D.4 - 2501 Sol Wilson Avenue - Citizen Comment — original pdf
Charles McKinney, a neighbor of 2501 Sol Wilson Avenue, opposes the demolition of the property. Comments shared over the phone with Angela Gaudette on 7/22/2020.
Historic Landmark Commission Homepage
HLC Annual Report — original pdf
Annual Internal Review This report covers the time period of 7/1/2019 to 6/30/2020 Historic Landmark Commission ____________________________________ The Board/Commission mission statement (per the City Code) is: Pursuant to Section 2-1-147(B) of the Code of the City of Austin, the Historic Landmark Commission: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Shall prepare and periodically revise an inventory of the structures and areas that may be eligible for designation as historic landmarks. Shall prepare, review, and propose amendments to the Historic Landmark Preservation Plan. Shall review requests to establish or remove a historic designation and make recommendations on the requests to the Land Use Commission, as determined in accordance with Section 25-1-46 of the Code of the City of Austin. Shall provide information and counseling to owners of structures that are designated as historic structures. May initiate zoning or rezoning of property to establish or remove a historic designation. May recommend amendments to the Code of the City of Austin relating to historic preservation. May recommend that the City acquire property if the Commission finds that acquisition by the City is the only means by which to preserve the property. May advise the Council on matters relating to historic preservation. For an object that is not permanently affixed to land, may recommend that Council confer special historic designation, and Shall perform other duties as prescribed by the Code of the City of Austin or other ordinance. Annual Review and Work Plan – Historic Landmark Commission Year 2019-2020 Page 2 1. Describe the board’s actions supporting their mission during the previous calendar year. Address all elements of the board’s mission statement as provided in the relevant sections of the City Code. 1. The Commission references several surveys in their evaluation of historical significance for properties subject to applications for demolition and relocation permits city-wide, and building permits within National Register and locally-designated historic districts. The surveys used by the Commission include the East Austin Survey (1980), the Comprehensive Cultural Resources Survey (1984), the Clarksville Survey (2000), the 11th and 12th Street East Austin Survey (2001), the Chestnut Neighborhood Survey (2001), and the multi-volume East Austin Historic Resources Survey, completed in 2016, among others. Survey efforts are continuing in several areas of the city with the availability of HOT funding for these projects, including a survey of the northeast Austin neighborhoods of Cherrywood, Wilshire Wood, and Delwood, as well as north-central …
A.1 - Citizen comments - final — original pdf
Backup
B.1 - 1415 Lavaca Street_Comments from TOMA — original pdf
Backup
B.1 - 1415 Lavaca Street_Photos/drawings submitted by applicant — original pdf
Catty-corner midway across intersection Photo Catty-corner intersection from outside lane heading East on 15th Assuming far lane on Lavaca Street before intersection Photo - At Intersection on Lavaca Street From Westbound on 15th at intersection Photo - Westbound on 15th Street at intersection
C.3 - 2607 McCallum Dr_Applicant's presentation — original pdf
2607 MCCALLUM DRIVE OLD WEST AUSTIN Historical Landmark Commission Meeting July 27, 2020 Presented by Permit Partners PER LDC 25- 2-352 NON CONTRIBUTING FACTORS • ARCHITECTURE - The house was built in 1941 and although is does meet the criteria for being over 50 years old, the house is unacceptable conditions per the most recent inspection report. Most notably the house foundation is cracked and needs severe repair and infested with termites. The house does not display high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; nor represents a rare example of an architectural style in the • HISTORICAL ASSOCIATIONS - There does not appear to be any historical associations with the house nor significant associations with persons, groups, institutions, businesses, or events of historic importance which contributed significantly to the history of the