Historic Landmark Commission Applications under Review for January 27, 2019 Meeting This list does not constitute a formal agenda and is subject to change. A final agenda will be posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Certificates of Appropriateness 802 Barton Boulevard – Construct a detached pool pavilion and replace the existing deck around the pool with concrete flatwork. door. 1612 Gaston Avenue – Construct an attached garage to the rear/west side of house and replace the front 422 Guadalupe Street – New signage for concessions building in Republic Square. 607 Oakland Avenue – Remove brick cladding, restore original wood siding, add a window opening to the front wall, replace detached rear garage with carport, and replace foundation and raise house 1’‐2’. National Register Historic District permits 311 E. 6th Street – Add a second story on top of existing building. 1215 W. 9th Street – Demolish a contributing building. Postponement from December 16, 2019 meeting. 801 Embassy Drive – Rehabilitate and construct an addition to the Carriage House and add site signage. 1104 Maufrais Street – Construct a new house. Postponement from December 16, 2019 meeting. 2411 Pemberton Place – Remove and restore brick after adding insulation, demolish 1‐story garage wing and reconstruct as 2‐story wing, construct new rear addition, and change roofing material to slate. 1111 Red River Street – Install new roofing and replace two plexiglass inserts on east and south walls with tempered glass. Demolition permits (all total demolitions unless otherwise noted) 1603 E. 7th Street – Postponement from December 16, 2019 meeting. 1009 E. 14th Street (partial) 3304 E. 17th Street 2116 South Congress Avenue 609 Hearn Street 706 Meriden Lane 4703 Ramsey Avenue 201 E. 3rd Street
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION JANUARY 27, 2020 APPLICATION FOR A HISTORIC SIGN PERMIT C14H-1990-0013 422 GUADALUPE STREET REPUBLIC SQUARE B.1 - 1 PROPOSAL Install two flush-mounted signs. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) The proposed sign on the south elevation is 15’ 4½” wide and 2’11” high, with an area of just over 29 square feet. It will consist of an aluminum pan with reverse channel letters. A circular aluminum disc in the center of the sign will hold an exposed neon ampersand (&). 2) The proposed sign on the east elevation is 8’5” wide and 4’ 4 ½” high, with an area of nearly 37 square feet. It will consist of an aluminum pan with reverse channel letters. A circular aluminum disc will hold an exposed neon ampersand (&). STANDARDS FOR REVIEW Standards for signs in historic districts include: Number of signs. The Commission allows one sign per building, unless the building has multiple tenants; in this case, the Commission may allow one sign per façade module, if the façade modules correspond to tenant spaces. The Commission may also allow one sign for each street frontage if the building is at an intersection. A single directory sign is appropriate for a large building with multiple tenants. The building stands in Republic Square and has four frontages facing open spaces. The proposal may meet this standard, at the Commission’s discretion. Sign types. The Commission may allow window signs, awning signs, projecting signs, and flush mounted signs for most commercial buildings. Freestanding signs are allowed for office and retail uses in historic residential buildings. The proposed project includes two flush-mounted signs. Sign size. The maximum size for signs depends on the sign type. Flush-mounted signs are allowed to have a maximum height of 2 feet and a maximum size of 20 square feet. The proposed sign on the south elevation is 29 square feet, while the proposed sign on the east elevation is 37 square feet. Neither meets this standard. However, staff feels that the larger signs may be appropriate given their orientation to the large open spaces in Republic Square and the Federal Courthouse plaza. Sign Design, Coloring and Materials. Use simple shapes, such as rectangular or oval signs. The Commission recommends painted wood or metal signs with matte finishes for all signs; plastic, reflective materials, and unfinished surfaces are not allowed. Limit the colors used in a sign to no more than three. …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS B.2 - 1 JANUARY 27, 2020 C14H-1986-0039 REUTER HOUSE 806 ROSEDALE TERRACE PROPOSAL Construct three new houses, two of which will have auxiliary dwelling units, on the north end of the property, with addresses of 807, 809, and 811 Mariposa Drive. These are vacant lots that have been subdivided off the original Reuter House property and are under separate ownership. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant proposes the construction of three new houses and two new auxiliary dwelling units that will have addresses of 807, 809, and 811 Mariposa Drive. While technically still part of the historically-zoned parcel, these are undeveloped lots that have been subdivided off from the Reuter House property and are under separate ownership. At 807 Mariposa Drive, the applicant proposes the construction of a new house and ADU. The proposed new house takes its cues from Tudor Revival houses in the neighborhood with a steeply-pitched roof with a catslide over the front door and a large round-arched projecting bay that contains the principal fenestration on the front of the house. The house will have a combination of stucco and brick siding. The garage will be behind the house. The proposed ADU will be at the back of the lot and will be a two-story building with a more traditional take on Tudor Revival styling. It will also have a steeply-pitched roof with a catslide and a round-arched arcade porch across the front and side. The ADU will have white stucco as a principal exterior material; the porch and arcade will be constructed of black brick. At 809 Mariposa Drive, the applicant proposes the construction of a two-story house that takes its cues from Colonial Revival architecture in the neighborhood. The house will have a gabled roof, an exterior chimney, and a gabled dormer. The exterior material will be stucco with board-and batten accents, stone chimneys, and a stone garage. The building will have a standing seam metal roof. The ADU at 809 Mariposa will have a combination of Tudor Revival and post-modern design elements. The ADU will have the catslide roof common to Tudor Revival design, on an otherwise blocky building with stucco and stone as the principal materials. The ADU will have a metal roof. At 811 Mariposa Drive, the applicant proposes the construction of a house, but no ADU. The proposed house will have a post-modern-influenced Tudor …
Plans and Specifications PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF PROPOSED WORK: Plans and specifications for project describing the work proposed in detail. Waterloo Greenway Conservancy’s general contractor, Kris Ward of Division Group LLC, has provided the following specifications for the proposed work. ROOFING Replace Existing Damaged Shingle Roof: Replace existing asphalt shingles with fiberglass shingles that more accurately represent the original roofing material, which was likely cedar shakes. Fiberglass shingles are made of a woven fiberglass base mat, covered with a waterproof asphalt coating, and topped with ceramic granules that shield the shingles from harmful UV rays. Because of the composition of the fiberglass mat, less asphalt is needed to give the shingles their durability and strength, making them a lighter and more environmentally friendly option than traditional organic-mat asphalt shingles. Fiberglass roofing provides many benefits, as it is a tough and very resilient material that is non-porous, does not change shape, and won’t dry out. Fiberglass shingles also contain less asphalt than organic mat-based shingles and are easier to transport, providing a lower overall environmental impact. The proposed replacement shingles are from GAF Camelot II Lifetime Designer Series. See attached for material selection. Replace Existing Damaged Flat Roof: Replace all Thermoplastic Polyolefin (TPO) and Modified Bitumen roofing materials with a new 60-millimeter TPO roofing system. TPO is a single-ply reflective roofing membrane made which is typically installed in a fully adhered or mechanically attached system, allowing the white membrane to remain exposed throughout the life of the roof. TPO is environmentally friendly, is resistant to ultraviolet, ozone and chemical exposure, and delivers benefits like lower roof surface temperatures, greater energy efficiency, superior puncture resistance against hail and enhanced indoor comfort. WINDOWS Reglaze Two Exterior Windows: Demo (2) Plexiglass inserts and replace with ¼” single-paned, tempered glass. Previous tenants replaced windows with thin sheets of plexiglass, which is energy inefficient and provides no real safety barrier. The original windows will remain intact, with only the glass being reglazed and restored to historical specifications. Heritage Grant Proposed Work Hardeman House at Symphony Square Shingle roof and flat roof identified above. Windows to be replaced marked in red.
