All documents

RSS feed for this page

Board of AdjustmentSept. 13, 2021

E-4 C15-2021-0081 Late Back-up original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

From: To: Subject: Date: mb@gte.net Ramirez, Elaine FW: C15-2021-0081 1308 W 9 1/2 Street - Opposition Letter Friday, September 10, 2021 3:58:16 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** September 10, 2021 RE: C15-2021-0081 Dear Board of Adjustment Commissioners, I still strongly oppose this variance request, for these additional reasons: The variance for 1308 W 9 ½ Street sites the property has an unusual hardship because it is zoned SF-3. This hardship states that 608 Blanco, zoned MF-4, which was granted a variance: “was allowed by the Board of Adjustment an increased floor-area-ratio, despite having to comply with single-family requirements” in 2012. While the original use of 608 Blanco was single family, it was converted to 3 apartments by the time it was purchased in 2012. (See property details listed in Realtor.com below.) The 2012 variance also states: “The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the prop erty in that: this structure is an older home that has been converted to three units and to restore and modernize the building to convert it back to a single family requires compliance with current requirements for single familyuse and proposed changes in conversion to 3 units to 1 uni t will also include in compliance with the McMansion requirement and will allow thestructure to be up graded to c urrent acceptable living standards. The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is locate d because: not many of the structures in the area are reducing density and imper vious cover in order to restore older building to original uses and maintain the appeal of the original construction while converting 3 units to one.” In addition, MF-4 properties over 8000 SF are entitled to FAR OF .75:1 and the variance request in 2012 only asked for an increase of .48.2:1. In 2015, the City of Austin Plan Review approved change of use to a triplex for 608 Blanco. Comparing a single family home zoned SF-3 to a 3 unit apartment zoned MF-4 is not a reasonable argument. 608 Blanco is also in close proximity to W 6th Street and 1308 w 9 ½ Street is in the heart of the OWANA neighborhood. While the OWANA neighborhood does have properties with multi-family use, there are many single family homes. Thus allowing the request for increased FAR for 1308 W 9 ½ Street, would set a …

Scraped at: Sept. 13, 2021, 6:20 p.m.
Board of AdjustmentSept. 13, 2021

Play video original link

Play video

Scraped at: Sept. 21, 2021, 2:50 p.m.
Board of AdjustmentSept. 13, 2021

BOA SIGN IN SHEET FOR SPEAKERS original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: Sept. 22, 2021, 5:20 a.m.
Board of AdjustmentSept. 13, 2021

BOA ATTENDANCE SHEET OF BOARD MEMBERS original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Backup

Scraped at: Sept. 22, 2021, 5:20 a.m.
Board of AdjustmentSept. 13, 2021

C-1 C16-2021-0008 WITHDRAWN DS original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet C-1 DATE: September 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0008 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne (ABSTAINING) _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Leah Bojo OWNER: The Standard at Austin, LLC ADDRESS: 715 W 23RD ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s), a total of 6 signs on the property from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for a total of six (6) signs to all be illuminated, five (5) LED illuminated wall signs and one (1) internally illuminated cabinet wall sign in a “CS-NP”, General Commercial Services – Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs: (H) A sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA JUNE 14, 2021 MEETING June 14, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Darryl Pruett motions to Postpone to August 9, 2021; Board Member Brooke Bailey seconds on a 9-0 vote (Board member Melissa Hawthorne abstained); POSTPONED TO AUGUST 9, 2021. August 9, 2021 POSTPONED TO September 13, 2021 BY APPLICANT; Sept 13, 2021 WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties, 3. The granting of this variance will not substantially conflict with the stated purposes of this sign ordinance, because: 4. Granting a variance would not provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated, because: because: OR, OR, AND, ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Chairman

Scraped at: Sept. 27, 2021, 3:50 p.m.
Board of AdjustmentSept. 13, 2021

D-1 C15-2021-0083 GRANTED DS original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-1 DATE: Monday September 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0083 ___-____Thomas Ates OUT ___-____Brooke Bailey OUT ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___Y____Richard Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___Y____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Victoria Haase OWNER: 1207 Taylor Series, LLC, Les Canter ADDRESS: 1207 TAYLOR ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code Section(s) a) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) to decrease the minimum Lot Size requirements from 5,750 square feet (required) to 5,676 square feet (requested) (see Note 1) and b) minimum rear yard setback from 25 feet (required) to 19.25 feet (requested) in order to erect a Two-Family Residential use (see Note 2) in an “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family Residence- Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Plan) 25-2-515 (Rear Yard of a Through Lot) from setback requirements to decrease the Note(s): a) Per LDC 25-2-774 (Two-Family Residential Use) (B) For a two-family residential use the minimum lot area is equivalent to a standard lot. b) Per LDC 25-2-515 (Rear Yard of a Through Lot) a rear yard must comply with the minimum requirements applicable to a front yard. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING SEPT 13, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Grant; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 11-0 vote; GRANTED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: the East Cesar Chavez NP demonstrates clear preference for residential development that includes secondary apartment and two family uses, this lot has SF-3-NP zoning, which allows for Secondary Apartment Special Use and two Family use, however the lot was platted at 5,663 sq ft, just under the minimum standard lot size requirement of 5,750 sq ft for an SF-3 lot. 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: the property has three protected trees of which two are heritage and must be preserved and protected, no construction can occur in the ½ critical root zone, thereby reducing the buildable area. (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: many of the lots in this area have structures built decades ago and therefore were not constrained by tree root systems …

Scraped at: Sept. 27, 2021, 3:50 p.m.
Board of AdjustmentSept. 13, 2021

D-2 C15-2021-0085 PP DS TO 10-11-21 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-2 DATE: Monday September 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0085 ___-____Thomas Ates OUT ___-____Brooke Bailey OUT ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___Y____Richard Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___Y____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: David Cancialosi OWNER: Estates at Lake Austin, LP ADDRESS: 1717 CHANNEL RD VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (B) (1) (a) from shoreline setback requirements to reduce the shoreline setback from 75 feet (required) to 25 feet (requested) along a man-made inlet in order to erect a Single-Family + associated improvements in a “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING SEPT 13, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Postpone to October 11, 2021; Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 11-0 vote; POSTPONED TO OCTOBER 11, 2021. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Chair for

Scraped at: Sept. 27, 2021, 3:50 p.m.
Board of AdjustmentSept. 13, 2021

E-1 C15-2021-0027 WITHDRAWN DS original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-1 DATE: Monday September 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0027 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: Charles Shapiro ADDRESS: 12905 VERONESE DR VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from Impervious Cover requirements to increase from 45% (maximum allowed) to 50% (requested), in order to construct a swimming pool to an existing Single-Family residence in an “SF-2”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA meeting April 12, 2021 cancelled; May 10, 2021; POSTPONED TO JUNE 14, 2021 DUE TO LACK OF BOARD MEMBERS/VOTES; JUNE 14, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to Postpone to July 12, 2021; Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 9-1 vote (Board Member Don Leighton-Burwell nay); POSTPONED TO JULY 12, 2021. July 12, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to Postpone to July 12, 2021; Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 9-1 vote (Board Member Don Leighton-Burwell nay); POSTPONED TO JULY 12, 2021. July 12, 2021 POSTPONED TO AUGUST 9, 2021; Aug 9, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to Postpone to September 13, 2021; Board Member Brooke Bailey seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO September 13, 2021 (APPLICANT NO SHOW); SEPT 13, 2021 WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Chair for

