Long-Range Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Planning FYs 21-23 Planning Commission 6/22/21 ACTION NEEDED ON JUNE 22 M e e t a n n u a l c h a r te r re q u i re m e n t f o r P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n to a p p ro v e F Ys 2 1 - 2 3 L o n g - R a n g e C a p i t a l I m p ro v e m e n t P ro g r a m P l a n n i n g ( L RC P ) M e m o of Re c o m m e n d a t i o n s f o r t r a n s m i s s i o n to C i t y M a n a g e r b y J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 2 1 . Comprehensive Plan Joint Committee (CPJC) to complete and approve memo for June 22 Planning Commission (PC) meeting LONG-RANGE CIP PLANNING PURPOSE • Imagine Austin + Strategic Direction 2023 • Aligning CIP with Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan Joint Committee (CPJC) to complete and approve memo for June 22 Planning Commission (PC) meeting DATA RESOURCES • Comprehensive Infrastructure Assessment, CIA Comprehensive Plan Joint Committee (CPJC) to complete and approve memo for June 22 • Rolling Needs Assessment, RNA Planning Commission (PC) meeting • Strategic Investment Analysis, SIA NEW THIS FYs 21-23 LRCP CYCLE • Long-Range CIP website: • https://imagineaustin.wixsite.com/lrcp Interactive maps and tables to offer accessibility and functionality with the data • Strengthening CIP alignment with Imagine Austin and Strategic Direction 2023 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS • On June 11 Comprehensive Plan Joint Committee (CPJC) final drafted and voted to approve the FYs 21-23 LRCP Memo of Recommendations • Key themes emerged in the recommendations: • Resiliency • Equity • Asset management and risk-based approach to infrastructure/CIP QUESTIONS & ANSWERS Staff is available to answer questions: Housing and Planning Department: • Matt Dugan, Division Manager • Dee Dee Quinnelly, Principal Planner • Lacy Patterson, Senior Planner Comprehensive Plan Joint Committee (CPJC) to complete and approve memo for June 22 Planning Commission (PC) meeting Budget Office: • Tina Van Wie, Corporate Budget …
Versión en español a continuación. Regular Meeting of the Hispanic/Latino Quality of Life Commission Tuesday, June 22, 2021 5:30pm Hispanic/Latino Quality of Life Commission to be held June 22 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (June 21 by Noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the June 22 Hispanic/Latino Quality of Life Commission Meeting, residents must: •Call or email the board liaison at Amanda.Jasso@austintexas.gov or 512-974-9107 no later than noon, (the day before the meeting). The information required is the speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). • Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. •Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. •Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. •Handouts or other information may be emailed to Amanda.Jasso@austintexas.gov by Noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. Reunión del Hispanic/Latino Quality of Life Commission FECHA de la reunion (martes, 22 de junio, 2021 5:30pm) La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (21 de junio antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los residentes deben: • Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en Amanda Jasso, 512-974-9107, Amanda.Jasso@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). La información requerida es el Font Size: 12; Font: Times New Roman; Font Style: Regular nombre del orador, los números de artículo sobre los que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutrales, dirección de correo electrónico (opcional) y un número de teléfono (debe ser el número que se utilizará para …