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS B.3 - 1 JANUARY 27, 2020 C14H-1986-0043 WEDIG-HARDEMAN HOUSE 1111 RED RIVER STREET This is a heritage grant proposal to replace roofing and to replace plexiglass inserts with tempered glass. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant proposes to replace the thermoplastic polyolefin and modified bitumen roofing with a new 60 mm. thermoplastic polyolefin roofing system, replace all asphalt shingles with new fiberglass shingles, and to remove 2 plexiglass window inserts on the east and south walls and replace them with ¼” single-paned tempered glass. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1) A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. Evaluation: N/A 2) The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. Evaluation: The proposal contemplates only the removal of non-historic materials, and replacement with materials that more accurately represent historic conditions at the site. 3) Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. Evaluation: The proposal does not create a false sense of historical development, but instead better portrays the historic appearance of the house. 4) Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. Evaluation: Neither the existing roofing materials nor the plexiglass window inserts have acquired historic significance. 5) Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. Evaluation: Neither the roofing materials nor the plexiglass window inserts represent features that characterize the historical development of this house. 6) Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. B.3 - 2 Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. Evaluation: The roofing materials and the plexiglass are not …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS B.4 - 1 JANUARY 27, 2020 C14H-1989-0020 and -0021 PLATT AND DITTLINGER BUILDINGS 302-04 E. 6TH STREET Construct a new balcony across the front of the buildings; convert two second-story windows to doors. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant proposes the construction of a wood balcony across the front of both buildings, in accordance with historic photographs. The current awning will be removed for the construction of the balcony. The applicant has based the design and positioning of the balcony on the historic photographs and will recreate the balcony exactly as shown. The applicant further proposes the conversion of two of the second-story windows to doors to allow for access to the new balcony. The applicant proposes to keep the existing original window in place, secure the sashes with a wooden member and interior steel bracing, and then install hinges on the windows so that it will swing in to the building. The applicant asserts that the window will operate securely and will cause no change to the exterior appearance of the building. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1) A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. Evaluation: Historic photographs indicate the existence of the balcony across both buildings, which is typical for 19th century commercial buildings along 6th Street. The balconies principally provided shade to the sidewalk below; use of the balconies as outdoor space for the businesses is less apparent in historic photographs. However, it is not uncommon for the balconies to have some use, especially on buildings where the windows could be opened to the extent to allow the ingress or egress from the second story to the balcony. 2) The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. Evaluation: The applicant maintains that the proposal to convert two windows to doors will not affect the exterior appearance of the building and will not require the removal or alteration of historic features other than changing the way two windows on the second story operate. 3) …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS B.6 - 1 JANUARY 27, 2020 C14H-1996-0002 ROCKY CLIFF HOUSE 802 BARTON BOULEVARD Construct a detached pool pavilion behind the house; replace the pool deck. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant proposes the construction of a new detached pool pavilion adjacent to the back- yard pool on the property. The proposed pavilion will be one-story with a slanted asphalt shingle roof with a band of clerestory windows; the walls will be combination of stucco and limestone; the building will have aluminum-framed windows and sliding glass doors. It will be located adjacent to the existing pool, mostly behind the existing garage and not visible from the street. The applicant also proposes improvements to the pool deck, consisting of concrete flatwork. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1) A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. Evaluation: N/A 2) The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. Evaluation: The proposed pool pavilion will not affect the historic character of the house. 3) Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. Evaluation: N/A 4) Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. Evaluation: N/A 5) Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. Evaluation: N/A 6) Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. Evaluation: N/A B.6 - 2 7) Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. Evaluation: N/A 8) Archeological resources will …
Brand Pool Pavilion 802 Barton Blvd Austin, Texas City of Austin Historic Preservation Submission Cover 802 Barton BlvdAustin, TX 78704Brand Pool Pavilion14 December 2019ImageDateLocationProjectContactActivate Architecturebeau@activatearch.com561.707.0418 NOTE: View of front of house from Barton Blvd. New Pool Pavilion building is not visible. View from Barton Blvd 802 Barton BlvdAustin, TX 78704Brand Pool Pavilion14 December 2019ImageDateLocationProjectContactActivate Architecturebeau@activatearch.com561.707.0418 NOTE: View of side of existing Garage and Accessory Dwelling Unit from Barton Blvd. New Pool Pavilion building is obscured by existing buildings and vegetation. View from Barton Blvd 802 Barton BlvdAustin, TX 78704Brand Pool Pavilion14 December 2019ImageDateLocationProjectContactActivate Architecturebeau@activatearch.com561.707.0418 Pool Pavilion Building outlined in pink (obscured by existing buildings and vegetation) NOTE: View of side of existing Garage and Accessory Dwelling Unit from Barton Blvd. New Pool Pavilion building is obscured by existing buildings and vegetation. View from Barton Blvd 802 Barton BlvdAustin, TX 78704Brand Pool Pavilion14 December 2019ImageDateLocationProjectContactActivate Architecturebeau@activatearch.com561.707.0418
Project Information Address: 802 Barton Blvd Austin, TX 78704 Zoning: SF-3-H, Zilker, South Lamar Combined NPA Legal Description: A portion of Lot 2A, Resubdivision of Lots 1 & 2 South Lund Park, Section 2, a Subdivision in Travis County, Texas. Legend Existing Building New Addition Demolition Property Line Site Calculations Site Area: 56,480.64 SF Allowable Building Cover Existing Building Cover New Addition to Building Cover Total Proposed Building Cover 22,592.26 SF (40%) 4,115.00 SF (7.29%) 1,552.26 SF 5,667.26 SF (10.03%) Allowable Impervious Cover Existing Impervious Cover New Addition to Impervious Cover Total Proposed Impervious Cover 25,416.28 SF (45%) 14,103.21 SF (24.97%) 2,640.25 SF 16,563.46 SF (29.33%) Existing Detached Garage 992.0 SF Building Cover Breakdown Existing House 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor Covered Porch Existing Accessory Dwelling 1st Floor 2nd Floor Covered Porch New Pool Pavilion 1st Floor Covered Patio Other Roofed Areas Total Building Area Total Building Coverage Pool Spa Site Breakdown Existing Driveways Existing Sidewalks Existing Uncovered Patio Existing Other Flatwork Addition to Driveway Addition to Sidewalks Addition to Uncovered Patio Addition to Flatwork 2,831.00 SF 1,900.00 SF 790.00 SF 708.00 SF 480.00 SF 480.00 SF 96.00 SF 718.64 SF 725.62 SF 108.00 SF 8,933.26 SF 5,667.26 SF 838.38 SF 55.78 SF 4,085.30 SF 2,465.20 SF 1,396.51 SF 2,041.20 SF 506.85 SF 0.00 SF 357.57 SF 43.57 SF Total Existing Site Coverage Total Proposed Site Coverage 9,988.21 SF 10,896.20 SF P R O P E R T Y L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E 1 0 ' R E A R S E T B A C K 16" CEDAR ELM O P R P E R T Y LIN E 1 0' R E A R S E T B A C K 5' SID E Y A R D S P R O P E R T E T B A C K Y LIN E 16" CEDAR ELM " 3 8 6'-1 2 NEW POOL DECK 9'-0" 1'-7" 1 NEW POOL DECK " 1 4 7'-5 2 1 " VIF 7 8 7'-5 1 POOL BATH NEW 1-STORY POOL PAVILION (NOT A DWELLING UNIT) P O O L E Q UIP. 56'-7" 68'-103 4" 4'-6" EXISTING POOL EXISTING SPA 1'-7" 1 2'-0" PLANTER 2 2'-0" 6'-0" PLANTER 6'-6" R E T N A L P DIVING BOARD 2 ' - 0 " 6'-0" R E …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS B.7 - 1 JANUARY 27, 2020 C14H-2006-0029 POPE HOUSE 1612 GASTON AVENUE PROPOSAL Construct a two-story addition at the rear of the house with a two-story glass connector between the original house and the proposed addition, demolish the existing garage and construct a new garage; replace the non-historic front door with a six-panel solid wood door. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant came before the Certificate of Appropriateness Review Committee last year for review and input on the proposed addition to the house; the Committee made some recommendations regarding the scale of the proposed addition, its roofline, and its connection to the existing house, which the applicant has incorporated into the latest set of plans. The proposed addition will be located on the site of the existing one-story addition, breezeway, and garage, on the west side of the house; these sections of the house will be demolished. The proposed addition will have smooth hardi-plank siding, an asphalt shingle roof, and a standing seam metal roof at the framed glass connector between the house and the addition. Windows in the addition will be aluminum-framed. Existing French doors on the back of the house will be replaced with new door units. The previous proposal for a street-facing gable over the garage has been replaced with a design that has the gable at the back of the addition, lowering the roofline along the west elevation of the house. The roof ridgeline will be lower than the ridgeline of the existing house to reduce its visibility from the front; the connector will have a standing seam metal roof that is lower than the roof on the house and the proposed addition. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1) A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. Evaluation: N/A. The use of the property will remain residential. 2) The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. Evaluation: While the addition is large, it is at the back of the house along the west elevation …
December 17, 2019 Mr. Selassie, Upon a thorough examination of the exterior brick veneer, it has become obvious that the overall performance of the system is compromised and failing. The brick was installed atop a concrete step footing which runs the perimeter of the home on the North, South and West sides. The footing alone poses a structural problem in that it is performing differently than the juniper piers beneath the home. As the ground expands and contracts the wood frame and piers are responding in a different fashion than the footing, thus causing the veneer, which is anchored to the original longleaf pine siding beneath the brick, to move and crack in several places. It is in my professional opinion, as a builder that almost exclusively works in historic structures, that the brick veneer and concrete step footing should both be removed from the home. Repairs would be a Pyrrhic victory, at best, and the overall nature of the home would be better served by reviving the existing siding. Upon close examination, I have surmised that the original siding appears to be in good shape and once exposed and painted would add a great deal of value to both the home and the overall fabric of the other homes in the block. Please let me know your thoughts regarding this potential change to the project. Sincerely, James Nolan James Nolan Construction Bertron, Cara From: Sent: To: Subject: Kefetew Selassie Tuesday, January 21, 2020 7:20 PM Bertron, Cara; James Nolan; Desta Selassie Re: 607 Oakland Avenue- Pictures Hello Cara, thank you for your feedback and it is always very helpful to get your perspective. Also please note that we are making significant effort and investment to restore this house, regardless of the guidelines. We are being deliberate with our approach both inside and outside to represent architecture and finish from the 1920s. We are restoring the ship lap inside, restoring original siding and etc... because we believe that is the right way to do it if we are going to restore the house. We are also truly rallying behind the intent of the historic preservation board requirements and not just following the guideline. Therefore we request for your’s and board’s consideration of our request based on what is the best way to accomplish the intent of the guidelines. Refer to clarification to some of your questions below... 1. Foundation: we …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION JANUARY 27, 2020 APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS LHD-2019-0031 607 OAKLAND AVENUE SMOOT/TERRACE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT B.8 - 1 PROPOSAL Remove brick cladding, restore and repair original wood cladding, add a window opening on the front wall, raise the house 2 feet, extend a covered porch across the right side of the building, construct a small 2-level rear addition, construct an attached carport, and shift a window opening forward on the south (secondary) wall. ARCHITECTURE One-story, rectangular-plan house with hipped roof, brick cladding, and 1:1 wood-sash windows covered by decorative shutters; gable-roofed entry porch with brick railing. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed project has eight parts: 1) Remove brick cladding due to cracking and buckling (see backup); 2) Restore and repair original wood cladding; 3) Add a window opening on the front wall to create symmetrical paired openings on both sides of the door; 4) Raise the house 2’ to install new concrete piers and raise the basement height; 5) Extend the covered porch across the entire front wall of the house, rebuilding the porch gable roof and adding boxed columns and metal railings; 6) Construct a two-level rear addition that will extend the side walls by 8’ and have a footprint of 231 square feet. The addition will match existing siding and feature 1:1 wood-sash windows and a fully glazed door at the ground (basement) level. An open deck at the street level (second story of the addition) will have a footprint of 279 square feet, wood decking, metal railings, and metal and wood stairs; 7) Construct an attached carport on the south wall 15’ back from the primary façade. The carport will have a flat roof supported by simple metal posts; and 8) Shift a window opening forward on the south (secondary) wall. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The property is contributing to the Smoot/Terrace Park Historic District. The following requirements from the historic district design standards apply to the proposed project: General standard Do not add a new feature that was not there historically. The proposed project extends the covered front porch to be full-width, creating a false sense of history. Previously, the applicant proposed to construct an uncovered patio with low brick walls on the right side of the primary façade, a change that would be discernible as new. The proposed full-width porch does not meet this standard, but the patio would. Currently proposed; staff …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS DECEMBER 16, 2019 NRD-2019-0048 1104 MAUFRAIS STREET C.1 - 1 PROPOSAL Construct a new house and detached auxiliary structure. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed primary building is a two-story gable-roofed house clad in stucco and horizontal siding with masonry and tongue-and-groove accents. It features a standing-seam metal roof with shed dormers at each side elevation, and a cross-gabled wing at the southwest corner. Fenestration is varied throughout, with fixed-pane aluminum windows and a projecting siding-framed window at the main elevation. A flat-roofed, partial-width porch shelters the entryway, supported by steel posts. The proposed secondary building is two stories, with a covered carport on the first floor and living space above. It is clad in stucco and horizontal siding with a standing seam metal roof and shed dormers at the front and rear. A wraparound metal staircase provides access to the second floor. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate new construction projects in National Register historic districts. Applicable standards include: 9) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. The proposed new construction is differentiated from historic properties in the district by its modern stucco and masonry cladding, its fixed-pane aluminum windows, and its two-story forms on both proposed structures. The proposed roof form, massing, and site orientation of both structures are more compatible with the historic building forms of the neighborhood; the applicant has amended the design to extend the eaves to 30” at the dormers. Massing has been adjusted in revised plans by raising the porch height to 11’6”. The proposed materials are partially compatible, as the majority of historic-age homes on the street are clad in horizontal wood siding. The irregular fenestration pattern on the main house is less compatible; however, the applicant has framed the previous bay window, added second-story windows to the main façade, and enlarged the window at the façade’s first floor per Committee suggestions. 10) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and …
