C.7.a - 3300 Beverly Road - public comment — original pdf
Backup
All documents
C.7.b - 3300 Beverly Road - public comment — original pdf
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Bill W Wednesday, March 23, 2022 9:38 AM PAZ Preservation HFR 22-019092--3300 Beverly Rd Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I received a notice of this hearing. I have no objections. William Woods Funston St. ‐‐Bill W Living on Earth is expensive but it does include a free trip around the Sun. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient and may contain information that is privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient, please notify the sender. All comments are the sender’s personal opinion unless otherwise noted. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
C.7.c - 3300 Beverly Road - public comment — original pdf
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Bill W Friday, March 4, 2022 4:10 PM Allen, Amber 3300 Beverly Rd, 2022-022413 PR Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** HLC Commissioners: The Historic Review Committee of the Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association has been in contact with the owner of 3300 Beverly Rd and reviewed the plans. We do NOT oppose this remodel. (By way of information, our Neighborhood Association only votes to “oppose” or “not oppose;” we do not “support.”) Thank you. Bill Woods Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association Historic Review Committee ‐‐Bill W Living on Earth is expensive but it does include a free trip around the Sun. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient and may contain information that is privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient, please notify the sender. All comments are the sender’s personal opinion unless otherwise noted. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
C.8.0 - 406 E Annie St — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS MARCH 28, 2022 HR-2022-022699 TRAVIS HEIGHTS -FAIRVIEW PARK 406 E. ANNIE STREET C.8 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Demolish a noncontributing building and construct a new building in its place. Construct a new studio. 1) Demolish existing noncontributing building. 2) Construct a new primary building on existing footprint, retaining existing stone retaining walls in front yard. The proposed new residence is clad in stucco, vertical cedar siding, horizontal lap siding, and stone. It is three stories in height, with a roof deck and balconies enclosed by metal guardrails. Fenestration is irregular throughout, with fixed undivided windows and full-height fully glazed sliders. It has a compound roofline with gabled and flat elements clad in standing-seam metal. 3) Construct a detached one-story studio building in front of the primary building. The proposed studio features a shed and hipped roof clad in standing-seam metal. It has stucco siding, lap siding, and vertical cedar siding. Fenestration matches the primary building. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed primary building is set back significantly, as it occupies the footprint of the existing noncontributing structure. The proposed accessory building is set back 25’, consistent with other buildings in the neighborhood. 2. Orientation Both buildings are oriented toward the primary street. 3. Scale, Massing, and Height and 4. Proportions The proposed primary building’s height, proportions, complex massing, and floor-to-floor heights are not compatible with the district; however, its placement on the lot should minimize its visual impact. The proposed accessory building is not subordinate to the primary building due to its placement on the lot, though it is somewhat more compatible in scale and proportion. 5. Design and Style While both proposed buildings are stylistically consistent and differentiated from the historic buildings in the district, neither are compatible with the character of the district. 6. Roofs The compound shed roof at the secondary structure, most visible from the street, is more compatible than the complex roof form of the primary building, which is not compatible with the district. 7. Exterior Walls While some of the buildings’ siding materials are appropriate for the district, the application of all siding …
C.8.a - 406 E Annie - public comment — original pdf
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Donna Morrow Wednesday, March 23, 2022 10:02 AM PAZ Preservation Case# HR 22-022699- 406 E Annie Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Attn: Amber Allen I object to the demolition of this house in the National Historic District, mainly because of the ongoing destruction of so many houses in this area & the domino effect this creates. This house is a well‐kept remodeled structure on a main artery in the district. Another multi‐story non‐contributing structure would not be appropriate nor in scale with the rest of the neighborhood. Donna Morrow 504 Terrace Dr CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
