Water Management Strategy Implementation REPORT First Quarter 2026, January - March May 14, 2026 Contents First Quarter Summary Water Conservation Updates Water Loss Reduction Updates Reclaimed Water and Onsite Reuse Updates Conservation Outreach Updates Water Supply Project Updates Water Use and GPCD Notes Regarding Data 2 Fourth Quarter Summary The Water Management Strategy Implementation Report is intended to provide transparency and accountability regarding the execution of strategies from the 2024 Water Conservation Plan and the 2024 Water Forward Plan. The plans include proactive and substantial demand management strategies and innovative local supply strategies, but the hard work necessary to complete the strategies and meet the goals are illustrated in the implementation reports. Austin’s first quarter water use was similar to previous years. Water loss mitigation activities and the development of the reclaimed system continued. While water conservation rebates are generally modest during the first three months of the year, the utility was putting down roots through: Customer outreach, Community events, Pilots of water loss-mitigation equipment, and Progressing with reclaimed water system projects. 3 Water Conservation Updates New water conservation community outreach grant (up to $3,000) was awarded to 5 organizations Shoal Creek Conservancy, 2026 Waterwise Landscapes Tour, March 21 Spring community events focusing on landscaping Landscape transformation limit on irrigation systems for new homes will be clarified as a Rule in late 2026 4 Water Conservation Metrics Residential Rebate Programs Approved Rebates 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Drought Survival Tools Irrigation Upgrades Rainwater Harvesting Rebates WaterWise Landscape WaterWise Rainscape Other Residential Programs Q1 2025-Q4 2025 Q1 2026 5 Water Conservation Metrics Commercial Rebate Programs 5 4 3 2 1 0 Approved Rebates 4 4 3 1 1 Bucks for Business Q1 2025-Q4 2025 Q1 2026 6 Water Conservation Metrics Compliance Assessments Number of Compliant Commercial Facilities Number of Compliant Commercial Facilities 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Landscape Irrigation Assessment Cooling Tower Assessment Vehicle Wash Assessment Q1 2025-Q4 2025 Q1 2026 Q1 2025-Q4 2025 Q1 2026 7 Water Conservation Strategy Milestones (Water Conservation Plan, p. 35-36, Water Forward Plan, p. 34, 36) 2026 Milestones Commercial Incentives Progress Identify opportunities for CII facility owners/managers to benefit from the My ATX Water alerts and information. Landscape transformation Coordinate with Austin …
TO: Austin Integrated Water Resource Planning Community Task Force FROM: Working Group of Austin Integrated Water Resource Planning Community Task Force (Sarah Baker Faust, Paul DiFiore, Hani Michel, Madelline Mathis) DATE: June 9, 2026 The Working Group presents this memo for the consideration of the full Task Force. We request that the Task Force forward the Recommendations to Austin City Council to address potential demand increases in commercial and industrial use that could affect Austin’s timing and expense in diversifying its potable water supplies. Background The Austin Integrated Water Resource Planning Community Task Force (“Water Forward Task Force” or “WFTF”) recently formed a working group (“Working Group”) to take a closer look at water use in commercial, industrial, and institutional water consumption due to potential changing demand conditions in these user groups.1 The Water Forward water supply planning process operates on a 5-year timeline. The Working Group was tasked with reviewing Water Forward 2024 planning in these categories to determine whether the planning is still in alignment with changing conditions or should be addressed through policy recommendations. We believe the Austin City Council should review and adopt the recommendations in this memo that would address potential demand increases in industrial and commercial water use. Existing and Projected Commercial, Industrial, Institutional Water Use Austin Water has customers using significant volumes of water in the commercial, industrial and institutional categories.2 Large volume including institutional, industrial, and 1 The Working Group was initiated at the April 14, 2026, Water Forward Task Meeting. The Working Group developed research and resources, submitted written questions to and received responses from Austin Water, and met twice to review research, characterize problems, identify gaps in policy, and develop interventions and policy recommendations. 2 See “Large Water User Overview”, Slide 21, Climate, Water, Environment and Parks Committee Meeting Backup: May 18, 2026) https://services.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=473249. In this memo the phrase “high water use’’ or “large water customers” is used rather than “large volume” because Austin Water defines a “large volume customer” specifically as “an existing commercial customer of Austin Water that purchases 85.0 million gallons of water during a fiscal year at a single service address or campus.” In this context commercial includes industrial. (See Slide 20, Climate, Water, Environment and Parks Committee Meeting Backup: May 18, 2026) https://services.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=473249. (Attachment 1). Austin Water follows TWDB customer classifications: Industrial water use refers to customers who use water to convert materials into products …
Large Water Working Group Water Forward Task Force June 9, 2026 Working Group Process ● Developed research document with source information. ● Meeting 1 reviewed research, drafted questions for Austin Water, discussion centered around identifying issues and problem characterization. ● Submitted questions to Austin Water. ● Reviewed responses to questions and developed additional research. ● Meeting 2 reviewed responses, discussion centered on identifying policy gaps and developing interventions/recommendations. ● Finalized memo and recommendations over email. Large User Demand ● Commercial, industrial, and institutional users together account for about one-quarter of total water use. ● Austin's five largest retail customers used about 13,900 acre-feet in 2025 (4.5 billion gallons). This is about 29% of projected 2030 commercial baseline demand (47,600 acre-feet)(before conservation and reuse). Total Austin Water baseline 2030 demand is a little over 150,000 acre-feet. (2025 water use approximately 144,000 acre-feet/47 billion gallons) ● Large users do not forecast water demand for Austin Water. Future water demand is projected through disaggregated demand model, and water benchmarking if available. ● Additional large users can materially change supply timing, costs, and conservation outcomes. Planning Pressure Points ● Growth in semiconductors, advanced manufacturing, and AI data centers may outpace historic forecasts of water use. ● Disaggregated demand models for commercial sector relies heavily on historic employee, demographic, and billing patterns. ● Square footage and employee counts may not be predictive of water use for high tech industries and new data centers that can have high water use per square foot and/or fewer employees than traditional commercial sector use. ● City is developing a new economic development plan to recruit new businesses through tax rebates, with high water use industries expected to be part of recruitment program. ● No public review of service extension requests in the desired development zone. Opportunities to continue to innovate and catalyze non- potable water use ● Shifting as much use as possible to non-potable protects potable supplies. ● Austin's reclaimed system serves 226 meters, including 4 added in 2025 and averaged 455 million gallons reclaimed water used in 2025. System expansion is constrained by cost and construction process in existing urban areas but could be energized with stronger mandates to connect and aligning system growth with new business recruitment. ● Cooling towers remain a major opportunity because current reuse requirements are effective but could be expanded. ● Expanding reclaimed and onsite reuse requirements can protect potable supplies as …
