CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM06 DATE: Monday May 11, 2026 CASE NUMBER: C15-2026-0010 ___Y____Thomas Ates (D1) ___-____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ___-____Jessica Cohen (D3) ___Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ___N____Haseeb Abdullah (D6) ___Y____Sameer S Birring (D7) ___Y____Margaret Shahrestani (D8) ___Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ___Y____Jeffery L Bowen (M) ___N____Corry L Archer-McClellan (Alternate) (M) ___Y____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) _______VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: David Anderson OWNER: Mark A Macaulay ADDRESS: 4219 1st Street VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-814 (Service Station Use) (3) to increase queue lanes from eight [8] vehicle queue lanes to twelve [12] vehicle queue lanes (requested) in order to erect a Service Station in a “CS-MU-NP ” Commercial Services-Mixed Use Neighborhood Plan (West Congress) zoning district. Note: 25-2-814 - SERVICE STATION USE. A service station use: (1) must be screened from the street by a building or a landscape buffer that includes shade trees; (2) may not have more than 16 fuel dispensers; and (3) may not have more than eight vehicle queue lanes. Source: Ord. 20060831-068; Ord. 20110804-008. BOARD’S DECISION: April 13, 2026 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen’s motion to approve with a condition that the heritage tree is preserved, Vice Chair Melissa Hawthorne second on 11-0 votes; GRANTED WITH A CONDITION THAT THE HERITAGE TREE IS PRESERVED. RECONSIDERATION REQUEST: May 11, 2026 Vice Chair Maggie Shahrestani’s motion to deny the reconsideration request, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne second on 9-2 votes (Board Members Haseeb Abdullah, Corry Archer-McClellan nay); RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for reasonable use because: compliance with the queue lane configuration illustrated in the TCM would prevent the site from functioning safely and efficiently as intended, the TCM illustration depicts a configuration that does not reflect modern fueling operations and would result in increased vehicular conflict points, reduced maneuverability and reduced visibility. 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: property is a subject to physical constraints due to configuration including lot, limited lot depth that prevents code required double stack configuration limited lot width which limits safe maneuverability and required residential compatibility buffer along the eastern portion of the site and required storm water detention and water quality infrastructure along the …
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Monday, May 11, 2026 The BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT convened in a Regular meeting on Monday, May 11, 2026, at 301 West 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Chair Jeffery Bowen called the Board of Adjustment Meeting to order at 5:35 PM. Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance in-Person: Jeffery Bowen-Chair, Haseeb Abdullah, Sameer S Birring, Brian Poteet, Michael Von Ohlen, Corry Archer-McClellan-Alternate, Suzanne Valentine-Alternate Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Maggie Shahrestani-Vice Chair, Tommy Ates (late 5:45pm), Melissa Hawthorne, Yung-ju Kim Board Members/Commissioners Absent: Jessica Cohen, Bianca A. Medina-Leal APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Board of Adjustment Regular meeting on April 13, 2026 On-Line Link: April 13, 2026 draft minutes The minutes from the meeting on April 13, 2026, were approved on Board Member Michael Von Ohlen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne second, on 10-0 Vote (Thomas Ates-no vote-late). PUBLIC HEARINGS Discussion and action on the following cases New sign case: 2. C16-2026-0005 Jim Wittliff for Alvin Momin 5001 Nuckols Crossing Road On-Line Link: ITEM02 ADV PACKET ; NO PRESENTATION The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-128 (Neighborhood Commercial Sign District Regulations (B) to allow from one (1) freestanding sign (maximum allowed), to adding one (1) additional freestanding sign (total of two (2)), in order to erect free-standing sign(s) for shopping center tenants in a Commercial Sign District, in a “LR-CO-NP”, Neighborhood Commercial – Combined Overlay – Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Southeast Combined Neighborhood). Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-128 Neighborhood Commercial Sign District Regulations (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) This section applies to a neighborhood commercial sign district. One freestanding sign is permitted on a lot. Wall signs are permitted. One flag for each curb cut is permitted. This subsection prescribes the maximum sign area. (1) For a freestanding sign, the total sign area for a lot may not exceed the lesser of: (a) (b) 0.3 square feet for each linear foot of street frontage; or 100 square feet. (2) For signs other than freestanding signs, the sign area may not exceed 10 percent of the façade area of the first 15 feet of building height. (F) The sign height may not exceed the greater of: (1) 20 feet above frontage street pavement grade; or (2) six feet above grade at the base of the sign. Source: Sections 13-2-867; Ord. 990225-70; Ord. 000309-39; Ord. 031211-11; …
- REGULAR MEETING OF THE AUSTIN-TRAVIS COUNTY FOOD POLICY BOARD MONDAY, MAY 11, 2026, AT 5:00 P.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, ROOM 1406 6310 WILHELMINO DELCO DRIVE, AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Austin-Travis County Food Policy Board may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Amanda Rohlich, (512) 974-1364, Amanda.Rohlich@austintexas.gov. CURRENT AUSTIN-TRAVIS COUNTY FOOD POLICY BOARD MEMBERS: Lisa Barden, Chair Andrea Abel Marissa Bell, Vice- Chair Beth Corbett Nitza Cuevas Kacey Hanson Seanna Marceaux Melody McClary Erin McDonald Natalie Poulos AGENDA CALL TO ORDER Board Member roll call and introduction of new and existing board members. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Austin-Travis County Food Policy Board Special Called Meeting on Monday, April 13, 2026. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing regarding Austin-Travis County Food Plan Implementation. Presentation by Edwin Marty, Food Policy Manager, Austin Climate Action & Resilience and Yaira Robinson, Assistant Director of Environmental Programs, Travis County. DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Presentation and discussion on how food access is experienced across Travis County, Central Texas Food Bank- Emily Foxman, setting the stage with the Travis County Food Access Community Needs Assessment Results Presentation and discussion on how food access is experienced across Travis County, Sustainable Food Center- Hannah Thornton & Amy Gallo Presentation and discussion on how food access is experienced across Travis County, ATX Free Fridge- Nitza Cuevas Presentation and discussion on how food access is experienced across Travis County, Central Texas Food Bank- Beth Corbett Presentation and discussion on how food access is experienced across Travis County, Meals on Wheels Central Texas- Seanna Marceaux Presentation and discussion on how food access is experienced across Travis County, Intergenerational Gardening Soul to Soul- Marva Overton & Genice H Presentation and discussion regarding the working group to expand access to nutritious foods through improvement to existing …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE AUSTIN-TRAVIS COUNTY FOOD POLICY BOARD MONDAY, MAY 11, 2026, AT 5:00 P.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, ROOM 1406 6310 WILHELMINO DELCO DRIVE, AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Austin-Travis County Food Policy Board may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Amanda Rohlich, (512) 974-1364, Amanda.Rohlich@austintexas.gov. CURRENT AUSTIN-TRAVIS COUNTY FOOD POLICY BOARD MEMBERS: Lisa Barden, Chair Andrea Abel Marissa Bell, Vice- Chair Beth Corbett Nitza Cuevas Kacey Hanson DISCUSSION ITEMS Seanna Marceaux Melody McClary Erin McDonald Natalie Poulos AGENDA ADDENDUM 15. Presentation and discussion regarding the working group to expand access to nutritious foods through improvement to existing materials and resources and explore alternate or expanded hours for existing resources. The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Amanda Rohlich and & Action Amanda.Rohlich@austintexas.gov, to request service or for additional information. Austin Climate Resilience, 974-1364 (512) at at For more information on the Austin-Travis County Food Policy Board, please contact Amanda Rohlich and & Austin Climate Amanda.Rohlich@austintexas.gov. Resilience, 974-1364 Action (512) at at
