COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (CDC) March 8, 2022 – 6:30pm Austin City Hall, Board and Commission- Room 1101 301 West 2nd Street, Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Community Development Commission may be participating by video conference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once, either in-person or remotely, and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register, call or email the board liaison at 512-974-1606 or jesse.gutierrez@austintexas.gov CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Amit Motwani, Chair Public Sector Appointee Karen Paup, Vice Chair Private Sector Appointee Bertha Delgado East Austin Joe Deshotel Public Sector Appointee Fisayo Fadelu Public Sector Appointee Cheryl Thompson St. John’s Miriam Garcia North Austin Jose Noe Elias Montopolis Cynthia Jaso Dove Springs Kendra Garrett Private Sector Appointee Julia Woods South Austin Eloise Sepeda Public Sector Appointee Heidi Sloan Public Sector Appointee Vacant Rosewood-Zaragosa/Blackland Michael Tolliver Colony Park Please visit https://austintexas.gov/cdc for more information about the Community Development Commission. Members in Attendance Amit Motwani, Chair Karen Paup, Vice Chair Miriam Garcia Fisayo Fadelu Jose Noe Elias Heidi Sloan Cheryl Thompson Bertha Delgado Kendra Garrett Cynthia Jaso Julia Woods MINUTES Members Absent Joe Deshotel Eloise Sepeda Michael Tolliver Staff in Attendance Jesse Gutierrez Angel Zambrano Zach Baumer James May Lisa Rodriguez CALL TO ORDER – Chair Motwani called the meeting to order at 6:37pm with 11 members present. Commissioners Deshotel, Sepeda and Tolliver were absent. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Three speakers addressed the CDC during public communication: • Susana Almanza • Deserah Alvarez Telles • Caroline Rendon Escobar 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Discussion and possible action on the February 8, 2022, Community Development Commission meeting minutes On Vice Chair Paup’s motion, Commissioner Delgado’s second, the February 8, 2022 minutes were approved unanimously. 2. COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT (CSBG) Briefing and discussion on the Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) (Angel Zambrano, Manager, Neighborhood Services Unit, Austin Public Health) Angel Zambrano gave the presentation. The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications …
AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 8, 2022 3:00 PM 2716 SPIRIT OF TEXAS DRIVE ROOM 160 (Board Room and Public Comments) ROOM 174 (Public Viewing of Proceedings via videoconference) AUSTIN, TEXAS 78719 Some members of the Commission may be participating via videoconference. Live audio of the meeting will be available as an alternative to attending in person. Please email Steve Khanoyan at Stephen.Khanoyan@austintexas.gov by noon of the day of the meeting for dial-in details. Public communication is welcome either in person or via dial-in. Any member of the public wishing to address the Commission in person may sign in before the meeting or, if via dial in, by noon of the meeting date by emailing Steve Khanoyan at Stephen.Khanoyan@austintexas.gov. Please include the phone number you will be calling from in your email. CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Eugene Sepulveda, Chair Scott Madole, Vice-Chair Jeremy Hendricks, Secretary Wendy Price Todd Vicky Sepulveda Ernest Saulmon Jonathan Coon Billy Owens Raymond Young Chad Ennis AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES February 8, 2022 meeting. 2. STAFF REPORTS a) January 2022 Financial Results. (Prepared by Rajeev Thomas, Deputy Chief of Finance) 1 Speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Please see further instructions on registration above. b) AUS Air Service Update. (Prepared by Jamy Kazanoff, Air Service Development) 3. STAFF BRIEFINGS a) “Updates from the CEO regarding budget amendment for FY 2022 and fuel facility community meeting update” presented by Jacqueline Yaft, Chief Executive Officer. b) “A Decade of Growth: Austin’s Population and Demographic Trends” presented by Lila Valencia, City Demographer. c) “Plan of Finance for the 2022 Bond Issuance” presented by Rajeev Thomas, Deputy Chief Officer of Finance. d) “Airport Expansion and Development Program (AEDP) Updates regarding the FAA Bipartisan Infrastructure Legislation (BIL) criteria and AUS plan an update on the Environmental Assessment outreach program” presented by Lyn Estabrook, Manager of Planning & Development. 4. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve a resolution authorizing acceptance of grants from the Federal Aviation Administration, the Department of Homeland Security, and other state and federal agencies to the City of Austin, Department of Aviation, for Austin-Bergstrom International Airport for Fiscal Years 2022-2024 in an amount not to exceed $320,000,000. Scheduled for approval by the City Council on March 24, 2022. (Note: Grant …
AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 8, 2022 3:00 PM 2716 SPIRIT OF TEXAS DRIVE ROOM 160 (Board Room and Public Comments) ROOM 174 (Public Viewing of Proceedings via videoconference) AUSTIN, TEXAS 78719 Some members of the Commission may be participating via videoconference. Live audio of the meeting will be available as an alternative to attending in person. Please email Steve Khanoyan at Stephen.Khanoyan@austintexas.gov by noon of the day of the meeting for dial-in details. Public communication is welcome either in person or via dial-in. Any member of the public wishing to address the Commission in person may sign in before the meeting or, if via dial in, by noon of the meeting date by emailing Steve Khanoyan at Stephen.Khanoyan@austintexas.gov. Please include the phone number you will be calling from in your email. CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Eugene Sepulveda, Chair Scott Madole, Vice-Chair Jeremy Hendricks, Secretary Wendy Price Todd Vicky Sepulveda Ernest Saulmon Jonathan Coon Billy Owens Raymond Young Chad Ennis AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES February 8, 2022 meeting. 2. STAFF REPORTS a) January 2022 Financial Results. (Prepared by Rajeev Thomas, Deputy Chief of Finance) 1 Speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Please see further instructions on registration above. b) AUS Air Service Update. (Prepared by Jamy Kazanoff, Air Service Development) 3. STAFF BRIEFINGS a) “Updates from the CEO regarding budget amendment for FY 2022 and fuel facility community meeting update” presented by Jacqueline Yaft, Chief Executive Officer. b) “A Decade of Growth: Austin’s Population and Demographic Trends” presented by Lila Valencia, City Demographer. c) “Plan of Finance for the 2022 Bond Issuance” presented by Rajeev Thomas, Deputy Chief Officer of Finance. d) “Airport Expansion and Development Program (AEDP) Updates regarding the FAA Bipartisan Infrastructure Legislation (BIL) criteria and AUS plan an update on the Environmental Assessment outreach program” presented by Lyn Estabrook, Manager of Planning & Development. 4. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve a resolution authorizing acceptance of grants from the Federal Aviation Administration, the Department of Homeland Security, and other state and federal agencies to the City of Austin, Department of Aviation, for Austin-Bergstrom International Airport for Fiscal Years 2022-2024 in an amount not to exceed $320,000,000. Scheduled for approval by the City Council on March 24, 2022. (Note: Grant …
A Decade of Growth: Austin’s Population and Demographic Trends Airport Advisory Commission March 8, 2022 Content Population Growth Austin’s Unique Diversity Areas of Growth Growing Pains and Gains Population Growth Austin Population Growth, 1870 to 2020 961,855 656,562 251,808 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Censuses 1870 – 2020. 4 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 4,428 0 .961 million Austin is the 11th largest city in the country but growth rivals that of the nation’s largest cities. Numeric Change among U.S. Largest Cities, 2010-2020 New York Houston Fort Worth Austin Phoenix Jacksonville San Antonio Dallas Los Angeles San Diego Philadelphia San Jose Chicago 171k in 10 yrs 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, P.L. 94-171 Redistricting Data, 2010 and 2020. 5 Austin was the fastest-growing large metro in the country every year this decade. 2020 Population Numeric Change, 2010-2020 Percent Change, 2010-2020 Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown, TX Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL Raleigh-Cary, NC Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, TN Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX Jacksonville, FL Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Decennial Census, P.L. 94-171. 2,283,371 2,673,376 1,413,982 1,989,519 7,122,240 7,637,387 2,558,143 1,605,848 2,660,329 4,018,762 567,082 538,965 283,492 343,319 1,201,824 1,270,845 415,635 260,252 416,369 578,953 33.0% 25.3% 25.1% 20.9% 20.3% 20.0% 19.4% 19.3% 18.6% 16.8% 6 Drivers of Growth Migration from other states and other parts of Texas drove nearly 3/4 of the growth in the Austin Metro area between July 1, 2019, and July 1, 2020. Increased share due to increase in newcomers paired with decreases in international migration and natural increase. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Vintage 2020. Domestic Migration 73% Natural Increase 21% Int'l Migration 6% 7 Austin Work Flows 2019 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, On the Map Work Flows, 2019. 8 Austin’s Unique Diversity Austin Race/Ethnicity Composition, 2010 & 2020 0.2% 0.1% 1.7% 0.2% 7.7% 6.2% 48.7% 0.5% 0.1% 3.9% 0.2% 8.9% Hispanic or Latino White, NH Black or African American, NH American Indian and Alaska Native, NH Asian, NH Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander, NH Some Other Race, NH 35.1% 6.9% 32.5% 2010 47.1% 2020 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Decennial Census, P.L. 94-171 File. Note: NH = Non-Hispanic Change in Austin’s Racial-Ethnic Composition, 2010 to 2020 40% Austin vs 5% TX, US More than …
