19.1 - 1515 Mohle Dr - Drawings — original pdf
Backup
Backup
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 5, 2022 HR-2022-132714 OLD WEST AUSTIN 1810 MOHLE DRIVE 20 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a new residence and detached garage PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) The proposed primary building is two stories, with a gabled roof. It is clad in horizontal and vertical siding. Fenestration includes fixed divided-light windows of varying configurations arranged in a regular pattern, as well as glazed entry and exit doors and French balcony doors. The inset porch, beneath a cantilevered second-story gable, is supported by metal posts and shaded by a flat roof, which extends toward the rear as a breezeway connecting the detached garage. 2) The proposed garage is a single-story gabled structure oriented toward the secondary streetscape. It is clad in horizontal and vertical siding to match the proposed main building. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed primary building is set back approximately 25’, and the secondary building is located at the rear of the lot. 2. Orientation The proposed orientations of the primary and secondary buildings appear consistent with the surrounding district. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed primary building is larger in scale, more monolithic in massing, and taller than surrounding contributing buildings, though the articulated porch and stepped gables appear to somewhat mitigate its visual impact. 4. Proportions The proposed primary building’s proportions are not consistent with surrounding buildings’ proportions. 5. Design and style The proposed design and style are somewhat compatible. 6. Roofs The proposed gabled roofline is mostly compatible, though the wraparound flat-roofed breezeway is less compatible. 7. Exterior walls Exterior materials are somewhat compatible, though limiting vertical siding to single-story masses may reduce the building’s verticality. 8. Windows and doors Proposed fenestration is mostly compatible, though a front-facing front door would be more compatible than the current door, which faces the secondary streetscape. 9. Porches Proposed porches and balconies are mostly compatible, though a projecting porch—rather than the integral porch set beneath the cantilevered gable of the second floor—would help to step larger masses back, reducing visual weight. Summary The project meets some of the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK The existing building was previously approved for demolition by the Historic Landmark Commission. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Comment …
1810 MOHLE 1810 MOHLE 1810 MOHLE 1810 MOHLE REVISION TAG ELEVATION DETAIL SECTION WINDOW TAG WALL TAG ROOM TAG + FINISH TAG DOOR TAG 3 +2'-0" 1 A101 W1 A ROOM 101 WD 000B STAIRS 20 R @ ±7 1/2" SINGLE STEP STEP WINDOW SYMBOLS LEGEND SYMBOLS LEGEND SYMBOLS LEGEND SYMBOLS LEGEND GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES GENERAL PLAN NOTES GENERAL PLAN NOTES GENERAL PLAN NOTES GENERAL PLAN NOTES GENERAL MECH/PLUMB. NOTES GENERAL MECH/PLUMB. NOTES GENERAL MECH/PLUMB. NOTES GENERAL MECH/PLUMB. NOTES SHEET INDEX SHEET INDEX SHEET INDEX SHEET INDEX DETAIL CALLOUT X AX.X ALL WORK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ADOPTED CODES, LOCAL AMMENDMENTS/RULES, AND STATE REGULATIONS. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND LAY OUT WALLS AND PARTITIONS AS THEY RELATE TO THE STRUCTURE AND OTHER BUILDING ELEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN CONCEPT/INTENT. ELEVATION 1 / A101 PROVIDE SOUND BATT INSULATION BELOW UPPER STORY FLOORS AND IN WALLS AROUND TOILETS/BATHROOMS. USE SMOOTH METAL DUCT FOR DRYER EXHAUST EXTENDING THROUGH ROOF WITH RAIN CAP. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND COORDINATE ALL DIMENSIONS ON THE JOB SITE. USE DIMENSIONS INDICATED. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES IN THE DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, OR ACTUAL JOB CONDITIONS WHICH AFFECT THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK AS INTENDED. ALL FLOOR PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE GRID LINES; THE CENTERLINE OF COLUMNS OR WINDOW MULLIONS; THE FACE OF FINISHED WALLS, FURRING OR CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY ALL NECESSARY LABOR AND MATERIAL NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK DESCRIBED HERE WITHIN. COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF HOSE BIBBS, ELECTRICAL METER, WATER, AND WASTEWATER WITH OWNER. REMOVE ALL EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF NEW CONSTRUCTION. COORDINATE WITH OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT ALL NEW GRADES TO SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING. PROVIDE A LIGHT BROOM FINISH ON ALL NEW EXTERIOR CONCRETE WALKS. PROVIDE REINFORCED HVAC PADS AS REQUIRED. COORDINATE EXACT BUILDING PLACEMENT WITH OWNER. 10. TRIM ALL TREES WITHIN 4 FEET OF NEW BUILDING IF APPLICABLE. 11. PROVIDE CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM-HARD WIRED WITH BATTERY BACKUP, INSTALLED OUTSIDE OF EACH SEPARATE SLEEPING AREA IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE BEDROOMS IN DWELLING UNITS WITHIN WHICH FUEL-FIRED APPLIANCES ARE INSTALLED AND/OR HAVE ATTACHED GARAGE. PARTITION NOTES PARTITION NOTES PARTITION NOTES PARTITION NOTES …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 5, 2022 HR-2022-133067 WILLOW-SPENCE 1201 CANTERBURY STREET 21 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct an apartment atop the existing detached garage. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed ADU is located at the rear of the lot. It adds 1.5 floors to the existing detached garage. The proposed ADU is clad in horizontal cement board siding and is capped by a gabled metal roof with shed dormers. Fenestration includes fixed undivided clad-wood windows, horizontal sliders, and fully glazed doors, as well as garage door facing the secondary street frontage. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The ADU is sited at the location of the existing detached garage, approximately 21’ from the main house. 2. Orientation The proposed building is oriented with its garage bay facing the secondary street, as does the existing garage. 3. Scale, massing, and height While the proposed ADU is significantly taller and more massive than the existing house, its location at the rear of the lot may mitigate the potential for overwhelming the main house. 4. Proportions The building’s proportions do not correspond to the proportions of nearby contributing buildings. 5. Design and style The proposed ADU is somewhat compatible in design and style. 6. Roofs The proposed building’s roof is somewhat compatible, though the large side dormers may be visible from the primary streetscape. 7. Exterior walls The proposed ADU’s exterior cladding appears appropriate. 8. Windows and doors Proposed fenestration is somewhat inappropriate, as the north-facing wall is mostly windowless. Summary The project meets some of the applicable standards. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Willow-Spence National Register district. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Comment on and release the plans. LOCATION MAP 21 – 2
