All documents

RSS feed for this page

Board of AdjustmentAug. 11, 2025

ITEM06 BOA ANNUAL INTERNAL REPORT 2024-2025_LATE BACKUP AUG11 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

Annual Internal Review This report covers the time period of 7/1/2024 to 6/30/2025 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT The Board’s mission statement (per the City Code, Title 2 Administration) is: Mission Statement The Board of Adjustment mission is defined by Article 2-1-111 Board of Adjustment and the Board of Adjustment Bylaws which state: The purpose of the Board of Adjustment is to: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Hear and decide requests for a variance from the requirements of Chapter 25-2 (Zoning), except as otherwise provided by the Code; and, Hear and decide a request for a special exception under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); and, Hear and decide an appeal of an administrative action under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); and, Hear and decide on a request for a variance from the requirements of airport zoning regulations under Section 241.034, Local Government Code; and, Perform other duties prescribed by ordinance, such as to hear and decide requests for a variance from the requirements of Chapter 25-10 (Sign Regulations); and, (6) Perform other duties prescribed by state law. Board Actions The following actions of the Board were taken during the period between July 1, 2024 and June 30, 2025 in support of the Board’s mission. ITEM06/1-LATE BACKUP Annual Review and Work Plan Year 7/1/2024 – 6/30/2025 A. Meetings: Page 2 Twelve (12) meetings were scheduled for the Board of Adjustment during the reporting period. 1. The Board of Adjustment met eleven (11) times in support of the purposes and duties noted above. One scheduled meetings was cancelled due to lack of quorum. 2. The Board of Adjustment held one (1) special called meeting June 9, 2025 for a Board Member training session. 3. The Board of Adjustment heard zero (0) cases related to airport zoning regulations. 4. At the May 2025 meeting, the current Chair and Vice chair were re-elected 5. Workgroups were formed to address BOA Bylaws and Rules of Procedure changes, Use of Alternates, and, Coordination with City Staff. B. Variance Cases Heard: 1. The Board heard a total of 35 items related to variance requests from the requirements of 25-2 (Zoning) and 25-10 (Sign Regulations), plus had 25 discussion items (new business items) during the reporting period. That equates to an average total case load of approximately 5 agenda items per month of which 22 were new cases which equates to an average of approximately 2 new cases per month. Disposition of variance cases: …

Scraped at: Aug. 11, 2025, 2:07 p.m.
Animal Advisory CommissionAug. 11, 2025

Play video original link

Play video

Scraped at: Aug. 12, 2025, 11:26 a.m.
Animal Advisory CommissionAug. 11, 2025

Item 2: Reporting: Austin Animal Services original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 12 pages

Reporting AUSTIN ANIMAL SERVICES Animal Advisory Commission August 11, 2025 Rolando Fernandez Jr. Animal Services Interim Director Jason Garza Animal Services Deputy Director 1 Monthly Reporting AUSTIN ANIMAL SERVICES 2 AUSTIN ANIMAL CENTER MONTHLY DATA The live outcome rate for July was 94.27%. 1,094 animals were brought to the shelter 767 animals were adopted 82 dogs and cats were returned to their owners July 1, 2025 1530 animals in the ASO inventory August 1, 2025 1306 animals in the ASO inventory 3 ANIMAL PROTECTION FIELD DATA Field Return to Owner (RTO) Fencing Applications Impounded Injured Impounded Regular or Sick Rabies Specimens 12 2 24 114 40 WILDLIFE COYOTES Coyote Related Activities 40 Activities Breakdown 17 wild sick 2 incidents 16 sightings 1 encounter 4 wild injured 4 VOLUNTEERING HOURS OVERVIEW 594 volunteers contributed 7,307.43 hours 4 orientations, introducing 123 potential volunteers 16 Community Service Restitution individuals to perform 145.2 hours 27 individuals donated 54 hours toward group volunteer service, through dog-walking and cat care SOCIAL MEDIA Facebook • 1.52 million page views • 472,000 unique individuals • 47,000 content interactions Instagram • 1.1 million page views • 271,000 unique individuals • 51,000 content interactions 5 FOSTER AND RESCUE In July, 13 different rescue partners pulled a total of 314 domestic animals from the Austin Animal Center. • This total included: 100 kittens, 100 cats, 48 puppies, 57 dogs, 4 guinea pigs, 4 rabbits, and 1 reptile • 476 different people/families fostered. • As of August 1st @ 7:30 a.m. there are 456 animals in foster care. • 31 animals were a part of Finder to Foster • More than 273 animals were adopted directly from foster care. • 341 new foster applications were processed. • There are currently 902 approved foster care providers 6 VET SERVICES • 615 spay/neuter surgeries were performed in July. • 1206 animals were vaccinated. • 0 visibly pregnant animals were spayed. • 345 animals were transferred to rescue organizations. • 66 animals were euthanized in July. • 64 for severe injury, neurological, congenital, cardiac, suffering, toxicity, or agonal reasons. • 2 for court ordered euthanasia. 7 Spay and Neuter AUSTIN ANIMAL SERVICES 8 SPAY/NEUTER SURGERIES BY THE YEAR FY2020 4642 FY2020 5986 Surgeries performed In-house FY2022 6079 FY2021 4916 FY2023 5217 Surgeries performed via Contract FY2022 4761 FY2023 7571 FY2021 4956 FY2024 5641 FY2024 10628 Austin Animal Services supports the community and the welfare of …

