From: To: Subject: Date: Patrick Goetz Ramirez, Elaine Case #C15-2021-0101 Tuesday, December 07, 2021 10:06:31 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi - I'm writing to state that I SUPPORT the requested variance. The LDC Section 25-2-1063 is one of the primary reasons Austin has the among the highest housing costs in the nation. In the absence of a new, more inclusive LDC, we have to do the best that we can. Thank you. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. D-2/1-LATE BACKUP D-2/2-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Brian Poteet Ramirez, Elaine In support of C15-2021-0101 Friday, December 10, 2021 3:07:10 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi Elaine, I can't attend the meeting next week, but I would like to voice my support for the variance request for the property at 403/201 East Koenig Ln and 5613 Avenue F. Here are a few reasons I think the variance should be approved: The city is behind on its housing goals (both affordable and market rate), and building higher on this lot will get us close to meeting those goals. The property is serviced by two high frequency bus lines. Building more housing on this lot will help the city meet its mode shift goals outlined in the ASMP. The North Loop Neighborhood Association unanimously voted in support of the variance. Personally I don't think this should matter given how unrepresentative the association is of the neighborhood, but I guess that probably matters to some of the commissioners. Compatibility requirements have a huge impact on this site, and it would be a real shame if we let those requirements get in the way of a better project for everyone. Best regards, Brian Poteet North Loop Homeowner CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. D-2/3-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Shannon May Ramirez, Elaine Hangar project at Koenig & F Sunday, December 12, 2021 9:58:46 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Case # C15-2021-0101 - 403/201 Ms. Ramirez, I’m …
Zilker Neighborhood Association __________________________________________________________________ Zoning Committee zilkerneighborhood@gmail.com Austin, TX 78704 December 5, 2021 Re: 1003 Kinney, lot-size variance, Case C15-2021-0100 December 13 Agenda item E2 To: Board of Adjustment c/o Elaine Ramirez, Development Review Dept., City of Austin via email Elaine.Ramirez@austintexas.gov Chair and Board Members: Thank you for allowing the zoning committee of the Zilker Neighborhood Association (ZNA) to review the variance request for 1003 Kinney (to decrease the minimum lot size from 5750 to 5464 square feet) and to share our recommendations with the applicants. City of Austin Supervisor Eric Thomas has now dated the parcel to September 1947, confirming that the minimum lot requirement of 5750 sf applies. His email of November 17 appears on page 9 of this letter. It eliminates the applicants’ argument that “At one time previously, it was likely this lot was larger, and would have met the minimum 5750sqft area for SF-3 and to not be considered a substandard lot.” Documents submitted by the applicants show that the alley has existed in its current configuration since 1896, and the dimensions of the parcel have always been approx. 62 ft × 88 ft—beginning in 1947, through 1962 when a house was built under the previous code, through March of this year when the applicants demolished the house, and up until today. That takes us back to the demolition question raised by ZNA at the hearing on November 8. The ZNA zoning committee believes that the “non-complying structure” regulations apply in this case (see 25-2-963 and 964, on page 7). This code allows an owner to rebuild or maintain an existing structure that does not comply with current code, as long as 50% of the supporting structure is preserved. Clearly, the zoning regulations allowed reasonable use before the house was demolished. ZNA is aware of two similar variance requests, at 1107 Kinney and 1516 Kinney, where lots were scraped without regard to 25-2-963. Both variances were denied for lack of a qualifying hardship. At 1003 Kinney, we now know that the entire structure was demolished sometime this year, and it was the applicants’ responsibility to verify before demolition that new construction would be 1 E-2/1-LATE BACKUP allowed. Evidence submitted by the applicants confirms that they were aware of the substandard lot size as early as January 2021, before they purchased the property. (A chronology appears on page 6.) Their survey in February 2021 …
