ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: C14H-2020-0133 HLC DATE: ZAP DATE: CC DATE: October 26, 2020 November 16, 2020 December 1, 2020 December 10, 2020 APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission HISTORIC NAME: David C. Graeber House WATERSHED: Taylor Slough North ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 4509 Balcones Drive ZONING FROM: SF-3 to SF-3-H COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 SUMMARY STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend historic zoning based on the house’s architecture and association with David C. Graeber. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Architecture, historical association HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: October 26, 2020: Initiated historic zoning. November 16, 2020: Recommended historic zoning to Zoning and Platting Commission, 11-0-0. ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION ACTION: N/A DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The house is beyond the bounds of any City survey to date. CITY COUNCIL DATE: December 10, 2020 ACTION: N/A ORDINANCE READINGS: 1st, 2nd, 3rd ORDINANCE NUMBER: N/A CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras PHONE: 974-2727 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATION: Highland Park West Balcones Area Neighborhood Assn. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: Architecture: The building is constructed in the Contemporary style (McAlester, 2017). Its use of natural materials, its low-slung form that blends into the hillside, its continuous expanses of glass, and its Japanese-inspired detailing—deep roof overhangs with exposed rafters, styled wood railings and gable ornamentation, “panelized” walls and windows, and the building’s overall orientation around a semi-interior courtyard—exemplify the style.The split-level house has horizontal and vertical wood siding; fixed and sliding undivided full- height and ribbon windows; a cross-gabled roof with gable-end detailing, exposed rafter tails, deep eaves, and triangular brackets; and Japanese-inspired decorative wood details at railings, roofline, and fenestration. The site is terraced with masonry retaining walls that follow the contours of its topography, softening the transition between house and landscape. B-061 of 20 Historical Associations: The building at 4509 Balcones Drive was constructed in 1959 by architect David C. Graeber as his personal dwelling. Graeber, who moved to Austin to attend the UT School of Architecture after building homes with his father’s lumber business in San Antonio, joined Kuhne, Brooks, and Barr in 1957. He became a firm partner in 1961. When they began consulting for the University of Texas in 1962, Graeber led the design teams for all new university buildings for the next four years. He established Graeber, Simmons, and Cowan in 1978. Notable projects throughout Graeber’s career include the Lyndon Baines Johnson Presidential Library, the All Faiths Chapel of the Austin State Supported Living Center, the Johnson Space Center in …
Frequently Asked Questions This FAQ sheet is intended to provide a brief orientation to the Historic Design Standards. Please contact preservation@austintexas.gov if you have further questions or feedback about the standards. 1 Why were the Historic Design Standards I own a property in a locally designated historic developed? Don’t we already have standards for district. How will the Historic Design Standards 3 historic properties? affect me? The Historic Design Standards were developed to clarify existing standards for historic landmarks and National Register districts, and to make the historic district application process easier and more equitable for new districts. The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation form the foundation of preservation practice in the United States and are used in Austin to evaluate proposed changes to historic landmarks and in National Register district. However, these very general standards can be challenging to interpret when planning and evaluating specific projects. The Historic Design Standards build on them with more specific standards and illustrations of good practices. For new historic districts, community members compiling an application currently must hire a consultant or learn how to develop their own design standards, then go through multiple rounds of review with other property owners and City staff. This adds time and cost to the application process—and results in design standards that are nearly identical to those for other districts. The Historic Design Standards will provide a consistent, predictable set of standards for all areas considering historic district designation. 2 I own a historic landmark. How will the Historic Design Standards affect me? If adopted by City Council, the Historic Design Standards will clarify existing standards for exterior changes to historic landmarks, as well as new construction on landmarked properties. The Historic Design Standards are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation that City staff and the Historic Landmark Commisison currently use to evaluate changes to historic landmarks, but they are clearer, more specific, and easier to use for planning and evaluating projects. The Historic Design Standards will not affect previously agreed-upon design standards for existing historic districts. They do align with existing district design standards and may be adopted by property owners within each district if desired. 4 I own a property in a National Register district. How will the Historic Design Standards affect me? If adopted by City Council, the Historic Design Standards will clarify existing recommended guidelines for changes to …
