All documents

RSS feed for this page

Parks and Recreation BoardAug. 24, 2021

B5: A-Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 23 pages

A Sustainable Greenway for South Austin Presentation to the Parks and Recreation Board August 24, 2021 Supports the City of Austin Strategic Direction 2023: Health and Environment ● Strategies ○ To support, maintain, and expand parks, open spaces, recreational facilities, and our urban trail network. ○ Provide accessible, diverse, and inclusive parks and recreation programs and amenities. Supports the Council Approved PARD Long Range Plan: ● Specific Recommendations ○ Develop a Vision Plan for Williamson Creek Greenbelt ○ Acquire parkland and improved trail connection/development Supports Council Approved Neighborhood Plans: ● ● ● ● Southeast Combined South Congress Combined South Austin Combined Oakhill Combined Identified in Council Approved Urban Trails Master Plan: ● Tier II Urban Trail Community Engagement Joint Community and City collaboration through working groups Direct feedback tools on plan progress: ● Social Pinpoint interactive map ● Creek Idea Cards ● Participatory Budgeting activity ● Comment platform for reviewing drafts Person to Person conversations: ● Virtual Community Picnics ● Creek Chats (Virtual & in-person Pop-ups) ● Individual & group meetings as requested “Take home” and individual activities: ● Community storytelling ● iNaturalist ● Conversation Toolkit ● Virtual Creek Stomps ● Creek Stomp Journal ● Flat Stanley Creek Stories General outreach: ● Newsletters ● Door hangers ● Yard signs ● Direct mail event invitation ● Social media notifications ● Project and neighborhood listservs ● Maintain active project website Team Roles Community Powered Workshop ● Facilitate engagement process in collaboration with Working Groups ● Grant partner The Nature Conservancy ● Liaise with City of Austin Departments ● Conduct field assessments and mapping ● Grant partner Asakura Robinson ● Landscape Architecture consultant Community Working Group ● 8 residents ● Collaborate on engagement activities and process ● Conduct outreach with neighbors and neighborhood groups ● Provide direct feedback on plan progress City Working Group ● 11 City of Austin staff + 2 National Park Service staff ● Technical expertise on parks, trails planning, and environmental restoration ● Advise on City of Austin requirements for proposed plan elements and planning processes Engagement Numbers 2,126 unique visitors to Central Williamson Creek Greenway website in 2020 1,136 unique visitors to Central Williamson Creek Greenway website in 2021 (Jan 1 - May 25) 651 unique users on Social Pinpoint Interactive Map 999 unique users on Social Pinpoint Creek Idea Cards and Vision Plan draft 133 participants in all virtual and socially-distanced events 234 newsletter subscribers on Mailchimp …

Scraped at: Aug. 20, 2021, 10:52 p.m.
Parks and Recreation BoardAug. 24, 2021

B5: B-Engagement Data Memo original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

TO: City of Austin Parks and Recreation Board Members FROM: Community Powered Workshop DATE: July 28, 2021 RE: Central Williamson Creek Greenway Vision Plan Community Engagement Statistics This memo provides summary information regarding community engagement statistics for the Central Williamson Creek Greenway Vision Plan. The data provided reflects the verifiable number of individuals who were aware of the vision planning process and either chose to take further action or not. This data comes from analytics from the online platforms used throughout the vision planning process. We also acknowledge that there are many other means of increasing awareness about the vision planning process that may not be reflected in the data we are able to collect on individual engagement including: word of mouth between friends and neighbors; distribution of printed materials, such as engagement toolkits, door hangers, letters, and yard signs; and social media and neighborhood listserv posts. All of these awareness strategies listed were also conducted throughout the vision planning process, but we are unable to verify the number of individuals this information reached and are not including them in the tally provided below. Hence, it is possible that the numbers shown below are lower than the actual number of people that were aware of the ongoing vision planning process. Total confirmable individuals aware of the Central Williamson Creek Greenway Vision Plan Number Description Dec 31, 2020) May 25, 2021) 2,126 unique visitors* to Central Williamson Creek Greenway website in 2020 (Jan 1 - 1,136 unique visitors* to Central Williamson Creek Greenway website in 2021 (Jan 1 - 651 unique users** on Social Pinpoint Interactive Map 999 unique users** on Social Pinpoint Creek Idea Cards and Vision Plan draft 133 participants in all virtual and socially-distanced events*** 234 newsletter subscribers on Mailchimp***** Page 1/3 20 storytellers 28 observers on iNaturalist 5,327 TOTAL * Unique Visitors: according to the Squarespace analytics panel the total unique visitors is an estimate of the total number of visitors that reached the website. This is a distinct metric from the number of single browsing sessions by individual visitors or how many actual page requests the site received. For more information about Squarespace analytics please visit: https://support.squarespace.com/hc/en-us/articles/217999797-Traffic-Analytics ** Unique Users: according to the Social Pinpoint engagement summary dashboard unique users are defined as the total number of unique people viewing your site (generally determined by using the same browser). This number is distinct from the individual …

Scraped at: Aug. 20, 2021, 10:52 p.m.
Parks and Recreation BoardAug. 24, 2021

B5: C-Board Questions and Responses original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

TO: City of Austin Parks and Recreation Board Members FROM: Community Powered Workshop DATE: July 28, 2021 RE: Central Williamson Creek Greenway Vision Plan May 25, 2021 PARB hearing questions and responses The following written responses to questions from the Parks and Recreation Board at the May 25, 2021 meeting are provided to offer additional documentation and clarity. Additional questions regarding the Central Williamson Creek Greenway Vision Plan and process may be directed to Community Powered Workshop Executive Director, Nicole Joslin at nicole@cp-workshop.org. To review the presentation again please follow this link to the hearing recording; the presentation beings around minute marker 31:20 and ends around 43:12. PARB Member Anna Di Carlo: 1. Request for additional information about the engagement process over the past year and how the previous community engagement was also incorporated into this plan. a. This Vision Plan is the culmination of a multi-year process of community members sharing their stories; mapping and providing over 130 comments on 43+ community-identified ideas; joining in on 3 socially distanced pop-ups along the creek, 5 virtual events and 6 virtual creek chats; casting 2,200 votes on community priorities and providing nearly 700 feedback comments on the draft alone, which were incorporated into the final version presented on May 25, 2021 to the Parks and Recreation Board. This community-led effort involved a collaboration model of a Community Working Group of eight neighbors and a City Working Group of department representatives from the Watershed Protection Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Public Works, and more. 2. Request for confirmation of the total number of individuals who participated in any part of the engagement process. a. The data provided reflects the verifiable number of individuals who were aware of the vision planning process and either chose to take further action or not. This data comes from analytics from the online platforms used throughout the vision planning process. We also acknowledge that there are many other means of increasing awareness about the vision planning process that may not be reflected in the data we are able to collect on individual engagement including: word of mouth between friends and neighbors; distribution of printed materials, Page 1/9 such as engagement toolkits, door hangers, letters, and yard signs; and social media and neighborhood listserv posts. All of these awareness strategies listed were also conducted throughout the vision planning process, but we are unable to verify the number of …

