Mold Assessment Summary Client Name Project Address Date of Inspection November 21, 2022 Scope Entire Structure Ilia Belov 2003 Canterbury Street ~ Austin, TX 78702 Summary of Findings and Lab Results My inspection revealed the following suspect conditions: • Visible mold-like growth • Elevated moisture content • Water damage or staining Samples were recommended according to the conditions observed and/or the reported complaints or concerns. Surface samples were collected from areas of visible mold-like growth, and laboratory analysis confirmed the presence of mold on the areas sampled as follows: • Crawlspace – Floor Truss • Primary Bedroom – Wall drywall • Kitchen – Ceiling Drywall Air samples were collected from the following areas, and laboratory analysis indicated the airborne mold spore concentration levels to be statistically elevated when compared to the outdoor air sample collected at the same time and place. Based on these results, there is a high likelihood that an indoor source of mold growth in the tested area is amplifying the indoor levels as follows: • Kitchen • Primary Bedroom • Primary Bathroom • Living Room Final Conclusion Based on the findings of the visual inspection and/or the lab results of the samples collected, mold remediation is needed. Corporate Office: (512) 535-2493 • 10403 Quail Ridge Dr., Austin, TX 78704 www.MoldInspectionTexas.com Recommendations 1. Engage Mold Inspection Sciences to write a Mold Remediation Protocol for the remediation project which is to include the following areas: • Living Room (<25 SF) • Kitchen (<25 SF) • Primary Bedroom (<25 SF) • Primary Bathroom (<25 SF) If less than (< 25 SF) 25 SF of visible mold growth was present, according to the Texas Mold Assessment and Remediation Rules (Rules), Exceptions and Exemptions, (b) Minimum area exemption, “A person is not required to be licensed under this subchapter to perform mold remediation in an area in which the mold contamination for the project affects a total surface area of less than 25 contiguous square feet.” In this case, a Licensed Mold Remediation Contractor is not required, but we strongly recommend hiring a licensed company. NOTICE: According to the Texas Mold and Remediation Rules (Rules): Regardless of the size of the area affected by mold contamination, if a licensed Mold Remediation Contractor is hired by the consumer, the Mold Remediation Contractor must follow the Rules. This includes developing a work plan which follows a protocol developed by a licensed Mold Assessment …
Document Number: TSE-2022-502094-STR-RPT-001-01 Nov 23, 2022, This letter summarizes the results of my structural and foundation assessment of a single-family home located at 2003 Canterbury St, Austin, TX 78702, inspected on Nov 18, 2022. TexasStructuralEngineers.com; Registration No.: F-21242. We Operate in 10 Largest Cities of Texas, Page 1 of 63 7505 Fannin St Suite 440 Houston TX 77054, (833) 781-7661, info@TexasStructuralEngineers.com The client hired Texas Structural Engineers to perform a structural inspection of the house based on the recommendation from the home inspector. Background Process Findings I inspected the house's interior and exterior walls, ceiling, roof framing (through the attic), and foundation, including the piers, beams, and floor sheathings. I also measured the maximum floor level differences using a laser level to investigate any foundation settlements in this house. The following are the findings from the structural inspection of the property: 1. The house is aged and worn. 2. There are several cracks in the house's ceilings and interior walls in multiple places (Figures 2 to 11). 3. There is visibly sagging on the ceiling drywall in the living room of the house (Figure 12). places (Figure 13). 4. There is visible damage and cracks on the floor of the house in multiple 5. There is visible rotten wood on the interior walls sheathings in multiple locations of the house (Figures 14 to 18). TexasStructuralEngineers.com; Registration No.: F-21242. We Operate in 10 Largest Cities of Texas, Page 2 of 63 7505 Fannin St Suite 440 Houston TX 77054, (833) 781-7661, info@TexasStructuralEngineers.com 6. The wall is not stable on the west side of the house and has movement. 7. The crawl space and floor have some leveling problems in this house. 8. The floor surfaces were walked and viewed for potential movement and deflection (Figure 16). 9. There are multiple piers that are missing a footing (Figures 40 to 50). 10. There are some different types of piers with different heights and sizes used in the house's foundation (Figures 40 to 50). 11. There are the most visible rotten floor beams and floor joists (Figures 40 to 50). 12. There are visible rotten and termite wood piers in multiple locations in the crawl space (Figures 31,32, 50,51). 13. There are about five piers that seem to be skewed and not fully vertical (Figure 31,34,40). 14. Visible rotten wood on the exterior walls sheathings on the east, west, and south side of …