Airport Expansion Development Program Capital Program Update Airport Advisory Commission March 08, 2022 AUS Project Update Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Environmental Assessment Update RFQ Updates 1 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) Clarifying Information: Airport terminal Program Project Eligibility provisions from Directly from Legislative Language Airport terminal development as defined under 49 U.S.C. §47102(28) • Airport passenger terminal buildings including terminal gates • Access roads servicing exclusively airport traffic that leads directly to or from an airport passenger terminal building • Walkways that lead directly to or from an airport passenger terminal building *Connection to lightrail • Vehicles for moving passengers between terminal facilities and between terminal facilities and aircraft Source: FAA Website AAC Capital Program Update 2 Airport Terminal Program— Project Priorities As Stated in the BIL Airport Infrastructure Grant Program federal shares (FAA Contributions) are the same as for AIP • Generally 75% for large and medium hubs • Generally 90% for other NPIAS airports Terminal Improvement Program federal shares (FAA Contributions) are modified from AIP • 75% for large and medium hubs • 95% for small hubs, non-hubs, and non-primary airports Terminal Improvement Program also includes apportionment by airport size • No more than 55% of TIP can go to large hubs • No more than 15% can go to medium hubs (150M of overall 1B program, ~5M per medium hub airport) • No more than 20% can go to small hubs • Not less than 10% must go to nonhub and non-primary airports AAC Capital Program Update Source: FAA Website 3 Airport Terminal Program— Project Priorities As Stated in the BIL Consideration to be given to projects that: Increase capacity and passenger access Replace aging infrastructure Achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act/ expand accessibility for persons with disabilities Improve airport access for historically disadvantaged populations Improve energy efficiency, including upgrading environmental systems, upgrading plant facilities, and achieving Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) accreditation standards Improve airfield safety through terminal relocation Encourage actual and potential competition Previously funding FAA Programs/Projects 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Source: FAA Website AAC Capital Program Update 4 AUS – FAA BIL Strategies Airport Terminals Grant Program: • Shovel ready projects • Baggage Handling System • Terminal Optimization • Future Projects • Concourse B • Tunnel Airport Infrastructure Grant Program: • Shovel ready project • Demo for Airfield Infrastructure • Future Projects • Airfield Infrastructure • Central Utility …
AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, MARCH 8, 2022 The Airport Advisory Commission convened in a regular meeting on Tuesday, March 8, 2022. CALL TO ORDER Chair E. Sepulveda called the Commission Meeting to order at 3:01 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Eugene Sepulveda – Chair Scott Madole – Vice Chair Jeremy Hendricks – Secretary* Jonathan Coon * (*attended via videoconference) Commissioners Absent: Billy Owens CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS: Raymond Young* Wendy Price Todd Vicky Sepulveda Ernest Saulmon Chad Ennis a) Bobbie Garza-Hernandez was allotted 3 minutes to address the Commission by telephone. b) Gavino Fernandez was allotted 3 minutes to address the Commission by telephone. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) The minutes from the meeting of January 11, 2022 were approved on Commissioner Saulmon’s motion; Commissioner V. Sepulveda seconded. Motion passed on an 8-0-0-2 vote. Commissions Owens and Ennis were absent. 2. STAFF REPORTS a) “January 2022 Financial Results” prepared by Rajeev Thomas, Deputy Chief of Finance. b) “AUS Air Service Update” prepared by Jamy Kazanoff, Air Service Development. 1 3. STAFF BRIEFINGS a) “Updates from the CEO regarding budget amendment for FY 2022 and fuel facility community meeting update” presented by Jacqueline Yaft, Chief Executive Officer. b) “A Decade of Growth: Austin’s Population and Demographic Trends” presented by Lila Valencia, City Demographer. c) “Plan of Finance for the 2022 Bond Issuance” presented by Rajeev Thomas, Deputy Chief Officer of Finance and Dennis Waley, Managing Director PFM. The Commission expressed its concern that this bond issuance was not submitted to the Commission for recommendation. The Commission have asked that all components of the AEDP financing be routed to it or its working group for better recommendation to Council. d) “Airport Expansion and Development Program (AEDP) Updates regarding the FAA Bipartisan Infrastructure Legislation (BIL) criteria and AUS plan an update on the Environmental Assessment outreach program” presented by Lyn Estabrook, Manager of Planning & Development. 4. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve a resolution authorizing acceptance of grants from the Federal Aviation Administration, the Department of Homeland Security, and other state and federal agencies to the City of Austin, Department of Aviation, for Austin-Bergstrom International Airport for Fiscal Years 2022-2024 in an amount not to exceed $320,000,000. b) Authorize award of a contract with Aviramp Ltd. for mobile air stairs in an amount not to exceed $489,410. c) Authorize negotiation and execution of a cooperative contract with Ecolab Inc, for pest control services, for …
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING March 7, 2022 @ 4:00PM City Hall Boards and Commissions Room 301 W 2nd Street, Austin Texas Some members of the PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register please call (512) 974-5747 before noon on March 6, 2022 or email Janet.jackson@austintexas.gov AGENDA Amanda Lewis Rocky Lane Michael Sierra-Arevalo Rebecca Bernhardt Cory Hall-Martin CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Rebecca Gonzales, Chair Nelly Paulina Ramirez, Vice Chair Rebecca Webber Kathleen Hausenfluck Queen Austin John T. Kiracofe CALL TO ORDER 4:00-4:05pm Public Communication 4:05-4:20pm (from speakers signed up to speak) Items for Presentation, Discussion and Possible Action: 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – Jan. 24, 2022 and Feb. 7, 2022 4:20pm-4:25pm 2. OLD BUSINESS a. Recommendation on consolidation of Forensics Lab and APD (sponsored by Commissioner Bernhardt and Ramirez) 4:25pm-4:35pm 3. NEW BUSINESS a. Public Safety Organizations Quarterly Report – Austin-Travis County EMS (sponsors: Commissioner Hausenfluck and Gonzales) 4:35pm-4:55pm Speaker(s): -Teresa Gardner, Assistant Chief, Austin/Travis County Emergency Medical Services b. Wildfire Resolution #20160512-016 Update (sponsors: Commissioner Gonzales and Ramirez) 4:50pm-5:15pm Speaker(s): -Chief Vires, Chief of Staff, Austin Fire Department -Justin Jones, Austin Fire Department -Carrie Stewart, Austin Fire Department c. Review of Kroll Consulting Report (Phase B) Austin Police Department (sponsors: Commissioner Bernhardt and Ramirez) 5:05pm-5:45pm Speaker(s): -Catherine Johnson, Assistant Chief, Austin Police Department -Dan Linskey, Managing Director, Kroll Consulting -Rick Brown, Senior Consultant, Kroll Consulting -Mark Ehlers, Managing Director, Kroll Consulting -Representative, Office of Police Oversight 4. Future Agenda Items 5:45-6:00pm Adjourn @ 6pm The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Janet Jackson at Austin Police Department, at 512-974-5747, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Public Safety Commission, please contact Robin Henderson, Chief of Staff, Austin Police Department at 512-974-5030.
` PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES February 7, 2022 Rebecca Webber Michael Sierra-Arevalo John Kiracofe Rebecca Bernhardt The Public Safety Commission convened a hybrid in person and videoconferencing meeting Monday, February 7, 2022 at City Hall 301 W. 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Commissioner Rebecca Gonzalez called the Board Meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Board Members in Attendance: Kathleen Hausenfluck Nelly Ramirez Amanda Lewis Rocky Lane Cory Hall-Martin Board Members Absent: Queen Austin Staff in Attendance: Robin Henderson, Assistant Chief, Austin Police Department Teresa Gardner, Assistant Chief, Austin/Travis County Emergency Medical Services Rob Vires, Chief of Staff, Austin Fire Department Citizen Communications - Citizens signed up to speak: none 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – This will occur at the March meeting for both the January and February minutes. 2. OLD BUSINESS a. TX SB69 from 87th Legislative Session -Vote on Recommendation for Council Action Sponsored by Commissioner Gonzales and Webber 4:02pm-4:06pm In the recommendation, Chair Gonzales is asking APD to create a policy that requires the reporting of whether use of force was prevented and if it took place. They also asked for a non-retaliation policy to ensure self-reporting. Commissioner Sierra-Arevalo asked for clarity on what was up for a vote. Chair Gonzales explained three points: if there is intervention and use of force still happens, if there is intervention and use of force is prevented, and a training plan for the officer who was 1 impacted by the intervention, such as further de-escalation. No further questions. Recommendation passed on unanimous vote. 3. NEW BUSINESS a. Public Safety Organizations Quarterly Report – Austin Police Department (sponsors: Commissioner Hausenfluck and Gonzales) 4:07pm-4:50pm Speaker(s): -Chief Henderson, Austin Police Department Chief Henderson, joined by Dr. Jonathan Kringen, presented on the APD quarterly report. Dr. Kringen presented on Citywide Crimes Against Persons between 2020 and 2021. There was an overall negligent reduction in crime. Aggravated assault has had a meaningful increase. For Crimes Against Property, for the same time period, there has been a meaningful increase in theft of car parts. Overall, a small reduction in crimes. Crimes Against Society, for the same time period, shows a reduction in drug violations, possibly due to cite and arrest. However, weapons violations has significantly increased. He explained clearance rates are hard to capture, as an crime committed in one month may be carried forward to a different month. Or they may have cleared an …
` PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION SPECIAL CALLED MEETING MINUTES January 24, 2022 Rebecca Bernhardt Queen Austin Michael Sierra-Arevalo John Kiracofe Rebecca Webber The Public Safety Commission convened a hybrid in person and videoconferencing meeting Monday, January 24, 2022 at City Hall 301 W. 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Commissioner Rebecca Gonzalez called the Board Meeting to order at 3:32 p.m. Board Members in Attendance: Kathleen Hausenfluck Nelly Ramirez Amanda Lewis Rocky Lane Cory Hall-Martin Board Members Absent: none Staff in Attendance: Robin Henderson, Assistant Chief, Austin Police Department Teresa Gardner, Assistant Chief, Austin/Travis County Emergency Medical Services Rob Vires, Chief of Staff, Austin Fire Department Citizen Communications - Citizens signed up to speak: Cathy Mitchell 1. Approval of Minutes – Chair Gonzales called for approval of the minutes by asking for any edits/changes, questions concerning the draft minutes of the December 6, 2021 meeting. Hearing no edits from the board, she deemed the minutes approved. 2. OLD BUSINESS a. Legislative update on SB69 (sponsors: Commissioner Ramirez and Gonzales) 4:00 pm-4:17pm Speaker(s): -Anni-Michelle Evans, Policy Compliance Consultant, Office of Police Oversight 1 As OPO was not online, Chair Gonzales moved on to the next item. This was picked back up at 4:00. Ms. Evans reported she was pleased to hear APD plans to revise the policy, but has not seen that language yet. She would like to highlight three points relating to duty to intervene: 1) proactive vs reactive language. APD seems to create a policy that is purely reactive. It needs to include proactive language. 2) Subjective vs. objective. APD needs to be revised to include objective (should know). 3). Reporting requirements. APD needs to be revised to mirror specifics of the bill, such as a making a written report. OPO also recommends more clarity on what should be included in report and timeline for report. Regarding neck restraints, APD should revise policy to reflect legislative intent to prevent all forms of prohibiting blood flow or air intake. Commissioner Webber wanted to know what the remedies for not intervening, which OPO stated was still up for debate. Ms. Evans stated she wasn’t aware of any changes yet. Commissioner Bernhardt was concerned that officers in Texas put knees in people’s backs. She wanted APD to ban that, which OPO agrees with and would support changes that reflect that. Commissioner Arevalo had a question on anticipated vs known excessive force – what kind …
1 Follow-up to BBB Complaint #16811494 March 5, 2022 Dear BBB, Feb. 26, 2022, I filed a BBB complaint (#16811494) against Starbucks Corporate. March 1, 2022, BBB’s electronic reply included the following suggestion: “should you desire to have your experience report publicly you may write a customer review by clicking "Get Involved" on bbb.org. “ However, there is NO “Get involved” to click on bbb.org, though I do want to publicly report what I documented in Complaint #16811494. Also, the BBB response said I am “not seeking BBB assistance in obtaining a specific resolution to your claim”. However, I am now seeking BBB assistance in obtaining an official written letter from Starbucks rightly overturning its new (2/28/22), wrongful Customer Restriction against me so that I am welcome at ALL Starbucks. STARBUCKS CUSTOMER RESTRICTION LETTER Feb. 28, 2022, Starbucks District Manager Anthony Rose (anrose@starbucks.com; 512- 571-7216) verbally told me, in person at Starbucks #691 at 3300 Bee Cave Road , Austin, TX, at about 10:45 AM, that I am now BANNED from ALL Starbucks stores in Austin, TX. At the same time, Mr. Rose handed me a letter dated 2/28/22 that appeared to be from Starbucks Coffee Company, entitled “Customer Restriction”, that says the following: “Dear Carlos Leon Our stores are a neighborhood gathering place for meeting friends and family. We are committed to creating a culture of warmth and belonging for all who enter our store. When using a Starbucks space, we respectfully request that customers behave in a manner that maintains a warm and welcoming environment by being considerate and respectful of others, communicating with respect, using spaces as intended and acting responsibly. We take very seriously the safety of our customers and partners (employees). Your recent conduct, which included: 2 Abusing our Third Place repeatedly by using obscene, harassing, abusive language, not limited to hate speech and racial slurs. Displaying inappropriate behavior by throwing a gifted granola bar while in the store on year 2021 at various stores in Austin, Texas and via emails to our Starbucks Care Team was disruptive and/or threatening to your fellow customers and our partners (employees). This behavior is unacceptable, and we can no longer permit you to visit any of our Starbucks stores. Please understand that if you choose to ignore this notice and return to one of our locations, you will be considered a trespasser. In that instance, we may elect …
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION No. 20220307-02a March 7, 2022 Proposal that the Austin City Council make the Forensic Science Bureau independent of the Austin Police Department budgetarily and structurally Date: Subject: Motioned by: Rebecca Bernhardt Seconded by: Nelly Paulina Ramirez Recommendation: The Public Safety Commission recommends that the City Council move the Forensic Science Bureau from under the control of the Austin Police Department and make it budgetarily and structurally independent. WHEREAS, the City of Austin operates the Forensic Science Bureau, which provides forensic laboratory services related to the investigation of crimes, under the budgetary and managerial control of the Austin Police Department; which is a holistic approach to assessing and evolving public safety systems. Reimagine Public Safety is supposed to go beyond the scope of law enforcement and include decoupling some activities previously envisioned as under law enforcement purview to be independent; closed by the Austin Police Department in 2016 as a result of systematic failures to hire and retain qualified staff, properly maintain biological samples, process samples in a timely manner, and follow scientifically sound protocols for forensic testing; enforcement as an important value. Independence helps eliminate bias, can make an organization more agile in setting priorities, in procurement and in hiring. Independence enables a lab to be transparent without the need to get approval from law enforcement leadership; recommended that forensic labs be independent from law enforcement. WHEREAS, the predecessor to the Forensic Science Bureau, the Austin Crime Lab, was WHEREAS, the City of Austin is committed to the Reimagine Public Safety Initiative, WHEREAS, best practices for forensic labs recognize the independence from law WHEREAS, the 2009 National Academy of Science Report on Forensic Sciences WHEREAS, an independent Forensic Sciences Bureau would be placed at the same level in the criminal justice system hierarchy as the Austin Police Department, the defense bar and the Travis County DA’s Office. This enables the Bureau to advocate for what is best in evidence analysis with the key players in the criminal justice system on equal footing; WHEREAS, until 2020 the budget of the Austin crime lab was rolled into a bundle with other civilian services in the Austin Police Department, including vehicle services and building maintenance, making it impossible for elected officials to identify and allocate needed resources to the crime lab even after serious problems with both staffing and equipment had been identified; budgetary needs to ensure that the …
Emergency Medical Services Public Safety Commission Meeting FY22 Q1 Teresa Gardner, Assistant Chief 1 Incidents Jan. 2019 - Jan. 2022 Incidents 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 9 1 - n a J 9 1 - b e F 9 1 - r a M 9 1 - r p A 9 1 - y a M 9 1 - n u J 9 1 - l u J 9 1 - g u A 9 1 - p e S 9 1 - t c O 9 1 - v o N 9 1 - c e D 0 2 - n a J 0 2 - b e F 0 2 - r a M 0 2 - r p A 0 2 - y a M 0 2 - n u J 0 2 - l u J 0 2 - g u A 0 2 - p e S 0 2 - t c O 0 2 - v o N 0 2 - c e D 1 2 - n a J 1 2 - b e F 1 2 - r a M 1 2 - r p A 1 2 - y a M 1 2 - n u J 1 2 - l u J 1 2 - g u A 1 2 - p e S 1 2 - t c O 1 2 - v o N 1 2 - c e D 2 2 - n a J 2 Patient Contacts Jan. 2019-Jan. 2022 Patient Contacts 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 9 1 - n a J 9 1 - b e F 9 1 - r a M 9 1 - r p A 9 1 - y a M 9 1 - n u J 9 1 - l u J 9 1 - g u A 9 1 - p e S 9 1 - t c O 9 1 - v o N 9 1 - c e D 0 2 - n a J 0 2 - b e F 0 2 - r a M 0 2 - r p A 0 2 - y a M 0 2 - n u J 0 2 - l u J 0 2 - g u A 0 2 - p e S 0 2 - t …
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION (PSC) MEETING: MARCH 7, 2022 AFD’s Six-Month Update Regarding Council Resolution No. 20160512-016 Chief Carrie Stewart and Justice Jones will be presenting virtually, updating the Commission on components identified in the resolution. Chief Stewart and Justice Jones will need to be able to share their computer screens for the briefing. AFD has created a specific page on the Austin-Area Wildfire Hub called the “Wildfire Readiness Update” that has a real-time representation on progress of these metrics. The components they will cover as identified in the resolution are: 1. Number of local Community Wildfire Protection Plans (CWPPS) completed and implemented in high-risk Wildfire-Urban Interface (WUI) areas. 2. Number of local CWPPs started in high-risk WUI areas but not completed. 3. Percentage of high-risk WUI areas in which identification of potential local CWPP planning areas is still ongoing. 4. Number of public presentations and home assessments provided. 5. For high-risk WUI areas, provide the number of fuel-mitigation activities, location of activities (identify local CWPP where applicable), type of fuel- mitigation activities (mechanical or prescribed fire), and size of areas mitigated. 6. Number of wildfire training contact hours by City employees, including AFD firefighters, and number of employees receiving training. Break down by classroom hours and hands-on training hours conducted.
