All documents

RSS feed for this page

Public Safety CommissionApril 4, 2022

PSC Backup-Item3c. AFD Diversity Metrics - April 4, 2022 mtg original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Public Safety Commission Austin Fire Department Demographics Monday, April 4th, 2022 Sworn Demographics Date Feb 2016 Jul 2016 Jan 2017 May 2017 Oct 2017 Jan 2018 Jul 2018 Jan 2019 Mar 2022 Male Female African American Asian/Pac Isl Caucasian Hispanic Other 967 992 914 938 911 962 992 1004 1066 805 820 759 767 741 764 787 796 822 166 173 158 175 169 190 198 204 233 19 23 18 20 19 22 23 21 23 46 50 46 49 51 53 54 55 63 74 80 72 75 71 77 82 85 92 5 6 5 2 2 10 12 13 5 Sworn Demographics by Rank Male Female Caucasian American Hispanic African Rank Assistant Chief Division Chief Battalion Chief Captain Lieutenant Specialist Firefighter 5 7 36 73 197 201 547 0 1 1 1 17 23 49 2 7 34 64 174 164 377 2 0 1 3 4 8 45 Asian/ Pac Isl 0 0 0 0 8 5 10 American Indian 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 Others 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 2 7 26 46 150 Sworn Age by Rank Rank Assistant Chief Division Chief Battalion Chief Captain Lieutenant Specialist Firefighter Average Age 50 50.63 50.35 47.78 47.46 42.71 36.53 Average Years of Service 24.4 25.13 23.84 21.65 19.36 13.97 7.09 Recent Cadet Class Demographics Class Male Female Caucasian 133 134 92% 92% 8% 8% 46% 52% Recent Applicants in Hiring Process Applicant Pool (as of June 2021) Structured Oral Process (90% of total applicant pool) Civilian Demographics African American Hispanic 6% 0% 25% 23% Asian/ Pac Isl 4% 2% 2+ Races 8% 6% Chose not to Disclose 8% 9% Male Female Caucasian African American Hispanic Asian/ Pac Isl Native American 2+ Races 88% 12% 30% 14% 43% 3% 1% 6% 88% 12% 32% 12% 43% 3% 1% 7% Rank Male Female Caucasian African American Hispanic Asian/Pac Isl Other CIVILIAN INTERN TEMP 65 3 3 72 3 4 49 1 2 63 2 3 12 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 2

Scraped at: April 6, 2022, 5 a.m.
Public Safety CommissionApril 4, 2022

PSC Backup-Item3c.EMS Diversity Metrics- April 4, 2022 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

EMS Sworn Personnel Ethnicity 2.08% 0.76% 0.76% 0.57% 0.38% 2.08% 18.56% 74.81% White 74.81% Asian 2.08% Hispanic or Latino 18.56% Black or African American 2.08% Choose Not To Disclose 0.76% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Isl 0.76% Two or more races 0.57% American Indian/Alaska Native 0.38% 1 EMS Sworn Personnel Gender 25.57% 74.43% Male Female 2 EMS Sworn Personnel Age 5% 0% 5% 23% 67% under 25 25-44 45-54 55-61 62 and over 3 EMS Diversity Challenges • Currently hire only EMS certified personnel • Industry-wide problem recognized by national associations • National Association of EMT created diversity scholarship last year • Demography of the National Emergency Medical Services Workforce: A Description of Those Providing Patient Care in the Prehospital Setting: Prehospital Emergency Care: Vol 25, No 2 (tandfonline.com) • In 2017-2018, 101,363 EMS professionals recertified and 87,471 (86%) completed the profile; in 2018-2019, 106,893 EMS professionals recertified and 92,640 (87%) completed the profile. Of the 142,751 EMS professionals who met inclusion criteria, the population was primarily male (76%) and age increased by certification level. By race/ethnicity, 85% were white, 5% were Hispanic/Latino, 5% were Black/African American, 2% were American Indian/Alaskan Native, 2% were Asian and 1% were Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. • Females and Minority Racial/Ethnic Groups Remain Underrepresented in Emergency Medical Services: A Ten-Year Assessment, 2008-2017 - PubMed (nih.gov) • Conclusions: The underrepresentation of females and minority racial/ethnic groups observed during this 10- year investigation of EMTs and paramedics earning initial certification suggests that EMS workforce diversity is unlikely to undergo substantial change in the near future. The representation gaps were larger and more stable among paramedics compared to EMTs and suggest an area where concerted efforts are needed to encourage students of diverse backgrounds to pursue EMS. 4 EMS Vacancy Staffing Plan • Plan to address diversity and vacancies • Council-directed initiative • Final plan due end of April • Create recruitment strategies to attract diverse certified personnel • Target communities of color • Identify industry conferences, trade shows, other opportunities for engagement • Explore direct hiring from the community and provide EMT training • Local high schools • Community groups and associations 5

