to access federal funding for the project, having overlooked the HLC’s code-mandated obligation to review the demolition in the first place. Since the City anticipates using federal funds from the U.S. Department of Transportation, two important laws apply, requiring the City to meaningfully consider alternatives to replacement. The National Historic Preservation Act’s Section 106 review requires that the City and TxDOT work with consulting parties to consider the project’s effects on historic resources and consider alternatives that would avoid, minimize, or mitigate damage to said resources. The City must also consider Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act, which prohibits approval of a transportation project that uses a historic site unless there is no feasible and prudent alternative and all possible planning to minimize harm has occurred. 4(f) is a substantive constraint, not a box-checking exercise that takes place at the end of an internal City review process. None of these municipal or federal regulations guarantees that the bridge will be preserved, but they were …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Carole Price Friday, February 27, 2026 4:09 PM Historic Preservation Office Barton springs bridge Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Completed You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution I urge you to stop the madness...I live in Barton Hill and do not wish to see the bridge over Barton springs demolished and replaced with a 4-6 lane monstrosity...for nearly 40 years I have watched in horror as more and more of south Austin charm has been removed from our life and it stops HERE! $54 million is an outrage...build a new pedestrian bridge like we have over on S. Lamar and move the foot traffic...and rehab this one for substantially less. Your name says it all HISTORIC LANDMARK commission...save this bridge, for now for the future... CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1 Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Sonia Santana Friday, February 27, 2026 4:24 PM Historic Preservation Office Save the Barton Springs Bridge You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution I am writing today to voice my concerns for demolishing the Barton Springs Bridge. I am a resident of Austin and live in the Zilker/Barton Hills neighborhood. I understand that the current estimate for demolition and replacement of the bridge is $54.5 million and construction would last 18 to 24 months; the 2022 estimate for tear down and replacement was only $10.2 million, compared to $14.5 million for rehabilitation of the bridge. On a cost basis alone it makes more sense to rehabilitate the bridge than to demolish it. That bridge should be a historical landmark and it should be saved - not torn down. Thank you, Sonia Santana 2005 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 2 Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Natasha Mulko Scheufele Friday, February 27, 2026 4:32 PM Historic …
Dear Historic Preservation Office and Commissioners, On behalf of ICC Austin student co-ops, I am writing to express our appreciation for the Commission’s recent inspection and our shared commitment to the stewardship of Helios Co-op located 1909 Nueces Street, Austin TX 78705. As a nonprofit student housing cooperative, our mission is to provide affordable, community-led housing to Austin’s student population. This mission is supported by our current tax-exempt status, which allows us to keep resident costs significantly below market rates. However, this model also means we operate on a "break-even" budget with limited capital reserves. The repairs noted, specifically the wood rot and window deterioration, are priorities for us. However, the immediate cost of full restoration would place an undue financial burden on our student members. We would like to work with the Commission to develop a Multi-Year Maintenance Plan that allows us to address the most critical exterior issues immediately while we secure funding for the remaining work. We are currently exploring the following avenues for funding: ● ● ● Applying for the Heritage Preservation Grant through the City of Austin. Seeking a Bricks and Mortar Grant from Preservation Austin. Investigating the sale of Texas State Historic Tax Credits . To ensure the long-term success of this preservation effort, we request that all future correspondence and compliance milestones be coordinated directly through ICC Austin’s professional staff . We are eager to receive technical guidance from the Commission on how to best phase these repairs. Our goal is to establish a clear, documented compliance path that respects both the architectural significance of 1909 Nueces and the fiduciary stability of our cooperative mission. Given the complexities of managing a historic property on a nonprofit budget, we request that the Commission establish a formal compliance agreement with ICC Austin. This will ensure that our maintenance priorities are determined by professional assessment and staff oversight, rather than ad hoc reports. We look forward to discussing a timeline at the upcoming meeting that balances immediate stabilization with the fiscal realities of student-led housing. I plan to attend the upcoming March 4 meeting at City Hall to discuss how we can balance the preservation of this landmark with our vital mission of housing Austin's college students. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Nicholas Hill, CPA Executive Director 512-609-0051
