REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MONDAY, May 11, 2026 AT 5:30 P.M. AUSTIN CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, ROOM 1001 301 WEST 2ND STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Elaine Ramirez at 512-974-2202 or email elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov. CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: ___Jeffery Bowen (Chair) ___Margaret Shahrestani (Vice-Chair) ___Haseeb Abdullah ___Thomas Ates ___Sameer S Birring ___ Jessica Cohen ___ Melissa Hawthorne ___Yung-ju Kim ___Blanca A Medina-Leal ___Brian Poteet ___Michael Von Ohlen ___Corry L Archer-Mcclellan (Alternate) ___Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 4 speakers signed up/register prior (no later than noon the day before the meeting) to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Board of Adjustment Regular meeting on April 13, 2026 On-Line Link: April 13, 2026 draft minutes PUBLIC HEARINGS Discussion and action on the following cases New sign case: 2. C16-2026-0005 Jim Wittliff for Alvin Momin 5001 Nuckols Crossing Road On-Line Link: ITEM02 ADV PACKET ; NO PRESENTATION The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-128 (Neighborhood Commercial Sign District Regulations (B) to allow from one (1) freestanding sign (maximum allowed), to adding one (1) additional freestanding sign (total of two (2)), in order to erect free-standing sign(s) for shopping center tenants in a Commercial Sign District, in a “LR-CO-NP”, Neighborhood Commercial – Combined Overlay – Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Southeast Combined Neighborhood). Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-128 Neighborhood Commercial Sign District Regulations (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) This section applies to a neighborhood commercial sign district. One freestanding sign is permitted on a lot. Wall signs are permitted. One flag for each curb cut is permitted. This subsection prescribes the maximum sign area. (1) For a freestanding sign, the total sign area for a lot may not exceed the lesser of: (a) …
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Monday, April 13, 2026 The BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT convened in a Regular meeting on Monday, April 13, 2026, at 301 West 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Madam Chair Jessica Cohen called the Board of Adjustment Meeting to order at 5:43 PM. Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance in-Person: Jessica Cohen-Chair, Melissa Hawthorne Vice-Chair, Haseeb Abdullah, Jeffery Bowen, Bianca A. Medina-Leal, Brian Poteet, Maggie Shahrestani, Michael Von Ohlen Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Tommy Ates, Sameer S Birring, Yung-ju Kim APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Board of Adjustment Regular meeting on March 9, 2026 On-Line Link: March 9, 2026 draft minutes The minutes from the meeting on March 9, 2026, were approved on Board member Michael Von Ohlen, Vice-chair Melissa Hawthorne second, Approved minutes with no objections. Discussion and action on the following cases Previous Postponed cases: 2. C15-2026-0003 Luke Caraway for Yair Cohen Hoshen 8506 & 8507 Walhill Cove On-Line Link: ITEM02 ADV PACKET ; PRESENTATION The applicant is requesting the following variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the interior yard setback from five feet (5 ft) (required) to one foot (1ft) (requested) in order to complete two residential structures in a “SF-3”, Single-Family zoning district. The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Michael Von Ohlen’s motion to approve as per drawing Item02/4 in advance packet, Vice Chair Melissa Hawthorne second on 11-0 votes; GRANTED AS PER DRAWING ITEM02/4 IN ADVANCE PACKET. 3. C15-2026-0006 Cole Stewart 4301 Manzanillo Drive On-Line Link: ITEM03 ADV PACKET PART1, PART2, PART3; PRESENTATION The applicant is requesting the following variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-899 (Fences as Accessory Uses) to increase the height from six feet (6 ft) (maximum allowed) to eight feet (8 ft.) (requested) along rear property line (southeast) and street side yard property line (northeast), in order to erect a fence in a “SF-2”, Single-Family zoning district. Note: The Land Development Code 25-2-899 Fences as Accessory Uses (A) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, a fence: (1) is permitted as an accessory use in any zoning district; and (2) must comply with the requirements of this section. (B) In this section: (1) an ornamental fence is a fence with an open design that has a ratio of solid material to open space of not more than one …
BOA SIGN REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C16-2026-0005 BOA DATE: Monday, May 11th, 2026 ADDRESS: 5001 Nuckols Crossing Rd OWNER: Alvin Momin COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 AGENT: Jim Wittliff ZONING: LR-CO-NP (Southeast Combined Neighborhood) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 93 BLK K SECOND AMENDED PLAT OF WILLIAMSON CREEK SUBD SEC 2 VARIANCE REQUEST: allow from one (1) freestanding sign (maximum allowed), adding one (1) additional freestanding sign (total of two (2) SUMMARY: erect free-standing sign(s) for shopping center tenants ISSUES: large size of tract ZONING LAND USES LR-CO-NP Site North MF-1-NP SF-2-NP South East MF-2-NP; SF-3-NP SF-2-NP; SF-6-NP West Neighborhood Commercial Multi-Family Single-Family Multi-Family; Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Neighborhoods Council Del Valle Community Coalition Del Valle Independent School District Dove Springs Proud Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Go Austin Vamos Austin 78744 Homeless Neighborhood Association Kensington Park Homeowners Assn Onion Creek Homeowners Assoc Overton Family Committee Southeast Combined Neighborhood Plan Contact Team ITEM02/1 April 27, 2026 Tamara Mitchell 5001 Nuckols Crossing Rd Austin TX, 78744 Property Description: LOT 93 BLK K SECOND AMENDED PLAT OF WILLIAMSON CREEK SUBD SEC 2 Re: C16-2026-0005 Dear Tamara, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from LDC, Section 25-10-128 at 5001 Nuckols Crossing Rd. Austin Energy does not oppose this request, provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance and Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applications expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Ashleigh Woolf, Project Assistant Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 4815 Mueller Blvd Austin, TX 78723 (512) 972-8400 ITEM02/2 ITEM02/3 ITEM02/4 ITEM02/5 ITEM02/6 E H T LONE STAR C E N T E R SOLD FINAL 2 Side View Sign SCALE: NTS 2 Side View Sign SCALE: NTS SIGN A QTY:1 FABRICATE AND INSTALL SIGN Top Body: • All aluminum construction, Finish: P1 • Logo & Copy Routed & backed with 3/16” 7328 White Acrylic • Illumination: Internal white LEDs • Address is V1 vinyl applied Multi- Tenant Cabinet: • All aluminum construction, Finish: P1 • …