city, state, or nation, nor represents a significant portrayal of the cultural practices or the way of life of a definable group of people in a historic time. • ARCHEOLOGY - The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning human history or prehistory of the region • COMMUNITY VALUE - The house does not possess a unique community location, physical characteristic property has a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, a neighborhood, or a particular group. • LANDSCAPE FEATURES - The property does not have significant natural or designed landscape with any value to City of Austin. INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION REPORT
D.1 - 2502 Park View Drive - Citizen Comments — original pdf
FW: Hearing on 2502 Park View Drive, Austin, Texas (HDP-2020-0214) PAZ Preservation <Preservation@austintexas.gov> Sat 7/25/2020 5 38 PM To: Gaudette, Angela <Angela.Gaudette@austintexas.gov> From: Carolyn Croom Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2020 10:38:21 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik To: PAZ Preservation Subject: Hearing on 2502 Park View Drive, Austin, Texas (HDP-2020-0214) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To the members of the Historic Landmark Commission: I oppose the demolition of the architecturally and historically significant house at 2502 Park View Drive. Its significance outweighs any financial considerations of the developer. Mid Tex Mod and Preservation Austinʼs letters strongly opposing this demolition are compelling. This outstanding, remarkably-intact midcentury residence with passive cooling strategies and innovative technological design and construction, which is part of the larger Air Conditioned Village project, is very much a part of Austinʼs history and culture. Austinite Ned Cole convinced organizers to locate this significant experiment appropriately in Austin, with our hot climate. The residence is an excellent early work of local architect, Fred Day, who made significant contributions to Austinʼs development. A National Register Historic District designation is underway for the Austin Air- Conditioned Village, and the best example of this project should be preserved. Please vote for the preservation of 2502 Park View Drive. Sincerely, Carolyn Croom 2502 Albata Avenue Austin, Texas 78757 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to CSIRT@austintexas.gov. Fw: 2502 ParkView Dr Gaudette, Angela <Angela.Gaudette@austintexas.gov> Mon 7/27/2020 8 40 AM To: Gaudette, Angela <Angela.Gaudette@austintexas.gov> From: Guy D < Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 11:09 PM To: Gaudette, Angela <Angela.Gaudette@austintexas.gov> Subject: Re: 2502 ParkView Dr Hello, > Please consider the following comments for the July 27th hearing regarding potential demolition of 2502 Park View Dr.: I implore the committee to not allow the destruction of this home. The home is a fine example of Mid-Century architecture that makes Allandale so unique. The home also has local, and national, historic relevance as being one of the original homes in Air-Conditioned Village. My grandparents built their home on the same street in 1955. With so many of the homes already torn down and replaced by houses that do not fit the neighborhood, I feel Allandale will continue to lose the charm and appeal it has always had. In …
D.4 - 2501 Sol Wilson Avenue - Citizen Comment (2) — original pdf
Gaudette, Angela From: Sent: To: Subject: Kim Barker Monday, July 27, 2020 11:59 AM PAZ Preservation HDP-2020-0258 - Sol Wilson House > *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello, I am a neighbor of this house and wish to both support historic landmark designation and register my position against demolition. Based on the research completed by City staff, it is my understanding this is the Sol Wilson House and perhaps the oldest house in the neighborhood. Both a street and subdivision were named after Sol Wilson. Like the Sol Wilson House, my house is at the intersection of Bedford and Sol Wilson Streets in the Sol Wilson subdivision. The City's research notes that not much is known about Mr. Wilson, but that he was a porter and worked at automobile dealers (and was married with many children). I suspect not much more is typically known about Black residents who lived in Austin during the 1920s and 1930s. Which does not mean that he was not important. This neighborhood is being decimated by demolition and over‐scaled new construction, but my support for designation is not just a vote against that. Mine is a vote to recognize the house of Sol Wilson, a Black homeowner and the subdivision's namesake. Photographs of the house are not a sufficient trade off for properly recognizing Mr. Wilson with landmark designation and prevention of demolition. Thank you, Kim Barker 1170 Bedford Street CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to CSIRT@austintexas.gov. 1
