Item 9 Water & Wastewater Commission: April 15, 2026 Council: April 23, 2026 Posting Language ..Title Recommend approval to authorize negotiation and execution of an interlocal agreement with Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority (CapMetro) for the City to reimburse CapMetro for an amount not to exceed $747,500 for costs associated with the design and construction of an oversized water main and appurtenances related to Service Extension Request No. 5781R2 that will provide water service to a proposed office warehouse and fleet facility development located at 10805 Cameron Road. Funding: $747,500 is available in the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Budget of Austin Water. ..De Fiscal Note Funding is available in the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Budget of Austin Water. Council Committee, Boards and Commission Action: April 15, 2026 – To be reviewed by the Water and Wastewater Commission. Additional Backup Information: The Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority (CapMetro) Demand Response Facility project consists of approximately 25 acres of land located at 10805 Cameron Road (the “Property”). The Property is located entirely within the City’s 2-mile Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction, Impact Fee Boundary, Austin Water’s service area for water and wastewater, the Desired Development Zone, and the Walnut Creek Watershed. A map of the property location is attached. CapMetro is proposing to develop approximately 60,703 sq. ft. of office and 45,093 sq. ft. of office warehouse. CapMetro requested that the City provide water utility service to the Property as proposed in Service Extension Request (SER) No. 5781R2. Austin Water will provide retail wastewater service to the Property as proposed in SER No. 5782. In accordance with Chapter 25-9 of the City’s Code, the City has asked CapMetro to oversize the water main in order to serve additional properties within the north water pressure zone consistent with the City’s long range planning goals for this area. If approved by Council, the City will cost participate in this construction project only to the extent of the City’s proportionate share of the oversized water main. The proposed oversized improvements include construction of approximately 825 feet of 16-inch water main from the existing 16-inch water main in Blue Goose Road and extending west along Cameron Road to the Property. The City will reimburse CapMetro for an overall total amount not to exceed $747,500 for hard costs and soft costs. Hard costs include, but are not limited to, construction and materials. Soft costs include, but are not limited to, preliminary engineering …
Item 10 Water & Wastewater Commission: April 15, 2026 Council: May 21, 2026 Posting Language ..Title Recommend approval to authorize execution of a contract for the Oltorf at Travis Heights Pressure Zone Conversion project with Facilities Rehabilitation, Inc., for a total contract amount not to exceed $5,073,625 plus a $507,363 contingency for a total contract amount not to exceed $5,580,988. Funding: Funding is available in the Capital Budget of Austin Water. ..Body Lead Department Austin Financial Services Department. Managing Department Austin Capital Delivery Services. Fiscal Note Funding is available in the Capital Budget of Austin Water. Purchasing Language: The Financial Services Department issued an Invitations for Bids (IFB) 6100 CLMC1138 for these services. The solicitation was issued on December 1, 2025, and closed on February 12, 2026. Of the 6 offers received, the recommended contractors submitted the lowest responsive offer. A complete solicitation package, including a tabulation of the bids received, is available for viewing on the City’s Financial Services website, Austin Finance Online. Link: Solicitation Documents https://financeonline.austintexas.gov/afo/account_services/solicitation/solicitation_details.cfm?sid=143167. Council Committee, Boards and Commission Action: April 15, 2026 - To be reviewed by the Water and Wastewater Commission. Additional Backup Information: Austin Water’s water distribution system is fundamental for the conveyance of water to customers. The water distribution system is a large and complex system, consisting of approximately 3,900 miles of water mains and serving approximately one million customers. Due to age, growth, and system expansion, water distribution system assets require upgrades to meet customer demand needs. The Oltorf at Travis Heights Pressure Zone Conversion project will convert residences and businesses in the project area from the Central Pressure Zone to the higher-pressure South Reduced Pressure Zone to provide improved pressures and fire flows. The work includes installation of approximately 3,800 linear feet of 6-inch, 8-inch, and 12-inch ductile iron water mains, 12 water services, 2 pressure reducing valve vaults, and approximately 490 residential pressure reducing valves (PRVs) on Mariposa Drive, South Congress Avenue, East Oltorf Street, St Edwards Drive, Alta Vista Avenue, Rebel Road, Algarita Avenue, Rosedale Terrace, East Live Oak Street. This item includes four allowances. An allowance of $50,000 is to address contaminated soil that may be encountered during construction; an allowance of $40,000 is to replace possible deficient valves found during construction; an allowance of $700,000 is for any work that may be needed on private property per City of Austin plumbing code after the installation of …
Item 11 Water & Wastewater Commission: April 15, 2026 Council: May 7, 2026 Posting Language Recommend approval to authorize a contract for construction services for the Elmhurst Drive Wastewater Pipe Renewal project with HEI Civil Texas, LLC, in the amount of $4,784,754 plus a $478,475 contingency for a total contract amount not to exceed $5,263,299. Funding $5,263,299 is available in the Capital Budget of Austin Water. Lead Department Austin Financial Services Amount and Source of Funding Funding is available in the Capital Budget of Austin Water. Purchasing Language: Austin Financial Services issued an Invitation for Bids (IFB) CLMC 1149 for these services. The solicitation published on January 5, 2026, and closed on February 12, 2026. Of the two offers received, the bids submitted by the recommended contractors were the lowest responsive bids received. A complete solicitation package, including a tabulation of the bids received, is available for viewing on the City’s website. This information can currently be found at https://financeonline.austintexas.gov/afo/account_services/solicitation/solicitation_details.cfm?sid=14362 6 MBE/WBE This contract will be awarded in compliance with City Code Chapter 2-9A (Minority-Owned and Women- Owned Business Enterprise Procurement Program) by meeting the with 8.74% MBE and 1.83% WBE participation. Council Committee, Boards and Commission Action: April 15, 2026 – To be reviewed by the Austin Water and Wastewater commission Additional Backup Information: Austin Water’s wastewater collection system is a large and complex system, consisting of approximately 3,000 miles of wastewater mains and serves over one million customers. Due to deterioration from the harsh conditions of the wastewater environment, wastewater collection system assets require ongoing repair and replacement to prevent sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). The Elmhurst Drive Wastewater Pipeline Renewal project will repair 8,600 linear feet of deteriorated wastewater mains with cured in place pipe (CIPP) and repair or replace all associated connections. The projects is located in the Town Lake Wastewater Basin, bounded by Old E Riverside Dr, Parker Ln, Taylor Gaines St, and Summit St. This infrastructure was identified for replacement through Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) inspection and selected for rehabilitation based upon the evaluation of the physical condition of the wastewater main, capacity limitations, and amount of inflow and infiltration, which is the estimated amount of groundwater or rainwater leaking into a wastewater main. In addition, the project includes the replacement of 1,300 linear feet of potable water mains determined to be in poor condition. Item 11 Water & Wastewater Commission: April 15, 2026 Council: …
Item 12 Water & Wastewater Commission: April 15, 2026 Council: May 7, 2026 POSTING LANGUAGE: Recommend approval to authorize a contract for production meter evaluation and pilot testing for Austin Water with M.E. Simpson Company, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $150,000. Funding: $150,000 is available in the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Operating Budget of Austin Water. LEAD DEPARTMENT: Austin Financial Services FISCAL NOTE: Funding in the amount of $150,000 is available in the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Operating Budget of Austin Water. PROCUREMENT: Austin Financial Services issued an Invitation for Bids solicitation IFB 2200 KMF1036 for these services. The solicitation was published on January 18, 2026, and closed on February 24, 2026. The recommended contractor submitted the only responsive offer. A complete solicitation package, including a tabulation of the bid received, is available for viewing on the City’s website. This information can currently be found at https://financeonline.austintexas.gov/afo/account_services/solicitation/solicitation_details.cfm?sid=143647 MBE/WBE: This solicitation was reviewed for subcontracting opportunities in accordance with City Code Chapter 2-9B (Minority-Owned and Women-Owned Business Enterprise Procurement Program). For the services required for this solicitation, there were no subcontracting opportunities; therefore, no subcontracting goals were established. BOARD AND COMMISSION ACTION: April 15, 2026 - To be reviewed by the Austin Water and Wastewater Commission ADDITIONAL BACKUP INFORMATION (RCA BODY) The contract will provide water production meter evaluations and pitot testing at 34 flow-metering locations to verify meter accuracy and confirm the actual volume of water being introduced into the distribution system. Pitot testing is an effective method for determining and correcting wholesale and production meter accuracy. These production meters are located throughout the water treatment plants—including below-ground vaults, service pump stations, and large-diameter pipe galleries—many of which have limited personnel access. Assessments will be conducted at the Davis, Ullrich, and Handcox Water Treatment Plants. This contract is a new contract. Requested authorization is based on the bid received for the required services. If a contract is not approved, Austin Water will be unable to validate the accuracy of its production meters. This will impact Austin Water's ability to correct plant production measurements in support of accurately quantifying real water losses in the distribution system.
