2 0 0 2 S C E N I C D R I V E R E S I D E N C E , E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S | J U N E 2 8 , 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 S C E N I C D R I V E E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S J U N E 2 8 , 2 0 2 2 3 2 0 0 2 S C E N I C D R I V E R E S I D E N C E Site Diagram A p a r t m e n t J U N E 2 8 , 2 0 2 2 5 2 0 0 2 S C E N I C D R I V E R E S I D E N C E Site Diagram 1. 2. APARTMENT EXTERIOR 1. ROOF DAMAGE INDICATED BY DISPLACED, DAMAGAGED AND MISSING SHINGLES. HOLES IN THE ROOF POINT TO BROAD WATER DAMAGE WITHIN AND POTENTIAL DAMAGE TO STRUCTURE. 2. WOOD WINDOWS - JAMBS, SILLS, AND FRAME ARE ROTTED. BROKEN PANES THROUGHOUT. J U N E 2 8 , 2 0 2 2 6 2 0 0 2 S C E N I C D R I V E R E S I D E N C E Apartment - Exterior 1. 2. APARTMENT EXTERIOR 1. METAL IS RUSTED AND VINES ARE ENTERING INTO APARTMENT. 2. WOOD WINDOWS - JAMBS, SILLS, AND FRAME ARE ROTTED. BROKEN PANES THROUGHOUT. VINES ARE OVERGROWN AND ARE ENTERING INTO THE INTERIOR. J U N E 2 8 , 2 0 2 2 7 2 0 0 2 S C E N I C D R I V E R E S I D E N C E Apartment - Exterior 1. 2. APARTMENT EXTERIOR 1. THE ROOF IS FALLING APART AND IS SHOWING SIGNS OF WATER DAMAGE. 2. THE ROOF IS SLANTING, WHICH IS A SIGN OF STRUCTURAL FAILURE AND MATERIAL DETERIORATION. J U N E 2 8 , 2 0 2 2 8 2 0 0 2 S C E N I C D R I V E R E S I D E N C E Apartment - Exterior …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-064555 HYDE PARK 4402 SPEEDWAY B.1 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct an addition. Replace windows and doors. Demolish detached garage and replace with new accessory dwelling unit. Add a deck and porch. Replace roof with metal roof. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Construct an addition to existing house. Construct a deck at the north elevation and screened porch at the west elevation. The proposed addition is clad in horizontal siding and is capped with a standing-seam metal roof. 2) Demolish detached garage and construct new accessory dwelling unit. ARCHITECTURE One-story Craftsman bungalow with exposed rafter tails, triangular brackets at eaves, partial-width gabled porch, and horizontal wood siding. DESIGN STANDARDS The Hyde Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1.2: Retention of Historic Style: Respect the historic style of existing structures and retain their historic features, including character-defining elements and building scale. The proposed project mostly retains the primary building’s scale, though it removes historic features from primary elevations. 1.3: Avoidance of False Historicism: Respect each contributing structure as an example of the architecture of its time. Do not make alterations that have no historic basis, such as the addition of gingerbread trim to a 1920s bungalow. Do not give an existing contributing structure a “historic” appearance it never had. When developing plans for additions, porches, and other exterior alterations, look to other houses of similar vintage to see how these changes were made historically, and then use that information as a guide to developing an appropriate size, scale, and massing for your proposed exterior change. The proposed project does not include alterations without historical basis; however, the proposed alterations to the main elevation do not appear to have historical precedents. 1.4: Appropriate Treatment Options for Contributing Structures: 1. Preserve the historic fabric: Repair deteriorated historic features and architectural elements. 2. Reconstruct missing or un-repairable architectural features with the following: a) Recycled historic materials that approximate the size and match the scale, profile, and appearance of the deteriorated or missing feature, if available. b) New material that that approximates the size and matches the scale, profile, and appearance of the historic material. Reconstruct or rebuild missing architectural features using photographic or physical indications as a guide. The proposed project preserves some historic fabric, but significantly alters the building’s façade. …
