HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS AUGUST 3, 2022 PR-2022-092566; GF-2022-103084 4008 N. LAMAR BOULEVARD 29 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1926 residence converted to a furniture store and salon. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH The house at 4008 N. Lamar Boulevard is a one-story gabled building with a full-width porch supported by boxed columns and enclosed by a wood railing. It is clad in horizontal wood siding and features single and paired 1:1 wood windows. The house at 4008 N. Lamar, also addressed as 4106 Morningside, was constructed in the 1920s for Ira G. and Hetra Gardenhire. Ira Gardenhire, a barber, managed the Stephen F. Austin Hotel barbershop before opening his own establishment. He died in 1945, leaving the home to his widow. Hetra Gardenhire remained in the home until her death in 1970. Her brother-in-law, H. E. Gardenhire, opened a furniture store in the house in 1973; it has housed retail and personal services since then. PROPERTY EVALUATION The 2020 North Central Austin historic resource survey lists the building as contributing to a potential historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate to high integrity. The porch has been modified for commercial use. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is constructed in the Craftsman style. b. Historical association. There do not appear to be significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Encourage adaptive reuse, then relocation over demolition, but release the permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. LOCATION MAP 29 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 29 – 3 Demolition application, 2022 Occupancy History City Directory Research, June 2022 1959 Hetra Gardenhire, owner 1955 1952 1947 1944 1941 1937 1935 1932 1929 Hetra Gardenhire, owner Hetra Gardenhire, owner (widow of Ira …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CC Date: TBD CASE NUMBER: C14H-2022-0098 HLC DATE: August 3, 2022 PC DATE: TBD APPLICANT: Nneka Shoulds HISTORIC NAME: Donley-Goode-Walton House / Walton’s Beauty Shop and Salon WATERSHED: Boggy Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 1605 Leona Street ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-NP to SF-3-NP-H COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from family residence-neighborhood plan (SF-3-NP) to family residence-neighborhood plan-historic landmark (SF-3-H-NP) combining district zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Historic associations and community value HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Davis-Thompson, Del Valle Community Coalition, East Austin Conservancy, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Neighbors United for Progress, Organization of Central East Austin Neighborhoods , Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: N/A BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: § 25-2-352(3)(c)(ii) Historical Associations. The property has long-standing significant associations with persons, groups, institutions, businesses, or events of historic importance which contributed significantly to the history of the city, state, or nation; or represents a significant portrayal of the cultural practices or the way of life of a definable group of people in a historic time. PHONE: 512-974-2727 Nominator Nneka Shoulds, the home’s current occupant, describes the building’s historical associations: Recommended as not eligible for a local historic landmark designation in the East Austin Historical Resources Survey of 2016, 1605 Leona St. was essential in assisting a multicultural Tejano-Irish immigrant family and a marginalized Black American family to establish strong foundations upon which future generations would launch long-lasting legacies. Uniquely located directly across from historic Oakwood Cemetery (originally called City Cemetery and the oldest city-owned cemetery in Austin), the home tells the untold story of two families who achieved their American dreams against unimaginable odds. The people who lived here experienced and endured painful racial segregation and discriminatory practices, and they fought against those conditions with dignity and courage to break barriers in education, the military, music, and business. 1605 Leona St. is the childhood home of Raymond (Ramón) “Cowboy” Donley, known as the “godfather of Tejano music.” Donley was a classically trained violinist who once played with the Durango Symphony. Raymond made his living as a barber by day, but at night, he led his band, La Orquesta de Ramon Donley. His son, Manuel Donley, took an …
The Donley-Goode-Walton House Supporting Historical Documentation 1. Deed Chronology Transaction City of Austin to C. (Charles) C. Cushman, 1839 M.C. (Marvin Criddle) Culbertson to A. Donley and Guadalupe Donley, May 29, 1917 Arcadio Donley, Sr., Raymond Donley, Willie Donley, Ernest Donley, Benita Donley Acosta, Huey Acosta to J.W. (John Wesley) Goode and Hattie Goode, October 20, 1944 Hattie Goode to Helen Walton, December 13, 1954 Helen Walton to Helen Shoulds, February 7, 2012 2. Occupancy History Vol./Page Original patent: Outlot 37, Division B (Austin City Lots and Outlots Records, Comptroller sales certificate, recorded Oct. 10, 1860, 1840 Sandusky map) 295/67A Book 750/16-19 1528/458 Instrument #2012019348 1940-1944 Manuel Donley 12-16 Musician Occupation Day Laborer/Farmer/Grocery Store Owner & Operator Barber and Violinist 1940-1944 40-44 Homemaker Year 1939-1944 1940-1944 1940-1944 Name Arcadio Donley, Sr. Raymond (Ramon) Donley, Sr. Delores (Quinones) Donley Delores Donley 1940-1944 Raymond Donley, Jr. Age 82-86 50-54 16-20 15-19 1940-1944 Eslenda Donley 14-18 1940-1944 Robert Donley 9-13 1940-1944 Lupe Donley 8-12 1940-1944 6-10 Beatrice Donley 1940-1944 Joe Donley 4-8 1940-1944 Edward Donley 1-5 - - - - - - - - 1944 1944-1947 1944-1952 1944-1952 Mr. and Mrs. Raymond Donley, Sr. (and family) Ernest R. Goode Rev. John Wesley Goode Willie “Boots” Walton, Sr. - Barber and Violinist/ Homemaker 24-28 79-87 44-52 Military Service/ Clergyman Clergyman/Farmer Musician/Cab Driver Source 1940 United States Federal Census 1940 United States Federal Census 1940 United States Federal Census 1940 United States Federal Census 1940 United States Federal Census 1940 United States Federal Census 1940 United States Federal Census 1940 United States Federal Census 1940 United States Federal Census 1940 United States Federal Census 1940 United States Federal Census 1940 United States Federal Census The Austin American Statesman Dec. 17, 