11 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JANUARY 10, 2024 HR-2023-160714 MORLEY BROTHERS DRUGSTORE 209 EAST SIXTH STREET PROPOSAL Convert a landmarked building from retail to restaurant use, rehabilitating historic features. Remove and store the sign. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Repair the brick and metal bay window as needed. Retain historic painted signage. 2) Repair openings, doors, and windows as needed. 3) Remove the ca. 1935 “Grove” sign and store it for use elsewhere. 4) Paint the existing ground-level wooden doors. Repair the cast iron detailing around the doors as needed. 5) Repair existing upper bay windows, restore existing stained-glass windows, and retain existing sconces. ARCHITECTURE The 1975 National Register listing describes the building as follows: Built 1874/1898, is a slender, three-bay, brick and stone commercial structure with a two-story cast-iron oriel on the upper stories. The first two floors were built ca. 1874, while the top story and bay were added in 1898. This Queen Anne cast-iron bay front was one of the few prefabricated iron fronts used in Austin. All the window frames are studded with rows of lightbulb sockets...Morley Brothers Drug Store occupied the building from 1906 through 1935, at which time Grove Drug Store became the occupants.1 DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The project proposes retention and repair, rather than removal or replacement, of all historic-age elements other than the sign. 4. Exterior walls and trim The project proposes repair, rather than replacement, of historic material. 5. Windows, doors, and screens The project proposes repair, rather than replacement, of historic fenestration. 9. Light fixtures The project proposes repair, rather than replacement, of historic fixtures. Summary The project meets the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK Consult with the Texas Historical Commission on removing the sign. 11. Commercial storefronts The project proposes repair of the existing storefront where historic material is present. It does not alter existing openings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the proposed repairs. Encourage sign retention, as it has gained significance over time, but should the recommended THC documentation support sign removal, approve the remainder of the application on the condition that the sign be stored on-site in a climate-controlled area for potential future …
S IXT H S TRE ET HI STORI C D I STRI CT REVITALIZATI ON 20 9 E 6TH STREE T V I E W F R O M 4 0 0 B L O C K E A S T 6 T H S T R E E T L O O K I N G W E S T A U S T I N H I S T O R Y C E N T E R , c . 1 9 3 7 , A U S T I N , T E X A S 1 of 7 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION | JAN 10, 2024HLC REVIEW | 209 EAST 6TH STREET 209 E 6TH ST. 200 BLOCK PROPERTY SUMMARY: ADDRESS: 209 E 6TH STREET CURRENT USE: VACANT 1975 NHRP SURVEY: 2022 MACROSTIE SURVEY: CONTRIBUTING CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC DESIGNATION: CoA HISTORIC LANDMARK Morley Brothers Drug Store DATE BUILT: 1874/1898 . T S S O Z A R B E 6TH ST. . T S O T N I C A J N A S View From Corner of E 6th and Brazos St. Looking Southeast at 203-209 E 6th Austin History Center, c. 1956, Austin, Texas HISTORIC PHOTO (1956) NORTH ELEVATION CURRENT PHOTOS (2022) SITE PLAN S S E R G N O C S O Z A R B O T N I C A J N A S SIXTH STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT LEGEND P R O P E R T Y O V E R V I E W Y T I N I R T E 6 T H S E H C E N R E V I R D E R E N I B A S 5 3 - I 2 of 7 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION | JAN 10, 2024HLC REVIEW | 209 EAST 6TH STREET View From Corner of E 6th and Brazos St. Looking Southeast at 203-209 E 6th Austin History Center, c. 1956, Austin, Texas HISTORIC PHOTO : 1930s NORTH ELEVATION: EXISTING 2022 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION N O R T H E L E V A T I O N C O M P A R I S O N O V E R T I M E 3 of 7 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION | JAN 10, 2024HLC REVIEW | 209 EAST 6TH STREET EXISTING FACADE, TO EXISTING FACADE, TO BE REMOVED …
12 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JANUARY 10, 2024 HR-2023-160752 SIXTH STREET NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT CARRINGTON STORE 520 EAST SIXTH STREET PROPOSAL Repair, rehabilitate, and convert a City landmark and Recorded Texas Historic Landmark from an office to a restaurant. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Repair and repoint brick as necessary. Repaint brick to emphasize detailing. 2) Install a new metal awning at the south elevation. 3) Repair and repaint the existing doors and windows. Install functional shutters on the second floor, matching photos. 4) Paint and repair existing downspouts at the south elevation. 5) Remove non-original second-floor lights at the south elevation. 6) Remove the non-original balcony at the east elevation, repairing the connection points as needed. Remove the existing openings on the ground floor and second floor and infill them with stone. The proposed infill will be slightly differentiated from the existing stone. 7) Remove all non-original additions from the west façade, repairing connection points with stone that is distinguishable from the existing stone and repainting where needed. 8) Remove the non-original metal balcony from the north elevation, repairing connection points with stone that is differentiated from the existing stone. Repaint. Remove the metal fence. ARCHITECTURE This two-part commercial block was originally built as a one-story structure in 1872, then enlarged in the 1890s. The building has four large arched openings on the first floor, five windows on the second floor, and simple brick detailing on the cornice. It was originally built as exposed brick; however, since the 1970s, the building has been painted. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposal includes repair rather than replacement and uses appropriately differentiated infill materials for masonry repair. Shutters and awnings are present in historic photos. 4. Exterior walls and trim The proposed masonry repair and infill appear compatible. Applicants should ensure that appropriate mortar testing is completed before undertaking repairs. 5. Windows, doors, and screens The proposal includes the repair of existing windows and doors. 11. Commercial storefronts The proposal repairs historic storefront elements and does not alter original openings. Photographic documentation of an awning present during the historic period will inform the new awning’s …
