. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Environmental Commission Recommendation 20260701-005: Dog’s Head Development WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission was informed about the Dog’s Head project by Endeavor Real Estate Group, city staff, and more than 35 concerned citizens at the June 17, 2026, meeting; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission formed a working group to advise and make recommendations regarding the environmental aspects of the project; and WHEREAS, the working group, comprised of commissioners and citizens, met on June 22, 24, and 29; and WHEREAS, the working group was informed that the City of Austin has not conducted an Environmental Assessment Study or an Environmental Resource Inventory, or Tree Survey, or worked with the state to assess the existing pollutants on the property; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin is recommending expanding access to the Dog’s Head by at least 3 bridges across the Colorado River as part of the infrastructure package, yet has not conducted an Environmental Assessment or Impact Study; and WHEREAS, the working group disagrees with the statements made by the developer that the ENTIRE property is “bombed out” or totally degraded to the point that it 100% has to be restored; however, we do agree major restoration is necessary and should be guided by the City’s policies and practices; and WHEREAS, Travis County and the State Historical Commission, via the Hicks Report, recognized portions of this property to have existing historic structures from earlier farms and ranching efforts in the 1850s, and adjacent properties that are still in ranching production; and WHEREAS, the working group recognizes this project falls in the blackland prairie ecoregion, and that the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department states that less than 1% of this region is left in Texas; and WHEREAS, the working group acknowledges the project is habitat for hundreds of species of migratory and resident birds that bring in birders from around the world every year who contribute millions to the regional economy; and . WHEREAS, the working group understands the project encompasses the alluvial aquifers that store and filter water along the river to provide drinking water for Austin’s Colony, Manor, Travis County, downstream counties, livestock, and wildlife; and WHEREAS, on November 6, 2024, the Environmental Commission passed a Recommendation concerning the Colorado River Code Amendment, and subsequently the City Council passed Ordinance 20250327-084, amending section 27-7-32 of the Land Development Code as the “Colorado River Protections Ordinance”; and, WHEREAS, approximately 20% …
. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Environmental Commission Recommendation 20260701-004: Austin Water Capital Improvement Projects located in the Drinking Water Protection Zone WHEREAS, Austin Water presented and updated the Environmental Commission on new and existing growth-related Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects located in the Drinking Water Protection Zone; and WHEREAS, the Austin Water provides adequate drinking water and reliable systems for current and future customers; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission requests that the 2027 report should reflect any water leak detection or abatement in the drinking water zone. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Environmental Commission recommends approval of the request for inclusion of the CIP projects in Austin Water’s 5-year capital spending budget. Date of Approval: July 1, 2026 Motioned By: Secretary Qureshi Seconded By: Commissioner Sullivan Vote: For: 8-0 Chair Krueger, Vice Chair Bristol, Secretary Qureshi, Commissioners Brimer, Fierro, Fleury, Luecke, and Sullivan Against: None Abstain: None Off the dais: None Absent: Commissioners Changsut and Morrison Attest: _____________________________________________ Mariana Krueger, Chair
. RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL Environmental Commission Recommendation 20260701-005: Dog’s Head Development WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission was informed about the Dog’s Head project by Endeavor Real Estate Group, city staff, and more than 35 concerned citizens at the June 17, 2026, meeting; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission formed a working group to advise and make recommendations regarding the environmental aspects of the project; and WHEREAS, the working group, comprised of commissioners and citizens, met on June 22, 24, and 29; and WHEREAS, the working group was informed that the City of Austin has not conducted an Environmental Assessment Study or an Environmental Resource Inventory, or Tree Survey, or worked with the state to assess the existing pollutants on the property; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin is recommending expanding access to the Dog’s Head by at least 3 bridges across the Colorado River as part of the infrastructure package, yet has not conducted an Environmental Assessment or Impact Study; and WHEREAS, the working group disagrees with the statements made by the developer that the ENTIRE property is “bombed out” or totally degraded to the point that it 100% has to be restored; however, we do agree major restoration is necessary and should be guided by the City’s policies and practices; and WHEREAS, Travis County and the State Historical Commission, via the Hicks Report, recognized portions of this property to have existing historic structures from earlier farms and ranching efforts in the 1850s, and adjacent properties that are still in ranching production; and WHEREAS, the working group recognizes this project falls in the blackland prairie ecoregion, and that the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department states that less than 1% of this region is left in Texas; and WHEREAS, the working group acknowledges the project is habitat for hundreds of species of migratory and resident birds that bring in birders from around the world every year who contribute millions to the regional economy; and . WHEREAS, the working group understands the project encompasses the alluvial aquifers that store and filter water along the river to provide drinking water for Austin’s Colony, Manor, Travis County, downstream counties, livestock, and wildlife; and WHEREAS, on November 6, 2024, the Environmental Commission passed a recommendation concerning the Colorado River Code Amendment, and subsequently the City Council passed Ordinance 20250327-084, amending section 27-7-32 of the Land Development Code as the “Colorado River Protections Ordinance”; and WHEREAS, approximately 20% …
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, JULY 1, 2026 The Environmental Commission convened in a regular meeting on Wednesday, July 1, 2026, at the Permitting and Development Center, Room 1405, located at 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive in Austin, Texas. Chair Krueger called the Environmental Commission Meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Mariana Krueger, Chair Jennifer Bristol, Vice Chair Haris Qureshi, Secretary Justin Fleury Martin Luecke David Sullivan Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Richard Brimer Annie Fierro PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on June 17, 2026. The minutes from the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on June 17, 2026, were approved on Commissioner Sullivan’s motion, Commissioner Luecke’s second, on a 6-0 vote. Commissioners Brimer and Fierro were off the dais. Commissioners Changsut and Morrison were absent. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing regarding Austin Watershed Protection's Reservoir Update for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026. Presentation by Brent Bellinger, Conservation Program Supervisor, Austin Watershed Protection. The presentation was made by Brent Bellinger, Conservation Program Supervisor, Austin Watershed Protection. 1 3. Staff briefing regarding Austin Resource Recovery's On-Demand Brush, Bulk, and Household Hazardous Waste Program. Presentation by Ron Romero, Assistant Director, Samuel Gilbert, Litter Abatement Division Manager, and Andy Dawson, Diversion Facilities Assistant Division Manager, Austin Resource Recovery. The presentation was made by Ron Romero, Assistant Director, Samuel Gilbert, Litter Abatement Division Manager, and Andy Dawson, Diversion Facilities Assistant Division Manager, Austin Resource Recovery. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 4. 5. Discussion and action to recommend approval of the Austin Water Capital Improvement Projects located in the Drinking Water Protection Zone for inclusion in the five-year Capital spending plan as required by Financial Policy #8. The motion to approve the Austin Water Capital Improvement Projects located in the Drinking Water Protection Zone for inclusion in the five-year Capital spending plan as required by Financial Policy #8, and request that the 2027 report reflect any water leak detection or abatement in the drinking water zone, was approved on Secretary Qureshi’s motion, Commissioner Sullivan’s second, on an 8-0 vote. Commissioners Changsut and Morrison were absent. Approve a recommendation to Council from the Dog’s Head Working Group regarding the environmental aspects and future potential City Council action, including a vote on the creation of a Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ), for the Dog’s Head area, located between the Colorado River, US Highway 183, and State …
Dog’s Head Data Analyses (a little bit) Dave Sullivan CoA Environmental Commissioner Univ. of TX at Austin, CEER Research Associate Cell 512-914-4710, email BC-David.Sullivan@austintexas.gov What’s measured? CHLORIDE (MG/L AS CL) CHLOROPHYLL-A, PHYTOPLANKTON UG/L, CHROMO-FLOURO E. COLI, COLILERT, IDEXX METHOD, MPN/100ML E.COLI, COLILERT, IDEXX, HOLDING TIME MACROPHYTE BED AT COLLECTION POINT (%) NITRITE PLUS NITRATE, TOTAL 1 DET. (MG/L AS N) NITROGEN, AMMONIA, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) NITROGEN, KJELDAHL, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) ORTHPHOSPHATE PHOSPHORUS,DISS,MG/L,FILTER >15MIN OXYGEN, DISSOLVED (MG/L) OXYGEN, DISSOLVED (PERCENT OF SATURATION) PH (STANDARD UNITS) PHEOPHYTIN-A UG/L FLUOROMETRIC METHOD PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL, WET METHOD (MG/L AS P) RESIDUE, TOT DISS,UNSPEC CALC BASED ON COND (MG/ RESIDUE, TOTAL NONFILTRABLE (MG/L) SULFATE (MG/L AS SO4) TURBIDITY,FIELD NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY UNITS, N PRESENT WEATHER (1=CLEAR,2=PTCLDY,3=CLDY,4=RAIN DAYS SINCE PRECIPITATION EVENT (DAYS) TEMPERATURE, WATER (DEGREES CENTIGRADE) STREAM FLOW ESTIMATE (CFS) FLOW:1=No Flow,2=Low,3=Normal,4=Flood,5=High,6=D SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE,FIELD (UMHOS/CM @ 25C) E. Coli trends 12474 (US 183) 12469 (FM 973) Turbidity US 183: 5.3 FM973: 17.9 12474 (US 183) 12469 (FM 973) Can do more with guidance • I’m an “air” guy, after all….