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2026-0013 BOA DATE: Monday, May 11th, 2026 ADDRESS: 2713 Hemphill Park OWNER: CJ+BP 2713 Hemphill, LLC COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 AGENT: Michael R. McHone ZONING: MF-5-NCCD-ETOD-DBETOD-NP (NUNA) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N 25FT OF W 1/2 OF LOT 7 & W 1/2 OF LOT 8 BLK 13 OLT 13 DIV D WHITIS SUBD VARIANCE REQUEST: variance request from LDC, 25-2-492 lot size requirements to decrease minimum lot size from 8,000 square feet (required) to 7,771.41 square feet (requested) setback requirements for a front yard setback from 15 feet (required) to 5 feet (requested) and from North University Neighborhood Association NCCD Ord. No. 040826-58 PART 6 (7) Parking (g) to reduce on-site parking from 24 parking spaces (required) to 14 parking spaces (requested) SUMMARY: erect Multi-Family use ISSUES: lot size, lot configuration, substantial grade differential from front to back, and large utility easement across property Site ZONING MF-5-NCCD-ETOD- DBETOD-NP North MF-5-NCCD-ETOD- DBETOD-NP South MF-5-NCCD-ETOD- DBETOD-NP East MF-5-NCCD-ETOD- DBETOD-NP CS-V-NCCD-ETOD- DBETOD-NP West LAND USES Multi-Family-Equitable Transit-Oriented Development-Density Bonus-ETOD Multi-Family-Equitable Transit-Oriented Development-Density Bonus-ETOD Multi-Family-Equitable Transit-Oriented Development-Density Bonus-ETOD Multi-Family-Equitable Transit-Oriented Development-Density Bonus-ETOD General Commercial Services-Vertical Mixed- Use- Equitable Transit-Oriented Development- Density Bonus-ETOD NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Neighborhoods Council CANPAC (Central Austin Neigh Plan Area Committee) Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association North University Neighborhood Association North University Neighborhood Association Development Review Committee Preservation Austin University Area Partners ITEM03/1 April 30, 2026 Mike Mchone 2713 Hemphill Park Austin TX, 78705 Property Description: N 25FT OF W 1/2 OF LOT 7 & W 1/2 OF LOT 8 BLK 13 OLT 13 DIV D WHITIS SUBD Re: C15-2026-0013 Dear Mike, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance request from LDC Section North university neighborhood association (NCCD) subdistrict 17 at 2713 Hemphill. Austin Energy does not oppose the request, provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. All signage will need to stay out of Austin Energy easements and 5’ from existing underground electric lines. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions …
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2026-0014 BOA DATE: Monday, May 11th, 2026 ADDRESS: 2727 Exposition Blvd OWNER: Roger Plourde COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 AGENT: Dillon Tuttle ZONING: CS-NP (WANG) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 36-43 & PT OF LOTS 34-35 & 44 BLK 4 BROWN HERMAN ADDN VARIANCE REQUEST: LDC, Section 25-2-492 Site Development Regulations (D) from setback requirements for a front setback of 10 feet (required) to 3 feet (requested) SUMMARY: erect a raised deck for ZED’S Ice Cream ISSUES: elevation change between the public right-of-way and finished floor elevation ZONING LAND USES Site CS-NP North CS-NP South CS-NP East West UNZ SF-3-NP General Commercial Services General Commercial Services General Commercial Services Unzoned -State Owned Land Casis Elementary School NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Neighborhoods Council Central West Austin Neighborhood Plan Contact Team Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Preservation Austin Save Barton Creek Assn TNR – BCP Travis County Natural Resources West Austin Neighborhood Group ITEM04/1 April 27, 2026 Ms.. Amber Bissell 2727 Exposition Blvd Austin TX, 78703 Property Description: LOT 36-43 & PT OF LOTS 34-35 & 44 BLK 4 BROWN HERMAN ADDN Re: C15-2026-0014 Dear Amber, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance request from LDC Section 25-2-492(D) at 2727 Exposition Blvd. Austin Energy does not oppose the request, provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. All signage will need to stay out of Austin Energy easements and 5’ from existing underground electric lines. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Ashley Robinson, Planner III Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050 ITEM04/2 ITEM04/3 Portion of the City of Austin Land Development Code applicant is seeking a variance from: ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Section 2: Variance Findings The Board must determine the existence of, sufficiency of, and weight of evidence supporting the findings described below. Therefore, you must complete each of the applicable Findings Statements as part of …
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2026-0017 BOA DATE: Monday, May 11th, 2026 ADDRESS: 57 N IH-35 SVRD NB OWNER: Brian Copland COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3 AGENT: Michael R. McHone ZONING: GR-MU-CO-NP (East Cesar Chavez) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 0.0292AC OF LOT 1 BLK 2 OLT 54 & 55 DIV O ELM GROVE ADDN VARIANCE REQUEST: Land Development Code, Section 25-2-779 (Small Lot Single-Family use) from: (F) (1) lot size requirements to decrease minimum lot size from 1,800 square feet (required) to 1,493 square feet (requested) (F) (4) (c) (i) from setback requirements for a front yard setback from 10 feet (required) to 5 feet (requested) and Land Development Code, Section 25-2-735 (Festival Beach Subdistrict Regulations) (D)(1) from Impervious Coverage requirements to increase from 40% (maximum allowed) to 60% (requested) SUMMARY: erect a Single-Family residence ISSUES: irregularly shaped lot created by the condemnation by TXDOT for the expansion of IH-35 ZONING LAND USES GR-MU-CO-NP Site North SF-3-NP South LO-MU-CO-NP SF-3-NP East N IH-35 West Community Commercial – Mixed-Use Single-Family Limited Office – Mixed Use Single-Family Interstate Highway NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Neighborhoods Council Del Valle Community Coalition East Austin Conservancy East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Association East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Plan Contact Team East Town Lake Citizens Neighborhood Association El Concilio Mexican-American Neighborhoods Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Guadalupe Neighborhood Development Corporation Homeless Neighborhood Association Overton Family Committee Preservation Austin Tejano Town Waterloo Greenway ITEM05/1 April 27, 2026 Mike Mchone 57 N Ih 35 Svrd Nb Austin TX, 78702 Property Description: 0.0292AC OF LOT 1 BLK 2 OLT 54 & 55 DIV O ELM GROVE ADDN Re: C15-2026-0017 Dear Mike, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from LDC S25-2-779F1, F4, and LDC S25- 2-735D1 at address 57 N IH 35 SVRD NB. https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/land_development_code?nodeId=TIT25LADE_CH 25-2ZO_SUBCHAPTER_CUSDERE_ART1GEPR_S25-2-472BOADVAAU Austin Energy does not oppose this request. Provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance and Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code and OSHA requirements. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicants expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Ashleigh Woolf, …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM07 DATE: Monday April 13, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C15-2026-0010 ___Y____Thomas Ates (D1) ___Y____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ___Y____Jessica Cohen (D3) ___Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ___Y____Haseeb Abdullah (D6) ___Y____Sameer S Birring (D7) ___Y____Margaret Shahrestani (D8) ___Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ___Y____Jeffery L Bowen (M) ___-____Corry L Archer-mcclellan (Alternate) (M) ___-____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ___-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: David Anderson OWNER: Mark A Macaulay ADDRESS: 4219 1st Street VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-814 (Service Station Use) (3) to increase queue lanes from eight [8] vehicle queue lanes to twelve [12] vehicle queue lanes (requested) in order to erect a Service Station in a “CS-MU-NP ” Commercial Services-Mixed Use Neighborhood Plan (West Congress) zoning district. Note: 25-2-814 - SERVICE STATION USE. A service station use: (1) must be screened from the street by a building or a landscape buffer that includes shade trees; (2) may not have more than 16 fuel dispensers; and (3) may not have more than eight vehicle queue lanes. Source: Ord. 20060831-068; Ord. 20110804-008. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Michael Von Ohlen’s motion to approve with a condition that the heritage tree is preserved, Vice Chair Melissa Hawthorne second on 11-0 votes; GRANTED WITH A CONDITION THAT THE HERITAGE TREE IS PRESERVED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: compliance with the queue lane configuration illustrated in the TCM would prevent the site ITEM06/1 from functioning safely and efficiently as intended, the TCM illustration depicts a configuration that does not reflect modern fueling operations and would result in increased vehicular conflict points, reduced maneuverability and reduced visibility. 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: property is a subject to physical constraints due to configuration including lot, limited lot depth that prevents code required double stack configuration limited lot width which limits safe maneuverability and required residential compatibility buffer along the eastern portion of the site and required storm water detention and water quality infrastructure along the west and heritage tree which will be kept. (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: the combination of site constraints uniquely limits the design flexibility …
Reconsideration: 4219 S 1st Street Board of Adjustment Case # C15-2026-0010 May 11, 2026 1 ITEM06/1-PERMIT HOLDER PRESENTATION Board of Adjustment – Rules and Procedures: Reconsideration • Article V (Hearings and Decisions), Section F (Deliberation, Voting and Post-Hearing Procedures), Paragraph 4 specifies the rules applicable a reconsideration request: (a) Limited to one (1) reconsideration (b) Person must have original standing in the matter (c) Shall be filed in writing with the staff liaison within 10 days after the Board’s decision and (i) state how the Board erred in its determination (ii) state why the action should be reconsidered; and (iii) be supported by new or clarified evidence. • The only evidence provided by GeauxNu Holdings, LLC to request the reconsideration is an undated letter that: ▪ Repeats the claims read into the record on April 13, 2026 at the Board of Adjustment hearing; and ▪ References discussions held on the dais at the same meeting; and ▪ Does not present new or clarified evidence. • As such, this request for reconsideration does not meet the requirements of the Board’s Rules and Procedures Manual, Article V, Section F, Paragraph (4)(c)(iii), because no new or clarified evidence has been provided, and cannot be granted. 2 ITEM06/2-PERMIT HOLDER PRESENTATION Project Location 3 ITEM06/3-PERMIT HOLDER PRESENTATION Request for Variance • Applicant is requesting a variance from §25-2-814 • §25-2-814 states that a service station use: (1) must be screened from the street by a building or a landscape buffer that includes shade trees; (2) may not have more than 16 fuel dispensers; and (3) may not have more than eight vehicle queue lanes. • Applicant is proposing 12 vehicle queue lanes 4 ITEM06/4-PERMIT HOLDER PRESENTATION Reasonable Use On a site with almost one-quarter of its area uniquely constrained: • The Applicant cannot develop on more than 24% of the site, yet the request for a variance is reasonable in that it only includes 75% of the maximum number of fuel dispensers allowed on the site. • It is reasonable for the Applicant to propose a use that: • Is compliant with emergency vehicle access requirements; • Improves site circulation; • Reduces site congestion; • Improves sight lines; and • Reduces vehicle and pedestrian conflict points by up to 50%. • It is unreasonable to require a fuel dispenser configuration on a site that will not meet fire lane requirements due to the width of …
BOA Monthly Report July 2025-June 2026 APRIL 13, 2026 Granted 6 1. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the interior yard setback 2. 25-2-899 (Fences as Accessory Uses) to increase the height 3. 25-10-191 (Sign Setback Requirements), (F) to decrease the setback from street right-of-way, (F) (1) to increase height, (F) (2) to decrease clearance 4. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the interior yard setback 5. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the interior side yard setback 6. 25-2-814 (Service Station Use) (3) to increase queue lanes Postponed Withdrawn Denied 0 0 1 1. The appellant has filed an appeal challenging determinations by City staff in connection with approval of a building permit (Permit No. 2025-140201 PR) and related construction plans for proposed development of a three-unit residential use (Reconsideration) Discussion Items 5 APR 2026 Interpretations APR 2026 BAAP 0 new inquiries 0 (Added APR13# 2026) The deposition of the case items: Granted Postponed Withdrawn Denied Discussion Items 15 16 0 6 15 Board members absent: None (1 vacant alternate position) New Chair - Jeffery Bowen and New Vice Chair – Margaret (Maggie) Shahrestani MARCH 9, 2026 Granted 1 1. 25-10-129 (Downtown Sign District Regulations): (F) (2) (a) maximum sign area for a freestanding sign and (G) (1) to exceed sign height for a freestanding sign Postponed 2 1. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the interior yard setback 2. 25-2-899 (Fences as Accessory Uses) to increase the height Withdrawn Denied 0 3 1. 25-2-1176 (Site Development Regulations for Docks, Marinas, and Other Lakefront Uses) (A) (1) to increase the dock length 2. 25-2-1176 (Site Development Regulations for Docks, Marinas, and Other Lakefront Uses) (A) (1) to increase the dock length 3. The appellant has filed an appeal challenging determinations by City staff in connection with approval of a building permit (Permit No. 2025-140201 PR) and related construction plans for proposed development of a three-unit residential use Discussion Items 1 MAR 2026 Interpretations MAR 2026 BAAP 0 new inquiries 0 (Added MAR 9# 2026) The deposition of the case items: Granted Postponed Withdrawn Denied Discussion Items 9 16 0 5 10 Board members absent: Melissa Hawthorne Vice Chair, Tommy Ates, Suzanne Valentine (unavailable) (1 vacant alternate position) February 9, 2026 Meeting cancelled due to notification error January 12, 2026 Meeting cancelled due to technology upgrades …
