Planning Commission Homepage

RSS feed for this page

Feb. 22, 2022

B-08 (C14-2021-0190 - 3000 E Cesar Chavez, District 3).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

MEMORANDUM ************************************************************************ TO: Todd Shaw, Chair Planning Commission Members February 22, 2022 Heather Chaffin, Senior Planner Housing and Planning Department C14-2021-0190 3000 East Cesar Chavez Notification Error FROM: DATE: RE: ************************************************************************ The notice for public hearing of this rezoning request was mailed with the incorrect address for the property. As a result, the request cannot be heard at the February 22, 2022, Planning Commission meeting. The case will be renotified for the March 8, 2022, agenda. 1 of 2B-8 From: Aneil Naik Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 12:51 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov> Cc: Amanda Swor Subject: RE: C14-2021-0083 (Trinsic - Cesar Chavez) - Status? Afternoon Heather. I’m following up on this case. I’d like this item to be placed on the next possible available agenda. We will be requesting an indefinite postponement. Please let me know if you need anything further. Thanks, ANEIL Aneil Naik, Senior Project Manager Drenner Group, PC | 200 Lee Barton Drive | Suite 100 | Austin, TX 78704 512-807-2900 office | 512-587-5447 cell | | www.drennergroup.com 2 of 2B-8

Scraped at: Feb. 18, 2022, 5:31 a.m.
Feb. 22, 2022

B-09 (NPA-2021-0005.01 - ALPHA .95; District 3).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 37 pages

Planning Commission: February 22, 2022 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW SHEET DATE FILED: July 26, 2021 (In-cycle) NEIGHORHOOD PLAN: Montopolis CASE#: NPA-2021-0005.01 PROJECT NAME: Alpha .95 PC DATE: February 22, 2022 February 8, 2022 January 25, 2022 November 9, 2021 October 12, 2021 September 28, 2021 2404 Thrasher Lane ADDRESS/ES: DISTRICT AREA: 3 SITE AREA: 0.95 acres OWNER/APPLICANT: Alpha Builders (Gino Shvetz) AGENT: *Husch Blackwell, LLP (Nikelle Meade) *New agent as of November 9, 2021 CASE MANAGER: Maureen Meredith STAFF EMAIL: Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov TYPE OF AMENDMENT: Change in Future Land Use Designation PHONE: (512) 974-2695 From: Single Family *Revised on November 10, 2021 from Higher Density Single Family to Mixed Use land use. To: *Mixed Use Base District Zoning Change Related Zoning Case: C14-2021-0128 From: CS-NP To: CS-MU-NP *Revised on November 10, 2021 from SF-6-NP to CS-MU-NP NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN ADOPTION DATE: September 27, 2001 1 1 of 37B-9 Planning Commission: February 22, 2022 ACTION: CITY COUNCIL DATE: To be scheduled PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: February 22, 2022 - February 8, 2022 – Postponed to February 22, 2022 on the consent agenda by the Planning Commission. [J. Shieh – 1st; G. Cox – 2nd] Vote: 11-0 [C. Hempel abstain on Items B-15 & B-16. S. R. Praxis absent]. January 25, 2022 - Postponed to February 8, 2022 on the consent agenda by the Planning Commission. [J. Shieh – 1st; C. Hempel – 2nd] Vote: 10-0 [P. Howard, J. Mushtaler and S. R. Praxis absent]. November 9, 2021 – Approved the applicant’s request for an indefinite postponement on the consent agenda. [C. Hempel – 1st; G. Cox – 2nd] Vote: 9-0-1 [C. Llanes Pulido abstained. Y. Flores, S. R. Praxis and R. Schneider absent]. October 12, 2021- Postponed on the consent agenda to November 9, 2021 at the request of the neighborhood. [R. Schneider – 1st; J. Shieh – 2nd] Vote: 9-0 [A. Azhar, J. Paulo Connolly, and C. Hempel absent]. September 28, 2021- Postponed on the consent agenda to October 12, 2021 at the request of the neighborhood. [A. Azhar – 1st; R. Schneider – 2nd] Vote: 10-0 [G. Cox and J. Shieh absent. C. Hempel recused from Item B-10]. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommended for applicant’s request for Mixed Use land use. BASIS FOR STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION: The property is a 0.95-acre vacant tract of land with CS-NP zoning and Commercial future land use. To the north is a single-family home zoned SF-3-NP with primary frontage …

Scraped at: Feb. 18, 2022, 5:31 a.m.
Feb. 22, 2022

B-10 (C14-2021-0128 - ALPHA .95; District 3).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 27 pages

C14-2021-0128 1 ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2021-0128 – ALPHA .95 DISTRICT: 3 ZONING FROM: CS-NP TO: CS-MU-NP, as amended ADDRESS: 2404 Thrasher Lane SITE AREA: 0.95 acres PROPERTY OWNER: Alpha Builders Group, Inc. (Gino Shvetz) AGENT: Husch Blackwell, LLC (Nikelle Meade) CASE MANAGER: Wendy Rhoades (512-974-7719, wendy.rhoades@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends general commercial services-mixed use-conditional overlay- neighborhood plan (CS-MU-CO-NP) combining district zoning. The CO would be for a maximum of 10 residential units. For a summary of the basis of staff’s recommendation, see page 2-3. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: February 22, 2022 February 8, 2022 Approved a postponement to February 22, 2022. Vote: 11-0. [Commissioner Shieh – 1st, Commissioner Cox – 2nd; Commissioner Connolly not present for passage of the consent agenda; Commissioner Praxis was absent. January 25, 2022 Approved Planning Commission’s postponement to February 8, 2022 on the consent agenda. Vote: 10-0. [Commissioner Shieh – 1st, Vice Chair Hempel – 2nd, Commissioner Praxis was off the dais, Commissioners Howard and Mushtaler were absent]. November 9, 2021 Approved applicant’s request to indefinitely postpone on the consent agenda. Vote: 9-0. [Vice Chair Hempel – 1st, Commissioner Cox – 2nd; Commissioner Llanes Pulido abstained; Commissioners Flores, Praxis and Schneider were absent]. October 12, 2021 Approved applicant's request to postpone to November 9, 2021 on the consent agenda. Vote: 9-0. [Commissioner Schneider – 1st, 1 of 27B-10 C14-2021-0128 2 Commissioner Shieh – 2nd; Commissioner Praxis was off the dais; Vice Chair Hempel and Commissioners Azhar and Connolly were absent]. September 28, 2021 Approved neighborhood’s request to postpone to October 12, 2021 on the consent agenda. Vote: 10-0. [Commissioner Azhar – 1st, Commissioner Schneider – 2nd; Commissioners Cox, Praxis and Shieh were absent]. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: To be Scheduled for City Council ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES: Staff has received comments in opposition to this rezoning request. For all written or emailed comments, please see Exhibit C: Correspondence Received. Natural Gas Pipeline on the Property The Austin Fire Department (AFD) used the Railroad Commission of Texas (TxRRC) GIS Viewer to identify a 12.4-inch diameter natural gas pipeline owned by the Texas Gas Service on close to the north side of the property. The pipeline is currently abandoned but could be returned to service at a future date. Please see Texas Railroad Commission’s GIS attributes table following Exhibit B. If it were to be returned to service, that process would need to comply with 49 …