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Austin Integrated Water Resource Planning Community Task Force Recommendation Number: 20260609-006: Large Water Users Date of Approval: June 9, 2026 Recommendation: The Austin Integrated Water Resource Planning Community Task Force believes that Austin City Council should review and adopt the recommendations in this memo that would address potential demand increases in industrial and commercial water use. Description of Recommendation to Council: - Require non-potable water for data centers and more commercial and industrial cooling uses. - Adapt Service Extension Request process to increase transparency and incentivize conserving potable water by establishing threshold potable water volume to qualify for waiver of board, commission, and city council process. - Adopt commercial water budgeting and tiered rates for large water use customers by 2028. - Expand triggers for reclaimed and onsite reuse ordinance to have larger distance allowances and a projected water use trigger (not based on square footage). - Align economic development incentives with non-potable water goals, ensure centralized reclaimed is considered in real estate inventories and development pipelines. Rationale: The Austin Integrated Water Resource Planning Community Task Force provides these recommended actions to the Austin City Council to address potential demand increases in commercial and industrial use that could affect Austin’s timing and expense in diversifying its potable water supplies. Motioned By: Paul DiFiore Seconded By: Perry Lorenz Vote: 7-0 For: Chair Jennifer Walker, Vice Chair Robert Mace, Leah Martinsson, Paul DiFiore, Perry Lorenz, Sarah Faust, Todd Bartee Against: None Abstain: None Off the dais: None Absent: Hani Michel and Madelline Mathis Attest: __________________________________ TO: Mayor Watson, Mayor Pro Tem Velasquez, and Austin City Council members FROM: Austin Integrated Water Resource Community Planning Task Force (“Water Forward Task Force”) DATE: June 9, 2026 The Water Forward Task Force provides these recommended actions to the Austin City Council to address potential demand increases in commercial and industrial use that could affect Austin’s timing and expense in diversifying its potable water supplies. Summary of Recommendations • Require non-potable water for data centers and more commercial and industrial cooling uses. • Adapt Service Extension Request process to increase transparency and incentivize conserving potable water by establishing threshold potable water volume to qualify for waiver of board, commission, and city council process. • Adopt commercial water budgeting and tiered rates for large water use customers by 2028. • Expand triggers for reclaimed and onsite reuse ordinance to have larger distance allowances and …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MONDAY, June 8, 2026 AT 5:30 P.M. AUSTIN CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, ROOM 1001 301 WEST 2ND STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Elaine Ramirez at 512-974-2202 or email elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov. CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: ___Jeffery Bowen (Chair) ___Margaret Shahrestani (Vice-Chair) ___Haseeb Abdullah ___Thomas Ates ___Sameer S Birring ___ Jessica Cohen ___ Melissa Hawthorne ___Yung-ju Kim ___Bianca A Medina-Leal ___Brian Poteet ___Michael Von Ohlen ___Corry L Archer-McClellan (Alternate) ___Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 4 speakers signed up/register prior (no later than noon the day before the meeting) to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Board of Adjustment Regular meeting on May 11, 2026 On-Line Link: May 11, 2026 draft minutes PUBLIC HEARINGS Discussion and action on the following cases New variance cases: 2. C15-2026-0020 Leonard Winn and Katherine Winn 6508 Highpoint Cove On-Line Link: ITEM02 ADV PACKET ; PRESENTATION The applicant is requesting a variance from the Land Development Code, Section 25- 2-899 (Fences as Accessory Uses) to increase the height from six (6) feet (maximum allowed) to eight feet (8’) feet (requested), in order to erect a fence along street side (North) property line in a “SF-2-NP”, Single-Family-Neighborhood Plan zoning district (University Hills Neighborhood Plan). Note: The Land Development Code 25-2-899 Fences as Accessory Uses (A) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, a fence: (1) is permitted as an accessory use in any zoning district; and (2) must comply with the requirements of this section. (B) In this section: (1) an ornamental fence is a fence with an open design that has a ratio of solid material to open space of not more than one to four; and (2) a solid fence is a fence other than an ornamental fence. (C) The height …
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Monday, May 11, 2026 The BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT convened in a Regular meeting on Monday, May 11, 2026, at 301 West 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Chair Jeffery Bowen called the Board of Adjustment Meeting to order at 5:35 PM. Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance in-Person: Jeffery Bowen-Chair, Haseeb Abdullah, Sameer S Birring, Brian Poteet, Michael Von Ohlen, Corry Archer-McClellan-Alternate, Suzanne Valentine-Alternate Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Maggie Shahrestani-Vice Chair, Tommy Ates (late 5:45pm), Melissa Hawthorne, Yung-ju Kim Board Members/Commissioners Absent: Jessica Cohen, Bianca A. Medina-Leal APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Board of Adjustment Regular meeting on April 13, 2026 On-Line Link: April 13, 2026 draft minutes The minutes from the meeting on April 13, 2026, were approved on Board Member Michael Von Ohlen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne second, on 10-0 Vote (Thomas Ates-no vote-late). PUBLIC HEARINGS Discussion and action on the following cases New sign case: 2. C16-2026-0005 Jim Wittliff for Alvin Momin 5001 Nuckols Crossing Road On-Line Link: ITEM02 ADV PACKET ; NO PRESENTATION The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-128 (Neighborhood Commercial Sign District Regulations (B) to allow from one (1) freestanding sign (maximum allowed), to adding one (1) additional freestanding sign (total of two (2)), in order to erect free-standing sign(s) for shopping center tenants in a Commercial Sign District, in a “LR-CO-NP”, Neighborhood Commercial – Combined Overlay – Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Southeast Combined Neighborhood). Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-128 Neighborhood Commercial Sign District Regulations (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) This section applies to a neighborhood commercial sign district. One freestanding sign is permitted on a lot. Wall signs are permitted. One flag for each curb cut is permitted. This subsection prescribes the maximum sign area. (1) For a freestanding sign, the total sign area for a lot may not exceed the lesser of: (a) (b) 0.3 square feet for each linear foot of street frontage; or 100 square feet. (2) For signs other than freestanding signs, the sign area may not exceed 10 percent of the façade area of the first 15 feet of building height. (F) The sign height may not exceed the greater of: (1) 20 feet above frontage street pavement grade; or (2) six feet above grade at the base of the sign. Source: Sections 13-2-867; Ord. 990225-70; Ord. 000309-39; Ord. 031211-11; …
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2026-0020 BOA DATE: Monday, June 8th, 2026 ADDRESS: 6508 Highpoint Cv OWNER: Leonard & Katherine Winn COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 AGENT: N/A ZONING: SF-2-NP (University Hills NP) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 23 BLK A BLUFFS OF UNIVERSITY HILLS SEC 1 VARIANCE REQUEST: increase the fence height from six (6) feet (maximum allowed) to eight feet (8’) feet (requested) SUMMARY: construct an 8 ft. fence ISSUES: corner lot, slight slope ZONING LAND USES Site North South East West SF-2-NP SF-2-NP SF-2-NP SF-2-NP SF-2-NP Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Neighborhoods Council Del Valle Community Coalition East Austin Conservancy Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Friends of Northeast Austin Homeless Neighborhood Association Overton Family Committee Preservation Austin University Hills Neighborhood Assn. ITEM02/1 May 20, 2026 Leonard Winn 6508 Highpoint Cv Austin TX, 78723 Property Description: LOT 23 BLK A BLUFFS OF UNIVERSITY HILLS SEC 1 Re: C15-2026-0020 Dear Leonard, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance request from LDC Section 25-2-899 at 6508 Highpoint CV. Austin Energy does not oppose the request, provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. All signage will need to stay out of Austin Energy easements and 5’ from existing underground electric lines. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements, which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Ashley Robinson, Project assistant Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050 ITEM02/2 ITEM02/3 ITEM02/4 ITEM02/5 ITEM02/6 ITEM02/7 ITEM02/8 ITEM02/9 ITEM02/10 6508 HIGHPOINT COVE Case CV-2025-072202 1/8/2026 Code Officer Gavin Peka ITEM02/11 6508 HIGHPOINT COVE Case CV-2025-072202 1/8/2026 Code Officer Gavin Peka ITEM02/12 6508 HIGHPOINT COVE Case CV-2025-072202 1/8/2026 Code Officer Gavin Peka ITEM02/13 6508 HIGHPOINT COVE Case CV-2025-072202 1/8/2026 Code Officer Gavin Peka ITEM02/14 6508 HIGHPOINT COVE Case CV-2025-072202 1/8/2026 Code Officer Gavin Peka ITEM02/15 6508 HIGHPOINT COVE Case CV-2025-072202 1/8/2026 Code Officer Gavin Peka ITEM02/16 North to South East to West ITEM02/17 North to South West to East ITEM02/18 …