Scraped at: April 6, 2022, 5 a.m.
Public Safety CommissionApril 4, 2022

PSC DRAFT minutes for Monday, March 7, 2022 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

` PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES March 7, 2022 Cory Hall-Martin Michael Sierra-Arevalo John Kiracofe Rebecca Webber The Public Safety Commission convened a hybrid in person and videoconferencing meeting Monday, March 7, 2022 at City Hall 301 W. 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Commissioner Nelly Ramirez called the Board Meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. Board Members in Attendance: Rebecca Gonzales Kathleen Hausenfluck Nelly Ramirez Rebecca Bernhardt Board Members Absent: Queen Austin, Amanda Lewis, and Rocky Lane Staff in Attendance: Robin Henderson, Chief of Staff, Austin Police Department Teresa Gardner, Assistant Chief, Austin/Travis County Emergency Medical Services Rob Vires, Chief of Staff, Austin Fire Department Public Communication: 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – Vice Chair Commissioner Ramirez asked for any edits to the minutes for January 24, 2022 and February 7, 2022. Hearing no edits to either of the minutes she deemed the minutes approved. 2. OLD BUSINESS a. Recommendation on consolidation of Forensics Lab and APD (sponsored by Commissioner Bernhardt and Ramirez) Commissioner Ramirez asked Commissioner Bernhardt to introduce the recommendation and elaborate on the reason/s for the sponsorship of this recommendation. Commissioner Bernhardt commented on the reasons for bringing the recommendation forward and motioned to vote. Commissioner Ramirez paused her motion and asked for questions or comments on the draft recommendation presented to the board. Hearing no questions from board members, Commissioner Gonzales motioned for a vote and Commissioner Webber seconded the motion. -Carlos Leon - Starbucks 1 The vote was unanimous and taken with roll calling. See recommendation below. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION No. 20220307-02a March 7, 2022 WHEREAS, the City of Austin operates the Forensic Science Bureau, which provides forensic WHEREAS, the City of Austin is committed to the Reimagine Public Safety Initiative, which is Proposal that the Austin City Council make the Forensic Science Bureau independent of the Austin Police Department budgetarily and structurally Date: Subject: Motioned by: Rebecca Bernhardt Seconded by: Nelly Paulina Ramirez Recommendation: The Public Safety Commission recommends that the City Council move the Forensic Science Bureau from under the control of the Austin Police Department and make it budgetarily and structurally independent. laboratory services related to the investigation of crimes, under the budgetary and managerial control of the Austin Police Department; a holistic approach to assessing and evolving public safety systems. Reimagine Public Safety is supposed to go beyond the scope of law enforcement and include decoupling some activities previously envisioned …

Scraped at: April 6, 2022, 5 a.m.
Commission on Immigrant AffairsApril 4, 2022

Play audio original link

Play audio

Scraped at: April 12, 2022, 4 a.m.
Music CommissionApril 4, 2022

20220404-3b: Austin Music Disaster Relief Funding original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

MUSIC COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20220404-3b Commissioner Mahone Recommendation for Funding Seconded By: Chair Patterson Date: April 4, 2022 Subject: Motioned By: Recommendation The Music Commission recommends that the City of Austin fund the remaining applicants of the Austin Music Disaster Relief Grant. Description of Recommendation to Council The Music Commission recommends that additional disaster relief funds in the amount of $3.3M be made available to fill a shortfall documented by the Economic Development Department in the last round of ARPA funding. Rationale: A tremendous number of ATX working musicians who applied for disaster relief funds were denied due need vastly outstripping demand. Economic Development Department records show this shortfall to be $3.3M. As multiple COVID-19 variants continued to result in cancelled gigs through the early part of this year, our city’s musician have struggled financially since the beginning of the pandemic. The Music Commission recommends that the city help fund this gap through any available source. Vote For: 8 (Chair Patterson, Vice-chair Medicharla, Commissioners Reynolds, Gould, Limon, Mahone, Pike, Strickland) Against: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 3 (Commissioners Garcia, Rosenthal, and Sullivan) Attest: Kim McCarson 1 of 1