Scraped at: Feb. 18, 2022, 5:31 a.m.
Feb. 22, 2022

B-11 (C14H-2021-0180 - Casa McMath; District 10)_Part1.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 43 pages

CASE NUMBER: C14H-2021-0180 HLC DATE: August 23, 2021 ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET PC DATE: December 14, 2021 September 27, 2021 October 25, 2021 January 25, 2022 February 8, 2022 February 22, 2022 APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission (owner-opposed) HISTORIC NAME: Casa McMath ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 2501 Inwood Place ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-NP to SF-3-NP-H COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 WATERSHED: Johnson Creek NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Central West Austin Combined STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the house meets the criteria for landmark designation and thus recommends the proposed zoning change from SF-3-NP (single family residence – neighborhood plan combining district zoning) to SF- 3-NP-H (single family residence – neighborhood plan – historic landmark combining district zoning). Should the Commission choose to release the permit, the staff recommendation is to require completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package, including documentation of the site and exterior and interior architectural features. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Architecture, historical associations, and landscape feature HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: August 23, 2021: Postponed to September 27, 2021. September 27, 2021: Initiated historic zoning. October 25, 2021: Recommended historic zoning for architecture, historical associations, landscape feature, and community value on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner Wright seconded the motion. Vote: 9-0 (Commissioners Castillo and Larosche absent). PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: December 14, 2021: Postponed to January 25, 2022. January 25, 2022: Postponed to February 8, 2022. February 8, 2022: Postponed to February 22, 2022. February 22, 2022: DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The house is beyond the bounds of the Comprehensive Cultural Resources Survey (1984) and has never been included in a city survey. CITY COUNCIL DATE: ACTION: ORDINANCE READINGS: ORDINANCE NUMBER: CASE MANAGER: Elizabeth Brummett PHONE: 512-974-1264 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Central West Austin Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Save Barton Creek Assn., Save Historic Muny District, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, TNR BCP - Travis County Natural Resources, Tarrytown Alliance , Tarrytown Neighborhood Association, West Austin Neighborhood Group 1 of 43B-11 BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: Historical Associations: The house was owned and occupied by Hugh and Frances McMath from the time of its construction until their deaths, and it remained in the McMath family until this year. Hugh McMath was a professor of architecture at the University of Texas who specialized in the study of Mexican architecture and was prominent in integrating Mexican schools …

Scraped at: Feb. 18, 2022, 5:31 a.m.
Feb. 22, 2022

B-11 (C14H-2021-0180 - Casa McMath; District 10)_Part2.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 71 pages

Figure 21. Patio 1 of 71B-11 Figure 22. Retrofitted lighting is not hardwired and does not meet code 2 of 71B-11 Figure 23. Garage has rotten fascia 3 of 71B-11 Figure 24. Interior of garage exhibits extensive rot resulting from site grading and drainage challenges 4 of 71B-11 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places REGISTRATION FORM NPS Form 10-900 Austin Air-Conditioned Village Historic District, Austin, Travis County, Texas Architects and Designers The following architects and designers are presented in order of prominence relative to the Austin Air-Conditioned Village. Ned A. Cole helped select Austin as the site of the experiment through his role as chairman of the National Association of Home Builders air-conditioning subcommittee, served as project manager for the construction, and designed seven of the houses. H. D. Powers designed five houses, J. Eugene Wukasch designed two, and Fred Winfield Day, Jr., W. R. Coleman, and Oran Vaughan each designed one home in the Village. While some found more critical acclaim in their careers than others, collectively their work is representative of mid-century residential design in Austin’s middle class, suburban neighborhoods. Ned Ansel Cole (1917–2008) Ned Ansel Cole was born in Ferris, Texas. He earned a degree in architecture with honors from the University of Texas at Austin in 1939 and subsequently began building houses and teaching in the architecture department. Drafted into the U.S. Army in 1941, Cole served in the South Pacific building infrastructure on Guam and in the Philippines.215 Cole returned to Austin after World War II and with three other veterans founded Fabricon, Inc. The firm designed and produced innovative prefabricated wall storage units that would serve as a centerpiece of Cole’s residential architecture. The founders constructed their factory building in modular sections in a rented garage, before the ultimate site of the facility at 4601 East Fifth Street in Austin had been selected and obtained. The hand-cast concrete block cornerstone of the building reads, “Fabricon, built by four soldiers with their bare hands, 1 June 1946.” In place of traditional site-built, load-bearing walls, the Fabricon wall units turned room dividers into organized storage with built-in sliding doors and drawers. An Austin Statesman article characterized the units as a modern space-saving measure in contrast with outmoded storage methods—“Room-consuming closets, cabinets and trunks are completely out.” 216 Cole’s role in the company was designing …

