All documents

RSS feed for this page

Community Development CommissionMay 10, 2022

Item4a_CDC_HRLP _May10_2022 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 13 pages

CDC Presentation Home Repair Loan Programs May 10, 2022 Current Home Rehabilitation Loan Programs (HRLP) Loan Program Home Rehabilitation Loan Program (Rehabilitation) Home Rehabilitation Loan Program (Reconstruction) Holly Good Neighbor Program Services Provided • Repairs to the foundation, roof, plumbing, HVAC, windows, and electrical • Major interior and exterior repairs • Complete rehabilitation of home, reconstruction if needed • Deferred 0% loan, terms up to 15 years. • Complete reconstruction, if • Deferred 0% loan, terms up needed to 30 years. • The repairs were limited to plumbing, electrical, roof, foundation, exterior painting and solar panel installation. • Forgivable 0% loan, terms up to 10 years. Funding Source CDBG Funding Amount Provide funding amount up to $75,000. Up to $110,000 for historical homes. Provide funding amount up to $250,000 for demolish and reconstruction. CDBG Austin Energy $50,000 MFI% At or below 80% At or below 80% At or below 100% 2 Home Rehabilitation Loan Program (HRLP) purpose and services Loan Program Home Rehabilitation Loan Program How does HRLP work? • No interest or monthly payments, but a lien is placed against the property. • The home must remain the primary residence of the homeowner for the entire term • • of the loan. If the owners choose to sell or rent the home, transfer title, refinance or draw an equity loan within 15 years of the loan, the amount owed on the loan due and payable. If it is necessary to demolish and replace the home, owners may be eligible for a loan up to $250,000 for a term of 20 years, with a 25% shared equity lien on the home for an additional 10 years, for a total of 30 years on the lien. Eligibility Requirements • The home is within the Austin city limits. • The home is a single-family detached home. It must be the primary residence of the • The applicant must own the property. Owner has clear title on the property (reconstruction), and ownership is in his/her name. • Applicant has not been discharged from bankruptcy less than two years of • Applicant must have a gross annual income at/below 80% Median Family Income applicant. application date. (MFI). 3 Housing and Urban Development Affordability Period Home Assistance Per Unit or Buyer Length of Affordability Period Less than $15,000 $15,000 - $40,000 More than $40,000 New construction 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 4 …

Scraped at: May 6, 2022, 10:10 a.m.
Airport Advisory CommissionMay 10, 2022

AAC Packet original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 22 pages

AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING MAY 10, 2022 3:00 PM 2716 SPIRIT OF TEXAS DRIVE ROOM 160 (Board Room and Public Comments) ROOM 174 (Public Viewing of Proceedings via videoconference) AUSTIN, TEXAS 78719 Some members of the Commission may be participating via videoconference. Live audio of the meeting will be available as an alternative to attending in person. Please email Steve Khanoyan at stephen.khanoyan@flyaustin.com by noon of the day of the meeting for dial-in details. Any member of the public wishing to address the Commission in person may sign in before the meeting or, if via dial in, by noon of the meeting date by emailing Steve Khanoyan at stephen.khanoyan@flyaustin.com. Please include the phone number you will be calling from. CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS Eugene Sepulveda, Chair Wendy Price Todd, Vice-Chair Jeremy Hendricks Scott Madole Ernest Saulmon Jonathan Coon Billy Owens AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Vicky Sepulveda Chad Ennis Raymond Young Speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Please see further instructions on registration above. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 12, 2022 meeting. 2. STAFF REPORTS a) March 2022 Financial Results prepared by Rajeev Thomas, Deputy Chief Finance Officer. b) AUS Air Service Update prepared by Jamy Kazanoff, Air Service Development. 3. STAFF BRIEFINGS a) Project Connect Combined Maintenance Facility presented by Tracy Thompson, Chief 1 Administrative and External Affairs Officer, Jocelyn Vokes, Public Involvement Manager, and Marcus Guerrero, Director of Facilities Expansion, Austin Transit Partnership. b) CEO Report on South Terminal Updates and TSA Staffing presented by Jacqueline Yaft, Chief Executive Officer. c) Hilton Hotel Update presented by Tracy Thompson, Chief Administrative and External Affairs Officer and Rajeev Thomas, Deputy Chief Finance Officer. d) Airport Expansion and Development Program (AEDP) RCA Schedule Update presented by Tracy Thompson, Interim Chief Planning and Development Officer. e) Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 (AMT) Results presented by Rajeev Thomas, Deputy Chief Finance Officer and Dennis Waley, Managing Director, PFM. a) Discussion and possible approval of changes to the AAC bylaws to add the position of 4. CONSENT AGENDA None. 5. ACTION ITEMS Secretary to its officers. 6. OLD BUSINESS None. 7. NEW BUSINESS Council Member. b) Future Agenda Items. a) Review of Commission Recommendations and Actions to discuss with appointing City c) Next regular meeting scheduled for 3:00 …