S IXT H S TRE ET HI STORI C D I STRI CT REVITALIZATI ON 520 E 6T H STREE T V I E W F R O M 4 0 0 B L O C K E A S T 6 T H S T R E E T L O O K I N G W E S T A U S T I N H I S T O R Y C E N T E R , c . 1 9 3 7 , A U S T I N , T E X A S PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION | JAN 10, 2024HLC REVIEW | 520 EAST 6TH STREET 500 BLOCK 520 E 6TH ST. PROPERTY SUMMARY: ADDRESS: 520 E 6TH STREET CURRENT USE: VACANT 1975 NHRP SURVEY: 2022 MACROSTIE SURVEY: CONTRIBUTING CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC DESIGNATION: CoA HISTORIC LANDSMARK E.H. Carrington Store DATE BUILT: 1872/1890s . T S S E H C E N E 6TH ST. . T S R E V I R D E R SITE PLAN HISTORIC PHOTO (1975) CURRENT PHOTOS (2023) View from E 6th Looking North at 520 E 6th Austin History Center, c. 1975, Austin, Texas SOUTH ELEVATION S S E R G N O C S O Z A R B O T N I C A J N A S Y T I N I R T E 6 T H S E H C E N R E V I R D E R E N I B A S 5 3 - I SIXTH STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT LEGEND P R O P E R T Y O V E R V I E W PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION | JAN 10, 2024HLC REVIEW | 520 EAST 6TH STREET V i e w f r o m E 6 t h L o o k i n g N o r t h a t 5 2 0 E 6 t h A u s t i n H i s t o r y C e n t e r , c . 1 9 7 5 , A u s t i n , Te x a s S O U T H E L E V A T I O N C O M P A R I S O N O V E R T I M E V i …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS DECEMBER 13, 2023 HR-2023-122500; GF-2023-130943 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK 1010 HARWOOD PLACE PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Demolish a ca. 1935 house and construct a new residence, ADU, and pool. The proposed new primary building is two stories, clad in stucco and horizontal siding and capped with a standing seam metal roof. It has a compound roofline and undivided fixed windows of varying proportions placed at irregular intervals throughout. The proposed ADU is two stories in height and constructed to match the main house. It has a rear-facing garage. The original portion of the house at 1010 Harwood Place is one story, with a symmetrical plan and side-gabled roof. Its central stoop is sheltered by a gabled portico with Classical Revival columns and traditional cornice returns. The house has a two-story rear addition and gabled side addition with fireplace, mostly constructed within the period of significance. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH 1010 Harwood Place was constructed around 1935. Early residents included Hoyt and Jessie Henderson, who rented the property. Hoyt Henderson was the chief operator at the Western Union Telephone Company. The house was sold to C. Morley and Frances Bartholemew, who lived there throughout the 1940s. Morley Bartholemew worked as a salesman and an engineer. During the 1950s, Raymond Williams, who worked for the Western Republic Life Insurance Company, purchased the home. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts . The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed main building is located 25’ from the primary street, and the rear building and garage are located to the rear of the primary building and adjacent to the alley. 2. Orientation The primary building is oriented toward Harwood Place, and the secondary structure toward the alley. 3. Scale, massing, and height Both buildings are larger in scale and taller in height than the surrounding contributing buildings. Their massing does not appear to reflect surrounding contributing buildings’ massing. 4. Proportions The buildings’ proportions do not appear compatible with surrounding contributing buildings’ proportions. 5. Design and style Both buildings are consistent in design and style, but do not reflect the character of the district. 6. Roofs The proposed rooflines are generally more complex than contributing buildings’ rooflines, though …
EXISTING BRICK WALK TO BE REMOVED EXIST.GAS METER TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED R 11"(PECAN) R 5'-6"(1/4 CRZ) R 11'(1/2 CRZ) R 22'(CRZ) P R OP ER T Y L INE 5 FT BUIL D L INE/ SET BA CK 5 2 2 EM GM EX IS T ING 2 ST OR Y R ES ID ENC E TO BE R E M O V E D 5 2 3 K C A B T E S T F 5 2 T E E R T S D O O W R A H ' 0 0 . 0 5 PP ' 0 0 . 3 ' 0 0 . 2 1 ' 0 0 . 3 WM PP EXIST. O.H. LINES TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED EXISTING BRICK WALK TO BE REMOVED EXIST. ELEC. METER TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED EXISTING COVERED PORCH TO BE REMOVED E N I L Y T R E P O R P CO N EM 5 FT BUIL D L INE/ SET BA CK P R OP ER T Y L INE 5 17 150.00' NE IG HB O R ING P R OP ER T Y R 93/4"(SPANISH ELM) R 4'-107/16"(1/4 CRZ) R 9'-9"(1/2 CRZ) R 19'-6"(CRZ) 150.00' 521 5 2 0 5 18 5 19 EX IS T ING COV ER ED W O O D D E C K TO BE R E M O V E D EX IS T ING W O O D D E C K T O BE R E M O V E D E X IS T ING P O O L T O BE R E M O V E D K C A B T E S T F 0 1 E N I L D L I U B T F 5 ' 0 0 . 