Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: patricia calhoun Monday, December 1, 2025 3:06 PM Historic Preservation Office patricia calhoun; Brenda Malik; Misael Ramos; Marilyn Poole 2406 E MLK, Jr. Blvd Demolition Protest Importance: High You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Good afternoon, Hunter, Thank you for returning my call today regarding the Certificate of Appropriateness for 2406 E. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd.. I am a resident of the Rogers-Washington-Holy Cross Historic District and I am in favor of a Postponement of this ruling pending plans or some type of document showing the use of this property. This property is adjacent to an original and well-known homeowner of this Historic District; I would strongly object to approval for demolition without site plans or other documentation showing that the structure is not suitable for rehab. Thank you, Patricia Calhoun, ASID, IIDA, RID Patricia Calhoun THE PERFECT ADDITION 972-814-6543 (Cell) CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: 1(713)6282228 <ctmavayaalerts@austintexas.gov> Tuesday, December 2, 2025 8:19 AM Historic Preservation Office [Transcribed] Voice Message From: 1 (713) 6282228 VoiceMsg[ID=1414728 G=40 F=228 A=588B9018-E3E0-4915-B196-27EE696E9546 C=1 CID= 1(713)6282228].wav Hello, my name is Marilyn Webb. I'm a neighbor of case number 20. G F 202-514-4858. The 2406 East Mar(cid:415)n Luther King junior Boulevard. I object to this applica(cid:415)on. The builder or whoever owns the property has has never discussed the cer(cid:415)ficate of appropriateness of a demoli(cid:415)on at this contribu(cid:415)ng property. I would like to see any alterna(cid:415)ves to pull demoli(cid:415)on. As it is a contribu(cid:415)ng property. Please give me a call, I'm going to make an a(cid:425)empt to file this objec(cid:415)on. Thank you. Yes. 1
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Dear Mr. Sturgill, Ora Houston Tuesday, December 2, 2025 9:49 AM Historic Preservation Office 2406 E. Martin Luther King, Jr., Blvd. - Case # - PR-2025-144142; GF 2025-144858 External Email - Exercise Caution I am Ms. Ora Houston and I own property at 1902 Maple Avenue, 78722, Lot 8 Washington Subdivision. Am requesting that the Historic Landmark Commission grant a postponement regarding the Certificate of Appropriateness for the above referenced Case number. The applicant, Dmitriy Dubrovsky has not been in contact with nor has had any conversations with anyone in the Rogers Washington Holy Cross Historic District! Rogers Washington Holy Cross will probably be the only Historic District possible within the six square mile boundaries of the African American Cultural Heritage District. That will be because of the stringent requirements imposed by the State Representative and State Senator who were elected to 'represent not repress' the people of the District. It is unthinkable that this Case would go forward without the Applicant having no conversations with the people in the District in order to have an understand of what can and can not be deconstructed and/or constructed on the site. How disrespectful of the history of citizens of Austin whose structures are continuing examples of how beautiful, creative, engaged and resourceful they were throughout this community, City and State. Please grant a postponement until those conversation(s) can be held! Respectfully, Ms. Ora Houston 2207 E. 22nd Street 512-472-2951 “Service is the rent we pay for the privilege of living on this earth. It is the very purpose of life, not something you do in your spare time.” - The Honorable Shirley Chisholm 1 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 2
Congress Avenue Urban Design Initiative Congress Avenue Urban Design Initiative Historic Landmark Commission Briefing | December 3, 2025 CAUDI Vision Plan "Congress Avenue, often called the "Main Street of Texas," is one of the most iconic, historic and lively streets in Austin. The Congress Avenue Urban Design Initiative (CAUDI) envisions a transformative urban design, placemaking, and implementation strategy for Congress Avenue between Riverside Dr. and 11th St.” “The goal of this effort is to create a multifunctional complete street with a dynamic public realm that contributes to Downtown Austin's evolution as a sustainable mixed-use downtown and supports Austin's identity as a unique and iconic cultural city." 2 Full Build Scenario Riverside Dr to South Shore of Lady Bird Lake (future, unfunded) Green Gateways (future, unfunded) Cesar Chavez St – 7th St (Planned First Phase, funded) Bridge Enhancements (Future, unfunded) 7th – 11th St (Future, unfunded) 3 How we got here & what we heard Grow into a plaza concept. Retail Street alternative north of 7th Street. High quality materials. Wider pedestrian zones. Support for trees. Balance parking, tree health, bikeway comfort, and pedestrian experience. 4 Planned First Phase Planned First Phase: Construction Impacts: Construction from Cesar Chavez St to Short-term vehicle detours possible 7th St starting early 2026 Timeline & Cost: Begins early 2026, continues through 2027 Approx. 