B.10.3 - Kenney House signs3 — original pdf
Backup
All documents
B.10.4 - Kenney House signs4 — original pdf
Backup
B.2.0 - 1501 Northwood Rd - Postponement request — original pdf
Brummett, Elizabeth From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: John Stoddard <john@jwstoddard.com> Tuesday, May 18, 2021 5:45 PM Brummett, Elizabeth Civins, Conor; CleanTag Permits Re: Architectural Review Committee meeting scheduled for Monday, May 10th at 2:00 PM Hi Elizabeth, Thank you for the phone call and additional feedback last week. I will need a little more time to develop the second level. Let's postpone until June. What date will you need the revised drawings by? Thank you, John John Stoddard PRINCIPAL, JOHN WEST STODDARD, INC. 512.987.4271 john@jwstoddard.com www.jwstoddard.com The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential. They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies thereof. Thank you. On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:56 PM Brummett, Elizabeth <Elizabeth.Brummett@austintexas.gov> wrote: Thanks for talking with me last week. I wanted to check in and see how the updates are coming. Do you anticipate being able to send a revised drawing set tomorrow, or is a postponement to June in order to allow more time? Hi, John and Conor, Thank you, Elizabeth 1
B.3.0 - 612 Highland Ave — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 24, 2021 HR-2021-039343 SMOOT/TERRACE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 612 HIGHLAND AVENUE B.3 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a 1-story house with a lower level and partial basement; renovate the existing garage. The proposed project is a 1-story house clad in horizontal hardiplank siding and capped by a combination hipped and flat roof covered in standing-seam metal. Features include a shed-roofed front dormer, full-height fixed and casement steel-sash windows, a fully glazed steel-frame front door, and a stucco chimney. Concrete steps provide access to a full-width, 11’ deep front porch with a low stucco wall, vertical metal railings, and flat metal roof with wood soffit. A screened porch on the south is capped by a low-pitched roof and set back 51’ from the front wall. A lower-level opening to the rear of the property is minimally visible from the street. An existing detached garage is proposed to be renovated. Changes include replacement of horizontal wood siding with board and batten hardiplank siding, replacement of the garage doors, and in-kind replacement of the roof covering. The garage is accessed by the rear alley and not visible from Highland Avenue. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Smoot/Terrace Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1. New construction shall have the same street orientation and distance from adjacent buildings as the contributing buildings in the same block. The building sits on the previous historic building’s footprint (destroyed by fire), with the same orientation and distance as contributing buildings on the block. The project meets this standard. 2. Setbacks for new construction shall be consistent with setbacks of the district’s contributing houses. The building’s setback aligns with the adjacent contributing building on the south. The project meets this standard. 4. Design new buildings so that they are compatible with, but differentiated from, historic buildings in the district. The building’s scale and massing are compatible with nearby historic buildings. Elements such as the hipped roof form, dormer window, and full-width front porch present a modern take on historic architecture found elsewhere in the district. The triple banks of windows on the front wall and in the dormer reference window patterns in nearby historic buildings, with more vertical proportions that are compatible with the modern style and steeper roof pitch. The horizontal siding and porch railing reference cladding and porch …
B.3.1 - 612 Highland - Plans — original pdf
