Planning Commission Homepage

RSS feed for this page

Feb. 9, 2021

B-13 (C8J-2018-0091.2A - Turners Crossing North Phase 2).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 10 pages

SUBDIVISION REVIEW SHEET LUC DATE: 2/9/2021 CASE NO.: C8J-2018-0091.2A SUBDIVISION NAME: Turners Crossing North Phase 2 AREA: 100.665 acres OWNER/APPLICANT: Meritage Homes of Texas, LLC (Matthew Scrivener) AGENT: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Jacob Kondo) ADDRESS OF SUBDIVISION: Approx. FM 1327 at N Turnersville Road GRIDS: G-8 WATERSHED: Rinard Creek COUNTY: Travis LOT(S): 304 JURISDICTION: 2-Mile ETJ MUD: N/A EXISTING ZONING: N/A PROPOSED LAND USE: Single Family, Commercial, Drainage, Landscape, Park ADMINISTRATIVE WAIVERS: N/A VARIANCES: None SIDEWALKS: Sidewalks will be provided on all internal streets. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The request is for approval with conditions of Turners Crossing North Phase Two Subdivision consisting of 304 lots on 100.665 acres. Water and wastewater will be provided by the City of Austin. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends approval with conditions of this final plat. The attached report details the conditions and the plat will be back for final approval when conditions are clear. ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Sarah Sumner Email address: sarah.sumner@traviscountytx.gov PHONE: 512-854-7687 1 1 of 10B-13 2 of 10B-13 3 of 10B-13 4 of 10B-13 5 of 10B-13 6 of 10B-13 7 of 10B-13 8 of 10B-13 9 of 10B-13 Turner’s Crossing North Phase 2 Location Map 10 of 10B-13

Scraped at: Feb. 7, 2021, 10:39 a.m.
Feb. 9, 2021

B-13 (Master Comment Report).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN – TRAVIS COUNTY – SINGLE SUBDIVISION OFFICE SUBDIVISION APPLICATION – MASTER COMMENT REPORT U1 512-854-7687 Turners Crossing North - Phase 2 13023 N TURNERSVILLE RD C8J-2018-0091.2A UPDATE: 00 Sarah Sumner PHONE #: CASE NUMBER: REVISION #: CASE MANAGER: PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: SUBMITTAL DATE: January 25, 2021 REPORT DUE DATE: February 8, 2021 FINAL REPORT DATE: February 3, 2021 STAFF REPORT: This report includes all staff comments received to date concerning your most recent subdivision application submittal. The comments may include requirements, recommendations, or information. The requirements in this report must be addressed by an updated submittal. The subdivision application will be approved when all requirements from each review discipline have been addressed. However, until this happens, your application is considered disapproved. Additional comments may be generated as a result of information or design changes provided in your update. If you have any questions, problems, concerns, or if you require additional information about this report, please do not hesitate to contact your case manager at the phone number listed above or by writing to the City of Austin, Development Services Department, P.O. Box 1088, Austin, Texas 78767. UPDATE DEADLINE (LDC 30-2-56; 30-2-82): It is the responsibility of the applicant or their agent to update this subdivision application. The final update to clear all comments must be submitted by the update deadline, which is March 15, 2021. Otherwise, the application will automatically be denied. If this date falls on a weekend or City of Austin holiday, the next City of Austin workday will be the deadline. UPDATE SUBMITTALS: An update submittal is required. Please submit 1.0 of the plans and 1.0 copies of a letter that address each comment for distribution to the following reviewers. Clearly label information or packets with the reviewer’s name that are intended for specific reviewers. No distribution is required for the Planner 1. Updates may be submitted between the hours of 8:30 am and 4:00 pm. Updates submitted after 3 pm may be processed on the following business day. Please note: if Austin Water rejects a plan on Update 2, a fee is due at or before resubmittal. Please contact Intake for the fee amount. REVIEWERS: Site Plan Plumbing : Cory Harmon Drainage Engineering : Kyle Virr Water Quality : Kyle Virr Electric Review - Andrea Katz - 512-322-6957 Comments cleared. 911 Addressing Review - Jorge Perdomo - 512-974-1620 AD 1 This plat review …

Scraped at: Feb. 7, 2021, 10:39 a.m.
Feb. 9, 2021

B-14 (C8J-2008-0176.01.8A - Sun Chase South Section Eight).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 7 pages

