Monday, February 7, 2022 City of Austin Board of Adjustments To: For: Case # C15-2022-0011 2715 Long Bow Trail, Austin TX Jonathan Kaplan - Presenter Reference: 2715 Longbow Trail – Variance Request I am writing to formally request the approval of the variance application that has been submitted for your review. Background: The property located at 2715 Longbow Trail is currently an empty single-family lot within the LA Zoning overlay in the Apache Shores Neighborhood. We are proposing to construct a new home that meets all the current codes and setback requirements except for the impervious coverage regulations due to the current grade of the property and the non-conforming regulations set upon this lot. Current Code Regulations: Per 25-2-492 site development regulations the LA zoned lot must be a minimum of 43,560 SF in size (1 acre), and the lot in question is only 8,822.11 sf (.20 acres). In addition, all LA zones lots are governed by 25-2-551 (C)-3 Impervious coverage restrictions based on a slope analysis of the property. This code requires a slope analysis of the current topography of the land and based on the existing conditions of this lot and due to the existing slope of the property, it provides no reasonable development can be constructed on this property. Variance Request: Due to the size of this lot, this is classified as a non-conforming lot that was developed and platted 50+ years before the existence of the LA regulations. The surrounding lots and the remaining area of the Apache Shores POA do not have any COA regulations and are governed under the TNR development guidelines. For these reasons, we are requesting a Variance to change the IC calculations to be the same as a standard SF-2 style lot configuration that this lot will meet the size requirements. If you have any questions on this matter, please contact me at any time. Regards, Jonathan Kaplan Managing Member Urban Building Services of Texas LLC 512-768-2789 ext. 501 214 Sailors Run Lakeway, TX 78734 www.ubstx.com 512-768-2789 E-4/1-PRESENTATION Lot sizes in Apache Shores Tradi(cid:415)onal LA zoned lots 1+ acres Exis(cid:415)ng non‐ conforming construc‐ (cid:415)on This diagram shows that the tradi(cid:415)onal Lake Aus(cid:415)n zoned lots (1+ acre) are located on the ease side of the river while the west side (Apache Shores) consists of all non‐conforming lots but have houses constructed on them. A lot of these houses were built prior to …
Monday, February 7, 2022 City of Austin Board of Adjustments Case # C15-2022-0012 2717 Long Bow Trail, Austin TX Jonathan Kaplan - Presenter To: For: Reference: 2717 Longbow Trail – Variance Request I am writing to formally request the approval of the variance application that has been submitted for your review. Background: The property located at 2715 Longbow Trail is currently an empty single-family lot within the LA Zoning overlay in the Apache Shores Neighborhood. We are proposing to construct a new home that meets all the current codes and setback requirements except for the impervious coverage regulations due to the current grade of the property and the non-conforming regulations set upon this lot. Current Code Regulations: Per 25-2-492 site development regulations the LA zoned lot must be a minimum of 43,560 SF in size (1 acre), and the lot in question is only 9,751.03 sf (.22 acres). In addition, all LA zones lots are governed by 25-2-551 (C)-3 Impervious coverage restrictions based on a slope analysis of the property. This code requires a slope analysis of the current topography of the land and based on the existing conditions of this lot and due to the existing slope of the property, it provides no reasonable development can be constructed on this property. Variance Request: Due to the size of this lot, this is classified as a non-conforming lot that was developed and platted 50+ years before the existence of the LA regulations. The surrounding lots and the remaining area of the Apache Shores POA do not have