BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2022-0032 BOA DATE: April 11th, 2022 ADDRESS: 2904 Rivercrest Dr OWNER: Cody Stavig COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 AGENT: David Cancialosi ZONING: LA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: VARIANCE REQUEST: a) decrease the minimum front yard setback from 40 feet to 25 feet and b) increase the height from 23 feet 8 inches to 24 feet 1 inch. SUMMARY: remodel existing residence ISSUES: lot size LA Site North LA LA South LA East LA West ZONING LAND USES Single-Family Lake Austin Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets BRNA ASSOCIATION INC City of Rollingwood Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Glenlake Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation SELTexas Save Our Springs Alliance Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group TNR BCP The Creek at Riverbend Neighborhood Association Travis County Natural Resources D-4/1 Board of Adjustment General/Parking Variance Application DevelopmentATX.com | Phone: 311 (or 512-974-2000 outside Austin) For submittal and fee information, see austintexas.gov/digitaldevelopment WARNING: Filing of this appeal stops all affected construction activity. This application is a fillable PDF that can be completed electronically. To ensure your information is saved, click here to Save the form to your computer, then open your copy and continue. The Tab key may be used to navigate to each field; Shift + Tab moves to the previous field. The Enter key activates links, emails, and buttons. Use the Up & Down Arrow keys to scroll through drop-down lists and check boxes, and hit Enter to make a selection. The application must be complete and accurate prior to submittal. If more space is required, please complete Section 6 as needed. All information is required (if applicable). For Office Use Only Case # __________________ ROW # ___________________ Tax # ____________________ Section 1: Applicant Statement Street Address: __________________________________________________________________ 2904 Rivercrest Subdivision Legal Description: lot 15 block A section 1 of the Rivercrest Addition ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Lot(s): _________________________________ Block(s): _____________________________ 15 A Outlot: _________________________________ Division: _____________________________ Zoning District: ___________________________________________________________________ LA I/We ________________________________________________ on behalf of myself/ourselves as David Cancialosi authorized agent for ________________________________________________ affirm that on Cody Stavig Month March , Day 11 , Year 2022 , hereby apply for a hearing before the Board of Adjustment for consideration to (select appropriate option below): Erect Attach Complete Remodel Maintain Other: ____________ Type of Structure: ______________________________________________________________ Single Family Residence City of Austin | Board of Adjustment General/Parking Variance Application | Page 4 of 8 D-4/2 Portion of …
N I T S U A F O Y T I C t n e m t s u j d A f o d r a o B t e e h S n o i s i c e D 2 - F 0 0 1 0 - 1 2 0 2 - 5 1 C : R E B M U N E S A C 2 2 0 2 , 4 1 h c r a M y a d n o M : E T A D d n a L e h t m o r f ) s ( e c n a i r a v a g n i t s e u q e r s i t n a c i l p p a e h T : e c n e d i s e r y l i m a F - e l g n i S a t c e r e o t r e d r o n i ) . t f . , q s 0 4 7 5 w o h s s d r o c e r D A C T ( , ) d e t s e u q e r ( t e e f e r a u q s 4 6 4 , 5 o t ) d e r i u q e r ( t e e f e r a u q s 0 5 7 , 5 m o r f s t n e m e r i u q e r e z i S t o L m u m i n i m e h t e s a e r c e d o t ) t o L d r a d n a t s b u S ( ) a ( ) 2 ( ) B ( 3 4 9 - 2 - 5 2 n o i t c e S : e d o C t n e m p o l e v e D y l i m a f - e l g n i s a r o f d e s u e b y a m t o l d r a d n a t s b u s A ) …
E-1/65 E-1/66 E-1/67 E-1/68 E-1/69 E-1/70 E-1/71 E-1/72 E-1/73 E-1/74 E-1/75 E-1/76 From: To: Subject: Date: Mark Hoelscher Ramirez, Elaine Board of Adjustment: Case number C15-2021-0100 Monday, November 01, 2021 11:04:37 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Elaine- I'm emailing you back regarding the request for rezoning on Kinney Ave. My Name: C. Mark Hoelscher Address: 1108 Kinney Ave, Austin 78704 Phone Number: 512.975.9117 Case C15-2021-0100 Comments: In our opinion, please allow for the rezoning of the subject property at 1003 Kinney Ave. The use of the property for an SF-3 single family with pool should be allowed, it is within the former use of the property. As a favor, could an amendment be added to the allowed SF-3 rezoning to prevent the future addition of an ABU on the lot. Thank you to you and your department for reaching out to us as neighbors and "stakeholders." Best