From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Kirsten Hofmann Sirwaitis, Sherri; Avila, Rosemary kirsten Re: FW: September 7, 2021 Zoning and Platting Commission Agenda Tuesday, September 7, 2021 12:50:05 PM RedFin flood risk C14-2021-0012.pdf Sherri [+ Rosemary per SP-2021-0124C]. VERY helpful, and my continued thanks in educating me on the sources and differences. I've learned that participants must be in person in today's Platting & Zoning meeting, which is unfortunate as I'm not able to do so. I have re-summarized my concerns here, and reached out to Rosemary (and re-cc’d here) per your suggestion: A) High concern for near-by residential and single-family housing due to: - Allowance for up to 60ft tall buildings - No requirement for minimum interior side yard, rear yard, front yard, or street yard setbacks - Buildings this tall, and the associated lighting, will adversely impact those residences with shadows and light/audio noise. People down the street with large apt buildings backed-up to their houses already complain of the noise (on both sides of the fence) and a mere barking dog in the backyard was forced inside despite his owner’s own fencing and property. - Glad to hear that impervious cover isn’t worsened, but these added structures and parking will impact the environment and living conditions of humans and wildlife in the area. - flood concerns and flood-plains along Walnut Creek (attached and more in Rosemary's scope?) . . .any added volume of structures and people, seem relevant to this zoning change: assessment on flood risk with people’s houses greatest-at-risk not proactively informed of this change B) Not sure if under your scope or Rosemary’s: - A new geological survey is needed, given the abandoned parking garage from years ago and earlier reports of caves, sinkholes and cavities 3) Per Sherri's note my other concerns are addressed by the site approval/design: Rosemary per SP-2021-0124C - when is this reviewed or discussed for approval? - any updates to assessments, surveys or studies? One geological report referenced is from Nov 2009 Earlier flood assessments were > 20 years ago [please ref attachment on flood risk near the primary path of water from site] Houston's flooding has shown that these changes need stronger and more recent assessments; please don't turn Austin into Houston. Thank you for your time and expertise! Good health to you and be safe! Kirsten Hofmann 6225 Avery Island Ave, Austin TX 78727 Hi Ms. Hofmann, On …
September 7, 2021 Micah J. King Senior Associate The Zoning and Platting Commission The City of Austin 111 Congress Avenue, Suite 1400 Austin, Texas 78701 Direct: 512.370.3468 micah.king@huschblackwell.com Re: Letter Regarding Item B-3 (Research Park Rezoning) on the September 7, 2021, Agenda of the Zoning and Platting Commission Regarding the Rezoning (the “Case”) of Property at: 12455, 12501 Research Boulevard North Bound, 12489, 12515 ½, 12517 ½ Research Boulevard Service Road NB, 12220 ½ Riata Trace Parkway (the “Property”) Dear Commissioners: I am writing you on behalf of my clients who own and reside at properties on Blackfoot Trail across McNeil Drive from the above-referenced zoning Property. My clients are not opposed to and could even support the rezoning so long as the applicant and developer of the Property work with the City Staff to ensure that there is no adverse flooding impact on my clients’ properties. There is a history of flooding on the west side of McNeil Drive near Blackfoot Trail. This flooding was addressed by the City installing a stormwater drain under and along the west side of McNeil Drive, but my clients are concerned that flooding would become an issue again if the City does increase the size of the drain to offset any future increase to the amount of impervious cover as part of the redevelopment of the overall Property (not just on Lot 11, which is in a different watershed than the western portion of the Property). Thank you for your consideration of this issue. Sincerely, Micah King HB: 4812-2256-4089.1
: e t o r w > v o g . s a x e t n i t s u a @ m a h a r G . k r a M < k r a M , m a h a r G M A 1 1 : 8 t a 1 2 0 2 , 0 3 g u A , n o M n O > v o g . s a x e t n i t s u a @ m a h a r G . k r a M < k r a M , m a h a r G : o T 7 1 1 0 - 1 2 0 2 - 4 1 C : # e s a C o t t c e j b o I : t c e j b u S M P 0 4 : 3 1 2 0 2 , 9 2 t s u g u A , y a d n u S : t n e S < n o t t a P r e h p o t s i r h C : m o r F . d e h c a t t a t n e m u c o d o n s a w e r e h T , r e h p o t s i r h C i H r e g a n a M e s a C , m a h a r G k r a M , s d r a g e R 7 1 1 0 - 1 2 0 2 - 4 1 C : # e s a C o t t c e j b o I : e R M A 1 4 : 1 3 : 8 1 2 0 2 , 0 3 t s u g u A , y a d n o M n o t t a P r e h p o t s i r h C k r a M , m a h a r G : t c e j b u S : e t a D : m o r F : o T G N P . 3 9 8 0 _ G M I : s t n e …