6508 Highpoint Cv BOA case C15-2026-0020 8 ft fence variance ITEM02/1=PRESENTATION ITEM02/2=PRESENTATION Front of house – 6508 Highpoint Cv ITEM02/3=PRESENTATION Corner of Highpoint Cv & Loyola Ln ITEM02/4=PRESENTATION Up close view of slope ITEM02/5=PRESENTATION Photos of height ITEM02/6=PRESENTATION
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2026-0021 BOA DATE: Monday, June 8th, 2026 ADDRESS: 2101 Arpdale St OWNER: George Siddall COUNCIL DISTRICT: 5 AGENT: N/A ZONING: SF-3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1-2 BLK 9 RABB INWOOD HILLS VARIANCE REQUEST: LDC 25-2-492, setback requirements for a street side setback of 15 feet (required) to 0 feet (requested) SUMMARY: maintain a carport ISSUES: corner lot ZONING LAND USES Site North South East West SF-3 SF-3 SF-3 SF-3 SF-3 Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Neighborhoods Council Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Friends of Zilker Homeless Neighborhood Association Perry Grid 614 Preservation Austin Save our Springs Alliance South Central Coalition TNR BCP – Travis County Natural Resources Zilker Neighborhood Association ITEM03/1 May 20, 2026 George Siddall 2101 Arpdale St Austin TX, 78704 Property Description: LOT 1-2 BLK 9 RABB INWOOD HILLS Re: C15-2026-0021 Dear George, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from LDC- 25-2-492 at address 2101 Arpdale St. https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/land_development_code?nodeId=TIT25LADE_CH 25-2ZO_SUBCHAPTER_CUSDERE_ART1GEPR_S25-2-472BOADVAAU Austin Energy does not oppose this request. Provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance and Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code and OSHA requirements. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Ashleigh Woolf, Project Assistant Austin Energy Land Development 4815 Mueller Blvd Austin, TX 78741 (512) 972-8400 ITEM03/2 ITEM03/3 ITEM03/4 ITEM03/5 ITEM03/6 ITEM03/7 ITEM03/8 ITEM03/9 ITEM03/10 ITEM03/11 ITEM03/12 ITEM03/13 ITEM03/14 ITEM03/15 ITEM03/16 ITEM03/17 ITEM03/18
C15-2026-0021 / 2101 Arpdale St George Siddall June 8, 2026 BOA Meeting ITEM03/1-PRESENTATION A corner lot requires a 15’ setback and is not allowed sufficient room to cover a driveway on a side street. • Most properties require only a 5’ side setback allowing room for covered parking. • The narrow width of the lot leaves no room for additional covered parking, and the existing driveway is in the only available place. ITEM03/2-PRESENTATION The two awning posts are setback 10’ with a flat 9’ cover. ITEM03/3-PRESENTATION The awning does not change the character of the area, allows for open space and visibility, and is not near neighboring property lines. ITEM03/4-PRESENTATION In contrast, setback for fencing is only 10’. A fence has posts and can be a solid barrier up to 8’ tall. Solid fences on a corner change the openness of an area and block visibility. ITEM03/5-PRESENTATION The awning provides protection from sun damage, hail damage or other related weather damage, and keeps the acidic droppings from the pecan tree off vehicles as demonstrated in the image below. ITEM03/6-PRESENTATION
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2026-0022 BOA DATE: Monday, June 8th, 2026 ADDRESS: 2615 ½ Hillview Rd OWNER: Laura Steinbach COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 AGENT: Nikelle Meade ZONING: SF-3-NP (WANG) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 2 BLK A SANCTUARY SUBD THE VARIANCE REQUEST: reduce the minimum required roadway width (Hillview Rd) to allow the use on a site located on a street with a paved width of at least 30’ (requested), from a minimum paved width of 40’ (required) SUMMARY: public or private primary or secondary school ISSUES: recorded plat note prohibits vehicular access from Hillview Rd and all legal access is dedicated exclusively to Exposition Blvd ZONING Site North South East West SF-3-NP SF-3-NP; PUD SF-3-NP; PUD PUD SF-3-NP LAND USES Private School for dyslexic students Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Neighborhoods Council Central West Austin Neighborhood Plan Contact Team Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Preservation Austin Save Barton Creek Association TNR BCP – Travis County Natural Resources West Austin Neighborhood Group ITEM04/1 May 20, 2026 Lindsey Walker 2615 1/2 Hillview Rd Austin TX, 78703 Property Description: LOT BLK A, THE SANCTUARY SUBDIVISION Re: C15-2026-0022 Dear Lindsey, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance request from LDC Section 25-2- 832 at 2615 ½ Hillview rd. Austin Energy does not oppose the request, provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. All signage will need to stay out of Austin Energy easements and 5’ from existing underground electric lines. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Ashley Robinson, Project assistant Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050 ITEM04/2 ITEM04/3 Portion of the City of Austin Land Development Code applicant is seeking a variance from: ____________________________________________________________________________ Variance from Section 25-2-832 (Private Schools) to reduce the minimum roadway width ____________________________________________________________________________ (Hillview Lane) from 40 feet to 30 feet where it connects with another street that has a paved ____________________________________________________________________________ width …
2615 ½ Hillview Road June 8, 2026 Item #4 – Case: C15-2026-0022 ITEM04/1-PRESENTATION Request Approve a variance from Section 25-2-832 (Private Schools) to permit the site to be located on a street that has a paved width less than 40 feet (Hillview Road) from the site to where it connects with another street that has a paved width of at least 40 feet (Exposition Boulevard). ITEM04/2-PRESENTATION Site Overview • Pursuant to the Land Development Code, private schools require compliance to Section 25-2-832. • The school has operated on the Property for over 15 years as a private school serving students with dyslexia. • All vehicular access to the Property occurs via Exposition Boulevard. The circumstances in this case are unique and create a hardship because access to the triggering roadway is prohibited. ITEM04/3-PRESENTATION ITEM04/4-PRESENTATION Site Constraints • The Property abuts Hillview Road, but the Property is prohibited from accessing that street. • All legal access is permanently dedicated to Exposition Boulevard, which satisfies the 40-foot paved width requirement. ITEM04/5-PRESENTATION Existing gate prohibiting access to Hillview Road ITEM04/6-PRESENTATION Hardship is Unique to Property • The site is subject to Section 25-2-832, which requires access along a street with a paved width of at least 40 feet. • This condition is unique to the Property because, while Section 25- 2-832 evaluates access compliance by reference to Hillview Road, the Property does not and cannot use Hillview Road for access, which leaving Exposition Boulevard as the sole lawful access point. • This condition is not typical of similarly situated properties in the area and results in a hardship specific to this site. ITEM04/7-PRESENTATION Plat Note • The recorded plat establishes the Property’s access configuration and limits where access may be taken. • The Property is permitted legal access only to Exposition Boulevard. ITEM04/8-PRESENTATION No Impact to Area Character • No change in use or intensification of existing operations • The variance applies only to a technical street-width standard on a road the Property cannot access • Granting the variance supports the character of the area by maintaining access via Exposition Boulevard and avoiding traffic on Hillview Road ITEM04/9-PRESENTATION Requested Action Approve agenda item #4 ITEM04/10-PRESENTATION
