1207 Taylor Street – Demolition Application City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – January 25, 2021 North (front) elevation 1207 Taylor Street – Demolition Application City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – January 25, 2021 Eastern elevation 1207 Taylor Street – Demolition Application City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – January 25, 2021 Eastern elevation 1207 Taylor Street – Demolition Application City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – January 25, 2021 Rear addition – eastern elevation 1207 Taylor Street – Demolition Application City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – January 25, 2021 Western elevation 1207 Taylor Street – Demolition Application City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – January 25, 2021 Rear addition – western elevation 1207 Taylor Street – Demolition Application City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – January 25, 2021 Southern (rear) elevation 1207 Taylor Street – Demolition Application City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – January 25, 2021 1207 Taylor Street – Demolition Application City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – January 25, 2021 1207 Taylor Street – Demolition Application City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – January 25, 2021 1207 Taylor Street – Demolition Application City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – January 25, 2021 1207 Taylor Street – Demolition Application City of Austin – Historic Landmark Commission – January 25, 2021 Architectural/Structural Inspections Ed Hughey, AIA – “Having been in it a number of times, I have significant reservations about attempting to keep the structure: 1. The stone façade is in disrepair, with areas that are unstable and needing rebuilt. 2. The stone façade was not properly installed / ventilated and has introduced improper air flow around and under the house. After many years of non-maintenance, moisture damage has become a big issue for supporting walls behind the stone, around all doors and windows, and at roof / wall intersections. 3. Exterior wall framing / exterior trim / exterior wall cladding is heavily deteriorated around the entirety of the structure. Likely all will need to be fully repaired / replaced in order to: a. Repair the extensive rot and pest damage. b. Bring the structure up to current building code, which would be applied to this re-build. Interior of the home is in atrocious condition, having been occupied by a hoarder for many years -- it is rotting from the inside out. The extent of …
Brummett, Elizabeth From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Jim Hightower Sunday, January 24, 2021 1:17 PM PAZ Preservation Printer; Melody Byrd; Mac Martinez Attn: Andrew Rice / Case # PR-20-183612 1601 Brackenridge St. Objection to Demo.pdf Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello Andrew and the Historic Preservation Commission. Attached you will find my official objection form concerning the property at 1601 Brackenridge Street. Please consider the following statement my official comment regarding the matter. I appreciate you giving me the opportunity to express my opinion on preserving the history of my neighborhood and our fine city. Sincerely, Jim Hightower I am filing this as my objection to the permit for demolition of the home at 1601 Brackenridge. I believe this home is of historical significance in light of the role of William H. Davis and Lettie Webster Davis in what is now the Teas School for the Deaf. The Texas School for the Deaf and the community it has served are an important part of the history of South Congress; the Davis home at 1601 Brackenridge is an extension and symbol of that importance. Further, the Craftsman architecture exhibited by this home contributes to the architectural integrity of our neighborhood. It along with the other examples of Craftsman homes in the area work together to form a more cohesive architectural community of interest. The home's listing as contributing to the pending Travis Heights‐Fairview Park National Register Historic District makes it imperative that this home be saved from demolition. The home should be more appropriately designated as a historic landmark. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Brummett, Elizabeth From: Sent: To: Subject: Candace Volz Sunday, January 24, 2021 11:25 AM PAZ Preservation 2803 Bonnie Rd Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** To the Historic Preservation Office‐ I am opposed to the proposed demolition of 2803 Bonnie Rd. The Nalle Co. bought this property in 10/20 for almost $1.3 million, and not because it’s a charming, historic house with its original integrity intact. No, they bought it for redevelopment and profit. Builders/ developers are profiting off of our historic inner city neighborhoods. They see them as blank fields in the suburbs ready for new construction. But these neighborhoods are not that. They’re Austin’s history and character. 2803 Bonnie will end up shoveled into an Austin landfill. It’s building materials and the energy embodied in them will be trashed. This is a fabulous way to ring our city‐ the one that’s working toward zero waste‐with overflowing landfills of building materials that are far superior to modern materials: fully dimensional old growth lumber, solid metal hardware, kitchen cabinets that aren’t substantially plastic, hardwood floors, operable sash windows that can actually be refurbished when needed. Please‐ tell Nalle NO. Tell them to stick to the fields on the edge of Austin. Thank you, Candace Volz CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Brummett, Elizabeth From: Sent: To: Subject: Lawrence Mathis Monday, January 25, 2021 12:58 PM PAZ Preservation Case No HR-20-184510, Hearing Date January 25, 2021 Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Attn: Andrew Rice, Historic Landmark Commission I am the next door neighbor of 121 Laurel Lane. I live at 119 Laurel Lane. I have reviewed the plans provided by Rindi McDonald and Don Harris for their garage apartment and it is totally satisfactory to me. Like a lot of old structures in the neighborhood, their existing garage is obviously beyond a simple repair. The new structure as designed appears compatible with the historic nature of our neighborhood and would contribute to it. No doubt a new structure would be a safer addition than the current structure. You may contact me with any questions. Thank you. Larry Mathis CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Jacki C Contreras, Kalan; Brummett, Elizabeth Rice, Andrew Re: Speaker registration instructions for January 25 Historic Landmark Commission meeting Monday, January 25, 2021 10:37:14 AM Hi Everyone, After my brief call with Kalan this morning and the clarifications on the process below I think the most effective use of everyone’s time is if we postpone for tonight and use the coming days to gather new elevations and plans and substitute the current demolition application for the active renovation application. Elizabeth would you mind getting us on the agenda for ARC for February and for HLC meeting that follows that. I will look into switching the permits. Thank you all for your time on this. Best wishes, Jacki On Jan 25, 2021, at 9:01 AM, Contreras, Kalan <Kalan.Contreras@austintexas.gov> wrote: Hi, Jacki, Sure thing! Ordinarily, significant changes to a building’s main façade that are visible from the street need to appear before the HLC. If the new plans do not significantly differ from the previously approved window changes, however, we can administratively approve them. If they are more dramatic or otherwise involve marked deviation from the approved plans, the HLC will need to re-review. If the Commission votes to postpone this month, we can roll your new plans into February’s hearing without starting the process over. If you’d like to speak in general to the demolition alternatives you’re considering at this meeting, you’re absolutely entitled to that; if you want to have elevations available to the Commission before speaking, we can postpone to February to give y’all some time to attend ARC. Each option will probably grant you a similar general timeframe, as far as redesign and HLC approval goes, so it really just depends on your comfort level with the project proposal and testimony/feedback options Elizabeth mentioned earlier. Best, Kalan Contreras MSHP | Senior Planner, Historic Preservation Office kalan.contreras@austintexas.gov | 512.974.2727
