ITEM06 C15-2026-0036 ADV PACKET OCT12 PART2a — original pdf
1 1 / 6 0 M E T I 7 2 25.0' 107.7' A E R A T C E J O R P
All documents
ITEM06 C15-2026-0036 ADV PACKET OCT12 PART3 — original pdf
ITEM06/12 ITEM06/13 ITEM06/14 Single Family Residence Lake Austin ITEM06/15
ITEM06 C15-2026-0036 PRESENTATION OCT12 — original pdf
C15-2026-0036 4107 Lakeplace Lane ITEM06/1-PRESENTATION ITEM06/2-PRESENTATION Existing tram was constructed in approximately 2001 by a previous owner. ITEM06/3-PRESENTATION ITEM06/4-PRESENTATION ITEM06/5-PRESENTATION ITEM06/6-PRESENTATION Variances Requested: 1. Variance from Section 25-2-551(B)(3)(a) (Lake Austin District Regulations) to permit mechanical pedestrian ("LA") zoning district. access in a Lake Austin 2. Variance from Section 25-2-551(E)(2) (Lake Austin District Regulations) to permit development on a slope with a gradient of more than 35 percent. ITEM06/7-PRESENTATION Variances Findings: Reasonable Use: The zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: The shoreline setback area restrictions and additional development standards based on slope gradient regulations are only applicable to properties zoned Lake Austin residence district ("LA") and do not apply to other zoning districts along Lake Austin. Without the variances the property owner would not be able to access all areas of the property. ITEM06/8-PRESENTATION Variances Findings: Hardship: a. The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: The topography of the property between the residence and Lake Austin is steeply sloped and varies from 35% to over 1,500% with a vertical drop in excess of 60 feet which makes it extremely difficult to access the entire property without a tram. ITEM06/9-PRESENTATION Variances Findings: Hardship: b. The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: The property sits on a sheer vertical cliff verses rolling slopes that are more common along Lake Austin. There is also an abundance of large, mature tress that are heavily concentrated along the lake side. ITEM06/10-PRESENTATION Variances Findings: Area Character: The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: These variances would not alter the character of adjacent properties nor impair their use of their own property because the tram is located within a heavily vegetated area and cannot be seen by the adjacent neighbors. LA zoning allows for roads and driveways to be located within the shoreline setback area with a gradient of more than 35%, but due to the extreme topography on the subject property, these types of improvements are not feasible. A tram is required to access all of the property. ITEM06/11-PRESENTATION
ITEM07 C15-2026-0037 ADV PACKET OCT12 PART1 — original pdf
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM07 DATE: Monday September 14, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C15-2026-0037 ____-____Thomas Ates (D1) (Resigned) ____Y____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ____-____VACANT (D3) ____Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ____Y____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ____Y____Haseeb Abdullah (D6) ____-____Sameer S Birring (D7) (Resigned) ____Y____Margaret Shahrestani (D8) ____Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ____-____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) OUT ____-____Jeffery L Bowen (M) OUT ____-____Corry L Archer-MccClellan (Alternate) (M) ____Y____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ____-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: Soren Aandahl OWNER: Shesh Aandahl ADDRESS: 714 POST OAK ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-779 (Small Lot Single-Family Residential Use) (J)(4) from gross floor area requirements to increase unit size from 2,300 square feet (maximum allowed) to 2,886 square feet (requested) in order to enclose an existing balcony to create conditioned bedroom space in a “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family-Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Bouldin Creek NP). Note: Land Development Code 25-2-779 Small Lot Single-Family Residential Use (A) This section applies to a small lot single-family residential use. (B) This section supersedes the base zoning district regulations to the extent of conflict. ITEM07/1 (C) Only one dwelling unit is permitted on a lot. (D) This subsection applies to small lot single-family residential use on a property zoned single-family residence small lot (SF-4A) district or less restrictive. (J) Gross Floor Area (1) This subsection applies to a property located within the area described in Subsection 1.2.1 of Subchapter F (Residential Design and Compatibility Standards). (2) GROSS FLOOR AREA means the total enclosed area of all floors in a building with a clear height of more than six feet, measured to the outside surface of the exterior walls, except as provided in this subsection. (3) The gross floor area may not exceed the greater of 1,650 square feet or a floor-to- area ratio of 0.55. (4) The maximum unit size is 2,300 square feet. Source: Ord. 041118-57; Ord. No. 20240516-006, Pt. 5, 5-27-24; Ord. No. 20250227-039, Pt. 2, 10-1-25. BOARD’S DECISION: September 14, 2026 Vice Chair’s motion to postpone to October 12, 2026, Board member Melissa Hawthorne second on 7-0 votes; POSTPONED TO OCTOBER 12, 2026, NOT ENOUGH BOARD MEMBERS FOR VOTING PURPOSES. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area …
ITEM07 C15-2026-0037 ADV PACKET OCT12 PART2a — original pdf
ITEM07/13
ITEM07 C15-2026-0037 ADV PACKET OCT12 PART3 — original pdf
ITEM07/14
ITEM07 C15-2026-0037 ADV PACKET OCT12 PART4a — original pdf
ITEM07/15
ITEM07 C15-2026-0037 ADV PACKET OCT12 PART5a — original pdf
ITEM07/16
ITEM07 C15-2026-0037 ADV PACKET OCT12 PART6 — original pdf
T C E T I H C R A L E B E O G I I D E H 4 8 8 9 . 4 5 4 . 2 1 5 . h p l t e n . l a b o g c b s @ e b e o g d e h i i l existing east elevation for reference existing north elevation for reference existing west elevation for reference existing construction new construction extend existing roof plane to create new gable over addition line of re-framed, low-slope cricket roof beyond midpoint of highest gable roof plane [new roof over addition] exisitng window exisitng window exisitng window new window 8'-0" pl. ht. @ east wall of master bedroom second floor 10'-0" pl. ht. @ 1st floor t i h g e h g n d i " 0 - ' 7 2 l i u b floor trusses extend existing roof as shown to create new gable over addition see structural drawings reframed low slope roof 'cricket' new construction existing construction . q e . q e . j d a e g a r e v a e v o b a e d a r g exisitng pitch break to remain dashed line indicates existing roofline to be removed line of re-framed, low-slope cricket roof beyond modify new eave overhang at this location to minimiize conflict with window / window trim drainage managemant at this location TBD - review in field 9'-0" typ. pl. ht. @ 2nd floor new window new window exisitng bedroom window new window exisitng window dashed line indicates existing roof overhang to be removed steel columns to remain in place T S A E exisitng living room doors exisitng kitchen window second floor is cantilevered see structural drawings new second floor to be partially cantilevered see structural drawings T S E W exisitng window exisitng door [460.50] t. / slab [per permit set dated 12.20.2017] [458.75] average adjacent grade [per permit set dated 12.20.2017] proposed east elevation proposed north elevation proposed west elevation exterior elevations scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" on full size sheet scale: 3/32" = 1'-0" on reduced [11x17] sheet 0 2 4 6 8 10 FT THESE DRAWINGS ILLUSTRATE PRELIMINARY DESIGN CONCEPT THIS DESIGN CONCEPT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH C.O.A. LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE - CHAPTER 25-2 -779 (J) [gross floor area exceeds allowable entitlement for this property] …
ITEM07 C15-2026-0037 PRESENTATION OCT12 — original pdf