CTFB | Travis County Food Access CNA Travis County: Food Insecurity at a Glance • 18.0% of Travis County – over 235,000 residents – experience food insecurity o 61,300 are children o 33,100 are older adults • Disproportionately high food insecurity along the I-35 corridor, in the Eastern Crescent, and in rural corners of the county • Key CTFB initiatives in Travis County: • Supports over 260 charitable food programs • Home delivery, benefit assistance, Food Is Medicine, workforce development • Advocacy & food system planning Data Source: CTFB’s 2025 Food Access Convening Tool. CTFB | Travis County Food Access CNA Key Findings: Community Response Desire to enhance choice and dignity Strong preference for nutritious, culturally-relevant, & local options – yet often too expensive or far away Navigating tensions, coordination is key Rising needs, capacity constraints, and limited awareness of community resources Data Source: CNA neighbor survey Emphasis on tailored approaches: No “one-size-fits-all” model CTFB | Travis County Food Access CNA Strengthening both the “What” and the “How” Meeting neighbors where they are: Physically In places that are convenient, private, familiar, and trusted Culturally & Linguistically • Culturally-relevant foods • Multi-lingual materials & services • Clear, plain language & visuals Technologically No-tech, low-tech, and tech-savvy options In Time • Non-traditional hours • Consistent presence • Timely support Co-creation & co-ownership Peer-to-peer advocates & Socially • • community networks • • Building relationships and trust Centering dignity and choice CTFB | Travis County Food Access CNA From Research to Action Travis County Food Access CNA: For – and by – the community • Resource to help inform community-driven action • CTFB an ongoing partner to help dive into the report, identify how data can support coordination and evidence- based solutions, partnerships Examples from CTFB • Medically Tailored Meals • Expansion of: • Mobile FARMacy • School & college pantry programs • Home delivery • Culturally relevant foods grown at on-site farm • Regional Food System Council
CTFB | Child Nutrition CTFB Children’s Meal Programs • Afterschool Meals (CACFP) • 35 sites • Feeding Futures School Pantries • 15 sites (2 pending) • Summer Meals (SFSP) • 69 sites in 2026 • GOAL: 250,000 meals (+40%) • Nutrition Education • College Food Access • 18 sites CTFB | SFSP Summer Food Service Program in Travis County • School Districts and CBOs eligible to operate • Geographic restrictions • CTFB’s role = fill the gaps + supplement ISDs • Rural (non-congregate) vs. Urban (congregate) • Weekly frozen delivery vs. daily hot meals • 2026 Travis County Meal Sites • 41 Total locations • • • • • • Austin Parks & Rec El Buen Samaritano The Safe Alliance Foundation Communities African American Youth Harvest (Manor) Community Care • 2 Non-congregate - Del Valle, Creedmoor Call to Action for ATCFPB NOW: Help spread the word about SFSP sites! FUTURE: Help identify/expand locations for congregate meals!
Aligned with Austin-Travis County Food Plan Strategies 6.3, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.10, and 6.11 The food system works— until you can’t get to it. For our neighbors, food access happens at the front door, —or not at all. We operate where food, health, and aging systems don’t yet connect.
Keep Austin Fed’s Food Rescue How Does it Work? 1 https://www.keepaustinfed.org Be the Change How it happens This is just 1 of 4 pages of our weekly schedule. Our slowest day is Sundays with 19 scheduled food rescues. Our busiest day is Mondays with 36 scheduled food rescues. 2 https://www.keepaustinfed.org Be the Change Where it comes from and where it goes 3 https://www.keepaustinfed.org Be the Change
Austin-Travis County Food Plan ATCFPB May 2026 – Staff Update City of Austin Food Plan Updates City Staff Updates ● City staff sent City Council a Food Plan Update Memo on May 5th 2026 ● City staff have completed the annual update of the Food Plan Dashboard ● Travis County Commissioners Court proclamation celebrating the Milan Pact Award took place on April 28th. City Council member Fuentes also provided a City Proclamation. ● Funding from the MUFPP Award will be released via a RFA in fall 2026 Food Plan Implementation Convening ● The Implementation Collaborative is being led by WNT ● Public launch for the Collaborative is scheduled for June 2026 ○ Action: ■ Sign up with WNT to get on the listserve ■ Register for the June 5th meeting ■ Consider how the Collaboratives priorities could relate to the Food Policy Board’s Working Groups City of Austin 2026 Bond - Next Steps ● City Council released a Supplemental Bond Proposal ● May 4, 2026: BEATF finalized recommendations to the Mayor and City Council ○ Final recommendations (the $750M recommendation per the resolution & a $400M alternative scenario requested by a sub quorum of Council). ● May 8, 2026: City staff provided recommendations, integrating feasibility and funding considerations ● May 19, 2026: City Council work session to discuss proposed bond package ● August 6, 2026: City Council Meeting – consideration of an ordinance to call for a bond election and set ballot language ● November 3, 2026: Bond election Travis County Food Plan Updates Implementation Updates 1. Raising Travis County contract with Urban Roots approved 5/5/2026. a. $858,000 for farm-based out of school time programming for 2nd-12th grade children & youth Summers, weekends, school holidays, & school breaks 2026-2027 “Foster connection to land, food, and community” b. c. 2. Coyote Creek Conservation Easement - 1st working farm protected in perpetuity under conservation easement with Travis County for the primary purpose of food production a. b. Fully organic Includes habitat for native plant and animal communities, agricultural open space, water quality & quantity + scenic attributes Thank You! www.austintexas.gov/food /austinsustainability