ITEM04/1-LATE BACKUP -OPP 8 May 2026 Elaine Ramirez, Liaison Board of Adjustment City of Austin RE: C-15-2026-0014 2727 Exposition Boulevard Dear Board of Adjustment: The Board of Directors (BoD) of West Austin Neighborhood Group (WANG), after discussion, has voted electronically to oppose the above referenced variance request to reduce the LDC required setback from 10 feet to 3 feet in order to finish completion of an outside deck. The variance request for an expansion of the deck into the required setback is being done in conjunction with a request for a beer and wine serving license to also be granted to Zed’s Ice Cream, under an application by the property’s owners, a request that will require another waiver from the city because directly across the street from this proposal is Casis Elementary School. Substantial work has already been done on this proposed expansion including the removal of a ten-foot-wide asphalt driveway between Zed’s Ice Cream’s current deck and the 3- foot sidewalk that abuts the curb on Exposition Boulevard. After the unpermitted construction was begun early this year, a water line was severed resulting in a stop work order being issued. In the subsequent application process to correct these code violations, a site plan exemption was required to be filed by the applicant. In the review of the site plan exemption application, one of the reviewers commented that the construction proposed in the application appears to encroach on an existing fire lane. Reviewer comments also raised concerns about drainage. Cassis Village Shopping Center is a high functioning neighborhood commercial node. It contains a pharmacy, a grocery store, two clothing stores, a bank, a jeweler, a Starbucks coffee, an ice cream parlor and a small to-go food store. On-site parking is always tight, but is normally manageable except during school access/recess. If the variance request is granted so that the development proposal outlined in your packet is achieved, the expansion of the deck and the addition of food trailers, it is very foreseeable that the on-site parking will be overwhelmed. Going north along Exposition Boulevard at this edge of the center, the road drops and bends to the east resulting in a semi-blind hazard, a hazard compounded by a same-side driveway onto Exposition from the small office complex contiguous to the shopping center on the north. If the variance is granted, you would have a heavily used street, a three-foot sidewalk, …
- REGULAR MEETING OF THE AUSTIN-TRAVIS COUNTY FOOD POLICY BOARD MONDAY, MAY 11, 2026, AT 5:00 P.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, ROOM 1406 6310 WILHELMINO DELCO DRIVE, AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Austin-Travis County Food Policy Board may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Amanda Rohlich, (512) 974-1364, Amanda.Rohlich@austintexas.gov. CURRENT AUSTIN-TRAVIS COUNTY FOOD POLICY BOARD MEMBERS: Lisa Barden, Chair Andrea Abel Marissa Bell, Vice- Chair Beth Corbett Nitza Cuevas Kacey Hanson Seanna Marceaux Melody McClary Erin McDonald Natalie Poulos AGENDA CALL TO ORDER Board Member roll call and introduction of new and existing board members. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Austin-Travis County Food Policy Board Special Called Meeting on Monday, April 13, 2026. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing regarding Austin-Travis County Food Plan Implementation. Presentation by Edwin Marty, Food Policy Manager, Austin Climate Action & Resilience and Yaira Robinson, Assistant Director of Environmental Programs, Travis County. DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Presentation and discussion on how food access is experienced across Travis County, Central Texas Food Bank- Emily Foxman, setting the stage with the Travis County Food Access Community Needs Assessment Results Presentation and discussion on how food access is experienced across Travis County, Sustainable Food Center- Hannah Thornton & Amy Gallo Presentation and discussion on how food access is experienced across Travis County, ATX Free Fridge- Nitza Cuevas Presentation and discussion on how food access is experienced across Travis County, Central Texas Food Bank- Beth Corbett Presentation and discussion on how food access is experienced across Travis County, Meals on Wheels Central Texas- Seanna Marceaux Presentation and discussion on how food access is experienced across Travis County, Intergenerational Gardening Soul to Soul- Marva Overton & Genice H Presentation and discussion regarding the working group to expand access to nutritious foods through improvement to existing …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE AUSTIN-TRAVIS COUNTY FOOD POLICY BOARD MONDAY, MAY 11, 2026, AT 5:00 P.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, ROOM 1406 6310 WILHELMINO DELCO DRIVE, AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Austin-Travis County Food Policy Board may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Amanda Rohlich, (512) 974-1364, Amanda.Rohlich@austintexas.gov. CURRENT AUSTIN-TRAVIS COUNTY FOOD POLICY BOARD MEMBERS: Lisa Barden, Chair Andrea Abel Marissa Bell, Vice- Chair Beth Corbett Nitza Cuevas Kacey Hanson DISCUSSION ITEMS Seanna Marceaux Melody McClary Erin McDonald Natalie Poulos AGENDA ADDENDUM 15. Presentation and discussion regarding the working group to expand access to nutritious foods through improvement to existing materials and resources and explore alternate or expanded hours for existing resources. The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Amanda Rohlich and & Action Amanda.Rohlich@austintexas.gov, to request service or for additional information. Austin Climate Resilience, 974-1364 (512) at at For more information on the Austin-Travis County Food Policy Board, please contact Amanda Rohlich and & Austin Climate Amanda.Rohlich@austintexas.gov. Resilience, 974-1364 Action (512) at at
CTFB | Travis County Food Access CNA Travis County: Food Insecurity at a Glance • 18.0% of Travis County – over 235,000 residents – experience food insecurity o 61,300 are children o 33,100 are older adults • Disproportionately high food insecurity along the I-35 corridor, in the Eastern Crescent, and in rural corners of the county • Key CTFB initiatives in Travis County: • Supports over 260 charitable food programs • Home delivery, benefit assistance, Food Is Medicine, workforce development • Advocacy & food system planning Data Source: CTFB’s 2025 Food Access Convening Tool. CTFB | Travis County Food Access CNA Key Findings: Community Response Desire to enhance choice and dignity Strong preference for nutritious, culturally-relevant, & local options – yet often too expensive or far away Navigating tensions, coordination is key Rising needs, capacity constraints, and limited awareness of community resources Data Source: CNA neighbor survey Emphasis on tailored approaches: No “one-size-fits-all” model CTFB | Travis County Food Access CNA Strengthening both the “What” and the “How” Meeting neighbors where they are: Physically In places that are convenient, private, familiar, and trusted Culturally & Linguistically • Culturally-relevant foods • Multi-lingual materials & services • Clear, plain language & visuals Technologically No-tech, low-tech, and tech-savvy options In Time • Non-traditional hours • Consistent presence • Timely support Co-creation & co-ownership Peer-to-peer advocates & Socially • • community networks • • Building relationships and trust Centering dignity and choice CTFB | Travis County Food Access CNA From Research to Action Travis County Food Access CNA: For – and by – the community • Resource to help inform community-driven action • CTFB an ongoing partner to help dive into the report, identify how data can support coordination and evidence- based solutions, partnerships Examples from CTFB • Medically Tailored Meals • Expansion of: • Mobile FARMacy • School & college pantry programs • Home delivery • Culturally relevant foods grown at on-site farm • Regional Food System Council