2003 Canterbury Historic Land Commission Presentation Proximity to Historic Districts Proximity to Historic Districts Structural Report Excerpts There is visible rotten wood on the framing members of the wall on the east and west side of the house. Structural Report Excerpts There is water damage on the ceiling sheathings of the kitchen Structural Report Excerpts Visible rotten wood on the exterior walls sheathings on the east, west, and south side of the house Structural Report Excerpts There are visible rotten and termite wood piers in multiple locations in the crawl space Structural Report Excerpts There are the most visible rotten floor beams and floor joists Structural Report Excerpts There are visible damaged and rotted members of the roof frame in multiple locations in the attic The laser level reading of the floor shows a maximum level difference of 7 inches on a span of 23 feet. 1705 Haskell St Historic Designation Denial
LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 40' MARK SECTION B LOW POINT -1'-8 3/8" N 67°43'09'' W 101.22' (F.M.) N 65°30'00'' W 101.22' (PLAT) 4'-1 1/2" 5' BLDG. SETBACK 482 PROPERTY LINE LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 0' MARK SECTION A LOW POINT -2'-9 3/8" 480 PL PL LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 80' MARK SECTION C LOW POINT 0'-3 3/4" FROM FNC. POST N 80°53'37'' W 0.56' PL PL 484 " 4 / 3 1 - ' 8 K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 5 E N I L Y T R E P O R P ) . M . F ( ' 8 2 . 1 5 W ' ' ' 3 0 7 5 ° 7 2 S 486 488 7'-0" 33'-4" 3'-6" 4'-0" 22'-10" " 4 / 1 2 - ' 6 10'-7 1/2" " 0 1 - ' 0 1 2 3 " 2 / 1 7 - ' 4 P U N D EXIST. 1 -STORY WOOD FRAME SIDING HOUSE NEW SECOND AND THIRD STORY ADDITION 100'-0" F.F.E. FIRST LEVEL ELECTRIC POLE T E E R T S O C N A L B E T E R C N O C K L A W E D S I ) T A L P ( ' 9 2 . 1 5 E ) . M F. ( ' 9 2 . 1 5 E ' ' ' ' ' 0 0 4 5 ° 9 2 N ' 1 5 0 4 ° 7 2 N E N I L Y T R E P O R P K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 0 2 K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 5 1 K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 0 2 PL 488 PL 486 484 LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 80' MARK SECTION C HIGH POINT +1'-8 3/8" VARIES" (TENT PORTION B) 40'-0" (TENT PORTION B) 40'-0" (TENT PORTION A) 5' BLDG. SETBACK GATE GATE 482 PROPERTY LINE SERVICE YARD LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 40' MARK SECTION B HIGH POINT -2'-5 5/8" S 65°29'00'' E 101.46' (PLAT) S 67°42'09'' E 101.46' (F.M.) 480 PL PL LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 0' MARK SECTION A HIGH POINT -3'-5" M P 6 3 : …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Monday, December 12, 2022 3:41 PM HPD Preservation Comment on Case HR-2022-170074 - 613 Blanco St. *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To the Historic Preservation Office, attn: Amber Allen: Please register my opposition to the project planned for 613 Blanco St. (Case HR-2022- 170074). This project violates multiple deed restrictions (height, easement, etc.); requires removal of a large tree; is an inappropriate and incompatible addition that would be seen by multiple neighbors including me. Thanks for your consideration, Randall Brown CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Item 1 JOINT SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING MEETING MINUTES October 26, 2022 The Joint Sustainability Committee convened in a hybrid meeting on October 26, 2022 via videoconferencing and at City Hall, Council Chambers, 301 West 2nd Street, Austin, Texas Chair Kaiba White called the Board Meeting to order at 6:10 pm. Board Members in Attendance: Kaiba White, Richard DePalma, Diana Wheeler, Melissa Rothrock, Haris Qureshi, Alberta Phillips, David Carroll, Frances Deviney, Kelsey Hitchingham, Karen Hadden Board Members Absent: Fisayo Fadelu, Robert Schneider City Staff in Attendance: Rohan Lilauwala CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION The speakers who registered in advance for public comment have three minutes each to address items on the agenda at this time. N/A 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES June 22, 2022, meeting of the Joint Sustainability Committee • Motion to approve (Rothrock), second (Wheeler). Record of the vote: 10 approved, 0 opposed, 0 abstained. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES August 24, 2022 meeting of the Joint Sustainability Committee • Motion to approve (Rothrock), second (Wheeler). Record of the vote: 10 approved, 0 opposed, 0 abstained. 4. AUSTIN TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CLIMATE EQUITY PLAN – COLE KITTEN, AUSTIN TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT (DISCUSSION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION) • Many transportation elements in Austin Strategic Mobility Plan are aligned with the Austin Climate Equity Plan. • Common goals around mode shift (shift of 70% to target 50% of people driving alone to work) and equity (success should be centered on equity) • Strategies in both plans are circularly referenced and supportive of each other’s goals • Presentation provided insights on ATD’s implementation of strategies in the Climate Equity Plan, including work as part of Project Connect, Mobility Bond Funding, Walk Bike Roll, • Rothrock: Kyle has a Boring Company tunnel proposal, has Austin considered this? State employees work downtown but don’t have CapMetro passes and free parking • DePalma: when do we see implementation of WalkBikeRoll initiatives • Kitten: Since 2016 bond, local mobility programs have annual implementation plans, presented to public for feedback. In 2020 bond, equity was centered. WalkBikeRoll = updates to plans, and updates to implementation. 2016 bond closing out in 2024, 2020 bond spending to last until 2027. 5. AUSTIN ENERGY RESIDENTIAL RATES AND VALUE OF SOLAR TARIFF (DISCUSSION AND/OR POSSIBLE ACTION) • Base rate review – Mark Dombroski, CFO, Austin Energy • Everything relevant to base rate case available on AE website • Presentation covered history of …
