Board of Adjustment Homepage

RSS feed for this page

Nov. 29, 2021

A1 03 BOA Resolution Future Location of Meetings November 8, 2021.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT RECOMMENDATION 20211108-F-4 Date: 11/08/2021 Subject: Resolution for Board of Adjustment hearings/meetings to continue at Austin City Hall Motioned By: Board Member Thomas Ates Seconded By: Vice-Chair Melissa Hawthorne Recommendation On 11/8/2021 the Board of Adjustment unanimously approved a resolution for board meetings to continue to be held at City Hall. Description of Recommendation to Council Please see accompanying Resolution Rationale: In the interest of transparency, equity, and accessibility for all Austinites to the Board of Adjustment, the Board is in unanimous agreement that future hearings and meetings should continue to be held at Austin City Hall. Vote For: 11 Against: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Attest: Chair Jessica Cohen 1 of 1 City Council & City Manager, Adjustment; and WHEREAS, since the opening of City Hall it has hosted the meetings of the Board of WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment is a quasi-judicial sovereign board only appealable to state district court rather than city council that has an impact on the development and growth of the City of Austin; and WHEREAS, sovereign boards are held to a higher standard than advisory boards and WHEREAS, land use board and commission public hearings take place outside normal commissions; and business hours; and WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment is not a city department or service; and WHEREAS, City management has decided to move the meetings of the Board of Adjustment, the Planning Commission, and the Zoning and Platting Commission to the City of Austin Permitting and Development Center (PDC) at Highland Mall without informing the Board or the public; and WHEREAS, moving the Board of Adjustment public hearings to the PDC places an undue burden on the public, the staff and the board members; and WHEREAS, public hearings for variances, special exceptions, and administrative appeals by the Board of Adjustment should be in the same location as city council and other land use commissions to avoid confusing the public; and WHEREAS, PDC signage is lacking, with only small signs on the glass doors facing Wilhelmina Delco Drive, the PDC’s official address, making it easy for participants to miss, yet the public entrance is on Thomas Hatfield Way; and WHEREAS, seven high-frequency bus routes serve City Hall including two MetroRapids, yet only two high-frequency bus routes – the 7 and the 337 – and the Red Line serve the PDC, and the bus stops are closer to City Hall than they …

Scraped at: Nov. 25, 2021, 5:20 a.m.
Nov. 29, 2021

A1 04 A&F Recommendation - DRAFT - ZAP Proposed Bylaws Revision.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 BYLAWS OF THE Zoning and Platting Commission ARTICLE 1. NAME. The name of the board is Zoning and Platting Commission ARTICLE 2. PURPOSE AND DUTIES. The purpose of the board is to perform duties relating to land use and development prescribed by Title 25 of the City Code, and other duties as may be assigned by the City Council. ARTICLE 3. MEMBERSHIP. (A) The board is composed of eleven members appointed by the city council. (B) A member serves at the pleasure of the city council. (C) Board members serve for a term of four years beginning March 1st on the year of appointment. (D) An individual board member may not act in an official capacity except through the action of the board. (E) A board member who is absent for three consecutive regular meetings or one-third of all regular meetings in a “rolling” twelve month timeframe automatically vacates the member’s position subject to the holdover provisions in Section 2-1-27 of the City Code. This does not apply to an absence due to illness or injury of the board member, an illness or injury of a board member’s immediate family member, active military service, or the birth or adoption of the board member’s child for 90 days after the event. The board member must notify the staff liaison of the reason for the absence not later than the date of the next regular meeting of the board. Failure to notify the liaison before the next regular meeting of the board will result in an unexcused absence. (F) At each meeting, each board member shall sign an attendance sheet which indicates that the member does not have a conflict of interest with any item on that agenda, or identifies each agenda item on which the member has a conflict of interest. Failure to sign the sheet results in the member being counted as absent and his/her votes are not counted. (G) A member who seeks to resign from the board shall submit a written resignation to the chair of the board, the staff liaison, or the city clerk’s office. If possible, the resignation should allow …

Scraped at: Nov. 25, 2021, 5:20 a.m.
Nov. 29, 2021

A1 05 A&F Recommendation - BOA Proposed Bylaws Revision.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

