ITEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSION MEETING DATE: NAME & NUMBER OF PROJECT: NAME OF APPLICANT OR ORGANIZATION: LOCATION: COUNCIL DISTRICT: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STAFF: WATERSHED: REQUEST: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: STAFF CONDITION: March 2, 2022 Case No. C814-97-0002.01; Mary Vice Estates PUD Lot 27 Amendment Husch Blackwell LLP (Stacey L Milazzo) Montopolis Dr. and Felix Ave. 3 Leslie Lilly, Environmental Program Coordinator Leslie.lilly@austintexas.gov Carson Creek/ Suburban Watershed To amend a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Staff recommended with conditions 1. This application completes the project established by the PUD such that any further development or redevelopment is subject to current code at the time of site development permit application. 2. This project shall comply with current code, except for the following exceptions: a. 70% impervious cover on a net site area calculation shall be allowed rather than the 65% currently allowed for multi-family use. Mary Vice Estates Montopolis Dr. and Felix Ave C814-97-0002.01 (PUD Amendment) Leslie Lilly Environmental Program Coordinator Watershed Protection Planned Unit Development Amendment • A Planned Unit Development (PUD) is a type of site development and regulatory process established by city ordinance for a tract of land. • The Mary Vice Estates PUD was approved by council in 1997, designating land use types to each lot based on a previously approved Land Use Plan. • Land use designations come with specific restrictions for impervious cover, building square footage, etc. • The applicant is requesting a PUD Amendment to revise the allowed use designated for a lot within the Mary Vice Estates tract from commercial to multi family. Site Conditions • Located in Full Purpose Jurisdiction • No creeks, CWQZ, CEFs, or Floodplain within or adjacent to site • In Carson Creek Watershed Land Use Change • The lot within the Mary Vice Estates PUD is being proposed to change from commercial use to multi family use. • The proposed development includes 12 affordable housing units. • Request is consistent with goals and objectives of • Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan • Montopolis Neighborhood Plan Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the PUD Amendment with the following condition 1. This project shall comply with current code, except for the following exceptions. • 70% impervious cover on a net site area calculation shall be allowed rather than the 65% currently allowed for multi-family use within Suburban Watersheds. The current PUD ordinance allows for 80% impervious cover under the commercial use. Questions? Contact Information: Leslie …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C814-97-0002.01 (Mary Vice Estates PUD Lot 27 Amendment #1) DISTRICT: 3 ZONING FROM: PUD TO: PUD* *Nature of Amendment: The applicant is proposing an amendment to Lot 27 of the Mary Vice Estates PUD to increase the maximum building square footage, to reduce building setbacks and to allow for townhouse, condo and duplex uses within the existing Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning. In addition, the applicant is requesting Code modifications to the allowable watershed impervious cover limit for multifamily use (please see the Applicant’s Amended Request Letter and Redlined Land Use Plan – Exhibit C and Exhibit D). CASE MANAGER: Sherri Sirwaitis (512-974-3057, sherri.sirwaitis@austintexas.gov) ADDRESS: 6301 Circulo de Amistad SITE AREA: 0.61 acres APPLICANT: Austin Habitat for Humanity, Inc. (Andy Alarcon) AGENT: Husch Blackwell LLP (Stacey L Milazzo) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the 1st amendment to the Mary Vice Estates PUD. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: March 2, 2022 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: March 8, 2022 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ORDINANCE NUMBER: C14-97-0002.01 ISSUES: N/A CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: 2 The property in question is a 0.61 acre lot (Lot 27) that is part of an approved Planned Unit Development, the Mary Vice Estates PUD, located at the southeast corner of Montopolis Drive and Circulo de Amistad. The rezoning area is approximately halfway between East Riverside Drive to the south and US Highway 183 to the north. The lots to the north and east are part of the PUD and are developed with single-family residences. The tract of land to the south is zoned LO-MU-CO-NP and is vacant. There are remnants of a parking area and detention pond for an approved Religious Assembly use that was never constructed on the site. The lots to the west, across Montopolis Drive, contain single family residences. The applicant in this case, Austin Habitat for Humanity, Inc., is asking for an amendment to the PUD to develop approximately 6 duplex residences/12 townhome dwelling units at this location. The proposed townhouses would be 100% affordable at 80% of AMFI or below (please see SMART Housing Certification Letter – Exhibit E). In this rezoning request, the applicant is specifically asking to amend Ordinance No. 971120- L and the accompanying PUD land use plan for Area 1 to increase the allowable maximum building square footage from 6,000 square feet to 30,000 square feet, to reduce the building setbacks from 25 feet to 15 …
ITEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSION MEETING DATE: March 2, 2022 NAME & NUMBER OF PROJECT: Water Oak Apartments SP-2019-0109C NAME OF APPLICANT OR ORGANIZATION: Gemsong Ryan Jones | Carter LOCATION: 12151 S I-35 Frontage Rd, Austin, TX 78747 COUNCIL DISTRICT: District #5 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STAFF: Pamela Abee-Taulli, Environmental Program Coordinator Development taulli@austintexas.gov 512.974.1879 Department, Services pamela.abee- WATERSHED: Onion Creek Watershed, Suburban Classification, Desired Development Zone REQUEST: Variance request is as follows: Request to vary from LDC 25-8-342 to allow fill to 25 feet to construct a driveway. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff does not recommend this variance, having determined that the findings of fact have not been met. STAFF CONDITION: None. Development Services Department Staff Recommendations Concerning Required Findings Project Name: Ordinance Standard: Watershed Protection Ordinance Variance Request: Water Oak Apartments Request to vary from LDC 25-8-342 to allow fill to 25 feet to construct a driveway. Include an explanation with each applicable finding of fact. A. Land Use Commission variance determinations from Chapter 25-8-41 of the City Code: 1. The requirement will deprive the applicant of a privilege available to owners of similarly situated property with approximately contemporaneous development subject to similar code requirements. Yes The Land Development Code provides the ability for public roadways to exceed 4 feet of cut and fill within the existing right of way. Originally, the concept for this roadway was to build the road to public standard and then dedicate the roadway as public. Therefore, the grading meets the requirements for a public roadway. However, due to the design of the retaining walls required to contain the fill, the Public Works Department is unable to accept the roadway as a public ROW. Private roadways are not allowed to exceed 4 feet of cut and fill. This is why the variance is required. 2. The variance: a) Is not necessitated by the scale, layout, construction method, or other design decision made by the applicant, unless the design decision provides greater overall environmental protection than is achievable without the variance; No The variance is necessitated by the construction method chosen by the applicant. The depth and quantity of fill is due to the applicant’s decision to fill rather than span the more than twenty (20) feet of grade change of the swale. b) Is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable use of the property; No The property is a …
EMMA S. BARRIENTOS MEXICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, MARCH 2, 2022 6:00 PM City Hall – Boards and Commissions Room 301 W. Second St. Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center Advisory Board may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. To speak in person, registration is required at least 10 min prior to the start of the meeting. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register call or email the board liaison at 512-974-3771 or michelle.rojas@austintexas.gov BOARD MEMBERS David Goujon, Chair Arthur Navarro, Vice Chair Gerardo Gandy, Member Ricardo Maga Rojas, Member Endi Silva, Member Wayne Lopes, Member Tomas Salas, Member AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed (3) three minutes to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. January 26, 2022 b. February 2, 2022 2. CHAIR REPORT a. The Chair will brief the board and encourage board dialogue on agenda items. 3. STAFF BRIEFINGS a. Staff Report on ESB-MACC program highlights. a. Discussion and possible action on budget recommendations for FY23. b. Discussion and possible action on Phase 2 shell space funding. (Goujon, c. Discussion and possible action on MACC art relocation and planning for Phase d. Discussion and possible action on Parkland Dedication funding for Phase 2. 4. NEW BUSINESS Navarro) 2. (Goujon, Navarro) (Goujon, Navarro) 5. OLD BUSINESS a. Discussion and possible action on Phase 2 Schematic Design (Goujon, Navarro) b. Reports on all working groups. (Goujon, Navarro) 1. Arts - Joint Cultural Committee liaison report 2. Transportation 3. Phase 2 Project 4. Budget 6. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 7. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Michelle Rojas at the Parks and Recreation Department, at 512-974-3771, for …
Pamela Abee‐Taulli Environmental Program Coordinator Development Services Department This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the- ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. This product has been produced by the Watershed Protection Department for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 0 5 10 Miles[ Site Location Austin ETJ Austin City Limits Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone March 2, 2022 2 Site Location [ March 2, 2022 3 • Onion Creek Watershed • Suburban Classification • Desired Development Zone • Full Purpose Jurisdiction • Not located over Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone • No Critical Environmental Features • Council District 5 March 2, 2022 4 • This variance is requested for a roadway that is already under construction. • The applicant is in the process of building the roadway as part of a site plan that was approved and released in June of 2020. VARIANCE REQUEST The project. March 2, 2022 5 • Originally, the roadway was to be built to public standards and then dedicated as a public Right‐of‐Way (ROW). • Due to the design – which uses 25 feet of fill held by retaining walls – the Public Works Department is unable to accept the roadway as a public ROW to be maintained by the City. VARIANCE REQUEST The situation. March 2, 2022 6 • The Land Development Code provides the ability for public roadways to exceed 4 feet of cut and fill within a ROW. • The grading approved for the roadway as a public ROW meets the requirements of Code. VARIANCE REQUEST The situation. March 2, 2022 7 • However, private roadways are not allowed to exceed 4 feet of cut and fill. • As a private roadway, a variance is required. • Variance request is to vary from LDC 25‐8‐342 to allow fill to 25 feet to construct a driveway. VARIANCE REQUEST The variance. March 2, 2022 8 Roadway is partially completed. Arrow shows area of 25’ fill. [ March 2, 2022 9 March 2, 2022 10 [ March 2, 2022 11 • Staff does not support the variance. We do not feel it meets the findings of • 25‐8‐41(2)(a) and • 25‐8‐41(2)(b). March 2, …
