I-6 C15-2020-0009 LATE BACKUP — original pdf
LATE BACKUPI-6/45
LATE BACKUPI-6/45
LATE BACKUPI-7/28 LATE BACKUPI-7/29 LATE BACKUPI-7/30 LATE BACKUPI-7/31 LATE BACKUPI-7/32 LATE BACKUPI-7/33 LATE BACKUPI-7/34 LATE BACKUPI-7/35 7 0 S a n S a b a S t , A u s t i n , T X 7 8 7 0 2 M A R C E L M E Y E R X 5 1 2 - 6 8 9 - 4 4 5 5 c e l l I a m i n f a v o r o f t h e v a r i i a n c e b e n g s o u g h t . I h a v e n o o b j e c t i o n s . LATE BACKUPI-7/36
Thanks Elaine. Please withdraw the BOA variance application and refund the fee. I realized I am stuck in a no-win situation with this whole process, with no foreseeable exit. From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Ramirez, Elaine RE: Refund for C15-2019-0057 / 1304 Willow St Wednesday, January 29, 2020 5:26:46 PM image001.png Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 8:10 AM, Ramirez, Elaine <Elaine.Ramirez@austintexas.gov> wrote: Hi Jennifer, As long as it is before the Feb. 11 deadline we can refund you the re-notification fee of $324.48. If it is after this deadline it will not be possible because notices are being prepared and sent out. The refund will not be issued right away I believe it takes 6-8 weeks, I am not sure you would need to check with the Cashier’s office. Respectfully, Elaine Ramirez Board of Adjustment Liaison Planner Senior One Texas Center, 1st Floor 505 Barton Springs Rd Office: 512-974-2202 City of Austin Development Services Department Follow us on Facebook, Twitter & Instagram @DevelopmentATX LATE BACKUPP-1/35 Scheduled Meeting Disclosure Information In accordance with City of Austin Ordinance 20160922-005 responsibility of written disclosure is required by visitors when attending a scheduled meeting with a City Official regarding a municipal question as defined within City Code 4-8- 2 for compensation on behalf of another person. Development Services Department has elected to implement an electronic survey as the methodology to provide the opportunity to record information as required of the department under Section 4-8-8 (E) of the City Code. Individuals scheduling or accepting a meeting invitation with a City Official are requested to provide responses to the questions included in the department survey available at the following link: DSD Survey. Please note that all information provided is subject to public disclosure via DSD’s open data portal. For more information please visit: City of Austin Ordinance 2016-0922-005 | City Clerk’s website | City Clerk’s FAQ’s From: Jennifer Conroy Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 3:56 PM To: Ramirez, Elaine <Elaine.Ramirez@austintexas.gov> Subject: Refund? *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** If I were to recall my application at this poimt coukd I be refunded the latest fee for notification for the March mtg? Im not ready to do that yet but want to kmow my options. Hi Elaine, Thank you. Jennifer 1304 and 1310 Willow St Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android CAUTION:This email was received at the City of …
From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Ramirez, Elaine RE: Request for Postponement from 2/5 to March (C15-2019-0061) Tuesday, February 04, 2020 3:34:03 PM image001.png image004.png *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Please advise- Thank you I have updated this request to March, not April. Besides the below being a factor, when the date of this hearing was changed to Wed, 2/5, in lieu of what the website listed, I do have available child care for tomorrow evening and am unable to attend. JARRED CORBELL Austin/San Antonio Acquisitions and Entitlements Manager C: (318) 230-4084 This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged, or subject to copyright. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender by return e-mail, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments. Unless stated otherwise, this e-mail does not constitute advice or commitment by the sender or any entity that the sender represents. From: Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2020 2:24 PM To: Ramirez, Elaine <Elaine.Ramirez@austintexas.gov> Subject: Request for Postponement from 2/5 to April 13 (C15-2019-0061) Hi Elaine- Please allow this email to serve as our official request to postpone the above case to April 13. Due to the City of Austin having unforeseen comments to our site development plans, we need to further evaluate these comments and gain a better understanding of their impacts to our site layout, which could further enhance the hardships on site. Please let me know if there are any questions. I assume since this postponement does not exceed 60 days, a re-notification fee will not apply. LATE BACKUPP-2/47 Thanks JARRED CORBELL Austin/San Antonio Acquisitions and Entitlements Manager C: (318) 230-4084 This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged, or subject to copyright. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender by return e-mail, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments. Unless stated otherwise, this e-mail does not constitute advice or commitment by the sender or any entity that the sender represents. CAUTION:This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to CSIRT@austintexas.gov. LATE BACKUPP-2/48
