Tourism Commission Board February 14, 2022, at 3 pm City Hall Board and Commissions Room 1101 301 W. Second St. Austin, Texas 78701 Some members of the Tourism Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for contact Felicia Ojeda, 512.404.4022 or felicia.ojeda@austintexas.gov remote participation. To register CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Alta Alexander Ed Bailey Bill Bunch John Riedie District 9 Vacant Mayoral Vacant CALL TO ORDER Greg Chanon Rachel Magee Ken Smith Lois Rodriguez Mike Cannatti REVISED AGENDA CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. March 8, 2021 b. May 10, 2021 2. NEW BUSINESS The Commission may discuss and take action on the following agenda items: a. Introduce new Board members b. Discussion and possible action to set meeting schedule for 2022 c. Discussion and update our appointed members of the Parks and Environment Working Group d. Update from staff on expansion contracted underway, with whom and how much, any timeline of "next steps” and discussion and possible action related to the convention center. e. Discussion and possible action on the previously created TPID working group f. Report on actions and current work of the Downtown Commission related to the convention center and consider and take possible action relating to coordinating with the Downtown Commission and/or Music Commission on convention center issues. g. Set agenda items for subsequent meetings, including recurring items, and make information requests to staff in support of those items. h. Election of a Presiding Officer FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS The Commission may discuss and take possible action to request information and identify future agenda items, topics, or presentation: ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) …
Electric Utility Commission February 14, 2022 6:00 PM Austin Energy Headquarters; 1st Floor; Shudde Fath Conference Room 4815 Mueller Blvd, Austin TX 78723 Some members of the Electric Utility Commission maybe participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register contact Robin Otto at Robin.Otto@austinenergy.com or 512-322-6254. REVISED AGENDA Members: Marty Hopkins, Chair (Casar) Dave Tuttle, Vice Chair (Alter) Marshall Bowen (Kelly) Randy Chapman (Pool) Cary Ferchill (Adler) Erik Funkhouser (Fuentes) Karen Hadden (Kitchen) Makenna Jonker (Harper- Madison) Cyrus Reed (Tovo) Kay Trostle (Ellis) Vacancy (Renteria) For more information, please visit: www.austintexas.gov/euc Reading and Action on Consent Agenda: Items 2-14 may be acted upon by one motion. No separate discussion or action on any of the items is necessary unless desired by a Commissioner. CALL MEETING TO ORDER CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Speaker must be present and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – Approve minutes of the November 19, 2021 meeting. NEW BUSINESS – CONSENT ( ) = Target Council Meeting Date; [ ] = RCA Type 2. (3/3) [Purchasing – Multi-Departmental; AE’s portion approximately $12.7M] Authorize an amendment to a contract with Nalco Company LLC d/b/a Nalco Company for continued specialty chemical water treatment services, to increase the amount by $3,500,250 and to extend the term by one year, for a revised total contract amount not to exceed $14,687,500. 3. (3/3) [Purchasing] Authorize an amendment to a contract with SAP America Inc. to provide a continued subscription for talent, performance, and learning management software, to increase the amount by $198,000 and to extend the term by one year, for a revised total contract amount not to exceed $3,146,933. 4. (3/3) [Purchasing] Authorize award of a contract with Johnson Controls Inc d/b/a Johnson Controls to provide fire protection and maintenance services, for a term of five years in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000. 5. (3/3) [Purchasing] Authorize negotiation and execution of a multi-term contract with Power Grid Engineering, LLC to provide relay services, for up to five years in an amount not to exceed …
December 2021 December 2021 Animal Services Report ANIMAL SERVICES REPORT Animal Services News • The live outcome percentage for December was 97.3 percent. • A total of 992 animals were brought to the shelter which included 644 dogs, 310 cats, 15 guinea pigs, 11 wild animals, eight rabbits, two birds, one ferret, and one chameleon. • A total of 673 animals were adopted (336 dogs, 327 cats and 10 small pets) • A total of 148 dogs and cats were returned to their owners (RTOs and RTO-Adopt). • Animal Protection Officers (APOs) returned 55 animals to their owners in the field during the Animal Protection month of June. • Officers handed out 38 fencing assistance applications, implanted zero microchips, impounded 130 injured animals and delivered 34 wildlife animals to Austin Wildlife Rescue. • Officers entered 180 rabies exposure reports and submitted 6 specimens for rabies testing. One bat tested positive for rabies. • 20 total coyote related activities o 0 Observations o 14 Sightings o 2 Encounters o 0 Incidents o 2 Wild Sicks o 4 Wild Injured and incident). • Out of 20 coyote related activities, 12 fell within the reported behavior types (sighting, encounter, • Encounters: Pets were a factor in 50% of activities: o 1 encounter involved a coyote following or approaching a person with no incident o 1 encounter involved a coyote following a person walking dogs with no incident December 2021 Animal Services Report Volunteer, Foster and Rescue Programs • A total of 165 volunteers donated 1,918 hours during December. • The Volunteer Coordinators held four orientations for new volunteers in December, introducing 79 people to the shelter programs. 