Scraped at: May 6, 2022, 10:20 a.m.
Planning CommissionMay 10, 2022

Planning Commission May 10 2022 Agenda.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 11 pages

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Tuesday, May 10, 2022 The Planning Commission will convene at 6:00 PM on Tuesday, May 10, 2022 at Austin City Hall, Council Chambers, Room 1001 301 W. Second Street, Austin, TX. Some members of the Planning Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Greg Anderson Awais Azhar Grayson Cox Yvette Flores – Secretary Claire Hempel – Vice-Chair Patrick Howard Jennifer Mushtaler Solveij Rosa Praxis Carmen Llanes Pulido Robert Schneider Todd Shaw – Chair James Shieh – Parliamentarian Jeffrey Thompson Ex-Officio Members Arati Singh – AISD Board of Trustees Jessica Cohen – Chair of Board of Adjustment Spencer Cronk - City Manager Richard Mendoza - Director of Public Works EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) The Planning Commission will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on this agenda. The Commission may not conduct a closed meeting without the approval of the city attorney. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071 Attorney: Steven Maddoux, 512-974-6080 Commission Liaison: Andrew Rivera, 512-974-6508 PUBLIC COMMUNICATION The first four (4) speakers signed up prior to the commencement of the meeting will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of April 26, 2022. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Rezoning: Location: Owner/Applicant: Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: 2. Plan Amendment: Location: Owner/Applicant: Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: 3. Rezoning: Location: Owner/Applicant: Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: C14-2022-0003 - Clayton Lane Residences, District 4 1120 and 1124 Clayton Lane, Fort Branch Watershed; Windsor Park NP Area Hallock Holdings, LLC (Gary Hallock) Alice Glasco Consuting (Alice Glasco) GR-MU-CO-NP TO GR-MU-V-NP Recommendation of GR-MU-V-CO-NP Heather Chaffin, 512-974-2122, heather.chaffin@austintexas.gov Housing and Planning Department NPA-2022-0019.01.SH - Cady Lofts; District 9 1004, 1006 & 1008 E. 39th Street, Boggy Creek Watershed; Central Austin Combined NP Area (Hancock) Cady Lofts, LLC SGI Ventures, Inc. (Sally Gaskin) Single Family and Mixed Use/Office to Multifamily Residential land use Recommended Maureen Meredith, 512-974-2695, Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov Housing and Planning Department C14-2022-0019.SH - Cady Lofts; District 9 1004 -1008 East 39th Strett, Boggy Creek Watershed; Central Austin Combined NP Area (Hancock) Cady Lofts, LLC (Nathan H. Leistico) SGI Ventures, Inc. (Sally Gaskin) SF-3-CO-NP, LO-MU-NP to MF-6-NP Recommendation of MF-4-NP Sherri Sirwaitis, 512-974-3057, sherri.sirwaitis@austintexas.gov …

Scraped at: May 6, 2022, 2:30 p.m.
Planning CommissionMay 10, 2022

B-15 SP-2021-0375C SH and SP-2021-0385D SH – Cornell Avenue R-O-W Vacation; District 1.pdf original pdf

