D-1/1-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Abbey Seidensticker Ramirez, Elaine Case Number C15-2021-0057; Variance Request Hearing 12/13/21 Monday, December 06, 2021 1:48:33 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Case Number: C15-2021-0057 Abbey Seidensticker 1602 Bluebonnet Ln, Austin, Texas 78704 512-529-4074 I am in favor of granting the variance. Comments: I am the next door neighbor to Mr. & Mrs. Burkhart and our property shares a fence line with their property. We believe the variance request should be granted Bluebonnet Lane is a busy street, not only for vehicular traffic, but also bicycles and pedestrians. It is a popular route to get to large events such as ACL Festival, Trail of Lights, Blues on the Green, and many others. Our properties are also across the street from businesses such as Bluebonnet Food Mart and Thoroughbread, further increasing the amount of activity around our homes. Tall fences are the norm along this street to ensure privacy and increase security. The fence at 2000 Peach Tree Street is very attractive and in similar taste as many other fences along Bluebonnet. Please let me know if you need any additional information in order to have my comments submitted to the Board of Adjustment. Thank you, Abbey Seidensticker CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. D-1/2-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Cindy Cross Ramirez, Elaine Case # C15-2021-0057 Variance Friday, December 10, 2021 3:23:24 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Cindy Cross 2001 Peach Tree Street Austin, TX 78704 I live across the street from the Burkharts. I am strongly in favor of granting the variance, for the following reasons: 1) Aesthetically the fence and landscaping are gorgeous! A+ on the whole project. The fence fits wonderfully into the Peach Tree neighborhood as well as this section of Bluebonnet. It actually improves the cohesiveness of the neighborhood. 2) Directly across the street from the Burkharts’ home is a commercial section. Michael A Laundry, Bluebonnet Market, Thoroughbread, as well as Zilker Properties are there. Modelo and Budweiser routinely park their 18 wheeler trucks and cabs in front of their home, as the beer companies seem to deliver around 7:30 in the morning. I’m sure the fence provides some relief …
From: To: Subject: Date: TONY ALONZI Ramirez, Elaine C15-2021-0101 Sunday, December 05, 2021 12:21:56 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Sent from my iPhone D-2/1-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Zach Reich Ramirez, Elaine C15-2021-0101 - Variance I OPPOSE (Both A and B) Monday, December 06, 2021 9:28:36 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I am completely opposed to this variance for this property. This is the property listed in the case number I put in the subject line. This change will dramatically raise the heights of this development and I think will be a big detractor in the neighborhood. Higher buildings mean more people which means more traffic and more potential parking spaces getting taken not to mention the size will be over bearing. 40 feet is already high enough but the fact they want to raise it to 60 feet is not acceptable in my opinion. I am completely opposed to this variance and I will be returning the form to the city and I will also make my best efforts to attend the variance hearings. In a nutshell I oppose this variance request. If you have any additional follow-up questions please feel free to contact me. Elaine, Regards, Zach R. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. D-2/2-LATE BACKUP D-2/3-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Amelia Hinds Ramirez, Elaine BOA12/13 Comments for Koenig SECO ventures height variance Monday, December 13, 2021 8:12:46 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello Ms. Ramirez, Please include this written comment opposing the height variance for Koenig Hangar/Tx Gas Service on Koenig/Ave F. This variance would be extremely out of place, and create a huge increase in an already congested area surrounded by single family homes. The traffic light at this corner is already a dangerous mess. The property is surrounded by single family homes that have been there since the 50s. I have been here since the 80s, and have relied on …