Scraped at: April 14, 2022, 12:10 a.m.
Music CommissionApril 4, 2022

Recommendation 20220404-3a: Budget Recommendation FY 2023 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

MUSIC COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20220404-3a Seconded By: Commissioner Reynolds Date: April 4, 2022 Subject: Music Commission Budget Recommendation FY 2023 Motioned By: Vice-chair Patterson Recommendation The Music Commission recommends $15 Million for FY 2023 from any and all available sources to sustain, strengthen, and build the Austin music economy. Description of Recommendation to Council The Music Commission, in support of Austin’s unique music ecosystem, recommends that the Austin City Council designate a $15 Million investment for FY2023 to Austin music professionals and enterprises for the purpose of growing operations, fueling Austin music industry growth, and supporting the music community in a visionary way. The Commission gratefully acknowledges the support the Austin music industry received from the City of Austin through COVID relief programs. As we emerge from a two-year pandemic period, the Commission recommends robust dedicated funding to transform and elevate the Austin music economy. Sources for the requested $15 Million could include, but are not limited to the General Fund, hotel occupancy taxes (outside of the Live Music Fund), public-private partnerships, and other sources. The commissions recommends the following investments: 1. As ATX music is a driver of tourism, an increase in Visit Austin’s budget specifically to create a dedicated Music Marketing Fund for the Austin music ecosystem, targeted to audiences both within and outside of Austin. Budget request: $3 Million. Source: Hotel Occupancy Taxes 2. A 3rd round of pandemic disaster relief for musicians due to need vastly outstripping demand in 2021, with the goal of helping musical artists remain in Austin. Budget request: $3 Million. Sources: General Fund, partnerships with private sector entities 3. Investment in the development of a music-centered capital venture which includes low-cost rehearsal, studio and other creative music spaces, and affordable housing units. Budget request: $9 Million. 1 of 2 Sources - Project Connect Anti-Displacement funding, General Fund, Density Bonus fees. With the addition of funding from Federal tax credits for affordable housing and private sector partnerships the total project budget should target $25 Million for a complete development unique to Austin, Texas. Rationale: ● Austin is the Music Capital of the World and the music industry here is a major driver of tourism and economic growth for the City of Austin. ● Austin is facing an affordability crisis, with market-rate real estate out of reach for most musicians, venues, and music industry workers. ● The pandemic has continued to create severe economic losses …

Scraped at: May 3, 2022, 10:40 p.m.
Public Safety CommissionApril 4, 2022

PSC APPROVED Minutes for April 4, 2022 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

` PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES April 4, 2022 The Public Safety Commission convened a hybrid in person and videoconferencing meeting Monday, April 4, 2022 at City Hall 301 W. 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Commissioner Nelly Ramirez called the Board Meeting to order at 4:02 p.m. Board Members in Attendance: Kathleen Hausenfluck Cory Hall-Martin Nelly Ramirez John Kiracofe Rebecca Bernhardt Amanda Lewis Rebecca Webber Rebecca Gonzales Absent: Commissioners Lane, Sierra-Arevalo, and Queen Austin Executive Liaison Present: Robin Henderson, APD Chief of Staff Brandon Wade, Assistant Chief, Austin Fire Department Theresa Gardner, Assistant Chief, Austin/Travis County Emergency Medical Services Public Communications - Citizens signed up to speak: none 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – Commissioner Ramirez called for any edits/corrections to the March 7, 2022 minutes and hearing none the minutes were deemed approved. 2. OLD BUSINESS a. Update from Austin Police Department on actions from the Kroll Report and potential recommendation (sponsored by Commissioner Bernhardt and Ramirez) 4:04pm-4:31pm Speaker(s): -Joseph Chacon, Chief, Austin Police Department Chief Chacon provided an update to changes that have been made. With regards to recruitment, he stated that the incoming 144th and 145th Cadet Class saw increased rates of black cadets and female cadets. APD has committed to trying increase female officers by 30% by 2030. They are also working with James Joyce to set diversity metrics. APD is working to modify fitness testing and qualification criteria. APD has updated their policies around use of force. This includes adding 1 language, definitions, and clarifying language around shooting at moving vehicles, firearm discharge situations, and response to resistance, de-escalation and duty to intervene. All 20 use of force cases flagged by Kroll were previously reviewed by APD. Chief Chacon introduced the Force Review Unit, which is outside of the officer’s chain-of-command and reviews use of force cases who are trained to investigate these cases. Commissioner Bernhardt asked if there had ever been the opportunity for an all-female cadet class with all female trainers. Chief responded no, mostly based on class size and trainer availability. Commissioner Webber asked for clarifications around the Force Review Unit. Chief Chacon provided a brief history of the review process. The Force Review Unit has nine dedicated sergeants and one lieutenant who are receiving training to review these cases in a consistent, unbiased manner. Commissioner Gonzales requested that APD continue to provide updates on these recommendations on a monthly basis. 3. …

