HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JUNE 28, 2021 2021-058680 PR HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 4006 1/2 AVENUE B B.3– 1 Construct a two-story rear addition to a one-story contributing building. Replace existing windows and doors. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURE STANDARDS FOR REVIEW 1) Partially demolish rear of residence. 2) Construct a two-story addition. The proposed addition is set back approximately 15’ from the front wall of the house. It has a compound gabled roof and horizontal wood siding. Single and paired 1:1 wood windows are regularly spaced throughout. 3) Replace existing non-original windows with 1:1s. Replace non-original door. The existing building is a one-story Craftsman bungalow with horizontal wood siding, 4:6 paired and single windows, a partial-width porch supported by tapered columns, and a gabled roof with exposed rafter tails and triangular knee braces at eaves. The Hyde Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1.2 Respect the historic style of existing structures and retain their historic features, including character-defining elements and building scale. 1.3 Respect each contributing structure as an example of the architecture of its time. Do not make alterations that have no historic basis, such as the addition of gingerbread trim to a 1920s bungalow. Do not give an existing contributing structure a “historic” appearance it never had. 1.4 Repair deteriorated historic features and architectural elements. The proposed addition retains some aspects of the building’s historic style but changes its scale. It is differentiated in scale and detailing, as the design has been amended per Architectural Review Committee feedback to remove inappropriate decorative details and add a horizontal trim between old and new construction. The proposed cladding will match the existing building’s horizontal siding. 3.1 Retain the historic facade of a house in terms of door and window placement and exterior wall materials. Repair damaged or deteriorated exterior wall materials where reasonably possible. If replacement of exterior wall materials is necessary, choose a material identical in size, profile, and appearance as the historic material. 3.2 Do not enlarge, alter, or relocate single doorways on the façade of the house. Retain and repair an original entry door. In cases where replacement of an original entry door is required, or where the house does not have the original door, choose a replacement door that is compatible in terms of design and appearance …
Design modifications Original submission Current design Changes from initial submission: 1) Dormers removed, 2) Second floor reduced by setback, 3) addition roof pitch reduced resulting in approximately 2.5 foot peak height reduction 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 9
4006 ½ Avenue B Addition Materials for Architectural Review Committee 6/12/2021 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 1 Overview The home is a contributing structure in the Hyde Park historic district. A previous addition to the rear of the structure was built around 1991. No original doors or windows remain. Plans were designed by local architect Jim Dunaway, who designed many homes and additions in Hyde Park during his career. Jim lived next door at 4006 Avenue B. 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 2 Plans updated Dormers removed North portion of second-floor reduced by two feet following feedback from zoning. Changes are reflected in the rendered views in this document and updated elevations. 