Scraped at: Aug. 12, 2025, 11:26 a.m.
Animal Advisory CommissionAug. 11, 2025

Item 7: Draft Recommendation - Animal Welfare Policies and Marketing Priorities original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Animal Advisory Commission Recommendation Number: (20250811-7): Animal Welfare Policies and Marketing Priorities WHEREAS, spay neuter surgeries are critical services provided to the community to stabilize and ultimately reduce shelter intake of unplanned litters of kittens and puppies; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin contracted with Greater Good Charities to provide high-quality, high-volume community spay/neuter services for up to seven (7) free clinics for the residents of Austin and Travis County with the goal of up to 1,200 animals spayed/neutered for each clinic; and WHEREAS, during each of the four (4) prior clinics the maximum goal of 1,200 animals spayed/neuterd per clinic was not met; and WHEREAS, when significant efforts by the public to assist with marketing the clinic resulted in an excellent turnout for the fifth clinic held in July 2025; and WHEREAS, when Austin Animal Center worked with all their partners and increased marketing efforts it also contributed to the success of the fifth clinic. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Animal Advisory Commission encourages the Austin City Council to support the following marketing recommendations to ensure continued excellent turnout for future spay neuter clinics by: 1. Recommending Austin Animal Center’s marketing team find new and creative ways to encourage participation in the free spay neuter clinics by posting clinic information in the Austin Chronicle, requesting the site hosting the clinic to cross promote, requesting more media coverage both before and during the clinic, creating more variety in social media posts about the clinic, and reaching out to contracted nonprofits providing services for APH/HHS to promote the clinic. 2. Recommending Austin Animal Center’s Community Cats Program work with the Greater Good Charities/Good Fix team to determine how many community cats they can accept each clinic day and plan and work with volunteer trappers and community members to fill these slots. 3. Recommending Austin Animal Center’s customer service team promote the clinic by posting flyers outside the Pet Resource Center, distributing flyers to customers, including a link to clinic information in the auto-reply for all shelter emails, emailing clinic information to every pet owner who has reclaimed their pet intact, and harvesting emails from 311 requests for the past year and email flyers to those addresses. 4. Recommending Austin Animal Center’s outreach team reinstate their spay and neuter outreach efforts where they picked up and transported owned pets to be sterilized and vaccinated and returned to their …

Scraped at: Aug. 12, 2025, 11:26 a.m.
Board of AdjustmentAug. 11, 2025

ITEM02 C15-2025-0025 AE APPVD_506 TERRACE DR original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

August 11, 2025 George McQueen 506 Terrace Dr Austin TX, 78704 Property Description: LOT 8 BLK 4 BLUE BONNET HILLS Re: C15-2025-0025 Dear George, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance request from LDC Section 25-2-492 to decrease the interior side yard setback at 506 Terrace Drive. that any proposed or Austin Energy does not oppose existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. the request, provided Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Rosemary Avila, Planning Officer Infrastructure Services | Austin Energy 4815 Mueller Blvd Austin, TX 78723 (512) 972-8488 Rosemary.avilla@austinenergy.com

Scraped at: Aug. 12, 2025, 11:56 a.m.
Board of AdjustmentAug. 11, 2025

ITEM03 C15-2025-0026 LATE BACKUP2_OPPOSITION original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