Scraped at: May 4, 2022, midnight
Firefighters', Police Officers' and EMS Civil Service CommissionApril 4, 2022

Approved Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Commission Member Eyna Canales-Zarate MINUTES for Firefighters’, Police Officers’ and Emergency Medical Personnel’s Civil Service Commission REGULAR MEETING Monday, April 4, 2022 The Firefighters’, Police Officers’, and Emergency Medical Services Personnel’s Civil Service Commission convened in a Special Called Meeting on Monday, April 4, 2022, at 5202 East Ben White Boulevard, Building 500, Austin TX 78741. Board Members in Attendance: Commission Chair Jolsna Thomas Commission Vice Chair Farah Ahmed Staff in Attendance: Monika Arvelo, Assistant Director Mecia Griffin, Civil Service Coordinator Michael Sullivan, Civil Service Coordinator Ann Skowronski, Assistant City Attorney CALL TO ORDER Civil Service Commission Chair Thomas called the Commission Meeting to order at 11:07 a.m. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Pete DiDonato, Interim Assistant Chief, ATCEMS Chris Vallejo, Commander, Police No members of the public signed up to speak on this item. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. Approve the minutes from the Firefighters’, Police Officers’, and Emergency Medical Services Personnel’s Civil Service Commission Special Called Meeting of March 10, 2022. The minutes from the Special Called Meeting of March 10, 2022, were approved on Commission Vice Chair Ahmed’s motion, Commission Member Canales- Zarate’s seconded, and the motion passed 3-0. 1 2. NEW BUSINESS a. Hear and rule on appeal(s) from the Austin Police Department Sergeant written promotional examination administered on March 2, 2022, pursuant to the Texas Local Government Code Chapter 143.034, Article 13 of the Agreement between the City of Austin and the Austin Police Association and Rule 7 of the City of Austin Fire Fighters’, Police Officers’ and Emergency Medical Services Personnel’s Civil Service Commission Rules and Regulations. Commission Member Canales-Zarate made a motion that exam question 56 remain as keyed. Commission Vice Chair Ahmed seconded the motion. The motion was approved 2-1 with Vice Chair Ahmed voting no. b. Hear and rule on appeal(s) from the ATCEMS Division Chief written promotional examination administered on March 17, 2022, pursuant to the Texas Local Government Code Chapter 143.034, Article 12 of the Agreement between the City of Austin and the Austin-Travis County EMS Employees Association and Rule 7 of the City of Austin Fire Fighters’, Police Officers’ and Emergency Medical Services Personnel’s Civil Service Commission Rules and Regulations. Commission Vice Chair Ahmed made a motion that answer choice “B” be noted as correct for exam question 30. Commission Member Canales-Zarate seconded the motion. The motion passed 3-0. Commission Member Canales-Zarate Commission made a motion that answer choices “A” …

Scraped at: June 1, 2022, 5:10 a.m.
Firefighters', Police Officers' and EMS Civil Service CommissionApril 4, 2022

