All documents

RSS feed for this page

Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 3, 2024

5.1 - 1003 E 9th - drawings original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of None page

Backup

Scraped at: June 27, 2024, 9:06 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 3, 2024

6.0 - 611 E 6th St original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JULY 3, 2024 HR-2024-044761 SIXTH STREET NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 611 EAST 6TH STREET 6 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a new commercial mixed-use building. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed building is six stories in height, with residential units stacked above ground-level commercial space. Materials include brick and stucco with stone accents. Full-height glazing is present on the ground floor, with divided 9-pane fixed windows at residential spaces above. The garage is accessed via Red River Street. The proposed project also includes plantings at East Sixth, Sabine, and Red River Street frontages. DESIGN STANDARDS The design standards established by Ordinance No. 20230720-160 (July 2023) and based on the Citywide Historic Design Standards for properties in the 500 and 600 blocks of East Sixth Street apply. The proposed project was evaluated based on the following applicable standards: 3) Commercial New Construction a) Location: Maintain the rhythm of contributing buildings on the street. Orient a new building consistently with the predominant orientation of contributing buildings on the same block. Set back a new building from the street at least: 15 feet, or the distance of the median setback of all historic buildings on the same block face, or in line with at least one adjacent historic building. The proposed project is oriented toward East Sixth Street. It is set back roughly in the same location as the previous non- contributing building. The applicant has amended the design to incorporate Committee feedback in order to better maintain the rhythm of contributing buildings elsewhere on the street. b) Scale, Massing, and Height: Design new building facades to reflect the massing of nearby historic building facades. Visually divide wider building facades into vertical bays that reflect typical widths of historic buildings on adjacent properties or the same block. Construct lower stories to appear as equal in height as possible to the story heights of adjacent historic buildings. Use vertical and horizontal design articulation techniques such as shifts in wall planes and differentiating materials to reduce a building's apparent scale and massing. Use step-downs in building height, wall-plane offsets, and other massing variations to provide a visual transition when the height of new construction exceeds that of adjacent contributing buildings by more than one story. The applicant has amended the proposal, per Committee feedback, to adjust the building’s bay widths and articulation to better reflect the widths of nearby …

Scraped at: June 27, 2024, 9:06 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 3, 2024

6.1 - 611 E 6th St - renderings original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

Backup

Scraped at: June 27, 2024, 9:06 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 3, 2024

7.0 - 1519 Alameda Dr original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JULY 3, 2024 HR-2024-048021 1519 ALAMEDA DRIVE TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 7 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a new house and pool. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed new house is three stories tall, with a habitable basement and garage beneath the two main floors. Materials include concrete and stucco with vertical wood accents; alternately, vertical seamed metal and stone are proposed as accents. The proposed building comprises three rectangular masses with flat roofs of varying heights. Fenestration includes undivided corner and vertical windows, a front-facing garage, and an obscured front door atop a walled staircase. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed building appears appropriately sited. 2. Orientation The proposed building is oriented toward the street. The front-facing garage at the front of the building is not compatible with the standards. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed building’s scale and height exceed those of nearby contributing buildings, and its massing is more complicated. Wall-plane offsets are used to reduce its monumentality when viewed from the street. 4. Proportions The proposed building’s proportions are not compatible with the surrounding historic district. 5. Design and style Though the proposed building is internally consistent in design and style, it does not appear to reflect the design or style of the surrounding district. 6. Roofs The proposed flat roofs do not reflect the roof styles of surrounding contributing buildings. 7. Exterior walls The proposed wood and stucco materials are mostly compatible; stone and metal options are less compatible. 8. Windows and doors The proposed fenestration does not reflect the fenestration styles present in surrounding contributing buildings. 11. Attached garages and carports See 2. Summary The project does not meet most of the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK Use dark colors to disguise massing and scale. Do not use option with wood siding. Ensure the garage blends. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Comment on plans. 7 – 2 LOCATION MAP 7 – 3

Scraped at: June 27, 2024, 9:06 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 3, 2024

8.0 - 2100 Travis Heights Blvd original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