Scraped at: Aug. 20, 2021, 10:52 p.m.
Parks and Recreation BoardAug. 24, 2021

C1: Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 20 pages

Parks and Recreation Board Briefing AUGUST 24, 2021 AGENDA 1. Schedule 2. Review of Progress 3. Next Steps Community Meeting #1 | 3 SCHEDULE PROJECT KICK-OFF FEB 1ST SMALL GROUP DISCUSSIONS PROJECT POP-UPS COMMUNITY MEETING #5 (IF NEEDED) COMMUNITY MEETING #1 INTRO TO THE PROJECT PROJECT POP-UPS COMMUNITY MEETING #3 ALTERNATIVES FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR TAG KICK-OFF MEETING COMMUNITY MEETING #2 PROGRAMMING SMALL GROUP DISCUSSIONS COMMUNITY MEETING #4 DRAFT PLAN FINAL VISION PLAN DRAFT TO COUNCIL Strategic Kick-Off and Project Initiation Site and Contextural Analysis and Data Project Meetings Stakeholders/Community Participation City Staff, Public Review/Boards, Commissions, Council Review Vision Plan Report Preparation Project Work Plan Kick-Off Meeting Site Analysis and Needs Assessment Report Project Meetings Materials Community Outreach and Draft Vision Plan Presentation of the Site Analysis and Meeting Minutes and Summaries Engagement Plan Final Draft Vision Plan Document Technical Advisory Group Meetings Needs Assessment Report Community Engagement and Outreach Presentation of Final Draft Vision Plan Document to City Commission, Progress Reports Presentation of the Site Analysis and Needs Boards, City Manager and City Council Provide a Needs Assessment Report Preliminary Vision Plan Concepts Final Vision Plan Document Assessment Report to City Commission, Boards, City Manager and City Council Community Wide Survey 4 REVIEW OF PROGRESS COMMUNITY MEETING #1 • Time: June 29th 6pm • Participants: About 140 people through Zoom, 13-15 through Facebook Live • Survey during the Meeting: 82 participants • Presentation Contents • Team Overview • Schedule • The Purpose of the Plan • History • Ecology • Mobility • Program/Funding • Relevant Plans • Regulation 6 COMMUNITY MEETING #1 Facebook Live Screenshot Zoom Live Screenshot 7 Council District Pop-ups Additional Pop-ups Upcoming Pop-ups • Monday, July 19 • Tuesday, July 27 • Saturday, August 7 • Tuesday, August 10 • Tuesday, September 7 7am - 10am Northwest Family YMCA (D6) 5807 McNeil Drive 7pm - 10pm Hillside Concert Series (D2) A.B. Cantu Rec Center APF Volunteer Saturday Oak Springs (D1, D3) Oak Springs School Park 6pm - 8pm Blues on the Green - Postponed Zilker Park Great Lawn UT Happier Happy Hour student event UT Austin • Saturday, July 24 • Tuesday, July 27 • Saturday, August 7 • Wednesday, August 11 • Friday, September 17 12pm - 3pm Shipe Neighborhood Pool (D9) 4400 Avenue G 6pm - 8pm Blues on the Green Zilker Park …

Scraped at: Aug. 20, 2021, 10:52 p.m.
Parks and Recreation BoardAug. 24, 2021

E: Director's Report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 11 pages

PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD DIRECTOR’S REPORT DATE: August 2021 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT EVENTS: Zilker Metropolitan Park Vision Plan: As follow-up to 11 in-person pop-ups in July which included an event at a park or pool in every Council District and one in Zilker Park, the planning team added several tabling events to continue to engage and survey community members prior to Community Meeting #2. Events included Blues on the Green (7/27, 7/28), Hillside Concert Series (7/27, 8/3), United Way’s Family Resource Fair (8/6), and Austin Parks Foundation Volunteer Days at Oak Springs (8/7). Community Meeting #2 occurred virtually on August 10 and focused on programming uses and priorities. The meeting’s survey will remain open for continued input and additional tabling opportunities will take place in September, as COVID-19 circumstances allow. Additionally, the planning team continues to engage the project’s Technical Advisory Group (Meeting #4, 8/18) and is scheduled to provide a briefing to the Parks and Recreation Board on August 24. Further details including the Site Analysis and Needs Assessment Report, meeting recordings, and community survey may be found on the project website at: https://www.austintexas.gov/ZilkerVision. Districts 5 and 8 Water Quality Improvements at the Asian American Resource Center: The Watershed Protection Department (WPD), will hold an informational community meeting on water quality improvements for Little Walnut Creek, which will enhance and benefit the Asian American Resource Center (AARC) and diminish the occurrence of flood events on Cameron Road. The Parks and Recreation Department (PARD) and WPD have worked together on this water quality project, as it surrounds the AARC campus and portions of the WPD project will include elements identified in the 2019 Council approved AARC Facility Expansion Plan. The project includes pond expansion, addition of a wetlands area, a new pedestrian bridge as well as new trails and landscaping. The online community meeting will be held on Wednesday, August 25, 2021, at 6:30pm. More information can be found at the project website at: https://www.austintexas.gov/LittleWalnutAARC. This project will be funded by WPD. District 1 1 PLANNING UPDATES: North Burnet / Gateway Regulating Plan Amendment: In the course of review of the Broadmoor Preliminary Plan, PARD staff met often with the developer (Brandywine/Drenner Group) and the City Law Department. The resulting code interpretation from Law was that any credit for offsite parkland dedication (e.g., parkland dedication on a separate block), would require the dedication be completed by the time the certificate of …

Scraped at: Aug. 20, 2021, 10:52 p.m.
Parks and Recreation BoardAug. 24, 2021

Play video original link

Play video

Scraped at: Aug. 25, 2021, 6:50 p.m.
Parks and Recreation BoardAug. 24, 2021

Approved Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD Tuesday, August 24, 2021 – 5:30pm Via Videoconference MINUTES The Parks and Recreation Board convened in a regular meeting on Tuesday, August 24, 2021 via videoconference in Austin, Texas. Chair Lewis called the meeting to order at 5:32pm. Board Members in Attendance: Chair Dawn Lewis, Vice Chair Richard DePalma, Nancy Barnard, Laura Cottam Sajbel, Anna Di Carlo, Sarah Faust, Lisa Hugman and Nina Rinaldi. Board Members Absent: Kimberly Taylor. Staff in Attendance: Kimberly McNeeley, Liana Kallivoka, Suzanne Piper, Anthony Segura, Gregory Montes, Ricardo Soliz, Christina Bies, Kevin Gomillion, Denisha Cox, Patricia Rossett, Christine Chute Canul, Leah Gibson, Christa McCarthy, Justin Schneider, Megan Eckard, Sammi Curless. Chair Lewis made a motion to modify Agenda Item speaker comment time to 90 seconds; Vice Chair DePalma seconded the motion. The motion passed 7-1 with Board Member Taylor absent and two vacancies. Those voting aye were Chair Lewis, Vice Chair DePalma, Board Members Barnard, Cottam Sajbel, Di Carlo, Hugman, and Rinaldi. Those voting nay were Board Member Faust. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Kevin Reinis – creation of a special committee to engage in rebuilding/relocation of the boat house. A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes from the regular meeting of June 22, 2021 were approved on Vice Chair DePlama’s motion, Board Member Barnard second on a 6-1 vote with Board Member Taylor absent and two vacancies. Those voting aye were Chair Lewis, Vice Chair DePalma, Board Members Barnard, Di Carlo, Hugman and Rinaldi. Those voting nay were Board Member Cottam Sajbel. Those abstaining were Board Members Faust. B. NEW BUSINESS: PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS CONSENT 1. Presentation, discussion and possible action regarding a recommendation to the City Council for the negotiation and execution of a partnership agreement with The Trail Page 1 of 3 Foundation for the operations, maintenance and programming for the Ann and Roy Butler Hike-and-Bike Trail at Town Lake Metropolitan Park. Board Member Faust pulled the item from the consent agenda. Following discussion, Vice Chair DePalma made a motion to recommend to the City Council the negotiation and execution of a partnership agreement with The Trail Foundation for the operations, maintenance and programming for the Ann and Roy Butler Hike-and-Bike Trail at Town Lake Metropolitan Park; Board Member Di Carlo seconded the motion. The motion passed 8-0 with Board Member Taylor absent and two vacancies. NON-CONSENT 2. Discussion and possible action on Contracts and Concessions Committee and …

Scraped at: Sept. 15, 2021, 10:20 p.m.
Asian American Quality of Life Advisory CommissionAug. 24, 2021

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

Versión en español a continuación. Asian American Quality of Life Advisory Commission August 24, 2021 Asian American Quality of Life Advisory Commission to be held August 24, 2021 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (August 23, 2021 by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the August 24, 2021 Asian American Quality of Life Advisory Commission Meeting, members of the public must:  Call or email the board liaison ena ganguly at (512) 978-1569 or enakshi.ganguly@austintexas.gov no later than noon, (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting).  Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call.  Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak.  Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak.  Handouts or other information may be emailed to enakshi.ganguly@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting.  If the meeting is broadcast live, it may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch- atxn-live Reunión del Asian American Quality of Life Advisory Commission Agosto 24, 2021 La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (agosto 23, 2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los miembros del público deben:  Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en ena ganguly at (512) 978-1569 o enakshi.ganguly@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, …

Scraped at: Aug. 20, 2021, 9:30 p.m.
Asian American Quality of Life Advisory CommissionAug. 24, 2021

