REGULAR MEETING of the HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Monday, September 22, 6:00 p.m. Austin City Hall, Room 1101 301 W. 2nd St AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Human Rights Commission may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, call or email Ryan Sperling at ryan.sperling@austintexas.gov or 512-974-3568 CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS/COMMISSIONERS: Kolby Duhon, Chair (He/They) Muneeb “Meebs” Aslam (He/Him) Jeffrey Clemmons Harriett Kirsh Pozen Maryam Khawar Gabriella Zeidan, Vice Chair Danielle Bryant Morgan Davis (He/Him) Mariana Krueger (She/Her) Tannya Oliva Martínez AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first ten speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Human Rights Commission regular meeting on July 28, 2025. WORKING GROUP UPDATES 2. Update from the Budget Working Group regarding the steps the group has taken since its formation, including contact with Council members and planned next steps. DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. Discussion regarding a potential recommendation to promote safety, dignity, and equity in Restroom Access in City of Austin Facilities. DISCUSSION & ACTION ITEMS 4. Approve the formation of an Austin Human Rights Resource Guide Working Group to gather resources, design, and identify printing methods for an Austin Human Rights Resource guide. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please contact Ryan Sperling, Office or ryan.sperling@austintexas.gov for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. the City Clerk 974-3568 (512) of at For more information on the Human Rights Commission, please contact Ryan Sperling at (512) 974-3568 or ryan.sperling@austintexas.gov
DESIGN COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MONDAY, AUGUST 25, 2025 The Design Commission convened in a regular meeting on Monday, August 25, 2025, at 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive in Austin, Texas. Chair Salinas called the Design Commission meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance: Jon Salinas, Chair Ramachandra “Rao” Aradhyula David Carroll Kevin Howard Saira Khan Evgenia “Jenny” Murkes Brendan Wittstruck – Commissioner Wittstruck joined the meeting at 6:20 p.m. Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Josue Meiners, Vice Chair Marissa McKinney PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Design Commission regular meeting on June 23, 2025. The minutes from the meeting of 06/23/2025 were approved on Commissioner Carroll’s motion, Commissioner Aradhyula’s second, on an 8-0 vote. Commissioner Wittstruck was off the dais. Commissioners Gelles and Ladner were absent. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing regarding the update to the Urban Design Guidelines. Presented by Jorge Rousselin, Planning Department. 1 The presentation was made by Jorge Rousselin and Stephen Crews, Planning Department. DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. 4. Discussion of the draft Urban Design Guidelines. The item was discussed. Discussion of analysis on the Design Commission's recommendations and the final approved Downtown Density Bonus Program projects from the past ten years. The item was discussed. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 5. 6. 7. Discussion and action to select Downtown Density Bonus Program projects from the past ten years to conduct analysis on outcomes. Sponsors: Chair Salinas and Vice Chair Meiners. The motion to select the Downtown Density Bonus Program project 321 W. 6th St to conduct analysis on the Design Commission's recommendation, and the final approved project was approved on Commissioner McKinney’s motion, Chair Salinas’ second, on a 9-0 vote. Commissioners Gelles and Ladner were absent. Discussion and action to select a member for the Urban Design Guidelines Working Group. Sponsors: Chair Salinas and Commissioner Wittstruck. The motion to select Commissioner Gelles as a member of the Urban Design Guidelines Working Group was approved on Commissioner Howard’s motion, Chair Salinas’ second, on a 9-0 vote. Commissioners Gelles and Ladner were absent. Select a representative for the South Central Waterfront Advisory Board per City Code §2- 1-172. The motion to select Commissioner McKinney as the representative for the South Central Waterfront Advisory Board was approved on Chair Salinas’ motion, Commissioner Howard’s second, on a 9-0 vote. WORKING GROUP/COMMITTEE UPDATES 8. 9. Update from the representative of the Downtown …
Technical Advisory Review Panel | Green Infrastructure Working Group Austin Roadmap for Advancing Green Infrastructure in the Right-of-Way This report is a product of the Technical Advisory Review Panel (TARP) – Green Infrastructure Working Group Facilitated by Austin Transportation & Public WorksSeptember 2025 WHY Street Trees Matter in Austin Austin’s streets are critical public spaces that must balance safety, utility reliability, and climate resilience. Street trees are vital infrastructure to achieving that balance. This initiative reframes trees as essential public infrastructure and integrates them into planning, utility coordination, permitting, and design from the outset so that tree needs are consistently addressed to deliver safer, healthier, and more resilient streets for all Austinites. Benefits of Street Trees Council Resolution No 20240321-039 Heat Mitigation Safety Air Quality Public & Mental Health Climate Resilience Review and identify barriers to installation and maintenance of green infrastructure Develop recommendations for modifying existing codes, criteria manuals, and regulations Coordinate with relevant departments to align standard and practices with the goal of enhancing green infrastructure Work with the Technical Advisory Review Panel Economic & Public Resource Value Water Quality & Flood