P-2 C15-2019-0055 PART8 — original pdf
UPDATED SURVEYP-2/206 SITE PLAN AT STREET LEVELP-2/207 VARIANCE REVISION NOTESP-2/208 DRAINAGEP-2/209 DRAINAGE –ENGINEER LETTERP-2/210 P-2/211 P-2/212
All documents
P-2 C18-2019-0055 LATE BACKUP PART5 — original pdf
P-2/228 P-2/229 P-2/230 P-2/231
P-3 C15-2019-0057 — original pdf
P-3/1 P-3/2 BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2019-0057 BOA DATE: November 7, 2019 ADDRESS: 1304 & 1310 Willow St COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3 OWNER: Jennifer Conroy AGENT: same ZONING: SF-3-NP (East Cesar Chavez NP) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: E43 FT AV OF LOT 18 OLT 33 DIV O CANTERBURY SQUARE & W32.5 FT OF LOT 19 OLT 33DIV O CANTERBURY SQUAREVARIANCE REQUEST: Special Exception SUMMARY: unpermitted Secondary Dwelling Unit ISSUES: encroaching into interior side setback ZONING LAND USES Site SF-3-NP Single-Family North SF-3-NP Single-Family South SF-3-NP Single-Family East SF-3-NP Single-Family West SF-3-NP Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Bike Austin Del Valle Community Coalition East Austin Conservancy East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Association East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Plan Contact Team East Town Lake Citizens Neighborhood Association El Concilio Mexican-Americal Neighborhoods Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Greater East Austin Neighborhood Association Guadalupe Neighborhood Development Corporation Homeless Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation Neighbors United for Progress Preservation Austin SEL Texas Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group Tejano Town P-3/3 October 29, 2019Jennifer Conroy1304 Willow St Austin TX, 78702 Property Description: E43 FT AV OF LOT 18 OLT 33 DIV O CANTERBURY SQUARERe: C15-2019-0057 Dear Jennifer, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider variance(s) from the following sections from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-476 (B) (3) (a) (i) (Special Exceptions); from Section 25-2-492 (D) (Site Development Regulations); To decrease the interior side yard setback from 5 feet (required) to 3 ft. 6 inches (requested) in order to maintain a Garage Apartment that has been at this location for at least 25 years in a “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. (East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Plan)Austin Energy does not oppose request provided any proposed and existing improvements follow AE clearance criteria requirements, The National Electric Safety Code and OSHA. Any removal or relocation of existing electric facilities will be at owners/applicants’ expense.Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1.10.0CLSAREIf you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Eben Kellogg, Property Agent Austin EnergyPublic Involvement | Real Estate Services2500 Montopolis DriveAustin, TX 78741(512) 322-6050 P-3/4 From:Jennifer ConroyTo:Ramirez, Elaine;Subject:1304 and 1310 Willow St BOA Special Exception hearing postponement requestDate:Thursday, November 07, 2019 …
P-4 C15-2019-0061 — original pdf
P-4/1 P-4/2 9/6/2019Board of AdjustmentsSpringdale Farms11/7/2019P-4/3 Site Location•Area: 4.85 acres•Zoning: CS-MU-CO-NP•Along Imagine Austin Corridor•2 Blocks from Transit priority (in both directions)•Activity CorridorP-4/4 Neighborhood Outreach•Held community meetings to:•Understand from our future neighbors what the Farm has meant to the community•Get a sense of what future uses could be beneficial to the community •Introduce StoryBuiltand discuss overall design strategy•Preservation (trees, existing features important to the site)•Sustainability•Green infrastructure•Neighborhood fabric•Mixed Use (residential for sale and commercial)P-4/5 Community Feedback and GoalsFeedback from community meetings:•Keep some level of farming and farm-stand operational•Mixed use (residential and commercial) •Open space•Independent grocery•Coffee shop/cafe•Affordable housing component•Welcoming environment•Pedestrian orientedP-4/6 What did we do with the Feedback..•Developed numerous site plans and programming options trying to incorporate all the feedback•Formed a working group with the Neighborhood Planning Contact Team to better identify pros and cons for the project, what agreements we could come to and identify our steps moving forward•Developed a site plan, working around the numerous constraints on the property to bring to life the best project possible. •Continued direct neighbor outreach during process to inform everyone of progress with the NPCTP-4/7 Neighborhood Conclusions•Conditional Overlay Zoning change supported to allow for restaurant and general convenience/retail uses•Support for 48-ft commercial building•Executed LOI with the Guadalupe Neighborhood Development Corporation to formalize partnership for affordable units to be conveyed at 60% MFI. A Missing middle for the GNDC will be filled due to unit sizes being conveyed. •Heritage Tree preservation•Maintain Urban Farming component: worked with Eden East, who is currently managing the farm and onsite restaurant, to determine necessary requirements for future needs. P-4/8 Site PlanSite Plan:•88 For sale Units•+/-50,000 sf of commercial•Open Space: 2.25 ac (includes 25k sf of Urban Farm•50% Imp cover•FAR: 0.7:1•Tree Preservation•Residential units 30-ft from property line•Collaboration of StoryBuiltand the NPCT to accomplish the goals:•Mixed Use•Farming•Sub-grade parking•Pedestrian OrientedP-4/9 Site Overview•Total Area from Springdale ROW to CL of Creek = 115,520 sf•Buildable area = 47,000 or 40% of total area due to preserving 10 Heritage Trees and CWQZ•Compatibility setbacks on all sidesP-4/10 Triggering PropertiesSingle Family Zoning but commercial useLimits of triggering propertiesP-4/11 As of Rights –40-feetCommercial Height:•3 stories at 40-ft yields approx. 12 -13’ floor to floor which yields an unmarketable and unviable commercial space•Floodplain requires FFE to be raised an additional 2-3ft above average grade further limiting heightP-4/12 Proposed HeightCommercial Height:•Variance to allow for 48-ft structure at 50-ft from both north and south property lines –Limit to 3 stories•Variance to allow …