Dog’s Head Working Group Environmental Commission Jennifer Bristol, June 29, 2026 Process Comprised of more than 20 individuals, the working group met 3 times between June 22 and June 29 A total system failure From the City of Austin that is eroding public trust The City failed to follow it’s own processes An Environmental Assessment or an Inventory have not been conducted per the City’s own Environmental Criteria Manual How can we plan Without the proper assessments •363 Species of birds recorded just across the river •Hornsby Bend Bird Observatory is a must see for any birder living in or visiting Austin •Birding generates $24 Billion annually to the Texas economy •Austin is home to the leading bird and nature tour company in the world •There are 4 Wild Birds Unlimited Stores in the greater Austin area Not 100% bombed Out Needs restoration- yes, but not 100% bombed out Farming and Ranching Since the 1830s Sighted in the Travis County Historial Commission Report 2018 According to Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, less than 1% of the original blackland prairie remains, lost forever due to development, row-crop agriculture, and overgrazing. It is one of the most endangered ecosystems in the U.S. Longhorn Dam High-Hazard Designation: The National Inventory of Dams tracks it as a "high hazard potential" dam. This ranking is due to the severe economic and human risks downstream if the structure fails completely. And what about the floodplain maps? Without an Environmental Assessment those maps are being modified without the input of City Staff at this time. Citizen Boards and Commissions act as oversight for the community and the environment •City Code of Austin, 2-1-144, the Board Authority of the Environmental Commission, which states, in part, “the commission shall advise the city council, the city manager, and the department concerning policies, projects, and programs that affect the quality of life or have the potential to affect the environment” The contract removes normal oversight From the Boards and Commissions- for up to 45 years Article V of the Draft Dog’s Head Development Agreement modifies multiple environmental sections of the Land Development Code within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Environmental Commission including: • • • • • • establishing a 200-foot Critical Water Quality Zone along the Colorado River (Section 5.07) and authorizing extensive development within the CWQZ. exempting Original Development from the cut and fill requirements of City Code …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE LIBRARY COMMISSION MONDAY, JUNE 29, 2026, AT 6 P.M. HAMPTON AT OAK HILL LIBRARY 5125 CONVICT HILL ROAD AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Commission may be participating via video conference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Laura Polio, 512-974-9624, laura.polio@austintexas.gov. Edward Selig, Vice Chair Dr. Suchitra Gururaj Elizabeth Hansen Andrea Herrera Moreno Lorrie Ann Mitchel CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Lynda Infante Huerta, Chair Pamela Carlile Sara Gore Melissah Hasdorff Sheila Mehta Holly Sabiston AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first five speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Library Commission regular meeting on May 18, 2026. DISCUSSION 2. Discussion regarding the agenda for the July 25, 2026, Library Commission Retreat. WORKING GROUP RECOMMENDATION 3. Report of the recommendation by the Book Safe Harbor Working Group. DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL 4. Approval of an updated recommendation to the Austin City Council reaffirming and expanding the previously adopted Freedom to Read Resolution (Resolution Number 20220901-086) and further designating the City of Austin as a Book Safe Harbor. STAFF BRIEFINGS 5. Staff briefing on June 2026 Austin Public Library Public Programming Highlights and Facilities Updates, by Hannah Terrell, Director of Libraries. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Laura Polio at Austin Public Library Department, at 512-974-9624 or laura.polio@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Library Commission, please contact Laura Polio at 512-974-9624 or laura.polio@austintexas.gov.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL LIBRARY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Recommendation Number: 20260623-04: Book Safe Harbor Date of Approval: June 29, 2026 Recommendation: Designate the City of Austin as a Book Safe Harbor. Description of Recommendation to Council: Requesting that the Austin City Council adopt a resolution that designates the City of Austin as a Book Safe Harbor rea(cid:431)irming and expanding the previously adopted Freedom to Read Resolution (Resolution Number 20220901-086). Rationale: Background Across the country and in the State of Texas, libraries are confronting aggressive challenges to materials in their collections. School libraries have been the primary target of these incidents.1 While public libraries are a lesser target, these challenges are occurring there, too.2 3 Since 2021, the State of Texas has passed several bills to restrict public access to books.4 5 Challenges and complaints often cite explicit content, issues around race, gender identity and sexuality, and sex education.6 We continue to believe it is a core mission of the public library to provide quality information from diverse viewpoints, especially on these kinds of topics. We also continue to believe that book bans and these undue challenges are attacks on open access and free inquiry, which are essential to our democracy. 7 On April 18, 2022, the City of Austin Library Commission sent a recommendation to City Council to support and protect the "Freedom to Read" as a result of the numerous challenges to the access of literature and library materials 8, resulting in Resolution 20220901-086.9 With sustained e(cid:431)orts at local, state, and national levels to ban access to literature and educational material, the nationwide Book Safe Harbor movement (also known as the Book Sanctuary movement) has emerged to protect access to information and literature. A book safe harbor provides unwavering support and protection for the freedom to read.10 Becoming a book safe harbor means a city is dedicated to protecting books and resources (physical or digital) that are endangered, challenged, or banned. This movement has championed the right to read all books, without censorship or limitation to access. Successful designations in the State of Texas include the Harris County Library System. 11 12 The "Freedom to Read" is a constitutional right13 that should continue to be protected and reinforced by the City's status as a Book Safe Harbor should undue challenges arise at the Austin Public Library. This designation aligns with the public, as 71% of Americans oppose book bans.14 All patrons …
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL LIBRARY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Recommendation Number: 20260623-04: Book Safe Harbor Date of Approval: June 29, 2026 Recommendation: Designate the City of Austin as a Book Safe Harbor. Description of Recommendation to Council: Requesting that the Austin City Council adopt a resolution that designates the City of Austin as a Book Safe Harbor rea(cid:431)irming and expanding the previously adopted Freedom to Read Resolution (Resolution Number 20220901-086). Rationale: Background Across the country and in the State of Texas, libraries are confronting aggressive challenges to materials in their collections. School libraries have been the primary target of these incidents.1 While public libraries are a lesser target, these challenges are occurring there, too.2 3 Since 2021, the State of Texas has passed several bills to restrict public access to books.4 5 Challenges and complaints often cite explicit content, issues around race, gender identity and sexuality, and sex education.6 We continue to believe it is a core mission of the public library to provide quality information from diverse viewpoints, especially on these kinds of topics. We also continue to believe that book bans and these undue challenges are attacks on open access and free inquiry, which are essential to our democracy. 7 On April 18, 2022, the City of Austin Library Commission sent a recommendation to City Council to support and protect the "Freedom to Read" as a result of the numerous challenges to the access of literature and library materials 8, resulting in Resolution 20220901-086.9 With sustained e(cid:431)orts at local, state, and national levels to ban access to literature and educational material, the nationwide Book Safe Harbor movement (also known as the Book Sanctuary movement) has emerged to protect access to information and literature. A book safe harbor provides unwavering support and protection for the freedom to read.10 Becoming a book safe harbor means a city is dedicated to protecting books and resources (physical or digital) that are endangered, challenged, or banned. This movement has championed the right to read all books, without censorship or limitation to access. Successful designations in the State of Texas include the Harris County Library System. 11 12 The "Freedom to Read" is a constitutional right13 that should continue to be protected and reinforced by the City's status as a Book Safe Harbor should undue challenges arise at the Austin Public Library. This designation aligns with the public, as 71% of Americans oppose book bans.14 All patrons …
Library Commission Meeting Minutes May 18, 2026 THE LIBRARY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MONDAY, MAY 18, 2026 The Library Commission convened in a regular meeting on Monday, May 18, 2026, at the St. John Branch Library in Austin, Texas. CALL TO ORDER Chair Infante Huerta called the Library Commission meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Lynda Infante Huerta, Chair Sara Gore Melissah Hasdorff Sheila Mehta Edward Selig, Vice-Chair Dr. Suchitra Gururaj Elizabeth Hansen Holly Sabiston Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Pamela Carlile Andrea Herrera Moreno Commissioners Absent: Lorrie Ann Mitchel PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Library Commission regular meeting on April 27, 2026. Library Commission Meeting Minutes May 18, 2026 The minutes meeting were approved, as amended, on a motion by Commissioner Gore and a second by Commissioner Hansen. The motion passed on a 10-0 vote. Commissioner Mitchel absent. The approved amendments correct the spelling of the name “Scanlon” by changing the character “i” to “l” on line 2 and line 5 of Page 2, under Agenda Item 2 in the Discussion section. WORKING GROUP UPDATE 2. Update from Working Group regarding Austin as a Book Safe Harbor. Commissioner Mehta provided the update. STAFF BRIEFING 3. Staff briefing on Austin Public Library Reconsideration Process by Christina Nelson, Branch Services Division Manager, Austin Public Library. The briefing was presented by Christina Nelson, Branch Services Division Manager. 4. Staff briefing on Summer at Austin Public Library and Kids Block Party, by Alanna Graves, Librarian III, Austin Public Library. The briefing was presented by Alanna Graves, Librarian III. 5. Staff briefing on the April APL Public Programming Highlights and Facilities Updates, by Hannah Terrell, Director of Libraries. The briefing was presented by Hannah Terrell, Director of Libraries. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Book Safe Harbor Working Group One ATS Reorganization Recycled Reads ADJOURNMENT Chair Infante Huerta adjourned the meeting at 7:43 p.m. without objection.