Variance Presentation for Case Number C15-0037/714 Post Oak St. Meeting date October 12, 2026 Good evening. My name is Ms. Shesh Aandahl. Photo #1. The subject house is highlighted. The variance is a request to make the existing balcony into bedroom conditioned space. Photo #2. This is the front view of the house. It’s cute. Photo #3. house on the right varies from three to two stories. This is the rear view of the house. The house to the left is a one story. The Photo #4. The backyard faces a creek and is green year around. Photo #5. The space is just over 5 feet wide. This is the only part of the second floor balcony that is visible to a neighbor. First, the good news about this variance is that it is simply changing already existing balcony space to conditioned bedroom space. Second, this change can only be seen minutely by the neighbor in the three story home next door. Third, this request complies with all LDC setback codes. The footprint of the house is not being expanded at all. Fourth, there will be no nature, home characteristics, or neighborhood alterations or impacts. Fifth, this request complies with LDC Code #25-2-779, Small Lot Single Family Residential Use, subsections (D) #9, maximum building coverage of 55 percent, and (J) #1, #2 and #3. However, subsection (J) #4 makes the gross floor area stipulated in subsections (D) #9 and (J) #3 unavailable. Please help us rectify this hardship. Thank you. ITEM07/1-PRESENTATION #1 ITEM07/2-PRESENTATION #2 ITEM07/3-PRESENTATION #3 ITEM07/4-PRESENTATION #4 ITEM07/5-PRESENTATION #5 ITEM07/6-PRESENTATION
ITEM08 C16-2026-0007 ADV PACKET OCT12 — original pdf
SIGN REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C16-2026-0007 BOA DATE: Monday, October 12th, 2026 ADDRESS: 620 W Slaughter Ln OWNER: QT South, LLC COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 AGENT: Drenner Group - David J. Anderson ZONING: CS-CO SIGN DISTRICT: Scenic Roadway Sign District LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 3 BLK A SLAUGHTER/SOUTH FIRST SEC 2 VARIANCE REQUEST: LDC, Section 25-10-124 (Scenic Roadway Sign District Regulations), (B) to allow more freestanding signs from one (1) (maximum allowed) to one (1) additional (requesting); a total of two free-standing signs SUMMARY: provide signage for QT gas station ISSUES: configuration of lot, heritage trees ZONING LAND USES Site CS-CO North MF-2-CO South GR-CO GR-CO East DR West General Commercial Services-Conditional Overlay Multi-Family-Conditional Overlay Community Commercial-Conditional Overlay Community Commercial-Conditional Overlay Development Reserve NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Neighborhoods Council Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association Onion Creek Homeowners Association Preservation Austin ITEM08/1 September 23, 2026 David Anderson 620 W Slaughter Ln Austin TX, 78748 Property Description: LOT 3 BLK A SLAUGHTER/SOUTH FIRST SEC 2 Re: C16-2026-0007 Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance request from LDC Section 25-2-899 at 6508 Highpoint CV. Austin Energy does not oppose the request, provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. All signage will need to stay out of Austin Energy easements and 5’ from existing underground electric lines. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements, which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Ashleigh Woolf, Project Assistant Austin Energy Infrastructure Support Services 4815 Mueller Blvd Austin, Texas, 78723 (512) 972-8400 ITEM08/2 ITEM08/3 Section 2: Variance Findings The Board must determine the existence of, sufficiency of, and weight of evidence supporting the findings described below. In order to grant your request for a variance, the Board must first make one or more of the findings described under 1, 2, and 3 below; the Board must then make the finding described in item 4 below. If the Board cannot make the required findings, it cannot approve a sign variance. Therefore, you must complete each of …
ITEM08 C16-2026-0007 PRESENTATION OCT12 PART1 — original pdf
ITEM08/1-PRESENTATION ITEM08/2-PRESENTATION ITEM08/3-PRESENTATION
ITEM08 C16-2026-0007 PRESENTATION OCT12 PART2 — original pdf
ITEM08/4-PRESENTATION ITEM08/5-PRESENTATION ITEM08/6-PRESENTATION ITEM08/7-PRESENTATION ITEM08/8-PRESENTATION ITEM08/9-PRESENTATION ITEM08/10-PRESENTATION
ITEM09 C15-2026-0040 ADV PACKET OCT12 — original pdf
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2026-0040 BOA DATE: Monday, October 12th, 2026 ADDRESS: 1703 Pasadena Dr COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7 OWNER: Eric Joseph Exelbert & Jessica Lea Boyer ZONING: SF-3-NP (Crestview NP) AGENT: Drenner Group – David J. Anderson LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 17 BLK J CRESTVIEW ADDN SEC 3 VARIANCE REQUEST: LDC, Subchapter F: Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards Section 2.1 (Maximum Development Permitted) to increase the F.A.R from 40% (required) to 44.46% (requested) SUMMARY: enclose a Carport into a Garage ISSUES: setbacks and easements ZONING LAND USES Site North South East West SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Neighborhoods Council Crestview Neighborhood Association Crestview Neighborhood Plan Contact Team Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association North Austin Neighborhood Alliance Shoal Creek Conservancy ITEM09/1 September 25, 2026 David Anderson 1703 Pasadena Dr Austin TX, 78757 Property Description: LOT 17 BLK J CRESTVIEW ADDN SEC 3 Re: C15-2026-0040 Dear Applicant, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above-mentioned property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance request from LDC Section 25-2 at 1703 Pasadena Dr. Austin Energy does not oppose the request, provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. All signage will need to stay out of Austin Energy easements and 5’ from existing underground electric lines. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Ashley Robinson, Project Assistant Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050 ITEM09/2 ITEM09/3 ITEM09/4 ITEM09/5 ITEM09/6 ITEM09/7 LOT 20 LOT 18 ' 0 . 0 1 LOT 16 UNABLE TO SET N 59° 38' 00" W 55.00' FENCE CORNER BEARS N 7° 14' W 1.0' ' 8 0 . 0.6' UNABLE TO SET ' 4 0 . UTILITY POLE FENCE CORNER BEARS N 71° 28' E 0.5' 5' BUILDING LINE VOL. 895, PG. 502 R.P.R.T.C.T. 5' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 10' BUILDING LINE PER ZONING ' . 0 7 2 EM 16.8' A/C ' 7 . 0 …
ITEM09 C15-2026-0040 PRESENTATION OCT12 — original pdf
ITEM09/1-PRESENTATION ITEM09/2-PRESENTATION ITEM09/3-PRESENTATION ITEM09/4-PRESENTATION ITEM09/5-PRESENTATION ITEM09/6-PRESENTATION ITEM09/7-PRESENTATION ITEM09/8-PRESENTATION ITEM09/9-PRESENTATION ITEM09/10-PRESENTATION
ITEM10 BOA MONTHLY REPORT_SEPT14 — original pdf
BOA Monthly Report July 2026-June 2027 September 14, 2026 (All items postponed to Oct 12,2026 due to not having enough board members) Granted 0 Postponed 6 1. 25-2-1176 (Site Development Regulations for Docks, Marinas, and Other Lakefront Uses) (A) (1) to increase the dock length 2. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) (D) from setback requirements for a front setback 3. 25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations) (C)(2) (a) from impervious requirements to increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope and 25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations) (E)(2) to decrease the impervious cover on a slope 4. 25-2-899 (Fences as Accessory Uses) to increase the height 5. 25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations) (B)(3) (a) to permit a tram (mechanical pedestrian access and 25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations) (E)(2) to permit 260 square feet development on a slope 6. 25-2-779 (Small Lot Single-Family Residential Use) (J)(4) from gross floor area requirements to increase unit size Withdrawn Denied 0 0 Discussion Items 5 (postponed to Oct 12, 2026) Sept 2026 Interpretations Sept 2026 BAAP 0 new inquiries 0 (Added Sept 14# 2026) The deposition of the case items: Granted Postponed Withdrawn Denied Discussion Items 5 10 0 0 15 Board members absent: Tommy Ates-resigned, Sameer Birring-resigned, Michael Von Ohlen, Jeffery Bowen, Corry L Archer-McClellan (Alternate)-technical issues (2 vacant positions-alternate and regular) August 10, 2026 Granted 4 1. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) (D) from setback requirements for a street side setback 2. 25-2-515 (Rear Yard of a Through Lot) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum rear yard setback 3. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from impervious coverage requirements to increase I.C. 4. 25-2-492 Site Development Regulations)(D) from lot size requirements to decrease minimum lot size Postponed 1 7. 25-2-1176 (Site Development Regulations for Docks, Marinas, and Other Lakefront Uses) (A) (1) to increase the dock length Withdrawn Denied 0 0 Discussion Items 5 AUG 2026 Interpretations AUG 2026 BAAP 0 new inquiries 0 (Added AUG10# 2026) The deposition of the case items: Granted Postponed Withdrawn Denied Discussion Items 5 4 0 0 10 Board members absent: Tommy Ates, Jessica Cohen (resigned), Haseeb Abdullah (1 vacant alternate position) July 13, 2026 Granted 1 1. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from impervious coverage requirements to increase I.C. Postponed 3 (due to only 9 board members present-voting purposes) 1. 25-2-515 (Rear Yard of a Through Lot) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum rear yard setback …
ITEM15 BOA MEETING DATES FOR JAN-DEC 2027 — original pdf
BOA Meeting Schedule for 2027 2nd Monday of each month at 5:30PM City Council Chambers-301 W 2nd Street -Room 1001 January 11, 2027 February 8, 2027 March 8, 2027 April 12, 2027 May 10, 2027 June 14, 2027 July 12, 2027 August 9, 2027 September 13, 2027 October 11, 2027 November 8, 2027 December 13, 2027
Item 4: Austin Pets Alive! Quarterly Report — original pdf
Monthly & Quarterly Report on License Agreement September 2026 This report is in agreement with the terms outlined in Section 8.4 of the License Agreement between the City of Austin and Austin Pets Alive!, with a focus on APA!’s impact on Travis County through our partnership with Austin Animal Services. Austin Pets Alive! (APA!) remains the City of Austin’s largest partner in lifesaving, specializing in animals with medical and behavioral needs beyond the municipal shelter’s capacity. Since 2011, this partnership with Austin Animal Services (AAS) has helped sustain Austin as the largest No Kill city in the United States. APA! Monthly Partnership Impact: In September 2026 alone, 340 animals were transferred directly from AAS, with 7 of them being behavior pulls (Casius, Freddy, Petey, Memphis, Barley, Frito, and Darla). Additionally, 95 animals were diverted from entering AAS through APA!’s PASS program and direct community intake. These combined efforts reduced strain on the City’s municipal shelter while ensuring vulnerable animals received timely intervention. AAS DIRECT TRANSFERS Cat Behavior Cat Bottle Baby Cat Maternity/Nursing Cat Medical Cat Space Dog Behavior Large/Medium Dog Behavior Small Dog Bottle Baby Dog Maternity/Nursing Dog Medical Dog Parvo Dog Space Large/Medium Dog Space Small TOTAL AAS DIRECT TRANSFERS Cat Born in Care Dog Born in Care TOTAL AAS ANIMALS Travis - PASS Travis - Parvo Owner-Surrender Travis - Stray/Abandoned TOTAL TRAVIS CO. DIVERSIONS 0 218 13 19 32 6 1 0 18 33 0 0 0 340 4 11 355 49 18 28 95 TOTAL AAS/TRAVIS CO. INTAKES 450 1 of 5 © 2026 Austin Pets Alive! APA! Transfers from AAS as % of Annual Goal APA! must: (a) Select a sufficient number of animals from the At-Risk List so that at the end of each year of the Term, APA! will have selected from the At-Risk List 12% of the total number of animals taken in by AAS during the preceding year. APA! Transfer Requirement for FY26: 1,360 Animals AAS Dog & Cat Intake Total in FY26: 2,768 Animals As of the end of September 2026, APA! has taken 204% of the total animal number required for the fiscal year. This quarter (Q4) accounts for 90% of the total yearly transfer requirement. In September 2026 alone, 25% of the annual transfer goal was met. For comparison, an average of 113 animals each month accomplishes our annual target. 2-Year % of AAS Intake Comparison In September 2025, …
Item 2: AAS Intake and Outcome September Data — original pdf
Outcome vs. Intake FY 26 Information is from October 1, 2025 – September 30, 2026 Intake Year (fiscal) Dog totals Cat totals Totals Outcome Year (fiscal) Dog totals Cat totals Totals Difference of outcomes - intakes Dog totals Cat totals Totals Cats - Outcomes Adoption RTO/RTO Adopt Transfer Euthanasia Died Missing SNR (former SCRP) Return to Habitat Total Dog - Outcomes Adoption RTO/RTO Adopt Transfer Euthanasia Died Missing Total 2026 4679 6922 11601 2026 4579 6886 11465 2026 -100 -36 -136 2026 3562 204 1885 261 96 1 613 264 6886 2026 2403 783 1247 115 27 4 4579
Item 2: Austin Animal Services Presentation — original pdf
Updates, Reports, and Briefings Updates, Reports, and Briefings Austin Animal Services | October 2026 Upcoming Events October 2026 Monica Dangler, Director 3 Events October 14th All staff training day October 17th Adoption event at Walmart (Ben White location) with Best Friends Animal Society October 24th Día de las Mascotas adoption event at Austin Animal Services November 7th Mega Adoption Event at Petsmart (Sunset Valley location) with rescue partners 4 Monthly Reporting September 2026 Jason Garza, Assistant Director 1,205 animals were impounded this month. Animals Impounded A breakdown of impounded animals by species and/or age. Wildlife 49 Critters 14 Puppies 99 Kittens 422 Cats 278 Dogs 343 978 5-year average September Intake Over Time This chart shows the number of animals impounded this month, ranked by fiscal year. 1,002 1,003 6 2 Y F 5 2 Y F 4 2 Y F 6 September 2026 had a live-release rate of 97.47 percent. Live Outcomes by Animal Type This chart shows how many of each animal type had a positive or live outcome during September. Breakdown per Outcome Type This chart shows the breakdown of each kind of live outcome by the number of animals with that live outcome. Each bar is equal to 100% of the outcome category. Puppies 69 Dogs 331 Critters 18 Kittens 362 Cats 300 Critters 4 Kittens 125 Puppies 35 Critters 7 Kittens 2 Puppies 9 Cats 14 Cats 25 Dogs 91 Cats 181 Dogs 190 Critters 6 Kittens 235 Puppies 25 Cats 79 Dogs 49 Critters 1 Cats 1 Dogs 1 Adopted Returned to Owner Returned to Habitat Rescue Transfer Escaped | Stolen | Missing 7 535 animals were adopted this month. Adoptions Over Time (Month, Fiscal Year) This chart shows the number of adoptions per month, ranked by fiscal year. FY25 | 607 FY23 | 579 FY24 | 578 FY26 | 535 Adoptions by Type (Age, Breed) This chart shows the total number of adoptions per animal type. Puppies 43 Critters 4 Kittens 165 Cats 141 Dogs 182 850 750 650 550 450 350 OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR. APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPTEMBER 8 30 animals were euthanized this month Animals Euthanized A breakdown of animals euthanized this month by species and/or age. Reasons for Euthanasia This chart shows the breakdown of reasons for euthanasia by animal. Each bar is equal to 100% of the euthanasia reason category. Puppies 1 Kittens 4 …
Item 2: Three-Year Data Report AAS — original pdf
Animal Services Office Statistical Report – September2024-2026 September 2026 Intake September2025 Intake September2024 Intake September 2026 Adoption September2025 Adoptions September2024 Adoptions September 2026 RTOs September2025 RTOs September2024 RTOs September 2026 Animal Euthanized September2025 Animals Euthanized September2024 Animals Euthanized September 2026 Live Release Rate September2025 Total Live Release Rate September2024 Total Live Release Rate September 2026 Vaccinations – 2790 vaccinations were provided to animals in care of Austin Animal Services. September2025 Vaccinations - 2867 vaccinations were provided to animals in care of Austin Animal Services. September2024 Animal Vaccinations September 2026 – Spay/Neuter at AAC September2025 Spayed/Neuter at AAC September2024 Spayed/Neutered at AAC September 2026 Deaths in Care September2025 Animal Deaths at AAC/Foster September2024 Animal Deaths at AAC/Foster September 2026 Animals Transferred (includes 36 cats that went through SNR) September2025 Animals Transferred (includes 44 cats that went through SNR : September2024 Animals Transferred September 2026 Animals Lost, Stolen or Missing September2025 Animal Lost, Stolen or Missing September2024 Animals Lost, Stolen or Missing September 2026 SNR Program – As noted above, 36 cats went through SNR September2025 SNR Program – As noted above, 44 cats went through SNR September2024 SNR Program September 2026 Intact Animals Adopted/RTO September2025 Intact Animals Adopted/RTO September2024 Intact Animals Adopted/RTO