D.4 - 2501 Sol Wilson Avenue - Citizen Comment (3) — original pdf
Gaudette, Angela From: Sent: To: Subject: Gaudette, Angela Monday, July 27, 2020 2:19 PM Gaudette, Angela FW: Case # KDP-2020-0148 From: gavin inverso Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 2:17 PM To: Gaudette, Angela <Angela.Gaudette@austintexas.gov> Subject: Re: Case # KDP‐2020‐0148 Dear Historic Landmark Commission, I'm writing you regarding the Historic Case #: HDP‐2020‐0258 Address: 2501 Sol Wilson Ave I would like to second the staff's recommendation of postponing the cases until Aug 24th 2020 so that there can be further investigation into the importance of Mr. and Mrs. Wilson in the community. I find it interesting that the street was named after Sol Wilson given the time period. I'd also like to agree that if it is not postponed to recommend rehabilitation or relocations over demolition of the structure. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best, Gavin Inverso 1183 Sol Wilson Ave, Austin, TX 78702 1 Gaudette, Angela From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Sarah Searcy Monday, July 27, 2020 2:21 PM Gaudette, Angela gavin inverso Tonight's hearing on 2501 Sol Wilson Ave. *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Historic Landmark Commission members, I endorse City staff's recommendation that the hearing on the proposed demolition of 2501 Sol Wilson Ave. be postponed to August 24 to allow more time for research on Sol and Mabel Wilson, who were the first residents of that property. I live on Sol Wilson Ave.‐‐my address is 1180 1/2, but I'm actually just a few houses down from 2501. I've always wondered who the street was named after, but Google searches haven't yielded anything. I'm intrigued to learn that the street's namesake lived in the blue house that's currently up for possible demolition. I would really like to learn more about the Wilsons to determine whether their house deserves historic status. Please give City staff more time to research this property and its original owners by postponing this hearing to August 24. Thank you for your consideration. Sarah Searcy 1180 1/2 Sol Wilson Ave. P.S.‐‐Would also love to know why some houses are "1/2," even though they're all single family. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to CSIRT@austintexas.gov. 1 Gaudette, Angela From: Sent: To: Subject: Aaron Cloninger Monday, July 27, 2020 2:43 …
Memo_LandmarkZoningVsUse.pdf — original pdf
M E M O R A N D U M TO: Historic Landmark Commission FROM: Historic Preservation Office staff DATE: July 24, 2020 Comparison of base zoning and current land use SUBJECT: At the June 22, 2020, meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission, Commissioner Heimsath requested that staff look analytically at historic landmarks in the central core of Austin to determine disconnects between their land use and zoning. Specifically, the commissioner expressed concern that, due to extreme financial pressure, properties not thought to be at risk have been threatened by untenable proposals that do not prioritize their preservation. This analysis would identify the level of risk such that the Commission can prioritize potential solutions. Commissioner Valenzuela also requested analysis for the potential historic landmarks and districts recommended in the 2016 East Austin Historic Survey. As an initial step in fulfilling this request, the attached maps and spreadsheet compile base zoning data from the City of Austin with current use data from the Travis Central Appraisal District for properties with Historic Landmark overlay zoning in central Austin. Staff next intends to create a map that interpolates between the two data sets and highlights those properties with the most significant differences between what is allowed under their base