(D) The board shall meet monthly 5:30p.m. on the second Monday of each month at Austin City Hall. In November of each year, the board shall adopt a schedule of the meetings for the upcoming year, including makeup meeting dates for the holidays and cancelled meetings. (E) The chair may call a special meeting, and the chair shall call a special meeting if requested by three or more members. The call shall state the purpose of the meeting. A board may not call a meeting in addition to its regular scheduled meetings as identified in its adopted meeting schedule, more often than once a quarter, unless the meeting is required to comply with a statutory deadline or a deadline established by Council. I (F) Six members constitute a quorum,_however, in order to approve a zoning variance or special exception, or to reverse an administrative decision on appeal, the following rules apply: (i) The affirmative vote of three-fourths of all qualified voting members is required. If all positions have been appointed and no board member is disqualified from voting, the minimum number of votes required is 9 out of 11. (ii) For purposes of calculating a required super-majority, the total number of positions excludes any vacancies (i.e., seats for which no appointment has been made) and members who are legally disqualified from voting on a particular case. For example, if one position is vacant and another position is held by a member who is legally required to recuse herself on a particular matter, then the required super-majority for that case would be 7 votes (i.e., three-fourths of 9, rounded to the nearest whole number). (G) If a quorum for a meeting does not convene within one-half hour of the posted time for the meeting, then the meeting may not be held. (H) To be effective, a board action must be adopted by: (i) an affirmative vote of the number of members necessary to provide a quorum; or (ii) for zoning variances, special exceptions, and administrative appeals, a three-fourths supermajority as determined under Subsection (F) of this article. (I) The chair has the same voting privilege as any other member. (J) The board shall allow citizens to address the board on agenda items, except individual cases under Article 2(A)(l) through (3) and (B)(l) and (2).lf a citizen requests in writing that a matter within the scope of the board's responsibilities other than …

Scraped at: Nov. 25, 2021, 5:20 a.m.
Nov. 29, 2021

A1 06 A&F Recommendation - Planning Commission Bylaws Revision.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 BYLAWS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ARTICLE 1. NAME. The name of the board is Planning Commission. ARTICLE 2. PURPOSE AND DUTIES. The purpose of the board is to serve as the Land Use Commission, as required by Title 25 of the City Code, and to carry out the following duties assigned by City Charter Article X (Planning): (A) Review and make recommendations to the council regarding the adoption and implementation of a comprehensive plan or element or portion thereof prepared under authorization of the city council and under the direction of the city manager and responsible city planning staff. (B) After a comprehensive plan or element or portion thereof has been adopted: i. Review and make recommendations to the council on all amendments to the comprehensive plan or element or portion thereof. ii. Review and make recommendations to the council on all proposals to adopt or amend land development regulations for the purpose of establishing the relationship of such proposal to, and its consistency with, the adopted comprehensive plan or element or portion thereof. For purposes of this article and subsection, “land development regulations” includes zoning, subdivision, building and construction, regulating, or affecting the use or development of land. (C) Pursuant to ordinances adopted by the council, exercise control over platting and subdividing land within the corporate limits of city areas that are: (i) covered by or in the process of developing Neighborhood Plans; the former Robert Mueller Airport site; and (iii) a Transit Oriented Development district. See: City Code Sections 25-1-46(C)-(D) & 2-1-187(B). The board must insure the consistency of any such plats or subdivisions with the adopted comprehensive plan or element or portion thereof. (D) Submit annually to the city manager, not less than ninety (90) days prior to the beginning of the budget year, a list of recommended capital improvements, which in the opinion of the board are necessary or desirable to implement the adopted comprehensive plan or element or portion thereof during the forthcoming five-year period. (E) Monitor and oversee the effectiveness and status of the comprehensive plan and recommend annually to the council any changes in or amendments …