622'6" n 30°00'00"e 42.13' 10'-0" a l l e y R A E R " 0 - ' 0 1 K C A B T E S M O R F S I D " 2 / 1 0 1 - ' 3 1 E L O P R E W O P ] E [ 32'-0" " 0 - ' 6 6'-7" 622'3" 1/2" MAX " 6 - ' 3 NE NE NE " 0 - ' 4 " 0 1 - ' 9 NE NE NE 14'-8 1/2" NE NE [E] POWER POLE 621'8" D A E H R E V O ] E [ " 0 - ' 8 I E C V R E S E S A H P 3 4'-0" TALL WD. FENCE " 3 - ' 2 1 NEW OVERHEAD POWER LINE TO NEW ELECTRICAL SERVICE NEW UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL SERVICE LINE ADDITION SHOWN SHADED " 6 NE NE 5'-0" SETBACK FFE 622'-3" UE UE UE REGRADE FOR 6" STEP DOWN NE NE NE UE UE 621'7" SCREENED PORCH FFE 622'-5 1/2" LOWEST ADJ GRADE ELEVATION 621'5" 621'4" s 5 9 ° ' 5 4 0 2 " e 1 2 9 . 9 3 ' " 2 / 1 9 - ' 0 1 UE " 2 / 1 2 - ' 1 4'-9" 7-1/4" RISER UE N D E U E U E U E U E U E U 3'-6" 1'-3" NEW UNCOVERED WOOD STEPS IN SIDE YARD ARE LESS THAN 30" ABOVE NATURAL GRADE + EXTEND LESS THAN 36" INTO REQUIRED YARD ELECTRICAL SERVICE. CONSULT CODE FOR CLEARANCE FROM WINDOWS, HOSE BIBBS, ETC, IT WILL BE NEAR THE UNDERGROUND POWER LINE ADDITION SHOWN SHADED Z R 2'-0" 1/2 C 1 24" BHD PROTECTED PECAN 6'-0" 1/4 CRZ 620'10" single family 1 story wd frame remodel + addtion on pier + beam [e] 720 sf TOTAL NEW 1,551 SF FFE 622'-6" 5'-3" " 2 HIGHEST NATURAL GRADE ZONE 3 WD. DECK AT GRADE HIGHEST ADJ NATURAL GRADE ELEVATION ' 0 4 ≤ 3 E N O Z N O I S N A M c M ACCESSORY APARTMENT PER 25-2-901, WITH COMMON FOUNDATION AND ROOF HIGHEST NATURAL GRADE ZONE 2 " 7 - ' 7 2 622'2" 622'0" 1 2 9 . 9 3 ' n 5 9 ° 5 4 0 2 " w ' [E] FENCE DASHED LINE OF …
' 0 4 ≤ 3 E N O Z N O I S N A M c M " 0 - ' 0 4 2 E N O Z N O I S N A M c M " 0 - ' 0 4 1 E N O Z N O I S N A M c M " 2 / 1 1 - ' 9 1 I T N R P T O O F ] E [ " 0 1 - ' 9 2 5'-0" SETBACK T S N O C " 0 - ' 0 2 S L I O P S / H S A R T 622'6" n 30°00'00"e 42.13' 10'-0" a l l e y M O R F S I D " 2 / 1 4 - ' 2 1 E L O P R E W O P ] E [ P E T S O N E T U O R E L B A T I S I V HIGHEST NATURAL GRADE ZONE 3 HIGHEST ADJ NATURAL GRADE ELEVATION R A E R " 0 - ' 0 1 K C A B T E S 622'3" " 2 / 1 0 - ' 7 1 622'0" HIGHEST NATURAL GRADE ZONE 2 HVAC 622'2" [E] FENCE DASHED LINE OF TOPOGRAPHY CONTOURS AVG ADJ GRADE ELEVATION 1 2 9 . 9 3 ' " 5 - ' 4 2 n 5 9 ° 5 4 0 2 " w ' HIGHEST ADJ GRADE ELEVATION " 2'0 2 6 621'9" 621'7" [E] POWER POLE 621'8" D A E H R E V O ] E [ " 0 - ' 8 I E C V R E S E S A H P 3 " 3 - ' 2 1 4'-0" TALL WD. FENCE WD. DECK AT GRADE " 0 - ' 4 " 0 1 - ' 9 P E T S O N E T U O R E L B A T I S I V 5'-0" SETBACK NEW OVERHEAD POWER LINE TO NEW ADU ELECTRICAL SERVICE REGRADE FOR VISITABLE ENTRY ROUTE ≈ 1:12 SLOPE; ENSURE NO STEP > 1/2" LOWEST ADJ GRADE ELEVATION N E N E N E N E N E U E U E U E U E U E U E 32'-0" " 0 - ' 6 12'-0" 1/2" MAX NEW CONSTRUCTION SHOWN SHADED …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-062618 LINDEMANN HOUSE 1100 E. 8TH STREET PROPOSAL Repair windows. Replace window at rear elevation with door. B.2 – 1 PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Repair 18 windows. See full restoration proposal in backup. 2) Replace one window with door at rear of house. The proposed door’s dimensions will match existing opening width and upper extent. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 5. Windows, doors, and screens The proposed project repairs 18 historic-age windows. It removes historic fabric at the rear of the building where a window replaces a door. Summary The project partially meets the applicable standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Request that the applicant retain the rear window to be removed on-site for replacement in the future, then approve the application. The applicant has amended the proposal to be more sensitive to the building’s historic fabric. LOCATION MAP B.2 – 2