zoning and their current use. Given the large amount of data to analyze, staff seeks feedback on how to narrow this effort by either: 1. Starting solely with certain types of base zoning, such as Central Business District and Downtown Mixed Use, where there is likely to be the biggest disconnect between what could be built under the base zoning and the size and use of existing historic landmarks; or 2. Eliminating residential properties where the zoning and use are compatible, such as Single Family zoning with Family Dwelling use, and performing analysis on the remainder of the properties. Following the successful development of methodology for this comparison for historic landmarks, staff will expand the analysis to address properties recommended for designation in the East Austin survey. Landmark Base ZoningCBD Central Business District (91)CS Commercial Services (34)DMU Downtown Mixed Use (27)GO General Office (25)GR Community Commercial (11)LO Limited Office (19)LR Neighborhood Commercial (5)MF Multifamily Residence (36)NO Neighborhood Office (4)P Public Use (15)SF Single Family Residence (296)TOD Transit-Oriented Development (5) TCAD Improvement Categories forLandmarked PropertiesNo Data (27)1 FAM DWELLING (332)2 FAM DWELLING; TRIPLEX; FOURPLEX (9)APARTMENT 5-25; TOWNHOMES (9)CLUBHOUSE (1)COMMERCIAL SPACE CONDOS (4)FRAT/SORORITY (4)HIRISE CONDO/APT (1)HOTEL-FULL …
Play video — original link
Play video
D.1 - 2502 Park View Drive - Citizen Comment (2) — original pdf
Gaudette, Angela From: Sent: To: Subject: John A Tate Monday, July 27, 2020 4:09 PM PAZ Preservation Supporting preservation of 2502 Park View Drive (HDP-2020-0214) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To the Members of the Historic Landmark Commission: I support preservation of the existing house at 2502 Park View Drive. The staff analysis and letters from Elizabeth Porterfield of Mid Tex Mod and Lori Martin of Preservation Austin agree that the house meets several of the criteria for historic status. The residence is an excellent early work of local architect, Fred Day, who designed a number of other iconic Austin buildings. In addition, a National Register Historic District designation is underway for the Austin Air‐ Conditioned Village, and this is the best existing example of the buildings from that project. Please vote to preserve 2502 Park View Drive. Thank you for your kind attention. John Tate 2502 Albata Avenue Austin, Texas 78757 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to CSIRT@austintexas.gov. 1
C.5.1 - 3313 Bryker - Citizen Comments (2) — original pdf
Backup
D.3.1 - 5512 Shoalwood_Citizen Comment (late) — original pdf
Backup
Approved Minutes — original pdf
Historic Landmark Commission July 27, 2020 The Historic Landmark Commission meeting will be held July 27, 2020 with social distancing modifications. Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers (applicants and others) must register in advance (no later than Sunday, July 26, 2020 by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the July 27, 2020 Historic Landmark Commission meeting, residents must: • Call or email the board liaison at preservation@austintexas.gov or (512) 974-1264 no later than noon on Sunday, July 26. The information required is the speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, and a telephone number or email address. • Once a request to speak has been called in or emailed to the board liaison, residents will receive either an email or phone call providing the telephone number to call on the day of the scheduled meeting. • Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to the meeting start in order to speak (not later than 5:45 p.m.). Late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. • Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. • Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon on Sunday, July 26, 2020. This information will be provided to commissioners in advance of the meeting. • Residents may watch the meeting here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch- atxn-live HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Monday, July 27, 2020 - 6:00 p.m. Regular Meeting attached notes for how to participate. NOTE: This meeting will be conducted remotely via teleconference. Please see the ___x___ Kelly Little ___x___ Trey McWhorter ___x___ Terri Myers ___x___ Alex Papavasiliou ___x___ Blake Tollett COMMISSION MEMBERS: _____ Emily Reed, Chair __x___ Beth Valenzuela, Vice Chair __x___ Witt Featherston __x___ Ben Heimsath __x___ Mathew Jacob __x___ Kevin Koch AGENDA CALL TO ORDER 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. June 22, 2020 MOTION: Approve Item A.1 on the consent agenda by Myers, Koch seconds. Vote: 10-0. 