ARMBRUST & BROWN, PLLC A T T O R N E Y S A N D C O U N S E L O R S 100 CONGRESS AVENUE, SUITE 1300 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701-2744 512-435-2300 FACSIMILE 512-435-2360 July 30, 2021 MICHAEL J. WHELLAN (512) 435-2320 mwhellan@abaustin.com Via Email Kimberly McNeeley, Director City of Austin Parks and Recreation Department 200 S. Lamar Blvd. Austin, TX 78704 Re: Parkland Appeal for SP-2020-0419C Director McNeeley, Please accept this letter as an official notice of appeal pursuant to Section 25-1-605(F) of the Land Development Code. I am submitting this appeal due to the decision made by the City of Austin Parks and Recreation Department (“PARD”) to reject the parkland dedication proposal described in this letter related to the Vertical Mixed-Use project with income-restricted affordable units proposed in site plan SP-2020-0419C (“the Project”). I am also providing the following information, as required by Section 25-1-183: Appellant Name: Appellant Address: Appellant Phone: Appellant Status: Appealed Decision: Date of Decision: Reasons for Appeal: Michael J. Whellan 100 Congress Ave., Suite 1300 512-435-2300 Agent for property owner. Parkland dedication determination (described below). July 27, 2021 As described below. Our team reached out to PARD last summer, in August 2020, to discuss the Project and the configuration of on-site parkland. We then officially submitted a site plan application in late November 2020, and received our first comments from PARD in February 2021. For nearly a year, we have engaged extensively with PARD regarding the configuration of our parkland and ways to meet PARD’s requirements, including obtaining Austin Energy’s approval to implement parkland improvements within an existing electrical easement area. This easement area – roughly 3,740 sf of amenitized space achieved through the applicant’s efforts – would expand the usable parkland area above and beyond the space owed by the applicant. The applicant undertook this effort to help meet PARD’s desire for additional space and is not requesting any parkland dedication credit for this area. {W1063188.4} The Project is located in an Imagine Austin Center (Highland Mall Station) and is surrounded on three sides by Transit Priority Network roadways, marking it as a priority area for additional housing, and especially for long-term, affordable, income-restricted housing, which the Project will provide. Fully embracing affordable housing in these areas is particularly important given that the city has progress to make on its affordable housing goals. …
305 S. Congress PUD Presentation to the Parks and Recreation Board September 14, 2021 Atha Phillips Environmental Program Coordinator Environmental Officer’s Office Scott Grantham Planner Principal, Park Planning Parks & Recreation Department Agenda • Proposed PUD environmental attributes and status • Proposed superiority • Code modifications • Staff evaluation • Staff proposed conditions for superiority Proposed PUD Lady Bird Lake Staff Evaluation - Environmental 1. PUD proposes to develop portions of the critical water quality zone and floodplain. Redundant concrete paths along with proposed vending in the future will exacerbate erosion. Proposing to cap impervious cover at 24.5% within the critical water quality zone, code allows 5% and Waterfront Overlay allows 15%. 2. Staff understands the need for a public viewing area and heavier programming on the west side of the park. Staff has offered in exchange for more development on the west side of the park , the east side should be restored to a more natural state. This would include relocating the trail a minimum of 25’ from the shoreline and moving all water quality to this area. 3. The restrictions proposed on the dedicated parkland by the applicant will not allow for the design necessary to achieve the environmental goals. There are areas on the west side of the property that are more suited to programming. This area near Congress bridge is full of ragweed and has no trees, it is where shoreline access including the pier and stairs should be located. There are areas throughout the shoreline that are eroding and need to be restored and protected with a split rail fence. There are areas along the trail where water is running downhill across the trail and causing erosion along the shoreline. On the eastern half of the property, the trail lies on the edge of the shoreline and is causing erosion downslope. Staff suggests that the trail be moved a minimum of 25’ from the shoreline in these areas. The area between the trail and the shoreline should be restored. Auditorium Shores example of restoration with access points In exchange for denser development on the west side for bat viewing, staff proposes moving the trail off the shoreline as shown. Staff also proposes moving all water quality ponds as shown and integrating the rain gardens with restoration, alleviating the need for a deep biofiltration pond in the bat viewing area. Staff Evaluation - Parkland 1. …