A US TIN FIRE D EP A RT MENT Wildfire Readiness Update Justice Jones – Wildfire Mitigation Officer BE IT RESOLVED... "Provide a progress report every six months to the Public Safety Commission for the following important components of a comprehensive WUI risk reduction plan." Council Resolution NO. 20160512-016 The information presented in this update are maintained in real-time through dynamic data 1 Wildfire Readiness Update 1. The number of local CWPP’s completed and implemented. 2. The number of local CWPP's started but not completed. 3. The percentage of high-risk WUI areas in which identification of potential local CWPP planning areas is still ongoing. 4. The number of public presentations and home assessments provided. 5. The number, size, type and location of fuel mitigation activities conducted. 6. The number of training hours received and conducted. 2 1) The number of local CWPP's completed and implemented is 20. Local level CWPP’s are community led initiatives that AFD facilitates and supports. We are pleased to have brought the community of Shepard Mountain as our newest Firewise community this year. A US TIN CW P P ’s 3 2) The number of local CWPP's started but not completed is 24. Local level CWPP’s are community led initiatives that AFD facilitates and supports. We are pleased to have brought the community of Shepard Mountain as our newest Firewise community this year. A c ti ve & En ga ged Sentence or subheading goes Here on the page in the header box. 4 3) The percentage of high-risk WUI areas in which identification of potential local CWPP planning areas is still ongoing is 49%. Of the 14% of Austin classified as high risk, 51% is covered by a local level CWPP, 49% are identified as opportunity zones. Hi gh Risk A rea s 5 4) The number of public presentations and home assessments provided in the past 6 months. 17 Presentations and events, including virtual events such as the annual Wildfire Symposium held virtually, and 15 home assessments provided. Ou t reach A c ti vities 6 5) The number, size, type and location of fuel mitigation activities conducted in the past 6 months. 9 Prescribed fires (1,170 ac) and 6 shaded fuel breaks (7.7 ac) completed, protecting 114 homes ($56 million value). Fu el Mi ti g ation 7 6) The number of training hours received and conducted in the past six months. 337 …
Kroll Phase B Report Evaluation of Austin Police Department: Use of Force / Public Interactions / Recruitment, Selection, and Promotions Presentation to Austin Public Safety Commission March 7, 2022 Introduction / Scope of Work Scope of Report Kroll’s evaluation addressed four distinct areas 2 3 1 Analysis of APD use-of-force incidents / Jan. 1, 2017 - Dec. 31, 2020 (48 months) Review of 1,321 APD use of force incidents / June – November 2019 (6 months) Analysis of public interactions with civilians (e.g., traffic stops, arrests, citations, and searches) / 2020 (12 months) 4 Evaluation of recruitment, selection, and promotion policies and practices 3 Report Overview Section 3 Section 4 Provides a 48-month analysis (2017-2020) and contextualized understanding of how, when, and against whom the APD uses force. Are there disparate impacts based on race, ethnicity, or gender / geographical sectors / other factors? Provides a qualitative analysis and review of 1,321 use-of-force incidents from June to November 2019. Is force appropriately applied? Does APD unnecessarily escalate encounters? Is their sufficient supervisory review? Section 5 Documents patterns and trends observed for APD motor vehicle stops during 2020 (1 year) and arrests from 2017-2020 (4 years) and examines racial/ethnic disparities in the outcomes. Section 6 Reviews and analyzes APD’s recruitment, selection, and promotion processes and potential impact on racial, ethnic, and gender diversity. Section 7 Kroll recommendations. 4 Section 3: Review and Data Analysis of APD Use of Force (2017-2020) Definitions • Disproportionality • Disparity • Bias o A difference in outcomes within a single racial/ethnic group (e.g., use of force against Black individuals) compared to that group’s representation in a selected comparison population (e.g., Black residential population) o A difference in outcomes across groups (e.g., racial/ethnic groups, gender, etc.) in policing o Prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair • Racially biased policing o Occurs when law enforcement inappropriately considers race or ethnicity in their decisions to intervene in a law enforcement capacity 6 If you find disparity what does that mean? How much disparity is too much? • Statistical analyses measure disparity or disproportionality, not bias o Cannot be reliably used to determine the reasons for differences o Cannot conclude that disparity, even high levels of disparity, is proof of bias – bright line does not exist • Why do the analyses then? o …
Evaluation of Austin Police Department: Use of Force / Public Interactions / Recruitment, Selection, and Promotions Prepared for City of Austin, Office of Police Oversight / City Manager’s Office January 21, 2022 Status Final Report Kroll Associates, Inc. 2000 Market Street, Suite 2700 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Kroll.com Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 1 2. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT ................................................................................................ 11 3. REVIEW AND DATA ANALYSIS OF APD USE OF FORCE (January 2017 to December 2020) ........................................................................................ 16 3.1 APD Use of Force - Overview ........................................................................................... 18 APD Use of Force Policies ....................................................................................... 18 Measuring APD Use of Force ................................................................................... 21 APD Use of Force Descriptives ................................................................................ 23 Individuals’ Resistance ............................................................................................. 27 Individuals’ Impairment ............................................................................................. 30 Types of Force -- Severity ........................................................................................ 33 Individuals with Repeat Uses of Force ..................................................................... 34 Post-Use of Force ..................................................................................................... 36 Geographic Analyses ............................................................................................... 37 3.2 Racial/Ethnic Disparity Analyses ...................................................................................... 41 Disparity Ratio Findings............................................................................................ 45 Summary: Disproportionality Use of Force Benchmark Analysis by Sector ............ 53 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 53 3.3 Predicting Use of Force .................................................................................................... 53 APD Uses of Force 2017-2020 ................................................................................ 54 APD Arrests with Use of Force 2017-2020 .............................................................. 55 Factors Influencing the Use of Force ....................................................................... 59 Limitations ................................................................................................................ 63 Descriptive Analyses ................................................................................................ 64 Multivariate Analyses ................................................................................................ 66 Summary .................................................................................................................. 71 4. REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF APD USE OF FORCE (June to November 2019) .................... 73 4.1 Incident and Demographic Comparisons ......................................................................... 73 4.2 Lack of Reasonable Suspicion and APD Use of Force .................................................... 75 4.3 Additional Trends and Issues within the Problematic Cases ............................................ 77 4.4 Individual Examples of Problematic Use of Force Cases ................................................. 80 4.5 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 85 5. ANALYSIS OF APD TRAFFIC STOPS, CITATIONS, ARRESTS, AND SEARCHES (January – December 2020) .................................................................................................. 86 5.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 86 5.2 Data Description and Limitations ...................................................................................... 86 Data Limitations ........................................................................................................ 88 5.3 Motor Vehicle Stops January 1 – December 31, 2020 ..................................................... 89 5.4 All Arrests January 1, 2017 – December 31, 2020 ......................................................... 105 5.5 Summary ......................................................................................................................... 114 6. RECRUITMENT, SELECTION, AND PROMOTIONS ............................................................... 117 6.1 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 117 6.2 APD Demographics and Diversity .................................................................................. 118 6.3 Recruitment ..................................................................................................................... 121 6.4 The APD Selection Process ........................................................................................... 133 6.5 The APD Promotion Process .......................................................................................... 142 6.6 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 150 7. RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................................. 152 7.1 Data Collection Recommendations ................................................................................ 152 7.2 Use of Force Recommendations .................................................................................... 156 7.3 Organizational Recommendations.................................................................................. 158 7.4 Recruitment, Selection, and Promotion Recommendations ........................................... 161 7.5 Appendix to Section 7: Data …