Scraped at: Sept. 27, 2021, 3:50 p.m.
Board of AdjustmentSept. 13, 2021

E-2 C15-2021-0055 WITHDRAWN DS original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-2 DATE: Monday September 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0055 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: Ruben Valdez ADDRESS: 1206 W OLTORF ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum Front Yard Setback from 25 feet (required) to 0 feet (requested) in order to maintain a Carport and Covered Entry in a “SF-6-NP”, Single-Family-Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Bouldin Creek Neighborhood Plan). BOARD’S DECISION: June 14, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to Postpone to August 9, 2021; Board Member Brooke Bailey seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO AUGUST 9, 2021. Aug 9, 2021 POSTPONED TO September 13, 2021 BY APPLICANT; SEPT 13, 2021 WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: _____________________________ ____________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Chairman for

Scraped at: Sept. 27, 2021, 3:50 p.m.
Board of AdjustmentSept. 13, 2021

E-3 C15-2021-0080 GRANTED DS W CONDS original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-3 DATE: Monday September 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0080 ___-____Thomas Ates OUT ___-____Brooke Bailey OUT ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___Y____Richard Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___Y____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Micah King OWNER: Darius Fisher ADDRESS: 74 SAN SABA ST Unit 2 VARIANCE REQUESTED: ): The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from: a) setback requirements to decrease the minimum Rear Yard Setback from 10 feet (required) to 2.1 feet (requested) b) setback requirements to decrease the minimum Interior Side Yard Setback from 5 feet(required) to 3.9 feet (requested) and from 25-2-735 (Festival Beach Subdistrict Regulations) from c) impervious cover requirements to increase from 40% (maximum allowed) to 41.38% (requested), (existing 47.8%), in order to maintain a 2nd FL deck on rear accessory structure in a “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family-Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Holly Neighborhood Plan). Note: 25-2-735 (Festival Beach Subdistrict Regulations) (A) This section applies in the Festival Beach subdistrict of the WO combining district. (D) For an area not included in a primary setback area or a secondary setback area, the maximum impervious cover is: 1) 40 percent BOARD’S DECISION: Aug 9, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to Postpone to September 13, 2021; Board Member Thomas Ates seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO September 13, 2021. Sept 13, 2021 the public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Grant as per drawing E-3/17 and Impervious cover as proposed; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 11-0 vote; GRANTED AS PER DRAWING E-3/17 AND IMPERVIOUS COVER AS PROPOSED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: would preclude being able to preserve an existing deck for upstairs rear residential unit, which increases the fire safety for residents by providing a secondary point of egress in case of emergency and which increases the quality of life for residents, the deck is set back approx. 10 ft from the originally platted lot line of the property to the rear, and the side of the deck is in line with the side of the existing structure from circa 1930 which it serves 2. (a) The hardship for …

Scraped at: Sept. 27, 2021, 3:50 p.m.
Board of AdjustmentSept. 13, 2021

E-4 C15-2021-0081 DENIED DS original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-4 DATE: Monday September 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0081 ___-____Thomas Ates OUT ___-____Brooke Bailey OUT ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___N____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___N____Richard Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___N____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___Y____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Amanda Swor OWNER: Maryelaine Sotos & Bill Shurtz ADDRESS: 1308 9TH HALF ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Subchapter F: Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards Section 2.1 (Maximum Development Permitted) to increase the F.A.R from .4 to 1.0 (required) to .46 to 1.0 (requested) in order to add an addition/remodel to an existing single family residence in an “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family- Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Old West Austin Neighborhood Plan) Note: 25-2 Subchapter F RESIDENTIAL DESIGN AND COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS, Article 2 Development Standards Section 2.1. - MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT PERMITTED. The maximum amount of development permitted on a property subject to this Subchapter is limited to the greater of 0.4 to 1.0 floor-to-area ratio or 2,300 square feet of gross floor area, as defined in Section 3.3. Floor-to-area ratio shall be measured using gross floor area as defined in Section 3.3, except that the lot area of a flag lot is calculated consistent with the requirements of Section 25-1-22 (Measurements). BOARD’S DECISION: BOA AUG 9 MEETING The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to Postpone to September 13, 2021; Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 9-1 vote (Chair Jessica Cohen nay); POSTPONED TO September 13, 2021. Sept 13, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to Grant; Board Member Michael Von Ohlen seconds on an 8-3 vote (Board members Rahm McDaniel, Richard Smith and Kelly Blume nay); DENIED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: the proposed variance doesn’t place any square footage on ground and additional volume will be aligned with existing roof height and will fit under the McMansion tent and therefore it’s not unreasonable. 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: the existing structure utilized the maximum FAR allowed under 25-2, F, 2.1 however floor area ratio requirements of this section limit development for less than what is allowed by …

Scraped at: Sept. 27, 2021, 3:50 p.m.
Board of AdjustmentSept. 13, 2021

APPROVAL OF MINUTES original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

AGENDA MEETING MINUTES September 13, 2021 The Board of Adjustment meeting convened on Monday, September 13, 2021. Some members of the Board of Adjustment may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Jessica Cohen (Chair) called the Board Meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. Board Members in Attendance (in person): Jessica Cohen (Chair), Rahm McDaniel, Richard Smith, Nicholl Wade, Kelly Blume (Alternate), Carrie Waller (Alternate) Board Members in Attendance (virtually via teleconference): Melissa Hawthorne (Vice Chair), Barbara Mcarthur, Darryl Pruett, Agustina Rodriguez, Michael Von Ohlen, Board Members Absent: Thomas Ates, Brooke Bailey City Staff in Attendance: Elaine Ramirez (Board Liaison) Lee Simmons (Board Attorney) City Staff Absent: Diana Ramirez (Board Secretary) EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) The Board of Adjustment will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on this agenda. The Board of Adjustment may also announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, to receive advice from Legal Counsel regarding any other item on this agenda. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071 CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (4) four speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda.NONE A. DISCUSSION AND REQUESTED ACTION ITEM Staff requests approval August 9, 2021 draft minutes A-1 On-Line Link: Item A-1 A-1/1 Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to approve the minutes for August 9, 2021, Board member Richard Smith seconds on a 10-0-1 vote (Board member Melissa Hawthorne abstained for Items C-1, C-2); APPROVED MINUTES FOR August 9, 2021. B. DISCUSSION AND REQUESTED ACTION ITEM B-1 Staff and Applicant requests for postponement and withdraw of items posted on this Agenda Items C-1, E-1 and E-2 applicant requests to withdraw C. SIGNS PREVIOUS POSTPONEMENTS C-1 C16-2021-0008 Leah M. Bojo for The Standard at Austin, LLC 715 W. 23rd Street On-Line Link: Item C-1 PART1; PART2; PART3; PART4; NO PRESENTATION The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s), a total of 6 signs on the property from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for a total of six (6) signs to all be illuminated, five (5) LED illuminated wall signs and one (1) internally illuminated cabinet …

Scraped at: Oct. 12, 2021, 6:20 p.m.
Austin Travis County Food Policy BoardSept. 13, 2021

Draft_Agenda_ATCFPB_SEPT2021 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

AUSTIN-TRAVIS COUNTY FOOD POLICY BOARD MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13th FROM 6:00 TO 8:00 PM City of Austin Permitting and Development Center 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr, Room 1405 Event Center Austin, TX 78752 CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Sharon Mays, Chair Joy Casnovsky, Vice Chair Andrea Abel Joi Chevalier Kacey Hanson Karen Magid Emily Nicola DeMaria Ryan Rosshirt Ellen Sweets AGENDA CALL TO ORDER and Introduction of new board member CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM AUGUST MEETING 2. STAFF and COMMUNITY BRIEFINGS a. Food System Planning Updates, Edwin Marty, Food Policy Manager, City of Austin 3. OLD BUSINESS b. Board Infrastructure & Protocol i. Review Board Members’ meetings with City and County Officials c. Board vacancies and appointments d. Review Prior Board Recommendations and Discuss City and County Budgets e. Community Engagement 4. NEW BUSINESS a. Discussion of Strategic Planning for October b. Working Group Briefings and Recommendations i. Healthy Food Access to All Communities ii. Governance iii. Food and Climate iv. Build Opportunities for Food Entrepreneurs v. Support Farms & Farmers vi. COVID-19 Food System Response c. Review of Board Member Assignments FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Amanda Rohlich at Amanda.Rohlich@austintexas.gov or call 512-974-1364 at Office of Sustainability for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Austin-Travis County Food Policy Board, please contact Amanda Rohlich at Amanda.Rohlich@austintexas.gov or call 512-974-1364.