2016 PLAN vs 2020 MODIFIED PLAN 2016 SCW Plan 2020 Modified SCW Plan DRAFT | October 19, 2020 DRAFT | October 19, 2020 2020 Modified Plan focuses on two properties - Statesman & Crockett. Combined, these two properties reflect 30 acres or roughly 30% of the properties in the SCW District. In the SCW Vision, these two properties contribute 65% of District’s Open Space through the Waterfront Park Sequence and Crockett Square; 70% of District’s New Streets - most notably extension of Barton Springs Road and accommodating the proposed alignment of CapMetro’s Blue Line; and 62% of Projected District Buildout. A fundamental difference between the 2016 Physical Framework and the 2020 Modified Physical Framework is in the location and alignment of future streets and the open space network on the two largest properties – colloquially known as the Statesman Site and the adjacent Crockett Property. R D T F A WAT ERFRONT PARK INT ERNAL ST REETS BARTON SPRINGS EXT ENSION CROCKET T SQUARE Barton Springs E Riverside S C o n g r e s s Statesman Property Crockett Property ENHANCED GREEN CONNECTOR T F ● A ● ● R D ● ● ● Block Structure reflects idealized district vision Barton Springs Alignment: ○ ○ 1.6 acres dedicated right-of-way, primarily on the “Crockett” property Requires co-development and City intervention and funding to complete as envisioned. Open Space Requirements (flexible layout): ○ Waterfront Park - 7.0 acres park ○ Plazas @ “Statesman” - 2.6 acres ○ Plaza @ “Crockett” - Crockett Square - 1.3 acre Block Structure follows the flexible guidelines laid out in the 2016 Plan and reflects on-the-ground realities Barton Springs Alignment: ○ 1.6 acres dedicated right-of-way, primarily on the “Statesman” property Open Space Requirements (flexible layout): ○ Waterfront Park - 7.0 acres - flexible layout ○ ○ ○ Plazas @ “Statesman” - 1.8 acres Plaza @ “Crockett” - Crockett Square - 1.6 acres Enhanced Green Connector @ “Crockett” - 0.6 acres The 2016 Physical Framework assumed a co-development of these two properties that would allow for the primary new collector street, East Barton Springs Road, to cross both properties but primarily built on the Crockett Property. According to the adopted SCW Plan in 2016, this new street and its location would have been facilitated by a recommended development corporation and funded through recommended tax-increment financing. Given that neither of these recommendations have been initiated, the 2016 recommended …
2016 PLAN vs 2020 MODIFIED PLAN 2016 SCW Plan 2020 Modified SCW Plan DRAFT | October 19, 2020 DRAFT | October 19, 2020 2020 Modified Plan focuses on two properties - Statesman & Crockett. Combined, these two properties reflect 30 acres or roughly 30% of the properties in the SCW District. In the SCW Vision, these two properties contribute 65% of District’s Open Space through the Waterfront Park Sequence and Crockett Square; 70% of District’s New Streets - most notably extension of Barton Springs Road and accommodating the proposed alignment of CapMetro’s Blue Line; and 62% of Projected District Buildout. A fundamental difference between the 2016 Physical Framework and the 2020 Modified Physical Framework is in the location and alignment of future streets and the open space network on the two largest properties – colloquially known as the Statesman Site and the adjacent Crockett Property. R D T F A WAT ERFRONT PARK INT ERNAL ST REETS BARTON SPRINGS EXT ENSION CROCKET T SQUARE Barton Springs E Riverside S C o n g r e s s Statesman Property Crockett Property ENHANCED GREEN CONNECTOR T F ● A ● ● R D ● ● ● Block Structure reflects idealized district vision Barton Springs Alignment: ○ ○ 1.6 acres dedicated right-of-way, primarily on the “Crockett” property Requires co-development and City intervention and funding to complete as envisioned. Open Space Requirements (flexible layout): ○ Waterfront Park - 7.0 acres park ○ Plazas @ “Statesman” - 2.6 acres ○ Plaza @ “Crockett” - Crockett Square - 1.3 acre Block Structure follows the flexible guidelines laid out in the 2016 Plan and reflects on-the-ground realities Barton Springs Alignment: ○ 1.6 acres dedicated right-of-way, primarily on the “Statesman” property Open Space Requirements (flexible layout): ○ Waterfront Park - 7.0 acres - flexible layout ○ ○ ○ Plazas @ “Statesman” - 1.8 acres Plaza @ “Crockett” - Crockett Square - 1.6 acres Enhanced Green Connector @ “Crockett” - 0.6 acres The 2016 Physical Framework assumed a co-development of these two properties that would allow for the primary new collector street, East Barton Springs Road, to cross both properties but primarily built on the Crockett Property. According to the adopted SCW Plan in 2016, this new street and its location would have been facilitated by a recommended development corporation and funded through recommended tax-increment financing. Given that neither of these recommendations have been initiated, the 2016 recommended …