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Date: March 4, 2026 Subject: FY 2026-27 Budget Recommendation Motioned By: Vice Chair Evans Seconded By: Commissioner Taniguchi MOTION: Approve the recommendation to Council on a motion by Vice Chair Evans. Commissioner Taniguchi seconded the motion. Vote 9-0. Commissioner Larosche and Commissioner Grogan were absent. The motion passed. RECOMMENDATION WHEREAS the City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission was established in 1974 to promote historic preservation activities in Austin and advise the Austin City Council on matters related to historic preservation; and WHEREAS the purpose of the Historic Landmark Commission is to prepare and periodically revise an inventory of the structures and areas that may be eligible for designation as historic landmarks, most recently completed in 1984; prepare, review, and propose amendments to a citywide Historic Preservation Plan recently updated in 2024; and review requests to establish or remove a historic designation and make recommendations on the requests to the Land Use Commission; and WHEREAS the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan outlines historic preservation policies for the City of Austin to preserve and interpret historic resources in Austin for residents and visitors, with goals including 1) the inventory and protection of historic buildings, structures, sites, places, and districts in neighborhoods throughout the city; and 2) the retention of the character of locally designated historic districts and National Register districts by ensuring development is compatible with the historic character of the districts; and WHEREAS the City Council adopted the Equity-Based Preservation Plan, a historic preservation plan, as an element of the City’s comprehensive plan by ordinance on November 21, 2024; and WHEREAS the City Manager is directed to identify funding to implement the Plan, including but not limited to these near-term items: (1) Evaluation of historic preservation incentives and any changes needed to make them more effective, building on the exploration of TDR; (2) Ready access to professional archaeological and engineering expertise for City staff and the Historic Landmark Commission; (3) Two additional staff members for the Historic Preservation Office to assist with Plan 1 of 2 implementation; (4) A cultural mapping program to identify significant places, businesses, and other resources, prioritizing communities historically marginalized communities and neighborhoods where longtime residents face a high risk of displacement; and (5) Resources to develop a deconstruction program for demolished historic buildings to preserve and recycle materials in an environmentally-sensitive way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Historic Landmark Commission recommends …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 2026, AT 6:00 PM PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, EVENTS CENTER, ROOM 1405 6310 WILHELMINA DELCO DRIVE AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Environmental Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Nicole Corona, 512-974-3146, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Jennifer Bristol, Chair Mariana Krueger, Vice Chair Haris Qureshi, Secretary Richard Brimer Isabella Changsut Annie Fierro CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Justin Fleury Martin Luecke Mar Moretta-Urdiales Allison Morrison David Sullivan AGENDA The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Special Called meeting on February 19, 2026. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 2. Presentation on Austin Watershed Protection’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Budget, Programs, and Projects Overview and approve recommendations for their FY27 budget. Presentation by Albert Castro, Financial Manager, and Janae Spence, Assistant Director, Austin Watershed Protection. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Name: Circuit Of the Americas (COTA) Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUD), C814- 2018-0122.03 Applicant: Armbrust & Brown, PLLC (Michael Whellan) Location: 9201 Circuit of the Americas Boulevard, Austin, Texas Council District: 2 Staff: Leslie Lilly, Environmental Conservation Program Manager, 512-535-8914, Leslie.Lilly@austintexas.com Applicant request: The applicant proposes to amend a previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD). This is amendment #3. Staff Recommendation: Recommended with conditions FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Nicole Corona at Austin Watershed Protection at 512-974-3146, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Environmental Commission, please contact Nicole Corona, 512-974- 3146, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov.