June 21, 2022 WINDOW RESTORATION PROPOSAL Proposal For: Amanda & Ben Wahlstom – Project Address: 1109 E. 8th Street, Austin, TX Number of windows: 18 Wood Window Full Restoration Scope of Work: Note: Restoration is an art, not a science. Although this is our general process, we may have to adjust as needed • • • • Sashes and stop will be removed and openings sealed with plywood (Faux Acrylic inserts available as upgrade) Transport sashes from job site to our shop in Austin. Sashes will be thoroughly examined in the shop and numbered prior to restoration process Jambs and sills at the job site will also be thoroughly inspected for necessary repairs. RRR estimates 10% of sills (or 2 windows) will require replacement. Sashes: Sashes will be stripped, sanded, primed, painted, glazed and slotted for weatherstripping. • • Abatron will be used to repair holes, splitting and cracks throughout the sash. Any areas of rot more than 8” will require Dutchman repairs. • A borate-based preservative (Boracare) will be applied to all bare wood prior to finish. This will minimize the risk of • • future rot or pest damage to the wood. Sash Rebuilds: rebuilds will use Spanish Cedar or Sipo Mahogany. RRR assumes 22% of sashes (or 4 windows) will require a component to be rebuilt (i.e. bottom or upper rail, stile or meeting rail). Sashes requiring major or complete rebuild will require a change order unless noted on the schedule. Paint & Stain: Sashes will be painted, glazing lines hand painted. Benjamin Moore Regal Select in Low Lustre will be used unless otherwise specified. Includes one color only. Pricing includes painted interior and exterior on all of the windows. • Glazing Putty: Glazing putty will be Sarco Type M. Glazing lines will be hand painted to seal putty for longevity • Glass: All historic wavy glass will be re-used if possible. Replacement glass will be 1/8” double strength clear flat glass. Wavy glass available as an upgrade Jambs/Sills: Jambs prepped and painted onsite Sash Hardware: Hardware can be cleaned and reused - excludes removal of paint, repair or replacement hardware Stop and parting bead to be replaced • • • • Weatherstripping: New concealed interlocking weatherstripping will used on functional windows when the sashes are reinstalled in the jambs. Bulb will be used at the meeting rails. Sash Cord: New Sampson spot sash cord will be …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-084104 SEBRON SNEED HOUSE 6301 BLUFF SPRINGS ROAD B.3 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct an apartment complex around the Sneed House ruins. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Construct a three-building apartment complex around the Sebron Sneed House ruins, providing a 25’ buffer zone between the ruins and the pool and other new construction. Proposed buildings are each three stories in height and display Mission Revival stylistic cues; they are clad in stucco and capped with hipped, tiled roofs. Columned arches accent the main entrance to each building. 2) Construct a fence around the ruins. Note: The applicant has provided 2015 correspondence, per Committee feedback, showing that former Preservation Officer Steve Sadowsky requested a mortar analysis and preliminary stabilization plan. The applicant specified that tuck-pointing and consolidation would be implemented following an observation report and recommendation from a masonry restoration contractor, as well as erection of a double steel fence around the ruins (see backup). DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location, 2. Orientation, 4. Proportions While individual design standards cater to neighborhood residences’ setbacks and streetscapes, the proposed project does not comply with the Secretary of the Interior’s guidance for siting new buildings near historic properties. The proposed apartment complex will visually overpower the existing ruins. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed project does not appear to conform to the relevant standards, though each building does appear to be segmented into two modules. 5. Design and style, 6. Roofs, 7. Exterior walls, 8. Windows and doors The proposed building’s Mission Revival design elements and modern fenestration do not reflect the Sneed House during its period of significance, nor do they relate to its current state by incorporating similar materials, scale, etc. 10. Chimneys The proposed buildings do not include boxed chimneys. Sites and streetscapes 1. Vegetation, topography, and landscaping The proposed project maintains only a 25’ buffer between the historic ruins and the apartments’ active circulation elements and amenities. Since no bracing is planned for the ruins, there may be safety concerns as well as concerns regarding accelerated deterioration, as the 25’ buffer immediately abuts the complex’s swimming pool. 2. Walls and fences …