DRAFT | October 19, 2020 DRAFT | October 19, 2020 2020 MODIFIED OPEN SPACES The SCW Framework Plan will add approximately 17 acres of open space to the South Central Waterfront. These new parks, plazas and trails serve as destinations for recreation as well as amenities for people who will live and work in the neighborhood. In addition, each park incorporates innovative strategies coordinated across the district to ensure that stormwater is managed and treated before flowing into Bouldin Creek and Lady Bird Lake. SCW Plan identifies four major open space opportunities that anchor the district’s public realm. The interconnected network of green streets and trails connect these open spaces. Code Major Open Spaces Acres Direct Costs* Indirect Costs Total Cost OS1 Waterfront Park & Plazas $33,048,700 $19,697,025 $52,745,725 Open Spaces make up 34% of the Physical Framework Infrastructure Costs at $85,250,220 T F $1,450,153 $864,291 $2,314,444 $5,596,072 $3,335,259 $8,931,331 $10,820,000 $6,448,720 $17,268,720 $2,500,000 $1,490,000 $3,990,000 TOTAL OPEN SPACE COSTS $85,250,220 A 0.58 8.79 5.22 1.6 0.17 R OS2 Green Connector OS3 Bouldin Creek Trail OS4 Crockett Square OS 5 Nightwing Plaza D T F A R D Executive Summary | Introduction | Physical Framework | Financial Framework | City Leadership | Appendices # Executive Summary | Introduction | Physical Framework | Financial Framework | City Leadership | Appendices #
South Central Waterfront Illustrative Vision Plan 2020 IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE > Modified SCW PLAN (The Big Shift) WATERFRONT PARK INTERNAL STREETS BARTON SPRINGS EXTENSION CROCKETT SQUARE E Riverside 2016 SCW Plan ● Block Structure reflects idealized district vision ● Barton Springs Alignment: ○ ○ ○ ○ Requires City Leadership to facilitate cooperation between two major property owners - Cox & Crockett Requires City Initiative and Public Funding to complete the construction Park & Pedestrian Plazas - 9.6 acres; flexible layout Crockett Square - 1 acre plaza; flexible layout + Green Connector ● Open Space Requirements: ● Block Structure follows the flexible guidelines laid out in the 2016 Plan and reflects on- 2020 Modified SCW Plan the-ground realities ● Barton Springs Alignment: follows property boundary between Cox & Crockett Barton Springs on Cox property consistent w/ 2019 PUD proposal ■ This shift requires Cox to dedicate ~1.6 acres to Barton Springs Rd. that would otherwise have been on Crockett ● Open Space Requirements: Key Open Spaces change slightly to accommodate the altered grid structure Cox Property requirement ~ 9 acres Park & Pedestrian Plazas Crockett Property - 1.3 acre plaza; flexible layout + Green Connector 17 ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ CATALYST OPEN SPACES > Placemaking Anchors – The Heart of the Plan 5 2 3 4 1 1. East Bouldin Creek Trail @ the Texas School for the Deaf 2. Barton Springs "Nightwing" Plaza 3. Crockett Square 4. Moton Lane Green Connector 5. Park & Open Spaces @ Statesman site 20 2020 IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE > Multimodal Transportation Network 18 2020 IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE > 7 Street Classifications & 5 Catalyst Open Spaces 19 The SCW Physical Framework provides substantial increases in open space and connectivity for the distrct. 8% 18% 13% 26% Existing Proposed 8% 18% 13% 26% Existing Proposed proposed open space property lines existing open space SCW boundary new right-of-way existing right-of-way Open Space Size (ac) 1.Waterfront Park 2. Bouldin Creek 3. Crocket Plaza 4. Rain Gardens 9.6 6.6 1.8 Bat Viewing Pier Trails and Boardwalks Amphitheater Canopy Walk Terrace Cafe Bridge to One Texas Center Pavilion Deck & Cafe Water Quality Ponds Wetland Preserve Bus Shelter and Bouldin Creek Overlook Performative and Educational Wetland Green Lawn and Amphitheater Marketplace and Cafe Fountain Plaza and Splashpad 1.2 Rain Gardens Ground Floor Retail and Outdoor Seating Sculpture Enhanced Pedestrian and Bike Crossings Key Features Kayak Launch & Rentals Disc Golf Course …
Background The Co-creation Team & Model Community Catalysts ● 30 people selected from a pool of 117 applicants. They are being compensated for their time ● Participants were selected based on displacement risk ● Catalyst group model used to center voices of people with lived experience and greatest risk of displacement 2 Evidence of Displacement: Central East Austin 17% Black 83% White 12% Black 23% Hispanic 62% White Source: “Austin Restricted” (Tretter, 2012) from U.S. Census data 8% Black 35% Hispanic 49% White 3 Evidence of Transit Oriented Displacement: Portland, OR 4 Vision With the help of the Equity Tool, we envision: Austin renowned for its strong communities and inclusive neighborhoods. It's economic and racial diversity as the foundation which fuels the City's innovative and entrepreneurial spirit. Austin that welcomes all incoming ethnic groups, new BIPOC transplants, and values its Native and long time BIPOC residents, businesses and community organizations. We see a future in which Austinites, regardless of race or means, thrive with the power to determine their futures. 5 Racial Equity Drivers Driver One: Prevent Residential, Commercial, and Community Displacement Driver Two: Advance Economic Mobility and Opportunity Driver Three: Build on Local Cultural Assets Driver Four: Promote Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Driver Five: Develop Healthy and Safe Neighborhoods Driver Six: Equitable Access to All Neighborhoods 6 People Black, Indigenous, and People of Color at risk of displacement 7 Places Displacement Risk Areas Image from the Project Connect Racial Equity Anti- Displacement Map Tool showing displacement risk categories and Project Connect lines (Link to online map: https://arcg.is/qr G8C) 8 Places Displacement Risk Areas Image from the Project Connect Racial Equity Anti- Displacement Map Tool showing displacement risk areas within 1 mile of a Project Connect station (Link to online map: https://arcg.is/qrG 8C) 9 Purposes Balanced Allocation Priorities for the Anti- Displacement Fund A balanced approach is needed to address the long history of public and private disinvestment in communities of color Illustration created by Racial Equity Catalyst Jasmine Willis 10 Racial Equity Anti-Displacement Tool Five sections: Community-Driven I. II. Community Priorities III. Community Guardrails IV. Reasonableness (funds only) V. Balanced Portfolio (funds only) Scoring criteria for each section informs project design and funding awards. Each criterion is scored on a range from 5 points for a strong response to 0 points for a weak response. 