C.9.0 - 1205 Alta Vista Ave — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS MARCH 28, 2022 HR-2022-026102 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK 1205 ALTA VISTA AVENUE C.9 – 1 Demolish existing two-story duplex and secondary building and construct a new three-story single-family house. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH DESIGN STANDARDS 1) Demolish existing house and rear garage apartment. 2) Construct a three-story house. The proposed building is flat-roofed and clad in stucco, board-and-batten, tongue-and- groove siding, and cedar slats. Fenestration includes fixed undivided windows and casement windows with irregular spacing, proportions, and orientation throughout; a front-facing garage; and sliding glass doors. The primary building at 1205 Alta Vista Avenue is a two-story cross-gabled duplex with horizontal siding, 6:6 wood windows, arched six-light accent windows, and composition shingle roof. 1205 Alta Vista Avenue was constructed around 1939 for Mary G. Sanders, along with a garage.1 A rear dwelling unit was constructed later. It appears to have been constructed as a duplex, and mostly housed two families in the main building and one in the rear unit. Renters were largely short-term and included a cattle buyer, a meat inspector, a bookkeepers, students, and oil company employees. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed new building is set back approximately 25’, in line with historic-age buildings on the street. 2. Orientation The proposed new building’s orientation is consistent with the predominant orientation of contributing buildings on the same block. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed new building is three stories, while nearby contributing buildings are one and two stories; its floor-to-floor and foundation height does not appear consistent with nearby contributing buildings. Its monolithic massing is not compatible with the district. 4. Proportions The proposed building’s proportions are not compatible with those of contributing buildings on the block. 5. Design and style The proposed building is differentiated from historic buildings and its details are consistent with its style, but its overall design is at odds with the historic district in terms of scale, massing, proportions, patterns, and some materials. 1 "Real Estate Transaction 1 -- no Title." The Austin American (1914-1973), Nov 06, 1938. https://atxlibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/historical-newspapers/real-estate-transaction-1-no- title/docview/1611453637/se-2?accountid=7451. 6. Roofs The proposed flat roof does not reflect the character of the roofs …
C.9.1 - 1205 Alta Vista-plans — original pdf
N 40' - 0" PORTION 1 A3.1 1 4 8 5 . 4 8 OVERHANG HIGHPOINT = 490' - 6" S 64°08'16"E 113.37' PROPERTY LINE 40' - 0" PORTION 2 HIGHPOINT = 498' - 0" 4 9 6 . 7 7 13' - 7 1/2" PORTION 3 HIGHPOINT = 499' - 0" 4 8 0 . 1 0 I N A L + B M 4 8 1 4 8 2 . 1 0 4 8 3 4 8 4 4 8 5 BUILDING FOOTPRINT ABOVE A/C PAD 4 8 8 HVAC 4 8 9 . 7 0 5' SIDE SETBACK BUILDING FOOTPRINT ABOVE 4 8 2 I A T S V A T L A 5 0 2 1 E U N E V A ENTRY 482' - 0" UP SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 482' - 0" K C A B T E S T N O R F ' 5 2 - - 1 0 . 3 A 4 9 1 4 9 0 4 8 8 4 8 9 NEW DRIVEWAY APRON ' 4 8 3 " 4 - ' 6 1 484 NEW DRIVEWAY STRIPS ATTACHED GARAGE 482' - 0" 4 9 9 4 9 8 5 0 0 . 2 1 3 . 3 A 1 ( 5 0 ' ) ' S 2 5 ° 5 6 2 5 " W 5 0 1 8 . ' E N I L Y T R E P O R P 4 9 2 493 K C A B T E S R A E R ' 0 1 4 9 6 4 9 7 4 9 5 4 8 5 . 2 3 486 4 8 9 . 3 5 1 A3.2 OVERHANG 5' SIDE SETBACK 4 9 4 N 64°00'46"W 116.91' PROPERTY LINE 4 9 4 . 4 6 4 9 8 . 0 8 E N I L Y T R E P O R P ' N 3 0 ° 0 0 0 0 " E 5 0 . 0 5 ( 5 0 . 1 ' ) 4 8 4 . 6 3 SITEPLAN - 1ST LEVEL 1 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 1100 S LAMAR BLVD SUITE 1145 PROJECT: 1205 ALTA VISTA AVE AUSTIN, TX DATE: PROJECT NO: 02/01/22 KTN9501 REVISION DATE NOTES: T E S D C SITEPLAN - 1ST LEVEL A1.0 DRAWN BY: CHRIS ZUNIGA 484 485 486 487 488 …
C.9.a - 1205 Alta Vista Ave - public comment — original pdf
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Chula Sims Sunday, March 20, 2022 1:27 PM PAZ Preservation Review Case Number: HR 22-026102 Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To: Amber Allen, Housing and Planning Department Regarding Case Number HR 22‐026102 1205 Alta Vista Ave, Austin, TX 78704 Applicant: Christopher Zuniga I am in favor of accepting this permit for demolition and new construction. Catherine Sims 803 Avondale Road Austin, TX 78704 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
C.9.b - 1205 Alta Vista Ave - public comment — original pdf
Backup