Scraped at: Nov. 25, 2021, 5:20 a.m.
Nov. 29, 2021

A1 07 Office of the City Clerk Denial of BOA, PC and ZAP 2022 Meeting Schedules.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Office of the City Clerk Denial of Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission and Zoning and Platting Commission adopted 2022 meeting schedules. From: Goodall, Jannette <Jannette.Goodall@austintexas.gov> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 2:25 PM To: Cohen, Jessica - BC <BC-Jessica.Cohen@austintexas.gov>; Rivera, Andrew <Andrew.Rivera@austintexas.gov> Cc: Rios, Myrna <Myrna.Rios@austintexas.gov>; Alexander, Jason <Jason.Alexander@austintexas.gov>; Hall, Stephanie <Stephanie.Hall@austintexas.gov>; Rodriguez, Joseph <JosephA.Rodriguez@austintexas.gov>; Ramirez, Elaine <Elaine.Ramirez@austintexas.gov>; Truelove, Rosie <Rosie.Truelove@austintexas.gov>; Cronk, Spencer <Spencer.Cronk@austintexas.gov>; Rusthoven, Jerry <Jerry.Rusthoven@austintexas.gov>; Lucas, Denise <Denise.Lucas@austintexas.gov>; Moore, Andrew <Andrew.Moore@austintexas.gov> Subject: FW: Board of Adjustment 2022 Meeting Schedule Chair Cohen, The Office of the City Clerk will book the January and February meeting dates at City Hall per the request. However, please refer to the attached memo which was distributed to the Chairs of all of the land use commissions regarding the meeting location changes scheduled for 2022. Based on this direction, the Clerk’s Office is unable to book any additional reservations at this time for BOA at City Hall. I would recommend reaching out the PDC to book the remaining 2022 meetings at the new Center. If you have questions about facility use decisions, please reach out to Jason Alexander in the City Manager’s Office. In addition, staff may want to confirm the resolution that was sent, the one provided to the Clerk’s Office was from the ZAP Commission. Jannette Goodall, MMC, TMRC, CRM City Clerk City of Austin PO Box 1088 Austin, Texas 78767 512-974-2211 From: Goodall, Jannette <Jannette.Goodall@austintexas.gov> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 9:59 AM To: Rivera, Andrew <Andrew.Rivera@austintexas.gov>; Shaw, Todd - BC <BC- Todd.Shaw@austintexas.gov> Cc: Rios, Myrna <Myrna.Rios@austintexas.gov>; Hall, Stephanie <Stephanie.Hall@austintexas.gov>; Rodriguez, Joseph <JosephA.Rodriguez@austintexas.gov>; Lucas, Denise <Denise.Lucas@austintexas.gov>; Truelove, Rosie <Rosie.Truelove@austintexas.gov>; Alexander, Jason <Jason.Alexander@austintexas.gov>; Hempel, Claire - BC <BC-Claire.Hempel@austintexas.gov>; Cronk, Spencer <Spencer.Cronk@austintexas.gov>; Rusthoven, Jerry <Jerry.Rusthoven@austintexas.gov>; Moore, Andrew <Andrew.Moore@austintexas.gov> Subject: RE: Planning Commission 2022 Meeting Schedule and Adopted Rules of Procedure The Office of the City Clerk will book the January and February meeting dates at City Hall per the request. However, please refer to the attached memo which was distributed to the Chairs of all of the land use commissions regarding the meeting location changes scheduled for 2022. Based on this direction, the Clerk’s Office is unable to book any additional reservations at this time for the Planning Commission at City Hall. I would recommend reaching out the PDC to book the remaining 2022 meetings at the new Center. If you have questions about facility use decisions, please reach out to Jason Alexander in the …