Austin-Travis County Food Plan ATCFPB May 2026 – Staff Update City of Austin Food Plan Updates City Staff Updates ● City staff sent City Council a Food Plan Update Memo on May 5th 2026 ● City staff have completed the annual update of the Food Plan Dashboard ● Travis County Commissioners Court proclamation celebrating the Milan Pact Award took place on April 28th. City Council member Fuentes also provided a City Proclamation. ● Funding from the MUFPP Award will be released via a RFA in fall 2026 Food Plan Implementation Convening ● The Implementation Collaborative is being led by WNT ● Public launch for the Collaborative is scheduled for June 2026 ○ Action: ■ Sign up with WNT to get on the listserve ■ Register for the June 5th meeting ■ Consider how the Collaboratives priorities could relate to the Food Policy Board’s Working Groups City of Austin 2026 Bond - Next Steps ● City Council released a Supplemental Bond Proposal ● May 4, 2026: BEATF finalized recommendations to the Mayor and City Council ○ Final recommendations (the $750M recommendation per the resolution & a $400M alternative scenario requested by a sub quorum of Council). ● City staff preparing to provide recommendations, integrating feasibility and funding considerations ● May 19, 2026: City Council work session to discuss proposed bond package ● August 6, 2026: City Council Meeting – consideration of an ordinance to call for a bond election and set ballot language ● November 3, 2026: Bond election Travis County Food Plan Updates Implementation Updates 1. Raising Travis County contract with Urban Roots approved 5/5/2026. a. $858,000 for farm-based out of school time programming for 2nd-12th grade children & youth Summers, weekends, school holidays, & school breaks 2026-2027 “Foster connection to land, food, and community” b. c. 2. Coyote Creek Conservation Easement - 1st working farm protected in perpetuity under conservation easement with Travis County for the primary purpose of food production a. b. Fully organic Includes habitat for native plant and animal communities, agricultural open space, water quality & quantity + scenic attributes Thank You! www.austintexas.gov/food /austinsustainability
Sustainable Food Center Austin Travis County Food Policy Council Food Access Working Group H a n n a h T h o r n t o n , M S , R D S e n i o r D i r e c t o r o f F o o d A c c e s s a n d E d u c a t i o n May 2026
Rooted in mutual aid, not charity, ourmodel is simple: give what you can,take what you need. Everyonedeserves access to fresh food, noquestions asked. All of the ATX Free Friges are located outdoors, 100% free & open to the community 24/7 no sign up or permissions required “Whenever I sign up to stock & clean the Brentwood fridge, I see the immediateimpact of what I’m contributing to my neighborhood. Neighbors come up to askabout the collective and/or happily accept what food and toiletries I haveavailable. Those who are just passing by take a second to pick up and throw away apiece of garbage in a receptacle, kiddos ask out loud if they can bring somethingfor the pantry next time. Everyone says “thank you”. It’s a moment out of my weekwhere I’m connecting with my neighbors, and it’s incredible feeling.”"I live and work central — I like to cook and for my joboften end up w/ catering extras. I love being able toshare directly w/ folks who might be hungry and helpeliminate food waste.""I wouldn't be able to feed my family a lot oftimes without it. Very thankful. I have 8 kids +grandkids. It's very hard even with a job""This project has helped us feed our large family + we are sograteful for a way to share food with the community. Wehave food allergies + intolerances so food pantries will givefood we cannot eat or cook."
Alliance for African American Health in Central Texas Addressing the Food System through Intergenerational Gardening About Intergenerational Gardening Soul to Soul (IGS2S) What IGS2S is: A program that brings together youth, adults, and senior adults to establish and maintain vegetable gardens at the homes of older adults (aka seniors). Why IGS2S started: Recognition that there were older adults in the Black community who wanted vegetables gardens but did not have the physical capacity to do all the work themselves. How IGS2S works: Bridges the generations to grow food, share knowledge, and enhance community connections. Main components include: • Gardening Teams • Gardening Skill Lessons • Food Sovereignty Workshops • Financial Literacy Workshops IGS2S and the Food Plan We see ourselves in the Food Plan because AAAHCT: • Provides access to culturally relevant foods (seniors grow what • they want to eat) Increases food access and community connections through home gardens and sharing of produce • Reduces transportation and access barriers for foods grown at home • Serves seniors primarily in eastern Travis County, an area identified as having higher rates of food insecurity • Focuses on populations known to be vulnerable to food insecurity (i.e., Blacks, older adults, and children) • Teaches the concept of food sovereignty and the importance of having agency over foods you consume • Covers the cycle of growing produce, from planting to preparation Challenges and Opportunities Challenges: •No full -time program manager •Maintaining gardens for seniors once they graduate from the program •Youth recruitment •Transportation for youth •Consistent tracking of quantity of food grown •Funding Opportunities: •Scale program •Develop volunteer component to help seniors maintain their gardens after finishing the program •Create pathways for participants, especially youth, to engage in food system advocacy •Incorporate more cooking lessons into the IGS2S program •Continue to leverage the intersection between IGS2S and A Better Me to educate and engage more people in food system issues
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANIMAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MONDAY, MAY 11, 2026, AT 6:00 P.M. AUSTIN CITY HALL, ROOM 1101 301 WEST 2ND STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Animal Advisory Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Nekaybaw Watson at nekaybaw.watson@austintexas.gov or 512-974-2562. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Dr. Paige Nilson, Chair, D4 Jo Anne Norton, Vice Chair, D7 Jennifer Daniel, Parliamentarian, D6 Koby Ahmed, Mayor Beatriz Dulzaides, D2 Erin Ferguson, D8 Whitney Holt, D5 Sarah Huddelston, D9 David Loignon, D10 Nancy Nemer, Travis County Jules Maron, D3 Erin Van Landingham, D1 CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL AGENDA The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Animal Advisory Commission Regular meeting on April 13, 2026. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. 3. Staff briefing regarding monthly reports. Presentation by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services and Jason Garza, Assistant Director, Austin Animal Services. Staff briefing regarding Austin Animal Service’s Strategic Plan One Year Update. Presentation by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services. WORKING GROUP UPDATES 4. Update from Pet Friendly Housing Working Group regarding future recommendations. DICUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Approve the election of Chair. Approve the creation of a working group regarding policies related to off-leash dogs and the addition of members. Approve the creation of a Working group that creates incentives for city and county employees who foster an animal for Ausin Animal Shelter and the addition of members. Approve a Recommendation to Council regarding breed labeling policies in shelters. Approve a Recommendation to Council regarding Satellite Adoption. Approve an update to the membership of the Pet Friendly Housing Working Group. Approve an amendment to the Rules and Procedures regarding the order of public comment. Approve the appointment of a chair and committee members OR the dissolution of the No Kill subcommittee. FUTURE AGENDA …