CITY of AUSTIN FAR CALCULATIONS MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FLOOR TO AREA RATIO (FAR) @ 40% = 2,703.61 SF CoA FAR AREAS EXISTING NEW EXEMPTION a) 1st FLOOR b) 2nd FLOOR c) 3rd FLOOR d) AREA W/ CEILINGS > 15' e) GROUND FLOOR PORCH f) BASEMENT g) ATTIC h) ATTACHED GARAGE i) DETACHED GARAGE j) ATTACHED CARPORT k) DETACHED CARPORT l) ACCESSORY BUILDING(S) TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 1,255.71 SF 1,225.88 SF 95.15 SF 12.36 SF 604.00 SF 0.00 SF 454.03 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 400.00 SF 291.65 SF 4,338.78 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF -604.00 SF 0.00 SF -454.03 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF -400.00 SF -291.65 SF -1,749.68 SF TOTAL 1,255.71 SF 1,225.88 SF 95.15 SF 12.36 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 2,589.10 SF TOTAL PROJECT FLOOR TO AREA RATIO (FAR) @ 2,589.10 SF = 38.31% TOTAL LOT AREA: 6,759.02 SF ZONING: SF-? LOT INFORMATION MAXIMUM ALLOWED BUILDING COVERAGE @ 40% = 2,703.61 SF MAXIMUM ALLOWED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE @ 45% = 3,041.56 SF CITY of AUSTIN AREA CALCULATIONS CoA AREA NAME EXISTING a) 1ST FLOOR CONDITIONED AREA b) 2ND FLOOR CONDITIONED AREA c) 3RD FLOOR CONDITIONED AREA d) BASEMENT e) ATTACHED COVERED PARKING f) DETACHED COVERED PARKING g) COVERED WOOD DECKS h) COVERED PATIO i) COVERED PORCH j) BALCONY k) OTHER: TOTAL BUILDING AREA TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE l) DRIVEWAY m) SIDEWALKS n) UNCOVERED PATIO o) UNCOVERED WOOD DECKS (COUNTED AT 50%) p) AC PADS AND OTHER CONCRETE FLATWORK q) OTHER (POOL COPING, RETAINING WALLS) r) POOL s) SPA NEW 1,255.71 SF 1,225.88 SF 95.15 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 400.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 604.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 3,580.74 SF 2,259.71 SF 187.50 SF 75.70 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 62.22 SF 173.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF TOTAL 1,255.71 SF 1,225.88 SF 95.15 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 400.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 604.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 3,580.74 SF 2,259.71 SF 187.50 SF 75.70 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 62.22 SF 173.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF …
Bertron, Cara From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Kevin Sims Wednesday, January 22, 2020 12:31 PM Bertron, Cara Gaudette, Angela Re: 1215 W 9th St - West Line - Contributing 1215W9thSt_200127.pdf It helps to include the attachment. Please note that the height of the proposed roof line is 1'9" higher than it is now. The porch height stays the same but the slope of the porch roof is increased to maintain the overall proportions of the building. This is something I discussed with the neighborhood. I am meeting with them again this Thursday as a final courtesy. The proposed rear replacement addition is not detailed but the dimensions of it are accurate. The building floors are out of level by 1" to 6". The exterior walls are out of plumb from 2" to 7", giving new meaning to entasis (sorry, that's meant to be a joke...). The ridge of the roof sags toward the middle 8" to 10", giving it a kind of pagoda look, which I like, but it isn't a viable structural condition. After extensive investigation and analysis, it is obvious that the existing building is an extreme state of deterioration and disrepair. As it is, the building is both physically dangerous and an environmental hazard. To rehabilitate it, I will have to carefully rebuild it board by board in order to bring it up to minimum safety and accessibility standards. In other words, I will have to take it down to the stud(s) and replace most of the structural components. Can we have the hearing at the location? I'll show you what I mean. Let me know if I'm missing anything or if you would like to discuss. I did not include the survey or engineering analysis because I believe you already have those documents. Apologies for grammatical errors. Thanks. On January 21, 2020 at 3:47 PM, "Bertron, Cara" <Cara.Bertron@austintexas.gov> wrote: Hi Kevin, this is to follow up with a phone message I just left you. I’ll need the revised plans by noon tomorrow (Tuesday). Thanks, and hope all’s well— Cara Cara Bertron Senior Planner / Deputy Historic Preservation Officer City of Austin Planning and Zoning Department 1
1215 W 9th St : West Line NRHD - Proposed Partial Demolition / Remodel / Addition 1215 W 9th St : Circa 1950 1215 W 9th St : Sanborn Map 1922 1935* 1215 W 9th St : Builder / Former Residents 1215 W 9th St : North Elevation 1215 W 9th St : West Elevation 1215 W 9th St : East Elevation 1215 W 9th St : South Elevation 1215 W 9th St : Building Conditions 1215 W 9th St : Building Conditions 1215 W 9th St : Building Conditions 1215 W 9th St : Building Conditions 1215 W 9th St : Building Conditions 1215 W 9th St : Building Conditions 1215 W 9th St : Building Conditions 1215 W 9th St : Building Conditions 1215 W 9th St : Building Conditions Legend AC B.L. BM CO (E) EM F.F.E. L.L. GM (N) RD (R) T.O.P. T.O.S. UP UL WIP WM Condenser Unit Building/Setback Line Benchmark Clean out Existing Electrical Meter Finish Floor Elevation Lot/Property Line Gas Meter Proposed/New Record Dignity Monument Remove/Demolish Spot Elevation Top of Plate Top of Slab Utility Pole Utility Line Work In Progress Water Meter Trees 98 97 141 142 158 179 Twin Pecan Pecan Twin Pecan Cedar Elm Red Oak Cedar Elm 4", 6" 8" 4", 10" 9" (remove) 7" 13" *No protected trees on lot or adjacent lots 1/2" Iron Rod* Utility Line (ovhd) 527' 526' UP 525' 524' 3'-6" 2 5'-9" 1 GM 1 A201 528' W 9th St LL = S 63,23'29"E 98 53.5' Wood Fence (adjacent lot) 2 A202 Roof Overhang 523' 9'-5" 7'-10" 25' EM BL = 30'-7" 34'-0" 5' = L B 20'-5" 0'-0" 4 9' 0.6 0 1 E 6" 2'5 6,1 2 N = L L 521' 522' 8'-3" WM 97 7'-10" 10'-2" 527' 2'-2"beyond L.L. 528.2'* Marked Location in Concrete* Concrete Sidewalk and Steps Repair/Replace Conc Driveway As Needed COVERED PORCH: Repair/Reuse Materials Where Possible; Remove/Replace As Needed EXISTING 2 LEVEL BUILDING: Repair/Reuse Materials Where Possible; Remove/Replace As Needed 34'-0" 20'-5" Remove Brick Column Remove Enclosed Porch Above EXISTING ADDITION: Remove/Replace NEW SINGLE LEVEL 700 SF ADDITION AND ROOF DECK (hatched) 520' 519' 179 518' 517' Site Grading As Needed 5'-8" 3 516' Stone Retaining Wall (see Engineering) 158 Wire Fence (remove, replace) Calculated Point* B L = 10' 4'-6" 1'-5"beyond L.L. 0'-0" 4 Remove Brick Column New Driveway Extension to Parking Area (WIP); Grade …
C.2 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION JANUARY 27, 2020 PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS NRD-2019-0073 1215 W. 9TH STREET WEST LINE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT PROPOSAL Rehabilitate a ca. 1910 house, remove an altered porte-cochere and one-story rear addition, and construct a one-story rear addition with a roof deck. ARCHITECTURE 2-story, side-gabled, L-plan house; composite siding with 1:1 and casement vinyl-sash windows; full-width shed-roofed porch; porte-cochere. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The project has four parts: 1) Rehabilitate the house, including replacement of composite siding with wood siding, replacement of 1:1 vinyl-sash windows with double-hung wood-sash windows, expansion of selected second-story window openings, replacement of the vinyl door with a wood door, and repair of porch materials, with in-kind replacement where needed. The porch roof will be raised by 1’9” to increase the slope of the porch roof; 2) Demolish the porte-cochere; 3) Demolish a rear addition; and 4) Construct a one-story rear addition with a footprint of approximately 700 square feet. The addition will be capped with a roof deck, clad in wood lap siding to match the replacement siding on the front of the house, and have fixed and operable aluminum- frame windows. RESEARCH Rush and Minnie Baldwin lived in the house for nearly two decades, from around 1916 until around 1934. Rush Baldwin was born in 1884 in Missouri. His family moved to Austin in 1896, when his father established the printing company that became A.C. Baldwin & Sons. Rush worked in the family business and served as president and secretary of the Austin Rotary club. He died in 1934 after a car accident, which received widespread publicity. A newspaper article announcing his death lauded him as “one of Austin’s best- known and most-respected business men.” Minnie Baldwin (nee Steiner) was born in 1891 in Austin. She married Rush Baldwin around 1912, and the couple had one daughter. Minnie was active in the First Methodist Church, the Austin Woman’s Club, and the League of Women Voters, among others. She died in 1941 in Austin. Allie Vernon lived in the house from around 1930 until her death in 1969. Ms. Vernon was born in 1878 in Texas. She moved to Austin in 1921 with her husband Thomas, who died in 1928. The couple had three children. The 1930 census lists the Vernon family in the house by themselves; by 1940, they were renting space to three “roomers.” An avid sports …