CTFB | Child Nutrition CTFB Children’s Meal Programs • Afterschool Meals (CACFP) • 35 sites • Feeding Futures School Pantries • 15 sites (2 pending) • Summer Meals (SFSP) • 69 sites in 2026 • GOAL: 250,000 meals (+40%) • Nutrition Education • College Food Access • 18 sites CTFB | SFSP Summer Food Service Program in Travis County • School Districts and CBOs eligible to operate • Geographic restrictions • CTFB’s role = fill the gaps + supplement ISDs • Rural (non-congregate) vs. Urban (congregate) • Weekly frozen delivery vs. daily hot meals • 2026 Travis County Meal Sites • 41 Total locations • • • • • • Austin Parks & Rec El Buen Samaritano The Safe Alliance Foundation Communities African American Youth Harvest (Manor) Community Care • 2 Non-congregate - Del Valle, Creedmoor Call to Action for ATCFPB NOW: Help spread the word about SFSP sites! FUTURE: Help identify/expand locations for congregate meals!
Aligned with Austin-Travis County Food Plan Strategies 6.3, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.10, and 6.11 The food system works— until you can’t get to it. For our neighbors, food access happens at the front door, —or not at all. We operate where food, health, and aging systems don’t yet connect.
Keep Austin Fed’s Food Rescue How Does it Work? 1 https://www.keepaustinfed.org Be the Change How it happens This is just 1 of 4 pages of our weekly schedule. Our slowest day is Sundays with 19 scheduled food rescues. Our busiest day is Mondays with 36 scheduled food rescues. 2 https://www.keepaustinfed.org Be the Change Where it comes from and where it goes 3 https://www.keepaustinfed.org Be the Change
Austin-Travis County Food Plan ATCFPB May 2026 – Staff Update City of Austin Food Plan Updates City Staff Updates ● City staff sent City Council a Food Plan Update Memo on May 5th 2026 ● City staff have completed the annual update of the Food Plan Dashboard ● Travis County Commissioners Court proclamation celebrating the Milan Pact Award took place on April 28th. City Council member Fuentes also provided a City Proclamation. ● Funding from the MUFPP Award will be released via a RFA in fall 2026 Food Plan Implementation Convening ● The Implementation Collaborative is being led by WNT ● Public launch for the Collaborative is scheduled for June 2026 ○ Action: ■ Sign up with WNT to get on the listserve ■ Register for the June 5th meeting ■ Consider how the Collaboratives priorities could relate to the Food Policy Board’s Working Groups City of Austin 2026 Bond - Next Steps ● City Council released a Supplemental Bond Proposal ● May 4, 2026: BEATF finalized recommendations to the Mayor and City Council ○ Final recommendations (the $750M recommendation per the resolution & a $400M alternative scenario requested by a sub quorum of Council). ● May 8, 2026: City staff provided recommendations, integrating feasibility and funding considerations ● May 19, 2026: City Council work session to discuss proposed bond package ● August 6, 2026: City Council Meeting – consideration of an ordinance to call for a bond election and set ballot language ● November 3, 2026: Bond election Travis County Food Plan Updates Implementation Updates 1. Raising Travis County contract with Urban Roots approved 5/5/2026. a. $858,000 for farm-based out of school time programming for 2nd-12th grade children & youth Summers, weekends, school holidays, & school breaks 2026-2027 “Foster connection to land, food, and community” b. c. 2. Coyote Creek Conservation Easement - 1st working farm protected in perpetuity under conservation easement with Travis County for the primary purpose of food production a. b. Fully organic Includes habitat for native plant and animal communities, agricultural open space, water quality & quantity + scenic attributes Thank You! www.austintexas.gov/food /austinsustainability
Austin-Travis County Food Plan ATCFPB May 2026 – Staff Update City of Austin Food Plan Updates City Staff Updates ● City staff sent City Council a Food Plan Update Memo on May 5th 2026 ● City staff have completed the annual update of the Food Plan Dashboard ● Travis County Commissioners Court proclamation celebrating the Milan Pact Award took place on April 28th. City Council member Fuentes also provided a City Proclamation. ● Funding from the MUFPP Award will be released via a RFA in fall 2026 Food Plan Implementation Convening ● The Implementation Collaborative is being led by WNT ● Public launch for the Collaborative is scheduled for June 2026 ○ Action: ■ Sign up with WNT to get on the listserve ■ Register for the June 5th meeting ■ Consider how the Collaboratives priorities could relate to the Food Policy Board’s Working Groups City of Austin 2026 Bond - Next Steps ● City Council released a Supplemental Bond Proposal ● May 4, 2026: BEATF finalized recommendations to the Mayor and City Council ○ Final recommendations (the $750M recommendation per the resolution & a $400M alternative scenario requested by a sub quorum of Council). ● City staff preparing to provide recommendations, integrating feasibility and funding considerations ● May 19, 2026: City Council work session to discuss proposed bond package ● August 6, 2026: City Council Meeting – consideration of an ordinance to call for a bond election and set ballot language ● November 3, 2026: Bond election Travis County Food Plan Updates Implementation Updates 1. Raising Travis County contract with Urban Roots approved 5/5/2026. a. $858,000 for farm-based out of school time programming for 2nd-12th grade children & youth Summers, weekends, school holidays, & school breaks 2026-2027 “Foster connection to land, food, and community” b. c. 2. Coyote Creek Conservation Easement - 1st working farm protected in perpetuity under conservation easement with Travis County for the primary purpose of food production a. b. Fully organic Includes habitat for native plant and animal communities, agricultural open space, water quality & quantity + scenic attributes Thank You! www.austintexas.gov/food /austinsustainability
Sustainable Food Center Austin Travis County Food Policy Council Food Access Working Group H a n n a h T h o r n t o n , M S , R D S e n i o r D i r e c t o r o f F o o d A c c e s s a n d E d u c a t i o n May 2026
