Versión en español a continuación. Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission Meeting 08/25/2021 Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission to be held 08/25/2021 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (08/24/2021 by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission Meeting, members of the public must: •Call or email the board liaison at 512-974-7665 and matthew.dugan@austintexas.gov no later than noon, (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). •Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. •Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. •Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. •Handouts or other information may be emailed to matthew.dugan@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. •If the meeting is broadcast live, it may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Reunión del Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission FECHA de la reunion (08/25/2021) La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (08/24/2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los miembros del público deben: • Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en 512-974-7665 and matthew.dugan@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, dirección de correo electrónico (opcional) y un número de teléfono (debe ser el número que se utilizará para llamar ). • Una vez que se haya realizado una solicitud para hablar con el enlace …
Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission (ICRC) August 18, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. Video Conference Join Zoom Meeting https://zoom.us/j/98278207374?pwd=eEhDSFpzNjVlZWFXNGcyYWpOKzZvZz09 Meeting ID: 982 7820 7374 Passcode: iqY34Q CURRENT COMMISSION MEMBERS: Prabhu Kannan Brigham Morris Errol Hardin Eugene Schneider Erin Dempsey Luis Gonzalez, Vice-Chair Dr. Sterling Lands Hoang Le Shaina Kambo Sara Inés Calderón Selina Yee Christina Puentes, Chair Joshua Blank Camellia Falcon Staff In Attendance Matthew Dugan, City's Planning Manager George Korbel, Mapping Specialist Christine Granados, ICRC Administrative Manager Members in Attendance Christina Puentes, Chair Luis Gonzalez, Vice Chair Joshua Blank Sara Inés Calderón Erin Dempsey Camellia Falcon Errol Hardin Prabhu Kannan Dr. Sterling Lands Hoang Le Eugene Schneider Selina Yee draft MINUTES Meeting Goals: Receive Information about Census Data and City's Boundaries; Receive Updates from Working Groups/Subcommittees CALL TO ORDER Chair Puentes called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. with 11 members present. Commissioner Kannan joined the meeting at 6:05 p.m. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first three speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Peck Young addressed the ICRC and opted to withhold comment at the public meeting. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Discussion and possible action on the Aug. 11, 2021, ICRC meeting minutes. The Aug. 11, 2021, meeting minutes were approved without objection. 2. UNFINISHED BUSINESS The ICRC may discuss and take action on the following agenda items A. Update from Public Forum Working Group on calendar changes Vice Chair Gonzalez gave update about county public forums being pushed back a week. 3. NEW BUSINESS The ICRC may discuss and take action on the following agenda items A. Presentation from Lila Valencia, Austin City Demographer City Demographer Lila Valencia shared findings from 2020 U.S. Census. B. Presentation from City Attorney on open meetings Assistant City Attorney Lynn Carter reviewed Open Meetings Act; Assistant City Attorney Zach Brown reviewed the Public Information Act. C. Update from Communications Working Group Commissioner Calderón discussed social media policies and the work done placing paid advertising on social media and legacy media. D. Update from Finance Subcommittee Vice Chair Gonzalez discussed the $2,000 in expenditures for Zoom moderator, website maintenance and overtime charges related to public forums. E. Update from Final Report Subcommittee No update. F. Discussion on mapping process Commissioner Yee made a motion to allow commissioners to voluntarily meet …