0 5 E N I L Y T R E P O R P Y E L L A EX IS T ING CA R P OR T T O BE R E MO V E D K C I R B G N I T S I X E E B O T E V I R D D E V M O E R 5 16 5 15 R 22'(CRZ) R 11'(12 CRZ) R 5'-6"(1/4 CRZ) R 11"(ELM NE IG HB O R ING P R OP ER T Y ID A001 …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JANUARY 10, 2024 PR-2023-155098 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICT 402 LOCKHART DRIVE 14 – 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH DESIGN STANDARDS Partially demolish and remodel a ca. 1939 house. One- and one-half story cross-gabled house with modern shed-roof two-story addition at rear; features horizontal wood siding, a partial-width porch, and 1:1 wood windows. The house at 402 Lockhart Drive was constructed in 1939 by T. C. Steiner. Its first owner, electrician Durward Waggoner, lived there only a year before selling the house to Mozelle and John T. Warren. John Warren worked as a public health instructor. The Warrens lived in the home until the end of the 1950s. The house then became a rental property, housing short-term occupants including a construction foreman and a National Guardsman. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following design standards apply to the proposed project: Residential additions 1. Location The proposed additions are located atop the existing house. 2. Scale, massing, and height The proposed additions substantially increase the scale and height of the existing 1 ½ -story house and bring the bulk of the massing to the front elevation. 3. Design and style The proposed design and style are mostly appropriate. 4. Roofs The proposed compound roofline is more complex than the contributing rooflines in the district. 5. Exterior walls The proposed siding is appropriate. 6. Windows, screens, and doors The proposed fenestration appears compatible. 9. Attached garages and carports The proposed front-facing garage is not compatible with the district. Summary The project meets some of the applicable standards, though it changes the contributing building entirely. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. A two-story addition and fence were added in 2017. The original window screens have been removed. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building does not appear to convey architectural significance. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not …
D GENERAL NOTES: APPLICABLE CODES: LOADS (ASD): -BUILDING CATEGORY II -WIND VELOCITY 115 MPH -EXPOSURE CATEGORY C -ROOF LIVE LOAD 20 PSF -ATTIC LIVE LOAD 20 PSF -FLOOR LIVE LOAD 40 PSF -DEAD LOAD 15 PSF 1 2 3 4 5 STRUCTURAL FOUNDATION PLANS, BRACED PLANS, FRAMING PLANS AND DETAILS FOR REMODEL/ADDITION C -AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION (AISC) STEEL CONSTRUCTION MANUAL 14TH EDITION -INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) 2021 -INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE (IRC) 2021 -ASCE 07-16 MINIMUM DESIGN LOADS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER STRUCTURES -NDS 2015 DESIGN OF WOOD STRUCTURES -ACI 318-19: BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE COORDINATION: 402 LOCKHART DR. AUSTIN, TEXAS 78754 1. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING CONSTRUCTION DUTIES & DESIGN INTENT WITHIN THE SUBCONTRACTORS & PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINES. ANY CONFLICTS ARE TO BE BROUGHT TO THE AOR/EOR BEFORE WORK IS TO BEGIN. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS THEREFORE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS OR CORRECTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO PROPERLY COORDINATE THE CONTSTRUCTION DUTIES & DESIGN INTENT. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE EOR/AOR OF ANY SUBSTITUTIONS OR IF CONDITIONS VARY FROM THE ASSUMED CONTRACT DRAWINGS. MODIFICATIONS TO THE STRUCUTRE, DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR DEVIATING FROM THE PLANS, IS NOT THE RESPONSIBLITY OF THE EOR/AOR. 3. REQUESTS FOR SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE EOR/AOR FOR APPROVAL. SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO BE USED WITHOUT CONSENT FROM THE EOR/AOR. 4. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SIZES ARE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. EOR/AOR SHALL NOT ASSUME RESPONSIBLITY FOR INCORRECT MEMBER SIZES/ MATERIAL ORDERS. 5. SOME ITEMS ON THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ARE ASSUMED, DUE TO ITEMS NOT BEING ACCESIBLE, HIDDEN, OR UNDISCLOSED AT THE TIME OF CONTRACT DOCUMENT COMPLETION & DELIVERY. IN SUCH CASE NOTIFY THE EOR/AOR WITH A REQUEST FOR INFORMATION AND GUIDANCE AND DETAILING WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE EOR/AOR. PROCEED WITHOUT CONSENT FROM THE EOR/AOR. ABBREVIATIONS LIST: 6. GEO-TECHNICAL REPORT NOT PROVIDED, GC TO VERIFY SOILS CONDITIONS MEET OR EXCEED ASSUMPTIONS. WHERE VOIDS, EXCESSIVE DEBRIS, OR LOOSE MATERIALS ARE ENCOUTERED, A GEO-TECHNICAL ENGINEER SHOULD BE EMPLOYED TO DETERMINE SOLUTION. EOR NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ISSUES WITH FOUNDATIONS, WHERE CONDITIONS ARE NOT VERIFIED. WHERE OWNER DECLINES GEO-TECHNICAL REPORT, OWNER AT RISK. SHEET INDEX: S-001 GENERAL NOTES & SHEET INDEX S-002 FOUNDATION DETAILS S-003 FRAMING DETAILS S-004 FRAMING DETAILS & ATTACHMENT SCHED. S-101 FOUNDATION PLAN & 1ST FL. BRACED FOUNDATION PLAN S-111 BRACED 2ND FLOOR & 1ST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN S-121 2ND FL. ATTIC & …
From: To: Subject: Date: Luke Allen HPD Preservation Case GF 23-147732 - 403 Lockhart Dr Sunday, December 10, 2023 6:00:47 PM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Just got the notice about this -- as a neighbor (at favor of letting the homeowner do demolition. (Seems to me like a pretty big overreach to call all random houses in this area historical landmarks -- it's none of my business what he wants to do with his property.) I'd like to register that I'm in Thanks, Luke Allen CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook or forward to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.