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 3 Street view Existing Proposed 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 4 Oblique View Existing Proposed *Next house on North side is >50 feet away 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 5 Street views with dormers 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 6 Street views no dormers 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 7 Elevation updates Updated Dormers removed Second floor reduced Original submission 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 8 4006 1/2 Avenue B Supplemental Materials for Proposed Addition S1 4413 Avenue C Built: 1927 Second floor added in 2011 S2 4113 Avenue D Built: 1932 Second floor added in 2019 S3 4303 Speedway Built: 1920 Added second floor in 2010 S4 4103 Avenue A Built: 1924 Second floor added in 2003 S5 3913 Avenue F Built: 1906 Second floor added in 2008 S6 4207 Avenue H Built: 1925 Second floor added in 2017 S7 RDC building envelope ' 2 3 45 degrees ' 5 1 elev. 610.25' highest elev. in RDC Parcel "A" elev. 609.875' average natural grade REVISED FRONT ELEVATION Scale if printed on 11x17 sheet: 1/8" = 1' - 0" Scale if printed on 24x36 sheet: 1/4" = 1' - 0" RDC building envelope in Parcel "A" RDC building envelope in Parcel "B" 45 degrees ' 5 1 elev. 610.25' highest elev. in RDC Parcel "A" elev. 609.875' average natural grade elev. 610.25' highest elev. in RDC Parcel "B" ' 0 1 top of existing wall plate wood frame windows finish floor elev. 612.0' " 4 / 1 4 - ' 8 1 elev. 610.25' highest elev. in RDC Parcel "A" elev. 609.875' average natural grade L2 Plate 45 degrees ' 5 1 REVISED REAR ELEVATION Scale if printed on 11x17 sheet: 1/8" = …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JUNE 28, 2021 C14H-2009-0020; HR-2021-084049 DR. RALPH AND ANNA CLOUD HOUSE 1718 SUMMIT VIEW B.7 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Demolish and replace existing rear building; construct detached carport; and limited addition or replacement of windows and doors. 1) Demolish existing guest house addition and construct a new addition. The addition consists of a two-story, side-gabled guest house across the rear of the property, linked to the main house through a flat-roofed hyphen and an entryway that fills in an inset corner at the rear of the house. The guest house and entryway additions are clad in vertical wood siding in a dark finish. A wood deck will extend between the historic house and guest house along its length, terminating on the Hartford Rd. (west) end in raised planters and steps to the yard. 2) Construct a detached carport east of and 2’ behind the front corner of the house, at the end of the existing driveway. The carport will have steel supports and a flat roof that aligns with the beam at the top of the adjacent enclosed porch. 3) Selectively replace and reconfigure window and door openings. On the east elevation, at a previously enclosed porch, paired doors and two windows will be replaced with a single door and window. Also on the east elevation, paired doors will be replaced with a single window, and paired windows replaced with paired doors. Two new windows and a door will be added on the rear wall. On the west elevation, two windows will be added to an existing pair of mulled windows. 4) Install landscape improvements, including in-place replacement of the driveway, walkways, and swimming pool, and installation of a gate in the side fence. The driveway will be brick and will be within the same general footprint as the existing. The front walkway will consist of concrete pavers within a gravel band, leading to a brick walkway with steps, and a walkway from Hartford Rd. to the side entrance will be concrete pavers. A walkway from the back of the carport to the addition will be gravel. Work also entails removal of other site pathways, landscape edging, and fencing that divides the side yard. ARCHITECTURE One-and-a half story rectangular-plan side-gabled stucco-covered frame house in an eclectic Tudor Revival style with a front-gabled entry with an arched doorway and a “catslide” …
MATT GARCIA MATT GARCIA DESIGN DESIGN 1010-B WEST LYNN ST. 1010-B WEST LYNN ST. AUSTIN, T E X A S 78703 AUSTIN, T E X A S 78703 TELEPHONE 210.861.0978 TELEPHONE 210.861.0978 www.mattgarciadesign.com www.mattgarciadesign.com PROJECT PROJECT SUMMIT VIEW SUMMIT VIEW RESIDENCE RESIDENCE 1718 SUMMIT VIEW 1718 SUMMIT VIEW AUSTIN, TEXAS 78703 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78703 W E I V E R C R O T S H I I 0 2 0 2 8 2 E N U J SHEET/REVISION INDEX KEY NEW SHEET REVISED SHEET NO CHANGE SHEET REMOVED 1.1 - SITE PLAN 1.2 - EXISTING BASEMENT PLAN 1.3 - EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1.4 - EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1.5 - EXISTING ROOF PLAN 1.6 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1.7 