Neighborhood Concerns RE: C14-2021-0117 (1017 W. SLAUGHTER LANE) OPPOSING REQUESTED REZONING TO GR-MU-V This is where we live… First issue: Increased traffic on Slaughter Lane threatens people’s safety! Chisholm Lane is a dead- end road with egress only onto Slaughter Lane. THE FOLLOWING SLIDE SHOWS THE INTERSECTION WITH SLAUGHTER LANE TO THE WEST… Overflow parking from La Petite daycare employee meeting Road conditions on trash and recycle day. Slaughter and Chisholm Lane Intersection …on a Sunday morning Target site has egress only onto Slaughter Lane. THE FOLLOWING SLIDE SHOWS THE CHISHOLM LANE INTERSECTION WITH SLAUGHTER LANE TO THE EAST… This is where they want to add retail and hundreds of apartments! What traffic control measures will ensure citizens are safe traveling north, south, east, and west? Second issue: There is a significant environmental threat Mary Moore Searight Metropolitan Park is designated wildland… THE FOLLOWING SLIDE SHOWS THE 150’PROXIMITY TO THE TARGET SITE… Subject Tract also overlaps a creek buffer zone: An additional environmental threat… An aerial view …clearly showing the creek buffer running through the southern third of the subject tract How will the runoff from the proposed development be captured to avoid flooding or water contamination? Too many on too little…a third of subject tract is unbuildable! Slaughter Lane from Brodie to IH35 Slaughter Lane from HEB on Menchaca to the east …with new apartment complex under construction marked Construction site from Bilbrook Place Construction site north to Slaughter Lane Construction site from Swanson Ranch Road Third issue: Infrastructure cannot accommodate more high- density residential. Transit options easy walking distance: Buses #3 & #318 CapMetro options via #3 and #318 (north and west) CapMetro options via #3 and #318 (east); #10 (north) Please: NO further development unless the City of Austin improves the infrastructure to support planful growth!! This is our neighborhood
From: To: Subject: Date: Ruth Lauer Graham, Mark; Kitchen, Ann; Craig, Ken C14-2021-0119 911/915 Dittmar Tuesday, September 7, 2021 12:07:54 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Mr. Graham, I am writing to rebut the claims made in the staff recommendations on the above case. I recognize the need for more affordable housing in Austin and would welcome a project like this along a transit corridor or within the urban core. However, the property is over ½ mile from the nearest transit corridor and not close to any schools, shops, services or other amenities. The owner proposes to build 30 up to 4 story units on 1.48 acres. In discussions with the neighborhood, he said these are likely to be 2 and 3 bedroom row-house style condominiums in two buildings. He requests a zoning change from what was SF-2 and DR (which was used as SF-2). The proposed zoning change does not satisfy the public need for affordable housing. The owner is seeking density that is incompatible with neighbors so that he can maximize the return on his investment. A change in zoning will provide special privilege to the owner while negatively impacting existing neighbors. The project does not add to housing choice. There are plenty of condos and smaller homes already in this area. There are currently over 200 condo style homes going in further west on Dittmar. And there is a condo development across the street. The owner representative stated that NO affordable units are planned. Please explain how this adds to housing choice. The zoning is incompatible with surrounding areas, which are generally SF and MH. None of the zoning cases cited allow such an extreme change. The adjacent SF-4 zoning is on small lots. The proposed MF zoning will bring 3 times that density to the area. Cramming a four story, 2 building condo development (along with an estimated 60 vehicles) in the middle of the neighborhood just doesn’t make sense. Again, it would if it were near an Activity Corridor with schools, amenities and public transport nearby. This is not the case. The wonderful Dittmar Rec Center and pool are about it. I would love to see Austin develop and stick to plans like Imagine Austin. Instead I see no proactive planning, just responding positively to anything a developer requests while penalizing existing residents. I would also like the Case Manager and builder …