Item 13 Water & Wastewater Commission: April 15, 2026 Council: May 28, 2026 POSTING LANGUAGE: Recommend approval to authorize a revenue contract for the cutting, baling and sale of hay for Austin Water with Allen Lee Click d/b/a Allen Click, for an initial term of 12-months, with up to four 12-month extension options for an estimated revenue of $1,000,000. Estimated net revenue will be allocated to the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Operating Budget of Austin Water. Net revenue for the remaining contract terms will be available in future budgets. LEAD DEPARTMENT: Austin Financial Services FISCAL NOTE: Estimated net revenue will be allocated to the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Operating Budget of Austin Water. Net revenue for the remaining contract terms will be available in future budgets. PROCUREMENT: Austin Financial Services issued an Invitation for Bids (IFB) 2200 MHR1015 for these services. The solicitation was published on December 22, 2025, and closed on January 29, 2026. Of the three offers received, the bid submitted by the recommended contractor was the highest responsive bid received. A complete solicitation package, including a tabulation of the bids received, is available for viewing on the City’s website. This information can currently be found at https://financeonline.austintexas.gov/afo/account_services/solicitation/solicitation_details.cfm?sid=143588 MBE/WBE: This solicitation was reviewed for subcontracting opportunities in accordance with City Code Chapter 2-9B (Minority-Owned and Women-Owned Business Enterprise Procurement Program). For the services required for this solicitation, there were no subcontracting opportunities; therefore, no subcontracting goals were established. BOARD AND COMMISSION ACTION: April 15, 2026 – To be reviewed by the Austin Water Advisory Commission. ADDITIONAL BACKUP INFORMATION: The contract will provide farming services for the production and harvesting of hay at the Hornsby Bend Biosolids Management Plant. The Hornsby Bend Biosolids Management Plant processes biosolids from Austin Water’s wastewater treatment plants into compost. A treated liquid stream from this process is used to irrigate hay fields onsite. Harvesting the hay removes nutrients from the wastewater, supports compliance with the facility’s Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) operating permit, and allows the harvested hay to be beneficially reused. The contract will replace an existing contract that expired on November 10, 2025. Quantities and amounts were determined by using departmental estimates, historical quantities, and forecasted usage. The recommended contractor is the current provider for these services. Austin Water does not possess the equipment, staffing, or agricultural expertise to perform the services internally, and fields may not be harvested as required, which …
Item 14 Water & Wastewater Commission: April 15, 2026 Council: May 28, 2026 Posting Language ..Title Recommend approval to authorize negotiation and execution of an interlocal agreement with Austin Transit Partnership (ATP) to define responsibilities and commitments for the design of light rail, related improvements, and utility betterments related to Project Connect in an amount not to exceed $36,789,645 and to grant ATP temporary access to right-of-way and City property for pre- construction activities. Funding: $88,484 is available in the Capital Budget of Austin Energy; $36,035,455 is available in the Capital Budget of Austin Water; and $665,706 is available in the FY27 Capital Budget of Austin Watershed Protection. ..De Lead Department Austin Project Connect Fiscal Note Funding in the amount of $88,484 is available in the Capital Budget of Austin Energy. Funding in the amount of $36,035,455 is available in the Capital Budget of Austin Water. Funding in the amount of $665,706 is available in the FY27 Capital Budget of Austin Watershed Protection. Prior Council Action: September 11, 2025 – City Council authorized negotiation and execution of an interlocal agreement with the Austin Transit Partnership concerning acquisition of real property in support of Austin Light Rail, a component of Project Connect. August 29, 2024 – City Council authorized negotiation and execution of an amendment to the second interlocal agreement with the Austin Transit Partnership to provide funding for the City of Austin Project Connect Office, in support of Project Connect. February 15, 2024 – City Council approved an amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement between the City, CapMetro, and the Austin Transit Partnership. June 6, 2023 – City Council approved an amendment and supplement to the Joint Powers Agreement between the City, CapMetro, and the Austin Transit Partnership. June 1, 2023 – City Council adopted modifications to light rail and implementation plans related to Project Connect and authorized an amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement to incorporate the Austin Light Rail Implementation Plan. September 1, 2022 – City Council authorized negotiation and execution of a second interlocal agreement with the Austin Transit Partnership to provide funding for the City of Austin Project Connect Office, in support of Project Connect. November 4, 2021 – City Council approved the Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Austin, CapMetro and the Austin Transit Partnership. March 4, 2021 – City Council authorized negotiation and execution of …
Austin Light Rail Update & Austin Water Infrastructure Improvements Austin Water and Wastewater Commission Austin Project Connect | April 15, 2026 Austin Light Rail Phase 1 Light rail is an expandable electric train system designed for metropolitan areas, serving as an integral part of the transit network by connecting people to essential destinations where they live, work and play. ACCESS TO: 136K CURRENT JOBS 200K+ FUTURE JOBS 15 STATIONS connecting north, south and east Austin 9.8 MILES of light rail transit 29K DAILY TRIPS on an average weekday 2 Austin Light Rail Phase 1 Austin Light Rail Timeline 3 Achieving Milestones • Advancing through the Capital Investment Grants program • Received a medium-high rating - the highest rating awarded by the Federal Transit Administration in the Fiscal Year 2026 cycle • Completed the NEPA Final Environmental Impact Statement in January 2026, the first major New Starts project to do so within the required 2-year deadline • 2026: Awarding Contracts to Build Austin Light Rail • February: ATP Board awards final design & construction contract to Austin Rail Constructors • Spring: ATP Board expected to award contract for construction of Operations & Maintenance Facility • Summer: ATP Board expected to award contract for light rail vehicles 4 Contracts to be Awarded in 2026 Civils, Rail, Stations, Systems Operations & Maintenance Facility Light Rail Vehicles • Progressive Design-Build • Progressive Design-Build • Summer 2026 Award • February 18th Board Award to Austin Rail Constructors • Phase 1: Preconstruction (continuing design and planning) • Phase 2: Construction • Q2 2026 Award • Phase 1: Preconstruction (continuing design and planning) • Phase 2: Construction • Design coordination with design-build teams • Vehicle design and manufacturing 5 LRT Contractor Preconstruction Overview Pre-Construction Activities Preconstruction (1A): Design Progression & Construction Planning 2026 2027 2028 … 2/18/2026 Board Authorization Preconstruction (1B): Final Design & Permitting Board Authorization to finish final design Construction Packages Board Authorization for Construction Packages Preconstruction (1A): Design Progression & Construction Planning • Advance design and initiate permitting • Field work and utility coordination Preconstruction (1B): Final Design & Permitting • Advance design and refine construction cost estimates to execute construction packages (may be staggered) • Constructability reviews, innovation, and integrated cost estimating • Advance Right-of-Way acquisition activities • Obtain Third Party approvals and permits • Planning for construction: phasing, sequencing, and schedule • Engage community in design and construction planning • Prepare for …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, APRIL 15, 2026, AT 6:00 P.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, ROOM 1405 6310 WILHELMINA DELCO DRIVE AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Environmental Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Nicole Corona, 512-974-3146, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Mariana Krueger, Chair Jennifer Bristol, Vice Chair Haris Qureshi, Secretary Richard Brimer Isabella Changsut Annie Fierro AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Justin Fleury Martin Luecke Mar Moretta-Urdiales Allison Morrison David Sullivan The first ten speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on April 1, 2026. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Presentation, discussion, and recommendation to amend City Code Title 25 (Land Development) and amend Ordinance No. 20221115-048 to modify development review processes, methods to demonstrate water quality compliance, street design, and utility infrastructure design for the design and construction of certain transit system projects and related transit system infrastructure. Presented by Donna Galati, Capital Program Consultant, Austin Project Connect, donna.galati@austintexas.gov, 512-974-2733. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 3. Approve a recommendation to Council regarding the Final Draft of the Rain to River Strategic Plan. Presented by Jorge Morales, Director, Austin Watershed Protection. WORKING GROUP UPDATES 4. Update from the Bird-Friendly Design Working Group regarding the meeting on April 10, 2026. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Nicole Corona at Austin Watershed Protection, at 512-974-3146, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Environmental Commission, please contact Nicole Corona at 512- 974-3146, Nicole.Corona@austintexas.gov.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, APRIL 1, 2026 The Environmental Commission convened in a regular meeting on Wednesday, April 1, 2026, at the Permitting and Development Center, Room 1405, located at 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive in Austin, Texas. Vice Chair Krueger called the Environmental Commission Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Mariana Krueger, Vice Chair Haris Qureshi, Secretary Richard Brimer Isabella Changsut Annie Fierro Justin Fleury Martin Luecke Mar Moretta-Urdiales Allison Morrison David Sullivan Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Jennifer Bristol, Chair PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Corbin Graham, Landfill leachate leakage in Walnut Creek watershed Roy Waley, Elon Musk’s data centers APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on March 4, 2026. The minutes from the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on March 4, 2026, were approved on Commissioner Sullivan’s motion, Commissioner Brimer’s second, on a 10-0 vote. Chair Bristol was off the dais. 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Name: 1404 East Riverside PUD, C814-2025-0111 Applicant: Amanda Swor, Drenner Group Location: 1404 East Riverside Drive Council District: 3 Staff: Sean Watson, Environmental Program Coordinator, Austin Watershed Protection, 512- 963-2167, Sean.Watson@austintexas.gov Applicant Request: The applicant proposes a new Planned Unit Development (PUD) Staff Recommendation: Recommended with conditions The meeting was recessed at 6:38 p.m. until 6:47 p.m. without objection. The public hearing was conducted, and a motion to close the public hearing was approved on Commissioner Sullivan’s motion, Commissioner Brimer’s second, on an 11-0 vote. The motion to recommend the project 1404 East Riverside PUD, C814-2025-0111, located at 1404 East Riverside Drive, to Council with conditions and the following amendments was approved on Secretary Qureshi’s motion, Commissioner Brimer’s second on an 11-0 vote. The following amendment was made by Commissioner Fleury and seconded by Chair Bristol. The amendment was to revise the condition “Of the existing parking on site, reserve at least ten parking spaces, including ADA-compliant parking, on the ground level garage floor for public parking and park access” to read: “Of the existing parking on site, reconsider reserving some parking spaces, including ADA- compliant parking, on the ground level garage floor for public parking and park access.” The amendment was approved on a 10-1 vote. Commissioner Brimer voted nay. The following amendment was made by Chair Bristol. The amendment was to remove the condition of maximum allowable height of 120 feet. The amendment was approved on an 11-0 vote without objection. 3. Name: …
ITEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSION MEETING DATE: April 15, 2026 NAME & NUMBER OF PROJECT: C20-2026-003 Transit System Projects Ordinance Amendment Sponsor Department: Austin Project Connect City Staff: Donna Galati, Capital Program Consultant, Austin Project Connect, donna.galati@austintexas.gov, 512-974-2733 Description: Amend the 2022 Transit System Projects Ordinance to add additional streamlining elements with a focus on project-specific technical regulation. Background: On October 29, 2021, Council approved Ordinance No. 20211029-003 directing staff to review City Code, criteria manuals, and permitting procedures to identify impediments to the design, construction, implementation, and operation of Project Connect to add streamlining elements with a focus on project-specific technical regulation. The foundational ordinance for Transit System Projects, Ordinance. No. 20221115-048, was approved by Council on November 15, 2022. The Transit System Projects foundational ordinance created a central location for transit- specific regulations, expanded permitting options, clarified uses, and provided a programmatic approach to construction noise mitigation. Summary of Proposed Code Amendment: 1. Modifies site plan requirements to accommodate permitting tools for the light rail permitting process. 2. Recission of obsolete utility ordinance from 2000. 3. Establishes back-of-curb streetscape standards for light rail. 4. Establishes a water quality compliance program for light rail. 5. Establishes administrative review of heritage trees for Transit System Projects. 6. Incorporates administrative rule modifications that proactively address constrained right of way conditions where compliance will be challenging and ensures consistency in expiration of site plan components. Proposed Text Amendment(s): See attached draft ordinance. Staff Recommendation: Recommended Staff supports the proposed amendments to Ordinance No. 20221115-048. The amendments will further support Resolution No. 20211029-003, which directed staff to review City Code, criteria manuals, and permitting procedures to identify impediments to the design, construction, implementation, and operation of Project Connect to add streamlining elements with a focus on project-specific technical regulation. Board and Commission Action: April 15, 2026 – To be considered by the Codes and Ordinances Joint Committee. April 15, 2026 – To be considered by the Environmental Commission. April 28, 2026 – Tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission. May 21, 2026 – Tentatively scheduled for City Council action.
