BRODIE OAKS Development Assessment | Environmental Commission | February 17, 2021 PROJECT TEAM • Landowner • Barshop & Oles • Lionstone Investments • Planning & Design Team Lionheart – Planning, Urban Design, & Landscape Architecture • • • Armbrust & Brown – Legal LJA Engineering – Civil, Utilities, Drainage • BOE Consulting – Transportation • Nelson Nygard – Parking Management and Travel Demand • Overland - Architecture • DPZ & Co. – Urban Design • Speck & Associates – Urban Design and Transportation • Terracon – Geotechnical Engineering BRODIE OAKS PROPERTY • 37.6 acres • 3.5 Miles from Downtown • Major intersection of Loop 360, HWY 290, and S. Lamar Boulevard • High-Capacity Transit Route • Barton Creek Greenbelt Brodie Oaks ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT 1981 • 4 years prior to Hill Country Overlay • 11 years prior to SOS • 31 years prior to Imagine Austin Barton Creek Plaza Gus Fruh Park 84 acres Brodie Oaks Shopping Center Retreat at Barton Creek PROJECT GOALS Ecology Vitality Meet highest environmental standards. Create a walkable mixed-use activity center. Connectivity Connect the site to its surroundings. Character Express the South Austin character. Performance Position the project for the future. SYSTEMS ANALYSIS CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN • Comply with SOS Ordinance. • Create destination quality public space (parks and streets). • Develop at Transit-Supportive Densities. • Include a Mix of Uses. • Commit to 10% of Bonus Area as Affordable Housing. The content on these slides is conceptual in nature and is subject to change. The content on these slides is conceptual in nature and is subject to change. The content on these slides is conceptual in nature and is subject to change. The content on these slides is conceptual in nature and is subject to change. THE RESTORATION • Acres of parking lot and buildings converted to green space = 13.7 (36% Of the Site) • Trails and interpretive material provided to educate, engage and connect people with the environment. The content on these slides is conceptual in nature and is subject to change. THE RESTORATION Current Proposed The content on these slides is conceptual in nature and is subject to change. SOS ORDINANCE Impervious Cover = 54% (down from 84%) SOS Pond Size = Sized per SOS Criteria (currently no on-site storage; most flows to ponds at Retreat at Barton Creek) Reirrigation Area* = 10 Acres (currently no recharge) *Reirrigation within Barton Creek Greenbelt …
BRIEFING SUMMARY SHEET DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT CASE NUMBER: CD-2020-0002 – Brodie Oaks Redevelopment REQUEST: Presentation of a development assessment report for the Brodie Oaks Redevelopment, located at 4021, 4025, 4107, 4109, 4115 and 4141 S. Capital of Texas Hwy NB, and 4220, 4040, 4036, 4006, 4032, 4030, 3940, 4024, 4200 and 4236 S. Lamar BLVD SB, within the Barton Creek Watershed – Barton Springs Zone. DISTRICT AREA: 5 DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The applicant has submitted a development assessment for a proposed 37.6-acre mixed-use development to be known as the Brodie Oaks Redevelopment. It is located at the northwest intersection of S. Lamar Boulevard and S. Capital of Texas Highway, see Exhibit A: Zoning Map and Exhibit B: Aerial Map. The project site (site) is located within the boundaries of an Activity Center for Redevelopment in Sensitive Environmental Areas (Lamar & Ben White) and along the South Lamar Activity Corridor, as identified within the Imagine Austin’s Growth Concept Map. It is also located within the South Lamar Neighborhood Planning Area. This neighborhood area does not have an adopted neighborhood plan and therefore this project would not require a neighborhood plan amendment (NPA). The site is within the Barton Creek Watershed of the Colorado River Basin, which is classified as a Barton Springs Zone Watershed by Chapter 25-8 of the City’s Land Development Code (LDC). The majority of the property is located within the Recharge Zone, with the exception of the southeast corner which is in the Contributing Zone. This site does not have any floodplain located within it but does contain other potential environmental features. An updated Environmental Resource Inventory (ERI) report has been requested to be submitted with the PUD application to identify these areas and features. The applicant’s proposed PUD plans “for approximately 1,564 residential units, 1,150,678 square feet of office, 448 hotel rooms, 110 thousand square feet of retail, and 30,000 square feet of restaurant uses located along private streets with public access easements including an Internal Circulator Route meeting Great Streets standards with activated ground floor uses.” The Applicant is requesting a maximum building height of 275 feet along S. Lamar Boulevard and S. Capital of Texas Highway, transitioning down to 160 feet internal to the development and 28 feet within their open space and park areas, see Exhibit F: Land Use Plan and Notes and Exhibit G: Open Space and Parks Plan. The proposed project intends to cluster …