From: To: Subject: Date: Patrick Goetz Ramirez, Elaine Case #C15-2021-0101 Tuesday, December 07, 2021 10:06:31 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi - I'm writing to state that I SUPPORT the requested variance. The LDC Section 25-2-1063 is one of the primary reasons Austin has the among the highest housing costs in the nation. In the absence of a new, more inclusive LDC, we have to do the best that we can. Thank you. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. D-2/1-LATE BACKUP D-2/2-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Brian Poteet Ramirez, Elaine In support of C15-2021-0101 Friday, December 10, 2021 3:07:10 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi Elaine, I can't attend the meeting next week, but I would like to voice my support for the variance request for the property at 403/201 East Koenig Ln and 5613 Avenue F. Here are a few reasons I think the variance should be approved: The city is behind on its housing goals (both affordable and market rate), and building higher on this lot will get us close to meeting those goals. The property is serviced by two high frequency bus lines. Building more housing on this lot will help the city meet its mode shift goals outlined in the ASMP. The North Loop Neighborhood Association unanimously voted in support of the variance. Personally I don't think this should matter given how unrepresentative the association is of the neighborhood, but I guess that probably matters to some of the commissioners. Compatibility requirements have a huge impact on this site, and it would be a real shame if we let those requirements get in the way of a better project for everyone. Best regards, Brian Poteet North Loop Homeowner CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. D-2/3-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Shannon May Ramirez, Elaine Hangar project at Koenig & F Sunday, December 12, 2021 9:58:46 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Case # C15-2021-0101 - 403/201 Ms. Ramirez, I’m …
Zilker Neighborhood Association __________________________________________________________________ Zoning Committee zilkerneighborhood@gmail.com Austin, TX 78704 December 5, 2021 Re: 1003 Kinney, lot-size variance, Case C15-2021-0100 December 13 Agenda item E2 To: Board of Adjustment c/o Elaine Ramirez, Development Review Dept., City of Austin via email Elaine.Ramirez@austintexas.gov Chair and Board Members: Thank you for allowing the zoning committee of the Zilker Neighborhood Association (ZNA) to review the variance request for 1003 Kinney (to decrease the minimum lot size from 5750 to 5464 square feet) and to share our recommendations with the applicants. City of Austin Supervisor Eric Thomas has now dated the parcel to September 1947, confirming that the minimum lot requirement of 5750 sf applies. His email of November 17 appears on page 9 of this letter. It eliminates the applicants’ argument that “At one time previously, it was likely this lot was larger, and would have met the minimum 5750sqft area for SF-3 and to not be considered a substandard lot.” Documents submitted by the applicants show that the alley has existed in its current configuration since 1896, and the dimensions of the parcel have always been approx. 62 ft × 88 ft—beginning in 1947, through 1962 when a house was built under the previous code, through March of this year when the applicants demolished the house, and up until today. That takes us back to the demolition question raised by ZNA at the hearing on November 8. The ZNA zoning committee believes that the “non-complying structure” regulations apply in this case (see 25-2-963 and 964, on page 7). This code allows an owner to rebuild or maintain an existing structure that does not comply with current code, as long as 50% of the supporting structure is preserved. Clearly, the zoning regulations allowed reasonable use before the house was demolished. ZNA is aware of two similar variance requests, at 1107 Kinney and 1516 Kinney, where lots were scraped without regard to 25-2-963. Both variances were denied for lack of a qualifying hardship. At 1003 Kinney, we now know that the entire structure was demolished sometime this year, and it was the applicants’ responsibility to verify before demolition that new construction would be 1 E-2/1-LATE BACKUP allowed. Evidence submitted by the applicants confirms that they were aware of the substandard lot size as early as January 2021, before they purchased the property. (A chronology appears on page 6.) Their survey in February 2021 …