From: To: Subject: Date: Ramirez, Diana FW: Strong Objection to Variance Request; Case No. C15-2025-0026; 1750 Channel Road Monday, August 11, 2025 12:34:59 PM External Email - Exercise Caution Strong Objection to Variance Request; Case No. C15-2025-0026; 1750 Channel Road Please add these pictures to my email Re: Strong Objection to Variance Request; Case No. C15-2025-0026; 1750 Channel Road Dear Members of the Board of Adjustments, We, Bruce and Niloofar Slayden, representing the SLAYDEN BRUCE & NELLIE REVOCABLE TRUST at 1744 Channel Road, respectfully submit this letter to express our strong and unequivocal opposition to the variance request submitted by Red Bud Partners LP for the property located at 1750 Channel Road. The request seeks approval to construct a new dock extending 37 feet and 3 inches from the shoreline—substantially exceeding the 30-foot maximum length permitted under the Land Development Code (LDC 25-2-1176). We urge the Board to deny this request. This request is not only excessive and unjustified, but also poses a threat to navigation safety, neighborhood consistency, and surrounding property values. Critically, this variance request is inconsistent with both the letter and the intent of the applicable regulations. 1. Undermining Code’s Intent The variance request proposes a dock length that is 124% of the maximum allowable by code—exceeding the 30-foot limit by a more than 7 feet. The applicant has not provided evidence demonstrating that this increased length is necessary for navigation safety, as required under LDC 25-2-1176. In the absence of such justification, approval would set a troubling precedent and undermine the intent and the integrity of the Code. 2. Navigation Hazard and Community Consistency The proposed 37+ feet, multi-level dock would constitute a significant navigational hazard. It would be the only residential multi-level dock in the area extending nearly 125% of the standard shoreline distance. This outlier configuration deviates dramatically from the existing character of surrounding docks along Lake Austin, which are predominantly conform to code. A new multi-level dock of up to a 30’ height and 37+’ length would obstruct sight lines around the shoreline curve, increasing the risk of boating accidents. The Board must not approve any new structure that compromises boater safety on Lake Austin. 3. Adverse Impact on Neighboring Properties and the Lake Community Approval of this variance would result in immediate and measurable harm to neighboring properties, including ours. A multi-level dock of this size (extending 25% further from the shoreline …

Scraped at: Aug. 12, 2025, 11:56 a.m.
Board of AdjustmentAug. 11, 2025

ITEM04 C15-2025-0027 LATE BACKUP2_OPPOSITION original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

From: To: Subject: Date: Ramirez, Diana FW: Strong Objection to Variance Request; Case No. C15-2025-0026; 1750 Channel Road Monday, August 11, 2025 12:34:59 PM External Email - Exercise Caution Strong Objection to Variance Request; Case No. C15-2025-0026; 1750 Channel Road Please add these pictures to my email Re: Strong Objection to Variance Request; Case No. C15-2025-0026; 1750 Channel Road Dear Members of the Board of Adjustments, We, Bruce and Niloofar Slayden, representing the SLAYDEN BRUCE & NELLIE REVOCABLE TRUST at 1744 Channel Road, respectfully submit this letter to express our strong and unequivocal opposition to the variance request submitted by Red Bud Partners LP for the property located at 1750 Channel Road. The request seeks approval to construct a new dock extending 37 feet and 3 inches from the shoreline—substantially exceeding the 30-foot maximum length permitted under the Land Development Code (LDC 25-2-1176). We urge the Board to deny this request. This request is not only excessive and unjustified, but also poses a threat to navigation safety, neighborhood consistency, and surrounding property values. Critically, this variance request is inconsistent with both the letter and the intent of the applicable regulations. 1. Undermining Code’s Intent The variance request proposes a dock length that is 124% of the maximum allowable by code—exceeding the 30-foot limit by a more than 7 feet. The applicant has not provided evidence demonstrating that this increased length is necessary for navigation safety, as required under LDC 25-2-1176. In the absence of such justification, approval would set a troubling precedent and undermine the intent and the integrity of the Code. 2. Navigation Hazard and Community Consistency The proposed 37+ feet, multi-level dock would constitute a significant navigational hazard. It would be the only residential multi-level dock in the area extending nearly 125% of the standard shoreline distance. This outlier configuration deviates dramatically from the existing character of surrounding docks along Lake Austin, which are predominantly conform to code. A new multi-level dock of up to a 30’ height and 37+’ length would obstruct sight lines around the shoreline curve, increasing the risk of boating accidents. The Board must not approve any new structure that compromises boater safety on Lake Austin. 3. Adverse Impact on Neighboring Properties and the Lake Community Approval of this variance would result in immediate and measurable harm to neighboring properties, including ours. A multi-level dock of this size (extending 25% further from the shoreline …