Highlights & Updates Report Hannah Terrell, Director of Libraries June 2026 Public Services Highlights AUSTIN PUBLIC LIBRARY APL Public Programming Highlights Highlights Greater Austin Book Fest (GAB Fest) Austin Public Library hosted the third annual Greater Austin Book Festival on May 16 at the Central Library, featuring over 200 local authors and drawing more than 800 attendees. The free event included panels and workshops on writing, publishing, and marketing, and authors sold their books directly to readers. Poet Laureate Zell Miller III led a workshop on performing poetry, and participating authors expressed strong appreciation and excitement for future festivals. Mayor’s Teen Town Hall 2026 As part of the Mayor’s USA250 Community Read Challenge, the Mayor’s Teen Town Hall was hosted by the Austin Public Library in partnership with the Mayor’s Office on May 22, 2026, at the Gallery. The event brought together 24 students and 7 chaperones from Akins Early College High School, Ann Richards School for Young Women Leaders, Austin High School, Crockett Early College High School, International High School, Navarro Early College High School, and Northeast Early College High School for a unique civic engagement opportunity with Mayor Kirk Watson. Student representatives from each participating campus had the opportunity to ask questions and share their perspectives on issues affecting young people and the Austin community. Mayor Watson also shared his personal journey, experiences in public service, and insights into local government, creating a meaningful dialogue that encouraged civic engagement and leadership among participants. 3 AUSTIN PUBLIC LIBRARY APL Public Programming Highlights History Harvest The John Gillum Branch Library hosted a History Harvest on May 30 as part of APL’s Centennial celebration, inviting community members to share photos and memories for inclusion in the Austin History Center archives. Attendees contributed stories, scanned photos, and wrote memories, and received a free APL 100 coffee mug. Centennial Planning Updates Centennial programming includes the rollout of the Adventure Booklet, with staff encouraged to increase in‑branch promotion after community feedback indicated limited awareness of the program. Additional summer offerings featured themed adult and teen programs such as vintage cake decorating, cheese tasting, the Library’s 100th Birthday Bash, mini piñatas, and Decoden workshops. Several History Harvests were completed in collaboration with the Austin History Center, with additional events scheduled at John Gillum, Milwood, and Old Quarry. Planning also continued for APL After Dark on July 10, a Roaring Twenties–themed evening event for adults, with …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE COMMUNITY POLICE REVIEW COMMISSION (CPRC) FRIDAY, JUNE 26, 2026, 3:00 PM AUSTIN CITY HALL, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, ROOM 1101 301 WEST 2ND STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 Public comments will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registra(cid:415)on no later than noon the day before the mee(cid:415)ng is required for remote par(cid:415)cipa(cid:415)on by telephone. To register to speak remotely, please call or email Ryan Alvarez at 512-974-9090 or Ryan.Alvarez@aus(cid:415)ntexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Carlos Alfonso Greaves, Chair Ruben DeLaPaz Terry Flood Christopher Harris Kathryn Russell Darrick Eugene Laura Cortes Franco, Vice Chair Lee Peterman Lauren Peña Marissa Johnson Celesta Williams AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Speakers who sign up prior to the mee(cid:415)ng being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approval of the minutes of the Community Police Review Commission regular-called mee(cid:415)ng of May 15, 2026. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. 3. Staff briefing/updates regarding progress of work with the Police Technology Unit on an internal drive for the CPRC to access case files. Staff briefing regarding updates related to Aus(cid:415)n Police Oversight, including an overview and key highlights; administra(cid:415)ve and opera(cid:415)onal updates; commission support and follow-up; community engagement; polity highlights; and upcoming items and priori(cid:415)es from Director Gail McCant. DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. 5. Discussion of Working Groups A, B, and C’s experiences reviewing case files and recommenda(cid:415)ons for expedi(cid:415)ng the case review process. Discussion of the Aus(cid:415)n Police Oversight Officer-Involved Shoo(cid:415)ng (OIS) Dashboard, presented by Public Informa(cid:415)on and Marke(cid:415)ng Program Manager Sara Peralta and Policy Compliance Consultant Crystal Kimbrough. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 6. 7. 8. 9. Summary, delibera(cid:415)on, and ac(cid:415)on regarding a recommenda(cid:415)on from Commissioner Review Working Group A for Case 2025-01049. Summary, delibera(cid:415)on, and ac(cid:415)on regarding a recommenda(cid:415)on from Commissioner Review Working Group B for Case 2025-1839. Summary, delibera(cid:415)on, and ac(cid:415)on regarding a recommenda(cid:415)on from Commissioner Review Working Group C for Case 2025-2338. Approve the crea(cid:415)on of a working group for the “CPRC Year in Review” to prepare a one-(cid:415)me report summarizing the Commission’s first-year accomplishments, challenges, and lessons learned, including compila(cid:415)on of commissioner input and a dra(cid:332) report for Commission review. 10. Selec(cid:415)on of new commissioners appointed by the City …
Community Police Review Commission – Meeting Minutes Friday, May 15, 2026 COMMUNITY POLICE REVIEW COMMISSION (CPRC) REGULAR CALLED MEETING MINUTES FRIDAY, MAY 15, 2026 The Community Police Review Commission convened in a regular meeting on Friday, May 15, 2026, at Austin City Hall, Boards and Commissions Room 1101, 301 West 2nd Street, in Austin, Texas. Chair Carlos Alfonso Greaves called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Carlos Greaves, Chair Laura Cortes Franco, Vice Chair Darrick Eugene Marissa Johnson Christopher Harris Lauren Peña Lee Peterman (joined online at 3:15 p.m.) Kathy Russell Commissioners Absent: Ruben De La Paz Terry Flood Celesta Williams PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approval of the minutes of the Community Police Review Commission regular-called meeting of April 17, 2026. The minutes from the April 17, 2026, meeting were approved on Commissioner Marissa Johnson’s motion, seconded by Commissioner Darrick Eugene, on a 7-1 vote, with Commissioner Lee Peterman abstaining. Commissioners Ruben De La Paz, Terry Flood, and Celesta Williams were absent. STAFF BRIEFING 2. Staff briefing regarding progress of work with the Police Technology Unit on an internal drive for the CPRC to access case files. No update was provided on this item. 1 Community Police Review Commission – Meeting Minutes Friday, May 15, 2026 3. Staff briefing regarding updates related to Austin Police Oversight, including an overview and key highlights; administrative and operational updates; commission support and follow-up; community engagement; policy highlights; and upcoming items and priorities from Director Gail McCant. Presentation was made by Gail McCant, Director, Austin Police Oversight. DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. Discussion with Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis regarding Community Police Review Commission, Austin Police Oversight, and Austin Police Department working relations. Discussed. 5. Discussion of Commissioner Review Working Groups A, B, and C experiences reviewing case files Discussed. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 6. Summary, deliberation, and recommendation from the Commissioner Review Working Groups on cases 2019-0792, 2025-2113, 2026-00114, 2026-00134, 2026-0053, and 2025-2678. The Community Police Review Commission will determine whether to endorse or not endorse each working group’s recommendation. Commissioners Lauren Peña and Lee Peterman presented the recommendations of Working Group A for Cases 2019-0792, 2025-2113, and 2026-00114. The Commission voted to endorse Working Group A’s recommendation for Case 2019- 0792. The recommendation was approved on a 6–0 vote, with Vice Chair Laura Cortes Franco and Commissioner Kathy Russell abstaining. Commissioners Ruben De La Paz, Terry Flood, …