20 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS DECEMBER 13, 2023 HR-2023-043027 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1409 ALTA VISTA AVENUE PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Construct a second-floor addition, deck, and patio at a ca. 1926 house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed addition is two stories in height. It is clad in horizontal siding, which will be installed throughout. Its roofline mirrors that of the original house, with a clipped side gable and central gablet. Windows are 1:1 throughout, and doors are fully-glazed sliders at secondary elevations. The north elevation features a second-floor balcony with a covered patio below. One-story Craftsman with horizontal wood siding, screened wood windows, decorative shutters, a hooded entryway with decorative brackets, and a clipped-gable roof. The house at 1409 Alta Vista Avenue was built around 1926. Until 1947, its occupants were mostly short-term owners and renters, including an engineer, a state highway inspector, an office manager, and a mechanic. The home was then purchased by Frank and Lura Connolly. Frank Connolly was the editor, owner, and publisher of the Texas Tax Journal, while Lura worked both at the journal and as a Red Cross nurse. The Connollys sold the home in the late 1950s to Anna and William Duncum. William Duncum worked as a public school teacher. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project removes some windows at secondary façades to accommodate the addition. It replaces existing siding with fiber cement siding. Residential additions 1. Location The proposed addition is located at the rear and side of the existing house, set approximately 17’ back from the front wall. 2. Scale, massing, and height The proposed addition appears mostly compatible in scale and massing, though a single story would be more compatible. 3. Design and style The proposed addition’s design and style are largely compatible. 4. Roofs The proposed roof form and materials are compatible. 5. Exterior walls The proposed siding is compatible; however, variations in siding could be used to differentiate original parts of the building from the new parts. 6. Windows, screens, and doors Proposed fenestration appears compatible. 7. Porches and decks Though the porch at the north …
S INGL E ST OR Y R ES IDENCE, A DJA CENT PROPERT Y . EST IMA T ED SIZE A ND P L A C E ME NT R 1'-3" (TREE 2 - LIVE OAK) R 1'-3" (TREE 2 - LIVE OAK) R 7'-6"(1/4 CRZ) R 15'(1/2 CRZ) R 30'(CRZ) R 101/2" (TREE 3 - LIVE OAK) R 5'-3"(1/4 CRZ) R 10'-6"(1/2 CRZ) R 21'(CRZ) A003 1 140.09' P R OP ER T Y L INE 5 FT S ET BA CK R 1'-3" (TREE 1 - LIVE OAK) R 7' R 14' R 28' E N I L Y T R E P O R P 5 37 5 3 8 CO E U N E V A A T S I V A T L A 3 0 0 A 3 K L A W E D I S ' 6 7 . 9 4 WM K C A B T E S T F 5 2 C O NC R E T E W A L K GM E N I L D L I U B T F 5 9 . 9 2 O I T A P E T E R C N O C EM 5 FT S ET BA CK P R OP ER T Y L INE S INGL E ST OR Y R ES ID ENC E T O BE E NL A R G E D 54 4 5 4 7 140.07' 2 A003 5 3 9 54 0 54 1 54 2 54 3 54 5 54 6 54 8 54 9 5 5 0 551 5 5 2 R 1' (TREE 5 - LIVE OAK) R 6'(1/4 CRZ) R 12'(1/2 CRZ) R 24'(CRZ) D E H C A T E D E G A R A G N I A M E R O T K C A B T E S T F 0 1 4 3 0 0 A E T E R C N O C N I A M E R O T E N I L Y T R E P O R P ' 8 1 . 0 5 Y E L L A S E W E R L INE W A T ER SUPPL Y L INE GA S SUPPL Y L INE OV ER HEA D P OW ER L INES T REE P R OT ECT ION …
23 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS DECEMBER 13, 2023 HR-2023-118825 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 514 EAST LIVE OAK STREET PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Demolish a house constructed between 1917 and 1930 and construct a new building. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed new building is two and one-half stories in height. It is clad in stucco, horizontal siding, and brick veneer. Its compound roof is clad in standing-seam metal. Fenestration includes fixed and casement windows with various lite configurations, a partially glazed front door, and a front-facing garage. One-story bungalow with pyramidal hipped roof with intersecting porch gable; partial width inset porch; and horizontal siding. Decorative details include exposed rafter tails and remnants of jigsawn brackets. The house at 514 East Live Oak Street, addressed as both 400 East Live Oak and 2119 Brooklyn in archival documents, is identified in the National Register inventory as a 1917 structure. Though the building does not appear in City directories until the 1930s, its modified form and details suggest an earlier build than the 1930 water tap permit. The Plumley family are the earliest documented residents; they appear to have sold the house in the early 1930s after being caught storing liquor illegally at the house. In the late 1930s into the 1940s, the home was occupied by J. Buford Smith, a bookkeeper at the State Highway Department, and his wife, Katherine. In the 1950s, the house appears to have been primarily a rental property, with residents including a mill operator and a dry cleaner. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed house is set back approximately 15’, per average setback on the block. 2. Orientation The proposed building is oriented toward the primary streetscape, with a front-facing garage that does not meet the standards. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed building’s scale, massing, and height all appear much larger and more monolithic than the surrounding buildings, though the changes in mass heights and other wall-plane offsets appear to mitigate some of the incompatibility. 4. Proportions The proposed building’s proportions do not appear to reflect the contributing properties’ proportions, except for the porch. 5. Design and style The …