WORKING DRAFT FOR AMENDMENT TO PROJECT CONNECT ORDINANCE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE CHANGES PART 1. On November 15, 2022, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 20221115-048 (the “Original Ordinance”), approving the Transit System Project Regulations to facilitate the construction of Project Connect (“Project”), the City’s high-capacity transit system expansion. PART 2. The attached exhibits are incorporated into this ordinance in their entirety as though set fully in the text of this ordinance. The exhibits are as follows: Exhibit A and A-1: Transit System Project Map Exhibit C: Preliminary Water Quality Treatment Map PART 3. This ordinance and the attached exhibits amend the Original Ordinance as amended for the Transit System Project Regulations, modifying conditions and replacing any likewise named or identified exhibits in the Original Ordinance as amended. Development of and uses for the Transit System Project shall conform to the limitations and conditions set forth in this ordinance and in the attached exhibits. If this ordinance and the attached exhibits conflict, this ordinance controls. Except as otherwise specifically provided by this ordinance, all other rules, regulations and ordinances of the City of Austin (“City”) apply to a Transit System Project. PART 4. This ordinance repeals Ordinance No. 000309-114. PART 5. Code Modifications. The following code modifications apply to a Transit System Project. (A) General Requirements and Procedures (1) City Code Section 25-1-21(108) (Definitions, Site) is modified to provide that a site can be a noncontiguous area and may cross a public street or right-of-way. (2) The Director of Austin Development Services may allow development to be reviewed and approved in multiple layers within one overall site plan. (B) Transportation (1) City Code Section 25-6-171 (Standards for Design and Construction) is modified to allow Project Connect Design Criteria to supersede any conflicting requirements in Chapter 25-6 (Transportation), subject to final approval by the City Traffic Engineer or Director of Austin Transportation and Public Works. (2) Notwithstanding any provision in Title 25 (Land Development) excluding Chapter 25- 2 (Zoning), the planting of street trees in the right-of-way shall follow the criteria of this subsection. WORKING DRAFT FOR AMENDMENT TO PROJECT CONNECT ORDINANCE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE CHANGES (a) Street trees planted in the right-of-way can have a horizontal clearance from the outer edge of the root barrier to the outer edge of an existing storm drain that is running parallel to the light rail alignment of: (i) five feet; or (ii) three …
2 3 4 Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision (FEIS/ROD) The Final Environmental Impact Statement includes: • Responses to each individual public comment received on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement • Design updates in response to community feedback • Analysis of environmental effects and commitments to address potential project impacts • Mitigation Monitoring Plan documenting measures that reduce or avoid potential adverse impacts, noting implementation and monitoring practices The Record of Decision: • Enables us to proceed into the next phase of project work The FEIS/ROD will conclude our NEPA compliance and affirm the preferred project 5 LRT Contractor Preconstruction Overview Pre-Construction Activities 2026 Preconstruction (1A): Design Progression & Construction Planning 2027 2028 … 2/18/2026 Board Authorization Preconstruction (1B): Final Design & Permitting Board Authorization to finish final design Construction Packages Board Authorization for Construction Packages Preconstruction (1A): Design Progression & Construction Planning • Advance design and initiate permitting • Field work and utility coordination Preconstruction (1B): Final Design & Permitting • Advance design and refine construction cost estimates to execute construction packages (may be staggered) • Constructability reviews, innovation, and integrated cost estimating • Advance Right-of-Way acquisition activities • Obtain Third Party approvals and permits • Planning for construction: phasing, sequencing, and schedule • Engage community in design and construction planning • Prepare for FTA requirements 7 Transit System Projects Ordinance Amendment Austin Project Connect | April 15, 2026 Transit System Projects Ordinance Response to: Resolution No. 20211029-003 which directed staff to: • Review City Code, criteria manuals, and permitting procedures to identify impediments to the design, construction, implementation, and operation of Project Connect • Develop new regulations and procedures to address those impediments Foundational ordinance approved by Council on Nov. 15, 2022 Established home for Transit System Project regulations Modified permitting tools to accommodate Austin Light Rail Anticipated additional impediments would be identified as project progressed Amendments address these issues and support the project as it enters final design 9 Components of this Ordinance 1. Site Plan Modification 2. Removal of Outdated Utility Policy 3. Austin Light Rail Streetscape Standards 4. Austin Light Rail Water Quality Compliance Program 5. Administrative Review of Heritage Trees 6. Administrative Rule Modifications 10 1. Site Plan Modifications To facilitate the permitting process for Austin Light Rail, site plans will be allowed to have non-contiguous limits of construction (LOC). Refresher: Site Plan Layers Tool …
ORDINANCE NO. 20221115-048 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE TITLE 25 AND CHAPTER 9-2 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN TRANSIT SYSTEM PROJECTS AND RELATED TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN: Project Connect is the City's high-capacity transit system expansion, PART 1. which will ultimately consist of a light rail network, an expanded bus system, transportation terminals and stations, maintenance facilities, and all associated improvements necessary for operation of the transit system. To facilitate the construction ofthis critical transportation infrastructure, certain modifications and waivers to City Code are necessary to ensure the construction of a high-capacity transit system. This ordinance and the attached Exhibits A and B consist of the PART 2. "Transit System Project Regulations". Development ofthe Transit System Project shall conform to the limitations and conditions set forth in this ordinance. If this ordinance and the attached exhibits conflict, this ordinance controls. Except as otherwise provided by this ordinance, all other rules, regulations, and ordinances of the City apply. PART 3. The attached exhibits are incorporated into this ordinance in their entirety as though set forth fully in the text of this ordinance. The exhibits are as follows: A. Transit System Project Map B. Light Rail Construction Noise and Mitigation Plan Requirements PART 4. Definitions. A. Transit System Project means a transportation project generally depicted on Exhibit A with any related appurtenances, including but not limited to a rail and public transit line, rail station, or a transportation terminal, funded by a public entity. B. Unless otherwise specifically defined, all terms in this ordinance shall have the meaning established in Title 25 of Code of the City of Austin, Texas (the .,Land Development Code"). Page 1 0f 3 A Transit System Project for light rail lines or any associated PART 5. infrastructure necessary to construct the light rail lines must comply with a noise and mitigation plan approved by the City that meets the requirements listed in Exhibit B. To the extent there is a conflict with Chapter 9-2 (Noise and Amplified Soundj, the approved noise and mitigation Plan will control. PART 6. Transit System Uses A. The use of a site for a traction powered substation is a Local Utility Service use as described in City Code Section 25-2-6(28). B. The use of a site for the provision of maintenance, repair, vehicular or equipment servicing, material storage, or similar activities for …
A STRATEGIC PLAN TO PROTECT AUSTIN’S CREEKS AND COMMUNITIES City of Austin | Austin Watershed Protection FINAL DRAFT 2026 A Strategic Plan to Protect Austin’s Creeks & Communities LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT As we introduce the Rain to River Strategic Plan, we ground our work in the recognition that every watershed has a story – one that began long before Austin was a city. By sharing this land acknowledgment, we hope to honor the Indigenous peoples who have cared for these lands and waters for generations while acknowledging the harms that persist today. We acknowledge, with respect, that the land we are on is the traditional and ancestral homelands of the Tonkawa, the Apache, the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo, the Lipan Apache Tribe, the Texas Band of Yaqui Indians, the Coahuitlecan and all other tribes not explicitly stated. Additionally, we would like to acknowledge and pay respects to the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas, the Kickapoo Tribe of Texas, Carrizo & Comecrudo, Tigua Pueblo, Caddo, Comanche, Kiowa, Wichita, Chickasaw, Waco nations, and all the American Indian and Indigenous Peoples and communities who have been or have become a part of these lands and territories in Texas, here on Turtle Island. Not all indigenous peoples listed claim Texas as ancestral lands, as many were forcibly relocated to Texas from their ancestral homelands. Though our work is just beginning, the vision and values in this strategic plan call us to care for our watersheds with humility, gratitude, and a deep sense of responsibility for generations to come. This shared purpose is reflected in the plan’s commitments and strategies, which prioritize equity, resilience, and collaborative stewardship. In adopting this new plan, we affirm our responsibility to learn from the land, repair relationships, and build trust as we work toward a future where watershed protection and cultural respect go hand in hand. 1 The clear, flowing water of Barton Creek at Sculpture Falls Scientist evaluating a wetland along Gilleland Creek Crew repairing a tributary of Tannehill Branch Creek Youth educator exploring a cave in the Edwards Aquifer Engineer assessing erosion on a tributary of Walnut Creek WELCOME LETTER I’m pleased to introduce Rain to River, the updated strategic plan for Austin Watershed Protection. This plan represents more than a set of strategies – it reflects a shift in how we approach our work, our partnerships, and our long-term responsibilities to the people and environment of Austin. Our …