Backup

Scraped at: May 6, 2022, 2:30 p.m.
Construction Advisory CommitteeMay 10, 2022

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Construction Advisory Committee Tuesday, May 10, 2022 One Texas Center 505 Barton Springs Road, 3rd Floor Congress Conference Room 10:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. Some members of the Construction Advisory Committee may be participating by videoconference Public comment will be allowed in‐person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once, either in‐person or remotely, and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register, please contact Susan Delgado at 512‐974‐7065. AGENDA CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Mayoral – Michelle Dahlstrom, Committee Member District 1 – Calvin Williams, Committee Member District 2 – Vacant District 3 – Bob Batlan, Committee Member District 4 – Lyn Nance‐Hendricks, Chair District 5 – Candelario Vazquez, Committee Member District 6 – Drew Hanish, Committee Member District 7 – Vacant District 8 – Sean Forkner, Committee Member District 9 – Anna Bocchini, Committee Member District 10 – Jeff Musgrove, Vice Chair LIAISONS: Executive Liaison – Eric Bailey Staff Liaison – Susan Delgado CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (5 min) a. April 12, 2022 2. DIRECTOR’S REPORT (10 min) a. Update on Public Works Projects – Richard Mendoza 3. NEW BUSINESS (60 min) a. Public Works Department Fiscal Year 2023 Budget presentation b. Update and discussion on the Workers Defense Project c. CAC discussion of work plan 4. NEXT MEETING: June 14, 2022 5. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Susan Delgado with the Public Works Department, at 512‐974‐7065, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Construction Advisory Committee, please contact Susan Delgado at 512‐974‐7065.

Scraped at: May 6, 2022, 4:40 p.m.
Community Development CommissionMay 10, 2022

Item1_4-12-2022_CDC_Draft_Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (CDC) April 12, 2022 – 6:30pm Austin City Hall, Board and Commission- Room 1101 301 West 2nd Street, Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Community Development Commission may be participating by video conference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once, either in-person or remotely, and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register, call or email the board liaison assistant at 512-974-3119 or lisa.rodriguez@austintexas.gov CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Amit Motwani, Chair Public Sector Appointee Karen Paup, Vice Chair Private Sector Appointee Bertha Delgado East Austin Joe Deshotel Public Sector Appointee Fisayo Fadelu Public Sector Appointee Cheryl Thompson St. John’s Miriam Garcia North Austin Cynthia Jaso Dove Springs Kendra Garrett Private Sector Appointee Julia Woods South Austin Eloise Sepeda Public Sector Appointee Heidi Sloan Public Sector Appointee Vacant Rosewood-Zaragosa/Blackland Jose Noe Elias Montopolis Michael Tolliver Colony Park Please visit https://austintexas.gov/cdc for more information about the Community Development Commission. DRAFT MINUTES Commissioners Absent Staff in Attendance Commissioners in Attendance Amit Motwani (Chair) Karen Paup (Vice Chair) Bertha Delgado Joe Deshotel Jose Noe Elias Fisayo Fadelu Miriam Garcia Kendra Garrett Cynthia Jaso Heidi Sloan Cheryl Thompson Julia Woods Eloise Sepeda Michael Tolliver Mandy DeMayo Janes May Letitia Brown Max Horstman Nefertitti Jackmon Lisa Rodriguez CALL TO ORDER Chair Motwani called the meeting to order at 6:34pm with 10 members present. Commissioners Deshotel and Garcia joined the meeting at 6:40pm. Commissioners Sepeda and Tolliver were absent, and Commissioner Deshotel left the meeting at 7:10pm. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Tod Marvin (President, Easterseals), Kori Hattemer (Foundation Communities) and Zenobia C. Joseph addressed the CDC. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Discussion and possible action on the March 8, 2022, Community Development Commission meeting minutes. On Commssioner Garrett’s motion, Commissioner Thompson’s second, the March 8, 2022, minutes were unanimously approved. The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair …

Scraped at: May 7, 2022, 12:40 a.m.
Planning CommissionMay 10, 2022

Addendum B-23 Entrada Item original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Tuesday, May 10, 2022 ADDENDUM The Planning Commission will convene at 6:00 PM on Tuesday, May 10, 2022 at Austin City Hall, Council Chambers, Room 1001 301 W. Second Street, Austin, TX. Some members of the Planning Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Greg Anderson Awais Azhar Grayson Cox Yvette Flores – Secretary Claire Hempel – Vice-Chair Patrick Howard Jennifer Mushtaler Solveij Rosa Praxis Carmen Llanes Pulido Robert Schneider Todd Shaw – Chair James Shieh – Parliamentarian Jeffrey Thompson Ex-Officio Members Arati Singh – AISD Board of Trustees Jessica Cohen – Chair of Board of Adjustment Spencer Cronk - City Manager Richard Mendoza - Director of Public Works EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) The Planning Commission will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on this agenda. The Commission may not conduct a closed meeting without the approval of the city Attorney: Steven Maddoux, 512-974-6080 Commission Liaison: Andrew Rivera, 512-974-6508 attorney. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071 B. PUBLIC HEARINGS 23. Final Plat from Approved Preliminary Plan: Location: Owner/Applicant: Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: C8J-2008-0168.01.1A - Entrada Phase 1 A Small Lot Subdivision Killingsworth Lane, Gilleland Creek Watershed AG Essential Housing Multi State 2, LLC. (Steven Benson) Carlson, Brigance &Doering, Inc. (Brendan McEntee) Approval with conditions of Entrada Phase 1 A Small Lot Subdivision consisting of 172 lots on 55.789 acres. Water and wastewater will be provided by the City of Austin Recommended Sarah Sumner, 512-854-7687, Sarah.sumner@traviscountytx.gov Single Office The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Andrew Rivera at the Housing and Planning Department, at 512-974-6508, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Attorney: Steven Maddoux, 512-974-6080 Commission Liaison: Andrew Rivera, 512-974-6508 SPEAKER REGISTRATION All participants wishing to address the commission must register to speak. Public participation is available by teleconference or in-person. Teleconference Registration Registration for participation by teleconference closes on Tuesday, May 10, 2022 at 2:00 PM. be and provided after the …

Scraped at: May 7, 2022, 5 a.m.
Planning CommissionMay 10, 2022

B-06 C14-2022-0031 - Remove Vehicular Access Restriction to Morrow Street; District 7.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 30 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2022-0031 – Remove Vehicular Access Restriction DISTRICT: 7 to Morrow Street ZONING FROM / TO: TOD-NP, to change a condition of zoning ADDRESS: Intersection of Easy Wind Drive and Morrow Street SITE AREA: 32.63 acres APPLICANT: City of Austin – Housing and Planning Department CASE MANAGER: Andrei Lubomudrov (512-974-7659) Andrei.lubomudrov@austintexas.gov STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommendation is to approve the zoning change to transit oriented development – neighborhood plan (TOD-NP) combining district zoning, to remove the vehicular access restriction to Morrow Street. For a summary of the basis of Staff’s recommendation, see case manager comments on page 2. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: May 10, 2022: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: June 9, 2022: ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES: The Crestview Neighborhood Association has requested postponement of the rezoning application. Please refer to correspondence attached at the back of the Staff report. The Applicant, in this case the City of Austin, has submitted a zoning application to remove a condition added to the Crestview TOD in 2011 to restrict vehicular access to Morrow Drive from Easy Wind Drive. The application was filed as a result of City Council direction provided in Resolution No. 20220217-037. Removing the zoning condition restricting access would ensure long-term unimpeded access to Morrow Drive from the Crestview Station area. The Austin Transportation Department recommended removal of the gate following a three- month traffic study that found opening the gate created no significant safety risks. B-61 of 30 C14-2022-0031 Page 2 CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The proposed rezoning change removes the restriction on vehicular access to Morrow Street via Easy Wind Drive. Further changes to the Crestview Station TOD are not proposed. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: 1. The proposed zoning should be consistent with the purpose statement of the district sought. The transit oriented development (TOD) district is the designation for an identified transit station and the area around it. The district provides for development that is compatible with and supportive of public transit and a pedestrian-oriented environment. Staff believes the proposed zoning is consistent with the district as it increases overall access to transit at Crestview station. The neighborhood plan (NP) district denotes a tract located within the boundaries of an adopted Neighborhood Plan. Zoning changes should promote compatibility with adjacent and nearby uses. 2. The requested change to the TOD-NP zoning would promote compatibility with adjacent and nearby uses by promoting easier vehicular access to transit, housing, …