Scraped at: Sept. 9, 2021, 3:50 p.m.
Austin Travis County Food Policy BoardSept. 13, 2021

Backup_ATCFPB_2a_Edwin Marty_Food Planning Updates_Sept2021 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

AUSTIN FOOD SYSTEM PLAN ATCFPB UPDATES Food Policy Team is currently: ● Distributed a memo to Mayor and Council providing updates on the planning process ● Reviewing food system plans from across the country to develop list of best practices (11 Food System Plans) ● Interviewing food system plan project managers from across the country to learn about planning process, budget, community engagement & centering equity (6 interviews) ● Interviewing COA staff on planning initiatives (Resilience Hubs, Austin Climate Equity Plan) to identify lessons learned and building interdepartmental team for planning process (8 interviews) ● Developing a RFP for consultant Food System Planning: Plan Review Government-led Plans: New York, NY: Food Forward: 10 Year Food Policy Plan - 2020 ⭐ Makes clear City government’s role in the food system; provides clear examples / callouts of work already underway Seattle: Food Action Plan - 2012 ⭐ Work that is already underway ; Proven impact: Fresh Bucks program, Farm to Table program Denver, CO: Food Vision - 2017, Food Action Plan - 2018 ⭐ Baseline Report, Vision, and Action Plan all separated out as digestible components of a larger planning process; Goals are SMART and target rationales are transparent ; declaration of support Community-led Plans: San Diego County, CA: Food Vision 2030 - 2021 ⭐ Deep engagement ; Land & People Acknowledgement ; Movement + Power Building Framework ; Interactive Website Pittsburgh, PA: Greater Pittsburgh Food Action Plan - 2020 ⭐ Deep community engagement ; Empowerment framework ; evaluation built into goals ; Food Policy Audit (U Virginia) Food System Planning: Project Interviews ● Completed interviews: ○ San Diego County, CA (Food Vision 2030) ■ Meeting w/ San Diego County Food System Alliance: 08/11/21 ○ Denver, CO (Food Action Plan) ■ Meeting w/ city staff: 08/25/21 ○ Pittsburgh, PA (Greater Pittsburgh Food Action Plan) ■ Meeting w/ city staff: 08/19/21 ■ Meeting w/ Pittsburgh Food Policy Council: 08/19/21 ○ Philadelphia, PA (Eating Here: Greater Philadelphia Food System Plan) ■ Meeting w/ city staff: 09/07/21 ○ New York, NY (Food Forward: 10 Year Food Policy Plan) ■ Meeting w/ city staff: 09/13/21 ○ Dallas, TX ■ Meeting w/ city staff: 9/9/21 ● Coming up: ○ Seattle, WA: Food Action Plan ○ Minneapolis, MN: Food Action Plan 07/26/21 + 08/26/21 (Marc) (Ongoing bi-weekly meeting scheduled) Food System Planning: COA Interviews ● Completed interviews: ○ Austin Public Health - 08/31/21 ○ Austin Resource Recovery - …

Scraped at: Sept. 14, 2021, 11:50 a.m.
Arts CommissionSept. 13, 2021

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

Regular Meeting of the Art in Public Places Panel September 13th, 2021 – 6:00 PM - 7:30 PM All public speakers must register in advance. Deadline to register: Sunday, September 12th, 2021 at noon. The Art in Public Places Panel Meeting will be held with Social Distancing Modifications. Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the Art in Public Places Panel Meeting, residents must:  Contact the panel liaison at 512-974-7841 or anna.bradley@austintexas.gov no later than noon, the day before the scheduled meeting. The information required is the speaker’s name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, and a telephone number or email address.  Once a request to speak has been called in or emailed to the panel liaison, residents will receive either an email or phone call providing the telephone number to call on the day of the scheduled meeting.  Speakers must call in at least 10 minutes prior to meeting start to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak.  Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak.  Handouts or other information may be emailed to anna.bradley@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Panel members in advance of the meeting. La Reunión Regular del Panel de Arte en Lugares Públicos 13 de septiembre del 2021 – 6:00pm - 7:30pm Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación. Fecha límite para registrarse: 12 de septiembre del 2021 antes del mediodía La reunión del Panel de Arte en Lugares Públicos se llevará a cabo con modificaciones de distancia social. Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna aportación en persona. Todos los comentarios del público se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión del Panel de Arte en Lugares Públicos, los residentes deben:  Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en 512.974.7841 o anna.bradley @austintexas.gov más tardar al mediodía el día antes de la reunión. La información requerida es el nombre del orador, los números de artículo sobre los que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutrales, y un número de teléfono o dirección de correo …

Scraped at: Sept. 10, 2021, 3:10 p.m.
Animal Advisory CommissionSept. 13, 2021

2a August 2021 Monthly Data Report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Aug-21 Cat Dog Other Bird Livestock Aug-21 Cat Dog Aug-21 Euth Died Missing Percentage Cat Dog Other Bird Livestock Aug-20 Cat Dog Aug-20 Euth Died Missing Percentage Outcome Type Adoption Died Euthanasia Missing Relocate RTO RTO-Adopt Transfer Subtotal Total Outcome Outcome Type Adoption Died Euthanasia Missing Relocate RTO RTO-Adopt Transfer Subtotal Total Outcome Outcome Type Adoption Died Euthanasia Missing Relocate RTO RTO-Adopt Transfer Subtotal Total Outcome 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1261 Aug-20 752 Aug-19 439 11 14 0 0 7 5 193 669 208 10 7 0 0 11 6 118 360 429 10 16 1 0 18 8 438 920 376 3 4 0 0 97 8 104 592 208 2 4 0 0 58 8 112 392 543 8 9 0 0 157 20 207 944 15 0 11 0 0 4 0 14 44 10 1 55 0 0 0 0 3 69 22 1 28 1 0 0 0 5 57 50 73 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1864 60 Live Outcome Percentage Live Outcome Percentage Age Neonate Youth Adult Total Total Age Neonate Youth Adult Subtotal Total Age Neonate Youth Adult Total Total Live Outcome Percentage 17 205 370 592 20 115 257 392 26 367 551 944 145 377 147 669 1261 97.5% 62 195 103 360 752 96.9% 179 526 215 920 1864 97.6% Age Neonate (cat) Kitten Cat Neonate (dog) Puppy Dog Total Age Neonate (cat) Kitten Cat Neonate (dog) Puppy Dog Total Age Neonate (cat) Kitten Cat Neonate (dog) Puppy Dog Total 7 4 0 1 1 1 14 4 4 2 0 1 1 12 1 6 3 4 3 1 18 2 8 4 0 1 3 18 2 1 4 0 0 4 11 2 7 7 1 1 7 25 93.8% 96.8% 97.3% 94.1% 99.0% 98.9% 90.3% 97.4% 94.2% 100.0% 99.1% 98.1% 98.3% 97.5% 95.3% 80.8% 98.9% 98.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Cat Dog Other Bird Aug-19 Cat Dog Aug-19 Euth Died Missing Percentage Other consists of the following: bats, raccoons, possums, rabbits, guinea pigs, turtle, coyote, skunk, ferret, squirrel, fox, armadillo Livestock consists …