M E M O R A N D U M TO: Dawn Lewis, Chairperson of the Parks and Recreation Board FROM: DATE: Kimberly A. McNeeley, M.Ed., CPRP, Director Director, Austin Parks and Recreation Department June 18, 2021 SUBJECT: Endorsement of the Renaming of Payton Gin Pocket Park This memorandum serves as my endorsement for renaming Payton Gin Pocket Park to Heron Hollow Pocket Park. Process At the Austin Parks and Recreation Board (Board) meeting on May 25, 2021, the Board directed the Parks and Recreation Department (Department) to initiate additional community engagement, as outlined in current municipal code, to supplement the initial naming process that took place in the early 2000s. This memorandum is the submission of the completed endorsement to the chair of the Parks and Recreation Board according to subsection 14-1-39(F). Background On June 29, 2000, the Austin City Council passed an ordinance adopting the North Austin Civic Association (NACA) Neighborhood Plan. Amongst other actions, this Neighborhood Plan called for the creation of a pocket park at the Old Fiskville site located at Lamar Boulevard and Payton Gin Road. The Plan also called for assistance to recognize the site as a local historical site. In the early 2000s, NACA conducted a contest and community engagement process to name the park. “Heron Hollow Park” was the name that was selected; however, the renaming was never memorialized by the Department and there is no archive of this process. As a result, the Department refers to this site as the Payton Gin Pocket Park because of its geographical location. Following the reaffirmation of NACA’s commitment to the name, NACA requested that the Department officially rename the park to “Heron Hollow Pocket Park.” In addition to the history of public engagement, testimony, and recorded meetings that are considered to be evidence supporting the name Heron Hollow, the Department initiated an engagement process to ensure that we are receiving current feedback from the community. Community Engagement The renaming ordinance requires the Department to “take reasonable steps to inform persons who are likely to have an interest . . . consider[ing] the nature and location of the facility and whether a particular community is likely to be especially interested in the process.” To achieve this goal, the Department focused on the geographic area of the pocket park as well as connecting to park visitors. The Department reached out to people connected to the NACA …
Comm. Chapter/ Page # Topic Proposed Amendment Justification References (if needed) Notes PC Vote Staff Response Proposed Text Change (Underline added text/Strikethrough deleted text) Text Change Included in Amendment (YES/NO) Image included The creation of a subdistrict on the Eastern end (subdistrict 4) aligns with the URB approval The creation of the subdistrict is necessary to reflect our other recommendations Proposed Amend- ment Tracking # Sub- Chapter 1 Working Group Agenda Item B-13 Backup 6 of 19 Changes to the 11th St. NCCD Subdistrict 2 Working Group Agenda Item B-13 Backup 10 of 19 11th St. NCCD Height No Recommendation for subdistrict 1,2 and 3, aligns with staff recommendation and recommendation for subdistrict 4 aligns with URB recommendation No No No No No No Yes Allows for existing planning processes to proceed while aligning with existing entitlements and responding to neighborhood concerns Responding to neighborhood concerns. Cocktail lounge is an accessory use in hotel-motel and allowing it as a conditional use would allow better planning around the accessory use Responding to neighborhood concerns and aligning with existing neighborhood character Responding to neighborhood concerns and aligning with existing neighborhood character Responding to neighborhood concerns. Cocktail lounge is an accessory use in hotel-motel and allowing it as a conditional use would allow better planning around the accessory use Responding to neighborhood concerns Responding to neighborhood concerns Intention: No nonconforming structure should be created in subdistrict 4 Intention: No nonconforming structure should be created in subdistrict 4 Intention: No nonconforming use should be created Intention: No nonconforming structure should be created in all subdistricts Intention: No nonconforming use should be created Intention: No nonconforming use should be created 12th St NCCD Standards Changes pdf on page: https://www.sp eakupaustin.org /urb-nccd The map is only for reference and no amendment has been made to it. Intention: No nonconforming use should be created 3 Working Group Agenda Item B-13 Backup 13 of 19 11th St. NCCD FAR Subdistrict 1 - 3:1, Subdistrict 2 - 2:1, Subdistrict 3, 3.75:1, Subdistrict, 4 - match with current base zoning today, except where it creates a nonconforming structure 4 Working Group Agenda Item B-13 Backup 14 of 19 11th St. NCCD Use Standards Hotel-Motel should be a conditional use in subdistrict 1, except where it creates a nonconforming use 5 Working Group Agenda Item B-14 12th St. NCCD Height Not in backup docume nt Subdistrict 1 - 60 feet, subdistrict …