any COA regulations and are governed under the TNR development guidelines. For these reasons, we are requesting a Variance to change the IC calculations to be the same as a standard SF-2 style lot configuration that this lot will meet the size requirements. If you have any questions on this matter, please contact me at any time. Regards, Jonathan Kaplan Managing Member Urban Building Services of Texas LLC 512-768-2789 ext. 501 214 Sailors Run Lakeway, TX 78734 www.ubstx.com 512-768-2789 E-5/1-PRESENTATION Lot sizes in Apache Shores Tradi(cid:415)onal LA zoned lots 1+ acres Exis(cid:415)ng non‐ conforming construc‐ (cid:415)on This diagram shows that the tradi(cid:415)onal Lake Aus(cid:415)n zoned lots (1+ acre) are located on the ease side of the river while the west side (Apache Shores) consists of all non‐conforming lots but have houses constructed on them. A lot of these houses were built prior to …
3300 BLUE JAY LANE Application for a Variance to LDC 25-2-1176(A)(1) and (A)(4)(b) Dock extension greater than 30 ft. from the Lake Austin shoreline Dock width exceeding 14’ for a shoreline length less than 70’ Case no. C15-2022-0013 Applicant: Janis J. Smith, P.E. E-6/1-PRESENTATION E-6/2-PRESENTATION 3300 & 3302 BLUE JAY LANE NOTE: THE PROPOSED BOAT DOCK MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF LDC 25-2-1174 (“STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS”), AND MUST COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 25-12, ARTICLE 1 (UNIFORM BUILDING CODE) AND THE BUILDING CRITERIA MANUAL. PROPOSED LOWER DECK RAMP 2.9' PROPOSED UPPER DECK RAMP 3.8' 58.1' 26.3' DOCK PLAN VIEW 1" = 10' END OF RAMP ELEV. = 505.5' EXISTING DOCK TO REMAIN LOWER DECK UPPER DECK EXISTING DOCK TO REMAIN EXISTING = PROPOSED LAKESIDE ELEVATION VIEW AS PERMITTED UNDER SP-01-0014 DS EXISTING LANDSCAPE WALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPE WALL OPEN OPEN RAMP TERMINUS AT BULKHEAD ELEV = 505.1' PROPOSED BULKHEAD T.O.W. = 495.0' BOTTOM OF BEAM ELEVATION = 493.8' SIDE ELEVATION 1" = 10' PROPOSED CONDITIONS PLAN/ELEVATION VIEWS OF THE DOCK AT 3302 BLUE JAY LANE BOTTOM OF BEAM ELEVATION = 493.8' EL. 509.3' EL. 504.8' DOCK EL. = 494.8' APPROX. WSEL = 492.8' ' D V P P A I N O S V E R I E T A D . O N 1 2 0 2 / 5 1 / 1 1 FEMA 100-YR FULLY DEVELOPED FLOODPLAIN ELEV = 510.8 FLOODPLAIN IS FULL PURPOSE REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY IS LIMITED PURPOSE X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8' 0 5 ' 6 0 5 4' 0 5 2' 0 5 INSTALL TREE BOARDS ' 8 9 4 EXISTING = PROPOSED SHORELINE ON 3300 NO BULKHEAD WORK IS PROPOSED ELEV 492.8 PROPOSED 1-STORY, 1-SLIP DOCK SEE DOCK PLAN/ELEVATION VIEWS ON SHEET 4 NO DREDGE PROPOSED LOC LOC LOC LOC FSS FSS FSS FSS LOC FSS 6' 9 4 4' 9 4 LOC LOC XX 431 X X XX 430 X X L O C L O C XX L O C ' 6 0 5 ' 4 0 5 INSTALL TREE BOARDS ' 2 0 5 ' 0 0 5 8' 9 4 ' 6 9 4 X X 429 S S F LOC FSS FSS LOC LOC S S F 3300 56.5' 53.1' EXISTING 5' X 127' WETLAND DISTURBED WETLAND AREAS TO BE MITIGATED LOC FSS C O L 16.4' S …
Legend Addresses Jurisdiction FULL PURPOSE LIMITED PURPOSE OTHER CITY LIMITS OTHER CITIES ETJ Jurisdiction FULL PURPOSE LIMITED PURPOSE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION 2 MILE ETJ AGRICULTURAL AGREEMENT EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION 2 MILE ETJ AGRICULTURAL AGREEMENT OTHER CITY LIMITS OTHER CITIES ETJ 0.0 0 0.01 0.0 Miles NAD_1983_StatePlane_Texas_Central_FIPS_4203_Feet Date Printed: 1: 600 Notes This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. E - 7 / 9 1208 HOLLY ST, AUSTIN, TX 78702E-7/1-PRESENTATION 1208 HOLLY ST, AUSTIN, TX 78702 1202 HOLLY | LOT 25 - BLDG LINE = 22.8' 1204 HOLLY | LOT 24 - BLDG LINE = 19.65' 1214 HOLLY | LOT 19 - BLDG LINE = 25.71' 1216 HOLLY | LOT 18- BLDG LINE = 25.71' _____________________________________ AVG SETBACK DISTANCE: 23.47' SETBACK AVERAGE CALCULATIONS LOT 25 LOT 24 LOT 23 " 1 - ' 1 5 E N I L Y T R E P O R P M O R F ' 0 5 N A H T E R O M . G V A M O R F D E D U L C X E 1202 HOLLY 1204 HOLLY " 2 / 1 8 - ' 2 2 " 7 - ' 9 1 1 SETBACK AVERAGE SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 1206 HOLLY E D A R G J D A ' 1 . 2 5 4 LOT 21 LOT 20 LOT 19 LOT 18 1208 HOLLY 1210 HOLLY 1212 HOLLY 1214 HOLLY 1216 HOLLY " 2 / 1 3 - ' 5 1 E R U T C U R T S Y R A D N O C E S : D E D U L C X E " 1 1 - ' 4 1 E R U T C U R T S Y R A D N O C E S : D E D U L C X E " 2 / 1 8 - ' 5 2 " 2 / 1 8 - ' 5 2 t v r . i i l i \ E T A D P U F O O R _ e c …