Contractor Registration Program Beth Culver, AIA, CBO, PMP Assistant Director, Building Official August 25, 2021 Building a Better and Safer Austin Together RECAP: Questions Insurance & Bonding • What amount of insurance is reasonable? • What amount of bond is reasonable? Metrics & Compliance • What can we measure to demonstrate equitable outcomes? • What is an appropriate response to contractors who are unable to comply with program requirements? Exemptions & Incentives • What incentives or benefits for participation do you see possible? • What exemptions should be considered? Building a Better and Safer Austin Together 2 RECAP: Current Staff Considerations • All Building and Demolition contractors register prior to the issuance of any Identifies contractor as licensed by Texas (if applicable). Consists of contact information (including Texas license, if applicable). Registration permit(s). • • Offenses Failure to register is an offense. • • A person may not: o Allow another to use a permit in an unlawful or fraudulent manner; o Perform, or cause to be performed, work that causes injury to a person or property; o Fail or refuse to display a license or permit to perform work when requested by the o Request inspections of work that is incomplete or work that has not been properly building official; reviewed by the permit holder; o More than 5 expired permits. • Offenses reported to licensing agencies, if applicable. Building a Better and Safer Austin Together 3 RECAP: Current Staff Considerations modified • All Building and Demolition contractors register prior to the issuance of any Identifies contractor as licensed by Texas (if applicable). Consists of contact information (including Texas license, if applicable). Registration permit(s). • • Offenses Failure to register is an offense. • • A person may not: o Allow another to use a permit in an unlawful or fraudulent manner; o Perform, or cause to be performed, work that causes injury to a person or property; o Fail or refuse to display a license or permit to perform work when requested by the o Request inspections of work that is incomplete or work that has not been properly building official; reviewed by the permit holder; o More than 5 expired permits. • Offenses reported to licensing agencies, if applicable. Building a Better and Safer Austin Together 4 RECAP: Current Staff Considerations Non-compliance • Notification of offense, with 3 months to resolve • 6 month period for first-time …
April 23, 2021 ZWAC Construction and Demolition (C&D) Ordinance Reform Committee REGULAR MEETING MINUTES The Construction and Demolition Ordinance Reform Committee of the Zero Waste Advisory Commission (ZWAC) convened in a regular meeting on April 23, 2021 remotely via WebEx. Ian Steyaert called the Board Meeting to order at 1:03 p.m. Board Members in Attendance: Ian Steyaert (chair), Cathy Gattuso, and Amanda Masino Staff in Attendance: Elizabeth Nelson, Selene Castillo, Gena McKinley, Jason McCombs, 1. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Four (4) citizens spoke during the opportunity for citizen communication. Ross Biel with Recon Services and 3B Recycling in reference to the Qualified Processor section of the C&D Ordinance, addressed that there is not a City Registered Evaluator that verifies third party processor diversion rates alongside RCI (Recycling Certification Institute). Stakeholder Biel also mentioned that processors are not required to register with the City and pointed out that there are issues with processors reporting and reporting accurately, identifying material end markets, and increased pressure to recycle materials that are difficult to divert. Stakeholder Biel pointed out a conflict with RCI allowing fuel burning and the City not allowing burning as a diversion option. Stakeholder Biel spoke of the benefits of RCI certification and the detailed reporting requirements. Walter Biel, owner of Recon Services, and 3B Recycling, discussed the process of becoming RCI Certified, the challenges of recycling construction debris and finding end markets, and the process for becoming a recycler through applying with TCEQ. Stakeholder Biel stated that 70% of the material they receive is wood and burning as biofuel is the only option for this material, which LEED and EPA count as diversion. Stakeholder Biel also spoke about contamination issues at sites collecting comingled recycling that must be landfilled because of that contamination. William Turley, founder and Executive Director of the Construction and Demolition Recycling Association (CDRA) shared facts about C&D materials. Stakeholder Turley mentioned that burning wood biomass is recognized as diversion from the landfill by both EPA and LEED and requested that the City recognize that when certifying facilities since Zero Waste tenets allow for 10% waste to energy. Stakeholder Turley stated that RCI certification is the only program for recycling facilities that has been developed to an ISO level and is recognized by USGBC as the only legitimate program, and that requiring all facilities to be certified would reduce fraudulent reporting and increase reporting accuracy. Jeffrey Jacoby, with …