17'-3" 45'-10" 21'-6" 31'-10" 11'-7" 466.6' WASTE WATER 466.9' S 10°11'45" W 128' HG TENT 1 467.2' HG TENT 2 467.3' HG TENT 3 467.4' 5' SETBACK AC TREE FENCING 1 " 0 - ' 0 5 BENCHMARK 465.5' 27" PECAN 1 4 CRZ 1 2 CRZ ' 0 5 E " 8 5 2 0 ° 0 8 S ' 8" MULCH WATER METER CRZ I E N L G N D L U B I I K C A B T E S ' 5 2 15' SETBACK 467' G EXISTING 1 STORY HOUSE 1540SF PROPOSED 2 STORY ADU 957SF 467.8' FF AC LOT 41 467.1' LG K C A B T E S ' 0 1 467.3' HG MATERIALS CONST. DEBRIS 467' ' 0 5 W ' " 8 5 2 0 ° 0 8 N TOILET " 1 - ' 5 " 6 - ' 2 2 " 6 - ' 2 2 465' 2 466' 465' 30'-4" ADU 465.5' 465.4' N 10°11'45" E 128' POWER POLE 465.3' 5 ' 6 4 16'-5" 22'-2" 13'-4" 45'-8" EXISTING HOUSE 5'-2" 10'-10" INLET 70'-2" 128'-0" 17'-0" EXISTING DRIVEWAY 24'-10" SITE PLAN SCALE 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 PROJECT NORTH IMPERVIOUS COVER (SF) EXISTING PORCH LANDINGS WALL AC ADU 1st FLR GARAGE STAIR LANDINGS DRIVEWAY AC PAD 1540 165 42 60 9 407 272 60 31 112 9 GIST E R E D AR RBACISSE A J C H I T U N E C T E R S T 257 5 7 A T E FO X E T SA July 2022 TOTAL ALLOWABLE 2707 2880 PROTECTED TREES: 27" PECAN NOTES: 1 Per COA Tree Ordinance 1 provide tree protection extended to full CRZ. Provide 8" of mulch where protection fence cannot be provided. A minimum of 50% of the critical root zone will be preserved at natural grade, with natural ground cover. No cut or fill greater than four (4) inches will be located closer to the tree trunk than ½ the CRZ radius distance. No cut or fill within the ¼ CRZ For heavy equipment anywhere within full CRZ, provide 3/4" plywood over 2x4 lumber over 12″ layer of mulch to bridge over the roots and prevent soil/root compaction. Spread mulch on site after construction to leave 3" max. within root zones. 2 2 required parking spots provided U D A t e e r t S …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 5, 2022 SB-2022-135187; GF-2022-139867 CONGRESS AVENUE 900 CONGRESS AVENUE 22 – 1 PROPOSAL Install a sign on a non-contributing building. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed channel letter sign is located at the south elevation of 900 Congress Avenue. Its white vinyl letters are halo- lit with white LEDs atop an aluminum background. It is approximately 72 square feet in area. The façade module currently contains an existing non-compliant sign with internally lit text of approximately 259 square feet in area at the top of the building. DESIGN STANDARDS The Guidelines for Signs in Historic Districts or at City Historic Landmarks are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Number of Signs: The Commission allows one sign per building, unless the building has multiple tenants; in this case, the Commission may allow one sign per façade module, if the façade modules correspond to tenant spaces. The Commission may also allow one sign for each street frontage if the building is at an intersection. A single directory sign is appropriate for a large building with multiple tenants. The proposed sign somewhat corresponds to the tenant space at the first floor. Sign Types: The Commission may allow window signs, awning signs, projecting signs, and flush mounted signs for most commercial buildings. Freestanding signs are allowed for office and retail uses in historic residential buildings. City codes prohibit the Commission from approving the following sign types: (1) rotating, (2) off-premise, (3) roof signs, (4) portable, or (5) signs which flash or blink at intervals. City code also prohibits handbills, posters, or placards on a structure except inside a window or on a bulletin board. The proposed sign is flush-mounted. Sign Size: Large commercial buildings (over 3 stories): Cumulative signage may not exceed 40 square feet per façade and must comply with a signage plan for the building. The proposed sign’s area is approximately 72 ft2. Existing non-compliant signage is 259 ft2 in area. Sign Design, Coloring and Materials: Use simple shapes, such as rectangular or oval signs. The Commission recommends painted wood or metal signs with matte finishes for all signs; plastic, reflective materials, and unfinished surfaces are not allowed. Limit the colors used in a sign to no more than three. For sites with multiple signs, all signs should have corresponding or matching designs, coloring …
SPECIFICATIONS: REVISED SIZE A. Fabricated halo illuminated channel letters, face and returns painted, internally illuminated with 6500K white LEDs, power supply remote housed in power supply box. B. Mounted with standoff hardware as required Electrical Note: Client's electrician to provide a 120-277 volt 20 amp dedicated sign circuit on a timer or photocell within 5' of each sign; sign includes 120-277 convertible transformers. Final connection to existing circuit included only if circuit is ready at time of install. BIG will coordinate directly with client's electrician as needed. Provided electrical whips to be 15ft long. Illumination Detail 225” B 2.00" A P1 3.00" " 0 0 6 4 . " 0 0 4 2 . A P1 Primary J-Box Transformer Enclosure Conduit for low voltage wiring Scale 1:48 Side Profile Face View - 218 SF Finish Schedule P1: MAP White, satin Signage dimensions, lighting and fabrication to be in compliance with all applicable local signage ordinances. These designs are for illustrative purposes only and are subject to modification per applicable code. P13668 09.06.2022 JJ Curative Exterior Signage 900 Congress Halo-illumianted Wall Sign Qty: 1 E.1B SPECIFICATIONS 2.00" 3.00" .125" thick aluminum face Polycarbonate back with translucent white vinyl Air space Electrical penetration Marble Facade 2.00" aluminum standoffs High output 6500K white LED modules Facade on top of CMU .375” D Wedge anchor embedded on brick To transformer enclosure Side Profile Scale 1:10 P13668 09.06.2022 JJ Curative Exterior Signage 900 Congress Halo-illumianted Wall Sign Qty: 1 E.1B CURATIVE HUB - OPTION E.1B - REVISED SOUTH ELEVATION 160 FT 258.5 SF (existing ) 31.17 SF (not in scope) E.1B 75 SF Scale 1:192 P13668 09.06.2022 JJ Curative Exterior Signage 900 Congress CURATIVE HUB - OPTION E.1B - REVISED SOUTH ELEVATION - NIGHT VIEW 160 FT 258.5 SF (existing ) 31.17 SF (not in scope) E.1B 75 SF Scale 1:192 P13668 09.06.2022 JJ Curative Exterior Signage 900 Congress INSTALL LOCATIONS (1) E.B Halo-illumianted Wall Sign 9TH STREET C O N G R E S S P13668 09.06.2022 JJ Curative Exterior Signage 900 Congress
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS OCTOBER 5, 2022 PR-2022-118744; GF-2022-138181 1905 TILLOTSON AVENUE 26 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1918 house ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH PROPERTY EVALUATION 1-story Craftsman bungalow clad in horizontal wood siding, with a gabled roofline, triangular brackets at gable end, and wood columns atop brick piers. One of the two entry doors has been filled in, and windows have been replaced, though the East Austin survey states that the alterations took place during the historic period. The house at 1905 Tillotson Avenue was built in 1918. Its earliest long-term residents were Lee and Maggie Green. Lee Green worked as a guard and porter at the Gulf Refining Company before becoming a City Parks Department employee. After his death, Maggie Green worked as a laundress before selling the property to Johnny and Alma Gooden in 1946.1 Johnny Gooden worked for the S & P Lines during his residence in the home. The 2016 East Austin survey lists the property as contributing to potential local and National Register historic districts. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high to moderate integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is constructed in the Craftsman style. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Strongly encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, then relocation over demolition, but release the permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. 1 "Real Estate Transaction 1 -- no Title." The Austin Statesman (1921-1973), Aug 09, 1946. 6. LOCATION MAP 26 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 26 – 3 Demolition permit application, 2022 Occupancy History City Directory Research, August 2022 1959 1955 John Gooden, owner John and Alma Gooden, owners Laborer, South Pacific …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS MEETING DATE PR-2022-129297 HYDE PARK 4513 AVENUE B 27.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Total demolition of two rear accessory dwelling units circa 1946 PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Total demolition of circa 1946 two-story accessory dwelling unit. 2) Total demolition of single-story accessory dwelling unit. ARCHITECTURE The primary house was built circa 1906 and is a single-family house of National Folk style. The two-story structure has a construction date of 1946 and has some Craftsman-style details with open eaves, exposed rafter tails, two windows placed in one central assembly, and a hipped roof. The ground-level façade has been altered from its original design. This structure may have been built to function as a garage apartment for the primary house. The single-story rear accessory unit has reduced integrity and significance due to alterations and lack of visibility from the street. PROPERTY EVALUATION The North Central Survey report, 2020 lists the two-story rear property as contributing to the potential North Hyde Park Local district but not eligible for individual listing alone. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a fair example of Craftsman architecture and conveys architectural significance. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Strongly encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, specifically of the two-story ADU, then relocation over demolition, but release the permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package, consisting of 8 x 10” photographs of all elevations printed on photographic paper, a dimensioned sketch plan, and a narrative history for archiving at the Austin History Center. LOCATION MAP 27.0 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 27.0 – 3 Two-story Accessory Dwelling Unit, …
Backup
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS OCTOBER 5, 2022 PR-2022-130978; GF-2022-138194 2711 MANOR ROAD 28 – 1 Demolish a ca. 1930 residence and detached garage. PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story house with horizontal wood siding, a side-gabled roof with exposed rafter tails and gabled portico, and 1:1 wood windows. The house at 2711 Manor Road, also listed in City directories as 2713 Manor, was constructed around the early 1930s. Its earliest documented residents were Charles O. and Evelyn Barker, who lived in the home until at least 1959. Charles Barker, who first worked for the Cabaniss Furniture Company, later owned and operated the Hollywood Food Store and Pic Pay Food Mart. Charles and Evelyn’s son Darewell also worked at the store with his father. PROPERTY EVALUATION The East Austin survey lists the property as contributing to potential local and National Register historic districts. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a vernacular example of the Craftsman style. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, then relocation over demolition, but release the permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. LOCATION MAP 28 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 28 – 3 28 – 4 Demolition permit application, 2022 Occupancy History City Directory Research, September 2022 Clyde W. Burch, renter Charles O. Barker, owner Charles O. and Evelyn Barker, owners Pic Pay Food Market Charles I. and Evelyn Barker, owners Proprietor, Hollywood Food Store Darewell Barker, renter Clerk, Hollywood Food Store 1944 Charles O. and Evelyn Barker, owners 1959 1955 1947 1941 Charles O. and Evelyn Barker, owners Collector, Cabaniss Furniture Co. Note: …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS OCTOBER 5, 2022 PR-2022-130994; GF-2022-138198 2713 MANOR ROAD 29 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1947 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH PROPERTY EVALUATION One-story Minimal Traditional house with 1:1 and picture windows, horizontal wood siding, and a partial-width inset porch supported by wrought-iron posts. The house at 2713 Manor Road was constructed between 1947 and 1954. Early City directories list George and Nellie Byrne as its first owners. George Byrne worked for the Internal Revenue Service. Later permits suggest that the house was built in 1954 by C. O. Barker and his wife, who occupied the house addressed as 2711 Manor Road, and occupied by Mrs. Barker’s father, Ernest Grip. The East Austin survey lists the property as contributing to potential local and National Register historic districts. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is constructed in the Minimal Traditional style. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, then relocation over demolition, but release the permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. LOCATION MAP 29 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 29 – 3 Zillow.com. https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/2713-Manor-Rd-Austin-TX-78722/29392157_zpid/ Demolition permit application, 2022 Occupancy History City Directory Research, September 2022 1959 Geo A. and Nell Byrne, owners Auditor International Revenue Charles O. and Evelyn Barker, owners Barker’s Food Market George R. and Trula Byrne, owners Auditor, Colr. Internal Revenue Serv. George A. and Nellie Byrne, owners Clerk, US Internal Revenue Sv. 1955 1952 1947 Permits 29 – 4 Sewer Service permit, 1954 Water service permit, 1954 Historical information Other 15 -- No Title. The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); 08 Sep 1954: …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OCTOBER 5, 2022 HR-2022-084104 SEBRON G. SNEED HOUSE 6301 BLUFF SPRINGS ROAD 3.0 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct an apartment complex around the Judge Sebron G. Sneed House ruins erected circa 1857-1860. 1) Construct a three-building apartment complex around the Sebron Sneed House ruins, providing a 25’ buffer zone between the ruins and the pool and other new construction. Proposed buildings are each three stories in height and display Mission Revival stylistic cues; they are clad in stucco and capped with hipped, tiled roofs. Columned arches accent the main entrance to each building. 