E-8/7-PRESENTATION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT/SIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING MINUTES (March 9, 2015) The Board of Adjustment/Sign Review Board convened in a meeting on March 9, 2015, City Council Chambers, 301 West 2nd Street, Austin, Texas. Chair Jeff Jack called the Board Meeting to order at 5:40 p.m. Board Members in Attendance: Jeff Jack (Chair), Melissa Hawthorne (Vice Chair), Sallie Burchett, Stuart Hampton (Alternate), Vincent Harding, Michael Von Ohlen, Will Schnier (Alternate) and Cathy French (SRB) Board Member Absent –Ricardo De Camps and Bryan King Staff in Attendance: Leane Heldenfels, Cindy Crosby (COA Attorney), Diana Ramirez EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) The Board of Adjustment/Sign Review Board will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on this agenda. The Board of Adjustment/Sign Review Board may also announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, to receive advice from Legal Counsel regarding any other item on this agenda. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071 A APPROVAL OF MINUTES A-1 February 9, 2015 Board Member Vincent Harding motion to Approve the minutes for February 9, 2015; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne second on 6-0-2 vote (Board members Sallie Burchett and Will Schnier Abstained); APPROVED MINUTES FOR February 9, 2015. B. SIGN REVIEW BOARD RECONSIDERATIONS NONE E-8/8-PRESENTATION BOARD F. POSTPONEMENTS OF NONE ADJUSTMENT INTERPRETATION PREVIOUS G. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT INTERPRETATION NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS G-1 C15-2015-0039 Betsy Greenberg for Heritage Neighborhood Association 2910 Rio Grande The appellant has requested the Board of Adjustment interpret whether staff erred in issuing a building permit at 2910 Rio Grande Street because: A. the garage that encroaches on 2910 Rio Grande does not qualify for an Exception from Compliance under Section 25-1-365, because a Certificate of Occupancy for the site has existed since 1983; and further that B. staff determined that Section 25-2-961 (Noncomplying Structures Defined) and 963 (Modification and Maintenance of Noncomplying Structures) applies to the existing garage since a structure which pre-dates applicable site development regulations may remain in its current configuration, however this determination does not address questions of additional development occurring on the site. The public hearing was closed on Board Member Will Schnier motion to Dismiss Item A as not applicable to the board’s authority and Deny Item B, Board Member Vincent Harding second on a 6-1 vote (Board member Stuart Hampton nay); …
54 Anthony Street Austin, TX 78702 CASE #C15-2022-0018 E-9/1-PRESENTATION 54 ANTHONY - VARIANCE REQUEST Requesting a variance from City of Austin Land Development Code: 1) Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard setback from 25 feet (required) to 10.3 feet (requested) 2) b) Section 25-2-943 (Substandard Lot) (1) (a) to decrease the minimum Lot Size requirements from 4,000 square feet (required) to 3,380 square fee E-9/2-PRESENTATION CURRENT CONDITIONS (FRONT OF LOT) E-9/3-PRESENTATION CURRENT CONDITIONS (REAR OF LOT) E-9/4-PRESENTATION 54 ANTHONY – KEY FACTORS SUBSTANDARD LOT SIZE OF 3,380 SQUARE FEET BUILDABLE AREA REDUCED BY AE EASEMENT (SIDE) - 1,035 SF BEACH FRONT OVERLAY REDUCES IMPERVIOUS COVER TO 40% PROTECTED PECAN TREES IN THE MIDDLE THE LOT (REAR) LEGAL