8 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JULY 3, 2024 HR-2024-056413 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 2100 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BOULEVARD PROPOSAL Enclose the front porch and replace windows at a ca. 1958 house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH DESIGN STANDARDS 1) Enclose the front porch with glazing, using siding at the corner to match the existing exterior. Construct a breeze-block wall in front of the existing driveway using salvaged brick. 2) Replace windows within existing openings. Proposed windows are metal sliders and casements. One-story brick-clad Ranch with an integral partial-width porch, aluminum 2:2 windows, and a low-sloped cross-gabled roof with deep eaves. The house at 2100 Travis Heights Boulevard was constructed in 1958. Its earliest residents were Roy B. Estepp and his family, who moved to Austin from Burnet in 1925. Estepp, a retired City employee, lived at 2100 Travis Heights with his wife until at least 1972. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project alters the historic form of the building, enclosing the porch. 4. Exterior walls and trim The proposed new siding and brick are compatible. 5. Windows, doors, and screens The proposed window replacements are compatible. 6. Porches The proposed porch enclosure, through its transparency, mostly maintains the open nature of the porch and appears reversible. Summary The project mostly meets the applicable standards. The applicant has amended the proposal to include Committee feedback. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of a modest Ranch house. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that …

Scraped at: June 27, 2024, 9:06 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 3, 2024

8.1 - 2100 Travis Heights Blvd - updated drawings original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

EXISITING | STREET VIEW 06/12/20242100 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD, AUSTN, TX EXISTING | DRIVEWAY 06/12/20242100 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD, AUSTN, TX OPTION 1 | DRIVEWAY 06/12/20242100 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD, AUSTN, TX OPTION 1 | FRONT APPROACH 06/12/20242100 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD, AUSTN, TX OPTION 1 | OVERHEAD 06/12/20242100 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD, AUSTN, TX OPTION 1 | FRONT APPROACH/GARAGE DOOR 06/12/20242100 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD, AUSTN, TX OPTION 1 | SEATING/ENTRY DOOR 06/12/20242100 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD, AUSTN, TX OPTION 1 | ENTRY DOOR 06/12/20242100 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD, AUSTN, TX 2848SH 4846LS 28210SH 64210TS 52'-7 7/16" L 5 0 1 7 3 7 1 U 3DB27 3DB27 3DB9 3DB9 3DB24 3DB24 3DB30 3DB30 OB30 OB30 3DB24 3DB24 SB36 SB36 3DB24 3DB24 W361924 U361490 W2436R W3627 W2536L R 8 0 1 0 3 4 2 U L 8 0 1 0 3 4 2 U R 8 0 1 0 3 4 2 U L 8 0 1 0 3 4 2 U 4 4 2 2 B B S S 9 9 3 3 B B D D 3 3 6 6 4 4 B B S S S R 0 1 2 0 1 3 S L 9 2 0 1 5 " 6 1 5 / 6 - ' 5 3 " 6 1 / 3 1 7 - ' 4 2 " 2 / 1 0 1 - ' 0 1 I 1 N O T A V E L E E1E1 " 6 1 5 / 6 - ' 5 3 C T 0 6 1 0 1 5 5 1 1 7 7 1 1 3 3 4 4 1 1 B B S R 8 4 5 5 " 6 1 5 / 6 - ' 4 2 ' 1 1 2068DH H D 3 1 8 3 8'-2 3/8" 28'-7 9/16" 15'-9 1/2" 29211SH 29211SH U241890R 52'-7 7/16" LIVING AREA 1607 SQ FT OPTION 1 | UPDATED FLOOR PLAN 06/12/20242100 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD, AUSTN, TX

Scraped at: June 27, 2024, 9:06 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 3, 2024

CORRECTED - Preview List original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Historic Landmark Commission Applications under Review for July 3, 2024 Meeting This list does not constitute a formal agenda and is subject to change. A final agenda will be posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. Briefings 2. Briefing on community outreach and engagement for the Equity-Based Preservation Plan – Cara Bertron and Gregory Farrar Historic landmark and historic district applications National Register district permit applications 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 801 Lydia Street – Robertson/Stuart & Mair Local Historic District – Total demolition. 1807 E Cesar Chavez Street – Berner-Clark-Mercado House - Repair/replace deck and rails, paint exterior. 1003 E 9th Street – Robertson/Stuart & Mair Local Historic District – Partial demolition/addition/remodel/new construction accessory dwelling unit. 611 E 6th Street – Sixth Street National Register Historic District – New construction. 1519 Alameda Drive – Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Historic District – New construction. 2100 Travis Heights Boulevard – Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Historic District – Partial demolition/addition. 900 Spence Street – Willow-Spence National Register Historic District – Total demolition. 1409 Alta Vista Avenue – Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Historic District – Total demolition. 1607 Kenwood Avenue – Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Historic District – Addition. 1701 W 32nd Street – Old West Austin National Register Historic District – Total demolition and new construction. 4200 Wilshire Parkway – Wilshire Wood National Register Historic District – Total demolition. 1205 W 10th Street – West Line National Register Historic District – Replace windows/doors, replace stone, repaint. Demolition and relocation permit applications (all total demolitions unless otherwise noted) 7304 Knox Lane – Relocation – 78731 1205 Cotton Street – 78702 10413 S IH 35 SVRD NB – 78747 4700 S Congress Avenue #10 – 78745 1702 E Martin Luther King Jr Boulevard – 78702 1704 E Martin Luther King Jr Boulevard – 78702 3711 Gilbert Street – 78703 4704 S Congress Avenue #16 – Relocation – 78745 4704 S Congress Avenue #15 – Relocation – 78745 …