regards, Mark Hoelscher CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. E-1/77 Austin Stowell Ramirez, Elaine From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: 2021-000085 BA - Notice of Support SUPPORT Monday, November 08, 2021 6:33:40 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** My name is Austin Stowell. I Ama Zilker neighbor live at 904 Ethel St and am writing a letter of support in favor of Case # 2021-000085 BA for the property located at 1003 Kinney. The design is far superior than the ubiquitous Hardie plan structures in the neighborhood being erected by many spec builders and will help contribute, not detract to the neighborhood character. The existing structure is in poor condition. All buildings have a natural life.. The IRS limits the functional life of a building to 27.5 years. This particular structure is in disrepair and not economically feasible to be repaired. Every property owner deserves the right to replace their existing home. In this case, the zoning does not allow for reasonable use of the land. I think the Board is justified in approving the request because reasonable use is currently excluded. The property is unique to the area. I am aware of only 3 lots in Zilker that are less than 5750 square feet that are not exempted from variance by the age of …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet F-5 DATE: Monday March14, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0011 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) APPLICANT: Jonathan Kaplan OWNER: David Scott Kosch ADDRESS: 2715 LONG BOW TRL increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope with a gradient of 15 percent and not increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope with a gradient of 15 percent or less VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (C) (3) (a) from 35 percent (allowed) to 40 percent (requested) (b) more than 25 percent from 10 percent (allowed) to 40 percent (requested) (c) percent and not more than 35 percent from 5 percent (allowed) to 40 percent (requested) (d) percent (requested), in order to complete a Single-Family residence in a “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope with a gradient of more than 25 increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope gradient greater than 35 percent to 40 Note: This section of the Land Development Code applies to lots that are included in a subdivision plat recorded before April 22, 1982 or a tract that is not required to be platted. For the above address the Subdivision Plat was recorded on November 17, 1969 (E) This subsection specifies additional development standards based on slope gradient in a Lake Austin (LA) district. (2) On a slope with a gradient of more than 35 percent, development is prohibited except for the construction of a fence, driveway, road or utility that cannot be E-2/1 reasonably placed elsewhere, or a non-mechanized pedestrian facility, such as a foot path, sidewalk, or stairs. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to postpone to March 14, 2022; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 11-0 vote; POSTPONED TO MARCH 14, 2022; March 14, 2022 POSTPONED TO APRIL 11, 2022 BY APPLICANT FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet F-7 DATE: Monday March 14, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0018 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____Barbara Mcarthur OUT ___-____Rahm McDaniel OUT ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___Y____Richard Smith ___-____Michael Von Ohlen OUT ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Carrie Waller (Alternate) N/A ___Y____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) APPLICANT: Jason McNair OWNER: Paul Smith ADDRESS: 54 ANTHONY STREET Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, a) the minimum front yard setback from 25 feet (required) to 10.3 feet (requested) b) Section 25-2-943 (Substandard Lot) (B) (1) (a) to decrease the minimum Lot Size requirements from 4,000 square feet (required) to 3,380 square feet (requested) in order to erect a Single- Plan zoning district (Holly Neighborhood Plan) -Family-Neighborhood -3- Note: 25-2-943 SUBSTANDARD LOT (B) A substandard lot may be used for a single-family residential use if the use is permitted in the zoning district in which the lot is located and the lot complies with the requirements of this subsection. (1) A substandard lot recorded in the county real property records before March 14, 1946 must: (a) have an area of not less than 4,000 square feet; and (b) be not less than 33 feet wide at the street or at the building line, or have access to a street by an easement that is: (i) not less than ten feet wide if it serves one lot, or not less than 18 feet wide if it serves more than one lot; (ii) not more than 150 feet in length; and (iii) maintained for access by the property owner. E-4/1 POSTPONED TO MARCH 14, 2022 (AE DENIAL); March 14, 2022 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Madam Chair Jessica Cohen motions to postpone to April 11, 2022; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO APRIL 11, 2022. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and …