Scraped at: May 7, 2022, 5 a.m.
Planning CommissionMay 10, 2022

22 Applicant Revised Memo.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

5110 Lancaster Court Austin, Texas 78723 Firm Registration #12469 Phone 512 761 6161 Fax 512 761 6167 info@civilitude.com www.civilitude.com ENGINEERS & PLANNERS Development Services Department Compatibility Setback Waiver 1400 Cedar Ave (SP-2021-0102C) 1400 Cedar Ave, Austin, TX 78702 April 22, 2022 To: Zack Lofton Re: Dear Mr. Lofton, On behalf of our client, Urban Gravity LLC, we are submitting a waiver request for the 1400 Cedar Ave project. We are requesting the following waiver to the Land Development Code to make the project feasible: Request: Allow to reduce the 25’ no build setback to 5’ The site is composed of 2 tracts of land adding up to 0.28 acres zoned CS-MU-V-CO-NP, surrounded by SF-3-NP properties. If it were to comply with compatibility standards, this site would be forced to be developed within 0.16-acres. To achieve this density, the unit configuration would be forced to be denser in a more compact layout. Constructing townhomes within these standards is not feasible. We would like to request that the compatibility standards are modified to reduce the no build zone from 25’ to 5’ and The 50’ setback to 20’, to build five 3-story townhomes 20’ from the western SF-3 property and 25’ from the northern SF- 3 property. Attached to this letter is the proposed building elevations sheet. We believe this request does not disrupt the neighborhood’s feel and meets the intent of the code, such that no high density or commercial developments occur in a near proximity to a single-family lot. The proposed density is 5 homes for two commercial lots. Allow to reduce the 50’ setback to 20’ [LDC 25.2.1063]. Please accept this letter as our official request. If you have any questions, please call us at 512-761-6161. Sincerely, Alejandra Flores Project Engineer May 06, 2022

Scraped at: May 10, 2022, 5:30 a.m.
Planning CommissionMay 10, 2022

22 Public Comment.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

Planning Commission May 10,2022 Item 22 ASMP Update _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Commissioners; I’m Joe Reynolds. I live on West 49th St I want to briefly discuss how defective planning leads to later failed projects. Planning in Austin often focuses only on a desired outcome, not on the costs or problems of implementation. That seems very true for this version of ASMP. The streets have been considered only based on issues seen with a map, weighted by other things like bicycle plans, etc. Many of the streets have ROW specifications that have very low likelihood of being realized. Think Hancock next to the Cemetery and with a State controlled bridge over MoPac. 49th St bordered on both side by State land, and a State parking garage. Barton Creek Rd with a railroad bridge. Other plans have been similar in focus, like the Trail Plan; “Downtown to the Domain”. This defective focus leads to trouble, because during implementation the Plan is taken to be Real; “It’s approved by Council.” So, the builders don’t look for trouble, but then find it. Implementation of the Trail Plan followed the selected route, and contracted for a paved path along Shoal Creek. They didn’t check for well known geologic conditions that made the route infeasible, namely the Del Rio Clay that makes Shoal creek banks very unstable. The resulting collapse now has a cost just under $20 million. ASMP is doing the same thing, choosing routes without listing limitations. Some, like the cemetery along Hancock will be obvious problems, caught during project implementation. Others, will not likely be caught. Barton Springs Rd at Lamar has a long history of hillside collapse. Yet, ASMP calls for wider ROW that would disturb the existing hillside, causing another collapse. ASPM similarly ignores things like pipeline ROW, and like the Trail Plan, ignores geology. ASMP should not be advanced until issues of implementation are identified, recognized, and clearly noted for following teams who are building projects. Plans must be more than just desires and objectives, they must include limitations and logistics. Thank You. Planning Commission May 10,2022 Item 22 ASMP Update _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Hancock and Cemetery State Owns Land Both N&S of 49th and E&W of Sunshine Planning Commission May 10,2022 Item 22 ASMP Update _______________________________________________________________________________________________ GEOLOGY of FAILURE Railroad Bridge Barton Springs Rd has an Obvious Problem and a Known but Invisible Problem Planning Commission May 10,2022 Item 22 ASMP Update _______________________________________________________________________________________________ …

Scraped at: May 10, 2022, 5:30 a.m.
Community Development CommissionMay 10, 2022

Item5a_HACA presentation to CDC 5.10.22 final original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 17 pages