RCI/CORR PROTOCOL ZWAC – C&D Meeting City of Austin, TX August 25, 2021 Stephen M Bantillo Executive Director Recycling Certification Institute What is CORR? • Protocol Created by CDRA • 3rd-party C&D facility certifications • Protocols developed with industry input • RCI protocols, procedures, and methodologies • Transparency / Confidence Process • Registration • “Application for Certification” • Desk Audit • Trained RCI Evaluators • Onsite Evaluation = Verification • Processes, records, and reports of the facility. Risk-Based Assessment • Permits • Frequency of Scale Calibration • Training of Facility Personnel • Maintenance/Operation of Equipment • Use of EMS or Other Data Management • QA/QC of Data Collection Process • Data Calculations • Markets and Sales of Materials Evaluation Report • Facility Overview • Development of Evaluation Plan • Criteria 1. Regulatory Compliance Test 2. Use of Scales 3. Supporting Data for Rate Calculations 4. Data Transcription and Management Individuals Properly Trained 5. 6. Performance Standard Test (5%) • Evaluation Statement Overview Why Important • Transparency • Independent and Objective Assessment and Performance Audit + Evaluation Report • Competitive Advantage -- Level Playing Field • Enforcement • Local Govt – Ordinance Variations and Reporting Why Important • National Standard • USGBC • CALGreen • C&D Industry Demand – Builders/Developers/Architects/LEED AP • Focus on Performance NEXT SECTION • Facility Engagement • Certification • Costs Registration / Certification • REGISTRATION allows a facility to upload its information • Not Audited, only self-reported • CERTIFICATION includes audited/verification and evaluation of data and operational processes Types of Certification • FULL / CONDITIONAL • SINGLE or MIXED MATERIAL • MSW and MIXED MATERIAL COMBINED • Application Process…. Certification • Application for Certification Narrative, Spreadsheets, Data files • Reporting Monthly, Warning Notices, Public Access Certification / Re-Cert Cycle • Certification for 5-years • Initial Certification Year 1 • Recertification Years 2 – 5 • New Certification Year 6 Cost Facility Service Registrations Certification -- Mixed (CDRA member) Certification -- Mixed (non-member) Certification – Single (CDRA member) Certification – Single (non-member) Re-Certification – Mixed Re-Certification – Single Rate $400 $7,000 $8,000 $2,500 $3,500 $3,500 $1,000 Standard Rate Calculation Q&A • Focus on Performance – Infrastructure – Revenues – Sustainability Goals – Jobs • CALGreen and local ordinances Information • stephen.bantillo@gmail.com • https://www.recyclingcertification.org/ • https://greenhalosystems.com/ finis
Environmental Code and Common Variances E nv i ro n m e n t a l C o m m i s s i o n Re t r e a t Au g u s t 2 5 , 2 0 2 1 C I T Y O F A U S T I N W A T E R S H E D P R O T E C T I O N D E P A R T M E N T A t h a P h i l l i p s E n v i r o n m e n t a l P r o g r a m C o o r d i n a t o r W a t e r s h e d P r o t e c t i o n D e p a r t m e n t Land Development Code 25-8 Environment and the Environmental Criteria Manual C I T Y O F A U S T I N W A T E R S H E D P R O T E C T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 2 25-8 Environment S U B C H A P T E R A – WAT E R Q UA L I T Y Development Services Department: Land Use Review – Environmental Review Watershed Protection Department CEF and Floodplain Modification Review S U B C H A P T E R B – T R E E A N D N AT U R A L A R E A P ROT E C T I O N ; E N DA N G E R E D S P E C I E S Development Services Department: Community Tree Division Land Use Review – Environmental Review (notification of Endangered Species only) C I T Y O F A U S T I N W A T E R S H E D P R O T E C T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 3 25-8 Environment SUB CHAPTER A – WATE R QUAL ITY • 25- 8- 211 Water Qual i ty Control Re qui rem ent • 25- 8- 261 Cri ti cal Water Qual i ty Zone D eve l …
City of Austin 2021 Environmental Commission Retreat City of Austin Tree Regulations Overview August 25, 2021 Keith Mars, AICP,CA Naomi Rotramel, City Arborist Overview • History and Values – The Austin Way • Policy and Governance – Tree Preservation Ordinances Work • Government that Works – Process and Due Diligence Matters • Austin’s Future Urban Forest The Community Tree Preservation Division: Urban Forest Program (A Healthy Urban Forest for All) Click here to see all the great work The Community Tree Preservation Division: City Arborist Program (Nationally recognized tree preservation ordinances) Tree Ordinances in Austin • First adopted in 1983 • Public health, safety, and welfare (Home Rule & Discretionary) • Preserve first then replenish • Alignment with council strategic outcomes Preserve the character of Austin’s urban forest, protect its current health, and increase it’s longevity The Value of Trees in the Urban Environment • Trees are