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM04 DATE: Monday May 11, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C15-2026-0014 __Y_____Thomas Ates (D1) __-_____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) __-_____Jessica Cohen (D3) __Y_____Yung-ju Kim (D4) __Y_____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) __Y_____Haseeb Abdullah (D6) __Y_____Sameer S Birring (D7) __Y_____Margaret Shahrestani (D8) __Y_____Brian Poteet (D9) __Y_____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) __Y_____Jeffery L Bowen (M) __Y_____Corry L Archer-McClellan (Alternate) (M) __Y_____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) _______VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: Dillon Tuttle OWNER: Roger Plourde ADDRESS: 2727 EXPOSITION BLVD VARIANCE REQUESTED: Construction of a raised deck that extends into the Section 25-2-492(D) 10' front yard setback in order to provide a safe and functional pedestrian access point form the public right-of-way. Due to the existing elevation change between the public right-of-way and the finished floor elevation, a limited entry stair and porch are proposed to enable safe ingress and egress and provide connectivity to the public right-of-way. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Chair Jeffery Bowen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne’s motion to postponed to June 8, 2026, Vice Chair Maggie Shahrestani second on 11-0 votes; POSTPONED TO JUNE 8, 2026. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: ITEM05/1 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jeffery Bowen Chair forITEM05/2 ITEM05/3 BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2026-0014 BOA DATE: Monday, May 11th, 2026 ADDRESS: 2727 Exposition Blvd OWNER: Roger Plourde COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 AGENT: Dillon Tuttle ZONING: CS-NP (WANG) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 36-43 & PT OF LOTS 34-35 & 44 BLK 4 BROWN HERMAN ADDN VARIANCE REQUEST: LDC, Section 25-2-492 Site Development Regulations (D) from setback requirements for a front setback of 10 feet (required) to 3 feet (requested) SUMMARY: erect a raised deck for ZED’S Ice Cream ISSUES: elevation change between the public right-of-way and finished floor elevation ZONING LAND USES Site CS-NP North CS-NP South CS-NP East West UNZ SF-3-NP General Commercial Services General Commercial Services General Commercial Services Unzoned -State Owned Land Casis Elementary School …
BOA Monthly Report July 2025-June 2026 MAY 11, 2026 Granted 3 1. 25-10-128 (Neighborhood Commercial Sign District Regulations (B) to allow from one (1) freestanding sign (maximum allowed), to adding one (1) additional freestanding sign (total of two (2) 2. 25-2-492 Site Development Regulations) and North University Neighborhood Association NCCD Ord. No. 040826-58, PART 7 (Residential District)(1) from: lot size requirements to decrease minimum lot size, setback requirements for a front yard setback and from North University Neighborhood Association NCCD Ord. No. 040826-58 PART 6 (7) Parking (g) to reduce on-site parking 3. 25-2-779 (Small Lot Single-Family use) from: (F) (1) lot size requirements to decrease minimum lot size, (F) (4) (c) (i) from setback requirements for a front yard setback and Land Development Code, Section 25-2-735 (Festival Beach Subdistrict Regulations) (D)(1) from Impervious Coverage requirements to increase Postponed 1 1. 25-2-492 Site Development Regulations) (D) from setback requirements for a front setback Withdrawn 0 Denied 1 1. 25-2-814 (Service Station Use) (3) to increase queue lanes (Reconsideration request by neighbor of a previous approved case- denied) Discussion Items 4 APR 2026 Interpretations APR 2026 BAAP 0 new inquiries 0 (Added MAY11# 2026) The deposition of the case items: Granted Postponed Withdrawn Denied Discussion Items 18 17 0 7 19 Board members absent: Jessica Cohen, Bianca A. Medina-Leal (1 vacant alternate position) APRIL 13, 2026 Granted 6 1. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the interior yard setback 2. 25-2-899 (Fences as Accessory Uses) to increase the height 3. 25-10-191 (Sign Setback Requirements), (F) to decrease the setback from street right-of-way, (F) (1) to increase height, (F) (2) to decrease clearance 4. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the interior yard setback 5. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the interior side yard setback 6. 25-2-814 (Service Station Use) (3) to increase queue lanes Postponed Withdrawn Denied 0 0 1 2. The appellant has filed an appeal challenging determinations by City staff in connection with approval of a building permit (Permit No. 2025-140201 PR) and related construction plans for proposed development of a three-unit residential use (Reconsideration) Discussion Items 5 APR 2026 Interpretations APR 2026 BAAP 0 new inquiries 0 (Added APR13# 2026) The deposition of the case items: Granted Postponed Withdrawn Denied Discussion Items 15 16 0 6 15 Board members absent: None (1 vacant alternate position) New Chair - …
ITEM03/1-LATE BACKUP-SUPP ITEM03/2-LATE BACKUP-SUPP Re: Case C15-2026-0021 2101 Arpdale, Austin TX 78704 Board of Adjustment Agenda Item 3, June 8, 2026 To: Chair and Members of the Board of Adjustment, City of Austin On behalf of the Zoning Committee of the Zilker Neighborhood Association, I am writing to inform you that the committee is not opposed to the variance from 25-2-492 (side street setback) requested at 2101 Arpdale. Some background: Our review of this case began in March when the shade structure was cited for a violation of the “Openness of Required Yards” ordinance, 25-2-513. We approached it from the perspective of neighbors who have been asking about City regulation of shade-cloth covers, tarps, awnings, aka carport canopies, to protect cars and reduce the heat coming off of driveways. Neighbors say they are not getting clear answers from the City, and most are left with the impression that permits are not required. A few years ago, the AIA recommended revisions to the “Openness” section, making a distinction between the actual building versus "structures" that are unenclosed and detached. These shade structures are not porches or carports that are part of the house itself; they need a separate definition that acknowledges the importance of mitigating heat, along with some guidelines for safe installation. Until we have a chance to review the placement and dimensions of existing shade structures in the area, we are reluctant to refer to this one as a carport that would be subject to the same permitting as a potential garage under current code. The City is also considering other code changes that could be relevant to this case, including a reduction in the width of side street setbacks. Meanwhile, we recognize that this request presents a qualifying hardship. The findings: The case meets the necessary findings for a hardship, in that the house was built in 1950 on an unusually narrow corner lot. The house is set back only 12 feet from the side street (Ann Arbor), rather than the current code requirement of 15 feet. The driveway parking area itself conforms to code and minimizes the impervious cover on the lot, but the orientation of this side of Ann Arbor to the sun exposes the pavement to intense heat. Strict adherence to the code (either 492 or 513) appears to deny the owner the reasonable use of a shade cover for vehicles in the parking area. …
ITEM04/1-LATE BACKUP OPP ITEM04/2-LATE BACKUP OPP ITEM04/3-LATE BACKUP OPP ITEM04/4-LATE BACKUP OPP ITEM04/5-LATE BACKUP OPP ITEM04/6-LATE BACKUP OPP ITEM04/7-LATE BACKUP OPP ITEM04/8-LATE BACKUP OPP
ITEM04/1-LATE BACKUP SUPP ITEM04/2-LATE BACKUP SUPP ITEM04/3-LATE BACKUP SUPP ITEM04/4-LATE BACKUP SUPP ITEM04/5-LATE BACKUP SUPP ITEM04/6-LATE BACKUP SUPP ITEM04/7-LATE BACKUP SUPP From: To: Subject: Date: Ramirez, Elaine C15-2026-002 Friday, June 5, 2026 1:16:27 PM [You don't often get email from https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Learn why this is important at External Email - Exercise Caution My name is Tara McCown and live at 2700 Hillview Green Lane which is within 500’of 2615 1/2 Hillview Rd., the address listed the Notice of public hearing variante request. I am requesting to be added as an interested Party. Please use my prefered email address and my phone number is 2 I conditionally support Variance request C15-2026-002. The condition that must included for my aprovar is that Hillview Rd will not be used. As an access pont or ingress/egress for the above property located at 2615 1/2 Hillview Rd. The property will follow the restrictions defined in the deed. Regards, Tara McCown Sent from my iPad CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". ITEM04/8-LATE BACKUP SUPP ITEM04/9-LATE BACKUP SUPP From: To: Subject: Date: n Ramirez, Elaine INTERESTED PARTY REQUEST FOR C15-2026-022 and Variance Approval with Condition Friday, June 5, 2026 2:08:27 PM External Email - Exercise Caution "My name is Cheryl Crain, I live at 2707 Hillview Green Lane, which is within 500' of 2615 1/2 Hillview Rd., the address listed the Notice of Public Hearing Variance Request. I am requesting to be added as an interested party. Please use my preferred email address s and my phone number is I conditionally support Variance request C15-2026-002. The condition that must be included in the variance for my approval is that Hillview Rd. will NOT be used as an access point or ingress/egress for the above property located at 2615 1/2 Hillview Rd. The property will follow the restrictions defined in the deed. Regards, Cheryl Crain 2707 Hillview Green Lane Austin, TX 78703 