ANIMAL ADVISORY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 13, 2026 The Animal Advisory Commission convened in a regular meeting on Monday, April 13, 2026, at Austin City Hall, Boards and Commissions Room 301 W 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Chair Nilson called the Animal Advisory Commission Meeting to order at 6:00 pm. Commissioners in Attendance: Dr. Paige Nilson, Chair, D4 Jennifer Daniel, D6 Beatriz Dulzaides, D2 Whitney Holt, D5 David Loignon, D10 Jules Maron, D3 Jo Anne Norton, Parliamentarian, D7 Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Erin Ferguson, D8 Nancy Nemer, Travis County Erin Van Landingham, D1 Commissioners Absent: Koby Ahmed, Mayor Ryan Clinton, Travis County Sarah Huddleston, D9 PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Rochelle Vickery – Requesting assistance for TNR volunteers via gas cards or gift cards to incentivize and reduce cost for volunteers Shelly Leibham – Dog overpopulation Julie Oliver – Data inconsistencies Lynette Cox – TNR process for community cats 1 Pat Valls-Trelles - Requesting assistance for TNR volunteers via gas cards or gift cards to incentivize and reduce cost for volunteers APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Animal Advisory Commission Regular Meeting on February 9, 2026. The minutes of March 9, 2026, regular meeting of the Animal Advisory Commission was approved during April 13, 2026, regular meeting on Commissioner Holt’s motion, Commissioner Dulzaides’ second on a 10-0 vote. Commissioners Ahmed, Clinton, and Huddleston were absent. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. 3. Staff briefing regarding monthly reports. Presentation by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services and Jason Garza, Assistant Director, Austin Animal Services. Presentation given by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services and Jason Garza, Assistant Director, Austin Animal Services. Staff briefing regarding deceased animal recovery services. Presentation by Amy Slagle, Assistant Director, Austin Resource Recovery. Presentation given by Amy Slagle, Assistant Director, Austin Resource Recovery. DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. Quarterly report from Animal Pets Alive! Presentation given by Mara Hartsell, Quality of Care Director, Austin Pets Alive! Presentation given by Mara Hartsell, Quality of Care Director, Austin Pets Alive! DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 5. 6. 7. Approve the reprioritization of the legislative priority list sent to the Austin Government Relations Office in February. Discussed. Approve a Recommendation to Council regarding pet friendly housing policies in public funded housing developments. The motion to approve a Recommendation to Council regarding pet friendly housing policies in public funded housing developments was approved on Commissioner Dulzaides’ motion, Commissioner Daniel’s second on a 10-0 vote. Commissioners …
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL ANIMAL ADVISORY COMMISSION 20260511-009 EXPANDING ACCESS TO PET ADOPTION THROUGH SATELLITE ADOPTION CENTERS WHEREAS, the City of Austin is committed to promoting animal welfare, supporting no-kill practices at Austin Animal Center, and achieving open intake; and WHEREAS, the Austin Animal Services Strategic Plan published in 2025 cites “Research, analyze, and explore additional locations to offer ASO services throughout the community (i.e., new satellite locations, secondary locations)” as Humane Care Goal 2C as well as “Expand ASO’s community presence, including increasing participation in local events, hosting new activities, and building partnerships” as Live Release Goal 3C; and WHEREAS, overcrowding in our shelter strains our resources, greatly hinders intake capacity, and creates barriers to timely adoption; and WHEREAS, increasing the visibility and accessibility of adoptable pets has been shown to significantly improve adoption rates and community engagement; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin owns and operates various public facilities and properties that may be suitable for temporary or permanent use as satellite adoption centers; and WHEREAS, Travis County contracts the City of Austin as part of their Animal Services Interlocal Agreement and also owns and operates various public facilities and properties that may be suitable for temporary or permanent use as satellite adoption centers; and WHEREAS, partnerships with local nonprofit organizations, as well as private businesses and community groups, could provide additional locations, volunteer staffing, and resources for off-site adoption efforts; and WHEREAS, establishing satellite adoption centers in high-traffic, community-centered locations throughout Austin and Travis County would reduce barriers to adoption, increase foot traffic exposure for animals, and enhance community participation in animal welfare initiatives; SO BE IT RESOLVED, that City staff across the appropriate departments shall research, and when appropriate, pilot satellite adoption center locations in Austin and Travis County; and SO BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Austin City Council shall offer full support in finding ways to reimagine the utilization of City owned or rented facilities so as to minimize the cost burden on residents and the Austin Animal Services Department in pursuit of these goals; and SO BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Travis County Commissioners Court shall take equal ownership and innovative steps in re-imagining the utilization of County owned and rented facilities in pursuit of these goals. Date of Approval: Motioned by: Seconded by: Vote: For: Against: Abstain: Recuse: Off Dais: Absent: Attest:
Reports and Updates Austin Animal Services | May 11, 2026 30-60-90 Day Horizon Plan Monica Dangler, Director Accomplishments on the Horizon! Completed action items in the past 30 days Clear the Crates! We sent out (adoptive, foster, or transfer) 103 animals in late April/early May with 60 being cats and 41 dogs, of which 29 were large breed adults! That is 29 more animals than last month during the same period which included 17 more large breed adult dogs! Process Improvement Continued work on pathways and transfer protocols Added extra day of surgery for animals who need extra support Programs and Socials Implemented Doggie Day Out Graduation for inaugural Enduring Service program dogs Improvements to shelter presence Added event calendar to the website Enhance Staffing Including VS positions in citywide market study to improve recruitment and retention 3 What does the horizon plan look like for May? 30 Community Engagement • Implement Marketing plan Enhance Staffing • Relaunch kennel cleaning study with adjusted Animal Care schedules • Continue recruiting for one lead and two technicians for Vet Services Process Improvement • Finalize dates for Maddie’s Fund Clinic Consultation for efficiency and S/N • Develop communication strategy for kennel space protocol on Socials • Procure Doobert a foster management tool • Procure Petzel a pet adoption follow up tool 4 What does the horizon plan look like for May? 30 Foster Program • Weekly foster posts • Identify 3 dogs for foster every day • Daily foster emails • Launch Dog Day Out to 4-5 days a week • Develop accountability plan Develop plan for reopening intake • Ongoing process • Work with APA on community-based solutions Social Presence • Update social messaging • Implement plan for socials 5 60 What does the horizon plan look like for May and June? Foster Program • Weekly foster posts • Identify 5 dogs for foster every day • Daily foster emails • Implement foster management tools • Offer Dog Day Out program 5 days a week Shelter and Process Improvements • Develop communication strategy for kennel space protocol on Socials • Implement Doobert foster management tool • Implement post-adoption tool Social Presence • Update engagement efforts • Implement Newsletter Develop plan for reopening intake • Reduce wait-time for intake 6 What does the horizon plan look like for May, June, and July? 90 Open Intake Planning • Open intake for all stray animals …
