HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS B.11 - 1 APRIL 27, 2020 C14H-2007-0040 PARRISH-FLEMING HOUSE 1410 NORTHWOOD ROAD PROPOSAL Consideration of remediation proposal. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant replaced the windows in the house without a Certificate of Appropriateness. The house historically had 1:1 windows with decorative wooden screens simulating a 6:6 pane configuration. The applicant replaced the deteriorating windows on the house with 6:6 windows with no screens. The Commission directed the applicant to prepare a plan for remediating the conditions for consideration by the Commission. The applicant has the original screens, which he is having re-finished and painted green (as original) for re- installation on the house at the suggestion of a commissioner for a possible resolution of this situation. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1) Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. Evaluation: The applicant states that the existing windows were deteriorated beyond repair, leading to his decision to replace them. The applicant’s proposal is to re-install the existing screens on the house to re-create the historic look of the house. Behind the screens, the new 6:6 windows will remain. The project meets the applicable standards. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Not reviewed since the last Commission meeting. In a previous meeting, the Committee did not recommend a solution to the problem; at the Commission meeting, the proposal to re-install the existing or replica screens was offered to the applicant but without a motion to direct this course. The applicant still had the screens and is proposing to refinish and re- install them. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposal. This is certainly not an ideal situation, but the fact that the applicant retained the screens and will re-install them over the new windows seems to be an appropriate measure to resolve the situation. B.11 - 2 Google streetview photo - 2014 E-mail from the applicant, April 9, 2020: Steve, The original screens are off to get repaired and fitted properly. Using all the original wood etc...except for a few pieces that were rotted through. …
SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. clarification. All spot elevations to be verified in field prior to construction. Notify MHOA of any discrepancies. Benchmark to be verified with architect prior to construction. Do not scale the drawings. If a specific dimension is not given, contact MHOA for GC is responsible for protecting and repairing additional damage arising during both demolition phase and new construction phase on existing partitions, finishes, and building elements that are to remain. Tree protection fencing is required for all existing trees 19 inches in diameter (60 inches in circumference) within the limits of construction. Fencing should protect the entire critical root zone (CRZ) area. Fencing is required to be chain-link mesh at a minimum height of five feet. A 6-inch layer of mulch within the entire available root zone area is required for trees which have any disturbance indicated within any portion of the critical root zone. Refer to General Requirements for additional information associated with, but not limited to: submittals, shop drawings, samples, cutting and patching, coordination and staging, protection of work. SITE PLAN KEYNOTES 21.01 Fire riser, refer to MEP. e r u t c e t i h c r A f O e c i f f O u s H l e a h c i M m o c . e c i f f O u s H 3 0 3 4 6 0 7 . ) 2 1 5 ( e c i f f O 6 5 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A d a o R t e n r u B 0 1 9 4 ì n Y m a e T n g s e D i t n a t l u s n o C ETSI ER I C M D A R C H H A E L H.H I T S U G E R E C T S A S T A 2 1 9 4 4 T E FO XE T l a e S 01/09/2020 l b u C s t r o p S n w o p tU 2 0 7 8 7 X T E 0 0 2 1 i t s u A h 6 t n , . e S t t e S t i m r e …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS B.12 - 1 APRIL 27, 2020 Un-numbered UPTOWN SPORTS BAR 1200 E. 6TH STREET Restoration of a historic building with heritage grant funds; addition of a rear patio and rooftop railing. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant proposes the restoration of the Uptown Sports Club at the corner of 6th and Waller Streets in East Austin. This ca. 1906 building is probably one of the best-known abandoned buildings in the city. Originally a meat market and bakery owned by a Swedish immigrant, Frank Zakrison, with his daughters, the building became a tavern later. The applicant proposes a restaurant use for the site, with restoration of the existing structure. Existing doors and windows will be restored or replaced with exact replicas. Infilled door and window openings will be restored with either existing historic fabric where it exists, or a replica of an existing feature. The exterior masonry will be cleaned and treated; the signature picket awning on the building will be restored; any elements too deteriorated to be repaired and restored will be replaced in-kind. Painted sections of the masonry exterior will be restored. A new patio will be built on the north (back) side of the building along Waller Street; the patio will have a wood and steel canopy and the infill of an existing arch will be removed and a new steel window and door system will be installed in the existing arch. Mechanical equipment will be installed on the roof with a 42” steel guardrail enclosure. The building is not yet designated a historic landmark, but has been determined eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places by the Texas Historical Commission. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1) A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. Evaluation: The proposed restaurant use of the building does not require changes to the building to accommodate this new use. 2) The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. Evaluation: The applicant proposes the restoration of the …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS B.2 - 1 APRIL 27, 2020 C14H-2010-0040 PAULSON-SING HOUSE 1705 WILLOW STREET Demolish the existing detached garage and construct a two-story ADU at the rear of the property. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant proposes to demolish the existing detached garage and construct a two-story ADU in its place. The proposed ADU will have a footprint of 744 square feet and will open on the alley at the south end of the property. The new building will be approximately 30 feet behind the back wall of the historic house and will be just over 26 feet tall. The proposed ADU will have hardi-plank siding with a horizontal pattern except for a two-story section of vertical hardi-plank siding in a board-and-batten pattern to the right of the round-arched door (complementing the round-arched door on the main house). The ADU will have a composition shingle roof in a cross-gabled configuration and Fibrex windows. A one-bay garage will face the alley to the right of the entry door. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1) A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. Evaluation: Many historic houses in East Austin have secondary dwelling units. The proposed ADU fits a historic pattern of settlement in the neighborhood. 2) The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. Evaluation: The proposed ADU will be set back approximately XX feet from the back wall of the house, preserving the spatial context of the historic house. The back wall of the ADU will face the back wall of the house so it will have a complementary relationship to the context of the house. 9) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. Evaluation: The proposed ADU is separated from …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS B.3 - 1 APRIL 27, 2020 C14H-2006-0016 NORWOOD TOWER 114 W. 7TH STREET Replace infilled sections of the ground-floor wall on the alley (south) elevation with new glass and opaque materials. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Four former openings along the south (alley) ground flor elevation of the building have been infilled over time with plastered CMU and architectural glass blocks. In the first two bays in from the street, the applicant proposes to remove the plastered infill to reveal the original window frame and glass, and install low-E glass. In the remaining bays along the alley, the applicant proposes to remove the existing infill (glass block and CMU) and fill the bay with a bronze frame to match existing window frames on the building and a combination of low-E glass, clear glass, and Kalwall, a translucent but opaque panel. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1) The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. Evaluation: It is unclear when the glass blocks were installed in the building, but they are likely not original. The removal of the glass blocks and replacement with glass and Kalwall will not impugn the overall character of the property. 2) Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. Evaluation: The applicant will be restoring two previously-covered windows towards the street side of this elevation. 4) Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. Evaluation: It is not clear when the glass blocks were installed; they do not constitute a significant architectural feature of the building that should require retention. 5) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property …
“The Restoration of the Norwood Tower & Motoramp in Downtown Austin” Regina Lauderdale December 1991 “The Restoration of the Norwood Tower & Motoramp in Downtown Austin” 1929 Regina Lauderdale December 1991 Preservation-student, class of Professor Wayne Bell, The University of Texas at Austin, Architecture Library, Battle Hall, December 1991 1957 1981