Zoning and Platting Commission Question and Answer Report September 7, 2021 B-03 C14-2021-0012 - Research Park Rezoning; District 6 Commissioner Denkler /Staff Response Hi Commissioner Denkler, The Housing and Planning Department staff believe that this project will comply with the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan as the proposed LI-PDA zoning on the property will provide for additional housing within 800 feet from the Jollyville Activity Corridor and 1,550 feet from the 183 and McNeil Neighborhood Center. As the Comprehensive Planning comments state in the zoning case report, the proposed LI-PDA zoning will meet the intent of: LUT P7. Encourage infill and redevelopment opportunities that place residential, work, and retail land uses in proximity to each other to maximize walking, bicycling, and transit opportunities. • HN P10. Create complete neighborhoods across Austin that have a mix of housing types and land uses, affordable housing and transportation options, and access to schools, retail, employment, community services, and parks and recreation options. This 179.14 acre site is located between two major arterial roadways, McNeil Drive and Research Boulevard (U.S. Highway 183) in an area with job opportunities, schools and a mixture of housing. The Housing and Planning Department does not review Imagine Austin for compliance with environmental issues. The Watershed Protection Department staff (the Environmental Officer) and the Development Services Department staff were included in the review of this rezoning application for the proposed LI-PDA zoning. The Current Planning staff reviewed the applicant’s proposed PDA overlay conditions (i.e.- additional permitted uses, prohibited uses and site development standards) and we are recommending the LI-PDA zoning request at this location. The environmental review’s comments have been cleared and the applicant amended their PDA overlay request to state that the maximum impervious cover and maximum building coverage is set forth by the applicable watershed limitation. New development on the property will be subject to Compatibility Standards. Per LDC Sec. 25-2- 1051, any development which occurs in an SF-6 or less restrictive zoning district which is located 540 feet or less from property in an SF-5 or more restrictive zoning district will be subject to compatibility development regulations. In this rezoning application, the applicant is only requesting that the proposed PDA conditions apply to Lot 11 on the property. The Transportation review comments from ATD state that a Traffic impact analysis was waived, except for the development on Lot 11, a new site plan (or revision to any …
` PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Monday, August 2, 2021 Queen Austin Rebecca Webber Amanda Lewis Rebecca Bernhardt The Public Safety Commission convened a videoconferencing meeting Monday, August 2, 2021 at City Hall 301 W. 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Chair Rebecca Gonzales called the Board Meeting to order at 3:01p.m. Board Members in Attendance: Rebecca Gonzales Kathleen Hausenfluck Nelly Ramirez John Kiracofe Board Members Absent: Rocky Lane and Michael Sierra-Arevalo Staff in Attendance: Robin Henderson, Assistant Chief, Austin Police Department Jasper Brown, Chief of Staff, Austin/Travis County Emergency Medical Services Rob Vires, Chief of Staff, Austin Fire Department Citizen Communications - Citizens signed up to speak: 1. Approval of Minutes – Chair Gonzales called for the approval of the July 6, 2021 minutes. Commissioner Bernhardt requested two edits/corrections to the minutes; 1. Update attendance list to include Rebecca Bernhardt’s name and delete the duplicate listings of Rebecca Webber’s name. 2. Edit language on Commissioner Bernhardt’s request to APD from “clearance updates to clearance rates”. Chair Gonzales, deemed the minutes approved with noted corrections. -Carlos Leon spoke on Threat from Cap Metro Driver, COVID-19 Vaccines, Mask and Unmasked mandates 1 2. OLD BUSINESS 2a. Implementation of Proposition B Ordinance (sponsors: Commissioner Bernhardt and Hausenfluck) 3:25pm-3:40pm This item was introduced by Commissioner Ramirez Speakers were: - Dianna Grey, Homeless Strategy Director, City of Austin -Sarah Rose, Director, Austin Mutual Aide -Candace Swan, Community Advocate and recipient of Austin Mutual Aide Services -Karly Jo Dixon, Attorney Dianna Grey thanked the board for inviting her to present/update on the latest efforts on im- plementation of Prop B Ordinance. Ms Grey commented on the stages/phases her office has in place when working to assist the homeless population to find temporary shelter and permanent housing. The topics discussed were: -HEAL(Homeless Encampment Assistance Link) initiative and the work taking place in Phase I to offer the homeless resources to assist in finding temporary housing and permanent housing. - First Phase: Four High Priority Encampments (East Austin, South Central, Downtown (Central Business District and Northwest Austin) Compassionate closure of first two HEAL sites -Terrazas Library – June -Ben White Bld. and Manchaca Road – July 15 -Suites #3 and #4: August/early September -70 of 74 people who were offered housing accepted and moved to bridge shelter -67 of the original 70 guests remain at Southbridge, - the 67 guests, approximately 50 have been enrolled in housing …