Scraped at: Aug. 12, 2025, 11:56 a.m.
Animal Advisory CommissionAug. 11, 2025

Recommendation Number: 20250811-007: Animal Welfare Policies and Marketing Priorities original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Animal Advisory Commission Recommendation Number: (20250811-7): Animal Welfare Policies and Marketing Priorities WHEREAS, spay neuter surgeries are critical services provided to the community to stabilize and ultimately reduce shelter intake of unplanned litters of kittens and puppies; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin contracted with Greater Good Charities to provide high-quality, high-volume community spay/neuter services for up to seven (7) free clinics for the residents of Austin and Travis County with the goal of up to 1,200 animals spayed/neutered for each clinic; and WHEREAS, during each of the four (4) prior clinics the maximum goal of 1,200 animals spayed/neuterd per clinic was not met; and WHEREAS, when significant efforts by the public to assist with marketing the clinic resulted in an excellent turnout for the fifth clinic held in July 2025; and WHEREAS, when Austin Animal Center worked with all their partners and increased marketing efforts it also contributed to the success of the fifth clinic. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Animal Advisory Commission encourages the Austin City Council and the Travis County Commissioners Court to support the following marketing recommendations to ensure continued excellent turnout for future spay neuter clinics by: 1. Recommending Austin Animal Center’s marketing team find new and creative ways to encourage participation in the free spay neuter clinics by posting clinic information in the Austin Chronicle, requesting the site hosting the clinic to cross promote, requesting more media coverage both before and during the clinic, creating more variety in social media posts about the clinic, and reaching out to contracted nonprofits providing services for APH/HHS to promote the clinic. 2. Recommending Austin Animal Center’s Community Cats Program work with the Greater Good Charities/Good Fix team to determine how many community cats they can accept each clinic day and plan and work with volunteer trappers and community members to fill these slots. 3. Recommending Austin Animal Center’s customer service team promote the clinic by posting flyers outside the Pet Resource Center, distributing flyers to customers, including a link to clinic information in the auto-reply for all shelter emails, emailing clinic information to every pet owner who has reclaimed their pet intact, and harvesting emails from 311 requests for the past year and email flyers to those addresses. 4. Recommending Austin Animal Center’s outreach team reinstate their spay and neuter outreach efforts where they picked up and transported owned pets to be sterilized …

Scraped at: Aug. 13, 2025, 9:29 a.m.
Electric Utility CommissionAug. 11, 2025

Play video original link

Play video

Scraped at: Aug. 14, 2025, 4:18 a.m.
Electric Utility CommissionAug. 11, 2025

Item 14- Recommendation against increasing Austin Energy monthly Customer Charge original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

ELECTRIC UTILITY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20250811-014 Date: August 11, 2025 Subject: Recommendation against increasing Austin Energy monthly Customer Charge Motioned By: Seconded By: Recommendation Recommendation against increasing the Austin Energy monthly Customer Charge for residential customers without a rate case Description of Recommendation to Council The Electric Utility Commission understands the need to increase rates to make up for a budget shortfall in FY 2026, but recommends that the monthly Customer Charge for residential customers remains at $15 per month until the conclusion of the next rate case. Any additional revenues that the Austin City Council believes are critical to collect from customers without the benefit of a full rate case should be levied from volumetric rates. This will preserve the important incentive to conserve energy and will protect lower-income customers who aren’t eligible for Customer Assistance Program (CAP) discounts from inequitable increases. Furthermore, the Austin City Council should consider scheduling Austin Energy rate cases more frequently than once every five years to better keep Austin Energy budgets aligned with costs. Rationale: The appropriate amount for the monthly Customer Charge for residential customers was a hotly contested issue in the last Austin Energy rate case, in 2022. Austin Energy proposed increasing the residential Customer Charge from $10 per month to $25 per month. The Independent Consumer Advocate and nearly all other parties to the rate case opposed this proposed increase on the grounds that it was inequitable and would reduce the incentive to conserve energy. Several Austin City Council members also raised similar concerns. As a result, the final decision approved by the Austin City Council was to phase in an increase to $15 per month over the course of three years. The remaining revenues were to be collected in the volumetric rates. As part of the proposed budget, Austin Energy is requesting a 5% increase in base rates in FY 2026, and also contemplating similar requests in future years of 5%. The FY 2026 budget proposal includes increasing the residential monthly Customer Charge from $15 per month to $16.50 per month and the fee would likely also be increased in future years. While the EUC recognizes the need for a base rate increase, we are concerned about a significant increase of five percent and specifically a significant increase in the residential monthly Customer Charge from $15 to $16.50 per month without going through a rate case. This is a significant …