Brummett, Elizabeth From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Robert Hicks Monday, January 25, 2021 1:41 PM PAZ Preservation Carrie Hicks GF-20-171512 – 1517 Murray Lane Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Historic Landmark Commission: I am writing to voice our opposition to the proposed demolition of 1517 Murray Lane. My wife and I live 2 houses down at 1712 Windsor Road. The homes on Murray Lane were built in the 1920's and remain true to their original character. It would be a shame to have 1517 Murray demolished, particularly with the significance the Morley family had in Austin's early growth. We are on record against the demolition. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Robert and Carrie Hicks 1712 Windsor Road CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Brummett, Elizabeth From: Sent: To: Subject: Wynn Baker Monday, January 25, 2021 3:01 PM PAZ Preservation 2803 Bonnie Road Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To the Austin Historic Landmark Commission ‐ I did not have a chance to register to speak in time for the hearing this evening but I would like to register against the proposed destruction of the home on 2803 Bonnie Road. Allowing the house at 2803 Bonnie Road to be torn down is going to continue the abhorrent process of the dissolution of our community identity. Home builders are buying properties across the city and building cold modern homes that do not reflect the character that made Austin desirable in the first place. The charms of the neighborhoods are being lost for the sake of market value and making already expensive home prices to be out of reach of residents in Austin. In the question of Bonnie road house, it is not falling down or in disrepair. The argument that the home isn’t eligible for a historic marker because the residents weren’t significant enough is a slap int he face of Austin residents. Austin is the State Capitol home to countless government employees who allow the state to function. Mr. Reichert worked for the Texas Highway Department after serving public radio for years. While that may not be significant to the greater history of the State, people like that are what make Austin special. I hope that my service to the State Legislature is not one day evaluated by city staff as not significant in 80 years. Nalle Custom Homes is going to build a custom home that looks exactly like all their other homes… sell it for millions of dollars and make the prospect of actual Austin residents looking for affordable homes continuously more difficult. More and more neighborhoods in Austin are slowly becoming carbon copies of Nalle homes and other modern builds. The unique draw that Austin has is disappearing because houses like Bonnie Road are being destroyed. These ‘custom’ homes are all so similar they’re going to turn our beautiful and historic city neighborhoods into streets no better than suburban masterplanned communities. I truly hope you will consider protecting this beautiful example of Tudor Revival home that has been well maintained for nearly a century. But I honestly don’t expect you to. I …