foundational to multiple public policy objects • Trees are a $16 billion asset • Trees reduce energy cost by ~$20M/year • Trees are critical to climate and equity outcomes Our Community Values Trees • Home Rule—Tree protection is an expression of our values • Continued public support for trees and tree preservation is crucial to the future of our urban forest Does the Heritage Tree Ordinance Work? - Ordinance adopted in February 2010 - ~16 Commission variances - Over 5,000 reviews by City Arborist staff - More than 70,000 inches of Heritage Trees reviewed - 95% preservation rate. National model. Administering the Tree Ordinances (Process matters-Government that Works for All) The Larger the Tree, the Greater the Protection Review Criteria for Protected and Heritage Trees Code Criteria for Removal Rules for Protecting Trees 1. Prevents a reasonable use 2. Prevents reasonable access 3. Dead, diseased, or imminent hazard Due Process for Administering Heritage Tree Ordinance Due Diligence for Reasonable Use (Reveal the real and perceived constraints, protect more trees) Zoning Regulations • By right or up to? Zoning Regulations • By right or up to? • Use based, form based, or both? Zoning Regulations • By right or up to? • Use based, form based, or both? • Do you know the setbacks? • Parking standards. • Know your Fire Code! It has a big impact on land use and trees. • Know your driveway alignment options. Transportation Austin’s Future Urban Forest (Opportunities and challenges abound) Thank You. Questions? SETBACKS - 15' ALLOWS …
“We do for neighborhoods what the Chamber of Commerce does for business.” –Joan Bartz 1973 • Community Building • Advocacy • Civic Education • Policy Education • Land Use Education • Connecting Council with Neighbors • Environmental Justice • Equity ANC Executive Committee Justin Irving President Barbara McArthur Vice-President 1 Mary Ingle Joyce Basciano Chip Harris TBD Vice-President 2 Vice-President 3 Secretary Co-Secretary Sheryl Cheatham Treasurer Alexandria Anderson Marc Duchen Randy Ortega Seth Fowler Jim Lear Megan Meisenbach Daniel Llanes Julie Woods Jeff Bowen Communications Coordinator Sector 1 Representative Sector 2 Representative Sector 3 Representative Sector 4 Representative Sector 5 Representative Sector 6 Representative Sector 7 Representative Sector 8 Representative Andy Anderson Sector 9 Representative TBD Patricia King Sector 10 Representative Immediate Past President Neighborhood Planning Areas • Each area consists of many neighborhoods • Only represent neighborhoods in the city “core”. • Quasi governmental • http://www.austintexas.gov/sites/def ault/files/files/Planning/Neighborhood_ Planning/npstatus_tab_9-19-18.pdf ANC and 10-1 “The Austin Neighborhoods Council also supported the 10-1 plan. Past president Steve Aleman says that he looks forward to a more even representation across the entire city. "Last year when I was president, driving from one far end of town to the other for neighborhood meetings," Aleman recalled, "I was struck by how diverse the city is. ... It personally hit home how important this was to ensure that all the neighborhoods have a voice.“ “ -Austin Chronicle FRI., FEB. 1, 2013 Do neighborhood associations have their own boundary maps? If so, could those be shared with the commissioners? • https://www.austintexas.gov/department/community-registry
Boards & Commissions Hybrid Meeting Pilot Program Hybrid Meeting Pilot Program rules • Presiding officer & second officer must be physically present at City Hall (Chair, Vice Chair, &/Secretary) • A quorum (6 members) must be physically present • Public testimony must be in person • Staff liaisons (Kaela & Liz) will be physically present Technical requirements for remote participation • Must be clearly visible & have two-way communication throughout the entire meeting • If audio or video communication is lost for any portion of the meeting, the remote participant is considered absent during that time. COVID-19 Safety Protocols • Only 7 commission members physically present • Empty dais seats between each member when possible • Staff and visitors are required to wear masks while on City property • Disposable masks will be provided to anyone who is not wearing proper face coverings • Public attendees will be socially distanced • To limit the number of people physically present, staff presenters will attend remotely • Hand sanitizer stations throughout Council Chamber • Lysol wipes for members Preparing for Hybrid Meetings • Communication is key. Please let liaison know as soon as possible if you cannot attend a meeting, need to recuse, etc. • Fill out survey • Seven members in person • Up to four members may participate remotely • Number will change depending on absences, recusals, etc.