Scraped at: Aug. 14, 2025, 4:18 a.m.
Electric Utility CommissionAug. 11, 2025

Customer Energy Solutions FY 25 Savings Report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Energy Efficiency Services EES- Appliance Efficiency Program EES- Home Energy Savings - Rebate EES- AE Weatherization & CAP Weatherization - D.I. * EES- School Based Education * EES- Strategic Partnership Between Utilities & Retailers * EES- Multifamily Rebates EES- Multifamily WX-D.I.+ EES- Commercial Rebate EES- Small Business Energy Efficiency TOTAL Demand Response (DR) - Annual Incremental DR- Power Partner DR- Commercial Demand Response (frmly Load Coop) Demand Response (DR) TOTAL Green Building GB- Residential Ratings GB- Residential Energy Code GB- Multifamily Ratings GB- Multifamily Energy Code GB- Commercial Ratings GB- Commercial Energy Code Green Building TOTAL MW Goal 2.50 0.90 0.70 0.30 1.75 0.65 1.00 6.00 2.00 15.80 MW Goal 6.40 2.00 8.40 MW Goal 0.35 1.48 1.34 4.41 4.60 1.71 13.89 MW To Date 1.09 0.22 0.66 0.09 0.80 2.27 1.15 1.82 0.43 8.53 MW To Date 3.33 3.33 MW To Date 0.20 1.05 1.72 3.38 1.86 1.10 9.31 Thermal Energy Storage TOTAL 0.00 0.00 Non-Public - AE# Customer Energy Solutions FY25 YTD MW Savings Report As of June 2025 Percentage 44% 24% 94% 29% 46% 350% 115% 30% 22% Participant Type Customers Customers Customers Products Products Apartments Apartments Customers Customers Participants To Date MWh To Date 1,598 223 820 2,043 127,072 5,299 4,751 75 40 14,849 2,223.21 310.71 1,239.94 458.57 6,494.81 4,660.31 2,918.83 5,601.78 925.02 24,833.18 Rebate Budget $ 1,200,000 $ 1,550,000 $ 5,450,000 $ 350,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 900,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 2,250,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 15,850,000 Spent to Date $ 682,049 $ 550,470 $ 7,438,654 $ 100,863 $ 670,723 $ 1,644,475 $ 1,591,626 $ 1,044,899 $ 277,576 $ 14,001,335 Percentage 52% 0% Participant Type Devices Customers Participants To Date MWh To Date 2,344 2,344 0 0.00 Rebate Budget $ 1,600,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 3,600,000 $ 254,230 $ 254,230 Percentage 58% 71% 128% 77% 41% 65% Participant Type Customers Customers Dwellings Dwellings 1,000 sf 1,000 sf Participants To Date MWh To Date Rebate Budget Spent to Date 260 1,341 4,117 6,593 2,802 4,036 12,311 0 235 1,450 3,625 3,910 5,288 3,590 18,098 $ - $ - $ - $ - 0 $ - $ - CES MW Savings Grand TOTAL Residential Totals Commercial Totals MW Goal 38.09 MW To Date 21.17 Percentage Participant Type Participants To Date MWh To Date 29,504 42,931.20 Rebate Budget $ 19,450,000 Spent to Date $ 14,255,565 16.03 14.06 10.86 16.07 68% 114% 145,751 17,548 19991.33 16528.07 $ $ 14,100,000 2,006,527 $ $ …

Scraped at: Aug. 16, 2025, 1:48 a.m.
Board of AdjustmentAug. 11, 2025

ITEM02 C15-2025-0025 GRANTED DS original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM02 DATE: Monday August 11, 2025 CASE NUMBER: C15-2025-0025 ___Y____Thomas Ates (D1) ___Y____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ___Y____Jessica Cohen (D3) ___Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ___-____Niccolo A Sacco (D6) OUT ___-____Sameer S Birring (D7) OUT ___-____Margaret Shahrestani (D8) OUT ___Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ___Y____Jeffery L Bowen (M) ___Y____Corry L Archer-mcclellan (Alternate) (M) ___-____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) OUT ___-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: George McQueen OWNER: George McQueen ADDRESS: 506 TERRACE DR VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting the following variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum interior side yard setback from 5 feet (required) to 1 foot (requested) in order to maintain a detached garage & carport for a Single-Family Residence in a “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family - Neighborhood Plan zoning district (South River City Neighborhood Plan). BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Michael Von Ohlen’s motion to Approve; Vice-Chair Melissa Hawthorne second on 9-0 votes; GRANTED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: LDC 25-2-893 (B) allows for vehicle storage and (C) allows for household storage buildings allowing the structures to remain in the setback does not provide a special privilege but provides equal opportunity for vehicle and household storage 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: there are three heritage oak trees (diameter of 24” or greater) on this property adjacent to the structures (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: a similarly sized property that does not have heritage oak trees would not have this hardship and could reasonably construct or relocate the garage and carport outside of the setbacks. 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: the proposed renovations do not change the footprint or size of the structures and do not change the use of the structures. Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for

