C.9.u - 1505 Alameda Dr - public comment — original pdf
Backup
All documents
C.9.v - 1505 Alameda Dr - public comment — original pdf
Backup
C.9.w - 1505 Alameda Dr - public comment — original pdf
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Calli Alford Friday, February 25, 2022 11:22 AM PAZ Preservation Re: 1505 Alameda Proposed Demolition Hi Amber, Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. I oppose the demolition of the house located at 1505 Alameda due to its historical significance. Preserving older homes is an important way to protect the culture, feel and aesthetic of the neighborhood. There are plenty of other development opportunities in the Austin area. Thanks, Calli Alford On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 11:16 AM PAZ Preservation <Preservation@austintexas.gov> wrote: You can simply send me a statement via email. Hi Callie, Thanks, Amber Allen Planner II, Historic Preservation Office City of Austin – Housing & Planning Department T: 512.974.3393 E: Amber.Allen@austintexas.gov From: Calli Alford Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 11:01 AM 1 To: PAZ Preservation <Preservation@austintexas.gov> Subject: 1505 Alameda Proposed Demolition *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** How do I register my opposition to the demolition of the subject property? Good morning, Thanks, Calli Alford CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 2
G.3 - 2022 Landmark Inspection Results — original pdf
Historic Landmark Inspection Results 2022 Zoning Case Number C14H-1974-0043 C14H-1977-0008 C14H-1977-0009 C14H-1977-0011 C14H-1978-0010 C14H-1978-0045-B C14H-1978-0048 C14H-1982-0001-F C14H-1982-0018 C14H-1986-0015 C14H-1986-0041 C14H-1988-0005 C14H-1991-0002 C14H-2000-0009 C14H-2004-0008 C14H-2008-0019 C14H-2014-0010 C14H-1974-0001 C14H-1974-0002 C14H-1974-0003 C14H-1974-0004 C14H-1974-0006 C14H-1974-0008 C14H-1974-0009 C14H-1974-0014 C14H-1974-0015 C14H-1974-0016 C14H-1974-0017 C14H-1974-0017-A C14H-1974-0019 C14H-1974-0020 C14H-1974-0021 Building Name Driskill, Day & Ford Building Depot Hotel Horton Duval House Seaborn Sneed Home Joseph Nalle Building Risher - Roach Building Mansbendel - Williams House Jacob Larmour Block (F) Sauter - Alley House Grandberry Building Mccallum, Arthur N. And Jane Y., House Monroe Building Wooten Medical Offices Berner-Clark-Mercado House Mitchell-Robertson Building Blondie Pharr House Majors-Butler-Thomas House Howson House Walter Tips House Daniel Caswell House Millican House Michael Paggi House Oliphant House Red - Purcell House St. Charles House Elizabet Ney Museum O Henry Museum St. David'S Episcopal Church Castleman-Bull House Hirshfeld House And Cottage Smoot Family Home Taylor Lime Kiln Street Address 403 E 6th Street 504 E 5th Street 6706 Bluff Springs Road 1801 Nelms Drive 409 E 6th Street 511 E 6th Street 3824 Avenue F 916 Congress Avenue 4012 Avenue F 907 Congress Avenue 613 W 32nd Street 300 E 6th Street 109 E 10th Street 1807 E Cesar Chavez Street 909 Congress Avenue 801 Highland Avenue 1119 E 11th Street 700 San Antonio Street 2336 S Congress Avenue 1404 West Avenue 1610 West Avenue 211 S Lamar Boulevard 3900 Avenue C 210 Academy Drive 316 E 6th Street 304 E 44th Street 409 E 5th Street 300 E 7th Street 201 Red River Street 303 W 9th Street 1316 W 6th Street 2614 Pecos St Inspection Result Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Property ID 206040103 206040514 423060302 422060104 206040105 206040507 219060509 206030507 219060707 206031003 217020504 206031715 206031011 202070924 206031004 108030801 205070505 206010505 303000805 210000322 211010803 105020308 219050815 201010601 206031709 220061601 204040501 206031808 204041306 208011103 108031175 120060109 C14H-1974-0022 C14H-1974-0023 C14H-1974-0025 C14H-1974-0026 C14H-1974-0027 C14H-1974-0028 C14H-1974-0029 C14H-1974-0030 C14H-1974-0031 C14H-1974-0032 C14H-1974-0033 C14H-1974-0034 C14H-1974-0035 C14H-1974-0036 C14H-1974-0037 C14H-1974-0040 C14H-1974-0041 C14H-1974-0042 C14H-1974-0044 C14H-1974-0046 C14H-1975-0003 C14H-1975-0008 C14H-1975-0009 C14H-1975-0010 C14H-1975-0011 C14H-1975-0012 C14H-1975-0013 C14H-1975-0014 C14H-1975-0018 C14H-1976-0001 C14H-1976-0002 C14H-1976-0004 C14H-1976-0005 C14H-1976-0011 C14H-1976-0012 C14H-1976-0013 C14H-1976-0017 Goodman Building French Legation St. Edwards Main Building & Holly Cross Hall Trask House St. Mary'S Cathedral Moonlight Towers B.J. Smith House Robinson (Catherine) House Bremond (Pierre) House Bremond (Eugene) House Neill-Cochran House Bremond (Walter) …