Redevelopment Projects: Chalmers Courts and Rosewood Courts Housing Authority of the City of Austin May 10, 2022 Original CHALMERS COURTS 158 Units in Central East Austin. Built in 1939. PATHWAYS AT CHALMERS COURTS MASTER PLAN Three phases totaling 398 units. Anticipated Completion: 2023 PATHWAYS AT CHALMERS SOUTH Phase 1: DONE! 86 units PATHWAYS AT CHALMERS EAST Phase 2: DONE! 156 units PATHWAYS AT CHALMERS EAST PATHWAYS AT CHALMERS EAST CommUnity Care Clinic – Medical & Dental Services PATHWAYS AT CHALMERS EAST CommUnity Care Clinic April 4th Groundbreaking PATHWAYS AT CHALMERS WEST Phase 3: Anticipated Completion Spring 2021 156 units *Subject to change PATHWAYS AT CHALMERS COURTS Unit Breakdown Bedroom Type Chalmers South Chalmers East Chalmers West TOTAL % of Total 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR 4 BR Total 44 32 6 4 86 78 53 17 8 75 49 20 12 197 134 43 24 49% 34% 11% 6% 156 156 398 . PATHWAYS AT CHALMERS COURTS Affordability Breakdown % of AMI 30% 50% 60% Market 0 0 86 0 Chalmers South Chalmers East Chalmers West Total 14 54 67 21 14 56 70 16 28 110 223 37 PATHWAYS AT ROSEWOOD COURTS Site Plan PATHWAYS AT ROSEWOOD COURTS New Construction & Historic District Chalmers South PATHWAYS AT ROSEWOOD COURTS Welcome Center & Commemorative Park VISITORS CENTER +/- 1,400 SF Entry to Park / Entry to History/ Exhibit / Gallery / Venue COMMEMORATIVE PARK ~.75 ACRE Heritage Trees/Walking Trails/Open to Community/ Special Events PATHWAYS AT ROSEWOOD COURTS Prospect Heights Site Plan PATHWAYS AT ROSEWOOD COURTS Milestones TENTATIVE TIMELINE March 2022 – Temporary resident relocation began; still underway Fall 2022 – Closing. Multifamily construction begins. Fall of 2024 – Multifamily Construction Complete. Residents Return! Timeline Subject to Change

Scraped at: May 10, 2022, 3:40 p.m.
Community Development CommissionMay 10, 2022

Item5b_EquityPreservationPLan2022-05 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 25 pages

EQUITY-BASED HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN Community Development Commission—May 10, 2022 GOAL Replace Austin’s 1981 preservation plan with an inclusive, equity-focused, and community- oriented process and outcome WHY NOW? • Substantial population growth • High development pressure Preservation plan approved I N O T A L U P O P WHY NOW? • Substantial population growth • High development pressure EQUITY + COMMUNITY • Older buildings house people affordably • Older buildings allow increased density at a human scale • Older buildings support small local businesses EQUITY + COMMUNITY • Places anchor community and memory EQUITY + COMMUNITY Images (clockwise from top): Westside Preservation Alliance/Esperanza Peace and Justice Center, Columbia University, City and County of San Francisco, Calle 24 Latino Cultural District, National Trust for Historic Preservation, San Antonio Office of Historic Preservation EQUITY + COMMUNITY • How can we better recognize, preserve, and share important places and stories? • How can preservation policies and tools address essential issues like sustainability, affordability, and displacement? • How can citizens co-create preservation policies? ) t h g i r ( i n o s u c n l I l i a c o S d n a n o i t a v r e s e r P , ) r e t n e c d n a t f e l ( n i t s u A f o y t i C / r i a h C n e p O : s e g a m I COMMUNITY-BASED PROCESS COMMUNITY-BASED PROCESS COMMUNITY-BASED PROCESS PHASE 2 Many opportunities for detailed feedback, prioritization, additions COMMUNITY-BASED PROCESS Professional facilitator COMMUNITY-BASED PROCESS 26 community members 19 ZIP codes 13 members opting into compensation AUSTIN WORKING GROUP COMMUNITY-BASED PROCESS ✓ Affordable housing advocate ✓ Archaeologist ✓ Architect ✓ Attorney ✓ Business owner ✓ City board or commission ✓ Community member ✓ Contractor ✓ Developer Economic development organization (withdrew) ✓ Educational institution ✓ Engineer ✓ Heritage organization Heritage tourism professional (withdrew) ✓ Historic property owner ✓ Historical commission (City, County, State) Landscape architect (withdrew) ✓ Neighborhood association ✓ Preservation organization ✓ Preservation consultant ✓ Religious institution ✓ Social justice organization ✓ Urban planner/planning organization LAYING THE FOUNDATION LAYING THE FOUNDATION PHASE 1 – COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 26-member community working group Essential Background and Process July ’21 Introduction and goals Aug. Sept. Equity workshop Decision-making Community heritage survey Topics Oct. Vision for the plan …