Scraped at: Aug. 26, 2025, 6:19 a.m.
Board of AdjustmentAug. 11, 2025

ITEM03 C15-2025-0026 PP DS TO SEPT8 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM03 DATE: Monday August 11, 2025 CASE NUMBER: C15-2025-0026 ___Y____Thomas Ates (D1) ___Y____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ___Y____Jessica Cohen (D3) ___Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ___-____Niccolo A Sacco (D6) OUT ___-____Sameer S Birring (D7) OUT ___-____Margaret Shahrestani (D8) OUT ___Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ___Y____Jeffery L Bowen (M) ___Y____Corry L Archer-mcclellan (Alternate) (M) ___-____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) OUT ___-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) OUT APPLICANT: Stephen Hawkins OWNER: Red Bud Partners, LP ADDRESS: 1750 CHANNEL RD VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant has requested variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-1176 (Site Development Regulations for Docks, Marinas, and Other Lakefront Uses) (A) (1) to increase the dock length from 30 feet (required) to thirty-seven feet and three inches (37’ 3”) (requested), in order to erect a boat dock in a “SF-2” Single-Family zoning district. Note: Land Development Code, 25-2-1176 Site Development Regulations for Docks, Marinas, and Other Lakefront Uses (A) A dock or similar structure must comply with the requirements of this subsection. (1) A dock may extend up to 30 feet from the shoreline, except that the director may require a dock to extend a lesser or greater distance from the shoreline if deemed necessary to ensure navigation safety. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Michael Von Ohlen’s motion to Postpone to September 8, 2025; Vice-Chair Melissa Hawthorne second on 9-0 votes; POSTPONED TO September 8, 2025. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for

Scraped at: Aug. 26, 2025, 6:19 a.m.
Board of AdjustmentAug. 11, 2025

ITEM04 C15-2025-0027 PP DS TO SEPT8 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM04 DATE: Monday August 11, 2025 CASE NUMBER: C15-2025-0027 ___Y____Thomas Ates (D1) ___Y____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ___Y____Jessica Cohen (D3) ___Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ___-____Niccolo A Sacco (D6) OUT ___-____Sameer S Birring (D7) OUT ___-____Margaret Shahrestani (D8) OUT ___Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ___Y____Jeffery L Bowen (M) ___Y____Corry L Archer-mcclellan (Alternate) (M) ___-____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) OUT ___-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) OUT APPLICANT: Stephen Hawkins OWNER: Tom Davis Jr. ADDRESS: 1752 CHANNEL RD VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant has requested variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-1176 (Site Development Regulations for Docks, Marinas, and Other Lakefront Uses) (A) (1) to increase the dock length from 30 feet (required) to forty-six feet and one inch (46’ 1”) (requested), in order to erect a boat dock in a “SF-2” Single-Family zoning district. Note: Land Development Code, 25-2-1176 Site Development Regulations for Docks, Marinas, and Other Lakefront Uses (A) A dock or similar structure must comply with the requirements of this subsection. (1) A dock may extend up to 30 feet from the shoreline, except that the director may require a dock to extend a lesser or greater distance from the shoreline if deemed necessary to ensure navigation safety. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Michael Von Ohlen’s motion to Postpone to September 8, 2025; Vice-Chair Melissa Hawthorne second on 9-0 votes; POSTPONED TO September 8, 2025. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for

Scraped at: Aug. 26, 2025, 6:19 a.m.
Austin Travis County Food Policy BoardAug. 11, 2025

Item 3. Staff Briefing on Food Plan - August 2025 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 11 pages