1944 Family Records Family Records Marriage Records, The ~1947-1984 37 Years Family Records 27-96 21-23 58-69 19 Austin American Statesman Directory, Family Records Family Records 64-99 Homemaker/Washwoman Cosmetologist/ Cosmetology Instructor/ Companion Nurse Business Student Family Records Truck Driver Family Records Retail Family Records 64-69 71-Current (82) Retired Caretaker (retired) Family Records Family Records 33 57-59 Restaurant Hospitality Nurse Family Records Family Records 1944-1979 1944-2015 1973-1975 1981-1990 1981 2007-2012 2011-Present 2016-2017 2019-2021 Hattie Jane (Bailey) Goode Helen E. (Goode) Walton Walton’s Beauty Shop/Salon Rubye Jean Goode Ernest R. Goode Helen (Ware) Shoulds Johnny Goode Lillian (Ware) Scott Kenan Shoulds Helen (Ware) Shoulds Nneka Shoulds 3. Biographical Data • Marvin Criddle Culbertson, Sr. 2019-Present 33-Current (36) Public …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AUGUST 3, 2022 HR-2022-084104 SEBRON G. SNEED HOUSE 6301 BLUFF SPRINGS ROAD 5.0 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct an apartment complex around the Judge Sebron G. Sneed House ruins erected circa 1857-1860. 1) Construct a three-building apartment complex around the Sebron Sneed House ruins, providing a 25’ buffer zone between the ruins and the pool and other new construction. Proposed buildings are each three stories in height and display Mission Revival stylistic cues; they are clad in stucco and capped with hipped, tiled roofs. Columned arches accent the main entrance to each building. 2) Construct a fence around the ruins. Note: The applicant has provided 2015 correspondence, per Committee feedback, showing that former Preservation Officer Steve Sadowsky requested a mortar analysis and preliminary stabilization plan. The applicant specified that tuck-pointing and consolidation would be implemented following an observation report and recommendation from a masonry restoration contractor and the erection of a double steel fence around the ruins (see backup). RESEARCH & ARCHITECTURE The home on this site was zoned historic in 1979, with the surrounding area rezoned historic in 1980. The house was destroyed by fire in 1989, and the ruins remain. Travis County foreclosed on the home for taxes owed in 2002 and retained the property until a private owner purchased the site from the county in 2006. Invest SmartHomes Inc owned it from 2006-2009, then The Foresight Foundation from 2009-2011. Since 2011, the property has toggled ownership between the same companies: IndoPak Investments, Inc and The Circle at The Nelms. In 1854, Judge Sebron G. Sneed moved his entire family from Fayetteville, Arkansas, to his newly acquired 470-acre farm south of the present city of Austin. Construction of a permanent family residence was begun shortly after that in 1857 and continued for five years. War stopped the work, and the house, never entirely completed, lacked its intended porches and interior finishes.1 The stone for the walls was quarried on the property and finished by hand. Lumber for the floors, roof, and finish material was acquired from the Lost Pine Forest at Bastrop, Texas, 30 miles east of the residence site. A Historic American Building Survey (HABS TX - 399) dated 2/3/1937 described the house as follows: “ This native limestone residence is located one mile off the Austin-San Antonio Highway on the Austin-Lockhart Highway, near Austin, Travis County. …
B -1. 1 ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2007-0042 ADDRESS: 1801 Nelms Drive (Sebron Sneed House) OWNERS: Invest Smart Homes, Inc. HLC DATE: June 25, 2007 July 23, 2007 August 27, 2007 ZAP DATE: COUNCIL DATE: AGENT: Thrower Design (A. Ron Thrower) SF-3-H GR-MU-CO-H, with the conditional overlay limiting the commercial (Todd Rayer) ZONING FROM: TO: uses to those allowed under the LR district AREA: 1.78 acres STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Multi-Family Residence – Moderate-High Density (MF-4-H) with the requirement that there be at least a 40-foot “buffer zone” between the exterior walls of the ruins and the exterior walls of the proposed multi-family development. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The home on this site was zoned historic in 1979 to honor Judge Sebron Sneed with the surrounding site having been rezoned historic in 1980. The house was destroyed by fire many years ago and the ruins remain (see attached photographs). Travis County foreclosed on the home for taxes owed and the site was recently purchased from the County by a private owner. In January and February, 2007, the owner presented plans to the Historic Landmark Commission (HLC) for a Certificate of Appropriateness on the treatment of the ruins. The HLC granted a Certificate of Appropriateness in April, 2007 for stabilization of the ruins and indicating that the applicant’s proposal constituted the minimum of the preservation work approved for the site. The applicant proposes a multi-family residential project two stories tall surrounding the proposed plaza incorporating the ruins. The applicant is now requesting a change in the base zoning to GR-MU-CO-H, Community Commercial-Mixed Use-Conditional Overlay-Historic zoning. The conditional overlay proposed would limit the commercial uses to those allowed under the less intense, LR, Neighborhood Commercial, zoning district. The applicant maintains that the primary use of the site would be residential though the GR-MU zoning does not require a mix of uses on the site and would permit entirely GR development. Regardless of the zoning, any new construction will be reviewed for a Certificate of Appropriateness by the HLC. The Zoning Staff recommends the applicant’s original rezoning request of MF-4-H. MF-4 zoning is intended for multifamily and group residential use with a maximum density of 36 to 54 units per acre, depending on unit size. The Land Development Code provides that an MF-4 district designation may be applied to high density housing in a centrally located area near supporting transportation and commercial facilities or in an …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION AUGUST 22, 2011 APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS C14H-1977-0011 Sebron Sneed House 1801 Nelms Drive B.2 - 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant is seeking a conceptual review to proceed with development plans for this site. The applicant is proposing redevelopment of this site, as was previously reviewed by the Commission several years ago. The Sebron Sneed House is a ruin; the historic zoning on the property is limited to a buffer area of 25 feet around the perimeter of the ruins. The applicant had requested that the Certificate of Appropriateness Review Committee review a plan for developing the area inside the ruins and also sought review of the placement of sidewalks and other public access routes to the ruins. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Commission’s Standards for Review of applications for Certificates of Appropriateness include: Do not destroy the distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure, or site and its environment. Avoid the removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features. Recognize all buildings, structures, and sites as products of their own time. Do not construct alterations which have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance. Changes which have taken place over time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site and its environment. Recognize and respect the changes, which may have acquired significance in their own right. Treat with sensitivity distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site. Make every reasonable effort to provide a compatible use for a property that requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site and its environment or to use the property for its originally-intended purpose. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS The Committee recommended against any new development within the core of the ruins, and recommended that the public access to the ruins take into account viewability of the ruins from the public right-of-way. STAFF RECOMMENDATION This is a conceptual review of development plans for the site, which will largely be outside the limits of historic zoning; however, staff recommends as great a public accessibility and ability to see the ruins from the public right-of-way as possible, and a prohibition against any development within the walls of the ruins. Staff further recommends the installation of B.2 - 2 an interpretive display detailing the history of the …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION OCTOBER 26, 2015 APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS C14H-1977-0011 Sebron Sneed House 1801 Nelms Drive B.5 - 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Tuck point the remaining limestone walls of the ruined house and clean the site of debris. The applicant proposes to stabilize the remaining limestone walls of the house, which was gutted by fire many years ago. The applicant will obtain a qualified masonry restoration contractor, and further consult with persons with expertise in restoration work to evaluate the stability of the stone walls and obtain a recommendation of the scope of work to preserve the remaining walls. The applicant is proposing to mortar the existing walls with white Portland cement, ASTM C 150, Type I or Type II, which will not contain more than 0.60% total alkali, and hydrated lime, ASTM C 207, Type S. . The mortar sand will be ASTM C 144 with a natural sand color, and will match the size, texture, and gradation of existing mortar sand as closely as possible. After the restoration work is complete, two rings of steel fencing will be erected to prevent intrusions to the ruins. A protective epoxy sealant will be applied to the top of the walls to prevent further deterioration from water penetration. The applicant further proposes to clear the site of intrusive vegetation and debris. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Commission’s Standards for Review of applications for Certificates of Appropriateness include: • Do not destroy the distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure, or site and its environment. Avoid the removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features. Recognize all buildings, structures, and sites as products of their own time. Do not construct alterations which have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance. Repair, rather than replace deteriorated architectural features wherever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Base the repair or replacement of missing architectural features on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historical, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from other buildings or structures. • • COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Not reviewed. B.5 - 2 STAFF COMMENTS This site has been deteriorating for years; the applicant is proposing to correct the conditions on the site and …
SLIDING GATES SOLID WOOD FENCE THE CIRCLE AT THE NELMS APARTMENTS 6301 BLUFF SPRINGS ROAD AUSTIN, TEXAS 78744 (BLDGS-1, 2,&3) Tchen Architect 1303 ELM FOREST DRIVE CEDAR PARK, TEXAS 78613 512.351.1801 512.870.9427 (FAX) tchenarch@gmail.com Drawings & written materials appearing herein constitute original and unpublished work of the architect and may not be duplicated, used, or disclosed without written consent of the architect. C 2022 TCHEN ARCHITECTS NELMS DR. 1 BLDG-2 (4) 1-B UNITS (20) 2-B UNITS "RUINS" AREA 2,050 S.F. 7826 s.f. Roof 598 1 LAUNDRY MECH D A O R S G N I R P S F F U L B MAIL BOX 318 APT OFFICE BLDG-1 (12) 1-B UNITS 9,739 S.F. BIKE RACKS K L A W T E F SID 5 300 4315 s.f. Roof 1 1 S E T A G G SLIDIN TRUE NORTH INDEX OF DRAWINGS SHEET DRAWING TITLE SYNOPSIS & VICINITY MAP ADA-TAS STANDARDS DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE LIFE SAFETY FIRST FLOOR LIFE SAFETY SECOND FLOOR LIFE SAFETY THIRD FLOOR LIFE SAFETY FIRST FLOOR LIFE SAFETY SECOND FLOOR LIFE SAFETY THIRD FLOOR LIFE SAFETY FIRST FLOOR LIFE SAFETY SECOND FLOOR LIFE SAFETY THIRD FLOOR FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION ELEVATION BUILDING CROSS SECTION STAIRWAY TYPICAL DETAILS WALL & FLOOR ASSEMBLIES DOOR SCHEDULE & WALL TYPES FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION ELEVATION ELEVATION BUILDING CROSS SECTION STAIRWAY TYPICAL DETAILS WALL & FLOOR ASSEMBLIES DOOR SCHEDULE & WALL TYPES FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION ELEVATION BUILDING CROSS SECTION STAIRWAY TYPICAL DETAILS WALL & FLOOR ASSEMBLIES DOOR SCHEDULE & WALL TYPES A0-0.0 A0-0.1 A0-0.2 L1-1.0 L1-1.1 L1-1.2 L2-1.0 L2-1.1 L2-1.2 L3-1.0 L3-1.1 L3-1.2 A1-1.0 A1-1.1 A1-1.2 A1-1.3 A1-1.4 A1-1.5 A1-1.6 A1-2.0 A1-2.1 A1-3.0 A1-3.1 A1-3.2 A1-4.0 A2-1.0 A2-1.1 A2-1.2 A2-1.3 A21.4 A2-1.5 A2-2.0 A2-2.1 A2-2.2 A2-3.0 A2-3.1 A2-3.2 A2-4.0 A3-1.0 A3-1.1 A3-1.2 A3-1.3 A3-1.4 A3-1.5 A3-2.0 A3-2.1 A3-3.0 A3-3.1 A3-3.2 A3-4.0 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 S-8 S-9 S-10 S-11 S-12 S-13 S-14 S-15 S-16 S-17 S-18 S-19 S-20 S-21 S-22 S-23 S-24 S-25 M-00 M-01 M-02 E-00 E-02 E-03 P-00 P-01 P-02 S-01 BLDG-1 FOUNDATION PLAN BLDG-2 FOUNDATION PLAN BLDG-2 FOUNDATION TYPICAL FOUNDATION DETAILS BLDG-1 …