l'UllUC Hf'AIHNG 1:'lf'ORMATION applic:mts Md:or 1heir agem(s} �1-e expected lo a11cnd 11 public not n:(luircd fo t1ttc11d. I lov.e\l;'f, if you do aucnd, Ahhoug.h hc�fiJlg, vou nn� lK1ve the opporhinity de\·elopmem or change. or e,wiron.menlal orga.11.iz,uion 1hu1 has expre..-scd an iutere:H in a.n .ip-plici11io11 am·,1ing your neighborhood. to spcnk FOR or AGAJKST 1h.::: p1•oposcd ntact a neighborhood You 111<1)' also <:.o yo11 cn1"' mus! be submitted to the contacl person 9 :un. !he dny of !he publ:t· he2ri11g to be added 10 the Wriu.cn co1111n bcforo viewed b�· lhc Board !he niglu of !he mcl.'ling. lhe name of 1hc boi1rd public .:\II hea,'ing; 1hc Case Number; eo1nmen1s received will bcc;omc; Your (;i)Jnmems or commission. or Council� the scheduled dale or the should include nnd 1hc ccmwc1 pc,rSon listed r<.':COrd of'thc public p:irl of1his on the 1101ice. cast". listed on lhe nolice Lale B:1ck-op and he�ufog,. the board or 1m app}ic.;Him,•s h,;:�uiog 10 Ouring o p-ubJk con1innc: or denial or the :tpp lic:nion. lf !he board 01· con-1.mission iul1lounccs � specilic date ::md 1,imc for a postponcmen! than 60 days from the announccmcul, m:i further 1t0Litt· is requir('d. commission may p o .4pm,e ur or cun:inu:.nion 1ha1 is no1 kiter o kiter date, or recommend approval Case Number: C 15-2021-0057 Contact: l'ublk l lcui1l": Elain� R:;1min;.r;dnine,r:·11nire1@·au;.1in1ex:1::.gov Oe('embcr 13111 Ho,1J'd of Adiustment: • 2021 _&:,Ae L , ILL/ rour Name (please pri;itJ (a..y- � J :,min f:n·(1r 0 1 objt<:t .J "IP) 'Ford,. <;t Ac1sha, 11. 1,£?0<..1 Your address(es) by 11,fs ' «pplinJJirm �� 'b/:(.dJ.,,Jd (�(/e�tcd Sigrwl11rt )2-[Q-;2./ Dft.'e Day1imc Telephone: 1 / :>-SO 3 • '-/ � 4,3 Couu11e1us: _________________________ _ or commission's decision may be ;1pp�i1led wilh A blX1n.l stunding h) appt·nl. or can i1pp-l'.!1I lhe decision. TI)e body hold ing n public will dclcrmine whelht'lr an inlel'est..::d has standing hearing 10 appeal a pcr:;on on :111 appeal lhe decision. parly lhal is identified al<' n pcr:-.tm who by a pers(m as n pcrS()n wh(> is the applicam or 1'e.C-Otd or dtc s.ubjcc1 is dclincd propc11y, or who conmmnica1cs ,111 in!eresl lO a by: An imcrcslcd pn.liy ownel' board ()r commission de.livering o wrilleu dudng 1he publi..: hearing 1h01 gener�1lly concern (i: 11!.'IJI be delivered or nollct.')� Jppc�ring identifies lhc issues of M Ille conwc; ;wrs<m !!:ued ori a and s1x:11king l()r lhe record at sta1e-nwn1 to the board or commission or before the publi..: )1..:�u ing: i.\ud: occu1>ies a …
From: To: Subject: Date: Carol Olewin Ramirez, Elaine Seco Development 403 and 201 E Koenig Ln Monday, December 13, 2021 4:29:09 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** In regards to the height variance request of Seco Development of 403 and 201 E Koenig Ln and 5613 Ave F, I Oppose granting the height variance. The increased height to 5 stories will have a negative impact on the aesthetics of the Skyview Neighborhood as well as a negative impact on the aesthetics of Koenig Ln. The height increase to 5 stories will increase the number of dwelling units further exacerbating the congestion already in the area. Although both the North Loop Neighborhood Association and the Skyview Neighborhood Association are voicing their support for the height variance, that does not mean all residents in both neighborhoods support the request. I participated in both neighborhood discussions about the Seco Development and their request for a height variance. I voiced my opposition but was out voted by the group. I stand by my opposition to the height variance because of the negative impact it will have on our neighborhood. Carol Olewin 302 W Skyview Rd, Austin, TX 78752 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.