Scraped at: Nov. 25, 2021, 5:20 a.m.
Nov. 29, 2021

A1 08 Planning Commission 2022 Adopted Meeting Schedule Resolution.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN Resolution to Schedule Planning Commission Meetings at Austin City Hall WHEREAS, the Planning Commission is established by Charter. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission receives authority and direction from State Law, City Charter, City Code and Planning Commission Rules of Procedure. WHEREAS, the City Charter establishes the membership of the commission to include the City Manager, the Chair of the Board of Adjustment, the Director of Public Works and the President of the Board of Trustees of the Austin Independent School District all serving as ex officio members. WHEREAS, in a memorandum dated October 19, 2021, the City of Austin Department Directors of Development Services and Housing and Planning notified chairs of land use boards and commissions that board and commission meetings would be relocated to the Permitting and Development Center (PDC) in February 2022. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, upon hearing concerns from the public and the other sovereign commissions of the City staff’s decision to move meetings from City Hall, took action by affirmative vote as provided by City code. WHEREAS, Planning Commission concurs with the concerns of Zoning and Platting Commission and the Zoning Board of Adjustment as documented in their resolutions on this matter. WHEREAS, on November 9, 2021, Planning Commission unanimously adopted amended Rules of Procedure to include the meeting place of Austin City Hall for all its regular meetings. WHEREAS, per City Code, adoption of the Planning Commission’s meeting schedule rests solely with the Planning Commission. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously approved its 2022 schedule identifying Austin City Hall as its meeting location, which was subsequently posted to the public on-line. WHEREAS, in accordance with City Code, on November 10, 2021, the approved 2022 meeting schedule was provided to the Office of the City Clerk. WHEREAS, on November 10, 2021, the Planning Commission Chair received an email from the City Clerk in response to the Planning Commission’s approved 2022 schedule that they would only book Planning Commission meetings at Austin City Hall through February 2022 and declining to book meetings for the remainder of 2022. WHEREAS, City code does not provide the Office of the City Clerk the right to deny the Planning Commission’s schedule submittal. WHEREAS, on November 9, 2021, the Planning Commission unanimously approved a recommendation to Council to change Planning Commission Bylaws to include Austin City Hall as the Planning Commission’s meeting location. WHEREAS, the change …

Scraped at: Nov. 25, 2021, 5:20 a.m.
Nov. 29, 2021

1 CapMetro_home_to PDC original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: Nov. 30, 2021, 1:20 a.m.
Nov. 29, 2021

2_CapMetro_PDC_to home_a original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: Nov. 30, 2021, 1:20 a.m.
Nov. 29, 2021

3_CapMetro_PDC_to home_b original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: Nov. 30, 2021, 1:20 a.m.
Nov. 29, 2021

A1 00 Office of the CC Commission Reservation of Austin CityHall original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Hall, Stephanie Boards and Commissions Rodriguez, Joseph 2022 Regular Meeting Schedule Wednesday, October 6, 2021 6:03:17 PM Reservation Form.docx Dear Liaisons, That time of year has come upon us once again - it’s time to approve annual schedules! Although there is still some uncertainty in how meetings will look next year, each board or commission should approve their regular meeting schedule as they “normally” would. Please make sure your board or commission approves their 2022 regular meeting schedule in October or early November. Once approved, please send the approved schedule over to me (and Cc: Joseph) to review. We must receive the approved schedule by November 30th to maintain the Board’s place in the scheduling queue. The schedules should be approved as if meetings will be occurring in person. Adjustments will be made should anything change. Is your Board or Commission wanting to change the regular date/time of their meetings? Keep in mind any potential changes may cause rippling scheduling conflicts. Most boards and commissions have established dates and times to maintain a decent rotation and room availability. We will likely not be able to accommodate any changes in the schedule for City Hall rooms. Additionally, we are currently ONLY able to utilize Chambers or the Boards and Commissions Room for meetings at City Hall due to occupancy limits in place to accommodate social distancing. There is no telling when or how that will change, so I’m including a list of alternate contacts for other meeting locations below. Does your Board/Commission normally meet in City Hall? In addition to the approved schedule, complete and send the attached room request form. Typically reservation requests for City Hall should be sent to the reservation desk, but please send the annual requests to Joseph or I so they can be reviewed first. Other things to keep in mind: Please have the schedule discussion and approval on your B/C agenda as soon as possible. Schedules must be APPROVED by the Board or Commission to be added to the scheduling queue. Do not send us any draft calendars. We will not begin booking rooms until Council and Council Committees have approved their schedules and booked the necessary rooms. City Hall is at capacity – priority is given to meetings that have historically met in a specific room during a specific date/time. However your approved schedules must be submitted on …