SUBDIVISION REVIEW SHEET LUC DATE: 2/9/2021 CASE NO.: C8J-2008-0176.01.8A SUBDIVISION NAME: Sun Chase South Section Eight AREA: 20.157 acres OWNER/APPLICANT: Qualico CR, LP (Vera Massaro) AGENT: Carlson Brigance & Doering, Inc. (Brian Kelling) ADDRESS OF SUBDIVISION: Sweet Mimosa Drive and Sparkling Light Drive GRIDS: R-11, R-12 WATERSHED: Dry Creek East COUNTY: Travis LOT(S): 91 JURISDICTION: Limited Purpose EXISTING ZONING: I-SF-4A MUD: Southeast Travis County MUD Number 1 PROPOSED LAND USE: Single Family, Sidewalk/Landscape ADMINISTRATIVE WAIVERS: Granted for cut and fill associated with water quality and detention facilities. VARIANCES: None SIDEWALKS: Sidewalks will be provided on all internal streets. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: Requesting approval with conditions of Sun Chase South Section Eight Final Plat, consisting of 91 lots on 20.157 acres. Water and wastewater will be provided by the City of Austin. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends approval of this subdivision. This plan has outstanding conditions to be satisfied to meet all applicable County, State and City of Austin LDC requirements. ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Sarah Sumner Email address: sarah.sumner@traviscountytx.gov PHONE: 512-854-7687 1 1 of 7B-14 2 of 7B-14 3 of 7B-14 4 of 7B-14 5 of 7B-14 6 of 7B-14 Sun Chase South Section 8 Location Map 7 of 7B-14

Scraped at: Feb. 7, 2021, 10:39 a.m.
Feb. 9, 2021

B-14 (Master Comment Report).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN – TRAVIS COUNTY – SINGLE SUBDIVISION OFFICE SUBDIVISION APPLICATION – MASTER COMMENT REPORT UPDATE: PHONE #: U0 512-854-7687 Sun Chase South Section 8 PEARCE LN C8J-2008-0176.01.8A 00 Sarah Sumner CASE NUMBER: REVISION #: CASE MANAGER: PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: SUBMITTAL DATE: January 11, 2021 REPORT DUE DATE: February 1, 2021 FINAL REPORT DATE: February 4, 2021(3 days have been added to the update deadline) STAFF REPORT: This report includes all staff comments received to date concerning your most recent subdivision application submittal. The comments may include requirements, recommendations, or information. The requirements in this report must be addressed by an updated submittal. The subdivision application will be approved when all requirements from each review discipline have been addressed. However, until this happens, your application is considered disapproved. Additional comments may be generated as a result of information or design changes provided in your update. If you have any questions, problems, concerns, or if you require additional information about this report, please do not hesitate to contact your case manager at the phone number listed above or by writing to the City of Austin, Development Services Department, P.O. Box 1088, Austin, Texas 78767. UPDATE DEADLINE (LDC 30-2-56; 30-2-82): It is the responsibility of the applicant or their agent to update this subdivision application. The final update to clear all comments must be submitted by the update deadline, which is April 15, 2021. Otherwise, the application will automatically be denied. If this date falls on a weekend or City of Austin holiday, the next City of Austin workday will be the deadline. UPDATE SUBMITTALS: A formal update submittal is required. You must make an appointment with the Intake Staff (974-2689) to submit the update. Please bring a copy of this report with you upon submittal to Intake. Please submit 4 copies of the plans and 4 copies of a letter that address each comment for distribution to the following reviewers. Clearly label information or packets with the reviewer’s name if intended for a specific reviewer. No distribution is required for the Planner 1. Updates may be submitted between the hours of 8:30 am and 4:00 pm. Updates submitted after 3 pm may be processed on the following business day. Please note: if Austin Water rejects a plan on Update 2, a fee is due at or before resubmittal. Please contact Intake for the fee amount. REVIEWERS: Planner 1: Elsa Garza …

Scraped at: Feb. 7, 2021, 10:41 a.m.
Feb. 9, 2021

B-15 (Additional Citizen Correspondence).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 16 pages

February 2, 2021 Pio.Renteria@austintexas.gov Case Number SP-2019-0600C District-2. Scott Grantham Scott.Grantham@austintexas.gov South Congress Combined Neighborhood Plan Contact Team – SCCNPCT Notice of Public Hearing Site Plan Appeal for 4802 South Congress Avenue DATE: TO: CC: FROM: Re: SCCNPCT - Requesting Postponement Planning Commission February 09, 2021 Re: Applicant: Mike McHome Parks Department: Scott Grantham Scott.Grantham@austintexas.gov . Dear Scott Grantham, We, the SCCNPCT are requesting postponement February 9, 2021 Planning Commission for Case Number SP-2019- 0600C 4802 South Congress Avenue to March 9, 2021 Planning Commission. We the SCCNPCT will need time to communicate with the applicant Mike McHone for this Notice of Public Hearing Site Plan Appeal. We will consult with Scott Grantham from the Parks Department and the applicant as to the intent and specifics of this appeal for 4802 South Congress Avenue. Thank you, Mario Cantu, Keena Miller & SCCNPCT. Grantham, Scott From: Sent: To: Subject: kevin mackie <> Thursday, February 4, 2021 1:11 AM Grantham, Scott case # SP-2019-0600C *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello Scott Grantham - I object to the exemption for case # SP-2019-0600C - Kevin Mackie (Mockingbird Lane) CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Grantham, Scott From: Sent: To: Subject: Elizabeth Birns <> Wednesday, February 3, 2021 9:30 PM Grantham, Scott NO to the exemption for SP-2019-0600C *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Scott As a resident on Hedgewood Drive, near Williamson Creek AND 4802 S. Congress, I wanted to let you know that I am very much opposed to the exemption for case # SP-2019-0600C. If you allow the park land access exemption in this case, you will be setting a horrible precedent. Allowing this exemption tells all future developers that they can promise whatever they need to in order to get approval for a permit to build. And they know that they won’t be held accountable and will only have to pay a fine to essentially do whatever they wanted to do in the first place. This is simply not acceptable, so please vote NO! on this exemption. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Elizabeth Burns Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL …

Scraped at: Feb. 7, 2021, 10:41 a.m.
Feb. 9, 2021

B-15 (Applicant Submitted Backup Part 1).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

Backup

Scraped at: Feb. 7, 2021, 10:41 a.m.
Feb. 9, 2021

B-15 (Applicant Submitted Backup Part 2).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

Backup

Scraped at: Feb. 7, 2021, 10:41 a.m.
Feb. 9, 2021

B-15 (SP-2019-0600C - Wilder, District 3).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 31 pages

APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISISON PARKLAND REQUIREMENT REVIEW SHEET 3 CS-MU-CO-NP 4802 South Congress Avenue South Congress Combined (West Congress Neighborhood) Parks Board: January 26, 2021 Planning Commission: February 9, 2021 Mike McHone Rivera Engineering (Michael Rivera) 4802 LLC (Mitch Ely) CASE NUMBER: SP-2019-0600C CASE NAME: Wilder DISTRICT: ADDRESS: ZONING: APPELLANT: APPLICANT: OWNER: NEIGHBOR- -HOOD PLAN: PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD ACTION: January 26, 2021: Board Member Mason-Murphy made a motion to recommend to the Planning Commission to deny the applicant's request to pay fee in lieu of land dedication for 4802 S. Congress (SP-2019-0600C) and uphold staff’s recommendation for the dedication of parkland; Board Morgan seconded the motion. The motion passed on a vote of 9-1 with Board Member Luca voting nay and Vice Chair Farasat absent. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: To be heard on February 9, 2021 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The applicant is proposing to construct 125 multifamily units in a multi-story building with an underground multi-level parking garage, driveway to South Congress Avenue, on-site storm water quality and detention pond, and site utilities. APPEAL REQUEST: The Appellant filed an appeal of the Parks and Recreation Department (PARD) decision to require land for this site plan, and requested to pay fee in lieu. This action is described in Land Development Code 25-1-605 (F); the appeal is to the Planning Commission, who will make the final decision. The case has already been heard by Park and Recreation Board, and a recommendation made (see above). 1 of 31B-15 SP-2019-0600C Wilder SUMMARY STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends upholding PARD’s original requirement to dedicate land as part of this site plan; and denial of the applicant’s request to pay fee in lieu. The criteria for the decision of whether to require land vs. fee in lieu are listed in 25-1-605. (B). In determining whether to require dedication of land under Section 25-1-602 (Dedication of Parkland) or allow payment of a fee in-lieu of dedication under this section, the director shall consider whether the subdivision or site plan: 2 (1) is located within the Deficient Park Area Map; (2) is adjacent to existing parkland; (3) has sufficient acreage to meet the standards for dedicated parkland under the Parkland (4) is needed to address a critical need for parkland or to remedy a deficiency identified Dedication Operating Procedures; by the Deficient Park Area Map; or (5) would provide increased connectivity with existing or planned parks or recreational amenities. These …

Scraped at: Feb. 7, 2021, 10:41 a.m.
Feb. 9, 2021

C-01 (Blueprint Scorecard Presentation).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 27 pages

Austin Strategic Housing Blueprint Scorecard with HousingWorks Austin Agenda Blueprint Overview Goals Progress Insights Information Other Progress Blueprint Overview Blueprint Overview - Timeline 2018 2017 2019 • $250M Affordable •Austin Strategic •Bond, Blueprint & Housing General Obligation Bond Passes • Strategic Direction 2023 Housing Blueprint Adopted SD23 Implementation Adopted by Council 2020 • '18 & '19 Blueprint Scorecard • $300M Project Connect Anti- Displacement 4 Blueprint Overview – Document Purpose  Establish Timeframe  Outline Goals  Build Partnerships  Identify Resources  Unify Strategy  Align Plans 5 Blueprint Overview - Community Values Prevent Households from Being Priced Out of Austin Foster Equitable, Integrated and Diverse Communities Invest in Housing for Those Most in Need Create New and Affordable Housing Choices for All Austinites in All Parts of Austin Help Austinites Reduce their Household Costs 6 Blueprint Overview – Displacement Prevention People’s Plan 7 Goals Goals Goal 1 Goal 2 Goal 3 Goal 4 Goal 5 Goal 6 Goal 7 Distribute Across All 10 Districts 30% MFI and less 20K housing units 31 - 60% MFI 25K housing units 61 - 80% MFI 15K housing units 81 - 120% MFI 25K housing units 121% MFI and above 50K housing units Count & Track Housing by District 75% w/in 0.5mi of Imagine Austin Centers and Corridors 25% near High Opportunity Areas Preserve 10K affordable units over 10 years Create 1,000 Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) / Continuum of Care (CoC) Units over 10 years 9 Progress 2019| Progress – Goal 1 – Affordable Units by District Information is for the 2019 calendar year reporting period. 11 2018 + 2019 Progress – Goal 2 & 3 = 135,000 Units in 10 Years Information is for the 2019 calendar year reporting period – chart includes both 2018 and 2019 progress. 12 2019| Progress – Goal 2 Only = Units at or below 80% MFI Information is for the 2019 calendar year reporting period. 13 2019| Progress – Goal 3 Only = Units above 81% MFI Information is for the 2019 calendar year reporting period. 14 2019| Progress – Goal 4 = Housing Units by District Data on the affordability of all housing units in Austin is not available annually. The City of Austin will have information responsive to this goal in 2023 when it conducts its next Comprehensive Housing Marketing Analysis, which is completed every five years and includes a comprehensive analysis of …