Name of Board or Commission: Public Safety Commission Request Number: PSC Recommendation #20220307-02a Description of Item: Recommendation Proposal that the Austin City Council make the Forensic Science Bureau independent of the Austin Police Department budgetary and structurally Board or Commission Vote to refer item to Council: Unanimous Date of Approval of Request: March 7, 2022 Attachments: ☒ Yes ☐ No If yes, please list the attachments: Attest: Janet Jackson, Public Safety Commission Liaison (512) 974-5747 Janet.jackson@austintexas.gov Council Committee Assigned: ☐Audit and Finance Committee ☐Austin Energy Utility Oversight Committee ☐Austin Watery Oversight Committee ☐Public Health Committee ☐Housing and Planning Committee ☐Mobility Committee ☐Public Safety Committee Recommend a Fiscal Analysis be completed? Recommend a Legal Analysis be completed? Notes: Mayor Signature & Date: MAYOR’S OFFICE USE ONLY 2 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION No. 20220307-02a Date: March 7, 2022 Motioned by: Rebecca Bernhardt Seconded by: Nelly Paulina Ramirez Subject: Proposal that the Austin City Council make the Forensic Science Bureau independent of the Austin Police Department budgetarily and structurally Recommendation: The Public Safety Commission recommends that the City Council move the Forensic Science Bureau from under the control of the Austin Police Department and make it budgetarily and structurally independent. WHEREAS, the City of Austin operates the Forensic Science Bureau, which provides forensic laboratory services related to the investigation of crimes, under the budgetary and managerial control of the Austin Police Department; WHEREAS, the City of Austin is committed to the Reimagine Public Safety Initiative, which is a holistic approach to assessing and evolving public safety systems. Reimagine Public Safety is supposed to go beyond the scope of law enforcement and include decoupling some activities previously envisioned as under law enforcement purview to be independent; WHEREAS, the predecessor to the Forensic Science Bureau, the Austin Crime Lab, was closed by the Austin Police Department in 2016 as a result of systematic failures to hire and retain qualified staff, properly maintain biological samples, process samples in a timely manner, and follow scientifically sound protocols for forensic testing; WHEREAS, best practices for forensic labs recognize the independence from law enforcement as an important value. Independence helps eliminate bias, can make an organization more agile in setting priorities, in procurement and in hiring. Independence 3 leadership; enables a lab to be transparent without the need to get approval from law enforcement WHEREAS, the 2009 National Academy of Science Report on Forensic Sciences recommended that forensic labs …
Music Commission Monday, March 7, 2022, 6:30pm Austin City Hall – Council Chambers Room 1001 301 W. 2nd Street, Austin TX 78701 Some members of the Music Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may register to speak on an item once, either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three (3) minutes to provide their comments. Speakers wishing to participate remotely by telephone are required to register in advance no later than noon the day before the meeting. To register to speak remotely email or call Kim McCarson at kimberly.mccarson@austintexas.gov , 512-974-7963 by noon on Sunday, March 6, 2022. CURRENT COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chair - Anne-Charlotte Patterson, Vice-chair - Nagavalli Medicharla, Secretary - Oren Rosenthal, Parliamentarian - Graham Reynolds, Gavin Garcia, Lauryn Gould, Christopher Limon, Jonathan “Chaka” Mahone, Patrice Pike, Scott Strickland, Stuart Sullivan AGENDA CALL TO ORDER MUSICAL PERFORMANCE Ray Prim PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2. STAFF BRIEFINGS Approval of Minutes from Regularly Scheduled Meeting on February 7, 2021. a. Update on City rate for musicians from Stephanie Bergara, Artist and Industry Development, Music & Entertainment Division, b. Update on Live Music Fund recommendation by Erica Shamaly, Division Manager, Music & Entertainment Division. 3. NEW BUSINESS industry role. 3. OLD BUSINESS a. Discussion and Possible Action following presentation by Quentin Prior, Battalion Chief/Assistant Fire Marshall, Special Events, on venue safety priorities. b. Discussion and Possible Action on Gig Buddy following presentation by Pat Buchta and Sonya Jevette of Austin Texas Musicians. c. Discussion and Possible Action on convention center renovation, expansion and music a. Discussion and Possible Action on making a possible budget recommendation. b. Discussion and Possible Action on voter registration and Music Commission role. c. Discussion and Possible Action on increasing City rate for musicians. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting …
MUSIC COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20220307-3c Seconded By: Vice-chair Medicharla Chair Patterson Increasing the City Rate for Musicians Date: March 7, 2022 Subject: Motioned By: Recommendation The Music Commission recommends that the City of Austin increase the rate for musicians to $200 per hour. Description of Recommendation to Council The Music Commission recommends that the hourly rate for City of Austin musical performances increase to $200/hr per musician. Rationale: Musician pay for City of Austin Performances has not increased since 2016, while during that time, the cost of living in Austin has risen dramatically. Each hour of musical performance represents hours of rehearsal, songwriting, travel time, and more; expenses for equipment and rehearsal space; and years spent honing talent and craft. The City of Austin should set the standard for well-paying music gigs here in the Live Music Capitol of the World. Vote For: 8 (Chair Patterson, Vice-chair Medicharla, Commissioners Rosenthal, Reynolds, Garcia, Gould, Limon, Mahone) Against: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 3 (Commissioners Pike, Strickland, and Sullivan) Attest: Kim McCarson 1 of 1
AUSTIN MUSIC COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES The Austin Music Commission convened in a regular meeting on March 7th, 2022, at Austin City Hall, 301 W. 2nd St. Austin, TX 78701 March 7, 2022 BOARD MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE: Chair - Anne-Charlotte Patterson, Vice-chair - Nagavalli Medicharla, Secretary - Oren Rosenthal, Parliamentarian - Graham Reynolds (virtual), Gavin Garcia (virtual), Lauryn Gould, Christopher Limon (virtual), Jonathan “Chaka” Mahone (virtual) Staff in Attendance: Erica Shamaly, Stephanie Bergara, Kim McCarson CALL TO ORDER 6:38pm MUSICAL PERFORMANCE Ray Prim PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Pat Buchta, Austin Texas Musicians, speaks in support of trying to find more money for the Austin Music Disaster Relief program. Zack Morgan speaks in critique of the Austin Music Disaster Relief Grant distribution. Sarah Hall speaks in critique of the Austin Music Disaster Relief Grant distribution. Sonya Reese speaks in critique of the Austin Music Disaster Relief Grant distribution. Anna Maciel speaks on advocacy for equity in programs and creation of music hub and in support of the Tejano Music Alliance. Approval of Minutes from Regularly Scheduled Meeting on March 7, 2022. Commissioner Reynolds motions and Commissioner Gould seconds. Motion carries 8-0. a. Update on City rate for musicians from Stephanie Bergara, Artist and Industry Development, Music & Entertainment Division, b. Update on Live Music Fund recommendation by Erica Shamaly, Division Manager, Music 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2. STAFF BRIEFINGS & Entertainment Division. 3. NEW BUSINESS a. Discussion and Possible Action following presentation by Quentin Prior, Battalion Chief/Assistant Fire Marshall, Special Events, on venue safety priorities. No action taken. b. Discussion and Possible Action on Gig Buddy following presentation by Pat Buchta and Sonya Jevette of Austin Texas Musicians. No action taken. 1 AUSTIN MUSIC COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES March 7, 2022 c. Discussion and Possible Action on convention center renovation, expansion and music industry role. Commissioners Mahone and Gould volunteer to be part of Joint Music and Downtown Commission working group on the convention center. No action taken. a. Discussion and Possible Action on making a possible budget recommendation. No action b. Discussion and Possible Action on voter registration and Music Commission role. No 3. OLD BUSINESS taken. action taken. c. Discussion and Possible Action on increasing City rate for musicians. Chair …