2) Construct a fence around the ruins. Note: The applicant has provided 2015 correspondence, per Committee feedback, showing that former Preservation Officer Steve Sadowsky requested a mortar analysis and preliminary stabilization plan. The applicant specified that tuck-pointing and consolidation would be implemented following an observation report and recommendation from a masonry restoration contractor and the erection of a double steel fence around the ruins (see backup). RESEARCH & ARCHITECTURE The home on this site was zoned historic in 1979, with the surrounding area rezoned historic in 1980. The house was destroyed by fire in 1989, and the ruins remain. Travis County foreclosed on the home for taxes owed in 2002 and retained the property until a private owner purchased the site from the county in 2006. Invest SmartHomes Inc owned it from 2006-2009, then The Foresight Foundation from 2009-2011. Since 2011, the property has toggled ownership between the same companies: IndoPak Investments, Inc and The Circle at The Nelms. In 1854, Judge Sebron G. Sneed moved his entire family from Fayetteville, Arkansas, to his newly acquired 470-acre farm south of the present city of Austin. Construction of a permanent family residence was begun shortly after that in 1857 and continued for five years. War stopped the work, and the house, never entirely completed, lacked its intended porches and interior finishes.1 The stone for the walls was quarried on the property and finished by hand. Lumber for the floors, roof, and finish material was acquired from the Lost Pine Forest at Bastrop, Texas, 30 miles east of the residence site. A Historic American Building Survey (HABS TX - 399) dated 2/3/1937 described the house as follows: “ This native limestone residence is located one mile off the Austin-San Antonio Highway on the Austin-Lockhart Highway, near Austin, Travis County. …
Backup
SLIDING GATES SOLID WOOD FENCE THE CIRCLE AT THE NELMS APARTMENTS 6301 BLUFF SPRINGS ROAD AUSTIN, TEXAS 78744 (BLDGS-1, 2,&3) Tchen Architect 1303 ELM FOREST DRIVE CEDAR PARK, TEXAS 78613 512.351.1801 512.870.9427 (FAX) tchenarch@gmail.com Drawings & written materials appearing herein constitute original and unpublished work of the architect and may not be duplicated, used, or disclosed without written consent of the architect. C 2022 TCHEN ARCHITECTS NELMS DR. 1 BLDG-2 (4) 1-B UNITS (20) 2-B UNITS "RUINS" AREA 2,050 S.F. 7826 s.f. Roof 598 1 LAUNDRY MECH D A O R S G N I R P S F F U L B MAIL BOX 318 APT OFFICE BLDG-1 (12) 1-B UNITS 9,739 S.F. BIKE RACKS K L A W T E F SID 5 300 4315 s.f. Roof 1 1 S E T A G G SLIDIN TRUE NORTH INDEX OF DRAWINGS SHEET DRAWING TITLE SYNOPSIS & VICINITY MAP ADA-TAS STANDARDS DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE LIFE SAFETY FIRST FLOOR LIFE SAFETY SECOND FLOOR LIFE SAFETY THIRD FLOOR LIFE SAFETY FIRST FLOOR LIFE SAFETY SECOND FLOOR LIFE SAFETY THIRD FLOOR LIFE SAFETY FIRST FLOOR LIFE SAFETY SECOND FLOOR LIFE SAFETY THIRD FLOOR FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION ELEVATION BUILDING CROSS SECTION STAIRWAY TYPICAL DETAILS WALL & FLOOR ASSEMBLIES DOOR SCHEDULE & WALL TYPES FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION ELEVATION ELEVATION BUILDING CROSS SECTION STAIRWAY TYPICAL DETAILS WALL & FLOOR ASSEMBLIES DOOR SCHEDULE & WALL TYPES FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION ELEVATION BUILDING CROSS SECTION STAIRWAY TYPICAL DETAILS WALL & FLOOR ASSEMBLIES DOOR SCHEDULE & WALL TYPES A0-0.0 A0-0.1 A0-0.2 L1-1.0 L1-1.1 L1-1.2 L2-1.0 L2-1.1 L2-1.2 L3-1.0 L3-1.1 L3-1.2 A1-1.0 A1-1.1 A1-1.2 A1-1.3 A1-1.4 A1-1.5 A1-1.6 A1-2.0 A1-2.1 A1-3.0 A1-3.1 A1-3.2 A1-4.0 A2-1.0 A2-1.1 A2-1.2 A2-1.3 A21.4 A2-1.5 A2-2.0 A2-2.1 A2-2.2 A2-3.0 A2-3.1 A2-3.2 A2-4.0 A3-1.0 A3-1.1 A3-1.2 A3-1.3 A3-1.4 A3-1.5 A3-2.0 A3-2.1 A3-3.0 A3-3.1 A3-3.2 A3-4.0 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 S-8 S-9 S-10 S-11 S-12 S-13 S-14 S-15 S-16 S-17 S-18 S-19 S-20 S-21 S-22 S-23 S-24 S-25 M-00 M-01 M-02 E-00 E-02 E-03 P-00 P-01 P-02 S-01 BLDG-1 FOUNDATION PLAN BLDG-2 FOUNDATION PLAN BLDG-2 FOUNDATION TYPICAL FOUNDATION DETAILS BLDG-1 …
Backup
From: Ryan Malooly ryan.malooly@mkmhomes.com Subject: RE: Follow-up Archeological Letter of Commitment Date: August 1, 2022 at 5:38 PM To: pfrost@hicksenv.com Cc: TChen Projects tchenprojects@gmail.com, minhas@sambuilders.com, Stefani Huerta stefani.huerta@mkmhomes.com, Mohammad Minhas mohammad.minhas@mkmlodging.com, Zenaida Mejia sandy@sambuilders.com, Tracy Chen tchenarch@gmail.com Patricia, The project, named “The Circle at Nelms” is located at 6305 Bluff Springs Rd, Austin TX 78744. The owner of the property is also names The Circle at Nelms LLC and the billing address is 2207 W. Parmer Ln, Austin TX 78727. (512) 833-0404 The Description/ Work Scope: Property contains ruins of the “Sneed House” a plantation from pre-civil war Texas litigator and Judge Sebron Sneed who contracted local architect Abner Cook who designed the Texas Governors Mansion in Austin. Need construction/Archeological monitoring on site earth work as per THC and Sec. of Interior guidelines. I have CC’ed my coworkers as well as our Architect and his team. Thank you! Regards, Ryan Malooly MKM Homes LLC 2207 W Parmer Ln Austin, TX 78727 512.833.0404 C: 915.238.6336 E: ryan.malooly@mkmhomes.com From: pfrost@hicksenv.com Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 5:20 PM To: ryan.malooly@mkmhomes.com Cc: Shannon Barrientes Subject: Follow-up Archeological Letter of Commitment Ryan, Thank you for reaching out to Hicks & Company regarding future archeological construction monitoring for your project. If you could please provide your contact information (address and phone number) along with a brief description of your request and the property in question. I will get with our staff to address your needs. Thanks Pat Patricia Frost, P.G.* Senior Geoscientist/Project Manager (512) 970-7218 cell *Licensed in Texas and Louisiana. HICKS & COMPANY Environmental, Archeological and Planning Consultants 1504 W. 5th Street | Austin, Texas 78703 512.478.0858 | fax 512.474.1849 pfrost@hicksenv.com www.hicksenv.com TBPG Registered Geoscience Firm No. 50498
Backup
Backup
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS OCTOBER 5, 2022 PR-2022-130934; GF-2022-138204 2715 MANOR ROAD 30 – 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Demolish a duplex moved onto the lot in 1959 from 1401 Congress Ave. Two-story duplex with asbestos siding, an attached carport, a hipped roof, and 1:1 wood windows. The duplex at 2715 Manor Road was moved onto the lot in 1959 by Earl Trull. At the time, Trull and his family lived a few blocks away on Breeze Terrace1 and were active in Travis County Democratic Party campaigning.2 The duplex appears to have been used as rental housing for university students. PROPERTY EVALUATION The East Austin survey lists the property as contributing to potential local and National Register historic districts. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate to low integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building does not appear to be architectural significance. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Release the permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. 1 “Frank Walling Again Heads Trades Council.” The Austin American (1914-1973); 10 Jan 1960: A17. 2 “FULL SWING.” The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); 21 Aug 1956: A10. LOCATION MAP 30 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION 30 – 3 Demolition permit, 2022 Occupancy History City Directory Research, September 2022 Not available for this address Permits Sewer service permit, 1959 30 – 4 Water service permit, 1959 Building permit, 1965 Relocation pemit, 1959 30 – 5 Historical information Building permit, 1942 “Classified Ad 4 -- No Title.” The Austin American (1914-1973); 04 Oct 1959: E10. “Six Grad Students Given Ford Grants.” The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); 18 June 1971: 20.