LOT PER 1995 PLATTING RULE PLATTING EXCEPTION FEW OPTIONS TO BUILD WITHOUT VARIANCE APPROVAL CURRENT STRUCTURES ARE IN SEVERE NEED OF DEMO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS NEIGHBORHOOD SUPPORT E-9/5-PRESENTATION 54 ANTHONY – FESTIVAL BEACH OVERLAY E-9/6-PRESENTATION 54 ANTHONY – ORIGINAL 1910 PLAT E-9/7-PRESENTATION REASONABLE USE This lot is considered to be a substandard lot / "small lot" per LCD 25-2-943, section (B) (1) (A). Per the survey the entire lot stands at a total of 3,380 SF. This is probably one of the smallest lots existing in Austin. The owner is requesting to build a modest home for his family and only asking for leniency as far as the current SF3 lot size requirement and for a reasonable reduction of 15 feet from the standard front yard setback. In order to build a livable space for a single family, the additional square footage is undoubtably necessary. E-9/8-PRESENTATION HARDSHIP This substandard lot has always been used as a single family residence since the early 1940s. The original structures of a single family 480 SF home and 162 SF garage still exist. This particular lot runs along a side alley on the north side of lot also which has a 15 foot electrical easement. Per current building requirements and the Austin Energy Criteria Manual, this reduces the buildable area by an approximate 1,040 due to the newly adopted requirement by AE. E-9/9-PRESENTATION NOT GENERAL TO THE AREA A majority of the lots in this neighborhood are at or above minimum lot sizes per COA LDC. There are only a few small lots in the Holly Neighborhood plan …
Owner and development team is seeking a variance request to allow for a new construction build on a substandard lot located at 1003 Kinney Ave. Austin, TX 78704. Current lot size is 5,461 SF and minimum allowable site to build on per current SF-3 zoning is 5,750 SF. The hardship is the original full lot size of 10,928 SF when split into halves of 5,461 SF for our lot, and 5,468 for the adjacent ½ lot, does not meet the minimum site area required by current SF-3 Zoning. This hardship would not be able to be overcome without the approval of the BOA in our variance request. Without the variance request this lot would remain vacant as we have confirmed through our research and the option of obtaining a portion of the adjacent city owned alley was rejected by the COA. Original plat and our most current site plat are from 1896. However, our lot was split into two separate tax parcels with no updated plat in 1947. The deeds in our following presentation packet document this transfer of ownership from legal lot to substandard lot status with no plat update. This was also confirmed through the Travis County Tax Accessor’s Office. The Tax Parcel map and deed documents indicate this split. In addition to the conflicting lot history that split the lots without updating the plat, there was construction allowed on the adjacent 1/2 lot last approved by the COA in 2007. This new construction had a previous residence which was demolished with no variance required to build new on the lot. Subsequent building permit was obtained for 2007 and was confirmed with our COA contact Eric Thomas. In seeking our variance, we have researched two avenues in how to be able to build on our lot. One being the recommended avenue of seeking a 1995 plat exemption to apply for legal lot status and therefore not require a variance, and second requesting a variance through the BOA. There was a previous land status determination that was approved on our lot through the 1995 Rule Platting Exception that was granted on February 25, 2019 and included in our Advanced packet. We presented this information to our permit reviewers/supervisors for an F-2/1-PRESENTATION avenue forward to build on our site, however the city of Austin planning department would not allow us to build on our lot with only that as documentation …