Agenda — original pdf
PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD FINANCIAL COMMITTEE MONDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2022 – 12:00PM BRITTON, DURST, HOWARD AND SPENCE BUILDING 1183 CHESTNUT AVENUE, AUSTIN, TX 78702 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Sarah Faust (D-5), Chair Richard DePalma (Mayor) Patrick Moore (D-3) CALL TO ORDER Lisa Hugman (D-6) Kimberly Taylor (D-8) Dawn Lewis (D-10), Ex-Officio AGENDA PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approve the minutes of the Financial Committee special meeting of November 18, 2021. B. NEW BUSINESS: PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS 1. Presentation, discussion and possible action with regards to the Department Aquatics Division budget as it relates to staffing, wages, operational items, security expenses and other expenses. Presenter(s): Jodi Jay, Aquatics Division Manager, Parks and Recreation Department; Daniel Paciocco, Human Resources Manager, Parks and Recreation Department; Vanorda Richardson, Financial Manager III, Parks and Recreation Department 2. Presentation, discussion and possible action with regards to the Department Summer Camps and supplemental summer programming budget as it relates to staffing and operational items. Presenter(s): Christa McCarthy, Centralized Programs Division Manager; Vanorda Richardson, Financial Manager III, Parks and Recreation Department 3. Presentation, discussion and possible action with regards to FY23 PARD Under Page 1 of 2 Resourced Service Expectations. Presenter(s): Vanorda Richardson, Financial Manager III, Parks and Recreation Department 4. Discussion of proposed Parks and Recreation Board Financial Committee agenda topics for 2022. Presenter(s): Sarah Faust, Committee Chair C. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Tim Dombeck, with the Austin Parks and Recreation Department, at 512-974- 6716, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Parks and Recreation Board, please contact Tim Dombeck at Tim.Dombeck@austintexas.gov or by phone at 512-974- 6716. Page 2 of 2
B1 PARB Finance Committee Aquatics Budget — original pdf
Austin Parks and Recreation Department Financial Services Division PARB Finance Committee Presentation Aquatics Budget and Staffing February 28, 2022 Aquatics Background and Current State Current Operations • 5 Year-round Pools in Operational • 95 Current Ready To Work Lifeguards • 55 New Applicants • 19 signed up for classes in March • Ready To Work Lifeguards 2019 • February 15th 165 RTW • March 23rd 229 RTW June 2nd 545 RTW • July 25th 865 RTW • • Ready To Work Lifeguards 2020 • February 14th 189 RTW • March 6th 232 RTW • Classes Stopped for 1 year FY22 Expenditure Budget by Category $11.5 million Contractuals 28% $3.3M Personnel 65% $7.4M 35.5 FTEs $714k Commodities 6% Non-CIP Capital 1% ($78k) 2 Aquatics Staffing and Pay Structure TITLE 2021 Staffing and Pay Structure • Temporaries vs. Full Time Employees • Avenues for Temps to see increases in Pay Cashier/Pool Attendant I ISP Registors I Buildings and Ground (Temp) Lifeguard I Lifeguard II Lifeguard III Head Lifeguard Facility Manager Open Water Lifeguard Open Water Head Lifeguard Swim Coach I Swim Coach II Swim Coach III Lifeguard Instructor I Lifeguard Instructor II WSI I (Water Safety Instructor I) WSI II (Water Safety Instructor II) District Supervisor I (Includes ISP & Auditor) District Supervisor II (Includes ISP & Auditor) $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.25 $15.50 $15.75 $16.25 $16.50 $15.25 $16.50 $17.00 $16.50 $17.00 $16.50 $17.00 $17.50 $18.00 3 Aquatics Options for Enhancing Pay Structure Option A TITLE Cashier/Pool Attendant I Cashier/Pool Attendant II ISP Registors I ISP Registors II Buildings and Ground (Temp) Lifeguard I Lifeguard II Lifeguard III Head Lifeguard Facility Manager Open Water Lifeguard Open Water Head Lifeguard Swim Coach I Swim Coach II Swim Coach III Lifeguard Instructor I Lifeguard Instructor II WSI I (Water Safety Instructor I) WSI II (Water Safety Instructor II) District Supervisor I (Includes ISP & Auditor) District Supervisor II (Includes ISP & Auditor) 2021 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.25 $15.50 $15.75 $16.25 $16.50 $15.25 $16.50 $17.00 $16.50 $17.00 $16.50 $17.00 $17.50 $18.00 Proposed $15.00 $15.50 $16.00 $16.50 $16.00 $15.00 $15.50 $16.25 $16.50 $17.00 $17.25 $17.50 $16.25 $17.00 $17.50 $17.50 $18.00 $17.00 $17.50 $18.00 $18.50 Option B $500 Summer Completion Bonus Proposed Criteria: -All Temporaries Trained by June 1st -All Temporaries Working Thru August 15th -All Temporaries Working 3 Shifts Per Week (unless otherwise approved) 4 Aquatics Budget Impact Under Resourced Service Expectation Potential …
B1 REVISED PARB Finance Committee Aquatics Budget — original pdf
Austin Parks and Recreation Department Financial Services Division PARB Finance Committee Presentation Aquatics Budget and Staffing February 28, 2022 Aquatics Background and Current State Current Operations • 5 Year-round Pools in Operational • 95 Current Ready To Work Lifeguards • 55 New Applicants • 19 signed up for classes in March • Ready To Work Lifeguards 2019 • February 15th 165 RTW • March 23rd 229 RTW June 2nd 545 RTW • July 25th 865 RTW • • Ready To Work Lifeguards 2020 • February 14th 189 RTW • March 6th 232 RTW • Classes Stopped for 1 year FY22 Expenditure Budget by Category $11.5 million Contractuals 28% $3.3M Personnel 65% $7.4M 35.5 FTEs $714k Commodities 6% Non-CIP Capital 1% ($78k) 2 Aquatics Staffing and Pay Structure TITLE 2021 Staffing and Pay Structure • Temporaries vs. Full Time Employees • Temporary compensation Cashier/Pool Attendant I ISP Registors I Buildings and Ground (Temp) Lifeguard I Lifeguard II Lifeguard III Head Lifeguard Facility Manager Open Water Lifeguard Open Water Head Lifeguard Swim Coach I Swim Coach II Swim Coach III Lifeguard Instructor I Lifeguard Instructor II WSI I (Water Safety Instructor I) WSI II (Water Safety Instructor II) District Supervisor I (Includes ISP & Auditor) District Supervisor II (Includes ISP & Auditor) $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.25 $15.50 $15.75 $16.25 $16.50 $15.25 $16.50 $17.00 $16.50 $17.00 $16.50 $17.00 $17.50 $18.00 3 Aquatics Options for Enhancing Pay Structure Option A TITLE Cashier/Pool Attendant I Cashier/Pool Attendant II ISP Registors I ISP Registors II Buildings and Ground (Temp) Lifeguard I Lifeguard II Lifeguard III Head Lifeguard Facility Manager Open Water Lifeguard Open Water Head Lifeguard Swim Coach I Swim Coach II Swim Coach III Lifeguard Instructor I Lifeguard Instructor II WSI I (Water Safety Instructor I) WSI II (Water Safety Instructor II) District Supervisor I (Includes ISP & Auditor) District Supervisor II (Includes ISP & Auditor) 2021 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.25 $15.50 $15.75 $16.25 $16.50 $15.25 $16.50 $17.00 $16.50 $17.00 $16.50 $17.00 $17.50 $18.00 Proposed $15.00 $15.50 $16.00 $16.50 $16.00 $15.00 $15.50 $16.25 $16.50 $17.00 $17.25 $17.50 $16.25 $17.00 $17.50 $17.50 $18.00 $17.00 $17.50 $18.00 $18.50 Option B $500 Summer Completion Bonus Proposed Criteria: -All Temporaries Trained by June 1 -All Temporaries Working Thru August 15th -All Temporaries Working 3 Shifts Per Week (unless otherwise approved) 4 Aquatics Budget Impact Under Resourced Service Expectation Potential Revenue Offset Description Estimated Cost Fee …
B2 PARB Finance Committee Summer Camp Staffing Report — original pdf