C.3 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JANUARY 27, 2020 NRD-2019-0075 311 E. 6TH STREET SIXTH STREET NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT PROPOSAL Construct a covered rooftop deck. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed covered rooftop deck will extend across the width of the buildings at 311 and 313 East Sixth Street and will have a guardrail set behind the existing historic parapet of the building as well as an exposed second railed section at the left side of the proposed new construction. The proposed deck will have a slanted front wall that tapers back from the parapet to the beginning of the roof. The walls will be constructed of CMU. The front guardrail will be set immediately behind the parapets of the existing buildings. The top of the proposed roof will be 41 feet above the sidewalk. The entire proposed construction will be visible from the street, in complete violation of the Sixth Street Architectural Design Standards, enacted to protect and preserve the character of this historic district. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation as well as the Sixth Street Architectural Design Standards are used to evaluate projects in National Register historic districts. The following Secretary of the Interior’s Standards apply to this proposal: 1) A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. Evaluation: These buildings have been used as nightclubs for many years without the rooftop uses. The rooftop use requires a major change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment in increasing the height of the building dramatically and impeding the ability to experience the building as it historically existed. 2) The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Evaluation: The proposal will significantly alter features and spaces that characterize these one-story building. 9) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Evaluation: The proposed rooftop uses will destroy …
311deckaddition 311E.6thst. Austin,TX.78701 SpacePlanningEngineering- ListofDrawings CoverSheet A1 A2 A3 -ExistingandProposedFloorplan -Proposed311and313 -Dimensionsandscopeofwork FacilitiesServicesofAustin 503E.6th.st.,suiteB Austin,TX.78701 512-481-0181 ss@facilityaustin.com www.facilityaustin.com SteveSimon,CFM LesterGermanio,Stuctural Location Facilities Services ofAustin 503E.6thst.,suiteB coPOBox684671 Austin,TX.78768 512-481-0181 n o i t i d d a k c e d . t s h t 6 . E 1 1 3 Cover Sheet 311-317E.6th.Existing Isoview 317 315 313 311 Frontview 311-317E.6th.Proposed Newdeck androof Newdeck androof Isoview Frontview 317 315 313 311 Facilities Services ofAustin 503E.6thst.,suiteB coPOBox684671 Austin,TX.78768 512-481-0181 n o i t i d d a k c e d . t s h t 6 . E 1 1 3 A1 Existing& Proposed Stairsdown Newbar2 CMUtyp. Roofsetback Stairsdown Newbar1 Stairsup Planview Noscale Sideview Noscale Storefront Newroof CMUwalls Existing Newroof CMUWalls Guardrails Facilities Services ofAustin 503E.6thst.,suiteB coPOBox684671 Austin,TX.78768 512-481-0181 ROOFNOT SHOWNFORCLARITY CMUwalls Awningtoremain Storefront Frontview Noscale Bar2 Stairsdown Bar1 Storefront Isoview Noscale n o i t i d d a k c e d . t s h t 6 . E 1 1 3 A2 311&313 Proposed Roof Sideview-roofsetback 18"=1' Frontview 18"=1' Scopeofwork 1.Constructdeckabovetheexisting311 buildingstructure. 2.Build2bars. 3.Spacetohave2exits. 4.Spacetobefiresprinklered. 5.Newguardrailsat42"abovedeck. 6.Rooftobesetbackgreaterthan15'from storefront. SeeStructuraldrawingsforfurtherdetails. Facilities Services ofAustin 503E.6thst.,suiteB coPOBox684671 Austin,TX.78768 512-481-0181 n o i t i d d a k c e d . t s h t 6 . E 1 1 3 A3 Dimensions
C.4 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION JANUARY 27, 2020 PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS NRD-2019-0076 2411 PEMBERTON PLACE OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT PROPOSAL Remove and restore brick cladding on a ca. 1951 house, demolish a one-story wing and replace it with a similar two-story addition, replace the shingle roof with slate, and construct a hyphen and two-story rear addition. ARCHITECTURE 2-story, side-gabled, rectangular-plan house; brick cladding with 8:8 wood-sash windows; end chimneys; integrated garage with rear entry. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The project has four parts: 1) Remove brick cladding, add insulation, and replace the brick cladding. New matching brick may be used on the rear wall to allow a new addition to be clad in original brick (see #2); 2) Demolish the one-story wing at the north end of the house and construct a very similar two-story wing with the same footprint and a low-profile second story. The addition will be clad in original brick and include 8:8 wood-sash windows at the ground floor and 8-lite awning windows at the basement level and second story. It will be approximately 5’ higher than the existing wing; 3) Replace the shingle roof with slate; and 4) Construct a one-story hyphen and two-story rear addition. The hyphen will be clad in multi-lite steel-sash windows on the south elevation and hardiplank siding with wood- sash casement windows on the north elevation, and capped by a gabled roof. It will overhang an area used as a carport. The rear addition will be clad in brick to match the existing house, with casement, awning, and fixed wood-sash windows and a side- gabled roof with a simplified version of the existing trim. RESEARCH Dr. Albert and Elise Terry constructed the house around 1951 and lived there until at least 1992. Albert Asbury Terry was born in 1904 in Nashville, Tennessee, where his father worked as a clerk. By 1910, the family had moved to Dallas, where his father worked as a real estate agent. Albert studied at UT Austin and was working as a doctor in Detroit by 1930. By 1935, he had moved his family to Glasgow, Montana; then back to Austin by 1940, where they settled. Albert Terry died in 1990 in Austin. Elise Jewett Terry was born in 1905 in Kansas. By 1910, her family had moved to Austin, where her father worked as a minister. Elise attended Austin High School, …
D.1 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION JANUARY 27, 2020 DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS HDP-2019-0628 1603 E. 7TH STREET PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1917 house. ARCHITECTURE One-story, rectangular-plan building; front-gabled jerkinhead roof; wood siding; double-hung wood-sash windows; half-width porch; door with transom and sidelights. RESEARCH 1603 E. 7th Street was built around 1917 by Dennis and Annie Hunter at a cost of $250. The family then occupied the house for five decades. The Hunters had lived in a previous dwelling on the property for at least five years before constructing the existing house. During this time, they were paying a “vendor’s lien” to the property owner/seller, which they paid off in 1916 to own the property outright. Dennis H. Hunter was born in 1882 in Martindale, Texas, and completed school through the 8th grade. Hunter operated a restaurant on E. 6th Street, which is not named in city directories. He also worked various other jobs: as a saloon bookkeeper (1910), drugstore porter (1914), assistant steward at the Home Social & Benevolence Association (1918), and dry goods store porter (1930). Census records and city directories from the early 1940s show that the Hunters rented rooms in their home, including to James H. Means and another professor at nearby Tillotson Institute. Dennis Hunter died in 1943 in Austin. Annie Storey Hunter was born in 1879 in Texas. She attended three years of college, later working as a dressmaker out of her home. She married Dennis Hunter prior to 1897, and the couple had three sons. Annie Hunter lived in the house until her death in 1970. STAFF COMMENTS The East Austin Historic Resources Survey (2016) identified the property as a potential historic landmark. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain a high degree of integrity. 3) Properties must meet two historic designation criteria for landmark designation (City of Austin Land Development Code, Section 25-2-352). The property appears to demonstrate significance according to one criterion. a. Architecture. The house embodies the distinguishing characteristics of the Craftsman style and appears to be significant under this criterion. b. Historical association. Dennis and Annie Hunter built the house and lived in the house for roughly fifty years. The Hunters owned a restaurant on E. 6th Street, and were prosperous enough to buy land and construct a house when D.1 - 2 African Americans faced substantial financial …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION JANUARY 27, 2020 DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS HDP-2019-0698 609 HEARN STREET D.3 - 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1914 house. ARCHITECTURE One-story rectangular-plan house with Cumberland-style double doors. It is clad in horizontal wood siding with paired 1:1 wood windows. Its hipped roof is covered with composition shingles. RESEARCH The house at 609 Hearn Street was built around 1914 by William W. Hearn and his wife Ellen. William Washington Hearn was born on February 22, 1888 to homebuilder and firefighter John L. Hearn and dressmaker Aurelia Mills Hearn. William Hearn’s childhood home at 902 Blanco Street was designated a historic landmark in 2005 based upon its architecture and association with John and Aurelia Hearn, middle-class entrepreneurs who contributed to Austin’s growth at the turn of the twentieth century. After his father’s death, William Hearn followed in his footsteps and worked as a carpenter to support the family alongside his siblings, also craftspeople. By 1914, he had moved to the Deep Eddy area. The street was named for the Hearn family, who occupied three adjacent addresses at 605, 607, and 609. William and his brother Claude married sisters Ellen and Alice Johnson and constructed similarly-styled homes next door to each other. Ellen and Alice’s family lived two blocks away on Dam Boulevard (now Lake Austin Boulevard) and Johnson Street, apparently named for the Johnson family. William Hearn was active in the carpenters’ union