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM 02 DATE: Monday June 8, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C15-2026-0020 ___-____Thomas Ates (D1) NO VOTE - LATE ___Y____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ___-____Jessica Cohen (D3) OUT ___Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ___-____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) OUT ___Y____Haseeb Abdullah (D6) ___Y____Sameer S Birring (D7) ___Y____Margaret Shahrestani (D8) ___Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ___Y____Jeffery L Bowen (M) ___Y____Corry L Archer-McClellan (Alternate) (M) ___Y____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ___-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: Leonard Winn and Katherine Winn OWNER: Leonard Winn and Katherine Winn ADDRESS: 6508 HIGHPOINT COVE VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-899 (Fences as Accessory Uses) to increase the height from six (6) feet (maximum allowed) to eight feet (8’) feet (requested), in order to erect a fence along street side (North) property line in a “SF-2-NP”, Single-Family-Neighborhood Plan zoning district (University Hills Neighborhood Plan). Note: The Land Development Code 25-2-899 Fences as Accessory Uses (A) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, a fence: (1) is permitted as an accessory use in any zoning district; and (2) must comply with the requirements of this section. (B) In this section: (1) an ornamental fence is a fence with an open design that has a ratio of solid material to open space of not more than one to four; and (2) a solid fence is a fence other than an ornamental fence. (C) The height restrictions of this section do not apply to an ornamental fence. (D) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a solid fence constructed along a property line may not exceed a height of six feet measured from the natural grade up. (E) If there is a change in grade of at least one foot measured along any run of a solid fence along a property line, then the portion of the fence where the grade change occurs may be constructed to a maximum height of seven feet. (F) a solid fence along a property line may be constructed to a maximum height of eight feet if each owner of property that adjoins a section of the fence that exceeds a height of six feet files written consent to the construction of the fence with the building official; and (1) there is a change in grade of at least two feet within 50 feet of the boundary between adjoining properties; or (2) a structure, including …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM 03 DATE: Monday June 8, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C15-2026-0021 ___Y____Thomas Ates (D1) ___Y____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ___-____Jessica Cohen (D3) OUT ___Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ___-____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) OUT ___Y____Haseeb Abdullah (D6) ___Y____Sameer S Birring (D7) ___Y____Margaret Shahrestani (D8) ___Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ___Y____Jeffery L Bowen (M) ___Y____Corry L Archer-McClellan (Alternate) (M) ___Y____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ___-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: George Siddall OWNER: George Siddall ADDRESS: 2101 ARPDALE STREET VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) (D) from setback requirements for a street side setback of 15 feet (required) to 0 feet (requested) in order to maintain a Carport in a “SF-3”, Single-Family zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Chair Jeffery Bowen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen’s motion to postpone to July 13, 2026, Board member Haseeb Abdullah second on 11-0 votes; POSTPONED TO JULY 13, 2026. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jeffery Bowen Chairman for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM 04 DATE: Monday June 8, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C15-2026-0022 ___Y____Thomas Ates (D1) ___Y____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ___-____Jessica Cohen (D3) OUT ___Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ___-____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) OUT ___Y____Haseeb Abdullah (D6) ___Y____Sameer S Birring (D7) ___Y____Margaret Shahrestani (D8) ___Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ___Y____Jeffery L Bowen (M) ___Y____Corry L Archer-McClellan (Alternate) (M) ___Y____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ___-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: Nikelle Meade OWNER: Austin Area School for Dyslexics-Laura Steinbach ADDRESS: 2615-1/2 HILLVIEW RD VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-832 (Private Schools) …(1) to reduce the minimum required roadway width (Hillview Rd) to allow the use on a site located on a street with a paved width of at least 30’ (requested), from a minimum paved width of 40’ (required) for a public or private primary or secondary school in a “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family-Neighborhood Plan zoning district (West Austin Neighborhood Group). NOTE: 25-2-832 - PRIVATE SCHOOLS. This section applies to a public or private primary or secondary school. A site must be located on a street that has a paved width of at least 40 feet from the site to where it connects with another street that has a paved width of at least 40 feet. If more than one dwelling unit is located on the site, the dwelling units must comply with the requirements of this title that are applicable to residential uses. Source: Section 13-2-261; Ord. 990225-70; Ord. 031211-11. (1) (2) BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Chair Jeffery Bowen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen’s motion to approve with conditions to prohibit access or curb cut on the Hillview side street and also that the school obtain No Parking signs established on the school property side of the street from property line marked 40.29 to 30.17 dimension line noted on Item04/04 Presentation sheet, Board member Corry L Archer-McClellan second on 11-0 votes; GRANTED WITH CONDITIONS TO PROHIBIT ACCESS OR CURB CUT ON THE HILLVIEW SIDE STREET AND ALSO THAT THE SCHOOL OBTAIN NO PARKING SIGNS ESTABLISHED ON THE SCHOOL PROPERTY SIDE OF THE STREET FROM PROPERTY LINE MARKED 40.29 TO 30.17 DIMENSION LINE NOTED ON ITEM04/04 PRESENTATION SHEET. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: the property is prohibited from taking access to Hillview Road by a recorded plat …
Ramirez, Elaine N RE: Submission of Written Comments for Case No. C15-2026-0022 Monday, June 8, 2026 2:48:11 PM image001.png External Email - Exercise Caution From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Hi Elaine. I want to amend my letter to read “Support with condition of variance that there is and will be no access to Hillview LN.” How best to do this? Thanks, Richard From: Ramirez, Elaine <Elaine.Ramirez@austintexas.gov> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2026 4:19 PM To: Jenny Foster < Cc: Richard Suttle, Jr. <R Subject: RE: Submission of Written Comments for Case No. C15-2026-0022 Hi Jenny, The Support/Opposition Letter(s) has/have been received and will be included in the Late Back-up that the Board will receive the evening of the BOA meeting, Mon. 6/8/26. If you wish to speak at the meeting, you may do so, the information is below. June 8th, 2026 BOA meeting will be held: Hybrid meeting – both in-person and virtual (via phone) 2nd Monday of the Month Austin City Hall - 301 West 2nd Street Council Chambers - 1st Floor / Room 1001 Begins @ 5:30 PM, if you wish to participate in-person please show up at 5:30p.m. as the Board can and will move items/cases around on the Agenda. The meeting will be broadcasted live and can be publicly viewed live at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Day of the meeting, Mon. 6/8/2026, City Hall –Council Chambers; doors will open at 5p.m. to the public, please do not enter before 5pm as City Staff is setting up. Elaine Ramirez Senior Planner Austin Development Services 512-974-2202 elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov From: Jenny Foster Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2026 3:07 PM To: Ramirez, Elaine <Elaine.Ramirez@austintexas.gov> Cc: r Subject: Submission of Written Comments for Case No. C15-2026-0022 External Email - Exercise Caution Good Afternoon Elaine, On behalf of Richard Suttle, Jr., please find the attached objection to the above reference case. Richard, copied here, can provide any more information needed. Please let me know if you need anything further for this. Thank you, Jenny Jenny Foster Armbrust & Brown, PLLC 100 Congress Avenue, Suite 1300 Austin, TX 78701 www.abaustin.com THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL AND IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE NAMED ADDRESSEE(S). THIS MESSAGE MAY BE PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE. IF THE READER OF THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS NOT AN INTENDED RECIPIENT (OR THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DELIVERY OF THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE TO AN INTENDED RECIPIENT), BE ADVISED THAT ANY REUSE, …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM 05 DATE: Monday June 8, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C15-2026-0014 _______Thomas Ates (D1) _______Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) _______Jessica Cohen (D3) _______Yung-ju Kim (D4) _______Melissa Hawthorne (D5) _______Haseeb Abdullah (D6) _______Sameer S Birring (D7) _______Margaret Shahrestani (D8) _______Brian Poteet (D9) _______Michael Von Ohlen (D10) _______Jeffery L Bowen (M) _______Corry L Archer-McClellan (Alternate) (M) _______Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) _______VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: Dillon Tuttle OWNER: Roger Plourde ADDRESS: 2727 EXPOSITION BLVD VARIANCE REQUESTED: Construction of a raised deck that extends into the Section 25-2-492(D) 10' front yard setback in order to provide a safe and functional pedestrian access point form the public right-of-way. Due to the existing elevation change between the public right-of-way and the finished floor elevation, a limited entry stair and porch are proposed to enable safe ingress and egress and provide connectivity to the public right-of-way. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Chair Jeffery Bowen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne’s motion to postponed to June 8, 2026, Vice Chair Maggie Shahrestani second on 11-0 votes; POSTPONED TO JUNE 8, 2026. June 8, 2026 – WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: N/A 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: N/A (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: N/A 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: N/A Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jeffery Bowen Chair for
- REGULAR MEETING OF THE AUSTIN-TRAVIS COUNTY FOOD POLICY BOARD MONDAY, JUNE 8, 2026, AT 5:00 P.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, ROOM 1406 6310 WILHELMINO DELCO DRIVE, AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Austin-Travis County Food Policy Board may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Amanda Rohlich, (512) 974-1364, Amanda.Rohlich@austintexas.gov. CURRENT AUSTIN-TRAVIS COUNTY FOOD POLICY BOARD MEMBERS: Lisa Barden, Chair Andrea Abel Marissa Bell, Vice- Chair Beth Corbett Nitza Cuevas Kacey Hanson Seanna Marceaux Melody McClary Erin McDonald Natalie Poulos AGENDA CALL TO ORDER Board Member roll call and introduction of new and existing board members. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Austin-Travis County Food Policy Board Special Called Meeting on Monday, May 11, 2026. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing regarding Austin-Travis County Food Plan Implementation. Presentation by Edwin Marty, Food Policy Manager, Austin Climate Action & Resilience and Yaira Robinson, Assistant Director of Environmental Programs, Travis County. DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Presentation and discussion about labor within our food system and challenges with food workers, Good Work Austin, Kara Hanaoka Presentation and discussion around Fresh for Less and food access in Travis County, Farmshare Austin, Andrea Abel Presentation and discussion regarding the working group to expand access to nutritious foods through improvement to existing materials and resources and explore alternate or expanded hours for existing resources. Presentation and discussion regarding the working group to participate in the USDA Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) application for funding for conservation easements as a regional partnership. Review Board Member Assignments. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 8. Discuss and take possible action on the Joint Sustainability Committee liaison appointment. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison …
Austin-Travis County Food Plan ATCFPB June 2026 – Staff Update City of Austin Food Plan Updates City Staff Updates ● City staff sent City Council a Food Plan Update Memo on May 5th 2026 ● City staff have completed the annual update of the Food Plan Dashboard ● Funding from the MUFPP Award will be released via a RFA in fall 2026 ● ACAR is hiring! ○ Food and Climate Program Coordinator position ● Food Plan Implementation Collab (pass to Kelly for Q2 updates) Action Station Affiliated Goals Identified Quick Win (one clear & specific action the Collaborative could take in 90 days) Green Dot Votes Red Dot Votes Grow Local Food Goals 1 & 2 Access for this network to maps that clearly overlay available viable land for gardening with food access points and other relevant data like mobility routes. Support Food Workers Goal 3 Power map within key Food + Bev sector leaders: identify + design what we want workers to engage with. Focus on food workers + farm workers initially. Goals 4 & 6 Summer food access for families coordinated via children serving organizations (at Summer Meal Program sites - enhance with referrals + additional food resources) Get Food to People – Group 1 Get Food to People – Group 2 Buy + Serve Better Food Goals 4 & 6 Goals 5 & 8 Rescue & Reuse Food Governance & Infrastructure Goal 7 Goal 9 Communication: initial steps for a food access + resource map/hotline: (1) hold a meeting for food access providers to identify who’s missing (2) Shared internal doc: what is your org; what do you offer •Develop a community outreach plan for Central Texas Farm to School Collaborative to bring more stakeholders to the table – do in collaboration with CAC, Network Weavers and Backbone Team •Pilot a Lunchbox Pepper Project to pilot how to produce commitments, between schools and local farmers. Incorporate a public awareness campaign that highlights the initiative and the Farm to School collaborative A convening / mini-summit to create a community of interest, create a network map, and develop a shared comms campaign/language Submit an LOI for funding for the Collaborative to the St. David’s Foundation Catalyzing Community-Led Leadership grant opportunity by 6/11. 14 1 1 10 8 14 6 1 6 19 5 3 2 17 Next Steps Within 30 days Within 60 days Within 90 days • Distribute …
Our Mission To foster healthy careers in the local food and beverage industry through professional development and advocacy for more equitable practices Our Vision A healthier Austin connected and uplifted by the local food and beverage community We create better jobs and fair treatment for food workers Good Work Austin Good Work Austin Lowest paid occupational group Highest uninsured rate of any occupational group FOOD WORKERS 65,000$2.13 ANHOURMINIMUM TIPPEDWAGE FOR WORKERS50% RESTAURANTS REPORTEDLABOR SHORTAGESINCOMEIS 25% LESS THAN WHAT ISCONSIDERED A LIVINGWAGE$22.05$16.50CITY OF AUSTIN LIVING WAGE(2025)AVERAGE FOODWORKERS WAGE(2025)IN AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTYSource: Austin/Travis County Food Plan (2024), Texas Restaurant Association, Austin Business Journal, City of Austin(2023), Supply Chain Vulnerability AssessmentU.S. Bureau of Labor Satistics (2025) , Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations$9.6BAUSTIN METRO IMPACTFROM FOOD & BEVERAGEINDUSTRY50% WORKERS ARESATISFIED WITHWAGESLARGEST OCCUPATIONALGROUP3rd Good Work Austin Healthy Workplaces champions improved workplace policies through advocacy, training, resouces, and networking. Having trained hundreds of industry professionals, we’re driving positive change throughout our community and advocating for policies that benefit the 65,000 food workers in Austin. Community Kitchen pays local restaurants every day to provide nutritious meals for food-insecure communities. Since May 2020, we’ve distributed over two million meals, distributing more than $10 million back into Austin’s local economy and supporting the survival of local eateries. Culinary Workforce Training offers a free 9-week training opportunity for individuals facing employment barriers, equipping them with essential skills to succeed in the restaurant industry. Due to increasing demand, we have expanded to three annual training cohorts to address labor shortages within the sector. Good Work Austin Our Members Make It PossibleFind an interactive map of our Members hereGood Work Austin’s member businessesare more than just great places to eat anddrink—they are committed to creating abetter food industry. They go the extramile to provide fair wages, benefits, andsafe working conditions for theiremployees while serving up delicious foodand hospitality. Good Work Austin Food Plan: Goal 3Strategy 3.4: Support livable wages for food workersthrough incentives such as rebates, tax incentives, andwage supplements for food system employers who pay alivable wage.Strategy 3.6 Recognize and support businesses in thefood industry that pay livable wages, support workerownership, promote fair labor practices, and offer careerpathways to their employees. Good Work Austin HEALTHCARE ACCESSPILOTNo-cost health coverage for restaurant andhospitality workers in Travis County Good Work Austin Pilot Model Good Work Austin Partnership between Good Work Austin and Central Health, the public hospital district for Travis County 1. …