COMMISSION FOR WOMEN MINUTES The Commission for Women convened for a hybrid regular meeting on Wednesday, February 2, 2022 with Chair Austen at Austin City Hall, 301 West Second Street, Austin, Texas 78701 in Room 1101 and the remaining members participating by videoconference. REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, February 2, 2022 Chair Austen called the Commission Meeting to order at 12:04 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Rebecca Austen, Chair Flannery Bope, Vice Chair Vanessa Bissereth Priscilla Cortez Neva Fernandez Juliana Gonzales Diana Melendez Pam Rattan Josie Serrata Staff in Attendance: Jonathan Babiak, Office of Civil Rights CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. Consider approval of the minutes from the Commission for Women regular meeting on July 7, 2021. The minutes from the regular meeting on November 3, 2021 were approved on Chair Austen’s motion, Commissioner Rattan’s second on a vote of 9-0. a. Discussion and possible action regarding updated from the following working 2. OLD BUSINESS groups: i. Homelessness ii. Safety Discussion was held. No action was taken. Discussion was held. No action was taken. COMMISSION FOR WOMEN MEETING MINUTES iii. Health Discussion was held. No action was taken. iv. Recognition of Equity for Women and Girls Discussion was held. No action was taken. Wednesday, February 2, 2022 b. Discussion and possible action regarding updates from the Joint Inclusion Discussion was held. No action was taken. c. Discussion and possible action regarding 2021 Commission for Women Working Committee. Groups. Discussion was held. The following working group membership was adopted on Chair Austen’s motion, Commissioner Rattan’s second on a vote of 9-0: Homelessness: Rebecca Austen, Vanessa Bissereth, Flannery Bope, and Pam Rattan Safety: Neva Fernandez, Juliana Gonzales, Josie Serrata, and Amanda Lewis* Health: Flannery Bope, Juliana Gonzales, Diana Melendez, and Josie Serrata Recognition of Equity for Women and Girls: Vanessa Bissereth, Priscilla Cortez, and Diana Melendez d. Discussion and possible action regarding the recommendation for the City of Austin * Community participant FY2022 budget. Discussion was held. No action was taken. 3. NEW BUSINESS a. Presentation by Melissa Taylor, Vice Chair, City of Austin Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Quality of Life Advisory Commission, followed by discussion and possible action regarding the LGBTQIA+ Quality of Life Study. The presenter was unavailable. By unanimous consent the Commission agreed to return this item to a future agenda. b. Discussion and possible action regarding selection of members to represent the Commission for Women …
Commission for Women Austin Commission for Women Recommendation 20220302-xxx: Recommendations for Women Experiencing Homelessness Whereas, the Commission for Women (“Commission”) of the City of Austin (“City”) serves as an advisory body that advocates for and inspires the City Council (“Council”) and City Manager to prioritize women’s quality of life, so that Austin becomes the most equitable city in the nation for women and girls; and Whereas, women and female-identifying persons (hereafter referenced as “women”) may be more vulnerable and less safe while experiencing homelessness; these risks are amplified for those with children; these women and children are often considered “invisible,” rather than living on the streets, they may be sleeping in cars, hotels, or shelters, or moving from one place to another with friends or family; being unhoused causes interrelated issues with stable housing, employment, child care, schooling, and family life; and Whereas, women with or without children who have experienced domestic violence, sexual assault, trafficking and any other form of sexual violence or trauma are at a greater risk; and Whereas, the capacity of short or long-term shelters and temporary/transitional housing for women and families is limited, and exacerbated by COVID-19 restrictions; facilities may also lack services tailored to the specific needs of women and families; and Whereas, the Saint Louise House is a viable solution to help those in need; their mission as a nonprofit organization is dedicated to the success of women and their children moving from homelessness to healthy independent lives, striving to empower women and their children to overcome homelessness for generations to come; their proven program provides stable housing and wraparound services with highly-individualized support that fosters education, financial literacy, strong family relationships and healthy living, leading to a lifetime of self-sufficiency; and Whereas, since the Saint Louise House was founded in Austin in 2000, there have been 205 families served, 448 children served with 100% moving to the next grade level, and 90% of the women increasing self- sufficiency; in 2020 there were 12 successful graduations, 15 families moved out of homelessness into St. Louise House, and even with COVID-19, 80% of families continued to make progress toward self-sufficiency; and Whereas, the need for housing and services such as those provided by St. Louise House exceeds current capacity, with a waiting list for families needing guidance and assistance; and Whereas, the Commission for Women passed Recommendation 20210203-04b: Continued Funding for the Hotel Safety …