SITE KEY PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION ITEM ON SITE TO BE DEMOLISHED PROTECTED (OR) HERITAGE TREE CRZ TREE TO BE REMOVED TREE AND CANOPY WOOD FENCE METAL FENCE OVERHEAD LINE UTILITY POLE WATER METER GAS METER GRADE POINT ELECTRIC PANEL & METER WM EM G SITE NOTES 1.) SITE PLAN BASED ON SURVEY OF 612 HIGHLAND AVENUE LOT XX, BLOCK XX, OLD WEST AUSTIN "XX" SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, DATED OCTOBER 11, 2019, BY "WATSON SURVEYING JOB NO. L3ROSEDALE-TP 2.) P6.) LIMIT AREAS OF STOCKPILED MATERIAL TO AREAS APPROVED BY ARCHITECT.DETERMINE EXACT LOCATION OF NEW STRUCTURES IN FIELD WITH ARCHITECT 3.) COORDINATE DESIGN & DETAILS WITH UTILITY COMPANY. COORDINATE LOCATION OF UTILITY LINES & PANEL LOCATIONS WITH ARCHITECT 4.) PROTECT TREES, ROCK OUT CROPPINGS, AND NATURAL SITE FEATURES DURING CONSTRUCTION. MINIMIZE SITE DISTURBANCE TO PROJECT LIMIT LINE. 5.) LIMIT AREAS OF STOCKPILED MATERIAL TO AREAS APPROVED BY ARCHITECT. 6.) DETERMINE EXACT LOCATION OF NEW STRUCTURES IN FIELD WITH ARCHITECT. 7.) CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH THE TREE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN. FOLLOW TREE PROTECTION PLAN PROVIDED BY VINCENT DEBROCK CONSULTING ARBORIST REVISIONS LOT ZONING TOTAL LOT SIZE BUILDING COVER CALCULATIONS PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE CONDITIONED FIRST FLOOR ROOF OVERHANG (BEYOND 2') ENTRY COVERED PORCH GARAGE TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 39% TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE ALLOWED @ 40% IMPERVIOUS COVER CALCULATIONS TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE GROTTO STAIR SITE WALLS ENTRY STEPS GARAGE STEPS AC CONCRETE PAD POOL SURROUND TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVER @ 44.9% IMPERVIOUS COVER ALLOWED @ 45% FLOOR AREA RATIO CALCULATIONS (FAR) 1ST FLOOR (EXCLUDING PORCHES) (FAR) LOWER FLOOR GARAGE (412 SF - 450 SF EXEMPTION) BASEMENT (729 SF EXEMPTED) (FAR) TOTAL (PROPOSED) @ 40% (FAR) TOTAL ALLOWED @ 40% SF-3-NP 7066 SF 0 1513 SF 491 SF 340 SF 412 SF 2756 SF 2826 SF 2756 SF 40 SF 225 SF 37 SF 40 SF 18 SF 62 SF 3178 SF 3180 SF 1513 SF 1312 SF 0 SF 0 SF 2825 SF 2826 SF TABLE OF CONTENTS SP1: SITE PLAN A1.0v: VISITABILITY PLANS A1.0: FLOOR PLAN A1.1: SECOND FLOOR PLAN A1.2: GENERAL NOTES, SYMBOLS, DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULES A1.3: GENERAL NOTES, SYMBOLS, DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULES A2.0: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.0: BUILDING SECTIONS A4.0: WALL SECTIONS & SECTION DETAILS A5.0: DETAILS A5.1: DETAILS A5.2: DETAILS A5.3: WINDOW & DOOR DETAILS A5.4: STAIR DETAILS A6.0-A6.1: INTERIOR ELEVATIONS MEP1: ELECTRICAL AND LIGHTING PLAN S0.0: STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES S1.0: FOUNDATION PLAN S1.1: …
B.4.0 - 1100 E 8th St — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 24, 2021 C14H-1975-0003; HR-2021-053747 LINDEMANN HOUSE 1100 E. 8TH ST. B.4 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct perimeter brick retaining walls with metal fencing. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Construct brick retaining walls along the E. 8th St. and Waller St. sides of the property. The walls will be in two tiers, each a maximum of 3’ high, with a planting bed between. The brick, which will match an existing planter at the rear of the property, is close in appearance to the brick of the house. See image, below. 2) Along the upper wall will be 3’-high decorative metal fencing to match an existing gate at the rear of the property. The gate has metal pickets with arches and finials. ARCHITECTURE Constructed ca. 1887, the Lindemann House is a 1 ½-story Folk Victorian house built of Austin common brick. The house has a side-gabled roof with a centered, front-facing gable. The full-width porch has a jigsawn balustrade between six square columns with chamfered corners, decorative trim, and jigsawn brackets. Windows are 2:2 double-hung wood within segmental arched openings. The house sits on a considerable rise above E. 8th and Waller streets. A raised lawn surrounding the house is reached by steps from the corner and side street, with decorative metal gates and railings. Between, dense primrose jasmine grows along the slope out to the curb line, with no sidewalk. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW Sites and streetscapes The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1.1 Do not grade, fill, or excavate unless it is to solve a drainage or flooding problem. The project will leave the upper lawn around the house at the same level. The brick retaining walls will provide a more durable and permanent solution for the significant slope between the lawn and street levels. The design also will have a greater sense of openness than the current dense plantings. 2.4 If constructing a new street-side fence or site wall, design it so that the materials, style, and scale are compatible with and differentiated from the architectural style and period of the building and are in keeping with historic fence styles and heights in the historic district. a. New front fences must be …
B.4.1 - 1100 E 8th St - Plans — original pdf
LUEDER CAP CMU WALL W/ BRICK FACADE GRADE HT. VARIES FILTER FABRIC DRAINAGE GRAVEL DRAIN PIPE BACK FILL 2 ROWS OF #4 REBAR CONT. @ BOTTOM W/ #4 @ TOP SHORT DIRECTION CONCRETE FOOTER DRAINS AS REQ'D (48” ON CENTER MIN.) . X A M " 6 3 " 2 1 18" MIN. WALL SECTION_N.T.S. DETAIL (ACTUAL HEIGHT VARIES, 48” HEIGHT MAX.) LEGEND .G.D DETCAPMOC NATIVE HARDWOOD MULCH WHERE NEW PLANTS ARE PATCH EXIST. LAWN BURIED DRAINAGE PIPE GNITHGIL EPACSDNAL DESOPORP STHGILPU DETNUOM DNUORG DEL _ 21 )XAM( ML06 ZB72 1103 CAW STHGILPU TNECCA INIM DEL _ 6 GNITHGIL TNECCA TNALP ROF )XAM( ML 563 ZB72 1115 CAW SERUTXIF 81 :LATOT TOTAL SNEMUL 720 091,2 2,910 TOTAL MAX LUMENS REMOVE EXISTING BAMBOO EXIST. CONC. RETAINING WALL BRICK RETAINING WALL ' 4 4 . 0 4 1 ) ' 0 5 . 0 4 1 ( W " 0 0 ' 1 0 ° 5 1 S S 65° 24' 45" E 70.58 (S 65° 30' E) (70.67') UTILITY LINES CALCULATED POINT IN 10" PECAN TREE REMOVE CHINABERRY EXIST. COMPACTED DECOMPOSED GRANITE ) ' 0 5 . 0 4 1 ( ' 0 5 . 0 4 1 E " 5 4 ' 8 0 ° 5 1 N LEAVE AS IS 48" MAX.HEIGHT BRICK PLANTER WALL GATE METAL FENCE (3' HEIGHT) TO MATCH EXISTING DRAINAGE PIPE DAYLIGHT DEMO EXISTING PRIMROSE JASMINE 48" MAX.HEIGHT BRICK PLANTER WALL DECOMPOSED GRANITE 2-STORY BRICK AND WOOD GARAGE A/C DIVING BOARD EXIST. COVERED WOOD PORCH EXIST. CONCRETE PATIO EXIST. POOL EXIST. SPA ELEC. EXIST. BRICK WALL A/C EXIST. COVERED WOOD PORCH AND STAIRS 2-STORY BRICK AND WOOD HOUSE LEAVE AS-IS EXIST. PORCH AND STAIRS PATCH EXISTNG TURF PATCH EXISTNG TURF EXIST. BRICK LEAVE AS-IS EXIST. CONC. RETAINING DRAINAGE PIPE METAL FENCE (3' HEIGHT) TO MATCH EXISTING 1 SITE PLAN GATE N 65° 30' 00" W 70.89' (N 65° 30' W) (70.67') DECOMPOSED GRANITE W/ BRICK BANDS 48" MAX. HEIGHT BRICK PLANTER WALL 48" MAX.HEIGHT BRICK PLANTER WALL DAYLIGHT 1 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1"=10' 0' 5' 10' 20' 30' 40' EXIST. BRICK PATIO 36" 36" 36" 36" 36" 30'-111 2" 36" MAX. HT. BRICK WALL W/ STONE CAP & CONCRETE FOOTER 36" HT. BRICK WALL W/ STONE CAP & CONCRETE FOOTER 2'-11" 36" 36" 28'-43 4" 36" HT. BRICK WALL W/ STONE CAP SCALE: 1"= 5' 04.13.2021
B.5.0 - 2406 Harris Blvd — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 24, 2021 C14H-2009-0021 JACKSON-NOVY-KELLY-HOEY HOUSE 2406 HARRIS BLVD. B.5 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a swimming pool and perimeter fence. Note that the design of these elements has been revised, following denial of a certificate of appropriateness for a pool at the March 22, 2021 Historic Landmark Commission meeting. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Construct a pool in front yard, fully integrated into the slope of the site and without a raised edge. Surrounding the pool will be a limestone patio in an area where a limestone patio already exists. The pool will be to the south end of the lot, largely offset from the façade of the house. Pool equipment will be located near the south property line, recessed further than the rear of the one-story side porch of the house. 