Scraped at: May 10, 2022, 3:40 p.m.
Airport Advisory CommissionMay 10, 2022

Item 3e - Bond Sale Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

City of Austin – Department of Aviation Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 (AMT) Airport Advisory Committee / May 10 © PFM 1 Pre-Pricing Events  Finance staff spent time educating investors about the growth at AUS prior to the bond sale to ensure maximum participation: • 5 in-person investor meetings in 2022 • 1 one-on-one investor calls leading up to the bond • 53 views of the investor roadshow leading up to the sale bond sale  A strong financial track record coupled with a strong recovery from the Pandemic led to an upgrade of the Airport’s credit rating from S&P from A to A+ • The Airport is one of only 7 airports to be upgraded by S&P in 2022 (after 11 downgrades due to the Pandemic) © PFM 2 Pricing Results  Investor interest for the Airport’s bonds was high and resulted in $2.5 billion worth of orders for approximately $400 million of bonds  This interest allowed the underwriter to lower yields on the bonds up to 9 basis points, despite the tax- exempt index staying flat on the day  7 different investors placed orders for over $100 million of the Airport’s bonds © PFM 3 Aggregate Pricing Results  The overall true interest cost of the bonds was 4.30%  Prior to the sale, interest rates had been increasing due to investor expectations about inflation and future Federal Reserve actions © PFM 4 Maturity1 Year Note2 Year Note3 Year Note5 Year Note10 Year Bond30 Year BondCurrent Yield1.93%2.48%2.66%2.74%2.72%2.83%% Time Less than Current52.01%65.02%62.67%57.37%41.91%21.32%Maximum Rate6.38%6.91%6.90%6.81%6.79%6.75%Minimum Rate0.04%0.10%0.11%0.19%0.51%1.00%Average Rate1.97%2.09%2.33%2.70%3.31%3.92%52.0%65.0%62.7%57.4%41.9%21.3%0.0%1.0%2.0%3.0%4.0%5.0%6.0%7.0%8.0%0%20%40%60%80%100%1 Year Note2 Year Note3 Year Note5 Year Note10 Year Bond30 Year BondMaturityCurrent US Treasury Rates% of Time US Treasury Rates Have Been LowerThan Current Levels% Of Time US Treasury Rates Have Been Lower Since 199904/26/2022 US Treasury Source: Thomson-Reuters Debt Service / Spreads to MMD  The evening before the sale, results were projected at: • True Interest Cost of 4.35% • Total debt service of $840.9 million  Final sale results were: • True Interest Cost of 4.30% • Total debt service of $835.0 million  Strong investor interest was able to be leveraged into approximately $5 million of debt service savings for the Airport over the life of the bonds © PFM 5 MaturityCouponYieldMMDSpread to MMD11/15/20255.000%2.900%2.350%0.5500%11/15/20265.000%2.940%2.370%0.5700%11/15/20275.000%3.040%2.420%0.6200%11/15/20285.000%3.160%2.490%0.6700%11/15/20295.000%3.280%2.560%0.7200%11/15/20305.000%3.370%2.600%0.7700%11/15/20315.000%3.490%2.670%0.8200%11/15/20325.000%3.550%2.700%0.8500%11/15/20335.000%3.640%2.750%0.8900%11/15/20345.000%3.690%2.770%0.9200%11/15/20355.000%3.750%2.800%0.9500%11/15/20365.000%3.800%2.800%1.0000%11/15/20375.000%3.820%2.820%1.0000%11/15/20385.000%3.880%2.840%1.0400%11/15/20395.000%3.910%2.860%1.0500%11/15/20405.000%3.920%2.870%1.0500%11/15/20415.000%3.930%2.880%1.0500%11/15/20425.000%3.950%2.900%1.0500%11/15/20435.000%3.970%2.920%1.0500%11/15/20475.250%3.890%2.980%0.9100%11/15/20525.000%4.060%3.030%1.0300%11/15/20524.250%4.270%3.030%1.2400% Use of Proceeds  Purpose of the Series 2022 Bonds: • Partially fund the Airport Expansion and Development Program (AEDP) which will: …

Scraped at: May 10, 2022, 3:50 p.m.
Planning CommissionMay 10, 2022

B-06 Public Communication.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 7 pages