Austin-Travis County Food Plan ATCFPB August 2025 – Staff Update City of Austin Food Plan Updates Food Plan Dashboard Now LIVE City Staff Report Back to Council ● City staff will provide another Memo to Council in October 2025 ● City staff will provide a summary of the Food Plan Memo to the CWEP (Climate, Water, Environment, and Parks) Council Committee in fall 2025 Implementation Collaborative ● City and County staff developed an Interlocal Agreement to support a Food Plan implementation collaborative (Strategy 9.1) ● On May 8th, City Council approved an RCA to negotiate a contract with the County. On May 13th, Travis County Commissioners Court approved the ILA with the City ● City staff released an RFP for support of an implementation collaborative. RFP will remain open through August. ● Consultant should be on-board in fall of 2025. ● Opportunity for Food Policy Board member to participate on the evaluation panel. Food Plan Implementation Convening ● First Food Plan Implementation Convening occurred on May 9th ● Food Plan webinar occured on August 7th ● Next Convening in fall of 2025. Let us know if you have suggestions on format. Food Plan - Relevant Budget Events ● City Manager presented proposed draft FY 2025/2026 budget to City Council on July 15th. ● Proposed budget for ACAR operations and staff ○ $3,301,446 ○ Includes a merging of ACAR and Urban Forestry ● City Council will vote on next year’s budget and Tax Rate Election policy on August 13th ○ Budget Engagement Public Input site ○ Austin City Council Message Board City of Austin 2026 Bond Travis County Food Plan Updates Travis County FY26 Budget Development ● Week of July 28: Preliminary budget published ● August 13-15 and 18 if needed: Potential budget hearings ● September 2-5 and 8 if needed: Budget markup ● September 30: FY26 Budget adoption Thank You! Travis County Environmental Quality: Sustainability Programs www.austintexas.gov/food /austinsustainability

Scraped at: Aug. 26, 2025, 12:20 p.m.
Board of AdjustmentAug. 11, 2025

Play video original link

Play video

Scraped at: Sept. 4, 2025, 8:40 a.m.
Electric Utility CommissionAug. 11, 2025

Approved Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

ELECTRIC UTILITY COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Monday, August 11, 2025 ELECTRIC UTILITY COMMISSION REGULAR CALLED MEETING MINUTES Monday, August 11, 2025 The Electric Utility Commission convened in a regular called meeting on Monday, August 11, 2025, at Austin Energy Headquarters, 4815 Mueller Blvd, Austin, TX 78723. Commissioner Chris Kirksey called the Electric Utility Commission meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Commissioner Lauren Bellomy; Commissioner Chris Gillett; Commissioner Chris Kirksey. Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Commissioner Kaiba White, Vice Chair; Commissioner Raul Alvarez; Commissioner Cesar Benavides; Commissioner Jonathon Blackburn; Commissioner Al Braden; Commissioner Cyrus Reed; Commissioner Joshua Rhodes. Commissioners Absent: Commissioner Dave Tuttle, Chair PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Electric Utility Commission Special Called Meeting on July 17, 2025. The motion approving the minutes of the Special Called Electric Utility Commission meeting of July 17, 2025, were approved on Commissioner Bellomy’s motion, Commissioner Gillett’s second on an 8-0 vote, with Commissioners Alvarez and Reed off the dais and Chair Tuttle absent. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 2. Recommend approval authorizing a contract for vacuum interrupter switches for Austin Energy with Techline Inc., for a term of two years with up to three one-year extension options in an amount not to exceed $10,000,000. Funding: $166,667 is available in the ELECTRIC UTILITY COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Monday, August 11, 2025 Operating Budget of Austin Energy, funding for the remaining contract term is contingent upon available funding in future budgets. The motion to recommend approval authorizing execution of a contract for vacuum interrupter switches for Austin Energy with Techline Inc., was recommended on Commissioner Bellomy’s motion, Commissioner Gillett’s second on an 8-0 vote with Commissioners Alvarez and Reed off the dais and Chair Tuttle absent. 3. Recommend approval authorizing a contract for manhole covers, boxes, and accessories for Austin Energy with Techline Pipe LP, for an initial term of two years with up to three one- year extension options in an amount not to exceed $1,100,000. Funding: $18,333 is available in the Operating Budget of Austin Energy, funding for the remaining contract term is contingent upon available funding in future budgets. The motion to recommend approval authorizing execution of a contract for manhole covers, boxes, and accessories for Austin Energy with Techline Pipe LP, was recommended on Commissioner Bellomy’s motion, Commissioner Gillett’s second on an 8-0 vote with Commissioners Alvarez and Reed off the dais and Chair …

Scraped at: Sept. 9, 2025, 2:54 p.m.
Austin Travis County Food Policy BoardAug. 11, 2025