January 28, 2020 Stephen Rison 1507 Fairfield Dr Austin TX, 78757 Property Description: LOT 28 WOOTEN PARK SEC 5 Re: C15-2019-0063 Dear Stephen, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from variance(s) from the minimum setback requirement of LDC Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) (D) to decrease the rear setback requirement from 10 feet (required) to 0 feet (requested) In order to maintain an existing shed in an “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family zoning district. (Wooten Neighborhood Plan) DENIED BY AUSTIN ENERGY (AE) , due to applicant having a permanent structures that conflict with Austin Energy’s clearance requirements. The Customer's facilities/installations shall maintain clearances from AE overhead facilities as required in Section 234 of the NESC. See NESC Clearance Envelope below for typical NESC clearances of 12-foot 6-inch vertical and 7-foot 6-inch horizontal from AE overhead primary voltage lines. Contact AE Design for specific clearance information. In addition, the Customer's facilities shall not be installed under or over AE overhead distribution facilities and shall maintain a minimum horizontal clearance of 7'-6" from overhead AE distribution facilities. It is recommended that you remove the features shown on the submitted survey, be relocated from outside the easement area and that they maintain the required electric clearance requirements. Please contact Eben Kellogg Property Agent for Austin Energy - Public Involvement and Real Estate Services 512-322-6050/ eben.kellogg@austinenergy.com to demonstrate that this has been accomplished. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://austinenergy.com/wcm/connect/8bb4699c-7691-4a74- 98e7-56059e9be364/Design+Criteria+Manual+Oct+2015.pdf?MOD=AJPERES see - Page 92 - 1.10.0 Clearance and Safety Requirements. Eben Kellogg, Property Agent Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050 LATE BACKUPP-3/30 From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Ramirez, Elaine RE: Possible Postponement for C15-2019-0063 / 1507 Fairfield Dr Thursday, January 30, 2020 3:53:45 PM image001.png *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Elaine, We are going to have to request another postponement to the next meeting date. I will follow up with you once I have an update. Thank you, Micah Micah J. King Attorney Direct: 512.370.3468 From: Ramirez, Elaine <Elaine.Ramirez@austintexas.gov> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 9:47 AM To: Subject: Possible Postponement for C15-2019-0063 / 1507 Fairfield Dr Importance: High [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Good morning Gentlemen, In speaking with Austin Energy I understand the above …
RAINEY SHARED STREETS PILOT UPDATE ESB-MACC ADVISORY BOARD FEBRUARY 5, 2020 AGENDA • MACC Survey and Survey Results • Next Steps 2 MACC INTERCEPT SURVEY • ATD and MACC staff worked together to create a MACC- specific survey on how the Rainey Shared Streets Pilot may affect MACC visitors. • ATD staff joined MACC staff on January 24 to survey during three MACC events: • Piecing It Together art opening • El Camino del Corazon photography opening with open mic • Sabor! A Night of Caribbean Music concert • Surveys were both administered by staff and available for visitors to complete independently. • A preamble explaining the Rainey Shared Streets Pilot was included on the survey if someone completed the survey independently. • The survey was available in Spanish and English. 3 MACC INTERCEPT SURVEY: QUESTIONS If you drove, did you park in the ESB-MACC parking lot? 1. How did you arrive to the ESB-MACC tonight? 2. 3. Did you know about the Rainey Shared Streets Pilot? 4. Does this Rainey Shared Streets Pilot affect how you travel to the 5. On a scale of 1-5, how strongly do you support the Rainey Shared MACC? Streets Pilot? 6. Does this Rainey Shared Streets Pilot affect how likely you are to attend future events at the MACC? 7. Where do you live? 8. How often do you visit the MACC? 9. We would love to know any additional thoughts you have on the Rainey Shared Streets Pilot or accessibility to the ESB-MACC. [Open Response] 4 MACC INTERCEPT SURVEY: RESULTS HIGHLIGHTS • 82 completed Surveys • Most people drove to the MACC (56), and most of them parked in the MACC parking lot (45) • 89% of respondents said the Pilot did not affect how they got to the MACC • Respondents were supportive of the Pilot. • Average rating of 3.53 out of 5 • 84% of respondents said the Pilot had no affect on their decision to attend future events at the MACC 5 Q1: HOW DID YOU ARRIVE TO THE ESB - MACC TONIGHT? Possible Answers (responses): • Drove with other people (32) • Drove by myself (24) Drove with Other People, 38% • Ridehailing (like Uber, RideAustin, etc.) (13) • Walk (8) • Bicycle (5) • Pedicab (0) • Other (0) • Public Transportation (1) • Micromobility (like scooter) (0) Walk, 10% Bicycle, 6% Ridehailing, 16% Public Transportation …
Play video