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1.8 - ROOF PLAN 2.1 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2.2 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2.3 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2.4 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DATE DATE JUNE 28 2021 JUNE 28 2021 ELEV- 577' ELEV- 577' 1625 24" PECAN P.P. ELEV- 576' ELEV- 575' S 27°24'06" W 159.65' 1693 38" PECAN 1661 14" PECAN 7 7 5 5 7 6 5' SIDE SETBACK 24'-0" HIGH ADJ. GRADE - 576.0' 5 7 6 575 WALKWAY (GRAVEL) PLANTER 574 574 E V O B A F O O R T R O P R A C F O E N L D E H S A D I NEW CARPORT 480 SF " 0 - ' 0 2 5 7 5 5 7 4 DRIVEWAY (BRICK) 3 7 5 2 7 5 E T A G 1204 25" PECAN NEW ADDITION FFE - 576.1' DASHED LINE OF ROOF ABOVE EXISTING TWO STORY RESIDENCE FFE - 576.1' DASHED LINE OF EXISTNG HOUSE PLANTER ENTRY WALKWAY (BRICK) ENTRY WALKWAY (CONCRETE W/ GRAVEL SURROUND) 571 K C A B T E S T N O R F ' 5 2 R E T N A L P AC AC AC POOL PUMP CREPE MYRTLE MTN LAURELS RAMP DRAIN LOW ADJ. GRADE - 571.0' 5 7 0 573 DECK (WOOD) DASHED LINE OF ROOF ABOVE DECK (WOOD) PLANTER EXISTING TREE #1467 (29" PECAN) TO BE REMOVED, PER ARBORIST ASSESSMENT OF DISEASE. APPROVED PERMIT FOR REMOVAL, 2021-023068 TP 1 7 5 UP Y A W K L A W Y R T N E ) E T E R C N O C ( GATE WALKWAY/PATIO (SOLID SURFACE) NEW POOL (W/ BEACH + HOT TUB) ELEV- …
1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO CHANGES TO BE MADE AT FRONT ELEVATION OF HOUSE. NEW PROPOSED CARPORT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN AREA OF RED BOX SHOWN. CARPORT WILL BE SET BACK FROM THE FRONT FACADE OF THE HOUSE BY 2’-0”. EXISTING STONE PAVER ENTRY WALKWAY AND STEPS TO BE REPLACED. NEW PLANTINGS THROUGHOUT THE FRONT YARD. LARGE FRONT LAWN TO REMAIN. SOUTH ELEVATION 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO CHANGES TO BE MADE AT FRONT ELEVATION OF HOUSE. NEW PROPOSED CARPORT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN AREA OF RED BOX SHOWN. CARPORT WILL BE SET BACK FROM THE FRONT FACADE OF THE HOUSE BY 2’-0”. EXISTING STONE PAVER ENTRY WALKWAY, STEPS, AND PLANTER WALLS TO BE REPLACED. NEW PLANTINGS THROUGHOUT THE FRONT YARD. LARGE FRONT LAWN TO REMAIN. SOUTH ELEVATION 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO CHANGES TO BE MADE AT FRONT ELEVATION OF HOUSE. NEW PROPOSED CARPORT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN AREA OF RED BOX SHOWN. CARPORT WILL BE SET BACK FROM THE FRONT FACADE OF THE HOUSE BY 2’-0”. EXISTING STONE PAVER ENTRY WALKWAY AND STEPS TO BE REPLACED. NEW PLANTINGS THROUGHOUT THE FRONT YARD. LARGE FRONT LAWN TO REMAIN. SOUTH ELEVATION 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO CHANGES TO BE MADE AT FRONT ELEVATION OF HOUSE. NEW PROPOSED CARPORT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN AREA OF RED BOX SHOWN. CARPORT WILL BE SET BACK FROM THE FRONT FACADE OF THE HOUSE BY 2’-0”. SOUTH ELEVATION 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO CHANGES TO BE MADE AT FRONT ELEVATION OF HOUSE. NEW PROPOSED CARPORT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN AREA OF LARGE RED BOX SHOWN. CARPORT WILL BE SET BACK FROM THE FRONT FACADE OF THE HOUSE BY 2’-0”. SIDE ENTRY DOORS AND WINDOWS TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW DOOR AND WINDOW IN MATCHING STYLE OF EXISTING HOUSE. (WINDOWS AND DOORS PROPOSED TO BE REPLACED ARE NOT ORIGINAL TO THE HOUSE.) SOUTH + EAST ELEVATION 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO CHANGES TO BE MADE AT FRONT ELEVATION OF HOUSE. NEW PROPOSED CARPORT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN AREA OF RED BOX SHOWN. CARPORT WILL BE SET BACK FROM THE FRONT FACADE OF THE HOUSE BY 2’-0”. EXISTING STONE PAVER ENTRY WALKWAY AND STEPS TO BE REPLACED. NEW PLANTINGS THROUGHOUT THE FRONT YARD. LARGE FRONT LAWN TO REMAIN. SOUTH ELEVATION 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW SITE PHOTOGRAPHS CORNER STREET …
