16.a - 4901 Ridge Oak Dr - public comment — original pdf
Backup
All documents
16.b - 4901 Ridge Oak Dr - public comment — original pdf
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office Please save 4901 Ridge Oak Drive Tuesday, March 4, 2025 1:56:11 PM [You don't often get email from https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Learn why this is important at External Email - Exercise Caution Hello, I am a resident of the beautiful neighborhood in Austin that’s home to 4901 Ridge Oak Dr. This house has served as a local landmark for me personally and my family for 15 years as we have lived in this area. We drive by the home and think what else could be done with this mid century time capsule? To honor and uphold and preserve our past is paramount to honoring our land and what it means to us. Because I live here, I matter, my voice matters. Thank you for reading this. Thank you for considering preserving and relegating historic status to the house at 4901 Ridge Oak Dr. in Austin, Texas. Thank you in advance for preserving the beautiful home on the corner lot with all the beautiful trees it contains. What a treasure we have in that home in our beautiful neighborhood. I can only imagine what is possible for such a gem. Thank you for not demolishing it. All the best, Jenna Smith 3607 Lucas Drive Austin, TX 78731 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
16.c - 4901 Ridge Oak Dr - public comment — original pdf
The Austin Historic Landmark Commission and City of Austin City of Austin Planning and Zoning Department To: Austin, TX Subject: Protest Against the Demolition of the Historic House at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive Dear Members of the Austin Historic Landmark Commission and the City of Austin and to whom it may concern: I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed demolition of the house located at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive. As a resident of Austin and a passionate advocate for the preservation of our city’s rich architectural and cultural heritage, I believe this house should be preserved, not destroyed. The house at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive, constructed around 1951, stands as a remarkable example of midcentury residential architecture, believed to have been designed by renowned Austin architect Barton Riley. This home is a testament to both the architectural vision of its time and the significant contributions of the Perry family to the development of Austin’s civic and cultural life. Edgar Perry III, a former City Council member and community leader, and his family are central to the history of this property, and the house has deep historical ties to both the Perry family and the evolution of the city. As a member of the neighborhood in which this house is a part, I have always admired its mid-century design and low-profile aesthetic. It serves as a sentry to our neighborhood - giving one a taste of how the neighborhood will look and feel beyond it. We all moved here for its interesting architecture, mid-century feel, trees, and proximity to downtown. This home serves as a sentinel for the entire neighborhood due to its historic and beautiful architecture and cultural relevance. Additionally, the significance of the Perry family’s involvement in Austin's business, political, and charitable sectors cannot be overstated. Edgar Perry III, a former Austin City Council member and mayor pro tempore, left an indelible mark on the city’s civic landscape. Demolishing the house erases a key piece of this history, one that is not only valuable for its architectural merit but also for its connection to the city’s political and social evolution. While I understand that new development is inevitable in a growing city like Austin, I urge the commission to consider the lasting impact of erasing such an important part of our city's history. Demolition would be a permanent loss to our cultural and architectural landscape. …
18.a - 1310 Haskell St - public comment — original pdf
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office PR 25-008862 1310 Haskell Street Friday, February 28, 2025 8:28:12 PM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution To Sam Fahnestock: I have a property at 62 Navasota. It is a small business and home for a tenant. We renovated the current structure so as to keep with the character of the neighborhood. I am opposed to the demolition of yet another property even without historical significance. And given this structure does, I strongly oppose the demolition of this structure. Paula Hern 1707 Francis Ave. Austin, Texas 78703 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
08.4 - 705 West Lynn St - Site Plan New Construction — original pdf
T E E R T S N N Y L T S E W 1130 SF 1350 SF 1345 SF 1240 SF 450 SF 450 SF 450 SF 450 SF FRONT UNIT AREA FIRST FLOOR FRONT PORCH GARAGE SECOND FLOOR CONDITIONED AREA SQ. FT. 1130 SF. 104 SF. 450 SF. 1,684 SF. 2,814 SF. REAR UNIT AREA FIRST FLOOR FRONT PORCH REAR PORCH SECOND FLOOR GARAGE SQ. FT. 1,345 SF. 64 SF. 142 SF. 1,551 SF. 450 SF. CONDITIONED AREA 2,896 SF.