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MOTION 20200205 006a Date: February 5, 2020 Subject: XSpace Group, SP-2019-0189D Motion by: Katie Coyne Seconded by: Mary Ann Neely RATIONALE: WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the applicant is requesting variances from: • LDC 25-8-301 to construct a driveway on slopes in excess of 15 percent gradient; and, • LDC 25-8-342 to allow fill in excess of four feet of depth. WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes that staff recommends the approval of this variance because the findings of fact have been met. THEREFORE, the Environmental Commission recommends approval of the requested variances listed above. For: Bedford, Creel, Nill, Guerrero, Coyne, Neely, and Gordon Against: None Abstain: None Recuse: Ramberg Absent: Smith, Thompson, and Maceo VOTE 7-0 Approved By: Linda Guerrero, Environmental Commission Chair 1
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MOTION 20200205 006b Date: February 5, 2020 Subject: Aspen Heights Multifamily Wastewater Service Extension Request #4629 Motion by: Kevin Ramberg Seconded by: Wendy Gordon RATIONALE: WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the applicant is requesting a Wastewater Service Extension Request recommendation; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes Service Extension Requests (SERs) located in the Drinking Water Protection Zone and outside of the City of Austin’s full purpose jurisdiction require Council approval and review by the Environmental Commission; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes Watershed Protection Department staff has completed the review for Aspen Heights Multifamily Wastewater SER #4629 and recommend approval of the request. THEREFORE, the Environmental Commission recommends the Service Extension Request listed above. VOTE 7-1 For: Bedford, Creel, Nill, Ramberg, Guerrero, Coyne, and Gordon Against: Neely Abstain: None Recuse: None Absent: Smith, Thompson, and Maceo Approved By: Linda Guerrero, Environmental Commission Chair 1
Climate Vulnerability in Austin: A multi-risk assessment A project of the Austin Area Sustainability Indicators & Texas Metropolitan Observatory of Planet Texas 2050 City of Austin Environmental Commission February 5, 2020 Prepared by: R. Patrick Bixler, PhD1 and Euijin Yang2 1. LBJ School of Public Affairs 2. Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering 2 A2SI Mission: To measure quality of life and sustainability trends and serve as the foundation for a systems approach to address the challenges of our region. www.austinindicators.org 3 The Texas Metro Observatory (TMO) is a communication and data platform dedicated to sharing information and ideas about Texas’ communities, understanding common problems, and developing solutions across the state’s metropolitan areas. https://tmo.utexas.edu/ TMO provides access to data (economic, environmental, health, demographic, governmental, etc.) for all metros in the state and produces unique data visualizations, infographics, and analysis tools that will provide a deeper understanding of issues within and among metro areas1. Climate Vulnerability in Austin Climate projections for Austin2 • Increases in annual and seasonal average temperatures • More frequent high temperature extremes • More frequent extreme precipitation • More frequent drought conditions in summer due to hotter weather Climate Vulnerability in Austin Austin can expect more extreme weather in the future Climate Vulnerability in Austin Climate Vulnerability in Austin Community Resilience Climate Vulnerability in Austin Community Resilience Neighborhood Household Climate Vulnerability in Austin Exposure Sensitivity Adaptive Capacity Community Resilience Neighborhood Household Climate Vulnerability in Austin Exposure Wildfire hazard exposure Flood hazard exposure Heat hazard exposure Sensitivity Adaptive Capacity Community Resilience Neighborhood Household Climate Vulnerability in Austin Exposure Wildfire hazard exposure (+) (+) Multi-hazard exposure (-) Community Resilience Flood hazard exposure Heat hazard exposure Sensitivity Adaptive Capacity Neighborhood Household Climate Vulnerability in Austin Exposure Wildfire hazard exposure (+) (+) Multi-hazard exposure Flood hazard exposure Heat hazard exposure Sensitivity Social Vulnerability (-) (-) Adaptive Capacity Community Resilience Neighborhood Household Climate Vulnerability in Austin Exposure Wildfire hazard exposure (+) (+) Multi-hazard exposure Flood hazard exposure Heat hazard exposure Sensitivity Adaptive Capacity (-) (-) (+) Social Vulnerability Adaptive Capacity Community Resilience Neighborhood Household Climate Vulnerability in Austin Assess the spatial sensitivity to hazards and difference across communities in their overall capacity to prepare for, respond to, and recover from hazards. We do this by adapting a well-vetted and oft-used tool – The Social Vulnerability Index (or SoVI®). Climate Vulnerability in Austin Assessing the spatial exposure of independent hazards. These include: …
Play video
Backup
Backup
Play audio
Backup
Backup
Backup
Backup
Backup
Backup