P-5 C15-2019-0062 — original pdf
P-5/1 P-5/2 From:Ramirez, ElaineTo:Ramirez, DianaSubject:Withdrawl of C15-2019-0062 / 1707 Astor PlDate:Tuesday, December 10, 2019 7:42:49 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution ***Hi ElaineRequesting to withdraw from the Variance Special Exception January 13th meeting for 1707 Astor Pl. The reason being is that there was a permit issued for the garage and the zoning department has approved that we don’t need a special exception anymore.Thanks Igor DimitrijevskiCity House Buyers586-822-8904CAUTION:This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to CSIRT@austintexas.gov.P-5/3 BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2019-0062 BOA DATE: November 7, 2019 ADDRESS: 1707 Astor Pl COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 OWNER: Enable Capital LLC AGENT: Igor Dimitrijevski ZONING: SF-3-NP LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 57 OLT 19 DIV B GRANT PARK VARIANCE REQUEST: Special Exception SUMMARY: maintain a Single-Family residence ISSUES: the structure was built in its configuration in 1963 ZONING LAND USES Site SF-3-NP Single-Family North SF-3-NP Single-Family South SF-3-NP Single-Family East SF-3-NP Single-Family West SF-3-NP Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Bike Austin Del Valle Community Coalition East Austin Conservancy East MLK Combined Neighborhood Plan Contact Team Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Friends of Northeast Austin Homeless Neighborhood Association Martin Luther King Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation Neighbors United for Progress Preservation Austin SEL Texas Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group P-5/4 October 30, 2019Igor Dimitrijevski, For Enable Capital, LLC1707 Astor Pl Austin TX, 78721 Property Description: LOT 57 OLT 19 DIV B GRANT PARKRe: C15-2019-0062 Dear Mr. Dimitrijevski, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from the following sections from the Land Development Code; Section 25-2-476 (B) (3) (a) (i) (Special Exceptions) – Section 25-2-492 (D) (Site Development Regulations); To decrease the interior side yard setback from 5 feet (required) to 3 ft. 9 inches (requested); In order to maintain a Single Family Residential use that has been at this location for at least 25 years in a “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. (MLK Neighborhood Plan)Austin Energy does not oppose requested side yard setback variance, provided any proposed and existing improvements are following AE clearance criteria requirements, The National Electric Safety Code and OSHA. Any removal or relocation of existing electric facilities will …
P-6 C15-2019-0064 — original pdf
P-6/1 P-6/2 From:To:Ramirez, Elaine;Subject:RE: REMINDER: C15-2019-0064 / 1415 W. 10th St. - POSTPONED case for Jan. 13, 2020 BOA mtg.Date:Wednesday, December 11, 2019 2:59:35 PMAttachments:image001.png*** External Email - Exercise Caution ***Elaine, My client would like to withdraw his request for Variance for his property at 1415 W. 10th St. Pleaseadvise on any further action needed to do this. Thank you, -- April Clark, AIANARI, LEED AP BD + CRegistered Architect (TX, NM, AZ)512-636-7653 Clark | Richardson Architects618 Lavaca St. Suite 7Austin, Texas 78701Web: www.clarkrichardson.comBlog: http://clarkrichardson.wordpress.com/Twitter: @CRArchitectPlease consider the environment before printing this email. The information contained in this e-mail is confidential, privileged, or otherwise protected from disclosure. It is intended only for the use of theauthorized individual as indicated in the e-mail. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, and distribution or taking of any action based on the contents ofthis material is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please delete it immediately. From: Ramirez, Elaine [mailto:Elaine.Ramirez@austintexas.gov] Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2019 7:31 AMTo: Subject: REMINDER: C15-2019-0064 / 1415 W. 10th St. - POSTPONED case for Jan. 13, 2020 BOAmtg. Hi Ed, This is a friendly reminder: You have until Friday, December 13 before 3p.m. to submit any maps,surveys, drawings, photos and any additional documentation (including the Special Exception InspectionP-6/3 Report if you applied for a Special Exception, if REPORT not included this case will have to be Postponed) you wantincluded as part of your Advanced Packet for your BOA variance case. This will need to be submittedto me via e-mail in PDF format. If you would like the Board to follow along with you, you will need to present a presentation, bringit on a thumb drive and you will hand it to our City Technician . The Board will not have anything toview on the overhead other than the Advanced Packets they have in front of them on the dais thatwas given to them a week prior to the meeting. Please note: Any late support that will be accepted after this deadline date of Dec. 13, 2019 will onlybe for Opposition and Support letters for this case. Respectfully,Elaine RamirezBoard of Adjustment LiaisonPlanner SeniorCity of Austin Development Services DepartmentOne Texas Center, 1st Floor505 Barton Springs RdOffice: 512-974-2202 Follow us on Facebook, Twitter & Instagram @DevelopmentATX Scheduled Meeting Disclosure Information:In accordance with City of Austin Ordinance 20160922-005, responsibility of written disclosure isrequired by visitors when attending a scheduled meeting with …
S-1 BOA MONTHLY REPORT — original pdf