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS OCTOBER 5, 2022 PR-2022-123716 BUILDING OR DISTRICT NAME 608 E. 3RD ST. 31.0 – 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE Demolition of a circa 1880 single-family residential structure. 608 E. 3rd Street is a National folk style, hall-and-parlor family house. Hall-and-Parlor family houses are a British form that is traditionally associated with heavy timber or hewn log construction but were adapted to masonry and other types of construction as the style moved into timber-scarce areas. After the expansion of the railroad, the form was executed with light-framed walls and remained the dominant form of folk housing over much of the rural Southeast well into the 20th century. Hall-and-Parlor houses are typically one or one-and-one half stories in height and have side-gabled roofs; porches are either inset and covered by the main roof or are shed-roofed extensions. Shed-roofed rear extensions are common. The design was popular as many people could not afford a large house; however, putting up a wall in the only room created a smaller area in the rear of the house called a parlor. This was a private room and usually contained a bed. The East 3rd Street dwelling is a well-preserved example of late nineteenth-century National folk housing of the hall-and- parlor family with rear shed addition. It is a single-story dwelling with a full front porch with an “x” cross-stick railing design and a metal roof that was likely rehabilitation of previous designs. It has a side-gabled roof and wood exterior sheathing with a balanced, symmetrical front façade composed of a single-entry wooden door flanked by 4:4 windows. RESEARCH The property was previously approved for relocation across the street only in 2019. Such a relocation would have helped retain the structure’s original neighborhood context. There do not appear to be any specific historical figures associated with the structure, but rather this dwelling is a rare surviving in situ example of a middle-lower income historic housing from the nineteenth century in Austin. It provides insight into the changing patterns of Austin’s history as an example of the living location and conditions of lower to middle-income Austinites. PROPERTY EVALUATION The Waller Creek Survey lists the property as eligible for NRHP listing. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has …
Backup
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS OCTOBER 5, 2022 PR-2022-129227; GF-2022-138214 2106 MATTHEWS DRIVE 32 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1946 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Two-story house with stone, siding, and CMU first floor and flat-roofed historic-period addition with wood siding. Windows are multilight steel casements and 2:2 aluminum. The house at 2106 Matthews Drive, addressed originally as 2104 Matthews Drive, was built in the late 1940s. It was first occupied by Kenneth and Anne Shoudy, former residents of 2002 Scenic Drive. Kenneth Shoudy operated the Lake City Building Supply Company and may have sold the steel casement windows at the home’s first floor from the property.1 John Jr. and Beatrice Neethe purchased the home around 1951, adding a second story. John Neethe, Jr. worked as an insurance broker. The house became a rental property after Beatrice Neethe sold it to Edward Farron in 1953.2 Farron later moved to 2404 Scenic Drive. PROPERTY EVALUATION Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building does not appear to convey architectural significance. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Release the demolition permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. 1 “Classified Ad 4 -- No Title.” The Austin American (1914-1973); 30 Mar 1947: 27. 2 “Other 5 -- No Title.” The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); 16 May 1953: 5. LOCATION MAP 32 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 32 – 3 32 – 4 32 – 5 Demolition permit application, 2022 Occupancy History City Directory Research, August 2022 Vacant 1959 1955 1952 1949 1947 Mike and Sammye J. Ramsey, renters Salesman, South Texas Equipment Company John Jr. and Beatrice Neethe, owners …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS OCTOBER 5, 2022 PR-2022-134255; GF-2022-138221 605 E. 47TH STREET 33 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1942 house ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH PROPERTY EVALUATION 1-story Craftsman bungalow clad in horizontal wood siding, with a gabled roofline, and wood columns supporting a gabled front porch. The house at 605 E 47th Street was built in the early 1940s. Its earliest long-term residents were Henry and Gladys Dunn. Henry Dunn primarily worked as a foreman at the University of Texas and was a building manager for a short time. Gladys Dunn regularly hosted the West Austin Study Group at their home and taught an intermediate Sunday School class for 25 years. The 2019 University-Windsor-Hyde Park survey lists the property as contributing to potential local and National Register historic districts. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high to moderate integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is constructed in the Craftsman style. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, then relocation over demolition, but release the permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. LOCATION MAP 33 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 33 – 3 Google Street View, 2022 Occupancy History City Directory Research, August 2022 Henry A. Dunn, owner Henry A. and Gladys W. Dunn, owners Foreman at the University of Texas Henry A. and Gladys Dunn, owners Building manager Henry A. and Gladys W. Dunn, owners Foreman at the University of Texas Henry A. and Gladys W. Dunn, owners Foreman at the University of Texas 1941 Address not listed 1959 1955 1952 1947 1944 Permits Sanborn Maps No permits avaiable 33 – 4 Sanborn map, …
PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION Although applicants and/or their agent(s) are expected to attend a public hearing, you are not required to attend. However, if you do attend, you have the opportunity to speak FOR or AGAINST the proposed development or change. You may also contact a neighborhood or environmental organization that has expressed an interest in an application affecting your neighborhood. During a public hearing, the board or commission may postpone or continue an application's hearing to a later date or recommend approval or denial of the application. If the board or commission announces a specific date and time for a postponement or continuation that is not later than 60 days from the announcement, no further notice is required. A board or commission's decision may be appealed by a person withstanding to appeal, or an interested party that is identified as a person who can appeal the decision. The body holding a public hearing on an appeal will determine whether a person has standing to appeal the decision. An interested party is defined as a person who is the applicant or record owner of the subject property, or who communicates an interest to a board or commission by: • delivering a written statement to the board or commission before the public hearing that generally identifies the issues of concern (it may be delivered to the contact person listed on a notice); or appearing and speaking for the record at the public hearing; and: • • —occupies a primary residenhat is within 500 feet ofth-e-§ibi sect properf pic•fliole-Edevelo-fi-ment: is the record owner of property within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development; or • is an officer of an environmental or neighborhood organization that has an interest in or whose declared boundaries are within • 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development? A notice of appeal must be filed with the director of the responsible department no later than 14 days after the decision. An appeal form may be available from the responsible department. For additional information on the City of Austin's land development process, please visit our website: www.austintexas.gov/abc Written comments must be submitted to the board or commission (or the contact person listed on the notice) before a public hearing. Your comments should include the board or commission's name, the scheduled date of the public hearing, the Case Number and the contact person listed on the …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OCTOBER 5, 2022 HR-2022-122453 HEIERMAN BUILDING 115 E. 5TH ST. 6.0-1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Alterations, demolition, and new construction of an addition to the existing 3-story commercial structure. 1) Demolish existing storefront assemblies; create a new custom storefront with metal framing and sill with new windows 2) Remove front façade side lites and salvage entry door; create a new recessed entry with the salvaged door. 3) Remove egress door and demolish brick infill on front façade 4) Windows are to be removed and replaced; existing openings are to remain 5) New rooftop steel frame construction with curtain wall glazing setback 20’ from the front facade. 6) Partial demolition of rear courtyard walls, all windows, roof enclosure, and structure. 7) Construct and install new curtain wall windows with divided lights, exterior balcony, blackened metal panel cladding, and enclosed area on level 1 in the rear courtyard. ARCHITECTURE The Heierman Building was zoned Historic in 1977. It was contracted for construction circa February 1887 by Tom Smith, Sr., with materials from M. Paggi and Joseph Nalle as the builder. It is a 3-story brick building believed to have been built initially as a commercial enterprise. Three walls were made of brick and one (west wall) of stone. It opened as the Provident Hotel circa 1890 and continued to operate as a hotel until 1923 (under various names). The family that ran it the longest was the Heiermans during its first 87 years hence the landmark name. Evidence suggests that the Hotel Provident had ten guest rooms on both the second and third floors. Rooms were single or suites and supplied with gas and electricity; closets and free bathrooms were provided on each floor. The rooms likely surrounded a central hall, and at least two rooms on each floor had a fireplace with a coal grate. Research suggests the upper floor may have been converted to support the weight of a machine shop in the 1920s, and lower first-floor walls were cut through to accommodate an automobile shop and showroom. A restoration was completed in 1974. The original façade was a symmetrical 6-bay Victorian storefront in front of a masonry structure. The original roof was metal with raised seams. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used …
Backup
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS OCTOBER 5, 2022 PR-2022-123716 ROBERTSON-STUART MAIR 606 E. 3RD ST. 7.0 – 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE Relocation of a circa 1880 single-family residential structure into a local historic district. 606 E. 3rd street is a circa 1880 dwelling of second empire style influences with a double-pile plan, and rear addition. There is the creation of a faux, centered wing, a common subtype of the second empire style, by the upper dormer and projecting porch below. The porch has a modest decorative spindle frieze with beads. The structure has a wood exterior with a wood- shingled straight mansard roof shape. Second empire is a rare style in the Southern states. Second Empire styling was particularly adapted for townhomes for it provided an upper floor behind the steep roof line, and made the structure appear less massive than most other styles with comparable space. The boxy roof line was considered particularly functional because it permitted a full upper story of usable living area or attic space. The second story and rear addition was added between 1880 and 1935, as indicated by the Sanborn maps. Second Empire was popular for a relatively short time from approximately 1855-1885, so it is likely the second story addition was constructed not long after the 1894 Sanborn map. Research indicates this structure continuously served two families or less but does not indicate a framed separation wall typically found with separate entrances. RESEARCH The property was previously approved for relocation across the street only in 2019. Such a relocation would have helped retain the structure’s original neighborhood context as opposed to a move outside its original neighborhood or demolition. There does not appear to be any specific historical figures associated with the structure, but rather this dwelling is a rare surviving in situ example of middle-lower income historic housing from the nineteenth century in Austin. It provides insight into the changing patterns of Austin’s history as an example of the housing style, type, location, and conditions of middle- lower income Austinites. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in the Robertson-Stuart Mair locally designated historic district that has adopted the Historic Design Standards. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1. General standards Relocation of this structure into the Robertson-Stuart …