Austin Parks and Recreation Department Financial Services Division PARB Finance Committee Presentation Summer Camp Staffing February 28, 2022 Summer Camp Program Background and Current State Current Operations • Summer Camp & Playground Programs 28 Locations • • Cultural & Arts, Natural Resources, Community Recreation, and 2019 Registrations: 8,445 Summer Camp & 2,296 Playground Programs 2022 Available: 10,266 Summer Camp & 2,500 Playground Programs Centralized Programs • 100% Capacity • • • • Staff Hiring Requirements 330 Temporary Staff • Recruitment Strategies Staffing and Pay Structure • Temporaries vs. Permanent • Temporary compensation • Marketing/Job Fairs/CIT Program/Referral Program 2 Options to Increase Needed Summer Camp Staffing Option A – Long Term Option B – Short Term $1 Pay Increase for Temporary Program Staff - Competitive Wage - Last Increase Was 2017 from $13.50 - Fiscal Impact: $55,071 per year TITLE 2021 Proposed Activity Leader Activity Specialist Building & Grounds Assistant Cultural Arts Apprentice Display/Lighting Technician Environmental Educator Junior Activity Specialist Office Attendant I Office Attendant II Playground Supervisor I Production Coordinator $15.75 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $16.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.75 $16.50 $15.00 $16.75 $16.00 $16.00 $16.00 $16.00 $17.00 $16.00 $16.00 $16.75 $17.50 $16.00 $500 Summer Completion Bonus - All Temporary Staff Hired by May 1st - - - Current who did not receive the December bonus are eligible Set Minimum # Hours & Absences unless otherwise approved Fiscal Impact: $165,000 one time covered by Community Recreation & Vacancy Savings
B3 PARB Finance Committee Under Resourced — original pdf
Austin Parks and Recreation Department Financial Services Division PARB Finance Committee Presentation Under Resourced Service Expectations February 28, 2022 FY 2023 Under Resourced Service Expectations Definition: critical needs that are essential to meeting service expectations of our community, but lack resources Prioritization of needs developed by subject matter experts from across the department Direction re: the Board/Commission input process: Focus on efficiency and/or consider options for reallocations of funding from the existing available budget 2 Categories of Prioritized Needs (FY 2023 Estimates) Address Homelessness, Safety and Security Increase Human Resources Support $2.5M ongoing $225K one-time $286K ongoing $7K one-time Advance Equity $744K ongoing $9K one-time Meet Customer Service Expectations for Condition and Quality of Parks and Facilities $1.13M ongoing $589K one-time $2.5M vehicles 3 Address Homelessness, Safety and Security Address Homelessness, Safety and Security - $2.5M ongoing; $225K one-time • Homelessness response and support $1.5M 2 FTEs $200K ongoing • Additional temporary staffing at Barton Springs Pool for increasing safety efforts $506K ongoing • Expand security services department- wide $213K ongoing • Natural Resources Temp Staffing for Park Rangers $300K ongoing; $25K one-time 4 Increase Human Resources Support Increase Human Resources Support - $286K ongoing; $7K one-time • Human Resources support for increased effort in onboarding of staff and training coordinator to ensure appropriate base training related to safety, program delivery, general operating policy/procedures $194K ongoing 2.5 FTEs $5K one-time • Increase in Department’s Diversity Recruiting Strategy and Equity Training $93K ongoing; 1 FTE $2K on-going 5 Advance Equity Advance Equity - $744K ongoing; $9K one-time • Advance Department’s Racial Equity/Planning Focus • Increase Community Engagement $150K ongoing 2 FTEs $3K one-time Services $339K ongoing 3 FTEs $6K one-time 6 Customer Services Expectations Meet Customer Service Expectations/Condition and Quality of Parks and Facilities $1.13M ongoing; $589K one-time; $2.5M vehicles • Increase Athletic Maintenance to increase public access to ball fields • Recreation Management Software (RecTrac) Support • Parks and Facility Maintenance inclusive of general grounds maintenance, HVAC maintenance and Plumbers $255,000 ongoing 3 FTEs $325,000 ongoing 4 FTEs $24,000 one-time $800K ongoing 14 FTEs $568K one-time $2.5 mil vehicles $50,000 ongoing • Cemetery Staff to perform Interments and Reset Cemetery Headstones 7 FY22 Recommendations – Funding Approved • Park Rangers Program Increase $440K 6 FTEs $900K $615K 7.5 FTEs • Summer Camp and Afterschool Programs Capacity Increase • Additional Operations and Maintenance support …