Austin Commission for Women Recommendation 20220302-xxx: Short Title WHEREAS, the Commission for Women (“Commission”) of the City of Austin (“City”) serves as an advisory body that advocates for and inspires the City Council (“Council”) and City Manager to prioritize women’s quality of life, so that Austin becomes the most equitable city in the nation for women and girls; and WHEREAS, sexual violence is an issue that disproportionately impacts female-identifying individuals, and women and girls are particularly vulnerable to and impacted by sexual violence. WHEREAS, survivors of sexual violence face many barriers to accessing resources and safety, including fear of criminal justice systems, the lack of a financial safety net, religious and cultural barriers, fear of deportation, lack of awareness or knowledge of the legal system, lack of adequate childcare services, and lack of low-cost housing options. WHEREAS, as proven by both national and state data, sexual assault is still vastly under- reported, under-investigated by law enforcement, and under-prosecuted. WHEREAS, sexual assault survivors benefit from and are entitled to wraparound services in the aftermath of a sexual assault, and it is widely understood that access to resources such as counseling, legal services, housing, and basic needs improves outcomes for survivors including healing and recovery, as well as enables them to participate in the investigation and prosecution of their case should they wish to. WHEREAS, in the 2021 Mid-Year Recommendations Report, the Reimagining Public Safety Task Force called for resources earmarked for victims/survivors of Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault, and Human Trafficking, regardless of law enforcement reporting and/or cooperation. WHEREAS, the City of Austin has made an ongoing commitment to survivors of sexual assault to ensure that their cases are handled appropriately and that they receive the support and resources they need. WHEREAS, on January 28, 2022, the City of Austin settled a lawsuit with sexual assault survivors, in which the City publicly committed to ensuring that in the future, survivors of sexual assault who come forward are treated seriously, are communicated with effectively, and will have their claims investigated thoroughly. WHEREAS, the City of Austin has invested significant resources into an independent evaluation of the Austin Police Department's handling of reported sexual assaults over 9 years. WHEREAS, the City of Austin Commission for Women has passed recommendations on dedicating resources and systems improvement for survivors of sexual violence, including eliminating the rape kit backlog and addressing the DNA lab closure (20160810-003a), the …
Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................... 1 Community Partners ............................................................................................................................. 1 Research Team ..................................................................................................................................... 1 City of Austin ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 3 Key Themes .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Key Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 4 Study Framework ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Key Themes Across Data Collection Tools ............................................................................................... 6 Introduction................................................................................................................................................ 9 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 9 COVID-19 Pandemic and Racial Unrest ............................................................................................... 9 LGBTQIA+ Population in US, Texas, and Austin ................................................................................ 10 Austin LGBTQIA+ History ................................................................................................................... 11 Research Advisory Board ................................................................................................................... 12 Qwell Foundation Prior Surveys.......................................................................................................... 13 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Qualitative Findings ................................................................................................................................. 14 Stakeholder Interviews ........................................................................................................................ 15 Town Halls ........................................................................................................................................... 19 Focus Groups ...................................................................................................................................... 