Coronado Residence Remodel and Addition Photos 3006 Kerbey Lane 78703 Front of house (East facing) South side from front yard South side from front driveway Remove screen porchRemove screen porchNew windows to kitchen West facing façade – backyard side of house North facing façade – sideyard from front Remove old additionNew windows
3006 Kerbey Lane Old West Austin National Register Historic District contributing structure TCAD: 1939 Existing Front of house images - brick bungalow, wood windows, existing screen porch, metal roof mix of hips and gables Erica Heroy Architecture and Design June 4, 2025 1 3006 Kerbey Lane Old West Austin National Register Historic District Existing house plans Remove previous rear addition Remove previous rear addition Remove Porch Remove Porch Erica Heroy Architecture and Design June 4, 2025 2 3006 Kerbey Lane Old West Austin National Register Historic District Existing Elevations Remove Porch Remove previous rear addition Remove previous rear addition Remove Porch Erica Heroy Architecture and Design June 4, 2025 3 3006 Kerbey Lane Old West Austin National Register Historic District Images of Screen Porch Erica Heroy Architecture and Design June 4, 2025 4 3006 Kerbey Lane Old West Austin National Register Historic District Proposed house plans Erica Heroy Architecture and Design June 4, 2025 5 3006 Kerbey Lane Old West Austin National Register Historic District Proposed Elevations Erica Heroy Architecture and Design June 4, 2025 6 3006 Kerbey Lane Old West Austin National Register Historic District Proposed Elevations Erica Heroy Architecture and Design June 4, 2025 7 3006 Kerbey Lane Old West Austin National Register Historic District Model Rendering Erica Heroy Architecture and Design June 4, 2025 8 3006 Kerbey Lane Old West Austin National Register Historic District Model Rendering Erica Heroy Architecture and Design June 4, 2025 9
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JUNE 4, 2025 HR-2025-050408 OLD WEST AUSTIN HISTORIC DISTRICT 1611 WETHERSFIELD ROAD 12.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a rear addition. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Demolish a non-historic rear addition and metal carport. Construct a new two-story addition in generally the same footprint. Construct a new covered carport that is tied into the front house. ARCHITECTURE The symmetrical single-story house features a front porch that extends across the entirety of the street facing elevation and is covered by a roof supported by six wood posts. The porch is constructed of brick and is slightly above grade. The front wall features a door at the center with a woodwork surround, including pilasters and dentil decorative elements. On each side of the door are two large 6-over-6 windows with functional shutters. The walls are all clad in painted wood siding. Above, the side gabled roof is set at a moderate pitch and features a chimney at one side. To the left of the house is a driveway that is partially covered by a standalone metal carport. RESEARCH Not much is known about early owners of the house, but a Mr. Elbert Strickel lived at the address for much of the 1940s in the 1950s, and at one point had a maid living at the address. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential additions 1. Location New addition is proposed at the rear of the property, in the location of an existing addition, which is proposed to be demolished. 2. Scale, massing, and height The addition is proposed to be two stories, and the ridgeline of the roof will extend above the existing side gable of the main house. However, this will be set far back from the street and won’t likely be visible from the street. 3. Design and style The building form of the addition is largely compatible with the main house, and will feature dormers, gabled roofs, and fenestration what, while not matching with the original house, will be in keeping with the character. 4. Roofs Gable roofs are proposed with orientations mostly facing the front and rear of the property. The main gable is proposed to tie into the …