City of Austin Founded by Congress, Republic of Texas, 1839 Historic Preservation Office Planning and Zoning Department One Texas Center, 505 Barton Springs Road P.O. Box 1088, Austin, Texas 78767 Demolition by Neglect Sebron Sneed Mansion, 1801 Nelms Drive August 8, 2017 The Circle at Nelms, LLC 2207 W Parmer Lane Austin, Texas, 78727 SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Re: Dear Sir or Madam: At the request of the Historic Landmark Commission, I am contacting you to discuss the demolition by neglect of the remains of the Sebron Sneed Mansion at 1801 Nelms Drive, which is owned by you. The Sebron Sneed Mansion is a city historic landmark. We are very concerned about the condition of this structure, which is in serious need of attention to prevent its continued deterioration. We are very gratified to see the new fencing and clean-up of the site, but we need to discuss a stabilization plan for the ruins to prevent their collapse. Please contact me as soon as possible to discuss plans for stabilization of the ruins, as I am due to make a report to the Historic Landmark Commission on August 28. I look forward to hearing from you. If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to call or e-mail me. Sincerely, __________________________________ Steve Sadowsky Historic Preservation Officer City of Austin, Texas Steve.sadowsky@austintexas.gov
ORDINANCE NO. 20080807-064 AN ORDINANCE REZONING AND CHANGING THE ZONING MAP FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY KNOWN AS THE SNEED HOUSE LOCATED AT 1801 NELMS DRIVE FROM FAMILY RESIDENCE (SF-3) DISTRICT AND (SF-3-H) COMBINING FAMILY RESIDENCE-HISTORIC LANDMARK DISTRICT TO MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE MODERATE HIGH DENSITY (MF- 4) DISTRICT FOR TRACT ONE AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE LANDMARK-CONDITIONAL MODERATE HIGH DENSITY-HISTORIC OVERLAY (MF-4-H-CO) COMBINING DISTRICT FOR TRACT TWO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN: PART 1. The zoning map established by Section 25-2-191 of the City Code is amended to change the base district from family residence (SF-3) district and family residence-historic landmark (SF-3-H) combining district to multifamily residence moderate high density (MF-4) district for Tract One and multifamily residence moderate high density-historic landmark-conditional overlay (MF-4-H-CO) combining district for Tract Two as described in Zoning Case No. C14-2007-0042, on file at the Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Department, as follows: Tracts One and Two: A 1.78 acre tract of land, more or less, out of the Santiago Del Valle Grant, Travis County, the tract of land being more particularly described by metes and bounds in Exhibit "A" incorporated into this ordinance (the "Property"), generally known as the Sneed House, locally known as 1801 Nelms Road, in the City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, and generally identified in the map attached as Exhibit "B". PART 2. The Property within the boundaries of the conditional overlay combining district established by this ordinance is subject to the following conditions: A. A 25-foot wide setback shall be established around the footprint area identified as Tract Two on Exhibit "A". Within the 25-foot wide setback the maximum impervious cover is 50 percent. B. Field notes to more particularly describe all tracts will be submitted with site plan application. Page 1 of 2 Except as specifically restricted under this ordinance, the Property may be developed and used in accordance with the regulations established for the multifamily residence moderate high density (MF-4) base district, and other applicable requirements of the City Code. PART 3. This ordinance takes effect on August 18, 2008. PASSED AND APPROVED August 7 ., 2008 Will Wy Mayor APPROVED ATTEST: David Allan Smith City Attorney Shirley A. Gentry City Clerk Page 2 of 2 'Office 512-487-9602 Fax 512-330-1621 Thomas P. Dixon R.P.L.S. 4324 J11502 Waterloo Surveyors Inc, EXHIBIT "A" March 21,2007 FIELD NOTES FIELD NOTES FOR 1.78 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AUGUST 3, 2022 HR-2022-075037 HILDRETH-FLANAGAN-HEIERMAN HOUSE 3909 AVENUE G 6 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a swimming pool. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURE Install a swimming pool in side yard. Replace existing fence and plant privacy hedges around the pool area. The house’s 1990 National Register nomination describes it as follows: […] 2-story frame dwelling that was built in 1902. As is sometimes seen on contemporaneous houses, the dwelling retains the features of Victorian-era housing coupled with details from the Classical Revival style. The house remains virtually unaltered and is in good condition. A massive 2-story dwelling with a generally square plan, the house rests on a pier-and-beam foundation. The primary (east) facade is dominated by a 2-tier porch featuring Doric columns and turned-wood balustrades suggestive of the Classical Revival style popular in Texas during the early 20th century. A projecting 2- tiered portico a t the south end of the porch marks the entry bay. Fenestration includes a single doorway with transom and double-hung wood sash with 1/1 lights. Polygonal projecting bays on the side (north) elevation alleviate the regular massing. Along with the complex roofscape of steeply pitched hipped and gable roof forms, these features are more typica l of Victorian-er a dwellings. Interior corbelled chimneys of buff-colored brick extend from the north and south slopes of the hipped roof. Modest changes that do not adversely affect the dwelling's historic integrity include a 2- story addition on the rear (west) elevation and installation of metal awnings over the windows and the entry bay of the porch.1 DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Sites and streetscapes 1. Vegetation, topography, and landscaping 1.3 If the property had a grassy, open front lawn when constructed, maintain that context. Do not replace the lawn with paving or gravel. The proposed pool has been pushed toward the rear of the property to improve maintenance of context. 2. Walls and fences 2.4 If constructing a new street-side fence or site wall, design it so that the materials, style, and scale are compatible with and differentiated from the architectural style and period of the building and are in keeping with historic fence styles and heights in …