11 I. Community-Driven Does this proposal advance the community’s vision of racially equitable development, …
Housing Program Production & 2018 GO Bond Update September 2021 Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Housing Program Production Overview FY2020-2021 Production Summary 3 FY2020-2021 Production Summary 4 FY 2020-21 GO Repair Production (through July 2021) 5 FY 2020-21 GO Repair Production (through July 2021) 6 FY 2020-21 GO Repair Production (through July 2021) 7 FY 2020-21 Down Payment Assistance (through July 2021) 8 FY 2020-21 Down Payment Assistance (through July 2021) 9 FY 2020-21 Down Payment Assistance (through July 2021) 10 2018 GO Bond Update Proposition A 2018 Bond Ballot Language 12 2018 Affordable Housing Bond Spend Plan Project Name Prop A- Affordable Housing FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 Total Land Acquisition $ 20 million $30 million $30 million $20 million - $100 million RHDA OHDA $16 million $18 million $20 million $20 million $20 million $94 million $4 million $6 million $6 million $6 million $6 million $28 million Home Repair $2 million $5 million $6 million $7 million $8 million $28 million $42 million $59 million $62 million $53 million $34 million $ 250 million 13 2018 Affordable Housing Bond Encumbrances Project Name Prop A- Affordable Housing Land Acquisition RHDA OHDA FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 Total Balance* - $42,019,000 $35,023,890 $77,042,890 $22,363,564 $16,154,524 $19,653,504 $16,584,211 $52,392,239 $40,223,481 $3,290,000 $5,801,334 $6,225,000 $15,316,334 $12,002,953 Home Repair $1,659,803 $3,871,323 $927,066 $6,458,192 $5,238,359 $21,104,327 $71,345,161 $58,760,167 $151,209,655 $ 79,828,357 *Balance = Total GO Bond allocation – (encumbrances + legal fees + salaries and indirect costs) 14 - - - - - 2018 Affordable Housing Bond Investments Hotel Acquisitions • Texas Bungalows • Country Inn • Candlewood • Townplace 15 2018 Affordable Housing Bond Investments Vi Collina – AHFC Partnership • Oltorf at Pleasant Valley • 170 units • 100% Affordable • January 2022 16 Questions?
Plan Amendment Case #: NPA-2021-0026.01 Zoning Case #: C14-2021-0039 Property Addresses: 10609, 10611, 10613, 10615 Brownie Dr. and 10610, 10612, 10614 Middle Fiskville Rd. Applicant: Brownie & Grady Investments LLC (Mohammad Memon) Agent: Thrower Design Application Proposing: Tract 1 - SF-3-NP (Family Residence District—Neighborhood Plan) to MF-4-NP (Multifamily Residence Moderate-High Density district—Neighborhood Plan) Tract 2 - LR-NP (Neighborhood Commercial district—Neighborhood Plan) to CS-MU—NP (General Commercial Services district—Neighborhood Plan) for multifamily residential and commercial uses. Detrimental Impacts ● Displacement of long-term and life-long residents ● Gentrification ● Further Oppression and systematic racism ● Negative Environmental Impacts including flooding in crease, increased heat, removal of green space and shadowing effect ● Diminished quality of life and health ● Incompatibility with current neighborhood culture and infrastructure ● Traffic & Safety concerns ● Not affordable ● Benefiting Demographic is not to current resident base ● Against what Austin says it stands for Systematic Challenges ● Severe Inequity of Experience and system navigation ● Civic Bullying ● Misleading and incomplete information passed to residents by city staff members, to prevent community involvement Lack of true community engagement with community Severe Inequity of Experience and system navigation Policies that hinder community input Severe Inequity of Experience and system navigation compared with high dollar developers ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Socioeconomic Oppression Systematic Racism Prey on highly minority, english as a second language community Exploitation of blue-collar working class neighborhood Further overlooking of an already dismissed and uncared for minority neighborhood ● Outreach to build community base from scratch ● Learning Curve ● Covid-19 Challenges Environmental, Quality of Life and Health Factors The City of Austin has identified North Austin as a prominent heat island in Austin, with up to 15 degrees hotter than other areas in the city. According to the Office of Sustainability, and outlined in the Climate Equity Plan. 0 3 The shadow effect posed to nearby homes pose to increased illnesses and decline in overall physical and mental health of current long-term residents, including depression, increase suicide rates, diabetes, high blood pressure and migraine headaches. This property is located in the Little Walnut Creek Watershed and development at the proposed scale poses life and property threatening flooding concerns. Heat Mapping - Austin Urban Heat Island Study Area in case review** Average land surface temperatures are shown. Red areas are hottest. Dark blue areas are coolest. Notice the high heat …