WETHERSFIELD REMODEL ADMINISTRATIVE CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES FOR GENERAL CONTRACTORS REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION (RFIS) IMMEDIATELY ON DISCOVERY OF THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR INTERPRETATION OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT AN RFI FORM TO THE ARCHITECT VIA EMAIL. CONTENT OF THE RFI FORM: INCLUDE A DETAILED, LEGIBLE DESCRIPTION OF ITEM NEEDING INFORMATION OR INTERPRETATION AND THE FOLLOWING: 1. PROJECT NAME. 2. PROJECT NUMBER. 3. DATE. NAME OF CONTRACTOR. 4. NAME OF ARCHITECT. 5. RFI NUMBER, NUMBERED SEQUENTIALLY. 6. RFI SUBJECT. EMAIL SUBJECT LINE TO MATCH RFI SUBJECT 7. CONTRACTOR'S SUGGESTED RESOLUTION. IF CONTRACTOR'S SUGGESTED RESOLUTION IMPACTS THE CONTRACT TIME OR THE CONTRACT SUM, CONTRACTOR SHALL STATE IMPACT IN THE RFI. 8. CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE. 9. ATTACHMENTS: INCLUDE SKETCHES, DESCRIPTIONS, MEASUREMENTS, PHOTOS, PRODUCT DATA, SHOP DRAWINGS, COORDINATION DRAWINGS, AND OTHER INFORMATION NECESSARY TO FULLY DESCRIBE ITEMS NEEDING INTERPRETATION. INCLUDE DIMENSIONS, THICKNESSES, STRUCTURAL GRID REFERENCES, AND DETAILS OF AFFECTED MATERIALS, ASSEMBLIES, AND ATTACHMENTS ON ATTACHED SKETCHES. RFI FORMS: AIA DOCUMENT G716 OROTHER SOFTWARE-GENERATED FORM WITH SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME CONTENT AS INDICATED ABOVE, ACCEPTABLE TO ARCHITECT. ATTACHMENTS SHALL BE ELECTRONIC FILES IN ADOBE ACROBAT PDF FORMAT. ARCHITECT'S ACTION: ARCHITECT WILL REVIEW EACH RFI, DETERMINE ACTION REQUIRED, AND RESPOND TO CONTRACTOR. ALLOW 3 WORKING DAYS FOR ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE FOR EACH RFI. IF MORE URGENT, PLEASE CALL PROJECT MANAGER AFTER SENDING RFI VIA EMAIL. RFIS RECEIVED BY ARCHITECT AFTER 1:00 P.M. WILL BE CONSIDERED AS RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING WORKING DAY. ALLOW 24 HOURS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL FEEDBACK FROM RFI RESPONSE. RFI LOG: PREPARE, MAINTAIN, AND SUBMIT A TABULAR LOG OF RFIS ORGANIZED BY THE RFI NUMBER. CONSTRUCTION PHOTOGRAPHS PRECONSTRUCTION PHOTOGRAPHS: BEFORE STARTING CONSTRUCTION, TAKE PHOTOGRAPHS OF PROJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, INCLUDING EXISTING ITEMS TO REMAIN DURING CONSTRUCTION, FROM DIFFERENT VANTAGE POINTS, AS DIRECTED BY ARCHITECT. PERIODIC CONSTRUCTION PHOTOGRAPHS: TAKE A MINIMUM OF 20 PHOTOGRAPHS WEEKLY. FINAL COMPLETION CONSTRUCTION PHOTOGRAPHS: TAKE 20 COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS AFTER DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION FOR SUBMISSION AS PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS. ARCHITECT WILL INFORM PHOTOGRAPHER OF DESIRED VANTAGE POINTS. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES FOR GENERAL CONTRACTORS 1) SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING SUBMITTAL ITEMS TO THE ARCHITECT UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE AS INDICATED ON AN APPROVED SUBMITTAL SCHEDULE. SEND ELECTRONIC SUBMITTALS AS PDF ELECTRONIC FILES DIRECTLY TO ARCHITECT'S PROJECT MANAGER VIA EMAIL. ORDERS FROM MANUFACTURERS AND SUPPLIERS WITH A COVER SHEET CAN SUFFICE AS A SUBMITTAL. ARCHITECT WILL NOTIFY GC WITHIN 2 BUSINESS DAYSOF INITIAL EMAIL RECEIPT, IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED FOR …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JUNE 4, 2025 HR-2025-057111 WEST LINE HISTORIC DISTRICT 1107 EASON STREET 13.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct three residential units. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct three units through the HOME incentive on the site of a previously non-contributing resource to the National Register district. All three units will be two stories with accessible roof decks. Two of the units will be side-by-side and face Eason Street, with the third to the rear. RESEARCH Not much is known about the original inhabitants of the property at 1107 Eason Street. There is record of a Sidney Ralph Jeffers, associated with this address, who graduated from the University of Texas in 1949, shortly after the first house on the site was constructed. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The front two units will be placed much closer to the street than the previous house, but they will be generally in line with neighboring setbacks. The rear unit will face the alley behind the property 2. Orientation Each of the front units will have their short sides facing the street, which is not typical of the surrounding area. However, when paired, the orientation of both will look closer in appearance to the surrounding properties. 