Scraped at: Sept. 2, 2021, 9 p.m.
Animal Advisory CommissionSept. 13, 2021

3e Placement Partner Transfer Agreement original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Backup

Scraped at: Sept. 3, 2021, 11:30 a.m.
Animal Advisory CommissionSept. 13, 2021

Agenda September 13, 2021 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

ANIMAL ADVISORY COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13, 2021, 6 PM AUSTIN CITY HALL, Room 1101 301 W. Second St. AUSTIN, TEXAS 78702 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at http://www.austintexas.gov/watch-atxn-live AGENDA CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Craig Nazor, Chair Nancy Nemer, Parliamentarian Palmer Neuhaus Edward Flores Monica Frenden Jo Anne Norton Lotta Smagula CALL TO ORDER CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Ryan Clinton, Vice Chair Lisa Mitchell Katie Jarl Dr. Jon Brandes Yolanda Rodriguez-Pacheco Luis Herrera a. Review and approval of minutes from the August 9, 2021, Animal Advisory Commission 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Meeting. 2. STAFF BRIEFINGS a. Austin Animal Center and Animal Services Reports. b. COVID Update. c. Briefing on Expiration of Eviction Moratorium by representative of Austin Tenants Council and Austin Public Health. 3. OLD BUSINESS: Update, Discussion and Possible Action a. Comparative Evaluations of Monthly Release Rates. b. Monthly Reporting of Data. c. Working Group on Off-Leash Dogs. d. Working Group on How to Increase Microchipping in the City of Austin. e. Placement Partner Transfer Agreement. f. Shelter Space Issues Working Group. g. Austin Pets Alive!’s Future at the Town Lake Animal Center and the Maintenance of No Kill in Austin. 4. NEW BUSINESS: Discussion and Possible Action a. Creation of a committee related to the City’s No-Kill policy and amend the Commission’s bylaws accordingly. b. Transferring Austin Animal Center Animals to Other Communities. 5. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 6. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Belinda Hare at the Animal Services Office, at 512-978-0565, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Animal Advisory Commission, please contact Board Liaison. Belinda Hare, 512-978-0565 or Belinda.Hare@austintexas.gov

Scraped at: Sept. 4, 2021, 2 a.m.
Animal Advisory CommissionSept. 13, 2021

2a August 2021 ASO report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

August 2021 August 2021 Animal Services Report ANIMAL SERVICES REPORT Animal Services News and four birds. Animal Protection August.  The live outcome percentage for August was 97.5 percent.  A total of 1,240 animals were brought to the shelter which included 607 dogs, 567 cats, 15 wild animals  A total of 833 animals were adopted (376 dogs, 439 cats, three livestock and 15 small pets)  A total of 121 dogs and cats were returned to their owners (RTOs and RTO-Adopt).  Animal Protection Officers (APOs) returned 40 animals to their owners in the field during the month of  Officers handed out 26 fencing assistance applications, impounded 172 injured animals and delivered 96 wildlife animals to Austin Wildlife Rescue.  Officers entered 152 rabies exposure reports and submitted 49 specimens for rabies testing. Four bats tested positive for rabies.  26 total coyote related activities o 12 sightings o 10 wild sick o 3 encounters o 1 incident o 1 wild injured  Out of 26 coyote related activities, 16 fell within the reported behavior types (sighting, encounter, and incident).  Encounters: Pets were a factor in both activities: o 2 encounters involved coyotes flushing dogs out of an area o 1 incident involved a coyote going after a small dog with person present in an unfenced backyard Volunteer, Foster and Rescue Programs  A total of 88 volunteers donated 1,712 hours during August.  The Volunteer Coordinators held 4 orientations for new volunteers in August, introducing 88 people to the shelter programs. 31 new volunteers attended their first training or mentor shifts in August.  More than 240 families provided foster care, and a total of 169 animals were adopted directly from foster care. August 2021 Animal Services Report  There are 1,256 approved fosters in GivePulse, and 127 new foster applications were processed.  There are currently 369 animals in foster homes.  303 animals were transferred to 22 AAC rescue partners:  5 to Austin Humane Society (AHS)  158 to Austin Pets Alive! (APA!) o 163 cats o 93 dogs  3 to AHS  49 to APA!  41 dogs to other partners Vet Services  Emergencies cases treated at AAC- 60  Emergencies transferred from Emergency Clinic- 55  Spay/Neuter surgeries performed - 663  Orthopedic surgeries - 6 dentals, etc. – 26  Cruelty cases- 3  Vet exams – …

Scraped at: Sept. 10, 2021, 3 a.m.
Animal Advisory CommissionSept. 13, 2021

2a August 2021 Monthly Data Report - Revised original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Aug-21 Cat Dog Aug-21 Cat Dog Aug-21 Other Bird Livestock Aug-20 Cat Dog Aug-20 Cat Dog Intake Type Abandoned Stray Owner Surrender Public Assist Subtotal Total Intake Intake Type Abandoned Stray Owner Surrender Public Assist Subtotal Total Intake Intake Type Abandoned Stray Owner Surrender Public Assist Subtotal Total Intake 40 399 123 5 567 14 275 77 12 378 0 650 176 1 827 1174 760 1732 18 339 220 30 607 9 234 114 25 382 0 644 204 57 905 Age Neonate Youth Adult Total Age Neonate Youth Adult Total Age Neonate Youth Adult Total 226 219 122 567 158 129 91 378 308 304 215 827 37 184 386 607 31 106 245 382 34 332 539 905 Intake Type Stray Wildlife Abandoned Owner Surrender Public Assist Subtotal Total Intake Intake Type Stray Wildlife Owner Surrender Public Assist Subtotal Total Intake Intake Type Stray Wildlife Owner Surrender Public Assist Subtotal Total Intake 66 Bird Aug-20 Other 8 15 0 37 1 61 4 63 5 0 72 13 29 14 6 62 4 0 0 0 0 4 3 1 0 0 4 2 2 2 0 6 76 68 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Aug-19 Cat Dog Aug-19 Cat Dog Aug-19 Other Bird Livestock Other consists of the following: bats, raccoons, possums, rabbits, guinea pigs, turtle, coyote, skunk, ferret, squirrel, fox, armadillo Livestock consists of the following: cows, pigs, horses, donkeys, goats Aug-21 Cat Dog Other Bird Livestock Aug-21 Cat Dog Aug-21 Euth Died Missing Percentage Cat Dog Other Bird Livestock Aug-20 Cat Dog Aug-20 Euth Died Missing Percentage Outcome Type Adoption Died Euthanasia Missing Relocate RTO RTO-Adopt Transfer Subtotal Total Outcome Outcome Type Adoption Died Euthanasia Missing Relocate RTO RTO-Adopt Transfer Subtotal Total Outcome Outcome Type Adoption Died Euthanasia Missing Relocate RTO RTO-Adopt Transfer Subtotal Total Outcome 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1261 Aug-20 752 Aug-19 439 11 14 0 0 7 5 193 669 208 10 7 0 0 11 6 118 360 429 10 16 1 0 18 8 438 920 376 3 4 0 0 97 8 104 592 208 2 4 0 0 58 8 112 392 543 8 9 0 0 157 20 207 944 15 0 11 0 0 4 0 14 44 10 1 55 0 0 0 0 …