Scraped at: June 27, 2024, 9:06 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 3, 2024

Revised Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, July 3rd, 2024 – 6:00 PM City Hall – Boards and Commissions Room 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Ben Heimsath, Chair Witt Featherston, Vice Chair Kevin Koch Carl Larosche Trey McWhorter Harmony Grogan Jaime Alvarez Roxanne Evans Raymond Castillo JuanRaymon Rubio Tara Dudley AGENDA REVISED CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. June 5, 2024 – Offered for consent approval. 1 BRIEFINGS 2. Briefing on community outreach and engagement for the Equity-Based Preservation Plan Presenter: Cara Bertron and Gregory Farrar PUBLIC HEARINGS/DISCUSSION AND ACTION Historic Landmark and Local Historic District Applications 3. PR-2024-014961 – 801 Lydia St. Robertson/Stuart & Mair Local Historic District Council District 1 Proposal: Total demolition. (Postponed June 5, 2024) Applicant: Jennifer Hanlen City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Deny the demolition request. 4. HR-2024-040291– 1807 E Cesar Chavez St. Berner-Clark-Mercado House Council District 3 Proposal: Repair/replace deck and rails, paint exterior. (Postponed June 5, 2024) Applicant: David Rudick City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Grant the applicant’s request to postpone the public hearing to August 7, 2024 to allow time to implement Committee feedback. 5. HR-2024-051579 – 1003 E 9th St. Robertson/Stuart & Mair Local Historic District Council District 1 Proposal: Partial demolition/addition/remodel/build new construction accessory dwelling unit. (Postponed June 5, 2024) Applicant: Joshua Mackley City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Strongly encourage the applicant to reduce the addition’s height further to enhance compatibility with the design standards, but approve the application, as the applicant has amended the design to better enhance compatibility per Committee feedback. National Register District Permit Applications 6. HR-2024-044761 – …

Scraped at: June 28, 2024, 11:30 a.m.
Environmental CommissionJuly 3, 2024

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Regular Meeting of the Environmental Commission July 3, 2024 at 6:00 PM Permitting And Development Center, Events Center, Room 1405 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, Texas 78752 Some members of the Environmental Commission will be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, call or email Elizabeth Funk, Watershed Protection Department, at (512) 568-2244, Elizabeth.Funk@austintexas.gov, no later than noon the day before the meeting. The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). Colin Nickells Jennifer Bristol, Secretary David Sullivan Richard Brimer Perry Bedford, Chair CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Haris Qureshi Peter Einhorn Mariana Krueger Melinda Schiera Hanna Cofer, Vice Chair AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1 Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on June 5, 2024. APPROVAL OF MINUTES STAFF BRIEFINGS Staff briefing on Austin's Drought Contingency Plan and Water Conservation Plan – Kevin Kluge, Water Conservation Division Manager, Austin Water Staff briefing on updates to single family residential landscape transformation activities – Kevin Kluge, Water Conservation Division Manager, Austin Water DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS Presentation, discussion and recommendation on the Community Investment Budget – Kathy Mitchell, Equity Action. Sponsored by Commissioners Sullivan and Krueger COMMITTEE UPDATES Discussion on the draft recommendation from the Urban Forestry Committee on supporting Austin’s tree canopy – Richard Brimer Update from the Bird-Friendly Design working group on their first meeting on July 1st – Jennifer Bristol FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 …

Scraped at: June 28, 2024, 1 p.m.
Environmental CommissionJuly 3, 2024

20240703-001 Draft minutes from June 5th, 2024 EC meeting original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