E-4/42 E-4/43 E-4/44 City of Austin - Board of Adjustments c/o Elaine Ramirez POB 1088 Austin, Texas 78767 SUBJECT: Case #C15-2022-0018, 54 Anthony Street, Austin Texas 78702 I am writing in support of the variances for the owner of 54 Anthony, Austin Texas 78702 located in the Holly Neighborhood. As a co-founder of the East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Planning Team, I am very familiar with the dilemma suffered by owners of substandard lots. Unfortunately, because of some self-proclaimed leaders in the Holly Planning Area who do not believe in the value of diversity being an asset, the City Council never accepted a formal Neighborhood Plan nor recognized a legitimate Planning Team despite heroic efforts by city staff, local businesses, diverse residents, congregations or civic groups within the planning boundary. I attended many Holly Planning meetings and helped with outreach efforts to ensure that all voices in the neighborhood had a seat at the table. In fact, city staff tried to mediate the conflicts between members of El Concilio and the East Town Lake Citizens and the rest of the honest folks who wanted to have a Neighborhood Plan and adopt land use regulations like small lot amnesty and prevailing setbacks like we did in the East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Plan. I knew the Dominguez family that lived at 54 Anthony for decades through my work with Summer Youth Employment and Community Education programs at Martin Middle School as an AISD project specialist up until 2000. Their tiny home, which I visited several times, was always at risk of being declared uninhabitable and my drive-by last week confirmed the condition of the tiny home has deteriorated even more. And there s a heritage tree that further restricts building a new home. I believe that unless these variances are granted, we ll all suffer from another vacant lot in the Holly Neighborhood because it s just not financially feasible to build a home with the current setbacks and required lot size. Or worse yet, the land will flip several times and future owners will expend their time, talent and treasure coming before your Board. Please allow the new owner to create a new home in Holly. We need more neighbors! Be a part of the solution of our housing crisis, not part of the problem. There are hundreds of these tiny homes on tiny lots that are grandfathered but unable to be …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet F-8 DATE: Monday March 14, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0019 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: Andrew Ryan Thompson ADDRESS: 607 E 49TH ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting variance(s) from the Land Development Code, a) second story (maximum allowed), to 864 square feet (requested) b) Standards Section 2.1 (Maximum Development Permitted) to increase the F.A.R from 40% (required) to 45.7% (requested) in order to remodel an existing detached Two-Family residential structure in an “SF-3-NCCD-NP”, Single-Family Residence-Neighborhood Conservation Combining District Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (North Hyde Park NCCD Neighborhood Plan) Note: Per LDC 25-2-774 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE (C) The second dwelling unit: (5) may not exceed: (a) 1,100 total square feet or a floor-to-area ratio of 0.15, whichever is smaller; and (b) 550 square feet on the second story, if any; and (6) may not be used as a short term rental for more than 30 days in a calendar year if the second dwelling unit was constructed after October 1, 2015. Per Subchapter F: The maximum amount of development permitted on a property subject to this Subchapter is limited to the greater of 0.4 to 1.0 floor-to-area ratio or 2,300 square feet of gross floor area, as defined in Section 3.3. Floor-to-area ratio shall be measured using gross floor area Section 25-2-774 (Two-Family Residential Use) (C) (5) (b) from 550 square feet on the Subchapter F: Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development E-5/1 as defined in Section 3.3, except that the lot area of a flag lot is calculated consistent with the requirements of Section 25-1-22 (Measurements). BOARD’S DECISION: POSTPONED TO MARCH 14, 2022 (AE DENIAL); MARCH 14, 2022 POSTPONED TO APRIL 11, 2022 BY APPLICANT FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-2 DATE: Monday March 14, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0021 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____Barbara Mcarthur OUT ___-____Rahm McDaniel OUT ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___Y____Richard Smith ___-____Michael Von Ohlen OUT ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___Y____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) APPLICANT: Bhavani Singal OWNER: Heidi Lew ADDRESS: 3701 ROBBINS RD VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section(s): 1. decrease the minimum Front Yard Setback from 40 feet (required) to 15 feet (requested) and 2. (a) percent or less from 35 percent (allowed) to 48 percent (requested), (58% existing) (c) than 25 percent and not more than 35 percent from 5 percent (allowed) to 14 percent (requested), (4% existing) in order to erect a new two story Single-Family residence in a “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope with a gradient of 15 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope with a gradient of more 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (C) (3) E-6/1 Note: This section of the Land Development Code applies to lots that are included in a subdivision plat recorded before April 22, 1982 or a tract that is not required to be platted. BOARD’S DECISION: March 14, 2022 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to postpone to April 11, 2022; Board Member Brooke Bailey seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO APRIL 11, 2022. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ ____________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Madam Chair E-6/2 ) ' 5 4 ( ) D A O R N B O R I ( e n i l t o l e v o b a s n u r e n i l …
E-6/37 E-6/38 From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Rick Swisher Ramirez, Elaine Case C15-2022-0021 Wednesday, March 09, 2022 3:43:35 PM 3701 Oak Shores C15-2022-0021.pdf *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I have attached the requested form to this email and thought it might help to put the verbiage in the body of this email as well. I appreciate your consideration and marked the form “I do not Support” that is not 100% accurate. I only wish there to be consideration to insure there is not a parking issue on this narrow street and this steep curve. If there is no off-street parking made available at this lot, there will be issues. Currently when a car is parked on the asphalt at this lot, it blocks over ½ of the street making it dangerous for a car coming down the hill by needing to be on the wrong side of the street during this steep blind curve. COMMENTS: Regarding the proposed variances for case C15-2022-0021 I have one concern. The requested 15’ front yard setback should be reviewed as per my comments below. There is a unique issue with this project. Robbins Road is a narrow, non-standard road only 18 feet wide. This is barely enough for two cars to pass plus this property is on a steep curve that causes additional issues for parked cars. Most of us living on this street have either provided for extra parking off the street on our property, or the ROW, to add gravel so guests have room to park off the road. While I do not know where the front/street property line starts, I would suggest you review it to insure there is enough room to add such a parking area. It is quite possible this can be achieved and allow the 15’ setback variance but should be reviewed and be part of your consideration. In addition to owning a home on the street, I was the builder of a neighboring home at 3605 Robbins Road where a variance was granted allowing a similar front yard variance. In the case of the 3605 Robbins granted variance, it was to allow a below street grade garage with parking on top that allows for off street parking for guests. Richard Swisher 3601 Robbins Road CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or …
BOA Monthly Report July 2021-June 2022 March 14, 2022 Granted 1. 25-2-531 (Height Limit Exceptions)(C) (1) in order to increase the height limit of an elevator shaft 2. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard setback 3. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) to decrease the minimum lot width 4. 25-2 492 (D) (Site Development Regulations) to decrease the minimum lot width Postponed 1. 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for illumination of a blade Sign 2. 25-10-123 (Expressway Corridor Sign District Regulations) (B) (3), to exceed sign height 3. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum Front Yard Setback from 40 feet (required) to 15 feet (requested) and 2. 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (C) (3) (a) increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope with a gradient of 15 percent or less from 35 percent (allowed) to 48 percent (requested), (58% existing) (c) increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope 4. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) to decrease the minimum Lot Size requirements and b) 25-2-947 (Nonconforming Use Regulation Groups) (B) (2) to increase the improvement value 5. 25-2-943 (B) (2) (a) (Substandard Lot) to decrease the minimum Lot Size requirement 6. Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (C) (3) increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope 7. Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (C) (3) increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope 8. 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard setback and 25-2-943 (Substandard Lot) (B) (1) (a) to decrease the minimum Lot Size 9. 25-2-774 (Two-Family Residential Use) (C) (5) (b) from 550 square feet on the second story and Subchapter F: Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards Section 2.1 (Maximum Development Permitted) to increase the F.A.R Denied 1. 25-2- 492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard setback Withdrawn None Discussion Items Mar 2022. Interpretations 1 new inquiries The deposition of the case items: A. Granted 27 B. Postponed 50 C. Withdrawn 7 4 D. Denied E. Discussion Items 40 (Added Mar 14, 2022 #’s) 7 items Februay 14, 2022 9 6 Granted 1. 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 1 sign(s) on the property: (F) to allow one (1) wall signs above the second and (H) to allow for the one …
TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: M E M O R A N D U M Mayor and Council January 14, 2022 Denise Lucas, Director, Development Services Department Update on Resolution No. 20211014-045 – Board of Adjustment Applicant Assistance Program On October 14, 2021, City Council adopted Resolution No. 20211014-045 directing the City Manager to explore the creation of a Board of Adjustment Applicant Assistance Program (BAAP) for residential homestead applicants who are requesting a hardship variance or special exception. The resolution contemplates the creation of a BAAP fund to support fee waivers or reductions for applicants who meet the eligibility criteria; as well as pro bono assistance with navigating the application process and subsequent proceedings. To meet the requirements outlined in this resolution, staff is working with the Financial Services Department to identify a funding source. In addition, staff is working with the procurement office to develop a process to procure pro-bono legal services. Staff does not anticipate completing all the components of the Council direction until May 2022 at which time a full response will be provided. Should you have questions or need additional information, please contact Doron Silberstein, Equity and Inclusion Program Manager, at doron.silberstein@austintexas.gov or (512) 978-1732. cc: Spencer Cronk, City Manager Rodney Gonzales, Assistant City Manager
§ 2-1-111 - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. (A) The Board of Adjustment is established as provided in Local Government Code Chapter 211 (Municipal Zoning Authority). (B) The board shall be composed of 11 members. (C) Each board member shall be appointed to serve a two-year term. (D) The council may appoint alternate board members to serve in the absence of regular members. An alternate member shall be appointed to serve a two-year term. (E) A regular or alternate board member may be removed by council for cause on a written charge after a public hearing. (F) The board shall: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) board. hear and decide a request for a variance from the requirements of Chapter 25-2 (Zoning), except as otherwise provided by the Code; hear and decide an appeal of an administrative action under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); hear and decide a request for a variance from the requirements of airport zoning regulations under Section 241.034, Local Government Code; hear and decide a request for a special exception under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); and perform other duties prescribed by ordinance or state law. (G) The board shall hold meetings at the call of the chairperson and at other times as requested by the (H) The chairperson, or the acting chairperson in the absence of the chairperson, may administer oaths and compel the attendance of witnesses. (I) Each case before the board must be heard by at least 75 percent of the board members. (J) The concurring vote of 75 percent of the board members is necessary to: reverse an order, requirement, decision, or determination of an administrative official; decide in favor of an applicant on a matter on which the board is required to pass under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); or (3) authorize a variation from the terms of Chapter 25-2 (Zoning). (K) The board shall prepare minutes of its proceedings. The minutes shall include the vote of each member on each item before the board and shall state if a member is absent or fails to vote on an item. Source: Ord. 20071129-011; Ord. 20080110-048; Ord. 20080618-030; Ord. 20110526-098;Ord. No. 20141211-204, Pt. 14, 7-1-15. ARTICLE 3. - PROCEDURES FOR APPEALS Division 1. - Reserved.[2] Footnotes: --- (2) --- §§ 2-5-41—2-5-45. - RESERVED. Division 2. - Appeals. § 2-5-61 - GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR APPEALS. Editor's note— Ord. No. 20170518-014 >, Pt. 4, effective May 29, 2017, repealed §§ 2-5-41—2-5-45, …