Scraped at: Feb. 18, 2022, 5:31 a.m.
Feb. 22, 2022

B-11 (C14H-2021-0180 - Casa McMath; District 10)_Part3.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Why Does the Demolition of a Marcel Breuer House Matter? - The New... https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/06/arts/design/marcel-breuer-geller-h... https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/06/arts/design/marcel-breuer-geller-house-demolition.html Why Does the Demolition of a Marcel Breuer House Matter? The Geller house embodied the optimistic, now-vanished values of postwar suburbia: technological progress and a lifestyle built around children’s needs. CRITIC’S NOTEBOOK By James S. Russell Feb. 6, 2022 Updated 4:21 p.m. ET LAWRENCE, N.Y. — “Are people going to care about one little house?” asked Elizabeth Waytkus, who had been alerted some weeks ago to the possibility that a once-celebrated house by the architect Marcel Breuer would be demolished. She is the executive director of Docomomo US, a nonprofit organization that promotes the preservation of modern structures. People did care, it turns out. She has received an outpouring of dismay and grief at the news that the 1945 Bertram and Phyllis Geller House in Lawrence, at the southwestern edge of Nassau County, had been demolished without warning on Jan. 26 by the current owners, Shimon and Judy Eckstein, who Waytkus said had assured her only three weeks earlier that they had admired it and had no plans to take it down. It was a handsome composition of three cedar-sided single-story wings, that zigzagged among the trees and shrubs of a spacious site, each wing topped with a low-sloped roof that gave the house an undulating silhouette. The house had been significantly, but not irreversibly, altered, according to pictures on a real estate website. The living room stonewall and fireplace is all that remains of the Geller House since its demolition in January. An Rong Xu for The New York Times Her question makes a larger point, however. The Geller house was rapturously covered by the press at its debut because it appealed to an America that was obsessed with making a better life after enduring sacrifices of World War II and the grinding bleakness of the Great Depression. It was “among the most famous houses of the period,” said Barry Bergdoll, a Breuer expert, who teaches architectural history at Columbia University and was the chief curator of architecture at the Museum of Modern Art. Yet it had fallen into a kind of obscurity, well known mainly to aficionados. Preserving individual houses is difficult and expensive, explained Waytkus, first because they are private. Docomomo’s modest resources are mostly focused on the preservation of commercial, cultural, and civic buildings because they are generally accessible to the …

Scraped at: Feb. 18, 2022, 5:32 a.m.
Feb. 22, 2022

B-11 (C14H-2021-0180 - Casa McMath; District 10)_Part4.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Why Does the Demolition of a Marcel Breuer House Matter? - The New... https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/06/arts/design/marcel-breuer-geller-h... Marcel Breuer, who helped shape 20th century architecture and design, at the Geller House in 1945. Ezra Stoller/Esto With the rise of the Nazis, Breuer, who was Jewish, would move several times, finally settling in Cambridge, Mass., in 1937, where he practiced and taught with his Bauhaus colleague Walter Gropius at Harvard. Gregarious and charming, “Lajko” became close friends with many clients, including the Gellers, who would hire him to design another house in Lawrence, in 1967. (For this reason the original Geller house is now known by preservationists as Geller I.) The house has been added to but remains largely the way it was built. In a series of houses with Gropius, Breuer would soften the crisp cubic forms, white plaster or metal surfaces, and dramatic cantilevers of his Bauhaus work. Geller was designed as Breuer was parting ways with Gropius and moving to New York. In this house, Breuer more fully merged his stylistic tendencies with American building techniques. The conventional wood construction was clad in vertical cedar siding that gave a sleek planar feeling. Inside, he used thin panels of varnished plywood and contrasted them with expanses of saturated paint colors in the mode of Modern artists. Jackson Pollock made one of his early drip paintings — sold long ago — for the house. Breuer anchored this lightweight architecture to the earth with a living-room wall and massive fireplace of fieldstone. Low stone walls projected into the landscape to demarcate places for play and relaxation. You could argue that the old-fashioned masonry harkens to traditions Americans cling to — or that the stone is simply a sensual counterpoint to the sleek planes of the rest of the design. Many of the ideas Breuer had refined in Geller would appear in a house he designed that was built in MoMA’s garden in 1949, broadcasting its ideas to an international audience. “Both the Geller and MoMA houses were intended to be replicable,” said Bergdoll, “a house that a local contractor could build.” 3 of 4 2/6/22, 6:59 PM 1 of 2B-11 Why Does the Demolition of a Marcel Breuer House Matter? - The New... https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/06/arts/design/marcel-breuer-geller-h... A Marcel Breuer house in the MoMA Garden, 1949. Both the Geller and MoMA houses were intended to be replicable around the country. Ezra Stoller/Esto While many other architects, including …

Scraped at: Feb. 18, 2022, 5:32 a.m.
Feb. 22, 2022

B-12 (SPC-2021-0129C - Rainey Tower; District 9).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 23 pages

PLANNING COMMISSION SITE PLAN VARIANCE REQUEST AND DOWNTOWN DENSITY BONUS REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: SPC-2021-0129C PC DATE: 02/22/22 COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 PROJECT NAME: Rainey Tower ADDRESS OF APPLICATION: 80 Rainey St Variance request: The applicant is requesting the removal of a Heritage tree with a stem greater than 30 inches as allowed under LDC 25-8-643. Downtown Density Bonus: The applicant is requesting a recommendation to the City Council on a request for additional floor to area ratio (FAR) from 15:1 to 20:1 for a proposed multi-family high rise project that has participated in the Downtown Density Bonus Program and is processing a request for bonus area up to 15:1 FAR to be granted administratively. APPLICANT: AGENT: Ashland Rainey LLC & EW Renovating Rainey LLC 165 W 73rd St, New York City, New York 10023 Wuest Group 5207 Airport Blvd Austin, Texas, 78751 (512) 394-1900 Drenner Group (Amanda Swor) 200 Lee Barton Dr. Sute 100 Austin, TX 78704 Phone: (512) 974-2711 Renee.Johns@austintexas.gov CASE MANAGER: Renee Johns EXISTING ZONING: CBD NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: NA/Downtown PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The applicant is proposing a 49 story multi use building in the Rainey District. The uses will include Administrative and Business Offices, Restaurant (limited), Multi-Family, and a Cocktail Lounge (conditional use that will go before PC at a later date). The development will also include associated drives, onsite parking, and utility improvements. COMMISION REQUESTS: DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE The variance request is to allow removal of a Heritage tree with a stem greater than 30 inches as allowed under LDC 25-8-643. The applicant requested a predevelopment site consultation with the City Arborist. There are currently two protected trees and three Heritage trees on site. One Protected tree and one Heritage tree are proposed to be removed. A 32.5 inch Heritage pecan is requested for removal and per Land Development Code would require a Land Use Commission variance. 1 of 23 DOWNTOWN DENSITY BONUS In accordance with LDC Section 25-2-586(B)(6), the applicant requests the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the City Council on a request for additional floor to area ratio (FAR) from 15:1 to 20:1 for a proposed multi-family high rise project that has participated in the Downtown Density Bonus Program and is processing a request for bonus area up to 15:1 FAR to be granted administratively. The applicant requests a recommendation from the Planning Commission to the City Council on the use of the other community benefits in …