Play audio original link

Play audio

Scraped at: June 1, 2022, 7:40 p.m.
Music CommissionApril 4, 2022

Approved Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

AUSTIN MUSIC COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES The Austin Music Commission convened in a regular meeting on April 4th 2022, at Austin City Hall, 301 W. 2nd St. Austin, TX 78701 April 4, 2022 BOARD MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE: Chair - Anne-Charlotte Patterson, Vice-chair - Nagavalli Medicharla, Parliamentarian - Graham Reynolds (virtual), Lauryn Gould (virtual), Christopher Limon (virtual), Jonathan “Chaka” Mahone (virtual), Patrice Pike (virtual), Scott Strickland Staff in Attendance: Erica Shamaly, Stephanie Bergara, Kim McCarson CALL TO ORDER 6:39pm MUSICAL PERFORMANCE PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Jon Muq The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. None 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2. STAFF BRIEFINGS 3. NEW BUSINESS Approval of Minutes from Regularly Scheduled Meeting on March 7, 2022. Commissioner Reynolds motions. Vice-chair Medicharla seconds. Motion carries 7-0. a. Presentation on the Community Navigator Program by Casey Ubias, Program Manager, Small Business Division, Economic Development Department. Commissioner Limon joins the meeting 7:11pm. a. Discussion and Possible Action on Austin Convention Center renovation, expansion and music industry role following presentation by Katy Zamesnik, Chief Administration Officer, Austin Convention Center. Katy Zamesnik was not able to attend the meeting. No action taken. b. Discussion and Possible Action on Austin Music Disaster Relief following presentation by Casey Smith, Strategic Planning Manager, Economic Development Department. Commissioner Mahone motions to recommend funding the remaining applicants of the Austin Music Disaster Relief Fund. Chair Patterson seconds. Motion carries 8-0. c. Discussion and Possible Action on addition of Short-term Rentals to Hotel Occupancy Tax fund revenue following presentation by Luis Briones, Airbnb. Commissioner Gould left the meeting 8:40pm. Commissioner Limon left the meeting at 8:40pm. 1 AUSTIN MUSIC COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES April 4, 2022 Commissioner Gould returns 8:41pm. Commissioner Gould left the meeting 8:42pm. Commissioner Limon returns 8:42pm. Commissioner Limon left the meeting at 8:49pm. Commissioner Limon returns 8:50pm. Chair Patterson motions to put this item on future agenda, Commissioner Strickland seconds. d. Discussion and Possible Action on the Live Music Fund following update by Kim McCarson, Program Manager, Music and Entertainment Division. No action taken. e. Discussion and Possible Action following update on Joint Arts and Music Commission Working Group. No action taken. f. Discussion and Possible Action regarding officer elections. No action taken. 4. OLD BUSINESS action taken. a. Discussion and Possible Action on budget recommendation. …

Scraped at: June 14, 2022, 12:40 a.m.
Music CommissionApril 4, 2022

Play video original link

Play video

Scraped at: June 14, 2022, 12:40 a.m.
Commission on Immigrant AffairsApril 4, 2022

Approved Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

COMMISSION ON IMMIGRANT AFFAIRS MONDAY, April 4, 2022 6:30 PM Meeting Minutes Aditi Joshi Rennison Lalgee Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch Joseph Ramirez-Hernandez Juan Vences-Benitez Board Members in Attendance: Krystal Gomez, Chair Nicole Merritt, Vice-Chair Karen Crawford Adrian De La Rosa Board Members not in Attendance: Sara Becker Glenn Rosales Karen Reyes Staff in Attendance: Sinying Chan, Staff Liaison & Health Equity Unit Program Coordinator/Austin Public Health CALL TO ORDER 1. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES – February 7, 2022; March 7, 2022 • February Minutes Approved, Kate moved to approve, motion seconded, all in favor • March Minutes Approved, Kate moved to approve, Karen seconded 2. NEW BUSINESS: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTIONS: A. Updates from Rocio Villalobos on her work with the Equity Office i. Equity Office has been working with Austin Public Library and several other partners on creating an enhanced library card that can also serve as a photo ID. Other cities and counties have already created an enhanced library card program, including San Antonio, San Marcos, and a county in Dallas. The office of Councilman Fuentes hosted a townhall to gather feedback from the community. The feedback was that people were more interested in something more like a municipal ID than an enhanced library card. There is also a potential that the United way of Greater Austin could host the database, and could store and manage the data. They are currently looking to see which route, enhanced library card or municipal ID, would be a better option. Concerns are that a municipal ID could be used to target immigrants unlike a library card which is more common, and whether switching to a municipal ID would delay this project. ii. Naturalization ceremonies resumed March 11th. The City of Austin joined the campaign National Partnership for New Americans which is working to help two million immigrants become U.S. citizens. The Equity Office participated in a large press conference of about 300 people. The ceremony was hybrid due to weather restrictions. More ceremonies are planned. iii. The City of San Antonio and other major hubs have been experiencing a large influx of immigrant and are considering the option of having Austin receive and facilitate their travel to relieve some of the burden. Rocio will be going to San Antonio to learn more. Rocio will also be attending the Welcoming Interactive Conference in Charlotte, North Carolina. B. Emi Johnson, Austin Public Library, updates …