Koenig Lane Compatibility Variance Request 1 F-3/1-PRESENTATION Koenig Lane City policies establish a clear vision for the site as an appropriate location for directing new growth and obtaining affordable housing and quality parkland. 2 F-3/2-PRESENTATION Koenig Lane City policies establish a clear vision for the site as an appropriate location for directing new growth and obtaining affordable housing and quality parkland. However, the site faces unique hardships that meaningfully impact its ability to achieve this reasonable use, impacting the site from all sides. 3 F-3/3-PRESENTATION Koenig Lane City policies establish a clear vision for the site as an appropriate location for directing new growth and obtaining affordable housing and quality parkland. However, the site faces unique hardships that meaningfully impact its ability to achieve this reasonable use, impacting the site from all sides. The reasonable use and hardship analyses presented here are fully consistent with past compatibility height variances approved by the Board of Adjustment. 4 F-3/4-PRESENTATION Reasonable Use Analysis (As Presented to BOA) Case Imagine Austin Center Corridor/ Transit Access Affordable Housing Parks Deficient C15-2021-0096 C15-2020-0053 C15-2019-0061 C15-2020-0009 Applicant Request ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 5 F-3/5-PRESENTATION Hardship Analysis Constraint Site Area Impacted Geographic Proximity to Railroad Crossing (East) and Avenue F/Koenig Lane Intersection (West) Site Layout Impact Public Utility Easement and Electrical and Telecoms Easement (East) On-Site Protected Trees Water Line (North) Power Line (South) Site Shape (East) Key Consideration: Ensuring Quality Parkland 1.04% 7.53% 2.41% 5.54% 15% Site Layout Impact 6 F-3/6-PRESENTATION 7 F-3/7-PRESENTATION 8 F-3/8-PRESENTATION 9 F-3/9-PRESENTATION 10 F-3/10-PRESENTATION 11 F-3/11-PRESENTATION 12 F-3/12-PRESENTATION Hardship Analysis Case Easements/ Setbacks On-Site Tree Preservation Site Shape & Adjacent Rail Floodplain/ CWQZ Vehicular Access Constraints C15-2021-0096 C15-2020-0053 C15-2019-0061 C15-2020-0013 C15-2020-0009 Applicant Request ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 13 F-3/13-PRESENTATION For Illustrative Purposes Only Without Requested Variance (Loss of 10 Potential Affordable Units) 14 F-3/14-PRESENTATION Imagine Austin For Illustrative Purposes Only With Requested Variance (Includes 10 More Affordable Units – Total: 52 Affordable Units) 15 F-3/15-PRESENTATION Support for Applicant Request Parks and Recreation Department Letter of Support: “A consolidated park would provide much greater value, with more contiguous parkland serving more people and offering a greater opportunity to fully develop quality on-site parks amenities.” North Loop Neighborhood Association Letter of Support: “As this is one of the last available commercially zoned sites of this scale …
November 2021 November 2021 Animal Services Report ANIMAL SERVICES REPORT Animal Services News • The live outcome percentage for November was 98.8 percent. • A total of 1,252 animals were brought to the shelter which included 705 dogs, 511 cats, 5 birds, 1 livestock and 30 animals listed as other. • A total of 634 animals were adopted (329 cats, 288 dogs, and 34 small animals such as guinea pigs and rabbits). • A total of 119 dogs and cats were returned to their owners (RTOs and RTO-Adopt). • Animal Protection Officers (APOs) returned 41 animals to their owners in the field during the month of • Officers handed out 29 fencing assistance applications, impounded 101 injured animals and delivered 37 wildlife • Officers entered 227 rabies exposure reports and submitted 17 specimens for rabies testing. Animal Protection November. • 2 microchips were implanted in the field. animals to Austin Wildlife Rescue. 