MTL01, METAL STANDING SEAM ROOF WD01, VERTICAL WOOD PLANK SIDING 1 North Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0" MTL01, METAL STANDING SEAM ROOF WD01, HORIZONTAL WOOD PLANK SIDING " 2 / 1 0 1 - ' 7 2 ST01, LIGHT GREY STUCCO ST01, LIGHT GREY STUCCO " 2 / 1 0 1 - ' 7 2 EXISTING GRADE 2 South Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0" BR01, GREY BRICK CLADDING ROOF RIDGE 27' - 10 1/2" T.O.P LVL2 19' - 7" T.O.D LVL 2 10' - 7" T.O.P LVL 1 9' - 0" EXISTING GRADE LVL 1 AT 546'-9" 0' - 0" AVERAGE GRADE AT 546.5' WD01, HORIZONTAL WOOD PLANK SIDING ROOF RIDGE 27' - 10 1/2" T.O.P LVL2 19' - 7" T.O.D LVL 2 10' - 7" T.O.P LVL 1 9' - 0" LVL 1 AT 546'-9" 0' - 0" AVERAGE GRADE AT 546.5' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ( Scale will be half-sized when printed at 11x17 ) LAND STRATEGIES INC. 1983 − 2023 40 YEARS OF EXCELLENCE 1411 W 5th St., #100, Austin, TX 78703 PH: (512) 328−6050 FAX: (512) 328−6172 EMAIL: LSI@LSIaustin.com WEBSITE: LSIaustin.com MICHAEL LINEHAN TEXAS ARCHITECT REGISTRATION # 26973 THIS DOCUMENT IS INCOMPLETE AND MAY NOT BE USED FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING OR CONSTRUCTION K A O E V I L E 4 1 5 4 0 7 8 7 X T , I N T S U A , T S K A O E V I L E 4 1 5 4 4 1 2 # t c e o r P # j : I S L SET ISSUED 09/06/2023 REVISIONS e t a D n o i t p i r c s e D a t l e D e u s s I DRAWN BY LSI SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET A2.10 MTL01, METAL STANDING SEAM ROOF WD01, HORIZONTAL WOOD PLANK SIDING ST01, LIGHT GREY STUCCO 1 East Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0" MTL01, METAL STANDING SEAM ROOF WD01, HORIZONTAL WOOD PLANK SIDING " 2 / 1 0 1 - ' 7 2 BR01, GREY BRICK CLADDING AVERAGE GRADE AT 546.5' 2 West Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0" " 2 / 1 0 1 - ' 7 2 ROOF RIDGE 27' - 10 1/2" BR01, GREY BRICK CLADDING T.O.P LVL2 19' - 7" T.O.D LVL 2 10' - 7" T.O.P LVL 1 9' - 0" LVL 1 AT 546'-9" 0' - 0" AVERAGE GRADE AT …
EXISTING GAS VALVE EXISTING POWER POLE SITE RETAINING WALL OVERHEAD UTILITY E N I L B R U C 549.0' . . . . T T T T S S S S K K K K A A A A O O O O E E E E V V V V I I I I L L L L T T T T S S S S A A A A E E E E G PP 549' ' W " 2 2 0 5 ° 2 6 N ' 0 0 0 5 . I E N L Y T R E P O R P Y T I L I T U D A E H R E V O I K L A W E D S G N T S X E I I I K L A W E D S G N T S X E I I W PP OVERHEAD UTILITY SD EXISTING WATER METER EXISTING POWER POLE OV E RH EA D UT ILI TY T H E B U I L D I N G I S O V E R 1 5 ' A 1 5 ' - 0 " W A Y F R O M T H E O H U 547' PATIO AWNING ROOF G N A H R E V O ' 7 . 5 1 O T K C A B T E S T N O R F D E G A R E V A BROOKLYN ST. BROOKLYN ST. BROOKLYN ST. BROOKLYN ST. EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE CURB LINE N27°20'57"E 99.91' PROPERTY LINE " 0 - ' 5 1 U H O E H T M O R F Y A W A ' 5 1 R E V O S I I G N D L I U B E H T " 0 - ' 5 1 514 E LIVE OAK RESIDENCE F.F.E = 546' -9" A.A.G = 546.5' 1/2 CRZ 548' 10' - 0" I E N L Y T R E P O R P ' E " 3 0 9 3 ° 2 6 S ' 0 0 . 0 5 1/2 CRZ G N A H R E V O K C E D D O O W 544' K C A B T E S D R A Y K C A B ' 0 …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS DECEMBER 13, 2023 HR-2023-122515; GF-2023-130947 OLD WEST AUSTIN 1621 WEST 14TH STREET 17– 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS standing-seam metal. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH DESIGN STANDARDS Remodel existing house entirely, constructing an addition and reconfiguring roofline, changing fenestration and cladding, and adding a second-floor patio accessed by a spiral stair. 1) Construct a shed-roofed stucco addition to the west side of the house. 2) Reconfigure roofline to a shed roof, removing gable and creating a flat-roofed patio beneath. All roofing is to be 3) Replace all windows with undivided fixed and sash windows of varying proportions, creating a new fenestration pattern. 4) Reclad house in stucco paneling. 5) Add metal spiral staircase to access second-floor balcony. One-story Ranch house with horizontal siding, stone water table cladding, an attached carport, and a side-gabled roof. The house at 1621 W. 14th Street was constructed in 1952. Its owners throughout the 1950s were Guy E. and Fannie Huddleston. Guy Huddleston, an Army veteran and major in the Army Reserves, worked as the chief inspector of the State Railroad Commission’s motor transport division. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project removes all intact historic material from the house’s exterior and changes its form entirely. 3. Roofs The proposed roof reconfiguration is not compatible with the district or the existing house. 4. Exterior walls and trim The proposed stucco paneling does not reflect the design of nearby contributing buildings in the district. 5. Windows, doors, and screens The proposed project removes and replaces all windows and doors and does not maintain existing openings. The new fenestration is not compatible with the district. 6. Porches The proposed project does not retain the existing porch. The proposed second-floor balcony and staircase is not compatible with the district. Summary The project does not meet the applicable standards. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Old West Austin National Register district. 17– 2 Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it …