Historic Design Standards City of Austin Adopted _________ Welcome In Austin, historic preservation encourages the preservation of historic buildings, structures, sites, and districts; promotes awareness of cultural and architectural heritage; and helps shape a more sustainable, equitable, and livable place. As the city grows, these Historic Design Standards will help property owners, designers, builders, and historic preservation professionals make consistent decisions about how to meet present-day needs while stewarding local built heritage and achieving larger goals. Clear standards and graphics show good practices, as well as changes to avoid. The Historic Design Standards were created by a working group representing property owners, designers, developers, advocates, and the Historic Landmark Commission. The working group sought to develop locally relevant standards grounded in national preservation principles. Many members are laypeople, and readability was a key concern: the standards needed to be understandable by property owners and neighbors considering whether to apply for historic district designation, as well as by architects. A Maintenance and Preservation chapter and illustrated glossary support those who want to learn more about architectural elements and materials. The Historic Design Standards promote long-term sustainability by supporting the retention and repair of existing buildings, which keep tons of old-growth wood and other material in use and out of the landfill. They also support sustainable solutions for making buildings more energy efficient now, from high-impact improvements like attic insulation and duct sealing to DIY changes such as weather-stripping around windows and doors. Historic Preservation Office staff are available to answer questions and provide feedback on proposed projects. Reach out to preservation@austintexas.gov or call (512) 974-3393. Left cover image: People looking out over Austin, ca. 1940s Acknowledgments Design Standards Working Group The Historic Landmark Commission created the Design Standards Working Group on September 24, 2018 to create a new set of historic design standards, with the goals of providing clear, user-friendly standards and guidelines for all historic property owners and of simplifying the historic district application process. This document is the product of the working group’s efforts and is modeled on the Preservation Austin design standards template produced through a community initiative in April 2011. David Carroll, AIA Urban Design Commission, preservation architect Janet Beinke Historic district property owner Cara Bertron Historic Preservation Office staff Madeline Clites Preservation consultant Angela Gaudette Historic Preservation Office staff Laura Keating Urban Design staff Marie Oehlerking-Read Texas Historical Commission staff (prev.) Misael Ramos Representative from potential …
November 13, 2020 Terri Myers, Chair City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission Re: Proposed Historic Design Standards Dear Ms. Myers, Preservation Austin exists to empower Austinites to shape a more inclusive, resilient, and meaningful community culture through preservation. We write today to respectfully support Austin's Historic Preservation Office's proposed Historic Design Standards. We commend the time-intensive and community-focused efforts of the working group and the Historic Preservation Office staff. We believe that the design standards will increase equity and accessibility in Austin’s local historic district application process. Preservation Austin has adopted Underrepresented Heritage as an FY21 Advocacy Priority. We see the citywide design standards as an encouragement to many groups who would not have the time or money to develop unique standards for their proposed district. We are optimistic the design standards will encourage new local district applications. At the same time, these design standards will streamline the Historic Landmark Commission process for city staff and advocates alike by providing clear and consistent standards. We believe this will create a more efficient and effective process for the benefit of all. We also believe the standards support the preservation of our city's diverse heritage, for the people of Austin, in a way that's compatible with increasing density. Preservation Austin knows how crucial density is for Austin's future and appreciate that the standards do not discourage density but rather recognizes that it can occur alongside preserving our historic neighborhoods. Preservation Austin encourages the Historic Landmark Commission to support the proposed Historic Design Standards. We know they will be an asset to our city for years to come. We again recognize the dedication that went into creating these standards and hope to see them adopted. Thank you for your service to the community, Clayton Bullock, President 1 of 1B-16
ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION DECEMBER 1, 2020 Historic preservation is a tool to steward change. Historic preservation is a tool to steward change. Design standards provide a clear, objective way to evaluate proposed changes. WHY HISTORIC DESIGN STANDARDS? 1. 2. Increase equity by reducing resources required for the historic district application. Increase predictability for property owners in potential districts. 3. Take a common-sense approach to design standards by recognizing underlying principles. WHY HISTORIC DESIGN STANDARDS? 4. Provide clearer standards for historic landmark owners and National Register district property owners. 5. Provide an educational tool for all historic property owners. 6. Provide consistent standards for project review by commissioners and staff. 7. Follow good practices in preservation. SECRETARY’S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET TO: LI-PDA CASE: C14-2020-0117 (Samsung Rezoning Tract 1 and 3-1) DISTRICT: 1 ZONING FROM: PUD Nature of the Request: The applicant is requesting to rezone the property to LI-PDA, Limited Industrial-Planned Development Area Combining District, zoning to create a new PDA area that will provide for the expansion of the Samsung Austin Semiconductor campus. Please see the Applicant Request Letter – Exhibit C. The applicant is proposing PDA conditions for this property that will mirror the uses, subdivision requirements and site development standards that were approved in the original Samsung PDA site through Ordinances No. 960229-L and 20190509-031. Please see the Proposed PDA Subdivision and Site Development Standards – Exhibit D. ADDRESS: 3215 East Parmer Lane SITE AREA: Tract 1: 56.42 acres (2,457,655.2 sq. ft.) Tract 3-1: 39.28 acres (1,711,036.8 sq. ft.) 95.70 acres (4,168,692.0 sq. ft.) PROPERTY OWNER: Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC AGENT: Drenner Group, PC (Dave Anderson) CASE MANAGER: Sherri Sirwaitis (512-974-3057, sherri.sirwaitis@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends LI-PDA, Limited Industrial-Planned Development Area Combining District, zoning with conditions. ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: December 1, 2020 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: December 10, 2020 ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES: C14-2020-0117 2 An amendment to the Pioneer Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD) will be deferred. A condition of the approval for this case is a PUD amendment will be initiated to address the removal of this land area from the Pioneer Crossing PUD. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: This property in question comprised of two undeveloped tracts of land located on the southeast corner of East Parmer Lane and Samsung Boulevard. This 95.98 acre site is to the east of the Samsung Semiconductor industrial campus across Samsung Boulevard. The original Samsung Austin Semiconductor plant is a 300-acre tract of land that fronts onto East Parmer Lane. The property was zoned LI-PDA in zoning case C14-96-0007 through Ordinance No. 960229-L. Surrounding land uses in the Pioneer Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD) include undeveloped tracts of land directly to the north, south, east and west. There is a single-family residential neighborhood further to the south (Pioneer East). In this request, the applicant is requesting to remove land from the Pioneer Crossing PUD to rezone it to LI-PDA to create a new Planned Development Area (PDA) that will consistent with the zoning of the existing Samsung campus. The proposed PDA agreement will reflect almost the same conditions approved on the current Samsung Austin …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET TO: LI-PDA CASE: C14-2020-0118 (Samsung Rezoning Tracts 2 and 3) DISTRICT: 1 ZONING FROM: PUD Nature of the Request: The applicant is requesting to rezone the property to LI-PDA, Limited Industrial-Planned Development Area Combining District, zoning to create a new PDA area that will provide for the expansion of the Samsung Austin Semiconductor campus. Please see the Applicant Request Letter – Exhibit C. The applicant is proposing PDA conditions for this property that will mirror the uses, subdivision requirements and site development standards that were approved in the original Samsung PDA site through Ordinances No. 960229-L and 20190509-031. Please see the Proposed PDA Subdivision and Site Development Standards – Exhibit D. ADDRESS: 2001 - 2821 East Parmer Lane and 11600 - 12161 Samsung Boulevard SITE AREA: Tract 2: 27.80 acres (1,210,968 sq. ft.) Tract 3: 81.45 acres (3,547,962 sq. ft.) 109.25 acres (4,758,930 sq. ft.) PROPERTY OWNER: Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC AGENT: Drenner Group, PC (Dave Anderson) CASE MANAGER: Sherri Sirwaitis (512-974-3057, sherri.sirwaitis@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends LI-PDA, Limited Industrial-Planned Development Area Combining District, zoning with conditions. ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: December 1, 2020 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: December 10, 2020 ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES: C14-2020-0118 2 An amendment to the Pioneer Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD) will be deferred. A condition of the approval for this case is a PUD amendment will be initiated to address the removal of this land area from the Pioneer Crossing PUD. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The property in question is two undeveloped tracts of land, consisting of 109.237 acres, which abut the Samsung Semiconductor industrial campus to the west and south. The original Samsung Austin Semiconductor plant is a 300-acre tract of land that fronts onto East Parmer Lane. The property was zoned LI-PDA in zoning case C14-96-0007 through Ordinance No. 960229-L. Surrounding land uses in the Pioneer Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD) include undeveloped tracts of land directly to the north, south, east and west. There are single-family residential neighborhoods further to the south (Pioneer East) and west (Pioneer Crossing West). In this request, the applicant is requesting to remove land from the Pioneer Crossing PUD to rezone it to LI-PDA to create a new Planned Development Area (PDA) that will consistent with the zoning of the existing Samsung campus. The proposed PDA agreement will reflect almost the same conditions approved on the current Samsung Austin Semiconductor site …
November 30, 2020 Memorandum for Zoning and Platting Commission Chair Kiolbassa and Members (Jolene.Kiolbassa@austintexas.gov) Subject: Against Staff Basis of Recommendation—No Bus for Samsung Rezoning (B-08: C14-2020-0117, B-09: C14-2020-0118) 1. Background: FM 734/Parmer Lane is car-centric. June 8, 2020 Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization reallocated $633M to I-35 Capital Express Central, eliminating 3 Northeast MetroRapid Lines (Parmer, Dessau, Decker)—funding, in part, Oak Hill (southwest least minorities) with no discourse. $7.1B Prop A disregarded 425-acre East Village development; 5,500 apartment units within 2 miles of Samsung—Imagine Austin Dessau/Parmer Neighborhood Center (p. A-31). “The county's most expensive agreement is with Samsung; Travis County has rebated $65 million in property taxes to Samsung since 2009,” KUT reported July 31, 2019. In light of $65M tax rebate, request Samsung provide Uber/Lyft cards to expand jobs to transit minorities. 2. Opposition - No Transit (Route 392/Dessau: 3-mile Samsung walk): “Staff recommends LI-PDA, Limited Industrial-Planned Development Area Combining District, zoning with conditions” (p. 2). However, I disagree with “BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: 2. . . . The staff recommends the applicant’s request for LI-PDA zoning as the property is located on an arterial roadway, East Parmer Lane, which is a designated Activity Corridor as shown on the Imagine Austin Growth Concept Map” (p. 2). Backup - B-08 (C14-2020-0117 (Samsung Rezoning Tract 1).pdf (16.3MB) Backup - B-09 (C14-2020-0118 (Samsung Rezoning Tracts 2 and 3).pdf (15.3MB) a. Connectivity: Staff Report accurately notes, “The mobility and connectivity options in this area are below average” (p. 12). b. Imagine Austin (Adopted June 15, 2012; Amended 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018) definition: “Activity corridors . . . To improve mobility along an activity corridor, new and redevelopment should reduce per capita car use and increase walking, bicycling, and transit use. Intensity of land use should correspond to the availability of quality transit, public space, and walkable destinations. Site design should use building arrangement and open space to reduce walking distance to transit and destinations, achieve safety and comfort, and draw people outdoors” (p. 106). [Note: Unsafe = No sidewalk: Dessau to Samsung] LUT P20. Locate industry, warehousing, logistics, manufacturing, and other freight intensive uses in proximity to adequate transportation and utility infrastructure. (See also E P16) (p. 136/348) [p. 120] E P16. Expand connectivity within the Texas Triangle (Dallas/Fort Worth, Austin, San Antonio, and Houston) in order to facilitate movement of ideas, goods, and people for economic prosperity. (See also …