SPECIAL-CALLED MEETING ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MINUTES THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2026 The Environmental Commission convened in a special-called meeting on Thursday, February 19, 2026, at the Permitting and Development Center, Room 1405, located at 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive in Austin, Texas. Vice Chair Kreuger called the Environmental Commission meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Mariana Krueger, Vice Chair Richard Brimer Justin Fleury Martin Luecke David Sullivan Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Isabella Changsut Annie Fierro Mar Moretta-Urdiales PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Craig Nazor, bird-friendly building construction, watershed restoration, and tree planting. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on February 4, 2026. The minutes from the Environmental Commission regular meeting on February 4, 2026, were approved on Commissioner Brimer’s motion, Commissioner Sullivan’s second, on an 8-0 vote. Chair Bristol, Secretary Qureshi, and Commissioner Morrison were absent. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. Presentation on Austin Youth River Watch’s mission and programming. Presentation by Melinda Chow and Fidel Campuzano Gonzalez, Co-Executive Directors, and Jasalyn Franco, Program Specialist, Austin Youth River Watch. The presentation was made by Melinda Chow and Fidel Campuzano Gonzalez, Co- Executive Directors, and Jasalyn Franco, Program Specialist, Austin Youth River Watch. 1 DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 3. 4. Presentation, discussion, and action regarding a recommendation to Austin City Council on the creation, continuation, terminations, and status of a concession including issuance for a Request for Proposal for a concession in Town Lake Metropolitan Park for inclusion in the joint report between the Parks and Recreation Board and the Environmental Commission that is provided to City Council annually. Presentation by Karen Charles, Contract Management Specialist, and Denisha Cox, Contract Management Supervisor, Austin Parks and Recreation. There was a motion to approve the recommendation to Council to approve the 2025 concessions report, acknowledging that the reporting requirements were met, and additionally recommend that future joint reports include the following: • • Information from contractors detailing the environmental stewardship initiatives and accomplishments they achieved, in specific qualitative and quantitative terms, and specifically request detailed metrics regarding erosion control, streambed restoration, grassland maintenance, trash pick-up, water quality, and biodiversity Information regarding environmental equity in terms of access and concession usage Include concessions from parks other than Lady Bird Lake • • Delay the implementation of Phase II of the Parks Operations and Maintenance Agreements with the Trail Conservancy until the financial audit is finalized and made public, and until it …
Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Overview Austin Watershed Protection Overview ▪ Mission & Organizational Structure ▪ FY26 Operating and Maintenance(O&M) Budget Overview ▪ FY26 O&M Budget Program Activities ▪ Capital Improvement Program(CIP) Budget ▪ CIP Project Overview ▪ Resources 2 Mission & Organizational Structure Mission ▪ Austin Watershed Protection(AWP) protects lives, property, and the environment of our community by reducing the impact of flooding, erosion, and water pollution. ▪ AWP’s mission is achieved through services such as responding to/developing: ▪ Drainage issues ▪ Water pollution ▪ Storm drain item retrieval ▪ Integrated pest management ▪ Floodplain mapping ▪ Storm drain infrastructure. 