Brodie Oaks Redevelopment Code Modification Table THE ORIGINAL CODE HAS BEEN PROVIDED IN THE “PROPOSED PUD REGULATION” COLUMN IN BLACK, WITH MODIFIED OR REMOVED TEXT HIGHLIGHTED IN RED AND UNDERLINED. CODE SECTION General 25-1-21 – Definitions. (11) 25-1-21 – Definitions 25-1-21 – Definitions 25-1-21 – Definitions. (98) 25-1-21 – Definitions. (105) Zoning 25-2, Subchapter B, Article 2, Subpart C, Section 3.2.2. (C) (Residential Uses) 25-2, Subchapter B, Article 2, Subpart C, Section 3.2.3. (B) (Nonresidential Uses) PROPOSED PUD REGULATION JUSTIFICATION Modify: BLOCK means one or more lots, tracts, or parcels of land bounded by streets (public or private), 30’ wide or larger pedestrian paseo or courtyard with a minimum 5’ sidewalk or trail, public or private park space/open space, easement, or plaza space, railroads, or subdivision boundary lines. Modify: GROSS FLOOR AREA means the total enclosed area of all floors in a building with a clear height of more than six feet, measured to the outside surface of the exterior walls. The term includes loading docks and excludes atria airspace, parking facilities, parking structures, driveways, and enclosed loading berths and off-street maneuvering areas. Addition: OPEN SPACE (OS) means the areas identified as Parks and Open Space on Exhibit C: Brodie Oaks Redevelopment Land Use Plan. Modify: ROADWAY means the portion of a street right-of-way, alley, and/or private streets with public access easements used for vehicular travel. Modify: SITE means a contiguous area intended for development, or the area on which a building has been proposed to be built or has been built. A site may not cross a public street or right-of-way. A site within the Brodie Oaks Redevelopment boundary may cross a public or private street with public access easements. Remove: (C) for multifamily development, the maximum floor to area ratio; Remove: (B) the maximum floor area ratio, which may not be greater than the maximum floor to area ratio permitted in the most restrictive base zoning district in which proposed use is permitted; Creative use of open space, parks, plazas, and paseos will be used throughout the development to achieve maximum walkability, connectivity, and value for the development. Vehicular facilities were never anticipated to be included in gross floor areas. It is desirable to clarify that parking structures are excluded from gross floor area as originally intended. Designated Parks and Open Space are intended as a buffer providing enhanced accessibility and vistas into the Barton Creek Greenbelt. We …
7 0 9 695 696 697 698 700 701 7 0 2 7 0 3 7 0 4 7 0 5 7 0 7 710 1 1 7 L O O P 3 6 0 BARTON CREEK GREENBELT 714 713 711 7 1 2 7 1 3 706 707 708 709 705 706 707 708 709 7 1 1 7 0 9 710 7 0 8 7 0 9 7 0 7 710 711 7 1 1 7 1 0 709 708 710 7 0 9 705 708 706 707 704 703 697 699 700 698 696 702 701 6 9 5 4 9 6 6 9 6 7 9 6 6 9 9 6 9 8 6 9 5 6 9 4 6 9 3 6 9 3 6 9 2 693 700 6 9 2 8 0 7 707 709 706 7 0 5 7 0 9 0 1 7 1 1 7 0 1 7 9 0 7 7 0 8 702 701 703 7 0 4 6 9 8 9 9 6 0 0 7 O U S S T O P 708 707 7 0 6 7 0 3 5 0 7 7 0 4 706 707 705 E T R A PIT A L M R A PID B C E T R O 5 0 7 711 710 709 711 709 710 7 0 8 708 707 706 708 705 701 700 R B A 6 9 5 M A S . L D R M A V E L 7 3 0 0 7 2 7 1 0 0 0 7 U O 4’-8’ Fill 4’-8’ Cut 8’-12’ Cut 12’-16’ Cut 16’-Over Cut Private Streets with Public Access Easements 0 200 400 800 EXHIBIT G: BRODIE OAKS REDEVELOPMENT GRADING PLAN SUBMITTAL DATE: DECEMBER 08, 2020 PUD CASE #: CD-2020-0002-BRODIE OAKS REDEVELOPMENT L O O P 3 6 0 Phase 1 - A portion of Phase I will be temporary restoration of the site for the purposes of reirrigation and revegetation. Future Phases - Future phases will be delivered in response to market conditions. A tracking chart will be provided for all phases of development that accounts for Impervious Cover, Building Coverage, Floor-To-Area, Parkland Credit, and Affordable Housing. BARTON CREEK GREENBELT O U S S T O P E T R A PIT A L M R A PID B C E T …