Recommendation to Council Animal Advisory Commission Recommendation 20260511-008 Regarding Breed Labeling Practices WHEREAS, accurate identification of a dog’s breed based solely on visual assessment has been widely shown to be unreliable without genetic testing even among animal welfare professionals and veterinary staff; and WHEREAS, labeling dogs as specific breeds—particularly “pit bull” or “pit bull mix”—based on appearance alone can misrepresent their true genetic makeup; and WHEREAS, many housing providers enforce breed restrictions that disproportionately impact dogs labeled as “pit bull” types, creating significant barriers for adopters seeking rental housing; and WHEREAS, such labeling practices can unintentionally reduce adoption rates and increase length of stay for affected dogs; and WHEREAS, a growing number of animal welfare organizations are adopting best practices that prioritize temperament, and individual characteristics over speculative breed identification including: 1. Orange County Animal Services (OCAS), an open intake municipal shelter in Florida, stopped using breed labels in 2014, and an independent peer-reviewed study of OCAS’s outcomes data found that removing breed labels improved adoption rates and decreased lengths of stay for all dog types, with the greatest impact for pit-bull-type dogs (https://www.ocnetpets.com/); 2. Williamson County Animal Services, an open intake municipal shelter in Texas, stopped using breed labels in 2017; most dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://www.wilcotx.gov/163/Animal-Shelter); 3. Memphis Animal Services, an open intake municipal shelter in Tennessee, stopped using breed labels in 2016; dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://memphisanimalservices.com/); 4. DeKalb County Animal Services and Fulton County Animal Services, two open intake municipal shelters in Georgia managed by LifeLine Animal Project, stopped using breed labels in 2017 (https://dekalbanimalservices.com/; https://fultonanimalservices.com/); 5. Fairfax County Animal Shelter, an open intake municipal shelter in Virginia, stopped using breed labels in 2015; dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/animalservices/); 6. Rochester Animal Services, a managed intake municipal shelter in New York, stopped using breed labels in 2017; dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://www.cityofrochester.gov/departments/department-recreation-and-human-serv ices-drhs/rochester-animal-services-ras); and WHEREAS, studies show that shifting to a “mixed breed” designation where lineage is unknown and distinct and undeniable breed traits are absent promotes fairness, reduces bias, and improves adoption outcomes for all dogs; and WHEREAS, the previous interim Director for Austin Animal Services had started the process of updating breed labeling practices to align with these goals; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Austin Animal Advisory Commission …
Resolution Regarding Breed Labeling Practices WHEREAS, accurate identification of a dog’s breed based solely on visual assessment has been widely shown to be unreliable without genetic testing even among animal welfare professionals and veterinary staff; and WHEREAS, labeling dogs as specific breeds—particularly “pit bull” or “pit bull mix”—based on appearance alone can misrepresent their true genetic makeup; and WHEREAS, many housing providers enforce breed restrictions that disproportionately impact dogs labeled as “pit bull” types, creating significant barriers for adopters seeking rental housing; and WHEREAS, such labeling practices can unintentionally reduce adoption rates and increase length of stay for affected dogs; and WHEREAS, a growing number of animal welfare organizations are adopting best practices that prioritize temperament, and individual characteristics over speculative breed identification including: 1. Orange County Animal Services (OCAS), an open intake municipal shelter in Florida, stopped using breed labels in 2014, and an independent peer-reviewed study of OCAS’s outcomes data found that removing breed labels improved adoption rates and decreased lengths of stay for all dog types, with the greatest impact for pit-bull-type dogs (https://www.ocnetpets.com/); 2. Williamson County Animal Services, an open intake municipal shelter in Texas, stopped using breed labels in 2017; most dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://www.wilcotx.gov/163/Animal-Shelter); 3. Memphis Animal Services, an open intake municipal shelter in Tennessee, stopped using breed labels in 2016; dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://memphisanimalservices.com/); 4. DeKalb County Animal Services and Fulton County Animal Services, two open intake municipal shelters in Georgia managed by LifeLine Animal Project, stopped using breed labels in 2017 (https://dekalbanimalservices.com/; https://fultonanimalservices.com/); 5. Fairfax County Animal Shelter, an open intake municipal shelter in Virginia, stopped using breed labels in 2015; dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/animalservices/); 6. Rochester Animal Services, a managed intake municipal shelter in New York, stopped using breed labels in 2017; dogs are currently listed on their website as “mixed breed” (https://www.cityofrochester.gov/departments/department-recreation-and-human-serv ices-drhs/rochester-animal-services-ras); and WHEREAS, studies show that shifting to a “mixed breed” designation where lineage is unknown and distinct and undeniable breed traits are absent promotes fairness, reduces bias, and improves adoption outcomes for all dogs; and WHEREAS, the previous interim Director for Austin Animal Services had started the process of updating breed labeling practices to align with these goals; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Austin Animal Advisory Commission respectfully recommends City Council and the City …
A RESOLUTION OF THE AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL EXPANDING ACCESS TO PET ADOPTION THROUGH SATELLITE ADOPTION CENTERS WHEREAS, the City of Austin is committed to promoting animal welfare, supporting no-kill practices at Austin Animal Center, and achieving open intake; and WHEREAS, the Austin Animal Services Strategic Plan published in 2025 cites “Research, analyze, and explore additional locations to offer ASO services throughout the community (i.e., new satellite locations, secondary locations)” as Humane Care Goal 2C as well as “Expand ASO’s community presence, including increasing participation in local events, hosting new activities, and building partnerships” as Live Release Goal 3C; and WHEREAS, overcrowding in our shelter strains our resources, greatly hinders intake capacity, and creates barriers to timely adoption; and WHEREAS, increasing the visibility and accessibility of adoptable pets has been shown to significantly improve adoption rates and community engagement; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin owns and operates various public facilities and properties that may be suitable for temporary or permanent use as satellite adoption centers; and WHEREAS, Travis County contracts the City of Austin as part of their Animal Services Interlocal Agreement and also owns and operates various public facilities and properties that may be suitable for temporary or permanent use as satellite adoption centers; and WHEREAS, partnerships with local nonprofit organizations, as well as private businesses and community groups, could provide additional locations, volunteer staffing, and resources for off-site adoption efforts; and WHEREAS, establishing satellite adoption centers in high-traffic, community-centered locations throughout Austin and Travis County would reduce barriers to adoption, increase foot traffic exposure for animals, and enhance community participation in animal welfare initiatives; SO BE IT RESOLVED, that City Council and the City Manager request City staff across the appropriate departments research, and when appropriate, pilot satellite adoption center locations in Austin and Travis County; and SO BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Austin City Council shall offer full support in finding ways to reimagine the utilization of City owned or rented facilities so as to minimize the cost burden on residents and the Austin Animal Services Department in pursuit of these goals; and SO BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Travis County Commissioners Court shall take equal ownership and innovative steps in reimagining the utilization of County owned and rented facilities in pursuit of these goals.
. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Animal Advisory Commission Recommendation Number: 20260511-009: Expanding Access to Pet Adoption Through Satellite Adoption Centers WHEREAS, the City of Austin is committed to promoting animal welfare, supporting no-kill practices at Austin Animal Center, and achieving open intake; and WHEREAS, the Austin Animal Services Strategic Plan published in 2025 cites “Research, analyze, and explore additional locations to offer ASO services throughout the community (i.e., new satellite locations, secondary locations)” as Humane Care Goal 2C as well as “Expand ASO’s community presence, including increasing participation in local events, hosting new activities, and building partnerships” as Live Release Goal 3C; and WHEREAS, overcrowding in our shelter strains our resources, greatly hinders intake capacity, and creates barriers to timely adoption; and WHEREAS, increasing the visibility and accessibility of adoptable pets has been shown to significantly improve adoption rates and community engagement; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin owns and operates various public facilities and properties that may be suitable for temporary or permanent use as satellite adoption centers; and WHEREAS, Travis County contracts the City of Austin as part of their Animal Services Interlocal Agreement and also owns and operates various public facilities and properties that may be suitable for temporary or permanent use as satellite adoption centers; and WHEREAS, partnerships with local nonprofit organizations, as well as private businesses and community groups, could provide additional locations, volunteer staffing, and resources for off- site adoption efforts; and WHEREAS, establishing satellite adoption centers in high-traffic, community-centered locations throughout Austin and Travis County would reduce barriers to adoption, increase foot traffic exposure for animals, and enhance community participation in animal welfare initiatives; SO BE IT RESOLVED, that City Council and the City Manager request City staff across the appropriate departments research, and when appropriate, pilot satellite adoption center locations in Austin and Travis County; and SO BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Austin City Council shall offer full support in finding ways to reimagine the utilization of City owned or rented facilities so as to minimize the cost burden on residents and the Austin Animal Services Department in pursuit of these goals; and . SO BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Travis County Commissioners Court shall take equal ownership and innovative steps in reimagining the utilization of County owned and rented facilities in pursuit of these goals. Date of Approval: May 11, 2026 Motioned By: Commissioner Holt Seconded By: Vice Chair Norton Vote: 11-0 …
Austin Animal Services 5-Year Strategic Plan One Year Update Presented May 11, 2026 Agenda Introduction & Background Strategic Plan Summary Priorities & Progress Highlights Summary & Next Steps Questions? What’s the purpose of the new Strategic Plan? The plan is a roadmap for future initiatives and decisions. It guides resource allocation, performance targets, and future collaboration with stakeholders. How was it developed? The strategic plan was developed over an 8-month period with input from diverse stakeholders, including staff, volunteers, partners, and the community. The Working Group used feedback/information gathered from stakeholders, along with their own expertise in animal welfare, to develop the strategic plan during a series of workshops facilitated by an external consultant. How’s it going? Well! Since March 2025, many initiatives have begun to meet the priorities and goals established by the plan. 3 The strategic plan established six priorities: Humane Care Open Intake Public Health and Safety Spay Neuter Live Release Staff and Volunteers Each has goals and strategies to help achieve the priority. In total, there are eighteen (18) goals and sixty-four (64) strategies. 4 4Goals 11Strategies Humane Care “Meet animals’ physical and emotional needs and ensure a high quality of life for animals in shelter and foster care by providing enrichment, behavioral support, and well-maintained facilities.” INCREASE ENRICHMENT, SOCIALIZATION, AND BEHAVIORAL SERVICES • Expanded dog play group activities • Implemented population rounds • Added Outcomes Consultant role OFFER TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES IN ANIMAL BEHAVIOR • Provided animal handling training for staff and volunteers 5 4Goals 11Strategies Humane Care “Meet animals’ physical and emotional needs and ensure a high quality of life for animals in shelter and foster care by providing enrichment, behavioral support, and well-maintained facilities.” Continued ENHANCE SHELTER CLEANLINESS AND SANITATION • Revised the Cleaning and Disinfecting Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) • Implemented inspections following SOP implementation IMPROVE CAMPUS FACILITIES AND PHYSICAL SPACES • Facilities enhancement was included in the proposed bond that is pending voter approval • Secured a third-party architect to develop construction plans for a small dog kennel with dedicated outdoor space 6 2 Goals 5 Strategies Spay Neuter “Reduce the number of stray, unowned, and unwanted animals by improving and increasing spay/neuter services.” INCREASE FREE & SUBSIDIZED SPAY/NEUTER SURGERIES FOR OWNED ANIMALS • Increased free spay/neuter surgeries by 34.9% from FY2024 to FY2025 • 11,112 owned animals were spayed through clinics provided by contracted vendors in fiscal year 2025 …
ANIMAL ADVISORY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MAY 11, 2026 The Animal Advisory Commission convened in a regular meeting on Monday, May 11, 2026, at Austin City Hall, Boards and Commissions Room 301 W 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Vice Chair Norton called the Animal Advisory Commission Meeting to order at 6:00 pm. Commissioners in Attendance: Jo Anne Norton, Vice Chair, D7 Jennifer Daniel, Parliamentarian, D6 Beatriz Dulzaides, D2 Erin Ferguson, D8 Whitney Holt, D5 David Loignon, D10 Jules Maron, D3 Erin Van Landingham, D1 Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Koby Ahmed, Mayor Sarah Huddleston, D9 Nancy Nemer, Travis County Commissioners Absent: Dr. Paige Nilson, Chair, D4 PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Robyn Katz – State of Animals in Texas Sandra Muller – Transparency in Reporting Pat Valls Trelles – Donations Fund Rochelle Vickery – No food to people who have no record of spay or neuter 1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Animal Advisory Commission Regular Meeting on April 13, 2026. The minutes of the April 13, 2026 regular meeting of the Animal Advisory Commission was approved during the May 11, 2026 regular meeting of the Animal Advisory Commission on Commissioner Holt’s motion, Commissioner Ferguson’s second on an 11-0 vote. Chair Nilson was absent. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. 3. Staff briefing regarding monthly reports. Presentation by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services and Jason Garza, Assistant Director, Austin Animal Services. Presentation given by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services and Jason Garza, Assistant Director, Austin Animal Services. Staff briefing regarding Austin Animal Service’s Strategic Plan One Year Update. Presentation by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services. Presentation given by Monica Dangler, Director, Austin Animal Services; Jason Garza, Assistant Director, Austin Animal Services; and Melissa Pool, Chief Administrative Officer, Austin Animal Services. WORKING GROUP UPDATES 4. Update from Pet Friendly Housing Working Group regarding future recommendations. Update provided by Commissioner Holt. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 5. 6. 7. Approve the election of Chair. The motion to approve Commissioner Nilson as Chair of the Animal Advisory Commission failed on Vice Chair Norton’s motion, Commissioner Holt’s second on a 6-2 vote. Vice Chair Norton, Parliamentarian Daniel, and Commissioners Ferguson, Holt, Huddleston, and Maron were for. Commissioners Ahmed and Nemer were against. Commissioners Dulzaides, Loignon, and Van Landingham abstained. Chair Nilson was absent. Approve the creation of a working group regarding policies related to off-leash dogs and the addition of members. The motion to …