23 Power Analysis .................................................................................................................................... 27 Quantitative Findings .............................................................................................................................. 30 Summation of Comparative Data ........................................................................................................ 30 Demographics ..................................................................................................................................... 31 Community and Social Connectedness .............................................................................................. 33 Economic Opportunity and Work ........................................................................................................ 37 Educational Opportunity and Access .................................................................................................. 41 Health .................................................................................................................................................. 43 Housing ............................................................................................................................................... 68 Personal Safety ................................................................................................................................... 70 Social and Public Services/Benefits .................................................................................................... 75 Overall Quality of Life .......................................................................................................................... 78 Disparities................................................................................................................................................ 79 Policy Priorities ........................................................................................................................................ 92 Findings Across Foundational Outcomes ............................................................................................... 93 Community and Social Connectedness .............................................................................................. 93 Economic Opportunity ......................................................................................................................... 94 Health .................................................................................................................................................. 94 Housing ............................................................................................................................................... 95 Safety .................................................................................................................................................. 96 Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion ........................................................................................................... 97 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 98 Key Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 98 Conclusion............................................................................................................................................. 101 About HMA Community Strategies ....................................................................................................... 102 Appendix ................................................................................................................................................... 103 Acknowledgments A. HMA Community Strategies is deeply grateful for the support and participation of countless LGBTQIA+ and allied organizations, groups, businesses, and community members throughout this project. Community Partners Research Team HMA Community Strategies Charles Robbins, MBA – Project Director Iliana Gilman, MA – Project Manager Michelle Parra, PhD Catherine Guerrero, MPH Ryan Maganini Research Advisory Board Alexander Anderson KB Richard Bondi Sha’nyia Baltimore Sam Davis Tabitha Hamilton Lex Keaton Rocky Lane Lais Milburn Philip Schnarrs Alexander Zapata City of Austin City of Austin’s Equity Office Brion Oaks, Chief Equity Officer Kellee Coleman, Business Process Consultant, Sr. Amanda Jasso, Equity & Inclusion Program Manager Rocío Villalobos, Immigrant Affairs Program Manager Joshua Robinson, Equity & Inclusion Program Coordinator Enakshi Ganguly, Public Information Specialist, Sr. Brandon Kroos, Business Process Specialist LGBTQ Quality of Life Advisory Commission Ruben Baeza Sandra Chavez Charles Curry Kannou Curette Tarik Daniels Deirdre Doughty Nan Dowling Saul Gonzalez Christina Gorczynski Kathryn Gonzales Terrance Hines Holly Kirby Rebecca Dreke Dr. Victor Martinez Melissa Taylor Brandon Wollerson Tarik Daniels 1 2 Executive Summary This report summarizes the results of the ShoutOut Austin Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, Asexual …