FROM RAIN TO RIVER: WORKING WITH WATER’S PROMISE AND PERIL WHY WE’RE UPDATING THE PLAN At Austin Watershed Protection, our work begins with a drop of rain and follows its journey across the land, into our streets and neighborhoods, and through the creeks that shape Austin’s people, places, and ecosystems. Water brings life, offering spaces to swim, fish, and connect with nature, nourishing our neighborhoods and local wildlife. Rain can also bring devastation, flooding streets and homes, endangering lives, and creating stress, uncertainty, and lasting harm. Every storm carries this duality (promise and peril, vitality and risk) and our work is grounded in navigating both sides of that reality. For decades, decisions about how to protect and manage Austin’s creeks, floodplains, and stormwater infrastructure were guided primarily by technical assessments, environmental monitoring, engineering models, and permitting requirements. While essential, these tools often overlooked the equally vital human systems that define watershed health: the social, historical, and cultural contexts of the communities that live alongside these waters and the realities they face every day. The Rain to River Strategic Plan marks a deliberate shift. We cannot do this work with technical expertise alone; we need the wisdom of those who experience flooding, erosion, and water pollution firsthand. By treating lived experience and community knowledge as data, we combine technical expertise with the insights of residents and community leaders to create strategies that are both practical and responsive to community needs. The Rain to River Strategic Plan charts a forward-looking path for the next decade. It responds to Austin’s changing climate, rapid growth, and the pressing need for equity, setting goals and strategies to ensure our watersheds—and the people who rely on them—are protected, resilient, and healthy. When we last updated our strategic plan in 2016, Austin faced many of the same challenges we see today. In the years since, those challenges have grown in scale, urgency, and complexity. Since 2016, our city has experienced severe floods, extreme heat, winter storms, and prolonged drought. These events had devastating impacts, with some Austinites losing their homes and others losing their lives. Population growth has accelerated development, increasing the pressure on our natural systems and aging infrastructure. At the same time, our community’s understanding of environmental justice and climate vulnerability has evolved, bringing a sharper focus on who benefits from public investment and who bears the greatest risks. Our previous plan helped us make …
OUR VALUES | STEWARDS These represent the core values that we, as Watershed Protection staff, aspire to as stewards of Austin’s watersheds. They were formally adopted by leadership in 2025 after extensive conversations with staff across the department about what matters most in how we do our work. As stewards, we care for our watersheds and safeguard our infrastructure to support the communities that rely on them. We recognize the environment’s fundamental connection to protecting health and safety. We address urgent needs while planning for a sustainable and resilient future. We use public funds responsibly and transparently to implement solutions. We are committed to equity, prioritizing efforts to achieve fair outcomes for all. Through shared stewardship, we collaborate with city and community partners, leveraging our collective wisdom and strengths. Staff at the Central Texas Juneteenth Parade SERVICE Show up TEAMWORK Paddle together EQUITY Lifts all boats WISDOM Reflect and listen ACCOUNTABILITY Anchor trust RESILIENCE Ride the waves DEDICATION Dive in SUSTAINABILITY Shape tomorrow Service is at the core of our work, ensuring we provide high quality support and effective solutions to the community. • We hold ourselves to the highest standards of customer service by listening, engaging, and responding in a timely manner. • We provide accurate and consistent service to our internal customers to ensure our staff works safely and effectively while serving the community. We promote teamwork and collaboration, knowing we can rely on each other and that we are stronger when we work together. • We invest time and effort in cultivating effective teams, characterized by mutual support and respect for each other as whole people. • We value collaboration beyond our department, understanding that working across agencies and with community members is essential to achieving our missions. We are committed to equity by acknowledging that different people and environments need different resources to thrive. • We foster a workplace where everyone is valued, empowered, and has the chance to succeed and grow. • We prioritize our work towards achieving equal outcomes for all. We strive for excellence in our work by leveraging the wisdom of our staff, community, and watersheds. • We learn from the knowledge and experiences of our community, ensuring their voices shape our work and guide our decisions. • We foster a culture of creativity, continuous learning, and data- informed decision making. We hold ourselves accountable to each other, our community, and the …
COMMUNITY PRIORITIES Connecting with our community ambassadors The community priorities were developed through several years of listening, surveying, and working directly with Austin residents, especially those historically left out of city planning. Input was gathered through a multi-year community engagement process. Across these efforts, residents consistently raised concerns about flooding, water quality, equity, access to natural spaces, and the need for clearer communication and proactive action from the City. These findings were synthesized into draft themes and priorities. The Community Activation Group (CAG) then refined and validated these priorities to ensure they reflected community needs and values. While these priorities highlight areas where the community sees the greatest opportunities for improvement, they do not encompass the full scope of our work. Our core services and functions remain the foundation of what we do, and we will continue delivering them reliably. The recommendations identified here are intended to build on that foundation, addressing gaps and strengthening the programs that matter most to residents. Some of the community recommendations outlined in this section may go beyond what our department can directly lead. To address these priorities, we will need to rely on strong partnerships and connections with other city departments, community organizations, and residents. Through collaboration on initiatives such as parks, trails, and housing, we can expand our impact and work together to make meaningful progress. The community priorities and our department values share a common focus on equity, resilience, sustainability, and collaboration. Acting as stewards, we draw on the wisdom of the community to guide decisions, prepare for challenges, and shape solutions. By grounding our work in these values, we aim to deliver results that are measurable and enduring. 47 Community Priorities: 1. EQUITY & INCLUSION 2. FLOOD MITIGATION & EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 3. CLIMATE RESILIENCE & SUSTAINABILITY 4. NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION & RESTORATION 5. ACCESSIBILITY & PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 6. TRUST & COLLABORATION 7. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT & GROWTH 8. SUPPORT FOR UNHOUSED & VULNERABLE POPULATIONS 9. EDUCATION & YOUTH ENGAGEMENT 10. INNOVATION & LEADERSHIP Students showing their #creeklove at Barton Springs University Rain to River: A Strategic Plan to Protect Austin’s Creeks & Communities | FINAL DRAFT 1. EQUITY & INCLUSION Ensure historically underserved communities have equitable access to resources and decision-making processes. S S E N D E R A P E R P Y C N E G R E M E I I & N O T A G …
Rain to River: Austin Watershed Protection Strategic Plan Review and Adoption Environmental Commission Austin Watershed Protection | April 15, 2026 What is Rain to River? Austin Watershed Protection’s Strategic Plan to Protect Austin’s Creeks and Communities Guiding Blueprint for Department Communication Resource – Establishes our mission, – Helps explain our vision, and values – Sets strategies and direction for the next 10 years work and priorities to staff, policymakers, and the community Note: Rain to River will update and replace the current Watershed Protection Strategic Plan 2 Guiding Principles for the Plan • • • • • • Center the needs of vulnerable populations Engage the community through clear and open communication Align our aspirations with community priorities Strengthen partnerships for greater impact Empower our leaders to advocate for our mission Create a dynamic and inclusive framework 3 Plan Highlights • Our mission remains unchanged to reduce the impacts of flooding, erosion, and water pollution • Reflects how we will strengthen and adapt our work to center community and build resilience • Expands our focus to include community voices, lived experience, and shared stewardship as essential components of our infrastructure • Holistic and proactive approach that balances immediate needs with our long-term vision • Equity not as a one-time initiative, but as an ongoing practice rooted in accountability and trust 4 Our Challenges • Climate change is driving more extreme weather, including more intense storms and prolonged drought • Historic inequities have left some neighborhoods more exposed to flooding and degraded waterways • Urbanization and development add pressure to our natural environment and infrastructure • Housing costs are driving displacement of residents and an increase in people experiencing homelessness 5 Community Engagement • Robust and inclusive process that spanned multiple years • We identified stakeholder groups that have been historically underrepresented in our past planning efforts and worked to engage with them more directly • We partnered with local organizations, community ambassadors, and advocacy groups to reach residents in every district • Engagement took many forms—surveys, interviews, focus groups, neighborhood meetings, and community events 6 Community Activation Group The Community Activation Group (CAG) helped shape the content of the plan and ensured that the diverse voices of our community are integral to the Rain to River planning process and Austin Watershed Protection’s work. • Diverse community leaders with expertise in the environment, community health, and disaster preparedness and recovery • …