1718 SUMMIT VIEW DR. RALPH AND ANNA CLOUD HOUSE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 28TH, 2021 1 2 0 2 t h g i r y p o C 8 2 7 8 7 2 X T , 0 5 6 0 n i t s 1 0 u A 1 . o , m 0 o N 0 c 4 . m c e n r i F t i i e u g g n S , b . i y d e w v v w l r B w u a S ● n d n 0 e e 0 s H 4 n 0 e s i u - c 9 i L o 7 L 8 S t - 2 L . s 1 E c e 5 P n I , W : l B e T E 1 0 T G 1 B 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW SCOPE OF WORK TO INCLUDE THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING REAR STRUCTURE, ADDED TO THE PROPERTY IN 1983, AND REPLACED WITH A NEW TWO-STORY ADDITION LINKED TO THE MAIN HOUSE WITH A ONE-STORY “HYPHEN”; ADDITION OF A NEW DETACHED CARPORT, LOCATED AT THE END OF THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY; THE ADDITION/REPLACEMENT OF A SE- LECT FEW WINDOWS AND DOORS AT EXISTING HOUSE. ADDITIONALLY, THERE ARE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED THAT INCLUDE: NEW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL REPLACEMENT, REMOVAL OF FRONT YARD WALKWAYS AND PLANTERS TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW SIMPLIFIED WALKWAYS AND PLANTINGS, A NEW POOL TO REMAIN LOCATED IN THE WEST SIDE YARD, AND OVERALL SIMPLIFICATION AND “CLEAN UP” OF EXISTING HARDSCAPE ON THE SIDE AND REAR YARDS OF THE PROPERTY. THE LARGE FRONT YARD WILL BE MAINTAINED. EXISTING SURVEY 1 HIGH ADJ. GRADE - 576.0' 577 O H E E H O P.P. 5 7 5 O H T O H T HIGH ADJ. GRADE - 576.0' E H O E H O O H E 577 5 7 5 S 6 2 ° 3 4 ' 3 7 " E 9 6 . 8 6 ' E H O CO CO E H O AC O H T O H T K C A B T E S R A E R ' 0 1 2 7 5 CO CO AC K C A B T E S R A E R ' 0 1 1 7 5 2 7 5 S 6 2 ° …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JUNE 28, 2021 HR-2021-084547 ROGERS WASHINGTON HOLY CROSS HISTORIC DISTRICT 2401 GIVENS AVENUE B.9 – 1 PROPOSAL Replace windows at front and rear of contributing house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Replace 2 aluminum slider windows at front elevation. Proposed replacements are aluminum-clad vinyl-wood composite material with screens to match existing. 2) Replace 1 aluminum window at rear elevation. Proposed replacement is aluminum-clad vinyl-wood composite material with screen to match existing. ARCHITECTURE STANDARDS FOR REVIEW One-story Transitional Ranch house clad in brick with side-gabled roof, built-in planters, sliding and clerestory windows, and deep overhangs at eaves. The Rogers Washington Holy Cross Historic District Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 4.5.1 Do not enlarge, move, or enclose historic window openings on protected facades. Do not create new window openings on protected façades. It may be appropriate to restore original window openings that have been enclosed. 4.5.2 Repair historic windows, surrounds, and elements rather than replacing them. If replacement is necessary due to severe deterioration or damage, or to meet a whole-house energy standard along with other energy-efficiency measures, the replacement shall match the historic window size, profile, appearance, window pane number and configuration, and other design characteristics. The relationship between the replacement windows, the window surrounds, and the screens (if present) shall match the original. 4.5.3 Do not install vinyl-clad wood windows or vinyl-sash windows. 4.5.4 Muntins, the strip of wood or metal separating and holding panes of glass in a window, must match the profile of the original window with either true divided lights or dimensional muntins placed on the outside of the glass. 4.5.5 Replacement glazing shall be clear. The application of clear ultraviolet (UV) film to window glazing is the least costly option for reducing heat gain from sunlight and may be an acceptable addition to window glass. The proposed project does not move, enlarge, or otherwise alter window openings. The replacements at the building’s protected façade match the original existing windows in profile, size, appearance, and configuration. The replacement at the rear matches the existing window. Proposed replacement windows are aluminum-clad composite with stainless steel tracks; only vinyl and vinyl-clad wood is prohibited by the standards. All windows are operable, and all proposed new glazing is clear. The project meets the applicable standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the …
These two windows are sliders and will be replaced. Line #100-1 on Estimate Rear Slider to be replaced-Line 400-1 on Estimate Master BR Slider- #400-1 on Estimate 30 yr old addition (Office) , double-hung windows may be replaced.. New framing for Garden Door,-in-swing, New siding on exterior. Wall Heating/ AC unit to be replaced. Kitchen Sliders -#100-1 on Estimate