Date: To: From: Subject: November 1, 2021 City of Austin Design Commission Planning & Urban Design Working Group Density Bonus Working Group review of 80 Rainey for substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines October 22, 2021; 12:00 pm; Virtual Microsoft Teams Meeting Amanda Swor- Drenner Group Meeting date: Applicant: The project is located at 80 Rainey Street. The project includes mixed use of residential (482,317 sf) and retail (17,444 sf). The project also includes 5 parking levels (none underground). The applicant is seeking a Density Bonus to raise the FAR from 8:1 to 20:1 resulting in a total project gross area of 564,979 gsf. The site is 0.66 acres (28,814 sf) with a current allowable building size of 230,512 nsf based on the current allowable 8:1 FAR. The total building height is 546 ft (49 floors). The maximum height achievable under the Density Bonus program is unlimited. Per the Density Bonus Program ordinance, the applicant is required to meet the three gatekeeper requirements: • Substantially comply with the City’s Urban Design Guidelines • Provide streetscape improvements along all public street frontages consistent with the Great Streets Program Standards • Applicant must commit to a minimum of 2-star green building rating (3-star proposed). WORKING GROUP COMMENTS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES AREA WIDE GUIDELINES 1. Create dense development – 25:1 far is being requested. Project complies with this Section. 2. Create mixed-use development – Residential and substantial retail uses are proposed. Project partially complies with this Section. 3. Limit development which closes downtown streets – This project is not permanently closing down any streets. Project complies with this Section. 4. Buffer neighborhood edges- The reused existing bungalows and proposed Paseo help buffer the adjacent neighborhood edges. Project complies with this Section. Incorporate civic art in both public and private development – This project is proposing public art at the Paseo Gateway. Project complies with this Section. 5. 6. Protect important public views – Since this project is already surrounded by high-rises, there are no important public views to protect. Not applicable. This project is protecting and reusing two existing on-site bungalows. Project complies with this Section. 9. Acknowledge that rooftops are not seen from other buildings and the street – 7. Avoid historical misrepresentations – Project complies with this Section. 8. Respect adjacent historic buildings- Project complies with this Section. 10. Avoid the development of theme environments- Project …
80 Rainey Design Commission December 13, 2021 1 Project Team Developer: Architect: Landscape Architect: Civil Engineer: Agent: Lincoln Ventures Pappageorge Haymes TBG Partners Wuest Group Drenner Group 2 3 Current Use Food truck lot, bar and small office. 5 Zoning Central Business District (CBD) 6 Property Facts Address: 78-84 Rainey Street Lot Size: 0.66 acres / 28,814 square feet Rainey Street Entitled Height: 40 feet DDBP Allowable Height: Proposed Height: Unlimited 546 feet / 49 floors CBD Zoning Entitled FAR: DDBP Allowable FAR: Proposed DDBP FAR: 8:1 15:1 20:1 7 Project Facts and Bonus Area Benefit 564,979 Total Project Gross Square Feet (GSF) Rainey Street Density Bonus Area Below 8:1 FAR: Net Residential Floor Area Within 8:1 FAR Density Bonus Affordable Set-Aside Total Required Affordable Square Feet = = 230,512 NSF X 5% 9,797 NSF 9,797 SF (18 units) will be set aside as affordable for-lease residential units at 80% MFI, in order to exceed the 40 feet maximum height limit per the Rainey Street Subdistrict regulations. Downtown Density Bonus Area Between 8:1 to 15:1 FAR: Total GSF Bonus Area Per DDBP (8:1 to 15:1) Green Building Community Benefit Area Total Density Bonus FIL Area Between 8:1 & 15:1 FAR = 201,698 GSF = (57,628) GSF 144,070 GSF = Total Density Bonus FIL Area Between 8:1 & 15:1 FAR Rainey DDBP Fee per SF Total Density Bonus FIL Contribution Between 8:1 & 15:1 FAR = = 144,070 GSF X $5 $720,350 8 Project Facts and Bonus Area Benefit 564,979 Total Project Gross Square Feet (GSF) Downtown Density Bonus Area Above 15:1 FAR: Total GSF Bonus Area Per DDBP (Above 15:1) Additional Affordable Housing Benefit Area Total Density Bonus FIL Area Above 15:1 FAR Total Density Bonus FIL Area Above 15:1 FAR Rainey DDBP Fee per SF Total Density Bonus FIL Contribution Above 15:1 FAR Gross Residential Floor Area Above 15:1 FAR Density Bonus Additional Affordable Set-Aside Total Additional Affordable Square Feet = = = = = = = 3,319 SF (5 units) will be set aside as affordable for-lease residential units at 80% MFI, in order to exceed the 40 feet maximum height limit per the Rainey Street Subdistrict regulations. 