12'-6" 12'-0" 2'-11" 57'-2" 4'-9" 5'-8" 6'-4" 8'-10" 14'-6" 4'-7" 6'-11" 1'-0" NEW FENCING LINE BARK MULCH 75 SF BARK MULCH 15 SF HORIZONTAL WOOD SLAT FENCE " 4 " 4 " 4 " 4 " 4 " 4 " 1 - ' 4 " 0 - ' 3 " 7 - ' 1 " 0 - ' 2 " 0 - ' 2 " 0 - ' 2 " 0 - ' 2 " 0 - ' 2 " 2 - ' 1 " 0 1 - ' 9 " 2 - ' 1 " 0 1 - ' 9 " 1 - ' 7 RESIDENCE (E) BARK MULCH 265 SF DECOMPOSED GRANITE 200 SF BRICK PATIO AND STEPERS 240 SF CONCRETE 80 SF POOL 225 SF TIMBER TECH 250 SF BARK MULCH 675 SF DRIVEWAY (E) BARK MULCH 55 SF LIMESTONE WASHED BRICKS 500 SF BUILDING (E) NATURAL FLAGSTONE 470 SF BUILDING (E) BARK MULCH 35 SF DECOMPOSED GRANITE 210 SF STONE STEP (E) " 6 - ' 6 2 " 8 - ' 4 " 3 - ' 5 " 5 - ' 4 2 " 4 - ' 7 1 " 0 - ' 2 2 10'-7" 9'-10" 23'-0" 24'-2" 20'-3" 23'-4" 10'-8" 1'-2" 1'-2" 1 5 7 8 7 , X T , n i t s u A G e u n e v A 9 0 9 3 i e c n e d s e R n a h a l l a C DIMENSIONS + MATERIALS PLAN BACK YARD DATE: 04/19/2022 SCALE: SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24" x 36" sheet N SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" 0 8' 16' ATTENTION LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR: IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS DESIGN, OR TO LEARN MORE ABOUT WORKING WITH YARDZEN, PLEASE CONTACT PROS@YARDZEN.COM. NOTE: PLANS ARE FOR CONCEPTUAL AND ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AUGUST 3, 2022 HR-2022-084876 HYDE PARK 4005 AVENUE B 7.0 – 1 Addition, remodel, and new construction to a circa 1928 single-family residence. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Add rear yard screen porch hyphen attaching new construction 2 story guest suite with bathroom and loft for bedroom. The hyphen will continue the ridgeline and roof of eaves. Match materials of the existing house on hyphen and new 2 story addition except the foundation will be slab on grade. 2) Build a new open carport over the existing rear driveway and paint it to match the house. 3) Add a small tool shed (40 sq. ft) to the existing NE wall under the existing windows. 4) Replace the existing rear deck in kind. ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS 4005 Avenue B is a Craftsman Style duplex residence built in 1928. It was renovated into a single-family home later and renovations have continued as recently as 20081. It is a single-story form with a low pitch, front-gabled roof with decorative braces under the gables and visible rafter tails. The home has two separate street-facing partial porches, with replacement single door entryways: evidence of its past life as a duplex. The Hyde Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 3.5: Roofs: 1. Retain the original roof pitches and profiles on the building. Avoid changes to roofs on the front of the building. Avoid adding to the eave height of original roofs, especially at the front of the structure. Retain historic dormers. 2. In replacing roof materials, consider first the use of the original material, then the use of a product that resembles the original material, such as fiberglass or other energy-efficient shingle. Metal roofs are also acceptable. 4.1: Preservation of Historic Character: Construct additions so as to require the removal or modification of a minimum of historic fabric. Do not construct additions that will require the removal of any portion of the front façade. Design additions to existing residential buildings to reflect the form and style of the existing house. The proposed addition does not appear to require the removal of a significant amount of historic fabric. It mostly reflects the form of the existing house. 4.2: Location: Locate new additions and alterations to the rear or rear side of the building so that …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AUGUST 3, 2022 HR-2022-105301 CASTLE HILL HISTORIC DISTRICT 1124/1122-1126 W. 6TH STREET 8 – 1 PROPOSAL Deconstruct the building, reconstruct the façade, and construct a new multi-story mixed-use building beyond. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Completely deconstruct existing contributing building. 2) Reconstruct the building façade. Approximately 23% of the original building will remain, with street-facing fenestration patterns unaltered. 3) Construct a new multi-story building beyond and directly atop the reconstructed façade. The proposed second floor will replicate the fenestration pattern and existing roofline at the first floor. Proposed new windows are fixed and undivided. The third and fourth floors are set back from the parapet and appear to be constructed of light-colored brick and fixed glazing, with flat roofs of variable height. ARCHITECTURE One-story Spanish Colonial Revival commercial building, originally with three tenant spaces demarcated by transom door- and-window combinations at each bay. Larger divided transoms appear above each fenestration unit. The building is clad in horizontal siding and is capped with a terra cotta tile shed roof, above which the parapet extends at each end of the building. DESIGN STANDARDS The Castle Hill Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: A.1. GENERAL DISTRICT STANDARDS (a) Repair, rather than replace, original materials. Replace only materials that are deteriorated beyond repair or that detract from and are not original to the building. Replacement materials shall match the original materials when feasible. The proposed project entirely deconstructs the existing building, leaving the façade only. It replaces character-defining divided transoms with undivided fixed glazing and replaces the terra cotta roof with another material. (b) Do not make changes to the public view of an existing contributing or non-contributing building that have no historic basis and/or that seek to create the appearance of an architectural style that is not original to the existing building. The proposed project replicates the first floor and existing roofline at a new second story. (c) Use best efforts to utilize photographic or physical evidence when reconstructing original historic details. The proposed project appropriately reconstructs the existing façade, except for the glazing and roofline. C.1. REHABILITATION OR ALTERATION OF CONTRIBUTING BUILDINGS (a) Maintain the historic style and retain character-defining features. (c) Repair existing original windows unless determined infeasible due to excessive deterioration that is adequately documented in the application for a …