D.1.0 - 301 W 6th St — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS MARCH 28, 2022 DA-2022-007262; GF-2022-017035 301 WEST 6TH STREET D.2 – 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE Demolish a ca. 1919 commercial building. RESEARCH The building at 301 W. 6th Street is a single-story brick warehouse with rhythmic fenestration, a corner entrance, and Art Deco cornice detailing. The building at 301 West 6th Street was constructed around 1919, though the lot appears to have been in use as commercial and dwelling space since at least the 1890s, per Sanborn fire insurance maps and occupancy histories. Onorato Del Curto sold the corner lot at 6th and Lavaca to the San Antonio-based Riegler Ice Cream Company in 1919. It became a manufacturing and sales center, with plate-glass windows to display the state-of-the-art facility and enameled interior1 to pedestrian traffic. By the 1920s, the Austin Ice Cream Company had purchased the building as their Austin headquarters, manufacturing Violet Crown Ice Cream products. In 1926, a group of Temple investors with the Bell Ice Cream Company had purchased the company, though the building kept the Violet Crown name. By 1931, the expanding Bell Company planned to construct a new factory at 10th Street and Guadalupe,2 and the Roy Rather Refrigeration Company purchased 301 W. 6th Street. During the 1930s, after a brief stint at 201 W. 6th Street, Morris and Curtis Mosteller moved their seed business into the former factory.3 During the late 1930s and early 1940s, their advertising focused on the wartime Victory Garden effort, and Morris Mosteller dispensed regular planting advice as part of his role as garden committee chairman of the Chamber of Commerce.4 Throughout the historic period, the secondary building sharing a party wall with 301 W. 6th Street—known through the years as 502, 504, and 506 Lavaca Street—served a variety of business and industrial occupants, most notably the Lindsey Auto Electric Company. Lindsey Auto Electric remained at the Lavaca Street address for at least twenty years. PROPERTY EVALUATION Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate to high integrity. Non-historic awnings have been removed. Brick painting may have occurred in the historic period. Though the windows have been replaced, they do not appear to have altered original openings. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it may meet two criteria: "Bell Ice …
D.1.a - 301 W 6th St - public comment — original pdf
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged Christian Leman Monday, March 21, 2022 5:22 PM PAZ Preservation Case Number: GF 22-017035 - 301W 6TH ST | Contact: Amber Allen | Public Hearing: Historic Landmark Commission, Mar. 28, 2022 *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Case Number: GF 22‐017035 ‐ 301W 6TH ST | Contact: Amber Allen | Public Hearing: Historic Landmark Commission, Mar. 28, 2022 I hereby object to this demolition. This building currently hosting the inclusive LGBTQ establishment The Iron Bear along with the nearby Belmont are beautiful historical buildings that are part of Austin’s unique character and should be preserved. We don’t want Austin downtown to become only a forest of giant towers with no history nor soul. Thank you for your consideration, ‐Christian Leman CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
D.2.1 - 1202 E 6th - plans and photos — original pdf
Photo Key #3 #2 #4 #1
D.3.0 - 2206 East Side Dr — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS MARCH 28, 2022 2206 EAST SIDE DRIVE D.3 – 1 Relocate a ca. 1915-1920 house outside city limits. PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story Craftsman bungalow with partial-width covered porch supported by tapered columns atop brick piers, 1:1 screened wood windows, exposed rafter tails at eaves, and triangular brackets at gable ends. The house at 2206 East Side Drive, formerly known as 2210 East Side Drive and 2210 Goodall Street, was built by the Wright family in the early twentieth century as part of the family’s dairy farm. City directories do not include records prior to the 1930s, as the farm was located outside the city limits. The Wright family had operated a dairy farm in South Austin since at least 1899.1 Claude W. Wright, Sr., and his wife Ethel Bowling Wright inherited the business from William W. Wright, who migrated to Texas from Mississippi after serving in the Confederate army as a teenager. Claude Wright, known as “Cap,” also served as a city fireman2 after his retirement from the dairy industry in 1946, a post he held for nearly twenty years. After the Wright family sold the dairy farm, the house became a rental property to several families. Renters during the 1940s and 1950s included clerks, butchers, saleswomen, and manufacturing employees. PROPERTY EVALUATION Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. However, the building’s integrity of setting has been compromised, as it no longer retains the rural surroundings appropriate for an agricultural complex, nor does it retain significant associated outbuildings present in historic photos. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it may meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a Craftsman bungalow. b. Historical association. The property appears to have been part of the Wright dairy farm prior to the widespread c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human urbanization of South Austin. history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, …