09.2 - 1412 Preston Ave - Response to Staff — original pdf
1412 PRESTON HISTORIC REVIEW General Standards – 1.The proposed project removes intact historic material from the building’s exterior and replaces elements that do not appear to be deteriorated beyond repair. Replacement materials and elements do not look the same as the existing materials. - The proposed material replacements are necessary due to the deteriorated condition of the existing siding. While it may not have initially appeared beyond repair, upon closer inspection, the siding was completely rotted, with no existing substrate to support it. Additionally, the historic windows were sitting directly on the deteriorated material, further compromising structural integrity. - To ensure the long-term durability and historic character of the home, the rear siding will be replaced with new Hardie siding, matching the original in size, profile, and appearance. On the front façade, only the rotted siding will be replaced, using brick that matches the existing brick, while all existing brick will remain in place and be repainted. - This approach not only preserves the home’s architectural integrity but also creates a cohesive, historically compatible design that aligns with the character of Preston Street, where most brick houses feature fully bricked exteriors without the introduction of additional materials. The decision to unify the façade with brick is based on contextual precedent and ensures a low-maintenance, long-lasting solution in keeping with the surrounding historic streetscape. Preston brick homes examples a. b. C. d. 3. Roofs The proposed project replaces the shingle roof in-kind, but changes the roofline at the main façade. It adds decorative copper awnings that were not historically present. - The proposed roof work primarily consists of an in-kind replacement of the existing shingles, ensuring no changes to the overall structure except for necessary repairs. - The front porch roofline modification is a carefully considered design choice that enhances the openness of the porch while remaining scaled appropriately in relation to the existing garage hip, front house hip, and second-story hip. By introducing a gentle pitch that ties into the existing hip roof, the design maintains visual harmony with the home’s original massing. - Additionally, this modification is informed by contextual precedent, as it complements the rooflines and porch openings of other homes along Preston Avenue. The decorative copper awnings, while not historically present, are designed to be proportionate and compatible with the architectural character of the home, serving as an accent that enhances the overall aesthetic without disrupting historical …
09.3 - 1412 Preston Ave - Response to Neighbor Objection — original pdf
GTT RESPONSE - Volz Rebuttal HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE: The claim that this home was designed by Kelly and Nancy McAdams appears to be unverified and inconsistent with available records. 1. City of Austin records and the DEED list the Zidd family as residents in 1959, and historical documentation identifies them as physicians, with no clear connection to the McAdams. It also indicates that the home was designed in 1950 for Christopher Claus Eckhoff, who later sold the property to the Zidd family. Deed timeline: - 1949 home was built for Eckhoff. He sold the house to the Zedds - 1959 the Zedds lived in this home and passed in 1968 - 1970 Cooper Raymond lived here till 1985 - 1985 Cooper Raymond sold the house to Kelly E+ Ina Ray McAdams (Kelly R+ Nancy’s parents/inlaws) - Kelly E and Ina Ray McAdams lived in this house for 3 years and sold it in 1987 to John and Janis Dailey - 1987 John and Janis Dailey owned the home and also used it as a rental property until 2024. - 2024 John and Janis Dailey sold the home to the Camerons Given these inconsistencies, it is important that any discussions regarding the home’s historical significance be based on factual evidence and verified documentation. Without concrete records linking 1412 Preston to the McAdams, the assertion that it is one of their surviving designs is speculative and does not provide a justified basis for additional historic designation considerations. At the end of the day, we are here to discuss bringing the home back to its intended use of a single family home. See the following: 2. Our approach to 1412 Preston Avenue is guided by principles provided by the city, engaging the city, respecting the existing with simple facts: ● We have followed the due process of applying for the permit Dec 19th, obtaining a demo permit Jan 29th, albeit with a minor mistake by the builder/subs which will (and has not) happened again. And we apologize for the mistake and miscommunication. ● We are committed to preserving the existing structure, ensuring that any modifications respect the original design while enhancing functionality. Our goal is to save the house and bring it back to its original intent as a single family dwelling, from a rental property. And doing this in a respectful fashion. ● The planned modifications aim to adapt the home for contemporary …