From: To: Subject: Date: Diana Spain Ramirez, Elaine Support for variance request # C15-2021-0101 - 403/201 East Koenig Ln and 5613 Avenue F. Monday, December 13, 2021 10:05:52 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Good morning, Ms. Ramirez, I am a homeowner in the North Loop neighborhood (5410 Avenue F) and a member of the North Loop Neighborhood Association. I am writing you to let you know that, although I cannot attend the Board of Adjustments meeting tonight about the above variance, I am in full support of it. I hope I have contacted you soon enough to communicate my support to the Board. Thank you very much, Diana Spain 5410 Avenue F Austin, TX 78751-1311 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.
Loayza, Katherine Ramirez, Elaine From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Importance: RE: 12/13/2021 (Mon.) Board of Adjustment hearing - Withdrawal of Item D-3 C15-2021-0102 [IMAN- JWDOCS.FID4278735] Monday, December 13, 2021 1:46:00 PM image001.png High *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Elaine, On behalf of the owner of 3201 Westlake Drive, please consider this a formal request to withdraw item D-3 C15-2021-0102 for B.O.A. action on tonight’s B.O.A. agenda. (Dec. 13, 2021). Thank you, Katherine Katherine P. Loayza Land Use Consultant Jackson Walker L.L.P. 100 Congress Avenue, Suite 1100 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 236-2259 (512) 236-2002 (fax) The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. This information may constitute information that is confidential and privileged as an attorney-client communication or as attorney work product. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver this communication to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution, copying, or use of this communication, electronic or otherwise, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone, by replying to the sender via e-mail, or by e-mail to ", and please delete this e-mail and any accompanying attachments from your in box, recycle bin, and any other directory, file, or electronic storage. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Ramirez, Elaine <Elaine.Ramirez@austintexas.gov> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 8:50 AM Cc: Ramirez, Diana <Diana.Ramirez@austintexas.gov> Subject: 12/13/2021 (Mon.) Board of Adjustment hearing Importance: High **RECEIVED FROM EXTERNAL SENDER – USE CAUTION** Greetings Board applicants on the Monday 12/13 agenda – Under the current situation the BOA meeting will be Hybrid for Board Members ONLY, meaning we have to have at least 6 Board Members physically present at City Hall - Council Chambers to have a quorum. Any and all public testimony will need to be in-person. Please read this entire e-mail APPLICANTS TO GIVE CASE PRESENTATION • There can only be one applicant that has to be registered to speak (Primary Speaker) and give presentation on case. (There will be a sign-in book as soon as you walk-in to Council Chambers, you will need to sign in and register if you will be presenting) • There could be additional speaker(s) –architect, surveyor, homeowner, etc. that can sign up as …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet C-1 DATE: December 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0011 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne (abstained) _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Renee Bornn OWNER: Villas Rio, LP ADDRESS: 2111 RIO GRANDE ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 1 sign(s) on the property: a) (F) to allow one (1) wall signs above the second floor (maximum allowed) to the eight floor (requested) b) (H) to allow for the one (1) sign(s) to all be illuminated in order to provide signage for the Villas on Rio Grande in a “GO-MU, LO-NP, MF-4-NP”, General Office- Mixed Use, Limited Office, Multi-Family– Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs (F) No signs may be placed above the second floor of a building, except for a non-electric sign that is engraved, cut into the building surface, or otherwise inlaid to become part of the building. (H) A sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. BOARD’S DECISION: Oct 11, 2021 BOA MEETING POSTPONED TO NOVEMBER 8, 2021 BY BOARD MEMBERS (AS REQUESTED BY APPLICANT); Nov 8, 2021 POSTPONED TO DEC 13, 2021 (per applicant); Dec 13, 2021 POSTPONED TO JANUARY 10, 2022 BY APPLICANT FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: OR, 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties, because: OR, 3. The granting of this variance will not substantially conflict with the stated purposes of this sign ordinance, because: AND, 4. Granting a variance would not provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated, because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Madam Chair ____________________________ for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-1 