Scraped at: Feb. 7, 2021, 10:41 a.m.
Feb. 9, 2021

PC February 9, 2021 Speaker List.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

February 9, 2021 Planning Commission Speaker List Applicant - Leah Bojo B1 For Justin Morgan Opposed Gina Rogers Mario Cantu Applicant Michael Whellan B2/ B3 For Dick Hall Opposed David Boyle 917-349-2917 Ezra Brown Thomas Barker Antony McGregor Day Applicant Amanda Surman B-4 B-6 Applicant - Renaldo Hernandez Applicant Phillip Crisara Applicant - David Anderson Jim Schissler For William Sayers Applicant Mike Mchone B-11 B-12 B-15 For Michael Rivera Opposed Marion Cantu Gwen Jewiss Paul Mullen Steve Prather Nicole Joslin Shavonne Otero Marla Torrado Mary Olmstead

Scraped at: Feb. 9, 2021, 8:30 p.m.
Feb. 9, 2021

Planning Commission Q and Report Final.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 18 pages

Planning Commission Q & A Report Question Commissioner Shaw / Staff Response B1- 6311 South 1st Street Is development already under construction-appears so based on photos? If so, is it already designed for VMU? RESPONSE: The subject property is undeveloped and the photos shown below are from another site in the South Congress neighborhood planning area. How can City address safety concerns raised by the neighbors? RESPONSE: The safety concerns will be reviewed by Staff as part of the site plan and construction applications. Did applicant agree to NPCT conditions? 1. Designated on-site pet area. RESPONSE: This is a private Restrictive Covenant item between the Applicant and the Staff, and cannot be placed in a zoning ordinance. 2. Following prohibited land uses: RESPONSE: Yes, the Applicant is agreeable to prohibiting the following uses. Please note that adult-oriented businesses is not a permitted use in the GR zoning district and therefore, cannot be listed as a prohibited use. Also, the Staff does not recommend prohibiting telecommunications tower due to the extensive siting restrictions already in Code. • Adult-oriented businesses • Alternative financial services (this includes payday loans) • Bail bonds services • Outdoor entertainment • Outdoor Sports and Recreation • Hotel-Motel • Service Station • Pawn Shop Services • Telecommunication Tower (PC) B2/B3 - 4908 Lott Avenue, 5000-5106 Lightfield Lane, & 1160-1166 Mason Avenue Is there opposition to this item? Response: Yes B4 - 35 West 6th Street, Shoal Creek Watershed; Downtown Austin Plan Why was the RC required in the first place? Did applicant get to waive certain regulatory requirements by providing the green roof and rainwater collection? Response Staff: When the applicant proposed to rezone the property from DMU to DMU-CURE in (Case # C14- 2009-0151 in November 2009), the City negotiated “community benefits” in conjunction with the modification of building height from the DMU maximum of 120’ to DMU-CURE height of 350’. The Design Commission outlined several benefits related to project design including building a green roof (please refer to attached memo). See, Exhibit Staff Response B-4 – Design Commission Memo B11 - Street Right-of-Way Vacation Application for Chalmers Avenue Has applicant agreed to all the conditions for approval from various City departments (e.g; Austin Water)? Applicant Response: Yes, we will comply with all conditions. As with AE, they all just wanted to be covered by an easement, which the City will retain, and be paid for any …

Scraped at: Feb. 9, 2021, 8:30 p.m.
Feb. 9, 2021

PC 2021-02-09 minutes.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 11 pages