2. in a REGULAR meeting on ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION REGULAR CALLED MEETING MINUTES WEDNESDAY, June 5, 2024 The ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION convened Wednesday, June 5, 2024, at 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive in Austin, Texas. Chair Bedford called the Environmental Commission Meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Perry Bedford, Jennifer Bristol, Richard Brimer, Peter Einhorn, Haris Qureshi, and David Sullivan Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Colin Nickells and Mariana Krueger Commissioners Absent: Hanna Cofer and Melinda Schiera PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Speakers Santiago Kathy Mitchell APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on May 15, 2024. The minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular meeting on May 15, 2024, were approved on Commissioner Einhorn’s motion, Commissioner Qureshi’s second on a 7-0 vote. Commissioner Bristol abstained. Commissioners Cofer and Schiera were absent. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS Discussion and recommendation of Austin Water Capital Improvement Projects located in the Drinking Water Protection Zone for approval to include in the 5-year Capital spending plan as required by Financial Policy #8 – Frida Guo, Financial Manager II, Austin Water The Environmental Commission took a ten-minute recess at 6:16 P.M. Chair Bedford called the meeting to order at 6:26 P.M 1 3. 4. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS A motion to recommend the approval of the request for inclusion of the CIP projects in Austin Water Utility’s 5-year capital spending budget passes on Commissioner Bristol’s motion, Commissioner Bedford’s second on an 8-0 vote. Commissioners Cofer and Schiera were absent. Presentation, discussion, and recommendation on bird-friendly design and building solutions from Travis Audubon – Heidi Trudell, requested by Commissioner Bristol Speakers Craig Nazor Maura Powers A recommendation regarding bird-friendly design and building solutions approved on Commissioner Bristol’s motion, Commissioner Bedford’s second on an 7-0 vote. Commissioner Nickells abstained. Commissioners Cofer and Schiera were absent. Name: 290 Parmer Industrial – 2, SP-2023-0401C Applicant: Ryan Taylor, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Location: 10095 E US 290 Hwy Service Road EB Austin, Texas Council District: District 1 Staff: David Michael, Environmental Review Specialist Senior, Development Services Department Applicant request: Variance request is to A) vary from LDC 25-8-341 to allow cut up to 15 feet and B) vary from LDC 25-8-342 to allow fill up to 16 feet. Staff recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the variances with conditions Speakers Ryan Taylor, Civil Engineer, Kimley-Horn A motion to close the public hearing was approved on Commissioner Einhorn’s motion, Commissioner Sullivan’s …

Scraped at: June 28, 2024, 1 p.m.
Environmental CommissionJuly 3, 2024

20240703-002 2024 Updates to the Water Conservation and Drought Contingency Plans Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 21 pages

2024 Updates to the Water Conservation and Drought Contingency Plans Environmental Commission – July 3, 2024 Kevin Kluge, Water Conservation Division Manager Agenda  Water Supply  Conservation & Drought Planning  Water Conservation Plan (WCP)  Drought Contingency Plan (DCP)  Next Steps 2 Austin’s Water Supply Colorado River • Combination of State-granted water rights & long-term contract with LCRA • Up to 325,000 acre- feet per year (afy) LCRA reservation & use fees pre-paid in 1999 • Additional use payments trigger when average for 2 consecutive years exceeds 201,000 afy Centralized Reclaimed System 3 Water Supply Storage Levels 4 Conservation & Drought Planning  Texas requires a Water Conservation Plan (WCP) and Drought Contingency Plan (DCP) to be updated every 5 years • Submit to Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) • Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) requires an updated WCP for financing  WCP – reduce overall water consumption and improve water use efficiency  DCP – water supply drought triggers and response activities 5 Conservation & Drought Planning Water Conservation Plan (WCP)  Activities in non-drought and drought conditions  Describes • Conservation (rebates, education, enforcement) • Water loss • Reuse Drought Contingency Plan (DCP)  Focused on drought conditions  Describes drought • Stages (1-3, emergency) • Triggers (demand and supply) • Actions (historically, restrictions)  Must be consistent with the LCRA  5- and 10-year goals for Total GPCD, Res. GPCD, and Water Loss DCP  Requires Code changes How does this work regionally with our water supply partner? LCRAs Drought Contingency Plan (DCP)  Austin DCP must align with LCRAs DCP  LCRA recently updated its DCP on March 26, 2024  LCRAs significant updates include: • Adjusting drought trigger levels (From 4 stages to 5 stages) • Adding LCRAs inflow trigger for Drought Stage 2 • Adding specific drought condition water use restrictions 7 Water Conservation Plan Residential Customer Programs  Household Material Distribution  Residential Irrigation Audits  Go Repair! and Plumbing Program  Austin Energy All-Star Conservation Kits 8 Water Conservation Plan Residential Incentive Programs 9 Water Conservation Plan Commercial Incentive Programs  Bucks for Business • Performance-based: $1 per 1,000 gallons saved over 10 years • Examples: high-efficient fixtures, cooling systems, reusing high quality rinse water • Program resurgence: In Fiscal Year 2024, 18 applications, saving 16.4 million gallons, plus up to 10 more by end of the fiscal …