Scraped at: Feb. 18, 2022, 5:32 a.m.
Feb. 22, 2022

B-13 (C8S-87-008(VAC) - Atwell Tract No. 2 Subdivision; District 3).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

SUBDIVISION REVIEW SHEET CASE NO.: C8S-84-065(VAC) COMMISSION DATE: February 22, 2022 SUBDIVISION NAME: Atwell Tract ADDRESS: 760 Airport Blvd APPLICANT: Ben Browder (OH Airport, LP) AGENT: Hannah Riemer-Rapesak (LJA Engineering, Inc.) ZONING: CS-MU-V-CO-NP NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Govalle AREA: 4.52 acres (196,891.2 sf) LOTS: 3 COUNTY: Travis DISTRICT: 3 WATERSHED: Colorado River/Boggy Creek JURISDICTION: Full Purpose DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The request is for the approval of the total vacation of Atwell Tract Subdivision, comprised of 3 lots on 4.52 acres (196,891.2 sf). Staff recommends approval of this total plat vacation as it complies with the City of Austin Land Development Code. CASE MANAGER: Joey de la Garza PHONE: 512-974-2664 E-mail: joey.delagarza@austintexas.gov ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Vicinity map Exhibit B: Plat to be vacated (Atwell Tract; C8S-84-065) Exhibit C: Plat vacation document 5404 5406 5408 B O L M R D 5410 1102 RESUB 5414 0203180501 1104 1104 WALTON LANE CONDOS N N L O LT A W 0 0 5 5 5305 914 361.07 5405 912 910 N R L E N R E O K 119.67 906 801 904 800 8 2 7 k e y C r e g g o B 914 920 SHADY LANE ADDN Boggy Creek 8 4 4 B o g g y C r e e k 841 838 923 830 917 915 814 A I R P O R T B L V D 823 820 812 4900 903 901 905 5110 817 5101 5105 5107 5112 5200 5202 5109 5201 GLIS S M A N R D 813 5203 5204 150.06 5206 150.08 5205 5301 764 N Y L D A H S 757 777 ATWELL TRACT 760 5419 HOWARD'S NURSERY ADDN 719 740 815 801 771 I A R P O R T B L V D 801 TANNEHILL, J C SUR 29 ABS 22 729 727 725 7 1/2 2 7 MIDTOWN INDUSTRIAL SUBD NO 1 7201 5206 720 E 7 T H S T AIRPORT 1 0202191301-1303 5705 2 1 9 910 908 906 T S A E O D A R O L O C A - 1 900 904 902 5701 t c i r t s D i l i a s a r p p A l a r t n e C s v a r T i 2 1 0 9 4 1 x o B . O P . 4 1 7 8 …

Scraped at: Feb. 18, 2022, 5:34 a.m.
Feb. 22, 2022

B-14 (C8S-84-065(VAC) - Atwell Tract Subdivision; District 3).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

SUBDIVISION REVIEW SHEET CASE NO.: C8S-87-008(VAC) COMMISSION DATE: February 22, 2022 SUBDIVISION NAME: Atwell Tract No. 2 ADDRESS: 760 Airport Blvd APPLICANT: Ben Browder (OH Airport, LP) AGENT: Hannah Riemer-Rapesak (LJA Engineering, Inc.) ZONING: CS-MU-V-CO-NP NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Govalle AREA: 1.149 acres (50,050.44 sq ft) LOTS: 1 COUNTY: Travis DISTRICT: 3 WATERSHED: Colorado River/Boggy Creek JURISDICTION: Full Purpose DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The request is for the approval of the total plat vacation of Atwell Tract No. 2 subdivision, comprised of 1 lot on 1.149 acres (50,050.44 sq ft). Staff recommends approval of this total plat vacation as it complies with the City of Austin Land Development Code. CASE MANAGER: Joey de la Garza PHONE: 512-974-2664 E-mail: joey.delagarza@austintexas.gov ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Vicinity map Exhibit B: Plat to be vacated (Atwell Tract No. 2; C8S-87-008) Exhibit C: Plat vacation document 5404 5406 5408 B O L M R D 5410 1102 RESUB 5414 0203180501 1104 1104 WALTON LANE CONDOS N N L O LT A W 0 0 5 5 5305 914 361.07 5405 912 910 N R L E N R E O K 119.67 906 801 904 800 8 2 7 k e y C r e g g o B 914 920 SHADY LANE ADDN Boggy Creek 8 4 4 B o g g y C r e e k 841 838 923 830 917 915 814 A I R P O R T B L V D 823 820 812 4900 903 901 905 5110 817 5101 5105 5107 5112 5200 5202 5109 5201 GLIS S M A N R D 813 5203 5204 150.06 5206 150.08 5205 5301 764 N Y L D A H S 757 777 ATWELL TRACT 760 5419 HOWARD'S NURSERY ADDN 719 740 815 801 771 I A R P O R T B L V D 801 TANNEHILL, J C SUR 29 ABS 22 729 727 725 7 1/2 2 7 MIDTOWN INDUSTRIAL SUBD NO 1 7201 5206 720 E 7 T H S T AIRPORT 1 0202191301-1303 5705 2 1 9 910 908 906 T S A E O D A R O L O C A - 1 900 904 902 5701 t c i r t s D i l i a s a r p p A l a r t n e C s v a r T i 2 1 0 9 4 1 x o …

Scraped at: Feb. 18, 2022, 5:34 a.m.
Feb. 22, 2022

Planning Commission February 22 2022 Agenda.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 10 pages