PLANNING COMMISSION February 9, 2021 MINUTES The Planning Commission convened in a meeting on February 9, 2021 via videoconference (http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live) Chair Shaw called the Commission Meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. Commission Members in Attendance: Awais Azhar Joao Paulo Connolly Claire Hempel – Vice-Chair Yvette Flores Patrick Howard Carmen Llanes Pulido Robert Schneider Patricia Seeger James Shieh Todd Shaw – Chair Jeffrey Thompson Absent: Don Leighton-Burwell – Ex-Officio EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) The Planning Commission will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on this agenda. The Commission may not conduct a closed meeting without the approval of the city attorney. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071 CITIZEN COMMUNICATIONS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of January 27, 2021. Motion to approve the minutes of January 27, 2021 was approved on the consent agenda on the motion by Commissioner Shieh, seconded by Commissioner Seeger on a vote of 11-0. Two vacancies on the Commission. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1 Rezoning: Location: C14-2020-0134 - 6311 South 1st Street; District 2 6311 South 1st Street, Williamson Creek Watershed; South Congress Combined (Sweetbriar) NP Area Owner/Applicant: ND South First LP (Haythem Dawlett) Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: Drenner Group PC (Leah M. Bojo) GR-MU-CO-NP to GR-MU-V-NP Recommendation of GR-MU-V-CO-NP Wendy Rhoades, 512-974-7719, wendy.rhoades@austintexas.gov Housing and Planning Department Public Hearing closed. Motion by Commissioner Azhar, seconded by Commissioner Connolly to grant Staff’s recommendation of GR-MU-VO-CO-NP combining district zoning for C14-2020-0134 - 6311 South 1st Street located at 6311 South 1st Street was approved on a vote of 11-0. Two vacancies on the Commission. Conditional Overlay: The following uses are not permitted uses of the Property: Alternative financial services Automotive sales Automotive washing (of any type) Bail bond services Hotel-motel Outdoor entertainment Outdoor sports and Recreation Pawn shop services Service station 2 Plan Amendment: NPA-2020-0015.04.SH - Lott Avenue; District 1 Location: 4908 Lott Ave; 5000-5016 Lightfield Ln; 1160-1166 Mason Ave, Fort Branch Watershed; East MLK Combined NP Area Owner/Applicant: 4908 Lott Holdings, LLC Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: (GMJ Real Estate Investments, LLC) (Matt McDonnell) Armbrust & Brown, PLLC (Michael J. Whellan) From Single Family to Higher Density Single Family Recommended Jeff Engstrom, 512-974-1621, jeffrey.engstrom@austintexas.gov Housing and Planning Department Public Hearing closed. Motion by Vice-Chair Hempel, seconded by Commissioner Connolly to …

Scraped at: April 8, 2021, 9:32 p.m.
Feb. 9, 2021

Feb 09, 2021 Planning Commission original link

Play video

Scraped at: April 8, 2021, 9:32 p.m.
Jan. 26, 2021

B-05 (C14H-2020-0136 - Ellen Wyse House -- Wyseacre; District 9).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 29 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: C14H-2020-0136 APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission HISTORIC NAME: Wyseacre, Ellen Wyse House WATERSHED: Shoal Creek HLC DATE: 8-24-2020, 9-28-2020, PC DATE: CC DATE: 10-26-2020, 11-16-2020 12-22-2020 TBD ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 2816 San Pedro Street ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-CO-NP to SF-3-CO-NP-H COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend historic zoning based on the property’s historical associations and architecture. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Architecture, historical association HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: 8-24-2020: Initiated historic zoning. 9- 28-2020: City postponement request. 10-26-2020: Applicant postponement request. 11-16- 2020: Recommended historic zoning, 8-2-1; Commissioners Featherston and Papavasiliou opposed, Commissioner Jacobs off dais. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: N/A DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: N/A CITY COUNCIL DATE: N/A ACTION: N/A ORDINANCE READINGS: N/A ORDINANCE NUMBER: N/A CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras PHONE: 974-2727 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATION: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Bike Austin, CANPAC (Central Austin Neigh. Plan Area Committee), Central Austin Community Development Corporation, Central Austin Urbanists, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Shoal Creek Conservancy, Shoal Crest Neighborhood Assn., Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, University Area Partners, West Campus Neighborhood Association BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: Architecture: 2816 San Pedro is a 1.5-story stucco residence with rectangular Cape Cod plan. It is side-gabled, with a composite-shingle roof, three gabled dormers with 1:1 wood windows and lap siding, and a gabled portico supported by Classical columns. At the main elevation’s southern bay are 4:4 and 6:6 mulled windows framed with shutters. The northern bay contains a single 12:12 window with similar shutters. A fanlight and sidelights surround the inset door. A hipped-roof addition to the south has 2:2 windows and a secondary entry. Historical Associations: 2816 San Pedro Street was constructed for the Wyse family around 1924. William Riley Wyse, an independent oilman with ties to Austin’s power and water company, passed away shortly after its construction. Ellen Borroughs Wyse remained there with her son and daughter-in-law. 1 of 29B-5 Ellen Wyse was a prominent writer, editor, and business owner in Austin. Early in her career, Wyse served as the society editor for the Austin Statesman, then established the Gossip Advertising firm in 1911, beginning with a single-page newspaper insert. By the 1920s, Gossip had grown into a multi-page publication and household name. Gossip’s offices were located first at the Austin National Bank Building and later at the Scarbrough Building, as noted on its state …

Scraped at: Jan. 22, 2021, 2:50 a.m.
Jan. 26, 2021

B-01 (NPA-2020-0005.01 - Montopolis Acres NPA; District 3).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 21 pages