2 positive results, all bats. • 37 total coyote related activities o 2 Observations o 16 Sightings o 7 Encounters o 1 Incident o 6 Wild sick o 5 Wild injured • Out of 37 coyote related activities, 24 fell within the reported behavior types (sighting, encounter, and incident). • Encounters: Pets were a factor in all activities: o 5 encounters involved a coyote following or approaching a person with no incident o 1 encounter involved a coyote following a person walking dogs o 1 encounter involved off-leash dogs in a natural area o 1 encounter involved mange coyotes Incident: Pets were a factor: • o 1 incident involved a coyote taking unattended chickens in a fenced backyard at night November 2021 Animal Services Report Volunteer, Foster and Rescue Programs • A total of 142 volunteers donated 1,771 hours during November. • The Volunteer Coordinators held 4 orientations for new volunteers in November, introducing 99 people to the shelter programs. 47 new volunteers attended their first training or mentor shifts in November. • More than 180 families provided foster care, and a total of 97 animals were adopted directly from foster care. • There are 1,378 approved fosters in GivePulse, and 94 new foster applications were processed. • There are currently 268 animals in foster homes. • 175 animals were transferred to 22 AAC rescue partners (This data is for our rescue program only and does not include transport data). • 4 owner surrender appointments were posted to …
October 2021 October 2021 Animal Services Report ANIMAL SERVICES REPORT Animal Services News birds. Animal Protection • The live outcome percentage for October was 97.8 percent. • A total of 1,249 animals were brought to the shelter which included 574 dogs, 607 cats, 62 wild animals and 6 • A total of 734 animals were adopted (315 dogs, 390 cats, 1 bird, and 28 small pets). • A total of 139 dogs and cats were returned to their owners (RTOs and RTO-Adopt). • Animal Protection Officers (APOs) returned 35 animals to their owners in the field during the month of October. • Officers handed out 42 fencing assistance applications, impounded 142 injured animals and delivered 110 wildlife • Officers entered 221 rabies exposure reports and submitted 45 specimens for rabies testing. • 2 microchips were implanted in the field. animals to Austin Wildlife Rescue. 8 positive results, all bats. • 31 total coyote related activities o 14 sightings o 2 observations o 6 wild sick (mange) o 3 encounters o 6 incidents • Out of 31 coyote related activities, 23 fell within the reported behavior types (sighting, encounter, and incident). • Encounters: Encounters and Incidents: Pets were a factor in all activities. 44% of encounters/incidents involved mange coyotes o 2 encounters involved coyotes chasing unattended cats in yards (no attack) o 1 encounter involved a coyote entering a yard at night while a dog and human were present (no attack) o 2 incidents involved a coyote injuring unattended livestock in yards o 3 incidents involved coyotes taking unattended cats in yards o 1 incident involved coyotes taking an unattended dog in a natural space • 44 wildlife calls were made that involved activity by raccoon, bat, snake, opossum, fox, bird, skunk, rabbit, turtle, coyote, squirrel, and unknown. Volunteer, Foster and Rescue Programs October 2021 Animal Services Report • A total of 166 volunteers donated 1,555 hours during October. • The Volunteer Coordinators held 6 orientations for new volunteers in October, introducing 138 people to the shelter programs. 28 new volunteers attended their first training or mentor shifts in October. • More than 200 families provided foster care, and a total of 158 animals were adopted directly from foster care. • There are 1,325 approved fosters in GivePulse, and 90 new foster applications were processed. • There are currently 273 animals in foster homes. • 251 animals were transferred to 30 …