Refresher on Boards & Commissions rules Attendance requirements What constitutes an excused absence? • Injury or illness of a member • Illness or injury to an immediate family member • Active military service • Birth/adoption of a child (for up to 90s days after) • Must be reported in advance of the next meeting Late/partial attendance • Notify liaison in advance if you will be late or need to recuse on an item • Must be present for ¾ of the meeting & not cause the commission to break quorum on any action items • New rules require remote participants to be visible & have 2-way communication the entire meeting. Any technical issues/visibility issues may result in an unexcused absence. Meeting cancellations • If a meeting is cancelled due to lack of a quorum, unexcused absences are still counted. • A cancellation notice will be posted including: • Members that planned to attend • Absent members Attendance violations • Unexcused absences for three consecutive meetings • Missing 1/3 (seven) of all regular meetings in a 12- month timeframe • Violations are reported to the Clerk’s Office • BC Coordinator notifies the nominating Council Member of their options: • Provide an attendance waiver; or • An automatic vacancy occurs that requires a new appointment. Citizen Communication • Residents may sign up to speak on general items for three minutes discussion. • General citizen communication is not posted for • Members may ask clarifying questions only • May ask staff to report back Citizen Communication • Residents may sign up to speak on all agenda items except for Staff Briefings. • No public testimony can be made after the public hearing is closed. • Example: hearing” • Member 1: “Chair, I move to close the public • Member 2: “Second” • Chair: “All in favor, say aye (or raise your hand)” New business – Future Agenda Items • Members may include an item if: • Sponsorship is received from two or more members • Outside of a meeting, members may also request the Chair to include an item on a future agenda • Approval is at the Chair’s discretion • Copy Kaela on all requests • Will be placed on next available agenda Things to know • The City Code prohibits boards and commissions from meeting in closed session unless they have received prior approval from the city attorney. Things to know …
Purview of the Environmental Commission August 25, 2021 Retreat City Code 2-1-144: Environmental Commission The commission is empowered to: REVIEW & ANALYZE ACT PROMOTE the policies relating to the environmental quality of the city as an advisory board to the city council, the city manager, and the department in their efforts to oversee the protection and integrity of the natural environment growth management and land use planning, minimize degradation of water resources, protect downstream areas, and promote recreation opportunities and environmental awareness ADVISE & RECOMMEND on any issue which the commission determines necessary or advisable for the enhancement and stewardship of the urban forest both public and private. 2-1-144 – Section G assist the city council, the city manager, and the department in studying, promoting and enforcing environmental protection policies to assure the health, safety, welfare and quality of life of all residents within the City's incorporated boundaries as well as those within its extraterritorial jurisdiction where the boundaries apply. 2-1-144 – Section H The commission shall advise on… Beautification Recreation resources Public education on environmental matters Construction controls for erosion & sedimentation Hazardous waste materials management City environmental policies re. monitoring & enforcement Revegetation & landscaping Solid waste disposal plan alternatives Air quality Water quality Growth management Land use planning Watershed protection Roadway planning Noise abatement All matters pertaining to the City’s urban forest, including public & private trees 2-1-144 – Section (I) The commission shall review: variances to requirements for water quality protection Monitoring of storm water runoff in developed & undeveloped areas Efficiency of existing and proposed structural & nonstructural water quality controls Effectiveness of Chapter 25-4 (Subdivision) Waste treatment permits within city’s ETJ Policies & programs for flood control, erosion control, & water quality Capital improvement projects Municipal utility district proposals & amendments Roadway plan amendments Recommend urban runoff standards Environmental elements of planned unit developments (PUDs) 2-1-144 – Section J & K The commission may recommend & initiate, with the advice and consent of city council, specific project studies concerning any matters described in Subsections (H) and (I), or any other related environmental or urban forestry issue. The commission shall make reports and recommendations for standards and criteria concerning any of these matters as well. 2-1-144 – Section L The commission shall promote close cooperation between the City and all private residents, institutions, and agencies interested in or conducting natural resource, environmental activities, so that …