Rooted in mutual aid, not charity, ourmodel is simple: give what you can,take what you need. Everyonedeserves access to fresh food, noquestions asked. All of the ATX Free Friges are located outdoors, 100% free & open to the community 24/7 no sign up or permissions required “Whenever I sign up to stock & clean the Brentwood fridge, I see the immediateimpact of what I’m contributing to my neighborhood. Neighbors come up to askabout the collective and/or happily accept what food and toiletries I haveavailable. Those who are just passing by take a second to pick up and throw away apiece of garbage in a receptacle, kiddos ask out loud if they can bring somethingfor the pantry next time. Everyone says “thank you”. It’s a moment out of my weekwhere I’m connecting with my neighbors, and it’s incredible feeling.”"I live and work central — I like to cook and for my joboften end up w/ catering extras. I love being able toshare directly w/ folks who might be hungry and helpeliminate food waste.""I wouldn't be able to feed my family a lot oftimes without it. Very thankful. I have 8 kids +grandkids. It's very hard even with a job""This project has helped us feed our large family + we are sograteful for a way to share food with the community. Wehave food allergies + intolerances so food pantries will givefood we cannot eat or cook."
Alliance for African American Health in Central Texas Addressing the Food System through Intergenerational Gardening About Intergenerational Gardening Soul to Soul (IGS2S) What IGS2S is: A program that brings together youth, adults, and senior adults to establish and maintain vegetable gardens at the homes of older adults (aka seniors). Why IGS2S started: Recognition that there were older adults in the Black community who wanted vegetables gardens but did not have the physical capacity to do all the work themselves. How IGS2S works: Bridges the generations to grow food, share knowledge, and enhance community connections. Main components include: • Gardening Teams • Gardening Skill Lessons • Food Sovereignty Workshops • Financial Literacy Workshops IGS2S and the Food Plan We see ourselves in the Food Plan because AAAHCT: • Provides access to culturally relevant foods (seniors grow what • they want to eat) Increases food access and community connections through home gardens and sharing of produce • Reduces transportation and access barriers for foods grown at home • Serves seniors primarily in eastern Travis County, an area identified as having higher rates of food insecurity • Focuses on populations known to be vulnerable to food insecurity (i.e., Blacks, older adults, and children) • Teaches the concept of food sovereignty and the importance of having agency over foods you consume • Covers the cycle of growing produce, from planting to preparation Challenges and Opportunities Challenges: •No full -time program manager •Maintaining gardens for seniors once they graduate from the program •Youth recruitment •Transportation for youth •Consistent tracking of quantity of food grown •Funding Opportunities: •Scale program •Develop volunteer component to help seniors maintain their gardens after finishing the program •Create pathways for participants, especially youth, to engage in food system advocacy •Incorporate more cooking lessons into the IGS2S program •Continue to leverage the intersection between IGS2S and A Better Me to educate and engage more people in food system issues
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANIMAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MONDAY, MAY 11, 2026, AT 6:00 P.M. AUSTIN CITY HALL, ROOM 1101 301 WEST 2ND STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Animal Advisory Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Nekaybaw Watson at nekaybaw.watson@austintexas.gov or 512-974-2562. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Dr. Paige Nilson, Chair, D4 Jo Anne Norton, Vice Chair, D7 Jennifer Daniel, Parliamentarian, D6 Koby Ahmed, Mayor Beatriz Dulzaides, D2 Erin Ferguson, D8 Whitney Holt, D5 Sarah Huddelston, D9 David Loignon, D10 Nancy Nemer, Travis County Jules Maron, D3 Erin Van Landingham, D1 CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL AGENDA The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Animal Advisory Commission Regular meeting on April 13, 2026. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. 3. Staff briefing regarding monthly reports. Presentation by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services and Jason Garza, Assistant Director, Austin Animal Services. Staff briefing regarding Austin Animal Service’s Strategic Plan One Year Update. Presentation by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services. WORKING GROUP UPDATES 4. Update from Pet Friendly Housing Working Group regarding future recommendations. DICUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Approve the election of Chair. Approve the creation of a working group regarding policies related to off-leash dogs and the addition of members. Approve the creation of a Working group that creates incentives for city and county employees who foster an animal for Ausin Animal Shelter and the addition of members. Approve a Recommendation to Council regarding breed labeling policies in shelters. Approve a Recommendation to Council regarding Satellite Adoption. Approve an update to the membership of the Pet Friendly Housing Working Group. Approve an amendment to the Rules and Procedures regarding the order of public comment. Approve the appointment of a chair and committee members OR the dissolution of the No Kill subcommittee. FUTURE AGENDA …
ANIMAL ADVISORY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 13, 2026 The Animal Advisory Commission convened in a regular meeting on Monday, April 13, 2026, at Austin City Hall, Boards and Commissions Room 301 W 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Chair Nilson called the Animal Advisory Commission Meeting to order at 6:00 pm. Commissioners in Attendance: Dr. Paige Nilson, Chair, D4 Jennifer Daniel, D6 Beatriz Dulzaides, D2 Whitney Holt, D5 David Loignon, D10 Jules Maron, D3 Jo Anne Norton, Parliamentarian, D7 Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Erin Ferguson, D8 Nancy Nemer, Travis County Erin Van Landingham, D1 Commissioners Absent: Koby Ahmed, Mayor Ryan Clinton, Travis County Sarah Huddleston, D9 PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Rochelle Vickery – Requesting assistance for TNR volunteers via gas cards or gift cards to incentivize and reduce cost for volunteers Shelly Leibham – Dog overpopulation Julie Oliver – Data inconsistencies Lynette Cox – TNR process for community cats 1 Pat Valls-Trelles - Requesting assistance for TNR volunteers via gas cards or gift cards to incentivize and reduce cost for volunteers APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Animal Advisory Commission Regular Meeting on February 9, 2026. The minutes of March 9, 2026, regular meeting of the Animal Advisory Commission was approved during April 13, 2026, regular meeting on Commissioner Holt’s motion, Commissioner Dulzaides’ second on a 10-0 vote. Commissioners Ahmed, Clinton, and Huddleston were absent. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. 3. Staff briefing regarding monthly reports. Presentation by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services and Jason Garza, Assistant Director, Austin Animal Services. Presentation given by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services and Jason Garza, Assistant Director, Austin Animal Services. Staff briefing regarding deceased animal recovery services. Presentation by Amy Slagle, Assistant Director, Austin Resource Recovery. Presentation given by Amy Slagle, Assistant Director, Austin Resource Recovery. DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. Quarterly report from Animal Pets Alive! Presentation given by Mara Hartsell, Quality of Care Director, Austin Pets Alive! Presentation given by Mara Hartsell, Quality of Care Director, Austin Pets Alive! DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 5. 6. 7. Approve the reprioritization of the legislative priority list sent to the Austin Government Relations Office in February. Discussed. Approve a Recommendation to Council regarding pet friendly housing policies in public funded housing developments. The motion to approve a Recommendation to Council regarding pet friendly housing policies in public funded housing developments was approved on Commissioner Dulzaides’ motion, Commissioner Daniel’s second on a 10-0 vote. Commissioners …