15.4 - 2600 E Martin Luther King Jr Blvd - Updated Presentation 3-5 — original pdf
2600 E Martin Luther King Jr Boulevard Historic Landmark Commission 3/5/2025 1 Project Site 2 Holy Cross Hospital 3 Existing Structure Existing Structure Landmark Designation Criteria LDC 25-2-352: 1. The property must be 50 years old and must represent a period of significance of at least 50 years ago; and 2. The property must retain a high degree of integrity, as defined by the National Register of Historic Places, that clearly conveys its historical significance and does not include an addition or alteration which has significantly compromised its integrity. Landmark Designation Criteria The property must meet at least two of the below criteria: i. Architecture ii. Historical Associations iii. Archaeology iv. Community Value v. Landscape Feature i. Architecture ARCHITECURE CRITERIA: √ Embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized Staff Report: architectural style, type, or method of construction; × Exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; × Displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; × Represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; × Serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; × Possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or × Represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. “Mid-century Modern design by Page, Southerland and Page, however, its context as part of a larger hospital campus is gone” ii. Historical Associations HISTORICAL CRITERIA: The property has long-standing significant associations with persons, groups, institutions, businesses, or events of historic importance which contributed significantly to the history of the city, state, or nation; or represents a significant portrayal of the cultural practices or the way of life of a definable group of people in a historic time. • Holy Cross Hospital (established in 1940) was the first hospital to allow Black doctors in Austin • The site received a Texas Historical Commission marker in 2021, however the main hospital has been demolished. • Original Holy Cross Hospital site on 12th St has marker. ii. Historical Marker – 1610 E 11th St. iv. Community Value COMMUNITY CRITERIA: The property has a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, a neighborhood, or a particular group. • Holy Cross Hospital history is the basis …
16.d - 4901 Ridge Oak Dr - public comment — original pdf
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office In support of 4901 Ridge Oak Drive Historic Zoning Tuesday, March 4, 2025 2:51:45 PM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution To whom it may concern, As a registered architect and a resident of the Highland Park Balconies West neighborhood, I would like to voice my support for designating the house at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive as "historic." The home anchors the prominent corner at Crestway Drive and Ridge Oak Drive, welcoming residents as they find their way home each evening. Even before moving to this neighborhood eight years ago, I recognized this house as among the most important in the neighborhood. In part, it was 4901 Ridge Oak that made me want to live in this neighborhood. It embodies the mid-century optimism upon which the neighborhood was founded. The long, low roof forms nestle comfortably beneath the prominent heritage oaks, while the home itself steps back respectfully from the street - acknowledging that this is an acute intersection demanding big, sweeping turns and long sight-lines for safety. The material palette is simple and native to central Texas: undressed limestone, wood siding and glass. It's unobtrusive scale is friendly, welcoming and utterly without pretention. Healthy cities and neighborhoods evolve, and our neighborhood is no different. New development in the neighborhood less attuned to the long-low structures of the mid-century modern movement. Not every older home in the neighborhood warrants historic designation. However, it would negatively impact the neighborhood to lose this gem at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive. The house is significant in what it represents to the history of the development of Austin as it slowly migrated out from the city center. To allow un-restricted development of the site could endanger the heritage trees on site and, more significantly, make the sightlines around this corner more difficult - jeopardizing pedestrian and vehicular safety. Thank you for your consideration, Talmadge Smith, AIA 3607 Lucas Dr. Austin, TX 78731 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
16.e - 4901 Ridge Oak Dr - public comment — original pdf