2) Construct a transparent fence at the perimeter of the property. The fence will be either iron pickets with iron posts, similar to the fence at the Governor’s Mansion but of lesser height, or iron pickets between masonry piers, similar to the open fencing and limestone piers at the Fred and Margaret Sharp House (not the solid wall; see description and photo, below). The applicant welcomes the Commission’s direction regarding the design. ARCHITECTURE Two-story, cross-gabled Tudor Revival house with brick cladding and half-timbering and stucco in the front-facing gable end. The house was designated for its architecture and historic associations. The site was not mentioned in the landmark nomination; it is significant as the setting of the landmark house and not in its own right. The front yard is substantial, with a 96’ setback from the curb to the front of the house. The house also sits at a noticeable rise from Harris Blvd., with the first-floor level 84” above the street. The primary character-defining features of the site are this subtly bermed topography and the central steps aligned with the front entrance. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1) A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces and spatial relationships. The property will continue to be used as a private residence. The proposed location of …
B.5.1 - 2406 Harris Blvd - Renderings — original pdf
Backup
B.5.a - 2406 Harris Blvd - Citizen Comments — original pdf
(cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION (cid:10) Although applicants and/or their agent(s) are expected to participate in a public hearing, you are not required to do so. This meeting (cid:10) will be conducted online and you have the opportunity to speak FOR or AGAINST the proposed development or change. Email or call (cid:10) the staff contact for information on how to participate in the public hearings online. You may also contact a neighborhood or (cid:10) environmental organization that has expressed an interest in an application affecting your neighborhood. (cid:10) During a public hearing, the board or commission may postpone or continue an application' 's hearing to a later date, or recommend (cid:10) approval or denial of the application (cid:10) If the board or commission announces a specific date and time for a postponement or (cid:10) continuation that is not later than 60 days from the announcement, no further notice is required (cid:10) A board or commission' 's decision may be appealed by a person with standing to appeal, or an interested party that is identified as a (cid:10) person who can appeal the decision. The body holding a public hearing on an appeal will determine whether a person has standing to (cid:10) appeal the decision (cid:10) interest to a board or commission by (cid:10) An interested party is defined as a person who is the applicant or record owner of the subject property, or who communicates an (cid:10) delivering a written statement to the board or commission before or during the public hearing that generally identifies the issues (cid:10) of concern (it may be delivered to the contact person listed on a notice); or (cid:10) appearing and speaking for the record at the public hearing; and: (cid:10) occupies a primary residence that is within 500 feet of the subject property …
B.5b - 2604 Harris Blvd - Citizen Comments — original pdf
PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION (cid:10) Although applicants and/or their agent(s) are expected to participate in a public hearing, you are not required to do so. This meeting (cid:10) will be conducted online and you have the opportunity to speak FOR or AGAINST the proposed development or change. Email or call (cid:10) the staff contact for information on how to participate in the public hearings online. You may also contact a neighborhood or (cid:10) environmental organization that has expressed an interest in an application affecting your neighborhood. (cid:10) During a public hearing, the board or commission may postpone or continue an application' 's hearing to a later date, or recommend (cid:10) approval or denial of the application (cid:10) If the board or commission announces a specific date and time for a postponement or (cid:10) continuation that is not later than 60 days from the announcement, no