AUSTIN ANIMAL CENTER DATA ANALYTICS AND MARKETING TEAM September 2016 DECEMBER 05, 2021 Introduction Current Situation Data Analysis Social Media Presence Risks & Mitigants PRESENTATION AGENDA INTRODUCTION CURRENT SITUATION SOCIAL MEDIA PRESENCE INTRODUCTION DATA ANALYSIS RISKS AND MITIGANTS Introduction Current Situation Data Analysis Social Media Presence Risks & Mitigants INTRODUCTION MEET THE AAC TEAM SID PURANIK SHIKHA LAKHI JUSTIN LANG NAVYA RAO SAKET MUKTHAPURAM Project Lead Marketing Consultant Data Analyst Data Analyst Data Analyst Introduction Current Situation Data Analysis Social Media Presence Risks & Mitigants CURRENT SITUATION AUSTIN ANIMAL CENTER HIGH INTAKE Over 18,000 total intakes in 2019. Each animal costs $43 per day. FALSE STRAYS AAC facilities being overloaded due to reporting of false strays 1 4 2 3 LOW ANIMAL CLAIM RATE Three out of four dogs are not claimed by owners LOW MARKETING ENGAGEMENT Large social media following, but low engagement on posts Introduction Current Situation Data Analysis Social Media Presence Risks & Mitigants PRESENTATION AGENDA DATA ANALYSIS CURRENT SITUATION SOCIAL MEDIA PRESENCE INTRODUCTION DATA ANALYSIS RISKS AND MITIGANTS Introduction Current Situation Data Analysis Social Media Presence Risks & Mitigants DATA ANALYSIS OVERVIEW How do we solve the issue of over intake in the animal shelter? What are key factors for over intake and how can we mitigate them? 01 MICROCHIPPING 02 LOCATION 03 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS 04 DELIVERABLE Introduction Current Situation Data Analysis Social Media Presence Risks & Mitigants DATA ANALYSIS MICROCHIPPING Pivot Tables Analysis MAIN TAKEAWAY: 2x as many chipped animals are returned Introduction Current Situation Data Analysis Social Media Presence Risks & Mitigants DATA ANALYSIS MICROCHIPPING Causal-Inference Test Inferring the effect of one variable on another variable What is the effect of being microchipped on the throughput rate of stray animals? Linear Regression Model to estimate the ATE Introduction Current Situation Data Analysis Social Media Presence Risks & Mitigants DATA ANALYSIS MICROCHIPPING Analysis Results MICROCHIPPING EFFECT Estimated increase of 17.3% in the adoption and return rate of animals microchipped Statistically significant difference between the subsets Potential confounding factors Introduction Current Situation Data Analysis Social Media Presence Risks & Mitigants DATA ANALYSIS LOCATION Frequency Analysis ZIP CODES WITH HIGHEST FALSE STRAY PERCENTAGE ZIP CODES WITH LOWEST FALSE STRAY PERCENTAGE 78731 | 78615 | 78701 | 78705 | 78728 78610 | 78732 | 78719 | 78621 | 78719 Introduction Current Situation Data Analysis Social Media Presence Risks & Mitigants DATA ANALYSIS ZIPCODE ANALYSIS Low False Stray Rate …
M E M O R A N D U M TO: Technical Committee on Animal Housing Facilities October 27, 2020 Kelly Carey, Committee Administrator FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: NFPA 150 Second Draft Technical Committee FINAL Ballot Results (A2021) According to the final ballot results, all ballot items received the necessary affirmative votes to pass ballot. 29 Members Eligible to Vote 8 Members Not Returned (Bahra, Day, Dvorscak, Gulati, Haas, Hoberg, Rieck, Wright) The attached report shows the number of affirmative, negative, and abstaining votes as well as the explanation of the vote for each revision. To pass ballot, each revision requires: (1) a simple majority of those eligible to vote and (2) an affirmative vote of 2/3 of ballots returned. See Sections 3.3.4.3.(c) and 4.3.10.1 of the Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA Standards. National Fire Protection Association Report https://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPar... Second Revision No. 1-NFPA 150-2020 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ] 2.3.3 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. ASTM D396, Standard Specification for Fuel Oils, 2019a . ASTM D3699, Standard Specification for Kerosene, 2018a 2019 . ASTM D6448, Industrial Burner Fuels from Used Lube Oils, 2016. ASTM D6751, Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel Blend Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuel, 2019. ASTM D6823, Standard Specification for Commercial Burner Fuels from Used Lube Boiler Fuels with Used Lubricating Oils, 2008, reapproved 2013. ASTM D7666, Standard Specification for Triglyceride Burner Fuel , 2012, reapproved 2019. ASTM E84, Standard Test Method of Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 2019b 2020 . ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, 2018c 2019 . ASTM E814, Standard Test Method for Fire Tests of Through Penetration Fire Stops Stop Systems , 2013a, reapproved 2017 . ASTM E1354, Standard Test Method for Heat and Visible Smoke Release Rates for Materials and Products Using an Oxygen Consumption Calorimeter, 2017. ASTM E1591, Standard Guide for Obtaining Data for Fire Growth Models, 2013. ASTM E1966, Standard Test Method for Fire-Resistive Joint Systems, 2015, reapproved 2019. ASTM E2307, Standard Test Method for Determining Fire Resistance of Perimeter Fire Barriers Using Intermediate-Scale, Multi-story Multi-Story Apparatus, 2019. Submitter Information Verification Committee: ASF-AAA Submittal Date: Wed Aug 19 09:26:35 EDT 2020 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Updates to reference standards. Response Message: SR-1-NFPA 150-2020 Public Comment No. 1-NFPA 150-2020 [Section No. 2.3.3] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 29 Eligible Voters 1 …
Belinda Hare for Animal Advisory Commission 2022 Proposed Meeting Schedule Animal Advisory Commission Proposed Meeting Schedule, 2022 The City of Austin’s Animal Advisory Commission meets on the second Monday of every month, 6 p.m.: • Monday, January 10 • Monday, February 14 (Valentine’s Day) • Monday, March 14 • Monday, April 11 • Monday, May 9 • Monday, June 13 • Monday, July 11 • Monday, August 8 • Monday, September 12 • Monday, October 10 • Monday, November 14 • Monday, December 12
February 8, 2022 Esteban Vilchez 10107 Research Blvd Svrd Nb Austin TX, 78759 Re: C16-2022-0001 Property Description: LOT 1 BLK A 183/ GREAT HILLS TRAIL SUBD Dear Esteban, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from City Code Chapter 25-10. Austin Energy cannot approve this request due to the lack of clarity in the plans. The plans must show side profiles and the height of the proposed sign, and the exact location of the sign must be pinpointed more clearly. Without this information, Austin Energy cannot determine whether the proposed sign meets required clearances as per Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Cody Shook, Planner II Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6881
February 8, 2022 Andrew Thompson 607 E 49th St Austin TX, 78751 Property Description: Re: C15-2022-0019 Dear Andrew, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from City of Austin Land Development Code Section 25-2-774 (C)(5)(b) Two-Family residential use. Austin Energy cannot approve the request until the applicant can show that any new proposed structures will be 15 feet away from any of Austin Energy Facilities, poles, or lines or underground facilities as per Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Cody Shook, Planner II Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6881
February 8, 2022 Christopher Paladino 4013 Clawson Rd Austin TX, 78704 Re: C15-2022-0010 Property Description: S50 FT OF N 1/2 OF LOT 25-27 BANISTER HEIGHTS Dear Christopher, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from City of Austin land Development Code Section 25-2-492 to subdivide property into two lots with widths below the required 50’ for SF-3 zoning. Austin Energy cannot approve the request until the applicant meets with Austin Energy’s Electric Design team to ensure that electric service can be sufficiently provided to the new sites and that any proposed development adheres to clearances as per Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. Please contact electric designer Donathan Hutchinson at Donathan.Hutchinson@austinenergy.com to address these concerns. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Cody Shook, Planner II Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6881