Item 2. Staff Briefing on Food Plan - October 2026 — original pdf
Austin-Travis County Food Plan ATCFPB October 2026 – Staff Update City of Austin Food Plan Updates City Staff Updates ● City staff are preparing a City Council Food Plan Update Memo for October 2026. ● Funding from the MUFPP Award will be released via a RFA in October 2026. Funding announced in December. ● ACAR has hired a new Food and Climate Program Coordinator - Mali Calvo City Staff Updates Implementation Collab ● Next Collaborative Meeting ○ January 22nd at the PDC ● Food Plan Summit ○ Planning has begun for an inaugural Summit in June 2027 ● Sign up to get on the listserve ● St Davids Funding ○ The Implementation Collaborative was informed by St Davids that they would not be receiving any Catalyzing Communities funding ● Work continues on the development of the Implementation Collaborative ‘charter’ City of Austin 2026 Budget Social Service Contract Reset During FY27, the City of Austin will conduct a Council-directed evaluation and redesign of its social services portfolio. As a part of this process, all agreements, regardless of their renewal date, will end on September 30, 2027. In the coming months, new solicitations will be issued for services to begin on October 1, 2027. Travis County Food Plan Updates No updates Thank You! www.austintexas.gov/food /austinsustainability
Play video — original link
Play video
Play video — original link
Play video
ITEM04 C15-2026-0034 LATE BACKUP WITHDRAWN LTR — original pdf
ITEM04/1-LATE BACKUP KeepersLandPlanning.com ITEM04/2-LATE BACKUP
ITEM06 C15-2026-0036 LATE BACKUP PPMT LTR — original pdf
ITEM06/1-LATE BACKUP
ITEM09 C15-2026-0040 LATE BACKUP OCT12 OPP — original pdf
ITEM09/1-LATE BACKUP Objections to Board of Adjustment application for 1703 Pasadena Drive CASE # C15-2026-0040 OCT 12, 2026 hearing My name is Karen Sonleitner and I have lived at 1712 Pasadena Drive since NOV 1982. That is not a typo — more than 40 years. I know and accept that the Crestview neighborhood is changing. However, developers and buyers need to follow the rules. And that is certainly possible with a budget in excess of $1.7 million just for the improvements to a lot (according to TCAD). This application seemingly is asking forgiveness rather than permission and it is due to poor planning by someone. According to TCAD, this property in 2024 used to be a 928 SF single story home on a 7755 .40 SF lot. Now according to TCAD, it is 3217 SF with only 1 SF each set aside for a pool and spa. Now the applicant is seeking a do-over on the F.A.R, claiming to want to enclose an attached carport into a garage. I was perplexed by the request. ITEM09/2-LATE BACKUP It already appears like the conversion, in initial form, already has taken place. The embedded photos were taken today, 10.06.26, and as you can see there already is an installed garage door. The side is enclosed — clearly not permanent, but the goal is still reached “fencing in” the side. It is a garage, not a carport, by anyone wanting to use common definitions. ITEM09/3-LATE BACKUP STOP IT. This is not a hardship by any definition. If the only answer is they can’t have a solid wall on the side, so be it. Or figure out another way to comply with the existing F.A.R. I also object to the fact that the applicants no longer have the NOTICE sign in front of their home that alerts neighbors as to what is going on. ITEM09/4-LATE BACKUP We had some heavy rains and wind last week and the sign fell apart days ago. There was zero effort to re- attach the sign. I’m used to making repairs on my political yard signs with soggy weather. It takes no time to get out a stapler and fix it. If the applicants wanted a home with a proper attached garage, they perhaps should have bought a different one from Paradisa Builders. There’s plenty of new construction underway right now in Crestview. Thank you for listening, Karen Sonleitner 1712 …
ITEM09 C15-2026-0040 LATE BACKUP OCT12 SUPP — original pdf
ITEM09/1-LATE BACKUP-SUPP ITEM09/2-LATE BACKUP-SUPP ITEM09/3-LATE BACKUP-SUPP Date: October 7, 2026 To: City of Austin Board of Adjustment Subject: Support for Variance Request – 1703 Pasadena Drive (Case No. C15-2026-0040) To the Board of Adjustment, I’m writing to share my full support for the variance request for 1703 Pasadena Drive (Case No. C15-2026-0040) to enclose their existing garage space and install a garage door. As a neighbor, this project makes total sense for the property. Enclosed garages are already standard throughout our neighborhood, so adding a door here fits right in with the look and feel of Pasadena Drive. Since they're just enclosing the space that's already there, it won't change the footprint of the house or impact neighboring yards, light, or privacy at all. Having a fully enclosed garage will also give the homeowners a much safer, protected spot to store their cars and belongings out of sight and out of the weather. It's a very reasonable residential upgrade that keeps the character of our street intact. I strongly encourage the Board to approve this request at the October 12 meeting. Sincerely, Pablo and Arlynda Rivas 1701 Pasadena Dr ITEM09/4-LATE BACKUP-SUPP October 8, 2026 Re: Letter of Support for Variance Request, 1703 Pasadena Drive Case No: C15-2026-0040 Dear Members of the Board, I am writing in support of the variance request for 1703 Pasadena Drive, which would allow the owners to enclose their existing garage space and install a garage door. As a neighbor, I believe the request is reasonable, modest, and consistent with our neighborhood, and I respectfully ask the Board to approve it. An enclosed garage would protect the owners' vehicles and belongings from theft and weather. Enclosed garages are also common on Pasadena Drive and throughout the surrounding neighborhood, so this change would be consistent with the area's residential character and scale which we are working hard to maintain. The request involves enclosing an existing space, not building a new one. The building's footprint would remain the same, with no additional impact on neighboring yards, light, air, or privacy. As an enclosed garage is a customary residential amenity, this would maintain the property's residential use and character. For these reasons, I urge the Board to approve the variance. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Sarah Walter Resident of 1512 Pasadena Drive ITEM09/5-LATE BACKUP-SUPP Paul Grotevant 1704 Pasadena Drive Austin, Texas 78757 October 6, 2026 City …
ITEM02 C15-2026-0029 GRANTED DS — original pdf