Joint Sustainability Committee: Departments Activities Related to the Austin Climate Equity Plan Rachel Tepper, AICP Housing and Planning Department December 14, 2022 Content • Related Climate Equity Goals • Short Term Goals and Activities • Success Measures • Equity Tools and Initiatives Climate Equity Policy Goals related to HPD TLU, Goal 1 (TLU.G1): 80% of new non-residential development is located within the city’s activity centers and corridors. – TLU.G1-S1: Plan for complete communities TLU, Goal 2 (TLU.G2): By 2027, preserve and produce 135,000 housing units, including 60,000 affordable housing units, with 75% of new housing located within ½ mile of activity centers and corridors. – TLU.G2-S1: Offer immediate affordable housing assistance – TLU.G2-S2: Fund affordable housing – TLU.G2-S3: Enhance community engagement for affordable housing and anti-displacement programs 3 Short Term Goals and Activities TLU.G1-S1: Plan for complete communities – Northeast Austin District Plan Resolution No. 20201112-043 – Staff conducted a solicitation for consultants in the summer of 2022 that did not have any compliant responses; staff is considering other approaches and will send an update to Council in fall of 2022. – Equitable Transit Oriented Development Planning Resolution No. 20201112-043 – Public Review of ETOD Policy Plan: November 2022 – City Council initiated Station Area Planning in North Lamar Transit Center and South Congress Transit Center December 8, 2022 – ETOD Policy Plan and initiation of related code amendments will be considered February 2023 – District Level Planning Process Resolution No. 20220609-069 – Staff anticipates sending a response to Council in early 2023. – Palm District Planning Initiative Resolution No. 20190523-029 – Public Review of Draft Plan: October 2022 – City Council 1st Reading: February 2023 4 Short Term Goals and Activities TLU.G2-S1: Offer immediate affordable housing assistance – From August 2020 to January 2022, the housing and planning department distributed nearly $76 million in direct rental assistance 5 Short Term Goals and Activities TLU.G2-S2: Fund affordable housing: All Subsidized Units Constructed/Pending 6 Short Term Goals and Activities TLU.G2-S2: Fund affordable housing: Subsidized Units Constructed/Pending 7 Short Term Goals and Activities TLU.G2-S2: Fund affordable housing: Incentivized Units Constructed/Pending 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 Downtown + Rainey East Riverside Corridor 138 0 North Burnet Gateway 190 31 TODs 233 362 University Neighborhood Overlay 195 1,092 Vertical Mixed-Use (VMU) 549 657 Planned Unit Development s (PUD) 5 317 Under Construction Completed 40 …
UPDATE ON AUSTIN CLIMATE EQUITY PLAN EFFORTS PRESENTATION TO JOINT SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE DECEMBER 14, 2022 STEPHANIE HELFMAN & MICHELLE FRIEDMAN APH Mission and Vision Vision: Everyone will have an optimal quality of life, health and well-being free from racism, poverty and oppression Mission: To prevent disease, promote health and protect the well-being of all Accredited by the Public Health Accreditation Board Austin Climate Equity Plan (ACEP) Food and Product Consumption: Strategy 2: Promote and fund community-driven food retail programs Retail: ▪ Mobile Markets and Curbside Delivery (Farmshare Austin) ▪ Nutrition education and recipe sampling at Markets (SFC) ▪ Healthy Corner Store Program (APH + EDD) Non-Retail outlets: ▪ Healthy Food Pantries and Pop-ups (Foundation Communities) ▪ APH Neighborhood Centers Food Programs ▪ Equidad ATX ACEP Food and Product Consumption: Strategy 3: Incentivize pro-climate, pro-health food choices ▪ Double Up Food Bucks (SFC) ▪ Farmers Markets, Mobile Markets ▪ Grocery Expansion of Double Up Food Bucks (SFC) ▪ Wheatsville Food Co-op Additional Strategy: Educate on pro-heath food choices Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Diabetes Empowerment Education Program PreventT2 Diabetes Prevention Program Mayors Health and Fitness Council Worksite Partner Certification Program Additional Strategy: Building community resiliency ▪Social Determinants of Health Screening and Referral through ConnectATX ▪Public Health Emergency Preparedness ▪Cold Weather Sheltering Operations ▪Competition for Social Services Food Access and Distribution programming coming out in February 2022 Thank You! FO R A D DI T IO NAL I N FO R M ATIO N CO N TAC T: ST E PHA NIE.HELF M AN@AU STINTEXAS.GOV M I CHE L LE. FR IEDMAN@ AU STI NTEXAS.GOV