Scraped at: Sept. 10, 2021, 3 a.m.
Animal Advisory CommissionSept. 13, 2021

Videotape of Meeting 09132021 original link

Play video

Scraped at: Sept. 16, 2021, 6:30 p.m.
Animal Advisory CommissionSept. 13, 2021

APPROVED Minutes September 13, 2021 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

AAC Meeting Minutes 2021-09-13 ANIMAL ADVISORY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 13, 2021, MINUTES APPROVED OCTOBER 11, 2021 The Animal Advisory Commission convened for a Regular Meeting, Monday, September 13, 2021, 6 p.m., in Room 1101, City Hall. Commission Chair Craig Nazor called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m., conducted a verbal roll call of those in attendance and confirmed a quorum of 11 commissioners. Seven commissioners attended the meeting in person, including Commissioners Nazor, Clinton, Jarl, Neuhaus, Flores, Smagula, and Herrera. Four commissioners participated via virtual teleconferencing, including Commissioners Mitchell, Brandes, Frenden and Norton. Commissioners Nemer and Rodriguez- Pacheco were absent. Commission Members in Attendance: Seven commissioners attended the meeting in person, including Commissioners Nazor, Clinton, Jarl, Neuhaus, Flores, Smagula, and Herrera. Four commissioners participated via virtual teleconferencing, including Commissioners Mitchell, Brandes, Frenden and Norton. Commissioners Nemer and Rodriguez-Pacheco were absent. Commission Members Absent: Commissioners Nemer and Rodriguez Pacheco were absent. Staff in Attendance: Don Bland, Jason Garza CITIZEN COMMUNICATIONS: Kristen Hassen 1 AAC Meeting Minutes 2021-09-13 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Jarl moved to approve the minutes from the Animal Advisory Commission Meeting, August 9, 2021, and Commissioner Flores seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously, 11 to 0, with all Commissioners in attendance voting approval: Nazor, Clinton, Jarl, Neuhaus, Flores, Smagula, and Herrera. Four commissioners participated via virtual teleconferencing, including Commissioners Mitchell, Brandes, Frenden and Norton. Commissioners Nemer and Rodriguez-Pacheco were absent. 2. STAFF BRIEFINGS a. Austin Animal Center and Animal Services Reports b. COVID Update c. Briefing on Expiration of Eviction Moratorium by representatives Laura La Fuentes and Nefertiti Jackmon, Austin Public Health, and Molly Jensen, executive director, the Austin Tenants Council, 3. OLD BUSINESS: a. Update, Discussion and Possible Action a. Comparative Evaluations of Monthly Release Rates d. Working Group on How to Increase Microchipping in the City of Austin b. Monthly Reporting of Data c. Working Group on Off-Leash Dogs e. Placement Partner Transfer Agreement f. Shelter Space Issues Working Group No action. No action. No action. No action. No action. No action. Kill No action. g. Austin Pets Alive!’s Future at the Town Lake Animal Center and the Maintenance of No 4. NEW BUSINESS: Discussion and Possible Action a. Creation of a Committee Related to the City’s No Kill Policy and Amend the Commission’s Bylaws Accordingly Commissioner Neuhaus moved to form a committee to sustain and advance No Kill in Austin. Commissioner Clinton seconded …

Scraped at: Oct. 12, 2021, 6 p.m.
Mayor's Committee for People with DisabilitiesSept. 10, 2021

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

MAYOR’S COMMITTEE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES September 10, 2021 5:30 p.m. – 7:00 p.m. Austin City Hall, Board & Commission Room, Room 1101 301 W 2nd Street, Austin, Texas 78701 Some members of the Mayor’s Committee for People With Disabilities may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Jonathan Franks, Chair Emily Shryock, Vice Chair Diana Anzaldua Taurean Burt Kathryn Broadwater CALL TO ORDER CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL AGENDA Joey Gidseg Diane Kearns-Osterweil Robin Orlowski Deborah Trejo Maria M. Villarreal Speakers will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. A. Consider approval of the minutes from the Mayor’s Committee for People with 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Disabilities June 11, 2021 Meeting. 2. NEW BUSINESS: Program Into the Civil Rights Office. A. Discussion and possible action regarding moving the Americans with Disabilities Act B. Discussion and possible action regarding Funding for Healthcare Navigation and Liaison Programs Benefiting Austin’s Immigrant Communities. C. Discussion and possible action regarding Family Connects in Response to the Resilient ATX Resolution. D. Discussion and possible action on a recommendation for a joint initiative by the City and County to create a downtown mental health diversion program. E. Discussion and possible action on a recommendation to designate September 13 to 20, 2021 as Disability Voter Registration Week in Austin. 3. OLD BUSINESS A. Discussion and possible action regarding American Sign Language (ASL) interpretation services and participation for people with disabilities during City Council meetings and press conferences, COVID-19 announcements, and other videos. 4. STAFF BRIEFINGS AND COMMISSIONER ANNOUNCEMENTS 5. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 6. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Jonathan Babiak, Office of Civil Rights, at (512) 974-3203 or jonathan.babiak@austintexas.gov, for additional information. TTY users’ route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Mayor’s Committee for People with Disabilities, please contact Jonathan Babiak at (512) 974-3203 or jonathan.babiak@austintexas.gov.

Scraped at: Sept. 7, 2021, 10:40 p.m.
Commission on SeniorsSept. 9, 2021

Community Interest Announcement original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Commission on Seniors Community Interest Announcement AGE-FRIENDLY AUSTIN FORUM: CIVIC PARTICIPATION AND EMPLOYMENT Thursday, September 9th, 2021 at 1:00pm Remote Event: Age-friendly Austin Forum Series (all events) Tickets | Eventbrite A quorum of Commission on Seniors members may be present. No action will be taken, and no Commission on Seniors business will occur Halana.Kaleel@austintexas.gov Halana Kaleel 512-972-5019

Scraped at: April 21, 2021, 5:20 p.m.
Airport Advisory CommissionSept. 9, 2021

Community Interest Announcement original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Airport Advisory Commission COMMUNITY INTEREST ANNOUNCEMENT Environmental Assessment Public Scoping Meeting September 9, 2021 6:30 PM - 7:30 PM Online, via Zoom (https://bit.ly/2Vsm9gY) A quorum of the Commission may be present. No action will be taken. Board Liaison: Ammie Calderon or Steve Khanoyan (512) 530-6605 or (312) 723-2619

Scraped at: Aug. 13, 2021, 2:20 p.m.
Independent Citizens Redistricting CommissionSept. 8, 2021

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission (ICRC) Sept. 8, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. Permitting and Development Center (PDC); Event Center 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr. Austin, TX 78752 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. CURRENT COMMISSION MEMBERS: Prabhu Kannan Brigham Morris Errol Hardin Eugene Schneider Erin Dempsey Luis Gonzalez, Vice-Chair Dr. Sterling Lands Hoang Le Shaina Kambo Sara Inés Calderón Selina Yee Christina Puentes, Chair Joshua Blank Camellia Falcon AGENDA Meeting Goals: Discussion on presented draft maps; Discussion on public forum structure; Receive Updates from Working Groups/Subcommittees CALL TO ORDER CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first three speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Discussion and possible action on the Sept. 1, 2021, ICRC meeting minutes. 2. UNFINISHED BUSINESS The ICRC may discuss and take action on the following agenda items A. Discussion on public forum structure & protocols B. Updates from Working Groups/Subcommittees 1. Communications Working Group 2. Public Forums Working Group 3. Finance Subcommittee 4. Final Report Subcommittee 3. NEW BUSINESS The ICRC may discuss and take action on the following agenda items A. Presentation of map from the NAACP/Hispanic Coalition B. Presentation of draft map by George Korbel, ICRC mapping specialist C. Discussion of draft map presented by Korbel D. Housekeeping FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Matt Dugan at the Housing and Planning Department, at 512-974-7665 and matthew.dugan@austintexas.gov, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission, please contact Matt Dugan at 512-974-7665 and matthew.dugan@austintexas.gov or Lisa Rodriguez at 512-974-3119 and lisa.rodriguez@austintexas.gov.