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM02 DATE: Monday, October 12, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C15-2026-0029 ____Y____Joseph El Habr (D1) ____Y____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ____Y____Corry L Archer-McClellan (D3) ____Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ____Y____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ____Y____Haseeb Abdullah (D6) ____-____VACANT (D7) ____Y____Margaret Shahrestani-Vice Chair (D8) ____Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ____Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ____Y____Jeffery L Bowen-Chair (M) ____-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) ____-____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ____-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: Stephen Hawkins OWNER: Agustin Gonzalez ADDRESS: 3011 WESTLAKE DR VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant has requested variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-1176 (Site Development Regulations for Docks, Marinas, and Other Lakefront Uses) (A) (1) to increase the dock length from 30 feet (required) to fifty feet (50’) (requested), in order to erect a boat dock in a “LA” Lake Austin zoning district. Note: Land Development Code, 25-2-1176 Site Development Regulations for Docks, Marinas, and Other Lakefront Uses (A) A dock or similar structure must comply with the requirements of this subsection. (1) A dock may extend up to 30 feet from the shoreline, except that the director may require a dock to extend a lesser or greater distance from the shoreline if deemed necessary to ensure navigation safety. BOARD’S DECISION: AUGUST 10, 2026 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jeffery Bowen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen’s motion to postpone to September 14, 2026, Board member Melissa Hawthorne second on 10-0 votes; POSTPONED TO SEPTEMBER 14, 2026. September 14, 2026 Vice Chair’s motion to postpone to October 12, 2026, Board member Melissa Hawthorne second on 7-0 votes; POSTPONED TO OCTOBER 12, 2026, NOT ENOUGH BOARD MEMBERS FOR VOTING PURPOSES. October 12, 2026 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jeffery Bowen, Vice Chair Maggie Shahrestani’s motion to approve, Board member Melissa Hawthorne second on 10-0 votes; GRANTED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for reasonable use because: there is a very shallow drop from the shore down to the riverbed which would create the need for more dredging than is allowed under code. 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: there is a very shallow drop from the shore down to the riverbed which would create the need for more dredging than is allowed under code. (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: this is a unique aspect …
ITEM03 C15-2026-0030 GRANTED DS — original pdf
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM03 DATE: Monday October 12, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C15-2026-0030 ___Y_____Joseph El Habr (D1) ___Y_____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ___Y_____Corry L Archer-McClellan (D3) ___Y_____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ___Y_____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ___Y_____Haseeb Abdullah (D6) ___-_____VACANT (D7) ___Y_____Margaret Shahrestani-Vice Chair (D8) ___Y_____Brian Poteet (D9) ___Y_____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ___Y_____Jeffery L Bowen-Chair (M) ___-_____VACANT (Alternate) (M) ___-_____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ___-_____VACANT (Alternate) (M) OWNER/APPLICANT: Xiao Huang ADDRESS: 2805 SARATOGA DR VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) (D) from setback requirements for a front setback of 40 feet (required) to 7 feet (requested) in order to erect a four-foot high (4’) attached uncovered wood deck in front of an existing single-family residence in a “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: September 14, 2026 Vice Chair’s motion to postpone to October 12, 2026, Board member Melissa Hawthorne second on 7-0 votes; POSTPONED TO OCTOBER 12, 2026, NOT ENOUGH BOARD MEMBERS FOR VOTING PURPOSES. October 12, 2026 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jeffery Bowen, Board member Micheal Von Ohlen’s motion to approve, Board member Melissa Hawthorne second on 10-0 votes; GRANTED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for reasonable use because: the strict enforcement would prevent a safe and functional primary entrance to the existing home at 2805 Saratoga predates current setback requirements and its fixed location means any practical front entry would extend beyond the setback line. 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: was legally built in the 70s before current city of Austin setback requirements applied its fixed location on a corner lot creates a preexisting physical constraint that prevents the compliant and current entrance requirements, the hardship results from later zoning changes not from any action by the property owner. (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: it arises from the specific placement of the 50-year-old home on a corner lot where the existing structure conflicts with the current setback requirements on both street frontages because the home fixed location and elevated entry cannot comply with modern setbacks regardless of orientation, this site specific physical constraint not shared by neighboring properties. 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will …
ITEM04 C15-2026-0034 WD DS — original pdf
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM04 DATE: Monday October 12, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C15-2026-0034 ________Joseph El Habr (D1) ________Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ________Corry L Archer-McClellan (D3) ________Yung-ju Kim (D4) ________Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ________Haseeb Abdullah (D6) ________VACANT (D7) ________Margaret Shahrestani-Vice Chair (D8) ________Brian Poteet (D9) ________Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ________Jeffery L Bowen-Chair (M) ________VACANT (Alternate) (M) ________Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ________VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: Ricca Keepers OWNER: Trent Trawick ADDRESS: 14200 FLAT TOP RANCH RD VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code: Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations) (C)(2) (a) from impervious requirements to increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope with a gradient of 25 percent or less from 20 percent (maximum allowed) to 26 percent (requested) and Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations) (E)(2) to decrease the impervious cover on a slope with a gradient of more than 35 percent from 2% to 0% (requested), in order to complete a remodel/addition in a “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. Note: Land Development Code Section 25-2-551 Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations (A) (1) (2) (3) (C) This subsection specifies lot width and impervious cover restrictions in a Lake Austin (LA) district. (2) For a lot included in a subdivision plat recorded after April 22, 1982, impervious cover may not exceed: In this section: SHORELINE means the 492.8 topographic contour line along the shores of Lake Austin. SHORELINE SETBACK means a line parallel to the shoreline and at a distance from the shoreline that is prescribed in this section. SHORELINE SETBACK AREA means an area between the shoreline and the shoreline setback. (a) 20 percent, on a slope with a gradient of 25 percent or less; (b) 10 percent, on a slope with a gradient of more than 25 percent and not more than 35 percent; or (c) if impervious cover is transferred under Subsection (D), 30 percent. (E) This subsection specifies additional development standards based on a slope gradient in a Lake Austin (LA) district. (1) On a slope with a gradient of more than 15 percent; (a) vegetation must be restored with native vegetation, as prescribed by the Enviromental Criteria Manual, if it is disturbed or removed as a result of construction; and (b) construction uphill or downhill from the slope must comply with the Enviromental Criteria Manual. (2) on a slope with a gradient of …
ITEM05 C15-2026-0035 GRANTED DS — original pdf