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL ANIMAL ADVISORY COMMISSION 20260511-009 EXPANDING ACCESS TO PET ADOPTION THROUGH SATELLITE ADOPTION CENTERS WHEREAS, the City of Austin is committed to promoting animal welfare, supporting no-kill practices at Austin Animal Center, and achieving open intake; and WHEREAS, the Austin Animal Services Strategic Plan published in 2025 cites “Research, analyze, and explore additional locations to offer ASO services throughout the community (i.e., new satellite locations, secondary locations)” as Humane Care Goal 2C as well as “Expand ASO’s community presence, including increasing participation in local events, hosting new activities, and building partnerships” as Live Release Goal 3C; and WHEREAS, overcrowding in our shelter strains our resources, greatly hinders intake capacity, and creates barriers to timely adoption; and WHEREAS, increasing the visibility and accessibility of adoptable pets has been shown to significantly improve adoption rates and community engagement; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin owns and operates various public facilities and properties that may be suitable for temporary or permanent use as satellite adoption centers; and WHEREAS, Travis County contracts the City of Austin as part of their Animal Services Interlocal Agreement and also owns and operates various public facilities and properties that may be suitable for temporary or permanent use as satellite adoption centers; and WHEREAS, partnerships with local nonprofit organizations, as well as private businesses and community groups, could provide additional locations, volunteer staffing, and resources for off-site adoption efforts; and WHEREAS, establishing satellite adoption centers in high-traffic, community-centered locations throughout Austin and Travis County would reduce barriers to adoption, increase foot traffic exposure for animals, and enhance community participation in animal welfare initiatives; SO BE IT RESOLVED, that City staff across the appropriate departments shall research, and when appropriate, pilot satellite adoption center locations in Austin and Travis County; and SO BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Austin City Council shall offer full support in finding ways to reimagine the utilization of City owned or rented facilities so as to minimize the cost burden on residents and the Austin Animal Services Department in pursuit of these goals; and SO BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Travis County Commissioners Court shall take equal ownership and innovative steps in re-imagining the utilization of County owned and rented facilities in pursuit of these goals. Date of Approval: Motioned by: Seconded by: Vote: For: Against: Abstain: Recuse: Off Dais: Absent: Attest:
Reports and Updates Austin Animal Services | May 11, 2026 30-60-90 Day Horizon Plan Monica Dangler, Director Accomplishments on the Horizon! Completed action items in the past 30 days Clear the Crates! We sent out (adoptive, foster, or transfer) 103 animals in late April/early May with 60 being cats and 41 dogs, of which 29 were large breed adults! That is 29 more animals than last month during the same period which included 17 more large breed adult dogs! Process Improvement Continued work on pathways and transfer protocols Added extra day of surgery for animals who need extra support Programs and Socials Implemented Doggie Day Out Graduation for inaugural Enduring Service program dogs Improvements to shelter presence Added event calendar to the website Enhance Staffing Including VS positions in citywide market study to improve recruitment and retention 3 What does the horizon plan look like for May? 30 Community Engagement • Implement Marketing plan Enhance Staffing • Relaunch kennel cleaning study with adjusted Animal Care schedules • Continue recruiting for one lead and two technicians for Vet Services Process Improvement • Finalize dates for Maddie’s Fund Clinic Consultation for efficiency and S/N • Develop communication strategy for kennel space protocol on Socials • Procure Doobert a foster management tool • Procure Petzel a pet adoption follow up tool 4 What does the horizon plan look like for May? 30 Foster Program • Weekly foster posts • Identify 3 dogs for foster every day • Daily foster emails • Launch Dog Day Out to 4-5 days a week • Develop accountability plan Develop plan for reopening intake • Ongoing process • Work with APA on community-based solutions Social Presence • Update social messaging • Implement plan for socials 5 60 What does the horizon plan look like for May and June? Foster Program • Weekly foster posts • Identify 5 dogs for foster every day • Daily foster emails • Implement foster management tools • Offer Dog Day Out program 5 days a week Shelter and Process Improvements • Develop communication strategy for kennel space protocol on Socials • Implement Doobert foster management tool • Implement post-adoption tool Social Presence • Update engagement efforts • Implement Newsletter Develop plan for reopening intake • Reduce wait-time for intake 6 What does the horizon plan look like for May, June, and July? 90 Open Intake Planning • Open intake for all stray animals …
Recommendation to Council Animal Advisory Commission Recommendation 20260511-008 Regarding Breed Labeling Practices WHEREAS, accurate identification of a dog’s breed based solely on visual assessment has been widely shown to be unreliable without genetic testing even among animal welfare professionals and veterinary staff; and WHEREAS, labeling dogs as specific breeds—particularly “pit bull” or “pit bull mix”—based on appearance alone can misrepresent their true genetic makeup; and WHEREAS, many housing providers enforce breed restrictions that disproportionately impact dogs labeled as “pit bull” types, creating significant barriers for adopters seeking rental housing; and WHEREAS, such labeling practices can unintentionally reduce adoption rates and increase length of stay for affected dogs; and WHEREAS, a growing number of animal welfare organizations are adopting best practices that prioritize temperament, and individual characteristics over speculative breed identification including: 1. Orange County Animal Services (OCAS), an open intake municipal shelter in Florida, stopped using breed labels in 2014, and an independent peer-reviewed study of OCAS’s outcomes data found that removing breed labels improved adoption rates and decreased lengths of stay for all dog types, with the greatest impact