SITE LOCATION T E E R T S O D A R O L O C U P Ref'g U P D N D N U P U P N D P C M H A R : 0 ' - 0 " C H : 0 ' - 0 " SUITE 135 SHARED STE. 135 & PERRY'S MECHANICAL ROOM 1,426 SF U P U P D N U P WH D N U P U P DW U P PERRY'S STEAKHOUSE SUITE 125 SUITE 100 WEST 7th STREET . E V A S S E R G N O C & . T S O D A R O L O C N E E W T E B Y E L L A N VICINITY MAP SITE PLAN 81 81 81 81 / 2 1 3 9 / 2 1 1 7 / 2 1 3 9 / 2 1 1 7 3 4 / 2 1 0 5 / 2 1 3 9 / 2 1 1 7 38 41 Existing plastered wall to be removed to expose original window and frame. Replace existing glass with Low E glass. Existing plastered wall to be removed to expose original window and frame. Replace existing glass with Low E glass. Remove existing glass block, replace with 2" dark bronze frame to match existing frames in existing windows. Lower portion of window to receive Kalwall panel. Upper section to be Low E glass . Remove areas of plastered CMU wall. Install 2" dark bronze frame to match existing frames in exsting windows. Area with valve to remain. New areas to receive Kalwall panels Remove area of plastered CMU and bricked walls. Install 2" dark bronze frame to match existing frames in exsting windows. New areas to receive Kalwall panels. Install metal door and pour concrete landing. Remove existing glass block, replace with 2" dark bronze frame to match existing frames in existing windows. Lower portion of window to receive Kalwall panel. Upper section to be clear. NORWOOD TOWER EAST ELEVATION at ALLEY - PROPOSED RESTORATION AND MODIFICATIONS 1/4" : 1'-0" NORWOOD TOWER 114 West 7th Sreet SUITE 100 Austin, TX 78701 Sheet Contents SITE INFORMATION & EXTERIOR ELEVATION Scale 1/2" = 1'-0" Revisions MHP Project No. 2020 Date 03.11.2020 Drawn By Sheet No. IA 6.00 07 OF
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APRIL 27, 2020 LHD-2020-0010 1105 CASTLE COURT (1105 W. 12TH STREET) CASTLE HILL HISTORIC DISTRICT B.5 - 1 PROPOSAL Construct an accessible ramp and deck to the main (south) entrance, replace non-historic infill at the north entrance, and replace and reconfigure windows on non-historic addition. ARCHITECTURE Reportedly the former mess hall of the Texas Military Institute, the building has been used at various times as a residence and office. It is a one-story, rectangular building with load- bearing limestone walls, a steeply pitched hipped roof, a shed-roofed frame addition on the east, and 2:2 and 6:6 light double-hung wood windows. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed project includes: 1) On the south elevation at the main entrance and entrance to the addition, demolition of the existing stairs and deck; construction of a new concrete ramp, connecting wood deck on brick piers, and limestone stairs with bronze handrails; and installation of shed-roofed awnings; 2) Replacement of the non-historic six-panel main entrance door (south elevation) with a wood door with two lights over a single panel, and reconstruction of the missing transom; 3) Replacement of non-historic infill at the north entrance with inoperable door(s): a. Option 1. Wood door with transom and sidelights based on the south entrance, b. Option 2. Paired wood doors with six lights matching the proportions of the or north elevation windows; 4) On the non-historic addition, replacement of 1:1 windows and French doors with 4:4 windows and a single multi-light door, and replacement of wood siding with fiber- cement siding; 5) Replacement of existing R-panel metal roof with composition shingle roofing and installation of copper half-round gutters; and 6) Selective masonry cleaning and repointing. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The property is contributing to the Castle Hill Historic District. The following requirements from the historic district design standards apply to the proposed project: General District Standards A.1.b. Do not make changes to the public view of an existing contributing or non- contributing building that have no historic basis and/or that seek to create the appearance of an architectural style that is not original to the existing building. There is no documentary or physical evidence for the historic appearance of the north entrance; the current infill is believed to be from a 1971 remodel. Paint analysis revealed that the transom and sidelights at the south entrance do not B.5 - 2 match the …