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office Demolition of 4901 Ridge Oak Drive Tuesday, March 4, 2025 3:54:31 PM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Hello I am writing regarding the potential demotion of the property at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive in Austin, 78731. I understand that there is a request to designate this a historic landmark based primarily on its relation to the Perry family in Austin and its mid-century modern architecture. Although the lot and overall appearance of the property is appealing, I do not believe that this house is unique, well-designed, or of high enough quality to receive a historic landscape designation. I’ve been inside and around that property on several occasions. The interior light fixtures, doors, cabinets and flooring appear to be standard builder’s grade - simple painted woodwork and carpeting typical of houses built before the 1970s. A previous owner described it as ‘living in a dorm’. The exterior of the house has had little to no maintenance for at least ten years. Without such maintenance, I’ve watched the exterior stone walls and deck slowly decay and fall apart. This house has been available for sale for some time with no buyers and has become an eyesore. I’m tired of looking out my window and watching it slowly decay further. Please approve the demolition permit. Thanks Melissa CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
16.f - 4901 Ridge Oak Dr - public comment — original pdf
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office 4901 Ridge Oak Dr Tuesday, March 4, 2025 5:04:40 PM [You don't often get email from https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] . Learn why this is important at External Email - Exercise Caution I understand there is consideration for historic zoning for 4901 Ridge Oak Dr. As someone who lives in this neighborhood, I would oppose such zoning. This house is aesthetically ugly and does not add any historic value to the neighborhood. I understand it was at one time owned by a descendant of Commodore Perry, however we are all grandchildren of someone, that does not make us the historically important. I would urge the city to allow this structure to be replaced with a modern, safe house or - even better - two houses as we could use the increased density. Sincerely, Ben Pasmore 5109 Lucas Lane Austin, TX 78731 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
16.g - 4901 Ridge Oak Dr - public comment — original pdf
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office 4901 Ridge Oak Dr. Wednesday, March 5, 2025 9:23:52 AM [You don't often get email from https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Learn why this is important at External Email - Exercise Caution Good Morning, I would like to let you know that there are many of us in our neighborhood that would like for 4901 Ridge Oak to have an historic zoning status. I have lived in this neighborhood for almost 20 years and walk my dog daily. This house and property are amazing. I love the trees, the bluebonnets that signal to the neighborhood that it is spring and that the midcentury look of the home. It would be heartbreaking to see a modern home at this site. Thank you, Shelly Russell 5013 Westview Austin, Tx 78731 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
16.h - 4901 Ridge Oak Dr - public comment — original pdf
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office Supporting Historic Designation for 4901 Ridge Oak Dr Wednesday, March 5, 2025 12:29:38 PM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Good afternoon, I am in support of the historic designation of 4902 Ridge Oak Drive. It is my understanding that the house was … Designed by Austin architect Barton Riley, the house at 4901 Ridge Oak Drive was constructed around 1951 for Edgar Perry III, grandson of Edgar Howard “Commodore” Perry. My family & I have lived at 5013 Westview Dr, Austin TX 78731 for the past 18+ years. Destruction of the home at 4901 Ridge Oak would also fundamentally change the character of the neighborhood - especially at an extremely prominent and visible location. I appreciate your consideration of my concern and position. Dave David Knoll CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
Item 5. Academia Cuauhtli Budget Proposal for FY25-26 — original pdf