Dougherty Arts Center Replacement Project Preliminary Design Phase Update Boards and Commissions February 2021 Site Map & Context 2 Previous City Council Direction • Butler Shores location approved on 5/9/19 • Council direction to consider site alternatives: on site 1. New DAC & existing PARD Main Office remain 2. New DAC & New PARD Main Office rebuilt on site (unfunded) 3. New DAC on site, existing PARD is removed/relocated elsewhere (unfunded) • Consolidated Arts District Parking (underground, partially unfunded) • Seek alternative financing mechanisms & interest in philanthropy Conceptual development scenario from 2018/2019 planning process 3 Existing PARD Main Office • Constructed 1959, 2-story addition in 1976 • First permanent home for COA Parks Department • High degree of historic integrity • Architect: R. Earl Dillard • Defining features: wide eaves, flat roof, curtain • Eligible for listing on National Register of Historic windows Places Image credits: Austin History Center 4 Recent Stakeholder Engagement • Two Open House Community Meetings • Meeting #1: Oct. 28, 2020 • Meeting #2: Jan. 26, 2021 • (10) Small Group Meetings • Dougherty Arts Center Staff: 11/10/2020 • Painting, Photography, and Drawing Artists and Instructors: 11/19/2020 • Youth Program Instructors and Parents: 12/1/2020 • Gallery Artists: 12/2/2020 • Artist Professional Development Programs: 12/3/2020 • Theater Organizations and Technical Staff: 12/7/2020 • Friends of the Dougherty Arts Center: 12/9/2020 • Ceramics Studio Artists and Instructors: 12/10/2020 • Neighbors to the Dougherty Arts Center: 12/15/2020 • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Arts: 1/7/2021 • Electronic Survey • 221 Participants & 894 Responses • Ongoing Partner Coordination • ZACH Scott Theater • The Trail Foundation • Austin Transportation Dept. 5 Project Mission Statement 6 Site Constraints Map 7 Four Options Key operational criteria and site considerations • Preservation of heritage trees • Relationship to adjacent ZACH • Underground parking solution • Pick-up & drop-off for youth programs • Load-in areas for theater programs • Balancing traffic impact between Toomey Rd. & Riverside Dr. • Preservation of PARD Main Office (1959) • Allowance for possible expansion • Activates parkland & enhance trail access • Civic presence/identity • Back of house areas for kiln yard, etc. 8 • Compact building footprint tucked closely behind PARD Main & ZACH School • One heritage oak impacted • Proposed parking garage sits between ZACH and new DAC, within ZACH lease boundary • PARD Main is retained and renovated/expanded (future scope, unfunded) …
MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of the Environmental Commission FROM: Andrei Lubomudrov, Housing and Planning Department DATE: February 26, 2021 RE: SH 130 Municipal Management District Petition for consent to issue bonds and assess taxes This is to inform the Commission of a petition from the SH130 Municipal Management District No. 1(the District) for the City’s consent to the District issuing bonds and assessing Sales and Use Taxes and Hotel Occupancy Taxes. The City received this petition in late December, and staff is preparing to bring a consent agreement to Council on March 25, 2021. Background Regarding District Authority Special legislation approved during the 2019 Legislative Session (HB 4694 by Cole) created the District. The District currently includes three non-contiguous tracts of land totaling approximately 1,138 acres. Two of the tracts are east of SH 130 and one is just west of SH 130. All three tracts are in Austin’s extraterritorial jurisdiction, though the westernmost track is adjacent to full purpose city limits. The special legislation gives the District several powers, including the ability to: • Annex territory that is not contiguous (adjacent) to the District • Impose property tax assessments to issue bonds for infrastructure and amenities • Collect Hotel Occupancy Taxes and Sales and Use Taxes within the District’s geography • Enter into economic development agreements under Local Government Code Chapter 380 and other provisions • Contract with municipalities and other entities for the provision of services, and 1 • Participate in other special taxing districts, such as tax increment reinvestment zones and tax abatement reinvestment zones. The special legislation appointed interim members to the District’s Board, and the Board has already called a Sales and Use Tax election, which voters approved on November 3. Once City Council provides consent as required in the bill, the District can secure financing for improvements and infrastructure. In addition, the applicants have represented that they have been in contact with other landholders who are interested in becoming part of the District. As such, a critical consideration is how future annexations and additions to the District should be handled. Background Regarding Scope of City Consent The legislation only requires the District to obtain the City’s consent prior to issuing bonds and assessing sales and use taxes and hotel occupancy taxes. The legislation provides the District cannot exercise its ability to issue bonds until “each municipality whose corporate limits or extraterritorial jurisdiction the …