Robert Mueller Municipal Airport Plan Implementation Advisory Commission Community Interest Announcement Mueller Control Tower District Community Meeting Tuesday, June 22, 2021 6:00PM Virtual Meeting To Register Please Visit: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_5gzv9gK8Tl6Ulm6H9wa2VA A quorum of Commission members may be present. No action will be taken, and no Commission business will occur. Matthew Schmidt 512-974-6415 Matt.Schmidt@austintexas.gov
Zilker Cafe Conditional Use Permit Community Meeting Question Report Report Generated: 6/17/2021 7:50:00 PM Webinar ID: 922 2541 4736 Actual Start Time: 6/17/2021 5:01:00 PM Actual Duration (minutes): 152 # Question: 159 Question Details # Question 1 Will we be able to see all participants? 2 I didn’t hear the answer to Patricia’s question. Will we be able to see all participants? Are we going to be able to see who is in attendance? And are we muted? 3 Asker Email (redacted) Answer(s) live answered Asker Name Patricia Bobeck Karen Blizzard Anonymous Attendee Yes, good question, are we all muted? 4 5 Will there be a time for comments (as opposed to questions)? Karen Blizzard Bill Oliver 6 Who is the selected vendor? Patricia Bobeck 7 Who will enforce the perimeter? Patricia Bobeck 8 Will the No Smoking rule be enforced? If so, by whom? 9 Who is going to monitor whether booze goes outside of this area …. regardless Patricia Bobeck W. Tucker of a “fence”. 10 What kind of glasses will be used to serve beer? glass or plastic? 11 What are the hours of operation for the cafe? Patricia Bobeck David King 12 Who is going to keep inebriated consumers from entering the pool area? Alma Kuttruff 1 Yes. We will have a questions and comments portion at the end of the presentation. Thank you for the question. The selected vendor is Springfed L.L.C, we will provide more information on the vendor later in the presentation. Thank you for the question, Patricia. This question will be addressed later in the presentation. live answered As Christina mentioned, APD will be enforcing this. If your question was not fully answered, you can bring it up during the Q&A portion. live answered live answered. Must be within park hours. Vendor can decide within those. live answered 13 will lifeguards be responsible for removing floks who are drunk from the pool? W. Tucker live answered Zilker Cafe Conditional Use Permit Community Meeting Patricia Bobeck Kelly Besecke live answered Karen Kreps live answered 16 I have never seen anyone enforce the No Smoking rule 14 15 Barton Springs and Zilker Park are already very popular destinations. They get quite crowded, and parking is at a premium. Why does PARD want the cafe to be an additional destination rather than a service to people who are there primarily to enjoy the natural resources? …
Revenue Summary for Concessionaire Under the current terms of the agreement, the concessionaire will pay (1) quarterly installments of $17,500 equal to the sum of $70,000 annually, and (2) an annual lump sum payment consisting of eight percent (8%) of the gross annual sales (minus sales tax and quarterly installments) . The concessionaire’s proposal expected alcohol to be 16% of revenue.
MEMORANDUM ************************************************************************ TO: Todd Shaw, Chair Planning Commission Members FROM: DATE: RE: Heather Chaffin, Senior Planner Maureen Meredith, Senior Planner Housing and Planning Department June 22, 2021 C14-2021-0061 NPA-2020-0002.01 Fair Market Rezoning / Fair Market District 3 Postponement Request by Staff ************************************************************************ Staff requests a postponement of the above-referenced rezoning and neighborhood plan amendment (NPA) cases from the June 22, 2021 Planning Commission hearing to the July 13, 2021 hearing date. There was an addressing error in the NPA public hearing notice and renotification is required.