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JUNE 28, 2021 GF-2021-060230 CLARKSVILLE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1805 WATERSTON AVENUE C.1 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1952 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story side-gabled house with partial-width gabled porch, 2:2:2 picture window, board-and-batten siding, and attached carport. The house at 1805 Waterston Avenue was built around 1952 for Kelly Louis and Johnnie Mary Jackson Meador. Kelly Meador taught vocational studies at the Texas State Blind, Deaf, and Orphan School (later the Texas State School for the Deaf). A pastor’s son, Meador was an active member of the Metropolitan AME congregation. The Meadors were both Tillotson College alumni and contributed to the United Negro College Fund as fundraising committee members. They also operated the Economy Radio and TV Service, a repair shop, around 1959. STAFF COMMENTS The building contributes to the Clarksville National Register Historic District according to a 2018 historic resource survey. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building does not appear to convey architectural significance. b. Historical association. The property is associated with Texas School for the Deaf teacher Kelly Louis Meador. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, then relocation, but release the demolition permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. New construction at this address must be reviewed by the Historic Landmark Commission prior to demolition permit release. LOCATION MAP C.1 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos C.1 – 3 C.1 – 4 Realtor.com, 2021 Occupancy History City Directory Research, April 2021 1959 1957 1955 Kelly L. and Johnnie M. Meador, owners Economy Radio & TV Service Kelly L. Meador, owner Teacher, State Blind Deaf & Orphan School Kelly L. and Johnnie …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JUNE 28, 2021 HR-2021-083636 WILLOW-SPENCE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 902 SPENCE STREET C.10 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a two-story rear addition to a one-story frame house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS The existing house is a one-story, rectangular-plan, pyramidal-roofed-roof frame house with a partial-width inset porch. The applicant proposes to construct a two-story, pyramidal-roof rear addition with a combination of vertical metal panels and horizontal wood siding and a composition shingle roof. The addition will have an inset balcony on the back of the structure; it will be supported on steel posts. The Willow-Spence National Register Historic District does not have specific design guidelines for new additions to contributing buildings, but the City has developed a uniform set of design guidelines for projects such as this: RA1.1 Locate additions to the rear and sides of historic buildings to minimize visual impact. The project complies. RA1.3 If an addition adds a story to the historic building, set it back from the front wall to minimize visual impact. The project complies. RA1.5: Minimize the loss of historic fabric by connecting additions to the existing building through the least possible invasive location and means. Staff recommends consideration of this standard to minimize the loss of historic fabric. RA2.1 Design an addition to complement the scale and massing of the building, including height. The addition must appear subordinate to the historic building. The proposed addition is two stories on a one-story house but complements the scale and massing of the existing house. RA2.2 Minimize the appearance of the addition from the street faced by the historic building’s front wall. The project complies. RA3.1 Design additions to be compatible with and differentiated from the historic building, if they are visible from the street. Design proportions and patterns such as window-to-wall area ratios, floor-to-floor heights, fenestration patterns, and bay divisions to increase compatibility. The proposed addition uses the form of the existing house as a guide but then uses a blank front wall which is out of character with the contributing buildings n the neighborhood and district. RA3.2 No particular architectural style is required for addition design. Designs in both traditional and contemporary styles can successfully achieve compatibility and differentiation with historic buildings. The proposed addition is compatible in its style with the existing building, but the use of vertical metal panels is at odds with the …