Joint Sustainability Committee Strategic Planning Discussion 12/14/22 Context The Austin Climate equity Plan was adopted in September 2021 Resolution 110 directed the addition of 5 new members to the JSC Over the last year, we’ve had challenges meeting quorum We’ve had a lot of back and forth about working groups / community task forces, with no resolution The Office of Sustainability is not “in charge” of implementing the climate equity plan and we have no dedicated budget for projects from the plan We’ve been inviting departments to present on their climate equity plan aligned activities for the past year, usually creating lots of Q&A The JSC occasionally passes resolutions adopted by other commissions (in support of their work) Seems like a good opportunity to pause and think strategically about what comes next Who is the JSC? The council creates the Joint Sustainability Committee of the: Community Development Commission; Design Commission; Economic Prosperity Commission; Electric Utility Commission; Environmental Commission; Parks and Recreation Board; Planning Commission; Resource Management Commission; Austin-Travis County Food Policy Board; Urban Transportation Commission; Water and Wastewater Commission; and Zero Waste Advisory Commission. (12 commissions) + + 1 Social Service Committee Nominee 5 Mayoral Nominees 18 total members, quorum = 10 The council intends that the joint committee members represent a broad diversity of community stakeholders including: large companies and employers; small businesses owners and non-profit leaders; renters; central city residents and families; and suburban residents and families. JSC By-laws The joint committee shall advise the council on matters related to conservation and sustainability; and review City policies and procedures relevant to the Austin Community Climate Plan and the Austin Climate Equity Plan, including planning, implementation, community engagement, goal setting, and progress monitoring; promote close cooperation between the council, City management, City boards, commissions, committees, and task forces, and individuals, institutions, and agencies concerned with the politics, procedures, and implementation of the Austin Community Climate Plan and the Austin Climate Equity Plan, with the goal of coordinating all similar activities within the City and the community in order to secure the greatest public benefit; and forward to the city manager all advisory material that the joint committee provides to the council, the Office of Sustainability, City departments and offices, or City boards, commissions, committees, and task forces. The joint committee may: advise the council, the city manager, the Office of Sustainability, City departments and offices, and City boards, commissions, …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, November 2, 2022 – 6:00 PM CITY HALL - Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. COMMISSION MEMBERS: x Terri Myers, Chair x Ben Heimsath, Vice Chair x Anissa Castillo x Witt Featherston x Kevin Koch x Carl Larosche x Harmony Grogan x Trey McWhorter x Blake Tollett x Beth Valenzuela x Caroline Wright DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Meghan King gave an update for Preservation Austin. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. October 5, 2022 – Offered for consent approval MOTION: Approve the minutes, per passage of the consent agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Larosche. Commissioner Koch seconded the motion. Vote: 11-0. BRIEFINGS 2. Palm District plan Presenter: Mark Walters 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS/DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION Historic Zoning Applications 3. C14H-2022-0139 – 2311 Woodlawn Blvd. – Discussion The Felts-Moss House Council District 10 Proposal: Owner-initiated historic zoning Applicant: John Pieratt City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Recommend historic zoning. John Pieratt spoke in favor of the project. There were no speakers in opposition. MOTION: Close the public hearing, on a motion by Commissioner Larosche. Commissioner Koch seconds the motion. Vote 11-0. MOTION: Recommend historic zoning, on a motion by Commissioner Grogan. Commissioner Castillo seconded the motion. Vote: 11-0. Historic Landmark and Local Historic District Applications 4. HR-2022-119336 – 900 Blanco St./1202 W. 9th St./901 Shelley Ave. – Consent Castle Hill Local Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Addition/remodel (Postponed October 5, 2022) Applicant: Tyler Rush City Staff: Kimberly Collins, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-1801 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the plans with the following conditions: notes are added to the plans that the carriage house is moved under structural engineer supervision via lifting and rotating the structure, not deconstruction and rebuild; and if there is significant deterioration found resulting in the need for deviance from the approved plans that the case return to the Historic Landmark Commission for approval. MOTION: Approve the project in accordance with the staff recommendation, per passage of the consent agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Larosche. Commissioner Koch seconded the …