MEMORANDUM ************************************************************************ TO: Todd Shaw, Chair Planning Commission Members FROM: DATE: RE: Heather Chaffin, Senior Planner Maureen Meredith, Senior Planner Housing and Planning Department June 22, 2021 C14-2021-0058 NPA-2020-0002.02 Centro East / 6th & Onion District 3 Postponement Request by Applicant ************************************************************************ The Applicant requests a postponement of the above-referenced rezoning and neighborhood plan amendment (NPA) cases from the June 22, 2021 Planning Commission hearing to the July 13, 2021 hearing date. Based on continued discussions between the Applicant and Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, the Applicant has decided to amend their application. The Applicant is modifying their request to ninety feet (90’) of height, rather than eighty-five feet (85’). This requires renotification for the July 13, 2021 agenda. Attachment: Applicant Letter ARMBRUST & BROWN, PLLC A T T O R N E Y S A N D C O U N S E L O R S 100 CONGRESS AVENUE, SUITE 1300 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701-2744 512-435-2300 FACSIMILE 512-435-2360 June 21, 2021 MICHAEL J. WHELLAN (512) 435-2320 mwhellan@abaustin.com Via email at Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov and Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov Heather Chaffin Maureen Meredith City of Austin Re: Subject: 1501 E. 6th St. - Plan Amendment Case: NPA-2020-0002.02; Zoning Case C-14-2021-0058 Dear Ms. Chaffin and Ms. Meredith: Because we have engaged in further discussions with the East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Planning Team, we would like to modify the Applicant’s request in the above- referenced Neighborhood Plan Amendment and the Zoning Case to reflect ninety feet (90’) of height, rather than eighty-five feet (85’). Independently, we have discussed entering into a private restrictive covenant with the neighborhood to restrict the height of the building to 85 feet as measured from the ground floor on E. 6th St. The combination of the site’s slope and the way in which the City measures height necessitate this safeguard to ensure the building’s proportions match those supported by the neighborhood. We understand that the case will be postponed until the July 13, 2021 Planning Commission meeting and that we will be invoiced for the new notification. Of course, I am happy to answer any questions. Very truly yours, Michael J. Whellan {W1065640.1}
Proposed Amend- ment Tracking # Sub- Chapter 1 Working Group Agenda Item B-13 Backup 6 of 19 Changes to the 11th St. NCCD Subdistrict 2 Working Group Agenda Item B-13 Backup 10 of 19 11th St. NCCD Height Comm. Chapter/ Page # Topic Proposed Amendment Justification References (if needed) Notes PC Vote Staff Response Proposed Text Change (Underline added text/Strikethrough deleted text) Text Change Included in Amendment (YES/NO) Image included The creation of a subdistrict on the Eastern end (subdistrict 4) aligns with the URB approval The creation of the subdistrict is necessary to reflect our other recommendations See staff recommendation to leave this subdistrict as part of Subdistricts 1 and 2. This recommendation will reduce and eliminate entitlements, create nonconforming uses, and effectively remove these properties from the NCCD. For example, 1310 Rosewood Avenue has the base zoning of SF-3 which does not allow commerical or multi-family uses; however, under the current NCCD regualtions and staff recommendations this site would be able to utilize the commercial and multi-family entitlements allowed in Subdistrict 1. Staff was made aware of the reduction in entitlements when engaging with property owners after the Urban Renewal Board made its recommendation. Intention: No nonconforming structure should be created in Subdistrict 4 Existing structures are one to two stories. While this change will probably not create nonconforming structures, it will reduce building height entitlements for properties in this subdistrict. No Recommendation for Subdistrict 1,2 and 3, aligns with staff recommendation and recommendation for Subdistrict 4 aligns with URB recommendation Allows for existing planning processes to proceed while aligning with existing entitlements and responding to neighborhood concerns Responding to neighborhood concerns. Cocktail lounge is an accessory use in hotel-motel and allowing it as a conditional use would allow better planning around the accessory use Responding to neighborhood concerns and aligning with existing neighborhood character Responding to neighborhood concerns. Cocktail lounge is an accessory use in hotel-motel and allowing it as a conditional use would allow better planning around the accessory use Responding to neighborhood concerns Responding to neighborhood concerns No No No No No No Yes 3 Working Group Agenda Item B-13 Backup 13 of 19 11th St. NCCD FAR Subdistrict 1 - 3:1, Subdistrict 2 - 2:1, Subdistrict - 3.75:1, Subdistrict 4 - match with current base zoning today, except where it creates a nonconforming structure 4 Working Group Agenda Item B-13 Backup 14 of 19 …
• Do the use allowances recommended by Staff for 11 St. NCCD apply along Rosewood as well or not? Can you please clarify the staff note in cell D4 in the DRAFT_PCWG_RecTable spreadsheet that you shared with us this? o Staff recommends that conditions related to use placement along 11th Street do not apply to Rosewood Avenue. This clarification is only needed if the staff recommendation for Subdistrict 1 to front along Rosewood is accepted. • Are condo/town home prohibited as a use in the staff recommendation for both 11th and 12th streets? Why are we looking to prohibit a use (SF) that is expressly called out in the original URP vision for the street? o Townhouse and Condominium use are allowed in both NCCDs with the condition that they will not front on 11th or 12th street. o The recommendation is to allow for single family use to continue where it exists through the “save & except” provision and on 12th street, where the base zoning is SF-3. • o Unsure which part of the original URP is being referenced. Please clarify. Is there a map that can show lot numbers in the area? We are specifically, trying to understand which lots are Lot 16 and 18. o Updated map attached!