59 new volunteers attended their first training or mentor shifts in November. • 111 animals were adopted directly from foster care • More than 191 different people/families fostered • 187 new foster applications were processed • There are currently 1443 members (approved fosters) in the foster program’s GivePulse group. • Two pets died or were euthanized in foster care in December (based on the reports that are available to us). • As of now (January 4th @ 9:15 a.m.) there are 272 animals in foster care. • 158 dogs, cats, guinea pigs, rabbits and birds were transferred to 26 AAC Rescue Partners (compared to 199 animals to 23 partners for December 2020). • Two owner surrender appointments were posted to AAC Rescue partners for intake deferral …
January 2022 January 2022 Animal Services Report AUSTIN ANIMAL SERVICES REPORT • The live outcome percentage for January was over 97 percent. • A total of 934 animals were brought to the shelter which included 628 dogs, 264 cats, 24 wild animals, 10 guinea pigs, seven rabbits, and one bird. • A total of 647 animals were adopted (342 dogs, 293 cats, and 12 small pets). • A total of 125 dogs and cats were returned to their owners (RTOs and RTO-Adopt). • Animal Protection Officers (APOs) returned 44 animals to their owners in the field during the • Officers handed out 26 fencing assistance applications and implanted one microchip. • Officers impounded 92 injured animals and delivered 23 wildlife animals to Austin Wildlife Rescue. • Officers entered 182 rabies exposure reports and submitted 19 specimens for rabies testing. Zero • Officers investigated 167 bites, including six Severe Bodily Injury (SBI) investigations. Animal Services News Animal Protection month of January. tested positive for rabies. • Coyote Activities: o Sightings 25 o Observations 4 o Encounters 4 o Incidents 3 Volunteer, Foster, and Rescue Programs • A total of 223 volunteers donated 2,448 hours of volunteer service in January. • The Volunteer Coordinators held four orientations for new volunteers in January, introducing 102 people to the shelter programs. 72 new volunteers attended their first training or mentor shifts in January. January 2022 Animal Services Report • 133 animals were adopted directly from foster care. • More than 150 different people/families fostered. • 131 new foster applications were processed. • There are currently 1,514 members (approved fosters) in the foster program’s GivePulse group. • Zero pets died or were euthanized in foster care in January. • As of February 2, 7:10 a.m. there were 218 animals in foster care. • 144 dogs, cats, guinea pigs, rabbits and birds were transferred to 19 local AAC Rescue Partners (compared to 157 animals to 23 partners for January 2021). • 38 dogs were transported to six out-of-state AAC Rescue Partners. • The average length of stay for transported dogs was 47 days and the average weight was 47.7 lbs. • 3 owner surrender appointments were posted to local AAC Rescue partners for intake deferral • Overall local AAC partner pull numbers decreased by 3 percent. Partner engagement decreased option. by 13 percent. Vet Services • AAC vets performed 948 vet exams. • AAC vets spayed/neutered …
Animal Advisory Commission Report Q4 2021 This report is intended to give a high level overview of Austin Pets Alive!’s lifesaving operations, with a focus on APA!’s impact on Travis county through our partnership with Austin Animal Center. Summary: Austin Pets Alive! (APA) continues to be the city of Austin’s largest partner in lifesaving and the largest subsidizer of the city’s budget to serve Austin animals. APA takes animals that have medical and behavioral issues that require a higher cost per animal than the average healthy animal in care. APA focuses on these animals in an effort to have a measurable effect on the live release rate at AAC. In 2021, of all animals transferred from Austin Animal Center to their partners, APA! Took in 1,686 pets directly, and an additional 291 that were born in care to transferred pregnant pets. The direct transfers were 61% of AAC’s total transfers. APA’s cost to care for the animals pulled in 2021 is approximately $1.5MM to $1.9MM. APA receives no funding from the City of Austin but does receive use of the TLAC property, which if on the rental market could reasonably expect to receive $8 per square foot, per year in rent for the use, condition and location that it is in (ie $100,000 per quarter). APA! Therefore, contributed between $1.1MM and $1.5MM to subsidize the city’s budget to service Austin animals. APA’s mission