SH 130 Municipal Management District – City Consent to Issue Bonds and Assess Taxes Environmental Commission March 3, 2021 Overview Municipal Management Districts Type of special district formed usually by special legislation Wide potential range of powers defined within the special legislation Independent from local governments but may contract with cities to develop land and provide public services Consider a petition for City consent from the SH 130 Municipal Management District to: Issue bonds for infrastructure development Assess taxes, including local sales and use taxes and hotel occupancy taxes The Environmental Commission is asked to make a recommendation on the request for City consent the District's request 2 Subject Tract Initial land designated by the legislature includes 1,138 acres Initial large acreage located generally east of SH 130 with two smaller portions along SH 130 Existing District entirely in extraterritorial jurisdiction Gilliland Creek Watershed District may annex land anywhere in Austin planning jurisdiction (and beyond) 3 6 Consent sought for financing of general development activities, such as infrastructure No information available on specific development types or Applicant’s Proposal proposed land uses legislation City provided no oversight over development in special District may annex area that is not‐contiguous (non‐ adjacent) to the District 5 Staff and Commission Recommendation Staff finalizing details of consent agreement Staff recommends that any consent agreement require that development in the District within the City's full purpose or extraterritorial jurisdictions will be governed by current City of Austin Land Development Code at the time of site development permit application The Environmental Commission is asked to make a recommendation on a consent agreement that includes the provision above 6
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MOTION 20210303 003c Date: March 3, 2021 Subject: Dougherty Arts Center Replacement Project Motion by: Kevin Ramberg Seconded by: Andrew Creel RATIONALE: WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the Parks and Recreation Department (PARD) has completed an extensive alternatives analysis and public outreach campaign for the proposed Dougherty Art Center relocation; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes that PARD has selected Option 1B as the preferred scenario for several reasons, including the preservation of heritage trees. THEREFORE, the Environmental Commission does not support the preferred alternative presented for Option 1B because the footprint of the layout of the site is too spread out and does not cluster consistent with the Commission’s understanding of what was presented to Council in the beginning. The Environmental Commission would like to note their support for Option 1A with the following additional understanding, exploration, and conditions: • The Environmental Commission supports Option 1A for several reasons, including the clustering of the footprints of buildings farther away from the lake and trail. Include the condition that any heritage trees that are removed will be relocated onsite. • • The Environmental Commission recommends clustering buildings away from the trail and a larger buffer from the trail and the park along the lake. The Environmental Commission recommends that the alternatives analysis team coordinate with PARD for their future use of the main building and anticipated future use of that. • Under scenario 1A, the Environmental Commission recommends that the restoration or rehabilitation of the Parks main building be done in the historical context with the eligibility of the building. • The Environmental Commission also asks the design team to review stormwater controls related to the siting of the buildings and stormwater. • The Environmental Commission recommends the design team reach out and coordinate with the neighborhood, commercial, and residential users as it relates to parking along Toomey Road. 1 For: Creel, Thompson, Barrett Bixler, Ramberg, Guerrero, Gordon, and Bedford Against: None Abstain: None Recuse: None Absent: Coyne, Maceo VOTE 7-0 Approved By: Linda Guerrero, Environmental Commission Chair 2