Community Police Review Commission – Meeting Minutes Friday, May 15, 2026 COMMUNITY POLICE REVIEW COMMISSION (CPRC) REGULAR CALLED MEETING MINUTES FRIDAY, MAY 15, 2026 The Community Police Review Commission convened in a regular meeting on Friday, May 15, 2026, at Austin City Hall, Boards and Commissions Room 1101, 301 West 2nd Street, in Austin, Texas. Chair Carlos Alfonso Greaves called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Carlos Greaves, Chair Laura Cortes Franco, Vice Chair Darrick Eugene Marissa Johnson Christopher Harris Lauren Peña Lee Peterman (joined online at 3:15 p.m.) Kathy Russell Commissioners Absent: Ruben De La Paz Terry Flood Celesta Williams PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approval of the minutes of the Community Police Review Commission regular-called meeting of April 17, 2026. The minutes from the April 17, 2026, meeting were approved on Commissioner Marissa Johnson's motion, seconded by Commissioner Darrick Eugene, on a 7-0 vote, with Commissioner Lee Peterman abstaining. Commissioners Ruben De La Paz, Terry Flood, and Celesta Williams were absent. STAFF BRIEFING 2. Staff briefing regarding progress of work with the Police Technology Unit on an internal drive for the CPRC to access case files. No update was provided on this item. 1 Community Police Review Commission – Meeting Minutes Friday, May 15, 2026 3. Staff briefing regarding updates related to Austin Police Oversight, including an overview and key highlights; administrative and operational updates; commission support and follow-up; community engagement; policy highlights; and upcoming items and priorities from Director Gail McCant. Presentation was made by Gail McCant, Director, Austin Police Oversight. DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. Discussion with Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis regarding Community Police Review Commission, Austin Police Oversight, and Austin Police Department working relations. Discussed. 5. Discussion of Commissioner Review Working Groups A, B, and C experiences reviewing case files Discussed. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 6. Summary, deliberation, and recommendation from the Commissioner Review Working Groups on cases 2019-0792, 2025-2113, 2026-00114, 2026-00134, 2026-0053, and 2025-2678. The Community Police Review Commission will determine whether to endorse or not endorse each working group’s recommendation. Commissioners Lauren Peña and Lee Peterman presented the recommendations of Working Group A for Cases 2019-0792, 2025-2113, and 2026-00114. The Commission voted to endorse Working Group A’s recommendation for Case 2019- 0792. The recommendation was approved on a 6–0 vote, with Vice Chair Laura Cortes Franco and Commissioner Kathy Russell abstaining. Commissioners Ruben De La Paz, Terry Flood, …
Officer Involved Shooting Dashboard Austin Police Oversight About Austin Police Oversight Austin Police Oversight is a separate and independent department from APD created to provide impartial oversight of the Austin Police Department’s conduct, practices, and policies to enhance accountability, inform the public to increase transparency and create sustainable partnerships throughout the community. ACCOUNTABILITY TRANSPARENCY PARTNERSHIPS 2 About Officer Involved Shootings An officer involved shooting is when an APD officer discharges their firearm. APO’s last OIS report was released in June 2000. The Officer-Involved Shooting (OIS) Dashboard transforms historical reports into an interactive, real-time analytical tool. Key Objectives: Enhance Transparency Enable Data-Driven Oversight Improve Accessibility & Efficiency 3 Overview Centralized platform for tracking officer- involved shootings Interactive data visualization tool Combines multiple data sources into one view Shows trends over time (2018-2025) Accessible to leadership, analysts, and the public 4 Data Governance Incident summaries (date, location, outcome) Demographics (subjects & officers) Use-of-force details (weapon type etc) Trends over time (currently 5 years, 2018-2025) Geographic mapping of incidents Filters (year, district, etc.) Data Validation Processes Critical Incident Briefing (CIB) Info SIU Yearly Spreadsheets Internal Affairs (IA ) Case Files 5 Overview Page 6 Officer Insights 7 Subject Insights 8 Incident Details 9 Spanish Dashboard 10 User Accessibility and Testing English and Spanish language dashboard launched simultaneously User testing performed by APO staff and volunteers from the City’s Shared Voices program Logical tab order, high contrast alternative color themes etc. Meets Federal web accessibility requirements (WCAG 2.0) 11 What’s Next? • Establish a process for updating and maintaining the dashboard. • Present dashboard to community and commissions. • Create videos and materials to promote and educate community members how to use the dashboard. ThePhoto by PhotoAuthor is licensed under CCYYSA. 12 Questions?
Community Police Review Commission – Meeting Minutes Friday, June 26, 2026 COMMUNITY POLICE REVIEW COMMISSION (CPRC) REGULAR CALLED MEETING MINUTES FRIDAY, JUNE 26, 2026 The Community Police Review Commission convened in a Regular meeting on Friday, June 26, 2026, at Austin City Hall, Boards and Commissions Room 1101, 301 West 2nd Street, in Austin, Texas. Vice Chair Laura Cortes Franco called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Laura Cortes Franco, Vice Chair Ruben De La Paz Darrick Eugene Christopher Harris Marissa Johnson (arrived at 3:08 p.m.) Lauren Peña Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Carlos Greaves, Chair Lee Peterman Commissioners Absent: Terry Flood Kathy Russell Celesta Williams PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approval of the minutes of the Community Police Review Commission regular-called meeting of May 15, 2026. The minutes from the Community Police Review Commission regular meeting of May 15, 2026, were approved on Commissioner Darrick Eugene’s motion, Chair Carlos Greaves second on a 7-0 vote. Commissioners Terry Flood, Marissa Johnson, Kathy Russell, and Celesta Williams were absent. STAFF BRIEFING 2. Staff briefing regarding progress of work with the Police Technology Unit on an internal drive for the CPRC to access case files. No update was provided. 1 Community Police Review Commission – Meeting Minutes Friday, June 26, 2026 3. Staff briefing regarding updates related to Austin Police Oversight, including an overview and key highlights; administrative and operational updates; commission support and follow-up; community engagement; policy highlights; and upcoming items and priorities from Director Gail McCant. Presentation was made by Kevin Masters, Deputy Director, Austin Police Oversight. DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. Discussion of Working Groups A, B, and C’s experiences reviewing case files and recommendations for expediting the case review process. Discussed. 5. Discussion of the Austin Police Oversight Officer-Involved Shooting (OIS) Dashboard, presented by Public Information and Marketing Program Manager Sara Peralta and Policy Compliance Consultant Crystal Kimbrough. Presentation was made by Public Information and Marketing Program Manager Sara Peralta and Policy Compliance Consultant Crystal Kimbrough of Austin Police Oversight. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 6. Summary, deliberation, and action regarding a recommendation from Commissioner Review Working Group A for Case 2025-01049. Commissioner Review Working Group A recommended sustaining the findings of Austin Police Oversight and the Internal Affairs Division and recommending an indefinite suspension for Case 2025-01049. The recommendation was approved on Commissioner Lee Peterman’s motion, Commissioner Christopher Harris second on an 8-0 vote. Commissioners …
SPECIAL CALLED MEETING OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN FIREFIGHTERS’, POLICE OFFICERS’ AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES PERSONNEL’S CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION FRIDAY, JUNE 26, 2026, AT 11:00 A.M. AUSTIN HUMAN RESOURCES’ LEARNING AND RESEARCH CENTER 5202 E BEN WHITE, SUITE 500 AUSTIN, TX 78741 Some members of the City of Austin Firefighters’, Police Officers’ and Emergency Medical Services Personnel’s Civil Service Commission may be participating by video conference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, call or email Matthew Chustz, 512-974- 2859, Matthew.Chustz@austintexas.gov. The committee may go into a closed session under the Open Meetings Act, Section 551.071, of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from legal counsel on any item on this agenda. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Jolsna Thomas, Chair Robert Gross, Commissioner CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Sarah Ivory, Commissioner AGENDA The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes from the Firefighters’, Police Officers’, and Emergency Medical Services Personnel’s Civil Service Commission Special Called Meeting on March 10, 2026. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 2. Hear and rule on appeal(s) from the Austin-Travis County Emergency Medical Services Clinical Specialist-Field written promotional examination administered on May 21, 2026, pursuant to the Texas Local Government Code, Section 143.034, and the City of Austin Fire 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Fighters’, Police Officers’ and Emergency Medical Services Personnel’s Civil Service Commission Rules and Regulations, Rule 7. Discussion and action regarding the request of one or more Austin Fire Department candidates to the Commission to appoint a three-member board for another mental or physical examination, as applicable, pursuant to the Texas Local Government Code, Section 143.022(c), and City of Austin Fire Fighters’, Police Officers’ and Emergency Medical Services Personnel’s Civil Service Commission Rules and Regulations, Rule 5.05. Discussion and action regarding the request of one or more Austin Police Department candidates to the Commission to appoint a three-member board for another mental or physical examination, as applicable, pursuant to the Texas Local …