Resilience Hubs Joint Sustainability Committee August 25, 2021 Equity Issue: All recent extreme weather events (Halloween/Memorial Day floods, heatwaves, Winter Storm Uri, etc.) have hit low income communities and communities of color first and worst Moving Forward ● Center low income communities and communities of color in these planning processes ● Build an equity lens for all staff participating in these processes ● Move as much as possible towards Community Leadership and Ownership of the work Council Resolution 20210408-028 Plan: Deliverable: ● Conduct an assessment to identify potential locations for resilience hubs. ● Explore "passive survivability", redundant power and water. ● Engagement with each community, center the needs of the most vulnerable and affected community members. ● Potential resilience hubs are based on 15-minute walkshed of each neighborhood. ● Budget sufficient to fund recommendations and strategies to design and equip hubs. ● Plan, budget recommendations, funding strategies, and a timeline for designing and equipping an initial six pilot hubs for disasters. ● Intergovernmental memoranda necessary to memorialize community partnerships necessary to create resilience hubs.” Reimagining Public Safety - Neighborhood Hubs 10 Neighborhoods - that meet these criteria 1. Over policing, concentrated surveillance, and Recommendation: $2.5 million - 5 X $500k (staffing, administration, and programming) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. patrol data Calls to 211 by Zip Code & Call Type Unemployment and underemployment rates Poverty and low-income neighborhoods Central Health Focus Areas Housing insecurity Areas vulnerable to flooding Areas lacking tree canopy coverage Neighborhoods near brownfields, landfills, recycling, and wastewater treatment facilities Food insecurity Predatory lender locations COVID-19 new cases, mortality rates, testing availability, and vaccine access - - - - - Drop-in center & outreach base. Created and staffed by neighborhood. Community members determine needs to be addressed & resources needed. City-run Neighborhood Centers exist in some communities, but they are not meeting community needs & residents do not feel safe accessing them. Idea is that they are community “owned” and run. Could these also serve as Resilience Hubs? 98% of the time a Neighborhood Hub 2% of the time a Resilience Hub GAVA Press Release: Uri Response Resilience Hubs and neighborhood centers must be supplied with critical on-site materials and resources, now: ● Generators and power banks ● Walkie Talkies and transistor radios ● Hard landlines for first responders and community responders in each hub First aid, medical (including OTC inventory and …
Rodriguez, Lisa From: Sent: To: Subject: HPD ICRC Commissioners Wednesday, August 25, 2021 10:50 AM HPD ICRC Commissionsers DL FW: new districts From: Kim Lanzillotti < Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 3:49:30 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik To: HPD ICRC Commissioners <ICRC.Commissioners@austintexas.gov> Subject: new districts > *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Members of the ICRC Commission, I am a resident in the South River City Citizens neighborhood association. When the city first divided the city into individual city council districts our area of SRCC was put in district 3 and the rest of our neighborhood was in district 9. This is problematic when we have issues affecting our neighborhood, because we are not represented by the same person on the city council. Living in south central Austin, our issues are different from those affecting east Austin and I feel we have not had sufficient representation. I believe we would have better representation if our neighborhood was in the same district. Now that the districts are being redrawn I would like to request that area 8 be included in the same district as the other areas of SRCC. Thank you, Kim Lanzillotti 78704 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Rodriguez, Lisa From: Sent: To: Subject: HPD ICRC Commissioners Thursday, August 26, 2021 8:48 AM HPD ICRC Commissionsers DL FW: District 9 > ________________________________________ From: Kimberly Levinson < Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2021 1:47:49 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik To: HPD ICRC Commissioners Subject: District 9 *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** To the Committee: My name is Kimberly Levinson, and I want to make sure you understand that I speak only for myself, despite leading the PAC and DANA this year. My concern is to create a district that reflects the true character of District 