Backup original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

ASIAN AMERICAN QUALITY OF LIFE ADVISORY COMMISSION (AAQOLAC) SPECIAL CALLED MEETING MINUTES OF TUESDAY, JUNE 15, 2021 The AAQOLAC convened in a regular meeting on Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Chair Yoshida called the Commission Meeting to order at 6:14 p.m. Commission Members in Attendance: Pooja Sethi, Sarah Chen, Kirk Yoshida, Hanna Huang, Shubhada Saxena, Fang Fang, Pramod Patil, and Vince Cobalis Staff in Attendance: Rey Arellano, Assistant City Manager Joshua Robinson, Equity & Inclusion Program Coordinator (Equity Office) Citizen Communication: N/A 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Commission moved to approve minutes from AAQOLAC meeting on April 20, 2021. Commissioner Cobalis motioned. Commissioner Huang seconded. Vote was 8-0. 2. OLD BUSINESS a. Workgroup/Project Reports 1. Asian American Resource Center (AARC) Workgroup – No updated provided 2. Health and Community Engagement Workgroup – No updated provided 3. Arts & Culture Workgroup – Commissioner Patil provided an update 4. Human Resources Workgroup – No update provided 5. Business Planning Workgroup – No update provided 6. Public Safety / Policing Project – Chair Yoshida provided an update. 7. Community Stakeholder Nomination Project – No update provided b. Update on the Joint Inclusion Committee Meeting – Commissioner Cobalis provided an update on the upcoming 1. Update on the AARC Master Plan - Chair Yoshida provided an update. 2. Winter Storm Review Task Force – No update provided. c. Follow-up Items: 3. NEW BUSINESS a. Presentation and Discussion with the Central Health Pandemic Equity Committee (Megan Cermak) – Megan Cermak, Central Health Pandemic provided an update on the Central Health Pandemic Equity Committee. 4. INFORMATION SHARING a. Commissioners Sethi, Cobalis, Patil, and Chen 5. FUTURE AGENDA 6. ADJOURN Chair Yoshida adjourned the meeting without any objections at 7:35 p.m.

Scraped at: Sept. 9, 2021, 5:30 a.m.
Asian American Quality of Life Advisory CommissionAug. 24, 2021

Backup original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

JOINT INCLUSION COMMITTEE June 23rd, 2021 Report to Asian American Quality of Life Commission By Vince Cobalis Joint Inclusion Committee members: Hispanic Quality of Life Advisory Commission: Amanda Afifi Alternate: Sharon Vigil Alternate: Johanna Hosking Pulido Early Childhood Council: Raul Alvarez Commission for Women: Flannery Bope Alternate: Rebecca Austen Comission for Seniors: Janee Briesemeister Alternate: Sally VanSickle Human Rights Commission: Jamarr Brown Alternate: Idona Griffith Asian American Quality of Life Commission: Vincent Cobalis Alternate: Hanna Huang Commission on Immigrant Affairs: Karen Crawford (Vice Chair) Alternate: Krystal Gomez Alternate: Charles Curry LGBTQ Quality of Life Commission: Sandra Chavez (Chair) Mayor’s Committee for People with Disability: Robin Orlowski African American Resource Advisory Commission: Gregory Smith Alternate: Joey Gidseg Alternate: Marissa Jones 1. Presentation from Central Health Pandemic Equity from Megan Cermak 2. Discussed Compassion 2020 Compassion Contract 3. Supported 6 recommendations from the Mayor’s Committee for People with Disabilities 4. Increased funding for cultural-specific mental health awareness and services and support for the recommendations from the Asian American Quality of Life Advisory Commission and the LGBTQ Quality of Life Commission. 5. Recommendation for increased funding for health care navigators and support for the recommendations from the Asian American Quality of Life Advisory Commission and the Commission on Immigrant Affairs. Amended to add Hispanic Quality of Life Commission 6. Support recommendation from the Commission on Women to provide free menstrual products in public places that are controlled and managed by the City of Austin that are accessible to folks experiencing homelessness and providing kits and educational materials about menstruation and menstrual disorders to individuals experiencing homelessness, 7. Voted to schedule Joint Inclusion Committee meetings in 2021 on the fourth Wednesdays at 3 pm with the exception of the November and December meetings NEW BUSINESS: 1. Endorse the Commission on Disabilities Resolution Number: 20210212-2B: A Resolution to Replace Mention of TTY in City of Austin Facilities 2. Endorsement of Mayor’s Committee for People with Disability’s Resolution Number: 20210409- 2B: A Resolution Acknowledging Impacts of Winter Storm Uri on People with Disabilities 3. Endorsement of Mayor’s Committee for People with Disability’s Resolution Number: 20210312- 2D: A Resolution For Austin Police department to reintegrate braille onto identification cards 4. Two Early Childhood Council recommendations tabled until next meeting

Scraped at: Sept. 9, 2021, 5:30 a.m.
Asian American Quality of Life Advisory CommissionAug. 24, 2021

Backup original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

AARC Workgroup 7/13/21 Meeting notes Attendees: Sona Shah, Jae Kwon, Laura Esparza, Christina Bies , Debasree Das Gupta, Shiller Liao, Vince Cobalis (lead) 1. NAAO Donor wall - - AARC staff awaiting NAAO completion to make additional improvements in the Zen Garden. - Per S. Liao: Delays due to COVID preventing access for awhile and then impacting the contractor. * Paint background, secure bricks and place a glass front for protection. 2. Introductions: Jae Kwon, part-time temp Marketing Rep, was introduced. He will be focused on helping with Phase 2 community engagement. 3. Phase 2 Community Engagement * David Nicks will write out Community Engagement Plan document * Architect under contract in August so currently no contact period - Architect will have it’s own process, informed by the City Community Engagement - Community Engagement * AARC staff working on following: ‐ Identifying groups that currently use the facility and don't - Developing outreach plan using Airtables so we are ready once architect contract signed ‐ Identifying Community Champions that can outreach in their communities ‐‐ would like Culture & Arts group of Commission to be involved - input from community will be about facility needs so thinking about how to present that information since City language is hard to understand for many communities ‐ Considering having initial meeting to invite public and NAAO to understand process and then do direct outreach ‐ During engagement process will also go to events hosted by other culture groups for hard to reach populations * Next steps: flesh out air table * Future meeting with Architect * Expect Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) contract in October (9700 sq gy, 450 capacity) 4. Language Access * APH Language Access Coordinator (template for similar PARD position) * PARD has Language Access SPOC, but need wider responsibility * Focus on defining position for 2023 budget request 5. Senior program / Meals on Wheels update * AARC will Open August 16, * Slow to implement Meals on Wheels due to supply chain problem * Space Reserved for Senior meals Mon ‐ Thurs 9am‐3pm 6. AARC now taking reservations for rooms and events * Fees same as 2021

Scraped at: Sept. 9, 2021, 5:30 a.m.
Asian American Quality of Life Advisory CommissionAug. 24, 2021

Play audio original link

Play audio

Scraped at: Sept. 24, 2021, 10:30 p.m.
Asian American Quality of Life Advisory CommissionAug. 24, 2021

Approved Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

Versión en español a continuación. Asian American Quality of Life Advisory Commission August 24, 2021 Asian American Quality of Life Advisory Commission to be held August 24, 2021 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (August 23, 2021 by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the August 24, 2021 Asian American Quality of Life Advisory Commission Meeting, members of the public must:  Call or email the board liaison ena ganguly at (512) 978-1569 or enakshi.ganguly@austintexas.gov no later than noon, (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting).  Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call.  Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak.  Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak.  Handouts or other information may be emailed to enakshi.ganguly@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting.  If the meeting is broadcast live, it may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch- atxn-live Reunión del Asian American Quality of Life Advisory Commission Agosto 24, 2021 La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (agosto 23, 2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los miembros del público deben:  Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en ena ganguly at (512) 978-1569 o enakshi.ganguly@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, …

Scraped at: Oct. 15, 2021, 11:30 a.m.
Human Rights CommissionAug. 23, 2021

Location: Via Videoconferencing original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

Versión en español a continuación. Human Rights Commission Meeting August 23, 2021 Human Rights Commission to be held August 23, 2021 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (August 22, 2021 by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the August 23, 2021 Human Rights Commission Meeting, members of the public must: •Call or email the board liaison Jonathan Babiak at (512) 974-3203 or jonathan.babiak@austintexas.gov no later than noon, August 22, 2021 (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). •Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. •Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. •Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. •Handouts or other information may be emailed to jonathan.babiak@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. •If the meeting is broadcast live, it may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Reunión del HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION FECHA de la reunion August 23, 2021 La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (August 22, 2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los miembros del público deben: • Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en Jonathan Babiak at (512) 974-3203 o jonathan.babiak@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, dirección de correo electrónico (opcional) y un número de teléfono (debe ser el número que …