Planning Commission Registered Speakers Citizen Communication Zenobia Joseph B1 / B2 Applicant - Richard Suttle Dennis McDaniel Will Marsh Richard Kooris Against Susan Benz B3 / B4 B5 / B6 Applicant - Bang Hunyh B7 Applicant - David Hartman Ben Browder Meredith Kizewski Scott Foster Santiago Araque B8 Applicant - Alice Glasco B9 Applicant - Amanda Swor Russ Tomer Allison Muth B10 Applicant - Amanda Swor Jen Weaver Caroline Bailey Marshall Geyer Dan Keshet Kate Kniejski Shelly Mitchell Marissa McKineey Jonathan Pearson Katie Stewart B-12 - B14 For Austin Berry Austin Pfeister Nailah Sankofa Against Zenobia Joseph Neutral Nate Jones Tracy Witte Patrick Houck B-16 Applicant - Kevin Burks
June 22, 2021 Citizen’s Communication Memorandum for Planning Commission THRU Staff Liaison Andrew Rivers <Andrew.Rivera@austintexas.gov> Subject: Title VI Northeast Austin Project Connect Disparate Impacts—Orange/Blue Lines Federal Register Deadline: 23Jun2021 1. Statutory Authority: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 “is a Federal statute and provides that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance” (FTA C 4702.1B, 2012, Ch. I-7). See Environmental Justice, Ch. I-6. Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s (“Capital Metro”) $7.1B Project Connect/rail is contingent on 45% Federal funding. June 3, 2018 Cap Remap discriminatory 52 route changes undergird Project Connect and helped kill Hinojosa’s Downtown tunnel bill (HB 3893). Blacks and Community First! Village wait 60 minutes for the bus as South/West/Central Austin whites enjoy 6 minutes. 2. Submit Formal Comment: Capital Metro used North Lamar Transit Center (“NLTC”) minority data to secure a $900K Equitable Transit-Oriented Development Grant, but north of US 183 Project Connect Orange Line rail is 24-30 years in *TxDOT’s right-of-way.1 ➢ Orange Line: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/05/24/2021-10865/preparation-of-an-environmental- impact-statement-for-the-capital-metro-orange-line-project-in-austin [*Texas Department of Transportation (“TxDOT”)] ➢ Blue Line: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/05/24/2021-10866/preparation-of-an-environmental- impact-statement-for-the-capital-metro-blue-line-project-in-austin#open-comment January 28, 2019 Capital Metro Chair/lawyer Wade Cooper admitted Disparate Impacts. February 25, 2019 Boardroom named Rosa Parks! “It is also undeniable that individuals may have seen, in particular areas, changes that did not help those individuals and maybe disadvantaged those individuals. . . . We hear the pain and challenge, particularly, with respect to the Eastside community.” August 7, 2020 FTA funding requires “implementing the least discriminatory alternative,” but Cooper maintains Black inequities. Title VI FHWA Transit Precedent Dayton Blacks v. Beavercreek, OH Denying Blacks equal access on federally-funded roadways run by TxDOT violates Title VI! Actors falsely conflate Ridership (white riders) with coverage (lifeline) Cap Remap maintains the racist status quo: Infrequent, Unreliable, Disconnected Northeast Buses! Northeast bus service Before 2018, 35-min Peak “New” Route 339 was a restored number from ServicePlan2020 Worsened: 60 min all day only for Blacks, but fooled the FTA! June 10, 2020 AI-2020-1273 (p. 48); August 7, 2020 (p. 52) August 7, 2020 Project Connect Resolution ID# AI-2020-1297 (p. 34) Bus to UPS stops at 9:10PM Blacks can’t work 2nd Shift TxDOT/FM 969: Craigwood (Blacks walk 1 mile to Frequent 18-MLK) Disparate Impact: June 3, 2018 Planner Roberto Gonzalez unilaterally took …