Scraped at: Nov. 30, 2021, 1:20 a.m.
Nov. 29, 2021

A1 Ana Aguirre-public comment original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Dear Commissioners, I am reaching out to you regarding Item A.1, which is the City Staff’s proposal to move future Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission and Zoning and Platting Commission Meetings to a new location in far North Austin. In regards to this item, please know that I am not speaking on the behalf of the Southeast Combined Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, but this item is on our next meeting's agenda, which is scheduled for December 13, 2021. It is listed on the SCNPCT Agenda as a "Discussion and Possible Action" item. The SCNPCT membership was alerted on this issue during our last meeting, but it was too late for us to formally consider and respond (vote) to any concerns we may have. I must say that we were extremely surprised to know this was even being considered. Our Contact Team represents residents from the City of Austin and Del Valle. As a D2 resident, I would fully support any efforts to ensure the Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission and Zoning and Platting Commission meetings stay centrally located at City Hall. Moving the meetings would add an undue burden to the residents in far SE Austin and Travis County. As you are aware, our population is very diverse and mostly representative of low-income and people of color, plus there would be challenges in having access to public transportation in order to make meetings on time or even return home safely, if there is any public transportation available when the meetings run extremely late. I do not think the Equity Office was consulted on the impact this move would have for vulnerable populations? The City Hall location is central and the logically best location for all residents when it comes to equal access for all residents. Additionally, because City Hall is centrally located, the surrounding residents and businesses would be best equally served, including equally disadvantaged. If the meetings are moved far North, those living and/or working in South Austin, particularly SE Austin, will be at a much greater disadvantage to publicly engage in BOA, PC and ZAP hearings. This could have an adverse impact on our community when equal access to community engagement is not afforded to the residents of the City of Austin and Travis County. With all the growth in our area, specifically in Southeast Austin, it will make it harder if not impossible for our community to …

Scraped at: Nov. 30, 2021, 1:20 a.m.
Nov. 29, 2021

Zucker report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Zucker Report Full Report www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Development_Services/ZuckerFinalReport/ZuckerFinalRep ort.pdf XVI. Boards and Commissions http://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Development_Services/ZuckerFinalReport/Zuck erFinalReport_16_BoardsCommissions.pdf

Scraped at: Nov. 30, 2021, 1:20 a.m.
Nov. 8, 2021

A-1 BOA MINUTES OCT 11, 2021-DRAFT original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 8 pages

AGENDA MEETING MINUTES October 11, 2021 The Board of Adjustment meeting convened on Monday, October 11, 2021. Some members of the Board of Adjustment may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Jessica Cohen (Chair) called the Board Meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Board Members in Attendance (in person): Jessica Cohen (Chair), Barbara Mcarthur, Darryl Pruett, Richard Smith, Nicholl Wade, Kelly Blume (Alternate) Board Members in Attendance (virtually via teleconference): N/A Board Members Absent: Thomas Ates, Brooke Bailey, Rahm McDaniel, Melissa Hawthorne (Vice Chair), Agustina Rodriguez, Michael Von Ohlen, Carrie Waller (Alternate) City Staff in Attendance: Elaine Ramirez (Board Liaison), Erika Lopez (Board Attorney) City Staff -: Diana Ramirez (Board Secretary) EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) The Board of Adjustment will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on this agenda. The Board of Adjustment may also announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, to receive advice from Legal Counsel regarding any other item on this agenda. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071 CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (4) four speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda.NONE A. DISCUSSION AND REQUESTED ACTION ITEM Staff requests approval September 13, 2021 draft minutes A-1 On-Line Link: Item A-1 A-1/1 Board Member Richard Smith motions to approve the minutes for September 13, 2021, Board member Barbara Mcarthur seconds on a 6-0 vote; APPROVED MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 13, 2021. B. DISCUSSION AND REQUESTED ACTION ITEM B-1 Staff and Applicant requests for postponement and withdraw of items posted on this Agenda Requesting postponements by applicant for Items C-1, F-1 and D-1 Board member Darryl Pruett motions to postpone Items C-1, F-1 to November 8, 2021 and D-1 to April 11, 2022, Board member Richard Smith seconds on a 6-0 vote; APPROVED POSTPONED ITEMS C-1, F-1 TO NOVEMBER 8, 2021 AND D-1 TO APRIL 11, 2022 AS REQESTED BY APPLCIANTS. Due to not enough Board Members present at the meeting Items E-1, E-2, E-3, E-4, F-2 and F-3 will be postponed to November 8, 2021. Madam Chair Jessica Cohen motions to Postpone Items E-1, E-2, E-3, E-4, F-2, and F-3 to November …