Scraped at: Sept. 3, 2021, 9:50 p.m.
Independent Citizens Redistricting CommissionSept. 8, 2021

Item1_ICRC_DraftMinutes_20210901 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission (ICRC) Sept. 1, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. Permitting and Development Center (PDC) 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr. Austin, TX 78752 CURRENT COMMISSION MEMBERS: Prabhu Kannan Brigham Morris Errol Hardin Eugene Schneider Erin Dempsey Luis Gonzalez, Vice-Chair Dr. Sterling Lands Hoang Le Shaina Kambo Sara Inés Calderón Selina Yee Christina Puentes, Chair Joshua Blank Camellia Falcon Staff In Attendance Matthew Dugan, City's Planning Manager George Korbel, Mapping Specialist Christine Granados, ICRC Administrative Manager Members in Attendance Christina Puentes, Chair Luis Gonzalez, Vice Chair Joshua Blank Sara Inés Calderón Camellia Falcon Errol Hardin Shaina Kambo Dr. Sterling Lands Hoang Le Eugene Schneider Selina Yee DRAFT MINUTES Meeting Goals: Discussion on public forums and mapping process; Receive Updates from Working Groups/Subcommittees CALL TO ORDER Chair Puentes called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. with nine members present. Commissioner Lands joined at 6:07 p.m. and Commissioner Le joined virtually at 6:30 p.m. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first three speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Fred Lewis addressed the commission on behalf of the NAACP and Hispanic Coalition about the need to follow the City Charter during the mapping process. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Discussion and possible action on the Aug. 25, 2021, ICRC meeting minutes. The Aug. 25, 2021 draft minutes were approved without objection. 2. UNFINISHED BUSINESS The ICRC may discuss and take action on the following agenda items A. Discussion on mapping process with mapping specialist 1. Presentation on city demographic data Korbel presented his methodology for the mapping process using Census numbers. 2. Individual commissioner conversations Korbel discussed why one-on-one input from commissioners was helpful during the mapping process. Chair Puentes shared the details for signing up for the optional, recorded one-on-one meetings scheduled Sept. 9-12, 2021. B. Update from Public Forum Working Group 1. Discussion of calendar changes Vice Chair Gonzalez shared the addition of two public meeting dates for the county precinct forums. On Vice Chair Gonzalez’s motion, Commissioner Blank's second, the ICRC unanimously approved the proposed 2021 county precinct public forum dates. 2. Discussion on better way to integrate and address questions asked by public at public forums Commissioner Hardin shared suggestions for how to structure the second round of public forums and address questions from the public. C. …

Scraped at: Sept. 3, 2021, 9:50 p.m.
Independent Citizens Redistricting CommissionSept. 8, 2021

Greenberg-Letter original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

From: Sent: To: Subject: Betsy Greenberg Monday, September 6, 2021 9:30 AM HPD ICRC Commissioners Draft redistricting maps > *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I hope you will make sure that electronic copies of the draft maps are posted to the commission website. Thank you! Betsy Greenberg CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1

Scraped at: Sept. 7, 2021, 12:50 p.m.
Independent Citizens Redistricting CommissionSept. 8, 2021

Gilcrease-Letter original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

HPD ICRC Commissioners From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Pete Gilcrease Wednesday, September 8, 2021 10:56 AM HPD ICRC Commissioners District Mapping Suggestions - D9 - Hyde Park (From Friends of Hyde Park President) HPBoundaries2.png *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Commissioners, I'm the president of Friends of Hyde Park. Friends of Hyde Park is currently the largest neighborhood association in our neighborhood with over 500 members. Friends of Hyde Park is not aligned with the Austin Neighborhoods Council (ANC). Hyde Park is made up of approximately 70% renters with a diverse background, including a large number of students that attend the University of Texas. This type of representation is almost completely absent in ANC aligned neighborhood associations. Unfortunately, because of the way the initial district lines were drawn, which didn't fully follow the charter guidance on socio economic grouping, there's a very small group of mainly wealthy older white property owners that dominate the representation for Hyde Park at the city council level. The majority of the people that live within Hyde Park have almost no representation because of this. I'd like to propose a change to the redistricting maps to ensure that Hyde Park and surrounding neighborhoods in central Austin receive better representation in the future. According to the latest population numbers by district, District 4 lost population and needs to incorporate more people into the district. I'd suggest, if it is compatible with the goals of building a minority opportunity district, incorporating the north part of Hyde Park, known as North Hyde Park, into District 4. North Hyde Park is the area north of 45th St and is more similar to the North Loop and Highland neighborhoods that are part of District 4 than neighborhoods to the south of it. Despite how ANC aligned neighborhood associations characterize it, North Hyde Park is a completely separate neighborhood with different housing types, different history, and a different diversity of people than the original Hyde Park neighborhood that's south of 45th St. An example of this cultural and historical split can be seen in Ridgetop Elementary School, located in North Hyde Park, that has a large percentage of hispanic children, and the school that Hyde Park feeds into, Lee Elementary, has a mainly white population. The reason that North Hyde Park has the name Hyde Park in it is because it was annexed as a way for the people …

Scraped at: Sept. 8, 2021, 5:50 p.m.
Independent Citizens Redistricting CommissionSept. 8, 2021

McCormick-Letter original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

HPD ICRC Commissioners From: Sent: To: Subject: Donna Beth McCormick Wednesday, September 8, 2021 12:45 PM HPD ICRC Commissioners Redistricting *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I live in Dist. 7 ‐ we need to keep the boundries of the district the same as much as possible after considering the growth. In drawing districts, it is important to have populations that are very similar values in the same district. The majority of Dist. 7 are family friendly homes with family activities. Tall buildings should be downtown where they are and attract a certain population. Donna Beth McCormick ‐ Allandale neighborhood former president and board member CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1

Scraped at: Sept. 8, 2021, 5:50 p.m.
Independent Citizens Redistricting CommissionSept. 8, 2021

Item3b_Draft-Map-Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 19 pages

Current Plan Suggested alternative A VTD and a Precinct are essentially equivalent terms I refer to the existing redistricting plan as the current plan and the one we are discussing here as an alternative 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 1 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 2 The redistricting starts with a large movement of population from District 6 (the most overpopulated district) into 10 and 7. Precincts 343, 234 and parts of precincts 232, moved from current district 6 to alternative district 10. Then precinct 246 and 267 are moved from Current 10 to alternative 7. 6 10 7 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 3 Move from precinct 325 and part of 206 from current district 1 to alternative district 9. Precinct 206 was split and in the alternative plan is made whole. 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 4 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 5 These 2 vtds (118 and 130) as well as part of 113 are moved from current district I to alternative 4. In doing so former split vtd 113 is made whole. 2 remains the same 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 6 VTD 340 moved from 5 to 9 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 7 37 blocks from VTD 307 (pop. 407) and 10 blocks from VTD 364 (pop. 53) moved into District 10 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 8 Parts of VTDs 274 and 214 were added to 9 combined and made precincts whole. 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 9 One whole VTD (422) and part of split precinct (433) were removed from 6 and moved to 3. This had the effect of making three split VTDs (424, 433 and 420) whole 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 10 One whole VTD (422) and three partial were removed from 6 and moved to 3. This had the effect of making three split VTDs (424, 433 and 420) whole 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 11 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 12 Compare current district 9 with alternative district 9 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 13 Move 428 from current district 7 into alternative district 4 Move from 1 into 4 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 14 Compare current district I and alternative district 1 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 15 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 16 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 17 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 18 9/9/2021 Draft Analysis 19