Planning Commission: January 26, 2021 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW SHEET DATE FILED: July 28, 2020 (In-cycle) NEIGHORHOOD PLAN: Montopolis CASE#: NPA-2020-0005.01 PROJECT NAME: Montopolis Acres PC DATE: January 26, 2021 January 12, 2021 December 22, 2020 1013 - 1017 Montopolis Dr. ADDRESSES: DISTRICT AREA: 3 SITE AREA: 3.13 acres OWNER/APPLICANT: Montopolis Acres, LP AGENT: Thrower Design (Ron Thrower and Victoria Haase) CASE MANAGER: Maureen Meredith, Housing and Planning Dept. PHONE: (512) 974-2695 STAFF EMAIL: Maureen.meredith@austintexas.gov TYPE OF AMENDMENT: Change in Future Land Use Designation From: Single Family Base District Zoning Change To: Multifamily Related Zoning Case: C14-2020-0029 From: SF-3-NP To: MF-6-NP NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN ADOPTION DATE: September 27, 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: January 26, 2021 - 1 NPA-2020-0005.01 1 of 21B-1 Planning Commission: January 26, 2021 January 12, 2021 – Postponed to January 26, 2021 on the consent agenda at the request of the Montopolis Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, applicant was in agreement. [J. Shieh – 1st; P. Seeger – 2nd] Vote: 12-0 [One vacancy]. December 22, 2020 - Postponed to January 12, 2021 on the consent agenda at the request of the Montopolis Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, applicant was in agreement. [A. Azhar – 1st; P. Seeger – 2nd] Vote: 11-0. [J. Shieh absent. One vacancy]. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To grant the applicant’s request for Multifamily land use. BASIS FOR STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports the applicant’s request for Multifamily land use because the property is located on Montopolis Drive which is a major thoroughfare where multifamily uses are appropriate. The property is less than one mile from the Riverside Station Activity Center and E. Riverside Drive Activity Corridor where the Project Connect Blue Line is proposed to be built. The Montopolis Neighborhood Plan supports a mix of zoning along Montopolis Drive and the creation of multiple house types of varied intensities. LAND USE DESCRIPTIONS EXISTING LAND USE ON THE PROPERTY Single family - Detached or two family residential uses at typical urban and/or suburban densities. Purpose 1. Preserve the land use pattern and future viability of existing neighborhoods; 2 2 of 21B-1 Planning Commission: January 26, 2021 2. Encourage new infill development that continues existing neighborhood patterns of development; and 3. Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible business or industry and the loss of existing housing. Application 1. Existing single‐family areas should generally be designated as single family to preserve established neighborhoods; and 2. May include small lot options (Cottage, Urban Home, …

Scraped at: Jan. 22, 2021, 2:50 a.m.
Jan. 26, 2021

B-02 (C14-2020-0029 - Montopolis Acres Rezoning; District 3).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 17 pages

C14-2020-0029 1 ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2020-0029 – Montopolis Acres Rezoning DISTRICT: 3 ZONING FROM: SF-3-NP TO: MF-6-NP, as amended ADDRESS: 1013 and 1017 Montopolis Dr SITE AREA: 3.12 acres PROPERTY OWNER: Montopolis Acres LP AGENT: Thrower Design (A. Ron Thrower & Victoria Haase) CASE MANAGER: Kate Clark (512-974-1237, kate.clark@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends multifamily residence (medium density) – neighborhood plan (MF-3- NP) combining district. For a summary of the basis of staff’s recommendation, see page 2. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: January 26, 2021 Scheduled for Planning Commission January 12, 2021 Approved neighborhood’s request to postpone to January 26, 2021 on the consent agenda. Vote: 12-0. [J. Shieh, P. Seeger – 2nd]. December 22, 2020 Approved neighborhood’s request to postpone to January 12, 2021 on the consent agenda. Vote: 11-0. [A. Azhar, P. Seeger – 2nd; J. Shieh was off the dais]. July 14, 2020 Approved an indefinite postponement request by staff. Vote: 13-0. [A. Azhar; J. Shieh – 2nd] June 23, 2020 Approved neighborhood’s request to postpone to July 14, 2020 on the consent agenda. Vote: 12-0. [J. Thompson, R. Schneider – 2nd; P. Seeger was off the dais]. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: February 18, 2021 Scheduled for City Council July 30, 2020 Approved staff’s request for indefinite postponement. Vote: 11-0. ORDINANCE NUMBER: 1 of 17B-2 C14-2020-0029 2 ISSUES: On June 18, 2020 staff received a letter of opposition to rezone this property from SF-3-NP to SF-6-NP from the Montopolis Neighborhood Planning Contact Team (MNPCT). On July 10, 2020 staff received a letter from the applicant requesting to amend their rezoning request from SF-6-NP to MF-6-NP, please see Exhibit D Amended Rezoning Request. The amended rezoning request requires a Neighborhood Plan Amendment (NPA) to change the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). Staff requested an indefinite postponement at Planning Commission on July 14, 2020 and City Council on July 30, 2020 to allow for the NPA process to be conducted and staff to consider the amended request. All communication received for this rezoning case can be found in Exhibit C: Correspondence Received. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: This property is approximately 3.12 acres and is located on the east side of Montopolis Drive. It is currently zoned SF-3-NP. Across Montopolis Drive to the west are properties zoned SF-3-NP with single-family residential buildings. Adjacent to the north is a property zoned LO-MU-CO- NP which is undeveloped. Adjacent to the east and south …