Austin Water FY27-FY31 Forecast Update May 2026 Austin Water Austin Water Financial Team Introductions Joseph Gonzales, Deputy Director of Business Services Christina "Tina" Romero, Acting Assistant Director of Financial Services Songli Floyd, Budget & Accouting Division Manager Nam Nguyen, Acting Financial Management Division Manager Li Yang, Budget & Accounting Financial Manager II Frida Guo, Capital Asset & Accounting Financial Manager II Shierin Shoghi, Rates & Forecasting Financial Manager II 2 Agenda Financial Condition/Budget Considerations Rates/Affordability Inflationary Cost Increases Growing Capital Spending Plan Financial Metrics Summary Discussion 3 Austin Water Financial Condition Austin Water Financial Condition Revenue Considerations Rate increases needed to cover increasing operating and capital costs Customer Assistance Program enrollment growth Slower development/customer growth Expenditure Considerations Ongoing resiliency and service reliability investments for essential infrastructure Inflationary cost increases impacting operating and capital delivery costs Workforce investments to support retention and staff increase Growing Capital Improvements Plan Continue debt management strategies Financial Performance Significant drop in operating cash reserves Cash financing of CIP below financial policy target 5 Austin Water Budget Development Process Revenues Cost of service rates calculated annually Revenue trend analysis and forecast updates performed monthly Operating Budget Comprehensive review of historic budget utilization performed annually Comprehensive review of open encumbrance amounts Executive team review of significant budget increases 2-year staffing plan development Capital Budget 5-year Capital Improvement Plan Development Proposed projects reviewed by a committee of Executive Team members 6 Bond Ratings Rating/Outlook Credit Highlights Fitch AA-/Stable Low leverage Moody’s Aa2/Stable DSC 2.3x Days Cash on Hand of 489 (neutral) Improving liquidity of 270 days cash Factors that could result in rating downgrade CIP cost increase not supported by adequate rate adjustments Significant increases in debt burden that exceeds 5x revenues S&P AA/Stable Adequate all-in DSC (2.9x) Strong liquidity (327 days) Material deterioration of all-in DSC and liquidity levels despite planned rate increases Sustained leverage exceeding 10.0x Sustained weakness in liquidity near 200 days cash or debt service coverage nearing 1.5x 7 FY27-FY31 Forecasted Rates $1,200.0 $1,100.0 $1,000.0 $900.0 $800.0 $700.0 $600.0 $500.0 $400.0 $300.0 $200.0 $100.0 $0.0 s n o i l l i M n I Total Available Funds Total Requirements -4.8% FY18 Actual $631.3 $631.2 Updated Rate Incr Forecast -4.8% 7.8% …
City of Austin FY2027 Budget Development Timeline Citywide Budget Dates Budget Kickoff Forecast Report Published Forecast Presentation to Council 1st Water & Wastewater Budget Committee 2nd Water & Wastewater Budget Committee Proposed Budget Published Proposed Budget Presentation to Council Water & Wastewater Commission JAN 15 APR 13-15 APR 21 May 8 TBD JUL 13 JUL 16 JUL 29 Approved Budget Adoption AUG 12-14 1
REGULAR MEETING OF THE AUSTIN TRAVIS COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, MAY 6TH, 2026, AT 2:30 P.M. CITY HALL, BOARD & COMMISSION ROOM, ROOM 1101 301 W. 2nd STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Austin Travis County Public Health Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch- atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by remotely, contact Daniela Romero, daniela.romero@austintexas.gov or Juanita Jackson at Juanita.jackson@austintexas.gov. telephone. To to speak register CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS OR COMMISSIONERS: Natalie Poindexter, Chair Cara Dahlhausen, Vice Chair Jawad Ali Chris Crookham Jacob Whitty Martha Lujan William Rice EX-OFFICIO BOARD MEMBERS/COMMISSIONERS: Adrienne Sturrup, Director, Austin Public Health Dr. Desmar Walkes, Austin/Travis County Public Health Authority Ana Almaguel, Division Director, Travis County Health & Human Services Perla Cavazos, Deputy Administrator, Central Health AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 5 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Public Health Commission Regular Meeting on April 1st, 2026. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Presentation and demonstration of RADD Platform by Phillip Bays, Christopher Collins and Brian Morris. Receive updates from commissioners on assigned action items. Discuss draft recommendation “Sexual Health Funding” created by Commissioner Jacob Whitty. Discuss draft recommendation “Heat-Related Illness Prevention for Outdoor Workers”. Discuss commissioner terms. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 7. 8. Discuss and approve “Bridging Public Health Funding” recommendation created by Commissioner Chris Crookham. Approve commission bylaws. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please contact Daniela Romero at Austin Public Health, at daniela.romero@austintexas.gov, or Juanita Jackson at Juanita.jackson@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Public Health Commission, please contact Daniela …
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Austin Travis County Public Health Commission Recommendation Number: [YYYYMMDD-XXX] (XXX is the agenda item number): Sexual Health Funding Preservation Date of Approval: Recommendation: This recommendation seeks to stabilize long-term funding sources to address sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) in the Austin/Travis County area through prevention, testing, linkage to care, treatment, retention, and supportive services. This recommendation directly addresses priorities outlined by Austin/Travis County as a Fast-Track City to end urban HIV epidemics, including goals to reach 95% of people living with HIV knowing their status, 95% are on treatment, and 95% maintain viral suppression by 2030. Description of Recommendation to Council: WHEREAS gonorrhea, chlamydia, syphilis, and HIV infections are reportable conditions to Austin Public Health (APH), WHEREAS APH provides core public health services not covered by other STI/HIV service providers, WHEREAS there is an overburdened demand for STI/HIV testing and treatment in Austin/Travis County for local service providers, WHEREAS trends for congenital syphilis cases have increased across Texas, leading to preventable infant illness and death, WHEREAS incidence rates for HIV are higher in Texas than the national average, WHEREAS gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis co-infections are more common in people living with HIV and those at highest risk of acquiring HIV, WHEREAS STI/HIV incidence rates are consistently higher in Black and Hispanic people compared with White people, WHEREAS STI/HIV incidence rates are higher in men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender people compared with their heterosexual and cisgender counterparts, WHEREAS investing in STI/HIV prevention efforts is more cost-effective than treatment, WHEREAS preventing one new HIV infection yields an estimated $300,000+ cost saved for lifetime medical costs, WHEREAS APH’s funding for STI/HIV programs is largely grant-reliant, and Disease Intervention Specialists (DIS)/Public Health Follow-up (PHFU) and HIV Surveillance are completely reliant on grant funding, WHEREAS federal budget negotiations demonstrate a shift in funding priorities and potential loss of STI/HIV funding, WHEREAS federal directives have threatened or already removed targeted approaches that serve people most disproportionately impacted by HIV, WHEREAS STI/HIV community partners are experiencing financial setbacks due to loss of funding and changing federal initiatives, WHEREAS vulnerable populations are at-risk for worse health outcomes with loss of funding, WHEREAS loss of grant funding for DIS/PHFU and HIV Surveillance would affect partner investigations, handling outbreaks, and community health data, WHEREAS any reduction to STI/HIV funding would negatively impact the Austin/Travis County community. Rationale: NOW THEREFORE …
. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Austin Travis County Public Health Commission Recommendation Number: 20260506-007 BRIDGING PUBLIC HEALTH FUNDING: WHEREAS according to the 2025 Austin-Travis County Community Health Assessment (CHA), the foundation of health in Austin and Travis County is shaped by longstanding structural conditions. Historical patterns of racial segregation, economic exclusion, and neighborhood disinvestment continue to influence present-day access to education, income, and opportunity. These inequities are especially pronounced in East Austin, where residents face compounded disadvantages, and WHEREAS the City of Austin 1928 Master Plan designated then East Avenue as the dividing racial line between East and West Austin, which was later replaced by Interstate 35, serving as a reinforced physical barrier between East and West Austin, and WHEREAS the CHA demonstrates that Interstate 35 traffic and congestion have exacerbated health disparities of those living in East Austin, leading to less access to quality care and healthy foods, increased rates of chronic diseases such as diabetes and infectious disease, poor maternal health outcomes, and increased socioeconomic inequities, and WHEREAS the CHA shows that Interstate 35 creates chronic stressors such as traffic noise, heat, and pollution, leading to poor mental health and stress of those living nearby, and WHEREAS City Council has touted Cap and Stitch as a once in a generation opportunity to repair the physical divide created by Interstate 35 and assist in repairing over 100 years of segregation, and WHEREAS City Council has welcomed the creation of new public spaces for civic participation and unlocking long-term economic and community benefits, and WHEREAS the CHA clearly illustrates that neighborhoods east of Interstate 35 tend to have a lower life expectancy compared to neighborhoods west of Interstate 35, ranging as low as 69 years old in East Austin and as high as 88 years old in West Austin. Data show that residents in historically underserved areas, particularly in East Austin, continue to experience shorter lifespans due to higher rates of chronic disease, fewer health care options, and limited access to other key . resources, pointing to the urgent need for place-based investments and equity-focused public health strategies to close the life expectancy gap and improve outcomes for all residents, and WHEREAS according to the CHA, the conditions of the neighborhoods where people live have a direct and lasting impact on health outcomes. Insecure housing, poor walkability, exposure to traffic dangers, and gaps in infrastructure don’t just limit mobility, they compound …