Management (TARP) Ecosystem Benefits Process Process These recommendations are a product of the Technical Advisory Review Panel (TARP) TARP Stakeholder recommended actions for facilitating street trees within Austin's rights-of- way CITY AND DEPARTMENT LEADERSHIP * *Staff review and evaluation of TARP recommendations are ongoing Technical Advisory Review Panel Green Infrastructure Working Group Department Staff: Austin Development Services Austin Energy Austin Parks and Recreation Austin Planning Austin Transit Partnership Austin Transportation and Public Works Austin Water Austin Watershed Protection Development Professionals: Arborholic Bartlett Coleman and Associates Entellus HNTB Lionheart McCann Adams Studio Nora Engineering Stanley Studios TBG Partners Consultant Team: AECOM Urbinden 1 2 3 Involve the rules, codes, and standardsthat restrict or complicate greeninfrastructure in the right-of-wayInvolve challenges in securingapprovals, permits, and meetingrequirementsRelate to institutional challenges suchas coordination, structure, andresource allocationREGULATORY FOUNDATIONSPolicy and manual updates to removeobstacles and support right-of-waydesign frameworksStreamline permits and procedures foreasier green infrastructureimplementationPROCESS IMPROVEMENTSIntegrate green infrastructure intocapital projects and improvement plansCAPITAL PLANNING &PROJECTSEstablish funding, tools, andprocedures for ongoing managementof assetsMAINTENANCEBARRIER IDENTIFICATIONPRECEDENTS & BEST PRACTICES RECOMMENDED ACTIONSAssessed the main challenges toplanting and maintaining streettrees in Austin’s right-of-wayReviewed how other citiesovercame similar challengesthrough policy, permitting,and funding strategiesThe final phase findings intoactionable recommendationstailored to Austin, organizedinto four categoriesREGULATORY BARRIERSPERMITTING BARRIERSPROGRAMMATIC BARRIERS REGULATORY FOUNDATIONS PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS MAINTENANCE CAPITAL PLANNING & PROJECTS TARP-RECOMMENDED SEQUENCE Regulatory Foundations Transportation/Right-of-Way …
Project Case Number Project Location In Date Bonus Request (FAR) Bonus Request (Height in ft Bonused Sq. Ft. Status of Project Design Commission (Working Group Date) Date Reviewed by Design Commission Design Commission Outcome DDBP Case Tracking Aspen Heights Apartments (now Rise) SP-2013-0434C 805 Nueces Street (516 W. 8th Street) 11/1/2013 8 5th & West SP-2013-0454C 501 W. 5th Street 1/31/2014 19.7 7th & Congress (Element & Aloft Hotels) SP-2014-0068C 619 & 621 Congress Ave. (109 E. 7th Street) 5/15/2014 21.2 5th & Brazos SP-2014-0406C 501 Brazos 10/3/2014 19.7 Third and Shoal SP-2015-0346C 607 W. 3rd 4/4/2016 10.2 Waterloo Park Tower SP-2016-0106C 1201 Red River 1/25/2017 405 Colorado SP-2016-0260C 405 Colorado 7/21/2016 Marriott at Cesar Chavez SP-2016-0300C 304 E. Cesar Chavez 10/6/2016 48 East Ave Apts SP-2016-0391C 48 East Avenue 8/9/2016 15 13 15 15 1400 Lavaca (now SXSW Center) SP-2016-0452C 1400 Lavaca 10/3/2016 4.11 Town Lake Lofts SP-2017-0107C 16 N I-35 Service Dr 7/22/2016 15 700 11th St SP-2017-0166C 700 11th St 9/7/2017 10.43 6th + Guadalupe SP-2017-0301C.F1 600 Guadalupe Street 5/24/2018 Block 71 (UT System Property) SP-2017-0311C 200 W. 6th St 10/26/2017 25 25 300 Colorado SP-2018-0096C 300 Colorado Street 5/22/2018 15.71 91 Red River SP-2018-0111C 91-93 Red River Street 7/5/2018 13.12 200 430 328 420 391 371 363 381 342 171 352 344 838 555 455 326 86,840 Approved with Memo 194,854 Approved with Memo 11/25/2013 2/24/2014 Recommendation of Compliance with additional recommendations (see letter) Recommendation of Non-Compliance with list of means for compliance (see letter) 145,977 Approved with Memo 5/27/2014 Recommendation of Compliance 408,999 Approved with Memo 10/27/2014 Recommendation of Compliance 77,720 Approved with Memo 4/25/2016 Recommendation of Compliance 133,140 Approved with Memo 3/27/2017 Recommendation of Compliance 85,634 Approved with Memo 1/9/2017 4/24/2017 & 5/22/2017 Recommendation of Non-Compliance 243,677 Approved with Memo 05/22/2017 & 6/05/2017 Recommendation of Compliance 125,055 Approved with Memo 1/23/2017 Recommendation of Compliance 66,600 Approved with Memo 11/28/2016 Recommendation of Compliance 109,214 Approved with Memo 12/19/2016 Recommendation of Compliance 85,702 Approved with Memo 10/23/2017 Motion for Recommendation of Compliance failed for lack of votes 565,109 Approved with Memo 8/27/2018 Recommendation of Compliance 1,296,080 Approved with Memo 11/27/2017 Recommendation of Compliance 191,424 Approved with Memo 6/25/2018 Recommendation of Compliance 164,768 Approved with Memo 9/24/2018 Recommendation of Compliance City of Austin - Planning Zoning Department - Urban Design Division - December 2018 The Travis Ph.1 SP-2018-0159C 80 Red River Street 2/22/2019 The Travis Ph.2 SP-2018-0159C …
Permitting and Development Center 2026 DESIGN COMMISSION MEETING DATES AND DEADLINES 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr, Austin, TX 78752 PDC Room 1405| 6:00 PM Meeting Date 4th Monday of the month at 6:00 p.m. (Unless otherwise noted) January 26th February 23rd March 23rd April 27th 1May 18th June 22nd July – No Meeting August 24th September 28th October 26th 2November 16th 3December 14th Materials Deadline 10 days prior to the Meeting by close of business (5:00 p.m.) (No Exceptions) January 16th February 13th March 13th April 17th May 8th June 12th Not Applicable August 14th September 18th October 16th November 6th December 4th 1 Meeting moved from 4th Monday to 3rd Monday due to Memorial Day Holiday 2 Meeting moved from 4th Monday to 3rd Monday due to Thanksgiving Holiday 3 Meeting moved from 4th Monday to 2nd Monday due to Christmas Holiday