Scraped at: Jan. 22, 2021, 2:50 a.m.
Jan. 26, 2021

B-03 (C14-2020-0154 - Domain Retail District 1, Block Z; District 7).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 14 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET DISTRICT: 7 TO: MI-PDA* CASE: C14-2020-0154 (Domain Retail District 1, Block Z) ZONING FROM: MI-PDA *Nature of the Request: In this rezoning request, the applicant is asking for an amendment to the conditions the Planned Development Area (PDA) overlay in Ordinance No. 20150611- 033 to permit the Pet Services use within this area of the Domain/MI-PDA. ADDRESS: 11700 Rock Rose Avenue, 3200-3250 Palm Way, 11701 ½, 11703 ½, 11711, 11711 ½, 11811, 11811 ½ Domain Drive SITE AREA: 7.19 acres (313,196.4 sq. ft.) PROPERTY OWNER: Domain Northside Retail Property Owner L.P. AGENT: Armbrust & Brown, PLLC (Walter W. Cardwell, IV) CASE MANAGER: Sherri Sirwaitis (512-974-3057, sherri.sirwaitis@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends MI-PDA, Major Industrial-Planned Development Area Combining District, zoning. The PDA amendment will permit the Pet Services use within this area of PDA. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: January 26, 2021 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ORDINANCE NUMBER: 1 of 14B-3 C14-2020-0154 2 ISSUES: N/A CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The property in question (The Domain-Northside site) is currently developed with a mixture of high density residential, office and commercial uses. In this rezoning request, the applicant is asking for an amendment to the conditions the Planned Development Area (PDA) overlay in Ordinance No. 20150611-033 to permit the Pet Services use within this area of the Domain/MI-PDA. The staff recommends the applicant’s request to amend the Planned Development Area overlay to permit an additional use in this area of the Domain development. The staff recommendation would allow for a dog grooming business (Pet Services use) within this 7+ acre area located in the northeastern portion of the Domain development. The staff believes the proposed amendment is consistent with the uses permitted within the Domain. Therefore, the PDA amendment will not alter the intent of the approved MI-PDA designation for this site. The proposed MI-PDA zoning will allow for a mixture of high-density residential uses, office uses, commercial uses, and industrial uses to be developed on the property in question. The location of the site is appropriate for the proposed mixture and intensity of uses because the site is located between three major roadways, MOPAC Expressway North, Burnet Road, and Braker Lane. The property in question is within the North Burnet/Gateway Combined Neighborhood Planning Area and is adjacent to the North Burnet/Gateway Transit Oriented Development District (TOD). The applicant agrees with the staff’s recommendation. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: 1. The proposed zoning should …

Scraped at: Jan. 22, 2021, 2:50 a.m.
Jan. 26, 2021

B-04 (C14-2020-0128 - NBG Austin Energy Substation Rezoning; District 7).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 14 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET TO: P DISTRICT: 7 CASE: C14-2020-0128 (NBG Austin Energy Substation Rezoning) ZONING FROM: NBG-TOD-NP ADDRESS: 2412 Kramer Lane SITE AREA: 33.56 (1,461873.6 sq. ft.) PROPERTY OWNER: City of Austin Fleet Services AGENT: City of Austin - Housing and Planning Department (Sherri Sirwaitis) CASE MANAGER: Sherri Sirwaitis (512-974-3057, sherri.sirwaitis@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends P, Public District, zoning. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: January 26, 2021 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: February 4, 2021 ORDINANCE NUMBER: 1 of 14B-4 C14-2020-0128 2 ISSUES: This is a City initiated case on October 29, 2020 per Council Resolution No. 20201029- SPEC001. Please see Exhibit C. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The property in question is a 33+ acre tract of land that fronts onto Kramer Lane and is located within the North Burnet/Gateway Combined Neighborhood Planning Area. The site is currently zoned NBG-TOD-NP, North Burnet/Gateway-Transit Oriented Development- Neighborhood Plan Combining District. The Austin City Council passed a resolution on October 29, 2020 to initiate an amendment to the North Burnet/Gateway Regulating Plan to remove the property and to rezone it to the P, Public District, to permit the development of an electric substation at this location. The site under consideration is currently developed with outdoor storage and warehouses that are used as a maintenance and service facility for City of Austin Fleet Services. The property to the north is developed with an office complex (Charles Schwab) with outdoor recreation (tennis courts, baseball field and soccer field). To the south and east there are office/warehouse uses. The rail line runs along the western border of the property and the existing Kramer Metro Rail Station is located at the southeast corner of Kramer Lane and Brockton Drive. Across the rail line to the west there is a hotel/motel use (Home 2 Suites by Hilton) fronting Burnet Road and an indoor sports and recreation/restaurant use (Top Golf) as well as office and warehouse uses. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: 1. The proposed zoning should be consistent with the purpose statement of the district sought. Public district land owned or leased by federal, state, county, or city government. 2. Zoning should allow for reasonable use of the property. The proposed P zoning will permit the city to develop an electric substation on a portion of the property. This tract of land is located in in an area that is experiencing a change in development patterns with the growth of the Domain …