Scraped at: Sept. 9, 2021, 10:50 p.m.
Independent Citizens Redistricting CommissionSept. 8, 2021

Play video original link

Play video

Scraped at: Sept. 14, 2021, 6:50 p.m.
Early Childhood CouncilSept. 8, 2021

In person meeting (no virtual option) original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 8, 2021, 8:30 A.M. CITY HALL, BOARD AND COMMISSION ROOM #1101 301 WEST SECOND STREET, AUSTIN, TEXAS AGENDA CALL TO ORDER CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first five speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES from August 16, 2021 meeting 2. NEW BUSINESS AND POSSIBLE ACTIONS a. Discussion on Child Care Subsidies – Guest: Nicole Robinson, Director of Child Care Contracts, Workforce Solutions Capital Area b. Community Engagement Work Group updates- Community experiences navigating child care systems c. Policy Work Group updates i. City Economic Prosperity Commission exploring concerns about child care ii. City Council approved Inclusion of child care as requested use in competitive real estate processes and in lease, acquisition, or redevelopment of City property iii. Child Care Regulations translated Listed Family Home Standards into Spanish iv. Digital Inclusion and Early Childhood b. Winter Storm Review Task Force final report update- Aletha Huston c. ECC topics to take to Joint Inclusion Committee 3. STAFF UPDATES a. COVID-19 updates FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Census data trends ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Rachel Farley, Program Coordinator, Austin Public Health, at 512-972-5093 or email: Rachel.Farley@austintexas.gov, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Early Childhood Council, please contact Rachel Farley, Program Coordinator, Austin Public Health, at 512-972-5093 or email: Rachel.Farley@austintexas.gov.

Scraped at: Sept. 4, 2021, 3:20 a.m.
Early Childhood CouncilSept. 8, 2021

Play audio original link

Play audio

Scraped at: Sept. 10, 2021, 4:20 a.m.
Early Childhood CouncilSept. 8, 2021

Backup original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

ECC Member Questions for Workforce Solutions Capital Area 9/8/2021 1. Is there an ongoing mechanism to confidentially track family satisfaction with the Workforce Solutions processes? If so, can we review the data/information? If not, is this currently in future plans? 2. What mechanisms are in place to gather feedback on process issues (application process, client questions, general communications, etc.) from families? 3. What role can the City of Austin play in improving the family interaction with Workforce Solutions? 4. What mechanisms are in place to gather feedback on process issues (application process, client questions, general communications, etc.) from child care providers and community organizations working with families? 5. What mechanisms are in place or can be created to use feedback (from families, providers, and community organizations) to identify when challenges and concerns raised are not only impacting individual families, but are more widespread and systemic? 6. Does Workforce Solutions believe that systemic process change is needed to better serve families? If not, what would it take to create that felt need? If there is agreement that systemic process change is needed, what are the plans to do so? a. Who is involved in the design? b. What funding is available? c. What is the timing? 8. What is the easiest click path to access the online application, aside from someone sending a parent/client a direct link? 9. What training is required for intake staff who manage and process applications and support clients through this process? How is this training funded? Are City of Austin funds utilized for that at all, or could they be? 10. Are the parenting virtual series provided in Spanish? 7.

Scraped at: Oct. 6, 2021, 6:20 p.m.
Early Childhood CouncilSept. 8, 2021

Backup original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

ARPA Funding Recommendations from Success By 6 Early & UWATX City of Austin approved $11 million for the following recommendations. Recommendation Child care fund for Workforce program grads to mitigate benefits cliff Increase Continuity of Care funding UWATX Pre-K Partnerships Hub to expand access to public Pre-K Expand/sustain family/home-based child care networks Plan and pilot non traditional hours child care system Plan and implement shared services alliance Expand wage supplements and tuition support to recruit and retain qualified early childhood educators Cost of living increase for Ready Families Collaborative programs Family Connects Program expansion by 2,000 births per year and program evaluation DVISD- Expand access to Pre-K4 for those who do not meet state income eligibility but cannot afford Pre-K 4 tuition AISD 1- Full day care for Pre-K 3 (highest option total = $4,125,000) AISD 2- Expand 2-Gen Families as Partners Program Scale United Way’s ConnectATX free navigation service 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 3-year total amounts requested Recommendation Link $4,500,000 Transforming the ATX Early Childhood System $1,500,000 Transforming the ATX Early Childhood System $1,200,000 Transforming the ATX Early Childhood System $1,000,000 Transforming the ATX Early Childhood System $1,000,000 Transforming the ATX Early Childhood System $1,500,000 Transforming the ATX Early Childhood System $1,000,000 Transforming the ATX Early Childhood System $250,000 Transforming the ATX Early Childhood System $3,540,000 Family Connects Supplemental Rec for Transforming the ATX Early Childhood System $1,500,000 DVISD Supplemental Rec for Transforming the ATX Early Childhood System $1,375,000 AISD Proposals to Support High Quality Early Education $429,150 AISD Proposals to Support High Quality Early Education $550,000 UWATX Rebuilding Systems Recs- social svc navigation, WF dev't, school-age child care 14 15 16 Expand 2-Gen United Way workforce development program for young parents with low income in middle skill job training Improve school-age child care in Austin- Youth Program Quality Instrument to assess 36 sites and make site improvement plans Embed Americorps VISTA early literacy and math tutors in out of school time programs $300,000 UWATX Rebuilding Systems Recs- social svc navigation, WF dev't, school-age child care $250,000 UWATX Rebuilding Systems Recs- social svc navigation, WF dev't, school-age child care UWATX Rebuilding Systems Recs- social svc navigation, WF dev't, school-age child care $625,000 $20,519,150

Scraped at: Oct. 6, 2021, 6:20 p.m.
Early Childhood CouncilSept. 8, 2021

Approved Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, September 8, 2021 EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL MINUTES The Early Childhood Council (ECC) convened on Wednesday, September 8, 2021. Board Members in Attendance: Chair McHorse; Vice Chair Worthington; Members Gordon, Alvarez, Huston, Hedrick, Conlin, and Schennum Staff in attendance: Rachel Farley, Caitlin Oliver, Donna Sundstrom, and Cindy Gamez CALL TO ORDER – Chair McHorse called the meeting to order at 8:41 a.m. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL – No citizen communication 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES from August 16, 2021, meeting – Member Hedrick moved to approve the minutes. Member Conlin seconded the motion. The minutes were approved by a vote of 7-0 2. NEW BUSINESS AND POSSIBLE ACTIONS a. Discussion on Child Care Subsidies – Guest: Nicole Robinson, Director of Child Care Contracts, Workforce Solutions Capital Area Early Childhood Council (ECC) members asked Nicole Robinson questions based on both oral (at City of Austin ECC meeting) and written community feedback about the child care subsidy system and services by Workforce Solutions Capital Area. Feedback pointed to the need for increased funding to expand the subsidy program and to reengineer the process by which parents interact with Workforce Solutions (WFS). A list of the questions ECC members prepared to ask WFS is included as a backup document for this meeting on the ECC website. Question 1 - Is there an ongoing mechanism to confidentially track family satisfaction with the Workforce Solutions processes? If so, can we review the data/information? WFS tracks customer feedback from the website and the communications team sends daily communications to the child care or workforce team, as is relevant. There is also a monthly report about compiled about the comments and questions WFS receives. WFS has explored doing more direct parent surveys. In the past they have had low response rates to parent surveys. WFS can extract childcare pieces from the monthly feedback reports and share them with ECC members. Question 2 - What mechanisms are in place to gather feedback from families on process issues (application process, client questions, general communications, etc.)? Robinson expressed appreciation for the feedback from parents and future customers that ECC shared with WFS. At the monthly provider meetings, WFS shares out the email address that parents can use to connect with WFS with concerns and inquiries. Parents are encouraged to reach out via email or phone so that the relevant unit can follow up. Parents can also provide feedback on the …