INDEX OF DRAWINGS NOTE: All drawings are drawn for compliasnce with the 2015 IRC and City of Austin Amendments Architectural Drawings: Cover Sheet Site Survey McMansion Site Plan Existing Demo Floor Plan Renovated First Floor Plan & General Notes New Second Floor Plan & Door and Window Schedules North and South Exterior Elevations East and West Exterior Elevations Electrical Floor Plans 1st and 2nd Floors and Roof Plan Interior Elevations Interior Elevations & Wall Section Structural Drawings: Structural General Notes Foundation Plan 2nd Floor & Lower Roof Framing Plans Roof Framing Plan Structural Details Structural Details Wind Brace Plan First Floor Wind Brace Plan Second Floor A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 3/22/21 n o i t i d d A & n o i t a v o n e R 2 0 7 8 7 s a x e T n i t s u A t e e r t S e c n e p S 2 0 9 A0 Average Point of Mid Highest Sloped Roof " 8 / 3 9 - ' 3 2 " 0 - ' 5 1 " 2 / 1 7 - ' 8 i t h g e H e t a P g n i t s x E l i Tent Setback Lines Typical 30 Year Roof Shingles 4 in 12 Pitch Plate Height Vertical Metal Siding Panels - Second Floor Addition Beyond Second Floor Line e s u o H g n i t s x E i " 0 - ' 9 " 4 / 3 4 - ' 0 1 " 0 - ' 2 3 " 0 - ' 5 1 102.66' FFE 100.9' High Point Tent 1 100.9' High Point Tent 1 100.85' Average Natural Grade Existing Single Story House South Front Elevation Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" Tent Setback Lines Composition Roof Shingles - Typ. 4 in 12 Pitch Plate Height 4 5 . 0 0 ° " 0 - ' 9 Second Floor Line 3'-6" WI Railing " 6 - ' 3 " 4 / 3 4 - ' 1 Plate Height " 0 - ' 9 " 0 - ' 5 1 101.3' High Point Tent 2 102.66' FFE 100.85' Average Natural Grade North Rear Elevation Scale: 1/8" = 1-0" Average Point of Mid-Highest Sloped Roof 117 …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JUNE 28, 2021 HR-2021-082850 WEST LINE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1415 W. 10TH STREET C.11 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Demolish ca. 1939 noncontributing secondary apartment. Construct new building, detached cabana, and garage. 1) Demolish existing noncontributing building. 2) Construct a new primary building. The proposed new construction is two and one-half stories in height. It is set back approximately 134’ from W. 10th Street, atop the relative location of the existing garage apartment building. It is clad in a Dekton-brand prefabricated masonry composite paneling system, with glass handrails, painted-steel accents, a curved secondary façade, and single-pane fixed windows with irregular placement and dimensions at all elevations. The compound roofline features multiple materials and pitches, including shallow hipped metal, flat, and flat with “green” roofing. 3) Construct a two-story garage. The garage is attached to the main building by an enclosed glass walkway at the second floor and is set back approximately 100’ from W. 10th Street. It is clad in prefabricated masonry composite panels and sited in front of the main residence. 4) Construct a one-story cabana at the rear of the lot. It is clad in prefabricated masonry composite panels and sited behind the main residence. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register Historic Districts The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1.1 Set back a new primary building from the street in line with nearby historic buildings. An appropriate setback may be calculated with the following: a. The setback of one adjacent contributing historic building; or b. The median of contributing historic buildings on the same block. This method must be used if contributing buildings on the block have a variety of setbacks. 1.2 Locate a new building to maintain the rhythm of contributing buildings on the street. 1.3 Locate accessory buildings in a way that follows the historic location and setback patterns of similar buildings on the block or in the district. Garage apartments, detached garages, and other accessory buildings are typically located at the rear of the lot, behind and to the side of the front building. The proposed main building is sited at the rough location of the existing noncontributing building, set back approximately 134’ from W. 10th Street. …