RECOMMENDATION REGARDING NOMINEE TO THE AUSTIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BOARD Historic Landmark Commission Recommendation 20210125-004A WHEREAS, the Historic Landmark Commission has been afforded an opportunity to appoint an individual to serve on the board of the Austin Economic Development Corporation (AEDC); and WHEREAS, at the December 14, 2020 meeting, the commission delegated to the Preservation Plan Committee the receipt and consideration of nominees for the AEDC; and WHEREAS, the Preservation Plan Committee is comprised of commissioners Terri Myers, Alex Papavasiliou, Beth Valenzuela, and Ben Heimsath; and WHEREAS, the committee received a total of three (3) nominations with the required applications and paperwork, for Ben Heimsath, Alyson McGee, and Bradford Patterson; and WHEREAS, the committee met on January 21, 2021 to consider nominees; each candidate attended to present their credentials and answer questions from the committee, and Mr. Heimsath participated as a candidate rather than a committee member; and WHEREAS, the three (3) committee members in attendance voted unanimously to recommend Bradford Patterson to the Historic Landmark Commission at its January 25, 2021 meeting; and WHEREAS, Mr. Patterson meets the criteria for nomination to the AEDC: he is a resident of the city of Austin; holds a strong background, understanding, and familiarity with historic preservation and its connections to economic development through his statewide work as the Director of Community Heritage Development at the Texas Historical Commission; understands the organization’s role; and has committed to regular attendance on the working board; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Historic Landmark Commission of the City of Austin: The commission hereby nominates Bradford Patterson as the Historic Landmark Commission appointee to the Austin Economic Development Corporation. Motioned by: Wright Seconded by: Little Featherston, Heimsath, Jacob, Koch, Little, McWhorter, Myers, Papavasiliou, Valenzuela, and Wright Vote For: Against: None Abstain: None Absent: Tollett ADOPTED: January 25, 2021 ATTEST:______________________________ Terri Myers, Chair, Historic Landmark Commission (cid:2)(cid:27)(cid:25)(cid:26)(cid:18)(cid:21) (cid:6)(cid:14)(cid:22)(cid:21)(cid:22)(cid:20)(cid:18)(cid:14) (cid:5)(cid:16)(cid:28)(cid:16)(cid:19)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:16)(cid:21)(cid:26) (cid:4)(cid:22)(cid:24)(cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:24)(cid:13)(cid:26)(cid:18)(cid:22)(cid:21)(cid:31) (cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:13)(cid:24)(cid:15) (cid:10)(cid:22)(cid:20)(cid:18)(cid:21)(cid:13)(cid:26)(cid:18)(cid:22)(cid:21) (cid:19)(cid:31)(cid:28) (cid:2)(cid:45)(cid:43)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:37) (cid:6)(cid:26)(cid:39)(cid:37)(cid:39)(cid:36)(cid:32)(cid:26) (cid:5)(cid:28)(cid:46)(cid:28)(cid:35)(cid:39)(cid:40)(cid:36)(cid:28)(cid:37)(cid:44) (cid:4)(cid:39)(cid:42)(cid:40)(cid:39)(cid:42)(cid:24)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:39)(cid:37) (cid:32)(cid:43) (cid:24) (cid:40)(cid:45)(cid:25)(cid:35)(cid:32)(cid:26)(cid:53) (cid:37)(cid:39)(cid:37)(cid:40)(cid:42)(cid:39)(cid:29)(cid:32)(cid:44)(cid:53) (cid:35)(cid:39)(cid:26)(cid:24)(cid:35) (cid:26)(cid:39)(cid:42)(cid:40)(cid:39)(cid:42)(cid:24)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:39)(cid:37) (cid:44)(cid:31)(cid:24)(cid:44) (cid:43)(cid:28)(cid:42)(cid:46)(cid:28)(cid:43) (cid:2)(cid:45)(cid:43)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:37) (cid:24)(cid:43) (cid:24) (cid:40)(cid:24)(cid:42)(cid:44)(cid:37)(cid:28)(cid:42) (cid:32)(cid:37) (cid:29)(cid:24)(cid:26)(cid:32)(cid:35)(cid:32)(cid:44)(cid:24)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:37)(cid:30) (cid:31)(cid:39)(cid:35)(cid:32)(cid:43)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:26) (cid:24)(cid:37)(cid:27) (cid:26)(cid:39)(cid:35)(cid:35)(cid:24)(cid:25)(cid:39)(cid:42)(cid:24)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:46)(cid:28)(cid:53) (cid:40)(cid:45)(cid:25)(cid:35)(cid:32)(cid:26)(cid:61)(cid:40)(cid:42)(cid:32)(cid:46)(cid:24)(cid:44)(cid:28) (cid:32)(cid:37)(cid:32)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:24)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:46)(cid:28)(cid:43) (cid:44)(cid:39) (cid:43)(cid:28)(cid:26)(cid:45)(cid:42)(cid:28) (cid:32)(cid:37)(