Scraped at: Nov. 1, 2021, 4:50 p.m.
Nov. 8, 2021

C-1 C16-2021-0011 ADV PACKET original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 10 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet C-1 DATE: October 11, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0011 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Renee Bornn OWNER: Villas Rio, LP ADDRESS: 2111 RIO GRANDE ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 1 sign(s) on the property: (F) to allow one (1) wall signs above the second floor (maximum allowed) to the a) eight floor (requested) (H) to allow for the one (1) sign(s) to all be illuminated in order to provide signage b) for the Villas on Rio Grande in a “GO-MU, LO-NP, MF-4-NP”, General Office-Mixed Use, Limited Office, Multi-Family– Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs (F) No signs may be placed above the second floor of a building, except for a non-electric sign that is engraved, cut into the building surface, or otherwise inlaid to become part of the building. (H) A sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. C-1/1 BOARD’S DECISION: Oct 11, 2021 BOA MEETING POSTPONED TO NOVEMBER 8, 2021 BY BOARD MEMBERS (AS REQUESTED BY APPLICANT) FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: OR, 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties, because: OR, 3. The granting of this variance will not substantially conflict with the stated purposes of this sign ordinance, because: AND, 4. Granting a variance would not provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated, because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Madam Chair ____________________________ forC-1/2 October 5, 2021 Renee Bornn, Building Image Group 2111 Rio Grande St Bldg Flr8 Austin TX, 78705 Property Description: LT 1-3 OLT 23-1/2 DIV D HORSTS LOUIS SUBD Re: C16-2021-0011 Dear Renee, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) …

Scraped at: Nov. 1, 2021, 4:50 p.m.
Nov. 8, 2021

D-1 C15-2021-0100 ADV PACKET PART1 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 30 pages

D-1/1 October 26, 2021 Ian Ellis 1003 Kinney Ave Austin TX, 78704 Re: C15-2021-0100 Dear Ian, Property Description: S 1/2 OF LOT 1-2 BLK 1 BARTON SPRINGS PARK Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from § 25-2-943 - SUBSTANDARD LOT (B) (2) to allow for the development of a single-family home on a 5,464 square-foot lot. Austin Energy does not oppose the request, provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Cody Shook, Planner II Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6881 D-1/2 N O T R A B D R O FF O P S LIN S C O M B JU LIET Y E N KIN TR E A D W ELL K E R R JULIET L E H T E SIE S JE E HIN P E S O J R A M A L LA M A R S Q U A R E GIB S O N H T 8 D E X T E R M A R G A R ET R E N R A G D Y W E R D R O F X O A S H B Y ! ! ± SUBJECT TRACT PENDING CASE ! ! ! ! ZONING BOUNDARY NOTIFICATIONS CASE#: LOCATION: C15-2021-0100 1003 KINNEY AVENUE This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. 1 " = 292 ' This product has been produced by CTM for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. D-1/3 D-1/4 D-1/5 D-1/6 D-1/7 D-1/8 D-1/9 D-1/10 D-1/11 D-1/12 D-1/13 D-1/14 D-1/15 D-1/16 D-1/17 D-1/18 D-1/19 D-1/20 D-1/21 …

Scraped at: Nov. 1, 2021, 4:50 p.m.
Nov. 8, 2021

D-1 C15-2021-0100 ADV PACKET PART2 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

D-1/31 D-1/32 D-1/33 D-1/34 D-1/35 D-1/36

Scraped at: Nov. 1, 2021, 4:53 p.m.
Nov. 8, 2021

D-1 C15-2021-0100 PRESENTATION original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 25 pages