Austin Moxy Hotel 2552 Guadalupe Street Austin, Texas Exterior Building Signage City Presentation Babendure Design Group 8140 Walnut Hill Ln. #950 Dallas, Texas 75231 214.265.1960 214.265.5552 (fax) www.babendure.com Signage & Wayfinding Design Specialists 1 C-1/1-PRESENTATION F E A B C D 5 4 1 3.2 3.1 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" Sign Location Plan 2 7 Existing single story building on adjacent lot (Owned by another party) Existing single story building on adjacent lot (Owned by another party) Existing single story building on adjacent lot (Owned by another party) Babendure Design Group8140 Walnut Hill Ln. #950Dallas, Texas 75231214.265.1960214.265.5552 (fax)www.babendure.comAustin Moxy HotelAustin, TexasExterior Building SignageNovember 18, 2020C-1/2-PRESENTATION 1 RESTAURANT IDENTITY Projecting Sign Box with push-through Restaurant Logo Top of Sign = 12’-8” above grade 3.1 MENU DISPLAY Located to left of windows. Top of Sign = 6’-0”above grade. 3.2 MENU DISPLAY Located to left of windows. Top of Sign = 6’-0”above grade. 4 5 PICK UP WINDOW IDENTITY Box sign with white push-through graphics. Top of Sign = 8’-0” above grade. ORDER WINDOW IDENTITY Box sign with white push-through graphics. Top of Sign = 8’-0” above grade. BILLBOARD (Owned By Another Party) 1 A B 3.1 4 3.2 5 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0” 18'-3 1/2" (High Logo) 16'-3" (Low Logo) " 2 / 1 8 - ' 2 A Dimensional Letters to be Moxy pink. Top of Sign - 58’-8” above grade. " 6 - ' 1 " 2 / 1 4 - ' 2 B Dimensional Letters to be Moxy pink. Top of Sign - 14’-8” above grade. D C Dimensional Letters mounted on the canopy ledge. Color to be Moxy pink. Top of Sign - 14’-2” above grade. Projecting Sign Box with push-through graphics. Logo to be Moxy pink day. Top of Sign - 22’-8” above grade. East Elevation High and Low Level Signs 3 Babendure Design Group8140 Walnut Hill Ln. #950Dallas, Texas 75231214.265.1960214.265.5552 (fax)www.babendure.comAustin Moxy HotelAustin, TexasExterior Building SignageNovember 18, 2020C-1/3-PRESENTATION 18'-3 1/2" 16'-3 1/2" " 8 / 1 8 - ' 2 " 2 / 1 7 - ' 3 A " 8 / 5 9 " 2 / 1 2 " 1 1 - ' 1 " 4 - ' 2 LOCATION A HIGH LEVEL WALL IDENTITY FRONT ELEVATION • AREA CALCULATION: 60 SQFT Top of Sign = 58’-8” above grade. SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0” 2 1/2" 6'-0" 5'-7" 1 3/4"Stroke Width 1" …
S I G N V A R I A N C E T A R G E T P Y L O N B O A M E E T I N G Walton Signage Esteban Vilchez C-2/1-PRESENTATION V A R I A N C E F A C T O R S • Existing Code: According to code, the max over all height is 35’ from “grade”. The Target parking lot is escalated above grade by 4’ so we were allowed an over all height of 31’ for this new pylon. • Location Issues: We had a location for the pylon however, when we went to dig the hole, there was an underground pipe that was not detected as it was on Targets property and not part of the underground utilities that is marked by the underground utility locator. • Variance Request: I would like to see if we can get an additional 10’ – 12’ of height approved. The location that would require this are within the tree line and would therefore need the height increase for the sign to be seen. C-2/2-PRESENTATION C-2/3-PRESENTATION E X A M P L E S O F S I G N W I T H E X I S T I N G C O D E A P P L I E D • As you can see from this flag test, the proposed location of the pylon would not clear the tree line as well as not provide any visibility whatsoever if you are looking westbound or eastbound down Great Hills Rd. The proposed request would not only provide us with the opportunity to save the landscaping on the property, but also provide traffic markers on the Great Hills Rd. C-2/4-PRESENTATION C-2/5-PRESENTATION C-2/6-PRESENTATION C-2/7-PRESENTATION C-2/8-PRESENTATION E X A M P L E S O F S I G N W I T H V A R I A N C E A P P L I E D • As you can see the proposed drawings depict the pylon around 10’-12’ taller which would clear the tree line as well as provide all the necessary markers for traffic. C-2/9-PRESENTATION C-2/10-PRESENTATION C-2/11-PRESENTATION C-2/12-PRESENTATION C-2/13-PRESENTATION H A R D S H I P • We believe that the proposed request should be approved because according to code chapter 25-10 which states: “The Board may grant a variance only if it finds …