DATE: Monday December 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0057 ___N____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___N____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___N____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___N____Agustina Rodriguez ___-____ Richard Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____ Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____ Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Stuart Sampley OWNER: Bryan and Laura Burkhart ADDRESS: 2000 PEACH TREE ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-899 (D) (Fences as Accessory Uses) to exceed the average height of six (6) feet or a maximum height of seven (7) feet (required) for a solid fence along the property line in order to maintain a seven (7) foot (requested) tall masonry, wood, steel fence along Bluebonnet St and Peach Tree Street in a “SF-3”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. Note: The Land Development Code 25-2-899 (D) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a solid fence constructed along a property line may not exceed an average height of six feet or a maximum height of seven feet. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA DEC 13, 2021 MEETING The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Deny; Board Member Brooke Bailey seconds on a 7-4 vote (Board members Thomas Ates, Jessica Cohen, Rahm McDaniel, Agustina Rodriguez nay); DENIED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-2 DATE: Monday December 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0101 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___-____Richard Smith (OUT) ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Michael Whellan OWNER: 201 E Koenig Ln, LTD. (Donald Reece) ADDRESS: 201 and 403 KOENIG LN/5613 Avenue F (C) (2) to increase height limit from three (3) stories and 40 feet (maximum allowed) to VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code Article 10, Compatibility Standards, Division 2 –Development Standards, Section 25-2-1063 (Height Limitations and Setbacks for Large Sites): a) 60 feet (requested) b) (C) (3) to increase allowed height from 40 feet plus one foot for each 10 feet of distance in excess of 100 feet from the property zoned SF-5 or more restrictive (maximum allowed) to 60 feet (requested) in order to erect a Vertical Mixed-use project with on-site affordable units and one acre of on-site, developed parkland in a “CS-MU-V-CO-NP”, General Commercial Services-Mixed Use-Vertical Mixed Use-Conditional Overlay – Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (North Loop Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code Section 25-2-1063 Height Limitations and Setbacks for Large Sites (C) (2) three stories and 40 feet, if the structure is more than 50 feet and not more than 100 feet from property. (C) (3) for a structure more than 100 feet but not more than 300 feet from property zoned SF-5 or more restrictive, 40 feet plus one foot for each 10 feet of distance in excess of 100 feet from the property zoned SF-5 or more restrictive. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA DEC 13, 2021 MEETING Madam Chair Jessica Cohen motions to Postpone the remaining cases to January 10, 2022 at City Hall due to technical difficulties –internet issues; Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 11-0 vote; POSTPONED TO JANUARY 10, 2022 DUE TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES- INTERNET ISSUES. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-3 DATE: Monday December 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0102 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) OWNER: Team Properties, LLC (Pamela Madere) ADDRESS: 3201 WESTLAKE DR VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (B) (1) (a) from shoreline setback requirements to reduce the shoreline setback from 75 feet (required) to 25 feet (requested) along a man-made slough in order to remodel an existing Single-Family residence + associated improvements in a “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. Note: The Land Development Code 25-2-551 (B) This subsection specifies shoreline setbacks in a Lake Austin (LA) district (1) The shoreline setback is: (a) 75 feet BOARD’S DECISION: BOA DEC 13, 2021 MEETING WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Madam Chair Diana Ramirez for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-1 DATE: Monday December 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0097 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Nathan Hobbs OWNER: Gary J. Hobbs ADDRESS: 4315 AVENUE A VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code: a) Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) to decrease the minimum Lot Size requirements from 5,750 square feet (required) to 5,700 square feet (requested) and b) Section 25-2-947 (Nonconforming Use Regulation