D.3.a - 2206 East Side Dr. - public comment — original pdf
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Contreras, Kalan Monday, March 21, 2022 11:23 AM Allen, Amber FW: 2206 East Side Dr - HLC Referral & Fees Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged One more for backup – you might already have this one in the folder. Kalan Contreras MSHP | Senior Planner | Historic Preservation Office Planning and Zoning Department 512.974.2727 | kalan.contreras@austintexas.gov PER CITY ORDINANCE: All individuals scheduling or accepting a meeting invitation with a City Official are requested to provide responses to the questions at the following link: https://bit.ly/HPDLobbyingForm Please note that all information provided is subject to public disclosure. For more information please visit: City of Austin Ordinance 2016-0922-005 | City Clerk’s website | City Clerk’s FAQs From: megan spencer Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 10:18 AM To: Contreras, Kalan Cc: Gretchen Janzow Allen, Amber Mary Jensen Subject: Re: 2206 East Side Dr ‐ HLC Referral & Fees Hello Kalan and Amber, I am the owner of the property at 2206 East Side Drive. I've lived there for 40 years. I found the home first listed in the directory at the Austin History Center in the early 1940s as the C.W. Wright Dairy. Both 2206 and 2210 East Side Drive were listed as properties owned by the C.W Wright Dairy. I was told that I am only the third owner of the property. I bought the property from Allen Messenger and his wife who owned it for only a short time while they were building a home outside of the city limits. My neighbor, Mr. Victor Polanco, who lived across the street told me that the home was rented out for years and it became severely deteriorated. From his front yard, he saw rats entering the home through holes in the roof and wood siding. The back yard was 1 covered by an asphalt parking area that extended almost to the back of the lot. It was large enough to accommodate several cars. When I closed on my home in January 1982, this area was not safe. South Congress was a very dangerous place where no one walked at night. Of course, that’s changed. This house sits on what used to be open land on the outer edges of the city prior to the 1940s. Over the past ten years, the character of East Side Drive has changed. Most of the surrounding homes have been …
F.1 - 4210 Avneue C - Tax Abatement Application — original pdf
City of Austin Local Historic District Tax Abatement Part I - Application for Certificate of Eligibility PART I - APPLICATION CHECK LIST: ___ Completed Application for Certificate of Eligibility signed by owner. ___ Estimate of costs for eligible work. ___ Completed Certificate of Appropriateness Application signed by owner. ___ Proof of pre-rehabilitation value from the Travis County Appraisal District. ___ Signed authorization for City Officials to inspect the property, and affidavit stating all property taxes are current and no city fees, fines, or penalties are owed on property owned by a business association in which the applicant has an ownership interest. ___ Current tax certificate providing proof no property taxes or City fees, fines, or penalties are delinquent on the property. ___ Proforma and development budget, if an estimated abatement is over $100,000. ___ Letter of intent from a financial institution or potential investors, if applicable. City of Austin Application for Historic Area District Tax Abatement Adopted December 2012 N/AN/A City of Austin Local Historic District Tax Abatement Part I - Application for Certificate of Eligibility Address of property: ______________________________________________________________ Name of Local Historic District:______________________________________________________ (cid:0) Contributing property (cid:0) Non-contributing property Legal Description of Property: _______________________________________________________ Tax Parcel ID Number:____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT: Name:_________________________________________ Telephone: (____) _________________ Mailing Address:_________________________________ Mobile phone: ( _______ City:___________________ State: ____ Zip:__________ Email: OWNER: Name:_________________________________________ Telephone: Mailing Address:_________________________________ Mobile phone: City:___________________ State: ____ Zip:__________ Email: _ __ _____ Proposed Use of the Property:_______________________________________________________ Proposed Scope of Work: _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Projected Construction Schedule:____________________________________________________ Has the property received any other property tax relief under § 11.24 of the Texas Tax Code?: _____________________________________________________________________________ Describe all City Code violations, if any, on the property within the previous five years: _______________________________________________________________________________ For Historic Preservation Office use only: ____ Property is not a contributing or potentially contributing structure ____ Certificate of Eligibility approved by Historic Landmark Commission ____ Certificate of Eligibility not approved by Historic Landmark Commission ____________________________________________________ Historic Preservation Officer ________________ Date City of Austin Application for Historic Area District Tax Abatement Adopted December 2012 None4210 Avenue CHyde Park Historic DistrictLOT 27-29 BLK 16 HYDE PARK ADDN NO 2218053Tere O'Connell, AIA512 751-13743908 Avenue B, Room 309AustinTX78751Mark and Zaz Floreani4210 Avenue CAustinTX78751ResidentialN/APlease see additional pages outlining proposed scope of work.Spring 2022 Local Historic District Abatement 4210 Avenue C Austin, Texas 78751 Proposed Scope of Work LOCATION OF PROPOSED WORK PROPOSED WORK PROPOSED MATERIAL(S) 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) …
F.2 - 3006 Hemphill - Tax Abatement Application — original pdf
City of Austin Local Historic District Tax Abatement Part I - Application for Certificate of Eligibility PART I - APPLICATION CHECK LIST: ___ Completed Application for Certificate of Eligibility signed by owner. ___ Estimate of costs for eligible work. ___ Completed Certificate of Appropriateness Application signed by owner. ___ Proof of pre-rehabilitation value from the Travis County Appraisal District. ___ Signed authorization for City Officials to inspect the property, and affidavit stating all property taxes are current and no city fees, fines, or penalties are owed on property owned by a business association in which the applicant has an ownership interest. ___ Current tax certificate providing proof no property taxes or City fees, fines, or penalties are delinquent on the property. ___ Proforma and development budget, if an estimated abatement is over $100,000. ___ Letter of intent from a financial institution or potential investors, if applicable. City of Austin Application for Historic Area District Tax Abatement Adopted December 2012 N/AN/A City of Austin Local Historic District Tax Abatement Part I - Application for Certificate of Eligibility Address of property: ______________________________________________________________ Name of Local Historic District:______________________________________________________ (cid:0) Contributing property (cid:0) Non-contributing property Legal Description of Property: _______________________________________________________ Tax Parcel ID Number:____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT: Name:_________________________________________ Telephone: (____) _________________ Mailing Address:_________________________________ Mobile phone: City:___________________ State: ____ Zip:__________ Email: OWNER: Name:_________________________________________ Telephone: Mailing Address:_________________________________ Mobile phone: City:___________________ State: ____ Zip:__________ Email: _ Proposed Use of the Property:_______________________________________________________ Proposed Scope of Work: _______________________________________________________________________________ ____ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Projected Construction Schedule:____________________________________________________ Has the property received any other property tax relief under § 11.24 of the Texas Tax Code?: _____________________________________________________________________________ Describe all City Code violations, if any, on the property within the previous five years: _______________________________________________________________________________ For Historic Preservation Office use only: ____ Property is not a contributing or potentially contributing structure ____ Certificate of Eligibility approved by Historic Landmark Commission ____ Certificate of Eligibility not approved by Historic Landmark Commission ____________________________________________________ Historic Preservation Officer ________________ Date City of Austin Application for Historic Area District Tax Abatement Adopted December 2012 3006 Hemphill Park Austin, Texas 78705Aldridge Place Historic DistrictLOT 11 BLK 9 OLT 73 DIV D FRUTH ADDN0216040908Tere O'Connell, AIA512751-13743908 Ave. B, Room 309AustinTX78705Robin Shepherd1101 Belmont ParkwayAustinTX78703rRental propertyN/ANone 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) Local Historic District Abatement 3006 Hemphill Park Austin, Texas 78705 LOCATION OF PROPOSED WORK PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK PROPOSED MATERIAL(S) ROOF: Replace composition roof. Reframe rear addition roof to match remainder of …
Agenda — original pdf