Zoning and Platting Commission Q & A Report B-1 Question Commissioner Denkler / Response Staff: 1) Does the applicant have permission to use Akin High School's connection to the proposed Brezza Lane? RESPONSE: Once the connection to Brezza Lane is constructed and accepted by the City, it will be a public right-of-way and available to all. 2) Please provide a little more info on the road closure meetings. How many people participated, what kinds of comments were made, etc. RESPONSE: Watershed Protection Department (WPD) staff held a public meeting on June 18, 2019 where City Staff presented the road closure to the general public. The meeting was also provided as a webinar. WPD staff who attended the meeting relayed that there were about 20-30 people who physically attended the meeting and 46 who logged onto the webinar. Most of the questions were regarding the issues with the closure of the road. The overwhelming sentiment from the meeting was to not close the road at least until the Brezza Lane connection is made and the signal improvements are made at the intersection of Old San Antonio Road and FM 1626. B-2 – B-5 Question Commissioner King / Response Staff: 1. What is the height limit under CH zoning? RESPONSE: In CH zoning, increases in height is related to a reduction in impervious cover (LDC 25-2-582 – Commercial Highway (CH) District Regulations). For building up to 60 feet in height, the maximum impervious cover is 85%. For a building up to 80 feet, the maximum impervious cover is 80%. For a building up to 100 feet, the maximum impervious cover is 75%. For a building up to 110 feet, the maximum impervious cover is 70%. Finally, for a building up to 120 feet, the maximum impervious cover is 65%. Note: Watershed regulations for impervious cover may be more restrictive than those cited above and would take precedence. The Gemini Tract sites are located in a Suburban watershed which limits impervious cover to 65% for commercial uses. 2. What hospital uses are allowed under CH zoning but not allowed under the current CS-MU zoning? RESPONSE: The hospital (general) use (includes overnight stays) is a conditional use in both CS and CH zoning. The hospital (limited) use is permitted in both the CH and CS-MU zoning districts. 3. As I understand, this site is exempt from transportation impact analysis (TIA). RESPONSE: Correct. If this …
Historic Landmark Commission Special Meeting of the Architectural Review Committee November 30, 2020, 3:00 p.m. Version en español a continuacion The Architectural Review Committee meeting will be held Monday, November 30, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. with social distancing modifications. THIS MEETING IS LIMITED IN DURATION. PLEASE MAKE PRESENTATIONS AS BRIEF AS POSSIBLE (Consider 7-8 minutes) SO THAT ALL APPLICANTS MAY HAVE THE CHANCE TO PRESENT TO AND RECEIVE INPUT FROM THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS. This is a virtual meeting; no in-person input will be allowed. Public comments will be allowed by phone. All participants must register in advance (no later than 12:00 noon on Sunday, November 1, 2020 to be notified of the call-in number and other instructions). If you have submitted a request, you will receive either an email or phone call on the day To listen to or participate in the Architectural Review Committee meeting, all persons must: Call or email the board liaison at preservation@austintexas.gov or (512) 974-1264 no later than 12:00 noon on Sunday, November 29, 2020. Provide your name and telephone number or email address. of the meeting with the telephone number and call-in instructions. You must call in at least 15 minutes prior to the meeting start in order to listen (no later than 2:45 p.m.). Late callers will not be accepted. Applicants will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov no later than 12:00 noon on Sunday, November 29. This information will be provided to commissioners in advance of the meeting. Reunión especial del Historic Landmark Commission, Architectural Review Committee FECHA de la reunion: 30 Noviembre, 2020 a las tres de la tarde (3:00 p.m.) La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Esta reunion tiene una duracion limitada. Haga todas las presentaciones lo mas breves possible (7-8 minutos) para que todos los solicitantes tengan la oportunidad de presenter y recibir comentarios de los miembros del comite. Gracias. Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (29 Noviembre 2020 antes del mediodía). Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, todas personas deben: • Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en 512-974-3393 o preservation@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía 29 Noviembre 2020 (el día antes de la reunión). La …