Scraped at: June 28, 2024, 1 p.m.
Environmental CommissionJuly 3, 2024

20240703-003 Landscape Transformation Briefing Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 15 pages

Landscape Transformation Activities Environmental Commission | July 3, 2024 Kevin Kluge, Water Conser vation Division Manager Why New Water Conservation Measures?  Lakes are 50% full  Highland Lakes inflow • 2022 - record low • 2023 – 4th lowest  El Niño will shift to La Niña  Drought Stage 2 restrictions  Per-person use has declined but plateaued 2 Landscape Transformation Strategy  From traditional landscaping to plants with reduced water needs  New single-family residential  Potential limits on turf and irrigation  Savings goal of 2,490 AF (811 MG) by 2040 3 Public Engagement & Input  Public and stakeholder meetings • February, May, June, & November 2022 • August 2023  Smaller stakeholder group meetings  Speak Up Austin! page • 2 surveys (256 and 303 responses) • Majority of local responses favored regulating landscape transformation 4 Internal City Stakeholders  Watershed Protection Department (WPD)  Development Services Department (DSD)  Austin Energy (AE) – Green Building  Office of Sustainability  Equity Office  Planning and Housing Department  Wildlife Austin (PARD)  Austin Fire Department – (Wildland-Urban Interface) 5 Stakeholder Meetings  Home Builders Association of Greater Austin (HBA) • Concern about project delays  Central Texas Professional Irrigation Association - • Supported increased enforcement • Supported high-efficiency irrigation system components  Association of Professional Landscape Architects (CTPIA) (ASLA)  Texas Nursery and Landscape Assoc. 6 (TNLA – Region 8) Additional Meetings  Other utilities in Texas • New Braunfels • City of Frisco • Model homes with 50% turf reduction • Post-installation inspections (within 1-2 days) • Irrigation check-up • Georgetown • Residential landscape ordinance 7 Steps to Transform Landscapes Build with savings Set customers up for success Encourage alternative water 8 Build with Savings  Enhanced Soil Inspections • A minimum of 6 inches of topsoil • Topsoil mix composed of 20% compost • Estimated Water Savings: 10% reduction 9  Required residential plant list • Apply commercial plant requirements to residential • Grow Green Plant Guide as a model Build with Savings  Limit irrigation area • Up to 50% of landscape area; front yard or back • Estimated Water Savings: 35% annually per home 10 Set Customers Up for Success Est. Water Savings Potential Cost 22% savings $543 plus labor 10% savings Austin Water inspection 5% savings Austin Water staff time Require pressure reduction devices (new irrigation systems) Require …

Scraped at: June 28, 2024, 1 p.m.
Environmental CommissionJuly 3, 2024

20240703-004: Community Investment Budget 2025 Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 7 pages

Community Investment Budget Fiscal Year 2025 Introductions Who is Equity Action? ● Equity Action is a non-profit (c4) focused on protecting and expanding Austin’s transformative justice efforts. What is the Community Investment Budget? ● In collaboration with dozens of community organizations, Equity Action facilitated a FY2025 Community Investment Budget prevent violence and overdoses, stabilize people and families living on the margins, address crises with appropriate first responders, create opportunity and ensure that the long-awaited Climate Equity Plan and Sustainable Food Plans are implemented starting FY25. History of CIB and other Community-Led Budget Initiatives Austin has a long history of community-based budgeting. ● For many years Communities of Color United organized and advocated for an annual People’s Budget. These community-driven spending priorities centered public health and equity. ● The first Community Investment Budget was FY22-23 and reflected input from the largest coalition ever coordinated to address unmet community needs. After voters rejected a ballot proposal to tie up $120M in additional police, we pressed the city to think about public safety in a new way -- well-maintained parks, housing, youth activities, living wages, an independent forensic lab, public health initiatives to keep people safe from the pandemic and more! ● This year we’re back because mental health first response, substance-related deaths, rehousing and housing stabilization, safe and well maintained parks, and workforce opportunity requires ongoing investment! Community Investment Budget Priorities Fiscal Year 2025 ● Crime survivor support, violence prevention ● Park maintenance, library materials ● Overdose prevention/NARCAN ● Mental health crisis response ● Sheltering/housing the unhoused ● Preventing eviction and stabilizing vulnerable families ● Re-entry assistance with jobs, housing for formerly incarcerated ● Resilience hubs in areas most vulnerable to extreme weather ● Workforce development & opportunity ● New sustainable food plan ● Implement climate equity plan and address water availability/cost Why is the CIB important? While Austin is considered one of the best cities in the country to live in for many people, we still have a long way to go to ensure that it is the best for everyone - regardless of age, race, gender, sexual orientation, immigration status, language and income. The CIB this year details spending priorities for 5.7% of the roughly $1.4 billion General Revenue budget. These funding recommendations address well established community needs, gaps in existing programs and services, and suggest ways to improve the safety and quality of life for Austinites across the city. …