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FRIDAY, JUNE 26, 2026 CITY OF AUSTIN FIREFIGHTERS’, POLICE OFFICERS’, AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES PERSONNEL’S CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MINUTES SPECIAL CALLED MEETING FRIDAY, JUNE 26, 2026 The City of Austin Firefighters’, Police Officers’, and Emergency Medical Services Personnel’s Civil Service Commission convened in a Special Called meeting on Friday, June 26, 2026, at 5202 E. Ben White Boulevard, Suite 500, in Austin, Texas. Chair Thomas called the City of Austin Firefighters’, Police Officers’, and Emergency Medical Services Personnel’s Civil Service Commission Meeting to order at 11:02 a.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Jolsna Thomas, Chair Robert Gross Sarah Ivory PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None Present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes from the City of Austin Firefighters’, Police Officers’, and Emergency Medical Services Personnel’s Civil Service Commission Meeting on March 10, 2026. The minutes from the Firefighters’, Police Officers’, and Emergency Medical Services Personnel’s Civil Service Commission special called meeting on March 10, 2026, were approved on Commissioner Gross’ motion, Commissioner Ivory’s second on a 3-0 vote. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 2. Hear and rule on appeal(s) from the Austin-Travis County Emergency Medical Services Clinical Specialist-Field written promotional examination administered on May 21, 2026, pursuant to the Texas Local Government Code, Section 143.034, and the City of Austin Fire Fighters’, Police Officers’ and Emergency Medical Services Personnel’s Civil Service Commission Rules and Regulations, Rule 7. The motion to approve the appeal of exam question 53 and accept all answers as correct, was approved on Commissioner Ivory’s motion, Commissioner Gross’ second on a 3-0 vote. 1 CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FRIDAY, JUNE 26, 2026 The motion to approve the appeal of exam question 62 and accept answers A & B as correct, was approved on Commissioner Ivory’s motion, Chair Thomas’ second on a 2-0 vote, Commissioner Gross, abstained. The motion to deny the appeal of exam question 70 and keep the answer as keyed, was approved on Chair Thomas’ motion, Commissioner Ivory’s second, on a 3-0 vote. The motion to deny the appeal of exam question 71 and keep the answer as keyed, was approved on Commissioner Ivory’s motion, Chair Thomas’ second, on a 2-0 vote, Commissioner Gross, abstained. Discussion and action regarding the request of one or more Austin Fire Department candidates to the Commission to appoint a three-member board for another mental or physical examination, as applicable, pursuant to the Texas Local Government Code, Section …
ZERO WASTE ADVISORY COMMISSION CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION REFORM COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 2026, AT 11:00 A.M. CEPEDA BRANCH LIBRARY 651 N PLEASANT VALLEY RD AUSTIN, TEXAS 78702 Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Elizabeth Nelson, 512-974-6492, Elizabeth.Nelson@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Ian Steyaert, Chair; Gerard Acuna; and Seth Whaland AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up [prior*] to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Zero Waste Advisory Commission Construction and Demolition Reform Committee meeting on March 4, 2026. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing on options for proposed changes to City Code and the department’s administrative rules for the Construction and Demolition Recycling Ordinance, including changes to the qualified processor program. Presentation by Elizabeth Nelson, Planner Principal, Austin Resource Recovery. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Elizabeth Nelson at Austin Resource Recovery Department, at 512-974-6492 or Elizabeth.Nelson@austintexas.gov, to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Zero Waste Advisory Commission, please contact Gustavo Valle at 512-974-4359 or Gustavo.Valle@austintexas.gov.
ZWAC C&D Committee Austin Resource Recovery | 6/24/2026 Agenda 1. Review three staff proposed options 2. Review residual vs average diversion rate audit 3. Review common changes to Code and Rules for options 1 and 2 2 Policy Change Options Options Staff propose three options for mixed-waste C&D processing: OPTION 1 Residuals Threshold Verified residual audit caps what gets landfilled (≤10% of listed materials, TBD) OPTION 2 No-minimum ADR Verified average diversion rate, but no minimum diversion to hit OPTION 3 Eliminate QP Program No Qualified Processor; each project submits weight tickets • All projects use a Qualified • All projects use a Qualified Processor (QP) • Replace registered evaluators with a City-contracted auditor • Annual City audit of mixed- • waste C&D facility (City pays) Facilities post quarterly ADR + annual audit results online Processor (QP) • Replace registered evaluators with a City-contracted auditor • Annual City audit of mixed- • waste C&D facility (City pays) Facilities post quarterly ADR + annual audit results online 4 Definitions Review • AVERAGE DIVERSION RATE means the percentage of all inbound commingled material over a period of time that a facility diverts for beneficial use — Code • RESIDUAL means the quantity of non-recyclable material left over at the end of a recycling process; often expressed as a percentage (i.e. amount of material remaining after the resource recovery process, divided by the total amount of materials processed) — Rules • PROJECT DISPOSAL RATE means the total pounds of material generated by a project and disposed per square foot of the project — Code • PROJECT DIVERSION RATE means the percentage of the materials generated by the project and diverted for beneficial use onsite or offsite — Code 5 What is a residual audit? ▪ A sampling of what a mixed C&D processing facility sends to the landfill. ▪ City will create a list of materials that are locally recyclable based on market conditions ▪ No more than 10% (by weight) of the residual material in all residual streams can include listed materials (to be determined) ▪ Each material will have size thresholds so that very small materials won’t count ▪ Materials will be audited before any shredding or grinding activity ▪ If sampling reveals that the processor is not meeting requirements, there is opportunity to come back into compliance with an additional sampling event at the processor’s expense. OPTION 1 - Residuals …
C&D Committee — Policy Options Decision Current Option 1 – Residuals Threshold preferred Option 2 – No-Minimum ADR Option 3 – Eliminate QP Must projects use a qualified processor (QP)? Not required YES Source separated facilities do not need to be qualified YES Source separated facilities do not need to be qualified NO QP program eliminated Type of audit and auditor QP Reporting requirements Average diversion rate* Registered evaluator or RCI Residuals Threshold* City-contractor Average diversion rate (ADR)* City-contractor Report ADR every six months. Report also includes: types of materials recovered, beneficial uses for the materials One annual validated residual audit +++ Quarterly unverified ADR sent by facility, posted on dept website One annual validated ADR audit +++ Quarterly unverified ADR sent by facility, posted on dept website None Projects submit weight tickets None Who pays for the audits? QP Annual Residual audit – City Subsequent, if failed, QP Annual ADR audit – City Subsequent, if failed, QP No Audit 1. Dept. suspends registration 2. QP sent notice of suspension 3. QP given time to correct violation 4. If not corrected, no longer a QP. QP may file appeal within 20 days after suspension. 1. Notice from dept. identifying 1. Notice from dept. identifying No audit to fail violation violation 2. 90 days to get in compliance via follow-up audit at facility’s expense or correction of other violations not requiring an audit 2. 