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND A NEIGHBORIIOOD PLAN Mailing Date of this Notice: $epl3,2021 Case Number: NPA-20 1 9-0022.01 Este aviso es para informarles de una junta priblica sobre un cambio en el uso de la tierra indicado abaio. Si usted desea recibir informaci6n en espafiol por favor llame al (512) 974-3531. The Housing and Planning Department has received an application for an amendment to the Greater South River City Combined Neighborhood Plan for properfy(ies) referenced below. This notice has been mailed to you because you own property, are a registered environmental or neighborhood organization, or have a utility service address within 500 feet of the subject property. The requested plan amendment will be reviewed and acted on at two public hearings: First, before the Planning Commission and then before the City Council. At a public hearing, the Planning Commission reviews and evaluates City stafPs recommendation and public input and then sends its recommendation to the City Council. For additional information on the City of Austin's Land Development Process, visit our website, http://www.austintexas.gov/planning or to find out more about the Greater South River City Combined Neighborhood Plan, go to h@e/neighborhood-plannins-areas. Owner/Annlicant: Agent: Proiect Name: Proiect Address(es): Related Zonins Case: SPEARHEAD ACADEMY LTD (Chris Wallin) Weiss Architecture Inc (Richard Weiss) - (512\ 924-0433 200 Academy 146%,200,200Y2and204% AcademyDrive and 1006 & 1020 MelissaLane c14-2020-0147 AMENDMENT REQUEST: To change the future land use designation for the specified property within the Greater South River City Combined Neighborhood Plan from Mixed Use/Office to Mixed Use (refer to attached map). LAND USE DEFINITIONS: Mixed Use/Office - An area that is appropriate for a mix of residential and office uses. Mixed Use - An areathat is appropriate for a mix of residential and non-residential uses. This application is scheduled to be heard by the Planning Commission on September 14,2021 beginning at 6:00 p.m. The meeting will be held in-person at City Hall Council Chambers, 301 West 2nd Street but may be viewable online at http://wu,a,v.atxn.ty. Public participation for this Public Hearing will be in-person only and no remote (by telephone) participation will be offered. To participate at this meeting, you must go to City Hall at 301 West 2nd Street and attend in-person. For additional information on how to participate in the meeting, please contact the case manager listed below by email or phone or go to the Planning Commission website: http :iiwrnw.austintexas. govlcontent/planning-commission. If you …
AUS AAC - 2022 Budget FY22 Aviation – Budget Highlights Revenues Revenues going up $35.6M from FY21 Budget to FY22 Proposed, driven by higher enplanements and higher aircraft operations. Enplanements projected to be at 6.8M versus FY21 estimate of 3.7M. Revenue per enplanement: $21.77 in FY21 Budget to $23.53 in FY22 Budget. Operating Requirements No increase to budgeted FTE’s. Instead, reducing vacancies from 99 to 40 in FY22 to maintain service levels. Airport operating expenses going up $1.2M from FY21 to FY22 Proposed. City allocations down ($1.9M). Debt (net of PFC) is going up $6.7M year over year. Cares Act and CRRSA federal funds application to debt estimated to go down from $30.1M in FY21 Budget to $14.6M in FY22 Budget. No ARPA funds budgeted in FY22 due to FAA guidance delay and final figures allocation to airports. 1 Enplanement Forecast FY21-25 FY22 Mid case enplanements forecasted to be 81% of 2019; 6.8M enplanements Projections based on A4A and rating agency reports FY22 Budget based on Mid case enplanements High trajectory scenario will put us at 7.4M passengers in FY22 versus 8.5M in 2019 2 Operating Revenues 2019 - 2022 FY22 revenues are significant improvement over FY21 3 Actual 2018-2019 Actual - P13 2019-2020 Approved Budget 2020-2021 Current Estimate 2020-2021 Proposed 2021-2022 30,827,114 46,398,412 77,225,525 41,278,183 6,369,975 14,784,393 16,303,523 2,648,154 16,363,787 97,748,014 1,758,413 1,758,413 24,318,648 49,381,268 73,699,917 -4.57% 23,409,088 3,912,754 10,259,195 10,286,314 2,108,648 15,677,727 65,653,725 -32.83% 812,924 812,924 16,720,000 37,697,000 54,417,000 21,107,271 4,487,041 11,069,553 16,683,098 1,750,000 14,598,015 69,694,978 6.16% 1,208,114 1,208,114 17,426,753 43,679,223 61,105,976 -17.09% 18,337,134 2,019,053 11,026,850 16,768,861 1,897,783 14,812,320 64,862,001 -1.21% 318,429 318,429 26,030,400 48,629,417 74,659,817 22.18% 36,056,647 4,983,334 11,586,297 15,711,619 2,059,095 15,532,040 85,929,032 32.48% 353,379 353,379 • Landed Weights – 75% of 2019 • Rental car and Food, Bev and Retail revenue at MAG for FY21 CYE and Fy22 proposed • Parking and GT revenue based on enplanements Airport Revenues FY22 REVENUE AIRLINE REVENUE Landing Fees Terminal Rental & Other Fees TOTAL AIRLINE REVENUE yoy growth % NON-AIRLINE REVENUE Parking Ground Transportation Rental Cars Food, Bev & Retail Advertising Other Rentals and Fees TOTAL NON-AIRLINE REVENUE yoy growth % Interest Income TOTAL INTEREST INCOME & BOND PROCEEDS 4 TOTAL REVENUE yoy growth % 176,731,952 140,166,565 -20.69% 125,320,092 -10.59% 126,286,406 -9.90% 160,942,228 27.44% Revenue per enplanements $20.88 $29.67 $21.77 $34.43 $23.34 AUS Budget – Operating Fund Actual 2019 Actual 2020 Budget 2021 …