for pit-bull-type dogs (https://www.ocnetpets.com/); 2. Williamson County Animal Services, an open intake municipal shelter in Texas, stopped using breed labels in 2017; most dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://www.wilcotx.gov/163/Animal-Shelter); 3. Memphis Animal Services, an open intake municipal shelter in Tennessee, stopped using breed labels in 2016; dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://memphisanimalservices.com/); 4. DeKalb County Animal Services and Fulton County Animal Services, two open intake municipal shelters in Georgia managed by LifeLine Animal Project, stopped using breed labels in 2017 (https://dekalbanimalservices.com/; https://fultonanimalservices.com/); 5. Fairfax County Animal Shelter, an open intake municipal shelter in Virginia, stopped using breed labels in 2015; dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/animalservices/); 6. Rochester Animal Services, a managed intake municipal shelter in New York, stopped using breed labels in 2017; dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://www.cityofrochester.gov/departments/department-recreation-and-human-serv ices-drhs/rochester-animal-services-ras); and WHEREAS, studies show that shifting to a “mixed breed” designation where lineage is unknown and distinct and undeniable breed traits are absent promotes fairness, reduces bias, and improves adoption outcomes for all dogs; and WHEREAS, the previous interim Director for Austin Animal Services had started the process of updating breed labeling practices to align with these goals; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Austin Animal Advisory Commission …
Resolution Regarding Breed Labeling Practices WHEREAS, accurate identification of a dog’s breed based solely on visual assessment has been widely shown to be unreliable without genetic testing even among animal welfare professionals and veterinary staff; and WHEREAS, labeling dogs as specific breeds—particularly “pit bull” or “pit bull mix”—based on appearance alone can misrepresent their true genetic makeup; and WHEREAS, many housing providers enforce breed restrictions that disproportionately impact dogs labeled as “pit bull” types, creating significant barriers for adopters seeking rental housing; and WHEREAS, such labeling practices can unintentionally reduce adoption rates and increase length of stay for affected dogs; and WHEREAS, a growing number of animal welfare organizations are adopting best practices that prioritize temperament, and individual characteristics over speculative breed identification including: 1. Orange County Animal Services (OCAS), an open intake municipal shelter in Florida, stopped using breed labels in 2014, and an independent peer-reviewed study of OCAS’s outcomes data found that removing breed labels improved adoption rates and decreased lengths of stay for all dog types, with the greatest impact for pit-bull-type dogs (https://www.ocnetpets.com/); 2. Williamson County Animal Services, an open intake municipal shelter in Texas, stopped using breed labels in 2017; most dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://www.wilcotx.gov/163/Animal-Shelter); 3. Memphis Animal Services, an open intake municipal shelter in Tennessee, stopped using breed labels in 2016; dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://memphisanimalservices.com/); 4. DeKalb County Animal Services and Fulton County Animal Services, two open intake municipal shelters in Georgia managed by LifeLine Animal Project, stopped using breed labels in 2017 (https://dekalbanimalservices.com/; https://fultonanimalservices.com/); 5. Fairfax County Animal Shelter, an open intake municipal shelter in Virginia, stopped using breed labels in 2015; dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/animalservices/); 6. Rochester Animal Services, a managed intake municipal shelter in New York, stopped using breed labels in 2017; dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://www.cityofrochester.gov/departments/department-recreation-and-human-serv ices-drhs/rochester-animal-services-ras); and WHEREAS, studies show that shifting to a “mixed breed” designation where lineage is unknown and distinct and undeniable breed traits are absent promotes fairness, reduces bias, and improves adoption outcomes for all dogs; and WHEREAS, the previous interim Director for Austin Animal Services had started the process of updating breed labeling practices to align with these goals; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Austin Animal Advisory Commission respectfully recommends City Council and the City …
A RESOLUTION OF THE AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL EXPANDING ACCESS TO PET ADOPTION THROUGH SATELLITE ADOPTION CENTERS WHEREAS, the City of Austin is committed to promoting animal welfare, supporting no-kill practices at Austin Animal Center, and achieving open intake; and WHEREAS, the Austin Animal Services Strategic Plan published in 2025 cites “Research, analyze, and explore additional locations to offer ASO services throughout the community (i.e., new satellite locations, secondary locations)” as Humane Care Goal 2C as well as “Expand ASO’s community presence, including increasing participation in local events, hosting new activities, and building partnerships” as Live Release Goal 3C; and WHEREAS, overcrowding in our shelter strains our resources, greatly hinders intake capacity, and creates barriers to timely adoption; and WHEREAS, increasing the visibility and accessibility of adoptable pets has been shown to significantly improve adoption rates and community engagement; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin owns and operates various public facilities and properties that may be suitable for temporary or permanent use as satellite adoption centers; and WHEREAS, Travis County contracts the City of Austin as part of their Animal Services Interlocal Agreement and also owns and operates various public facilities and properties that may be suitable for temporary or permanent use as satellite adoption centers; and WHEREAS, partnerships with local nonprofit organizations, as well as private businesses and community groups, could provide additional locations, volunteer staffing, and resources for off-site adoption efforts; and WHEREAS, establishing satellite adoption centers in high-traffic, community-centered locations throughout Austin and Travis County would reduce barriers to adoption, increase foot traffic exposure for animals, and enhance community participation in animal welfare initiatives; SO BE IT RESOLVED, that City Council and the City Manager request City staff across the appropriate departments research, and when appropriate, pilot satellite adoption center locations in Austin and Travis County; and SO BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Austin City Council shall offer full support in finding ways to reimagine the utilization of City owned or rented facilities so as to minimize the cost burden on residents and the Austin Animal Services Department in pursuit of these goals; and SO BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Travis County Commissioners Court shall take equal ownership and innovative steps in reimagining the utilization of County owned and rented facilities in pursuit of these goals.