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MOTION 20210303 003d Subject: Consider a petition from the SH 130 Municipal Management District, created by the legislature in 2019, for the City of Austin’s consent to issue bonds and assess various taxes on any area that is within the District or that the District may annex in the future. Motion by: Kevin Ramberg Seconded by: Pam Thompson Date: March 3, 2021 RATIONALE: WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes that the 86th Legislature in 2019 approved HB 4694, creating the SH 130 Municipal Management District; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes that special legislation creating the District requires the City’s consent prior to the issuance of bonds or assessment of taxes, such as a sales and use tax or a hotel occupancy tax; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes that a consent agreement may include specific requirements for current code provision that are protective of water quality and minimize pollution and other negative impacts on watersheds. THEREFORE, the Environmental Commission recommends consent to the SH 130 petition provided that this consent includes a requirement that all District development meet current code at the time of site development permit application and that the consent agreement contain a condition that future annexations must return to the City for consent. VOTE 6-0 Approved By: For: Thompson, Ramberg, Barrett Bixler, Guerrero, Gordon, and Bedford Against: None Abstain: None Recuse: None Absent: Creel, Coyne, and Maceo Linda Guerrero, Environmental Commission Chair
COMMISSION FOR WOMEN RECOMMENDATION 20210303-02b Date: March 3, 2021 Subject: Appointment of APD Chief Motioned By: Rebecca Austen Seconded By: Tanya Athar-Jogee Recommendation to Council WHEREAS, the Commission for Women (“Commission”) of the City of Austin (“City”) serves as an advisory body that advocates for and inspires the City Council (“Council”) and City Manager to prioritize women’s quality of life, so that Austin becomes the most equitable city in the nation for women and girls; and WHEREAS, on February 14, 2018, the Commission passed Recommendation 20200417-03C: Recommendation for Chief of Police Candidate Requirement, which recommended that community engagement be a critical function of the vetting of City of Austin police chief candidates relative to addressing women-specific issues, with supporting rationale; and WHEREAS, policing in Austin has come under increased scrutiny with regard to the handling of sexual assault cases, racial bias, militarized training methods and policing tactics; and WHEREAS, women and people of color are significantly under-represented in the Austin Police Department, particular in sworn officer and leadership positions; and WHEREAS, a redesign of public safety is in progress, and its success is dependent on transformational leadership at all levels of the Austin Police Department; and WHEREAS, a nationwide search to appoint a new Chief of Police is under way, with the retirement of the current Chief in March 2021 and appointment of an interim Chief; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Commission recommends that for the interim Chief, new Chief, Assistant Chiefs and other leadership roles, • Community engagement be a critical function of the vetting of candidates. • Community engagement occur early and throughout the vetting and selection process, not just with finalist candidates. 1 • Candidates be assessed and selected based on their experience and outcomes with gender and race equity, including: o Equity, diversity and inclusion in recruitment, training, advancement, and appointment of leadership roles within the department, o Handling of issues related to sexual assault, domestic violence and human trafficking, o Prioritization of authority and resources associated with Victim Services. Date of Approval: March 3, 2021 Record of the vote: Unanimous on a 7-0 vote, with two commissioners absent, and one district vacant. Attest: April E. Shaw April Shaw, Staff Liaison 2