MACC Staff Report – March 2, 2022 Website - Facebook - Digital Programs EXHIBITS- March Joe Garcia III Art Comes to Life, a Retrospective, Community Gallery -Opening Reception for this exhibit was held at the MACC on Feb 14 -Joe Garcia will be featured in Community Gallery during MACCnifico MACC Phase 2 -Overview of the MACC past, present, and future -History of the MACC, Updates on Phase 2, & mapping activities that the public can use to give their feedback on future programming -Online exhibit -In-person exhibit in the Sam Coronado Gallery (March) -Portable exhibit format, can be displayed in other sites/ during future meetings EDUCATION -Summer Camp will run in-person at the MACC from June 6th – August 12. -Each session is one week, cost is $120 per week. -Currently hiring Summer Camp instructors- please spread the word! -Instructor application link on MACC website under Education, or on https://www.austincityjobs.org/postings/95748 -Spring Break Camp will be offered virtually Caminos - Presentation at SXSW EDU March , Austin Convention Center. Caminos: Leveraging Art in Youth Driven Programs. 4 student panelists, Frederico Geib, Cassie Smith. - Breaking Barriers Teen Mental Health Conference’ happening at the MACC on April 2 - Caminos Exhibit and 5 Year Anniversary on Saturday, April 23. - CAPOEIRA Body Movement Classes on Saturdays in-person taught by Futa Ofamo Oni & Erick Salazar. - TALLER ABIERTO Art classes first Friday of each month - Tejano Genealogy Society: We expect to host them back on site in March - The Bronze Community Band: We are currently hosting rehearsals, work meetings Saturdays 12-4PM Latino Artist Access Program (LAAP) -Healing Garden Volunteer Workday Sun, Feb. 27th. Volunteers helped our garden recover from the winter weather and plant some new additions. -LAAP in-person meeting to be held March 3rd. -Teatro Vivo “Ursula” (Fri, Mar 4th 7PM and Sat, Mar 5th 3PM): This youth production tells the story of Nadia, a 7-year-old, separated from her mother after seeking asylum at the US-Mexico border. As Nadia waits for her asylum to be processed, she reflects on the difficulties she is leaving behind in Honduras and the new reality she is facing. This play was also screened to high school students at the MACC this week. -Healing Hearts: Behind the Curtain (Sun, March 6 @ 2pm): Our very first in-person Healing HeARTs “Behind the Curtain” artist roundtable. Artists from our Latino Artist Access Program will explore the …
WHEREAS, the Commission for Women (“Commission”) of the City of Austin (“City”) serves as an advisory body that advocates for and inspires the City Council (“Council”) and City Manager to prioritize women’s quality of life, so that Austin becomes the most equitable city in the nation for women and girls; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 8 became law on September 1, 2021, essentially banning abortions after six weeks gestation and allowing private citizens to sue abortion providers. Historically, roughly 85% of abortions in Texas take place after six weeks gestations; and WHEREAS, there are nearly 7 million women of reproductive age in Texas, and The Texas Policy Evaluation Project estimates the law means only 16% of Texans seeking abortions will be able to access them in-state, and as many of 46% of people seeking abortions in Texans will carry their pregnancies to term against their will; and WHEREAS, a report from the Guttmacher Institute, Texas patients will now have to travel 20 times farther to get an abortion — increasing driving times an average of 3.5 hours each way. Already, people who struggle to make ends meet are often forced to delay abortion services because they need time to secure the funds. They are also less able to travel out of state to get the care they need; and WHEREAS, in Texas, like many states, a legacy of systemic racism has trapped Black women and Latinas in poverty at disproportionately high rates, and they likely will be most harmed by this ban; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Commission for Women recommends: The City of Austin should allocate funding to help buffer the impact of SB8 for Austin birthing individuals. 1. Funding should be allocated to Austin health centers that offer reproductive healthcare and who are now taking on additional and unplanned resources in the aftermath of the passing of SB8 in 2021. 2. Funding should be allocated to provide legal resources to support the current lawsuits that challenge SB8.
1 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MOTION 20220302 004b Date: March 2, 2022 Subject: Case No. C814-97-0002.01; Mary Vice Estates PUD Lot 27 Amendment Motion by: Jennifer Bristol Seconded by: Perry Bedford RATIONALE: WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the applicant is requesting to amend a Planned Unit Development (PUD). WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the site is located in the Carson Creek, Suburban Watershed; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes that staff recommends this variance, (with two staff conditions) having determined the required Findings of Fact have been met. THEREFORE, the Environmental Commission recommends the variance request with the following: Staff Conditions: 1. This application completes the project established by the PUD such that any further development or redevelopment is subject to current code at the time of site development permit application. 2. This project shall comply with current code, except for the following exceptions: a. 70% impervious cover on a net site area calculation shall be allowed rather than the 65% currently allowed for multi-family use. VOTE 8-0 For: Bedford, Qureshi, Thompson, Aguirre, Brimer, Barrett Bixler, Ramberg, Bristol Against: None Abstain: None Recuse: None Absent: Scott Approved By: Kevin Ramberg, Environmental Commission Chair 2