and ran for public office at least once during his lifetime. William and Ellen Hearn had three children; their son Norman G. Hearn, who briefly occupied the second unit at 609 Hearn St. with his wife Dorothy, was killed in World War II in 1945. After William Hearn’s death in 1964, his nephew Calvin E. Hearn and Calvin’s wife June M. Hearn occupied the home. Calvin Hearn’s childhood home was next door at 607 Hearn, and during the late 1940s and ‘50s, he occupied the garage apartment at 605 Hearn. Calvin, like his uncle, learned his father’s trade as a bricklayer and ran for public office on a platform of working-class values. June Marie Frels Hearn occupied the home until her death in 2011. The home remained in the Hearn family for 105 years until its sale in 2019. STAFF COMMENTS Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION JANUARY 27, 2020 DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS HDP-2019-0711 4703 RAMSEY AVENUE D.4 - 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1939 house. ARCHITECTURE One-story, rectangular-plan house clad in painted brick, capped with a side-gabled roof with composition shingles and shallow eaves. It has single and paired 1:1 wood windows and a full-width shed-roof porch with decorative metal supports. A small addition was constructed to the rear in 1950. A detached garage is located behind the house. The home’s small footprint and minimal detailing is typical for homes of the era and location. RESEARCH The house was built in 1939 and rented by NYA assistant director Raymond Leberban, then purchased by Forrest W. and Cecile Trafton around 1945. Forrest Trafton was a tile contractor. He began working for his uncle’s family business, Trafton Marble and Tile, before he and his father branched off to start their own business, Trafton and Son, in 1940. Cecile Trafton worked as bookkeeper and office manager for the business, and her brother John F. Rodriguez was an assistant manager. Son Capt. William Trafton later joined the business The Traftons lived in the home until Mrs. Trafton’s death in 1968; per deed records, it stayed in the family until 2006. Renters include grandson Mike Trafton and tilesetter Joe Castro, who may also have been associated with the Traftons’ business. STAFF COMMENTS Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two historic designation criteria for landmark designation (Land Development Code, Section 25-2-352). The property may demonstrate significance according to one criterion: a) Architecture. The house is constructed in the Minimal Traditional style. b) Historical association. While the house is associated with the Trafton family, who contributed their expertise as contractors to some of Austin’s most iconic buildings at midcentury, the Trafton & Son building at 3700 Guadalupe may hold stronger associational and architectural significance due to its exceptional exterior tilework that showcases the Traftons’ skills at both trade and salesmanship. However, the Commission may wish to consider Forrest and Cecile Trafton’s importance with regards to their house, given the uncertain integrity of the Trafton & Son building since 2011. c) Archaeology. The house was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d) Community value. The house does not possess a …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION JANUARY 27, 2020 DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS HDP-2019-0714 3304 E 17TH STREET D.5 - 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1965 house. ARCHITECTURE One-story Ranch clad in stone veneer. The house has a side-gabled roof with deep eaves, a covered carport, and half-height aluminum casement windows at the main elevation. RESEARCH The house was built in 1965 for Theodore and Pauline Thompson. Theo “Booster” Thompson worked as a sexton at St. David’s Episcopal Church, and was also a gospel musician for two successful quartets. He sang as a tenor with the Royal Lights Singers, who performed at the first Kerrville Folk Festival alongside headliners from 1972 to 1977, and the Bells of Joy, made famous by radio personality and musician Lavada Durst in the 1940s and ‘50s. The Royal Lights produced two albums with Sonobeat Records before creating their own label, Royal, based in the house next door to Thompson’s. Thompson held multiple offices in the Quartet Association and served as a deacon at Del Valle Missionary Baptist Church, where his wife Pauline also served as deaconess. STAFF COMMENTS Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two historic designation criteria for landmark designation (Land Development Code, Section 25-2-352). The property may demonstrate significance according to one criterion: a) Architecture. The house is constructed with Ranch and Mid-Century Modern stylistic influences. b) Historical association. The house does not appear to meet the criterion for significant historical association; however, the Commission may wish to consider Thompson’s contributions to the Austin gospel music community when evaluating significance. c) Archaeology. The house was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d) Community value. The house does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e) Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive re-use, then relocation over demolition, but release the permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package, consisting of photographs of all elevations, a dimensioned sketch plan, and a narrative history, for archiving at the Austin History Center. LOCATION …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION JANUARY 27, 2020 DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS HDP-2019-0754 201 E. 3RD STREET D.6 - 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1904 warehouse building. ARCHITECTURE One-story, rectangular-plan flat-roofed brick warehouse building with a round-arched entry facing 3rd Street with stone coping at the arch and a non-historic metal-framed glazed entry; fenestration consisting of non-historic metal-framed windows, with a 1:1 configuration along the 3rd Street elevation and fixed-sash fenestration along the west elevation, all of which have stone lintels and sills. The windows along the west elevation appear to be non-historic penetrations. The other modern alteration to the building is the roof-top belvedere with a slanted roof and glass walls. The building retains faded historic commercial murals along the west elevation. RESEARCH The building appears to have been built around 1904 and served as a grocery warehouse and retail grocery store for the majority of its existence. The building does not appear on the 1900 Sanborn map, and the first entries for addresses that correspond to this site appear in the 1905 city directory, when the firm of Heidenheimer, Strassburger & Company occupied the building. Both Isaac Heidenheimer, Jr. and Louis Strassburger were successful wholesale grocery merchants in Austin. Heidenheimer, who was the son of a very prominent grocery merchant in Galveston, had worked for Nelson Davis & Company, whose wholesale grocery business was in the 100 block of W. 4th Street (in a city landmark building). Heidenheimer left Nelson Davis in 1888 to establish his own wholesale grocery business, and in 1896, merged with Louis Strassburger’s wholesale produce company. They moved their business from the 100 block of E. 5th Street to this new building around 1904, and remained in business here until around 1932, when the company dissolved. David Lowenberger, Mrs. Heidenheimer’s brother, joined the firm around 1919. Lomis Slaughter, the proprietor of Slaughter Markets, purchased this property around 1932 and operated the Slaughter Public Market here until around World War II, when it became Slaughter Store No. 4. Lomis Slaughter was a character, and wrote a regular column for the Austin American-Statesman in the 1940s and 1950s, entitled “From Soop to Nutz,” which combined his musings on a variety of subjects along with plugs for various grocery brands. Slaughter had several food-related businesses in Austin, including a couple of supermarkets, a packing house (in this building), and a bakery (also in this building for a short period …