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Tuesday, February 22, 2022 The Planning Commission will convene at 6:00 PM on Tuesday, February 22, 2022 at Austin City Hall, Council Chambers, Room 1001 301 W. Second Street, Austin, TX. Some members of the Planning Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Awais Azhar Joao Paulo Connolly Grayson Cox Yvette Flores – Secretary Claire Hempel – Vice-Chair Patrick Howard Jennifer Mushtaler Solveij Rosa Praxis Carmen Llanes Pulido Robert Schneider Todd Shaw – Chair James Shieh – Parliamentarian Jeffrey Thompson Ex-Officio Members Arati Singh – AISD Board of Trustees Jessica Cohen – Chair of Board of Adjustment Spencer Cronk - City Manager Richard Mendoza - Director of Public Works EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) The Planning Commission will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on this agenda. The Commission may not conduct a closed meeting without the approval of the city attorney. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071 Attorney: Steven Maddoux, 512-974-6080 Commission Liaison: Andrew Rivera, 512-974-6508 CITIZEN COMMUNICATION The first four (4) speakers signed up prior to the commencement of the meeting will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of February 8, 2022. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Plan Amendment: Location: Owner/Applicant: Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: Postponement Request 2. Plan Amendment: Location: Owner/Applicant: Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: 3. Rezoning: Location: Owner/Applicant: Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: NPA-2021-0005.02 - Montopolis Multifamily; District 3 2601 Montopolis Drive, 6700 & 6800 E. Ben White Blvd SVRD WB, Carson Creek, Country Club Creek Watersheds; Montopolis NP Area Montopolis QO2B, LLC Thrower Design, LLC (Ron Thrower and Victoria Haase) Industry to Mixed Use land use Not Recommended Maureen Meredith, 512-974-2695, maureen.meredith@austintexas.gov Housing and Planning Department Applicant Postponement request to March 22, 2022 NPA-2021-0015.01 - Austin Sports Facility; District 3 1138 1/2 & 1140 Gunter Street, Boggy Creek Watershed; E. MLK Combined NP Area GSTF, LLC (c/o Michael Orsak of 3 MP ENT) Brown & Ortiz, PC (c/o Caroline McDonald) Single Family to Mixed Use land use Recommended Maureen Meredith, 512-974-2695, maureen.meredith@austintexas.gov Housing and Planning Department C14-2021-0125 - Austin Sports Facility; District 3 1138 1/2 & 1140 Gunter Street, Boggy Creek Watershed; …

Scraped at: Feb. 18, 2022, 8 p.m.
Feb. 22, 2022

B-12 Public Comment for Rainey Tower.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

February 18, 2022 Case Number: SPC-2021-0129C Planning Commission Renee Johns / Cindy Edmond City of Austin, Development Services Department PO Box 1088 Austin TX 78767 To whom it may concern: The Shore condominiums object to this case due to trying to utilize the alley for access for parking garage. The current alley to the south has dumpsters from the 70 Rainey project preventing 2-way access to the proposed location. To the North, there is also limited width and the Van Zandt hotel having its loading dock at the location and deliveries there will have their delivery trucks parked there completely blocking the alley to the North. The plans submitted by the developer also show Red River street accessing the alley location. This is incorrect. That area is a private drive for the Van Zandt Hotel garage access and The Shore Condominiums garage access. We are not in favor in granting our private land for access to a large development that threatens our residents, employees, and guests. The traffic pattern of this project is not in the best interests of their future residents or our current residents. Please do not approve this layout. Sincerely, James Reist General Manager The Shore Condominium Association 603 Davis Street Austin, TX 78701 512-473-8600 (P) 512-473-8602 (F) Dear Ms. Johns, I am writing to object to this case (to use of the alley between Red River and Rainey Streets, bounded by Davis Street to the north and the private driveway of the VanZandt and the Shore to the south) as the access to the 80 Rainey St. project.) This alley is barely passable as it is with many garbage dumpsters and trucks unloading materials for and servicing businesses on Rainey Street. Residents trying to exit the Shore Condominiums when Red River has been closed for construction, have been threatened with vehicular harm when confronted by a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction, even if our driver was 75% of the way through the alley. The entire Rainey Street area, from Driskill to River Street and from Rainey to Red River Street, is becoming increasingly dense with no apparent upgrades to the streets and sidewalks to accommodate the increase in both vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The plan also shows that the private drive for the VanZandt and The Shore will serve as access to their garage. As an owner of a unit at the Shore, I am …

Scraped at: Feb. 23, 2022, 1:30 a.m.
Feb. 22, 2022

D-01 FY23 Budget Calendar Memo.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

MEMORANDUM ______ February 2, 2022 Boards and Commissions Kerri Lang, FSD - Budget Officer FY 2022-23 Budget Process and Calendar TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Resident and stakeholder feedback on budget priorities, including input from the City’s various boards and commissions, remains a key component of the annual budget development process. The FY 2021-22 Budget included investments in community priorities such as, critical infrastructure, cultural and creative spaces, and a renewal in our commitment to advancing progress within the transformative Reimagining Public Safety (RPS) framework. Since the 3.5% tax revenue cap took effect in FY 2020-21, the City has implemented measures aimed at flattening the organization’s cost curve, as well as identifying potential new revenue streams. These measures have helped allow the City to propose a balanced budget. However, the financial outlook for the City continues to project expenditures exceeding revenue. Thus, it remains crucial to focus recommendations and to provide feedback on the efficiency, equity, and effectiveness of the City’s existing services and programs. As in previous years, the Budget Office will coordinate with City departments to review recommendations passed by boards and commissions. We are requesting recommendations be submitted online at www.austintexas.gov/budget. All recommendations must be received by March 31, 2022. This will allow the Budget Office the necessary time to review the recommendations with Department staff. For your information, the Council-approved calendar for the FY 2022-23 budget is shown below: • March 31 • May 6 • July 15 • July 27 • August 17 Board and Commission recommendations due to the Budget Office Department budgets due to the Budget Office Presentation of the FY 2022-23 Proposed Budget to City Council Community Input Session Budget Adoption Additional information can be found at www.austintexas.gov/budget. Should you have any questions, please contact our office at BudgetQA@austintexas.gov. cc: Spencer Cronk, City Manager Assistant City Managers Ed Van Eenoo, Chief Financial Officer, Financial Services Department

Scraped at: Feb. 23, 2022, 1:30 a.m.
Feb. 22, 2022

Planning Commission February 22 2022 Minutes.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 11 pages