Scraped at: June 28, 2024, 1 p.m.
Environmental CommissionJuly 3, 2024

20240703-004: Community Investment Budget in English and Spanish original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 48 pages

Summary of Community Investment Budget and Endorsing Groups The City’s budget is a reflection of our values. Austin is a progressive city, but budget processes are by nature conservative. Each budget is built on the prior one, and such a process makes the city resistant to change, regardless of the priorities expressed by voters and those they elect to address the urgent needs of today. The undersigned organizations jointly urge the city to continue its commitment to AFSCME (4%) in the baseline and invest in the following priorities in community health, housing, affordability, sustainability and safety for FY24 totaling $79.5 million or 5.7% of this year’s roughly $1.4 billion General Revenue budget. ● Parent Support Specialists [$2.4M] ongoing ● Tenant Relocation Assistance Program [$1M] ongoing ● Emergency Rental Assistance, Eviction Defense, and Tenant Legal and Support Services [$10M] ● Forensic Nursing, Austin Health Department [$328K] ongoing ● Mental Health 1st Response [$4M] ongoing ● Library books/materials [$900K] ● Reentry navigators for jobs/housing formerly incarcerated [$1.4M] ongoing ● Workforce Development [$3.46M ] ● Office of Violence Prevention [$500K] ● Implementation of the Austin Climate Equity Plan [$1.335M] ● Improve rebates for residential and commercial landscape conversions [$400,000, Austin Water Utility Revenue] ● Increase Leak Detection Programs [$2.28M, Austin Water Utility Revenue] ● Park Maintenance and Safety [$2M] ongoing ● Tenant Education, Stabilization Support, and Community-based Agreement Support [$300K] ongoing ● Displacement Prevention Navigators [$1M] ongoing ● Fair Housing Education, Support, and Testing [$350K] ● Emergency Supplemental Assistance for Low Income Residents [$300K] ● Inclement Weather Response [$4.5M] ongoing Community Crisis Response [$2.3M] ongoing [$4M] ● Street Outreach Services, Case Managers, and Peer Support Specialists ● Strengthen Rapid Rehousing (RRH) and create a bridge to Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) [$8M] ● Service funding for Permanent Supportive Housing [$4M] ● Early Childhood Education and Development [$1.575M] ongoing ● Resilience Hubs [$15M] ● Harm Reduction Services and Infrastructure [$1M] ongoing ● Immigration Legal Services for Low Income Families [$250K] ● Equity Office [$800K] ongoing ● Family Stabilization Grant [$3M] ongoing ● Logistical Support For Austinites Seeking Abortion Care [$250K] ongoing ● Food Sovereignty and Food Systems-Related Funding [$850K] ● East Austin Performing Arts Funding [$850K] ● Austin Community-Owned Food Retail Initiative [$500K] ● Give the Resilience Office a budget [$1M] ongoing TOTAL REQUEST FOR NEW FUNDS: $79.5M (General Fund) $2,680,000 (AWU) Endorsing Organizations Alliance for Safety and Justice American Civil Liberties Union of Tx …

Scraped at: June 28, 2024, 1 p.m.
Environmental CommissionJuly 3, 2024

20240703-004: DRAFT Community Investment Budget Recommendation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20240703-004 Second by: Mariana Krueger Date: July 3th, 2024 Subject: Community Investment Budget proposal Motion by: David Sullivan RATIONAL: WHEREAS, marginalized communities in Austin are disproportionately threatened by food apartheid and insecurity, heat islands and limited access to green space, climate change and its resultant natural disasters, pollution and poor health, and housing instability and homelessness; WHEREAS, the City of Austin, to varying degrees, has acknowledged these inequities and pledged to curtail them, including through the implementation of the Austin Climate Equity Plan and the first-ever Austin/ Travis County Comprehensive Food Plan; WHEREAS, in order to achieve a more equitable city and see the fruition of these plans and other equity-oriented policies, the City must appropriately fund them with input from the community at- large; WHEREAS, Equity Action has organized a broad coalition of support for an FY2025 Community Investment Budget after public input, thorough research, and endorsements from more than 40 organizations and individuals, including the Sierra Club (Austin Regional Group), Black Lives Veggies, Austin Environmental Democrats, Save Our Springs Alliance, Fruitful Commons, Sunrise Movement Austin, and others; WHEREAS, the City Manager and his office will soon draft a proposed FY2025 budget for City Council’s approval; WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission may advise City Council on matters of environmental importance, including as they relate to funding initiatives related to the environment and intersecting issues; THEREFORE, the Environmental Commission recommends that the City Manager’s office incorporates the entirety of the Community Investment Budget proposal into the forecasted, baseline FY2025 budget. Vote: Against: Abstain: Absent: Attest: 1 of 1