9 and keeps communities of interest together as much as possible. First, I think the Capital belongs in District 9. That is a huge part of Downtown, and carving it out makes little sense to me. Development around it is clearly a huge part of further developing the Downtown area, and the district lines should reflect that. Second, I think the area that is currently in District 1, but is on the west side of I‐35, should be included in District 9 on the principle that communities should be kept together, and those buildings are clearly part of Downtown. Moving them into District 9 will also help maintain the current character and demographic mix of District 1, which is part of the ICRC's concerns. Third, I believe the southwest part of District 9, in the Bouldin area and points west from there, should be removed from the Downtown district. That area should be joined with other parts of south Austin, as their community interests are more aligned, and District 9 has grown large enough to need to remove at least some areas, especially if you consider my final point. Finally, I believe there is a case to be made for adding the areas east of I‐35 from E 7th Street down to East Cesar Chavez into District 9. Those areas are effectively merging with downtown, becoming more urban, and becoming more gentrified. Therefore, they have a common community interest in the development of the Downtown area, and their inclusion in District 9 and their removal from District 3 will help maintain the character and demographic mix of District 3, which is also a goal of this redistricting process. Thank you for considering my points, and for all the work I know you are putting into this. Warmest regards, Kimberly Levinson 1 CAUTION: This email …
Rodriguez, Lisa From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: HPD ICRC Commissioners Wednesday, August 25, 2021 7:54 AM HPD ICRC Commissionsers DL FW: Parsons Letter to 10-1 Commissioners (w/attachments) (1 of 2) Parsons ICRC Letter 08-24-21.pdf From: Dugan, Matthew <Matthew.Dugan@austintexas.gov> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 12:54:18 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik To: HPD ICRC Commissioners <ICRC.Commissioners@austintexas.gov> Subject: FW: Parsons Letter to 10-1 Commissioners (w/attachments) (1 of 2) > From: Brad Parsons Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2021 9:15 PM To: Puentes, Christina ‐ BC <BC‐Christina.Puentes@austintexas.gov>; Gonzalez, Luis ‐ BC <BC‐ Luis.Gonzalez@austintexas.gov>; Lands, Sterling ‐ BC <BC‐Sterling.Lands@austintexas.gov>; Le, Hoang ‐ BC <BC‐ Hoang.Le@austintexas.gov>; Blank, Joshua ‐ BC <BC‐Joshua.Blank@austintexas.gov>; Hardin, Errol ‐ BC <BC‐ Errol.Hardin@austintexas.gov>; Yee, Selina ‐ BC <BC‐Selina.Yee@austintexas.gov>; Kambo, Shaina ‐ BC <BC‐ Shaina.Kambo@austintexas.gov>; Kannan, Prabhu ‐ BC <BC‐Prabhu.Kannan@austintexas.gov>; bc‐ brigham.morris@austintexas.gov; Dempsey, Erin ‐ BC <BC‐Erin.Dempsey@austintexas.gov>; Falcon, Camellia ‐ BC <BC‐ Camellia.Falcon@austintexas.gov>; Schneider, Eugene ‐ BC <BC‐Eugene.Schneider@austintexas.gov>; bc‐sara.ines‐ calderon@austintexas.gov; bc‐sara.inescalderon@austintexas.gov Cc: Dugan, Matthew <Matthew.Dugan@austintexas.gov> Subject: Parsons Letter to 10‐1 Commissioners (w/attachments) (1 of 2) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** (See attachments) Tuesday, August 24, 2021 Greetings ICRC Commissioners! I noticed the video of your last meeting just posted on the City webpage, day before yesterday. Particularly, what stood out to me is that Mr. Korbel is going to draft your map and then take feedback from you all as a group and then individually after he has drafted the 10 districts map and before that Preliminary Map is released for public comment in the middle of September. 1 I had assumed like the last 10-1 Commission that you all would be having an open public meeting with your mapper and giving him direction on the layout of the map, as he drew it, as opposed to delegating the drafting of the 10 district map to your mapper and then give him feedback on that afterward. I had thought that you all might have watched the videos of the days when the last 10-1 Commission worked with their mapper to draw both their Preliminary map and their Final map, but just now checking, I see that the City of Austin has taken down those ATXN videos showing the mapper working with the last 10-1 Commission at AE’s Town Lake Center and One Texas Center. See: 1. http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=198360 2. http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=197729 3. http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=200533 4. http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=200802 and 5. http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=203067 . If this is to be the case, then I think you should give some detailed direction …