3. Scale, massing, and height Two narrow, two-story housing units are not in keeping with the scale, massing, and height of their neighbors. However, the design has been altered to reduce the verticality of the original plans. The footprints and exterior design of the two front units are generally the same but rotated 180 degrees from one another. 4. Proportions The two-story residences have proportions that are much more vertical than surrounding properties. 5. Design and style As a side-by-side duplex, each two stories tall with additional roof decks, the style of the front building is not in keeping with surrounding houses. However, other highly modern designs have been approved in historic districts. Standard 5.4 calls for modern styles to use modern architecture details, which is true here. There is no likelihood of this design to be confused with anything historic. 6. Roofs The combined roofs of the two front units form a front gable …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JUNE 4, 2025 HR-2025-059564 OLD WEST AUSTIN HISTORIC DISTRICT 1511 HARDOUIN AVENUE 14.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a rear addition. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a two-story addition at the rear of this original house. Width of addition is not to exceed the existing, but roof height is proposed to exceed the current roof ridge height. ARCHITECTURE The existing house an intact example of the Colonial Revival style. The front elevation is symmetrical, with a center door and one window bay on each side. Both the ground floor windows and the three second floor windows feature functional shutters and original window frames and sashes. The roof is a side gable assembly set a moderate pitch, with small gables framed above the windows below. The ground floor walls are clad in brick painted white, with the second-floor walls clad in horizontal wood siding. The red front entry door is accessed by a small set of stairs from the front walk, and a decorative surround frames the doorway. To one side is a driveway that terminates at a gate at the rear of the side of the house. Overall, the property maintains high integrity from its original construction. RESEARCH Upon construction, this house was occupied by a Mr. Neil Allen and his family for several years. Mr. Allen was involved in the real estate industry and, for at least some years, worked as a realtor in Austin. He and his wife raised their children at this address until they attended college, one son at the University of Texas and one daughter at the University of Houston. Later records indicate that the daughter had married and given birth to a child by the late 1950s. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential additions 1. Location The entire addition is located behind the main house and does not extend beyond the sides in either direction. 2. Scale, massing, and height The original house is two stories, and the addition matches this. However, an attic “bonus room” is also proposed, which increases the overall height of the house and extends the roof above the main house. Because this will be full behind the original, …
LEGEND RECORD INFORMATION (....) CONTROL MONUMENT CM 1/2" IRON REBAR FOUND OVERHEAD ELECTRIC FENCE CORNER WOOD FENCE / / EDGE OF ASPHALT / / POWER POLE WATER METER ELECTRIC METER AIR CONDITIONER GAS METER TREE OE FC W EM AC T59 OAK Ø12" SINGLE TRUNK T60 CHINESE TALLOW Ø18" SINGLE TRUNK T61 LIVE OAK Ø11" SINGLE TRUNK T62 LIVE OAK Ø10" SINGLE TRUNK T63 LIVE OAK Ø10" SINGLE TRUNK T64 NULL T65 LIVE OAK Ø14" SINGLE TRUNK T66 LIVE OAK Ø28" SINGLE TRUNK T67 LIVE OAK Ø24" SINGLE TRUNK T68 LIVE OAK Ø24" SINGLE TRUNK T69 LIVE OAK Ø17" SINGLE TRUNK EXAMPLE T68 CRITICAL ROOT ZONE: 1/4 CRZ NO IMPACT CM R 2 8 8.0' 84.90' (85') LOT 2 OE / / OE / OE / / (N 77°04' W 55') OE OE OE / / / / LOT 1 OE / / / / OE OE / / / 68 69 67 / 66 65 6261 / 63 / / / / / / AC W. 35' OF LOT 10 & E. 50' LOT 11, BLK 2 ( S 1 2 ° 5 6 ' W 1 5 0 ' ) R 1 2.0' AC E O / EXISTING ONE STORY WOOD GARAGE ON CONC E O / E O / E O / E O / E O / PROPOSED TWO STORY ADDITION W 10' OF LOT 11, E 45' OF LOT 12, BLK 2 E O E O E O E O EM 59 ( N 1 2 ° 5 6 ' E 1 5 0 ' ) CM EXISTING ONE STORY WOOD GARAGE ON CONC ALL OF LOT 13 AND W 15' LOT 12, BLK 2 PROPOSED TWO STORY ADDITION 1 1 T O L 2 1 T O L 2 1 T O L 3 1 T O L CRITICAL ROOT ZONE PLAN Scale: 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 139.54' (140') (S 77°04' E 55') W / / / / / / / / / PROPOSED SITE PLAN Scale: 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 H A R D O U I N A V E N U E ( 60' R.O.W. ) SCALE: 1" = 20' RIVER QUEEN DESIGNS P R O J E C T N A M E R E G I N O R A S A C E 3 U 0 N 7 E 8 V 7 A S N A I U …