MEMORANDUM TO: Site Plan and Building Permit Case Managers FROM: Jerry Rusthoven$ Housing & Planning Department DATE: September 8,2027 RE Density Bonus for 321 W. 6th Street under SP-2019-0516C, Expected address: 321 W. 6th Street, Austin, Texas 78701 This memorandum grants approvalto 321 W. 5th Street (the Project) subject to the stated conditions and requirements as of the date listed above. This memorandum also summarizes the requirements that must be met for the above-mentioned project to be granted the entitlements listed below through the Downtown Density Bonus Program as described in City Code section 25-2-586. The entitlements described below are associated only with the Project as described in the attached documents and site plan No. SP-2019-0516C and cannot be transferred to a different project. lf an applicant proposes a different project on the same site and seeks to use a Density Bonus, the applicant must re-apply for the Downtown Density Bonus Program using the rules in effect at the time of application. The entitlements granted herein do not run with the land. "A Certificate of Occupancy shall not be granted for this Project until atl requirements below are met. This memorandum shall be attached to allsite plan applications and building permit applications and the following note shall be placed in AMANDA and on the cover of all site plan applications and building permit applications: 'ACertificate of Occupancy shall not be granted for this Project untilall requirementsspecifiedinthememo f,EDensity Bonusfor32l W. 6th Street dated September 8, 2021 are met." Staffshallverify that all requirements have been met before issuins a certificate of occupancv by checking with Aaron D. Jenkins of the Zonirg &Urban Design Division, Housing and Planning Department, aaron.ienkins@austintexas.gov or (512) 97 4-t243. Requirements to be fulfilled before a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) may be granted for this project: 1. GreatStreets lmprovements: Complete construction of allGreat Streets improvements along all of the project's public right-of-way frontages consistent with the City of Austin Great Streets Standards and in accordance with the attached executed public restrictive covenant and Gatekeeper requirements of Ordinance No. 2014A522-A77. City of Austin Zoning & Urban Design Staff will inspect construction for compliance prior to granting a CO. Page 1 of 2 2. AEBG requirement: Prior to issuance of a CO, achieve a minimum two-star rating under the AEGB program using the ratings in effect at the time the Project is registered with the Austin Energy Green Building Program. 3. …
Contents - The previous draft of guidelines and core principles can be found at this link Assignments KEY- David Marissa Kevin Brendan Sophia WORKING DRAFT1 Introduction PURPOSE APPLICABILITY These categories determine if a project must comply with a specific design guideline. Private Projects Applies to: ● All projects participating in the Downtown Density Bonus Program (DDBP), and ● All private projects for which the City Council or the Planning Commission requests a review by the Design Commission. The applicability extends to these projects regardless of their participation in a density bonus program. The Design Commission will advise the Planning Commission and City Council based on the values and intent of the Urban Design Guidelines as is applicable or appropriate to the project. . Public Projects Applies to all municipal buildings and associated site development including any components of these projects that include Alternative Equivalent Compliance. The Design Commission reviews all municipal buildings and associated site development projects to ensure they demonstrate compliance with city design and sustainability standards (Council Resolution No. 20071129-046), including those seeking Subchapter E Design Standards Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) (Council Resolution No. 20100923-086). Public Infrastructure Applies to all infrastructure projects commissioned by the City of Austin. (Resolution 20100819-035) All projects requiring a right-of-way vacation are required to be reviewed by the Design Commission (Council Resolution No. 20100805-028). Infrastructure is the constructed physical and biophysical elements, facilities, and systems of the built environment that provide a shared foundation for sustaining the health, safety, and welfare of a community. Infrastructure includes, but is not limited to, the following aspects of WORKING DRAFT2 planning and design: air quality management, communication, energy production and transmission (chemical, electrical, mechanical, and thermal), public safety (support for policing and fire suppression), transportation and movement, waste management (refuse recycling and disposal; sewage treatment), and water management (storage, conveyance, distribution, purification). SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE In order for a project to be considered in Substantial Compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines, projects must address each core principle by complying with All Tier 1 Design Guidelines applicable to their project type as well as 12 of the Tier 2 Design Guidelines applicable to their project type. PRIORITIES Tier 1 Tier 1 indicates design guidelines that are mandatory. Applicants must demonstrate compliance with all Tier 1 Guidelines applicable to their project type. Tier 2 Tier 2 indicates design guidelines that are optional but highly recommended. Applicants may choose which …