BOA Monthly Report July 2019-June 2020 November 7, 2019 Granted 3 1)25-2-899 (D) (Fences as Accessory Uses) to increase the height2)25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations) (B)(1) to reduce theShoreline setback, (C)(3)(a)(b)(c) to increase IC on a slope, (E)(2) increase ICfor driveway3)Article 10, Compatibility Standards, Division 2, 25-2-1063 (B) (2)(Height Limitations and Setbacks from Large Sites) to decrease theMinimum setback and 25-2-1063 (C) (1) and (2) (Height Limitations andSetbacks for Large Sites) to increase the maximum compatibility heightPP cases 6 1)25-2-476 (B) (3) (a) (i) (Special Exceptions) from Section 25-2-492 (D) (SiteDevelopment Regulations) to decrease the interior side yard setback2)Article 10, Compatibility Standards, Division 2 –Development Standards,Section 25-2-1063 (C)(2) (Height Limitations and Setbacks for Large Sites) toincrease the maximum allowable Compatibility Height3)25-2-476 (B) (3) (a) (i) (Special Exceptions) from Section 25-2-492 (D) (SiteDevelopment Regulations) to decrease the interior side yard setback4)Subchapter F: Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 3,Section 3.3.3 (Gross Floor Area – Porch, Basement and Attic Exemptions)(B)(2) in order to receive the basement exemption on a sloped site5)25-2-1067 (H) (Design Regulations) Compatibility Height requirements ofArticle 10, Compatibility Standards, Division 2 –Development Standards todecrease the minimum parking setback and to decrease the minimumdriveway setback6)25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations)(C)(3)(c) increase IC ona slope, (E)(2) increase IC for drivewayWithdrawn 2 1)25-10-133 (Univ Neigh Overlay Zoning Dist) (F) to allow for 3 electricalwall signs to be placed on the 5th floor2)25-2-899 (D) (Fences as Accessory Uses) to increase the heightDenied 1 1)25-2-492 (D) to increase the maximum allowable IC and 25-2-899 (fenceas Accessory Use) (E)(1)Discussion 6 Items Nov. interpretations 0 new inquiries The deposition of the case items: (Added Nov’s # 2019) A. Granted 16 B. Postponed 29 C. Withdrawn 7 D. Denied 4 E.Discussion Items 28E.Indef PPmt0 S-1/1 October 14, 2019 Granted 1 1)25-2-1176 (A)(1) Site Dev Regulations for Docks, marinas.. to increase theShoreline setbackPP cases 6 1)25-10-133 (Univ Neigh Overlay Zoning Dist) (F) to allow for 3 electricalwall signs to be placed on the 5th floor2)25-2-899 (D) (Fences as Accessory Uses) to increase the height3)25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations) (B)(1) to reduce theShoreline setback, (C)(3)(a)(b)(c) to increase IC, (E)(2) increase IC fordriveway4)25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations)(C)(3)(c) increase IC,(E)(2) increase IC for driveway5)Article 10, Compatibility Standards, Division 2, 25-2-1063 (B) (2)(Height Limitations and Setbacks from Large Sites) to decrease theMinimum setback and 25-2-1063 (C) (1) and (2) (Height Limitations andSetbacks for Large Sites) to increase the maximum compatibility …
S-3 BOA WORKGROUP COMPILATION — original pdf
Board of Adjustment LDC WorkgroupRecommendations, Comments & Questions on Proposed LDC (to share with City Council)11/4/2019 -- Compiled by Don Leighton-Burwell, BOA Chair; updated 11-25-2019Code Section / Issue for ConsiderationWorkgroup Synopsis (with support of BOA)General Comments by BOA WorkgroupRECOMMENDATION: BOA Workgroup does not support this shift of approvals to City Staff (e.g. MUPs and "Minor Adjustments"). COMMENT: The zoning code and general planning requirements (Chapter 23-3 and 23-4, respectively) are better-written than current code, with clearer language and better graphics and format. The proposed new regulations are simpler and more prescriptive, with fewer exemptions and exceptions. RECOMMENDATION: Graphic examples (and commentaries regarding intent) of development rights (similar to the Signage Chapter 23-7 of the proposed LDC), would help laypeople more fully understand the LDC.COMMENT: Increases in housing supply should result from a code that is simpler and clearer—simplicity and clarity equal predictability, which equals greater ease of use...which equals greater ease of review...which equals faster reviews...which equals, per unit time, more housing created.RECOMMENDATION: Increases in Housing Supply do NOT equal increases in Affordable Housing Units (per Staff's Report Card); preservation of existing affordable units must play a role.RECOMMENDATION: Where an ADU is allowed (within a Residential Zone), the accompanying table should make that clear by creating an "ADU column" between “Principal Dwelling Units” and “Width.” COMMENT: Concern that lack of or poor public notice may diminish appeal rights of people contesting City Staff interpretations, determinations and approvals.RECOMMENDATION: Request Staff to continue work on BOA "Heat Map" (and update of AMANDA) to better track permits, appeals, variances, special exceptions; this will allow people to access information more easily and thus support both clarity and transparency of City processes.RECOMMENDATION: BOA wants to be able to track common variance requests to serve as basis for possible LDC amendments.INTRODUCTION:GENERAL PROVISIONS23-1A-3030 (C) (2) (a) (i and ii) Types of Administrative Decisions; A decision by the responsible director on an application for:(i ) A site plan or minor use permit;RECOMMENDATION: BOA Workgroup does not support MUPs, as public input is not required as part of this streamlined process and diminishes public input that is currently required by a CUP.(ii) A minor adjustment or alternative equivalent compliance (See sections later in this document…)23-1A-4010 (A) Consistency Requirement. “Legislative, quasi-judicial, and administrative decisions under this Title must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as required by Article X of the City Charter.”COMMENT: Adherence to the Comprehensive Plan (Imagine Austin) …
S-4 NEW BUSINESS BUDGET CALENDAR 2021 — original pdf