Inspected on 5/12/2019 at 10:30 AM PROPERTY INSPECTION REPORT Prepared For: Kate Ertle Property Address: 703 & 705 Oakland Avenue, Austin, TX 78703 Report Identification: 703 & 705 Oakland Avenue TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Page .................................................................1 Table of Contents ........................................................2 Intro Page ...................................................................3 I STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS........................................7 II ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS.......................................22 III HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS .....................................26 IV PLUMBING SYSTEM ...........................................27 V APPLIANCES ........................................................32 VI OPTIONAL SYSTEMS .........................................34 Summary...................................................................37 Invoice.......................................................................40 Back Page.................................................................42 REI 7-5 (05/04/2015) Page 2 of 42 Report Identification: 703 & 705 Oakland Avenue PROPERTY INSPECTION REPORT Prepared For: Kate Ertle Concerning: 703 & 705 Oakland Avenue, Austin, TX 78703 By: Nathan W. Vick (TREC#20219), Professional Inspector, TREC #20219, 5/12/2019 PURPOSE, LIMITATIONS AND INSPECTOR / CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES This property inspection report may include an inspection agreement (contract), addenda, and other information related to property conditions. If any item or comment is unclear, you should ask the inspector to clarify the findings. It is important that you carefully read ALL of this information. This inspection is subject to the rules (“Rules”) of the Texas Real Estate Commission (“TREC”), which can be found at www.trec.texas.gov. The TREC Standards of Practice (Sections 535.227-535.233 of the Rules) are the minimum standards for inspections by TREC licensed inspectors. An inspection addresses only those components and conditions that are present, visible, and accessible at the time of the inspection. While there may be other parts, components or systems present, only those items specifically noted as being inspected were inspected. The inspector is NOT required to turn on decommissioned equipment, systems, utility services or apply an open flame or light a pilot to operate any appliance. The inspector is NOT required to climb over obstacles, move furnishings or stored items. The inspection report may address issues that are code-based or may refer to a particular code; however, this is NOT a code compliance inspection and does NOT verify compliance with manufacturer’s installation instructions. The inspection does NOT imply insurability or warrantability of the structure or its components. Although some safety issues may be addressed in this report, this inspection is NOT a safety/code inspection, and the inspector is NOT required to identify all potential hazards. In this report, the inspector shall indicate, by checking the appropriate boxes on the form, whether each item was inspected, not inspected, not present or deficient and explain the findings in the corresponding section in the body of the report …
703 Oakland Avenue Inspection Report : Exterior Walls Deficient: Significant and detrimental water damage observed at wall assemblies. Condition is most severe at east wall and "garage" transition. Other locations included around all wall openings (doors, windows, etc.). As repairs are conducted, additional areas are expected to be discovered. The water damage is correlated with deferred maintenance, missing flashing and weatherization details and poor construction practices. If ignored, condition will progress. Visible active termites Smoot Terrace Design Standards : Exterior Walls If replacement of the historic exterior wall materials is necessary, choose a material similar in dimensions, profile, reveal, and texture to the historic material, and install the new materials so that they do not damage adjacent historic fabric and so that they maintain the planar relationships and joint patterns that existed historically relative to window frames, door frames, and other exterior features What Katie Did: Discussion with OWANA zoning members Selected tear-drop siding based on the historical significance and relates to the character of the homes built in 1930s. Installed flashing and water barrier (zip board) for long term preservation. Replaced window molding with pressure-treated wood for long term preservation but maintaining same architectural design from 1938. Inspection Report : Windows Deficient: The windows are in over-all very poor condition. The majority of windows observed with water penetrations issues, air infiltration issues, deteriorated glazing, cracked panes and damaged/missing counter balance springs, impeded egress (can not escape during emergency - windows do not open). Smoot Terrace Design Standards : Windows 1. Avoid alterations that enlarge or relocate window openings 2. Retain and repair all components of existing historic windows unless HPO staff and/or the HLC agree that the individual component is deteriorated beyond repair 3. If replacement of historic windows is necessary, use windows that are the same size and match the dimensions, profile, and configuration of historic windows 4. Substitute materials are appropriate if they maintain the profile and finish appearance of the historic window. What Katie Did 1. Did not enlarge or relocate any window openings with the exception two rear kitchen windows (south wall - facing backyard) 2. Retained and repaired all possible historic windows by mixing and matching components which were salvageable. 3. For necessary replacement of historic windows, used windows that are the same size and match the dimensions, profile, and configuration of historic windows 4. Substituted materials are appropriate to the profile and finish …