Fiscal Year 2025 - 2026 Budget Recommendation Academia Cuauhtli seeks support for its FY 2025-2026 budget recommendation aimed at serving predominantly indigenous, Hispanic, Spanish-speaking youth in Austin. We are requesting on-going funding for culturally and linguistically diverse programs with an annual allocation of $105,930.00. Below is a concise outline of our minimal operating costs derived from the fiscal year 2023-2024, along with a proposal for additional funds to initiate our programmatic expansion. Detailed program descriptions, budgets, and material costs can be found on the following pages. Minimal Operational Costs ❖ Academia Cuauhtli (Eagle Academy) - Saturday Arts Program $37,750 ❖ Parent Support Program ❖ Bilingual Summer Program/ La Colaborativa Cuauhtli ❖ Teacher Conference Fund ❖ Teacher Professional Development Total Fund Request Amount $105,930 $13,300 $43,380 $10,000 $1,500 $105,930 Fiscal Year 2025 - 2026 Budget Recommendation Our Minimal Necessary Operating Costs ensure the seamless continuation of our programs by covering essential expenses, including operational costs and staffing. This foundational support sustains the quality and impact of our initiatives. The detailed budget breakdown encompasses four key components: Saturday Academy, Parent Support Program, Bilingual Summer Camp, and Teacher Professional Development funds, each playing a vital role in serving our community and fulfilling our mission. Minimum Necessary Operational Costs (106K) Saturday Academy (37.8K): A bilingual and cultural revitalization program offers instruction in Mexican American Studies and STEM curriculum for third to fifth grade students attending AISD. We focus on creating alternative learning spaces with focuses on social emotional learning and culturally responsive education. The program runs throughout the school year, spanning 20 weeks and serving approximately 50 youth participants. Program Costs: (37.8K) ● Staff (26.2K) ○ (13.2K) - 3 Activity Specialists for Saturday school ■ $4,400 - $22p/hr, 10 hours per week , 20 weeks ■ $13,200 total per school year ○ (2.2K) - Professional Instructor I - Danza Teacher ■ ~$2,170 - $31 p/hr, 10 hours per week, 7 weeks ○ (7K) - Fall Program Support Specialist ■ $7,020 total per fall semester: 27 p/hr, 20 hrs per week, 13 weeks total ○ (3.8K) - Spring Program Support Specialist ■ $3,780 total per fall semester: 27 p/hr, 20 hrs per week, 7 weeks total ● Food (8K) ○ (5K) - Breakfast Tacos/Prepared Foods ○ (3K) - Store bought breakfast items, sack lunches, snacks, etc. ● Materials: (1.7K) - art supplies, danza supplies, graduation items ○ (1K) - Art supplies ○ ($500) - Danza …
Item 5. Academia Cuauhtli Programming Presentation for FY25-26 Budget — original pdf
Bilingual cultural revitalization program for third to fifth grade students attending AISD. Vision A future where children live with a thinking heart and the courage to pursue their aspirations within liberating and sacred learning spaces. Mission Honor our community’s cultural heritage Foster a social justice consciousness Reclaim our collective identities in pursuit of educational freedom The Purpose Despite a predominantly Indigenous, Hispanic, and Spanish-speaking youth population in Texas, the lack of culturally relevant education limits self-expression, academic success, and a sense of belonging. Initiatives Throughout the years Nuestro Grupo has established various partnerships and initiatives within the community with key focuses on students, teachers, parents, and community members. Academia Cuauhtli Parent Support Program STEM/Aztech Kidz Code Teacher Development Academia Cuauhtli The Bilingual Cultural Revitalization Saturday Academy offers ethnic studies and Danza Mexica instruction to AISD third- to fifth-graders at no cost, including breakfast and transportation. In 2023, ~60 students were hosted from six Title 1 AISD schools, including: Sanchez, Perez, Houston, Travis Heights, Harris, and Hart Elementary schools. Program Costs (38K) The program runs throughout the school year, spanning 20 weeks and serving an average of 50 youth participants. Projected costs for 2025-2026 fiscal year: Staff (26.2K) Food (8K) Materials (1.7K) Field Trips (1K) Custodian (1K) Family Support (13.3K) The Parent Support Program engages families during the Saturday Academy, providing community resources tailored to their needs and guest speakers, such as the Mexican Consulate. Parent Support Specialist (10.8K) Guest Speakers (2K) Materials ($500) Summer Program (44K) A culturally sustaining STEAM program for third to fifth grade AISD students to learn coding and Danza Mexica in both Spanish and English. Science, Tech, Engineering, Art, Math (STEAM) Social Emotional Learning (SEL) Culturally Relevant Curriculum Experiential Learning (Field Trips) Program Costs (44K) Last summer, we offered three two-week sessions, serving a total of 65 Austin youth participants. Projected costs for 2025-2026 fiscal year: Staff (32.8K) Field Trips (1.5K) Materials (7K) Custodial Staff (4.5K) Food (4.5K) Teacher PD (11.5K) Preparation and mentorship for teachers through support networks, professional development workshops, conferences, and La Colaborativa Cuauhtli, which sends teachers to Mexico annually. Attend Conferences (10K) Professional Development Workshops (1.5K) Budget FY25-26 (106K) Teacher PD 11500 Saturday Academy 37750 Bilingual Summer Camp 43380 Parent Support Program 13300 Support the Vision Help us secure ongoing funding from Austin City Council members to support the academic and cultural growth, sense of identity, and belonging of indigenous, Hispanic, Spanish-speaking …