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM05 DATE: Monday October 12, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C15-2026-0035 ____Y____Joseph El Habr (D1) ____Y____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ____Y____Corry L Archer-McClellan (D3) ____Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ____Y____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ____Y____Haseeb Abdullah (D6) ____-____VACANT (D7) ____Y____Margaret Shahrestani-Vice Chair (D8) ____Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ____Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ____Y____Jeffery L Bowen-Chair (M) ____-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) ____-____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ____-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: Victoria Goodman OWNER: Mark Sainsbury ADDRESS: 4523 AVENUE G VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-899 (Fences as Accessory Uses) to increase the height from eight (8’) feet (maximum allowed) to nine feet (9’) (requested) (6 ft. solid + 3 ft. trellis), in order to maintain a fence along interior side property line (N/NE) & rear property line (E/SE) in a “SF-3-NCCD-NP”, Single-Family-Neighborhood Conservation Combining District-Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Hyde Park Neighborhood Plan). Note: The Land Development Code 25-2-899 Fences as Accessory Uses (A) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, a fence: (1) is permitted as an accessory use in any zoning district; and (2) must comply with the requirements of this section. (B) In this section: (1) an ornamental fence is a fence with an open design that has a ratio of solid material to open space of not more than one to four; and (2) a solid fence is a fence other than an ornamental fence. (C) The height restrictions of this section do not apply to an ornamental fence. (D) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a solid fence constructed along a property line may not exceed a height of six feet measured from the natural grade up. (E) If there is a change in grade of at least one foot measured along any run of a solid fence along a property line, then the portion of the fence where the grade change occurs may be constructed to a maximum height of seven feet. (F) a solid fence along a property line may be constructed to a maximum height of eight feet if each owner of property that adjoins a section of the fence that exceeds a height of six feet files written consent to the construction of the fence with the building official; and (1) there is a change in grade of at least two feet within 50 feet of the boundary between adjoining properties; or (2) a structure, including …
ITEM06 C15-2026-0036 PP DS TO 11-9-26 — original pdf
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM06 DATE: Monday October 12, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C15-2026-0036 ____Y____Joseph El Habr (D1) ____Y____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ____Y____Corry L Archer-McClellan (D3) ____Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ____Y____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ____Y____Haseeb Abdullah (D6) ____-____VACANT (D7) ____Y____Margaret Shahrestani-Vice Chair (D8) ____Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ____Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ____Y____Jeffery L Bowen-Chair (M) ____-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) ____-____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ____-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: Richard T Suttle Jr. OWNER: Erin Booth Derbas ADDRESS: 4107 LAKEPLACE LANE VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code: Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations) (B)(3) (a) to permit a tram (mechanical pedestrian access). And Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations) (E)(2) to permit 260 square feet development on a slope with a gradient of more than 35%, in order to maintain a tram in a “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. For the above address the Subdivision Plat was recorded on March 25, 1915. Note: Land Development Code, Section 25-2-551 Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations {A} In this section: (1) SHORELINE means the 492.8 topographic contour line along the shores of Lake Austin. (2) SHORELINE SETBACK means a line parallel to the shoreline and at a distance from the shoreline that is prescribed in this section. (3) SHORELINE SETBACK AREA means an area between the shoreline and the shoreline setback. (B) This subsection specifies shoreline setbacks in a Lake Austin (LA) district. (1) The shoreline setback is: (a) 75 feet; or (b) 25 feet, if: (i) the lot is located in a subdivision plat recorded before April 22, 1982, or is a legal tract exempt from the requirement to plat; and (ii) the distance between the shoreline and the front lot line, or the property line of a l egal tract, is 200 feet or less. (E) This subsection specifies additional development standards based on a slope gradient in a Lake Austin (LA) district. (1) On a slope with a gradient of more than 15 percent; (a) vegetation must be restored with native vegetation, as prescribed by the Enviromental Criteria Manual, if it is disturbed or removed as a result of construction; and (b) construction uphill or downhill from the slope must comply with the Enviromental Criteria Manual. (2) on a slope with a gradient of more than 35 percent, development is prohibited except for the construction of a fence, driveway, road or utility …
ITEM07 C15-2026-0037 PP DS TO 11-9-26 — original pdf
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM07 DATE: Monday October 12, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C15-2026-0037 ____Y____Joseph El Habr (D1) ____Y____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ____Y____Corry L Archer-McClellan (D3) ____Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ____Y____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ____Y____Haseeb Abdullah (D6) ____-____VACANT (D7) ____Y____Margaret Shahrestani-Vice Chair (D8) ____Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ____Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ____Y____Jeffery L Bowen-Chair (M) ____-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) ____-____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ____-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: Soren Aandahl OWNER: Shesh Aandahl ADDRESS: 714 POST OAK ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-779 (Small Lot Single-Family Residential Use) (J)(4) from gross floor area requirements to increase unit size from 2,300 square feet (maximum allowed) to 2,886 square feet (requested) in order to enclose an existing balcony to create conditioned bedroom space in a “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family-Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Bouldin Creek NP). Note: Land Development Code 25-2-779 Small Lot Single-Family Residential Use (A) This section applies to a small lot single-family residential use. (B) This section supersedes the base zoning district regulations to the extent of conflict. (C) Only one dwelling unit is permitted on a lot. (D) This subsection applies to small lot single-family residential use on a property zoned single-family residence small lot (SF-4A) district or less restrictive. (J) Gross Floor Area (1) This subsection applies to a property located within the area described in Subsection 1.2.1 of Subchapter F (Residential Design and Compatibility Standards). (2) GROSS FLOOR AREA means the total enclosed area of all floors in a building with a clear height of more than six feet, measured to the outside surface of the exterior walls, except as provided in this subsection. (3) The gross floor area may not exceed the greater of 1,650 square feet or a floor-to-area ratio of 0.55. (4) The maximum unit size is 2,300 square feet. Source: Ord. 041118-57; Ord. No. 20240516-006, Pt. 5, 5-27-24; Ord. No. 20250227-039, Pt. 2, 10-1-25. BOARD’S DECISION: September 14, 2026 Vice Chair’s motion to postpone to October 12, 2026, Board member Melissa Hawthorne second on 7-0 votes; POSTPONED TO OCTOBER 12, 2026, NOT ENOUGH BOARD MEMBERS FOR VOTING PURPOSES. October 12, 2026 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jeffery Bowen, Board member Melissa Hawthorne’s motion to postpone to November 9, 2026, Vice Chair Maggie Shahrestani second on 10-0 votes; POSTPONED TO NOVEMBER 9, 2026. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property does not allow for …
ITEM08 C16-2026-0007 GRANTED DS — original pdf