Taxicab Industry Update – September 7, 2021 City of Austin Transportation Department Taxicab Franchise Operators Current Franchise Operators Franchise Closures During Pandemic ATX Co-Op Taxi Lone Star Cab (May 2020) Central City Taxi Longhorn Taxicab Co. (Dec. 2020) Yellow Cab Number of Taxicabs in Service 2019-2021 Three Year Comparison 1,016 245 220 FY 2018-2019 FY 2019-2020 FY 2020-2021 Current Taxicab Franchise Fleet Numbers ATX Co-Op Taxi 100 Taxicabs (93 Standard + 7 WCL) Central City Taxi 25 Taxicabs (21 Standard + 4 WCL) Yellow Cab 95 Taxicabs (87 Standard + 8 WCL) 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 Taxicab Number of Trips Five-Year Comparison: 2016 - 2021 3,078,481 1,814,306 1,000,207 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21* *As of 7/31/2021 466,841 197,012 • • • • • • Taxicab companies were first licensed in the City of Austin under an operating authority model on March 8th, 1932. On June 8th, 1950, taxicab companies were declared public utilities by City Council and formed into taxicab franchises by subsequent ordinance. Taxicab Companies reached their peak service in 2016-2017 with over 3 million trips and more than 1500 taxicabs deployed within the City. In 2017, Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) such as Uber and Lyft began operating in Austin under state regulatory authority and taxicab franchises experienced an eventual seventy-five percent decline in their number of trips the following year. Council In 2018, reform recommendations, intended to address this decline, lighten franchise restrictions, and level the playing field between taxicabs and other transportation options. taxicab franchise approved ATD’s regulatory In 2020-2021, due to the global pandemic, taxicab franchises have now experienced the lowest trip numbers on record. ATD recommends that taxicab companies no longer be regarded as public utilities, but rather as a valuable part of a diverse and ever-evolving network of competitive mobility options and that Council transition taxicabs from a franchise licensing model to an operating authority licensing model. The benefits of licensing taxicab companies under an operating authority model versus a franchise model are demonstrated in the figure below: Franchise Model Operating Authority Model Application takes more than 30 days to complete Application can be completed in one business day Requires Council action for approval, renewal, or transfer Approval, renewal, or transfer based on established prerequisite criteria Three-readings franchise approval processes may take 3 to 6 months Approval granted within 2 business days upon the fulfillment …
SHOAL CREEK TRAIL PLAN Trail Network >> Seamless, connected network of hike-and-bike trails along the 11-mile Shoal Creek corridor, and connection to other urban trails city-wide City Adoption >> In 2018, the City of Austin Public Works Department accepted the Trail Plan. Top Priority Project >> The improvements along the Cypress & Shoal project area is one of the top five stakeholder-identified priority improvements. The Big Loop >> The City of Austin’s Urban Trail Plan and Bicycle Plan position the Shoal Creek Trail to become a major segment in a 30-mile ‘Big Loop’ of bikeways traversing the city. Shoal Creek Trail is also poised to be the western link in the Downtown Urban Greenbelt, a 6.5 mile loop formed by the Shoal Creek Trail, the Capitol Mall, Waterloo Greenway, and the Butler Hike-and-Bike Trail. PROPOSED PROJECT AREA >> GABLES WEST AVENUE TRADER JOE’S THE INDEPENDENT 360 CONDOS SEAHOLM RESIDENCES AUSTIN ENERGY SUBSTATION THIRD + SHOAL 3RD STREETNUECES STREETWEST AVENUE SEAHOLM DRIVE THE INDEPENDENT GABLES WEST AVENUE TRADER JOE’S 360 CONDOS THIRD + SHOAL SEAHOLM RESIDENCES AUSTIN ENERGY SUBSTATION LANCE ARMSTRONG BIKEWAY L I A R T K E E R L C A O H S LANCE ARMSTRONG BIKEWAY A N N & ROY B U T L E R H I K E - A N D - I K E T RAIL B NEW CROSSTOWN PATHWAYS PROJECT AREA EXISTING BIKE & TRAIL ROUTES PROPOSED BIKE & TRAIL ROUTES Located on the cusp of Shoal Creek’s confluence with the Colorado River, the Cypress & Shoal Creek area is home to two major crosstown pathways: Shoal Creek Trail which runs north- south, and the Lance Armstrong Bikeway which runs west-east. W 3RD STREETW 4TH STREETW 2ND STREETW CESAR CHAVEZ STREETNUECES STREETWEST AVENUE SEAHOLM DRIVE PROJECT PROCESS On-the ground site inventory and analysis >> Community and stakeholder input >> Two stages of widely promoted online feedback to first gather information about existing conditions and then collect feedback on the draft Public Space Strategy. Technical Advisory Group >> Comprised of representatives from key City of Austin departments. Presented the project and its desired outcomes to gauge feasibility and to collect embedded knowledge of the history of this area. Review with area property owners >> Insight about current day-to-day usage and potential challenges with the proposed concept. 1 BOWIE STREET UNDERPASS GABLES WEST AVENUE TRADER JOE’S 1 THE INDEPENDENT 360 CONDOS SEAHOLM RESIDENCES …