B4 Proposed Agenda Topics 2022 — original pdf
Proposed Agenda Financial Committee 2022 Canceled Budget (Under resourced Needs) January 2022 February 28, 2022 March 21, 2022 April 11, 2022 May 9, 2022 July 11, 2022 a. Presentation on employee and salary structures at PARD, opportunities for cost of living increase, opportunities for accrued leave and sick leave, especially among temporary employees in aquatics and other departments. b. Budget (Division submittals, please note any significant fee changes within 2022-2023 budget); responses to requests for information on Budget from Finance Committee provided at February 28, 2022 meeting a. Any remaining budget issues; b. Parkland dedication – please provide an update on parkland dedication fee amounts available to be spent and acquisitions and expenditures expected in 2022; please describe how land donations are solicited and processed; what are unrestricted donations. c. Unrestricted donations d. Standards for Sale of Land CANCEL a. Parks partners and equity across system; how are the parks partners, especially Pease, Waterloo, affecting equity across the system, how are they contributing to fundraising and development capacity of organizations concerned with park development across the City; if you look at park development as a whole, publicly and privately (through conservancies) financing, are investments equitable distributed? August 8, 2022 CANCEL September 12, 2022 Update on Budget adoption: changes at City Council from PARD Submittal and PARB recommendation. October 10, 2022 CANCEL November 14, 2022 a. Presentation on 2023-2024 budget schedule. b. Set 2023 meeting schedule c. Budget issues: how does maintaining service levels take into account population increases; where d. Annual Report of Activities of Financial Committee
B.1.c - 2402 San Gabriel St - public comment — original pdf
February 25, 2022 Terri Myers, Chair City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission Re: Reverend Jacob Fontaine Gold Dollar Building Chair Myers: Preservation Austin exists to empower Austinites to shape a more inclusive, resilient, and meaningful community culture through preservation. We write today to express our concerns about proposed changes to the historic Reverend Jacob Fontaine Gold Dollar Building located at 2402 San Gabriel Street. This building is in the former Freedman’s Colony known as Wheatville, founded in 1869 by freedman James Wheat on the edge of the Shoal Creek flood plain. Not only is this property and area historically significant, but the first known owner of the house has a noteworthy history, as well. Had it not been for his efforts, the University of Texas, whose presence threatens to engulf the modest property, might not exist in Austin. Rev. Jacob (Jake) Fontaine was born into slavery in Arkansas in 1808. He was brought to Austin in 1839 as the personal secretary of Texas president Mirabeau B. Lamar. In 1867, after Emancipation, Fontaine founded the First (Colored) Baptist Church in Austin, the first of many churches he founded in Central Texas. In 1876, Fontaine established the Austin Gold Dollar, the first black-owned newspaper in Austin out of his home, the property on San Gabriel. In 1881, Fontaine emerged as one of Austin's leading advocates for the establishment of the University of Texas in Austin, even though it would be decades before Blacks could attend the university. Rev. Fontaine died in 1898 and is buried in Oakwood Cemetery. The City of Austin has declared this building a landmark and the previously proposed changes to the balcony and roof would certainly harm its architectural as well as historic integrity. Preservation Austin supports calls for a rigorous analysis of this