Scraped at: Jan. 22, 2021, 2:50 a.m.
Jan. 26, 2021

B-07 (C14H-2021-0006 - Delta Kappa Gamma Society International; District 9 Part 1).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 32 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET HLC DATE: PC DATE: November 16, 2020 December 14, 2020 January 26, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C14H-2021-0006 (Formerly HDP-2020-0440) APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission HISTORIC NAME: Delta Kappa Gamma Building WATERSHED: Shoal Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 416 W. 12th Street Council District: 9 ZONING FROM: GO to DMU-H-CO SUMMARY STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from general office (GO) district to downtown mixed use – Historic Landmark (DMU-H) combining district zoning. While staff appreciates the property owners’ dilemma in what they now view as a financial and maintenance burden, the building has demonstrated significance as reflected by its individual inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. National Register designation in and of itself does not prevent modification or even demolition of the building, but in the City of Austin, National Register designation does automatically qualify a building as eligible for landmark designation, which does place a barrier on demolition. Staff cannot recommend that a building individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places should be demolished, and must recommend landmark designation for the building to determine if the Commission or the Planning Commission, and ultimately the City Council votes to grant the building historic zoning. Given the architecture and history of this building, staff would recommend landmark designation even if the building were not listed on the National Register. In the meantime, staff recommends that the applicant for the demolition permit continue to develop proposals to incorporate the building into new development plans for the site, which staff acknowledges may preclude the construction of a high-rise building on this site. In staff’s evaluation, preserving portions of the exterior finishes of the building into an interior space of the proposed new building is not sufficiently respectful of the integrity, design, and significance of the existing building. Continuing conversations about the relationship of historic and new may result in a proposal that is much more palatable to both the owners of the building and the interests of preserving buildings that have demonstrated historical significance. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: The building is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: November 16, 2020: Initiated historic zoning. Vote: 9-0-2 (Papavasiliou and Jacob off-dais). December 14, 2020: Recommended historic zoning (Tollett/Koch). Vote: 9-0-1 (Papavasiliou absent; Featherston abstaining). PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: 1 of 32B-7 DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The building was listed on the National Register …

Scraped at: Jan. 22, 2021, 2:50 a.m.
Jan. 26, 2021

B-08 (NPA-2020-0015.04.SH - Lott Avenue; District 1).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 38 pages

Planning Commission: January 26, 2021 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW SHEET NEIGHORHOOD PLAN: East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan CASE#: NPA-2020-0015.04 .SH DATE FILED: July 30, 2020 (In-cycle) PROJECT NAME: Lott Avenue PC DATE: January 26, 2021 ADDRESS/ES: 4908 Lott Ave; 5000-5016 Lightfield Ln; 1160-1166 Mason Ave DISTRICT AREA: 1 SITE AREA: 5.01 acres OWNER/APPLICANT: 4908 Lott Holdings, LLC (GMJ Real Estate Investments, LLC) (Matt McDonnell) (Note: Agent at time application was filed on July 30, 2020 – David Suissa) AGENT: Armbrust & Brown, PLLC (Michael J. Whellan) (Note: Agent at time application was filed on July 30, 2020 – David Suissa) CASE MANAGER: Jeffrey Engstrom, Senior Planner, Housing & Planning Department PHONE: (512) 974-1621 STAFF EMAIL: Jeffrey.engstrom@austintexas.gov TYPE OF AMENDMENT: Change in Future Land Use Designation To: Higher Density Single Family From: Single Family Base District Zoning Change Related Zoning Case: C14-2020-0135.SH From: SF-3-NP To: SF-6-NP NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN ADOPTION DATE: November 7, 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: 1 1 of 38B-8 Planning Commission: January 26, 2021 January 26, 2021 - STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To grant applicant’s request for Higher Density Single Family BASIS FOR STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the FLUM change request from Single Family land use to Higher Density Single Family land use. Staff recommends the project because it would be compatible with residential housing adjacency; provide owner occupied infill housing; and is supported by housing policies and text found in the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan, the East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan, and the Austin Strategic Housing Blueprint. Below are excerpts from the East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan that supports infill housing and small-lot single family housing in this portion of the planning area. Goal 1: Preserve established residential areas and improve opportunities for home ownership by promoting the rehabilitation of existing housing and new, infill housing compatible with the existing style of this neighborhood. (pg. 44). Objective 1.2: Promote new infill housing in appropriate locations. Goal 5: Provide housing that helps to maintain the social and economic diversity of residents. (pg. 45) Below are additional policies and text that are excerpted from the East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan that supports a change from Single Family to High Density Single Family on the Future Land Use Map: Fort Branch Recommendations: The greatest need in the Fort Branch area is continued development of quality residential infill. Some larger tracts on Webberville, Tannehill Lane, and Jackie Robinson Street could be developed with mixed residential, …

Scraped at: Jan. 22, 2021, 2:52 a.m.