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 BYLAWS OF THE AUSTIN/TRAVIS COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH COMMISSION ARTICLE 1. NAME. The name of the board is Austin/Travis County Public Health Commission. ARTICLE 2. PURPOSE AND DUTIES. The purpose and duties of the board are as follows: The global COVID-19 pandemic illustrates the importance of having policy, plans, programs and operations ready to address public health crisis at a national, state and local level. The pandemic also reveals the importance of collaborative efforts to support public health and prioritize addressing health disparities as a central goal. The purpose of the joint Austin/Travis County Public Health Commission (“Commission”) is to: 1. Explore the best/evidence-based public health practices for areas that need improvement and provide recommendations; 2. Provide an annual recommendation for Austi City Council (“Council”) and Travis County Commissioners Court (“Commissioners Court”) action on the improvement of overall public health programs, projects, and services within the governing entities in the city and county; 3. Work to inform strategies that address health disparities that impact health outcomes for underserved patients and populations; 4. Gather input from the community on budget and programing recommendations to share with policy makers and health agencies annually; and 5. Report periodically to the Public Health Committee of the Council and to the Commissioners Court (or the appropriate committee thereof). ARTICLE 3. MEMBERSHIP. (A) The Commission shall include a balanced and diverse membership that represents a broad range of health and human services interests and lived experiences with members jointly appointed by the Council and the Commissioners Court. The Commission is composed of nine (9) regular members who serve staggered four-year terms, with four (4) or five (5) members, as appropriate, jointly appointed each even-numbered year by the Council and the Commissioners Court. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 (B) The Austin Travis County Health Authority and one designee each from Austin Public Health, Travis County Health and Human Services, and …
Enabling Timely Public Health Response Austin Public Health Department | 05.06.2026 The Gap Public health needs are clear, but execution is constrained. Data is slow Systems are disconnected New tools take too long 2 What We Built A rapid application development platform and an AI capability: 1. Inside City systems 2. Secure (Microsoft Azure-based) 3. Reusable + scalable 4. Already delivering working tools 3 What It Does From data to insight to action, this AI-enabled capability: 1. Detect signals earlier 2. Connect data across systems 3. Generate usable insights 4. Support real-time decisions 5. Support faster response 4 Proof: Austin Service Guide A working ‘Services’ navigator for Austin residents, built in days, with modern tools on existing data. What does it do? A resident has a conversation in ANY language and is matched to city, county, state, federal, and Nonprofit programs they qualify for. It includes an interactive map and no account is required; best of all, no forms to fill out to see if you qualify. The admin console gives staff a live view of demand, equity, and service gaps, by district, by language, by life event. 5 Missed Opportunity We are not using this at scale Recent initiatives required new funding External solutions were used Internal capability already exists 6 The Risk More missed opportunities Continued fragmentation Uncoordinated AI usage Higher long-term cost Slower response 7 The Recommendation 1. Recognize this as a City capability 2. Align it with governance (ATS + RADD) 3. Enable a path: pilot → review → production 8 What We Need From This Commission Use your role Acknowledge the public health value Support this as infrastructure Elevate to Council 9 Closing We built it. It works. It’s not scaled. Next step is alignment……. 10
AUSTIN TRAVIS COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH COMMISSION Wednesday, April 1st, 2026 AUSTIN TRAVIS COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, April 1st, 2026 The Austin Travis County Public Health Commission convened in a regular meeting on Wednesday, April 1st, 2026, at 301 West 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Chair Natalie Poindexter called the Austin Travis County Public Health Commission Meeting to order at 2:35 pm. Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance: Natalie Poindexter, Chair Cara Dahlhausen Chris Crookham Jacob Whitty Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Jawad Ali Martha Lujan William Rice Board Members/Commissioners Absent: Enrique Lin Shiao, Vice Chair Ex-Officio and Staff in Attendance: Dr. Desmar Walkes, Austin/Travis County Public Health Authority Daniela Romero, Staff, Austin Public Health Juanita Jackson, Staff, Austin Public Health Ex-Officio and Staff in Attendance Remotely: Ana Almaguel Ex-Officio and Staff Absent: Adrienne Sturrup Perla Cavazos Megan Cermak PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Austin Travis County Public Health Commission regular meeting on April 1st, 2026. The minutes for the regular meeting of March 4th, 2026, were approved on Commissioner William Rice’s motion, Commissioner Jacob Whitty’s second on a 6-0 vote. (Absent: Commissioner Enrique Lin Shiao, Off-Dais: Commissioner Jawad Ali) DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. 3. Presentation by Communities in Schools of Central Texas. Presentation by Jacob Reach, Chief of Operations and Maria I. Campos, Chief Advocacy Officer. Received updates from commissioners on assigned action items. Food Plan Update: Commissioner Lujan provided an update on the Austin/Travis County Food Plan implementation. CHW Workforce Advocacy: Commissioner Lujan reintroduced the topic of Community Health Workers (CHWs). Raised concerns regarding employment barriers for certified workers. Commissioner also requests a follow-up with Ricardo Garay and potentially inviting him back for a future presentation on CHW workforce data. Refugee Health Initiative: Commissioner Ali met with the refugee community to discuss health outcomes and explore opportunities to integrate members of the refugee community into Central Health’s Community Health Worker program. UT Engagement: Commissioner Crookham and Rice met with a UT School of Pharmacy professor regarding data and public health funding. While the contact was not the right match for the current Public Health funding recommendation, the relationship will be maintained for future technical or data-related needs. AI Integration: Commissioner Rice reported his research on incorporating AI into Public Health initiatives. Proposed starting a dialogue with the University of Texas to potentially have experts present on the practical applications of …
REGULAR MEETING SMALL AREA PLANNING JOINT COMMITTEE Wednesday, May 6th, 2026 11:30 AM Permitting and Development Center (PDC), Rm. 3004 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, TX 78752 Some members of the Small Area Plan Joint Committee may be participating by video conference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once, either in-person or remotely, and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register, call or email the board liaisons at 512-974-3170 or Samuel.Gonsoulin@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Ryan Puzycki, Chair Christian A Tschoepe, Vice Chair Nadia Barrera-Ramirez Brian C Bedrosian Casey Haney Luis D Osta Lugo Danielle Skidmore AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 3 speakers who sign up by noon (12:00 PM) the day before the meeting, being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1 1. Approve the minutes of the Small Area Planning Joint Committee meeting on March 10, 2026. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 2. Discussion and possible action on a recommendation on case number C814-2008- 0087.02, South Shore PUD Addition. Austin Planning Staff: Jonathan Tomko, AICP, jonathan.tomko@austintexas.gov, (512) 974-1057. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Mark Walters at the Housing and Planning Department, at 512-974-7695, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Small Area Planning Joint Committee, please contact the liaison, Chase Gonsoulin at 512-974-3170, Samuel.Gonsoulin@austintexas.gov; or Donna Arwood at 512- 974-3440, donna.arwood@austintexas.gov. 2