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Monday, July 28, 2025 The Human Rights Commission convened in a regular meeting on Monday, July 28, 2025, at 301 West 2nd St, Boards and Commissions Room in Austin, Texas. Chair Duhon called the Human Rights Commission meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Kolby Duhon (Chair) Gabrielle Zeidan (Vice Chair) Jeffrey Clemmons Harriet Kirsh Pozen Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Muneeb “Meebs” Aslam Danielle Bryant Morgan Davis Mariana Krueger Tannya Oliva Martinez PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Zenobia Joseph – Gus Garcia/ Northeast YMCA Homeless Needs APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Human Rights Commission regular meeting on June 23, 2025. The minutes of the June 23, 2025, meeting were approved on Vice Chair Zeidan’s motion, Commissioner Bryant’s second, on a 7-0 vote. Commissioners Krueger and Oliva Martinez were off the dais. Commissioner Khawar was absent. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Introduction of the City Manager to the commission. 1 The presentation was made by T.C. Broadnax, City Manager, Austin Office of the City Manager. 3. Staff briefing regarding an introduction and an overview of Austin Equity and Inclusion by the Commission’s new Executive Liaison Dr. Lindsey Wilson, Director, Austin Equity and Inclusion, Shafina Khaki, Human Rights Officer, Austin Equity and Inclusion, and Enrique Serrano, Civil Rights Officer, Austin Equity and Inclusion. The presentation was made by Dr. Lindsey Wilson, Director, Austin Equity and Inclusion, and Shafina Khaki, Human Rights Officer, Austin Equity and Inclusion. Commissioner Oliva Martinez requested data regarding housing. DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. Presentation regarding the Austin Community College Board of Trustee’s recent vote in protection of immigrant communities. Presentation by Julie Ann Nitsch, Austin Community College Trustee. The presentation was made by Julie Ann Nitsch, Austin Community College Trustee. 5. Update regarding actions by the Texas State Legislature in 2025 relating to human rights. Discussed. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 6. Approve the 2024-2025 Annual Internal Review Report. The motion to approve the 2024-2025 Annual Internal Review Report was approved on Vice Chair Zeidan’s motion, Commissioner Clemmon’s second on an 8-0 vote. Commissioner Aslam was off the dais. Commissioner Khawar was absent. WORKING GROUP UPDATES 7. Update from the intergroup relations working group about its most recent working group meeting and progress on the working group goals. Commissioner Clemmons provided an update. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Update from the Budget Working Group Joint Inclusion Committee Update Approve a Recommendation to Council regarding …
Bird Friendly Design in Austin Austin Watershed Protection Leslie Lilly City Staff Wa t e r s h e d P r o t e c t i o n Liz Johnston, Leslie Lilly, Elizabeth Funk Matt Hollon, Sean Watson A u s t i n E n e r g y G r e e n B u i l d i n g Garret Jaynes, Heidi Kasper D e v e l o p m e n t S e r v i c e s D e p a r t m e n t Farhana Biswas B u i l d i n g S e r v i c e s Kit Johnson, Nate Jackson A n i m a l S e r v i c e s Emery Sadkin P l a n n i n g Jordan Feldman 2 Resolution 20241121-073 • Came out of a recommendation from a working group and Resolution 20210902-050 on Lights Out Austin • Directs staff to: • Update on Light’s Out Austin • Explore integration of bird-friendly building techniques for new low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise buildings • Conduct a feasibility analysis on the potential impacts of these standards • Seek input from stakeholders, including developers, environmental organizations, and the public. 3 Migration and Habitat • Austin was designated a Bird City in 2023 • Austin within North America’s Central Flyway • Over 400 species of birds • Edwards Plateau and the Blackland Prairies habitat • Premier destination for birdwatchers throughout most of the year. • Birding generates more than $5 billion in annual ecotourism revenue in Texas ($279 billion nationwide) 4 The Problem Bird collisions have both local relevance and enormous impact. Birds do not perceive glass as a barrier. In daytime, birds encounter reflective or translucent glass. In nighttime, birds encounter artificial sources of light. Birds fly to these confusing features, without seeing the glass barriers. The collision is deadly. An estimated 1 billion birds die every year. 5 Solutions Glass Strategies B i r d - f r i e n d l y d e s i g n i n c l u d e s : • reducing the use of glass • reducing glass exposure (using solar shading, external insect/solar screens, louvers, etc.) • incorporating bird-friendly signals (markers) in or on the glass • UV coating, glazing, and etched or …
RESOLUTION NO. 20241121-073 WHEREAS, the City of Austin is committed to promoting environmental sustainability and biodiversity as a key part of its climate resilience and sustainability initiatives; and WHEREAS, Texas is recognized nationally and internationally for its important migration corridors for birds, with approximately one of every three birds migrating through the U.S. in the spring, and one of every four birds migrating through the U.S. in the fall, or nearly two billion birds, passing through every year; and WHEREAS, tourism generated from bird-watching brings more than $1.8 billion into the state’s economy annually; and WHEREAS, bird populations face significant threats from collisions with buildings, particularly due to glass structures and night lighting, which result in one billion bird fatalities every year from collisions with manmade structures in the United States; and WHEREAS, Audubon Texas initiated the Lights Out, Texas! campaign of education, awareness, and action that focuses on protecting the billions of migratory birds traveling through Texas; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 20210902-050 previously directed the City Manager to initiate a program to turn off non-essential lighting in City buildings where feasible during peak fall and spring bird migration periods; and WHEREAS, Audubon Texas and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department created the Bird City Texas campaign to promote science-based bird conservation initiatives