COMMISSION FOR WOMEN RECOMMENDATION 20210303-03a Date: March 3, 2021 Subject: Support for City of Austin Legislative Agenda Motioned By: Rebecca Austen Seconded By: Flannery Bope Recommendation to Council WHEREAS, the City of Austin’s greatest asset is its people who are passionate about their city, committed to its improvement, and determined to see its vision become a reality; and WHEREAS, the percent of registered voters who voted in the past 4 years of city elections exceeded 60 percent; and WHEREAS, an overwhelming majority of registered voters who live in Austin voted for the current Austin City Council representation; and WHEREAS, over 700 Austinites participate and serve on over 60 Boards and Commissions to help shape, and continually improve upon the policies of the City and the lives of its Residents; and WHEREAS, the input provided to the Austin City Council through the City’s Boards and Commissions reflects the will of the community; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Austin that the legislative agenda guide City staff, in coordination with the City’s strategic partners, in their efforts to advocate on behalf of the City of Austin and its residents; and WHEREAS, each year, the Texas Legislature increasingly attempts to pass legislation that negatively impacts the City through preemption or limiting the ability to advocate; and WHEREAS, the 2019 Legislature strongly considered and almost passed S.B. 29 which would have limited the ability of the City to utilize community advocates to effectively advocate on behalf of the policies created and supported by its residents; and WHEREAS, taxpayers and City residents benefit from and need community advocates as a tool that amplifies their voices before the Legislature, Congress, and regulatory bodies; and WHEREAS, a prohibition on community advocacy equates to censorship of Residents’ voices 1 and is detrimental to a representative democracy where all Austinites and Texans have equal opportunities to voice their opinions. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE COMMISSION FOR WOMEN OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN HEREBY ADOPTS THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION THAT: • The Commission for Women endorses the City of Austin’s 2020 Legislative Agenda adopted by the Austin City Council on September 17th, 2020. • The Commission for Women believes the general principals of the policy and position statements contained in the City of Austin’s state legislative agenda capture the positions of its membership and the community it represents. • The Commission for Women urges all …
2. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, March 3, 2021 The Environmental Commission convened in a public meeting on Wednesday, March 3, 2021 with Social Distancing Modifications via remote video conferencing. Commissioners in Attendance: Andrew Creel Pam Thompson Kevin Ramberg Linda Guerrero Perry Bedford Wendy Gordon Audrey Barrett Bixler Commissioners Absent: Katie Coyne Peggy Maceo Staff in Attendance: Kate Clark Kaela Champlin Chris Herrington Kevin Johnson Liz Johnston Keith Mars Andrei Lubomudrov Atha Phillips CALL TO ORDER Chair Guerrero called the meeting to order at 6:07 P.M. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND ACTION a. Approval of the February 3, 2021 Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes A motion to approve the Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes of February 3, 2021 was approved on Commissioner Gordon’s motion, Commissioner Ramberg’s second on a 7-0 vote. Commissioners Coyne and Maceo were absent. ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER UPDATES a. Announcement of new Deputy Environmental Officer—Chris Herrington, Environmental Officer, Watershed Protection Department Item conducted as posted. No action taken. 1 3. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION a. Recognize Peggy Maceo for over five years of service on the Environmental Commission Speakers Bobby Levinski Item conducted as posted. No action taken. b. Presentation of Development Assessment Report for the Brodie Oaks Planned Unit Development, located at 4021 S Capital of Texas Highway, CD-2020-0002 (District 5). Applicant: Rebecca Leonard, Lionheart Places. Staff: Kate Clark, Housing and Planning Department and Atha Phillips, Environmental Program Coordinator, Watershed Protection Department Speakers Bobby Levinski Item conducted as posted. No action taken. c. Discussion and possible action regarding a recommendation to City Council on the preferred design scenario for the Dougherty Arts Center Replacement Project—Kevin Johnson, Acting Project Management Supervisor, Parks and Recreation Department Speakers Bobby Levinski A motion to recommend against Option 1B and support Option 1A with conditions was approved on Commissioner Ramberg’s vote, Commissioner Creel’s second on a 7-0 vote. Commissioners Coyne and Maceo were absent. d. Consider a petition from the SH 130 Municipal Management District, created by the legislature in 2019, for the City of Austin’s consent to issue bonds and assess various taxes on any area that is within the District or that the District may annex in the future— Andrei Lubomudrov, Senior Planner, Housing and Planning Department A motion to recommend consent to the SH 130 petition provided that this consent includes a requirement that all District development meet current code at the time of site development permit application and …