3 months per block $13M budget for first phase Pedestrian access will remain open City + DAA campaign to support businesses 5 6 Trees Maintain existing trees unless identified as dead, diseased, or an imminent hazard. Provide new landscaped areas around trees with soil and hardwood mulch. Add new trees only as needed to fill significant canopy gaps or replace dead, diseased or hazardous trees – subject to further coordination. 7 Furnishings Above ground planters to be removed. Great Streets Furnishings proposed for trash + recycling receptacles, bike racks, and benches. Great Streets Bench Great Streets Bike Racks Great Streets Recycling Great Streets Trash 8 Pavers Match existing paver style. Use new OR salvaged pavers based on feasibility of removing existing pavers without damaging them. Typical granite paver style and size. Variations in pavers on 300 block. 9 Lighting Strategy: relocate light poles (only as needed) where they severely conflict with the proposed pedestrian path. Coordination ongoing. Example of …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: CLIFTON LADD Wednesday, November 26, 2025 3:47 PM Bat Taniguchi; Heimsath, Ben - BC; Larosche, Carl - BC; Grogan, Harmony - BC; Eppright, Harrison - BC; Alvarez, Jaime - BC; Acton, Jeffrey - BC; Rice, Judah - BC; Koch, Kevin - BC; Pleasant-Wright, Tonya - BC; McWhorter, Trey - BC Historic Preservation Office; Barbara Cilley; Susan Armstrong Fisher; Mary Fealkoff HLC meeting 12-3-25; item 9. PR-2025-142120 – 1806 Drake Ave. External Email - Exercise Cau(cid:415)on Good a(cid:332)ernoon, Commissioners - I am wri(cid:415)ng to urge you to deny the applica(cid:415)on for demoli(cid:415)on of 1806 Drake Avenue, as included on your agenda for your December 3 mee(cid:415)ng. 1806 Drake is a 1940s ranch-style home and a contribu(cid:415)ng structure in the Travis Heights - Fairview Park Na(cid:415)onal Register Historic District. We urge the owners to reconsider their applica(cid:415)on for demoli(cid:415)on and to look for ways to retain and remodel the exis(cid:415)ng home. Most of the homes in this block of Drake are contribu(cid:415)ng structures in the District, and it would be a shame to lose another valuable contribu(cid:415)ng home. We also note that the applicant has not provided any plans for what they would do on the property in place of the exis(cid:415)ng home. The Historic Landmark Commission must review plans for new construc(cid:415)on in Na(cid:415)onal Register districts before demoli(cid:415)on permits may be issued. The SRCC Historic Preserva(cid:415)on Commi(cid:425)ee does not agree to the demoli(cid:415)on of any contribu(cid:415)ng structure for which we do not have an opportunity to review replacement plans. There are many instances of similar homes being rehabilitated much more affordably than demolishing an exis(cid:415)ng home and building an en(cid:415)rely new one. We would hope that the owners would further consider this op(cid:415)on. Thank you for your considera(cid:415)on of these comments. Sincerely, Cli(cid:332)on Ladd SRCC Historic Preserva(cid:415)on Commi(cid:425)ee Co-Chair CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use cau(cid:415)on when clicking links or opening a(cid:425)achments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" bu(cid:425)on in Outlook. For any addi(cid:415)onal ques(cid:415)ons or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@aus(cid:415)ntexas.gov". 1
Richard E. Anderson 2307 Woodlawn Blvd. Austin, Texas 78703 T: 512.538.0051 November 13, 2025 Via email preservation@austintexas.gov City of Austin Historic Preservation Office Permitting and Development Center 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, TX 78752 RE: 1608 PEASE ROAD, AUSTIN, TX To Whom it May Concern: Please accept this letter as my recommendation to demolish the duplex at 1608 Pease Road. The duplex was built in 1976, and the demolition would make way for a new home that honors and will contribute to the character of our neighborhood. For the past 25 years, my wife and I have lived at 2307 Woodlawn and are in favor of this demolition. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Richard E. Anderson /mjo
Claudia Taylor Johnson Hall Certificate of Appropriateness 1. Install awnings in same locations as historic awnings (south/west facades) 2. Replace glass at non-original windows (south/west facades) 3. Paint doors and frames (south facade) 4. Replace non-historic handrail (south facade) 5. 6. 7. Install accessibility doors (north facade) Install rooftop screening (west bay roof) Install signage (south/north facades) Install Sign (Compliant) Two New Accessibility Doors North Façade Install Rooftop Screening Install Awnings & Replace Glass West Façade Install Rooftop Screening Install Awnings, Replace Glass, and Paint Doors/Frames Install Signage (50 sf) Replace Handrail South Façade Lowered rooftop screening from 7 ft. to 5 ft. Confirmed glass replacement and door frame painting does not affect original or unaltered conditions. Revised south façade signage installation to have minimal impact on columns Removed trellis at patio Responsive to Committee Feedback Back-Up Slides