4 Organizational Structure 5 AustinWatershed ProtectionTotal FTEs: 456.75OperationsFTEs: 182Modeling,Monitoring, and ComplianceFTEs: 89Office of the DirectorFTEs: 69Business EnterprisesFTEs: 61.25Project Design & DesignFTEs: 45.5Environmental Policy & ReviewFTEs: 10 AWP Budget Information FY26 AWP O&M BUDGET BY PROGRAM Total Budget - $127.9M Business Enterprises, $10,045,470 , 8% Environmental Policy and Review, $1,356,811 , 1% Transfers, $48,869,392 , 38% Modeling, Monitoring, and Compliance, $13,433,743 , 11% Office of the Director, $11,988,137 , 9% Project Design and Delivery, $6,858,186 , 5% Operations, $35,311,386 , 28% 7 Funding Sources ▪ Operations ▪ Drainage Utility Charge ▪ Based on the amount and percent of impervious cover ▪ Other Fees and Interest Income ▪ Site plans, subdivisions, MUD, PUDs; Permit Fees ▪ Capital Projects ▪ Cash transfer from operations ▪ GO Bonds ▪ Grants ▪ Tax Increment Financing ▪ RSMP and USCF Payments 8 FY26 Funds Sources and Expense Type FY26 Revenue by Funding Category Drainage Utlility Charge 95% Interest Income and other misc. revenue Development, licenses and permit Fees 4% $5,459,738 1% $887,176 FY26 Budget by Expense Category Personnel Contractuals Transfers 47% 28% 23% $36,026,186 $29,119,257 Non-CIP Capital Expenditures Commodities 3% $3,233,339 0% $157,000 Expense Refunds -$751,608 -1% $118,655,633 $60,078,951 9 AWP Program Activities Operating & Maintenance Activities ▪ Drainage Infrastructure Maintenance ▪ Trash and Debris Removal ▪ Land Management & Ponds Maintenance 11 Operating & Maintenance Activities ▪ Pollution Prevention & Response ▪ Floodplain Modeling & Development Review ▪ Environmental Policy and Planning ▪ Environmental Research and Data Analysis 12 Operating & Maintenance Activities ▪ Storm Event Monitoring ▪ Replenishing Creek Beds ▪ Community Education & Outreach 13 Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Program: Overview ▪ Projects in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are major improvements to our infrastructure, facilities, and waterways. ▪ CIP projects have a higher price tag and longer lifespan than routine maintenance …
Acreage Use Zoning Jurisdition Green Building Water Quality Current Code 1,153 acres Iterim-Rural Residential I-RR Full-Purpose 100% GSI (starting in 2022) Existing PUD 1,153 acres Mixed Use PUD Full-Purpose 2 star 100% GSI + additional WQ treatement for asphalt trail Drainage Floodplain Modification Impervious Cover CWQZ 25-7-93 & 96 25-8-263 80% 25-8-91 & 92 Current code Current code 68% Current code CWQZ Development Critical Environmental Features (CEF) 25-8-261 & 262 specifies and limits trail crossings 25-8-281 & 282 Current code and as defined by wetland mitigation plan Restoration Required in some situations 14.36 acres of Blackland Prairie Restoration native restoration along asphalt trail as shown in Exhibit H Open Space Cut/Fill Current code 25-8-341 & 342 298 acres of public open space up to 20' in Planning Area 4 Construction on Slopes 25-8-301 current code Proposed Amendment 1,153 acres Mixed Use PUD Full-Purpose 2 star 100% GSI + additional WQ treatement for asphalt trail Modification to 25-7-93 & 96 to allow maintenance buildings associated with golf course Current code 68% current code Development allowed in the CWQZ associated with golf course and CWQZ crossing of race track (1:1 mitigation for crossing required) Current code and as defined by wetland mitigation plan Surplus wetland restoration 0.87 CEF / 0.56 CEF Buffer 14.38 acres of Blackland Prairie Restoration native restoration along asphalt trail as shown in Exhibit H Riparian restoration plan for 4.59 areas shown in Exhibit H 100 acres of open space (off site open space provided) up to 20' for Planning areas 4,5,6 For golf course - cut allowed within CWQZ outside EHZ up to XXX Admin variance for over 20ft to match grade in Planning area 4 Admin variance for up to 15 ft outside of Planning areas 4, 5, 6 w/ commensurate mitigation Allowed in Planning Area 8 with commensurate mitigation Admin variance for construction on slopes over 15% Landscape Requirements Current code additional 400 native trees planted minimum 2-in, native Central Texas seed stock, 1000 cubic feet of soil volume for each newly planted tree additional 400 native trees planted minimum 2-in, native Central Texas seed stock, 1000 cubic feet of soil volume for each newly planted tree Tree Protection IPM Current code Native tree species from Appendix F Native and adapted plants per Grow Green Central Texas Native seed stock Beneficial reuse of condensate water for irrigation Current code Required additional 1000 caliper inches of native …
ITEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSION MEETING DATE: March 4, 2026 NAME & NUMBER OF PROJECT: Circuit of the Americas PUD Amendment #3, C814-2018-0122.03 NAME OF APPLICANT OR ORGANIZATION: Armbrust & Brown, PLLC (Michael Whellan) LOCATION: 9201 Circuit of the Americas Boulevard COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STAFF: WATERSHED: REQUEST: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Leslie Lilly, Environmental Conservation Program Manager, 512-535-8914, Leslie.Lilly@austintexas.com Suburban Watershed, Dry Creek East Watershed, Desired Development Zone The applicant proposes to amend a previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD). This is amendment #3. Recommended with conditions. Circuit of the Americas (COTA) Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment #3 C814-2018-0122.03 Austin Watershed Protection | March 4, 2026 COTA PUD C814-2018-0122 2 History of the Site 1940’s Lady Bird Lake ▪ Clearing and grading activities documented from 1940s on. ▪ Dam built in 1970s ▪ Site development permit for racetrack approved in 2011 ▪ Planned Unit Development (PUD) approved in 2020 1970’s 3 Existing Conditions Lady Bird Lake ▪ 1,153 acres ▪ Suburban Watershed, Dry Creek East ▪ Desired Development Zone ▪ Major Critical Water Quality Zones (CWQZ) ▪ 100-yr Floodplain ▪ Critical Environmental Features (CEF) ▪ Slopes in excess of 15% COTA PUD Wetlands Wetland Buffer CWQZ 100-yr Floodplain 4 5 Proposed Amendment ▪ 3rd Amendment ▪ Hotel / Convention Center in Planning Area 4 ▪ Golf Course in Planning Area 4, 5, & 6 ▪ Practice racetrack in Planning Area 8 ▪ Wetland Mitigation and Riparian Restoration 6 The COTA PUD Existing vs Proposed Lady Bird Lake Requirement Existing Proposed Green Building 2-star 2-star Water Quality Impervious Cover IPM 100% GSI + additional WQ treatment for asphalt trail 100% GSI + additional WQ treatment for asphalt trail 68% Required 68% Required 7 Green Building Basic Requirements Lady Bird Lake ▪ EV Charging Stations requirements ▪ Potable Water Use Reduction (for water features - 100% non-potable water supply) ▪ Bike Parking ▪ Energy Performance ▪ Additional requirements Link to Austin Energy Green Building Guides: Rating Documents 8 The COTA PUD Existing vs Proposed Lady Bird Lake Requirement Existing Proposed Drainage Current code Modification to 25-7-93 & 96 to allow structures associated with golf course Floodplain Modification Current code Current code CWQZ Defined Current code current code CWQZ Development specifies and limits trail crossings Development allowed in the CWQZ associated with golf course and CWQZ crossing of racetrack (1:1 mitigation for crossing required) Critical Environmental Features (CEF) Current code and as …
ITEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSION MEETING DATE: March 4, 2026 NAME & NUMBER OF PROJECT: Circuit of the Americas PUD Amendment #3, C814-2018-0122.03 NAME OF APPLICANT OR ORGANIZATION: Armbrust & Brown, PLLC (Michael Whellan) LOCATION: 9201 Circuit of the Americas Boulevard COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STAFF: WATERSHED: REQUEST: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Leslie Lilly, Environmental Conservation Program Manager, 512-535-8914, Leslie.Lilly@austintexas.com Suburban Watershed, Dry Creek East Watershed, Desired Development Zone The applicant proposes to amend a previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD). This is amendment #3. Recommended with conditions. ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C814-2018-0122.03 DISTRICT: 2 (Circuit of the Americas PUD Amendment #3) ADDRESS: 9201 Circuit of the Americas Boulevard ZONING FROM: PUD TO: PUD* *The applicant is requesting a PUD amendment to change conditions of the approved PUD zoning in Ordinance No. 20201001-042 and Ordinance No. 20231214-105 (Please see Applicant’s Request Letter – Exhibit C and Proposed Redlined PUD Exhibits – Exhibits D - K). SITE AREA: 1,153 acres PROPERTY OWNER: Circuit of the Americas, Inc. (Alyssa Epstein, Secretary) AGENT: Armbrust & Brown, PLLC (Michael J. Whellan) CASE MANAGER: Sherri Sirwaitis (512-974-3057, sherri.sirwaitis@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMEDATION: Recommendation Pending PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD: February 23, 2026: ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION: March 4, 2026 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ORDINANCE NUMBER: C814-2018-0122.03 ISSUES: N/A CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: 2 The Circuit of the Americas Planned Unit Development is a 1,153 acre property generally located east of State Highway 130 and north of FM 812 on Circuit of the Americas Boulevard. The PUD consists of a mixed-use development and is currently comprised of eight planning Areas with approximately 967 acres of commercial space (Areas 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, & 8) and 186 acres of mixed use (Area 2). The land use plan includes 298 acres of open space that is dispersed throughout Areas 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8 on the site. The CS, General Commercial Services District, is the baseline zoning district for the PUD. The property in question was annexed in 2012 through Ordinance No. 20121108-027. The site is surrounded by residential and commercial properties within the City’s Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) that do not have zoning and are not part of an active or near-future neighborhood planning effort. Although there are residential uses within 540 feet of the project, the majority of the properties are not located within the City of Austin and are not subject to compatibility requirements. …
Circuit of the Americas (COTA) Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment #3 C814-2018-0122.03 Austin Watershed Protection | March 4, 2026 COTA PUD C814-2018-0122 2 History of the Site 1940’s Lady Bird Lake ▪ Clearing and grading activities documented from 1940s on. ▪ Dam built in 1970s ▪ Site development permit for racetrack approved in 2011 ▪ Planned Unit Development (PUD) approved in 2020 1970’s 3 Existing Conditions Lady Bird Lake ▪ 1,153 acres ▪ Suburban Watershed, Dry Creek East ▪ Desired Development Zone ▪ Major Critical Water Quality Zones (CWQZ) ▪ 100-yr Floodplain ▪ Critical Environmental Features (CEF) ▪ Slopes in excess of 15% COTA PUD Wetlands Wetland Buffer CWQZ 100-yr Floodplain 4 5 Proposed Amendment ▪ 3rd Amendment ▪ Hotel / Convention Center in Planning Area 4 ▪ Golf Course in Planning Area 4, 5, & 6 ▪ Practice racetrack in Planning Area 8 ▪ Wetland Mitigation and Riparian Restoration 6 The COTA PUD Existing vs Proposed Lady Bird Lake Requirement Existing Proposed Green Building 2-star 2-star Water Quality Impervious Cover IPM 100% GSI + additional WQ treatment for asphalt trail 100% GSI + additional WQ treatment for asphalt trail 68% Required 68% Required 7 Green Building Basic Requirements Lady Bird Lake ▪ EV Charging Stations requirements ▪ Potable Water Use Reduction (for water features - 100% non-potable water supply) ▪ Bike Parking ▪ Energy Performance ▪ Additional requirements Link to Austin Energy Green Building Guides: Rating Documents 8 The COTA PUD Existing vs Proposed Lady Bird Lake Requirement Existing Proposed Drainage Current code Modification to 25-7-93 & 96 to allow structures associated with golf course Floodplain Modification Current code Current code CWQZ Defined Current code current code CWQZ Development specifies and limits trail crossings Development allowed in the CWQZ associated with golf course and CWQZ crossing of racetrack (1:1 mitigation for crossing required) Critical Environmental Features (CEF) Current code and as defined by wetland mitigation plan Current code and as defined by wetland mitigation plan 9 10 The COTA PUD Existing vs Proposed Lady Bird Lake Requirement Existing Proposed Restoration 14.36 acres of Blackland Prairie Restoration 14.38 acres of Blackland Prairie Restoration native restoration along asphalt trail as shown in Exhibit H native restoration along asphalt trail as shown in Exhibit H Open Space 298 acres of public open space Riparian restoration plan for areas shown in Exhibit H Surplus wetland restoration 0.87 CEF / 0.56 CEF Buffer 100 …