further notice is required (cid:10) A board or commission' 's decision may be appealed by a person with standing to appeal, or an interested party that is identified as a (cid:10) person who can appeal the decision. The body holding a public hearing on an appeal will determine whether a person has standing to (cid:10) appeal the decision (cid:10) interest to a board or commission by (cid:10) An interested party is defined as a person who is the applicant or record owner of the subject property, or who communicates an (cid:10) delivering a written statement to the board or commission before or during the public hearing that generally identifies the issues (cid:10) of concern (it may be delivered to the contact person listed on a notice); or (cid:10) appearing and speaking for the record at the public hearing; and: (cid:10) occupies a primary residence that is within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development; (cid:10) is the record owner of property within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development; or (cid:10) is an officer of an environmental or neighborhood organization that has an interest in or whose declared boundaries are within (cid:10) 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development. (cid:10) A notice of appeal must be filed with the director of the responsible department no later than 14 days after the decision. An appeal (cid:10) form may be available from the responsible department. (cid:10) For additional information on the City of Austin' 's land development process, please visit our website …
B.6.0 - 1805 E. 3rd St - Herrera House — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 24, 2021 HR-2021-067051 1805 E. 3RD STREET HERRERA HOUSE B.6 – 1 Replace the front doors and paint the historic house; construct a 2-story rear addition. Previous restoration work was approved administratively. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed project involves six parts: ARCHITECTURE STANDARDS FOR REVIEW Repair and Alterations 1) Replace the non-historic front doors with 2-over-2 glazed doors. 2) Replace the metal roof with composition shingles with a wood-shake profile. 3) Paint the house to match the historic color (yellow). 4) Reconstruct the rear (south) wall after it was removed beyond the scope of approvals. The proposed new wall includes a 3-panel fully glazed sliding door and a window opening with a 2-over-2 window (sash material pending). 5) Construct a 4’3” deep concrete patio behind the rear (south) wall of the historic house. 6) Construct a 2-story rear addition. The addition is set back approximately 24’ from the front wall and has a footprint of 265 square feet. It is clad in horizontal hardiplank siding and capped by a front-gabled roof, with a slope and eave depth matching those of the historic house. Windows are sliding and fixed vinyl-sash. A garage on the ground floor is accessed by a glazed roll-up door on the rear (south) wall. One-story, L-plan, cross-gabled building; vertical board-and-batten siding; 4:4 wood-sash windows; shed porch with two entry doors; National Folk style. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: General Standards 1.1 Do not remove intact historic material from the exterior of a building. 1.2 Always attempt repair first. Replacement should only be undertaken when absolutely necessary, and for the smallest area possible. 1.3 When historic material must be replaced due to damage or deterioration, replacement material should look the same, perform reliably within the existing construction, and, in most cases, be made of the same material. The proposed project repairs and retains historic wood siding, windows, and trim. Where replacement of boards or battens is necessary due to deterioration, replacements will match historic materials and profiles. The project meets these standards. 1.4 Do not attempt to re-create an architectural detail or element without proof that it existed on the building historically. The proposed project replaces plain wood porch posts with …
B.6.1 - 1805 E. 3rd Street - Plans — original pdf