PLANNING COMMISSION February 22, 2022 MINUTES The Planning Commission convened in a meeting on February 22, 2022 in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 301 W. 2nd Street, Austin, Texas and via videoconference @ http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Chair Shaw called the Commission Meeting to order at 6:07 p.m. Commission Members in Attendance: Awais Azhar Joao Paulo Connolly Grayson Cox Yvette Flores Claire Hempel – Vice-Chair Patrick Howard Jennifer Mushtaler Carmen Llanes Pulido Solveij Rosa Praxis Robert Schneider Todd Shaw – Chair James Shieh Jeffrey Thompson Jessica Cohen – Ex-Officio Absent: Arati Singh – Ex -Ex-Officio Richard Mendoza – Ex-Officio Spencer Cronk – Ex-Officio 1. Ms. Angela Benavides Garza provided remarks regarding a rezoning case on Regiene CITIZEN COMMUNICATIONS Road. B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of February 8, 2022. Motion to approve the minutes of February 8, 2022, as amended, was approved on the consent agenda on the motion by Commissioner Azhar, seconded by Commissioner Shieh on a vote of 13-0. C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Plan Amendment: NPA-2021-0005.02 - Montopolis Multifamily; District 3 2601 Montopolis Drive, 6700 & 6800 E. Ben White Blvd SVRD WB, Carson Creek, Country Club Creek Watersheds; Montopolis NP Area Owner/Applicant: Montopolis QO2B, LLC Thrower Design, LLC (Ron Thrower and Victoria Haase) Industry to Mixed Use land use Staff Rec.: Not Recommended Location: Agent: Request: Staff: Maureen Meredith, 512-974-2695, maureen.meredith@austintexas.gov Housing and Planning Department Postponement Request Applicant Postponement request to March 22, 2022 Motion to grant Applicant’s request for postponement of this item to March 22, 2022 was approved on the consent agenda on the motion by Commissioner Azhar, seconded by Commissioner Shieh on a vote of 13-0. 2. Plan Amendment: NPA-2021-0015.01 - Austin Sports Facility; District 3 Location: 1138 1/2 & 1140 Gunter Street, Boggy Creek Watershed; E. MLK Combined NP Area Owner/Applicant: GSTF, LLC (c/o Michael Orsak of 3 MP ENT) Brown & Ortiz, PC (c/o Caroline McDonald) Single Family to Mixed Use land use Agent: Request: Staff: Staff Rec.: Recommended Maureen Meredith, 512-974-2695, maureen.meredith@austintexas.gov Housing and Planning Department Motion by Commissioner Cox, seconded by Commissioner Mushtaler to postpone this item to April 12, 2022 was approved on a vote of 7-5. Vice-Chair Hempel and Commissioners Howard, Connolly, Thompson, and Azhar voting nay. Commissioner Praxis abstained. 3. Rezoning: C14-2021-0125 - Austin Sports Facility; District 3 Location: 1138 1/2 & 1140 Gunter Street, Boggy Creek Watershed; E. MLK Combined NP Area Owner/Applicant: GSTF, LLC (in …

Scraped at: March 9, 2022, 1:30 p.m.
Feb. 8, 2022

Planning Commission February 8 2022 Agenda.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 12 pages

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Tuesday, February 8, 2022 The Planning Commission will convene at 6:00 PM on Tuesday, February 8, 2022 at Austin City Hall, Council Chambers, Room 1001 301 W. Second Street, Austin, TX. Some members of the Planning Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Awais Azhar Joao Paulo Connolly Grayson Cox Yvette Flores – Secretary Claire Hempel – Vice-Chair Patrick Howard Jennifer Mushtaler Solveij Rosa Praxis Carmen Llanes Pulido Robert Schneider Todd Shaw – Chair James Shieh – Parliamentarian Jeffrey Thompson Ex-Officio Members Arati Singh – AISD Board of Trustees Jessica Cohen – Chair of Board of Adjustment Spencer Cronk - City Manager Richard Mendoza - Director of Public Works EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) The Planning Commission will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on this agenda. The Commission may not conduct a closed meeting without the approval of the city attorney. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071 Attorney: Steven Maddoux, 512-974-6080 Commission Liaison: Andrew Rivera, 512-974-6508 2. 3. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION The first four (4) speakers signed up prior to the commencement of the meeting will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of January 25, 2022. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Rezoning: Location: Owner/Applicant: Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: Rezoning: Location: Owner/Applicant: Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: Plan Amendment: Location: Owner/Applicant: Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: C14-2021-0166 - South Congress Avenue Residences; District 2 6424 South Congress Avenue, Williamson Creek Watershed; South Congress Combined (Sweetbriar) NP Area Calixto Jesus Cobos Alice Glasco Consulting (Alice Glasco) GR-MU-CO-NP to GR-MU-V-NP Recommendation of GR-MU-V-CO-NP Wendy Rhoades, 512-974-7719, wendy.rhoades@austintexas.gov Housing and Planning Department C14-2021-0174 - 815 W. 11th Street; District 9 815 West 11th Street, Shoal Creek Watershed; Downtown Austin Plan BSF Land Ventures LLC (Steven Bell, Ben Snyder, and Kevin Fleming) Drenner Group, PC (Leah M. Bojo) LO to DMU-CO Recommended Heather Chaffin, 512-974-2122, heather.chaffin@austintexas.gov Housing and Planning Department NPA-2021-0009.01 - 1612 E. 7th Street; District 1 1612 E. 7th Street, Lady Bird Lake Watershed; Central East Austin NP Area and Plaza Saltillo TOD Station Area Plan 1610 JFH, LLC (John Hernandez) Drenner Group, PC (Dave Anderson) To amend the Plaza Saltillo …