MEMORANDUM TO: Boards and Commissions FROM: Ed Van Eenoo, Deputy Chief Financial Officer DATE: November 8, 2019 SUBJECT: FY 2020-21 Budget Calendar The City is committed to an inclusive and transparent budget development process that utilizes resident and stakeholder feedback to ensure budget priorities are being met. An important component of this process is input received annually from the City’s various boards and commissions. Over the past several years, your unique perspectives on the needs of our community coupled with your knowledge of City operations have resulted in a significantly more equitable and effective allocation of City resources. Earlier this year, the State legislature lowered the cap on allowable property tax revenue growth to 3.5% annually without voter approval, significantly impacting our ability to balance future budgets in the face of growing demands for City services. Numerous initiatives to ensure the City’s long-term financial sustainabilitywhile maintaining high-quality municipal servicesare already underway. These include: A review of existing programs for potential business process improvements, efficiency audits conducted by outside experts, ensuring the alignment of existing City programs to Strategic Direction 2023, a review of the City’s retirement systems, and a comprehensive look at options for increasing General Fund revenue. Another effect of the new revenue cap legislation is the need to advance the annual budget cycle by approximately one month in order to preserve the option for the City Council to call a tax rate election should that prove necessary to meet policy objectives. The Council approved calendar for the FY 2020-21 budget is shown below: May 8Department Budgets Due to the Budget Office July 13Presentation of the FY20-21 Proposed Budget to City Council July 23First Budget Hearing July 28City Council Budget Work Session July 30Second Budget Hearing August 4City Council Budget Work Session August 12Tax Rate Hearing and Budget Adoption S-4/1 Please note that department budgets are due to the Budget Office this year on May 8. As such, any budget recommendations from boards and commissions will ideally be provided to departments no later than mid-April. In light of the significant restrictions on property tax revenue growth that we will begin experiencing next year, your recommendations should focus on the efficiency, effectiveness, and equity of existing City programs. xc: Spencer Cronk, City Manager Assistant City Managers Chief Financial Officer S-4/2
C15-2019-0046 PP DS TO 3-9-2020 — original pdf
Backup
C15-2019-0055 DENIED DS — original pdf
Backup
C15-2019-0055 LATE LATE BACKUP — original pdf
Backup
C15-2019-0057 PP DS TO 2-5-2020 — original pdf
Backup
C15-2019-0059 GRANTED DS — original pdf
Backup
C15-2019-0059 LATE LATE BACKUP — original pdf
Backup
C15-2019-0061 PP DS TO 2-5-2020 — original pdf
Backup
C15-2019-0062 WITHDRAWN — original pdf
Backup
C15-2019-0063 PP DS TO 2-5-2020 — original pdf
Backup
C15-2019-0064 WITHDRAWN — original pdf
Backup
C15-2019-0068 LATE LATE BACKUP — original pdf
Backup
C15-2019-0068 PP DS TO 2-5-2020 — original pdf
Backup
C15-2020-0002 GRANTED DS — original pdf
Backup
Agenda_ATCFPB_20200113 — original pdf
AUSTIN TRAVIS COUNTY FOOD POLICY BOARD MONDAY, JANUARY 13th 2020 AT 6:00 PM Carver Branch Library, 1161 Angelina St, Austin, TX 78702 - Meeting Room #1 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER 1) CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL a) Speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 2) STAFF BRIEFINGS a) Office of Sustainability quarterly update 3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM NOVEMBER 25th MEETING 4) OLD BUSINESS i) Board Appointments (1) Discuss Recruitment Strategy ii) Board Infrastructure & Protocol (1) Follow up on Board Strategic Plan (2) Discuss Marketing Strategy (3) Review Board Members’ meetings with City and County Officials iii) Board Recommendations (1) Update on the COA Land Development Code rewrite 5) NEW BUSINESS i) Debrief of the Joint Sustainability Board meeting ii) Working Group Briefings and Recommendations (1) Build Opportunities for Food Entrepreneurs (2) Support Farms & Farmers (3) Food and Climate (4) Healthy Food Access to All Communities (5) Food and Gardens iii) Review of Board Member Assignments 6) FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Edwin Marty, Office of Sustainability at 512-974-2120, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Food Policy Board please contact Edwin Marty at 512-974-2120
Backup_COA_Food_Sytem_Overview_Presentation_20200113 — original pdf
Food Systems Update 2019 Edwin Marty City of Austin Food Policy Manager Edwin.Marty@austintexas.gov Released May 2015 Released October 2018 Central Texas Food Planning Process Data Collection Metrics for Central Texas Food System Food Policy Scan The codes and ordinances that regulate the food system Fall 2018 Fall 2019 Equity feedback Spring 2020 • Regional Food Planning Steering committee • Draft Food Charter Food Charter Coalition • Formation of Food Planning Coalition • Vet draft with stakeholders • To be determined based on feedback from stakeholders Action Plan Food and Equity Trainings Equity feedback Community Climate Plan Good Food Fund Providing capital for addressing gaps and opportunities State and Local Food System Policy Scan • Which policies shape our local food system? • City, County, State, Federal • Policy Inventory – categorized, searchable • Policy fact sheets: • Policy Landscape • Sustainable Food Production • Food Assistance • Food Retail • Food Recovery Land Development Code Rewrite “Allow small neighborhood grocers as CUP in all zones DIRECTION: Work with Economic Department to identify the square footage of a small neighborhood grocer and where this type of use can benefit areas that have difficulties accessing healthy food options." Revised Community Climate Plan Structure 2020 Electric Utility Commission Joint Sustainability Committee Equity and Engagement Working Group Large Institutions Working Group Steering Committee Transportation Electrification AG Transportation and Land Use AG Sustainable Buildings AG Consumption AG Natural Systems AG Community Climate Ambassadors 7 Food Pantry Permitting How can the City of Austin make it more simple, and cost-effective to run a safe, and compliant food pantry that serves healthy foods? Determining level of permit Which best describes your pantry? Example Proposed Level Relative food safety risk Ex: Mobile pantries, emergency food pantries Note: Low risk because no food is being openly handled. Description of operations Pass-through only portioning no food prep or re- Distribution some food re- portioning Food service Some meals are prepared or packaged on-site Ex: Residential pantries – Foundation Communities Ex: Community kitchens, group home pantries/kitchens Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Note: Medium risk because of re- portioning. Important to note that this triggers a review from Industrial Waste and may require the need for a grease trap. Note: Perceived high risk because food is being prepared and served. Urban Agriculture on Public Land • COA Community Garden Permit revisions • Joint use agreements • School Gardens as Community Gardens …