and community-centric action; and Page 1 of 4 WHEREAS, the City of Austin became a Bird City in 2023; and WHEREAS, the Travis Audubon Society has been a leading conservation organization in Travis County since 1952, and in 2024, they contracted with bird- friendly design expert Heidi Trudell to present a report on bird friendly building design to the South-Central Waterfront Commission, Design Commission and Environmental Commission; and WHEREAS, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in partnership with the American Bird Conservancy, DarkSky International, and Yale University has developed Bird-Friendly Building Toolkits that provide strategies and guidelines for designing and retrofitting low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise buildings to reduce bird collisions through the use of bird-friendly materials, lighting strategies, landscaping, and architectural designs; and WHEREAS, cities across the United States, including New York, Madison, San Francisco and twenty-three other cities, have successfully adopted bird- friendly building standards, demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of such measures; and WHEREAS, the integration ofbird-friendly building design supports Austin's existing efforts to protect wildlife habitats, promote urban biodiversity and sustainable development practices and provides an opportunity to lead by example in environmental stewardship; …
RESPONSE TO COUNCIL RESOLUTION 20241121-073 BIRD-FRIENDLYDESIGN REPORT 9/10/2025 Response to 20241121-073 Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4 Overview of Bird Friendly Design .......................................................................................................... 5 Migration and Habitat in Austin............................................................................................................ 5 Glass and Building Design Elements ..................................................................................................... 6 Lighting Standards to Minimize Light Pollution .................................................................................... 9 Behavioral practices ............................................................................................................................ 10 Benchmarking Report on Bird Friendly Design in North America ....................................................... 11 New York City, NY ............................................................................................................................... 11 Madison, WI ........................................................................................................................................ 12 Portland, ME ....................................................................................................................................... 12 Berkeley, CA ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Toronto, ON ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Arlington County, VA........................................................................................................................... 14 Bird Friendly Design in Austin ............................................................................................................. 15 Austin Energy Green Building ............................................................................................................. 15 Lights Out Austin! ................................................................................................................................ 16 Site Specific Regulations ..................................................................................................................... 16 Glass and Lighting Requirements in Code ........................................................................................... 17 Case Studies of Bird Friendly Projects in Austin.................................................................................. 17 Considerations for New Construction ................................................................................................. 19 Co-Benefits of Bird Friendly Design .................................................................................................... 19 The 100/100/100 rule ......................................................................................................................... 21 Best Practices for Low-, Mid-, and High-Rise Buildings ...................................................................... 21 Feasibility of Bird Friendly Building in Austin ....................................................................................... 23 Cost Estimates ..................................................................................................................................... 23 Building Plan Review ........................................................................................................................... 25 Inspection and Compliance ................................................................................................................. 26 Education ............................................................................................................................................ 26 Stakeholder Engagement .................................................................................................................... 26 Boards and Commission ..................................................................................................................... 28 Staff Recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 29 1. Land Development Code Amendment ............................................................................................ 29 9/10/2025 Response to 20241121-073 2. Austin Energy Green Building Program and Policy Updates ........................................................... 