Scraped at: Feb. 4, 2022, 10:30 p.m.
Feb. 8, 2022

B-01 (C14-2021-0166 - South Congress Avenue Residences; District 2).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 27 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2021-0166 – South Congress Avenue Residences ZONING FROM: GR-MU-CO-NP ADDRESS: 6424 South Congress Avenue PROPERTY OWNER: Calixto Jesus Cobos DISTRICT: 2 TO: GR-MU-V-NP SITE AREA: 0.8717 acres (37,971 square feet) AGENT: Alice Glasco Consulting (Alice Glasco) CASE MANAGER: Wendy Rhoades (512-974-7719, wendy.rhoades@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommendation is to grant community commercial – mixed use – vertical mixed use building – conditional overlay – neighborhood plan (GR-MU-V-CO-NP) combining district zoning. The CO, Conditional Overlay prohibits automotive sales, automotive washing (of any type), and pawn shop services. For a summary of the basis of Staff’s recommendation, please see pages 2 - 3. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: February 8, 2022: January 11, 2022: APPROVED A POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN CONTACT TEAM TO FEBRUARY 8, 2022 [J. SHIEH; A. AZHAR – 2ND] (12-0) P. HOWARD – ABSENT December 14, 2021: APPROVED A POSTPONEMENT TO JANUARY 11, 2022 [A. AZHAR; R. SCHNEIDER – 2ND] (11-0) P. HOWARD – OFF THE DAIS; J. SHIEH – ABSENT CITY COUNCIL ACTION: February 17, 2022: January 27, 2022: APPROVED A POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY STAFF TO FEBRUARY 17, 2022. VOTE: 11-0. ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES: The South Congress Combined Neighborhood Plan is unable to recommend the rezoning request. All correspondence received is attached at the back of the Staff report. 1 of 27B-1 Page 2 C14-2021-0166 The Applicant and the Contact Team met virtually on Thursday evening, January 6th. The Applicant is in agreement with the Staff’s recommendation to maintain the existing Conditional Overlay which applies to properties along this segment of Congress Avenue. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The subject undeveloped lot is located on the west side of South Congress Avenue, between Stassney Lane and William Cannon Drive. The property is one lot south of its intersection with Eberhart Lane, and has had community commercial – mixed use – conditional overlay – neighborhood plan (GR-MU-CO-NP) zoning since Council approved the Sweetbriar Neighborhood Plan rezonings in August 2005. The Conditional Overlay prohibits automotive sales, automotive washing (of any type), and pawn shop services. There is a service station with food sales uses, alternative financial services and an administrative and business office on the adjacent property to the north, and apartments north of Eberhart Lane (GR-MU-CO-NP; MF-2-CO-NP); medical offices, retail / commercial uses across South Congress to the east (LR-MU-CO-NP; GR-MU-CO-NP); a child care facility, warehouse building, general retail uses and other commercial uses …

Scraped at: Feb. 4, 2022, 10:30 p.m.
Feb. 8, 2022

B-02 (C14-2021-0174 - 815 W. 11th Street; District 9)pdf.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 23 pages

C14-2021-0174 1 ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2021-0174 – 815 W. 11th Street DISTRICT: 9 ZONING FROM: LO TO: DMU-CO ADDRESS: 815 W. 11th Street SITE AREA: 0.15 acres PROPERTY OWNER: BSF Land Ventures LLC (Steven Bell, Ben Snyder, and Kevin Fleming (Managers)) AGENT: Drenner Group, PC (Leah M Bojo) CASE MANAGER: Kate Clark (512-974-1237, kate.clark@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends downtown mixed use-conditional overlay (DMU-CO) combining district zoning. The conditional overlay is for a maximum building height of 60 feet. For a summary of the basis of staff’s recommendation, see page 2. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: February 8, 2022 Scheduled for Planning Commission January 11, 2022 Approved Applicant’s request to postpone to February 8, 2022 on the consent agenda. Vote: 12-0. [Commissioner Azhar – 1st, Commissioner Connolly – 2nd; Commissioner Howard was absent]. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: March 3, 2022 Scheduled for City Council ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES Staff has received comments on this rezoning request. For all written or emailed comments, please see Exhibit C: Correspondence Received. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: This property is located on the south side of W. 11th Street and is approximately 0.15 acres in size. It is currently zoned LO and is developed with a single-family residential unit. Adjacent 1 of 23B-2 C14-2021-0174 2 zoning consists of GO-MU to the east and LO to the west. Across the alley to the south and to the north across W. 11th Street are properties zoned GO, please see Exhibit A: Zoning Map and Exhibit B: Aerial Map. The applicant is requesting DMU zoning to allow for a higher intensity of use and a mix of commercial and residential uses. This block of the Downtown Austin Plan (DAP) has identified a mixture of DMU-40 and DMU-60 properties. While the DAP identifies this property as DMU- 40, it is surrounded by DMU-60 properties on three sides. Additionally, within this area there have been three rezoning cases in the last two years where the City Council has approved DMU- CO with height limits of either 60 or 90 feet. Within the applicant’s rezoning application, they stated they were agreeable to a conditional overlay to limit the building height to 60 feet on the property. Staff supports the addition of this CO. The Downtown Austin Plan does not have a future land use map (FLUM) and therefore does not require a neighborhood plan amendment (NPA) to be considered with the rezoning request. …

Scraped at: Feb. 4, 2022, 10:30 p.m.
Feb. 8, 2022

B-03 (NPA-2021-0009.01 - 1612 E. 7th Street; District 1).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 48 pages

Planning Commission: February 8, 2022 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW SHEET DATE FILED: July 29, 2021 (In-cycle) NEIGHORHOOD PLAN: Central East Austin CASE#: NPA-20221-0009.01 PROJECT NAME: 1612 East 7th Street PC DATE: February 8, 2022 January 11, 2022 ADDRESS/ES: 1612 E. 7th Street DISTRICT AREA: 1 SITE AREA: 6,210 sq. ft. OWNER/APPLICANT: 1610 JFH, LLC (John Hernandez) AGENT: Drenner Group, PC (Dave Anderson) CASE MANAGER: Maureen Meredith STAFF EMAIL: Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov TYPE OF AMENDMENT: Change in Future Land Use Designation (no proposed change) PHONE: (512) 974-2695 Base District Zoning Change Related Zoning Case: C14-2021-0132 From: Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) Subdistrict (TOD-CMU) To: TOD Mixed Use (MU) Subdistrict (TOD-MU) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN ADOPTION DATE: December 13, 2001 CITY COUNCIL DATE: To be scheduled PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: ACTION: 1 From: Specific Regulating District To: Specific Regulating District 1 of 48B-3 Planning Commission: February 8, 2022 February 8, 2022 - January 11, 2022 – Postponed to February 8, 2022 on the consent agenda at the request of the neighborhood. [A. Azar – 1st; J. P. Connelly – 2nd] Vote: 11-0 [C. Hempel recused from Items B-4 and B-5. P. Howard and J. Mushtaler absent]. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To support the applicant’s request for Mixed Use (MU) Subdistrict (TOD-MU). BASIS FOR STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION: The property is within the Central East Austin Neighborhood Plan and the Plaza Saltillo TOD Station Area Plan. The property is a 6,210 square foot lot on the north side of East 7th Street between Comal Street to the west and Concho Street to the east. There is a single-family home on the lot, with vacant land to the north owned by Huston-Tillotson University. To the east is a restaurant across Concho Street. To the south are single family homes, and several commercial buildings. The applicant proposes to build a boutique hotel on the property that will include the three lots directly to the west. The three lots to the west have a Base Maximum Building Height of 60 feet. The applicant’s request for TOD-MU to achieve a 60 foot height using the density bonus program. Staff supports the applicant’s request for TOD-Muto be consistent with three lot to the west and because the property is on E. 7th Street which is an activity corridor and within the Plaza Saltillo Activity Center. Below are sections from the Central East Austin Neighborhood Plan that staff believes supports the request. 2 2 of 48B-3 Planning Commission: February …