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM08 DATE: October 12, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C16-2026-0007 ____Y____Joseph El Habr (D1) ____Y____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ____Y____Corry L Archer-McClellan (D3) ____Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ____Y____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ____Y____Haseeb Abdullah (D6) ____-____VACANT (D7) ____Y____Margaret Shahrestani-Vice Chair (D8) ____Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ____Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ____Y____Jeffery L Bowen-Chair (M) ____-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) ____-____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ____-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: David Anderson OWNER: QT South, LLC ADDRESS: 620 WEST SLAUGHTER LN VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-124 (Scenic Roadway Sign District Regulations), (B) to allow more freestanding signs from one (1) (maximum allowed) to one (1) additional (requesting); a total of two free-standing signs in order to provide signage for QT gas station in a “CS-CO”, General Commercial Services – Conditional Overlay zoning district. (Scenic Roadway Sign District). Note: 25-10-124 - SCENIC ROADWAY SIGN DISTRICT REGULATIONS (A) This section applies to a scenic roadway sign district. (B) One freestanding sign is permitted on a lot. (1) The sign area may not exceed the lesser of: (a) 0.4 square feet for each linear foot of street frontage; or (b) 64 square feet. (2) The sign height may not exceed 12 feet. (C) Wall signs are permitted. (D) For signs other than freestanding signs, the total sign area for a lot may not exceed 10 percent of the facade area of the first 15 feet of the building. (E) In a Hill Country Roadway corridor, a spotlight on a sign or exterior lighting of a sign must be concealed from view and oriented away from adjacent properties and roadways. (F) Internal lighting of signs is prohibited, except for the internal lighting of individual letters. (G) In addition to the sign setback requirements established by Section 25-10-191 (Sign Setback Requirements), a sign or sign support must be installed at least 12 feet from the street right-of-way, or at least 25 feet from street pavement or curb in the right-of-way, whichever setback is the lesser distance from the street. This subsection does not apply to a sign permitted by Section 25-10-102(F) (Signs Associated with Political Elections). Source: Sections 13-2-867 and 13-2-868; Ord. 990225-70; Ord. 031030-11; Ord. 031211-11; Ord. No. 20170817-072, Pt. 10, 8-28-17. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Chair Jeffery Bowen, Board member Melissa Hawthorne’s motion to approve, Board member Michael Von Ohlen second on 10-0 …
ITEM09 C15-2026-0040 DENIED DS — original pdf
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM09 DATE: Monday October 12, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C15-2026-0040 ____Y____Joseph El Habr (D1) ____N____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ____Y____Corry L Archer-McClellan (D3) ____Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ____Y____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ____N____Haseeb Abdullah (D6) ____-____VACANT (D7) ____Y____Margaret Shahrestani-Vice Chair (D8) ____Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ____Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ____Y____Jeffery L Bowen-Chair (M) ____-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) ____-____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ____-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: David J. Anderson OWNER: Eric Joseph Exelbert & Jessica Lea Boyer ADDRESS: 1703 PASADENA DR VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code Subchapter F: Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards Section 2.1 (Maximum Development Permitted) to increase the F.A.R from 40% (required) to 44.46% (requested), in order to enclose a Carport to a Garage of an existing 2-story single family residence in an “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family-Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Crestview Neighborhood Plan). NOTE: LDC 25-2 Land Development, Subchapter F: Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2: - Development Standards, Section 2.1 – Maximum Development Permitted. The maximum amount of development permitted on a property subject to this Subchapter is limited to the greater of 0.4 to 1.0 floor-to-area ratio or 2,300 square feet of gross floor area, as defined in Section 3.3. Floor-to-area ratio shall be measured using gross floor area as defined in Section 3.3, except that the lot area of a flag lot is calculated consistent with the requirements of 25-1-22 (Measurements). BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Chair Jeffery Bowen, Vice Chair Maggie Shahrestani’s motion to deny, Board member Melissa Hawthorne second on 8- 2 votes (Board members Bianca Medina-Leal and Haseeb Abdullah nay); DENIED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property does not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jeffery Bowen Chairman for
Agenda — original pdf
REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR’S COMMITTEE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES FRIDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2026, AT 5:30PM AUSTIN CITY HALL, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ROOM 1101 301 W 2nd STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Mayor’s Committee for People with Disabilities may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch- atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Nekaybaw Watson, Nekaybaw.watson@austintexas.gov, 512-974-2562. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: DeLawnia Comer-HaGans Lisa Chang, Chair Alejandro San Martin, Vice Chair Lynn Murphy Gabriel Arellano Katie Simon Anthony Chase Jr. Brandon Chesser Elizabeth Slade Kristen Vassallo CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL AGENDA The first ten speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Mayor’s Committee for People with Disabilities regular meeting on September 11, 2026. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. 3. Staff briefing regarding the Human Rights Impact Review and Report. Presented by Dr. Lindsey Wilson, Director of Austin Equity and Inclusion and Shafina Khaki, Human Rights Officer. Staff briefing regarding the Creative Reset Phase II: Reimagining Austin’s Cultural Facilities and Museums. Presentation by Candice Cooper, Interim Chief Administrative Officer, ACME; Matrex Kilgore, Division Manager, ACME; and Marjorie Flanagan, Division manager, Austin Parks & Recreation. 4. 5. Staff briefing regarding Vision Zero and micromobility devices. Presentation by Michael Kimbro, Program Manager III, Austin Transportation and Public Works. Staff briefing regarding the New Officer Involved Shooting Dashboard. Presentation by Sara Peralta, Public Information and Marketing Program Manager, Austin Police Oversight and Crystal Kimbrough, Policy Compliance Consultant, Austin Police Oversight. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 6. 7. 8. 9. Approve the 2027 Annual Meeting Schedule of the Mayor’s Committee for People with Disabilities. Approve the creation of a budget working group for the 2027 fiscal year to create budget workshops and recommendations for the 2027 fiscal year. Approve the creation of a working group that writes recommendations to support victims of assault and violence with disabilities. Approve a Recommendation to Council regarding public statements, ADA compliance, …
Item 1: Draft Minutes for 9.11.26 — original pdf