ApprovedMinutes_ATCFPB_20200113 — original pdf
MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 13, 2020 Austin-Travis County Food Policy Board The Austin-Travis County Food Policy Board (ATCFPB) convened on Monday, January 13, 2020 at the Carver Branch Library, 1161 Angelina St, Austin, TX 78702. CALL TO ORDER Board Chair Karen Magid called the meeting to order at 6:19 P.M. Board Members in Attendance: Lorig Hawkins (Vice-Chair), Felipe Camacho, Karen Magid (Chair), Roman Gonzalez, Kara Prior, Emily DeMaria, Sharon Mays, Joi Chevalier, Kacey Hanson Absent board members: Ryan Rosshirt, Andrea Abel Staff in Attendance: Edwin Marty, Sam Night, Emily Ackland, Chris Schreck 1) CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL i) Speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 2) STAFF BRIEFINGS i) Office of Sustainability quarterly update 3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM NOVEMBER 25th MEETING Board Member Emily DeMaria motioned to approve the meeting minutes from November 25, 2019 with Board Member Joi Chevalier seconding the motion. Passed on a 9-0 vote. Board Member Emily DeMaria motioned to amend the meeting minutes from November 25, 2019 by changing the phrase “May Meeting” to “November 4th Meeting” with Board Member Joi Chevalier seconding the motion. Passed on a 9-0 vote. 4) OLD BUSINESS i) Board Appointments (1) Discuss Recruitment Strategy ii) Board Infrastructure & Protocol (1) Follow up on Board Strategic Plan (2) Discuss Marketing Strategy (3) Review Board Members’ meetings with City and County Officials iii) Board Recommendations (1) Update on the COA Land Development Code rewrite The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Edwin Marty, Office of Sustainability at 512-974-2120, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Food Policy Board please contact Edwin Marty at 512-974-2120 5) NEW BUSINESS i) Debrief of the Joint Sustainability Board meeting ii) Working Group Briefings and Recommendations (1) Build Opportunities for Food Entrepreneurs (2) Support Farms & Farmers (3) Food and Climate (4) Healthy Food Access to All Communities (5) Food and Gardens iii) Review of Board Member Assignments 6) FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 2020 Agenda Items: i) Budget …
Agenda — original pdf
AUSTIN ARTS COMMISSION AGENDA Special Called Meeting – Monday, January 13, 2020, 6:00 P.M. Cultural Arts Division Bluebonnet Training Room 5202 E Ben White, Suite 400, Austin, TX 78741 CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Jaime Castillo – Chair, Michelle Polgar – Vice Chair, Brett Barnes, Lulu Flores, Bears Rebecca Fonte, Felipe Garza, Amy Mok, Krissi Reeves, Celina Zisman CALL TO ORDER – 6:00 P.M. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The speakers signed up prior to 6:00pm will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items posted and/or not posted on the agenda. 1. STAFF BRIEFINGS a. Cultural Funding Program Review Process Update, presented by Cultural Arts Division Staff 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATION 3. NEW BUSINESS a. Strategic Themes Presentation, presented by Margie Reese, MJR Consultants a. Strategic Themes Workshop Activity b. Discussion and Possible Action regarding Strategic Themes 4. STAFF CLOSING COMMENTS/NEXT STEPS 5. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION Next Regular Meeting will be on Monday, January 27 @ 6pm at Cultural Arts Division Bluebonnet Training Room – 5202 E Ben White, Suite 400, Austin, TX 78741 6. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Anne-Marie McKaskle-Davis at the Cultural Arts Division, at 512-974-7854, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Austin Arts Commission please contact Anne-Marie McKaskle-Davis at 512-974-7854.
added the AIPP Panelist names and new Arts Commissioner name — original pdf
Special Called Meeting of the Arts Commission and the Art in Public Places Panel AUSTIN ARTS COMMISSION REVISED AGENDA Monday, January 13, 2020, 6:00 P.M. Cultural Arts Division Bluebonnet Training Room 5202 E Ben White, Suite 400, Austin, TX 78741 CURRENT ARTS COMMISSION MEMBERS: Jaime Castillo – Chair, Michelle Polgar – Vice Chair, Brett Barnes, Lulu Flores, Bears Rebecca Fonte, Felipe Garza, kYmberly Keeton, Amy Mok, Krissi Reeves, Celina Zisman CURRENT AIPP PANEL MEMBERS: Chris McCray – Chair, Tammie Rubin–Vice Chair, Brett Barnes – Arts Commission Liaison, Sarah Carr, Stephanie Lemmo, Joel Nolan, Jacob Villanueva CALL TO ORDER – 6:00 P.M. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The speakers signed up prior to 6:00pm will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items posted and/or not posted on the agenda. 1. STAFF BRIEFINGS Staff a. Cultural Funding Program Review Process Update, presented by Cultural Arts Division 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATION a. Strategic Themes Presentation, presented by Margie Reese, MJR Consultants 3. NEW BUSINESS a. Strategic Themes Workshop Activity b. Discussion and Possible Action regarding Strategic Themes 4. STAFF CLOSING COMMENTS/NEXT STEPS 5. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION Next Regular Arts Commission Meeting will be on Monday, January 27 @ 6pm at Cultural Arts Division Bluebonnet Training Room – 5202 E Ben White, Suite 400, Austin, TX 78741 6. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Anne-Marie McKaskle-Davis at the Cultural Arts Division, at 512-974-7854, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Austin Arts Commission please contact Anne-Marie McKaskle-Davis at 512-974-7854.