Scraped at: July 28, 2022, 5 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionApril 1, 2022

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION GRANTS COMMITTEE Friday, April 1, 2022 – 10:00 A.M. Street-Jones Building, Room 400A 1000 E. 11th Street Austin, Texas COMMISSION MEMBERS: Witt Featherston Kelly Little Blake Tollett CALL TO ORDER AGENDA PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Speakers who register no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1. Briefing regarding legal consideration related to equity in Economic Development Department Hotel Occupancy Tax-funded programs Neal Falgoust, City of Austin Law Department STAFF BRIEFING A. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call the Historic Preservation Office at 512-974-3393 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Grants Committee, please contact Elizabeth Brummett, Historic Preservation Officer, at 512-974-1264. 1

Scraped at: March 23, 2022, 9:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionApril 1, 2022

Presentation - Equity lens on funding programs original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 18 pages

Equity Considerations in Contracts and Program Funding Historic Landmark Commission Grants Committee April 1, 2022 Neal Falgoust, Assistant City Attorney Purpose • Discuss legal risks associated with using race, gender and protected-class criteria in determining awards of contracts and program funding. 2 Why Now? • Recent federal court decisions that put race-focused programs at risk. • Law Department deliberative process. • Briefing to City Council. 3 Acknowledgement • History of intentional racial segregation – 1928 Master Plan and “Negro District.” • Oppression of BIPOC – 1954 Federal Housing Act, “urban renewal,” and seizing of Black-owned land. • City Council has committed the City to correcting its racist practices. (Resolution 20210304-067) 4 City’s Programs • As part of Project Connect, community members developed displacement mitigation strategies and an equity tool to guide decision making. (“Nothing About Us Without Us”) • EDD also wants an equity focus for the Cultural Arts and Heritage Tourism grant programs. 5 Legal Foundation • 14th Amendment – Equal Protection Clause • No government may “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” 6 “Tiered Scrutiny” • Strict Scrutiny (Race, National Origin, Religion, Alienage) – Government must demonstrate the policy is narrowly tailored to meet a compelling purpose. • Intermediate Scrutiny (Gender, Sex, Sexual Orientation?) – Government must demonstrate the policy is substantially related to an important purpose. • Rational Basis (Age, Disability, Wealth, Felony Status) – The policy must have a rational connection to a legitimate interest. 7 Strict Scrutiny Any government program that takes race into consideration faces strict scrutiny by the courts. Strict scrutiny is the most rigorous judicial review. Courts start with presumption that policy is invalid and government must prove its interests. 8 Compelling Government Interest The government must demonstrate: • actual discrimination in the relevant market, and • that the government either actively or passively perpetuated the discrimination. 9 Narrowly Tailored The government must demonstrate: • it considered other race-neutral policies; • race-neutral policies failed to achieve the compelling interest. 10 City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. • “Generalized assertions” of past racial discrimination would not justify “rigid” quotas; • 30 percent quota could not be connected to “any injury suffered by anyone;” • Race-neutral measures must be seriously considered. 11 Evidence Acceptable to a Court Disparity studies are conducted to determine if there is discrimination in the studied market and if the government is …

Scraped at: April 8, 2022, 2:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionApril 1, 2022

Play audio original link

Play audio

Scraped at: April 12, 2022, 5:20 a.m.
Environmental CommissionMarch 30, 2022

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Special Called Meeting of the Environmental Commission March 30, 2022 at 6:00 P.M. Permitting and Development Center, Events Center, Room 1405 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive, Austin, Texas 78752 Some members of the Environmental Commission will be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register to speak remotely, call or email the board liaison Kaela Champlin, (512) 974-3443, Kaela.Champlin@austintexas.gov, no later than noon, (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). COMMISSIONERS: Haris Qureshi (D-1) Rachel Scott (D-2) Pam Thompson (D-3) Vacant (D-4) Audrey Barrett Bixler (D-5) Ana Aguirre (D-9) Colin Nickells (D-6) Richard Brimer (D-10) Jennifer Bristol (D-7) Secretary Perry Bedford (Mayor) _________________________________________________________________________________ Kevin Ramberg (D-8) Vice-Chair Agenda CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1 1. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION a. Watershed Protection Department’s Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Forecast and Capital Improvement Program Plan—Anupa Gharpurey, Financial Manager, Erin Wood, Planner, and Annie Van Zandt, Capital Program Consultant, Watershed Protection Department (1 hour) b. Development Services Department’s Fiscal Year 2023-2027 Financial Forecast— Denise Lucas, Director; Angela Means, Assistant Director; Eric Ugalde, Financial Manager; David Hillers, Financial Manager; and Amy Hunter, Financial Manager, Development Services Department (1 hour) ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days before the meeting date. Please call Kaela Champlin at Watershed Protection Department, at (512) 974-3443 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Environmental Commission, please contact Kaela Champlin, Watershed Protection Department, …