1 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MOTION 20220302 004c Date: March 2, 2022 Subject: Water Oak Apartments, SP-2019-0109C Motion by: Jennifer Bristol Seconded by: Perry Bedford RATIONALE: WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the applicant is requesting to vary from LDC 25-8-342 to allow fill to 25 feet to construct a driveway. WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the site is located in the Onion Creek Watershed, Suburban Classification, Desired Development Zone, with no critical environmental features; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes that staff does not recommend this variance having determined the required Findings of Fact have not been met. With that in mind, the Environmental Commission does recommend the variance. THEREFORE, the Environmental Commission recommends the variance requested with the comment that City staff work collaboratively to ensure this situation does not occur in the future. VOTE 7-1 For: Bedford, Qureshi, Aguirre, Brimer, Barrett Bixler, Ramberg, Bristol Against: Thompson Recuse: None Absent: Scott Approved By: Kevin Ramberg, Environmental Commission Chair
EMMA S. BARRIENTOS MEXICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION 20220302-4a Seconded By: Maga Rojas FY2023 Budget Recommendations Date: March 2, 2022 Subject: Motioned By: Navarro Recommendation The Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Advisory Board (MACC) recommends the City Council direct the City Manager to take the following actions and to allocate additional funds for the following items for FY 2023. These recommendations include actions that can be taken immediately outside the budget process and recommendations for the FY 2023 budget: Description of Recommendation to Council 1. Allocate sufficient funding for a Music HUB and provide a feasibility assessment for a Music Residency Program at the ESB MACC. Convert long-standing Part-Time Employees to Full-Time Employees. 2. Rationale: ALIGNMENT & PURPOSE As the City of Austin continues to champion the integration of equity into the budget process - such as pursuing formal structural changes, being deliberate in finding opportunities to prioritize equity, and redefine collaborations - the ESB MACC Advisory Board recommends the creation of a Music Hub and a Music Residency program at the ESB MACC. The 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic has created unique challenges for the local Latino music community leaving many without the means to adjust to digital platforms. Coupled with the total lack of local recording studios catering to Latino artists, many musicians have been forced to leave the profession or move from the city entirely. Together with our community, we want to shape a Music Residency program that can help put artists back to work by sharing their knowledge and experience with emerging local artists while providing much needed services and training on how to succeed in the music industry. The MACC is fortunate to have the support of our community through the 2018 voter-approved bond initiative that has allowed us to begin the work of expanding our center to better meet the needs of the community. And as we begin to collectively imagine a brighter future, music infrastructure has been identified as one of key areas of improvement. Our goal is to always stay on pace with the needs of our community, and a Music Residency program, in parallel with the creation of a music HUB at the ESB MACC, will provide our local Latino musicians with services that allow them to grow on pace with our city’s population growth, and to help us remain the “live music capital of the world.” HISTORY 1 of …
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Mexican American Cultural Center Advisory Board Recommendation Number: (202200302-04B) Completion and Funding of Shell Space in the Phase 2 Schematic Design Whereas the Mexican American Cultural Center Advisory Board supports the completion and finish out of all spaces including shell spaces as presented in the Phase 2 schematic design. Whereas the Advisory Board recommends that City Council fund the finish out of the shell spaces in the Phase 2 schematic design. Record of the vote: Unanimous on a 6.0 vote, Member Lopez was not in attendance. Date of Approval: March 2, 2022 Attest: __________________________ Michelle Rojas, Staff Liaison
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Mexican American Cultural Center Advisory Board Recommendation Number: (202200302-04C) Art Installation Relocation Whereas the Mexican American Cultural Center Advisory Board supports the artists of existing public art located at the Mexican American Cultural Center. Whereas the Advisory Board recommends that the Phase 2 project team inform the artists of the existing artwork of any plans to relocate it. Record of the vote: Unanimous on a 6.0 vote, Member Lopez was not in attendance. Date of Approval: March 2, 2022 Attest: __________________________ Michelle Rojas, Staff Liaison
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Mexican American Cultural Center Advisory Board Recommendation Number: (202200302-05A) Phase 2 Schematic Design and Community Communications Forum (CCF) Whereas the ESB MACC Advisory Board supports the Schematic Design for Phase 2 and recommends the following conditions: 1. The role of the Advisory Board be leveraged for improved community communications. 2. Feedback on any surveys completed from Schematic Design be shared with the Advisory Board. group. 3. A monthly digest of CCF be presented to the board as it progresses. 4. Advisory Board have input and oversight of the CCF participants through the life of the 5. The CCF participant list is to be originated by the Advisory Board in collaboration with the project team. Record of the vote: Unanimous on a 6.0 vote, Member Lopez was not in attendance. Date of Approval: March 2, 2022 Attest: __________________________ Michelle Rojas, Staff Liaison