Scraped at: Oct. 15, 2021, 5:20 a.m.
Community Technology and Telecommunications CommissionSept. 8, 2021

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

COMMUNITY TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Regular Meeting Wednesday – September 8, 2021 – 6:30 PM City Hall - Boards & Commissions Room 1101 301 W. 2nd Street - Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Community Technology and Telecommunications Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Nehemiah Pitts III, Chair Sophie Gairo Malcolm Yeatts Illiya Svirsky Jennifer Ramos Sumit DasGupta David Alexander, Vice Chair Steven Apodaca Dave Floyd Maxine Eiland Nicole Thompson AGENDA CALL TO ORDER CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first ten speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – July 14, 2021 2. STAFF AND COMMUNITY BRIEFINGS (A member of the public may not address a board at a meeting on an item posted as a briefing) a. Autonomy Institute Fellow Presentation on Physics Informed Neural Networks (Jeff DeCoux, Autonomy Institute Fellow) 3. NEW BUSINESS (Discussion and Possible Action) a. City of Austin Strategic Outcomes Review (Commission discussion and possible action) b. Digital Inclusion Week 2021 Planning (Commission discussion and possible action) 4. COMMISSION UPDATES (Discussion and Possible Action) a. Digital Inclusion, Civic Engagement, and Strategic Technology and Telecom Policy Working Group b. Knowledge, Information, and Data Stewardship Working Group c. Technology, Infrastructure, and Innovation Working Group FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Jesse Rodriguez at the Telecommunications and Regulatory Affairs Department, at jesse.rodriguez@austintexas.gov for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Community Technology and Telecommunications Commission, please contact Jesse Rodriguez at jesse.rodriguez@austintexas.gov

Scraped at: Sept. 3, 2021, 10:30 p.m.
Zoning and Platting CommissionSept. 7, 2021

B-01 (C14-2021-0040 - 1501 Crozier Lane Zoning; District 2).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 15 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2021-0040 – 1501 Crozier Lane Zoning ZONING FROM: I-RR ADDRESS: 1501 Crozier Lane PROPERTY OWNER: Old Man City, LLC (Lauren Carson) AGENT: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Amanda Brown) DISTRICT: 2 ZONING TO: CS-CO SITE AREA: 32.93 acres CASE MANAGER: Wendy Rhoades (512-974-7719, wendy.rhoades@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Amended): The Staff recommendation is to grant general commercial services – conditional overlay (CS-CO) combining district zoning. The Conditional Overlay: 1) prohibits the following uses: automotive rentals, automotive repair services, automotive sales, automotive washing (of any type), bail bond services, bed and breakfast (group 1), bed and breakfast (group 1), building maintenance services, campground, commercial blood plasma center, construction sales and services, convenience storage, day care services (commercial), day care services (commercial), day care services (general), day care services (limited), drop-off recycling collection facility, electronic prototype assembly, electronic testing, equipment repair services, equipment sales, exterminating services, indoor crop production, kennels, laundry services, maintenance and service facilities, monument retail sales, outdoor entertainment, outdoor sports and recreation, plant nursery, private primary educational facility, private secondary educational facility, public primary educational facility, public secondary educational facility, service station, short term rental, transportation terminal, urban farm, vehicle storage, and veterinary services; 2) establishes custom manufacturing as a conditional use; and 3) establishes that Chapter 25-2, Article 10 (Compatibility Standards) applies along the south property line adjacent to a mobile home residential use. For a summary of the basis of Staff’s recommendation, please see page 2. ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: September 7, 2021: August 17, 2021: APPROVED A POSTPONEMENT TO SEPTEMBER 7, 2021 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: October 14, 2021: ORDINANCE NUMBER: [B. GREENBERG; J. KIOLBASSA – 2ND] (10-0) R. WOODY – ABSENT 1 of 15B-1 C14-2021-0040 Page 2 ISSUES: In late-March 2021 and on Saturday, August 21, 2021, the Applicant met to discuss the zoning case with residents of the Capitol Manor Mobile Home Park. On August 20, 2021 and September 1, 2021, the Applicant amended the zoning request to add uses to the prohibited use list (see attached correspondence). The Staff does not object to these uses and has incorporated them into the Staff recommendation. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The Applicant proposes to zone the property to the general commercial services – conditional overlay (CS-CO) district so that it may be developed with a limited warehousing and distribution use, and is intended for the storage of wine collections. The Applicant’s Conditional Overlay …

Scraped at: Sept. 2, 2021, 9:40 p.m.
Zoning and Platting CommissionSept. 7, 2021

B-02 (C14-2021-0120 - Rezoning Liquor Store; District 2).pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 10 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET DISTRICT: 2 AGENT: Hector Avila CASE: C14-2021-0120 – Rezoning Liquor Store TO: CS-1 ZONING FROM: GR-CO ADDRESS: 3131 East SH 71 Service Road Westbound, Suite 200 SITE AREA: 0.023 acres (1,000 square feet) APPLICANT: 3131 East 71 LLC (Najib F. Wehbe) CASE MANAGER: Wendy Rhoades (512-974-7719, wendy.rhoades@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommendation is to grant commercial - liquor sales – conditional overlay (CS-1-CO) combining district zoning. The Conditional Overlay prohibits automotive repair services, automotive washing, and pawn shop services. For a summary of the basis of Staff’s recommendation, see page 2. ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: September 1, 2021: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: October 14, 2021: ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES: The Applicant is in agreement with the Staff recommendation. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The subject rezoning area is a 1,000 square foot unoccupied lease space at the east end of a recently constructed commercial development that contains a service station and a food sales use, and is located on the East SH 71 westbound service road at its intersections with Cheviot Lane and Royster Avenue. The property was annexed into the City in September 2001 and zoned community commercial – conditional overlay (GR-CO) district by a 2008 case. The Conditional Overlay limits development to 2,000 vehicle trips per day, and prohibits automotive repair services, automotive washing, and pawn shop services. The property is located just outside of the Airport Overlay Zone-3 district, also known as the ½ mile buffer. There are residential uses to the north and east (I-SF-2; LO-MU); and commercial uses, including a concrete pad for a former restaurant (limited) and auto-related uses to the west (GR; GR-CO; CS-CO). Please refer to Exhibits A (Zoning Map) and A-1 (Aerial View). 1 of 10B-2 C14-2021-0120 Page 2 The Applicant proposes commercial – liquor sales (CS-1) district zoning in order to occupy the lease space with a liquor sales use. The approved site plan shows driveways to East SH 71 service road, Royster Avenue and Cheviot Lane. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION 1. The proposed zoning should be consistent with the purpose statement of the district sought. The commercial – liquor sales (CS-1) zoning district is intended for commercial and industrial activities of a service nature which typically have operating characteristics or traffic service requirements generally incompatible with residential environments, and specifically includes liquor sales as a permitted use. The Conditional Overlay (CO) combining district may be applied in …

Scraped at: Sept. 2, 2021, 9:40 p.m.