Final - CAD-MJR Partners Presentation — original pdf
Cultural Arts Funding Review Process Arts Commission and AIPP Panel Workshop 1/13/2020 Cultural Funding Process Refresher The Cultural Funding Review Process will consist of the following key phases: Listen Refine Recommend Feedback Draft Goal: Hold listening sessions to hear the views and values of the community through conversations with individuals and small and large groups. Events: Town Hall Kick Off Event | July 10 One-on-Ones | July 11 - 12 Listening Sessions | July 13 - Aug. 27 Virtual Comment Box Goal: Conclude Listening Sessions Start Feedback Analysis-continue conversations with the community Begin to analyze feedback from those conversations to organize into more specific themes and directions to discuss further. Phase 1& 2 participation: 175 Town Hall Event Participants • • 540 participants in 39 unique stakeholder listening sessions including o Interdepartmental City Staff o Community stakeholders representing arts education, faith- based, social services, funders & community advocacy/organizing o City of Austin Cultural Contractors & members of the creative community • 1160 Unduplicated Hours of stakeholder engagement • Additional meetings with stakeholder groups such as the Equity Action Team, Raza Roundtable, Austin Arts Advocacy Coalition, and council members & policy staff Listening Session Goals: • Gather multiple points of view regarding programs and operations of the CAD • Understand perceptions and expectations of CAD, of the funding and grant making process from announcement of grant opportunities thru the review and contracting process; • Understand grantees’ (artists/organizations across the spectrum of grantees) sense of shared responsibility for contributing to a healthy cultural system in the Austin; Identify effectiveness and potential efficiencies in the grant making processes; Stimulate awareness of the City’s goals for achieving racial equity; and • Understand grantees’ (contractors’) approach to inclusion across five key • • programmatic and operational areas: o Programming o Audience expansion o Marketing and public information o Staffing o Governance How CAD has responded in real time: • Moved up pre-contract & final report submission due dates for cultural contractors - incentivized early completion • ADA quiz no longer required every year • Drafting reducing # of questions in final report questionnaire • Working closely with Purchasing & Finance offices to improve contract management efficiency & contracting • Collaboration with Equity Office, Convention Center in best practices in grant making • Emphasizing resident centered/friendly language & communications in collaboration with CTM Office of Design & Delivery • Referring cultural contractors …
Final - Meeting Design — original pdf
Cultural Funding Arts Commission & Art in Public Places Strategic Planning Meeting Meeting Objective(s): 3 or less is fine 1. Define & leading with a racial equity lens as a Cultural Arts Division (completed in first session) 2. 3. Use community feedback to set Arts Commission role in Cultural Funding Review process, explore best approach to organize AC input & interaction with Inform meeting attendees of potential strategic themes derived from community feedback of Cultural Funding Review Process & process 4. Describe extended Cultural Funding Review process timeline Meeting Location: CAD offices, Date: Jan 13, 2020 Time: 6:00pm‐8:30pm Attendees: Commissioners, AIPP panel members, COA Staff, Facilitators, Community Members Overview: Commissioners will participate in activities to achieve Commission goals and update strategic planning activities. Agenda Item 1.Sign In Leader Commission Liaison Outcome Duration To occur prior to the commencement of the meeting 3‐5 Minutes / 6:00pm 2.Call to Order Chair Castillo Meeting will be called to order. 3.Approval of Minutes and Action 3‐5 Minutes 6:10pm Chair Castillo Minutes and actions will be approved. Cultural Funding Arts Commission & Art in Public Places Strategic Planning Meeting 4.Citizen Communication: General 10‐Minutes 6:15pm Chair Castillo Hear concerns and voices of the citizens. 5.a. Motion to Suspend Robert Rules of Order 5 Minutes 6:20pm Chair Castillo Robert rules of order will be suspended. 5.a. Motion to Suspend Robert Rules of Order 5.b Commission Introduction Cara Welch /Alberto Mejia 6. Staff Introduction &CFRP Refresher & Extension brief 7. Leading with a Racial Equity Lens in the Cultural Arts Ask: Any reflections? Any major comments missing? 10‐15 Minutes 6:30pm Slides 2‐ 16 *Slides 15,16,19 hidden 10‐15 Minutes 6:45pm Slides 17‐ 18 Robert rules of order will be suspended. Introduce the commission members as well as a brief description of the purpose of the meeting. Introduce the staff, go over agenda and plan for the meeting. Meghan Wells and/or Brion Oaks Set a framework for activities and the discussion Commissioners & AIPP will identify tasks that address the themes from the previous session. Commissioners will understand the timeline and planned activities for the extended cultural funding review process Reinstate Robert rules of order for the remaining of the meeting. Margie Reese / MJR Consultants 45 min – 1hr 7:45pm Slides 19‐29 Cultural Funding Arts Commission & Art in Public Places Strategic Planning Meeting 8. Presentation of potential strategic themes derived from community feedback of Cultural Funding Review Process …
Leading with a Racial Equity Lens in the Cultural Arts — original pdf