Play audio original link

Play audio

Scraped at: Sept. 11, 2025, 12:02 a.m.
Board of AdjustmentAug. 11, 2025

Approved Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Monday, August 11, 2025 The BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT convened in a Regular meeting on Monday, August 11, 2025, at 301 West 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Madam Chair Jessica Cohen called the Board of Adjustment Meeting to order at 5:39 PM. Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance in-Person: Jessica Cohen-Chair, Melissa Hawthorne-Vice Chair, Jeffery Bowen, Yung-ju Kim, Brian Poteet, Michael Von Ohlen, Corry L Archer-Mcclellan (Alternate) Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Thomas Ates, Bianca A. Medina-Leal Board Members absent: Niccolo A Sacco, Sameer S Birring, Maggie Shahrestani (virtual-technical issues) PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (4) four speakers signed up/register prior (no later than noon the day before the meeting) to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. NONE APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Board of Adjustment meetings on July 14, 2025. On-Line Link: Draft Minutes for July 14, 2025 The minutes from the meeting on July 14, 2025, were approved on Vice Chair Melissa Hawthorne, Board member Corry L. Archer-Mcclellan second, on 9-0 Vote. PUBLIC HEARINGS Discussion and action on the following cases. New Variance cases: 2. C15-2025-0025 George McQueen 506 Terrace Drive On-Line Link: ITEM02 ADV PACKET, PRESENTATION The applicant is requesting the following variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum interior side yard setback from 5 feet (required) to 1 foot (requested) in order to maintain a detached garage & carport for a Single-Family Residence in a “SF-3- NP”, Single-Family - Neighborhood Plan zoning district (South River City Neighborhood Plan). The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Michael Von Ohlen’s motion to Approve; Vice-Chair Melissa Hawthorne second on 9-0 votes; GRANTED. 3. C15-2025-0026 Stephen Hawkins for Red Bud Partners, LP 1750 Channel Road On-Line Link: ITEM03 ADV PACKET, PRESENTATION The applicant has requested variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-1176 (Site Development Regulations for Docks, Marinas, and Other Lakefront Uses) (A) (1) to increase the dock length from 30 feet (required) to thirty-seven feet and three inches (37’ 3”) (requested), in order to erect a boat dock in a “SF-2” Single-Family zoning district. Note: Land Development Code, 25-2-1176 Site Development Regulations for Docks, Marinas, and Other Lakefront Uses (A) A dock or similar structure must comply with …

Scraped at: Sept. 18, 2025, 12:43 a.m.
Animal Advisory CommissionAug. 11, 2025

Approved Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Animal Advisory Commission Minutes August 11, 2025 Animal Advisory Commission Regular Meeting Minutes Monday, August 11, 2025 The Animal Advisory Commission convened in a regular meeting on Monday, August 11, 2025, at Austin City Hall, 301 W 2nd St, Room 1101 in Austin, Texas. Commissioner Clinton called the Animal Advisory Commission meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Ryan Clinton, Travis County Erin Ferguson, D8 Whitney Holt, D5 David Loignon, D10 Dr. Paige Nilson, D4 Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Ann Linder, Vice Chair, D3 Koby Ahmed, Mayor Beatriz Dulzaides, D2 Sarah Huddleston, D9 Nancy Nemer, Travis County Jo Anne Norton, Parliamentarian, D7 Commissioners Absent: PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Heather Meyer - AAC Operations Comments Rochelle Vickery - Cat Trapping and Shelter Needs Shelly Leibham - Restore emergency vet funding Julie Oliver - AAC Operations Comments Max Oliver - Restore emergency vet funding Suzie Chase - Austin Pets Alive! Update 1 Animal Advisory Commission Minutes August 11, 2025 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Animal Advisory Commission Regular Meeting on July 14, 2025. The motion to approve the minutes of the Animal Advisory Commission Regular Meeting on July 14, 2025 was approved on Commissioner Nilson’s motion, Commissioner Holt’s second on an 11-0 vote. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. 3. Staff briefing regarding monthly reports provided by Jason Garza, Deputy Chief Animal Services Officer and Rolando Fernandez, Interim Chief Animal Services Officer, Animal Services Office. The presentation was made by Jason Garza, Deputy Chief Animal Services Officer and Rolando Fernandez, Interim Chief Animal Services Officer, Animal Services Office. Staff briefing on Close Out Report on Goodfix Spay and Neuter Clinics and current Spay and Neuter count provided by Jason Garza, Deputy Chief Animal Services Officer and Rolando Fernandez, Interim Chief Animal Services Officer, Animal Services Office. The presentation was made by Jason Garza, Deputy Chief Animal Services Officer, Animal Services Office and Rolando Fernandez, Interim Chief Animal Services Officer, Animal Services Office. DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. 5. Discussion of the Bond Election priorities as it relates to the delivery of animal services. Discussed. Discussion of heart worm testing and monthly preventative for animals at the Austin Animal Center. Discussed. WORKING GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS 6. Good Fix Working Group recommendation regarding animal welfare policies and marketing priorities. Item taken up with Item 7. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 7. Approve a Recommendation to Council regarding animal welfare policies and marketing priorities. The motion to …

Scraped at: Sept. 27, 2025, 3:53 a.m.