Airport Expansion and Development Program Update to AAAC September 14, 2021 Overview Airport Expansion and Development Program (AEDP) • Grant Strategy • The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act • What does this mean for Airports • Application Criteria • AEDP Grant Eligible Projects • Focus projects: Passenger Processing Projects • New Concourse B • AEDP Upcoming Council Action Items • Terminal Optimization, Baggage Handling System, Airline Ticketing and AEDP Program Summary 1 Long-range Airport Program Utilities and Airfield Infrastructure New Concourse B AEDP Program Summary Future Roadway and Landside Improvements Future Barbara Jordan Terminal Expansion Optimize Barbara Jordan Terminal 2 AEDP Grant Strategy AEDP Program Summary 3 The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act • Airport Infrastructure Grants • $3 billion/year for 5 years • Formulaic allocation with a few specific set-asides • PFC-project eligibility criteria apply • Airport Terminal Program • $1 billion/year for 5 years • Competitive allocation within hub categories • Limited to terminal projects AEDP Program Summary 4 What does this mean for Airports • Use or lose funding provisions will drive focus on “shovel ready” projects • Planning is complete • Project on an approved ALP • Environmental review underway • Terminal program priorities broaden set of projects for consideration • Local share requirements still need to be considered • Minimum local shares range from 5% to 25% of project costs depending on hub classification, program, and project type • Collaboration with the FAA is critical essential to success • Clear implementation guidance • Straightforward application and compliance processes • Early and frequent airport engagement • Need for sponsor empowerment AEDP Program Summary 5 The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Consideration to be given to projects that: Increase capacity and passenger access 1. 2. Replace aging infrastructure 3. Achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act/ 4. 5. expand accessibility for persons with disabilities Improve airport access for historically disadvantaged populations Improve energy efficiency, including upgrading environmental systems, upgrading plant facilities, and achieving Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) accreditation standards Improve airfield safety through terminal relocation 6. 7. Encourage actual and potential competition AEDP Program Summary 6 Grant Eligible Projects AEDP Program Summary 7 Airport Expansion & Development Program Demand Capacity Initiatives Enabling Infrastructure • Passenger processing improvements • Apron and airfield improvements/connections • Upgrade utility infrastructure • Demolition, storm water, and environmental site preparation Optimize Barbara Jordan Terminal Gates, Ticket Counters and Processing …
AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 14, 2021 3:00 PM 2716 SPIRIT OF TEXAS DRIVE, ROOM 174-A AUSTIN, TEXAS 78719 (Note: The Mayor of the City of Austin Order No. 20210811-033 requires all individuals over the age of two to wear a face covering while present on or in City property unless expressly exempted in Section 2 of the order or by a City policy applicable to the premises or facility.) CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Eugene Sepulveda, Chair Scott Madole, Vice-Chair Jeremy Hendricks, Secretary Wendy Price Todd Vicky Sepulveda Chad Ennis Ernest Saulmon Jonathan Coon Billy Owens Frank Maldonado Raymond Young AGENDA CALL TO ORDER CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES August 10, 2021 meeting. 3. WRITTEN STAFF BRIEFINGS a) July 2021 Financial Results. (Prepared by Rajeev Thomas, Deputy Chief, Finance) b) AUS Air Service Update. (Prepared by Jamy Kazanoff, Air Service Development) 1 Speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1. INTRODUCTION OF COMMISSIONER CHAD ENNIS 1 4. VERBAL STAFF BRIEFINGS a) “Updates on the Airport Expansion and Development Program (AEDP)” presented by Tracy Thompson, Interim Chief of Planning and Development, and Shane Harbinson, Deputy Chief of Planning and Development. b) “Recap of 2022 Department of Aviation Budget” presented by Rajeev Thomas, Deputy c) “Update on Cargo Development Project” presented by Mookie Patel, Chief Officer of Chief, Finance. Business and Finance 5. ACTION ITEMS None. 6. FOR RECOMMENDATION, AVIATION DEPARTMENT a) Approve a resolution finding the use of the Construction Manager-at-Risk method of contracting, as authorized by Subchapter F, Chapter 2269 of the Texas Government Code, is the project delivery method that provides the best value to the City for the Airport Development Expansion Program, Airfield Construction project for airfield improvements. (Note: MBE/WBE goals will be established prior to issuance of this solicitation.) a) Review of Commission Recommendations and Actions to discuss with appointing 7. NEW BUSINESS City Council Member. b) Future Agenda Items. c) Next scheduled meeting October 12, 2021 at 3:00 PM. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days before the meeting date. …