Scraped at: Feb. 4, 2022, 10:30 p.m.
Feb. 8, 2022

B-04 (Applicant Presentation).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 25 pages

1612 East 7th Street Waller ESK C14-2021-0087 / NPA-2021-0009.01 February 8, 2022 Aerial Zoomed Out Aerial Zoomed Out Aerial Zoomed In Request The requested Zoning Change/Neighborhood Plan Amendment is from Corridor MU (light brown) to TOD MU (dark brown) for this property. Project Summary Project Summary • Proposed project is hotel • Regulated by Saltillo TOD Regulating Plan (STRP) • Proposed site is on a TOD Core Transit Corridor • Proposed site is 0.523 acres (22,806 square feet) • Property is currently zoned TOD-Corridor Mixed Use • Property is within ¼ mile of Saltillo Transit Station • Surrounding Uses • North: GO-CO-NP (vacant) • South: TOD-NP TOD-NP • East: TOD-NP • West: Project Summary • Hotel will sit on four (4) tracts – 3 of which already have 60’ height by right • Adjacent lot will preserve Heritage Tree, significantly reducing developable area • 60’ height limit is consistent with: • 3 tracts immediately to the west • 2 tracts immediately across Concho St to the east • The majority of tracts to across 7th street to the south • Tracts abutting the site to the north have a 60’ height limit and are vacant. Project Summary Project Summary • Applicant will pursue a Density & Height Bonus (Section 4.3.3 of Saltillo TOD Regulating Plan) to achieve a 60’ height to make project feasible with reduced development area • Community Benefits • Fee-in-Lieu will be paid into Housing Assistance Fund to meet Density & Height Bonus requirements • Tree Care Program will be implemented to ensure Heritage Tree remains healthy – REQUESTED AT MEETING WITH NEIGHBORHOOD REPRESENTATIVES • Restrictive covenant applied to all 4 tracts limiting height to 60’ – REQUESTED AT MEETING WITH NEIGHBORHOOD REPRESENTATIVES Proposed Amendment Proposed Amendment Planning Context Zoning Principles • Granting a request for zoning should result in an equal treatment of similarly situated properties. • Granting the zoning should not in any way set an undesirable precedent for other properties in the neighborhood or within other areas of the city. • Zoning should allow for a reasonable use of the property. • Zoning changes should promote compatibility with adjacent and nearby uses and should not result in detrimental impacts to the neighborhood character. • Zoning should promote a transition between adjacent and nearby zoning districts, land uses, and development intensities. • The request should serve to protect and preserve places and areas of historical …

Scraped at: Feb. 4, 2022, 10:30 p.m.
Feb. 8, 2022

B-04 (C14-2021-0132 - 1612 East 7th Street; District 1).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 12 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET DISTRICT: 1 CASE: C14-2021-0132 1617 East 7th Street ZONING FROM: TOD-NP ADDRESS: 1617 East 7th Street TO: TOD-NP, to change a condition of zoning SITE AREA: 6,210 Square Feet (0.14 Acres) PROPERTY OWNER: 1610 JFH LLC (John Hernandez) AGENT: Drenner Group PC (Dave Anderson) CASE MANAGER: Heather Chaffin (512-974-2122, heather.chaffin@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports the Applicant’s request for rezoning to TOD-NP to amend the Saltillo Plaza Transit Oriented District (TOD) Station Area Plan and Regulating Plan to redesignate the property from Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) subdistrict to TOD Mixed Use (TOD-MU) subdistrict. For a summary of the basis of staff’s recommendation, see case manager comments on page 2. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: February 8, 2022: January 11, 2022: To postpone to February 8, 2022 as requested by Planning Commission, approved on consent. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: TBD ORDINANCE NUMBER: 1 of 12B-4 C14-2021-0132 2 ISSUES: The Applicant is requesting to redesignate the property from CMU subdistrict to TOD-MU subdistrict. CMU is the most permissive Mixed Use Subdistrict in terms of land uses and does not require active ground floor uses. A wide array of retail, office, and residential uses are permitted. TOD-MU is the most intensively developed mixed use subdistrict and requires active ground floor uses. TOD-MU also requires a minimum 2-story building. The Applicant also proposes utilizing the Plaza Saltillo TOD Density Bonus tool which allows increased floor-to-area ratio (FAR) for developments that include affordable residential units or pays a fee-in-lieu to Housing and Planning Department (HPD). The Applicant has stated their intent to develop a 5-story hotel. To achieve the increased FAR, the Applicant proposes increasing the building height from 35 feet to 60 feet. Since the project does not include any residential units, the Applicant will be required to pay a fee-in- lieu to HPD. This is already administratively permitted by the TOD. (Please see Exhibit C- Applicant Letter). CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The subject property is located on the north side of East 7th Street between Comal Street and Concho Street. East 7th Street is an Imagine Austin Transit Priority Network roadway. The property is currently developed with one single family residence which is proposed to be demolished. The property is zoned TOD-NP, as are the surrounding properties to the west, east and south. These properties are a mix of office, commercial and residential uses. Further west across Comal Street is the Texas …

Scraped at: Feb. 4, 2022, 10:30 p.m.