www.farmshareaustin.org Our Mission Located on 13-acre certified organic, mixed produce farm in Eastern Travis County, Farmshare Austin’s mission is to grow a healthy, just and equitable local food system by increasing community food access and cultivating new farmers. www.farmshareaustin.org Education: Pathway to Farming Farmshare Austin provides beginning farmers a training pathway to a career in farming. Farmer Starter is a five-month, entry-level, immersive, cohort-based farmer training program designed to provide aspiring farmers with the essential skills and training needed to manage a sustainable farming business. Cultivator offers Farmer Starter graduates the chance to start their own micro-farm for up to one year. We supply the land, tools, equipment and mentorship and purchase their harvest for our Food Access programs or help them to connect with other buyers. The Central Texas Farm Incubator Collaborative in collaboration with Urban Roots and Hope Full Farm provides beginning farmers in the start-up phase of their businesses with 3-years of access to land, infrastructure, mentorship, business training and marketing outlets to bridge barriers to starting and sustaining a farm. www.farmshareaustin.org Food Access: Mobile Markets & Home Delivery Launched in 2016 as a partnership with Austin Public Health, Fresh for Less provides year-round access to farmers’ market quality, reduced-price produce and nutrient-dense grocery items in 25 zip codes (440 sq miles) in the Eastern Crescent of Austin and Travis County. 5 Mobile Markets Twice Weekly Home Delivery ● ● ● Produce & Pantry RX with Lone Star Circle of Care Food is the Best Medicine postpartum food access ● with Ascension Seton Medical Center ● Casa Marianella ● Northeast District Demonstration Project www.farmshareaustin.org Check out weekly produce and grocery availability! ● ● ● 20+ seasonal veggies, fruit, and herbs, plus year-round staples, such as onions, potatoes and chiles Focus on sourcing from local farms, including Farmshare 20+ grocery items, mostly organic, with enough variety to make complete meals Local eggs and honey ● ● Cash, card, SNAP and Double Up Food Bucks (partnership with Sustainable Food Center) ● Whether shopping at a Mobile Market or for Home Delivery, customers select the quantity and variety that meets their individual needs and preferences www.farmshareaustin.org Mobile Market Locations/Hosts Central Health Del Valle Health & Wellness Center Foundation Communities Sierra Vista Apartments (South Austin) Central Health Southeast Health & Wellness Center Tues 4pm-6pm Weds 4pm-6pm Thurs 10am-12pm Thurs 12:30-2:30pm People’s Community Clinic 3rd Fri of the Month 3pm-5pm Central Health …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANIMAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MONDAY, JUNE 8, 2026, AT 6:00 P.M. AUSTIN CITY HALL, ROOM 1101 301 WEST 2ND STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Animal Advisory Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Nekaybaw Watson at nekaybaw.watson@austintexas.gov or 512-974-2562. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Dr. Paige Nilson, Chair, D4 Jo Anne Norton, Vice Chair, D7 Jennifer Daniel, Parliamentarian, D6 Koby Ahmed, Mayor Beatriz Dulzaides, D2 Erin Ferguson, D8 Whitney Holt, D5 Sarah Huddelston, D9 David Loignon, D10 Nancy Nemer, Travis County Jules Maron, D3 Erin Van Landingham, D1 CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL AGENDA The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Animal Advisory Commission Regular meeting on May 11, 2026. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. 3. Staff briefing regarding monthly reports. Presentation by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services and Jason Garza, Assistant Director, Austin Animal Services. Staff briefing regarding the Austin Animal Services Donation Fund. Presentation by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services, Jason Garza, Assistant Director , Austin Animal Services, and Melissa Pool, Chief Administrative Officer, Austin Animal Services. DICUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Approve the election of Chair. Update and Discussion from the Off Leash Dog Working Group regarding working group focus areas. Approve the addition of members to the Off Leash Dog Working Group. Approve the addition of members to the Foster Incentives Working Group. Approve a Recommendation to Council regarding breed labeling policies in shelters. Approve the Annual Internal Review Report for Animal Advisory Commission. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 …
ANIMAL ADVISORY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MAY 11, 2026 The Animal Advisory Commission convened in a regular meeting on Monday, May 11, 2026, at Austin City Hall, Boards and Commissions Room 301 W 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Vice Chair Norton called the Animal Advisory Commission Meeting to order at 6:00 pm. Commissioners in Attendance: Jo Anne Norton, Vice Chair, D7 Jennifer Daniel, Parliamentarian, D6 Beatriz Dulzaides, D2 Erin Ferguson, D8 Whitney Holt, D5 David Loignon, D10 Jules Maron, D3 Erin Van Landingham, D1 Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Koby Ahmed, Mayor Sarah Huddleston, D9 Nancy Nemer, Travis County Commissioners Absent: Dr. Paige Nilson, Chair, D4 PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Robyn Katz – State of Animals in Texas Sandra Muller – Transparency in Reporting Pat Valls Trelles – Donations Fund Rochelle Vickery – No food to people who have no record of spay or neuter 1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Animal Advisory Commission Regular Meeting on April 13, 2026. The minutes of the April 13, 2026 regular meeting of the Animal Advisory Commission was approved during the May 11, 2026 regular meeting of the Animal Advisory Commission on Commissioner Holt’s motion, Commissioner Ferguson’s second on an 11-0 vote. Chair Nilson was absent. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. 3. Staff briefing regarding monthly reports. Presentation by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services and Jason Garza, Assistant Director, Austin Animal Services. Presentation given by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services and Jason Garza, Assistant Director, Austin Animal Services. Staff briefing regarding Austin Animal Service’s Strategic Plan One Year Update. Presentation by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services. Presentation given by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services; Jason Garza, Assistant Director, Austin Animal Services; and Melissa Pool, Chief Administrative Officer, Austin Animal Services. WORKING GROUP UPDATES 4. Update from Pet Friendly Housing Working Group regarding future recommendations. Update provided by Commissioner Holt. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 5. 6. 7. Approve the election of Chair. The motion to approve Commissioner Nilson as Chair of the Animal Advisory Commission failed on Vice Chair Norton’s motion, Commissioner Holt’s second on a 6-2 vote. Vice Chair Norton, Parliamentarian Daniel, and Commissioners Ferguson, Holt, Huddleston, and Maron were for. Commissioners Ahmed and Nemer were against. Commissioners Dulzaides, Loignon, and Van Landingham abstained. Approve the creation of a working group regarding policies related to off-leash dogs and the addition of members. The motion to approve the creation of …