COTA PUD AMENDMENT #3 Environmental Commission March 4, 2026 PROJECT OVERVIEW • 1,000+ key hotel resort • Golf course • Mid-size conference center (3.5x smaller than downtown CC) • Possible secondary racetrack • Flexible uses for future development at COTA PROJECT IMPACT • $925 million total development costs; $650 million in hard construction costs • $10 billion in total economic activity over 30 years • Hundreds of million in tax revenues going to the City budget • Experience developing in environmentally sensitive areas (Chula Vista, CA) PROJECT IMPACT • Economic anchor in Del Valle and the Eastern Crescent • 1,000s of jobs over project life from construction to operation • Labor peace agreement with hospitality union = first large- scale, privately-owned union hotel in Austin ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS & SUPERIORITY Water Quality & Water Forward Habitat Mitigation & Restoration Trees Open Space 100% green stormwater infrastructure 14.38 acres of Blackland Prairie Restoration 400 new native trees planted (min. 2-in caliper) 100 acres of on-site open space in PUD, with likely add’l 100+ acres for golf course Development Standards AEGB 2-Star Green Building Standard 38,332 sf of enhanced WQ treatment for asphalt trails 4.59 acres of riparian restoration Additional 1,000 caliper inches of native trees Minimum 14 acres if off-site dedication is selected 68% impervious cover maximum Condensate for irrigation; Onsite Water Reuse System (OWRS) 37,897 sf of new CEF 24,393 sf of new CEF buffer 1,000 cubic feet of engineered soil volume for every new tree ~$2 million of improvements (off-site parkland) Integrated Pest Management Comprehensive native restoration along asphalt trail Certified arborist hired on-site to oversee landscaping and tree establishment
. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Environmental Commission Recommendation 20260403-003: C814-2018-0122.03 Circuit of the Americas Planned Unit Development Amendment #3 WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the applicant, Armbrust & Brown, PLLC, is requesting an amendment to a previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD); and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the site is located in Suburban Watershed, Dry Creek East Watershed, and the Desired Development Zone; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes that staff recommends this Planned Unit Development amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Environmental Commission recommends the Circuit of the Americas (COTA) PUD Amendment #3 with the following conditions: Staff Conditions: • An additional 0.87 acres of wetland Critical Environmental Feature (CEF) and 0.56 wetland CEF buffer will be restored above what is minimally required for mitigation • AC condensate and Rainwater will be used for irrigation • 4.59 acres of riparian restoration will be completed • An additional 1000 caliper inches of trees planted in addition to the 400 trees required Environmental Commission Conditions: • Restrict administrative cut/fill approvals to 15’ throughout the PUD • Remove the “fee in lieu” option for parkland • Require each cut/fill approval exceeding 15’ to be reviewed and specifically approved by the Environmental Commission throughout the PUD • Maintain existing requirement for 298 acres of open space in Area 8, including two soccer fields, related amenities, and public access easement • Require construction within the 25-year flood zone to meet current City Code requirements • Require COTA to dedicate 11.38 acres to the City within the PUD • Retain existing Affordable Housing requirements. • Maintain existing bicycle infrastructure requirements • Maintain 30’ easement to parkland • Work with CapMetro to establish bus lines to COTA facilities from downtown Austin and the airport • Prevent construction within Critical Water Quality Zone (CWQZ) without specific approval of the Environmental Commission . • Maintain a 200-foot buffer for CWQZs per City Code • Prohibit CWQZ buffer averaging • Prohibit illuminated signs • Prohibit mobile homes within the PUD • Prohibit short-term rentals within the PUD • Require noise mitigation action be taken around any practice tracks (including, but not limited to, racetracks, kennels, aviation facilities), or any other facilities whose normal operation may exceed noise limits specified in the City’s noise ordinances • Prohibit operation of practice tracks and aviation facilities between 9 p.m. and 7 a.m. local time • Erect acoustic monitors around racetracks, kennels, …