PROJECT INFORMATION SITE NOTES GENERAL NOTES PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH ATTACHED GARAGE, BASEMENT, DETACHED GUEST HOUSE, AND ADJACENT POOL. ZONING: NEIGHBORHOOD: SUBDIVISION: SF-3NP W.A.N.G. WEED SUBDIVISION FLOODPLAIN: NOT LOCATED IN 100 YR FLOODPLAIN PER COA GIS 1. MINIMUM SETBACKS: FRONT YARD: 25'; SIDE YARD: 5'; REAR YARD: 10' LANDSCAPING: THERE ARE PROTECTED TREES ON THE LOT. PARKING: (2) TWO REQUIRED FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING OCCUPANCY: OWNER OCCUPIED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE MAX BUILDING HEIGHT: 32' PER MCMANSION ORDINANCE APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES: 2015 IRC, 2015 IECC, 2011 NEC, 2012 IFC, 2012 UMC, 2012 UPC, TAS, AND LOCAL AMENDMENTS TREES TO BE SAVED SHALL BE PROTECTED BY FENCING BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. NO EQUIPMENT OR MATERIAL SHALL BE OPERATED OR STORED WITHIN THE FENCED-IN AREA. FENCES SHALL BE AT THE DRIP LINE AND COMPLETELY SURROUND THE TREE OR CLUSTER OF TREES. NO BURNING OF DEBRIS, CLEANING FLUIDS, CONCRETE SPILLS, ETC. WILL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THESE AREAS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXACT LOCATION OF STRUCTURES, AND RELATED STRUCTURES ON LOT ACCORDING TO THE SET OF DRAWINGS. 3. ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS MUST BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY ARCHITECT IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE DRAWINGS. 1. AT NO TIME ARE CHANGES TO THE CONSTRUCTION METHODS, MATERIALS, DETAILS, SPECIFICATIONS, GENERAL NOTES OR SCHEDULES, OR DELETION OF ANY REQUIREMENT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS ACCEPTABLE WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE ARCHITECT AND CLIENT. TO OBTAIN PERMISSION - PRICING, RELEVANT DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS MUST BE PROVIDED. 2. ALL PROPOSALS SHALL TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION ALL SITE & CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS AFFECTING WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT. 3. COORDINATE MECHANICAL PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL DIVISIONS WITH OTHER TRADES AFFECTING OR AFFECTED BY SAME. 4. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE STAGING AREAS, SEE PROPOSED STAGING PLAN FOR COA MANDATED RESTRICTIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTING THE PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS TO BE OF THE HIGHEST INDUSTRY STANDARDS. THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITH THE INTENT OF MEETING OR EXCEEDING THE MINIMUM REQUIRED STANDARDS. SHOULD THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS DISAGREE WITH THEMSELVES, THE GREATER QUALITY OR GREATER QUANTITY SHALL BE PERFORMED OR FURNISHED. 7. NOTICE TO ALL SUBCONTRACTORS: IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO BID YOUR SCOPE OF WORK USING THE COMPLETE SET OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE FACT THAT SOMETHING WAS NOT INDICATED ON YOUR PORTION OF THE DRAWINGS WILL NOT …