cid:26)(cid:35)(cid:45)(cid:43)(cid:32)(cid:46)(cid:28) (cid:39)(cid:45)(cid:44)(cid:26)(cid:39)(cid:36)(cid:28)(cid:43) (cid:44)(cid:31)(cid:24)(cid:44) (cid:43)(cid:44)(cid:42)(cid:28)(cid:37)(cid:30)(cid:44)(cid:31)(cid:28)(cid:37) (cid:44)(cid:31)(cid:28) (cid:46)(cid:24)(cid:35)(cid:45)(cid:28)(cid:43) (cid:39)(cid:29) (cid:44)(cid:31)(cid:28) (cid:26)(cid:32)(cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:56) (cid:19)(cid:31)(cid:28) (cid:26)(cid:39)(cid:42)(cid:40)(cid:39)(cid:42)(cid:24)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:39)(cid:37) (cid:32)(cid:43) (cid:30)(cid:39)(cid:46)(cid:28)(cid:42)(cid:37)(cid:28)(cid:27) (cid:25)(cid:49) (cid:24) (cid:58)(cid:25)(cid:35)(cid:45)(cid:28)(cid:61)(cid:42)(cid:32)(cid:25)(cid:25)(cid:39)(cid:37)(cid:59) (cid:25)(cid:39)(cid:24)(cid:42)(cid:27) (cid:26)(cid:39)(cid:37)(cid:43)(cid:32)(cid:43)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:37)(cid:30) (cid:39)(cid:29) (cid:69)(cid:68) (cid:36)(cid:28)(cid:36)(cid:25)(cid:28)(cid:42)(cid:43) (cid:47)(cid:31)(cid:39) (cid:24)(cid:42)(cid:28) (cid:37)(cid:39)(cid:36)(cid:32)(cid:37)(cid:24)(cid:44)(cid:28)(cid:27) (cid:25)(cid:49) (cid:44)(cid:31)(cid:28) (cid:4)(cid:32)(cid:44)(cid:49) (cid:24)(cid:37)(cid:27) (cid:39)(cid:44)(cid:31)(cid:28)(cid:42) (cid:28)(cid:48)(cid:44)(cid:28)(cid:42)(cid:37)(cid:24)(cid:35) (cid:24)(cid:30)(cid:28)(cid:37)(cid:26)(cid:32)(cid:28)(cid:43) (cid:32)(cid:37) (cid:44)(cid:31)(cid:28) (cid:26)(cid:39)(cid:36)(cid:36)(cid:45)(cid:37)(cid:32)(cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:56) (cid:6)(cid:24)(cid:26)(cid:31) (cid:37)(cid:39)(cid:36)(cid:32)(cid:37)(cid:24)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:37)(cid:30) (cid:25)(cid:39)(cid:27)(cid:49) (cid:47)(cid:32)(cid:35)(cid:35) (cid:25)(cid:28) (cid:30)(cid:32)(cid:46)(cid:28)(cid:37) (cid:24) (cid:27)(cid:28)(cid:43)(cid:26)(cid:42)(cid:32)(cid:40)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:39)(cid:37) (cid:39)(cid:29) (cid:44)(cid:31)(cid:28) (cid:43)(cid:45)(cid:25)(cid:33)(cid:28)(cid:26)(cid:44) (cid:36)(cid:24)(cid:44)(cid:44)(cid:28)(cid:42) (cid:24)(cid:42)(cid:28)(cid:24)(cid:53) (cid:41)(cid:45)(cid:24)(cid:35)(cid:32)(cid:29)(cid:32)(cid:26)(cid:24)(cid:44)(cid:32)(cid:39)(cid:37)(cid:43) (cid:24)(cid:37)(cid:27) (cid:43)(cid:34)(cid:32)(cid:35)(cid:35) (cid:43)(cid:28)(cid:44)(cid:43) (cid:29)(cid:39)(cid:42) (cid:24)(cid:37) (cid:32)(cid:27)(cid:28)(cid:24)(cid:35) (cid:37)(cid:39)(cid:36)(cid:32)(cid:37)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:56) (cid:19)(cid:31)(cid:28) (cid:4)(cid:32)(cid:44)(cid:49) (cid:4)(cid:39)(cid:45)(cid:37)(cid:26)(cid:32)(cid:35) (cid:47)(cid:32)(cid:35)(cid:35) …
MUNICIPAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Monday, January 25, 2021 REGULAR MEETING Monday, January 25, 2021 MUNICIPAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MINUTES The Municipal Civil Service Commission convened in a regularly scheduled meeting on Monday, January 25, 2021 via videoconferencing. Vice-Chair Rogers called the Commission meeting to order at 9:03 a.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Melissa Rogers, Vice-Chair Rebecca Eisenbrey Erika Kane Teresa Peréz-Wiseley Commissioners Absent: Pamela Lancaster, Chair Staff in Attendance: Matthew Chustz, Municipal Civil Service Administrator April Shaw, Municipal Civil Service Coordinator Mecia Griffin, Civil Service Coordinator Michael Sullivan, Civil Service Coordinator 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES November 9, 2020. a. Approve the minutes of the Municipal Civil Service Commission regular meeting of The minutes of the November 9, 2020 regular meeting were approved on Commissioner Peréz-Wiseley’s motion, Commissioner Eisenbrey’s second, on a vote of 4-0. 2. HEARING a. Conduct a hearing on the appeal filed by Eladio Mendoza regarding their Denial of Promotion from the Public Works Department. A hearing was conducted on the appeal filed by Eladio Mendoza regarding their Denial of Promotion from the Public Works Department. 