Water Forward 2018 Implementation Progress 9/7/2021 FY21 July & August FY21 July & August Progress Current/Planned FY22 Q1 Activities Future Implementation Steps Water Forward 2024 Continued pre-planning, consultant procurement, and technical work to support WF plan update, including demographics and demand-related data gathering and updates. Finalize climate and hydrology consultant procurement. Continue technical work to support WF plan update. FY21: Pre-planning work FY22: Begin community engagement, update methodology, demands, climate & hydrology analysis FY23: Identify water needs, strategies, develop portfolios Conservation My ATX Water team performed pre-install field surveys and continued meter installations, bringing the total number of meters installed to ~11,771. The My ATX Water customer portal was at ~50% adoption rate for customers after new meter is installed. AW staff began internal planning discussions for future landscape transformation ordinance. Drought Supplies Continued work on ASR storage zone and integration point analysis. Completed equity and affordability research effort and began development of equity and affordability road map. Continued work on community engagement and education plan. . Surveys and installs will continue around the city, moving from neighborhood to neighborhood as more installers are hired. FY21: Installation of 250,000 meters continues. FY25: Anticipated project completion. AW staff will continue internal planning discussions and technical analyses to support future landscape transformation ordinance. Finalize storage zone and integration point analysis. Continue developing education and engagement materials and work on equity and affordability roadmap. FY22-23: Planned completion and adoption of landscape transformation ordinance FY20-23: Initial contract and identify where to pilot. FY24-27: Design, construct, and test ASR pilot. Develop recommendations for full-scale ASR. FY28-35: Preliminary engineering, design, construction of full-scale ASR. FY21 July & August FY21 July & August Progress Current/Planned FY22 Q1 Activities Future Implementation Steps Onsite Water Reuse AW staff performed stakeholder outreach to educate the development community on the OWRS Ordinance and Pilot Incentive program. Staff also reviewed the first application for an OWRS project, which included an application for the pilot incentive program. Staff continuing to review OWRS applications and incorporating this review process in the City’s development review system, commissioning OSCAR and CLARA pilot, and finalizing the online water benchmarking platform. FY21: AW will begin stakeholder outreach to potential incentive candidates. FY23/4: Anticipated onsite water reuse mandate in effect for new developments >250,000 square feet. Centralized & Decentralized Reclaimed AW continued work to 1) implement AW’s 2013 Completing the Core plan to create a reclaimed loop through downtown …
Advisory Group and Task Force Subcommittee Reports Water Forward Task Force Meeting | September 7th, 2021 Lead Abatement Subcommittee July 22nd, 2021 EPA Rule Updates Service Line Inventory Facility Testing Ordinance Task Force Subcommittee July 16th ,2021 Water Forward Code changes and updates Next Meeting: September 23rd 2-3pm – WCC Conference room 900, Virtual Indirect Potable Reuse Subcommittee July 27th ,2021 Daniel Nix- Wichita Falls • Indirect Potable Reuse and Direct Potable Reuse Next Meeting: October 12th2021 3:30-4:30pm – WCC Conference room 300 Climate Technical Advisory Group July 15th ,2021 Climate Projections- John Nielson-Gammon Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Technical Advisory Group (TAG) August 31st ,2021 Project Updates Criteria Discussion Questions and Discussion