29 3. Residential Educational Campaign .................................................................................................. 30 Contributors: ..................................................................................................................................... 31 References:........................................................................................................................................ 32 Appendix A: Benchmarking Data and City Regulations ........................................................................ 33 Appendix B: Austin Energy Green Building Program Requirements ..................................................... 34 Appendix C: Stakeholder Engagement Plan ........................................................................................ 36 Appendix D: Bird Friendly Design for Residential ................................................................................. 37 9/10/2025 Response to 20241121-073 Executive Summary implementation, In response to City Council Resolution 20241121-073, staff conducted comprehensive research on bird- friendly building design including stakeholder engagement with developers, environmental organizations, and the public through virtual sessions, public tours of the Austin Airport IT building, and professional roundtable discussions in collaboration with the American Institute of Architects (AIA). The following analysis provides an overview of the impact that building collisions have on bird populations and how Austin can address the problem through assessing local case studies, cost feasibility, and regulatory frameworks from peer cities including New York, Madison, Portland, Toronto, Berkeley, and Arlington County, VA. The report explores how Austin's built environment and land development regulations present many opportunities for bird-friendly design implementation, including already existing regulatory mechanisms and programs like Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning and the Austin …
Capital Delivery Services Capital Delivery Services Public Improvement Bond Program Public Improvement Bond Program Integrated Bond Program Development and Delivery Plan Integrated Bond Program Development and Delivery Plan Arts Commission Update Arts Commission Update Eric Bailey Eric Bailey Deputy Director Deputy Director Capital Delivery Services Capital Delivery Services September 22, 2025 September 22, 2025 “Effectively and Efficiently Deliver Quality Projects with the Concept of Speed” 1 AGENDA Improved Bond Development Process • CDS Overview • What is a General Obligation Bond Program? • • Staff Work Completed to Date • Guiding Principles, Technical Criteria, & Scoring Matrices • Progress to Date & Upcoming Milestones “Effectively and Efficiently Deliver Quality Projects with the Concept of Speed” 2 Created in 2023 with the goal of reducing project delivery time Who we are • Engineers • Architects • Project managers • Community Engagement Our partners • Consultants • Contracting teams • City asset owners • Community members • Mayor & Council Role in 2026 Bond Program One City – One Team – One Approach to effectively and efficiently deliver quality public projects. • Convene asset owner departments to develop needs assessment • Guide the process to ensure projects are vetted and scopes/schedules/budgets are accurate and realistic • Coordinate projects across departments to achieve mutual benefits What is a General Obligation Bond Program? Typical Bond Projects: • Flood and Erosion Control Improvements • New or Replacement City Facilities • Rehabilitation of Existing Facilities • Housing Infrastructure/Housing Projects • Street and Thoroughfare Improvements o Sidewalks o Traffic Signals • Park and Recreation Facilities • Public Safety Facilities (Fire/EMS/Police) • Land Purchase 4 What is a General Obligation Bond Program? Types of work NOT included: • Routine operations and maintenance activities o Potholes o Minor street repair o Landscaping maintenance o General building maintenance Improvements for short term leased space • • Code enforcement initiatives • Employee salaries (including police & fire) • AE/AW Capital Projects typically funded by using debt are funded via AE and AW revenue bonds, not General Obligation debt and thus are not for the 2026 GO Bond Program City of Austin | Capital Delivery Services Department | One City, One Team, One Approach to Capital Delivery 5 Improved Bond Delivery Process for 2026 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Council calls for Bond Election (Aug) Bond Election (Nov) BEATF Meetings, Council, and Public Engagement HOW WE’VE DONE BONDS …
Hotel Occupancy Tax Update Arts Commission Meeting September 22, 2025 Hotel Occupancy Tax – August 2025 Approved Budget Amended Budget August w/ Encumb Year-to-date w/Encumb Year-End Estimate Total Revenue $169,901,585 $169,901,585 $41,199,921 $160,546,805 $165,125,757 Transfer to Cultural Arts Fund $16,217,879 $16,217,879 $3,934,592 $15,332,220 $15,762,004 • Total HOT Collections August 2025 = $41,137,300 • 94% of FY25 Approved Budget of $169,901,585 • Cultural Arts Fund August 2025 = $3,934,592 C I TY O F A U S T I N Hotel Occupancy Tax Collections – Significant Contributing Events • Independence Day – July 3-4 o Texas Music Scene Independence Eve Party featuring Reckless Kelly o Austin Symphony Orchestra July 4th Concert and Fireworks o Willie Nelson's 4th of July Picnic and Fireworks • Zilker Summer Musical – July 11-August 16 • Wellness Wonderland – July 12 • Bob Bullock Birthday Bash – July 13 • Hot Summer Nights – July 18-20 • Classic Game Fest – July 25-27 AUS Passenger Totals: 2,036,077 (July 2025) C I TY O F A U S T I N HOT Cultural Arts Fund - FY25 C I TY O F A U S T I N HOT Collections (FY22 – FY25) C I TY O F A U S T I N Questions? Arts, Culture, Music and Entertainment (ACME)