SLIDING GATES SOLID WOOD FENCE THE CIRCLE AT THE NELMS APARTMENTS 6301 BLUFF SPRINGS ROAD AUSTIN, TEXAS 78744 (BLDGS-1, 2,&3) Tchen Architect 1303 ELM FOREST DRIVE CEDAR PARK, TEXAS 78613 512.351.1801 512.870.9427 (FAX) tchenarch@gmail.com Drawings & written materials appearing herein constitute original and unpublished work of the architect and may not be duplicated, used, or disclosed without written consent of the architect. C 2022 TCHEN ARCHITECTS NELMS DR. 1 BLDG-2 (4) 1-B UNITS (20) 2-B UNITS "RUINS" AREA 2,050 S.F. 7826 s.f. Roof 598 1 LAUNDRY MECH D A O R S G N I R P S F F U L B MAIL BOX 318 APT OFFICE BLDG-1 (12) 1-B UNITS 9,739 S.F. BIKE RACKS K L A W T E F SID 5 300 4315 s.f. Roof 1 1 S E T A G G SLIDIN TRUE NORTH INDEX OF DRAWINGS SHEET DRAWING TITLE SYNOPSIS & VICINITY MAP ADA-TAS STANDARDS DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE LIFE SAFETY FIRST FLOOR LIFE SAFETY SECOND FLOOR LIFE SAFETY THIRD FLOOR LIFE SAFETY FIRST FLOOR LIFE SAFETY SECOND FLOOR LIFE SAFETY THIRD FLOOR LIFE SAFETY FIRST FLOOR LIFE SAFETY SECOND FLOOR LIFE SAFETY THIRD FLOOR FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION ELEVATION BUILDING CROSS SECTION STAIRWAY TYPICAL DETAILS WALL & FLOOR ASSEMBLIES DOOR SCHEDULE & WALL TYPES FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION ELEVATION ELEVATION BUILDING CROSS SECTION STAIRWAY TYPICAL DETAILS WALL & FLOOR ASSEMBLIES DOOR SCHEDULE & WALL TYPES FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION ELEVATION BUILDING CROSS SECTION STAIRWAY TYPICAL DETAILS WALL & FLOOR ASSEMBLIES DOOR SCHEDULE & WALL TYPES A0-0.0 A0-0.1 A0-0.2 L1-1.0 L1-1.1 L1-1.2 L2-1.0 L2-1.1 L2-1.2 L3-1.0 L3-1.1 L3-1.2 A1-1.0 A1-1.1 A1-1.2 A1-1.3 A1-1.4 A1-1.5 A1-1.6 A1-2.0 A1-2.1 A1-3.0 A1-3.1 A1-3.2 A1-4.0 A2-1.0 A2-1.1 A2-1.2 A2-1.3 A21.4 A2-1.5 A2-2.0 A2-2.1 A2-2.2 A2-3.0 A2-3.1 A2-3.2 A2-4.0 A3-1.0 A3-1.1 A3-1.2 A3-1.3 A3-1.4 A3-1.5 A3-2.0 A3-2.1 A3-3.0 A3-3.1 A3-3.2 A3-4.0 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 S-8 S-9 S-10 S-11 S-12 S-13 S-14 S-15 S-16 S-17 S-18 S-19 S-20 S-21 S-22 S-23 S-24 S-25 M-00 M-01 M-02 E-00 E-02 E-03 P-00 P-01 P-02 S-01 BLDG-1 FOUNDATION PLAN BLDG-2 FOUNDATION PLAN BLDG-2 FOUNDATION TYPICAL FOUNDATION DETAILS BLDG-1 …
Subject: Fwd: Ruins at 1801 Nelms, (6305 Bluff Springs) Stone Restoration , SAEEDAH MINHAS Harry Karr From: Tracy Chen Date: June 9, 2022 at 3:23 PM To: TChen Projects Forwarding email-1. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Tracy Chen Date: Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:36 PM Subject: Fwd: Ruins at 1801 Nelms, (6305 Bluff Springs) Stone Restoration To: Sadowsky, Steve <Steve.Sadowsky@austintexas.gov> Cc: Saeed Minhas Dear Steve, Thank you for your time meeting with Mr. Saeed Minhas, the project owner, and me, the Architect on Record, for the stone restoration of the subject project. We would like to propose that the owner will immediately undertake the process of obtaining a qualified Masonry Restoration Contractor to begin the preservation work. Upon such time of selecting the Contractor, we will explore and consult with persons with expertise in these restoration areas: we will evaluate the stability of the stone walls with a detailed Observation Report, and obtain a Recommendation of the scope of work. Mortar specification is based on Sec. 04902 - 1.1 MORTAR MATERIALS Add specific requirements to suit Project. A. Portland Cement: ASTM C 150, Type I or Type II. B. Hydrated Lime: ASTM C 207, Type S. Product below must be slaked before it is used. C. Quicklime: ASTM C 5, pulverized lime. 1. Provide white cement containing not more than 0.60 percent total alkali when tested according to ASTM C 114. 