D.7 - 1 PROPOSAL HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION JANUARY 27, 2020 DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS (PARTIAL) HDP-2019-0756 1009 E. 14TH STREET Construct an addition to a ca. 1929 house. ARCHITECTURE One-story, T-plan building; cross-gabled roof; wood siding; 2:2 fiberglass windows; half-width porch; door with multi-lite transom. RESEARCH 1009 E. 14th Street was built around 1929 by Robert and Delia Batts, an African American couple who occupied the house until around 1947 before moving next door to 1011 E. 14th Street. Robert Lee Batts was born in 1908 in Austin and completed school through the 10th grade. He worked as a linoleum layer at the Swann-Schulle Furniture Co. Robert Batts died in 1978 in Austin. Delia Mae Batts (nee Daniels) was born in 1909 in Round Rock, where her father worked as a grocer and later as a farm laborer. She completed two years of college and married Robert Batts in 1929 in Austin; the couple had two children. After Robert died in 1978, Delia married Charlie Davidson in Travis County in 1980. She died in 1988. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Construct a second story atop and behind the existing building; add an attached garage to the west wall. The L-plan second-story addition is set behind the ridgeline on the east side of the building and behind the gable front on the primary (north) façade. It is clad in hardiplank siding and capped by a hipped metal roof with a front gable end that echoes that of the house. Windows will be fixed and casement with fiberglass sashes and be covered by historic-age wood screens. The garage is clad in hardiplank horizontal siding and capped by a hipped roof. The existing horizontal wood siding, wood-sash windows, porch materials, and front door will be retained. STAFF COMMENTS The East Austin Historic Resources Survey (2016) identified the property as contributing to a potential historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain a high degree of integrity. 3) Properties must meet two historic designation criteria for landmark designation (City of Austin Land Development Code, Section 25-2-352). The property appears to demonstrate significance according to one criterion. D.7 - 2 a. Architecture. The house embodies the distinguishing characteristics of the Folk Victorian style and appears to be significant under this criterion. b. Historical association. Robert and Delia Batts lived in the house for more than 15 …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Monday, January 27, 2020 - 6:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Council Chambers, Austin City Hall 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, Texas COMMISSION MEMBERS: _____ Emily Reed, Chair ______ Beth Valenzuela, Vice Chair ______ Witt Featherston ______ Ben Heimsath ______ Emily Hibbs ______ Mathew Jacob ______ Kevin Koch ______ Kelly Little ______ Terri Myers ______ Alex Papavasiliou ______ Blake Tollett NOTES ON HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MEETINGS a) The first speaker signed up for each side of a contested public hearing will be allowed up to 5 minutes to speak. Any further speakers will be allowed up to 3 minutes. The Commission does not allow for the donation of time. The applicant or their agent may have a rebuttal after the conclusion of testimony of up to 3 minutes. Speakers should not repeat the testimony previously given on any case. c) b) Cases passed by the Commission on the consent agenda will not have a formal public hearing. If a citizen would like to speak on a case proposed for passage on the consent agenda, that person should make it known to the Chair of the Commission at the time of the reading of the consent agenda. Otherwise, the case will pass on consent, and there is no later recourse. In cases involving the review of demolition or relocation permit applications, the Commission may initiate a historic zoning case to further study the evidence regarding the potential of the subject property for landmark designation. If the Commission initiates a historic zoning case, the Commission will review the case again at its next regularly scheduled meeting for a recommendation regarding historic zoning. There will be no new notification sent out by the City stating the next hearing date. d) All public comments must be received by staff by 1 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Staff cannot forward public comments to commissioners after this time. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Speakers may address the Commission on items not posted on the agenda. Each speaker will have up to three minutes. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. December 16, 2019 2. BRIEFINGS, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION None 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ON APPLICATIONS FOR HISTORIC ZONING, DISCUSSION AND ACTION ON APPLICATIONS FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT ZONING, AND REQUESTS TO CONSIDER THE INITIATION OF A HISTORIC ZONING CASE 1. HDP-2018-0646 – Lavada Durst House – Postponement request by Staff 1906 E. 21st Street …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Monday, December 16, 2019 - 6:00 p.m. Council Chambers, Austin City Hall Regular Meeting 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, Texas COMMISSION MEMBERS: __ab__ Kevin Koch __X__ Emily Reed, Chair __X___ Beth Valenzuela, Vice Chair ___X__ Kelly Little ___X__ Terri Myers __ab__ Witt Featherston __X___ Ben Heimsath ___ab_ Alex Papavasiliou __X__ Emily Hibbs ___X__ Blake Tollett __X___ Mathew Jacob NOTES ON HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MEETINGS a) The first speaker signed up for each side of a contested public hearing will be allowed up to 5 minutes to speak. Any further speakers will be allowed up to 3 minutes. The Commission does not allow for the donation of time. The applicant or their agent may have a rebuttal after the conclusion of testimony of up to 3 minutes. Speakers should not repeat the testimony previously given on any case. b) Cases passed by the Commission on the consent agenda will not have a formal public hearing. If a citizen would like to speak on a case proposed for passage on the consent agenda, that person should make it known to the Chair of the Commission at the time of the reading of the consent agenda. Otherwise, the case will pass on consent, and there is no later recourse. In cases involving the review of demolition or relocation permit applications, the Commission may initiate a historic zoning case to further study the evidence regarding the potential of the subject property for landmark designation. If the Commission initiates a historic zoning case, the Commission will review the case again at its next regularly scheduled meeting for a recommendation regarding historic zoning. There will be no new notification sent out by the City stating the next hearing date. c) d) All public comments must be received by staff by 1 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Staff cannot forward public comments to commissioners after this time. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first three speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address items not posted on the agenda. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. November 18, 2019 MOTION: Approve items 1A, B4, B5, B6, B7, B8, B9, C3, C4, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7, D9, D10, D11, D12, D13, D14, D15, D16, D17 on the consent agenda by Reed, Heimsath seconds. Vote: 6-0. MOTION: Postpone items C5, D8, and D18 to …
7 | P a g e Pathway between French Legation House and Carriage House (the proposed new Visitor Center) Pathway to Carriage House from the Legation building Side View of Carriage House. View of east wall of Carriage House, March 9, 2018 8 | P a g e
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS B.5 - 1 JANUARY 27, 2020 C14H-1974-0023 FRENCH LEGATION 802 SAN MARCOS STREET PROPOSAL This is a heritage grant proposal to convert the carriage house to a visitor’s center and office space, construct an addition to the carriage house, and replace the existing wood shake roof with composition shingles. The carriage house is not a historic structure. The plans for this site also include the construction of a new stone retaining wall. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant proposes to rehabilitate the first floor of the carriage house for use as a business operations center, including repairs to the slab, woodwork, and windows, and prepare the second floor as office space, build an addition to the carriage house, install a new entrance facing San Marcos Street, and replacing the existing wood shake roof with composition shingles. The applicant further proposes the construction of a new stone retaining wall, and the installation of signage both at the street and on the site. The signage will follow uniform signage for all Texas Historical Commission-administered sites. B.5 - 2 B.5 - 3 Steve, I am the Director of Historic Sites Operations that has been overseeing the Legation since its transfer to the Historical Commission – we have not yet met in person, but I hope we may do so soon. We do not yet have all of the text for the signs, but I can share what we know at this point. We will certainly have: • Two (2) medium-sized main identification signs, one at each of the two main entrances to the site (San Marcos Street and Embassy Drive), which will have the site name, web address, THC logo and site phone number similar to the example shown on page 27 of the manual. • One vehicular sign located in the site parking lot at the corner of 9th St. and Embassy Dr. similar to the example shown on page 41 of the manual, which will indicate the lot is for Legation parking only and the site’s general hours. • Two (2) small pedestrian signs OR plaques at the entrances to indicate the site hours Beyond this, we may have some additional smaller wayfinding signs within the site to direct visitors to the visitor center and historic Legation building – because we would like to keep them to a minimum necessary for good wayfinding, we’re …