Office of Arts, Culture, Music and Entertainment (ACME) Cultural Arts Funding Update September 22, 2025 Agenda 1.Contracts & Payments 2.Cultural Arts Funding Updates 3.Grant Funded Activities Contracts & Payments Contracts & Payments (As of 9/19/25) FY23 Elevate FY24 Elevate FY24 Nexus (Spring/ Summer) FY25-26 Thrive (Year 1) FY25-26 Thrive (Year 2) Total Contracts Signed & Processed Contracts Test payments issued & verified Payment 1 Issued Payment 2 Issued Payment 3 Issued 199 199 (100%) 199 (100%) 199 (100%) 198 (99%) 194 (98%) 230 229 (99%) 229 (99%) 229 (99%) 216 (94%) 57 (25%) 51 51 (100%) 51 (100%) 51 (100%) 49 (96%) n/a Total Dist. to date $6,221,000 (99%) $8,386,000 (91%) Total Allocation $6,250,000 $9,265,000 $245,000 (96%) $255,000 35 33 (94%) 34 (97%) 33 (94%) 32 (91%) 1 (3%) $3,268,500 (85%) See year 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (N/A) $3,850,000 $3,850,000 *Each grant has a different reporting deadline. Final Payments are issued upon successful close out of Final Report. Cultural Arts Funding Updates Launch Update • October 21 – AACME grant funding opportunities launch • December 4 – Final deadline to submit Eligibility Form Grant Funded Activities FY 24-25 Cultural Funding Grantee Activities ICMCA presents renowned Sitarist - Pandit Kushal Das October 5 ICMCA (MSA) – Unity Church of the Hills Deaf Film Festival October 11 – 12 Deaf Film Festival (District 3) – Texas School for the Deaf Creative Fusion October 12 Angela Thornton (District 1) – Kenny Dorham’s Backyard C I TY O F A U S T I N FY 24-25 Cultural Funding Grantee Activities Yollotl: Encuentro del Corazón October 17 – 19 colectivo IN SITU (District 1) – Multiple venues Eastside Kings Festival October 18 – 19 Eastside Kings Foundation (District 8) – Multiple venues Groundwork Music Project's Second Sunday Concert Second Sunday monthly through December 2 Groundwork Music Project (District 2) – Cherrywood Coffee House C I TY O F A U S T I N Questions? Arts, Culture, Music and Entertainment (ACME) Thank You For Your Partnership
• Project: Duncan Park • Artist(s): Andre Fuqua • Phase: Final Design • Sponsoring Department: Parks and Recreation • Project Budget: $48,000 • Council District: District 9 • Project Manager: Ryan Runcie AIPP PANEL MEETING AGENDA ITEM #5 DATE:8/4/2025 AIPP Corridor Construction - Duncan Park Mirror of the Earth, 2025 A low profile, metal sculpture that represents the power, presence, and importance of water in shaping Austin’s Downtown community Artist: André Fuqua | andrefuqua.com | @drefuqua Community Engagement In Person and Virtual Meetings Group Community Redesign Presentation Individual Charles Peveto, Community Member Date June 7 2025 Date May 19 2023 Ivey Kaiser, Executive Director, Shoal Creek Conservancy April 26 2023 Sierra DaSilva, Watershed Coordinator, Shoal Creek Conservancy Jon Rookstool, Retail Sales Manager, REI Ted Siff, President, OANA April 21 2023 Michael Portman, resident of Nokonah Building, Board Member, OANA Todd Moon, 9th Street Jumps, Long-time Volunteer & Advocacy Lead April 19 2023 Archival research at Austin History Center on Shoal Creek and flooding in Austin Artist: André Fuqua | andrefuqua.com | @drefuqua A park with many perspectives T E E R T S H T 9 Duncan Park Site Visit 7/26/2023 2008, 9th Street BMX, Photo Archive Duncan Park Site Visit 8/30/2023 2008, 9th Street BMX, Photo Archive Artist: André Fuqua | andrefuqua.com | @drefuqua Inspiration - Water and Reflectivity Puddling water on landscape at Duncan Park, 2025 Artist: André Fuqua | andrefuqua.com | @drefuqua Looking North towards 10th Street NOTE: The work will be flat and elevated 4 - 5 in above the ground Reflective Stainless Steel puddle pieces Note: This is a detail for (1) distinct piece of the sculpture. The full art work will be composed of 5 distinct shapes to create the full sculpture 316L Stainless Steel waterjet cut 1 8 thick 316L SS #8 mirror polished face epoxy layer 1 4 in thick sheet threaded leveling rod U-channels welded to base plate of each piece leveling rods embedded in concrete to attach plates nuts and washers used to attach plates to leveling rods Leveling Mechanism Note: All pieces of leveling mechanism fabricated from 304 stainless steel 1 8 inch thick #8 mirror finish 316 stainless steel face plate 1 4 in thick 304 stainless steel base plate 4 in 2 in depth of rod 6 in depth of concrete U-channel welds 2 in nut and leveling washer nut and flat washer threaded rod Concrete and …
• Project: Givens Pool • Artist(s): Melissa Borrell • Phase: Final Design • Sponsoring Department: Parks and Recreation • Project Budget: $170,000 • Council District: District 1 • Project Manager: Ryan Runcie AIPP PANEL MEETING AGENDA ITEM #8 DATE:9/8/2025 Making Waves at Givens Pool Melissa Borrell Final Design Making Waves at Givens Pool Making Waves artwork is a tribute to Dr. Givens, providing much needed shade at the pool that has been and continues to be a favorite community gathering spot for generations of residents of the neighborhood. The title alludes to both the changes that Dr. Givens fought for and made in the city as well as the literal waves that happen in the pool as people play, cool off, and splash. The colorful artwork has a kinetic visual element that changes depending on the viewing angle. The red and yellow colors represent the movement of the sun over the course of the day from sunrise to sunset. Viewed from one direction the background of yellow daytime sun will be more visible and red will be more apparent from the opposite side referencing the sunset hours. Making WavesMelissa Borrell -Givens Pool Final Design Making Waves at Givens Pool - Various Views Making WavesMelissa Borrell -Givens Pool Final Design 1 2 3 4 5 47'-3 5/8" 17'-4 3/8" 1'-4 7/8" 41'-5" 5" CONCRETE SLAB-ON-GRADE REINFORCED W/ #4 @ 12" O.C. EA. WAY, SEE STRUCTURAL NOTES FOR BUILDING PAD PREPARATION 16'-0" 44'-5 1/8" 40'-6 7/8" " 6 - ' 1 1 " 2 - ' 4 1 " 0 1 - ' 1 1 " 6 6 S307 SHADE CANOPY FOUNDATION BY SHADE CANOPY MFR. 7.00° 5 1 1 ' - 6 7 / 8 " 0'- 0 " = 1 R 6 S307 6 S307 16'-0" 13'-7 3/8" 26'-8 1/8" 19'-6" 19'-6" NEW POOL DECK ON GRADE 2 S304 6 S304 SHADE CANOPY FOUNDATION BY SHADE CANOPY MFR. R = 1 0 '- 0 " 6 S307 / " 8 1 7 - ' 8 19'-6" 153'-5 1/2" " 2 - ' 3 . Q S 1 S305 A B 6 S307 R= 10'-0" 11'-5 3/4" SHADE CANOPY FOUNDATION BY SHADE CANOPY MFR. 4 5 . 0 0 ° 6 S307 19'-6" 18'-11 1/8" 27'-5 5/8" / " 4 1 0 - ' 9 1 " 6 13'-5 5/8" 12'-11 5/8" " 0 - ' 5 1 EXISTING 2'-0"W X …