WORKING DRAFT FOR AMENDMENT TO PROJECT CONNECT ORDINANCE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE CHANGES PART 1. On November 15, 2022, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 20221115-048 (the “Original Ordinance”), approving the Transit System Project Regulations to facilitate the construction of Project Connect, the City’s high-capacity transit system expansion. PART 2. The attached exhibits are incorporated into this ordinance in their entirety as though set fully in the text of this ordinance. The exhibits are as follows: Exhibit A and A-1: Transit System Project Map Exhibit C: Preliminary Water Quality Treatment Map PART 3. This ordinance and the attached exhibits amend the Original Ordinance as amended for the Transit System Project Regulations, modifying conditions and replacing any likewise named or identified exhibits in the Original Ordinance as amended. Development of and uses for the Transit System Project shall conform to the limitations and conditions set forth in this ordinance and in the attached exhibits. If this ordinance and the attached exhibits conflict, this ordinance controls. Except as otherwise specifically provided by this ordinance, all other rules, regulations and ordinances of the City of Austin (“City”) apply to a Transit System Project. PART 4. This ordinance repeals Ordinance No. 000309-114. PART 5. Definitions (A) Austin Light Rail means the light rail system generally depicted on Exhibit A-1 with any related appurtenances funded by a public entity. PART 6. Code Modifications. The following code modifications apply to development applications for the Austin Light Rail. (A) General Requirements and Procedures (1) City Code Section 25-1-21(108) (Definitions, Site) is modified to provide that a site can be a noncontiguous area and may cross a public street or right-of-way. (2) The Director of Austin Development Services may allow development to be reviewed and approved in multiple layers within one overall site plan. (B) Transportation (1) City Code Section 25-6-171 (Standards for Design and Construction) is modified to allow Project Connect Design Criteria to supersede any conflicting requirements in Chapter 25-6 (Transportation), subject to final approval by the City Traffic Engineer or Director of Austin Transportation and Public Works. WORKING DRAFT FOR AMENDMENT TO PROJECT CONNECT ORDINANCE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE CHANGES (2) Notwithstanding any provision in Title 25 (Land Development) excluding Chapter 25- 2 (Zoning), the planting of street trees in the right-of-way shall follow the criteria of this subsection. (a) Street trees planted in the right-of-way can have a horizontal clearance from the outer edge of …
Rain to River: Austin Watershed Protection Strategic Plan Review and Adoption Environmental Commission Austin Watershed Protection | April 15, 2026 What is Rain to River? Austin Watershed Protection’s Strategic Plan to Protect Austin’s Creeks and Communities Guiding Blueprint for Department Communication Resource – Establishes our mission, – Helps explain our vision, and values – Sets strategies and direction for the next 10 years work and priorities to staff, policymakers, and the community Note: Rain to River will update and replace the current Watershed Protection Strategic Plan 2 Guiding Principles for the Plan • • • • • • Center the needs of vulnerable populations Engage the community through clear and open communication Align our aspirations with community priorities Strengthen partnerships for greater impact Empower our leaders to advocate for our mission Create a dynamic and inclusive framework 3 Plan Highlights • Our mission remains unchanged to reduce the impacts of flooding, erosion, and water pollution • Reflects how we will strengthen and adapt our work to center community and build resilience • Expands our focus to include community voices, lived experience, and shared stewardship as essential components of our infrastructure • Holistic and proactive approach that balances immediate needs with our long-term vision • Equity not as a one-time initiative, but as an ongoing practice rooted in accountability and trust 4 Our Challenges • Climate change is driving more extreme weather, including more intense storms and prolonged drought • Historic inequities have left some neighborhoods more exposed to flooding and degraded waterways • Urbanization and development add pressure to our natural environment and infrastructure • Housing costs are driving displacement of residents and an increase in people experiencing homelessness 5 Community Engagement • Robust and inclusive process that spanned multiple years • We identified stakeholder groups that have been historically underrepresented in our past planning efforts and worked to engage with them more directly • We partnered with local organizations, community ambassadors, and advocacy groups to reach residents in every district • Engagement took many forms—surveys, interviews, focus groups, neighborhood meetings, and community events 6 Community Activation Group The Community Activation Group (CAG) helped shape the content of the plan and ensured that the diverse voices of our community are integral to the Rain to River planning process and Austin Watershed Protection’s work. • Diverse community leaders with expertise in the environment, community health, and disaster preparedness and recovery • …
REGULAR CALLED MEETING ELECTRIC BOARD Wednesday April 15, 2026 @ 10:00 AM- In Person/Web Ex PERMITTING DEVELOPMENT CENTER/ 1st FLOOR, CONF RM 1401-1402 6310 WILHELMINA DELCO DR AUSTIN, TEXAS Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register, contact rick.arzola@austintexas.gov. CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: David Johnson- Chair; Gabe Flores- Vice Chair; Cochren, Joel; Deschaine, David; Grant, Michael; Goss, Delwin; Hernandez, Joseph; King, Kenny; Shope, Victoria; Wallace, Rogelio CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES- 1. Approve the minutes of the Electrical Board Regular Called Meeting of January 21, 2026 DISCUSSION 2. Update on Austin Energy Disconnect program team on any changes to the contractor registration or disconnect program 3. Update with Austin Energy metering team on the proposed changes in the Austin Energy Criteria Manual 4. Update on the 2026 National Electrical Code ordinance. 5. Discussion on Commercial Plan Review update; Submittals, on time ratio and staffing. 6. Discussion on Building and Trade Contractor Service update; permit application process, turnaround times and staffing. 7. Discussion with Commercial and Residential Inspection staff on updates regarding staff vacancies and timely inspections. DISCUSSION AND ACTION 8. Conduct officer elections for the Chair and V. Chair FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Rick Arola at Austin Development Services Department, at 512-974-2417 or rick.arzola@austintexas.gov, to request service or for additional information. For more rick.arzola@austintexas.gov information on the Electrical Board please contact Rick Arzola at 512-974-2417 and
REGULAR CALLED MEETING OF THE ECONOMIC PROSPERITY COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, APRIL 15, 2026, 6:30 PM AUSTIN CITY HALL, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ROOM, #1101 301 WEST 2ND STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 Some members of the Economic Prosperity Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Chelsea Pfeifer at chelsea.pfeifer@austintexas.gov or 512-974-2498. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Commissioner Appointment Nicole Tomaszewski Ofelia Zapata District 1 District 2 Raquel Valdez Sanchez (Vice Chair) District 3 Michael Nahas Kevin Roberts Shakeel Rashed CALL TO ORDER District 4 District 5 District 6 PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Commissioner Zain Pleuthner VACANT Appointment District 7 District 8 Aaron Gonzales (Chair) District 9 Aditi Joshi Jake Randall District 10 Mayor The first ten speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Economic Prosperity Commission regular meeting on February 25, 2026 and the Special Called meeting on March 16, 2026. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. Presentation on an Economic Snapshot of Central Texas. Presentation by Chair Gonzales. 3. Discussion of priority initiatives related to the use of Artificial Intelligence as it relates to construction and job creation. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION 4. Approve a revised version of Recommendation 20251119-010: Pensions and OPEB Benefits based on additional information received from stakeholders. Approve an impact assessment framework and recommendation approval guidelines for the Economic Prosperity Commission. Conduct officer elections for the Chair and Vice Chair. 5. 6. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Chelsea Pfeifer at the Austin City Clerk’s Office, at 512-974-2498 or chelsea.pfeifer@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional information. For more information on the …
ECONOMIC PROSPERITY COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2026 ECONOMIC PROSPERITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2026 The Economic Prosperity Commission convened in a regular meeting on Wednesday, February 25, 2026 at Permitting and Development Center, Rooms 1401 & 1402, 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive, Austin, Texas. Chair Gonzales called the Economic Prosperity Commission Meeting to order at 6:47 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Aaron Gonzales, Chair Aditi Joshi Michael Nahas Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Jacob Randall Nicole Tomaszewski Ofelia Zapata PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Economic Prosperity Commission Regular Meeting on January 21, 2026. The minutes from the Economic Prosperity Commission regular meeting on January 21, 2026 were approved on Commissioner Joshi’s motion and Commissioner Nahas’ second on a 6-0 vote. Vice Chair Valdez Sanchez and Commissioners Cantu, Rashed, and Pleuthner were absent. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. Discussion regarding the city’s FY 2026-27 budget process. Discussed. 1 ECONOMIC PROSPERITY COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2026 3. 4. 5. Discussion regarding the city’s boards & commissions bylaw amendment process. Chair Gonzales made a motion to postpone Items 3, 6 and 7 to the March 18, 2026 regular meeting, seconded by Commissioner Joshi. The motion did not pass, on a 5-1 vote. Commissioner Nahas voted nay. Vice Chair Valdez Sanchez and Commissioners Cantu, Rashed, and Pleuthner were absent. Discussed. Discussion regarding priority policy areas for potential Working Groups. Discussed. Update on outreach efforts regarding Recommendation 20251119-010: Pensions and OPEB Benefits. Update was given by Commissioner Nahas. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 6. 7. Approve a revised version of Recommendation 20251119-010: Pensions and OPEB Benefits based on additional information received from stakeholders. Chair Gonzales made a motion to postpone Items 3, 6 and 7 to the March 18, 2026 regular meeting, seconded by Commissioner Joshi. The motion did not pass, on a 5-1 vote. Commissioner Nahas voted nay. Vice Chair Valdez Sanchez and Commissioners Cantu, Rashed, and Pleuthner were absent. Withdrawn due to lack of quorum. Approve an impact assessment framework and recommendation approval guidelines for the Economic Prosperity Commission. Chair Gonzales made a motion to postpone Items 3, 6 and 7 to the March 18, 2026 regular meeting, seconded by Commissioner Joshi. The motion did not pass, on a 5-1 vote. Commissioner Nahas voted nay. Vice Chair Valdez Sanchez and Commissioners Cantu, Rashed, and Pleuthner were absent. Withdrawn due to lack of quorum. Chair …