LGBTQ QUALITY OF LIFE ADVISORY COMMISSION Monday, March 7, 2022 7:00 p.m. City of Austin Permitting and Development Center, Room 1401 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr., Austin, Texas 78752 Some commissioners may be participating by videoconference Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register email or call staff liaison Alyssa Parra at 512-974-2934 or Alyssa.Parra@AustinTexas.gov District Commissioner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Kannou (Kimberly) Curette VACANT Victor Martinez Holly Kirby Katie Jones Rebecca Dreke VACANT VACANT District 9 10 Mayor At-Large At-Large At-Large At-Large Commissioner Nan Dowling Brandon Wollerson Marti Bier VACANT Charles Curry Ryn Gonzales (Chair) Melissa Taylor (Vice Chair) CALL TO ORDER AGENDA PUBLIC COMMUNICATION – Each speaker will have 3 minutes to speak. 1. MOTION TO SUSPEND ROBERT’S RULES OF ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES- November 8, 2021 3. REGULAR BUSINESS – The commission may act or make recommendations on the following topics: a. New Commissioner Introductions b. Honor Saul Gonzalez, former Commissioner c. Budget Workshop recap, including timeline, possibilities of new funds, and discussion on the goals of the commission. (Sponsor: Gonzales; Strategic Outcome: Government That Works for All) d. Joint Inclusion Committee appointment (Sponsor: Gonzales; Strategic Outcome: Government e. Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity data recommendation. (Sponsor: Wollerson; Strategic Outcome: Government That Works for All) f. Overview of working groups (Sponsor: Taylor; Strategic Outcome: Government That Works for That Works for All) All) g. Request for commission representation on The University of Texas Osher Lifelong Learning Institute board (Sponsor: Gonzales; Strategic Outcome: Government That Works for All) h. Update on Council member Tovo conversation and relevant city positions (e.g., Equity Liaison, APD designate) (Sponsor: Dowling; Strategic Outcome: Government That Works for All) i. Vacant commissioner positions (Sponsor: Gonzales; Strategic Outcome: Government That Works for All) j. Meeting schedules 2022 and discussion for a different date for our March meeting (Sponsor: Gonzales; Strategic Outcome: Government That Works for All) k. Update on the Equity-based historic preservation plan. (Sponsor: Gonzales; Strategic Outcome: Government That Works for All) l. Update on the Quality-of-Life Study. (Sponsor: Taylor; Strategic Outcome: Government That m. Requests for QOL study data access update (Sponsor: Gonzales; Strategic …
COMMISSION ON IMMIGRANT AFFAIRS MONDAY, MARCH 7, 2022 6:30 PM AUSTIN CITY HALL ROOM 1101 301 W 2ND STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Krystal Gomez, Chair Nicole Merritt, Vice Chair Sara Becker Karen Crawford Adrian De La Rosa AGENDA Rennison Lalgee Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch Joseph Ramirez-Hernandez Glenn Rosales Juan Vences-Benitez CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – February 7, 2022 2. NEW BUSINESS a. Karla Peredo, Office of Police Oversight, to provide updates on current work to revise APD’s body-worn camera and dashboard camera policies and speak on previous and future community engagement efforts with immigrant and refugee communities b. Chief Joseph Chacon and Lieutenants Christine Chomout and Craig Smith, Austin Police Department (APD), to discuss: (1) U-Visa report and (2) Resolution 74 Immigration Enforcement report c. Brie Franco, Intergovernmental Relations Office, briefing on legislation that passed that affects the City of Austin d. Budget discussion and vote on recommendations 3. OLD BUSINESS a. Report back from ISNA and the RST quarterly consultations – Juan and Rennison b. Joint Inclusion Committee meeting updates – Karen FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Sinying Chan at Austin Public Health Department, at 512-972-5117, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Commission on Immigrant Affairs, please contact Sinying Chan at 512-972-5117.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Commission on Immigrant Affairs Recommendation Number: 20220307-2d1: Development of Immigrant Affairs Office WHEREAS, we heard from the community an appreciation that the Immigrant Affairs position was created, and a recognition that one person cannot handle all of the work that will be required; and WHEREAS, an immigrant affairs office would help ensure the needs of the immigrant community in Austin are met; and WHEREAS, Austin has a large and diverse immigrant community, with varying needs and varying degrees of involvement in city government. Those most impacted are largely unseen, whether because of language barriers, cultural concerns, or concerns related to immigration status. This office will be able to reach out to the community so that their voices can be heard; and WHEREAS, immigrant communities have been most affected by the pandemic and the ongoing energy and utility crises, and having an immigrant affairs office helps ensure the communities are not only reached but best served, which helps the community as a whole; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin funded one full time position within the Equity Office to work in immigrant affairs; and WHEREAS, there is a large, diverse immigrant community in Austin, and our commission’s hope is that the immigrant affairs office can go out into the community to learn their concerns, see where there are gaps in services, and assess the City’s ability to address their concerns; and WHEREAS, many cities that are Austin’s peers have established immigrant affairs offices, including Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio; and WHEREAS, a report by the LBJ School of the University of Texas at Austin found that an immigrant affairs office is necessary and recommended1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Commission on Immigrant Affairs recommends the expansion of the Immigrant Affairs office, since one person cannot take on everything that is required of this office. 1 “Advancing Immigrant Incorporation in Austin,” Ruth Ellen Wassem et al, University of Texas LBJ School for Public Affairs, July 2021, https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/86821 Date of Approval: March 7, 2022 Record of the vote: Unanimous on a 9-0 vote with Glenn Rosales absent Attest: Staff Liaison
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Commission on Immigrant Affairs Recommendation Number: 20220307-2d2: Increase in Legal Services Funding WHEREAS, we heard from the community that legal services funding is crucial, and there is still unmet need; and WHEREAS, there are immigrants who need access to counsel, and cannot afford attorneys. This is especially so for immigrants facing removal proceedings; and WHEREAS, in a time of changes in immigration policy, people have more need of legal representation, as it has become very complicated, and it is essential that immigrant communities obtain accurate advice and assistance; and WHEREAS, the people most impacted by the complicated changes in immigration policy are low-income immigrants; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin already funds legal services for low income immigrants who are Austin residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Commission on Immigrant Affairs recommends that we increase funding for immigration legal services. Date of Approval: March 7, 2022 Record of the vote: Unanimous on a 9-0 vote with Glenn Rosales absent Attest: Staff Liaison
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Commission on Immigrant Affairs Recommendation Number: 20220307-2d3: Fund Refugee Health Screening Clinic WHEREAS, we heard testimony from staff of the City of Austin Refugee Health Screening Clinic regarding the work that they do and the challenges that they face; and WHEREAS, Austin has seen an increase in arrivals of refugees, including from Afghanistan, and will be seeing new refugees from Ukraine, in addition to continued refugee arrivals from other parts of the world; and WHEREAS, prior to the Ukrainian refugee crisis, the Refugee Health Screening Clinic was projecting for FY22 over four times the number of refugees in the Austin/Travis County area as compared to FY21; and WHEREAS, the work of the Refugee Health Screening Clinic supports the city’s outreach efforts to new immigrants and refugees, especially in the area of public health. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Commission on Immigrant Affairs recommends that we provide funding to the City of Austin Refugee Health Screening Clinic to pay for the salaries of two FTE staff. Date of Approval: March 7, 2022 Record of the vote: Unanimous on a 9-0 vote with Glenn Rosales absent Attest: Staff Liaison
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Commission on Immigrant Affairs Recommendation Number: 20220307-2d4: Creation of Summer Camps in Spanish or Dual Language Summer Camps to Support A.I.S.D.’s English Learner and Dual Language Learner Populations WHEREAS, 22.2% of Austinites speak primarily Spanish at home1; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin is committed to “making reasonable efforts to ensure that City services and information about those services are provided in a manner that is accessible, relevant, and timely to residents” even if those residents are limited in their English proficiency (LEP).2; and WHEREAS, on November 3, 2016, the City of Austin passed Resolution No. 20161103-052 directing the City Manager to develop “Language Access Procedures” for each City Department that interacts with the public. The procedures were to specify steps for staff to follow to, among other things, deliver services to LEP individuals and ensure effective services are provided, and3; and WHEREAS, 26% of the 81,000 students enrolled in the Austin Independent School District are English learners4; and WHEREAS, 87% of those English Learners speak Spanish as their primary home language5; and 1U.S. Census Data from available at: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=language%20austin%20tx&g=1600000US4805000&hide Preview=false&tid=ACSST1Y2018.S1601&vintage=2018&layer=VT_2018_160_00_PY_D1&c id=S1601_C01_001E 2 See the City of Austin’s Language Access Plan p.3 available at: https://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/images/Airport/Travel_Security/Language_Acces s_Plan.pdf 3 Resolution No. 20161103-52 available at: http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=267426 4 https://www.austinisd.org/multilingual 5 https://www.austinisd.org/sites/default/files/dre- reports/18.22_Bilingual_and_ESL_Program_and_Demographic_Executive_Summary_2018- 2019.pdf WHEREAS, the City of Austin Parks and Recreation Department (PARD) offers a wide variety of summer camps for children ages 5-12 at affordable rates; and WHEREAS, the stated goal of the PARD’s summer program is to “provide children with exciting experiences through structured recreation in a safe and welcoming environment”6; and WHEREAS, the PARD currently offers their summer camp information, website and enrollment materials in languages other than English, but conducts most of its over 500 camps in only English; and WHEREAS, English-only summer camps are not welcoming environments for children who speak another language at home; and WHEREAS, the City of Austin’s Commission on Immigrant Affairs received testimony and feedback from the Austin community regarding the need for City summer programming in Spanish; and WHEREAS, the Austin Independent School District Dual Language program helps students excel academically while becoming bilingual, biliterate and bicultural and is committed to educating students in a multicultural learning environment and encouraging learners to celebrate diversity and become responsible citizens of the world7; and WHEREAS, these students would also benefit from continuing their exposure to Spanish throughout the summer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED …
COMMISSION ON IMMIGRANT AFFAIRS MONDAY, MARCH 7, 2022 6:30 PM Meeting Minutes Karen Crawford Adrian De La Rosa Rennison Lalgee Board Members in Attendance: Krystal Gomez, Chair Nicole Merritt, Vice-Chair Sara Becker Board Members not in Attendance: Glenn Rosales Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch Joseph Ramirez-Hernandez Juan Vences-Benitez Staff in Attendance: Sinying Chan, Staff Liaison & Health Equity Unit Program Coordinator/Austin Public Health CALL TO ORDER 1. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES – February 7, 2022 • Postponed to next month; Kate moved; Karen seconded; all in favor 2. NEW BUSINESS: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTIONS: A. Karla Peredo, Office of Police Oversight, to provide updates on current work to revise APD’s body-worn camera and dashboard camera policies and speak on previous and future community engagement efforts with immigrant and refugee communities • Results of two reports from 2015 and 2019 showed racial disparities persisted and in many cases worsen; OPO’s analysis revealed patterns that negatively affected Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino community members; Black/African American drivers are the most overrepresented group across all categories except for citations; Hispanic/Latinos received the highest percentage of citations; White/Caucasian are the most underrepresented in all categories; Asians are slightly underrepresented in all categories • Austin officer-involved shootings in 2018 showed that 7 out of 12 incidents involved Latinx individuals; most individuals involved in the 2018 incidents were ethnic minorities, specifically Latinx males, and most individuals involved in the 2018 incidents were between 20-28 year old; officers failed to use deescalate tactics in many incidents mail • Can make a complain/thank you for APD to OPO online, over the phone, in person, or by • OPO actively participates in community engagement events and building partnerships; it also provides education and resources • Current informational campaign to request public feedback that; project to rewrite APD’s general orders in the future few years; OPO’s analysis released in January 2022 found APD’s policy on body camera and dash camera is too vague; an officer can stop recording with a supervisor’s authorization but there’s no information on when the supervisor can make that call; OPO will ask for more clarity B. Chief Joseph Chacon and Lieutenants Christine Chomout and Craig Smith, Austin Police Department (APD), to discuss: (1) U-Visa report and (2) Resolution 74 Immigration Enforcement report • Chief Chacon was not available to attend the meeting • Lieutenant Christine Chomout shared data on U-Visa report and clarifications on denials • Lieutenant Craig …
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PANEL AGENDA Regular Meeting - Monday, March 7, 2022; 6:00 PM The Art in Public Places Panel will participate by videoconference. The public may attend the meeting online with pre-registration. Please contact marjorie.flanagan@austintexas.gov by March 6 at 3 PM to pre-register. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PANEL MEMBERS: Tammie Rubin – Chair, Jacob Villanueva –Vice Chair, Brett Barnes – Arts Commission Liaison, Sarah Carr, Stephanie Lemmo, J Muzacz, Joel Nolan CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items posted on the agenda. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. Approve minutes from the AIPP Panel meeting held on 2/07/2022 2. 3. 4. CHAIR’S REPORT a. Communication on current projects on social ARTS COMMISSION LIAISON REPORT a. Update on new funding program release NEW BUSINESS a. Discussion and Action Items i) iv) Legal Consideration Related to Equity in Economic Development Department Hotel Occupancy Tax Funded Programs --Neal Falgoust, Assistant City Attorney ii) Review the Updated Mid-Design presentation for Austin Travis County Emergency Medic Services/Austin Fire Department Facilities Renovation Art in Public Places Embedded Artist Project --Luis Angulo, Artist iii) Approve the Final Design for the Austin Fire Department Phase 6 Renovations Art in Public Places Project --Mery Collette and Luis Gutierrez, Artists Review the Mid-Design for the Anderson Mill Road Reginal Mobility Bond Art in Public Places project --Dianne Sonnenberg, Artist 5. 6. OLD BUSINESS a. P3 Working Group Update STAFF BRIEFINGS a. Collection Update ADJOURNMENT GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS / FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 7. 8. The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request - including translation and interpretation services. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days before the meeting date. For assistance, please contact the Economic Development Department at 512-974-7819 or Relay Texas 7-1-1.
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PANEL Regular Meeting Minutes The Art in Public Places Panel convened a regular meeting on Monday, March 7, 2022 via Zoom. Vice Chair Villanueva called the Meeting to order at 6:02 PM. Panel Members in Attendance: Panel Chair Tammie Rubin, Vice Chair Jacob Villanueva, Panel Members Sarah Carr, Stephanie Lemmo and J Muzacz. Arts Commission Liaison Brett Barnes arrived at 6:11 PM. Panel Member Joel Nolan was absent. Staff in Attendance: Anna Bradley, and Marjorie Flanagan, AIPP staff; Neil Falgoust, City Attorney’s office; William Massingill, Public Works Department; Guests in Attendance: Mery Godigna Collett, Luis Gutierrez, Dianne Sonnengerg. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. The minutes from the Regular meeting on Monday, February 7, 2022, were approved on the motion of Panel Member Carr and Panel Member Lemmo seconded. Passed 5- 0-0. 2. CHAIR’S REPORT a. None. 3. ARTS COMMISSION LIAISON REPORT a. Update on the P3 Working group and new funding release update. 4. NEW BUSINESS a. Discussion and Action Items Legal Consideration Related to Equity in Economic Development Department Hotel Occupancy Tax Funded Programs Assistant City Attorney presented information on the recent legal items of note related to artist selections processes. Discussion ensued. No action was taken. i) ii) Review the Updated Mid-Design presentation for Austin Travis County Emergency Medic Services/Austin Fire Department Facilities Renovation Art in Public Places Embedded Artist Project The artist requested to postpone this item to a later date. Request was recognized. iii) Approve the Final Design for the Austin Fire Department Phase 6 Renovations Art in Public Places Project Artists Mery Collette and Luis Gutierriz presented their final design for the AFD Phase 6 project. Discussion ensued. Panel Member Carr moved for approval and Panel Member Lemmo seconded. Motion passed 6-0-0. Review the Mid-Design for the Anderson Mill Road Reginal Mobility Bond Art in Public Places project Artist Dianne Sonenberg presented her mid design for the Anderson Mill Road project. Discussion ensued. No action was taken. iv) 5. OLD BUSINESS a. None. 6. STAFF BRIEFINGS a. Frank Wick updated the Panel on recent vandalism of artworks in the collection. 7. GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS / FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 8. ADJOURNMENT Chair Rubin adjourned the meeting at 8:04 PM without objection.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Special Called Meeting Friday, March 4, 2022 5:30 p.m. – Adjournment City of Austin Permitting & Development Center 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive, Room 1203 Austin TX 78752 Some members of Human Rights Commission may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may speak up to three minutes on an item only once either in-person or remotely. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register call or email the board liaison at 512-974-3203 or jonathan.babiak@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSION MEMBERS: Sareta Davis, Chair Isabel Casas, Vice Chair Malenie Areche Jared Breckenridge Kimberly Brienzi Garry Brown Jamarr Brown Kristian Caballero Idona Griffith Maram Museitif Alicia Weigel CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL AGENDA Members of the public signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed three minutes to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. a. Consider approval of the minutes from the Human Rights Commission’s February 28, 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2022 Regular Meeting. 2. NEW BUSINESS a. Discussion and possible action on a recommendation to City Council related to the City of Austin Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Budget and Strategic Direction 2023: Economic Opportunity and Affordability; Mobility; Safety; Health and Environment; Culture and Lifelong Learning; and Government That Works for All. (Davis/Casas) 3. OLD BUSINESS a. Commissioners will report on and discuss the status of the Commission’s key priority areas of concern for 2021-2022, including plans and strategies for meeting those key priority areas of concern: i. Institutional Equity ii. Environment & Land Use iii. Health Access & Nutrition iv. Autonomy & Human Rights ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Jonathan Babiak, Office of Civil Rights, at (512) 974-3203 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Human Rights Commission, please contact Jonathan Babiak at (512) 974-3203 or visit http://www.austintexas.gov/hrc.
REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, February 28, 2022 HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION MINUTES The Human Rights Commission convened in a regular meeting on Monday, February 28, 2022 at City of Austin Permitting & Development Center, 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive, Room 1406, Austin TX 78752. Chair Sareta Davis called the Board Meeting to order at 5:40 p.m. Board Members in Attendance: Chair Davis, Vice Chair Casas, Commissioner Areche, Commissioner Brienzi, Commissioner Garry Brown, and Commissioner Weigel. Staff in Attendance: Andrea Jordan, Investigator, Office of Civil Rights (OCR); Jonathan Babiak, Business Process Consultant, OCR CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. The minutes from the regular meeting of November 22, 2021 were approved on a vote of 6-0: Chair Davis motion, Commissioner Garry Brown second. Voting in favor were Chair Davis, Vice Chair Casas, Commissioner Areche, Commissioner Brienzi, Commissioner Garry Brown, and Commissioner Weigel. Commissioner Breckenridge, Commissioner Jamarr Brown, Commissioner Caballero, Commissioner Griffith, and Commissioner Museitif were absent. 2. NEW BUSINESS a. Presentation by Edna Yang, Co-Executive Director, American Gateways, followed by discussion and possible action regarding an update on the successes of the American Gateways program serving the low income immigrant community and request for support in making immigration legal services a continued priority in the city’s budget for next year. (Davis/Casas) Edna Yang, Co-Executive Director, American Gateways presented to the Commission and answered questions from the Commission. The Commission discussed this item. The Commission took no action on this item. b. Discussion and possible action on a recommendation to City Council related to the City of Austin Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Budget and Strategic Direction 2023: Economic Opportunity and Affordability; Mobility; Safety; Health and Environment; Culture and Lifelong Learning; and Government That Works for All. (Davis/Casas) The Commission discussed this item. The Commission took no action on this item. 1 c. Discussion and possible action on a recommendation to City Council and the City Manager to strengthen policies regarding investigative authority for the City of Austin Office of Police Oversight. (Brown, G./Davis) The Commission discussed this item. Chair Davis moved to adopt the recommendation, Commissioner Garry Brown second. The recommendation was adopted on a vote of 6-0. Voting in favor were Chair Davis, Vice Chair Casas, Commissioner Areche, Commissioner Brienzi, Commissioner Garry Brown, and Commissioner Weigel. Commissioner Breckenridge, Commissioner Jamarr Brown, Commissioner Caballero, Commissioner Griffith, and Commissioner Museitif were absent. d. Discussion and possible action regarding commissioner nominations to the Joint Inclusion …
Budget Recommendation 2022-23 DRAFT families; WHEREAS, On February 22, 2022, Governor Abbott and Attorney General Paxton issued disturbing and dangerous directives impeding the safety and personal freedoms of our transgender youth and their WHEREAS, City of Austin values and recognizes the LGBTQIA+ community and will not support any efforts to compromise the welfare and safety of our LGBTQIA+ youth and their families; WHEREAS, Gender identity and freedom of expression are vital to how children and teens see themselves and their ability to thrive; WHEREAS, Family support and professional care reduce suicide attempts by LGBTQIA+ youth by 40%; WHEREAS, It is critical for families and transgender youth to have safe access to resources and professional guidance to ensure a positive quality of life; WHEREAS, Major medical healthcare organizations support gender-affirming care and oppose legislation that will hinder medical care for transgender youth; WHEREAS, Dismissing the needs of transgender youth and families is fundamentally negligent and poses a significant risk that may have harmful and dangerous physical and mental health consequences; WHEREAS, Actions like those of Governor Abbott and Attorney General Paxton are likely to increase rejection, targeted harassment, and hate crimes against transgender youth intersex youth; statewide; WHEREAS, The intended directives by Governor Abbott and Attorney General Paxton are a misrepresentation of the law and intend to erode the rights of families and the LGBTQIA+ youth WHEREAS, City of Austin Leadership has a long history of standing in solidarity with our LGBTQIA+ community, including recent actions of the Travis County Attorney and District Attorney statements to not unjustifiably interfere with the medical decisions made between children, their parents, and their medical physicians; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Human Rights Commission recommends to Council and the City Manager to stand in solidarity with our LGBTQIA+ community, protect their rights to seek care and feel physically and mentally safe in our community, oppose actions that negatively impact the well-being and rights of LGBTQIA+ youth and their families, and include funding in the FY 2022-2023 budget to demonstrate this commitment.
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Human Rights Commission Recommendation Number 20220304-2A: City of Austin Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget Recommendation WHEREAS, the Human Rights Commission of the City of Austin (“Commission”) advocates on behalf of human rights for all people in the City of Austin (“City”); and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Strategic Direction 2023, including the strategic outcomes of Economic Opportunity and Affordability; Mobility; Safety; Health and Environment; Culture and Lifelong Learning; and Government That Works for All; and WHEREAS, the Joint Inclusion Committee hosted Budget Engagement Community Forums to receive feedback from the community on budget priorities, and to help ensure and inclusive and transparent budget process that incorporates resident and stakeholder feedback to ensure community priorities are being met; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Human Rights Commission recommends the City Council to give careful consideration to the following Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Budget Proposals: Public Safety I. An open process and community input in selection of the next APD Police Chief . HRC 20210419-001a: FY 2021-22 Budget Recommendation II. Guidance from the community/quality of life commissions on the selection process instead of waiting for community input after final candidates have been selected. III. Divert Funds from APD to other social service agencies and non-police crisis intervention programs. IV. Explore the possibility of establishing a fund that Peace Officers must pay into for insurance to cover the costs of abuse of force complaints and law suits. V. Establish a bonus incentive program for officers that maintain a professional record clear of abuse of force allegations. Health and Environment I. Community approach for health care navigation and support: Resources exist for specific communities, but coverage is not consistent across all constituencies. II. The City of Austin should provide coordination/oversight to ensure resources are equitable and address gaps. III. Outreach and Navigation: Digital Access: Includes wifi, devices, and training. Need to address different needs for seniors, kids in school, adults working from home, people with disabilities and/or who are homebound, people who need access to healthcare (e.g. telehealth), access to workforce development/job postings, etc. Targeted interventions specific to each community are needed. IV. The City should include these recommendations in their digital inclusion strategic plan (TARA “Telecommunications & Regulatory Affairs”). 2 HRC 20210419-001a: FY 2021-22 Budget Recommendation V. Funding should be provided for programs to enroll inmates released into the community in health care coverage insurance plans. Economic Opportunity, Culture, & Affordability I. …
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Human Rights Commission Recommendation Number 20220304-002a: FY 2022-23 Budget Recommendation WHEREAS, the Human Rights Commission of the City of Austin (“Commission”) advocates on behalf of human rights for all people in the City of Austin (“City”); and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Strategic Direction 2023, including the strategic outcomes of Economic Opportunity and Affordability; Mobility; Safety; Health and Environment; Culture and Lifelong Learning; and Government That Works for All; and WHEREAS, the Joint Inclusion Committee hosted Budget Engagement Community Forums to receive feedback from the community on budget priorities, and to help ensure and inclusive and transparent budget process that incorporates resident and stakeholder feedback to ensure community priorities are being met; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Human Rights Commission recommends the City Council to give careful consideration to the following Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Budget Proposals: DO NOT TOUCH THE FUNDING PRESENT OR FUTURE FOR THE FOLLOWING: 1. MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 2. DIRECT CASH ASSISTANCE FOR RENT OR ANY OTHER PURPOSE 3. QWELL COMMUNITY GRANT TO CONDUCT DATA COLLETION FOR LGBTQIA+ WELL BEING; THIS DATE IS CONTRIBUTED TO THE LGBTQ QUALITY OF LIFE STUDY--$500,000 GRANT WILL EXPIRE SOON AND $300,000 WILL BE REQUESTED TO CONTINUE 4. THE CITY OF AUSTIN EQUITY OFFICE AND VACANT POSITIONS FUNDS FROM THE VACANCY SAVINGS 5. THE CITY OF AUSTIN OFFICE OF POLICE OVERSIGHT AND VACANT POSITIONS FUNDS FROM THE VACANCY SAVINGS 6. AUSTIN PUBLIC HEALTH AND VACANT POSITIONS FUNDS FROM THE VACANCY SAVINGS 7. ANY AND ALL MAC FUNDING 8. ANY AND ALL FUNDING FOR THE CARVER MUSEUM 9. GRANT FUNDING FOR THE AMERICAN GATEWAYS PROGRAM; MUST PROVIDE $460,000 IF NOT MORE FOR THEIR NEW GRANT REQUEST Public Safety I. Continue funding to other social service agencies and non-police crisis intervention II. programs. Establish a bonus incentive program for officers that maintain a professional record clear of abuse of force allegations. Health and Environment I. Community approach for health care navigation and support: Resources exist for specific communities, but coverage is not consistent across all constituencies. II. The City of Austin should provide coordination/oversight to ensure resources are equitable and address gaps. III. Outreach and Navigation: Digital Access: Includes wifi, devices, and training. Need to address different needs for seniors, kids in school, adults working from home, people with disabilities and/or who are homebound, people who need access to healthcare (e.g. telehealth), access to workforce development/job postings, etc. Targeted interventions …