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maximum ADU area 953.7 ADU allowed? ADU proposed? Project ADU area Difference ADU L2 area Max ADU L2 area Difference Yes No 0 -953.7 0 550 -550 Total Remodeled Floor Area (SF) (work within existing habitable square footage) G002 General Notes G003 Standard Details G004 Standard Details G005 Standard Details G006 Environmental Details G007 Door Schedules G008 Window Schedules A000 Site Plan A101 Floor Plans, Level 01 A102 Floor Plans, Level 02 A104 Roof Plans A105 MEP Plans, Level 01 A106 MEP Plans, Level 02 A201 Elevations, Bldg 1 A202 Elevations, Bldg 1 A203 Elevations, Bldg 1 A204 Elevations, Bldg 1 PROJECT CALCULATION AND APPLICATION SHEET FOR PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF AUSTIN (REFERENCE A000 FOR SITE PLAN) PROPERTY INFORMATION (p1 of application) SITE DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION (p2 of application) Address Tax Parcel ID Legal Description Zoning District Lot Area (SF) Lot Width (FT) Historic District REQUIRED REVIEWS 1805 E 3rd St 78702 #191991 Lot 3 Blk 2 Cypher Subdivision SF-3-NP/SF-3-H-NP 6358 45.94 N/A Area Description 1st floor conditioned (enclosed) area 2nd floor conditioned (enclosed) area 3rd floor conditioned (enclosed) area (including attics) Yes/No Covered parking (garage or carport, attached or detached) Neighborhood Planning Area East Cesar Chavez Basements Existing SF to remain New or Added SF Total SF Remodeled SF Bldg 2 Bldg 3 Bldg 4 Bldg 1 Bldg 2 Bldg 3 Bldg 4 Bldg 1 Bldg 2 Bldg 3 Bldg 4 Bldg 1 Bldg 2 Bldg 3 Bldg 4 Total ADU GROSS FLOOR AREA (PER COA DSD, CALCULATED PER LDC 25-1- 21, [46]. AREAS w/ CEILING HEIGHTS BTWN 5' AND 6' NOT COUNTED.) TABLE OF CONTENTS G001 Cover Sheet/Project Calculations Is project participating in SMART Housing? Does project have Green Building requirement? Is site within an Airport Overlay Zone? Does this site have a septic system? Does the structure exceed 3,600 total under roof? Is this property within 200 feet of a hazardous pipeline? Is this siite located within an Erosion Hazard Zone? Is this property within 100 feet of the 100-year floodplain? Are there trees 19" or greater in diameter on/adjacent to the property? ---> If yes, how many? ---> Was there a pre-development consultation for the Tree Review? Root zone Canopy Removal Uncertain ---> Proposed impacts to trees Is this site in the …
B.7.0 - 4006.5 Avenue B — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 24, 2021 2021-058680 PR HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 4006 1/2 AVENUE B B.7 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a two-story rear addition to a one-story contributing building. Replace existing windows and doors. 1) Partially demolish rear of residence. 2) Construct a two-story addition. The proposed addition is set back approximately 15’ from the front wall of the house. It has a compound gabled roof with shed dormers at secondary elevations. It is clad in horizontal wood siding. Single and paired 1:1 wood windows are regularly spaced throughout. The addition’s eaves feature exposed rafter tails and brackets to mimic existing. 3) Replace windows with 1:1s. ARCHITECTURE STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The existing building is a one-story Craftsman bungalow with horizontal wood siding, 4:6 paired and single windows, a partial-width porch supported by tapered columns, and a gabled roof with exposed rafter tails and triangular knee braces at eaves. The Hyde Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1.2: Retention of Historic Style. Respect the historic style of existing structures and retain their historic features, including character-defining elements and building scale. 