Scraped at: March 25, 2022, 3:10 p.m.
Environmental CommissionMarch 30, 2022

20220330-001a: WPD FY22-23 Forecast & CIP Plan original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 35 pages

Watershed Protection Department FY 2022-23 Forecast and CIP Plan 1 Overview ◦ Mission & Organizational Structure ◦ Operating Financial Forecast ◦ FY23 New Staffing Request ◦ Capital Improvement Program ◦ Project Highlights ◦ Resources 2 Our Department & Mission Established in 1991, Watershed Protection Department was charged with the goal of managing the City’s creeks, drainage systems and water quality programs. Our Mission: “…to protect the lives, property, and environment of our community by reducing the impact of floods, erosion, and water pollution.” Our Funding: Primary Source: Drainage Charge - >95% Other sources: Bonds (for Capital Projects), Development Fees, Interest Income, Grants 3 WPD Organizational Structure Watershed Protection Office of the Director Planning, Monitoring, & Compliance Field Operations Project Design and Delivery Support Services 4 FY21 Expense Budget Variance FY21 Expense Budget: $107.3M; FY21 Actual Spending: $102.3M FY21 variance: $5.0M Variance ($M) % Unspent Category Personnel expenses Contractual Services Materials and Commodities Transfer to CIP Total $1.9 $3.1 $1.0 ($1.0) $5.0 4.7% 12.6% 53.8% -2.5% 5.0% 5 Revenue & Expense Trends Rate Increase 130 125 120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Revenue Expenses 6 Five-Year Revenue Projection Rate Increase s n o i l l i m $ n I 125 120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 FY 2022 Budget FY 2022 CYE FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 DUF Revenue Other Revenue In $ millions FY 2022 CYE FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 Drainage Rev. Other Revenue Total Revenue Rate Increase Med. Res. Chrg ($) FY 2022 Budget 98.7 2.0 100.7 $11.80 99.1 2.0 101.1 99.8 2.1 101.9 0% $11.80 107.0 2.2 109.2 6.8% $12.60 113.4 2.2 115.6 5.6% $13.31 116.2 2.3 118.5 2.2% $13.60 118.3 2.3 120.6 1.5% $13.80 7 Forecast Expenses by Category Category Personnel Other Program Exp. Program Expenses Transfer to CIP Other Transfers Total Transfers 2021Actual 2022CYE 2023 2022 Budget 37.9 12.0 49.9 36.4 16.0 52.4 41.8 15.3 57.1 35.0 18.4 53.4 40.2 12.6 52.8 35.0 18.1 53.1 42.6 14.2 56.8 33.0 18.5 51.5 2024 45.0 14.9 59.9 33.0 19.0 52.0 2025 46.6 14.6 61.2 35.0 19.5 54.5 2026 47.7 15.3 63.0 35.0 20.0 55.0 2027 48.7 16.1 64.8 35.0 20.6 55.6 Total Expenses 102.3 110.5 105.9 108.3 111.9 115.7 118.0 120.4 2% decrease: $2m reduction in CIP …

Scraped at: March 25, 2022, 3:10 p.m.
Environmental CommissionMarch 30, 2022

20220330-001b: DSD FY23-27 Financial Forecast original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 16 pages