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Vickie Schubert Monday, December 1, 2025 4:05 PM Historic Preservation Office GF2025-121036 Demo permit 2821 Salado St (followup) You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Good afternoon. Prior to your meeting of December 3 I wanted to provide a follow-up to my previous email of November 14 in further support of demolition of the property at 2821 Salado. As of the time of my last email, the owner had just boarded up the house because an unhinged homeless man had taken up residence in the property and was yelling, breaking windows and who know what else in the house. It was a very uncomfortable and possibly dangerous situation to which the owner responded. In the two weeks since then, it has become a target of taggers (photos attached). They continue to visit the property and add more tags every several days. Finally today, I noticed the boarding over the back door has been torn off so either another homeless person has take up residence or the house is being scavenged for things like copper wire or both. In either case it has become a dangerous property to live next to and the costs of any sort of rehabilitation grow by the week. The developer met with Shoal Creek Neighborhood Association on November 17. The association decided to take no action to either support or oppose the project. I am urging and pleading with the Commission to take up this matter at the meeting of December 3 and approve the demolition so some positive progress can be made at the property. Thank you. Vickie Schubert 2819 Salado 1 2 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report 3 Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 4
Rosedale School – AISD 2117 W 49th Street Rosedale School – DA-2025-142965 City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 1940 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025 Rosedale School – 2117 West 49th Street City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – 12/3/2025
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Leslie Currens Monday, December 1, 2025 9:27 PM Historic Preservation Office Postpone the Demolition Permit Decision for Old Rosedale School You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Chairman Heimsath and commission members, As a neighbor near the Rosedale School, I request that you postpone a decision on the demolition of this property, as requested in case number: DA 25-142965. A legal fight over deed restrictions on the property is being waged in court, and it’s premature to consider a permit to demolish the building until the court case is resolved. The building itself may have useful life left on it. Until the future of the property is decided, it would be best not to demolish the building at this time. Sincerely, Leslie Currens 5615 Bull Creek Rd, Austin, TX 78756 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1 Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Joshua Villarreal Monday, December 1, 2025 9:27 PM Historic Preservation Office Old Rosedale School You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission, My name is Joshua Villarreal, I am a resident and owner of 4700 Rosedale Avenue, literally feet from the old Rosedale School. I am writing to express my concern as an Austin and Rosedale resident on the hearing tomorrow to decide the historical value and potential demolition of the school. It seems to be premature to hold this hearing while there is a court ruling in the balance on the site's existing deed restriction limiting a single residence per parcel, and the hearing should be postponed until there is clarity on what could be built on the site. There is also an active lawsuit from Austin Independent School District suing the Rosedale H homeowners, which includes myself and my wife. Pretty shocking to be sued by my own school district and feels like a breach of the social contract between citizens and their own government who is supposed to be for them, not against them. Thanks, -- Joshua Villarreal (210) 328-9679 CAUTION: This is an …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Trevor Howard Tuesday, November 25, 2025 8:20 PM Historic Preservation Office Clair Mattson Review Case Number: DA 25-142965 Objection to Demolition and Proposed Apartment Complex at 2117 W 49th Street You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Mr. Sturgill, Review Case Number: DA 25-142965 I am writing to express my strong opposition and objection to the proposed demolition of the property at 2117 W 49th Street, Austin, TX 78756 and the subsequent construction of the proposed apartment complex. The Rosedale neighborhood is a unique and cherished community, defined by its residential character, walkability, and family-friendly environment. The proposed project threatens to fundamentally alter this character. Specifically: • Neighborhood Integrity: The scale and density of the proposed complex are incompatible with the existing fabric of Rosedale. It risks eroding the sense of community that residents have worked hard to preserve. • Traffic and Safety Concerns: Increased traffic from a large apartment complex poses a serious danger in a neighborhood where children regularly play in the streets. The infrastructure here was not designed to handle such volume, and the risks to pedestrian safety are significant. • Quality of Life: Beyond traffic, the project would bring noise, congestion, and strain on local resources, diminishing the livability of the neighborhood for current residents. Said plainly, this project would ruin the character and safety of our neighborhood. I urge the Planning Department to reconsider approval of this demolition and development, and instead prioritize projects that respect the scale, safety, and integrity of Rosedale. To the extent that the demolition and proposed apartment complex are approved for construction, our family will strongly consider moving out of the neighborhood, despite not having the adequate financial resources to easily accommodate such a move. The risks associated with increased traffic and neighborhood density are not worth it given we have a 1 year old daughter and soon to be born child. 