90 days to get in compliance via follow-up audit at facility’s expense or correction of other violations not requiring an audit 3. Fail to correct violation, 3. Fail to correct violation, suspend QPs registration in accordance with code 15-6- 164 suspend QPs registration in accordance with code 15-6- 164 NO YES — ≤10%, materials TBD NO NO If a facility fails audit Residuals Threshold? * In addition to audit, must meet Minimum requirements (rules/code): includes things like compliance with all federal, state, and local regulations, ability to weigh materials, supplying customers with documentation and disposition of diverted materials C&D Committee — Option Strengths and Tradeoffs Current Option 1 – Residuals Threshold preferred Option 2 – No-Minimum ADR Option 3 – Eliminate QP Strengths - Flexibility for facilities to choose whether to register as QP - Projects using QP have reduced reporting burden - Transparency for projects to view facility residuals and ADR on Department’s website - Transparency for projects to view all facilities’ ADR on Department’s website …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE JOINT SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24TH, 2026, AT 6 PM CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 301 W 2ND ST AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 Some members of the Joint Sustainability Committee may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by remotely, contact Amanda Mortl (amanda.mortl@austintexas.gov or 512-974-2651). telephone. To to speak register CURRENT JOINT SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE MEMBERS Home Commission Member Alternate Electric Utility Commission Kaiba White (Chair) Al Braden Resource Management Commission Charlotte Davis (Vice-Chair) GeNell Gary Urban Transportation Commission Varun Prasad Justin Jacobson Environmental Commission Haris Qureshi Zero Waste Advisory Commission Iris Suddaby Community Development Commission Vacant Vacant Vacant Vacant Austin Travis County Food Policy Board Andrew Smith Marissa Bell Economic Prosperity Commission Aaron Gonzales Zain Pleuthner Water & Wastewater Commission Chris Maxwell-Gaines Amanda Marzullo Parks & Recreation Board Lane Becker Shelby Orme Design Commission Planning Commission Jon Salinas Josh Hiller Evgenia Murkes Peter Breton Austin/Travis County Public Health Commission Chris Crookham Vacant City Council Mayor’s Representative Mayor’s Representative Vacant Rodrigo Leal Anna Scott Mayor’s Representative Mridula Madipakkam Mayor’s Representative Christopher Campbell Mayor’s Representative Diana Wheeler Vacant N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Joint Sustainability Committee Special Called Meeting on May 13th, 2026. DISCUSSION 2. Discussion to develop Joint Sustainability Committee priorities and plan for upcoming year. STAFF BRIEFINGS 3. Staff briefing regarding Travis County Environmental Preferred Procurement Program. Presentation by Ryan Kenney and Katie Cane, Travis County Operational Sustainability. HOME COMMISSION UPDATES 4. Update regarding the status of Mopac Expansion – Chris Crookham, Austin/Travis County Public Health Commission. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may …
JOINT SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES May 13, 2026 The Joint Sustainability Committee convened in a special called meeting on Wednesday, May 13, 2026, at Shudde Fath Hall (4815 Mueller Blvd) in Austin, Texas. Chair Kaiba White called the Meeting to order at 6:10 pm Commissioners in Attendance: Kaiba White, Charlotte Davis, Anna Scott, Haris Qureshi, Iris Suddaby Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Aaron Gonzales, Chris Crookham, Chris Maxwell-Gaines, Rodrigo Leal, Jon Salinas, Mridula Madipakkam, Chris Campbell Board Members Absent: Josh Hiller, Diana Wheeler, Varun Prasad PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None Present APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. 2. Approve the minutes of the Joint Sustainability Committee Regular Meeting on February 25th, 2026. Minutes were approved on Davis’ motion and Quershi’s second on a 11-0 vote with Suddaby off the Dais. Approve the minutes of the Joint Sustainability Committee Regular Meeting on March 25th, 2026. The minutes from the March 25th, 2026, meeting were approved with the following amendment on Commissioner Davis’ motion, Commissioner Qureshi’s second on a 11-0 vote with Suddaby off the Dais. The amendments were: page 2 of 2, Discussion and Action Item #4, from “monet” to “money.” DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 3. Conduct officer elections for the Chair and Vice Chair of the Joint Sustainability Committee. 1 a. Anna nominated and Charlotte seconded Aaron as Vice chair, all in favor b. Chair Kaiba White was re-elected as Chair on Commissioner Scott’s motion, Commissioner Qureshi’s second on a 11-0 vote with Suddaby off the Dais. c. Commissioner Gonzales was elected as Vice Chair on Commissioner Scott’s motion, Commissioner Davis’ second on a 12-0 vote. HOME COMMISSION UPDATES 4. Jon Salinas gave updates on the status of updates to the City’s Urban Design Guidelines from the Design Commission. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 5. Recommendation regarding implementation of and options for generation in Austin Energy’s Resource Generation Plan. a. Commissioner Davis’ made a motion to approve the recommendation and Qureshi seconded b. The following amendment was made by Commissioner Davis and seconded by Commissioner Suddaby: The amendment was to add “and the financial risks associated with potential stranded assets;” to #4. The amendment was approved on a 12-0 vote. c. The following amendment was made by Chair White and seconded by Commissioner Scott. The amendment was to remove “and carbon-free" from #6 The amendment was approved on a 12-0 vote. d. The following amendment was made by Chair White and seconded by Commissioner Scott. …
Environmentally Preferable Purchasing A Look at Travis County’s EPP Policy Katie Cane Ryan Kenney Travis County’s Operational Sustainability Team Travis County’s Operational Sustainability Team Conserve Travis County | Environmentally Preferable Purchasing 2026 Katie CaneEnvironmental SpecialistRyan KenneyEnvironmental Specialist Sr. Agenda Conserve Travis County | Environmentally Preferable Purchasing 2026 1: What is EPP?2: Why does EPP matter?3: How to shop EPP?4: EPP at Travis County What is Environmentally Preferable Purchasing? Conserve Travis County | Environmentally Preferable Purchasing Conserve Travis County | Environmentally Preferable Purchasing 2026 “Environmentally preferablepurchasing (EPP)” means purchasingand procuring products and servicesthat have the least adverse effect onhuman health and the quality of theenvironment when compared tosimilar products and services. EPP Key Factors Life Cycle Perspective Green Spending/ Green Products Vendor Selection Conserve Travis County | Environmentally Preferable Purchasing Why does EPP matter? Conserve Travis County | Environmentally Preferable Purchasing Carbon Foot Print Conserve Travis County | Environmentally Preferable Purchasing 2026 Why EPP MattersCircular Economy Which product would you buy? Item A $12.49 $0.02/count Item B $15.49 $0.04/count Your Agency or Department Name | SDG Progress Report 2025 Conserve Travis County | Environmentally Preferable Purchasing 2026 Which product would you buy? Your Agency or Department Name | SDG Progress Report 2025 Conserve Travis County | Environmentally Preferable Purchasing 2026 Item AItem B$12.49$15.49$0.02/count$0.04/count Considerations - recycled content? made locally? Avoid - toxic chemicals, single-use items Eco-labels - certified EPP products Vendors - take back programs? PLC impacts? Conserve Travis County | Environmentally Preferable Purchasing 2026 How toshop EPP? The Life Cycle Perspective https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351393304_Personal_protective_equ ipments_PPEs_for_COVID-19_a_product_lifecycle_perspective#pf7 Conserve Travis County | Environmentally Preferable Purchasing 2026 Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels for Federal Purchasing | US EPA Conserve Travis County | Environmentally Preferable Purchasing 2026 Eco-Labels EPP at Travis County Conserve Travis County | Environmentally Preferable Purchasing EPP at Travis County Conserve Travis County | Environmentally Preferable Purchasing 2026 Education and TrainingOnline and In-person trainingPolicy2019 - Travis County CommissionersCourt adopted EPP PolicyReuse ResourcesReuse Store and PurchasingWarehouse EPP Policy Use EPP for a minimum of 50% of office supply purchases Influencing vendor behavior by requesting information on vendor EPP and sustainability practices Develop and utilize internal reuse networks – Reuse Store and Purchasing Warehouse Conserve Travis County | Environmentally Preferable Purchasing 2026 Goals Conserve Travis County | Environmentally Preferable Purchasing 2026 Gently used office supplies Department admin assistance Your Agency or Department Name | SDG Progress Report 2025 Conserve Travis County | Environmentally Preferable Purchasing …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE JOINT INCLUSION COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 2026, 6:00 P.M. PERMITTING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, ROOM 1401/1402 6310 WILHELMINA DELCO DR AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Joint Inclusion Committee may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Ryan Sperling, 512-974-3568, ryan.sperling@austintexas.gov CURRENT COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Primary Representative: Justin Parsons (Chair) Nirali J Thakkar Member Commission: African American Resource Advisory Commission Asian American Quality of Life Advisory Commission VACANT Commission for Women Commission on Aging Richard Bondi Commission on Immigrant Affairs Diane Kanawati Commission on Veterans Affairs Early Childhood Council Hispanic/Latino Quality of Life Resource Advisory Commission Human Rights Commission LGBTQ Quality of Life Advisory Commission Mayor’s Committee for People with Disabilities Tannya Oliva-Martínez Jerry Joe Benson (Vice Chair) Lisa Chang Bryce F Laake-Stanfield Craig McNary Amanda Afifi Alternate Representative: Alexandria Anderson Nayer Sikder VACANT Teresa Ferguson Azeem Edwin Christopher Wilson Delphi Alvizo Dulce Castaneda Lila Igram VACANT Gabriel Arellano AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first ten speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Joint Inclusion Committee regular meeting of May 27, 2026. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. 3. Briefing on the Levers of Economic Mobility Index and recap of the 2026 Fair Housing Economic Mobility Conference. Presentation by Gary Aaron, Business Process Consultant Sr., and Shivani Datar, Business Process Specialist, Austin Equity & Inclusion. Staff briefing regarding the Human Rights Impact Review. Briefing by Shafina Khaki, Human Rights Office, Austin Equity & Inclusion. DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. 5. 6. 7. Introduction of new Equity Officer Dr. Joseph Allen to the committee. Presentation by Dr. Joseph Allen, Equity Officer, and Dr. Lindsey Wilson, Director, Austin Equity & Inclusion. Presentation regarding the Austin Police Department (APD) Collective Sex Crimes Unit and discussion of APD engagement with the Joint Inclusion Committee. Presentation by Stephanie Gonzales, Equity and Inclusion Coordinator, APD. Discussion on the newly established Native American and Indigenous Quality of Life Commission. Discussion …
JOINT INCLUSION COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES WEDNESDAY, MAY 27, 2026 JOINT INCLUSION COMMITTEE MINUTES REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, MAY 27, 2026 The Joint Inclusion Committee convened in a regular meeting on Wednesday, May 27, 2026 at the Permitting and Development Center, 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr. in Austin, Texas. Chair Parsons called the Joint Inclusion Meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Justin Parsons (Chair) Jerry Joe Benson (Vice Chair) Richard Bondi Craig McNary Tannya Oliva Martinez Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Amanda Afifi Lisa Chang Nirali Thakkar PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Joint Inclusion Committee regular meeting on April 22, 2026. The minutes of the April 22, 2026 meeting were approved on Commissioner Bondi’s motion, Vice Chair Benson’s second on an 8-0 vote. Commissioners Bullard, Edwin, Kanawati, Laake-Stanfield, Melendez, and Wilson were absent. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing regarding the Austin Resilience Network. Briefing by Austin Emergency Management staff. 1 JOINT INCLUSION COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES WEDNESDAY, MAY 27, 2026 The briefing was made by Natalie Lyell, Resilience & Partnerships Manager, Austin Emergency Management. DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. 4. 5. Presentation regarding the work of Communities in Schools of Central Texas. Presentation by Jacob Reach, COO, and Sharin Vigil, CEO, Communities in Schools of Central Texas. The presentation was made by Jacob Reach, COO, Communities in Schools of Central Texas. Discussion regarding a potential special called meeting as a retreat for Joint Inclusion Committee members. Items 4 and 5 were taken up together. Discussion was held. Discussion on scheduling a briefing from Austin Police Department, questions to ask, and the potential for a special called meeting. Items 4 and 5 were taken up together. Discussion was held. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 6. 7. 8. Approve the formation of a FY2026-27 Budget Follow-Up Working Group to track this year’s budget recommendations across the budget cycle. The motion to approve the formation of a FY2026-27 Budget Follow-Up Working Group to track this year’s budget recommendations across the budget cycle was approved on Commissioner Bondi’s motion, Commissioner McNary’s second on an 8-0 vote. Commissioners Bullard, Edwin, Kanawati, Laake-Stanfield, Melendez, and Wilson were absent. Working Group members: Commissioners Benson and Chang Approve a recommendation regarding a proposed schedule for FY2027-28 Community Engagement. The recommendation regarding a proposed schedule for FY2027-28 Community Engagement was approved on Commissioner Benson’s motion, Commissioner McNary’s second on an 8-0 vote. Commissioners Bullard, Edwin, …
Commission Recommendation Joint Inclusion Committee Recommendation Number 20260624-008: Emergency Funding Recommendation for SAFE Alliance – Eloise House WHEREAS, Eloise House, operated by SAFE Alliance, is the only community-based, non- hospital forensic exam facility in Austin providing sexual assault forensic exams and rape kits at no cost to survivors, in a setting purposely built to provide: 1) Trauma-informed care 2) Outside the emergency room 3) Free from billing and 4) Staffed by advocates who remain with survivors throughout the process; and WHEREAS, Emergency rooms are not trauma-informed environments. Wait times are long, lighting is harsh, and staff rotate through 12-hour shifts without the continuity of care that survivors; and WHEREAS, The Mayor’s May 5, 2026 announcement proposed transitioning forensic nursing services to hospital systems and BRAVE Alliance, a Cedar Park-based organization with no demonstrated capacity at Austin’s scale; and WHEREAS, Eloise House, operated by SAFE Alliance conducts 600 forensic exams per year, serves 700 survivors per day, host 27,000 SAFEline contacts per year, and perform 95% of regional exams; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Joint Inclusion Committee (JIC) recommends that the Austin City Council immediately pause the Mayor’s proposed transition of forensic nursing services to hospital systems and BRAVE Alliance and require a meaningful community input process that centers survivors, advocates, and the communities most impacted before any transition moves forward; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the JIC recommends Austin City Council and the Mayor’s Office, in partnership with Travis County allocate a minimum of $430,000 in funding to preserve Eloise House as a community-based, non-hospital forensic exam and advocacy center operated by SAFE Alliance from June 9 through September 30, 2026, and $200,000 to keep the SAFE domestic violence shelter open from October 2026 through October 2027; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City commit to a sustainable, multi-year funding strategy that ensures continuity of SAFE’s full wraparound model without displacement into hospital settings. Wrap around services include: 1) Forensic exams 2) Trauma- informed and culturally responsive care and advocacy 3) Shelter 4) Legal services; and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that this approach and intentionality reflect Austin’s commitment to investing into services and organizations that protect and support every Austinite, regardless of race, immigrations status, gender identity, income, or language. Date of Approval: June 24, 2026 Motioned By: Commissioner McNary Seconded By: Commissioner Edwin Vote: 10-0 For: Chair Parsons, Vice Chair Benson, Commissioners Afifi, Bondi, Chang, Edwin, McNary, Oliva …
Economic Mobility: Accelerating Impact Austin Equity & Inclusion June 2026 Agenda • 2026 Fair Housing and Economic Mobility Conference: Recap • Economic Mobility Framework Resources • LEMI in Action: Live Demo • Operational Focus and Next Steps 2 Conference Reflections Keynote Panel Brought together policymakers, advocates, practitioners, community leaders, and business owners to connect efforts around a shared framework for systemic change. Attended by 283 participants 12 breakout sessions 50+ speakers Moderator: Miles Bloxon, Moderator, Producer & Host, KUT New Panelists: • Fran Rosebush Baylor, Senior Director, Asset Funders Network • Carmen Llanes, Executive Director, GAVA • Ingrid Taylor, CEO, United Way for Greater Austin • Henry Van de Putte, CEO, Meals on Wheels Central Texas • Sharon Vigil, CEO, Communities in Schools 3 Economic Mobility Framework: Workshop Recap • Introduced the Economic Mobility Framework and Index • Over 130 minutes, participants explored the tool, engaged in guided discussions, and worked across sectors to identify practical steps that advance economic mobility. 4 Economic Mobility Framework Assets Core Products Communications Technical Users Levers of Economic Mobility Index Report Framework At-a- Glance brochure Technical Document Levers of Economic Mobility Index (LEMI) FAQs LEMI ArcGIS layers StoryMap Tutorial Videos* Raw Data Economic Mobility | Austin Equity and Inclusion | AustinTexas.gov 5 LEMI Walkthrough Advancing Economic Mobility Operationalizing Visualizing Organizing Normalizing 7 Next Steps April 29, 2026 June 2026 August 2026 2026 Fair Housing & Economic Mobility Conference Launch of Levers of Economic Mobility Index (et. al) Boards & Commissions briefings EveryTexan Virtual Sessions Expanded Media Communications Creation of Resource (LEMI) Implementation Guide Resilient Cities Catalyst Austin Energy Affordable Energy Summit Presentation Community Member Virtual Sessions & Workshops Department Working Group Meetings Continuous Engagement Citywide Implementation May 2026 July 2026 September 2026 - 8 Learn More • Economic Mobility Website: • www.austintexas.gov/equity-inclusion/economic-mobility • Austin Equity & Inclusion Newsletter Sign up: • https://www.austintexas.gov/equity-inclusion • Stay tuned for virtual sessions & in-person workshop dates this summer! LEMI Report Index & Story Map Economic Mobility At-a-Glance 9