Fiscal Year 2023 – 2027 Financial Forecast Environmental Commission March 30, 2022 Presentation Overview • Development Services • Budget Process • Funding Sources • Revenue Outlook • Fee Methodology • Proposed Operating Budget • Forecasts and Measures Department and Budget Process Development Services Mission: To support a vibrant community through responsible development. Goal/ Indicator Conduct timely plan reviews and inspections Percent of DSD controlled activities on-time Protect and renew Austin’s tree canopy Percentage of Austin’s total land area covered by the tree canopy 425 Full-Time Employees 36 Temporary Employees Properly steward financial resources Percent of operating expenses held in reserve Fiscal Year 2021 Budget: $64.2M Provide excellent customer service Percentage of customers reporting satisfied or very satisfied on Customer Satisfaction Poll Development Services Office of the Director • Equity & Inclusion • Executive functions Customer & Employee Experience • Customer Experience • Finance • Human Resources • • Stakeholder & Community Engagement Information Technology Building Plan Review • Austin Center for Events • Building Plan Review Land Development Review Construction & Environmental Inspections • Community Tree Preservation • Land Use Review • Public Projects Review • Regulatory Policy & Administration • Transportation & General Permit Review • Building Inspections • Environmental Inspections • Gen. Permit, Telecom & Excvtn Inspections • Site & Subdivision Inspections Budget Process • Required by City Charter • Ensures proper spending and monitoring of taxes and fees paid by public Budget Kick-off January 2022 Budget Engagement Mar – Apr 2022 Budget Public Hearings August 2022 Budget Development Jan – Mar 2022 Budget Submitted May 2022 Budget Adoption August 2022 Funding Sources, Revenue & Fee Methodology Funding Sources FY 2022 Forecast $69.62M FY 2023 Forecast $69.59M $9.81 General Fund $7.35 Other $23.55 Development Fees $28.91 Building Safety $9.27 General Fund $6.27 Other $24.81 Development Fees $29.23 Building Safety Revenue Outlook Five-Year Revenue Forecast 3.5% 3.2% $72.03 3.3% $74.32 3.4% $76.76 $79.35 $84.00 $78.00 $72.00 $66.00 $60.00 $54.00 $69.35 $69.62 $69.59 0.4% FY21 0.0% FY22 Actuals FY20 4.0% 3.5% 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% -0.5% FY23 FY24 FY25 Revenue Growth in % FY26 FY27 Forecast Five-Year Forecast Program FY19 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 Building Safety $27.16M $27.22M $30.24M $28.91M $29.23M $30.11M $31.01M $31.95M $32.90M Development Fees $24.95M $20.92M $23.19M $23.55M $24.81M $25.91M $26.82M $27.83M $28.95M Other General Fund $5.36M $5.81M $6.88M $7.35M $6.27M $6.46M $6.65M $6.85M $7.06M $16.55M $7.54M $9.03M $9.81M $9.27M $9.55M …

Scraped at: March 25, 2022, 3:10 p.m.
Joint Sustainability CommitteeMarch 30, 2022

20220330 JSC Special Called Meeting Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

SPECIAL CALLED JOINT SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE HYBRID MEETING FORMAT March 30th at 6pm City Hall, Council Chambers 301 West 2nd Street, Austin, Texas CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Kaiba White, Chair (Resource Mgmt. Commission) Audrey Barrett (Environmental Commission) Melissa Rothrock (Zero Waste Advisory Commission) Diana Wheeler (Urban Transportation Commission) Fisayo Fadelu (Community Development Commission) Karen Magid (Austin Travis County Food Policy Board) Christy Williams (Water & Wastewater Commission) Alexis Taylor (Economic Prosperity Commission) Richard DePalma - (Parks & Recreation Board) David Carroll (Design Commission) Alberta Phillips (City Council) Karen Hadden (Electric Utility Commission) Solveij Praxis (Planning Commission) For more information, please visit: www.austintexas.gov/jsc AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register please email Zach Baumer (zach.baumer@austintexas.gov). 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) February 23, 2022 meeting of the Joint Sustainability Committee 2. NEW BUSINESS a) Chair Election – (Discussion and/or possible action) b) Airport fuel tank expansion presentation (Discussion and/or possible action) c) Austin Climate Equity Plan Implementation Update, Zach Baumer, Office of Sustainability – (Discussion and/or possible action) d) JSC FY22-23 Budget Recommendations– (Discussion and/or possible action) e) Departmental presentation schedule and committee questions– (Discussion and/or possible action) f) Working Group Updates – (Discussion and/or possible action) g) Commission members report back on any relevant discussions from their respective boards and commissions – (Discussion and/or possible action) FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS • Ongoing updates on Austin Climate Equity Plan implementation • Ongoing updates on community and climate resilience ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Zach Baumer at the Office of Sustainability at 415-694-3111, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the …

Scraped at: March 25, 2022, 7:10 p.m.
Environmental CommissionMarch 30, 2022

Play video original link

Play video

Scraped at: March 31, 2022, 4:12 p.m.