B.6 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APRIL 27, 2020 APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS LHD-2020-0012 703 OAKLAND AVENUE SMOOT/TERRACE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT PROPOSAL Replace siding and windows, change the roof material, widen the front stoop, infill a second-story rear sleeping porch, demolish a rear garage, and add a below-grade basement. Many parts of this project were completed prior to historic review, due to an error by Development Services Department staff during intake. The applicant has followed all City instructions, consulted with the OWANA Zoning Committee, and referred to the Smoot/Terrace Park Historic District Design Standards in planning the project. ARCHITECTURE Two-story, rectangular-plan house with a side-gabled roof, wood cladding, 1:1 and 6:6 wood- sash windows, and a hip-roofed entry portico with two wood doors. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed project has five parts: 1) Replace wood lap siding with wood teardrop siding; 2) Replace some windows with 1:1 wood-sash windows. The central four windows on the front elevation, as well as four windows on the rear wall, have been replaced. Other windows have been repaired; 3) Install a standing-seam metal roof in place of the shingled roof; 4) Reconstruct the front stoop to be wider and deeper; remove the low wing walls. The stone from the existing steps will be reused as much as possible to surface the new stoop; 5) Infill a second-story rear sleeping porch with wood siding; 6) Demolish a rear open one-story garage; and 7) Add a below-grade basement, raising the house by 1’. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The property is contributing to the Smoot/Terrace Park Historic District. The following requirements from the historic district design standards apply to the proposed project: Front Exterior Walls 1. Retain and repair the historic exterior materials on front walls, side walls within 15 feet of the front, unless HPO staff and/or the HLC agree that repair is not possible due to deterioration beyond repair. The historic siding and trim have been replaced. The applicant has provided an inspector’s report that notes: o Significant and detrimental water damage at wall assemblies; o End-of-life conditions for siding, including wood rot, deterioration, water damage, loose boards, and damaged boards; and o Bowed or leaning walls at east and west walls. 2. If replacement of the historic exterior wall materials is necessary, choose a material similar in dimensions, profile, reveal, and texture to the historic material, and install B.6 - 2 the new materials …
B.7 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APRIL 27, 2020 APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS LHD-2020-0014 602 HIGHLAND AVENUE SMOOT/TERRACE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT PROPOSAL Construct a habitable basement and replace a rear staircase. ARCHITECTURE One-story, rectangular-plan house with a gable roof, wood cladding, 4-over-1 and 3-over-1 wood-sash windows, and a gable-roofed entry porch with battered piers. The house has a partial-width habitable basement where the grade slopes down from the street. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Demolish the existing basement and construct a larger basement with vertical wood siding, triple banks of fixed and sliding windows, and paired fully glazed doors. Replace an existing wood staircase at the rear (west) elevation with a new steel-framed staircase. The primary façade of the historic building will not be altered. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The property is contributing to the Smoot/Terrace Park Historic District. The following requirements from the historic district design standards apply to the proposed project: Additions to Contributing Buildings 1. New additions should be compatible with the historic building by reflecting the scale, massing, and/or materials of the historic building, but differentiated enough so that they are not confused as historic or original to the building. The basement addition is clad in vertical wood siding that is similar to the historic siding in material, but differentiated in orientation and pattern. The project meets this standard. 