2. PRESENTATIONS, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION A. Presentation by AISD regarding Yellow Jacket Stadium Speaker: Drew Johnson 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON APPLICATIONS FOR HISTORIC ZONING, DISCUSSION AND ACTION ON APPLICATIONS FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT ZONING, AND REQUESTS TO CONSIDER THE INITIATION OF A HISTORIC ZONING CASE 1. C14H-2020-0069 – Rogers Washington Holy Cross …
Agenda — original pdf
Historic Landmark Commission Certificate of Appropriateness Review Committee July 17, 2020 The Certificate of Appropriateness Review Committee meeting will be held July 17, 2020 with social distancing modifications. Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers (applicants and others) must register in advance (no later than Thursday, July 16, 2020 by noon). To speak remotely at the July 17, 2020 Historic Landmark Commission meeting, residents must: • Call or email the board liaison at preservation@austintexas.gov or (512) 974-1264 no later than noon on Thursday, July 16th. The information required is the speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, and a telephone number or email address. • Once a request to speak has been called in or emailed to the board liaison, residents will receive either an email or phone call providing the telephone number to call on the day of the scheduled meeting. • Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to the meeting start in order to speak (not later than 2:45 p.m.). Late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. • Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. • Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon on Thursday, July 16, 2020. This information will be provided to commissioners in advance of the meeting. • Residents may watch the meeting here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS REVIEW COMMITTEE Friday, July 17, 2020 – 3:00 p.m. This meeting will be held remotely and will be limited to 90 minutes’ duration. AGENDA CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: ____ Terri Myers ____ Kevin Koch ____ Beth Valenzuela CALL TO ORDER A. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS and PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF OTHER PROJECTS 1. C14H-1996-0003 – Bartholomew-Robinson Building, 1415 Lavaca Street Proposal for high-rise addition. 2. C14H-2011-0002 – Lopez House, 809 E. 9th Street Construct a high rise building adjacent to the historic house. 3. Un-numbered – 602 Highland Avenue (Smoot-Terrace Park Historic District) 4. C14H-2008-0016 – Davis-Sibley House, 2201 Windsor Road Second-story addition. Additions and modifications. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice …
1415 Lavaca Street - PLANS — original pdf
Backup
2210 Windsor Road - additional plans submitted by applicant — original pdf
SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 22" X 34". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO 11" X 17". CROSS SECTION 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" CROSS SECTION 2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" CROSS SECTION 3 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ALL EXISTING TO REMAIN TRIM, WINDOWS, DOORS AND SHUTTERS TO BE RESTORED TO WELL-MAINTAINED CONDITION, REPAINT. RESTORATION NOTE: SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 22" X 34". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO 11" X 17". s r o i r e t n i + e r u t c e t i h c r a m o c . s t c e t i h c r a t t e p p u c 0 2 8 0 . 0 5 4 2 1 5 . 4 8 4 1 1 # P P U ETT, AIA Y D. C OTH N. TIM O E R E R H A E P P E ATE A D D N E A R ATU N AL, SIG CT'S S HITE C R S A S NLE S, U E S O P R U N P CTIO U STR N O R C MIT O R E G P DIN R BID O OT F W. N VIE E RIM R R INTE S. THIS IS F ATIO CIFIC D S N S A G WIN A R OTH D F B SIST O N O S C G WIN A R N D CTIO U STR N O C E P O N 0 2 0 2 C L L I H D R A H C R (cid:9) E A R I . D R R O S D N W (cid:19) 1 2 2 I 3 (cid:19) 7 8 7 X T , N I T S U A O M E D . P X E (cid:19) 2 . 8 1 3 (cid:19) . G W D R N W O (cid:19) 2 . 1 2 4 (cid:19) . T I M R E P (cid:19) 2 . 7 2 (cid:24) (cid:19) . R O F N O I T A V O N E R A E U S S I 2 0 4 A . S N O I T C E S SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 22" X 34". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO …
2210 Windsor Road - PLANS — original pdf
SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 22" X 34". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO 11" X 17". REMOVEALL GARAGE CABINETRY DEMO FLATWORK SCREEN WALL TO BE RECONSTRUCTED BEDROOM LIVING ROOM GARAGE KITCHEN DINING ROOM REMOVE ENTRY BEDROOM SITTING ROOM LOGGIA LIVING ROOM FRONT PORCH STUDY BATH CLOSET REPAIR CUPOLA MASTER BEDROOM SITTING ROOM FIRST FLOOR DEMO PLAN 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 22" X 34". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO 11" X 17". FLOOR PLAN WALL KEY: TO BE REMOVED/DEMOLISHED EXISTING TO REMAIN DEMOLITION NOTES: - - - - TAKE PRECAUTION TO PROTECT EXISTING STRUCTURE. TEMP. SHORING AS REQ'D BY OTHERS. TAKE PRECAUTION TO MAINTAIN UTILITIES. RECYCLE MATERIAL WHERE POSSIBLE. DRAWINGS INDICATE EXISTING CONDITIONS TO THE EXTENT THEY ARE VISIBLE, REPORT DISCREPANCIES AND/0R DISCOVERIES TO ARCHITECT. 0 0 2 A . N A L P O M E D s r o i r e t n i + e r u t c e t i h c r a m o c . s t c e t i h c r a t t e p p u c 0 2 8 0 . 0 5 4 2 1 5 . L L I H D R A H C R (cid:9) E A R I . D R R O S D N W 0 1 2 2 I 3 0 7 8 7 X T , N I T S U A O M E D . P X E 0 2 . 8 1 3 0 . G W D R N W O 0 2 . 1 2 4 0 . T I M R E P 0 2 . 7 2 (cid:24) 0 . R O F N O I T A V O N E R A E U S S I 4 8 4 1 1 # P P U ETT, AIA Y D. C OTH N. TIM O E R E R H A E P P E ATE A D D N E A R ATU N AL, SIG CT'S S HITE C R S A S NLE S, U E S O P R U N P CTIO U STR N O R C MIT O R E G P DIN R BID O OT F W. N VIE E RIM R R …
2210 Windsor Road - Project Description — original pdf
Tim Cuppett Architects Austin, TX 2210 Windsor Road Proposed Work to 1930 structure 1) Re-roof entire house; remove clay roof tiles; reuse and supplement with additional reclaimed matching clay tile from Ludowici, over 2” rigid insulation and roof membrane. 2) Repair rotted, existing wood windows. Restore broken hardware and make operable. 3) Where original windows were previously removed and replaced by aluminum and steel units, re-build custom wood windows to match original design. 4) Re-construct exterior West exterior stair and knee wall, due to wood rot and 5) Restore 2nd floor wood windows on West wall which were previously sealed and potential structural failure. shuttered. 6) Remove “added” mechanical tower on North face. Replace with lower enclosure of stucco wall, tile cap, and membrane roof to protect and divert water from basement entry. 7) Add copper gutters and downspouts as shown on Sheet A.208 in order to protect the house for another century. Lack of run-off water control has led to considerable rot. Existing floor structure in North service wing is rotted; portions of original floor were replaced with plywood. New floor framing will be installed within existing envelope. Some new wall framing will be required. 8) Repair stucco as required by window and framing repairs. Paint all stucco to white. 9) Repair wood shutters to operating condition, or fabricate and install new wood shutters. 10) Install new True-divided lite steel and glass entry door unit at end of Southwest Loggia to convert open Loggia to interior conditioned space. Create opening on North side of Loggia to connect to interior. 11) Remove center post at Garage Doors; make new, double wide custom door to fit original opening height. Clad door with painted wood, vertical v-groove. 12) At Guest Quarter, West end of property, remove previously installed French doors and restore patio. 13) Reframe rotting North and West walls inside loggia and adjacent to exterior stair. Tim Cuppett Architects Austin, TX Proposed work to ca 1975 addition. 20) Re-structure roof and cupola due to structural failure. Ridge is sagging; roof framing is undersized. 21) At arched niche in East wall, install new wood window, see Sheet A.301 22) At East wall remove rotted wood French doors and synthetic deck with railing. Install new custom wood window as shown on the drawings. Conceal access well with plantings. 23) At North and South walls of Southeast wing, add new custom wood window to …