PRESENTING TO BOA: PROJECT DEVELOPER TEAM- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID PRINCIPAL ARCHICTECT- SARAH JOHNSON, AIA, RID KINNEY AVE BOA Variance Package Case Number 2021-000085 BA October 21, 2021 D-1/1-PRESENTATION VARIANCE REQUEST D-1/2-PRESENTATION SECTION B.2. A MINIMUM LOT SIZE 5,750 SQ FT - EXISTING 5,464 SF VARIANCE REQUESTED 2 STORY RESIDENCE PROPOSED FFE = 533.16' 2 STORY A.A.G = 531.72' RESIDENCE DS R E T N A L P L E E T S 5' - 5 1/2" 1' - 0" 5' - 0" 1' - 0" 7' x 3' 6" PAVERS WITH 2" SPACING SETBACKS & HEIGHT* *** TOTALS AND PERCENTAGES LISTED APPLY TO OUR EXISTING SUBSTANDARD LOT AREA MAXIMUM HEIGHT MINIMUM SETBACKS FRONT YARD INTERIOR SIDE YARD REAR YARD 35’ 25’ 5’ 10’ ZONING SUBSTANDARD LOT- § 25-2-943 B.2 SECTION B.2. B MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 50 FT - EXISTING 61’-7” COMPLIANT RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS - SF-3-NP SIDE - 15’ ABOVE GRADE AT 45º REAR - 15’ ABOVE GRADE AT 45º SETBACK PLANES COMPLIANT COMPLIANT SIDE WALL ARTICULATION MAX 36’ LENGTH COMPLIANT BUILDABLE AREA 5,464 SF IMPERVIOUS COVER - 45% FAR (ZONING 25-2 § 2.1) 2,297 SF (> 2300 SF) ** CALCULATION BASED ON GREATER OF .4:1 OR 2,300 SF TOTAL LOT AREA 1ST FLOOR CONDITIONED 1,014 SF 2ND FLOOR CONDITIONED 1,262 SF GARAGE 221 SF ( EXEMPT -200 SF) PORCH 105 SF ( EXEMPT) 2,394 SF (43.8%) COMPLIANT COMPLIANT TOTAL 2,297 SF COMPLIANT M P 1 0 : 7 5 : 2 1 1 2 0 2 / 0 1 / 9 : d e t n i r P CRZ 1/2 CRZ 1/4 CRZ COA REQUIRED PARKING X X X X X X DS X ' 8 6 . 7 8 E " 8 4 8 2 ° 8 5 S ' X I E N L Y T R E P O R P X K C A B T E S D R A Y R O R E T N I I ' 5 E O DS E E O X X X CL X E O SETBACK 5’ 5' - 0" 7' - 2 1/2" E O E O PROPOSED NEW AC PAD PROPOSED NEW POOL PAD NEW FRENCH DRAIN PROPOSED WOOD FENCE LINE OF UNDERGROUND PIPED DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION TO DAYLIGHT PROPOSED NEW ELECTRIC METER PROPOSED NEW BUILDING FOOTPRINT EXISTING WOOD FENCE TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED WOOD FENCE E O 531.90 E …

Scraped at: Nov. 1, 2021, 4:53 p.m.
Nov. 8, 2021

E-1 C15-2021-0056 ADV PACKET PART1 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 42 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet F-1 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0056 DATE: Monday October 11, 2021 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Andrea Hamilton OWNER: Chase & Andrea Hamilton ADDRESS: 3006 GLENVIEW AVE VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-515 (Rear Yard of a Through Lot) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum rear yard setback from 25 feet (required) to 5 feet (requested) in order to erect a detached garage/office in an “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family Residence-Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (Windsor Road Neighborhood Plan) Note: Per LDC for a Through Lot, a rear yard must comply with the minimum requirements applicable to a front yard. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA JULY 12, 2021 POSTPONED TO AUG 9, 2021 AE DENIAL; Aug 9, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to Postpone to October 11, 2021; Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 9-1 vote (Board Member Brooke Bailey nay); POSTPONED TO October 11, 2021; Oct 11, 2021-POSTPONED TO NOVEMBER 8, 2021 BY BOARD MEMBERS (Due to not enough Board Members present at the meeting) E-1/1 FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Madam Chair forE-1/2 BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET RE-NOTIFICATION CASE: C15-2021-0056 BOA DATE: November 8th, 2021 ADDRESS: 3006 Glenview Ave OWNER: Chase & Andrea Hamilton COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 AGENT: N/A ZONING: SF-3-NP (Windsor Road NP) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N 55 FT OF LOT 3 BLK 7 BRYKERWOODS B VARIANCE REQUEST: a) decrease the minimum rear yard setback from 25 feet to 5 feet & b) decrease minimum distance from principal structure from 10 feet to 5 feet. SUMMARY: erect a detached garage/office ISSUES: lot has …

Scraped at: Nov. 1, 2021, 4:55 p.m.
Nov. 8, 2021

E-1 C15-2021-0056 ADV PACKET PART2 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 22 pages