Scraped at: Aug. 21, 2021, 5:30 a.m.
Human Rights CommissionAug. 23, 2021

20210823 003b Public Health Recommendation DRAFT original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Human Rights Commission Recommendation Number 20210726-003b: Public Health Crises and Vaccine Inequities WHEREAS, Covid19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted low income communities and communities of color; WHEREAS, solutions are not equitable in terms of digital access and transportation; and WHEREAS, the only way we can end this pandemic is vaccinating our population and reaching herd immunity; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Human Rights Commission recommends ease access to vaccine registration portals and administration of vaccines in a culturally sensitive manner by exploring all available means in order to create short, medium, and long-term solutions for public health crises and vaccine inequities in Austin. Date of Approval: July 26, 2021 Record of the vote: Attest: _____________________________________________ (Staff or board member can sign)

Scraped at: Aug. 21, 2021, 5:30 a.m.
Human Rights CommissionAug. 23, 2021

20210823 003c original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 124 pages

6/23/2021 Medically Unnecessary Surgeries on Intersex Children in the US | HRW DONATE NOW I. Background July , “I Want to Be Like Nature Made Me” Medically Unnecessary Surgeries on Intersex Children in the US A father plays with his daughter, who was born with atypical sex characteristics. Despite pressure from doctors, the parents chose not to elect medically unnecessary surgeries on their child. © 2017 Human Rights Watch Video Map Photo Gallery Summary https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/07/25/i-want-be-nature-made-me/medically-unnecessary-surgeries-intersex-children-us 1/124 6/23/2021 Medically Unnecessary Surgeries on Intersex Children in the US | HRW Reader Advisory: This report contains graphic descriptions of traumatic experiences, DONATE NOW I. Background often affecting children. Intersex people in the United States are subjected to medical practices that can inflict irreversible physical and psychological harm on them starting in infancy, harms that can last throughout their lives. Many of these procedures are done with the stated aim of making it easier for children to grow up “normal” and integrate more easily into society by helping them conform to a particular sex assignment. The results are often catastrophic, the supposed benefits are largely unproven, and there are generally no urgent health considerations at stake. Procedures that could be delayed until intersex children are old enough to decide whether they want them are instead performed on infants who then have to live with the consequences for a lifetime. Intersex people are not rare, but they are widely misunderstood. Biology classes often oversimplify a fundamental reality. We are taught that sex is dimorphic: simply male or female. But sex, in reality, is a spectrum—with the majority of humans appearing to exist at one end or the other. In fact, as many as 1.7 percent of babies are different from what is typically called a boy or a girl. The chromosomes, gonads, internal or external genitalia in these children— intersex children—differ from social expectations. Around 1 in 2,000 babies is different enough https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/07/25/i-want-be-nature-made-me/medically-unnecessary-surgeries-intersex-children-us 2/124 6/23/2021 Medically Unnecessary Surgeries on Intersex Children in the US | HRW that doctors may recommend surgical intervention to make the body appear more in line with DONATE NOW I. Background those expectations. Until the 1960s, when intersex children were born, the people around them—parents and doctors—made their best guess and assigned the child a sex. Parents then reared them per social gender norms. Sometimes the intersex people experienced harassment and discrimination as a result of their atypical traits but …

Scraped at: Aug. 21, 2021, 5:30 a.m.
Human Rights CommissionAug. 23, 2021

20210823 003c original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

6/23/2021 Op-Ed | Don’t forget the “I” in LGBTQIA+ | amNewYork AMNY Newsletter Tackle the city, with our help. Subscribe Boroughs ⌵ Business Events Games Digital Editions Webinars Podcasts Contact Us    Op-Ed Op-Ed | Don’t forget the “I” in LGBTQIA+ By NYC Councilmember Daniel Dromm  0 comments Posted on June 21, 2021 F  Ho X Photo via Getty Images https://www.amny.com/opinion/op-ed-dont-forget-the-i-in-lgbtqia/?fbclid=IwAR3F34c9kMlZSFdQ7TbUotQT1KWAlJwxTEnkpETw8GkOmaf05Oc1DAS9wc4 1/7 ___Flipthroughtoday’spaper 6/23/2021 Op-Ed | Don’t forget the “I” in LGBTQIA+ | amNewYork Facebook Twitter Print More 2  Ea Ta ou S  Sign up for our PoliticsNY newsletter for the latest coverage and to stay informed about the 2021 elections in your district and across NYC I founded Queens Pride 29 years ago to be a welcoming space for all the borough’s diverse communities. Through the years, I excitedly watched as this colorful celebration, with a serious political message, grew. It seems every country is now represented. The transgender presence, always there from the beginning, is ubiquitous at this point. Many others of all stripes ock to an event that is grounded in family, friends, and neighbors, not corporations. And, of course, so many straight allies have come to stand with us, which always makes me swell with emotion. If asked to distill the essence of Pride, I would say it is about creating a home for all who do not conform to rigid societal notions of gender and sexuality. One group is taking this a step further and challenging the idea of what “normal” bodies should look like: the intersex community. Eliot Glazer, Thank You For Coming Out (While Staying In) Thank You for Coming Out 00:00 00:00 SUBSCRIBE:  RSS  iTunes  Spotify  Stitcher  Amazon  Google Play LATEST “Intersex” is an umbrella term for differences in sex traits or reproductive anatomy. Intersex people are born with these differences or develop them in childhood. There are many possible differences in genitalia, hormones, internal anatomy, or chromosomes, compared to the usual two ways that human bodies develop. According to the United Nations, up to 1.7 percent of the world population are born with intersex traits. Medical professionals often encourage parents and guardians to agree to procedures to treat intersex traits and variations in sex characteristics, even when such procedures are medically unnecessary. Despite the prevalence of these violations of basic human rights, there is no federal or state law …

Scraped at: Aug. 21, 2021, 5:31 a.m.
Human Rights CommissionAug. 23, 2021

Draft Minutes 04.26.21 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

REGULAR MEETING HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION MINUTES MONDAY, April 26, 2021 The Human Rights Commission convened in a regular meeting on Monday, April 26, 2021 via teleconference in Austin, Texas. Chair Sareta Davis called the Board Meeting to order at 5:44 p.m. Board Members in Attendance: Chair Davis, Vice Chair Jamarr Brown, Commissioner Breckenridge, Commissioner Garry Brown, Commissioner Caballero, Commissioner Casas, Commissioner Griffith, Commissioner Museitif, and Commissioner Santana. Staff in Attendance: Jonathan Babiak, Human Resources Coordinator, Office of Civil Rights CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. The minutes from the regular meeting of March 22, 2021 were approved on a vote of 9-0: Chair Davis motion, Commissioner Garry Brown second. Voting in favor were Chair Davis, Vice Chair Jamarr Brown, Commissioner Breckenridge, Commissioner Garry Brown, Commissioner Caballero, Commissioner Casas, Commissioner Griffith, Commissioner Museitif, and Commissioner Santana. Commissioner Areche and Commissioner Weigel were absent. b. The minutes from the special called meeting of April 19, 2021 were approved on a vote of 8-0-1: Chair Davis motion, Commissioner Griffith second. Voting in favor were Chair Davis, Vice Chair Jamarr Brown, Commissioner Breckenridge, Commissioner Garry Brown, Commissioner Caballero, Commissioner Casas, Commissioner Griffith, and Commissioner Santana. Commissioner Museitif abstained. Commissioner Areche and Commissioner Weigel were absent. 2. NEW BUSINESS a. Discussion and possible action on Human Rights Commission Officer Elections for Chair and Vice Chair. (Davis/Brown, J.) The Commission voted to override the term limits provisions in the bylaws for the election of the office of Chair by a vote of 9-0: Commissioner Garry Brown motion, Commissioner Museitif second. Voting in favor were Chair Davis, Vice Chair Jamarr Brown, Commissioner Breckenridge, Commissioner Garry Brown, Commissioner Caballero, Commissioner Casas, Commissioner Griffith, Commissioner Museitif, and Commissioner Santana. Commissioner Areche and Commissioner Weigel were absent. The Commission elected Sareta Davis to the office of Chair on a vote of 9-0: Commissioner Santana motion, Commissioner Griffith second. Voting in favor were 1 Chair Davis, Vice Chair Jamarr Brown, Commissioner Breckenridge, Commissioner Garry Brown, Commissioner Caballero, Commissioner Casas, Commissioner Griffith, Commissioner Museitif, and Commissioner Santana. Commissioner Areche and Commissioner Weigel were absent. The Commission elected Isabel Casas to the office of Vice Chair on a vote of 9-0: Chair Davis motion, Commissioner Garry Brown second. Voting in favor were Chair Davis, Vice Chair Jamarr Brown, Commissioner Breckenridge, Commissioner Garry Brown, Commissioner Caballero, Commissioner Casas, Commissioner Griffith, Commissioner Museitif, and Commissioner Santana. Commissioner Areche and Commissioner Weigel were …