is to eliminate the unnecessary killing of shelter animals. Over the last 10 years of the license agreement, the role of APA’s support at AAC has shifted away from lifesaving and into serving as “overflow” for AAC, serving many animals that should not be at risk of euthanasia in the city’s publicly-funded shelter. The Austin Animal Center has received an increase in budget of more than 10 million dollars since 2010 and many supports have been put in place over the years by Austin City Council. APA is 100% committed to continuing to serve as a safety net for animals that cannot be saved through tax payer dollars and is currently negotiating a license agreement that more accurately reflects the mission of APA and the responsible utilization of all funds put towards animals, whether they are donated or tax funded. Last year, 1,814/1,977 animals were considered “at risk” or “at high risk” of euthanasia. 122 dogs and 41 cats were pulled for “space” or as “non at …
From: To: Subject: Date: Cindy Black Ramirez, Elaine C15-2022-0019 neighbor feedback Wednesday, February 09, 2022 11:45:30 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi Elaine, I received a notice of variance letter for the property at 607 E 49th Street. Here is my submission: Name: Cindy Black: “I object" Address: 5109 Evans Ave, Austin, TX 78751 Signature: attached below Phone: 214-796-5637 Comments: The applicant states "The existing accessory unit was constructed in 2004 but not permitted by the builder or any previous owners” and that the hardship is "No permit issues when building it before current Austin building guidelines”. This existing house was built in 2018 with permit approval as a garage-forward, side-by-side duplex. No accessory building is noted on the record set. It appears on Google Maps as though a very large accessory building sits at the back of the property, but this building is not shown on the 2018 permit records. This indicates that the 2018 applicant was negligent in documenting the property. This is unfortunate for the new owner, but it doesn’t make sense that the non-conforming, non-permitted building should carry forward through another stage of development. I vote in objection, and request that the applicant figure out an alternative design that improves the property within zoning and historic district guidelines. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. E-10/1-LATE BACKUP E-10/2-LATE BACKUP E-10/3-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: David Ramirez, Elaine C15-2022-0019 Monday, February 07, 2022 5:21:50 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi. We received a public hearing notice for case C15-2022-0019. I would like to comment that we are in *favor* of the requested variances. - David Orr 4509 Avenue F, Austin, TX 78751 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. E-10/4-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Matt Desloge Ramirez, Elaine C15-2022-0019 Tuesday, February 08, 2022 9:37:46 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or …
Written comments must be submitted to the contact person listed on the notice before 9 a.m. the day of the public hearing to be added to the Late Back-up and viewed by the Board the nighi of the meeting. Your comments should include the name ofthe board or commission, or Council; the scheduled date ofthe public hearing; the Case Number; and the contact person listed on the notice. All comments received will become part ofthe public record of this case. Case Number: Cl5 -2022-0004 Contact: Elaine Ramirez; elaine.ramirezCa)austintexas.qov Public Hearins: Board of Adiustment; F 14'h.2022 Board ofAdi I am in favor I object a/zh" Daytime Telephone: Comments: 6- 27 PUBLIC TIEARING INFORMATION Although applicants and,/or their agent(s) are expected to attend a public hearing, vou are not required to attend. However, ifyou do attend, you have the opportunity to speak FOR or AGAINST the proposed development or change. You may also contact a neighborhood or environmental organization that has expressed an interest in an application affecting your neighborhood. During a public hearing, the board or commission may postpone or continue an application's hearing to a later date, or recommend approval or denial of the application. If the board or commission announces a specific date and time for a postponement or continuation that is not later than 60 days from the announcement, no further notice is required. A board or commission's decision may be appealed by a person with standing to appeal, or an interested party that is identified as a person who can appeal the decision. The body holding a public hearing on an appeal will determine whether a person has standing to appeal the decision. An interested party is defined as a person who is the applicant or record owner ofthe subject property, or who communicates an interest to a board or commission by: . delivering a written statement to the board or commission before or during the public hearing that generally identifies the issues of concern (it may be delivered to the contact person listed on a notice); or . appearing and speaking for the record at the public hearing; and: . occupies a primary residence that is within 5l)0 feet ofthe subject property or proposed development; . is the record owner of property within 500 feet ofthe subject property or proposed development; or . is an officer ofan environmental or neighborhood organization that has an interest in …