H i s t o r i c P r e s e r v a t i o n P a c k a g e J u l y 8 , 2 0 2 2 CLARKSVILLAGEA Vertical Mixed Use Development in Austin West 9th Street West 8th Street West 9th Street West 7th Street SITE Duncan Neighborhood park Shoal Creek W e s t A v e n u e S t . R i o G r a n d e d r a v e l u o B r a m a L h t r o N d r a v e l u o B r a m a L h t r o N West 6th Street West 6th Street West 5th Street West 5th Street W e s t A v e n u e S t . R i o G r a n d e Shoal creak Ladybird Lake-Lamar Beach Metro Park 6TH STREET LOOKING EAST - EXISTING HEIGHT TRANSITION +24’▼ +22’▼ +41’▼ +29’▼ ▼+31’ ▼+62’ +26’▼ +35’▼ +60’▼ +75’▼ +200’▼ . t S o c n a l B Site +361’▼ +300’▼ +246’▼ +120’▼ . t S r e l s s e r P . r D w o l f n W i . t S n a h t r a H . t S r o l y a B . d v l B r a m a L h t r o N . t S n o s r e d n e H . t S d o o W . e v A t s e W . t S s e c e u N . t S e d n a r G o i R . t S o i n o t n A n a S . t S e p u l a d a u G . t S a c a v a L . t S o d a r o l o C . e v A s s e r g n o C 6 T H S T R E E T ( N O R T H E L E V A T I O N ) HORIZONTALLY STACKED PROGRAM RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL HOTEL OFFICE RETAIL HOTEL OFFICE RETAIL BLANCO STREET 1124 1116 WEST 6TH STREET 578_Clarksville8'016'32'1/16” …
G F E D C B A DEMOLITION NOTES: 0 10' 20' 40' TP ALLEY (20' R.O.W.) TP T P T P T P P T P T T P T P P T P T P T T P TP T P TP TP P T P T T P T P T P T P P T TP WEST 6TH STREET (80' R.O.W.) G F E D C B A R O F D E Z I R O H T U A T O N O T R O I R P N O I T C U R T S N O C L A V O R P P A Y T I C L A M R O F 2 0 7 8 7 , S A X E T , N I T S U A , 0 0 2 E T I U S , T E E R T S H T 5 T S A E 1 2 0 2 5 8 0 5 1 - F : O N M R I F 0 6 5 5 . 9 6 6 . 2 1 5 PRELIMINARY 3 N O I T P M E X E N A L P E T I S E G A L L I V S K R A L C T E E R T S H T 6 . W 6 1 1 1 ; T E E R T S H T 6 . W 4 1 1 1 3 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , Y T N U O C S I V A R T , N I T S U A N O I T P M E X E N A L P E T I S N O I T I L O M E D CITY APPROVAL STAMP SHEET C100 1 OF 1 5 4 3 2 1 g w d . E P S _ 0 0 . 9 6 0 7 \ s E P S - 9 1 5 0 2 2 0 2 \ s t b h x E - 7 0 \ X T _ l i i v C - 1 0 \ e g a l l i l V s k r a C 0 0 . 9 6 0 …
Attachment to Historic Review Application for: 1110, 1112, 1114, 1116, 1118-20, 1122-24 W 6th Street Castle Hill Local Historic District / West Line National Historic District The application under review is related to a proposed redevelopment of the above listed properties. The development is a moderately dense mix of various commercial and residential uses, stacked vertically. The building mass decreases with each level. Towards the perimeter of the proposed building, and specifically towards W 6th Street, the development maintains a 2-story frontage, stepping back the upper levels. This creates a continuous and respectful elevation which seamlessly integrates with the existing buildings and restores the historic urban fabric of W 6th Street. There is a conscious decision not to maximize the available height based on zoning allowances, which would overpower and dominate the existing buildings. The idea of historic preservation as related to this proposal is not just about preserving the two contributing structures on the site, but to also develop the surrounding structure in a respectful way which emphasizes and strengthens the character and feel of the neighborhood. Similarly, the proposed material composition, which is very much in development, will pay homage to the Clarksville neighborhood traditions and history. The architectural elements which make up the façade proposal are very much rooted in local vocabulary. All this in order to integrate into the existing context, respect the beautiful existing buildings not just on site but those in the vicinity, and root the project in the traditions of the place and its history. Structures proposed for demolition - 1110 W 6th Street – Not Contributing - 1112 W 6th Street – Not Contributing - 1114 W 6th Street – Not Contributing - 1118-20 W 6th Street – Not Contributing Structures proposed for reconstruction - 1116 W 6th Street – Contributing to Castle Hill Local Historic District - 1122-24 W 6th Street – Contributing to West Line National Historic District * All properties listed above are located within the West Line National Historic District. 1122- 1124 W 6th Street is also in the Castle Hill Local Historic District. Reference the following pages for a detailed narrative of proposed changes to the 1116 and 1122-24 W 6th Street structures. 1 of 4 1116 W 6th Street Contributing building to the West Line National Historic District 1) Proposed Work The design team intends to document and reconstruct the front façade of the existing structure. …
HISTORICITY ANALYSIS 1100 Block W 6th Street October 11, 2021 Prepared for Clarks Village, LP 1601 Miriam Ave #306 | Austin, TX 78702 | 512-970-4706 | jlaycock10@gmail.com October 11, 2021 Mr. Barrett Lepore Clarks Village, LP RE: 1100 Block W 6th Barrett, I have reviewed the properties referenced above, from 1110 W 6th to 1130 W 6th, as well as 605 Blanco and 607 Blanco Street. In general, they are typically of a pre-WWII streetcar development pattern, with a mix of bungalows and small, neighborhood serving stores. Only one of the properties appears to be historically significant in its own right; however, according to the city of Austin every property except for Z Tejas and Swedish Hill is considered contributing to a historic district, which means any alteration will require historic landmark review. That said, the information and conclusions in this report are made upon my experience with the city and informed by the resources available. I hope that this information will prove useful to you. After your review I look forward to discussing it with you further. If you have any questions or desire further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, John Laycock 1601 Miriam Ave #306 | Austin, TX 78702 | 512-970-4706 | jlaycock10@gmail.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview Data Sources Historic Context Sanborn Maps Historic Districts The Properties 1110 W 6th Street 1112 W 6th Street 1114 W 6th Street 1116 W 6th Street 1118 & 1120 W 6th Street 1122-1126 W 6th Street 1126.5, 1128, & 1130 W 6th 605 Blanco Street 607 Blanco Conclusions and Recommendations Appendix A: Historic Designation Criteria 4 5 5 6 6 8 9 11 14 11 20 24 28 34 36 39 3 Historicity Analysis | 1100 Block W 6th | June 2021 This report analyzes the western half of the 1100 Block of W 6th Street, from 1110 W 6th street to 1130 W 6th Street, as well as 605 and 607 Blanco. The study area contains 10 principal buildings and on 6 parcels. The buildings range in age from 1895 (1114 W 6th) to 1995 (1120 W 6th). This block was historically a mix of residential and commercial buildings, including live/work buildings with a residence above the store. For instance, from 1927 to 1944, 1116 W 6th street, formerly Fortney’s, was home to Alex Fischer Grocery, with Alex Fischer and his wife living in the residence …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AUGUST 3, 2022 HR-2022-103067 MILLER-LONG HOUSE 813 PARK BOULEVARD 9 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Rehabilitate a house and accessory building for which historic zoning is pending. 