Groups) (B) (2) to increase the improvement value from 20% (allowed) to 60% (requested) in order to complete a remodel and addition of an existing home in a “SF-3-NCCD-NP”, Single-Family- Neighborhood Conservation Combining District-Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Hyde Park Neighborhood Plan). BOARD’S DECISION: BOA Meeting Oct 11, 2021-POSTPONED TO NOVEMBER 8, 2021 BY BOARD MEMBERS (Due to not enough Board Members present at the meeting); Nov 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to postpone to December 13, 2021; Board Member Thomas Ates seconds on an 11-0 vote; POSTPONED TO DECEMBER 13, 2021; Dec 13, 2021 POSTPONED TO JANUARY 10, 2022 BY APPLICANT FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-2 DATE: Monday December 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0100 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___-____Richard Smith (OUT) ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: Ian Ellis ADDRESS: 1003 KINNEY AVE VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code: Section 25-2-943 (B) (2) (a) (Substandard Lot) to decrease the minimum Lot Size requirements from 5,750 square feet (required) to 5,464 square feet (requested), (TCAD records show 5,740 sq. ft.) in order to erect a Single-Family residence with a Pool in a “SF-3”, Single-Family zoning district. Note: 25-2-943 SUBSTANDARD LOT (B) A substandard lot may be used for a single-family residential use if the use is permitted in the zoning district in which the lot is located and the lot complies with the requirements of this subsection. (2) A substandard lot recorded in the county real property records after March 14, 1946 must: (a) have an area of not less than 5,750 square feet. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING NOV 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to Postpone to December 13, 2021; Board Member Darryl Pruett seconds on a 9-0-2 vote (Board members Agustina Rodriguez and Carrie Waller Abstained); POSTPONED TO DECEMBER 13, 2021. Dec 13, 2021 Madam Chair Jessica Cohen motions to Postpone the remaining cases to January 10, 2022 at City Hall due to technical difficulties –internet issues; Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 11-0 vote; POSTPONED TO JANUARY 10, 2022 DUE TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES-INTERNET ISSUES. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for
Joint Meeting of the Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission and Zoning and Platting Commission Monday, November 29, 2021 The Special Called joint meeting of the Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission and Zoning and Planning Commission will convene at 6:00 PM on Monday, November 29, 2021 at Austin City Hall, Council Chambers, Room 1001, 301 W. Second Street, Austin, TX. Some members may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) The Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission and Zoning and Planning Commission will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on this agenda. The Commission may not conduct a closed meeting without the approval of the city attorney. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071 CITIZEN COMMUNICATION The first four (4) speakers signed up prior to the commencement of the meeting will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda A. DISCUSSION & PRESENTATION 1. Austin City Hall Revised Boards and Commissions Use Policy; Required Relocation of Meetings of the Land Use Boards and Commissions Discussion with staff concerning revised policy use of Austin City Hall, prohibition of Land Use Commissions from utilizing Austin City Hall meeting space, and City management mandate requiring relocation of meetings to the Permitting and Development Center. Staff: Denise Lucas, Director of Development Services, 512- 974-2614, denise.lucas@austintexas.gov, Rosie Truelove, Director of Housing & Planning, 512-974-3064, rosie.truelove@austintexas.gov Andy Moore, Financial Services, 512-974-7604, andrew.moore@austintexas.gov, Rodney Gonzales, Assistant City Manager, 512- 974- 2313, rodney.gonzales@austintexas.gov Liaison for Board of Adjustment: Elaine Ramirez, 512- 974-2202 Liaison for Planning Commission and Zoning and Platting Commission: Andrew Rivera, 512-974-6508 ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Andrew Rivera at the Housing and Planning Department, at 512-974-6508, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Liaison for Board of Adjustment: Elaine Ramirez, 512- 974-2202 Liaison for Planning Commission and Zoning and Platting Commission: Andrew Rivera, 512-974-6508 SPEAKER REGISTRATION Click on link below …