1 MUNICIPAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Monday, January 25, 2021 b. Deliberate in open or closed session, pursuant to 551.074 of the Texas Government Code (personnel exception), regarding the appeal of Eladio Mendoza regarding their Denial of Promotion from the Public Works Department. Vice-Chair Rogers’ recessed the Municipal Civil Service Commission meeting to go into closed session at 4:30 p.m. The Commission deliberated in closed session on the appeal filed by Eladio Mendoza regarding their Denial of Promotion from the Public Works Department. Closed session ended and Vice-Chair Rogers called the Municipal Civil Service Commission meeting back to order at 5:03 p.m. to resume the hearing on the appeal filed by Eladio Mendoza regarding their Denial of Promotion from the Public Works Department. c. Possible action and decision regarding the appeal of Eladio Mendoza regarding their Denial of Promotion from the Public Works Department. The motion to deny Eladio Mendoza’s appeal and uphold the decision made by the City of Austin in the Denial of Promotion of Eladio Mendoza was approved on Commissioner Kane’s motion, Commissioner Eisenbrey’s second, on a vote of 4-0. 3. OLD BUSINESS a. Discussion and possible action on the Municipal Civil Service Commission recommendation to City Council (Recommendation 20191108-04B) regarding the review of granted denial of promotion and discharge appeals. Discussion was held regarding the Municipal …
REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, January 25, 2021 HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION MINUTES The Human Rights Commission convened in a regular meeting on Monday, January 25, 2021 via teleconference in Austin, Texas. Chair Sareta Davis called the Board Meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. Board Members in Attendance: Chair Davis, Vice Chair Jamarr Brown, Commissioner Breckenridge, Commissioner Garry Brown, Commissioner Caballero, Commissioner Casas, Commissioner Griffith, Commissioner Museitif, and Commissioner Weigel. Staff in Attendance: Jonathan Babiak, Human Resources Coordinator, Human Resources Department CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. The minutes from the regular meeting of October 26, 2020 were approved on a vote of 7-0: Chair Davis motion, Commissioner Garry Brown second. Voting in favor were Chair Davis, Commissioner Garry Brown, Commissioner Caballero, Commissioner Casas, Commissioner Griffith, Commissioner Museitif, and Commissioner Weigel. Vice Chair Jamarr Brown, Commissioner Breckenridge, Commissioner Santana, and Commissioner White were absent. 2. NEW BUSINESS a. Presentation by Cynthia Turner, AmeriCorps VISTA Volunteer and Pro Bono Attorney Engagement Specialist, and discussion regarding successes as an organization and request for support in making immigration funding a priority in the City's budget for next year. (Davis/Brown, J./Casas) Rebecca Lightsey, Co Executive Director, American Gateways, addressed the Commission and answered questions. The Commission discussed this item. The Commission took no action on this item. b. Discussion regarding planning and logistics of a future meeting agenda item related to Community Budget Forum. (Davis/Brown, J./Casas) The Commission discussed this item. The Commission took no action on this item. c. Discussion and possible action related to Austin, Texas Covid19 response and its impact on communities of color. (Museitif/Davis) The Commission discussed this item. The Commission took no action on this item. 1 J./Casas) 3. OLD BUSINESS d. Discussion and possible action regarding 87th State Legislative Agenda. (Davis/Brown, The Commission discussed this item. The Commission took no action on this item. a. The Commission discussed the following key priority areas of concern for 2020-2021: i. Institutional Equity Environment & Land Use ii. iii. Health Access & Nutrition iv. Autonomy & Human Right ADJOURNMENT Chair Davis adjourned the meeting at 7:22 p.m. on unanimous consent. 2