FRENCH LEGATION STATE HISTORIC SITE Visit o r C e n t e r A d d iti o n 8 0 2 S a n M a rc o s S tre e t A u sti n , Te x a s Landscape Architect: Studio Balcones 702 San Antonio Street Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 383-8815 Structural Engineer: Tsen Engineering 210 Barton Springs Road, #250 Austin, Texas 78704 (512) 474-4001 Architect: 1206 Quail Park Drive Austin, Texas 78758 (512) 960-0013 Hutson Gallagher, Inc. Texas Historical Commission Civil Engineer: Dunaway|UDG 3660 Stoneridge Road, #E101 Austin, Texas 78746 (512) 306-8252 MEP Engineer: H2MG, LLC. 8000 W. Interstate 10, #1002 San Antonio, Texas 78702 (210) 525-0220 Kitchen Designer: Cosper & Associates, Inc. 13061 #3 Highway 181 San Antonio, Texas 78223 (210) 633-2020 Owner: Historic Sites Division T.J. Rusk Building 208 E. 10th Street, Suite 327 Austin, Texas 78701 Funding Provided By: Friends of the Texas Historical Commission Contract No. FTHC_HG_10202019 Security Systems: Combs Consulting Group 4425 South MoPac Expressway Building IV, #800 Austin, Texas 78735 (512) 773-6580 50% Draft Construction Documents December 06, 2019 ABBREVIATIONS GENERAL NOTES STREET VIEW REGIONAL MAP @ @FF A/C A-V ACCOM ACOUST ACT ADA ADD'L ADJ ADMIN AFF AHJ AHU ALT ALUM ANOD AP APPROX ARCH ASPH ASST ASTM AUTO AV AVG BB BRD BIT BLDG BLK(G) B.M. BM(S) BOC BOS BTTM BRK BRNZ BSMT BTWN BUR C CAB C.B. CF CG CHAN CI CJ CL CLG CLOS CLR CMU CO COL COM CONC CONN CONST CONT CONTR COORD CORR CST CT CTR(D) CU CVR CW DBL DED DEMO DET DF DH DIA DIAG DIFF DISC DISP DIM DIV DN DP DPM DR DS DW DWG DWLS DWR At At Finished Floor Air Conditioning Audio-Visual Accommodate Acoustical Acoustical Tile Americans w/ Disabilities Act Additional Adjacent Administration Above Finished Floor Authority Having Jurisdiction Air Handling Unit Alternative/Alternate Aluminum Anodized Access Panel Approximate Architect Asphalt Assistant American Society for Testing & Materials Automatic Audio Visual Alarm Average Ball-Bearing Board Bitumen Building Block(ing) Benchmark Beam(s) Back of Curb Bottom of Structure Bottom Brick Bronze Basement Between Built-up Roofing Conduit Cabinet Catch Basin Cubic Feet Corner Guard Channel Cast Iron Control Joint Center Line Ceiling Closet Clear Concrete Masonry Unit Cased Opening Column Communication Concrete Connection Construction Continuous Contractor Coordination or Coordinate Corridor Cast Stone Ceramic Tile Center(ed) Copper Cover Cold Water Double Dedicated Demolish, Demolition Detail Drinking Fountain Double Hung …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS B.5 - 1 JANUARY 27, 2020 C14H-1974-0023 FRENCH LEGATION 802 SAN MARCOS STREET PROPOSAL This is a heritage grant proposal to convert the carriage house to a visitor’s center and office space, construct an addition to the carriage house, and replace the existing wood shake roof with composition shingles. The carriage house is not a historic structure. The plans for this site also include the construction of a new stone retaining wall. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant proposes to rehabilitate the first floor of the carriage house for use as a business operations center, including repairs to the slab, woodwork, and windows, and prepare the second floor as office space, build an addition to the carriage house, install a new entrance facing San Marcos Street, and replacing the existing wood shake roof with composition shingles. The applicant further proposes the construction of a new stone retaining wall, and the installation of signage both at the street and on the site. The signage will follow uniform signage for all Texas Historical Commission-administered sites. B.5 - 2 B.5 - 3 Steve, I am the Director of Historic Sites Operations that has been overseeing the Legation since its transfer to the Historical Commission – we have not yet met in person, but I hope we may do so soon. We do not yet have all of the text for the signs, but I can share what we know at this point. We will certainly have: • Two (2) medium-sized main identification signs, one at each of the two main entrances to the site (San Marcos Street and Embassy Drive), which will have the site name, web address, THC logo and site phone number similar to the example shown on page 27 of the manual. • One vehicular sign located in the site parking lot at the corner of 9th St. and Embassy Dr. similar to the example shown on page 41 of the manual, which will indicate the lot is for Legation parking only and the site’s general hours. • Two (2) small pedestrian signs OR plaques at the entrances to indicate the site hours Beyond this, we may have some additional smaller wayfinding signs within the site to direct visitors to the visitor center and historic Legation building – because we would like to keep them to a minimum necessary for good wayfinding, we’re …
LANDMARK HISTORIC COMMISSION | 01-27-20203RD & BRAZOS | AUSTIN, TXTHE HANOVER COMPANY EXISTING CONDITIONS - 2000 LANDMARK HISTORIC COMMISSION | AUSTIN,TX | 3RD & BRAZOS | 01-27-2020 EXISTING CONDITIONS - 2019 LANDMARK HISTORIC COMMISSION | AUSTIN,TX | 3RD & BRAZOS | 01-27-2020 3RD ST ELEVATION PARTY WALL ELEVATION ALLEY ELEVATION BRAZOS ELEVATION (SINCE MODIFIED) EXISTING MASONRY DETAILS TO BE REBUILT DEMO & REUSE BRICK V.I.F. REBUILD TO MATCH CHARACTER OF OPENINGS DEMO & REUSE BRICK V.I.F. NEW WALL TO BE CMU DEMO & REUSE BRICK V.I.F. NEW WALL TO BE CMU/STUCCO EXISTING GROCERY SIGNAGE TO BE REBUILT EXISTING MASONRY DETAILS TO BE REBUILT DEMO & REUSE BRICK V.I.F. REBUILD TO MATCH CHARACTER OF OPENINGS NEW OPENINGS TO BE LARGER TO ACCOMDATE THE NEW USE INCORPORATE PARKING ENTRANCE MATERIAL PRESERVATION LANDMARK HISTORIC COMMISSION | AUSTIN,TX | 3RD & BRAZOS | 01-27-2020 AUSTIN HISTORY + TEXTURE LANDMARK HISTORIC COMMISSION | AUSTIN,TX | 3RD & BRAZOS | 01-27-2020 AUSTIN URBAN TEXTURE LANDMARK HISTORIC COMMISSION | AUSTIN,TX | 3RD & BRAZOS | 01-27-2020 GROUND FLOOR | LOBBY & RETAIL 40' - 11" 95' - 0" 135' - 11" ENTER E 3RD STREET LINE OF EXISTING BUILDING " 4 - ' 9 " 9 - ' 5 7 " 0 - ' 4 2 " 9 - ' 7 1 T S S O Z A R B I T T O R R A M W J " 0 1 - ' 6 2 1 R E T N E RES LOBBY 748 SF RETAIL 5292 SF FCC 151 SF LEASING 748 SF TRASH 913 SF MAIL 470 SF PACKAGE 240 SF MOVE IN 167 SF BIKE 364 SF RAMP ELEC VAULT 1045 SF GENERATOR 514 SF PARKING ENTRANCE GAS METER LOADING DOCK PUMP ROOM AT VAULT LEVEL BELOW HYATT PLACE HAMPTON INN LANDMARK HISTORIC COMMISSION | AUSTIN,TX | 3RD & BRAZOS | 01-27-20200’30’ 3rd St EXISTING Brazos St EXISTING 3rd St PROPOSAL Brazos St PROPOSAL LANDMARK HISTORIC COMMISSION | AUSTIN,TX | 3RD & BRAZOS | 01-27-2020 PATIO CONCEPT LANDMARK HISTORIC COMMISSION | AUSTIN,TX | 3RD & BRAZOS | 01-27-2020 PATIO CONCEPT LANDMARK HISTORIC COMMISSION | AUSTIN,TX | 3RD & BRAZOS | 01-27-2020 PATIO CONCEPT LANDMARK HISTORIC COMMISSION | AUSTIN,TX | 3RD & BRAZOS | 01-27-2020 CONCEPT LANDMARK HISTORIC COMMISSION | AUSTIN,TX | 3RD & BRAZOS | 01-27-2020 136' - 2" 121' - 4" " 4 - ' 6 2 1 UNIT A 1062 …
RESOLUTION NO. _________ WHEREAS, the Historic Landmark Commission has established the Certificate of Appropriateness Review Committee; and WHEREAS, the committee’s role is to provide advisory feedback on projects recommended by staff and the Historic Landmark Commission and meetings attended on a voluntary basis by property owners and designers; and WHEREAS, the committee provides feedback on changes to locally designated historic landmarks and historic districts, which require a Certificate of Appropriateness; and WHEREAS, National Register historic district projects and historic-age but non-designated buildings, which do not require a Certificate of Appropriateness, can benefit from the advice to encourage historic preservation; and WHEREAS, the current committee name can be confusing for property owners whose projects are recommended for committee review but do not require a Certificate of Appropriateness; and WHEREAS, the interests of historic preservation will be better served by changing the committee name to align with its role; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN: The Certificate of Appropriateness Review Committee shall henceforth be named the Architectural Review Committee. ADOPTED: ______________, 2020 ATTEST: _____________________ Emily Reed, Chair
January 27, 2020 City of Austin Preservation Office Historic Landmark Commission c/o Cara Betron Dear Ms. Bertron, Best Regards, Tim Morgan My name is Tim Morgan. My address is 1211 W 9th St, where I have lived since 1999. The applicant, Kevin Sims, is my immediate neighbor to the west. I am very excited by the improvements that Kevin is proposing for 1215 W 9th St, which are long overdue. I, along with my family, am in full support of his plans. I sincerely hope you will approve his application for demolition, remodel, and new construction. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Bertron, Cara From: Sent: To: Subject: Richard Ryan Friday, January 24, 2020 1:23 PM Bertron, Cara C-2. 1215 W. 9th Street (West Line Historic District) Council District 9 *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Dear Members of the Historic Landmark Commission, I live at 1210 West 9th St almost directly across the street from the proposed rehabilitation of 1215 W. 9th Street and have followed the development of the plans for rehabilitation with great interest in addition to witnessing the deteriorated condition of the structure. Thursday I was able to view the updated plans at the OWANA Zoning Committee Meeting. I am in support of the project. Thank you, Richard Ryan, Architect Emeritus, owner of 1210 W 9th Street CAUTION:This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to CSIRT@austintexas.gov. 1