Total Proposed Building Cover: Total Proposed Impervious Cover: 3,620 s.f. (31%) 5,361 s.f. (46%) PROVIDED PARKING: 4 SPACES IN DRIVEWAYS Existing 21'-1" driveway apron SITE INFORMATION MF-2-HD-NP SITE ADDRESS: 1005 Lydia Street and 1002 Wheeless Street, Austin, TX 78702 Lots #16, #17, Block 4, Stuart and Mairs, a LEGAL DESCRIPTION: subdivision recorded in the plat records of Travis County, Texas. Vol. W, Page #230 ZONING: NEIGHBORHOOD: Central East Austin HISTORIC DISTRICT: Robertson/Stuart and Mair Historic District LAND USE: Multi-Family Scope Of Work: Relocate an existing, 2 bedroom, 2 bathroom, Two story single-family residence of approximately 1,233 s.f. to an existing MF-2 zoned site with two existing duplexes. Project is 100% affordable, and will utilize relief from Affordability Unlocked to allow 5th living unit. CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-B Non-fire rated, wood frame, on piers. SITE AREA: 11,643 s.f. NOTE: Areas are measured to the outside of finished surface per C.O.A. Requirements for Building Coverage and FAR. Existing Building Cover: Existing Paving Area: 2,689 s.f. 1,696 s.f. New Lower Floor Relocated House: New Second Floor Relocated House: Total Heated and Cooled: New Front Porch: New Back Porch: Total New Impervious Cover: Total New Limits of Construction: Existing A/C pads: New A/C Pad: 812 s.f. 421 s.f. 1,233 s.f. 78 s.f. 41 s.f. 931 s.f. 1,753 s.f. 36 s.f. 9 s.f. GENERAL NOTES 1. THESE DRAWINGS ARE BASED UPON THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, AND THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MEETING ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THIS CODE. THIS INCLUDES ALL LOCAL AMENDMENTS PER THE CITY OF AUSTIN. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY WITH ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND CODE REQUIREMENTS OR DRAWINGS AND MANUFACTURERS' INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLARIFICATION. THESE DRAWINGS MAY NOT INDICATE OR DESCRIBE ALL THE WORK REQUIRED FOR FULL COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES RELATED TO THE PROJECT'S CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE SAFETY. THESE DRAWINGS DO NOT INDICATE THE NECESSARY ELEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. 3. ALL VERTICAL DIMENSIONS INDICATED ON EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, BUILDING SECTIONS, DETAILS AND INTERIOR ELEVATIONS ARE NOMINAL. ALL PLAN DIMENSIONS INDICATE EITHER FACE OF FRAMING, FACE OF MASONRY OR CENTERLINE OF ROUGH OPENING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. DO NOT SCALE MEASUREMENTS FROM DRAWINGS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT WITH ANY DIMENSIONAL QUESTIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE WORK …
Backup
8.0 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OCTOBER 5, 2022 HR-2022-135906 CHARLES JOHNSON HOMESTEAD/AMERICAN LEGION 404 ATLANTA ST. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Installation of an elevator in the NW corner of the original 1858 structure. 1) Install elevator and elevator shaft in NW corner of original 1858 structure; 2) Prep existing access path & elevator corner location for excavation; 3) Excavate all necessary existing grade/sub-grade materials; 4) Form & pour reinforce concrete footings/piers/stem walls/stone ledges as req'd; 5) Waterproof all subterranean concrete surfaces as req'd; 6) Install drainage system(s) as req'd; 7) Enlarge existing masonry wall rough opening as req'd; 8) Prep existing masonry at the exterior for structural connections for new elevator assembly; 9) Construct new masonry CMU shaft & ext stone cladding; 10) Clear out exist storage closet & provide all new MEP connections as req'd; 11) Construct new wood-framing at the material-clad roof above; 12) Install new elevator cab & finishes; 13) Install all interior trim assemblies, signage, and control devices as req'd; 14) Apply finish/sealer as req'd. ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS The Charles Johnson Homestead is a two-story limestone residential structure with a dog-run. 404 Atlanta St is now occupied by the American Legion and used for special events. It was zoned a historic landmark in 1987. Charles Johnson was the original owner and builder and used local limestone to build the structure from a nearby quarry on site. The porch was replaced in 1924, and in 1930, there was an addition to the structure at the Northwest corner. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate local historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Commercial additions 1. Location The location of the elevator is at the side/rear of the property and is non-invasive. It is compatible with design standards. However, it was not clear from the drawings whether the elevator addition will be structurally independent and not tied into the historic structure per the THC’s recommendations and compatible with the City of Austin design standards. 1.1 Locate additions at the rear and sides of historic buildings to minimize visual impact. 1.3 Minimize the loss of historic fabric by connecting additions to the existing building through the most noninvasive location and methods Summary The project appears to meet the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK …
ELEC POLE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE ELEC PNL CLASSRM 5 / SCHOOL ADMIN MAIN PRE-SCHOOL SECURE GATE CASA MONTESSORI PRE-SCHOOL ELEC POLE OHE ELEC PNL ELEC POLE OHE CLASSRM 2 CUT EAVE BACK AS REQ'D @ CLASS-RM CLASSRM 1 GRAPHIC NOTE: SEE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR ALL GRAPHIC PHOTOS & NOTES I C H P A R G 4 1 / 3 1 SECURE GATE 'SYMMETRY' ELEV CONFIG: SGL-OPENING CAB SIZE: 48x54 W: 68" / D: 72" RAIL CTR-LINE: 40.75" DR CTR-LINE: 42.5" I 4 1 / 3 1 C H P A R G STORAGE RM NEW ELEV- ATOR VEST HVAC COND 1 HVAC COND 2 HVAC COND 3 HVAC COND 4 MEN WOMEN MECH STOR CLST 15 16 17 STAIR HALL D T F A H S 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ENTRY HALL SECURE GATE DARKER SHADED-AREA DENOTES EXTENT OF NEW ELEVATOR SHAFT & ROOF CONSTRUCTION SECURE GATE I 9 C H P A R G GRAPHIC NOTE: SEE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR ALL GRAPHIC PHOTOS & NOTES GRAPHIC 12 GRAPHIC NOTE: SEE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR ALL GRAPHIC PHOTOS & NOTES ELEC PNL H2O IN FR STREET UP 7 EQ RI UP 4 EQ RI NORTH MEETING UP 4 EQ RI CARETAKER APT UP 4 EQ RI CARETAKER COURT CLASSRM 4 CLASSRM 3 WEST LOUNGE EAST LOUNGE OFFICE ENTRANCE GAS MTR CARETAKER ENTRANCE GAS IN FR STREET KITCHEN EAST RESTRM EAST ENTRY FOUNTAIN NORTH PARKING 48" DIA OAK AM LGN POST 76 SIGN T S A T N A L T A VEHICLE ENTRANCE FOSTER AVE GRAPHIC NOTE: SEE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR ALL GRAPHIC PHOTOS & NOTES G R A P H I C 5 H2O MTR G R A P H I C 8 MISC STOR CVD DANCE FLR UNCVD PATIO STONE WALK CVD SOUTH PATIO AM LGN HALL ENTRANCE I 7 C H P A R G GRAPHIC NOTE: SEE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR ALL GRAPHIC PHOTOS & NOTES MAIN ENTRANCE GRAPHIC 6 GRAPHIC NOTE: SEE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR ALL GRAPHIC PHOTOS & NOTES K L A W E N O T S AMERICAN LEGION HALL / CHARLES JOHNSON HOUSE UNCVD LAWN G R A P H I C 3 / 4 GRAPHIC NOTE: SEE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR ALL GRAPHIC PHOTOS & NOTES 44" DIA OAK 48" DIA OAK UNCVD LAWN 48" DIA OAK SOUTH PARKING 90" DIA …