Ed Richardson Contreras, Kalan Allen, Amber 1415 W 10th St | OWANA and Neighborhood Meeting Dates Summary Monday, June 21, 2021 12:49:02 PM From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: H Folks, Below is a summary of our outreach to both OWANA’s Zoning Committee and through that process to the adjacent neighbors to the project. We will also meet with them (OWANA) Thursday the 24th to give them an update. For context, our client’s father became sick after the second round of meetings (and eventually passed away early 2021) so the project was somewhat delayed as a result – hence the gap between the fall meetings and permitting in 2021. We will send the updated presentation on Thursday for distribution to HLC members. -9.24.2020: OWANA Zoning Committee Meeting: Ed Richardson | CRA presents existing site conditions and proposed design to OWANA Zoning Committee. - 10.13.2020: Meeting with Adjacent Neighbors: Ed Richardson | CRA meets all directly adjacent neighbors at 1415 W 10th to review proposed design. Topics included: - Reviewed Existing and Proposed Drainage on site with east neighbor. - Reviewed Height and Location of proposed structures. Reviewed what each neighbor with views into the lot could expect to see from their homes. - Discussed Fence Heights and Location. We will revisit the Fence and Fence Heights when project is closer to construction. We are open to a lower fence along 10thstreet. - Reviewed Second Floor Window Alignments: between the proposed structure and the existing home to the east. Clark Richardson field surveyed the window locations and mapped them on the survey and reviewed with property owner. There are no direct window alignments. - 10.22.2020: OWANA Zoning Committee Meeting II: Ed Richardson | CRA presented our responses to the comments / concerns from the previous meeting Shoring: The noise and disruption from potential shoring for the construction of the basement was a primary concern for neighbors. CRA recommends no driven piles be used for shoring and instead drilled piers be used in any temporary shoring required. The structural work for the shoring will be part of the means and methods for construction of the basement by the contractor and therefore while it will be engineered. The precise drawings will not be included in the architectural drawings. Street Façade: We’re proposing a specimen tree be added in front of the street façade complimenting the window located towards the west side of the façade …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JUNE 28, 2021 SB-2021-071307, 2021-071325 CONGRESS AVENUE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 111 CONGRESS AVENUE C.9 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Install two freestanding gateway signs adjacent to a non-historic building and plaza. The gateway signs for Fareground Eat + Drink will be located at the steps down to the sunken plaza of 111 Congress Ave. Sign A is near the corner of Congress Ave. and E. Cesar Chavez St. Sign B is along a diagonal sidewalk from the corner of Congress Ave. and E. 2nd St. Both signs will be 15’-3 7/8” tall. Their widths are based on the width of the stairs at each location. Sign A is 19’-4 ¾” wide, while Sign B is 26’-6 ¾” wide. The signs consist of reverse-lit channel letters mounted to 3” horizontal gold bars, which in turn are mounted to 8” black square posts. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The City of Austin’s Historic Sign Standards are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Number of signs. The Commission allows one sign per building, unless the building has multiple tenants; in this case, the Commission may allow one sign per façade module if the façade modules correspond to tenant spaces. The Commission may also allow one sign for each street frontage if the building is at an intersection. Sign types. The Commission may allow window signs, awning signs, projecting signs, and flush mounted signs for most commercial buildings. Freestanding signs are allowed for office and retail uses in historic residential buildings. Constructed in 1987, 111 Congress is a Late-Modernist office tower sited diagonally across the middle of the block to create a sunken plaza at the corner of Congress Ave. and Cesar Chavez St. The sign standards do not address this type of building or site, as public plazas in the Sixth Street and Congress Avenue historic districts are uncommon and are not historic in age. Further, the sign standards primarily address historic commercial buildings of a much more limited size and are not directly applicable to a building that occupies a full city block. The proposed gateway signs will be in addition to existing signage. This includes building-mounted signs for Wells Fargo Bank, primary building signage with a tenant directory along the sidewalk …