ECONOMIC PROSPERITY COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES MARCH 16, 2026 ECONOMIC PROSPERITY COMMISSION SPECIAL CALLED MEETING MINUTES MONDAY, MARCH 16, 2026 The Economic Prosperity Commission convened in a special called meeting on Monday, March 16, 2026 at Austin City Hall, 301 W. 2nd Street, Austin, Texas. Chair Gonzales called the Economic Prosperity Commission Meeting to order at 5:09 P.M. Commissioners in Attendance: Aaron Gonzales, Chair Michael Nahas Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Aditi Joshi Zain Pleuthner Jacob Randall Shakeel Rashed Nicole Tomaszewski Raquel Valdez Sanchez PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 1. Approve a revised version of Recommendation 20251119-010: Pensions and OPEB Benefits based on additional information received from stakeholders. The recommendation and possible amendments were discussed. The following amendment was made by Chair Gonzales and seconded by Vice Chair Valdez Sanchez. The amendment was to reinsert the following sections that were previously struck through: “WHEREAS, the City of Austin’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report says “The deficit in governmental unrestricted net position is largely due to the net 1 ECONOMIC PROSPERITY COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES MARCH 16, 2026 pension liability of $2.3 billion and other postemployment benefits (OPEB) liability of $1.9 billion.” AND “Request that the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) require a prudent, financially conservative discount rate and use it for the liabilities used to calculate the City’s total governmental activities net position.” The motion to approve the amendment failed on a 3-3 vote with Chair Gonzales, Vice Chair Valdez Sanchez and Commissioner Joshi voting Aye, and Commissioners Pleuthner, Randall and Tomaszewski voting Nay. Commissioners Nahas and Rashed abstained. Commissioner Zapata was absent. The motion to approve the recommendation without amending was made by Chair Gonzales and seconded by Vice Chair Valdez Sanchez. Chair Gonzales called the question. Commissioner Tomaszewski objected to calling the question. The motion to proceed with calling the question failed on a 3-5 vote with Chair Gonzales, Vice Chair Valdez Sanchez and Commissioner Joshi voting Aye, and Commissioners Pleuthner, Randall, Tomaszewski, Nahas and Rashed voting Nay. Commissioner Zapata was absent. Chair Gonzales withdrew the item without objection. 2. Approve an impact assessment framework and recommendation approval guidelines for the Economic Prosperity Commission. Withdrawn without objection. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Approve a revised version of the pension recommendation. Approve an impact assessment framework and recommendation approval guidelines. Chair Gonzales made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 6:18 p.m., seconded by Commissioner Joshi and passed on a unanimous vote. …
. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Economic Prosperity Commission Recommendation Number: 20260415-004: Revision to Pensions and OPEB Benefits Recommendation Rationale: The Economic Prosperity Commission previously issued a recommendation regarding pensions. After further discussion among commission members and the receipt of additional information, the Commission determined it appropriate to revisit and refine its prior recommendation, including the addition and removal of provisions. Retirement pensions are of significant importance to the community. In light of questions raised by members of the public, the Commission believes clarification and refinement of its earlier recommendation are warranted. The purpose of this recommendation is to reduce risks to the City’s future budgets, thereby strengthening the City’s financial position as the guarantor of employee benefits and ensuring that the greatest possible share of public funds is directed toward benefit payments rather than interest costs. This document constitutes a recommendation only. It is not binding and does not establish or modify City policy in any way. It represents the advice of volunteer commissioners to the Austin City Council. Any action to adopt, modify, or reject these recommendations rests solely with the City Council. These recommendations were developed based on the information presented to the Commission. Because the members of the Commission are not all financial professionals, the Commission strongly advises that each recommendation be reviewed by qualified financial professionals before being implemented in law. As with any recommendation, legal counsel should be consulted to ensure the City of Austin has the lawful authority to implement any action it may choose to pursue. WHEREAS, City Council created the Economic Prosperity Commission to advise the council on matters related to job creation and the City of Austin is one of the largest employers in Austin and retirement benefits make up a large percentage of the compensation of City of Austin employees. WHEREAS, City Council created the Economic Prosperity Commission to advise the council on matters related to job creation and the financial health of the City of Austin’s government is a signal used by employers to decide where to create jobs. . WHEREAS, the City of Austin’s retirement liabilities are large and have grown over the last decade. Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for FY2025 on page 4 says “The deficit in governmental unrestricted net position is largely due to the net pension liability of $2.2 billion and other postemployment benefits (OPEB) liability of $771.7 million.”. While the absolute value of the …
Austin/Travis County 2025 Community Health Assessment Executive Summary • • • • • Region of 1.3+ million residents with rapid growth and increasing diversity Health inequities follow lines of race, income, and geography—reflecting systemic barriers Key challenges: housing instability, mental health crisis, healthcare access gaps Nearly 1/4 of households are ALICE (Asset-Limited, Income-Constrained, Employed) Community resilience and grassroots leadership offer pathways forward Population Characteristics 1.3+ Million Travis County residents (2023) Demographic Profile • • • • Hispanic/Latine residents: ~1/3 of population Nearly 30% speak language other than English at home Population aging: growing share of older adults (65+) Need for culturally responsive & age-friendly services critical Economic Stability: The ALICE Challenge ~24% Households classified as ALICE • ALICE = Asset-Limited, Income-Constrained, Employed (working but unable to afford basics) Key Economic Barriers • • • Stagnant wages while housing & living costs rise rapidly Renters: nearly 50% spend >30% of income on housing Food insecurity, especially among children, remains challenge Healthcare Access Disparities 1 in 7 Travis County residents under 65 uninsured Access Barriers • • • • Coverage gaps disproportionately affect Black, Latino, and immigrant communities Cost, transportation, and language barriers prevent timely preventive care Primary care & behavioral health services limited in under-resourced neighborhoods Delays in diagnosis and treatment from access gaps Mental Health: Widespread Community Concern Rising Distress Across Groups • Youth and young adults: academic stress, social isolation, trauma • Working mothers: caregiving burden, financial strain, burnout • Communities experiencing poverty and trauma: compounded stress System Barriers • Fragmented, often inaccessible system of care • Workforce shortages, stigma, and cultural disconnects limit service use Chronic Disease: Disproportionate Impact Prevalent Conditions • • Diabetes, hypertension, asthma remain widespread, especially in low-income communities Risk factors tied to environmental conditions: poor nutrition, limited physical activity Root Causes • • Neighborhoods lack: sidewalks, transit, grocery stores, healthcare facilities, green space Environmental hazards (extreme heat, flooding) disproportionately affect vulnerable areas Housing Instability: A Core Health Driver The Crisis • • Renters: ~50% spend more than 30% of income on housing Rising displacement, overcrowding, unaffordable rents undermine health Health Consequences • • • Difficulty managing chronic conditions with unstable housing Limited access to basic services (utilities, healthcare) when displaced Gentrification and exclusion from economic opportunity perpetuate inequity Place-Based Inequities: East & Southeast Austin Persistent Geographic Disparities • • Black and Latine residents in East/Southeast Travis County face compounded disadvantages Higher rates of: chronic …
Austin EPC | AI Policy Recommendation | DRAFT Austin Economic Prosperity Commission DRAFT POLICY RECOMMENDATION Ideation Phase Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Austin Residents: Labor Market and Economic Security March 2026 Commissioner Jake Randall (Policy Champion) Commissioner Tomaszewski Commissioner Joshi Commissioner Rashed Prepared for internal commissioner discussion. This document does not represent a formal position of the Economic Prosperity Commission. Submitted for Commissioner review and working-group discussion consistent with EPC bylaws. Draft for Commissioner Review Page 1 Austin EPC | AI Policy Recommendation | DRAFT Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 2. Impact Snapshot (Preliminary) 3. Relevant Context 4. Glossary of Key Terms 5. Supporting Detail and Analysis 5.1 Problem Statement 5.2 Three Analytical Components Within the Ideation Phase 5.3 Preliminary Impact Hypothesis, Baseline Findings, and Measurement Plan 5.4 Feasibility Constraints 5.5 Policy and Program Options 5.6 Key Risks and Mitigations 6. Stakeholder Signals and Map (External) 7. Recommended Next Steps (60-Day Plan) 7.1 Days 1–15: Baseline Assembly 7.2 Days 15–40: Impact Estimation and Stakeholder Input 7.3 Days 40–60: Policy Design and Synthesis 7.4 Evidence Status: Verified, Preliminary, or Removed 8. References Draft for Commissioner Review Page 2 Austin EPC | AI Policy Recommendation | DRAFT 1. Executive Summary Austin should approach AI as a labor-market issue first, not only as a technology issue. The key policy question is straightforward: how is AI likely to affect the labor market and economic security of Austin residents, and how should the City prepare? Within the Commission’s construction and job creation mandate, this brief focuses primarily on job creation, job retention, and resident economic security, while treating construction as a secondary but relevant channel where AI-related infrastructure may increase local skilled-trades demand. Austin enters the AI paradigm shift with both strengths and vulnerabilities. The Austin metro has a large professional and technical workforce, low unemployment, and a durable base in computer and mathematical work. The city also has a highly educated population and high incomes. At the same time, Austin has many residents in office support, sales, food service, customer-facing, and other occupations where task change can create uneven effects across households. The current evidence does not justify alarmist claims about large, immediate job loss. Published research is more cautious: AI is likely to change tasks first, especially in cognitive and clerical work, before broad labor-market effects become visible. Early evidence also suggests that exposure is different from displacement. Some workers in highly …