Scraped at: June 28, 2024, 1 p.m.
Environmental CommissionJuly 3, 2024

20240703-005: DRAFT Urban Forestry Tree Canopy Recommendation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

URBAN FORESTRY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION 20240627-004 Seconded by: Richard Brimer Date: June 27, 2024 Subject: City of Austin Tree Canopy Ordinance Motion by: Melinda Schiera WHEREAS, the Urban Forestry Committee recognizes Council approved, on August 8, 2019, a Resolution declaring a climate emergency in the City, and WHEREAS, the Council approved, on September 30, 2021, the Austin Climate Equity Plan setting a goal of 50% Tree Canopy by 2050, and WHEREAS, Council re-affirmed its target of net-zero community-wide emissions by 2040 on February 15, 2024, and WHEREAS, current data shows 41% canopy cover city-wide based on satellite imagery captured in the summer of 2022, and WHEREAS, the payment rate to the Urban Forest Replenishment Fund (UFRF) was last set in 2010 and has not been updated since then, and WHEREAS, the tree canopy over East Austin is less than West Austin, and there is a specific need to increase tree canopy on private land in East Austin, and WHEREAS, an expansive Tree Canopy mitigates the heat island effect, removes carbon from the air, improves community health by removing pollutants from the air, and improves biodiversity, and WHEREAS, feedback from Urban Landscape Architects to the Environmental Commission is that trees planted from site plan requirements are not surviving, THEREFORE, the Urban Forestry Committee recommends the Environmental Commission advise Council adopt the following actions to more aggressively expand, protect, and enhance the City’s Tree Canopy: 1. Set a goal of 50% city-wide canopy cover by 2040 instead of 2050 with a particular emphasis on racial equity and and reducing heat island effects in East Austin (that is, land East of I-35 within the city limits). 1 of 3 2. Capture satellite imagery to calculate the city-wide canopy cover biennially instead of every four years and use this data to inform methods for achieving 50% canopy cover by 2040. 3. Require the City Arborist and the Development Services Department to document the number and scope of unpermitted removal of protected and heritage trees removed each year by address and actions taken. A report of these activities shall be presented to the Environmental Commission, Urban Forestry Committee, and Council annually. 4. Add fruit and nut-bearing trees to the list of preferred trees that are appropriate for the Central Texas climate. Bennually update the list of preferred trees to adjust for changing climate. 5. Define a new category of protected trees, based on the breadth of …

Scraped at: June 28, 2024, 1 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 3, 2024

12.1 - 1701 W 32nd St - drawings original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 14 pages

NEW NO CHANGE REVISED ELIMINATED 3 2 / 0 3 / 0 1 I T E S Y T L B S A E F I I / 4 2 1 0 2 0 / T E S G N C R P I I / 4 2 2 0 4 0 / T E S S S E R G O R P G N C R P I I 4 2 / 1 3 / 5 0 I T E S T M R E P DRAWING INDEX ISSUE ARCHITECTURAL TITLE SHEET & SITEPLAN GENERAL NOTES SURVEY TREE PRESERVATION TREE FLARE TYPE I DRIVEWAY DETAILS DEMOLITION PLAN CONSTRUCTION & ROOF PLAN FINISH & POWER PLAN REFLECTED CLNG PLAN BUILDING ELEVATIONS BUILDING ELEVATIONS WINDOW & DOOR SCHEDULE PROJECT SCHEDULE PROJECT SCHEDULE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES FOUNDATION DETAILS FOUNDATION DETAILS FRAMING DETAILS FRAMING DETAILS FRAMING DETAILS FOUNDATION/PIER LAYOUT PLAN FRAMING AND LATERAL BRACING PLAN R E B M U N T E E H S A0.00 A0.01 A0.02 A0.03 A0.04 D2.00 A2.00 A2.10 A2.20 A3.00 A3.01 A6.00 A6.01 A6.02 A7.00 A7.01 A7.02 A7.03 S0.0 S0.1 S1.0 S2.0 S3.0 S3.1 S4.0 S4.1 S4.2 EXISTING OVER HEAD UTILITY LINES @ 653.4' EXISTING OVER HEAD UTILITY LINES @ 654.4' FINISH GRADE @ SOD AREA METAL EDGING DECOMPOSED GRANITE SIZE: FINE TO 1/4" PARTICLE SIZE 1 1/2" LAYERS, EACH LAYER COMPACTED 90% W/TOP LAYER MIN. 75% DUST FINES ADD STABILIZER PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE (REFER TO SOILS REPORT FOR COMPACTION RATE IF AVAILABLE COMPACTED SUBGRADE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC " 3 " 4 WEST 32ND STREET (50') S70º43'00" E 63.85' EXISTING NO PARKING SIGN EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT K L A W . C N O C G N T S X E I I 34" HACKBERRY TO BE REMOVED RE: 2024-039448TP 1358 HIGH ADJ GRADE 621.4' " 0 - ' 5 1 LOT 4 621 15' CLEARANCE FROM CLOSEST O/H ELECTRIC WIRE NEW FRONT PORCH TO REPLACE EXTG FRONT PORCH 25' BUILDING LINE EXISTING STOP SIGN EXISTING WATER VALVES EXISTING OVER HEAD UTILITY LINES; TYP EXISTING OVER HEAD UTILITY LINES @ 657.4' 7500 LADLE LANE AUSTIN, TX 78749 WWW.RESTRUCTURESTUDIO.COM CONSULTANTS STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: ARCH CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PLLC 2579 WESTERN TRAILS BLVD, SUITE 230 AUSTIN, TX 78745 512-328-5353 | WWW.ARCHCE.NET CONTRACTOR: MERIDIAN CUSTOM HOMES P.O. BOX 161060 - AUSTIN, TX 78716 512-809-9840 | WWW.MCHAUSTIN.COM …