1 Thank you for your attention to this matter. I hope the voices of residents will be given full consideration in the decision-making process. I am available whenever to speak with you about our and our neighborhood's concerns with the project. Sincerely, Trevor Howard, Clair Howard 2210 W. 49th Street Austin, TX 78756 (m): 480-747-3339 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Karrie Key Monday, December 1, 2025 9:28 PM Historic Preservation Office Rosedale School You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution AISD wants to sell this historic property to OHT Properties so that OHT can build a tall apt complex with 600 plus apartments. I wager no apt building of that size has been built when said building will be surrounded by old, tiny two lane roads. The presentation made by OHT’s lawyer insisted that Burnet Road ran parallels Rosedale parcel. Wrong. Either the lawyer is lying or he cannot read a map. If the project is built on the Rosedale school parcel, pedestrian and vehicular deaths will occur. Please designate the Rosedale parcel as a historic site. Best regards, Karrie Key 512 507 1456. CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Tom Goodrum Tuesday, December 2, 2025 7:44 AM Historic Preservation Office Postpone Decision on the Rosedale School Demo Permit You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Chairman Heimsath and commission members: I live at 4808 Shoalwood Avenue, near the former Rosedale School site, which, as you may know, served our most fragile children with special needs in Austin. I support the postponement request by the Play Fair with Rosedale and the Rosedale Neighborhood Association (DA 25-142965). I am utterly gobsmacked that AISD has sued 125 of my neighbors, including my wife and me, to try to nullify a deed restriction that allows only one residence per lot. Having never been sued before, I feel steamrolled, having had no prior notification that this was happening. As neighbors, we are fighting this in court, and believe it’s premature to consider a permit to demolish a building until the court case is resolved. I don’t know whether the school is historic, but there is absolutely no reason to decide on this now. Last time I was there with my dog (who has since passed), there was an area in the back corner where families had made a tribute to their deceased children. Walking through the area with special markers, painted rocks, and light catchers with the children’s names felt sacred - it’s clearly a meaningful place for those families. I’m not sure why AISD and OHT are in such a hurry to get a demo permit when there is a very good chance the courts will uphold the deed restrictions. For what it's worth, the neighbors are not opposed to having the building used, perhaps like Carpenters Hall, or as it has been most recently, for active shooter training. What we don’t want is for the Rosedale School to be bulldozed and replaced with a high-density apartment building when the streets and neighborhood aren't equipped to handle the cars that come with the (proposed) 435+-unit development. Our neighborhood is filled with young children being pushed in strollers, families walking their dogs, and older, white-haired ones hobbling along. There are no sidewalks, and because it’s so walkable and neighborly, cars drive slowly. If you agree to demolish Rosedale School without regard for what it will be replaced with, it is a mistake. Moreover, to make this decision without …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Raquel Gorny Tuesday, December 2, 2025 1:51 PM Historic Preservation Office Notice of Appeal Rosedale School You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution To whom it may concern - I live at 4519 Rosedale Ave and am a neighbor of the former Rosedale School site. I support the postponement request by Play Fair with Rosedale and the Rosedale Neighborhood Association on case number: DA 25-142965. AISD has sued125 neighbors of the site to try to nullify a deed restriction that only allows one residence per lot. We are fighting this in court and it’s premature to consider a permit to demolish the building until the court case is resolved. I don't know if the old school is historic or not, but there is absolutely no reason to make any decision on this right now. Why are AISD and OHT in such a hurry to get a demolition permit, when there is very good chance the courts will uphold the deed restrictions and make their project impossible? It’s shocking to be sued by our own school district. We shouldn’t even have to be dealing with the historic value of building at this time. It feels like AISD and OHT are trying to steamroll us. Please take our opinions into consideration. Thank you, Raquel CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1 Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Nitin Agrawal Tuesday, December 2, 2025 1:20 PM