MAYOR’S COMMITTEE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES REGULAR MEETING MINUTES FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2026 The Mayor’s Committee for People with Disabilities convened in a regular meeting on Friday, September 11, 2026, at 301 W 2nd St. in Austin, Texas. Chair Chang called the Mayor’s Committee for People with Disabilities meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Lisa Chang, Chair Alejandro San Martin, Vice Chair Gabriel Arellano Katie Simon Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Lynn Murphy Elizabeth Slade Kristen Vassallo Commissioners Absent: DeLawnia Comer-HaGans PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Brandon Chesser- Introduction to the commission. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Mayor’s Committee for People with Disabilities Regular Meeting on August 14, 2026. The motion to approve the minutes of the August 14, 2026, regular meeting of the Mayor’s Committee for People with Disabilities was approved on Vice Chair San Martin’s 1 motion, Commissioner Vassallo’s second on an 8-0 vote. Commissioner Comer-HaGans was absent. STAFF BRIEFING 2. Staff briefing regarding processing times of rape kits and abuse reporting. Presentation by Dr. Dana Kadavy, Forensic Science Director, Austin Forensic Science, Kachina Clark, Division Manager, Austin Forensic Science, and Tracy Morris, Victim Services Manager, Austin Police. Presentation given by Dr. Dana Kadavy, Forensic Science Director, Austin Forensic Science, Kachina Clark, Division Manager, Austin Forensic Science, and Tracy Morris, Victim Services Manager, Austin Police. DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. Presentation from SAFE Alliance ATX regarding SAFE’s disability program, interpersonal violence in the disability community and current gaps in resources. Presentation by Pierre Berastain, CEO, SAFE Alliance ATX and Serena Villa, Disability Services Project Coordinator and Educator, SAFE Alliance ATX. Presentation given by Pierre Berastain, CEO, SAFE Alliance ATX and Serena Villa, Disability Services Project Coordinator and Educator, SAFE Alliance ATX. 4. Discussion on creating Budget Recommendation Workshops. Discussed. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS -Creation of a budget rec working group -Creation of a working group to write recommendations for victim support for organizations that support victims with disabilities -Follow up with Cap Metro -JIC update -Presentation from Cap Metro Police Force on their training with how they respond to people with IDD ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by Chair Chang at 7:28pm without objection. 2
Item 2: Human Rights Impact Review Presentation — original pdf
Mayor’s Committee for People with Disabilities Human Rights Impact Review Austin Equity and Inclusion Mayor’s Committee for People with Disabilities Friday, October 9 , 2026, 5:30 PM What is a Human Rights Framework? A human rights framework evaluates government performance through the lens of residents’ rights, and equitable access to services. dignity, Rather than asking whether programs exist, it asks whether people's rights are being fulfilled and where barriers remain. Why is it necessary and how does it support the City? Policies and services can exist without reaching those who need them most. A human rights framework helps identify gaps, improve accountability, and ensure that city decisions advance dignity, equity, and access for all residents. 2 Co - Created Impact Review The City engaged Henekom Group, a human rights consulting firm, to conduct an independent Human Rights Impact Review. The review included research across sources , engagement with more than 160+ 300 stakeholders , and a community workshop with 120 participants to identify and prioritize human rights risks and opportunities across 12 key issue areas. The resulting recommendations were co created, reflecting community input and - best practice from international human rights standards. 3 City of Austin - Human Rights Framework "Design and implement a Human Rights framework for assessing existing City services and programs to improve accessibility and responsiveness for residents' needs." 160+ 300+ Sources and commissions reviewed Stakeholders identified and engaged 120 Registered workshop attendees 92 Issues identified 69 Proposed mitigation for salience s 4 Steps to Conduct a Human Rights Impact Review Issue Identification → Mitigation Identification → Stakeholder Engagement → Implementation 1 Desk Research Dec 2025 - Jan 2026: 12 issue areas, 160+ sources 2 3 4 5 6 Issue & Mitigation Identification Defined salient human rights issues and potential mitigations Mapping Stakeholder Built 300+ stakeholder list with community and City Council recommendations Assessment Landscape Reviewed existing programs, initiatives, ordinances, and laws informed by community and City Council - identified issues and mitigations, Activity Set - Up Designed with pre with blank tabs available for write Facilitator Trained facilitators with landscape insights to avoid duplicating existing mitigations Training - ins 7 Human Rights Workshop Multi - stakeholder dialogue at March 23 workshop, approximately 120 attendees - Building Consensus 8 9 HeneKom’s Activity Analysis Scored and identified salient issues and mitigations for priority action Post Workshop Survey Sent to all registered stakeholders unable to attend 10 Human …
Item 3: Creative Reset Phase II Presentation — original pdf
The Creative Reset Phase II Reimagining Austin’s Cultural Facilities and Museums Arts, Culture, Music, and Entertainment July 2026 Why Now? Austin Has Changed. Our Cultural System Must Change With It. ▪ Austin's population continues to grow and diversify. ▪ Community expectations have shifted from simply preserving facilities to actively programming and activating them. ▪ Residents expect welcoming, accessible, vibrant public spaces that are open, responsive, and community-centered. ▪ The Creative Reset presented an opportunity to rethink how our facilities operate, not just maintain the status quo. Emma S Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center 2 Our Community Spaces Cultural Centers and Entertainment Complex Millennium Youth Entertainment Complex African American Cultural & Heritage Facility + Dedrick Hamilton House Asian American Resource Center Connelly-Yerwood “Pink” House Emma S Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center George Washington Carver Museum, Cultural + Genealogy Center Museums and Art Center Montopolis Negro School Zilker Hillside Theater Dougherty Arts Center Elisabet Ney Museum UMLAUF Sculpture Garden & Museum Susanna Dickinson Museum O. Henry Museum Old Bakery & Emporium 23rd Street Renaissance Artist Market 3 Our Approach The Creative Reset Phase II Reimagining Austin’s Cultural Facilities and Museums Beverly Sheffield Hillside Theater Our Approach We designed this process around listening. Community Engagement Internal Assessment Staff Visioning Site Identity Exercise Operational Review Recommendations Implementation Plan Evaluation 5 Nearly a year of engagement ensured that our recommendations reflect both community priorities and operational realities. Elisabeth Ney Museum 6 Community: What We Heard The Creative Reset Phase II Reimagining Austin’s Cultural Facilities and Museums ACME Creative Reset Engagement Community: What We Heard Activate our facilities More activity, more energy, more opportunities. Expand partnerships Collaborate with artists, nonprofits, schools, and community organizations. Improve customer experience Create welcoming, consistent, easy-to-access spaces. Reduce barriers Simplify processes and increase accessibility. Celebrate each site's unique identity Honor history while creating new opportunities. Brush Square Pun-Off Event 8 Staff: What We Learned The Creative Reset Phase II Reimagining Austin’s Cultural Facilities and Museums Dougherty Arts Center Staff: What We Learned ▪ Staff are passionate and deeply committed to serving the community. ▪ Operational processes vary significantly across facilities. ▪ Administrative responsibilities often limit time available for programming and community engagement. ▪ Greater collaboration, shared services, and consistent expectations can improve efficiency while preserving each site's unique identity. ▪ Our facilities are aging. Staff Engagement Event 10 Our New Operating Model The Creative Reset Phase II Reimagining Austin’s Cultural Facilities …