Scraped at: July 2, 2024, 2:30 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 3, 2024

29.4 - Support for Austin Historic Zoning-Fannie Davis Gazebo original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: July 2, 2024, 2:30 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 3, 2024

6.2 - 611 E 6th St - updated drawings original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of None page

Backup

Scraped at: July 2, 2024, 2:30 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 3, 2024

7.1 - 1519 Alameda Dr - Presentation package original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 25 pages

John Pawson Kosmos House Exterior Cladding 15 April 2023 Plans A L A M E D A D R I V E E U N E V A A T S V A T L A I MONROE STREET © Drawing is copyright Do not scale All dimensions to be checked on site All construction, materials, workmanship etc to meet The National Building Regulations and Codes of Practice. All discrepancies within these drawings are to be reported to the Executive Architects. Rev Date Description General Notes: All given dimensions are nominal and are to be verified by the contractor in the field. Full shop drawings must be issued to the architect for comment before fabrication. N Client: DES BONEVA & SHANE DAVIS Project: KOSMOS HOUSE John Pawson Unit B 70-78 York Way London N1 9AG Telephone +44 (0)20 7837 2929 Facsimile +44 (0)20 7837 4949 email@johnpawson.com Drawing Title: SITE PLAN Scale: 1/16" = 1' @ A1 1/32" = 1' @ A3 Job No: 2311 Drawing No.: GA-100 Date: 12 APRIL 2024 Revision: - ' 0 1 5 ' 5 1 5 5 2 0 ' 5 2 5 ' 5 3 0 ' GARDEN STORAGE / EQUIPMENT ROOM ENTRY | + 508'-0" WORK ROOM GARAGE | + 509'-0" EQUIPMENT / STORAGE EQUIPMENT / POOL ROOM GUEST BEDROOM | + 509'-0" ' 5 0 5 5 1 0' 5' 1 5 0' 2 5 5' 2 5 © Drawing is copyright Do not scale All dimensions to be checked on site All construction, materials, workmanship etc to meet The National Building Regulations and Codes of Practice. All discrepancies within these drawings are to be reported to the Executive Architects. Rev Date Description General Notes: All given dimensions are nominal and are to be verified by the contractor in the field. Full shop drawings must be issued to the architect for comment before fabrication. N Client: DES BONEVA & SHANE DAVIS Project: KOSMOS HOUSE John Pawson Unit B 70-78 York Way London N1 9AG Telephone +44 (0)20 7837 2929 Facsimile +44 (0)20 7837 4949 email@johnpawson.com Drawing Title: PLAN - BASEMENT Scale: 3/16" = 1' @ A1 3/32" = 1' @ A3 Job No: 2311 Drawing No.: GA-101 Date: 12 APRIL 2024 Revision: - ' 0 1 5 ' 5 1 5 5 2 0 ' 5 2 5 ' + 508'-0" ENTRY RECEPTION | + 519'-6" 5 3 0 ' POOL LIVING …

Scraped at: July 2, 2024, 2:30 a.m.