132,769 GSF (66,385) GSF 66,385 GSF 66,385 GSF X $5 $331,923 66,385 NSF X 5% 3,319 NSF 9 Total Bonus Area Community Benefit 16,435 SF (23 units) will be set aside as affordable for-lease residential units at 80% MFI, in …
l'UllUC Hf'AIHNG 1:'lf'ORMATION applic:mts Md:or 1heir agem(s} �1-e expected lo a11cnd 11 public not n:(luircd fo t1ttc11d. I lov.e\l;'f, if you do aucnd, Ahhoug.h hc�fiJlg, vou nn� lK1ve the opporhinity de\·elopmem or change. or e,wiron.menlal orga.11.iz,uion 1hu1 has expre..-scd an iutere:H in a.n .ip-plici11io11 am·,1ing your neighborhood. to spcnk FOR or AGAJKST 1h.::: p1•oposcd ntact a neighborhood You 111<1)' also <:.o yo11 cn1"' mus! be submitted to the contacl person 9 :un. !he dny of !he publ:t· he2ri11g to be added 10 the Wriu.cn co1111n bcforo viewed b�· lhc Board !he niglu of !he mcl.'ling. lhe name of 1hc boi1rd public .:\II hea,'ing; 1hc Case Number; eo1nmen1s received will bcc;omc; Your (;i)Jnmems or commission. or Council� the scheduled dale or the should include nnd 1hc ccmwc1 pc,rSon listed r<.':COrd of'thc public p:irl of1his on the 1101ice. cast". listed on lhe nolice Lale B:1ck-op and he�ufog,. the board or 1m app}ic.;Him,•s h,;:�uiog 10 Ouring o p-ubJk con1innc: or denial or the :tpp lic:nion. lf !he board 01· con-1.mission iul1lounccs � specilic date ::md 1,imc for a postponcmen! than 60 days from the announccmcul, m:i further 1t0Litt· is requir('d. commission may p o .4pm,e ur or cun:inu:.nion 1ha1 is no1 kiter o kiter date, or recommend approval Case Number: C 15-2021-0057 Contact: l'ublk l lcui1l": Elain� R:;1min;.r;dnine,r:·11nire1@·au;.1in1ex:1::.gov Oe('embcr 13111 Ho,1J'd of Adiustment: • 2021 _&:,Ae L , ILL/ rour Name (please pri;itJ (a..y- � J :,min f:n·(1r 0 1 objt<:t .J "IP) 'Ford,. <;t Ac1sha, 11. 1,£?0<..1 Your address(es) by 11,fs ' «pplinJJirm �� 'b/:(.dJ.,,Jd (�(/e�tcd Sigrwl11rt )2-[Q-;2./ Dft.'e Day1imc Telephone: 1 / :>-SO 3 • '-/ � 4,3 Couu11e1us: _________________________ _ or commission's decision may be ;1pp�i1led wilh A blX1n.l stunding h) appt·nl. or can i1pp-l'.!1I lhe decision. TI)e body hold ing n public will dclcrmine whelht'lr an inlel'est..::d has standing hearing 10 appeal a pcr:;on on :111 appeal lhe decision. parly lhal is identified al<' n pcr:-.tm who by a pers(m as n pcrS()n wh(> is the applicam or 1'e.C-Otd or dtc s.ubjcc1 is dclincd propc11y, or who conmmnica1cs ,111 in!eresl lO a by: An imcrcslcd pn.liy ownel' board ()r commission de.livering o wrilleu dudng 1he publi..: hearing 1h01 gener�1lly concern (i: 11!.'IJI be delivered or nollct.')� Jppc�ring identifies lhc issues of M Ille conwc; ;wrs<m !!:ued ori a and s1x:11king l()r lhe record at sta1e-nwn1 to the board or commission or before the publi..: )1..:�u ing: i.\ud: occu1>ies a …
From: To: Subject: Date: Carol Olewin Ramirez, Elaine Seco Development 403 and 201 E Koenig Ln Monday, December 13, 2021 4:29:09 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** In regards to the height variance request of Seco Development of 403 and 201 E Koenig Ln and 5613 Ave F, I Oppose granting the height variance. The increased height to 5 stories will have a negative impact on the aesthetics of the Skyview Neighborhood as well as a negative impact on the aesthetics of Koenig Ln. The height increase to 5 stories will increase the number of dwelling units further exacerbating the congestion already in the area. Although both the North Loop Neighborhood Association and the Skyview Neighborhood Association are voicing their support for the height variance, that does not mean all residents in both neighborhoods support the request. I participated in both neighborhood discussions about the Seco Development and their request for a height variance. I voiced my opposition but was out voted by the group. I stand by my opposition to the height variance because of the negative impact it will have on our neighborhood. Carol Olewin 302 W Skyview Rd, Austin, TX 78752 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.