• Project: Montopolis Pool • Artist(s): Britt Johnson • Phase: Final Design • Sponsoring Department: PARD • Project Budget: $100,000 • Council District: 3 • Project Manager: Bryana Iglesias MAP AIPP PROJECT BRITTANY JOHNSON MURALIST • PAINTER • DESIGNER JANUARY 2025 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT REPORT OVERVIEW Community-Centered Focus: Reflecting Montopolis’ values and aspirations. Engagement Activities: Surveys, workshops, and events for input. Key Themes: Diversity, joy, unity, and connection to nature. Project Goal: Celebrate Montopolis through community-inspired art. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT REPORT ACTIVITIES Held workshops & Events: Spray Paint Workshop at Something Cool Studios. Community tabling event at Montopolis Rec Center. Targeted workforce development skills in the arts while gaining feedback. Surveys: I helped people answer questionnaires in English and Spanish. 36 responses were collected. Canvassing: Group discussions with community members and staff. Attended Varisty painting class. Community Input: Desire for vibrant colors, inclusivity, family life depictions, nature, and unity. CONCEPT & NARRATIVE PRELIMINARY MURAL CONCEPT The proposed mural, titled "Flowing Together: Celebration of Montopolis Pool & Park," is inspired by Community Engagement results. will depict families enjoying the pool, surrounded by local flora and fauna. Designed with bright, realistic colors transitioning through a gradient, the mural will evoke love, belonging, and nostalgia. Combining abstract and realistic elements, the artwork aims to reflect the community’s identity, creating a meaningful and uplifting centerpiece for Montopolis. Concept A1 • Woman and child gathering wildflowers, wearing backpacks from activities between families afterschool • Mexican textile patterns in background • Eastern Blue bird native to austin migrating to Mexico symbol of hope and happiness • Pink evening primrose Concept C1 • Woman swimming underwater • Freshwater fish and turtle native to austin lakes • Mexican textile patterns • Surreal abstract elements Concept A3 • Boy and adult holding hands at park • Purple coneflowers • Monarch and bats • Kids playing with Austin skyline • African textile patterns Concept C3 • Senior woman swimming • Ruby throated humming bird, native to austin and symbol of goodluck • Agave plant and trumpet flowers • African textile patterns SITE LOCATION C3 A3 C1 A1 C1 A1 C3 A3 Edge to Metal Box 26” Edge to Panel 19.75’ 8” 10” 26” Edge to Panel 8” 10” WALL ART PANEL Metal Box WALL ART PANEL A1 C1 26” Edge to Panel 26” Edge to Panel 26” Edge to Panel 8” 10” 8” 10” WALL ART PANEL WALL ART PANEL FORM & …
Austin Arts, Culture, Music and Entertainment (AACME) Artist In Residence (AIR) Program Update September 22, 2025 Agenda 1.Program Overview 2.Timeline 3.Selected Artists Program Overview Our Future 35 Artist Residence Our Future 35 Artist in Residence, a program developed and launched in Partnership with Austin Transportation and Public Works Residency Goals: To use art as a method to foster connection among • community • • To integrate the rich cultural history of neighborhoods su rrounding IH-35 into the OF35 planning process To benefit Austin's local art community Ideal Applicants: • From or with experience of East Austin • Has worked with and among community • Is aware of IH-35's history and cultural context • Can demonstrate social practice in their art • Can produce art that shares stories, preferable in multiple mediums Artist in Residence Timeline Opened call July 2024 Top Artist Interviews September 2024 Contract process paused for Council Action on Our Future 35 Caps November 2025- May 2025 New funds allocated, Artists under contract August 2025 August 2024 October 2024 May 2025 August 2026 Application Deadline Artist Selected NEA Rescinded Award Final Reports Due Selected Artists Cat Carter Cat Carter is a multidisciplinary creative director, artist, and founder of SuperWoman Records, a nonprofit record label empowering women through music, storytelling, and community-driven initiatives. Her work bridges art, culture, and equity—using music, events, and publishing to create platforms that amplify marginalized voices and inspire new possibilities. • Founder & CEO of SuperWoman Records, the first Black woman–led nonprofit record label and festival in Austin. • Recipient of the Cannes Lions Festival of Creativity’s ERA program, attending the world’s leading creative festival to represent women-led innovation in music and culture. • Creative producer and visionary behind SheXSW and the SuperWoman Records Festival, merging music, fashion, and community to create groundbreaking cultural experiences. Launched SuperWoman Records Publishing and published its first book, The House the 90s Built, expanding into literature and cultural storytelling. • Proposed Event: Candy Coated 35 The 35 Project is a cultural storytelling campaign rooted in rhythm, memory and reclaiming space. It will include music, oral histories, live performance and visual art TENTATIVE Activation Timeline (Nov 2025 – Mar 2026) November Slowed, Throwed & Candy Coated — Live KAZI DJ Set December The Chrome Mirror — Kya Monee at Riches Art Gallery January The Divide Cypher — Rooftop or Lot Overlooking I-35 February Black Girl Future — Film Night …