MATERIALS COST INCREASES ERIC BAILEY P E , P M P A S S I S TA N T D I R EC TO R , C A P I TA L P ROJ EC T D E L I V E RY O F F I C E : ( 5 1 2 ) 9 7 4 - 7 7 1 3 | C E L L : ( 5 4 1 ) 5 1 3 - 3 3 9 1 E - M A I L : E R I C . BA I L E Y @ AU S T I N T E X A S .G OV 1 MATERIAL COST INCREASES Some contractors have requested: • An adjustment in contract amount due to unexpected inflation of material prices • An adjustment in contract time due to delays in material delivery 2 SECTION 00700 GENERAL CONDITIONS 11.1: • The Contract Amount is stated in the Agreement and, including authorized adjustments, is the total amount payable by OWNER to CONTRACTOR for performance of the Work under the Contract Documents. 3 SECTION 00700 GENERAL CONDITIONS 12.1.3 • When CONTRACTOR is prevented from completing any part of the Work within the Contract Times (or Milestones) due to delay beyond the control of both OWNER and CONTRACTOR, an extension of the Contract Times (or Milestones) in an amount equal to the time lost due to such delay shall be CONTRACTOR's sole and exclusive remedy for such delay. 4 MATERIALS COST INCREASES Q&A ERIC BAILEY P E , P M P A S S I S TA N T D I R EC TO R , C A P I TA L P ROJ EC T D E L I V E RY O F F I C E : ( 5 1 2 ) 9 7 4 - 7 7 1 3 | C E L L : ( 5 4 1 ) 5 1 3 - 3 3 9 1 E - M A I L : E R I C . BA I L E Y @ AU S T I N T E X A S .G OV 5 CONTRACTUAL REMEDIES Per the signed contract, the Contractor assumes all risk associated with cost fluctuations There will be no change in the contract amount due to material cost increases or decreases The Project Team may consider granting an …
The Board/Commission mission statement (per the City Code) is: 1) Review the city manager's report, as described in Sections 2-9(A-D)-18 (Program Review); and 2) Recommend changes to the City Code provisions, adopted rules and regulations, and program operations. 1. Describe the board’s actions supporting their mission during the previous reporting period. Address all elements of the board’s mission statement as provide in the relevant sections of the City Code. The MBE/WBE & Small Business Procurement Advisory Board/ Committee’s actions supported its mission during the reporting period of June 2020– July 2021 despite the ongoing pandemic and various challenges presented. The adoption of technology facilitated the advisory and guidance role of the MBE/WBE & Small Business Procurement Advisory Board/Committee during the past year. The incorporation of virtual meetings increased the attendance of individual committee members resulting in robust participation and recording quorum in all months with the exception of December 2020. The board regularly received reports and monitored the areas listed below. While the committee met diligently, the disruption caused by the pandemic affected deadlines and startup projects under the purview of this board as noted in the following lines of business. MBE/WBE PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT & MONITORING: SMBR Budget: Budget discussions were not held due to the COA’s quarantine orders prohibiting in person meetings. Previously the board received timely updates on annual department budget and made recommendations as appropriate. Annual Internal Review: Presentation on the 2020 Annual Internal Review was made in accordance to department practices. City Solicitation and Goal Determination Process: Reviewed and discussed solicitation and goal determination process. Corridor Mobility Bond Program: Reviewed and monitored the Corridor Mobility Bond Program on MBE/WBE Outreach plan in support of the Minority-Owned, Women–Owned and Small Business Enterprise Procurement Program ordinance: Proposed revision to the MBE/WBE and Small Business Enterprise Procurement Program. Disparity Study: The pandemic disrupted much of the momentum of the disparity study, causing a slow process to slow even further. Regardless, this Board reviewed and monitored the disparity study scope of work including the public input process, timelines and provided feedback and information as necessary for staff to administer and received presentation from consultant team undertaking the study approved by the City Council. Personal Net Worth (PNW): The Board received presentations on the concept and definition of Personal Net Worth as PNW is tied to the definition of an economically disadvantaged business or individual. This topic will continue to be …
Current Overview of SMBR FY 2021- 2022 Budget The decreases are from Support SDervices (which includes items such as city travel, postage, carpentry services, and office machine rentals) and Transfers Activities(which covers CTM Support and Operations). Departmental Divisions FY21 FY22 Variance Departmental Support Services $1,398,039 $1,382,488 ($15,551) Other Requirements $4,837 $31,162 $26,325 $991,068 $993,735 $2,667 $1,304,079 $1,317,205 $13,126 $777,030 $821,059 $44,029 $464,128 $211,263 ($252,865) $4,939,181 $4,756,912 ($182,269) MBE/WBE Certification Compliance Resource Services Transfers Total