From: To: Subject: Date: Diana Spain Ramirez, Elaine Support for variance request # C15-2021-0101 - 403/201 East Koenig Ln and 5613 Avenue F. Monday, December 13, 2021 10:05:52 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Good morning, Ms. Ramirez, I am a homeowner in the North Loop neighborhood (5410 Avenue F) and a member of the North Loop Neighborhood Association. I am writing you to let you know that, although I cannot attend the Board of Adjustments meeting tonight about the above variance, I am in full support of it. I hope I have contacted you soon enough to communicate my support to the Board. Thank you very much, Diana Spain 5410 Avenue F Austin, TX 78751-1311 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.
Loayza, Katherine Ramirez, Elaine From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Importance: RE: 12/13/2021 (Mon.) Board of Adjustment hearing - Withdrawal of Item D-3 C15-2021-0102 [IMAN- JWDOCS.FID4278735] Monday, December 13, 2021 1:46:00 PM image001.png High *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Elaine, On behalf of the owner of 3201 Westlake Drive, please consider this a formal request to withdraw item D-3 C15-2021-0102 for B.O.A. action on tonight’s B.O.A. agenda. (Dec. 13, 2021). Thank you, Katherine Katherine P. Loayza Land Use Consultant Jackson Walker L.L.P. 100 Congress Avenue, Suite 1100 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 236-2259 (512) 236-2002 (fax) The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. This information may constitute information that is confidential and privileged as an attorney-client communication or as attorney work product. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver this communication to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution, copying, or use of this communication, electronic or otherwise, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone, by replying to the sender via e-mail, or by e-mail to ", and please delete this e-mail and any accompanying attachments from your in box, recycle bin, and any other directory, file, or electronic storage. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Ramirez, Elaine <Elaine.Ramirez@austintexas.gov> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 8:50 AM Cc: Ramirez, Diana <Diana.Ramirez@austintexas.gov> Subject: 12/13/2021 (Mon.) Board of Adjustment hearing Importance: High **RECEIVED FROM EXTERNAL SENDER – USE CAUTION** Greetings Board applicants on the Monday 12/13 agenda – Under the current situation the BOA meeting will be Hybrid for Board Members ONLY, meaning we have to have at least 6 Board Members physically present at City Hall - Council Chambers to have a quorum. Any and all public testimony will need to be in-person. Please read this entire e-mail APPLICANTS TO GIVE CASE PRESENTATION • There can only be one applicant that has to be registered to speak (Primary Speaker) and give presentation on case. (There will be a sign-in book as soon as you walk-in to Council Chambers, you will need to sign in and register if you will be presenting) • There could be additional speaker(s) –architect, surveyor, homeowner, etc. that can sign up as …
80 Rainey Design Commission December 13, 2021 1 Project Team Developer: Architect: Landscape Architect: Civil Engineer: Agent: Lincoln Ventures Pappageorge Haymes TBG Partners Wuest Group Drenner Group 2 3 Current Use Food truck lot, bar and small office. 5 Zoning Central Business District (CBD) 6 Property Facts Address: 78-84 Rainey Street Lot Size: 0.66 acres / 28,814 square feet Rainey Street Entitled Height: 40 feet DDBP Allowable Height: Proposed Height: Unlimited 546 feet / 49 floors CBD Zoning Entitled FAR: DDBP Allowable FAR: Proposed DDBP FAR: 8:1 15:1 20:1 7 Project Facts and Bonus Area Benefit 564,979 Total Project Gross Square Feet (GSF) Rainey Street Density Bonus Area Below 8:1 FAR: Net Residential Floor Area Within 8:1 FAR Density Bonus Affordable Set-Aside Total Required Affordable Square Feet = = 195,935 NSF X 5% 9,797 NSF 9,797 SF (13 units) will be set aside as affordable for-lease residential units at 80% MFI, in order to exceed the 40 feet maximum height limit per the Rainey Street Subdistrict regulations. Downtown Density Bonus Area Between 8:1 to 15:1 FAR: Total GSF Bonus Area Per DDBP (8:1 to 15:1) Green Building