TO B E R E M OV E D PR O P O S E D CO N S T R U C T I O N T R E E S TO B E R E M OV E D T R E E S TO R E M A I N (cid:14)(cid:24)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:10) (cid:14)(cid:24)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:10) (cid:14)(cid:24)(cid:28) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:22)(cid:22)(cid:22)(cid:25)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:23) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:20) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:20) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:20) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:20) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:20) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:25) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:21) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:21) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:21) (cid:10) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:21) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:22) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:22) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:22) (cid:10)(cid:22) O C (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:19) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:19) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:24)(cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:26) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:27) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:28) (cid:10) (cid:23)(cid:24)(cid:25) (cid:23)(cid:24)(cid:25)(cid:23)(cid:24) E M G (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:28) PARKING COURT P L BRICK WALL (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:24) (cid:24)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:23)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:22) O C (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:20) (cid:19) (cid:10) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:21) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:27) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:27) O C BASKETBALL COURT (cid:23)(cid:26)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:26)(cid:23) (cid:14)(cid:25)(cid:19)(cid:23)(cid:10) (cid:14)(cid:25)(cid:19) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:24)(cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:25)(cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:26)(cid:10) (cid:24)(cid:21)(cid:24) (cid:24)(cid:21)(cid:24) (cid:10) (cid:27) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:14) FOOTPATH (cid:28) (cid:10) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:14) POOL HOUSE POOL (cid:19)(cid:10) (cid:20) (cid:25) (cid:14) UTILIT Y SHED PL ANTER (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:26) (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:26) (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:27) (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:27) TREE HOUSE (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:26)(cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:26)(cid:22)(cid:26)(cid:26)(cid:26)(cid:26) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:26) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:25) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:25) POOL EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE / LOW WALL WELL HOUSE (cid:23)(cid:26)(cid:28)(cid:26)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:26)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:24)(cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:24)(cid:24)(cid:24)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:24)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:24)(cid:28)(cid:24)(cid:28) (cid:24)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:26) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:26) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:23) (cid:24)(cid:21)(cid:23) (cid:24)(cid:21)(cid:23) (cid:10) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:26)(cid:10) (cid:26)(cid:10) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:25) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:14) (cid:14) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:28) (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:28) (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:28) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:27) (cid:27) (cid:27) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:25) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:14) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:27) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:27)(cid:28)(cid:27)(cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:28) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:26)(cid:10) (cid:25) (cid:10) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:19) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:19) CURB CUT TO BE RELOCATED FO NOISNETXE WROUGHT IRON FENCE NORTHUMBERLAND RD NEW GATE NEW GATE (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:27) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:27) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:19) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:19) (cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:28)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:28) (cid:19)(cid:10) (cid:20) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:25) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:25)(cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:25) (cid:14)(cid:25)(cid:19)(cid:27)(cid:10) (cid:28)(cid:10) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:22) (cid:14)(cid:25)(cid:19)(cid:26)(cid:10) 364 3 264 464 460 TENNIS SSIISSSSSSSSS T NNNNNNNNNNNNNEEEETT NTTEEEEEETT NNNNNE TT TENNISNN SS TENNIS TENN SS TENNIS TENNISS TENNIS CCCCOOOOOOOOUUUUUUURRRRRTTRRTTTRTRTTTTT R CCCCCCOOOOOOOOUUUURRRRUUCCC CC COURTUU TT COURTUCCCOURT COCO COURT COURT COURT 474 R DN (4) R @ 6" DN DN (4) R @ 6" …