" 1 1 - ' 8 " 6 - ' 5 1 Kitchen Sinks K-3174 Stainless Steel Undertone KITCHEN 107 BUTLERS PANTRY/OFFICE 108 LIVING ROOM 106 DINING ROOM 104 103 CLOSET HVAC MUD ROOM 105 POWDER ROOM 102 OFFICE 109 FORMAL LIVING ROOM 101 I I N O T D D A D E S O P O R P " 5 - ' 4 2 I R O O L F T S R F G N T S X E " 8 - ' 7 2 I I I I N O T D D A D E S O P O R P " 5 - ' 4 3 I I N O T D D A D E S O P O R P " 6 - ' 5 1 R O O L F D N O C E S G N T S X E " 8 - ' 8 2 I I I R O O L F T S R F G N T S X E " 8 - ' 7 1 I I I FLEX ROOM 301 ATTIC FLOOR PLAN LAYOUT Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 MASTER BATHROOM 205 LAUNDRY ROOM 204 BATH 1 206 HVAC CLOSET 201 MASTER BEDROOM 202 MASTER CLOSET 203 BEDROOM 1 207 BEDROOM 2 208 BEDROOM 3 210 BATH 2 209 I I N O T D D A D E S O P O R P " 6 - ' 5 2 R O O L F D N O C E S G N T S X E " 8 - ' 8 1 I I FIRST FLOOR PLAN LAYOUT Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN LAYOUT Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 RIVER QUEEN DESIGNS P R O J E C T N A M E R E G I N O R A S A C E 3 U 0 N 7 E 8 V 7 A S N A I U O D R X E T , A N H I T S U 1 1 5 1 A PROJECT No. PHASE: ISSUE DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: 001 DESIGN 05/22/25 LR AM S H E E T D2.0 " 1 1 - ' 8 " 1 - ' 2 5 " 2 - ' 3 4 " 2 / 1 1 1 - ' 7 1 " …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS JUNE 4, 2025 PR-2025-045700; GF-2025-049018 604 COPELAND STREET 15.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1935 house. ARCHITECTURE The footprint of the non-descript bungalow is roughly square in shape, with all sides clad in narrow teardrop wood siding. There is a steeply pitched hipped roof, which is covered in non-historic metal material. Though the windows are currently boarded over, they appear to be the original openings, though the condition of the frames are unknown. It is set on an elevated foundation with a concrete skirt. A small dormer on the front of the house marks the front doorway, but there is no porch present, which may be seen at other contemporary construction in the neighborhood. RESEARCH After initial construction around 1935, the house was occupied for renters for about ten years. These renters included various residents mostly occupied in state government and local businesses, and during World War II a meat grinder working for the US War Food Administration. After the war, the house was bought by Mrs. Lucy H. Overall, a widow, and her two sons, who would go on to attend the University of Texas before moving out on their own. Mrs. Overall, who would later go by Mrs. Blanton, was a music teacher of some acclaim around Austin, who worked with students of all ages as well as serving as music director for various shows, including one associated with the Methodist church. PROPERTY EVALUATION The 2015 Bouldin Creek Historic Resource Survey lists the property as a medium priority and as contributing to the potential Copeland historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of vernacular bungalow architecture in South Austin. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS JUNE 4, 2025 PR-2025-044852; GF-2025-049021 606 COPELAND STREET 16.