From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Omega170 Ramirez, Elaine Re: Monday, February 07, 2022 9:28:36 AM image001.png Charles Thomas Westerman 2667 Crazyhorse Pass Austin, TX 78734 512 300 6173 my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device Get Outlook for Android From: Sent: Monday, February 7, 2022 9:27:23 AM To: Ramirez, Elaine <Elaine.Ramirez@austintexas.gov> Subject: Re: Case number c15-2022-0011 2715 Long Bow Trail Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device Get Outlook for Android From: Ramirez, Elaine <Elaine.Ramirez@austintexas.gov> Sent: Monday, February 7, 2022 9:23:43 AM To: Omega170 Subject: RE: Respectfully, Elaine Ramirez Planner Senior / Board of Adjustment Liaison City of Austin Development Services Department 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr, Austin, Texas 78752 Office: 512-974-2202 In order for me to accept this e-mail. You will need to include the case #, address of property in question and you will need to include your name and address. PER CITY ORDINANCE: All individuals scheduling or accepting a meeting invitation with a City Official are requested to provide responses to the questions at the following link: DSD Visitor Log. Please note that all information provided is subject to public disclosure via DSD’s open data portal. For more information please visit: City of Austin Ordinance 2016-0922-005 | City Clerk’s website | City Clerk’s FAQ’s E-4/1-LATE BACKUP From: Omega170 Sent: Monday, February 07, 2022 9:17 AM To: Ramirez, Elaine <Elaine.Ramirez@austintexas.gov> Subject: *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I am against the new changes that are being sought to build these new homes.in Apache Shores especially the one they are requesting a permit for on Long Bow Trail. These developers trash the land and overbuild and overpopulated on this area oft here and enough is enough. You should see the concrete trucks that dump there slag right into the creeks here when they build these million dollar California dream atrocities. Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device Get Outlook for Android CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. E-4/2-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Sam W Ramirez, Elaine; Clerk, City C15-2022-0011 Monday, February 07, 2022 9:58:20 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I'm not really sure what the process to file opposition to some requested changes to lot restrictions, but I live just a few houses …
To Elaine Ramirez, February 7, 2022 My name is Charles Thomas Westerman, I live at 2667 Crazyhorse Pass, Austin, TX 78734. I am writing in Opposition to Case number C15-2022-0011 / 2715 Long Bow Trail AND C15-2022-0012 / 2717 Long Bow Trail. I am against the new changes that are being sought to build these new homes.in Apache Shores especially the one they are requesting a permit for on Long Bow Trail. These developers trash the land and overbuild and overpopulated on this area oft here and enough is enough. You should see the concrete trucks that dump there slag right into the creeks here when they build these million dollar California dream atrocities. The repercussions of this out of check building out here is horrible. Traffic is bad and this building will constitute a HUGE fire hazard should an evacuation ever need take place due to a fire. There is a post on the Next-door app out here that shows my photos I took as well as others took of the developers allowing the concrete truck that pour the slabs to leave the waste at the bottom of the hill that runs straight into the water system out here. They are building unchecked houses that raise the property value and tax out people that have owned houses and lived here their whole life. That doesn't even include all the new coyotes that are out and because there is nowhere left for them to go. Let alone all the water pipes damaged by the constant water pressure checks on all of these over unit overpriced Hollywood McMansions. I will not waste any more of your time since your position is not a tax payer funded position. I hope you heed my concerns. Sincerely, Charles Thomas Westerman E-5/1-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Jamie McKenzie Ramirez, Elaine Long bow trail variance Tuesday, February 08, 2022 7:35:42 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Elaine, I am writing as a concerned citizen that lives in Apache Shores subdivision where a variance is being requested on a property on Long Bow Trail. As a professional in the building industry and someone who wants to see our beautiful lake preserved I would strongly advise you not to grant this variance. The impervious cover that they are asking for would cause rain water runoff in excess to dump into the lake and adversely affect …