Special Called Meeting of the Impact Fee Advisory Committee December 13, 2022, 4:30 PM Hybrid Meeting held via WebEx and in person at: The City of Austin Permitting and Development Center, Room 1203 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive, Austin, Tx Some members of the Committee may be participating by videoconference. Members of the public who would like to join the virtual meeting may do so by selecting this link: https://austintexas.webex.com/austintexas/j.php?MTID=mc3f773ea4c0dbbdedc5cde065fc09e3b or by dialing 1-408-418-9388 (Toll) or 1-844-992-4726 (Toll Free). Meeting number/Access code: 2482 367 9727 / Yq6SW7bwuK3 Members of the public wishing to speak during public communication must register in advance by emailing their name, email address and/or phone number to lauren.t.king@austintexas.gov no later than Tuesday, December 13, 2022, at 12 p.m. If you experience technical difficulties logging in or calling in, please call Lauren King at (210) 854-6654. Please indicate in your email if you’d like to speak on a specific item. CURRENT COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Kris Bailey Lance Parisher Susan Turrieta Dick Kallerman Channy Soeur Chi Lee Bobak Tehrany, Chair CALL TO ORDER – December 13, 2022, 4:30 p.m. AGENDA PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items NOT posted on the agenda. Speakers who would like to address items ON the agenda will be called on by the Chair to speak for up to three-minutes when that item is taken up. 1. Approve the minutes of the Impact Fee Advisory Committee Special Meeting on APPROVAL OF MINUTES November 15, 2022. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 2. Discussion and possible action on the water and wastewater Semi-Annual Impact Fee Report for April 1, 2022, through September 30, 2022, as set forth in the functions of the advisory committee, Austin City Code and Chapter 395.058 of the Texas Local Government Code. 3. Staff briefing and committee discussion on draft service areas and land use assumptions for water and wastewater impact fees under development in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local. 4. Discussion and possible action on future Impact Fee Advisory Committee meeting dates for 2023. Impact Fee Advisory Committee December 13, 2022 Page 2 of 2 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations …
CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS AUSTIN WATER SEMI-ANNUAL IMPACT FEE COLLECTIONS REPORT April 1, 2022 through September 30, 2022 City of Austin | Austin Water P.O. Box 1088 Austin, TX 78767 AustinWater.org Martin Tower, P.E., Managing Engineer, Austin Water Nam Nguyen, Financial Manager II, Austin Water December 2, 2022 Semi-Annual Impact Fee Collections Report for April 1, 2022 to September 30, 2022 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Subject: The Semi-Annual Impact Fee Collections Report as of September 30, 2022, is attached for your reference. The report is based on financial information reported in the City’s accounting system, ADV3, and in AMANDA, one of the City’s accounts receivable systems. Water fees collected during this six-month reporting period were $5,393,695 lower than the amount collected during the April through September reporting period a year prior; wastewater fees collected were $2,428,124 lower than those collected during the same period one year ago. Interest earnings for the six-month period equaled $242,377. The combined utility impact fees collected, plus interest, during the six-month period totaled $22,629,867. Of this total, $15,521,119 was for water and $7,108,748 was for wastewater. Total combined utility impact fees collected, plus interest, since the adoption of the current ordinance on June 20, 1990, through September 30, 2022, equal $447,505,990. Of this total, $302,374,928 was collected for water and $145,131,062 was collected for wastewater. As of September 30, 2022, the cash balances in the water and wastewater impact fee funds were $37,601,304 and $18,420,623 respectively, for a combined total of $56,021,927. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. I can be reached at 512-972-0048. Cc: Robert Goode, Interim Director Joseph Gonzales, Assistant Director, Financial Services Christina Romero, Financial Manager III, Financial Services Aurora Pizano, Financial Manager II, Financial Services Jonathan Orenstein, Financial Manager III, Consumer Services Division Teresa Lutes, P.E., Managing Engineer, Systems Planning Division Attachment: Semi-Annual Impact Fee Collections Report Semi-Annual Impact Fee Collections October 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 395, Section 395.058, requires that the Impact Fee Advisory Committee “file semiannual reports with respect to the progress of the capital improvements plan and report to the political subdivision any perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing the impact fee.” This report supports the committee by providing financial information about the collection of impact fees, and the value of fee waivers and exemptions. Waivers are granted for policy reasons or …