September 11, 2022 Mr. Peter Dick Architect 2804 Oak Crest Avenue Austin, Texas 78704 Via email to peterdickarchitect@gmail.com Dear Mr. Peter Dick, Re: Recorded Texas Historic Landmark project review, The Johnson Home (American Legion Travis Post 76), 404 Atlanta Street, Austin, Travis County, Texas (RTHL 6448) Thank you for sending the proposed project application for The Johnson Home (American Legion Travis Post 76), which has been designated as a Recorded Texas Historic Landmark (RTHL) since 1966. This letter presents the comments of the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission (THC). The Texas Historical Commission Division of Architecture staff, led by Alex Toprac, completed their review of the project proposal along with the preliminary design plans produced by Peter Dick, Architect, dated August 31, 2022, and received on September 1, 2022. Our staff acknowledges the proposed exterior scope of work is largely limited to the construction of a compatible limestone clad masonry elevator addition at the northwest crook of the rear, north building elevation, along with all necessary appurtenances and new utilities, which will require removal of two historic 6-over-6 double hung wood sash windows and selective removal of historic masonry to extend the window openings to be adapted for the associated elevator doors. Although it appears to be the case based on the current preliminary design plans, our review staff expects the elevator addition to be structurally independent and not tied into the historic structure. Furthermore, for any application of mortar directly in contact with the historic building limestone masonry our staff expects the use of a type N mortar mix (composed of 1 part hydrated/hydraulic lime, 1 part Portland concrete, and 5-6 parts matching aggregate). Our staff recommends the installation of expansion/control joint material be used to separate the new elevation addition from the historic building to allow the greatest level of reversibility possible. Additionally, our staff encourages the owner, in coordination with their selected contractor, to salvage and appropriately store the two historic 6-over-6 double hung wood sash windows planned for removal, to allow for potential future reuse. After thorough review of the submitted project proposal, design plans, historic documentation, and photographs, the Texas Historical Commission review staff determined the proposed exterior scope of work appropriately meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Therefore, we hereby waive the remainder of the RTHL review period, and work may proceed at this time. If any substantial revisions …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OCTOBER 5, 2022 HR-2022-137075 MUELLER CONTROL TOWER 3952 BERKMAN DRIVE 9 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct an elevated observation deck and walkway attached to the base of the tower. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construction of a concrete deck, approximately 20' above natural grade, around the non-architecturally treated concrete tower base of the Mueller Control Tower. ARCHITECTURE The 2018 historic zoning report describes the building as follows: Local architects Fehr and Granger were chosen to design the new airport facilities, which won a runner-up award from Progressive Architect in 1959. The new facilities embodied the aesthetics of mid-century Modern style in its long, low profile and horizontal configuration, with ample glass at the entries and a series of continuous extruded lozenge-shaped motifs along the cornice of the entry promenade. Rising from the terminal building was the airport control tower, which was designed to have a dramatic and modern presence, pleasing to the eye whether in the air or on the ground. The tower has a concrete frame, with aluminum and glass panels on the exterior. The original structure had alternating light blue and dark blue porcelain panels set in vertical bands; much of this was covered by glass in a renovation but restored to its original materials and configuration today. The control tower is 18 feet by 18 feet at its base, and 9 stories tall, rising 83 feet, 10 inches to the top of the roof. It begins to flare at the 3rd floor, eventually to a space that is 30 feet, 7 inches square at the control room on the 9th floor of the structure.1 DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project does not remove significant intact historic material from the building’s exterior. The portion of the building that is impacted by the observation deck was historically inside the terminal building. The remainder of the building has been rehabilitated per a previous Certificate of Appropriateness. Institutional buildings 1. General standards 1.1 Ensure that the building’s historic character is preserved through careful repair and maintenance of historic materials. The proposed project does not impact the character-defining historic materials at the building’s exterior. 1.2 …
TOWER PLAZA MUELLER TOWER DISTRICT BERKMAN DRIVE AUSTIN, TEXAS 78722 LANDMARK COMMISSION PROJECT OVERVIEW JULY 11, 2022 1/2 MILE 1/4 MILE 10 Minute Walk May 24, 2021 Concept PresentationTower Plaza Existing Site Conditions May 24, 2021 Concept PresentationTower Plaza VAUGHAN STREET RYAN PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT (2023) F U T U R E P A S E O RYAN PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT (2023) FUTURE DEVELOPMENT T E E R T S N I R O S FUTURE TOWER PLAZA B E R K M A N D R I V E T E E R T S Y D R U C C M Mueller Tower Block May 24, 2021 Concept PresentationTower Plaza Historic Photos May 24, 2021 Concept PresentationTower Plaza May 28th, 1961 Opening May 24, 2021 Concept PresentationTower Plaza Existing Site Conditions May 24, 2021 Concept PresentationTower Plaza FLIGHT PATH FLIGHT DECK TOWER FOREST 3 Tower Plaza Concepts May 24, 2021 Concept PresentationTower Plaza PASEO SWEEPING STEPS PED. BRIDGE OVER PASEO OBSERV. DECK ADA PATH Flight Path Bird’s Eye Perspective May 24, 2021 Concept PresentationTower Plaza Brooklyn Botanic Garden Robert W. Wilson Overlook (Weiss Manfredi) Twist Bridge Vlaadingen, NL (West 8) Flex MSE Bag Wall Milkweed Meadow Brooklyn Botanic Garden Visitor Center (Weiss/Manfredi) Teardrop Park New York, NY (MVVA) Historic Mueller Airport Shade Structure Austin, TX (Fehr & Grainger) Flight Path Precedent Imagery May 24, 2021 Concept PresentationTower Plaza 7’ BIKE LANE SWEEPING STEPS + 21’ PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ACROSS PASEO (BEYOND) ADA PATH SURROUNDING PLAZA AND GREEN Flight Path South Elevation May 24, 2021 Concept PresentationTower Plaza MILKWEED MEADOW P A S E O OVERLOOK LAWN AMPITHEATER OVERLOOK MILKWEED MEADOW TOWER ADA PATH RETAINING WALL BRIDGE OBSERVATION DECK SWEEPING STEPS Flight Path Conceptual Site Plan May 24, 2021 Concept PresentationTower Plaza 1 | VIEW OF TOWER FROM PASEO, LOOKING WEST 11 22 CONCEPTUAL RENDERING Page 1 of 18 December 15, 2021 NCC PresentationTower Plaza 1 S C A L E : 1 / 1 0 " = 1 ' S E C T I O N E L E V A T I O N - T H R O U G H A M P I T H E A T R E 0 5 ' 1 0 ' 2 0 ' 2 S C A L E : 1 / 1 0 " = 1 ' S E C T I O N E L E V A T …
Backup
Backup
Backup
Backup
Backup