TO: M E M O R A N D U M Mayor and Council Chairs of the following Boards, Commissions, and Committees: Zoning and Platting Commission; Planning Commission; Historic Landmark Commission; Board of Adjustment; Environmental Commission; Sign Review Board; Building and Standards Commission; Building and Fire Code Board of Appeals; Code and Ordinances Joint Committee; Design Commission; Electric Board; Mechanical and Plumbing Board; Small Area Planning Joint Committee; Waterfront Planning Advisory Board; and the Urban Forestry Board October 19, 2021 Change of location for land use related Commissions Denise Lucas, Development Services Department Director Rosie Truelove, Housing and Planning Department Director FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: On June 29, 2021, a memo was distributed regarding the opening of the Permitting and Development Center. As indicated within the memo, the PDC brings together resources and expertise from multiple City departments which provide permitting and development services for our community. The new facility is designed to provide a seamless development process, all in one place, for residential and commercial customers and special events permitting. All pertinent department representatives will be co-located at the PDC. As a next step for utilizing the PDC, liaisons to each respective board, commission, and committee will be asked to assist with coordinating the relocation of meetings to the PDC Conference Center, which is a key asset included in the approved design of the PDC. Coordination will include working with each board, commission, and committee to walk through the facility, identify and collaborate to solve for major concerns, and to develop and implement communications plans leading up to and through changes in meeting locations. The Conference Center is 5,000 square feet, will be equipped to televise meetings through ATXN by late February 2022, has sufficient room for 351-person occupancy and the capacity to be separated into small rooms, and has a 969-parking space garage connected to the PDC. Changes in meeting locations will not occur prior to February 2022. Rather, there will be initial discussions and opportunities to visit the PDC so that each respective board, commission, and committee has an opportunity to learn more about the PDC. This change will reduce the reliance on the City Hall Council Chambers and Boards and Commissions Room and reinforces the concept of the PDC serving as the City’s one-stop shop for all development and permitting related needs, which was a key recommendation in the 2015 Zucker Analysis. As with all public meetings, …
ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20211019-D-01 Date: October 19, 2021 Subject: Future Location of Meetings Motioned By: Commissioner King Seconded By: Commissioner Greenberg Zoning and Platting Commission Meetings shall remain at City Hall, see attachment. For: Chair Barrera-Ramirez Vice-Chair Kiolbassa and Commissioners Acosta, Bray, Denkler, Greenberg, King, Thompson and Woody Recommendation: Vote: 9-0 Abstain: Smith One vacancy on the Commission Attest: Andrew D. Rivera Zoning and Platting Commission Liaison Zoning and Platting Commission Resolution to Continue to Meet at City Hall Whereas, City Hall is a well-known and accessible landmark that is centrally located; Whereas, since the opening of City Hall it has hosted the meetings of the Zoning and Platting Commission; Whereas, City management has decided to move the meetings of the Zoning and Platting Commission, the Planning Commission and the Board of Adjustment to the City of Austin Permitting and Development Center (PDC) at Highland Mall without informing the commission or the public; Whereas, moving the Zoning and Platting Commission public hearings to the PDC places an undue burden on the public, the staff and the commissioners; Whereas, public hearings on zoning and land use cases by the Zoning and Platting Commission and the City Council should be in the same location to avoid confusing the public and the need for multiple notices, especially since members of the public may be unfamiliar with the locations; Whereas, signage is lacking, with only small signs on the glass doors facing Wilhelmina Delco Drive, the PDC’s official address, making it easy for participants to miss, yet the public entrance is on Thomas Hatfield Way; Whereas, seven high-frequency bus routes serve City Hall including two MetroRapids, yet only two high-frequency bus routes – the 7 and the 337 – and the Red Line serve the PDC, and the bus stops are closer to City Hall than they are to the PDC; Whereas, the safety and security of participants is paramount and City Hall has metal detectors, security immediately outside the chamber and secure parking; Whereas, Highland Mall is a construction zone so pedestrians and transit riders will have to walk past empty lots at night including a vacated lot used for surface parking across the street from the PDC, while City Hall is in the middle of an active, walkable downtown; Whereas, City Hall has a dais, computers on the dais, work tables for staff and comfortable, permanent chairs for the public …