Historic Preservation Office Play Fair With Rosedale Please! Historic Landmark Commission Demo Permit Hearing on Rosedale School.pdf You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Chairman Heimsath and commission members: My name is Nitin Agrawal, and I live at 4606 Rosedale Ave. I am a neighbor of the former Rosedale School site, and I am writing in support of the postponement request submitted by Play Fair with Rosedale and the Rosedale Neighborhood Association regarding case number DA 25-142965. As you may know, AISD has sued 125 neighbors of the site—including myself, if applicable—in an effort to nullify a long-standing deed restriction that allows …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Contreras, Kalan Tuesday, December 2, 2025 10:32 AM ; Historic Preservation Office FW: Historic Landmark hearing for Former Rosedale School Ramsey-Nitschke_Line.pdf Good morning, Mr. Allen, Thank you so much for sharing this with me! Though it is too late for this additional research to make it into the staff report, I will ask our HLC liaison, Hunter, to upload it as backup so that the Commissioners may review on their own. Kalan Contreras Principal Planner Historic Preservation Office Austin Planning 512-974-2727 kalan.contreras@austintexas.gov From: Chris Allen Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2025 8:50 AM To: Contreras, Kalan <Kalan.Contreras@austintexas.gov> Subject: Re: Historic Landmark hearing for Former Rosedale School External Email - Exercise Caution Good morning! I thought you'd appreciate some more background history on the impressive line of Ramsey women who shaped Rosedale for generations. Doing all of my research on the deeds for the school parcel, I learned a lot. Winnie Ramsey (one of F.T. Ramsey's 3 developer daughters) and her husband Hilliare created the original Rosedale H subdivision in 1938 and sold several lots to the Austin school district that year for the construction of the original school building. By 1946, Winnie's daughter Alice and husband Harry Wilder later sold additional lots to the school district for the expansion of the school. During my time dealing with land use in Rosedale, I've had the distinct pleasure of working with Diane Wilder Davenport Howard, daughter of Alice, who developed the Rosedale Village project (where Gusto and Citizen Allday are). Diane is 83 today and is being SUED by AISD over the deed restrictions her grandmother wrote and AISD agreed to. Funny world!! Diane's daughter Casey Davenport operated a doggy day care for several years where Citizen's allday sits and still lives in the neighborhood. That's a mighty impressive group of women who had quite an influence on our neighborhood. Their husbands' names are all over the records, but the Ramsey women are the constant thread in the story of Rosedale. 1 A lot of this information came from Karen Collins' "Rosedale Ramble" history walks, which we helped produce in the '90s, but this document I found a few weeks ago filled in some of the blanks: https://www.charlottes-web.com/Ramsey-Nitschke_Line.pdf (copy attached) Have a great day! Chris On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 3:18 PM Contreras, Kalan <Kalan.Contreras@austintexas.gov> wrote: Good afternoon, all, We have queried our legal department …
906 W 22nd Street Historic Landmark Commission Item No. 14 2025-141132 DA December 3, 2025 1 Neighborhood Aerial 2 Site Aerial 3 Property Details Size: • 0.1613 acres, or approximately 7,027 square feet • All lots: 0.4993 acres, or approximately 21,753 square feet Protected Bike Lanes Current Use: • Multifamily (Apartments, 8 units) Transit/Access: • CapMetro 22nd and Pearl Stop: • Route 642 – (UT Shuttle Weekdays + Sundays) • All Ages and Abilities Bicycle Priority Network • Pearl Street – Protected two-way bike lanes 4 Zoning and FLUM Map CS-NP Mixed Use /Office MF-4-NP MF-4-NP Mixed Use Multi- family MF-4-NP MF-4-NP High- Density Mixed Use MF-4-CO- ETOD- DBETOD-NP MF-4-NP (Moderate High-Density Multifamily Residential – Neighborhood Plan) Mixed Use Mixed Use 5 Landmark Designation Criteria City Code requires that a property must demonstrate significance in at least two of the below criteria: i. Architecture ii. Historical Associations iii. Archeology iv. Community Value v. Landscape Feature 6 Landmark Designation Criteria City Code requires that a property must demonstrate significance in at least two of the below criteria: i. Architecture ii. Historical Associations iii. Archeology iv. Community Value v. Landscape Feature 7 Landmark Designation Criteria Significance i. Architecture • The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. ii. Historical Associations • The property has long-standing significant associations with persons, groups, institutions, businesses, or events of historic importance which contributed significantly to the history of the city, state, or nation; or represents a significant portrayal of the cultural practices or the way of life of a definable group of people in a historic time. iii. Archeology • The property has, or is expected to yield, significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region; iv. Community Value • The property has a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of …
Thanks so much, Terri Myers, (512) 695-7375 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 2