ANIMAL ADVISORY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MAY 11, 2026 The Animal Advisory Commission convened in a regular meeting on Monday, May 11, 2026, at Austin City Hall, Boards and Commissions Room 301 W 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Vice Chair Norton called the Animal Advisory Commission Meeting to order at 6:00 pm. Commissioners in Attendance: Jo Anne Norton, Vice Chair, D7 Jennifer Daniel, Parliamentarian, D6 Beatriz Dulzaides, D2 Erin Ferguson, D8 Whitney Holt, D5 David Loignon, D10 Jules Maron, D3 Erin Van Landingham, D1 Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Koby Ahmed, Mayor Sarah Huddleston, D9 Nancy Nemer, Travis County Commissioners Absent: Dr. Paige Nilson, Chair, D4 PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Robyn Katz – State of Animals in Texas Sandra Muller – Transparency in Reporting Pat Valls Trelles – Donations Fund Rochelle Vickery – No food to people who have no record of spay or neuter 1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Animal Advisory Commission Regular Meeting on April 13, 2026. The minutes of the April 13, 2026 regular meeting of the Animal Advisory Commission was approved during the May 11, 2026 regular meeting of the Animal Advisory Commission on Commissioner Holt’s motion, Commissioner Ferguson’s second on an 11-0 vote. Chair Nilson was absent. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. 3. Staff briefing regarding monthly reports. Presentation by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services and Jason Garza, Assistant Director, Austin Animal Services. Presentation given by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services and Jason Garza, Assistant Director, Austin Animal Services. Staff briefing regarding Austin Animal Service’s Strategic Plan One Year Update. Presentation by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services. Presentation given by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services; Jason Garza, Assistant Director, Austin Animal Services; and Melissa Pool, Chief Administrative Officer, Austin Animal Services. WORKING GROUP UPDATES 4. Update from Pet Friendly Housing Working Group regarding future recommendations. Update provided by Commissioner Holt. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 5. 6. 7. Approve the election of Chair. The motion to approve Commissioner Nilson as Chair of the Animal Advisory Commission failed on Vice Chair Norton’s motion, Commissioner Holt’s second on a 6-2 vote. Vice Chair Norton, Parliamentarian Daniel, and Commissioners Ferguson, Holt, Huddleston, and Maron were for. Commissioners Ahmed and Nemer were against. Commissioners Dulzaides, Loignon, and Van Landingham abstained. Approve the creation of a working group regarding policies related to off-leash dogs and the addition of members. The motion to approve the creation of …
Animal Services Office Statistical Report – May2024-2026 May 2026 Intake May2025 Intake Chameleon ShelterBuddy – 1194 animals May2024 Intake May 2026 Adoption May2025 Adoptions Chameleon ShelterBuddy May2024 Adoptions May 2026 RTOs May2025 RTOs Chameleon ShelterBuddy May2024 RTOs May 2026 Animal Euthanized May2025 Animals Euthanized Chameleon ShelterBuddy May2024 Animals Euthanized May 2026 Live Release Rate May2025 Total Live Release Rate Chameleon ShelterBuddy May2024 Total Live Release Rate May 2026 Vaccinations – 2184 vaccinations were provided to animals in care of Austin Animal Services. May2025 Animal Vaccinations May2024 Animal Vaccinations May 2026 – Spay/Neuter at AAC May2025 Spayed/Neuter at AAC Chameleon ShelterBuddy May2024 Spayed/Neutered at AAC May 2026 Deaths in Care May2025 Animal Deaths at AAC/Foster Chameleon ShelterBuddy May2024 Animal Deaths at AAC/Foster May 2026 Animals Transferred (includes 64 cats that went through SNR) May2025 Animals Transferred: Chameleon ShelterBuddy Includes 45 cats that went to AHS for SNR May2024 Animals Transferred May 2026 Animals Lost, Stolen or Missing May2025 Animal Lost, Stolen or Missing Chameleon ShelterBuddy May2024 Animals Lost, Stolen or Missing May 2026 SNR Program – As noted above, 64 cats went through SNR May2025 SNR Program Chameleon May2024 SNR Program May 2026 Intact Animals Adopted/RTO May2025 Intact Animals Adopted/RTO Chameleon ShelterBuddy May2024 Intact Animals Adopted/RTO
. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL ANIMAL ADVISORY COMMISSION Recommendation Number: 20260608-008 Recommendation to Council Regarding Breed Labeling Policies WHEREAS, accurate identification of a dog’s breed based solely on visual assessment has been widely shown to be unreliable without genetic testing even among animal welfare professionals and veterinary staff; and WHEREAS, research has found that the vast majority of dogs at animal shelters are composed of three or more breeds; and WHEREAS, labeling dogs as specific breeds—particularly “pit bull” or “pit bull mix”—based on appearance alone can misrepresent their true genetic makeup; and WHEREAS, many housing providers enforce breed restrictions that disproportionately impact dogs labeled as “pit bull” types, creating significant barriers for adopters seeking rental housing; and WHEREAS, such labeling practices can unintentionally reduce adoption rates and increase length of stay for affected dogs; and WHEREAS, a growing number of animal welfare organizations are adopting best practices that prioritize temperament, and individual characteristics over speculative breed identification including: 1. Orange County Animal Services (OCAS), an open intake municipal shelter in Florida, stopped using breed labels in 2014, and an independent peer-reviewed study of OCAS’s outcomes data found that removing breed labels improved adoption rates and decreased lengths of stay for all dog types, with the greatest impact for pit-bull-type dogs (https://www.ocnetpets.com/); 2. Williamson County Animal Services, an open intake municipal shelter in Texas, stopped using breed labels in 2017; most dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://www.wilcotx.gov/163/Animal-Shelter); 3. Memphis Animal Services, an open intake municipal shelter in Tennessee, stopped using breed labels in 2016; dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://memphisanimalservices.com/); 4. DeKalb County Animal Services and Fulton County Animal Services, two open intake municipal shelters in Georgia managed by LifeLine Animal Project, stopped using breed labels in 2017 (https://dekalbanimalservices.com/; https://fultonanimalservices.com/); . 5. Fairfax County Animal Shelter, an open intake municipal shelter in Virginia, stopped using breed labels in 2015; dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/animalservices/); 6. Rochester Animal Services, a managed intake municipal shelter in New York, stopped using breed labels in 2017; dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://www.cityofrochester.gov/departments/department-recreation-and-human-services- drhs/rochester-animal-services-ras); and WHEREAS, studies show that shifting to a “mixed breed” designation where lineage is unknown and distinct and undeniable breed traits are absent promotes fairness, reduces bias, and improves adoption outcomes for all dogs; and WHEREAS, “mixed breed” is an acceptable designation …
Updates, Reports and Briefings Austin Animal Services | June 8, 2026 Upcoming Events 2 30-60-90 Day Horizon Plan Monica Dangler, Director Accomplishments Completed action items in the past 30 days Empty the Shelter Event Partnered with Bissel Pet Foundation to adopted out 269 animals including 78 cats, 47 kittens, 108 dogs, 33 puppies, and 2 rabbits! Programs and Socials Started the second cohort of dogs in the Enduring Service program! Improvements to shelter presence Added billboard sign on HWY 71 promoting the shelter and events Enhance Staffing Hired temporary Public Information Specialist and onboarded intern to support marketing activities. 4 Monthly Reporting May 2026 Jason Garza, Assistant Director 1,376 animals were impounded this month. May 2026 (FY26) saw 1,286 domestic animals impounded at AAS. This is a 22% increase from April 2026 which brought in 1,053 domestic animals to the shelter. The remaining number was wildlife. Intake Sources A breakdown of the sources for intake. Most animals came from stray brought in by the public. The number of strays impounded increased by 50%. 498 385 307 111 35 21 Stray from Public APO Impound Community Cat Owner Surrender Returned to Shelter APD | TCSO Emergency Clinic Born in Care Abandoned APO DOA Impound Wildlife Animals Impounded A breakdown of impounded animals by species and/or age. Fowl 6 Bird 3 Kittens 600 Rabbits 11 Wildlife 53 Puppies 104 Dogs 288 Cats 294 6 46 animals were euthanized this month* Animals Euthanized A breakdown of animals euthanized this month by species and/or age. Reasons for Euthanasia This chart shows the breakdown of reasons for euthanasia by animal. Each bar is equal to 100% of the euthanasia reason category. Kittens 8 Dogs 3 Wildlife 13 Cats 22 Kitten 7 Wildlife 1 Cat 18 0 Wildlife 10 Kitten 1 Wildlife 1 Dog 2 Cat 2 Wildlife 1 Cat 2 Dog 5 Dog 1 Suffering Rabies Risk Dog 0 Trauma Dog 0 DB4 Bites Injured Neuro Court Order 7 May 2026 had a live-release rate of 96.11 percent This means that of all companion animal outcomes for the month of May, 96.11 percent or 1064 were “live” and involved adoption, rescue transfer, return-to-owner, etc. Live Outcomes by Animal Type This chart shows how many of each animal type had a positive or live outcome during May. Breakdown per Outcome Type This chart shows the breakdown of each kind of live outcome by the number of …