Dell Children’s Building For The Future Robert Mueller Municipal Airport PIAC - September Meeting Christopher Born, President - Dell Children’s Medical Center David Prusha, Principal - HKS Architects Over $720M in Pediatric Ecosystem Investment in Central Texas • Initiated investment in October 2017 • Focus on development • Capital - facilities, technology, equipment • Operations - pediatric specialists, staff support, technology, programmatic • Next steps...more investment in people, technology and facilities 2 3 Projects Completed: 2017-2020 • CCU Phase 1 and 2 June 2019 - Conversion of IMC to CCU standards • October 2020 - Completion of room renovations • CCU Phase 3 June 2020 - Completion of entire unit to include advanced technology • • 4 Projects Completed: 2017-2020 • All Dell Children’s campus signage will be replaced • A majority of the Dell Children’s landscaping is in the process of being updated • Updates to Healing Garden pond, respite spaces throughout campus 5 Garage 1 - Green Garage Completed August 2020 • 690 parking spaces • Staff / Visitor parking 6 Dell Children’s Specialty Pavilion • Dell Children’s Specialty Pavilion - April 2021 • The Texas Center for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease • The Dell Children’s Comprehensive • The Dell Children’s Blood and Cancer Fetal Center Center • The UTHealth Austin Pediatric Neurosciences Center at Dell Children’s 7 Dell Children’s Specialty Pavilion • 161,000 sq ft • 4th floor shelled space 8 Dell Children’s Specialty Pavilion 9 4th Bed Tower July 2021 - November 2022 • • 1st floor • PICU (24 beds) and Sedation Suites • Heme/Onc (24 beds) and Satellite • 2nd floor Pharmacy • 3rd floor Center • 4th floor • Shelled space • Acute care (24 beds) and Simulation 10 DCMC Town Hall • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 Garage 3 - Blue Garage • • 1250 parking spaces • Visitor parking July 2021 - August 2022 15 DCMC Town Hall • 16 17 Dell Children’s Final Site Plan • Additional Medical Office space • Emergency Department (ED) growth • Acute Care/Critical Care growth • Potential Retail/Hotel 18 Dell Children’s North Campus Hospital • 18 ER beds (2 Trauma/Critical Care) • • • • • 4 ORs, 2 procedure rooms, 2 Imaging Center In/Outpatient Pharmacy In/Outpatient Rehab Lab draw station endoscopy rooms • 12 PICU beds • 24 Acute Care beds • Sleep lab services • 2 room Ronald McDonald House …
Project Connect Overview September 14, 2021 Mueller Commision The Geometry of Transit Historic Population Growth Austin MSA Population 2 The Geometry of Transit Bus 3 The Geometry of Transit Bus Bike 4 The Geometry of Transit Bus Bike Car 5 Implementing the Project Connect Vision 6 Comprehensive Transit Plan LIGHT RAIL REGIONAL RAIL New Rail System Expanded Bus Service 4 new MetroRapid routes; high- frequency bus service with priority treatments. 42 miles, 99 stations 10 new stations, with planned conversion to Light Rail 3 new MetroExpress commuter routes 9 New Park & Rides/Transit Centers Downtown Transit Tunnel All-Electric Bus Fleet MetroBike integration New neighborhood circulator zones with on-demand pick-up 7 Light Rail Transit Conceptual Illustration 8 New Rail System Light rail to connect north and south Austin. From Tech Ridge (initially from North Lamar and U.S. 183) and extending to Slaughter (initially to Stassney Lane. 9 New Rail System Destinations include: • North Lamar Transit Center • Crestview • UT • Republic Square • Auditorium Shores • The SoCo District 10 New Rail System Light rail service to the airport. Operating from North Lamar and U.S. 183 to downtown and directly to the airport. 12 New Rail System Destinations include: • Austin-Bergstrom International Airport • Lakeshore Drive • Convention Center • Rainey Street • UT • Crestview • North Lamar Transit Center 13 Rail System Expansion Expanded regional rail stations serving The Domain and Austin’s FC Stadium. 14 Rail System Expansion Destinations include: • Leander • The Domain • McKalla Place • Crestview • ACC Highland • MLK • Saltillo • Downtown 15 New Rail System New regional rail service will connect downtown to East Austin’s Colony Park, Manor and Elgin. 16 New Rail System Destinations include: • East Austin • Springdale • U.S. 183 Park & Ride • Colony Park 17 Expo MetroRapid Line Project Objectives: • Establish high-quality transit service east of IH35 • Provide service from northeast Austin to downtown • Connect and improve access to major developments and destinations 44 Stations 18 electric buses 18 Expo MetroRapid Line Highlighted destinations: • Travis County Expo Center • AISD Delco Activity Center • The University of Texas • UT Stadium • Dell Medical School • Capitol complex • Downtown • Austin Convention Center • Republic Square 19 Pleasant Valley MetroRapid Line Project Objectives: • Establish high-quality transit service east of IH35 • Provide service from NE to SE …
PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD September 14, 2021 MINUTES The Parks and Recreation Board convened in a special meeting on Tuesday, September 14, 2021 at 2220 Barton Springs Road in Austin, Texas. Board Members in Attendance: Dawn Lewis, Nancy Barnard, Laura Cottam Sajbel, Anna Di Carlo, Sarah Faust and Kimberly Taylor. Board Members Absent: Richard DePalma, Lisa Hugman and Nina Rinaldi. Staff in Attendance: Kimberly McNeeley, Liana Kallivoka, Anthony Segura, Scott Grantham, Robynne Heymans, Steven Linnet, Thomas Rowlinson, Randy Scott, Atha Phillips, Liz Johnston and Sammi Curless. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None. A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes from the regular meeting of August 24, 2021were approved on Board Member Faust motion, Board Member Cottam Sajbel second on a 6-0 vote with Vice Chair DePalma and Board Members Hugman and Rinaldi absent and two vacancies. B. STAFF BRIEFING 1. Presentation on parkland dedication and overview of recent achievements in acquiring new parkland. Presentation material is available online at austintexas.gov/atxparkland and https://youtu.be/_m7dM94FSgw. Thomas Rowlinson and Robynne Heymans of the Parks and Recreation Department made a presentation and answered questions from the Board. The viewing of the Parkland Acquisitions video was taken up with Item B2. To ensure adequate time for discussion, Chair Lewis moved Item C1 to be heard after Item B1 and Item B2 was heard after Item C2. 2. Presentation regarding the implementation of the 2018 Bond Program. Steven Linett and Randy Scott of the Parks and Recreation Department made a presentation and answered questions from the Board. Page 1 of 2 C. NEW BUSINESS: PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS 1. Presentation, discussion and possible action regarding a recommendation to the Planning Commission regarding the applicant's appeal of the Parkland Dedication Requirements for 403 East Koenig Lane (SP-2020-0419C; Koenig MF). Board Member Barnard made a motion to recommend to the Planning Commission to deny the applicant's request to exclusively pay fee in lieu of land dedication for Koenig Multifamily (SP-2020-0419C); Board Member Cottam Sajbel seconded the motion. The motion passed on a 6-0 vote with Vice Chair DePalma and Board Members Hugman and Rinaldi absent and two vacancies. 2. Presentation and discussion on the proposed 305 South Congress Avenue "Statesman" Planned Unit Development. Scott Grantham of the Parks and Recreation Department and Atha Phillips of the Watershed Protection Department made a presentation and answered questions from the Board. No action was taken on this item. 3. Discussion of potential Parks …
AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2021 The Airport Advisory Commission convened in a Virtual Regular Meeting on Tuesday, September 14, 2021. CALL TO ORDER Chair E. Sepulveda called the Commission Meeting to order at 3:02 p.m. Jonathan Coon Vicky Sepulveda Chad Ennis Raymond Young Ernest Saulmon Commissioners in Attendance: Eugene Sepulveda – Chair Scott Madole – Vice-Chair Jeremy Hendricks – Secretary Billy Owens Commissioners Absent: Frank Maldonado Wendy Price Todd Aviation Staff in Attendance: Jacqueline Yaft Tracy Thompson Ghizlane Badawi Rajeev Thomas Kane Carpenter CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS: John Gallo Steve Khanoyan Brian Long Shane Harbinson Sam Haynes David Smythe-Macaulay Ammie Calderon Mukesh “Mookie” Patel Jamy Kazanoff None. 1. INTRODUCTION OF COMMISSIONER CHAD ENNIS Commissioner Chad Ennis of District 6 was introduced to the Commission. 1 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) The minutes from the meeting of August 10, 2021 were approved on Commissioner Young’s motion, Commissioner Coon seconded. Motion passed on a 7-0-0-4 vote. Commissioners Maldonado, Saulmon, V. Sepulveda, and Todd were absent at this vote. 3. WRITTEN STAFF BRIEFINGS a) “July 2021 Financial Results” prepared by Rajeev Thomas, Deputy Chief, Finance. b) “AUS Air Service Update” prepared by Jamy Kazanoff, Air Service Development. 4. VERBAL STAFF BRIEFINGS a) “Updates on the Airport Expansion and Development Program (AEDP)” presented by Tracy Thompson, Interim Chief of Planning and Development. b) “Recap of 2022 Department of Aviation Budget” presented by Rajeev Thomas, Deputy Chief, c) “Update on Cargo Development Project” presented by Mookie Patel, Chief, Business and Finance. Finance. 5. ACTION ITEMS None. 6. FOR RECOMMENDATION, AVIATION DEPARTMENT a) Approve a resolution finding the use of the Construction Manager-at-Risk method of contracting, as authorized by Subchapter F, Chapter 2269 of the Texas Government Code, is the project delivery method that provides the best value to the City for the Airport Development and Expansion Program, Airfield Construction project for airfield improvements. A motion to approve was made by Secretary Hendricks, Commissioner Young seconded for a vote. Motion passed on an 8-0-0-3 vote. Commissioners Maldonado, Saulmon, and Todd were absent at this vote. 2 7. NEW BUSINESS Council Member a) Review of Commission Recommendations and Actions to discuss with appointing City ꞏ Aviation revenues have a strong upwardly trend. ꞏ Airline competing and expanding routes remains robust. ꞏ The AEDP has the potential to receive additional funds through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. AUS will compete for a fair share …