CEILINGJOISTNOTES: (cid:120) (cid:120) (cid:120) ALLCEILINGJOISTSARE2GRADEAND2x6@ 24"O.C.U.N.O. PROVIDESTRONGBACKSPANMORETHAN10' ASSHOWNONDETAIL10ATMIDSPAN. 1-3PLYBEAMSCANBENAILEDTOGETHER. (cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:49)(cid:40)(cid:38)(cid:55)(cid:3)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:49)(cid:39)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:47)(cid:60)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:40)(cid:36)(cid:48)(cid:3)(cid:58)(cid:44)(cid:55)(cid:43)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:18)(cid:21)(cid:5)(cid:145) THROUGHBOLTS@24"O.C..TOPAND BOTTOM. VERIFYALLDIMENSIONSAGAINST ARCHITECTURALANDALLOTHERPERTINENT DRAWINGSFORDETAILSNOTSHOWNONTHE STRUCTURALDRAWINGS. LEGEND CEILINGJOIST CEILINGLINE FLOORJOIST TJIORTRUSS LINELOAD STAIR FLOORAREA ROOFBRACELOCATION ENGINEEREDBEAM ALLBEAMSAREDROPPEDU.N.O. (C)-CONCEALEDBEAM (F)-FLOATINGBEAM FURRDOWN LIVINGDINING 8'CLG CLOSET 8'CLG BATHROOM 8'CLG BEDROOM 8'CLG EXISTINGCEIING LIVINGDINING 8'CLG KITCHEN 8'CLG EXISTINGCEIING BATHROOM 8'CLG BONUSROOM 8'CLG EXISTINGCEIING BEDROOM 8'CLG EXISTINGCEIING EXISTINGCEIING BEDROOM 8'CLG 18"=1'-0" 14"=1'-0" 11X17SIZE 22X34SIZE DESIGNEDFORCOMPOSITIONROOF RAFTERSNOTE: (cid:120) ALLRAFTERSARE2GRADE,2x6AND24"O.C. U.N.O. (cid:120) MATERIALLOADUPTO5PSF. (cid:120) ROOFSHEATHINGSHALLBE U.N.O. 5 16"THICKMIN. ROOFNOTES: (cid:120) MATERIALLOADUPTO5PSF. (cid:120) 16"THICKMIN. ROOFSHEATHINGSHALLBE 5 U.N.O. BRACESUPTO6'SHALLBE2X6",LONGER BRACES(6'-16')SHALLBEMADEOF2x6"AND LONGERBRACES(16'-27')SHALLBEMADEOF 2X10"FASTENEDTOGETHERINA"L"OR"T" PATTERN. VERIFYALLDIMENSIONSAGAINST ARCHITECTURAL. ALLPURLINSIZESHALLMATCHRAFTERSIZE ALLFRAMINGANDCONSTRUCTIONMEMBERS TOBEPER2015IRCCODE. (cid:120) (cid:120) (cid:120) (cid:120) VERIFYALLDIMENSIONSAGAINST ARCHITECTURALANDALLOTHERPERTINENT DRAWINGSFORDETAILSNOTSHOWNONTHE STRUCTURALDRAWINGS. LEGEND ENGINEEREDBEAM ROOFBRACE WALLSTACKED PURLIN M A E B N O R A E B O T R E T F A R M A E B N O R A E B O T R E T F A R L L A W N O R A E B O T R E T F A R L L A W N O R A E B O T R E T F A R 18"=1'-0" 14"=1'-0" 11X17SIZE 22X34SIZE VICINITY MAP PROPERTY PROFILE MAP AREA SCHEDULE EXISTING OWNER: AHMED ASHRAF & DARCY ADDRESS: 1621 W 14TH ST AUSTIN, TX 78703-3922 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ABS 697 SUR 7 SPEAR G W ACR. 142 ZONING: MF-3-NP PROPERTY ID: 110136 GEOGRAPHIC ID:0111030705 LAND: 0.1420 ACRES (6,185.52 SQFT) BUILDING PROGRAM • • • • CONVERSION OF CARPORT AND LAUNDRY TO CONDITIONED SPACE ADDITION OF MASTER SUITE RENOVATION OF KITCHEN EXISTING ROOF DEMOLISHED, NEW ROOF TO BE BUILT SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS 1ST FLOOR STORAGE CARPORT 2ND STORAGE OPEN PORCH EXISTING SQ FT. NEW ADDITION IMPERVIOUS SQ FT. CALCS. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE % 25% ADDED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE % 3% AREA 1188 SQFT 80 SQFT 256 SQFT 63 SQFT 48 SQFT 1572 SQFT 246 SQFT Sheet List Sheet Sheet Name Number Drawn By Approved By A0 TITLE PAGE A101 SITE PLAN A102 FOUNDATION A103 EXISTING FLOOR PLANS A104 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN A105 PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN A106 EXISTING ROOF PLAN PROPOSED ROOF PLAN A107 EXISTING NORTH / SOUTH ELEVATIONS A201 EXISTING EAST / WEST ELEVATIONS A202 PROPOSED NORTH / SOUTH ELEVATIONS A203 A204 PROPOSED EAST / WEST ELEVATIONS A205 KITCHEN ELEVATIONS A301 SECTIONS A501 DETAILS A901 RENDERS A902 RENDERS E101 ELECTRICAL PLAN G1 GENERAL NOTES JESUS A OMAR G JESUS A OMAR G JESUS A OMAR G JESUS A OMAR G JESUS A OMAR G JESUS A OMAR …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS DECEMBER 13, 2023 HR-2023-149931; GF-2023-150410 OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 2716 WOOLDRIDGE DRIVE 18 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1940 house. Construct a new residence and pool. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed new residence is eclectic in style, with elements of Dutch Colonial Revival, Tudor Revival, and Gothic Revival styles. It is three stories in height, with a compound roofline clad in copper, slate, and architectural shingles with copper finials at gable ends and turret. Roof forms include traditional gables, a turret with cupola, catslide entryway, and gambrel. Exterior cladding includes limestone, sandstone, limewashed brick, limewashed stucco, and decorative faux half- timbering. Fenestration is varied throughout and includes arched doorways and a variety of Tudor Revival-style leaded glass windows of varying dimensions. The detached garage apartment faces the primary streetscape. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH DESIGN STANDARDS The existing building is a one-story house with a cross-gabled roof, partial-width porch behind a simple loggia, attached carport, and brick cladding. The house at 2716 Wooldridge Drive was constructed around 1940. Its long-term residents were Helen and Harry Joseph. Harry Joseph, whose family owned several prominent businesses during the twentieth century, operated Harry’s Liquor Store and Schoonerville, a beer store. Eventually, Joseph and his father opened Centennial Liquor, as well as Austin’s first import business.1 The Josephs remained in the home until at least 1972. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed primary building appears appropriately set back; however, the garage apartment is located at the front of the lot. 2. Orientation The proposed house is oriented toward the primary streetscape. The proposed garage apartment is not oriented consistently with similar outbuildings in the district. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed building is larger in scale, taller in height, and more complex in massing than most contributing buildings in the district. 4. Proportions The proposed building’s proportions do not appear consistent with contributing buildings in the district. 5. Design and style The proposed building’s eclectic design and style, while differentiated from other buildings in the district, is not compatible. 6. Roofs The proposed roof form and materials do not reflect the styles of contributing buildings …