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Parks and Recreation Board Recommendation Number 20210622-B1: Parkland Naming of Heron Hollow Pocket Park WHEREAS, this recommendation is intended to correct a park name and to document some of the history of the community for future generations; WHEREAS, currently the name of the park located at 801 Payton Gin Road is inadvertently listed by the City of Austin as Payton Gin Pocket Park; WHEREAS, the City of Austin never officially named the park “Payton Gin Pocket Park”; WHEREAS, the city property was not dedicated parkland property until the North Austin Civic Association (NACA) adopted the area and made the improvements to the now parkland in the early 2000s; WHEREAS, the site was named Heron Hollow Park by a community vote held by the NACA Park Committee prior to becoming City of Austin parkland; WHEREAS, the first meetings of the NACA “Heron Hollow Improvement Committee” were held on May 10, 2001; May 31, 2001; June 13, 2001; and June 25, 2001; WHEREAS, NACA signed an October 11, 2002, cooperative agreement with the City of Austin Parks and Recreation Department (PARD) to make improvements to the city property at 8830 North Lamar Blvd, now identified as, 801 Payton Gin Road; WHEREAS, the NACA and PARD agreement was referred to in an 2003-2004 Neighborhood Parks Grant application and the site was referred to as Heron Hollow; WHEREAS, NACA has led the beautification and all improvements at the site which include, but not limited to; designating wildflower areas, planting two black walnut trees, two Texas redbud trees, two Mexican buckeye trees, creating a walking trail, and erecting a Chimney Swift Tower; WHEREAS, the park was named after the blue herons that visit the park; WHEREAS, other names under consideration were Fiskville Green, Little Walnut Bend, and Payton Gin Nature Area; WHEREAS, the site is recognized by the Texas Historical Commission as the site of Fiskville, a settlement founded in 1857 that existed until the City of Austin annexed the community in 1963;
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, June 22, 2021 The Resource Management Commission convened via videoconference on Tuesday, June 22, 2021 in accordance with social distancing protocols necessitated by the COVID 19 pandemic. Commissioners in Attendance: Jonathan Blackburn, Chair (District 8); Kaiba White, Vice Chair (District 2); Nakyshia Fralin (District 1), Shane Johnson (District 4); Kelly Davis (District 7), Dana Harmon (District 9); Rebecca Brenneman (District 10); Lisa Chavarria(Mayor) Vacancy (District 6) Commissioners Absent: Sam Angoori (District 3); Tom “Smitty” Smith (District 5) CALL TO ORDER – Chair Blackburn called the meeting to order at 1:24 p.m. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: Paul Robbins- not present (Item 3) Zenobia Joseph commented on equity barriers within the Capital Metro’s Project Connect. Consent Items: APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve minutes of the April 20, 2021 meeting. A motion to recommend was on Commissioner Harmon’s motion, Commissioner Chavarria’s second; passed on a 6-1 vote, with Commissioner White abstaining, Commissioners Angoori and Smith absent, Commissioner Davis off the dais, and one vacancy. 2. Approve minutes of the May 18, 2021 meeting. A motion to recommend and update item 7 was on Commissioner Brenneman’s motion, Commissioner Johnson’s second; passed on a 7-0 vote, with Commissioners Angoori and Smith absent, Commissioner Davis off the dais, and one vacancy. STAFF REPORTS AND BRIEFINGS 3. Equitable participation in programs RFP update. Liz Jambor, Data Analytics and Business Intelligence Manager of Austin Energy presented the Equitable Participation in Programs RFP Update. 4. Briefing regarding alternatives for EV ready, electric ready, and residential multifamily water heating. Kurt Stogdill, Green Building and Sustainability Manager of Austin Energy presented the Briefing Regarding Alternatives for EV Ready, Electric Ready, and Residential Multifamily Water Heating. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 5. Discuss potential future agenda items • Commercial Incentives and Shared Solar Program • Solar Meter Fees • Community Solar RFP • Energy Efficiency Transportation (Project Connect) Page 1 of 2 ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 2:40 p.m. Page 2 of 2