Cultural Arts Funding Review Process Arts Commission and AIPP Panel Workshop 1/13/2020 Leading with a Racial Equity Lens in the Cultural Arts Equity Framework • • • • • City goal of achieving a point at which race is no longer a predictor of quality of life outcomes; (acknowledges intersectionality but race is most reliable predictor) Equity Office helps normalize, organize, and operational race‐forward efforts across city departments Strategic Direction 2023 – “Equity” not a separate effort, but infused throughout Ensure that we are not further “othering,” marginalizing, or displacing through good intentions Commit together to continue this work throughout all of CAD’s programs to broaden and deepen community access to City investment in the arts and remove barriers to participation • MJR Partners and Equity Office identifying areas where we can focus need for change across CAD’s work – from internal to external policies and practices Cultural Funding Process Refresher The Cultural Funding Review Process will consist of the following key phases: Listen Refine Recommend Feedback Draft Goal: Hold listening sessions to hear the views and values of the community through conversations with individuals and small and large groups. Events: Town Hall Kick Off Event | July 10 One-on-Ones | July 11 - 12 Listening Sessions | July 13 - Aug. 27 Virtual Comment Box Goal: Conclude Listening Sessions Start Feedback Analysis-continue conversations with the community Begin to analyze feedback from those conversations to organize into more specific themes and directions to discuss further. Phase 1& 2 participation: 175 Town Hall Event Participants • • • 540 participants in 39 unique stakeholder listening sessions including o Interdepartmental City Staff o Community stakeholders representing arts education, faith- based, social services, funders & community advocacy/organizing o City of Austin Cultural Contractors & members of the creative community 1160 Unduplicated Hours of stakeholder engagement • Additional meetings with stakeholder groups such as the Equity Action Team, Raza Roundtable, Austin Arts Advocacy Coalition, and council members & policy staff Listening Session Goals: • Gather multiple points of view regarding programs and operations of the CAD • Understand perceptions and expectations of CAD, of the funding and grant making process from announcement of grant opportunities thru the review and contracting process; • Understand grantees’ (artists/organizations across the spectrum of grantees) sense of shared responsibility for contributing to a healthy cultural system in the Austin; Identify effectiveness and potential efficiencies in …
Meeting outline — original pdf
Cultural Funding Arts Commission & Art in Public Places Strategic Planning Meeting Meeting Objective(s): 3 or less is fine 1. Define & leading with a racial equity lens as a Cultural Arts Division (completed in first session) 2. 3. Use community feedback to set Arts Commission role in Cultural Funding Review process, explore best approach to organize AC input & interaction with Inform meeting attendees of potential strategic themes derived from community feedback of Cultural Funding Review Process & process 4. Describe extended Cultural Funding Review process timeline Meeting Location: CAD offices, Date: Jan 13, 2020 Time: 6:00pm‐8:30pm Attendees: Commissioners, AIPP panel members, COA Staff, Facilitators, Community Members Overview: Commissioners will participate in activities to achieve Commission goals and update strategic planning activities. Outcome Set Up Name tags, Name tents, sign in sheet Agenda Item 1.Sign In Duration To occur prior to the commencement of the meeting Leader Commission Liaison 2.Call to Order 3‐5 Minutes Chair Castillo Meeting will be called to order. Agenda, recorders, batteries 3.Approval of Minutes and Action 3‐5 Minutes Chair Castillo Minutes and actions will be approved. Copy of previous minutes Cultural Funding Arts Commission & Art in Public Places Strategic Planning Meeting 4.Citizen Communication: General Chair Castillo 10‐Minutes Hear concerns and voices of the citizens. Citizen communication signup sheet 5.a. Motion to Suspend Robert Rules of Order 5 Minutes Chair Castillo Robert rules of order will be suspended. 5.a. Motion to Suspend Robert Rules of Order 5.b Commission Introduction 6. Staff Introduction 7. Leading with a Racial Equity Lens in the Cultural Arts Ask: Any reflections? Any major comments missing? 3‐5 Minutes 10‐15 Minutes Cara Welch /Alberto Mejia Meghan Wells and/or Brion Oaks Agenda Agenda Robert rules of order will be suspended. Introduce the commission members as well as a brief description of the purpose of the meeting. Introduce the staff, go over agenda and plan for the meeting. Set a framework for activities and the discussion Handout, (Documents for backup‐ planning session notes prepared by Alberto & Anne Marie) 25 Minutes 45 min – 1hr Margie Reese / MJR Consultants Marion Sanchez/Cara Welch Cultural Funding Arts Commission & Art in Public Places Strategic Planning Meeting 8. Presentation of potential strategic themes derived from community feedback of Cultural Funding Review Process 9. Tyranny of Urgent Activity Prompt: Ask participants to sort the themes/theme items on the X axis‐ IMPORTANT IMPORTANT: of great significance or value; …
Meeting Audio Pt. 1 of 2 — original link
Play audio
Meeting Audio Pt. 2 of 2 — original link
Play audio
Approved Minutes — original pdf