Lori Renteria 1511 Haskell Street Austin, Texas 78702 512.478.6770 (no texts) City of Austin - Board of Adjustments c/o Elaine Ramirez POB 1088 Austin, Texas 78767 SUBJECT: Case #C15-2022-0018, 54 Anthony Street, Austin Texas 78702 I am writing in support of the variances for the owner of 54 Anthony, Austin Texas 78702 located in the Holly Neighborhood. As a co-founder of the East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Planning Team, I am very familiar with the dilemma suffered by owners of substandard lots. Unfortunately, because of some self-proclaimed leaders in the Holly Planning Area who do not believe in the value of diversity being an asset, the City Council never accepted a formal Neighborhood Plan nor recognized a legitimate Planning Team despite heroic efforts by city staff, local businesses, diverse residents, congregations or civic groups within the planning boundary. I attended many Holly Planning meetings and helped with outreach efforts to ensure that all voices in the neighborhood had a seat at the table. In fact, city staff tried to mediate the conflicts between members of El Concilio and the East Town Lake Citizens and the rest of the honest folks who wanted to have a Neighborhood Plan and adopt land use regulations like small lot amnesty and prevailing setbacks like we did in the East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Plan. I knew the Dominguez family that lived at 54 Anthony for decades through my work with Summer Youth Employment and Community Education programs at Martin Middle School as an AISD project specialist up until 2000. Their tiny home, which I visited several times, was always at risk of being declared uninhabitable and my drive-by last week confirmed the condition of the tiny home has deteriorated even more. And there’s a heritage tree that further restricts building a new home. I believe that unless these variances are granted, we’ll all suffer from another vacant lot in the Holly Neighborhood because it’s just not financially feasible to build a home with the current setbacks and required lot size. Or worse yet, the land will flip several times and future owners will expend their time, talent and treasure coming before your Board. Please allow the new owner to create a new home in Holly. We need more neighbors! Be a part of the solution of our housing crisis, not part of the problem. There are hundreds of these tiny homes on tiny lots that are …
From: To: Subject: Date: Baldick, Ross Ramirez, Elaine Objection to Case Number C15-2021-0097 Sunday, February 06, 2022 4:38:48 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Ramirez, I own and live in the property at 4211 Avenue A, and own and rent out the property at 4209 Avenue A. Both of these properties have had their crawl spaces inundated with water during severe rain in past years. Therefore, the issue of increased impervious cover and implications for future flooding is of utmost importance to me. The subject property, at 4315 Avenue A, is "upstream" from my properties. Increasing impervious cover at 4315 Avenue A, as implied by the variance request, will tend to worsen the flooding that my properties experience. For these reasons, I request that the Board of Adjustment deny the variance request. Thank you, Ross Baldick CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. F-1/1-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Sunday, February 06, 2022 9:43:07 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. F-1/2-LATE BACKUP
N E W Y O R K A V E N U E T E E R T S A N O E L FRONT YARD - STREET SIDE SIDE YARD - STREET SIDE CONTEXT PLAN NOT TO SCALE EXISTING BUILDING REAR YARD SIDE YARD RESIDENTIAL ADDITION P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | J A N U A R Y 2 0 2 2 | 1 of 5 HISTORIC DESIGN STANDARDS 1617 NEW YORK AVE. AUSTIN, TX 78702 2-STORY ADDITION 2-STORY ADDITION NEW CHIMNEY NEW SUN ROOM EXISTING BUILDING NORTHEAST VIEW - STREET SIDE NORTHWEST VIEW - SIDE YARD NEW CHIMNEY RESIDENTIAL ADDITION P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | J A N U A R Y 2 0 2 2 | 2 of 5 HISTORIC DESIGN STANDARDS 1617 NEW YORK AVE. AUSTIN, TX 78702 STANDARD 1.4 FOR CORNER PROPERTIES, SET BACK THE ADDITION TO ALIGN WITH OR BEHIND THE FRONT SETBACK OF THE ADJACENT BUILDING FRONTING ON THAT STREET. FRONT OF ADJACENT BUILDING NEW SUN ROOM NEW SUN ROOM EXISTING CONDITIONS PERSPECTIVE FROM STREET SIDE AT FRONT RESIDENTIAL ADDITION P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | J A N U A R Y 2 0 2 2 | 3 of 5 HISTORIC DESIGN STANDARDS 1617 NEW YORK AVE. AUSTIN, TX 78702 STANDARD 2.2 MINIMIZE THE APPEARANCE OF THE ADDITION FROM THE STREET FACED BY THE HISTORIC BUILDING’S FRONT WALL. A. IF THE ADDITION CONNECTS TO THE HISTORIC BUILDING’S REAR WALL, STEP IN THE ADDITION’S SIDE WALLS AT LEAST ONE FOOT FROM THE SIDE WALLS OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. NEW CHIMNEY EXISTING BUILDING 2-STORY ADDITION BEYOND ” 8 - ’ 5 1 1’-3” NEW SUN ROOM NEW SUN ROOM 2’-6” 2-STORY ADDITION ROOF PLAN PERSPECTIVE FROM STREET SIDE AT FRONT RESIDENTIAL ADDITION P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | J A N U …