Scraped at: Aug. 21, 2021, 5:31 a.m.
Human Rights CommissionAug. 23, 2021

Draft Minutes 06.28.21 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

REGULAR MEETING HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION MINUTES MONDAY, June 28, 2021 The Human Rights Commission convened in a regular meeting on Monday, June 28, 2021 via teleconference in Austin, Texas. Chair Sareta Davis called the Board Meeting to order at 5:36 p.m. Board Members in Attendance: Chair Davis, Vice Chair Casas, Commissioner Caballero, Commissioner Griffith, Commissioner Museitif, and Commissioner Weigel. Staff in Attendance: Jonathan Babiak, Human Resources Coordinator, Office of Civil Rights CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. The minutes from the regular meeting of April 26, 2021 were approved on a vote of 6-0: Chair Davis motion, Commissioner Griffith second. Voting in favor were Chair Davis, Vice Chair Casas, Commissioner Caballero, Commissioner Griffith, Commissioner Museitif, and Commissioner Weigel. Commissioner Areche, Commissioner Breckenridge, Commissioner Brienzi, Commissioner Garry Brown, and Commissioner Jamarr Brown were absent. NOTE: The audio recording of the meeting malfunctioned. This item will be returned to a future agenda for action. 2. NEW BUSINESS a. Discussion and possible action related to Campaign Zero’s 8 Can’t Wait initiative and recommending Austin Police Department address inappropriate use of force by implementing a Duty to Intervene policy for officers. (Casas/Davis) The Commission discussed this item. The Commission took no action on this item. b. Discussion and possible action on setting goals for July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. (Davis/Casas) The commission discussed this item. The Commission voted to continue the current goals unchanged for the coming year on a vote of 6–0: Chair Davis motion, Commissioner Griffith second. Voting in favor were Chair Davis, Vice Chair Casas, Commissioner Caballero, Commissioner Griffith, Commissioner Museitif, and Commissioner Weigel. Commissioner Areche, Commissioner Breckenridge, Commissioner Brienzi, Commissioner Garry Brown, and Commissioner Jamarr Brown were absent. NOTE: The audio recording of the meeting malfunctioned. This item will be returned to a future agenda for action. 1 c. Discussion on the 2020-21 Annual Internal Review Report. (Davis/Casas) The Commission discussed this item. The Commission took no action on this item. d. Discussion and possible action on a recommendation regarding Public Health Crises and Vaccine Inequities. (Museitif/Davis) The Commission discussed this item. The amended recommendation was adopted on a vote of 6–0: Commissioner Museitif motion, Chair Davis second. Voting in favor were Chair Davis, Vice Chair Casas, Commissioner Caballero, Commissioner Griffith, Commissioner Museitif, and Commissioner Weigel. Commissioner Areche, Commissioner Breckenridge, Commissioner Brienzi, Commissioner Garry Brown, and Commissioner Jamarr Brown were absent. NOTE: The audio recording …

Scraped at: Aug. 21, 2021, 5:31 a.m.
Human Rights CommissionAug. 23, 2021

Draft Minutes 07.26.21 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

REGULAR MEETING HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION MINUTES MONDAY, July 26, 2021 The Human Rights Commission convened in a regular meeting on Monday, July 26, 2021 via teleconference in Austin, Texas. Vice Chair Isabel Casas called the Board Meeting to order at 5:36 p.m. Board Members in Attendance: Vice Chair Casas, Commissioner Brienzi, Commissioner Garry Brown, Commissioner Caballero, Commissioner Museitif, and Commissioner Weigel. Staff in Attendance: Jonathan Babiak, Business Process Consultant, Office of Civil Rights CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. The minutes from the regular meeting of April 26, 2021 were approved on a vote of 6-0: Vice Chair Casas motion, Commissioner Museitif second. Voting in favor were Vice Chair Casas, Commissioner Brienzi, Commissioner Garry Brown, Commissioner Caballero, Commissioner Museitif, and Commissioner Weigel. Chair Davis, Commissioner Areche, Commissioner Breckenridge, Commissioner Jamarr Brown, and Commissioner Griffith were absent. By unanimous consent, the Commission agreed to take up the minutes from the June 28, 2021 meeting at a future meeting. 2. NEW BUSINESS a. Introduction of Carol Johnson, Civil Rights Officer, City of Austin Office of Civil Rights, followed by discussion regarding Human Rights Commission and Office of Civil Rights. (Davis/Casas) Carol Johnson, Civil Rights Officer, City of Austin Office of Civil Rights addressed the Commission and answered questions. The Commission took no action on this item. 3. OLD BUSINESS a. Discussion and possible action related to Campaign Zero’s 8 Can’t Wait initiative and recommending Austin Police Department address inappropriate use of force by implementing a Duty to Intervene policy for officers. (Casas/Davis) The Commission did not discuss this item due to a loss of quorum before this item was taken up during the meeting. The Commission took no action on this item. b. Discussion and possible action on a recommendation regarding Public Health Crises and Vaccine Inequities. (Museitif/Davis) 1 The Commission discussed this item. Commissioner Museitif moved adoption, Vice Chair Casas second. The Commission lost quorum during the discussion of this item. The Commission took no action on this item. c. Discussion and possible action on a recommendation to City Council regarding funding a public information and outreach campaign regarding medically unnecessary treatments on individuals born with intersex traits or variations in sex characteristics. (Weigel/Davis) The Commission did not discuss this item due to a loss of quorum before this item was taken up during the meeting. The Commission took no action on this item. d. Discussion and possible …

Scraped at: Aug. 23, 2021, 3:30 p.m.
Human Rights CommissionAug. 23, 2021

Play audio original link

Play audio

Scraped at: Sept. 4, 2021, 3 a.m.
Human Rights CommissionAug. 23, 2021

20210823-003b: Public Health Crises and Vaccine Inequities original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Human Rights Commission Recommendation Number 20210823-003b: Public Health Crises and Vaccine Inequities WHEREAS, Covid19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted low income communities and communities of color; WHEREAS, solutions are not equitable in terms of digital access and transportation; and WHEREAS, the only way we can end this pandemic is vaccinating our population and reaching herd immunity; and WHEREAS, the Human Rights Commission encourages community groups and the Health District to meet unvaccinated people of color in their own communities; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Human Rights Commission recommends easy access to vaccine registration portals and administration of vaccines in a culturally sensitive manner by exploring all available means in order to create short, medium, and long-term solutions for public health crises and vaccine inequities in Austin. Date of Approval: August 23, 2021 Record of the vote: 6-0; Commissioner Garry Brown motion, Commissioner Griffith second. Voting in favor were Vice Chair Casas, Commissioner Brienzi, Commissioner Garry Brown, Commissioner Caballero, Commissioner Griffith, and Commissioner Weigel. Chair Davis, Commissioner Areche, Commissioner Breckenridge, Commissioner Jamarr Brown, and Commissioner Museitif were absent. Jonathan Babiak Jonathan Babiak, Staff Liaison Attest:

Scraped at: Sept. 27, 2021, 4:30 p.m.
HIV Planning CouncilAug. 23, 2021

August Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

Business Committee Meeting of the HIV Planning Council Monday, August 23, 2021 The Business Committee Meeting to be held 08/23/2021 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via Microsoft Teams; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (8/22/2021 by Noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the August 23, 2021 HIV Planning Council Meeting, residents must: •Call or email the board liaison at (512) 972-5806 and Jaseudia.Killion@austintexas.gov no later than noon, (the day before the meeting). The information required is the speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, and a telephone number or email address. •Once a request to speak has been called in or emailed to the board liaison, residents will receive either an email or phone call providing the telephone number to call on the day of the scheduled meeting. •Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. •Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. •Handouts or other information may be emailed to Jaseudia.Killion@austintexas.gov by Noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. •If this meeting is broadcast live, residents may watch the meeting here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch- atxn-live Versión en español a continuación. Reunión del Business Committee Meeting of the HIV Planning Council la folletos junta en FECHA de la reunion (August 23, 2021) La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (08/22/2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los miembros del público deben: • Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de (512) 972-5806 and Jaseudia.Killion@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). La información requerida es el nombre del orador, los números de artículo sobre los que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutrales, y un número de teléfono o dirección de correo electrónico. • Una vez que se haya llamado o enviado por correo electrónico una solicitud para …

Scraped at: Aug. 21, 2021, 4:40 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionAug. 23, 2021

8/23 Preview List original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Historic Landmark Commission Applications under Review for August 23, 2021 Meeting This list does not constitute a formal agenda and is subject to change. A final agenda will be posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The Historic Landmark Commission meeting will be held with Social Distancing Modifications. Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers (applicants included) must register in advance no later than Sunday, August 22, 2021 by 12:00 noon. All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the Historic Landmark Commission meeting:  Call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov no later than 12:00 noon the day before the meeting. The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting).  Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call.  Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak.  Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak.  Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. If the meeting is broadcast live, it may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live  Historic zoning applications A.1. A.2. 3009 Bowman Avenue – Commission-initiated historic zoning 2502 Park View Drive – Commission-initiated historic zoning Historic landmark and historic district applications B.1. 1805 E. 3rd Street – Herrera House – Construct a rear 1-story addition (postponed July 26, 2021) 200 Lee Barton Drive – Paggi House – Replace existing butterfly roof and construct glass walls between the buildings to fully enclose the courtyard (postponed July 26, 2021) 5312 Shoal Creek Boulevard – Kohn House – Construct a low fence at the front property line and a detached 2-car garage behind the house 809 E. 9th Street – Routon-Alvarez-Lopez House – Temporarily relocate the house to B.2. B.3. B.4. 1 protect it from …

Scraped at: Aug. 11, 2021, 5:50 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionAug. 23, 2021

August 23, 2021 Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 10 pages

Versión en español a continuación. Historic Landmark Commission Meeting Monday, August 23, 2021, 6:00 PM Historic Landmark Meeting to be held August 23, 2021 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (Sunday, August 22 by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the August 23 Historic Landmark Commission Meeting, members of the public must:  Call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon, Sunday, August 22 (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting).  Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call.  Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak.  Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak.  Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting.  If the meeting is broadcast live, it may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Reunión del Historic Landmark Commission FECHA de la reunion (23 de agosto, 2021) La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (22 de agosto, 2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los miembros del público deben:  Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en (512) 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, dirección de correo electrónico (opcional) y un número de teléfono …

Scraped at: Aug. 19, 2021, 2:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionAug. 23, 2021

1.A.1 - Annotated Agenda – July 26, 2021 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 17 pages

Versión en español a continuación. Historic Landmark Commission Meeting Monday, July 26, 2021, 6:00 PM Historic Landmark Meeting to be held July 26, 2021 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (Sunday, July 25 by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the July 26 Historic Landmark Commission Meeting, members of the public must:  Call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon, Sunday, July 25 (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting).  Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call.  Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak.  Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak.  Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting.  If the meeting is broadcast live, it may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Reunión del Historic Landmark Commission FECHA de la reunion (26 de julio, 2021) La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (25 de julio, 2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los miembros del público deben:  Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en (512) 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, dirección de correo electrónico (opcional) y un número de teléfono …

Scraped at: Aug. 19, 2021, 2:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionAug. 23, 2021

A.1.0 - John and Mattie Barclay House - 3009 Bowman Avenue original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

A.1 - 1 ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET HLC DATE: PC DATE: June 28, 2021 July 26, 2021 CASE NUMBER: PR-2021-084005 APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission HISTORIC NAME: Rev. John and Mattie Barclay House COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 WATERSHED: Taylor Slough ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 3009 Bowman Avenue ZONING FROM: SF-3-NP to SF-3-H-NP SUMMARY STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from single family residence (SF-3) district to single family residence – Historic Landmark (SF-3-H) combining district zoning for the original part of the house, and release of the demolition permit for the south addition and pool. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Architecture and historical associations. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: June 28, 2021: Postponed at staff request with applicant’s consent. July 26, 2021: Initiated historic zoning. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The house is beyond the bounds of the Comprehensive Cultural Resources Survey (1984). The applicants have submitted a lead-based paint report in support of their application for demolition; however, the report states that while there is lead paint on the interior of the house it is intact, and no remediation is necessary. ACTION: ORDINANCE NUMBER: CITY COUNCIL DATE: ORDINANCE READINGS: 1ST 2ND 3RD CASE MANAGER: Steve Sadowsky NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATION: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Central West Austin Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Save Barton Creek Assn., Save Historic Muny District, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, TNR BCP - Travis County Natural Resources, Tarrytown Alliance , Tarrytown Neighborhood Association, West Austin Neighborhood Group PHONE: 974-6454 A.1 - 2 BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: Architecture: One-story Colonial Revival-styled wood frame house with a front-gabled entry and a partial-width independent porch on round columns; single and paired fenestration. The original house has a large, two-story, front-gabled frame addition to the south, which replaced a what appears to be an original detached garage, and then a later detached garage. The original house retains its articulation despite the additions to the south. Historical Associations: The house appears to have been built around 1941 for John Barclay, the pastor of the Central Christian Church in downtown Austin. There is a water service permit to Burt Dyke, who owned the large estate at what was the end of Bowman Avenue, and whose home is now known as the Tarry House; there does not appear to be a building permit for this house; but the …

Scraped at: Aug. 19, 2021, 2:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionAug. 23, 2021

A.1.1 - 3009 Bowman - presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 13 pages

3009 Bowman West Austin Case Overview • Request: To release the demolition permit. • Staff Recommendation: The site “may” meet two criteria for designation, though “there is a question of integrity” as to whether it truly meets architectural criteria. • Discussion: Staff reports that “it is unlikely that Rev. Barclay would recognize the current building.” Historic Designation Criteria Code Criteria (Must Meet Two) 3009 Bowman Architecture Historic Association Archaeology Community Value Landscape Feature ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ A Question of Integrity: Architecture Staff Report: “[T]he new addition to the south dwarfs [the original part of the house] so there is a question of integrity here that the Commission needs to decide as to whether the house meets the architectural significance criterion at this point. A Question of Integrity: Architecture Staff Report: “[I]t is unlikely that Rev. Barclay would recognize the current building as the home he and his wife occupied for over 20 years.” Site Footprint Not Original Original Roughly 60 percent of the façade perimeter is not part of the original home. Not Original Not Original Staff Report: “It is unlikely that Rev. Barclay would recognize the current building as the home he and his wife occupied for over 20 years.” Historic Association Historic Association: Rev. John Barclay • Pastor at Central Christian Church when LBJ was in the congregation. • Offered a prayer at the inauguration of LBJ/JFK (1961). Policy Questions for Consideration: • While Rev. Barclay, like many local leaders, knew LBJ, does this connection warrant historic designation? • If connection to LBJ is sufficient for historic designation, such a decision – when applied consistently – would likely result in designation (and tax exemption) for various other West Austin homes. There are five historic landmarks within a half‐mile of this property Condition: Lead Paint The property owners hired experts to conduct an environmental test of the original portion of the home, which confirmed that lead paint is present in the existing home. This has contributed to the property owner’s decision to seek to construct a new, less compromised home on the site. Historic Designation Criteria Code Criteria (Must Meet Two) 3009 Bowman Architecture Historic Association Archaeology Community Value Landscape Feature ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ Recap Staff has indicated that 3009 Bowman “may” meet two criteria for historic designation related to Rev. John Barclay. However, the original structure has undergone significant changes, and staff states that …

Scraped at: Aug. 19, 2021, 2:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionAug. 23, 2021

A.1.2 - 3009 Bowman Avenue - Lead paint report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 28 pages