AUSTIN ARTS COMMISSION MINUTES Special Called Meeting – Monday, January 13, 2020, 6:00 P.M. Cultural Arts Division Bluebonnet Training Room 5202 E Ben White, Suite 400, Austin, TX 78741 CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Jaime Castillo – Chair, Michelle Polgar – Vice Chair, Brett Barnes, Lulu Flores, Bears Rebecca Fonte, Felipe Garza, Amy Mok, Krissi Reeves, Celina Zisman Commissioners Polgar, Garza and Reeves absent CALL TO ORDER – 6:12 P.M. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The speakers signed up prior to 6:00pm will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items posted and/or not posted on the agenda. Madge Darlington, Rude Mechanicals – They are still here, with two year lease at Crash Box, The cultural funding is important to them. They tour their work across the country as cultural ambassadors of Austin. They continue to mentor artists and will participate in the Jubilee event next year. 1. STAFF BRIEFINGS a. Cultural Funding Program Review Process Update, presented by Cultural Arts Division a. Strategic Themes Presentation, presented by Margie Reese, MJR Consultants Staff Motion to suspend Roberts Rules of Order Motioned: Barnes Seconded: Mok Vote: 7-0 Approved 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Adjourned for a 10 minute break @ 7:28pm Meeting brought back to order @ 7:43pm 3. NEW BUSINESS a. Strategic Themes Workshop Activity b. Discussion and Possible Action regarding Strategic Themes No action taken Seconded: Mok Motion to reinstate Roberts rules of order Motioned Barnes Vote: 7-0 approved 4. STAFF CLOSING COMMENTS/NEXT STEPS 5. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION Next Regular Meeting will be on Monday, January 27 @ 6pm at Cultural Arts Division Bluebonnet Training Room – 5202 E Ben White, Suite 400, Austin, TX 78741 Lunar New Year celebration at Asian American Cultural Center on January 18 Growing your Roots African American Genealogy Conference – Jan 30 – Feb 2nd 6. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Discuss definition of diversity and inclusion and/or program mission and vision Establish Guidelines Working group ADJOURNMENT – 8:38pm The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Anne-Marie McKaskle-Davis at the Cultural Arts Division, at 512-974-7854, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more …
Approved Agenda Jan 13 2020 — original pdf
Agenda
REVISED Agenda Jan 13 2020 — original pdf
Revised Agenda
Channel 6 Video — original link
Play video
AAC December 2019 Report — original pdf
Austin Animal Center Monthly Report December 2019 Fiscal Year 2020 Austin Animal Center December 2019 Intakes Born in Owner Surrender Public Assistance Stray Total Neonatal Kitten Kitten Adult Cat Puppy Adult Dog Total Neonatal Puppy 0 55 3 121 179 7 4 0 33 44 0 68 4 173 245 0 123 41 361 525 11 301 49 781 1,142 4 1 0 12 17 301 0 50 1 81 132 49 Intakes by Intake Type 11 1,142 781 Born in Owner Surrender Public Assistance Stray Intakes by Age Breakdown Cat 17 132 179 328 Dog 44 245 525 814 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Neonatal Kitten Kitten Adult Cat Neonatal Puppy Puppy Adult Dog Age Breakdown Neonatal under 6 weeks old Kitten/Puppy 6 weeks to under 1 year old Adult at least 1 year old page 1 Austin Animal Center December 2017 to 2019 Intakes Born in Owner Surrender Public Assistance Stray Total 2017 Dog 0 181 71 525 Cat 3 121 13 206 343 Total Cat 3 302 84 731 3 64 8 199 274 2018 Dog 6 173 75 563 Total 9 237 83 762 Cat 106 4 4 214 328 2019 Dog 7 195 45 567 Total 11 301 49 781 777 1,120 817 1,091 814 1,142 Yearly December Intakes by Intake Type 84 302 83 237 49 301 3 1,120 9 1,091 11 1,142 731 2017 762 2018 781 2019 Born in Owner Surrender Public Assistance Stray Yearly December Intakes by Animal Type 817 274 2018 814 328 2019 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 777 343 2017 page 2 Austin Animal Center December 2019 Outcomes Neonatal Kitten Kitten Adult Cat Puppy Adult Dog Neonatal Puppy 239 282 Adoption Deceased Disposal Missing RTO Rto-Adopt Transfer Total Humane Euthanasia Shelter Neuter Return 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 275 3 1 1 0 9 1 14 25 72 1 3 6 0 16 6 50 16 Outcomes by Outcome Type 329 5 170 868 1,379 5591 199 29 64 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 1 0 0 1 0 23 37 301 1 0 2 1 151 21 0 108 566 Total 868 5 5 9 1 199 29 64 199 1,379 Age Breakdown Neonatal Kitten/Puppy under 6 weeks old 6 weeks to under 1 year old Adult at least 1 year old Adoption …
APA! 2019 Q4 Report — original pdf
Animal Advisory Commission Report Q4 2019 This report is intended to give a high level overview of Austin Pets Alive!’s lifesaving operations each quarter, with a focus on APA!’s impact on Travis county through our partnership with Austin Animal Center. Intakes - Compared to Q4 2018, APA transfers from AAC were up 18% overall in Q4 2019, with a 74% increase in cat transfers and a 12% decrease in dog transfers. Total Cat Transfers from AAC Total Dog Transfers from AAC Total Transfers from AAC Q4 2019 388 366 754 Q4 2018 223 415 638 % Change '19 v '18 74% -12% 18% Detailed Breakdown of APA Intakes from AAC AAC - Cat Behavior AAC - Cat Bottle Baby (Includes BIC) AAC - Cat Maternity AAC - Cat Medical AAC - Cat Space AAC - Dog BIC AAC - Dog Behavior Large/Medium AAC - Dog Behavior Small AAC - Dog Bottle Baby AAC - Dog Maternity AAC - Dog Medical AAC - Dog Parvo Transfer AAC - Dog Space Large/Medium AAC - Dog Space Small Total AAC Travis - PASS Travis - Parvo OS/PASS Total Travis 1 of 5 Reserved Oct 2019 10 118 8 74 16 19 7 3 5 2 17 1 76 15 371 25 0 396 Nov 2019 4 48 9 41 34 6 5 0 12 1 23 5 32 10 230 16 0 246 Dec 2019 6 6 0 14 0 42 5 0 5 2 23 4 40 6 153 12 0 165 Q4 2019 20 172 17 129 50 67 17 3 22 5 63 10 148 31 754 53 0 807 © 2019 Austin Pets Alive! All Rights 2 of 5 © 2019 Austin Pets Alive! All Rights Reserved The first chart shows AAC to APA transfers as a percentage of total AAC Intakes for Q4 2019 compared to Q4 2018 as a way of gauging how APA is responding to increased AAC intakes. The second chart shows AAC to APA transfers as a percentage of total AAC Intakes for the last four quarters (Q1 of 2019 through Q4 of 2019). 3 of 5 © 2019 Austin Pets Alive! All Rights Reserved Q4 2019 November 2019 December 2019 Dog Total Cat Dog Total Cat Dog Total Cat 5 0 0 3 13 1 October 2019 Cat 136 1 0 0 0 2 0 139 197 3 0 0 3 3 1 …
Code Revision ASO Proposed Language — original pdf
Backup