2. Low-Alkali Cement: Portland cement for use with limestone shall contain not more than 0.60 percent total alkali when tested according to ASTM C 114. D. Factory-Prepared Lime Putty: Screened, fully-slaked lime putty, prepared from pulverized lime complying with ASTM C 5. E. Mortar Sand: ASTM C 144, unless otherwise indicated. 1. Color: Provide natural sand[ or ground marble, granite, or other sound stone]; of color necessary to produce required mortar color. 2. For pointing mortar, provide sand with rounded edges. 3. Match size, texture, and gradation of existing mortar sand as closely as possible. Blend several sands, if necessary, to achieve suitable match. If known, indicate source of sand and size and gradation. G. Water: Potable. The main effort of restoration will be concentrated in the stabilization of the "Ruins", by ways of "Tuck Pointing" with specified Tuck-pointing Mortar (referencing to the Video: http://quikrete.com/AtHome/Video-Tuckpointing-Mortar-Joints.asp? gclid=CO36tfK30sgCFQmJaQod3F8ACw ), and apply/inject epoxy where deem required. Structural Bracing is not considered at this point. Please note the Limit of Restoration will …
CITY OF AUSTIN – PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN APPLICATION – MASTER COMMENT REPORT CASE NUMBER: REVISION #: CASE MANAGER: SP-2014-0370C 00 Rosemary Avila UPDATE: PHONE #: U0 512-974-2784 PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: The Circle at Nelms Multi-Family Developmental Site Plan 6305 BLUFF SPRINGS RD W/BLDGS & UNITS SUBMITTAL DATE: November 3, 2014 REPORT DUE DATE: December 1, 2014 FINAL REPORT DATE: December 11, 2014 10 DAYS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE UPDATE DEADLINE STAFF REPORT: This report includes all staff comments received to date concerning your most recent site plan submittal. The comments may include requirements, recommendations, or information. The requirements in this report must be addressed by an updated site plan submittal. The site plan will be approved when all requirements from each review discipline have been addressed. However, until this happens, your site plan is considered disapproved. Additional comments may be generated as a result of information or design changes provided in your update. If you have any questions, problems, concerns, or if you require additional information about this report, please do not hesitate to contact your case manager at the phone number listed above or by writing to the City of Austin, Planning and Development Review Department, P.O. Box 1088, Austin, Texas 78704. UPDATE DEADLINE (LDC 25-5-113): It is the responsibility of the applicant or his/her agent to update this site plan application. The final update to clear all comments must be submitted by the update deadline, which is March 27, 2015. Otherwise, the application will automatically be denied. If this date falls on a weekend or City of Austin holiday, the next City of Austin workday will be the deadline. EXTENSION OF UPDATE DEADLINE (LDC 25-1-88): You may request an extension to the update deadline by submitting a written justification to your case manager on or before the update deadline. Extensions may be granted for good cause at the Director’s discretion. UPDATE SUBMITTALS: A formal update submittal is required. You must make an appointment with the Intake Staff (974-2689) to submit the update. Please bring a copy of this report with you upon submittal to Intake. Please submit 11 copies of the plans and 12 copies of a letter that address each comment for distribution to the following reviewers. Clearly label information or packets with the reviewer’s name that are intended for specific reviewers. No distribution is required for the Planner 1 and only …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-068314 MCDONALD-MCGOWN HOUSE 1802 LAVACA STREET B.4 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish brick wall. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Demolish an existing brick wall, topped with wrought iron, at the rear of the property. Remove wrought-iron gate. Do not replace. ARCHITECTURE 1802 Lavaca Street is a brick Second Empire building with a Mansard roof, built in 1876. While the wrought iron gate and trim were added in 1972 per the historic zoning application, the date of the wall is unrecorded in City permit records and certificates of appropriateness. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Sites and streetscapes 2. Walls and fences While the design standards do not address non-street-facing walls and fences, they do prohibit covering or painting historic- age masonry site walls. Summary The project may meet the applicable standards. If the wall dates to the time of later restoration and modification of the property, demolition without replacement is within the scope of the design standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the application. The applicant has provided information that shows the wall was constructed in the 1970s. LOCATION MAP B.4 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos B.4 – 3 1975 image showing rear wall. Yancey, Michael D. [Historic Property, Photograph THC_07-0174], photograph, February 6, 1975; (https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth672897/m1/1/?q=%221802%20lavaca%22: accessed June 22, 2022), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu; crediting Texas Historical Commission.
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-084176 THOMAS FAMILY HOME 1119 E. 11TH STREET B.5 – 1 PROPOSAL Repair deteriorated wood elements or replace in-kind where deteriorated beyond repair. Repair foundation, replace porch steps, and replace roof in-kind. Remove non-original additions, repair historic-age windows and doors, and replace deteriorated or non-original windows and doors. Repair porch handrail, raise porch trim, and install an ADA-compliant lift. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Repair existing siding at north, west, and east elevations. Repair shingles at gable. Retain trim. 2) Replace corrugated metal foundation skirting with wood lattice. 3) Replace shingle roof and gutters in-kind. 4) Replace front concrete steps with wood steps. Relocate and replace steps at east elevation to accommodate ADA lift. 5) Repair existing handrail. 6) Repair and repaint existing front door. Reorient to open out. Replace non-historic door at east elevation. Add new kitchen access door and steps at west rear elevation. 7) Repair historic windows. Where deteriorated beyond repair, replace in-kind. Remove non-original window at rear addition. molding. 8) Repair porch columns. Where deteriorated beyond repair, replace in-kind. Raise trim height and remove non-original 9) Demolish non-historic water heater closet and non-original lean-to addition at east elevation. ARCHITECTURE One-story wing-and-gable house with a hipped roof and projecting gables with fish-scale shingling at tympanum and a wraparound porch supported by Doric columns. The front gable has a large window with a multi-lite transom, indicative of the Queen Anne style. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project repairs and stabilizes deteriorated siding, trim, windows, doors, and columns; it only replaces deteriorated elements when they are damaged beyond repair. It removes some non-original accretions that do not appear to be character-defining features of the house, though they were constructed during the historic period. 2. Foundations The proposed project stabilizes the house’s foundation and replaces the corrugated metal skirting with brick. The brick appears appropriate, provided that pier locations are articulated per Committee feedback so as not to create an unbroken masonry expanse. 3. Roofs The proposed project replaces the existing shingle roof in-kind. The proposed roofline modifications at the rear are not appropriate, as they alter an …