Historic Landmark Commission Special Meeting of the Architectural Review Committee November 30, 2020, 3:00 p.m. Version en español a continuacion The Architectural Review Committee meeting will be held Monday, November 30, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. with social distancing modifications. THIS MEETING IS LIMITED IN DURATION. PLEASE MAKE PRESENTATIONS AS BRIEF AS POSSIBLE (Consider 6-7 minutes) SO THAT ALL APPLICANTS MAY HAVE THE CHANCE TO PRESENT TO AND RECEIVE INPUT FROM THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS. This is a virtual meeting; no in-person input will be allowed. Public comments will be allowed by phone. All participants must register in advance (no later than 12:00 noon on Sunday, November 29, 2020 to be notified of the call-in number and other instructions). If you have submitted a request, you will receive either an email or phone call on the day To listen to or participate in the Architectural Review Committee meeting, all persons must: Call or email the board liaison at preservation@austintexas.gov or (512) 974-1264 no later than 12:00 noon on Sunday, November 29, 2020. Provide your name and telephone number or email address. of the meeting with the telephone number and call-in instructions. You must call in at least 15 minutes prior to the meeting start in order to listen (no later than 2:45 p.m.). Late callers will not be accepted. Applicants will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov no later than 12:00 noon on Sunday, November 29. This information will be provided to commissioners in advance of the meeting. Reunión especial del Historic Landmark Commission, Architectural Review Committee FECHA de la reunion: 30 Noviembre, 2020 a las tres de la tarde (3:00 p.m.) La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Esta reunion tiene una duracion limitada. Haga todas las presentaciones lo mas breves possible (6-7 minutos) para que todos los solicitantes tengan la oportunidad de presenter y recibir comentarios de los miembros del comite. Gracias. Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (29 Noviembre 2020 antes del mediodía). Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, todas personas deben: • Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en 512-974-3393 o preservation@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía 29 Noviembre 2020 (el día antes de la reunión). La …
Versión en español a continuación. URBAN RENEWAL BOARD OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN November 30, 2020 Urban Renewal Board of the City of Austin meeting to be held November 30, 2020, with Social Distancing Modifications. Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance by Sunday, November 29, 2020, by NOON. All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the November 30, 2020, Urban Renewal Board of the City of Austin Meeting, residents must: •Call or email the board liaison at 512-974-3458 or laura.keating@austintexas.gov no later than noon, (the day before the meeting). The information required is the speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, and a telephone number or email address. •Once a request to speak has been called in or emailed to the board liaison, residents will receive either an email or phone call providing the telephone number to call on the day of the scheduled meeting. •Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. •Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. •Handouts or other information may be emailed to laura.keating@austintexas.gov by Noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. Reunión del Urban Renewal Board of the City of Austin FECHA de la reunion (November 30, 2020) La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todo s los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (November 29, 2020 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los residentes deben: junta en 512-974-3458 or • Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de laura.keating@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). La información requerida es el nombre del orador, los números de artículo sobre los que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutrales, y un número de teléfono o dirección de correo electrónico. la • Una vez que se haya llamado o enviado por correo electrónico una solicitud para hablar al …
URBAN RENEWAL BOARD OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN Monday, October 19, 2020 VIA VIDEOCONFERENCING 5:30 – 9:30 p.m. MINUTES AGENDA CALL TO ORDER Chair Escobar called the Board Meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. Board Members in Attendance: Manuel Escobar, Chair Danielle Skidmore Amit Motwani Jacqueline Watson Nathaniel Bradford Board Members Absent: Darrell Pierce Staff in Attendance: Erica Leak Sandra Harkins Lisa Rodriguez Mark Walters Laura Keating PURPOSE: The Board of Commissioners primary responsibility is to oversee the implementation and compliance of approved Urban Renewal Plans that are adopted by the Austin City Council. An Urban Renewal Plan's primary purpose is to eliminate slum and blighting influence within a designated area of the city. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. Approval of the September 21, 2020, Special Called Meeting Minutes The motion to approve the September 21, 2020, special called meeting minutes was made by Commissioner Watson, seconded by Commissioner Skidmore; the item was approved on a 5-0-0 vote. 2. NEW BUSINESS 1 a. Discussion and possible action regarding 2021 Meeting Calendar The motion to approve the 2021 Meeting Calendar was made by Commissioner Watson, seconded by Bradford; the item was approved on a 5- 0-0 vote. b. Election of URB Chair and Vice Chair to serve the 2020 – 2021 term of o ffice, November 1, 2020 through October 31, 2021. The nomination by Chair Escobar, seconded by Commissioner Watson for Chair Escobar to serve as Chair for the 2020-2021 term of office, Nov ember 1, 2020 through October 31, 2021 was approved on a 5-0-0 vote. The nomination by Chair Escobar, seconded by Commissioner Watson for Commissioner Pierce to serve as Vice-Chair for the 2020-2021 term of office, November 1, 2020 through October 31, 2021 was approved on a 5-0-0 vote. The nomination by Chair Escobar, seconded by Commissioner Bradford for Commissioner Watson to serve as Vice-Chair for the 2020-2021 term of office, in the event that Commissioner Pierce declines to serve as Vice-Chair was approved on a 5-0-0 vote. 3. OLD BUSINESS a. Discussion and possible action on recommended modifications to the East 11th and 12th Street Urban Renewal Plan. Discussion occurred. No action was taken. b. Discussion and possible action on recommended modifications to the East 11 t h Street Neighborhood Conservation Combining District (NCCD) to parallel the structure of the current East 12th Street NCCD. Discussion occurred. No action was taken. c. Discussion and possible action …
UPDATED OCTOBER 19, 2020 DRAFT URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE EAST 11TH AND 12TH STREETS URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AREA 1484775.v1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Boundary Description 2. History 2.1 Accomplishments 3. Vision, Purpose, Authority and Scope 4. Redevelopment Strategy 5. Applicability of NCCD Controls 6. Land Use 7. Relocation of Persons, Businesses (including individuals and families, business concerns, and others displaced by the project) 8. Duration and Modification Procedures of URP Appendices: Appendix A: East 11th and 12th Street Urban Renewal Plan; Amendments Appendix B: East 11th Street and East 12th Street Neighborhood Conservation Combining District (NCCDs); Amendments Abbreviations commonly used in the document: URP – Urban Renewal Plan URA-Urban Renewal Agency ARA – Austin Revitalization Authority Note: Some of the tables and figures from the original 1999 Urban Renewal Plan have been deleted or modified, as they were no longer accurate or relevant. The original plan is available at this website: http://www.austintexas.gov/department/urban-renewal-plan 1484775.v1 EAST 11 TH & 12TH STREETS URBAN RENEWAL PLAN (URP) 1. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION The formal boundaries of the East 11th and 12th Streets Urban Renewal Area are set forth in the documents listed in Appendix A and the ordinance approving this URP. In general, the boundaries are: The East 11th Street Corridor, including properties within one-half block of the north frontage of East 11th Street and south frontage of Juniper Street, from Branch Street on the west to Navasota Street on the east; and properties within one-half block of the south frontage of East 11th, from San Marcos Street on the west to Navasota Street on the east. The East 12th Street Corridor, including properties within one-half block of the north frontage of East 12th and between the IH-35 Northbound Frontage Road on the west to Poquito Street to the east; and properties within one-half block of the south frontage of East 12th Street, from Branch Street on the west to Poquito Street on the east. 2. HISTORY This East 11th and 12th Streets Urban Renewal Plan (“URP" also referred to as the East 11th and 12th Streets Community Redevelopment Plan or “CRP”), is a comprehensive document defining the official public policy guidelines of the City of Austin (City) for driving public and private redevelopment actions within the East 11th and 12th Streets Urban Renewal Area in compliance with Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 374. The URP’s original conceptual approaches and strategies for the entire Central …
ORDINANCE NO. __________________ WALTERS, MARK 3/10/2020 DRAFT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 910620-C, REZONING AND CHANGING THE ZONING MAP TO AMEND THE EAST 11TH STREET NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION COMBINING DISTRICT (NCCD) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG THE NORTHBOUND FRONTAGE ROAD OF IH-35 BETWEEN THE NORTHERN ALLEY OF THE 800-900 BLOCK OF EAST 7TH STREET AND EAST 12TH STREET; THE WEST SIDE OF THE 800-1000 BLOCKS OF SAN MARCOS STREET; EAST 11TH STREET FROM IH-35 TO NAVASOTA STREET; ALONG ROSEWOOD AVENUE FROM 11TH STREET TO APPROXIMATELY ANGELINA STREET; ALONG A SEGMENT OF THE 1200 BLOCK OF NAVASOTA STREET; AND ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF A SEGMENT OF THE 1500 AND 1600 BLOCK OF SAN BERNARD STREET IN THE CENTRAL EAST AUSTIN NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN AREA, AND TO MODIFY CERTAIN BASE DISTRICTS IN THE NCCD. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN: PART 1. The zoning map established by Section 25-2-191 of the City Code is amended to amend the East 11th Street neighborhood conservation combining district (NCCD), identified in the attached Exhibit "A" incorporated into this ordinance, and to add a NCCD to each base zoning district within the District on the property described in Zoning Case No. C14-XX-XXXX, on file at the Planning and Zoning Department, as follows: Approximately XX acres of land consisting of four subdistricts, identified in the attached Exhibit “B” incorporated into this ordinance, lying within the Central East Austin Neighborhood Plan Area, more particularly described as follows, a. Subdistrict 1, sites located along and oriented to East 11th Street between Branch Street and San Marcos Street on the west, and extending to Navasota Street on the east; b. Subdistrict 2, sites oriented to Juniper Street between Branch Street and Lydia Street, and including parcels with frontages on Curve Street and Waller Street; c. Subdistrict 3, sites located along IH-35 and bounded by Embassy Drive, San Marcos Street, and Branch Street on the east, East 12th Street on the north, the Northbound Frontage Road of IH-35 on the west and the alley of the 800-900 block of East 7th street on the south; and d. Subdistrict 4, sites generally oriented toward the 1200 and 1300 blocks of Rosewood Avenue but excluding 1326 and 1319 Rosewood Avenue, the east side of the 1100 block of Navasota Street, the 1100-1200 blocks of San Bernard Street but excluding 1159, 1161, 1164, and 1165 San Bernard Street. This …
ORDINANCE NO. __________________ AN ORDINANCE AMENDINDING THE EAST 12™ STREET NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION (NCCD) COMBINING DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED GENERALLY ALONG EAST 12TH STREET FROM IH-35 AND BRANCH STREET TO POQUITO STREET IN THE CENTRAL EAST AUSTIN, ROSEWOOD, AND CHESTNUT NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN AREAS; AND TO MODIFY CERTAIN BASE DISTRICTS IN THE NCCD. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN: PART 1. The zoning map established by Section 25-2-191 of the City Code is amended to establish the East 12th Street neighborhood conservation (NCCD) combining district and to add a NCCD to each base zoning district within the property and to change the base zoning districts on 18 tracts of land on the property described in Zoning Case No. C14-XX-XXXX, on file at the Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Department, as follows: Approximately 23 acres of land, more or less, consisting of four subdistricts, lying within the Central East Austin, Rosewood, and Chestnut neighborhood plan areas, more particularly described and identified in the attached Exhibit "A" incorporated into this ordinance, and as follows, (the "Property"), a. Subdistrict 1, also known as Tract One, being the area on the northside of East 12th Street from IH-35 to Olander Street. b. Subdistrict 2, also known as Tracts 2-10, the east portion of Tract 15, and Tract 18, being the areas along the northside of East 12' Street from Olander Street to Poquito Street, 1425 East 12th Street, the southside of East 12th Street between Chicon Street and Poquito Street c. Subdistrict 2a, also known as Tracts 16-17, being the area on the southside of East 12th Street from Leona Comal Street to Chicon Street. d. Subdistrict 3, also known as Tracts 11-14 and Tract 15 excluding 1425 East 12th Street, being the areas along the southside of East 12th Street between Branch Street and Comal Street, not including 1425 East 12th Street; generally known as the East 12th Street neighborhood conservation-neighborhood plan combining district, locally known as the area bounded by East 12th street from IH-35 and Branch Street to Poquito Street, in the City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, and generally identified in the map attached as Exhibit "D". PART 2. The base zoning of the 18 tracts shown in the chart below are changed from family residence- neighborhood conservation combining district-neighborhood plan (SF-3-NCCD-NP) combining district, multifamily residence medium density-neighborhood conservation combining district neighborhood plan (MF-3-NCCD-NP) combining district, …
H I S T O R I C P R E S E R V A T I O N O F F I C E | P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | N O V E M B E R 3 0 , 2 0 2 0 | 1 O F 5 9 F I E S T A G A R D E N S 2101 JESSE E. SEGOVIA ST. | AUSTIN, TEXAS 78702FIESTA GARDENS T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S P R O J E C T G O A L S S I T E H I S T O R Y 3 5 8 1 1 1 7 S T A K E H O L D E R I N P U T C H A R A C T E R D E F I N I N G F E A T U R E S E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S 2 8 R E H A B I L I T A T I O N S T R A T E G I E S H I S T O R I C P R E S E R V A T I O N O F F I C E | P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | N O V E M B E R 3 0 , 2 0 2 0 | 2 O F 5 9 O P E N H O U S E A G E N D A | 2101 JESSE E. SEGOVIA ST. | AUSTIN, TEXAS 78702FIESTA GARDENS P R O J E C T G O A L S H I S T O R I C P R E S E R V A T I O N O F F I C E | P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R …