Play audio — original link
Play audio
Recommendation 20250305-004 - 2025-26 Budget Recommendation — original pdf
COMMISSION FOR WOMEN RECOMMENDATION 20250305-004 Seconded By: Commissioner Scheihing 2025-26 Budget Recommendation Date: March 5, 2025 Subject: Motioned By: Chair Tau Recommendation The City of Austin Commission for Women urges City Council to prioritize funding for previously identified unmet needs as well as enhancements that particularly impact women and girls in Austin. Description of Recommendation to Council In particular, the commission recommends funding for: ● The Collective Sex Crimes Response Model - with a focus on ensuring its formal completion and closure and a seamless transition to a future governance body such as the Sexual Assault Response and Resource Team (SARRT) ● Menstrual equity supplies in public libraries ● The Family Stabilization Grant Program ● The Workforce and Childcare Division ● After-school programming geared toward building positive mental health in girls in Title 1 schools Rationale: As support for the unique needs of disadvantaged populations is attacked at the federal level, it is incumbent upon the City of Austin to make every effort to protect the safety and well-being of its disadvantaged residents. Our commission is particularly concerned with Austin’s women and girls, especially those with intersecting marginalized identities. We hope that if pending threats to cut Medicaid and Social Security indeed manifest under the current presidential administration that the City will maintain some flexibility in its budget to address urgent needs that may arise in order to proactively protect our vulnerable populations. Vote: Approved on an 8-0 vote. For: Chair Tau, Vice Chair Bullard, Commissioners Bissereth, Glasser, Harris, Melendez, Scheihing and Veloz-Salas. Against: None Abstain: None Absent: Commissioners Austen and Rattan Attest: Christi Vitela Commission for Women staff liaison [Staff or board member can sign]
Play video — original link
Play video
Item 5 Digital Needs Assessment backup — original pdf
Travis County and the City of Austin 2023 Broadband and Digital Equity Needs Assessment 4.5 Access inside and outside the home 4.5.1 Computers to thrive and mobile to survive 4.5.2 Location based access outside the home 5.1.3 Increase availability, accessibility, and awareness of free public- access internet options 5.1.4 Support mobile connectivity 5.4.1 Support people’s ownership of their own data as a default 5.4.2 Provide the public with information on anti-spam laws 5.1.5 Advocate for the accessibilty of services, programs, and mobile information online, especially on 5.4.3 Support the decision-making autonomy of tenants when it comes to their decisions about internet and technology Contents 1 Introduction 2 Background 3 Approach 4 Findings 4.1 Who is and is not connected 4.6 Technology support 4.1.1 Populations that face higher digital barriers 4.7 Consumer protection concerns 4.1.2 By geography 4.1.3 By race/ethnicity 4.1.4 By income 4.2 The cost of connecting 4.3 Lack of digital skills 4.3.1 Digital skills and breaks in economic or educational participation 4.3.2 Differences in self-reported digital skills 4.7.1 Spams, scams, and data privacy and ownership 4.7.2 Unfair or confusing marketing practices 4.7.3 Planned obsolescence and lack of affordable repair options 4.7.4 Internet options in multi-tenant environments (MTEs) 4.8 Need for accessibility features 4.9 Issues of trust 5 Recommendations 4.3.3 Who is interested in digital skills training 4.3.4 What digital skills topics do people want to know Internet service availability, quality, and 4.4 reliability 5.1 How might we support all populations in accessing affordable, reliable, high- speed internet? 5.1.1 Provide targeted support to populations that have higher digital barriers 4.4.1 Causes for disruption 4.4.2 Who is impacted by disruption 4.4.3 What is impacted by disruption 5.1.2 Identify and support strategies to make sure all consumers know what low-cost internet options are available and how to compare and sign up for plans 5.2 How might we promote and maintain the community’s access to quality, low- cost devices? 6 How to get engaged 5.2.1 Identify, support, and promote sources of low-cost devices 5.2.2 Increase the availability, awareness, and affordability of options to have devices reparied or receive technology support 5.2.3 Support the ability of consumers to repair their own devices 7 Thank you 8 About this report 9 Appendix 9.1 Methods 5.3 How might we improve the community’s access to free digital skills training and development opportunities 5.3.1 Teach community members what they want to know 5.3.2 Provide digital skills training in …
Play video — original link
Play video