1.3: Avoidance of False Historicism. Respect each contributing structure as an example of the architecture of its time. Do not make alterations that have no historic basis, such as the addition of gingerbread trim to a 1920s bungalow. Do not give an existing contributing structure a “historic” appearance it never had. 1.4: Appropriate Treatment Options for Contributing or Potentially Contributing Structures. Preserve the historic fabric: Repair deteriorated historic features and architectural elements. The proposed addition retains some aspects of the building’s historic style but changes its scale. It is differentiated in scale and placement but includes exposed rafter tails and triangular knee braces that may not be appropriate for new construction. The proposed cladding appears to match the existing building’s horizontal siding. However, existing historic-age windows will be replaced. 3.1: Front of Houses. Retain the historic facade of a house in terms of door and window placement and exterior wall materials. Repair damaged or deteriorated exterior wall materials where reasonably possible. If replacement of exterior wall materials is necessary, choose a material identical in size, profile, and appearance as the historic material. 3.2: Doors and Doorways. Do not enlarge, alter, or relocate single doorways on the façade of …
B.7.1 - 4006.5 Avenue B - applicant photos and plans — original pdf
Alley N 30 degrees 00' 00" E 37.50' 10' rear building setback line full CRZ 27" diameter Post Oak tree 1/4 CRZ One-Story Frame Garage elev. 609.50' elev. 609.25' 1/2 CRZ 1/4 CRZ FULL CRZ 5' high protective chain link fence - typical 1/2 CRZ roof overhang 13", 15" and 22" diameter Cedar Elms 5.0' uncovered wood deck and steps 5' high protective chain link fence - typical 5' high protective chain link fence - typical provide 8" deep layer of mulch within entire root zone area elev. 609.75' up 6.5' 6 ' Sun Room 5.8' elev. 609.5' provide 8" deep layer of mulch within entire root zone area " B " l e c r a P C D R - ' 0 4 " A " l e c r a P C D R - ' 0 4 0 0 . 0 3 1 ' E " 0 0 0 0 s e e r g e d 0 6 N 20" diameter Post Oak tree 1/4 CRZ elev. 609.75' - highest in Parcel "B" 1/2 CRZ full CRZ 5' sideyard setback line elev. 610.25' - highest in Parcel "A" Bedroom 2 cu pan. ref. Kitchen elev. 609.5' Bath 2 Dining roof overhang closet u p Living Room Finish Floor Elevation 612.0' Study Covered Front Porch 0 0 . 0 3 1 W ' " 0 0 0 0 s e e r g e d 0 6 S elev. 610.25' up elev. 609.75' elev. 609.75' 1/2 CRZ FULL CRZ existing concrete sidewalk ' 3 . 3 2 porch roof overhang dumpster g n i g a t s s l a i r e t a m a e r a e n i l k c a b t e s d r a y t n o r f ' 5 2 port. toilet S 30 degrees 00' 00" W 37.50' property line 1/4 CRZ 5' high protective chain link fence - typical existing concrete sidewalk REVISED SITE PLAN Scale if printed on 11x17 sheet: 1/16" = 1' - 0" Scale if printed on 24x36 sheet: 1/8" = 1' - 0" N 03/15/2021 Legal Description: Lot 26 and the south 12.5' of Lot 27, Block 7, Hyde Park Addition, A Subdivision in Travis County, Texas, according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Volume 1, Page 75 of the plat records of Travis …
B.8.1 - 1113 E. 9th St - Plans — original pdf
ZONING: LOT SIZE: PROPERTY ID: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1 JOBE HOUSE RESUB SF-3-NP 7,246 S.F. 443354 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREA: FRONT YARD SETBACK: SIDE YARD SETBACK: STREET SIDE YARD SETBACK: REAR YARD SETBACK: MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE: MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE: CENTRAL EAST AUSTIN 25 FEET 5 FEET 15 FEET 10 FEET 40% 45% Sheet List ARCHITECTURAL AS-101 A-101 A-111 A-121 A-201 A-202 A-411 SITE PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN REFLECTED CEILING PLAN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS STRUCTURAL S-100 S-200 S-300 FOUNDATION PLAN & DETAILS ROOF FRAMING & BRACING PLAN BRACING DETAILS BUILDING COVERAGE AREA DESCRIPTION 1ST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR BASEMENT COVERED PARKING COVERED DECK COVERED PORCH COVERED PATIO BALCONY OTHER ROOFED AREAS TOTAL BUILDING AREA TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE EXISTING SQ. FT 1700 N/A N/A N/A 0 0 489 0 0 0 NEW/ADDED SQ.FT 331 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DRIVEWAY SIDEWALKS UNCOVERED PATIO UNCOVERED DECK OTHER FLATWORK (POOL COPING, RETAINING WALLS, ETC.) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 2927 331 331 331 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2189 2189 150 588 0 0 0 0 0 30.21% 34.78% 40.40% 44.96% LOT SIZE 7246 POOL (SURFACE AREA) SPA (SURFACE AREA) EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE % TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE % EXISTING IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE % TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE % TOTAL SQ. FT 2031 0 0 0 0 0 489 0 0 0 2520 2520 150 588 0 0 0 3258 0 0 hatch + ulland owen a r c h i t e c t s 1010 East 11th Street Austin, Texas 78702 T: 512.474.8548 F: 512.474.8643 www.huoarchitects.com Civil Engineer: .... .... .... .... Structural Engineer: GreenEarth Enginnering, Inc. 2500 W. Willian Cannon Dr, Suite 201 Austin, TX 78745 512.289.8086 Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineer: .... .... .... .... h t 9 t s a E 3 1 1 1 2 0 7 8 7 X T , n i t s u A NOTE: This document, the ideas and design incorporated herein are and shall remain the property of h+uo architects. These documents are not to be used or altered, in whole or in part, for other than the original intended use, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without written permission from h+uo architects. NOTE: By act of submitting a bid for the proposed contract, the bidder warrants that the bidder, and all subcontractors and material suppliers he intends to use have carefully …
B.8.a - 1113 E. 9th St - Citizen comment — original pdf
Backup
B.8.b - 1113 E. 9th St - Citizen comment — original pdf
Backup
B.9.1 - 810 Lydia Street - Plans — original pdf
Residential New Construction and Addition Permit Application Property Information Project Address: Legal Description: Zoning District: DevelopmentATX.com | Phone: 311 (or 512-974-2000 outside Austin) For submittal and fee information, see austintexas.gov/digitaldevelopment Download application before entering information. Tax Parcel ID: Lot Area (sq ft): Historic District (if applicable): Neighborhood Plan Area (if applicable): Required Reviews Is project participating in S.M.A.R.T. Housing? (If yes, attach signed certification letter from NHCD, and signed conditional approval letter from Austin Energy Green Building) Is this site within an Airport Overlay Zone? (If yes, approval through Aviation is required) Y Y N N Does project have a Green Building requirement? (If yes, attach signed conditional approval letter from Austin Energy Green Building) Y N Does this site have a septic system? Y N (If yes, submit a copy of approved septic permit. OSSF review required) Does the structure exceed 3,600 square feet total under roof? Is this property within 200 feet of a hazardous pipeline? Y Y N N (If yes, Fire review is required) (If yes, Fire review is required) Is this site located within an Erosion Hazard Zone? Is this property within 100 feet of the 100-year floodplain? Y N (If yes, EHZ review is required) Y N (Proximity to floodplain may require additional review time.) Are there trees 19” or greater in diameter on/adjacent to the property? If yes, how many?_____ ( Provide plans with a tree survey, tree review required.) Y N Was there a pre-development consultation for the Tree Review? Y N Proposed impacts to trees: (Check all that apply) Root zone Canopy Removal None/Uncertain Is this site in the Capital View Corridor? (If yes, a preliminary review through land use is needed to determine if full view corridor review is required.) Does this site currently have: water availability? wastewater availability? Y Y Y N N N Is this site within the Residential Design and Compatibility Standards Ordinance Boundary Area? (LDC 25-2 Subchapter F) Y N (If no, contact Austin Water Utility to apply for water/wastewater taps and/or service extension request.) (If yes, submit approved auxiliary and potable plumbing plans.) Does this site have or will it have an auxiliary water source? (Auxiliary water supplies are wells, rainwater harvesting, river water, lake water, reclaimed water, etc.) Does this site require a cut or fill in excess of four (4) feet? Y N Y N (If yes, contact the Development Assistance Center for …
B.9.a - 810 Lydia Street - Citizen comment — original pdf
Backup