2022-000013 BA 2323 San Antonio Dawn Aimone The Castilian – Austin C-3/1-PRESENTATION Blade Sign - Plans and Location North Elevation of Building C-3/2-PRESENTATION 2323 San Antonio North Elevation – Location Click to add text C-3/3-PRESENTATION Current Non Lit Sign C-3/4-PRESENTATION Mounting Details Non Lit Click to add text Click to add text C-3/5-PRESENTATION Electrical Details Will Power Supply C-3/6-PRESENTATION Mounting Details with Electrical Details C-3/7-PRESENTATION
3709 Cedar St. Board of Adjustment April 11, 2022 Case # C15-2022-0025 Homeowner: Suzannah Cox Applicant : Karen McGraw . D-1/1-PRESENTATION Existing Use: • Single Family Home D-1/2-PRESENTATION Scope: • Zoning - MF2-NCCD-NP (At 6,636 SF it cannot be developed as Multi-family - 8,000 SF required.) • Will be developed per SF3-NCCD-NP regulations. • Homeowner wishes to: • Maintain the existing c. 1930 bungalow • Create a Two-Family use by adding a small second dwelling unit. • Relocate the garage for alley access while protecting heritage Pecan Trees. D-1/3-PRESENTATION The 3700 block of Cedar has mixed zoning. D-1/4-PRESENTATION Variances Requested: • 1) Decrease the minimum lot width from 50’ (required) to 41’ (requested) in order to allow a Two-family residential use and • Notes: • The North University NCCD No. 040826-058 Part 7 (1) requires a lot minimum width to be 50’. • The North University NCCD (Revision) Ordinance No. 2011-0804-040 Allows 2- family use on a lot at least 5,750 Sf. • The existing lot is 41’ x 160’ and has 6,636 square feet. D-1/5-PRESENTATION *building footprints *number of dwelling units *Lot widths D-1/6-PRESENTATION Second Variance • 2) Decrease the minimum interior side yard setback from 5’ (required) to 3’ (requested) to erect a detached garage in an SF3- NCCD-NP) zoning district • Notes: • The North University NCCD No. 040826-058 Part 7 (3) (d) states “a non-complying accessory building may be reconstructed at its existing location, but may not be less than 3’ from the rear and interior side property lines.” • The existing garage is 2.3’ from the side property line. The new garage needs to be accessible from the alley and requires a 3’ setback to protect heritage trees but will NOT be on the existing location. D-1/7-PRESENTATION Proposed Site Plan D-1/8-PRESENTATION Reasonable Use • All other lots on this blockface have a width of at least 50’ except for 3709 and also 3711 where a new two-story home is under construction. • Two-family uses are permitted on most nearby lots. • The proposed second dwelling will meet all other regulations. • The garage 3’ minimum setback will protect the 28.6” Heritage Pecan Tree. D-1/9-PRESENTATION Hardship • The hardship is unique to the property as most other lots on this blockface are already developed with two or more dwelling units except for 3703 (and 3711 currently under construction). • The hardship is not general to the …
BOA –April 11, 2022 Michele Rogerson Lynch Metcalfe Wolff Stuart & Williams 7125 & 7129 Dancing Wind C15-2022-0028 7236 & 7240 Dancing Wind C15-2022-0026 D-2/1-PRESENTATION Aerial close up with site highlighted D-2/2-PRESENTATION Variance Request 7125 & 7129 Dancing Wind MF-2 Front Setback 25 ft 20.5 ft 4.5 ft reduction 7236 & 7240 Dancing Wind -cul-de-sac MF-2 Front Setback 25 ft 16.5 ft 8.5 ft reduction D-2/3-PRESENTATION Overall Project Single Family Attached home subdivision under construction Limited Purpose City Limits Attached house over two lots 47 lots in subdivision 94 attached homes D-2/4-PRESENTATION Title 30 vs 25-2 Conflict with Limited Purpose Title 30 controls subdivision Title 25 controls zoning (MF-2) Title 30 - ZAP variance process Subdivision vacation and replat Title 25 - BOA variance process D-2/5-PRESENTATION 7125 & 7129 D-2/6-PRESENTATION 7125 & 7129 D-2/7-PRESENTATION 7236 & 7240 D-2/8-PRESENTATION 7236 & 7240 D-2/9-PRESENTATION Area Character -Intent Still Met Setbacks intended to provide distance between structures and uniformity Side and rear setbacks with yards more important to retain Reduced front yard not as impactful No front porches No real yard space – all driveway D-2/10-PRESENTATION Summary Builder discovered after City inspections passed Title 30/Title 25 Conflict in Limited Purpose ZAP variance Reasonable Use Hardship neighboring lots homes) 4 families standing by to close over minor setback issue Unique – minor deviations that do not impact enjoyment of Not general to the area – only 4 lots out of 47 (92 of 94 Area Character - Intent Met No material front yard to protect – all driveway Side and rear setbacks still intact where yard exists D-2/11-PRESENTATION