T H O M A S H O U S E E A S T S I D E S T R E E T FA C I N G F R O N T B A W E S T S I D E L O O K I N G S O U T H G C F W E S T S I D E L O O K I N G N O R T H A L L E Y FA C I N G S O U T H A L L E Y FA C I N G S O U T H S O U T H E A S T C O R N E R E D E X I S T I N G E X T E R I O R C O N D I T I O N S A L E T T E R D E N O T E S L O C AT I O N O N E X I S T I N G S I T E P L A N THOMAS HOUSE1119 E 11TH ST AUSTIN TX 7870210 JUNE 2022 N F O Y E R K I T C H E N B AT H R O O M L K J I M H B E D R O O M D E N ( N O T O R I G I N A L ) S I T T I N G R O O M L I V I N G R O O M E X I S T I N G I N T E R I O R C O N D I T I O N S A L E T T E R D E N O T E S L O C AT I O N O N E X I S T I N G F L O O R P L A N THOMAS HOUSE1119 E 11TH ST AUSTIN TX 7870210 JUNE 2022 F W/H 4/WEST ELEVATION N 11°24'20" E 102.28' PROPERTY LINE 5' SETBACK OH OH KITCHEN DINING ROOM LIVING ROOM N O I T A V E L E H T U O S / 3 OH E ) T A L P R E P ( Y E L L A ' …
D E T E R I O R AT I N G F O U N D AT I O N , M E TA L S K I R T AT P O R C H D E C K A N D E X P O S E D S O I L S TA C K . N O N - O R I G I N A L A LT E R AT I O N S AT D E E P E R C O V E R E D P O R C H R O O F S U P P O R T B E A M S , S H O R T E N E D C O L U M N S A N D P LY W O O D AT C O V E R E D P O R C H C E I L I N G . R E P L A C E N O N - O R I G I N A L S I D E R E F R E S H F R O N T E N T R A N C E E N T R A N C E D O O R D O O R A D D I T I O N A L E X H I B I T S THOMAS HOUSE1119 E 11TH ST AUSTIN TX 7870210 JUNE 2022
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-084089 BRASS-GODDARD HOUSE 1108 W. 9TH STREET B.6 – 1 PROPOSAL Repair deteriorated porch elements and windows. Reopen enclosed door opening at front porch and install door and transom. Add elevator shaft to north elevation. Replace existing rear addition, add arbor at east elevation, and renovate existing garage and guest house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS and wood windows. 1) Repair deteriorated porch elements, including wood columns, wood balustrade, wood frieze and trim, porch foundation, 2) Reopen enclosed opening at front porch and install a door. 3) Add elevator and elevator shaft to north façade. The proposed elevator shaft allows access to all three floors. 4) Demolish two-story addition at rear (north) elevation. Construct a new two-story addition. The proposed addition includes a screened porch connecting to the guest house. Fenestration includes fixed-glazing steel windows and doors at full and half-height. Proposed cladding includes vertical wood rainscreen and metal shingle siding. Roof materials include nonreflective paint-grip standing seam metal. 5) Install detached steel arbor at east elevation. 6) Renovate existing detached garage and guest house to match addition. ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS Three-story limestone house designed by Jacob Larmour with Mansard roof, gabled dormers, limestone masonry cladding, second-floor veranda, widow’s walk, and wrap-around porch supported by Corinthian columns. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project includes repair, rather than replacement, of historic character-defining features. The application has been amended to reopen an enclosed door using physical evidence of patching and replace it with a door, rather than with a window from the rear of the building. 2. Foundations The proposed project repairs the deteriorated foundation and pavers in-kind. 3. Roofs The proposed project removes some roof material at the rear for the installation of an elevator. 4. Exterior walls and trim The proposed project repairs deteriorated trim. The application has been amended to reopen an enclosed door using physical evidence of patching and replace it with a door, rather than with a window from the rear of the building. 5. Windows, doors, and screens The proposed project includes repair of existing windows and replacement of an infilled door and transom. 6. Porches The …