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1935 house. ARCHITECTURE Described in the 2015 Bouldin Creek Survey as a wood framed bungalow, the house features a steep pitched hipped roof with a small gable at one corner indicating the front entryway. Like its neighbor at 604 Copeland Street, there is no front porch, though this property does feature a covered carport to the left of the entryway. Until early 2025, the walls were clad in some sort of shingle, though this material has been removed as of May 2025. The house appears to be in stable, if weathered, condition. RESEARCH The house at 606 Copeland Street was occupied by renters for the first ten years after its construction around 1935. After being vacant in the mid-1940s, it was purchased by Mrs. Hazel Thompson, a widow and saleswoman at Hutchins Bros, a San Antonio menswear store with locations in Austin. Mrs. Thompson lived in the house for several decades and was involved in the Order of the Eastern Star at the city’s Scottish Rite Temple. PROPERTY EVALUATION The 2015 Bouldin Creek Historic Resource Survey lists the property as a medium priority and as contributing to the potential Copeland historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is an excellent example of vernacular bungalow architecture in South Austin. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Strongly encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, then material salvage and reuse, but release the demolition permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. LOCATION MAP 16.0 – 2 …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS JUNE 4, 2025 PR-2025-049503; GF-2025-054619 1004 SOUTH 1ST STREET 17.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1929 house. ARCHITECTURE The asymmetric Craftsman style house at 1004 South 1st Street features a broad front porch that spans about half of the street facing elevation and is covered by a front gabled roof that features decorative brackets. The building is elevated on pier and beam foundation that is covered by a concrete skirt under the house, with the porch decorated on its sides by local stone in various colors. The roof is side-gabled and set at a moderate pitch. Walls are clad in narrow teardrop wood siding. Overall, the house is in good condition, though there is significant graffiti tagging present. RESEARCH After construction around 1929, the house was occupied by renters until 1935, where it was purchased by Henry & Lillie Polvado, who lived there with at least one daughter. Henry was a city fireman who was later promoted to fire department captain, and the couple owned the house until around 1950, by which time their daughter had married and moved out. After a short series of renters, it was purchased by Norman & Louis Allen, who lived in the house until at least 1972, when Norman passed away. PROPERTY EVALUATION The 2015 Bouldin Creek Historic Resource Survey lists the property as a medium priority and as contributing to the potential Copeland historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of craftsman architecture in South Austin. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Strongly encourage rehabilitation and adaptive …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS JUNE 4, 2025 PR-2025-044914; GF-2025-049037 1006 SOUTH 1ST STREET 18.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1924 house. ARCHITECTURE When viewed from the street, the house at 1006 South 1st Street is largely symmetrical, with a few rooms added at the rear of the sides. The front entry is framed by two wood posts supporting a front gable covering a porch. The porch spans roughly the middle third of the building and is elevated above grade by two steps. The walls are clad in teardrop siding and a large hung window is present at either side of the front elevation. The roof is side gabled and set at a moderate-to-high pitch. The house maintains good integrity. RESEARCH After construction around 1925, the house had a series of renters for ten years before being purchased by Thomas and Bertha Fisher. Thomas was a hoseman at the city fire department and would eventually be promoted to firefighter and station captain. The couple owned the house until at least 1974, when Thomas passed away. There was some time where the house appears to have been occupied by renters in the 1930s, according to city directories, but the Fishers would be listed as the occupants by 1947. The property may have also incorporated a rear two-story garage structure, which may have been rented out and had these additional names associated with the address. PROPERTY EVALUATION The 2015 Bouldin Creek Historic Resource Survey lists the property as a medium priority and as contributing to the potential Copeland historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of vernacular bungalow architecture in South Austin. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a …