1) Remove existing roof and flashings and install new felt, flashings, and architectural composition shingle roof. Replace all roof vents and appurtenances. Add venting skylight at south elevation. 2) Stabilize foundation of main house and add new concrete skirting with access to crawlspace. 3) Replace rotted wood at eaves and trim with new to match original detailing. Repair and repoint masonry and replace stucco on both buildings. Paint finish to match historic. 4) Make grade modifications to correct negative slope. Landscape site. 5) Install new fence on east and north perimeters of property. 6) Install brick terrace at south with new ramp and stair access. 7) Remove, restore, and reinstall all existing steel sash casement windows in main house. Enlarge the attic window on south elevation. Replace existing double hung windows in garage with new aluminum-clad wood sash windows to match historic. Remove windows next to site wall, then infill with stucco. 8) Restore all historic exterior doors and main entry screen door. Install new door at south elevation. Install new paired metal-framed, multi-lite French doors leading to the new terrace. Restore garage doors and fix in place. Replace plywood with new window to match historic. Enlarge opening at south elevation to accommodate new exterior door. 9) Restore and reinstall historic light fixtures. ARCHITECTURE Tudor Revival-style house with a steeply pitched front-facing gable with wing, a smaller gable nested within the larger one, shed dormers, arched detailing, and distinctive patterned brickwork. Materials include variegated brick, stucco, steel casement windows and Tudor-styled entry doors. The original roof was wood shingles but is now composition shingle. The garage matches the house in form, roof pitch and wall materials, and consequently reads as an integral part of the property. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at potential historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The project proposes repair rather than replacement wherever possible, including at character-defining features. Intact historic-age material is removed only at the rear elevation of the main house and garage. 2. Foundations The …
813 Park Blvd. ca. 1929 Miller-Long House XINESI Holdings, LLC Owner South elevation REPLACE ROOF West elevation REPAIR AND REPOINT MASONRY East elevation SITE CONDITION REPLACE ROOF Main House and Garage Sun porch Attic Basement Structural issues in Main House INTERIOR SIDE OF STUCCO RESTORE HISTORIC LIGHTING Stucco and historic lighting REMOVE AND REPLACE STUCCO Garage – Stucco and evidence of original awning Garage - Double hung windows Main House – Steel sash casement windows Main House – Repair and replace rotted wood Main House Garage Main House Restore historic doors Repair and repoint masonry. Repair and replace concrete skirt. Main House Garage Main House Main House Replace all bathroom fixtures and tile. Reconfigure layouts. Main House – Restore interior woodwork
SYMBOL LEGEND X DESIGN TEAM ARCHITECTURE O'CONNELL ARCHITECTURE, LLC TERESA O'CONNELL, AIA 3908 AVENUE B, SUITE 309 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78751 512.751.1374 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TSEN ENGINEERING 210 BARTON SPRINGS RD. SUITE 250 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78704 512.474.4001 CIVIL ENGINEERING DUNAWAY ASSOCIATES, L.P. 5707 SOUTHWEST PARKWAY, SUITE 2-250 AUSTIN, TEXAS. 78735 817.335.1121 SITE LOCATION MAP FFE 0" FFE OR GRADE ELEVATION AS NOTED ELEVATION (LARGE SCALE) 112 DOOR NUMBER 116 WINDOW NUMBER A WALL TYPE (PLAN VIEW) NEW WALL (PLAN VIEW) W E 1/A-401 ELEVATION (SMALL SCALE) SECTION DETAIL CL CENTERLINE PLAN/ ELEVATION DETAIL EQUAL DIMENSIONS IN LINE A-211 1 N S 1 A-211 1 A-211 MATERIALS LEGEND BRICK MASONRY FRAMING WOOD (Detail Scale) BATT INSULATION CONCRETE (Detail Scale) BLOCKING - NON-CONTINUOUS (Detail Scale) EARTH FINISHED WOOD STEEL (Detail Scale) PLYWOOD RIGID INSULATION PLASTER OR CONCRETE AS NOTED (Detail Scale) NEW PARTITION WALL (see plan legend) ABBREVIATIONS & # @ And Pound At Air Conditioning A/C ACOUST Acoustical ADD'L Additional ADJ AFF AHJ AHU APPROX Approximately ARCH ASTM American Society for Testing Adjacent Above Finish Floor Authority Having Jurisdiction Air Handling Unit Architect & Materials Bottom of Rafter BOR Board BRD BLDG Building BDRM Bedroom BTM BTWN Between Bottom Cabinet Cubic Feet Control Joint Centerline Ceiling Closet Clear Column CAB CF CJ CL CLG CLO CLR COL COMP Composite CONC CONST Construction CONT COORD Coordinate, Coordination Critical Root Zone CRZ Cover CVR Cold Water CW Continuous Concrete Deep, Depth, Dryer Double D DBL DEMO Demolish, Demolition Double Hung DH Diameter DIA Diagonal, Diagonally DIAG Down DN Downspout DS Dishwasher DW Drawing DWG Drawer DWR East Each Expansion Joint Electric Meter Equal Spacing, Equivalent Equipment E EA EJ EM EQ EQUIP EXST'G Existing Exterior EXT MANUF Manufacturer MAX Maximum MECH Mechanical M/E MEP Mechanical/Electrical Mechanical, Electrical, & Plumbing Minimum MIN MISC Miscellaneous MTD Mounted MTL Metal N NA NIC NO NSF NTS North Not Applicable Not in Contract Number Net Square Feet Not to Scale OC On Center OCEW On Center Each Way OP'G OVHD Overhead OZ Opening Ounce P&I PC PG PL PR PSF PSI PT PTD PVC PVMT PWD Provide & Install Photo Cell Page Plate or Plateline Pair Pounds Per Square Foot Pounds Per Square Inch Pressure Treated Painted Polyvinyl Chloride Pavement Plywood QTR Quarter Radius/Refrigerator Reflected Ceiling Plan R RCP RE/REF Reference REINF Reinforced REQ'D Required REQMT'S Requirements Revision REV Roofing RFG Room RM Rough Opening RO ROW Right of …