Community Benefit Area Total Density Bonus FIL Area Between 8:1 & 15:1 FAR = 201,698 GSF = (57,628) GSF 144,070 GSF = Total Density Bonus FIL Area Between 8:1 & 15:1 FAR Rainey DDBP Fee per SF Total Density Bonus FIL Contribution Between 8:1 & 15:1 FAR = = 144,070 GSF X $5 $720,350 8 Project Facts and Bonus Area Benefit 564,979 Total Project Gross Square Feet (GSF) Downtown Density Bonus Area Above 15:1 FAR: Total GSF Bonus Area Per DDBP (Above 15:1) Additional Affordable Housing Benefit Area Total Density Bonus FIL Area Above 15:1 FAR Total Density Bonus FIL Area Above 15:1 FAR Rainey DDBP Fee per SF Total Density Bonus FIL Contribution Above 15:1 FAR Gross Residential Floor Area Above 15:1 FAR Density Bonus Additional Affordable Set-Aside Total Additional Affordable Square Feet = = = = = = = 132,769 GSF (66,385) GSF 66,385 GSF 66,385 GSF X $5 $331,923 132,769 GSF X 5% 6,638 GSF An additional 6,638 SF (9 units) will be set aside as affordable for-lease residential units at 80% MFI, as a community benefit to exceed the administrative FAR maximum per the DDBP and Rainey Street Subdistrict regulations. 9 Total Bonus Area Community Benefit 16,435 SF (approx. 22 units) will be set aside as affordable for-lease residential …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet C-1 DATE: December 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0011 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne (abstained) _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Renee Bornn OWNER: Villas Rio, LP ADDRESS: 2111 RIO GRANDE ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 1 sign(s) on the property: a) (F) to allow one (1) wall signs above the second floor (maximum allowed) to the eight floor (requested) b) (H) to allow for the one (1) sign(s) to all be illuminated in order to provide signage for the Villas on Rio Grande in a “GO-MU, LO-NP, MF-4-NP”, General Office- Mixed Use, Limited Office, Multi-Family– Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs (F) No signs may be placed above the second floor of a building, except for a non-electric sign that is engraved, cut into the building surface, or otherwise inlaid to become part of the building. (H) A sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. BOARD’S DECISION: Oct 11, 2021 BOA MEETING POSTPONED TO NOVEMBER 8, 2021 BY BOARD MEMBERS (AS REQUESTED BY APPLICANT); Nov 8, 2021 POSTPONED TO DEC 13, 2021 (per applicant); Dec 13, 2021 POSTPONED TO JANUARY 10, 2022 BY APPLICANT FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: OR, 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties, because: OR, 3. The granting of this variance will not substantially conflict with the stated purposes of this sign ordinance, because: AND, 4. Granting a variance would not provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated, because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Madam Chair ____________________________ for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-1 DATE: Monday December 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0057 ___N____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___N____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___N____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___N____Agustina Rodriguez ___-____ Richard Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____ Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____ Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Stuart Sampley OWNER: Bryan and Laura Burkhart ADDRESS: 2000 PEACH TREE ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-899 (D) (Fences as Accessory Uses) to exceed the average height of six (6) feet or a maximum height of seven (7) feet (required) for a solid fence along the property line in order to maintain a seven (7) foot (requested) tall masonry, wood, steel fence along Bluebonnet St and Peach Tree Street in a “SF-3”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. Note: The Land Development Code 25-2-899 (D) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a solid fence constructed along a property line may not exceed an average height of six feet or a maximum height of seven feet. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA DEC 13, 2021 MEETING The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Deny; Board Member Brooke Bailey seconds on a 7-4 vote (Board members Thomas Ates, Jessica Cohen, Rahm McDaniel, Agustina Rodriguez nay); DENIED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-2 DATE: Monday December 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0101 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___-____Richard Smith (OUT) ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Michael Whellan OWNER: 201 E Koenig Ln, LTD. (Donald Reece) ADDRESS: 201 and 403 KOENIG LN/5613 Avenue F (C) (2) to increase height limit from three (3) stories and 40 feet (maximum allowed) to VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code Article 10, Compatibility Standards, Division 2 –Development Standards, Section 25-2-1063 (Height Limitations and Setbacks for Large Sites): a) 60 feet (requested) b) (C) (3) to increase allowed height from 40 feet plus one foot for each 10 feet of distance in excess of 100 feet from the property zoned SF-5 or more restrictive (maximum allowed) to 60 feet (requested) in order to erect a Vertical Mixed-use project with on-site affordable units and one acre of on-site, developed parkland in a “CS-MU-V-CO-NP”, General Commercial Services-Mixed Use-Vertical Mixed Use-Conditional Overlay – Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (North Loop Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code Section 25-2-1063 Height Limitations and Setbacks for Large Sites (C) (2) three stories and 40 feet, if the structure is more than 50 feet and not more than 100 feet from property. (C) (3) for a structure more than 100 feet but not more than 300 feet from property zoned SF-5 or more restrictive, 40 feet plus one foot for each 10 feet of distance in excess of 100 feet from the property zoned SF-5 or more restrictive. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA DEC 13, 2021 MEETING Madam Chair Jessica Cohen motions to Postpone the remaining cases to January 10, 2022 at City Hall due to technical difficulties –internet issues; Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 11-0 vote; POSTPONED TO JANUARY 10, 2022 DUE TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES- INTERNET ISSUES. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-3 DATE: Monday December 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0102 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) OWNER: Team Properties, LLC (Pamela Madere) ADDRESS: 3201 WESTLAKE DR VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (B) (1) (a) from shoreline setback requirements to reduce the shoreline setback from 75 feet (required) to 25 feet (requested) along a man-made slough in order to remodel an existing Single-Family residence + associated improvements in a “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. Note: The Land Development Code 25-2-551 (B) This subsection specifies shoreline setbacks in a Lake Austin (LA) district (1) The shoreline setback is: (a) 75 feet BOARD’S DECISION: BOA DEC 13, 2021 MEETING WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Madam Chair Diana Ramirez for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-1 DATE: Monday December 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0097 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Nathan Hobbs OWNER: Gary J. Hobbs ADDRESS: 4315 AVENUE A VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code: a) Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) to decrease the minimum Lot Size requirements from 5,750 square feet (required) to 5,700 square feet (requested) and b) Section 25-2-947 (Nonconforming Use Regulation Groups) (B) (2) to increase the improvement value from 20% (allowed) to 60% (requested) in order to complete a remodel and addition of an existing home in a “SF-3-NCCD-NP”, Single-Family- Neighborhood Conservation Combining District-Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Hyde Park Neighborhood Plan). BOARD’S DECISION: BOA Meeting Oct 11, 2021-POSTPONED TO NOVEMBER 8, 2021 BY BOARD MEMBERS (Due to not enough Board Members present at the meeting); Nov 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to postpone to December 13, 2021; Board Member Thomas Ates seconds on an 11-0 vote; POSTPONED TO DECEMBER 13, 2021; Dec 13, 2021 POSTPONED TO JANUARY 10, 2022 BY APPLICANT FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for