27 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS DECEMBER 13, 2023 HR-2023-147071; GF-2023-149161 OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1610 PRESTON AVENUE PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN STANDARDS Construct a new residence, detached garage, and accessory dwelling unit. The existing building was approved for demolition by the Historic Landmark Commission in November 2023. The proposed new building is a one-story Tudor Revival house, clad in painted brick with a compound roofline and divided- light windows. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed new house and garage appear appropriately set back and sited. 2. Orientation The proposed buildings match the orientations of contributing buildings in the district. 3. Scale, massing, and height The building’s scale and height appear appropriate; however, its massing is more complex than most contributing buildings’ massing nearby. 4. Proportions The building’s proportions are somewhat compatible; though the steep gables emphasize its height, they are stylistically appropriate. 5. Design and style The building’s design and style appear internally consistent. The Tudor Revival detailing is appropriate for the district’s period of significance and appears sufficiently differentiated. 6. Roofs The compound roofline is much more complex than surrounding contributing buildings’ rooflines. 7. Exterior walls The proposed painted brick is compatible. 8. Windows and doors Fenestration is mostly compatible and helps to differentiate the building. Summary The project meets most of the applicable standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Comment on plans, encouraging simpler massing. LOCATION MAP 27 – 2
Historical landmark commission, As the owner representative of our family’s estate we are wholeheartedly in agreement for a demolition permit to be issued. There are severe foundation and structural roofing conditions that have been prevalent for years that we have dealt with. We feel that there is nothing about our home that would contribute to a national historical district. Again we approve and support a demolition permit to be issued so we can better help and serve our family. Historical landmark commission, As the owner and representative of my family’s estate, we wholeheartedly, approve and agree on a demolition permit for the structure. The failing roof and foundation have been a problem for years. We also feel there is zero contributing attributes of this home and its shape, appearance or materials used that word contribute any kind of significance at all to a national historical registry. We fully support and approve the demolition to better help our family and our futures. Murrey Swanson DocuSign Envelope ID: 76F5B166-AF42-4994-A77E-67FE16726654Murrey Swanson10/23/2023
) T A L P ( E U P ' 5 15'-0" ELEC CLEARANCE H O H O H O H O H O 5 0 6 ' 9 9 . 9 5 E " 3 4 9 3 ° 2 6 S ' ) ' 0 6 E ° 0 6 S ( H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O 20" YELLOWWOOD S 26°00'51" W 137.38' (S 30° W 137.5') 10" PECAN LOT SQUARE FOOTAGE 8,233 SQ. FT. 15.5" LIGUSTRUM 604 603 602 5' BL (ZONING) FIREPLACE 3x7 3x7 FIREPLACE POOL POOL 30'X12' 30'X12' LIVING 10'-0" CLG 9.5" LIGUSTRUM TEMPORARY BENCHMA ELEVATION = 60 CLOSET 2'6x6 OFFICE 10' CLG 14x12 5x6'6 9x8'6 DINING 10'-0" CLG PANTRY 10'-0" CLG BATHRM 10' CLG ENTRY 10' CLG 3x8'6 3x8'6 UP 4x7 3x7 CARPORT 10'-0" CLG " 0 - ' 0 1 15x9 10x9 UP GARGAGE 10'-0" CLG 10'X8' DOOR OPENING 24" DW KITCHEN 10'-0" CLG OUTDOOR PATIO BBQ 4x6 48" REF/FRZ STORAGE 3x9 BUILT-IN MUDRM 10' CLG 2x4 24" LIVE OAK 5' BL (ZONING) N 25°58'05" E 137.44' (N 30° E 137.5') ' 8 8 . 9 5 W ' " 9 3 2 4 ° 2 6 N ) ' 0 6 W ° 0 6 N ( E U N E V A N O T S E R P ) . . W O R . ' 0 5 ( 1ST FL 1619 SF 2ND FL 1567 SF ATTICS 415 SF PARKING 653 SF TOTAL CONDITIONED 3601 SF SITE PLAN SCALE : 3/32" = 1'-0" PRESTON FIREPLACE CLOSET 3x7 3x7 FIREPLACE 15x9 10x9 LIVING 10'-0" CLG 24" DW KITCHEN 10'-0" CLG OUTDOOR PATIO BBQ 4x6 48" REF/FRZ STORAGE 3x9 BUILT-IN MUDRM 10' CLG 2x4 9x8'6 DINING 10'-0" CLG PANTRY 10'-0" CLG BATHRM 10' CLG ENTRY 10' CLG 2'6x6 OFFICE 10' CLG 14x12 5x6'6 3x8'6 3x8'6 UP 4x7 3x7 CARPORT 10'-0" CLG " 0 - ' 0 1 Rodenberg Design PRESTON 1ST FL PLANS SCALE : 3/16" = 1'-0" 2'6x6 2'6x6 2'6x6 2'6x6 2x4 BATHRM 9' CLG CLOSET CLOSET BEDROOM 9' CLG 11x11 BEDROOM 9' CLG 11x11 6x8 PRIM BATHRM 9' CLG LINEN BATHRM 9' CLG COVERED PORCH VAULTED CLG 12x8 PRIM BEDRM VAULTED CLG 17x14 PRIM CLOSET 9' CLG S E V L E H S N I - T L I U B …
Heritage Preservation Grant FY24 RECOMMENDATIONS Equitable Funding Review Goal The desired goal is to sustain and grow Austin’s cultural infrastructure so that all may share in the economic and employment benefits of the heritage preservation and creative sectors, as well as upholding the City’s commitment to racial equity per the City of Austin’s Equity Office standards and goals. CITY OF AUSTIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2 Grant Overview The Heritage Preservation Grant promotes tourism by restoring historic sites, and through planning, educational, or marketing projects. Projects should tell inclusive stories on historic places rooted in Austin's history and heritage. Based on State Statute Ch. 351, the project must: • • Be used for historical restoration and preservation projects or activities to encourage tourism to visit preserved historic sites. • At, or in the immediate vicinity of, Convention Center facilities or visitor information centers; Located in the areas that would be frequented by tourists and convention delegates CITY OF AUSTIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 3 Program Highlights • Historic preservation projects and history-informing activities that promote heritage tourism • Contract Term: 2-yr Grant • Eligible: Non-Profit and For Profit (leased or owned) • Funds preservation project costs (no match) • Optional Fees: Insurance • • 10% Project Management (Capital only) • Tourism Marketing Training in Eng/Spn REQUIREMENTS • Historic designated sites that promote heritage tourism (or be eligible) • Marketed to increase/benefit tourism and expand audiences • Accessible grounds • Occurs in Austin City Council District • Resides within MSA with Austin programming experience for at least 2 years (applicant) CITY OF AUSTIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 4 Priorities • Outreach to First-time Applicants; • Tourism-serving properties listed in the East Austin Historic Survey; • Inclusive Interpretive Plans & Story-Telling: Projects that share Austin’s history in a fresh and compelling way; • Creative Collaborations Encouraged: Partnerships between historic properties and community organizations; • Tourism: Use of innovative and inclusive methods to attract new and diverse audiences and tourists. • Promotion of local historic designation CITY OF AUSTIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 5 Grant Overview Owner authorization is required for all project proposals Historic Designation Project Budget and Bid Selection Process Now Eligible Capital Planning Educational Marketing Local, State or National Designation (or Eligible) Required Local, State or National Designation (or Eligible) Required Local, State or National Designation (or Eligible) Required Local, State or National Designation (or Eligible) Required Project Budget and Outside Consultant Bids for Each Activity; Match …
19 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JANUARY 10, 2024 HR-2023-155105 WILSHIRE WOOD NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 4106 LULLWOOD ROAD PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS PROPOSAL shingled roof. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH DESIGN STANDARDS Construct an addition to a ca. 1951 house. Remodel the garage and replace doors and windows at rear of house. Install new door in place of existing window. 1) Construct an addition to the front of the garage toward the street. The proposed addition is clad in wood siding, with a 2) Add a roll-up door the rear of the existing garage. 3) Replace door and windows at rear of house. Replace window at front of house with door. One-story Ranch house with cutstone veneer, multilight sliding and casement windows, and front-facing garage. 4106 Lullwood Road was built in 1951. Its first occupants were Carl G. and Lois Shepard. Carl Shepard owned and operated a furniture distribution company located on East 6th Street. By 1959, it had been sold to rancher Earl Tucker, and to R. S. Merrill by 1970. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project removes some historic material from the building’s exterior. 4. Exterior walls and trim The proposed wood siding differentiates the new material from the old; however, it partially replaces some of the original cutstone cladding. 5. Windows, doors, and screens While most of the window replacements are at the rear of the building and are therefore appropriate, the replacement of a front window with a door is not compatible. 8. Attached garages and carports The proposed garage alterations somewhat maintain the existing proportions and roofline, though changes will be highly visible from the street. Summary The project somewhat meets the applicable standards. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Wilshire Wood National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of the vernacular Ranch style. b. Historical association. The property does not appear …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JANUARY 10, 2024 HR-2023-155129 WEST LINE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1100 LORRAIN STREET 20 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a new two-story ADU. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN STANDARDS The proposed ADU is two stories, with living space above a ground-floor garage. It is located at the rear of the lot and is clad in wood siding with an asphalt shingle roof. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed ADU is located at the rear of the lot, behind the main house. 2. Orientation The proposed ADU is oriented consistently with other detached accessory buildings in the district. 3. Scale, massing, and height and 4. Proportions The proposed scale, massing, height, and proportions appear compatible; the building will be minimally visible. 5. Design and style The proposed building’s design and style are simple and consistent. 6. Roofs The proposed cross-gabled roof appears appropriate. 7. Exterior walls Exterior horizontal siding is appropriate. 8. Windows and doors The proposed fenestration is compatible, though the blank wall at the secondary elevation is less compatible. 11. Attached garages and carports See 2. The project mostly meets the applicable standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Comment on plans. LOCATION MAP 20 – 2
MORRIS RESIDENCE PROJECT ADDRESS CONSULTANTS e g a P GIST E R E D AR L EE A N B I I R B E R C H I T S E H O P C T S T A T 18 1 1 2 E FO T X E SA 12/01/2023 DRAWING LIST ABBREVIATIONS KEYNOTES L E D O M E R N E H C T K & U D A W E N I I E C N E D S E R S R R O M I S A X E T , I N T S U A A1.1 50% FULL CRZ: 726 sq.ft. TOTAL COVERAGE: 843 sq.ft. FULL CRZ: 1,452 sq.ft. ADU COVERAGE: 530 sq.ft. . t f . q s 7 3 Y N O C L A B DRIVE STRIPS COVERAGE: 69 sq.ft. E. PORCH COVERAGE: 207 sq.ft. GENERAL TREE SCHEDULE KEYNOTES e g a P GIST E R E D AR L EE A N B I I R B E R C H I T S E H O P C T S T A T 18 1 1 2 E FO T X E SA 12/01/2023 L E D O M E R N E H C T K & U D A W E N I I E C N E D S E R S R R O M I S A X E T , I N T S U A A1.2 Y R T N A P LIVING / KITCHEN BEDROOM D E R E V O C N U Y N O C L A B GARAGE D E R E V O C H C R O P KEYNOTES LEGEND GENERAL WALL TYPES WINDOWS & DOORS e g a P GIST E R E D AR L EE A N B I I R B E R C H I T S E H O P C T S T A T 18 1 1 2 E FO T X E SA 12/01/2023 L E D O M E R N E H C T K & U D A W E N I I E C N E D S E R S R R O M I S A X E T , I N T S U A EXTERIOR WALL NOTES ’ A2.1 GENERAL KEYNOTES e g a P …