Human Rights Human Rights Human Rights Impact Review Austin Equity and Inclusion What is a Human Rights Framework? A human rights framework evaluates government performance through the lens of residents’ rights, dignity, and equitable access to services. Rather than asking whether programs exist, it asks whether people's rights are being fulfilled and where barriers remain. Why is it necessary and how does it support the City? Policies and services can exist without reaching those who need them most. A human rights framework helps identify gaps, improve accountability, and ensure that city decisions advance dignity, equity, and access for all residents. 2 Co-Created Impact Review The City engaged Henekom Group, a human rights consulting firm, to conduct an independent Human Rights Impact Review. The review included research across 160+ sources, engagement with more than 300 stakeholders, and a community workshop with 120 participants to identify and prioritize human rights risks and opportunities across 12 key issue areas. The resulting recommendations were co-created, reflecting community input and best practice from international human rights standards. 3 City of Austin - Human Rights Framework "Design and implement a Human Rights framework for assessing existing City services and programs to improve accessibility and responsiveness for residents' needs." 160+ 300+ 120 Sources and commissions reviewed Stakeholders identified and engaged Registered workshop attendees 92 Issues identified 69 Proposed mitigations for salience 4 Steps to Conduct a Human Rights Impact Review Issue Identification → Mitigation Identification → Stakeholder Engagement → Implementation 1 2 3 4 5 6 Desk Research Dec 2025-Jan 2026: 12 issue areas, 160+ sources Issue & Mitigation Identification Defined salient human rights issues and potential mitigations Stakeholder Mapping Built 300+ stakeholder list with community and City Council recommendations Landscape Assessment Reviewed existing programs, initiatives, ordinances, and laws informed by community and City Council Activity Set-Up Designed with pre-identified issues and mitigations, with blank tabs available for write-ins Facilitator Training Trained facilitators with landscape insights to avoid duplicating existing mitigations 7 Human Rights Workshop - Building Consensus Multi-stakeholder dialogue at March 23 workshop, approximately 120 attendees 8 9 10 11 12 HeneKom’s Activity Analysis Scored and identified salient issues and mitigations for priority action Post Workshop Survey Sent to all registered stakeholders unable to attend Human Rights Post Workshop Mitigations Report Developed feasible municipal strategies based on knowledge-based best practices research City of Austin - Cross-Functional Integration Mapped mitigations across City departments City of Austin - …
Collective Sex Crimes Response Model (CSCRM) Project Briefing Joint Inclusion Committee Austin Police | June 24, 2026 Project Background The Collective Sex Crimes Response Model (CSCRM) project was born in 2023 out of many challenges experienced by the Austin Police (APD) Sex Crimes Unit (SCU) in the last decade, including: ▪ 2016: Systemic issues in its DNA lab that ultimately led to its closure; ▪ 2017: The withdrawal of APD sworn from the Austin/Travis County Sexual Assault Response and Resource Team (A/TC SARRT); ▪ 2018: An investigative report that highlighted APD’s improper use of Exceptional Clearance in the closure of sexual assault cases; ▪ 2018 & 2020: Two class-action lawsuits filed against the City for the improper handling of sexual assault investigations (Smith v COA, Senko v COA); and ▪ 2022: Over 100 recommendations for change were reported by the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) after a comprehensive and multi-year assessment of APD’s SCU. 2 Project Overview A formal project was needed due to… ▪ The deep history ▪ The lack of community trust and constrained relationships ▪ The need for formal communications and status updates ▪ The size, complexity, and importance of the work Project Scope (123 total items): ▪ PERF report recommendations – 103 items ▪ Survivor lawsuit settlement – 16 items ▪ Project scope addition – 4 item Workgroup Model: ▪ Each item of scope has been assigned to one of five Workgroups ▪ Each Workgroup is led by two co-chairs (1 APD Individual, 1 Non-APD Individual) 1. Project Management 2. Policy, Response, & Investigation 3. 4. Data & Metrics 5. Outreach & Partnerships Training Policy, Response, & Investigations Outreach & Partnerships Project Management Training Data & Metrics 3 Project Team Members Engagement with community advocates and partners is a priority. The project team includes 33 total members: ▪ APD Sworn (x8) ▪ APD Victim Services (x8) ▪ APD Civilian (x4) ▪ Community Advocates & Partners (x13) ▪ Asian Family Support Services of Austin (AFSSA) ▪ Austin/Travis County Sexual Assault Response and Resource Team (SARRT) ▪ Independent Subject Matter Experts (Ind.) ▪ SAFE Alliance (SAFE) ▪ Survivors ▪ Travis County Attorney’s Office (TCAO) ▪ Travis County District Attorney’s Office (TCDAO) ▪ Texas Legal Services Center (TLSC) RACI Model: ▪ (R)esponsible = APD ▪ (A)ccountable = APD ▪ (C)onsulted = Project Members, Project Workgroups, Project Steering Committee ▪ (I)nformed = City Council, Commission for Women, Public Safety Commission, …
Joint Inclusion Committee Recommendation Number: 202606242026-001 Date: June 24, 2026 Organization: SAFE Alliance – Eloise House Subject: Emergency Funding Recommendation for SAFE Alliance - Eloise House - DRAFT Recommendation: WHEREAS, Eloise House, operated by SAFE Alliance, is the only community-based, non- hospital forensic exam facility in Austin providing sexual assault forensic exams and rape kits at no cost to survivors, in a setting purposely built to provide: 1) Trauma-informed care 2) Outside the emergency room 3) Free from billing and 4) Staffed by advocates who remain with survivors throughout the process; and WHEREAS, Emergency rooms are not trauma-informed environments. Wait times are long, lighting is harsh, and staff rotate through 12-hour shifts without the continuity of care that survivors; and WHEREAS, The Mayor’s May 5, 2026 announcement proposed transitioning forensic nursing services to hospital systems and BRAVE Alliance, a Cedar Park-based organization with no demonstrated capacity at Austin’s scale; and WHEREAS, Eloise House, operated by SAFE Alliance conducts 600 forensic exams per year, serves 700 survivors per day, host 27,000 SAFEline contacts per year, and perform 95% of regional exams; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Joint Inclusion Committee (JIC) recommends that the Austin City Council immediately pause the Mayor’s proposed transition of forensic nursing services to hospital systems and BRAVE Alliance and require a meaningful community input process that centers survivors, advocates, and the communities most impacted before any transition moves forward; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the JIC recommends Austin City Council and the Mayor’s Office, in partnership with Travis County allocate a minimum of $430,000 in funding to preserve Eloise House as a community-based, non-hospital forensic exam and advocacy center operated by SAFE Alliance from June 9 through September 30, 2026, and $200,000 to keep the SAFE domestic violence shelter open from October 2026 through October 2027; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City commit to a sustainable, multi-year funding strategy that ensures continuity of SAFE’s full wraparound model without displacement into hospital settings. Wrap around services include: 1) Forensic exams 2) Trauma- informed and culturally responsive care and advocacy 3) Shelter 4) Legal services; and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that this approach and intentionality reflect Austin’s commitment to investing into services and organizations that protect and support every Austinite, regardless of race, immigrations status, gender identity, income, or language.