Brandy Maggio 810 W St Johns Ave Unit 1159 Austin, TX 78752 May 9th, 2022 I’m writing to oppose 2022-036792 ZC, which would permanently open the gate between Easy Wind and Morrow St and which they have been recently testing out. I have serious concerns around how this will impact the safety of the residents using the street. In particular, I’m worried about how it would disproportionately affect: 1) those with visual impairments and other disabilities who live in this area to be closer to transit and 2) the many children who live in the neighborhood and their families who chose this area to raise them. The neighborhood off of Easy Wind is extremely walkable and there are always people enjoying the day, strolling with their children, people walking dogs, and frequent bicycle riders on the road. The way the area is developed, it encourages people to cross Easy Wind frequently, as well as many side roads. For years, this has never been a problem; people driving around were not driving thru the neighborhood; they lived in the neighborhood and were respectful of their neighbors. They took a care for their safety. Since the gate was removed, I’ve noticed an increase in traffic going thru the neighborhood. Additionally, those who are driving out towards Morrow are driving at higher speeds. I, personally, have had one very close call with a car who was driving out of Easy Wind towards Morrow street and did not stop as I attempted to cross at an intersection. There have been other situations that were avoided primarily because I chose not to attempt to cross, even when I had the right of way. And I have full vision; I worry about the impact for my neighbors who are more limited. That easily could have been a tragedy. Children are also not always so wise, no matter how many times we tell them to look both ways. I’m assuming that part of the reason this is being opened is to allow for easier access of emergency vehicles. Or perhaps it was to allow an alternative route out of the area for the first responders who live in our neighborhood. I was also concerned when I saw the way the gate was closed off, with the lock and everything. I had hoped that the reason it was removed was to upgrade the barrier into something that first …

Scraped at: May 10, 2022, 8 p.m.
Planning CommissionMay 10, 2022

B-07 Govalle Twin Liquors Correspondence.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: May 10, 2022, 8 p.m.
Robert Mueller Municipal Airport Plan Implementation Advisory CommissionMay 10, 2022

Item 1A: POA Long-Term Financials Overview original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 8 pages

POA Long-Term Financials Overview Mueller Commission May 10, 2022 1 Agenda • About the Overall Budget • About the Build-Out Budget • About Reserves • About the Pavilion Pro Forma Mueller Commission, May 10, 2022 | 2 A POA Budget Introduction • A fundamental task of a POA/HOA is to produce an annual budget, based on previous expenses, anticipated revenues, committee input, a reserve study and more. • A budget committee reviews the annual budget before the master board approves it. • The budget is then shared at the annual meeting, posted online and assessment notices are conveyed by newsletter and mail. • Over the years, the budget has become more detailed: o First, by breaking the budget into special service areas like garden homes and pools o Second, by adding line items within sub- categories (for example, specialty mulch used at playscapes is separated by mulch used everywhere else) o Today, there are more than 200 line items Mueller Commission, May 10, 2022 | 3 The Build-Out Budget • With transition from developer to property owners on the horizon, the POA board and staff charted out the draft budget for 2022 through 2026 This is well after the MDA is set to expire in December 2024 o o Main purpose: to show the Budget, Transition committees the financial health of the POA upon build out • It is purposely financially conservative o Many expenses increased annually by 5-6% instead of 3%, due to inflation Hard-to-predict items, such as irrigation utilities, are estimated higher If revenue exceeds expenses, any overage goes to reserves for future larger expenses o o • Currently includes small annual assessment increase (5%) to keep up with increased expenses • Future items are incorporated, such as ballpark figures for future parks maintenance and anticipated additional staff • This “build-out” budget is a working draft that will be updated many times, but it will be published for any Mueller property owners to view online by end of this week Mueller Commission, May 10, 2022 | 4 About the Reserve Study • Is a long-range planning tool that helps POA staffs and boards anticipate and prepare for the cost of repairing and/or replacing a community’s common assets • Presents a prioritized and potential schedule of capital projects and a reserve funding plan to offset future costs associated with repairing and replacing the common assets • We asked the …

Scraped at: May 11, 2022, 2:10 p.m.
Community Development CommissionMay 10, 2022

CDC-Video-5-10-2022 original link

Play video

Scraped at: May 11, 2022, 8:40 p.m.
Robert Mueller Municipal Airport Plan Implementation Advisory CommissionMay 10, 2022

Play audio original link

Play audio

Scraped at: May 12, 2022, 7:10 p.m.
Airport Advisory CommissionMay 10, 2022

Play audio original link

Play audio

Scraped at: May 16, 2022, 4:50 p.m.
Planning CommissionMay 10, 2022

May 10, 2022 Planning Commission original link

Play video

Scraped at: June 4, 2022, midnight