Federal law (24 CFR part 35 and 40 CFR par 745) requires sellers and lessors of residential units constructed prior to 1978, except housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities (unless any child who is less than six year of age resides or is expected to reside in such housing) or any zero-bedroom dwelling to disclose and provide a copy of this report to new purchasers or lessees before they become obligated under a lease or sales contract. Property owners and sellers are also required to distribute an educational pamphlet approved by the United States environmental protection agency and include standard warning language in leases or sales contracts to ensure that parents have the information they need to protect children from lead- based paint hazards. Visual Assessment, Lead-Based Paint Inspection and Stabilization Plan 3009 Bowman Avenue Austin, TX 78703 Date of Inspection: March 7, 2019 Prepared and Submitted by: A&W Environmental Services, LLP 3912 Tumbril Lane Plano, TX 75023 Telephone (214) 460-1513 Reviewed by: David Alavi TABLE OF CONTENTS I II Cover Letter Executive Summary III Scope of Inspection A. Building Background E. Inspection Company B. Preface C. Training D. Equipment F. Methods G. Findings H. Conclusions V XRF Results VI License/Certification VII Drawings/Floor Plans IX Glossary I. Paint Stabilization Recommendations and Cost Estimate IV Disclosure Responsibility and Disclaimer VIII XRF Performance Characteristic Sheets (PCS) Sheets Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report for March 7, 2019 Re: Single Family Property Located at: 3009 Bowman Avenue Austin, TX 78703 Dear Client: Please find enclosed the lead inspection report for the single-family home located at 3009 Bowman Avenue, Austin, TX 78703. The XRF survey was performed within the current acceptable industry guidelines, Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines Chapter 7 (revised 1997) and Texas regulations. During a visual assessment of the property A&W Environmental Services, LLP (License number: 2110404, Expiration date: February 17, 2020), observed that deteriorated paint was present at the property. In association with those findings, we performed a Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Inspection and have determined that all surfaces containing lead-based paint are intact and hence no stabilization plan is required. A&W Environmental Services, LLP used a Niton XLP300A X-Ray fluorescence (XRF) serial# 12249 with a Cd-109 sourced on August 2014 to sample paint for lead based paint at the property. Licensed Texas Lead Risk Assessor, Mohammad Alavi (License number: 2070687 - Expiration date: December 12, 2020) performed the inspection. If …

Scraped at: Aug. 19, 2021, 2:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionAug. 23, 2021

A.1.3 - 3009 Bowman - applicant's statement and photos original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Here is a copy of the lead report that was done in March 2019 – there were 12 positive findings of lead; full report attached. The applicant has young children. Also, given the extensive level of remodeling of the older section of the home (which does not include the fact that the new addition is more than 50% of the house), I hope you might reconsider - - photos below of the exterior of the older portion of the home with new doors/windows in what appears to be slightly modified openings. I can’t imagine that the original home had an opening that would accommodate French doors with side windows. MJW.

Scraped at: Aug. 19, 2021, 2:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionAug. 23, 2021

A.1.4 - 3009 Bowman - owner's objection original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

HEATHER WINN AND TIBAUT BOWMAN 3009 Bowman Austin Texas 78703-2251 July 20, 2021 Via Email at Steve.Sadowsky@AustinTexas.gov Steve Sadowsky Historic Preservation Office Street-Jones Building 1000 E. 11th Street, Suite200 Austin, Texas 78702 Dear Mr. Sadowsky: RE: Objection to Historic Zoning of 3009 Bowman Avenue; PR-2021-084005 We are the owners of 3009 Bowman in Tarrytown. As your report indicates, a significant addition to the home existed at the time of our purchase. Moreover, new windows and French doors were added to the older section of the home. As accurately stated in your report, the new addition is quite large compared to the older portions of the house. To compound things, because we suspected the use of lead paint, we hired experts to conduct an environmental test on the older section of the home. Our suspicion was confirmed in the report. We have two small children. Because of the extensive addition and the modifications to the exterior of the older portion of the property, we do not believe that historic designation is appropriate for this West Austin home. The Central Christian Church certainly is an appropriate place to recognize Pastor John Barclay and Lyndon B. Johnson’s participation in the church. As you can well imagine, there are hundreds of people who knew and were involved in LBJ’s life and times, who lived throughout Austin. We are sure that many of their homes and other sites have appropriately honored their connection to LBJ. In this particular case, given the modifications to the property, the condition of the house, and its location, we hope that you might reconsider the staff’s recommendation. Please accept this letter as our objection to the rezoning of our property to Historic. Sincerely, Heather Winn Bowman Tibaut Bowman {W1073706.1} DocuSign Envelope ID: 79684A98-BE40-4200-89B7-4CC2ABB8EA1E

Scraped at: Aug. 19, 2021, 2:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionAug. 23, 2021

A.2.0 - Chrysler Air-Temp House - 2502 Park View Drive original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 8 pages

A.2 - 1 ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET August 23, 2021 HLC DATE: July 26, 2021 PC DATE: CASE NUMBER: GF-21-10366 APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission HISTORIC NAME: Chrysler Air-Temp House COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7 WATERSHED: Shoal Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 2502 Park View Drive ZONING FROM: SF-2 to SF-2-H SUMMARY STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from single family residence – standard lot (SF-2) district to single family residence – standard lot – Historic Landmark (SF-2-H) combining district zoning if the Commission believes that this house qualifies as a historic landmark and represents the entire proposed historic district.. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Architecture, historical significance, community value. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: July 26, 2021: Initiated historic zoning. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The house is beyond the bounds of the Comprehensive Cultural Resources Survey (1984) but is contributing to the Air Conditioned Village National Register Historic District, currently pending before the State Board of Review. This case came before the Commission in June, 2020 for a full demolition. The applicant in the 2020 case reconsidered their application for full demolition and submitted plans for a partial demolition and retention of the character-defining features of this house; those plans were reviewed and approved by the Commission. The prior proposal would have preserved much of the street façade of the house, replacing deteriorated materials in kind or with a visually-compatible modern material, and an addition to the back in what promised to be a sensitive rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of the house. The Commission initiated historic zoning on the house during the pendency of the preparation of those plans, and satisfied that the plans would preserve the character of the house, dropped the historic zoning case. Since that time, the original applicants sold the house to the current applicant, who is seeking a permit to demolish the house and build a new house in its place. One question before the Commission is whether this house represents an individual landmark-worthy designation, or whether it is simply contributing to the proposed National Register Historic District. If the Commission decides that this house qualifies individually as a historic landmark, then any changes to its exterior or site will require a Certificate of Appropriateness. If this house is contributing to the proposed National Register Historic A.2 - 2 District, then the Commission will have only advisory review over changes to the exterior or the …

Scraped at: Aug. 19, 2021, 2:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionAug. 23, 2021

B.1.0 - Herrera House - 1805 E. 3rd St original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 7 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AUGUST 23, 2021 HR-2021-067051 1805 E. 3RD STREET HERRERA HOUSE B.1 – 1 Replace the front doors and paint the historic house, add a new window to an existing or new rear wall opening, and construct a 1-story rear addition. Previous restoration work was approved administratively. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed project involves eight parts: 1) Replace the non-historic front doors with paneled partially glazed doors. 2) Replace some glazing in historic window sashes. 3) Replace the metal roof with composition shingles with a wood-shake profile. 4) Paint the house to match the historic color (yellow). 5) Possibly change window and door openings on the historic rear wall. 6) Replace a historic rear window with a new window with unknown sash material. 7) Construct an uncovered wood deck behind the rear (south) wall of the historic house. 8) Construct a 1-story rear addition. The addition is set back approximately 24’ from the front wall and has an unknown footprint. A flat-roofed hyphen likely clad in hardiplank connects the new construction to the historic house. The addition will likely be clad in board-and-batten and horizontal hardiplank siding and capped by a likely cross-gabled roof, with a slope, eave depth, and shingles matching those of the historic house. Windows are single-hung and fixed with an unknown sash material; paired sliding glass doors on the hyphen’s east wall provide access to the wood deck between the historic house and addition. ARCHITECTURE STANDARDS FOR REVIEW Repair and Alterations One-story, L-plan, cross-gabled building; vertical board-and-batten siding; 4:4 wood-sash windows; shed porch with two entry doors; National Folk style. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: General Standards 1.1 Do not remove intact historic material from the exterior of a building. 1.2 Always attempt repair first. Replacement should only be undertaken when absolutely necessary, and for the smallest area possible. 1.3 When historic material must be replaced due to damage or deterioration, replacement material should look the same, perform reliably within the existing construction, and, in most cases, be made of the same material. The proposed project repairs and retains historic wood siding, windows, and trim. Where replacement of boards or battens is necessary due to deterioration, replacements will match historic materials …