3. Design new additions that are subordinate to and do not overpower the historic building. The basement addition is minimally visible and subordinate to the historic building. It meets this standard. 4. Construct additions that avoid the removal or obstruction of any historic exterior features on the front of the building or the sides within 15 feet of the front. The basement addition does not entail the removal or obstruction of historic exterior features. It meets this standard. 6. A new basement addition may extend to the front of the house. The basement addition extends to the front of the house, as allowed. It meets this standard. B.7 - 2 7. Design basement additions so that they do not raise the floor level of the house, or so that the new floor level of the house is not higher than either the average of the contributing houses on the same block face, or the average of the adjacent houses if contributing. The basement addition does not raise the floor level of the house. It meets this standard. The project …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS B.8 - 1 APRIL 27, 2020 C14H-1986-0008 SCARBROUGH BUILDING 522 CONGRESS AVENUE Remove plate glass from the Congress Avenue storefront to create a semi-outdoor dining area for a new restaurant and install a new railing at the opening. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant proposes the removal of the plate glass storefront windows along the Congress Avenue elevation of the building to align with the applicant’s restaurant use and create a sheltered outdoor dining area. To separate the dining area from the street, the applicant proposes the installation of a new ornamental metal railing, painted black. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1) A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. Evaluation: The Scarbrough Building housed E.M. Scarbrough & Sons, downtown Austin’s premier department store. The plate glass storefronts along Congress Avenue were display windows for their merchandise. The restaurant that has come into the former department store space has removed the plate glass. Besides the attraction of a semi-open air dining area for the restaurant, there does not appear to be any clear need for altering the building by removing the plate glass display windows. 2) The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. Evaluation: The display windows along Congress Avenue are part of the building’s history as a department store. The removal of the windows has compromised the integrity and historical context of the building. The project does NOT meet the applicable standards. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Not reviewed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the application for the removal of the plate glass and direct that the applicant immediately restore the windows removed without review and approval by the Commission. Condition the applicant’s application for a property tax exemption for this property on the restoration of the removed windows. B.8 - 2 E-mail from applicant, March 25, 2020: I am sorry to hear that we missed this requirement when making the submission of this revision to the City of Austin. We did submit a revision to the City of Austin, …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS B.9 - 1 APRIL 27, 2020 C14H-1978-0033 LITTLEFIELD BUILDING 106 E. 6TH STREET Install a removable metal canopy along with 6th Street elevation of the building. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant proposes a suspended metal canopy along the east portion of the 6th Street elevation of the building. The canopy will extend over the retail spaces to the east of the 6th Street entrance to the building. The canopy will be suspended from metal cables and will be constructed of welded aluminum with a sheet metal roof and a frosted plexiglass ceiling. The exterior of the canopy will be finished in black. The canopy has a modern design. The applicant’s drawings show signage to be installed on the face of the canopy but no application for signs has been submitted at this time. There is currently a metal canopy over the 6th Street entrance to the building, but canvas awnings over the retail space to the east. Historic photos show the metal awning and the entry on 6th Street but nothing over the current retail space to the east: B.9 - 2 B.9 - 3 B.9 - 4 STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1) Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. Evaluation: There is no historic record of a metal canopy at this location on the building. 9) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. Evaluation: If permitted, the new canopy will not mimic the historic style of the existing canopy over the 6th Street entrance (which is a modern reconstruction of the historic canopy), but will be compatible with the scale and materials of the existing canopies. B.9 - 5 10) New additions and adjacent or related construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed …
6 9 7 6 2 3 6 7 6 6 49'-5" 6'-4 7/8" " 0 1 - ' 2 " 0 - ' 1 " 0 1 - ' 3 " 4 - ' 1 1 8 5 4 2 AWNING ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" THE LITTLEFIELD BUILDING 601 S. CONGRESS 55'-9 7/8" 49'-5" ' 7 2 . 0 9 ' W " 0 0 0 0 ° 9 1 S 6'-4 7/8" 1'-0 1/4" 7'-6 3/4" 7'-1 5/8" 8'-0 3/4" 2'-8 1/4" 11'-4 3/8" 2'-8 1/4" 8'-10 7/8" N71°O5'42"W 160.00' " 8 / 7 3 - ' " 1 8 / 7 6 - ' 8 " 3 - ' 7 " 3 " 0 - ' 7 8 1 EXISTING CONCRETE PARALLEL 2 4 3 PARKING SPACES 2/AS1.0 EAST 6TH STREET 80' R.O.W. N 1 AWNING PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" C. B. Architectural Site Plan & Awning Elevation General Notes: The dimensions on this sheet are based off of the face of finish material or A. masonry. All dimensions are to face of finish material, edge of awning, or centerline of support, unless otherwise noted. Contractor (GC) to field verify all dimensions prior to construction and/or installation of any equipment, accessories, etc. If a discrepancy is identified, notify NolanStudio immediately. Elevations are shown for reference only. Refer to Building Plans, Sections, Wall Sections and Window Elevations for additional information. All glass to be tempered in areas required by applicable code. Refer to appropriate sheet and/or schedule for additional information/detail regarding items shown herein. Keynotes located on this sheet are for this sheet only. Do not scale the drawings. If a specific dimension is not given, contact NolanStudio for clarification. Refer to Sheet A0.01-General Conditions for additional information associated with, but not limited to: submittals, shop drawings, samples, cutting and patching, coordination and staging, protection of work. Install all products per manufacturer's recommendations. D. E. F. G. H. I. 3. 4. 5. Architectural Site Plan & Awning Elevation Key Notes: 1. 2. Lot line. Building mounted awning to match design of existing above entrance to building lobby. Coordinate with Building Owner for paint color & finish during construction. Location, spacing, & size of overhead hanger and turn-buckle shown for reference only. Refer to Structural Drawings for specifications and layout. Existing entrance to tenant space to remain. Slope in existing sidewalk not shown here, vertical dimensions taken from …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS C.1 - 1 FEBRUARY 24, 2020 NRD-2020-0004 92 RAINEY STREET RAINEY STREET NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1911-12 contributing bungalow and construct a new high-rise tower in its place. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Demolish existing contributing building. 2) Construct new 53-floor, 606’ tower, occupying two adjacent lots at 90 (now Container Bar) and 92 Rainey Street. The tower includes: a) Below-ground garage b) Commercial space (first and second floors plus third-floor bar area): i. Materials throughout include a transparent glass curtainwall system with metal mullions; simplified pilasters of textured stone at bay divisions; recessed mural panels with overhead lighting, and textured concrete cladding. Flat metal awnings above each tenant entrance at 1 and 1.5 stories are topped with lit signage. ii. At the east elevation, vertically-articulated panel systems of varying widths define tenant spaces. An altered metal shipping container with viewport projects from a recessed bar space at the second floor, hovering above the streetscape. An angled precast concrete panel projects through both recessed bar spaces. c) Hotel and residential spaces: i. The tower is clad in a reflective glass curtainwall system throughout, with precast concrete accent panels on secondary facades. ii. Levels 8-52 are set back from the lower section of the tower (at roughly 177’). iii. After level 24, which separates the hotel units from residences and short-term rental units, glass balconies project from the north and south elevations. d) Roof deck RESEARCH The house at 92 Rainey Street was built around 1911. Its first owner was Alonzo B. Cook, who ran a horseshoeing shop on Congress Avenue. From 1914 to 1920, the house had many owners and renters, including a painter, a grocer, and a night watchman. By 1920, it had been purchased by Emil and Edith Bohls. Emil Bohls was the proprietor of a restaurant in 1920, but he soon opened an auto paint shop on 5th Street, which remained in business for many years. By 1937, as Austin’s automobile culture continued to grow, Bohls had expanded his repertoire to include a tourist camp, as well as a filling station, on South Congress Avenue. By 1939, the Bohls family had sold the home to Charles B. and Pearl Eustace. The Eustace family had lived across the street at 95 Rainey since 1922. Charles had recently retired from the Southwestern Bell Telephone Company after a 39-year …