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Regular Meeting Monday, March 28, 2022 5:30 p.m. – Adjournment Austin City Hall, Board & Commission Room, Room 1101 301 West 2nd Street, Austin, Texas 78701 Some members of the Human Rights Commission may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may speak up to three minutes on an item only once either in-person or remotely. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register call or email the board liaison at 512-974-3250 or andrea.jordan@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSION MEMBERS: Sareta Davis, Chair Isabel Casas, Vice Chair Malenie Areche Jared Breckenridge Kimberly Brienzi Garry Brown Jamarr Brown Kristian Caballero Idona Griffith Maram Museitif Alicia Weigel CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL AGENDA Members of the public signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed three minutes to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. a. Consider approval of the minutes from the Human Rights Commission’s February 28, b. Consider approval of the minutes from the Human Rights Commission’s Special Called 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2022, Regular Meeting. Meeting on March 4, 2022. 2. NEW BUSINESS a. Discussion of briefing on legislation that passed that affects the city – presented by the City’s Intergovernmental Relations Office (IGRO) sponsored by (Davis/Casas) 3. OLD BUSINESS a. Commissioners will report on and discuss the status of the Commission’s key priority areas of concern for 2021-2022, including plans and strategies for meeting those key priority areas of concern: i. Institutional Equity ii. Environment & Land Use iii. Health Access & Nutrition iv. Autonomy & Human Rights ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Andrea Jordan, Office of Civil Rights, at (512) 974-3250 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Human Rights Commission, please contact Andrea Jordan at (512) 974-3250 or visit http://www.austintexas.gov/hrc.
4.B - Draft budget recommendation for FY2022-23 — original pdf
FY2022-23 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Historic Landmark Commission Recommendation 20220328-4B WHEREAS the City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission was established in 1974 to promote historic preservation activities in Austin and advise the Austin City Council on matters related to historic preservation; and WHEREAS the purpose of the Historic Landmark Commission is to prepare and periodically revise an inventory of the structures and areas that may be eligible for designation as historic landmarks, most recently completed in 1984; prepare, review, and propose amendments to a citywide Historic Preservation Plan, last adopted in 1981; and review requests to establish or remove a historic designation and make recommendations on the requests to the Land Use Commission; and WHEREAS the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan outlines historic preservation policies for the City of Austin to preserve and interpret historic resources in Austin for residents and visitors, with goals including 1) the inventory and protection of historic buildings, structures, sites, places, and districts in neighborhoods throughout the city; and 2) the retention of the character of locally designated historic districts and National Register districts by ensuring development is compatible with the historic character of the districts; and WHEREAS Strategic Direction 2023 includes the honoring and preservation of historical and ethnic heritage as an indicator category, with strategies that include protecting places that reflect Austin’s diverse history and broadening support for and participation in preserving underrepresented histories and resources; and WHEREAS Austin has transformed since the existing Historic Preservation Plan was adopted in 1981, including a tripling of the city’s population, passage of a historic district ordinance, urgent challenges around affordability and sustainability, a booming real estate market driving high development and demolition pressures, and displacement threats to longstanding residents, especially in East Austin neighborhoods historically home to communities of color; and WHEREAS the historic preservation field has also transformed in the last 40 years, with equity, sustainability, and cultural heritage as leading factors guiding preservation efforts, and vernacular buildings and neighborhoods valued as critical to telling the full American story of racially and culturally diverse communities; and WHEREAS studies and practices across the country have demonstrated that historic preservation can help meet other community goals such as equity, affordability, density, health, and sustainability, in addition to protecting places with cultural and historical significance; and WHEREAS the Historic Landmark Commission and Historic Preservation Office seek to respond to 21st- century challenges with improved and new policies, programs, and tools, …
A.1.a - 1617 New York Ave - public comment — original pdf
Backup
B.2.c - 3908 Avenue H - public comment — original pdf
Backup