Scraped at: Aug. 19, 2021, 2:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionAug. 23, 2021

B.1.1 - 1805 E. 3rd Street - Plans original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

T R E E P R O T E C T I O N N O T E S 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Trees depicted on this sheet have been located, sized, and given species identifications per survey provided to Architect by Owner. Regardless of species—and regardless of whether they have been depicted on this sheet or not—all trees 19" in trunk diameter and greater at a height of 4'-6" above adjacent grade are protected by municipal ordinance. No protected tree shall be removed without a permit. No impacts of any kind are permitted in the 1/4 CRZ of any protected tree. Tree protection measures per the details on sheet G006 are required for all protected trees (on subject property and adjacent properties) whose CRZs fall within the subject property, even if said CRZs will not be directly impacted by construction. Extents of tree protection fencing are shown on this sheet. Tree protection fencing shall be installed prior to the commencement of construction. 2x4 or greater size planks @ 6' minimum length shall be strapped securely around protected trees' trunks and root flares when protective fencing does not incorporate entire 1/2 CRZ. All pruning shall be conducted under the strict oversight of a licensed professional arborist. PRUNING FOR SUBJECT TREES SHALL NOT EXCEED 25% OF TREE CANOPY. Trenching for all utilities in CRZs (indicated by notes 13, 14, 15, and 16) shall be minimized to the least extent feasible and shall occur by means of air-spading by a licensed professional arborist. Care shall be taken during construction that activities requiring vertical movement (eg, drilling rigs) shall not disturb existing tree canopies. The placement and storage of materials and/or heavy equipment on CRZs is strictly prohibited without exception. Applicable to all projects where CRZs of ANY protected trees (on s u b j e c t p r o p e r t y a n d / o r o n adjacent properties) fall within boundaries of subject property R E G A R D L E S S O F P R O J E C T S C A L E , S C O P E , O R T Y P E 4 61'-0 " 4 5 8'-9" N20°25'39"E 138.23' 4 5 9'-0 " 5' SIDE SETBACK 4 5 9'-10 " 0'-0" 6 4 K C A B T E S R …

Scraped at: Aug. 19, 2021, 2:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionAug. 23, 2021

B.1.2 - 1805 E. 3rd Street - Condition Assessment Report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 54 pages

The Herrera House 1805 East 3rd Street, Austin, Texas Historic Condition Assessment Report December 18, 2019 SOUND HISTORICAL RESOURCES, LLC Seattle, Washington • 206-582-9989 • adam@soundhistorical.com 1805 East 3rd Street, Austin, Texas – Historic Condition Assessment Report December 18, 2019 Introduction This historic condition assessment report provides information about an existing single-family residential dwelling located at 1805 East 3rd Street, Austin, Travis County, Texas. Sound Historical Resources, LLC, of Seattle, Washington prepared this report at the request of William Lawrence Hodge, AIA, who is an architect and principal with OCHONA Development+Architecture of Austin, Texas. Sound Historical Resources, LLC prepared this report under contract directly with OCHONA Development+Architecture. The research and development of this report was completed in December 2019 by Adam S. Alsobrook, AIA, architect, historic preservation consultant, and owner of Sound Historical Resources, LLC. Research included the review of documents held by the Austin History Center of the Austin Public Library, through the Austin American-Statesman newspaper archive (accessed online newspapers.com), the Sanborn fire insurance map archive (accessed online through the Seattle Public Library), and historic directories for the City of Austin (accessed online through Ancestry.com). Sound Historical Resources, LLC wishes to thank Cara Bertron, Deputy Historic Preservation Officer for the City of Austin, for providing us with the Historic Landmark Commission staff report dated June 24, 2019. Citations for resources used in the preparation of this report are contained in footnotes. The site, neighborhood context, and the exterior and interior of the existing single-family residential dwelling were observed and photographed by Adam S. Alsobrook, AIA on Monday, December 9, 2019. Photographs taken during this site visit are located in Section 4.0 of this report. Sound Historical Resources, LLC Page 2 of 54 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1805 East 3rd Street, Austin, Texas – Historic Condition Assessment Report December 18, 2019 SECTION 1.0 – OVERVIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 1.1 The subject property consists of a single tax parcel (Travis County Appraisal District Property ID# 191991, Geographic ID# 0204080616), which is located on the south side of East 3rd Street approximately midway between Chicon Street and Salina Street in Austin, Travis County, Texas. This parcel measures 46 feet wide by 138 deep and measures 6,348 square feet (0.1457 acres) in area.1 The legal description of the property is as follows: “LOT 3, CYPHER RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 2, OUTLOT 22, DIVISION “O” OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN, ACCORDING TO THE …

Scraped at: Aug. 19, 2021, 2:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionAug. 23, 2021

B.2.a - Paggi House - 200 Lee Barton Dr - postponement request original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Brummett, Elizabeth From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Emily Little Monday, August 16, 2021 2:31 PM Brummett, Elizabeth Babcock, Ryan: C12 (NYK); Kristen Brown Paggi House - request postponement *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi Elizabeth – thank you again for your helpful assistance on the zoom call today. We will proceed with the suggestions you made and would like to request a postponement of our AHLC appearance until the September 27 meeting. We will submit to you our final revised packet of drawings by September 20 and will not request another meeting with the Architectural Review Committee since they have already seen this general direction for our design solution. Thank you very much. Let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Best always, Emily Little, FAIA | Partner Emerita Clayton Korte 2201 N. Lamar Blvd. Austin, Texas 78705 o. 512-477-1727 x 202 www.claytonkorte.com CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1

Scraped at: Aug. 19, 2021, 2:21 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionAug. 23, 2021

B.3.0 - Kohn House - 5312 Shoal Creek Blvd original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AUGUST 23, 2021 HR-2021-115716 KOHN HOUSE 5312 SHOAL CREEK BLVD. B.3 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a low fence at the front property line and a detached 2-car garage behind the house at a pending landmark. 1) Construct a 36” tall weathering steel mesh fencing at the street. Supports along the length of the fence are metal posts. Limestone piers flank mesh gates at the sidewalk and driveway; the stone will have a sawn surface with parged joints. 2) Construct a detached 2-car garage behind the house. The proposed location, recessed to the northwest of the house and north of the historic guest house, was shown on the site plan reviewed by the Commission on April 26, 2021 in conjunction with other site modifications, though the garage design was not presented at that time. The garage has an asymmetrical, broken-pitch gable roof over the main volume, with a symmetrical gable over a rear portion. Roofing is standing-seam metal, and wall cladding is board-and-batten siding. Openings include paired overhead doors facing the driveway, solid doors at multiple locations, a sliding barn door on the side facing the guest house, steel and glass doors on the opposite side, and large multi-light steel windows wrapping the rear. ARCHITECTURE The Kohn House occupies a premier site in the Shoalmont Addition. Two lots wide, the expansive parcel extends from Shoal Creek Boulevard on the east to Shoal Creek on the west and is studded with mature oaks. The one-story house, eclectic in its design, is T-shaped, with a long side-gabled volume facing the street and a rear hipped-roof wing. A two-story square tower with a pyramidal roof is asymmetrically placed near the north end of the house. The house is predominantly clad in random ashlar limestone with quoins at the corners and a stone chimney; a portion of the rear elevation is clad in horizontal wood siding. Wrapping the southeast end of the house is a porch with square wood posts and curved brackets; its gable end has waney-edge siding. Varied fenestration includes multi-light casements, a bay window with a metal roof, round portholes, and 1:1 double-hung wood windows. To the rear of the house, the site also includes a side-gabled accessory building, clad in board-and-batten on the front under the full-width porch and horizontal wood siding on the other sides. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW Residential …

Scraped at: Aug. 19, 2021, 2:21 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionAug. 23, 2021

B.3.1 - 5312 Shoal Creek Blvd - presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of None page

Backup

Scraped at: Aug. 19, 2021, 2:21 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionAug. 23, 2021

B.3.a - 5312 Shoal Creek Blvd - citizen comment original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: Aug. 19, 2021, 2:21 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionAug. 23, 2021

B.3.b - 5312 Shoal Creek Blvd - citizen comment original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: Aug. 19, 2021, 2:21 p.m.