landmark’s physical evolution to ensure that any changes respect and preserve its historic fabric with minimal intervention. We appreciate the Historic Landmark Commission’s extreme care with this case given the erasure of Wheatville, and of so many other Black settlements in West and South Austin, as well as continued threats to African American heritage throughout the city. Also, if possible, we would encourage outreach to any of Rev. Fontaine’s descendants who may still live in the area who may not be aware of these proposed changes. And, given the controversial issues related to erasure of African American places and spaces, perhaps this could provide …
B.2.a - 207 W 33rd St - public comment — original pdf
Backup
B.2.b - 207 W 33rd St - public comment — original pdf
Backup
B.3.b - 3908 Avenue H - public comment — original pdf
Backup
B.4.a - 4203 Speedway - public comment — original pdf
Backup
B.5.a - 1104 E 10th St - public comment — original pdf
Backup
B.5.b - 1104 E 10th St - public comment — original pdf
Backup
B.5.c - 1104 E 10th St - public comment — original pdf
Backup
C.1.f - 804 Rutherford Pl - public comment — original pdf
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged Paula Kothmann Friday, February 25, 2022 12:13 PM PAZ Preservation Paula Kothmann 804 Rutherford Place PC_Improvement Values_SF TH vs Downtown HLC Meeting Feb 28, 2022.pdf; THZC7PointsOnePageCommitteeFinal.pdf *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Commissioners: Representing SRCC (~5,000 households): 3. PRESERVATION / DEMOLITION We agree with The Imagine Austin Plan, which advises that comprehensive urban planning and design should protect historic areas and help maintain neighborhood character. However , McMansion FAR limits are not sufficient to discourage the extensive demolition of residences within the central neighborhoods. Preservation incentives, such as more flexibility in regard to ADUs coupled with greater density rather than new development, are a positive step and another tool to avoid extensive demolition Representing myself: 1. I ask for a postponement on 804 Rutherford Place because there was no notice of a public meeting posted at the property. 2. Attached please find improvement values for 804 Rutherford Place, 806 Rutherford Place, and surrounding properties. Improvement values for these two properties more than doubled from 2020-2021 It's my opinion that the huge increase in property tax burden may have prompted the landlords of these properties to sell It's my opinion that if we had some kind of City historic property tax credit for preservation, more landlords would be able to keep their properties and we'd have less demolitions Travis Heights is losing some relatively affordable rentals that require no subsidy from taxpayers The commercial improvement values are laughably low compared to residential, although for landlords their properties are "commercial" landlords don't get the same homestead exemption that protects other residents please consider initiating some kind of preservation incentive with the City to help us preserve our old, affordable rentals to keep Travis Heights diverse i Thank you for your consideration, Paula Kothmann 1 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 2 Outline of the South River City Citizens’ Position 2019 Regarding Proposed Land Use Code Revision 1. SHADES OF TRANSITION ZONES We agree that the City should allow for more housing density along the corridors of Congress Avenue, Riverside, IH-35, Ben White Boulevard, …
C.1.g - 804 Rutherford Pl - public comment — original pdf
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Sunday, February 27, 2022 10:22 AM PAZ Preservation Case no. 22-001198 804 Rutherford This message is from Cherie J Deutchman. I live at 1318 Travis Heights Blvd. I object to granting a demolition permit in the referenced case. As the staff report states, the current structure is an example of an eclectic architectural style and the proposed new construction is not compatible with adjacent structures in design. 1