E-1/43 E-1/44 E-1/45 E-1/46 E-1/47 E-1/48 E-1/49 E-1/50 E-1/51 E-1/52 E-1/53 E-1/54 E-1/55 E-1/56 Ramirez, Elaine From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Importance: High Friday, July 09, 2021 5:40 PM Ramirez, Elaine; Ramirez, Diana C15-2021-0056 3006 Glenview Avenue Agenda Item D-2 3006 Glenview 7-12-21 BOA case.pdf *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Good afternoon Elaine and Diana, Please be sure that the Board of Adjustment members get the following position statement and attachment before the Monday, July 12, 2021 hearing. By the way, the Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association did not receive notification of this variance hearing from the City, rather we received it second hand from another neighborhood association. Thank you, Joyce Basciano Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association Dear Chair Cohen and Members of the Board of Adjustment, Re: C15‐2021‐0056 3006 Glenview Avenue Agenda Item D‐2 The Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association (BWNA) Board of Directors considered this variance request. In the case of through lots we are guided by the precedent set by the Board of Adjustment on Monday, September 8, 2014 in Case Number C15‐2014‐0115 (see attachment). That case involved another through lot on Glenview Avenue that backed up to Jefferson St. (3200 Glenview, cited in the backup for 3006 Glenview). The 2014 BOA Decision granted a variance decreasing the 25 ft setback to 10 ft from the property line, not 5 ft. A 10 ft rear lot setback is still reasonable for through lots on Glenview Avenue and is in keeping with the historic character of Jefferson St. Accordingly, we support a decrease of the 25 ft setback to 10 ft but oppose a decrease of the setback to 5 ft. Thank you for your service to the community, Joyce Basciano, for the Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 E-1/57 E-1/58 E-1/59 From: To: Subject: Date: Kathryn Timmerman Ramirez, Elaine C15-2021-0056 Thursday, July 29, 2021 3:31:40 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** C15-2021-0056 Elaine, I live at 2908 Glenview Avenue, Austin, Texas 78703 and I writing you in support of the variance from the Land Development Code requested by Andrea Hamilton. Thank you, Kathryn Timmerman 512-825-8375 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an …

Scraped at: Nov. 1, 2021, 4:56 p.m.
Nov. 8, 2021

E-1 C15-2021-0056 PRESENTATION original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 11 pages

Additional Variance Request: LDC 25-2 Subchapter F 3.3.2.A.1 allowing for a 450sf FAR exemption less than 10 feet from primary residence 3006 Glenview Avenue Variance Request (LDC 25-2-515 Re: Rear Yard of a Through Lot) E-1/1-PRESENTATION History & Background Details The current home was constructed in 2015 with surface parking in the rear. The subject property is located on Glenview Avenue in Brykerwoods. This street is unusual, in that homes on the east side of the street have curb cuts and driveway access from the front of the homes, while all homes on the west side of the street do not. Homes have historically treated Jefferson Avenue as an alley and all off-street parking for these homes on the west side of Glenview access their parking via rear entry. E-1/2-PRESENTATION A side-by-side comparison of the previous and current survey shows that a non-complaint garage structure was removed in order to make room for two off-street parking spaces as required by city code. E-1/3-PRESENTATION Following the July BOA meeting, adjustments were made to the proposed garage structure which would require partial demolition of the existing parking pad. The result places the garage 5’ farther from Jefferson Ave. E-1/4-PRESENTATION E-1/5-PRESENTATION In response to the changes made to the site plan, the Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association has withdrawn it’s opposition to the variance request. E-1/6-PRESENTATION Aerial views by Google Maps show driveways along Jefferson Avenue with varying distances from the ROW. Some have been updated and some have not (photos to follow). Most range from 19’ to 23’ from the asphalt. *Plot plan revisions for 3006 Glenview Avenue place the proposed garage at 21’8” from asphalt at Jefferson Ave, consistent with others along the corridor. E-1/7-PRESENTATION E-1/8-PRESENTATION E-1/9-PRESENTATION A variance was granted for a neighbor’s property at 3200 Glenview Avenue in 2014 and a garage and studio apartment were built. E-1/10-PRESENTATION Revised Proposed Garage and Home Office E-1/11-PRESENTATION

Scraped at: Nov. 1, 2021, 4:57 p.m.