Companion Summary Document of changes for Commissioners Total Items Reviewed: 16 ● 🟢🟢 No Change: 3 ● 🔵🔵 Revised for Clarity or Scope: 5 ● 🟣🟣 Amendment Pending Vote: 3 ● 🔴🔴 Removed by Mutual Agreement: 6 ● 1 item added 1. November Recommendation: The City should establish a defined-contribution plan to pay for OPEB for all employees hired after the plan was created. This is a legal trust where a fixed percentage of wages should be put into the fund to pay for OPEB benefits during each employees’ retirement. 2. November Recommendation: The City should continue to explore the cheapest way to provide medical care to existing retirees. This includes studying Chicago’s plan to use the Affordable Care Act, known as ObamaCare, as a way to get medical coverage for retirees. April Recommendation: Items 1 and 2 from the November recommendation were consolidated and refined in the following April recommendation. The City of Austin should continue to explore the most cost effective way to administer the Other Post Employment Benefit (OPEB) plan and contractually guarantee high quality medical care to existing and new retirees. This provision is intended to allow the city to provide the same if not better level of medical care for retirees while utilizing cost sharing federal programs and subsidies to reduce city costs. This includes studying Chicago’s plan to use the Affordable Care Act, known as ObamaCare, as a way to get medical coverage for retirees. Rationale: Removes defined contribution plan (401k) provision. Separates the dedicated (Other Post Employment Benefits) OPEB fund into a separate recommendation, and removes that this plan funding should be from a fixed percentage of wages. Makes clear the intent of this policy. —---------------- 3. November Recommendation: The City Budget’s “Taxpayer Impact Statement” page should include the per-ratepayer change in the City’s “total governmental activities net position” for the previous year. April Recommendation AMENDMENT: This item is no longer a part of the resolution’s recommendation. It is an amendment and should it be voted by a majority of commissioners in favor, it will be included in the April recommendation. The april language reads as “To avoid similar problems in the future, the residents of Austin should be informed when the City is losing money and taxes will have to be increased in the future to pay it back. The amount per ratepayer should be included in the City Budget’s “Taxpayer Impact …
. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Economic Prosperity Commission Recommendation Number: [YYYYMMDD-XXX]: Revision to Pensions and OPEB Benefits Recommendation Rationale: The Economic Prosperity Commission previously issued a recommendation regarding pensions. After further discussion among commission members and the receipt of additional information, the Commission determined it appropriate to revisit and refine its prior recommendation, including the addition and removal of provisions. Retirement pensions are of significant importance to the community. In light of questions raised by members of the public, the Commission believes clarification and refinement of its earlier recommendation are warranted. The purpose of this recommendation is to reduce risks to the City’s future budgets, thereby strengthening the City’s financial position as the guarantor of employee benefits and ensuring that the greatest possible share of public funds is directed toward benefit payments rather than interest costs. This document constitutes a recommendation only. It is not binding and does not establish or modify City policy in any way. It represents the advice of volunteer commissioners to the Austin City Council. Any action to adopt, modify, or reject these recommendations rests solely with the City Council. These recommendations were developed based on the information presented to the Commission. Because the members of the Commission are not all financial professionals, the Commission strongly advises that each recommendation be reviewed by qualified financial professionals before being implemented in law. As with any recommendation, legal counsel should be consulted to ensure the City of Austin has the lawful authority to implement any action it may choose to pursue. WHEREAS, City Council created the Economic Prosperity Commission to advise the council on matters related to job creation and the City of Austin is one of the largest employers in Austin and retirement benefits make up a large percentage of the compensation of City of Austin employees. WHEREAS, City Council created the Economic Prosperity Commission to advise the council on matters related to job creation and the financial health of the City of Austin’s government is a signal used by employers to decide where to create jobs. . WHEREAS, the City of Austin’s retirement liabilities are large and have grown over the last decade. Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for FY2025 on page 4 says “The deficit in governmental unrestricted net position is largely due to the net pension liability of $2.2 billion and other postemployment benefits (OPEB) liability of $771.7 million.”. While the absolute value of the …
. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Economic Prosperity Commission Recommendation Number: 20251119-010: Pensions and OPEB Benefits WHEREAS, City Council created the Economic Prosperity Commission to advise the council on matters related to job creation and the City of Austin is one of the largest employers in Austin and retirement benefits make up a large percentage of the compensation of City of Austin employees. WHEREAS, City Council created the Economic Prosperity Commission to advise the council on matters related to job creation and the financial health of the City of Austin’s government is a signal used by employers to decide where to create jobs. WHEREAS, the City of Austin’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report says “The deficit in governmental unrestricted net position is largely due to the net pension liability of $2.3 billion and other postemployment benefits (OPEB) liability of $1.9 billion.”. WHEREAS, the Legacy Liability of all 3 pensions is expected to increase. The police pension’s increases until 2030, COAERS until 2031, and the firefighter’s until 2032. WHEREAS, the payments to reduce the Legacity Liability will exceed $190 million in 2028. And those payments will continue until 2051 for the police pension, until 2053 for COAERS, and until 2055 for the firefighters’. WHEREAS, the City of Austin has not saved any money to pay for “other post-employment benefits” (OPEB), such as medical care. WHEREAS, the City of Austin is not legally required to provide OPEB and employees have no guarantee that OPEB will continue. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Economic Prosperity Commission makes the following recommendations: • • The City should establish a defined-contribution plan to pay for OPEB for all employees hired after the plan was created. This is a legal trust where a fixed percentage of wages should be put into the fund to pay for OPEB benefits during each employees’ retirement. The City should continue to explore the cheapest way to provide medical care to existing retirees. This includes studying Chicago’s plan to use the Affordable Care Act, known as ObamaCare, as a way to get medical coverage for retirees. . • • • • The City Budget’s “Taxpayer Impact Statement” page should include the per-ratepayer change in the City’s “total governmental activities net position” for the previous year. The pensions’ rules should be simulated under random expected conditions (for example, shuffled historical data) and varying assumptions. The output of those simulations should include the range of values …
City of Austin | Economic Prosperity Commission Impact Framework and Procedural Guidance January 21st, 2026 City of Austin | Economic Prosperity Commission Impact Framework and Procedural Guidance Executive Summary This document attempts to establish a clear, shared operating framework for the Austin Economic Prosperity Commission to improve consistency, effectiveness, and accountability in its policy work. The document attempts to define how the Commission measures success, how policy ideas should be developed from concept to Council-ready recommendation, and how potential initiatives are evaluated for impact, feasibility, and readiness. By articulating a North Star Metric and a standardized policy development process, the document is intended to support both new and tenured Commissioners in producing high- quality, actionable recommendations that are well-aligned with City priorities and capable of achieving necessary external buy-in. City of Austin | Economic Prosperity Commission Impact Framework and Procedural Guidance January 21st, 2026 Table of Contents I. Context & Purpose of Document II. Scope of Recommendations III. North Star Metric Definition IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. Communications and Representation Guidelines Impact Assessment Framework Phased Policy Development Workflow Policy Recommendation Template Example Policy Recommendation City of Austin | Economic Prosperity Commission Impact Framework and Procedural Guidance January 21st, 2026 I. Context & Purpose of Document Situational Context: The Economic Prosperity Commission has benefited from the addition of new Commissioners that bring fresh perspectives and expertise. However, newer Commissioners have at times expressed difficulty orienting to the Commission’s core goals, the metrics that define Commission success, and the practical mechanics of forming an initial idea into a well-formed, Council-ready policy recommendation. Historically, the Commission has been unclear on how policy potential is assessed, how Commission success is measured, and how both internal and external policy alignment are achieved. Document Purpose: The purpose of this document is to provide a shared operating context for Commissioners. The document attempts to establish a clear North Star Metric for defining Commission output and success, and it lays out a standardized process for policy development, including a structured rubric for assessing the potential impact, feasibility, and readiness of policy initiatives. The intent is to improve clarity, consistency, and effectiveness across Commission work, while supporting Commissioners in their efforts to produce high-quality, actionable recommendations for City Council and adhering to Commission bylaws. City of Austin | Economic Prosperity Commission Impact Framework and Procedural Guidance January 21st, 2026 II. Scope of Recommendations The Economic Prosperity Commission may advance …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE DOWNTOWN COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, APRIL 15, 2026 AT 5:30 P.M. AUSTIN CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, ROOM 1001 301 W 2ND ST. AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Downtown Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Ryan Sperling, 512-974-3568, ryan.sperling@austintexas.gov CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Ed Ishmael, Chair Rebecca Bernhardt Pat Buchta David Carroll Kevin Chen Liz Coufal Jennifer Franklin Kimberly Levinson, Vice Chair Nathan McDaniel Charles Peveto Nancy Pollak Sania Shifferd Joe Silva Philip Wiley AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first ten speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Downtown Commission regular meeting of March 11, 2026. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Briefing regarding updates to the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan. Presentation by Chris Ryerson, Division Manager and Evelyn Mitchell, Planner Principal, Austin Planning. 3. Briefing regarding Downtown Density Bonus Phase I Updates. Briefing by Nicholas Smith, Planner Senior and Stevie Greathouse, Capital Program Consultant, Austin Planning. DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. Presentation providing a general update on progress and plans for the new Austin Convention Center. Presentation by Katy Zamesnik, Interim Director, Austin Convention Center. 5. Presentation regarding the Red River Cultural District’s economic impact on the downtown area. Presentation by Nicole Klepadlo, Executive Director, Red River Cultural District. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 6. Approve a recommendation to Council regarding renaming Cesar Chavez Street. 7. Conduct officer elections for Chair and Vice Chair. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Ryan Sperling at the Austin City Clerk’s Office, at 512-974-3568 or ryan.sperling@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional …
REGULAR MEETING DOWNTOWN COMMISSION MINUTES WEDNESDAY, MARCH 11, 2026 The Downtown Commission convened in a regular meeting on Wednesday, March 11, 2026 at 301 W 2nd St. in Austin, Texas. Vice Chair Levinson called the Downtown Commission Meeting to order at 5:46 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Kimberly Levinson (Vice Chair) Pat Buchta David Carroll Sania Shifferd Joe Silva Phillip Wiley Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Ed Ishmael (Chair) Kevin Chen Gina Houston PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Downtown Commission regular meeting of February 18, 2026. The February 18, 2026 minutes were approved on Commissioner Buchta’s motion, Commissioner Shifferd’s second on a 6-0 vote. Commissioners Coufal, Gelles, McDaniel, Peveto, and Pollak were absent. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. Update on the Central City District Plan. Presentation by Shanisha Johnson, Planner Principal, Austin Planning; Aaron A. May, AICP, Associate Principal, AECOM; and Sean P. Tapia, AICP, ENV SP, Digital and Geospatial, AECOM. 1 The presentation was made by Shanisha Johnson, Planner Principal, Austin Planning; Aaron A. May, AICP, Associate Principal, AECOM; and Sean P. Tapia, AICP, ENV SP, Digital and Geospatial, AECOM. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 3. Approve budget recommendations for the City of Austin FY2026-27 budget. The budget recommendation for the City of Austin FY2026-27 budget was approved on Chair Ishmael’s motion, Vice Chair Levinson’s second on a 6-0 vote. Commissioners Coufal, Gelles, McDaniel, Peveto, and Pollak were absent. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Report on cultural funding for programs from the Arts Commission. ADJOURNMENT Vice Chair Levinson adjourned the meeting at 6:48 p.m. without objection. 2
Imagine Austin Update Austin Planning | April 15, 2026 AGENDA Why Updating Imagine Austin Matters Overview of the Past Six Months Project Goals and Scope Advisory Groups Imagine Austin Plan Framework Imagine Austin Implementation Compact & Connected Project Timeline 2 Why Updating Imagine Austin Matters Provides a guiding framework Turning community, Council, and department priorities into actionable programs Cross-departmental alignment and collaboration Breaking down silos so departments can work together more easily and effectively Provides a strong foundation for decision making Guides choices with up-to-date policies and alignment across citywide plans Strengthens how the City operates Building a more proactive city 3 Overview of the Past Six Months AUG 28, 2025 SEP - NOV 2025 NOV 20, 2025 NOV 2025 - PRESENT Resolution Adopted Consultant Selected and Onboarded City Council Reallocated $1.5M of IA’s $3M Budget Project Rescoping Phase • Refined scope based on reduced project budget • Identified staff tasks and internal responsibilities 4 Project Goals Develop a Place Types map to support consistent land use planning throughout Austin that helps achieve citywide goals while recognizing the needs of different communities. Create regular engagement opportunities with the community. Update policies to provide clear guidance for current and future planning and decision-making. Refine the plan document for clearer organization and to be more user-friendly. Strengthen alignment between Imagine Austin and other citywide strategic plans to provide clearer direction and consistency. 5 Project Scope CONSULTANT LED CITY STAFF LED Project Support Existing Conditions and Future Trends Assessment Task 0 Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Engagement Vision and Goals Task 4 Priority Programs and Policies Land Use Goals and Policies Task 5 Place Types Palette and Methodology Place Types Map Task 6 Task 7 Task 8 Task 9 Plan Alignment Implementation Document Design Task 10 Plan Writing 6 Imagine Austin Community Working Group Evaluation and Selection Process Applications: ~360 applications Evaluation Committee comprised of seven departments Austin Communications and Engagement Austin Development Services Austin Housing Austin Planning Austin Public Health Austin Watershed Protection Final Working Group 45 members - aimed to reflect City of Austin demographics as closely as possible Duration: 5-6 meetings – Spring 2026 to Summer 2027 Goal: Support with the creation of the Place Types Map and policy revisions 7 …
Downtown Density Bonus Phase 1 – Proposal Austin Planning | Downtown Commission | 04/15/2026 Agenda • • • Background Existing Program & Process Proposed Changes • Urban Design Standards • Community Benefits | • Downtown Density Bonus Process • Stakeholder Engagement and Timeline 2 Background City Council Resolution Downtown Density Bonus Update Resolution No. 20240718-185 in July 2024 directed staff to update the Downtown Density Bonus (DDB) program Requested: Updates to gatekeeper requirements Integration of Rainey subdistrict Creation of new subdistricts Prioritization of accessibility and shade opportunities Simplification of the affordability program Alignment of the program with the Equitable Transit-Oriented Development (ETOD) overlay. Downtown Density Bonus – Phase 1 In response to Senate Bill 840, Council adopted Ordinance No. 20251023-063, which amended the Central Business District Zone and directed staff to update the DDB program by June 2026 for three DDB subdistricts 4 Existing Program & Process Phase 1 - Existing Height & FAR Map After the recent adoption of the Central Business District Zone amendments and updates to the DDB, the three subdistricts in Phase 1 have the following entitlements available via the DDB program: Core Subdistrict – 350ft of height and 25:1 FAR* Rainey Subdistrict – 350ft of height and 15:1 FAR* Convention Center Subdistrict – 350ft of height and 15:1 FAR* Applicants can request Council approval to exceed these entitlements *FAR limits are only applicable to commercial developments 6 Proposed Changes Phase I – Proposed Applicability Revised to remove the Red River Cultural District from Phase I To be updated and included in Phase II of the DDB Update DDB is a voluntary program Supersedes the following overlays: Capitol Dominance Overlay Equitable Transit-Oriented Development Density Bonus Waterfront Overlay 8 Phase I – Combining Districts Each combining district will have different entitlements/requirements. Phase I will create 2 combining districts: DDB400 has +400 ft DDB850 has +850 ft Additional height is additive to the property’s base zoning height limit E.g., a CBD-DDB400 site could build up to 750 ft (350 ft base height + 400 bonus ft) Sites will be rezoned into DDB400 in Phase I. Sites will be eligible to request rezoning into DDB850 through the standard rezoning process. Max height cannot be exceeded by Council approval. …
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Downtown Commission Recommendation Number_________________________: RENAMING CESAR CHAVEZ STREET Recommendation: WHEREAS: the 1839 City of Austin City Plan the downtown street running parallel to and north shore of the Colorado River was named Water Avenue; and WHEREAS: in 1884, the Austin City Council renamed Water Avenue to 1st Street in an effort to modernize and simplify downtown navigation; and WHEREAS: in 1993, after his death, local community leaders petitioned the City to rename a major street after Cesar Chavez as a way of recognizing the contributions of the local Latino community and the progress in farm labor conditions achieved by the farm labor movement founded in part by him; and WHERAS; Latinos make up roughly a third of Austin’s population and have contributed immeasurably to the history, vibrance, culture and character of the City; and WHEREAS: the contributions of that community and that of the United Farm Workers organization are worthy of recognition; and WHEREAS: recent, disturbing allegations—corroborated by several victims—have caused many to re-evaluate the propriety of honoring Cesar Chavez with an Austin city street named for him; and WHEREAS: many City Council Members, Community Leaders, and Business owners, are on record supporting a street name change; and WHEREAS: the City Manager has stated that the City “firmly believe[s] that the right thing to do is move forward to remove his name from the street that runs through the heart of our city” and to do so “in partnership with our community, particularly those groups who have long supported the farmworkers movement and championed civil rights”; and WHEREAS: the renaming of the street should be a thoughtful process that engages key stakeholders and community leaders; and WHEREAS, a core value in our City is respecting the dignity and autonomy of its citizen; and WHEREAS, today, more than ever, when many of our national and state leaders venerate toxic masculinity, celebrate cruelty, embody a might equals right mentality, and work tirelessly to erode the autonomy of women over their own bodies, it is incumbent upon us to, whenever possible, take a stand in opposition to anyone who shows themselves to be less than fully respectful of each individual’s right of bodily self-determination. NOW THEREFORE it is the considered recommendation of the Downtown Commission that the City Manager, as soon as possible, initiate a process of community and stakeholder engagement to determine the most appropriate and expeditious path for: 1. …