WATER & WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE REPORTS: ASSESSED AND COLLECTED FEES LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN December 6, 2022 – DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS ASSESSED AND COLLECTED FEES Table of Contents .....................................................................................................................................ACF-i I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... ACF-1 II. Assessed Fees ...................................................................................................................................ACF-2 III. Collected Fees ...................................................................................................................................ACF-2 IV. Adopted Fees .....................................................................................................................................ACF-3 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS Table of Contents .....................................................................................................................................LUA-i List of Maps ...............................................................................................................................................LUA-i List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................LUA-i I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................LUA-1 II. Service Area .......................................................................................................................................LUA-2 III. Growth Projections ...........................................................................................................................LUA-4 IV. Service Units ......................................................................................................................................LUA-7 Appendix A – Description of Impact Fee Boundary for 5-Year Update ..........................................LUA-A-1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................CIP-i List of Maps ...............................................................................................................................................CIP-ii List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................CIP-ii I. Introduction..........................................................................................................................................CIP-1 II. Facility Planning – Defining Level of Capacity Usage & Reserve Capacity Needs ......................CIP-2 III. Impact Fee Facilities and Fee Calculation Methodology ...............................................................CIP-29 IV. Service Unit Demand and Capacity Relationships.........................................................................CIP-30 V. Service Unit Demand Projections ....................................................................................................CIP-33 VI. Capacity and Cost Attributable to New Growth..............................................................................CIP-33 VII. Maximum Allowable Fee Calculation and Rate Revenue Credit ...................................................CIP-53 Appendix A – Water Rate Revenue Credit Table.................................................................................CIP-A-1 Appendix B – Wastewater Rate Revenue Credit Table.......................................................................CIP-B-1 Appendix C – CIP Projects Targeted to Meet Existing Needs – Water & Reclaimed .......................CIP-C-1 Appendix D – CIP Projects Targeted to Meet Existing Needs – Wastewater....................................CIP-D-1 Appendix E – Descriptions of the Zones for Fees...............................................................................CIP-E-1 WATER & WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE REPORT: ASSESSED AND COLLECTED FEES TABLE OF CONTENTS ASSESSED AND COLLECTED FEES Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................ACF-i I. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... ACF-1 II. Assessed Fees ....................................................................................................................ACF-2 III. Collected Fees ....................................................................................................................ACF-2 IV. Adopted Fees .....................................................................................................................ACF-3 ACF-i I. INTRODUCTION Austin Water (AW) has developed this periodic impact fee update in close collaboration with the Austin City Council appointed Impact Fee Advisory Committee (IFAC) and other City of Austin (City) departments in accordance with state law. This required 5-year update takes a fresh look at Land Use Assumptions (LUA) and the impact fee Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) that will serve new development in the next 10 years. The basic requirements for determining the costs “Necessitated by and attributed to” new development are prescribed in the Impact Fee Act, Section 395.016 of the Texas Local Government Code. These requirements state that facility capacity that will be used by new growth and its cost are determined by first projecting the demand on the system (the LUA), and then deriving the facility plan for serving that demand (the CIP). The end-products are the maximum allowable impact fees for water and …