2 0 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A 2 0 1 # , t e e r t S h t 6 t s a E 4 2 1 2 8 1 5 1 . 0 5 4 . 2 1 5 PRELIMINARY Not for regulatory approval, permitting or construction ALFRED GODFREY, ARCHITECT May 6, 2022 I K R A P D O O H R O B H G E N A Z O G A R A Z E U Q R A P I N O T A V O N E R M O O R T S E R t e e r t l S s e a n r e d e P 1 4 7 2 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , I N T S U A DESIGN DEVELOPMENT MAY 6, 2022 DATE: REVISIONS: OBLIQUE VIEWS A3.02.2 x w v . 8 2 6 0 2 2 g n d i l i i / u B a z o g a r a Z A G L / s g n w a r D D C D D D S a z o g a r a Z e u q r a P 2 / a z o g a r a Z e u q r a P 0 7 0 - 0 2 / e v i t c A - 1 0 / E G A R O T S _ G L / s e m u o V l / 2 2 0 2 , 8 l y u J , y a d i r F M P 8 5 : 8 0 : 2 : e m a n e l i F : e t a D : e m T i 2 OBLIQUE VIEW Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" OBLIQUE VIEWScale: 1" = 1'-0"1 F R A N S I S C O S T R E E T 4 0 0 3 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 3 6 0 0 3 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 3 7 0 0 3 D A O R E L L I V R E B B E W P E D E R N A L E S S …
R e p r o d u c e d w i i i t h p e r m s s o n o f t h e c o p y r i g h t o w n e r . F u r t h e r r e p r o d u c t i o n p r o h b i i t e d w i t h o u t i p e r m s s o n i . p g . 3 4 O t h e r 4 5 - - N o T i t l e T h e A u s t i n S t a t e s m a n ( 1 9 2 1 - 1 9 7 3 ) ; D e c 1 5 , 1 9 5 4 ; P r o Q u e s t H i s t o r i c a l N e w s p a p e r s : T h e A u s t i n A m e r i c a n S t a t e s m a n Austin Men Returning From Foreign Service The Austin American (1914-1973); Dec 17, 1944; ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The Austin American Statesman pg. 22 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. R e p r o d u c e d w i i i t h p e r m s s o n o f t h e c o p y r i g h t o w n e r . F u r t h e r r e p r o d u c t i o n p r o h b i i t e d w i t h o u t i p e r m s s o n i . p g . 2 0 F i v e A r r e s t e d I n V i c e R a i d s T h e A u s t i n S t a t e s m a n ( 1 9 2 1 - 1 9 7 3 ) ; J u l 1 2 , 1 9 4 …
Five Arrested In Vice Raids The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); Jul 12, 1949; ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The Austin American Statesman pg. 20 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Patient Braves Norther The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); Sep 17, 1951; ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The Austin American Statesman pg. 8 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Other 11 -- No Title The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); Jan 11, 1952; ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The Austin American Statesman pg. 18 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 'Boots' Walton keeps busy playing old hymns on piano CHRIS PETRISON American-Statesman Staff The Austin American Statesman (1973-1980); Feb 7, 1980; ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The Austin American Statesman pg. J1 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Birth Notice 1 -- No Title The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); Apr 12, 1960; ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The Austin American Statesman pg. 8 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Birth Notice 1 -- No Title The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); Feb 28, 1962; ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The Austin American Statesman pg. 9 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Quality Foundation Repair 512-363-7769 (512) 363-7769 Austin, Texas 78758 United States Estimate Date 09/20/2012 Estimate Number 120920 Prepared For Helen Shoulds 1605 Leona St Austin, Texas 78702 United States Description Rate Qty Line Total $1,200.00 1 $1,200.00 Skirting Around the perimeter of the home remove any existing skirting and replace with mortar skirting up to the existing siding and 6" below grade. #3 re-bar, metal lath and a masons cement / sand mix will be used. Venting will be installed where possible and not to close to the ground along with a hinged access door at a location of your choosing. Qty in sq feet. Trash removal All building debris created during the scope of this work will be removed from crawl space and job site on completion. $0.00 1 $0.00 Subtotal Tax 1,200.00 0.00 Estimate Total (USD) $1,200.00 Terms Owner Agrees to pay half upon start of job and half upon completion. The workmanship and materials installed by Quality Foundation Repair have a six-year warranty. Movement in the soil through change in moisture levels can affect the foundation. Quality Foundation …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Jeff Kessel Tuesday, August 2, 2022 8:22 AM HPD Preservation August 3, 2022 Agenda Items: 1315 and 1317 Newning Avenue Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** I wish to record my opposition to the proposed demolition permits for the referenced Items located at 1315 and 1317 Newning Avenue, Austin TX. I would like to know more about the owner’s intent for these properties. Please keep me informed on their permitting status. Thank you, Jeff Kessel, P.E. retired Austin TX 78704 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Heritage Wayfinding Manual Economic Development Department • Heritage Tourism Division AGENDA Heritage Wayfinding Guidelines Design Options Open Discussion Next Steps Introductions & Project Background Melissa Alvarado Heritage Tourism Division Manager CoA Economic Development Department# 5 min John Bosio MERJE / Principal All John Bosio MERJE / Principal 20 min 30 min 5 min # HERITAGE WAYFINDING MANUAL GOAL Develop a manual inclusive of sign types and historic interpretive elements within districts to enhance the visitor’s connectedness to place, history, culture and experience, including underrepresented sites that reflect Austin’s diverse communities. Key Points: • Initiative does not include fabrication or installation# • First step to creating a design guide • Serves as the foundational work for the districts that were previously allocated funding for wayfinding by the City Council# • Lays the foundation for future eligible districts HERITAGE WAYFINDING GUIDELINES WORK COMPLETED TO DATE Project Kick-Off Stakeholder Meetings #1 December 2021 February / March 2022 Online Survey February / March 2022 Conceptual Design / Field Work Stakeholder Meetings #2 Schematic Design April / May Current / June 2022 O B A L L O • C S L A V O R P P A • E C N A N E G E T A R T Y • E G A N RATIO N • S SIG V e hic ula r / P Gate ways a r kin g K D E S T I N A T I ON INCLUSION • VISUAL C HOME TEC Tourism W ebsite s p a M e g o o G Trip Pla er n n v e o s r i p e n e k l i l B / t r r t t I / e e e d n i i s a c y c P L U T T E R • S U H N O L O S T A I N G A Y B I L I T Y • I N T E R A C T I O N • P H A S I N G Y G O L O N H C E b sit e s p e M a n s W e t i v c a r e A ttra ctio t I n l e A p p s M o b i GPS Devices P edestrian Kiosks i B …