COMMISSION FOR WOMEN MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, March 3, 2021 REGULER MEETING Wednesday, March 3, 2021 COMMISSION FOR WOMEN MINUTES The Commission for Women convened for a regular meeting on Wednesday, March 3, 2021 via videoconference. Chair Austen called the Commission Meeting to order at 9:06 a.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Rebecca Austen, Chair Flannery Bope, Vice Chair Tanya Athar-Jogee Amanda Lewis Neva Fernandez Diana Melendez Sarah Tober Commissioners Absent: Julia Cuba Lewis Juliana Gonzales Vacant: District 2 Staff in Attendance: April Shaw, Human Resources Department 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. Consider approval of the minutes from the Commission for Women regular meeting on February 3, 2021. The minutes from the regular meeting on February 3, 2021 were approved on Chair Austen’s motion, Commissioner Fernandez’ second on a vote of 6-0, with Commissioner Lewis off the dais, and Commissioners Cuba Lewis and Gonzales absent. COMMISSION FOR WOMEN MEETING MINUTES 2. OLD BUSINESS Wednesday, March 3, 2021 a. Discussion and possible action regarding updated from the following working groups: i. Homelessness Discussion was held. No action was taken. Discussion was held. No action was taken. ii. Safety iii. Health Discussion was held. No action was taken. iv. Recognition of Equity for Women and Girls Discussion was held. No action was taken. b. Discussion and possible action regarding updates from the Joint Inclusion Committee. The motion to make a recommendation to the City Council regarding appointment of the APD Chief was made on Chair Austen’s motion, Commissioner Athar-Jogee’s second on a vote of 7-0, with Commissioners Cuba Lewis and Gonzales absent. c. Discussion and possible action regarding the recommendation for the City of Austin d. Discussion and possible action regarding Commission for Women Working Groups. FY2021 budget. Discussion was held. No action was taken. Discussion was held. No action was taken. 3. NEW BUSINESS a. Discussion and possible action regarding a recommendation to the City Council endorsing the City of Austin’s 2020 legislative agenda. The motion to make a recommendation to the City Council in support of the City of Austin’s 2020 legislative agenda was made on Chair Austen’s motion, Vice-Chair Bope’s Wednesday, March 3, 2021 COMMISSION FOR WOMEN MEETING MINUTES 4. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS second on a vote of 6-0, with Commissioner Lewis off the dais, and Commissioners Cuba Lewis and Gonzales absent. The Commission requested a future agenda item from EMS regarding the community health program for people experiencing homelessness. The Commission …
EMMA S. BARRIENTOS MEXICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, March 3, 2021 ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES The Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Advisory Board convened via video conferencing. Board Members in Attendance: David Goujon, Chair Olga Campos-Benz, Member Gerardo Gandy, Member Ricardo Maga Rojas, Member Claudia Massey, Member Endi Silva, Member Diana Gomez, Member Board Member Absent: Art Navarro, Vice Chair Tomas Salas, Member Wayne Lopes, Member Staff in Attendance: Lucas Massie, PARD Division Manager Laura Esparza, PARD Division Manager Michelle Rojas, ESB-MACC Manager Olivia Tamzarian, ESB-MACC Supervisor CALL TO ORDER: Chair Goujon called the Board Meeting to order at 6:10 pm. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION Michael Abelson, previous President of the Town Lake and Rainy Neighborhood Associations spoke with regards to his concerns on the numerous Rainey Street developments and potential encroachment by the Transpiration department through the MACC and potentially create safety issues. He mention working with Councilmember Tovo and his wish to work with the MACC board on their common interest. Brian Furlong the president of the Rainy Neighborhood Association, spoke with regards to the many developments that are up for approval with the City. He mentioned that the City Council is considering an upgrade of the allowable density in the Rainey District to such a high level that it threatens to overwhelm the capacity of the neighborhood’s roads and infrastructure systems. This could over time lead to debilitating levels of local traffic that impedes easy access to the MACC. Chair Goujon stated the ESB MACC mission statement. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (AGENDA ITEM 1) 1 Member Campos-Benz motioned to approve the January 7 and February 3, 2021 Advisory Board Meeting minutes. Member Massey Seconded. Vote Passed. (7.0) CHAIR REPORT (AGENDA ITEM 2) Chair Goujon presented the chair report. He encouraged Board members to be engaged in dialogue, listen, and advocate for the community. PUBLIC INPUT Gabriela Bermea representing the Latinos in Architecture and the American Institute of Architects (AIA) Austin expressed support for the Master Plan and the Phase 2 design team’s efforts and stated the Latinos in Architecture and AIA may be able to provide support in the process for lectures, community outreach, etc. Marina Islas, former employee of the ESB MACC and current employee of Austin History Center Latinx Community Archivist, expressed concerns and issues with the Phase 2 Community Engagement she attended. She also expressed the concerns with Spanish language interpretation provided and communications. Senator …
EMMA S. BARRIENTOS MACC P2 PROGRAMMING PRESENTATION Miro Rivera Architects and Tatiana Bilbao ESTUDIO Community Engagement Design Team The Design Team - Joint Venture In 2020 a joint venture between Miró Rivera Architects and Tatiana Bilbao Estudio was comissioned to work on the Phase 2 design of the Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center (ESB-MACC). Community Engagement The Design Team - Joint Venture Community Engagement The Design Team - Joint Venture EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Design Team Community Engagement The Design Team - Joint Venture Austin 360 Amphitheatre, Texas Chinmaya Mission Austin, Texas Botanical Garden, Culiacán, Mexico Miró Rivera Architects, Austin, United States Three basic principles guide the practice of Miró Rivera Architects and must be ad- Three basic principles guide the practice of Miró Rivera Architects and must be dressed in every project. The Architect acts as a listener, a builder, and a visionary in addressed in every project. The Architect acts as a listener, a builder, and a vision- order to transcend a mere building into true architecture. MRA has emerged as one of the architecture voices in the United States, creating a body of work that exemplifies ary in order to transcend a mere building into true architecture. MRA has emerged design excellence. Their work has been recognized nationally and internationally with as one of the architecture voices in the United States, creating a body of work that over 80 design awards. Partners Juan Miró and Miguel Rivera were elevated to the AIA College of Fellows in recognition to their contributions to the profession and society. In exemplifies design excellence. Their work has been recognized nationally and 2016, MRA won the Architecture Firm Award from the Texas Society of Architects. Juan is also an Associate Dean and Professor at the University Of Texas School Of Architec- internationally with over 80 design awards. Partners Juan Miró and Miguel Rivera ture. Juan has taught and researched Mexican Architecture, art, history which includes were elevated to the AIA College of Fellows in recognition to their contributions to the work of late MACC architect, Teodoro González de León. the profession and society. In 2016, MRA won the Architecture Firm Award from the Texas Society of Architects. Juan is also an Associate Dean and Professor at the University Of Texas School Of Architecture. Juan has taught and researched Juan Miró and Miguel Rivera, principals Mexican Architecture, art, history which includes the work of …
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Mexican American Cultural Center Advisory Board Recommendation Number: (20210303-05A) Phase 2 Building Program WHEREAS, the citizens of Austin have approved 27 million dollars in bond funding for the Phase 2 construction of the ESB-MACC. WHEREAS, the City of Austin has started the Phase 2 development process and the citizens of Austin deserve the best possible outcome with the highest quality work. BE IT RESOLVED that the ESB-MACC Advisory Board supports the Phase 2 building program as presented by the joint venture of Miro Rivera Architects and Tatiana Bilbao Studio. The board also recommends that the project team create a comprehensive community engagement plan to create meaningful avenues for engagement throughout the design phase from start to finish. Date of Approval: March 3, 2021 Record of the vote: Unanimous on a 7.0 vote, Members Navarro, Salas, and Lopes were off the dais. Attest: __________________________ Michelle Rojas, Staff Liaison
